CPA2024006 BOS REPORT_11-5-25PART-1.PDF
Extracted text (via pymupdf)
214803 characters
November 5, 2025
CPA2024006
Page 1 of 2
Report to the Board of Supervisors
Prepared by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
Board Hearing Date:
November 5, 2025 (Cont. from August 20, 2025)
Case #/Title:
CPA2024006 – BNSF Intermodal CPA
Supervisor District:
4
Applicant/Owner:
Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC / BNSF
Request:
Major Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) to change the land
use designation in the White Tank Grand Avenue Area Plan from
Single-Family Rural to Mixed Use Employment. CPA case approval
is by Resolution
Site Location:
Generally located north of US-60 between 211th Ave. and 235th
Ave. in the Wittmann area
Site Size:
839-acres of a total 4,321-acre site
County Island Status:
Yes, City of Surprise
Additional
Comments:
Approval of this item would designate an 839-acre portion of the
total 4,321-acre BNSF intermodal facility site from Single-Family
Rural to Mixed Use Employment. The remainder of these acres
already have the Mixed-Use Employment designation. This is due
to a mapping discrepancy during the update of the White Tank
Grand Avenue Area Plan in which the land use designation was
inadvertently deleted for an 839-acre area that had originally been
designated as industrial in the 2000 version of the White Tank
Grand Avenue Area Plan. Industrial uses ae appropriate along the
railroad with highway access. The intermodal facility will be an
economic development boon.
Staff has received thousands of letters, petitions, and writings in
support and opposition for this case from throughout the State of
Arizona but especially from Supervisor District 4. The support
primarily speaks to the economic benefits of the proposed
development. The opposition regards the loss of rural and
suburban quality of life from a heavily trafficked industrial facility.
As of this writing, staff has received 9,400 items in support and
4,248 items in opposition. When adjusted for duplicates, staff
received 9,138 support items and 3,754 opposition items. In
November 5, 2025
CPA2024006
Page 2 of 2
Supervisor District 4, staff received 4,802 support items and 3,811
opposition items. When adjusted for duplicates, staff received
4,677 support items and 3,392 opposition items.
This case was originally scheduled to be heard on December 11,
2024. The applicant requested continuance to the March 26, 2025
Board hearing to allow the applicant to continue working with the
community and local stakeholders and so that this CPA case could
be heard concurrent with zoning case Z2024072. The same
rationale led to further continuances to August 20th and November
5th.
CPA case approval is by Resolution, attached.
Commission
Recommendation:
On 11/7/24, the Commission voted 6-0 to adopt a motion
recommending the Board of Supervisors approve CPA2024006
Presented by:
Joel Landis, Planner
Reviewed by:
Darren Gérard, AICP, Planning Manager
Attachments:
8/20/25 BOS Short Report (4 pages)
11/7/24 P&Z Packet (518 pages)
Handout Memo (1) 11/7/2024 (7 pages)
Handout Memo (2) 11/7/2024 (27 pages)
Cumulative Support as of 10/14/2025 (1,223 pages)
Cumulative Opposition as of 10/14/2025 (3,148 pages)
Resolution (2 pages)
August 20, 2025
CPA2024006
Page 1 of 2
Report to the Board of Supervisors
Prepared by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
Board Hearing Date:
August 20, 2025
Case #/Title:
CPA2024006 – BNSF Intermodal CPA
Supervisor District:
4
Applicant/Owner:
Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC / BNSF
Request:
Major Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) to change the land
use designation in the White Tank Grand Avenue Area Plan from
Single-Family Rural to Mixed Use Employment. CPA case approval
is by Resolution, attached.
Site Location:
Generally located north of US-60 between 211th Ave. and 235th
Ave. in the Wittmann area
Site Size:
839-acres of a total 4,321-acre site
County Island Status:
Yes, City of Surprise
Additional
Comments:
Approval of this item would designate an 839-acre portion of the
total 4,321-acre BNSF intermodal facility site from Single-Family
Rural to Mixed Use Employment. The remainder of these acres
already have the Mixed-Use Employment designation. This is due
to a mapping error during the update of the White Tank Grand
Avenue Area Plan in which the land use designation was
inadvertently deleted for an 839-acre area that had originally been
designated as industrial in the 2000 version of the White Tank
Grand Avenue Area Plan. Industrial uses ae appropriate along the
railroad with highway access. The intermodal facility will be an
economic development boon.
