Summary Sheet- RFCA SUMMARY
Extracted text (via pymupdf)
4816 characters
CITY OF TEMPE Meeting Date: 01/22/2026 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Agenda Item: 7B2 ACTION: Award a one-year contract with four, one-year renewal options to T.E.A.M. Security for providing professional, unarmed event security services at the Tempe Diablo Stadium Complex. FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of the contract will not exceed $140,000. Sufficient funds have been appropriated in the General Fund, Cost Center 3281 (Diablo Stadium), for anticipated expenditures during the current fiscal year and next fiscal year, contingent upon City Council approval of the City’s annual budget. RECOMMENDATION: Award the contract. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: (RFP 26-034) The City issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) to establish a contract to provide professional, unarmed event security services at the Tempe Diablo Stadium. These services will primarily support the annual Spring Training baseball season, as well as other large-scale events hosted at the venue. The objective is to ensure a safe and positive experience for all attendees by reducing incidents such as altercations, unauthorized access, and property crimes through proactive risk management, effective crowd control, and strict access enforcement. Evaluation Process The City issued notices of this opportunity to all registered firms for this commodity, along with advertising in the Arizona Business Gazette. A total of 52 firms downloaded the RFP from the City’s e- procurement portal, resulting in the submission of seven (7) proposals from the following firms: AA Safety Security Consultants, LLC. ACT Security Charlie Mike Protective Services Contemporary Services Corporation* Pride Group, LLC. PRO EM National Event Services T.E.A.M. Security *Contemporary Services Corporation did not sign the Vendor’s Offer Form and were deemed non- responsive and removed from further consideration. 2 The proposals were evaluated by a committee comprised of Community Services and Procurement staff. Results of the evaluation are presented in the tables below in rank order: Award Criteria Weig ht T.E.A.M. Security Pride Group, LLC. Pro Em National Event Services ACT Security, LLC. AA Safety Security Consultant s, LLC. Charlie Mike Protective Services Cost 25 230 230 212.5 245 250 115 Cost Firm’s Qualifications and Experience to include references 25 250 225 225 175 175 175 Staffing Plan and Qualifications 15 135 135 135 105 90 105 Security Strategy and Risk Management Approach 10 90 90 80 80 80 80 Community Engagement and Customer Service Orientation 10 90 90 80 80 80 70 Heat Safety Compliance 10 100 100 100 100 90 100 Overall response to the RFP and acceptance to the City’s terms and Conditions 5 50 50 47.5 50 45 40 Total Points: 945 920 880 835 810 685 Initial Ranking: 1 2 3 4 5 6 3 Month Total Pricing: $97,020.3 0 $96,814.8 0 $103,920. 00 $90,330.0 0 $88,800.0 0 $193,350. 00 The pricing outlined above reflect the total three-month expense for event security services at Tempe Diablo Stadium during Spring Training. The totals shown cover 15 games, each staffed with 24 security officers working 8.5 hours per game, in addition to one lead security officer working 10 hours per game. Recommendation The committee recommends awarding the contract to T.E.A.M. Security. Although T.E.A.M. Security is not the lowest-priced offer, the committee believes it offers the best overall value for this effort. T.E.A.M. Security offered competitive, reasonable pricing while maintaining appropriate staffing levels. This company demonstrated strong qualifications and extensive experience providing event security services at comparable venues and events, supported by positive and relevant references. Their proposed staffing plan is comprehensive and supports effective security operations. All guards have completed the mandatory training requirements and maintain current licensure with the Arizona Department of Public Safety. Their security strategy reflects a proactive, well-developed approach to risk management, crowd control, emergency response, and coordination with local law enforcement. In addition, the company’s proposal emphasizes a customer-service-oriented approach that fosters positive community engagement and enhances the attendee experience. In accordance with Council policy when staff is not recommending the lowest priced offer, Internal Audit staff have reviewed the evaluation process resulting in their approval of the recommendation. ATTACHMENTS: Vendor’s Offer Page 3 STAFF CONTACT(S): Alex Jovanovic, Deputy Community Services Director - Parks, (480) 350-5811 Department Director: Laura Calder, Financial Services Director Legal review by: Dave Park, Senior Assistant City Attorney Prepared by: Cecille Lewis, Procurement Officer