SOLE SOURCE WALKER AND PESKIND RENEWAL APVD 072413.PDF

Maricopa County — Formal (2013-08-21)

View PDF Item 12 Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf_layout) 10883 characters
MARICOPA COUNTY MATERIALS MANAGEMENT
SOLE SOURCE JUSTIFICATION RENEWAL
Purpose — Used to communicate to the Procurement Officer that:
• Only one specific material or service can reasonably meet the County's need.
• Only one vendor can reasonably provide that material or service.
If only the first condition is met, this will be a brand name procurement.
If both conditions are met, this will be a sole source procurement.
Your request for sole source must be approved by Materials Management prior to being ,ftirvvarded as a BOS
Agenda Item. A copy of the cost justification must be submitted with this fbrm.
Your request for sole source procurement will be reviewed by the Procurement Officer responsible for this
material or service. Please provide the following requested information and submit this form to the Materials
Management Department.
A sole source justification cannot be based on price alone. If your request or sole source is approved, the
Procurement Officer will need to determine ?/the price is fair and reasonable.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Today's Date: July 23, 2013
Requesting Department: County Attorney
Department RX#: N/A
Department Budget Info: 100-470-
CONTACT INFORMATION (Person to contact if the Procurement Officer has questions concerning this
procurement.
Requestor Name: John Garcia
Telephone Number: 506-3188
Facsimile Number: 594-7015
Email Address: garciaj mcao.maricopa.gov
VENDOR INFORMATION
Vendor Name: Winston and Strawn, LLP
Point of Contact: Dan K. Webb
Telephone Number: (312) 558-5600
Facsimile Number: (312) 558-5700
Email Address: DWebb@winston.com
Estimated Cost/Price: FY2014 - $300,000 (Original FY2013 Amount 375,000)

MATERIAL / SERVICE INFORMATION
NEEDS STATEMENT Continue to represent Maricopa County in the matter of United States
Describe in detail the material or service to be of America vs. Maricopa County, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office,
procured and how only it meets your needs. and Joseph M. Arpaio in his capacity as Sheriff of Maricopa County,
Arizona. In U. S. District Court for the District of Arizona, CV12-
00981-ROS.
FEATURES/REQUIREMENTS This is a continuation of the Sole Source issued in FY2012-2013 —
Identify the major features/capabilities that are Serial 12081 SS that expired May 31, 2013. Please extend for another
required. What unique design/performance year to May 31, 2014.
ofeature(s) make this material or vendor the only one
that can meet your requirements? Provide a brief
explanation as to why only these features or this
vendor can meet your requirements. Identiff the
manufacturer/model or your existing equipment.
service or system, if applicable.
COMPETING It would be impractical to investigate other vendors as this firm is
BRANDS/VENDORS well established in this legal matter.
INVESTIGATED
Did you consider other materials or vendors with
similar capabilities? Indicate specific competitor's
brands/model's or vendors that were investigated
and describe why they do not meet your
requirements. You need to state that to the best of
your knowledge - these are the only companies
making this material, equipment or providing this
service. List sales representatives and their phone
numbers so the Procurement ()officer can contact
them to verion, that other materials, equipment or
services do not meet your requirements.
BRAND NAME N/A
(FOR MATERIALS ONLY)
Is the specific brand/model being recommended for
procurement available from more than one source
(i.e., more than one dealer or distributor)? If Yes.
this will be processed as a brand name
procurement. Provide the company name(s) of'
known sources _for this item.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The department agrees that there is no real or potential conflict of interest in recommending this material or
service as a sole source procurement_
NOTE: If a real or potential conflict exists, contact the Procurement Officer listed on your Requisition.
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR/DEPUTY APPROVAL
By signing below, the department director certifies that the information submitted on this form and the
accompany cost information is accurate and complete. The final determination of sole source or brand name
will be made by Materials Management.
7- z z
Signature Date

OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE 1ECHNOLOGY DIRECTOR/DEPUTY APPROVAL (If applicable)
If technology-related materials or services are required, this farm must be ,farwarcleal to OET for
coordination and/or approval. If this procurement request is not approved by OET, the form will be returned
to the Requestor,
[ ] Approved. Recommended purchase is in line with Maricopa County's strategic technology plan or
currently
installed equipment or service and is considered to be a sole source procurement.
[ ] Not Approved. Recommended purchase is not in line with Maricopa County's strategic technology
plan or
currently installed equipment or service, or is not considered to be a sole source procurement.
Signature Date
MATERIALS MANAGEMENT USE ONLY
[ Sole source approved - purchase as requested
[ Sole source not approved - issue solicitation using brand name only or perfoi nance specifications
Procurement Officer Signature Date
Approved. Proceed TA /3 a> ^. /9/,fiew tesa/
[4
[ Not Approved. Proceed with a issue solicitation using brand name only or performance
specifications.
7 t/
ector/Deputy Director, Materials Management
Send signed, completed form to:
Materials Management Department, 320 West Lincoln Street, Phoenix, Arizona 85003