Staff has received extensive public comment on this project. As of
this writing, staff has received a total of 5,429 support items and
1,537 opposition items.
The applicant has provided a memorandum indicating their wanting
to have this case continued to the November 5, 2025 Board of
Supervisors hearing to allow the applicant more time to prepare
their second submittal and so that this CPA case could be heard
alongside the zoning case, Z2024072, rather than separately.
August 20, 2025
CPA2024006
Page 2 of 2
Commission
Recommendation:
On 11/7/24, the Commission voted 6-0 to adopt a motion
recommending the Board of Supervisors approve CPA2024006
Continuance
Request:
The applicant has requested the case be continued to the
November 5, 2025 Board of Supervisors’ hearing.
Presented by:
Joel Landis, Planner
Reviewed by:
Darren Gérard, AICP, Planning Manager
Attachment:
Continuance Request by Applicant (2 pages)
Note:
11/7/24 Draft P&Z Minutes are not available as of the writing of this report, but can be
provided upon request later when available.
Lacy A. Kreger
General Director Economic Development
BNSF Railway Company
P.O. Box 961057
Fort Worth, Texas 76161-0057
2650 Lou Menk Dr.
Fort Worth, Texas 76131
Tel 817.867.6845
Lacy.Kreger@bnsf.com
www.bnsf.com
July 23, 2025
Via Email
Maricopa County Board of Supervisors
Chairman Tom Galvin, District 2 (district2@maricopa.gov)
Supervisor Debbie Lesko, District 4 (district4@maricopa.gov)
301 West Jefferson Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
Re:
CPA2024006– BNSF Logistics Park Phoenix
Dear Chairman Galvin and Supervisor Lesko:
The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors is scheduled to consider BNSF’s above-
referenced Major Comprehensive Plan Amendment case on August 20, 2025. BNSF respectfully
requests that the Board continue this matter to its November 5, 2025 meeting. BNSF, in
coordination with Supervisor Lesko and the District 4 office, is requesting this continuance to align
the hearing schedule for the Major Comprehensive Plan Amendment with the companion rezoning
request, Case Number Z2024072.
BNSF’s Logistics Park Phoenix project will be a state-of-the art master-planned campus
featuring a rail-served intermodal facility, logistics park, and logistics center designed to facilitate
the transportation, storage, and distribution of goods destined for the Phoenix metropolitan area.
As part of designing this project, BNSF has been coordinating closely with the Arizona
Department of Transportation, the Maricopa County Department of Transportation and the City of
Surprise on the project’s traffic impact analysis, which will result in commitments by BNSF for
local and regional transportation infrastructure improvements.
BNSF will also be submitting an updated rezoning application that includes a reduction in
access points and other measures to minimize traffic concerns, generous building setbacks and
open space buffers with landscaped natural earthen berms for the benefit of adjacent properties,
Dark Sky lighting protocols, and reduced building heights for the warehousing and distribution
facilities. The core intermodal facility is more than one-half mile away from the nearest residential
properties.
Lacy A. Kreger
General Director Economic Development
BNSF Railway Company
P.O. Box 961057
Fort Worth, Texas 76161-0057
2650 Lou Menk Dr.
Fort Worth, Texas 76131
Tel 817.867.6845
Lacy.Kreger@bnsf.com
www.bnsf.com
With the Logistics Park Phoenix project, the Phoenix region has a crucial opportunity to
prepare thoughtfully for growth and position Phoenix as a leader in creating a resilient domestic
supply chain while maximizing the use of rail, the most environmentally-friendly form of surface
transportation.
We sincerely appreciate the continued coordination and considerable time and energy
devoted to working with us and the community by Supervisor Lesko and her office as BNSF moves
this important project forward.
Should you have any questions regarding this continuance request, please do not hesitate
to contact me at lacy.kreger@bnsf.com. Thank you for your consideration of this request.
Sincerely,
Lacy Kreger
General Director Economic Development
cc:
Mr. Scott Isham
Mr. Tom Ellsworth
Mr. Joel Landis
CPA2024006
Page 1 of 13
Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission
Prepared by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
Case:
CPA2024006 – BNSF Intermodal CPA
Hearing Date:
November 7, 2024
Supervisor District:
4
Applicant:
Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Owner:
BNSF
Request:
Major Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) to change the land use
designation in the White Tank Grand Avenue Area Plan from Single-Family
Rural to Mixed Use Employment
Site Location:
Generally located north of US-60 between 211th Ave. and 235th Ave. in the
Wittmann area
Site Size:
839-acres of a total 4,321-acre site
Density:
N/A
County Island:
Yes, City of Surprise
County Plan:
White Tank Grand Avenue Area Plan – Single-Family Rural
Municipal Plan:
City of Surprise General Plan 2040 – Employment
Municipal Comments:
Yuma County – Neutral
Pima County – Neutral
Support/Opposition:
1 in support / 98 in opposition
Recommendation:
Approve
CPA2024006
Page 2 of 13
Project Summary:
1.
The applicant is requesting a Major Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) to change the land
use designation on 839-acres in the White Tank Grand Avenue Area Plan (WTGA Area Plan) from
the Single-Family Rural designation to Mixed Use Employment (MUE) to accommodate the
anticipated development of a proposed BNSF intermodal facility. Staff notes this major CPA is
required in part because the industrial designation that existed over the southeastern potion of
the site when WTGA was adopted in 2000 was inadvertently deleted from the map in the 2023
plan update. There was no comment on this map change during public participation of the plan
update. There was never intent to lessen the area of or remove the industrial designation.
Adoption of this CPA would rectify this error.
2.
The area of the CPA is part of a larger 4,321-acre site for which the applicant proposed a zone
change from Rural-43 WHSC (Wickenburg Highway Scenic Corridor Overlay Zoning District) to
IND-3 IUPD (Industrial Unit Plan of Development) WHSC. The zone change case will be heard
separately at an undetermined date.
3.
Intermodal facilities are facilities specialized for transferring cargo using different methods of
transportation to allow for efficient freight distribution. In its current proposed configuration, the
site would consist of three areas:
1. Intermodal facility in the northern portion of the site where cargo would be
transferred between railcars and trucks;
2. Logistics park in the middle portion of the site for warehousing and distribution
facilities for national and regional companies;
3. Logistics center portion, much of which is the subject of this application, where
BNSF will provide management over incoming and exiting train cargo. The site will
also include its own wastewater treatment facility in its southeast corner near the
intersection of 211th Ave and Dove Valley Rd.
4.
The site is generally bounded by 211th and 235th Avenues in between the Wickenburg Highway
(US-60) and SR 74 and is primarily flat with many crisscrossing washes. Sonoran flora and fauna
are present along the wash banks or burrowed underneath the plain. The railroad tracks running
along US-60 by the project site were laid by the Santa Fe, Prescott and Phoenix Railway prior to
its acquiring by BNSF’s predecessor company, the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railway in
1911. The line helped foster burgeoning mining and farming operations early into Arizona’s
statehood. Railroad operations on this line have continued throughout the 20th and early 21st
century as the Phoenix area began to increasingly develop as a modern industrial hub. A variety
of factors have made the Phoenix metropolitan area, and particularly the west valley, more
attractive for industrial development. These include the development of the 303 and its
connection to I-10 and proximity to ports in California. Automakers such as Chrysler, Toyota, and
Ford have all located proving ground facilities in the west valley given the ability to test vehicles
in extreme summer conditions, rural environs, and easy access to freight corridors. US-60 has
seen a substantial increase in truck traffic as the road comprises a part of the current fastest
route to reaching the Las Vegas area. The future development of Interstate 11 may direct traffic
away from much of this route as it is currently planned to intersect with US-60 west of Wickenburg
south towards Interstate 10 near Tonopah.
5.
Adjacent to the broader BNSF site are several residential developments in Maricopa County and
City of Surprise jurisdiction scattered along the US-60 corridor. Most directly adjacent to the site
are unincorporated rural communities such as Wittmann (fka Nadaburg), which is bisected by
CPA2024006
Page 3 of 13
Dove Valley Rd and 211th Ave where the BNSF site would likely have multiple accesses. This area
contains several dozen homes, including many ranches. South of US-60 includes similar rural
homes in addition to the master-planned Walden Ranch and Rancho Maria communities. The
western bound of the site, 235th Ave, abuts the Thunder Ridge Airpark and Circle City subdivisions,
with Morristown further northwest as US-60 begins its meandering path through the hills towards
the Town of Wickenburg. The area to the north of the site includes remaining land owned by the
Arizona State Land Department (ASLD) towards SR-74. The City of Surprise’s jurisdiction begins
east of 211th Ave with several master-planned residential communities having been entitled,
including the Cielo Crossing and Asante communities. The former Chrysler Proving Grounds
facility directly east is also planned for residential development as Grand Vista per the applicant
as the City of Surprise continues to grow past the Loop 303 freeway. Residential development is
restricted further south and east primarily along the Patton Rd. and Jomax Rd. alignments due to
the noise contours surrounding Luke AFBs (LAFB) auxiliary airfield.