MARICOPA COUNTY MATERIALS MANAGEMENT
SOLE SOURCE JUSTIFICATION RENEWAL
Purpose — Used to communicate to the Procurement Officer that:
• Only one specific material or service can reasonably meet the County's need.
* Only one vendor can reasonably provide that material or service.
If only the first condition is met, this will be a brand name procurement.
If both conditions are met, this will be a sole source procurement.
Your request for sole source must be approved by Materials Management prior to being forwarded as a BOS
Agenda Item. A copy of the cost justification must be submitted with this form.
Your request for sole source procurement will be reviewed by the Procurement Officer responsible for this
material or service. Please provide the following requested information and submit this form to the Materials
Management Department.
A sole source justification cannot be based on price alone. If your request for sole source is approved, the
Procurement Officer will need to determine if the price is fair and reasonable.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Today's Date: May 24, 2012
Requesting Department: County Attorney
Department RX#: N/A
Department Budget Info: 100-470-
CONTACT INFORMATION (Person to contact if the Procurement Officer has questions concerning this
procurement.
Requestor Name: John Garcia
Telephone Number: 506-3188
Facsimile Number: 594-7015
Email Address: garciaj@mcao.maricopa.gov
VENDOR INFORMATION
Vendor Name: Walker and Peskind, PLLC
Point of Contact: Richard K. Walker, Esq.
Telephone Number: (480) 483-6336
Facsimile Number: (480) 483-6337
Email Address: rkwazlawpartner.com
Estimated Cost/Price: FY2014 - $300,000 (Original FY2013 Amount $375,000)

MATERIAL / SERVICE INFORMATION
NEEDS STATEMENT Continue to represent Maricopa County in the matter of United States
Describe in detail the material or service to be of America vs. Maricopa County, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office,
procured and how only it meets your needs. and Joseph M. Arpaio in his capacity as Sheriff of Maricopa County,
Arizona. In U. S. district Court for the District of Arizona, CVl2-
00981 -ROS.
FEATURES/REQUIREMENTS This is a continuation of the Sole Source issued in FY2012-2013 —
Identij, the major features/capabilities that are Serial 12081-SS that expired May 31, 2013. Please extend for another
required. What unique design/performance year to May 31, 2014.
feature(s) make this material or vendor the only one
that can meet your requirements? Provide a brief
explanation as to why only these features or this
vendor can meet your requirements. Identn5) the
manufacturer/model or your existing equipment,
service or system, if applicable.
COMPETING It would be impractical to investigate other vendors as this firm is
BRANDS/VENDORS well established in this legal matter.
INVESTIGATED
Did you consider other materials or vendors with
similar capabilities? Indicate specific competitor's
brands/models or vendors that were investigated
and describe why they do not meet your
requirements. You need to state that — to the best of
your knowledge — these are the only companies
making this material, equipment or providing this
service. List sales representatives and their phone
numbers so the Procurement Officer can contact
them to verify that other materials, equipment or
services do not meet your requirements,
BRAND NAME N/A
(FOR MATERIALS ONLY)
Is the specific brand/model being recommended for
procurement available from more than one source
(i.e., more than one dealer or distributor)? If Yes,
this will be processed as a brand name
procurement. Provide the company name(s) of
known sources for this item.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The department agrees that there is no real or potential conflict of interest in recommending this material or
service as a sole source procurement.
NOTE: If a real or potential conflict exists, contact the Procurement Officer listed on your Requisition.
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR/DEPUTY APPROVAL
By signing below, the department director certifies that the information submitted on this form and the
accompany cost information is accurate and complete. The final determination of sole source or brand name
will be made by Materials Management.
77 -Z,7-7?
Signature Date

OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY DIRECTOR/DEPUTY APPROVAL (If applicable)
If technology-related materials or services are required, this form must be forwarded to OET for
coordination and/or approval. If this procurement request is not approved by OET, the form will be returned
to the Requestor.
[ ] Approved. Recommended purchase is in line with Maricopa County's strategic technology plan or
currently
installed equipment or service and is considered to be a sole source procurement.
[ ] Not Approved. Recommended purchase is not in line with Maricopa County's strategic technology
plan or
currently installed equipment or service, or is not considered to be a sole source procurement.
Signature Date
MATERIALS MANAGEMENT USE ONLY
El] Sole source approved - purchase as requested
El] Sole source not approved - issue solicitation using brand name only or performance specifications
Procurement Officer Signature Date
[ ] Approved. Proceed voi V4 5 > -7go
Not Approved. Proceed with a issue solicitation using brand name only or perfoimance
specifications.
r ector/Deputy Director, Materials Management
Send signed, completed form to:
Materials Management Department, 320 West Lincoln Street, Phoenix, Arizona 85003