Regional context map showing the northwest valley with entitled and developed communities labeled.
6.
Staff continues to encourage coordination with the City of Surprise. The site received an advance
general plan amendment from the City of Surprise in 2023 in preparation for its annexation by the
applicant. The applicant intended and planned to annex into the City but shifted gears and
switched its attention to the County potentially due to timing concerns. The subject CPA would
bring the county’s plan in alignment with the City of Surprise General Plan. It is preferred that the
site, if approved and developed in Maricopa County, ultimately annex into Surprise upon site
buildout to obtain access to municipal services. Such services would likely be necessary
considering the intense industrial use of the site. The applicant indicates the development
becoming operational by 2028.
7.
The first regional planning efforts within the northwest valley began in the early 1980s with the
adoption of the White Tanks/Agua Fria Policy and Development Guide. This was followed by the
institution of US-60 as a scenic corridor by the Board of Supervisors in 1989, and then by the
adoption of the Wickenburg Highway Scenic Corridor Plan in January of 1991. Maricopa County’s
first comprehensive plan, Eye to the Future 2020, was adopted in 1997. Finally, The Board
CPA2024006
Page 4 of 13
approved the WTGA Area Plan on December 6, 2000, to synthesize prior plans and help manage
and promote growth throughout the west valley. The future land use map adopted by the Board
at this time shows most of the subject area to be designated industrial in 2000 prior to BNSF
acquiring its first portion of the area around 2004. Further developments within the west valley
over the next two decades spurred the adoption by the Board of the revamped WTGA Area Plan
on December 6, 2023.The area as represented in the 2023 version of the WTGA Area Plan, created
in preparation for what was thought to be the site’s annexation to the City of Surprise, includes
much of the land that was purchased by BNSF in 2022. The applicant’s request would essentially
combine the 2000 and 2023 versions of the WTGA Area Plan to create one large, cohesive MUE
area. This essentially corrects an inadvertent deletion of the industrial designation during the
2023 plan update. Most of the subject area has essentially been designated for industrial and or
employment uses in all adopted land use plans since 2000. The area is intended for industrial
development as noted in the following chronology.
CPA2024006
Page 5 of 13
Chronology
City of Surprise Vision 2040 Plan – the purple area coinciding
with BNSFs bounds is designated as ‘Employment”
•
1982: Adoption of White Tanks Agua Fria Policy
and Development Guide
•
1991: Adoption of the Wickenburg Highway
Scenic Corridor Plan
•
1997: Adoption of Eye to the Future 2020
•
2000: Adoption of WTGA Area Plan showing the
southeastern portion the BNSF area as ‘Industrial’
in the future land use plan map
•
Early 2000s: BNSF begins buying parcels in the
area in preparation for future development
•
2022: BNSF buys 3,508 acres of land coinciding
with the overall project area from ASLD
•
March 2023: Approval of general plan
amendment by City of Surprise to ‘Employment’
for entirety of BNSF site
•
December 2023: Adoption of updated WTGA Area
Plan mostly aligned with City of Surprise land use
amendment
•
June 2024: BNSF files for comprehensive plan
amendment and rezoning through Maricopa
County
•
July 2024: Adoption of City of Surprise Vision
2040 plan
Maricopa County White Tank Grand
Avenue Area Plan (2023) –the
BNSF area in purple is designated
as ‘Mixed Use Employment’ except
the acreage of this CPA
Maricopa County White Tank Grand
Avenue Area Plan (2020) –the area
in dark gray southwest of the
proving grounds is designated as
‘Industrial’
City of Surprise Vision 2040 Plan – the BNSF area in
purple is designated as ‘Employment’ over the entirety
of the BNSF site
CPA2024006
Page 6 of 13
Map of the land-use designations of the BNSF site with the proposed CPA areas hatched diagonally in purple. The
site bounds are shown in red/hatched maroon.
CPA2024006
Page 7 of 13
Regional map of the area surrounding BNSF – areas not overlaid are within Maricopa County jurisdiction. Areas
in green, except for the area representing Luke AFB’s auxiliary area, are Development Master Plans (DMPs) and
CPAs still within Maricopa County’s jurisdiction.
8.
The narrative asserts that the proposed development meets the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment criteria in the following manner:
Whether the amendment constitutes an overall improvement to the Comprehensive Plan and is
not solely for the good or benefit of a particular landowner or owners at a particular point in time.
The applicant states in their narrative that the Major Comprehensive Plan Amendment constitutes
an overall improvement and is not solely for the good or benefit of BNSF. They indicate the
application will create an area of a sufficient size to develop a regional employment center that
will support the larger surrounding area as it develops with current and planned residential uses
over time and continuously speaks to large numbers of jobs being created, although no formal
figure is given. The applicant also states this amendment would ensure consistency with the City
of Surprise’s land-use designation for the site which help ensure balanced future growth. The
applicant indicates the “path of growth” is expanding northwest along US-60 and that growth and
change are coming to the area, regardless of the outcome of this application. Planning for
developments such as this constitutes an overall improvement to the WTGA Area Plan rather than
allowing for sporadic growth to continue unabated.
CPA2024006
Page 8 of 13
Whether the amendment will adversely impact all or a portion of the planning area.
A. Altering acceptable land use patterns to the detriment of the plan – The applicant notes that
except for limited pockets of residential homes, most of the area surrounding the site is
undeveloped desert upon which development would have little impact. However, as prior
mentioned, much of the immediate area contains a variety of housing types, including rural
estates and master-planned residential communities with many housing units having been
entitled in recent years. The prior operation of the Chrysler Proving Ground facility
immediately east of the subject properties and the land use designations of the rest of the
BNSF properties within the WTGA Area Plan and City of Surprise General Plan 2040 indicates
this area always having been intended for industrial development. The site has easy access
to both the adjacent railroad, US-60, AZ-74, the Loop 303, and I-11 once constructed.
Therefore, the MUE designation is appropriate given the area context.
B. Requiring public expenditures for larger or more expensive infrastructure – The applicant’s
narrative states the development of the site will create a robust and healthy business
environment for BNSF and other business. They state site development will not place an
economic burden on the community and will contribute to a more prosperous Maricopa
County. The applicant does not directly indicate whether they will bear development costs for
infrastructure surrounding the site.
C. Requiring public improvements to roads, sewer, or water systems that are needed to support
the planned land uses – The applicant states they intend to construct standalone on-site water
and wastewater systems and will minimize water consumption throughout the site. The
applicant also proposes to work with the City of Surprise to explore potential infrastructure
interconnections to support regional needs. They state offsite roadway and intersection
improvements would develop to accommodate traffic caused by site usage. The applicant
has included a traffic impact study as part of their application materials. Maricopa County
Engineering and MCDOT staff are presently reviewing this report as part of the zone change
case to ensure proper access and traffic flow if this facility were to be built.
D. Adversely impacting planned uses because of increased traffic – The applicant indicates they
will work to replace the current roadway network with modern roadways and establish easy
access to places lacking such access.
E. Affecting the livability of the area or health or safety of present and future residents – The
applicant says BNSF will clear and grub vegetation site vegetation for fire prevention. They
also intend on including fire suppression equipment throughout all developed areas of the
site. Additionally, BNSF utilizes police teams with local, state, and federal authority to protect
the site in addition to working with surrounding local police agencies. Wildlife prevention and
mitigation measures will be incorporated into the Plan of Development. During the
construction period, dust control measures shall be utilized to minimize fugitive dust
generation including proper grading and erosion control in line with Maricopa County
development regulations. Additionally, the project will follow federal, state and local
regulations regarding the production, use, storage, transport or disposal of hazardous
materials for cargo to and from the site. Staff would note there are inherent risks to cargo
transportation involving hazardous materials – however, these same risks are present
currently, and there is no reason to believe that the facility in-of-itself would contribute more
to those risks. Rather, the integration of BNSFs logistical operations into the facility would
appear to lessen such risks.
CPA2024006
Page 9 of 13
F. Adversely impacting the natural environment or scenic quality of the area in contradiction to
the plan –
a. Animals/Plants – The applicant says the transition from residential land uses to a
master planned-employment community protect flora and fauna as the rezoning
process will provide an opportunity to address and establish appropriate measures to
protect the local habitat. They indicate this form of development is preferable to
haphazard single-lot developments which are not required to take these concerns into
account. They also indicate a willingness to work with Arizona Game & Fish, who
provided comments to Maricopa County and the applicant, throughout the
development process on ensuring these protections. Comments provided by Arizona
Game & Fish will be considered for conditions to the zoning to be fulfilled at the time
of development.
b. Historical Resources – The applicant says no cultural resources or historical
properties have been identified in the area. The State Historic Preservation Office did
not comment on the application. However, any discovery of human remains or
funerary objects will be reported to the Director of the Arizona State Museum upon
discovery per state law.
c. Scenic Views – The applicant does not address scenic views in the narrative beyond
working to establish appropriate open space, buffers, and/or wash corridors on-site.
Staff would note this development is in the Wickenburg Highway Scenic Corridor Plan
and Wickenburg Scenic Corridor Overlay zoning district subject to Ch. 10 Sec. 1008 of
the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance, although neither are formally addressed in the
narrative. Aspects of this section of the ordinance can be modified as part of the IUPD
zoning of the zoning case, subject to Board of Supervisors’ approval.
Hydrology/Ground Disturbance – The applicant does not address hydrology in detail
in the narrative; however, notes that any environmental impacts will be evaluated as
part of the zone change and plan of development stage if approved. For ground
disturbance, it is expected that improvements to the local transportation network will
be significant given the traffic generated by the site’s intended usage.
Whether the amendment is consistent with the overall intent of the Comprehensive Plan.
The applicant’s narrative indicates that the request is consistent with the overall intent of the
Vision 2030 Comprehensive Plan, WTGA Area Plan, and City of Surprise General Plan 2040. The
intent of the application addresses the Strategic Priorities for Maricopa County, such as
supporting economic growth, promoting quality communities, and coordinating with
municipalities, local jurisdictions, and community-based entities. The applicant argues that
economic vitality is a regional issue for the future of Maricopa County and its surrounding
jurisdictions, and that adoption of the proposed amendment will be a significant area of Maricopa
County’s employment upon build-out.
The extent to which the amendment is consistent with the specific goals and policies contained
within the plan.
Vision 2030 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan & White Tank Grand Avenue Area Plan
The applicant’s narrative contains a substantial list of Goals and Policies from the Vision 2030
Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan. This staff report identifies which Goals and Policies the
applicant’s narrative addressed.
CPA2024006
Page 10 of 13
Vision 2030 Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Element – Goal 1, Goal 2, Goal 3, Policy 7, Policy 10, Policy 13, Policy 17, Policy 18,
Policy 22
Transportation Element – Goal 1, Goal 2, Goal 3, Policy 1, Policy 2, Policy 4, Policy 6, Policy 7,
Policy 8, Policy 15, Policy 17
Economic Growth Element – Goal 1, Goal 2, Policy 1, Policy 5, Policy 6, Policy 8, Policy 9
Growth Area Element – Goal 1
Environmental Element – Goal 1, Policy 2, Policy 3, Policy 4, Policy 5
Water Resources Element – Goal 1, Goal 2, Policy 7
Energy Element – Goal 1, Goal 3, Goal 4, Policy 1
Cost of Development Element – Goal 1, Goal 2, Policy 1
White Tank Grand Avenue Area Plan
Land Use Element – Policy 1, Policy 2, Policy 6
Transportation Element – Goal 1, Goal 2, Policy 2, Policy 3
Growth Area Element – Policy 1, Policy 6, Policy 7
Economic Growth Element – Goal 2, Policy 1
Water Resources Element – Goal 1, Policy 1, Policy 2
Energy, Utilities, & Public Facilities Element – Goal 1, Goal 2
Existing On-Site and Adjacent Zoning / Land Use:
9.
On-site:
Rural-43 WSCO/Rural-43 / Vacant
North:
Rural-43 / Vacant
South:
Rural-43/C-2/R1-6 / Nadaburg townsite
East:
PAD (City of Surprise) / Future master-planned residential community
West:
Rural-43/C-2/R1-6 / Circle City/Thunder Ridge Airpark sites
Right-of-Way:
10.
The following table includes existing and proposed half-width right-of-way and the future
classification based upon the Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) Major
Streets and Routes Plan. Only 211th Avenue is under MCDOT jurisdiction as of this report.
Street Name
Half-width Existing R/W
Half-width Proposed R/W
Future Classification
211th Avenue
12’
40’
Major Collector
Adopted Plans:
11.
Maricopa County White Tank Grand Avenue Area Plan (adopted December 6, 2023): The area
subject to this application is designated Single-Family Rural, which allows for residential uses
with a density of one dwelling unit per acre. (It should be noted that prior to the 2023 plan update
mot of the subject area was designated Industrial but that historical land use designation was
inadvertently changed on the map during the update.)
12.
Surprise General Plan 2040 (adopted July 30, 2024): The City of Surprise General Plan designates
the subject site as Employment. Per the Surprise General Plan 2040, “The Employment Land Use
Character Area is intended to promote economic and business development opportunities that
CPA2024006
Page 11 of 13
create jobs that are vital to the economic sustainability and growth of the City of Surprise. The
largest concentration of the Employment Land Use Character Area is located in close proximity
to the Luke AFB Auxiliary 1 field. This designation of large acreage around the Luke Aux 1 field is
intended to support and protect the mission of Luke AFB, but also is designated to maximize the
clustering of employment-related uses for specialization, synergy, transportation efficiency and
exchange of knowledge. Strong access to transportation and water/wastewater infrastructure is
necessary to attract and support value-added employment generating businesses into these
areas.”
“Typical employment sites and building development should promote the specific needs of large-
scale activities and/or clustering of smaller, complimentary businesses designed in a cohesive,
campus style setting. Appropriate uses within the Employment Character Area include those that
generate employment such as research/development/hi-tech parks, corporate campuses or
business parks, manufacturing/processing facilities, distribution centers, medical campuses, and
office/industrial flex spaces.”
Public Participation Summary:
13.
The applicant posted the subject site, and staff notified all property owners within 300’ of the site,
and additionally notified all property owners along 211th Ave. and 235th Ave. (outside of the 300’)
as well as all interested parties / stakeholders who either attended the neighborhood meeting
held by the applicant, sent an email to the County regarding the project or sent an email to the
applicant regarding the project. Pursuant to state law, Staff sent enhanced notification letters to
all adjacent and internal jurisdictions to Maricopa County, select state and regional agencies and
Luke Air Force Base (LAFB). Responses were received from Pima and Yuma counties expressing
no concerns. Staff conducted meetings with the City of Surprise regarding certain aspects of the
project and development process and will continue to work with City of Surprise staff as the
zoning case progresses. LAFB indicated that currently it does not appear that the proposed
facility will affect their flight operations, but that they would like to see future site plans. The
Arizona Fire and Medical Authority provided a letter in support of the application. Comments
received from Arizona Game & Fish Department (AZGFD) and associated responses by the
applicant are included in the attachments section and are not actionable from the County’s
perspective until the zone change and plan of development stage.
14.
The Public Participation Results Report includes correspondence between the applicant and
those interested in the case. Much of these interactions display and often mirror concerns that
were expressed to staff by members of the public. The applicant held a public meeting in early
September 2024 at a local elementary school to share the project status with the community. The
applicant has indicated to staff their intent to hold a second public meeting regarding the zoning
case as that case moves closer to hearings.
15.
Staff has received 98 letters of opposition from area residents throughout the west valley. Much
of the concerns center around the disruption of quality-of-life aspects that residents of the area
enjoy, particularly Wittmann area residents who see this development as destruction of their
bucolic rural lifestyle. Many of these letters request certain zoning requirements for the site that
are not germane for the comprehensive plan amendment application but may be considered as
part of the zoning case. These concerns include:
a. Quality of life concerns, particularly for children, regarding health and safety living near
industrial uses
b. Groundwater usage draining the local aquifer and wells
CPA2024006
Page 12 of 13
c. Traffic congestion caused by a heavy increase in industrial truck traffic
d. Public safety concerns caused by inadequate site security or other bad elements
e. Light pollution caused by 24-hour operations
f. Noise pollution from site operations and truck traffic
g. Diversion of washes causing drainage runoff
h. Welfare of fauna living within the site bounds
Outstanding Concerns from Reviewing Agencies:
16.
N/A
Staff Analysis:
17.
This area has always been considered appropriate for industrial development. This is seen in the
early mining developments spurred by the expansion of the railway into the Arizona territory; the
nascent industrial developments enabled by the developments of US-60 and SR-74; and the rapid
suburban growth prompted by the construction of the Loop 303 freeway. The WTGA Area Plan
anticipated industrial development on and around this site and intended to emulate the City of
Surprise general plan designation. The site includes access to both rail lines and major roadways.
Site operations would potentially provide hundreds of jobs across the skill spectrum and promote
further economic growth.
18.
Staff would note this Major CPA is in-part required because the industrial designation that existed
over the southeastern portion of the site in the 2000 version of the WTGA Area Plan appears to
have been inadvertently deleted in the 2023 version. Adoption of this CPA would rectify this error.
This area of the site has been designated for industrial development in both historical Maricopa
County and recent City of Surprise land use plans. Staff would still note the northwestern portion
proposed to be designated MUE as part of this CPA is the only portion to not to have been
considered either industrial or MUE in either iteration of the WTGA Area Plan. However, this area
should be included in the MUE area considering its location north of US-60 along the railway
surrounded by parcels owned by BNSF. Overall, the site would function as a core regional
employment center in conformance with policies and goals of the comprehensive plan.
19.
As stated above, the Wittmann area will be impacted by this development. To that end, the CPA
narrative report indicates future development will provide appropriate buffering through the use
of landscaping and other design elements such as limitations to building heights and greater
setbacks in transition areas. Additionally, the narrative also includes provisions to provide plans
regarding protection of air and water quality. Detailed plans addressing these mitigation efforts
will be reviewed and approved as part of the zoning of the property. The applicant will continue
to implement their public outreach plan to facilitate discussion towards compromises on aspects
of site planning that would minimize the effects of industrial development on the surrounding
rural communities.
20.
The County Comprehensive Plan includes policies regarding the need for urban level development
to have urban level services. such as road, water, sewer, and public safety. Adequate services and
connectivity of regional infrastructure will be a significant part of future entitlement and
permitting. The applicant, throughout the narrative report, indicates their willingness to promote
regional collaboration for infrastructure needs. While the County prefers annexation for
development that requires urban services and discourages the creation of a permanent county
island within the future planning area of Surprise, the County still intends to align its plan land use
designations with those included in municipal general plans whenever possible. Approval of this
CPA2024006
Page 13 of 13
application will further this goal as the designation change directly aligns the WTGA Area Plan
and Surprise General Plan 2040. Staff believes this project represents proper, long-term land use
planning in the region and for Maricopa County as a whole.
21.
The CPA is appropriate. Industrial development along a railroad is more optimal than residential
development. A railroad logistics center in this region will be a boon to economic development
and the national transportation network. A major employment center is necessary given the urban
development already occurring and planned for this region of the county.
Recommendation:
22.
Staff recommends the Commission adopt a motion recommend that the Board of Supervisors
approve CPA2024006.
Presented by:
Joel Landis, Planner
Reviewed by:
Rachel Applegate, Interim Planning Supervisor
Attachments:
Case Map (1 page)
Land Use Plan (2 pages)
Narrative Report (26 pages)
MC Engineering comments (4 pages)
ADOT Comments (2 pages)
MCESD comments (2 pages)
Pima County Comments (2 pages)
Yuma County Comments (2 pages)
Luke AFB Comments (2 pages)
AZ Game & Fish Comments (15 pages)
AFMA Support (3 pages)
Opposition (444 pages)
/
Maricopa County Planning & Development - Phoenix, AZ
4
Gross Acres: 4,226 approx.
Generated October 16, 2024 2:44 PM
CPA2024006
Application Name:
Legal Description
BNSF Intermodal Facility
Applicant
Case Address
Applicant Phone/Email
Parcel Primary:
Map scale 1:44,374
Supervisor District No.
Major CPA - BNSF Intermodal Facility
N
0 200
1000
SCALE 1"=1000'
2
AREA PLAN LAND USES
2023 WHITE TANKS GRAND AVENUE
1
EXISTING
OF
SM
REV
DATE
DESCRIPTION
BY
APP
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
CHECKED BY
APPROVED BY
DATE
SUB
CONTRACT NO.
DRAWING NO.
REVISION
SCALE
SHEET NO.
COMPANY.
AGREEMENTS WITH BNSF RAILWAY
NOT PROVIDED FOR IN
NOT BE USED FOR ANY PURPOSE
HELD CONFIDENTIAL AND SHALL
RAILWAY COMPANY AND SHALL BE
REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF BNSF
FURNISHED HEREWITH SHALL
CATIONS, AND/OR INFORMATION
ALL PLANS, DRAWINGS SPECIFI-
INFORMATION CONFIDENTIAL
TEL (602) 522-7700
PHOENIX, AZ 85012
SUITE 2500
20 E. THOMAS ROAD
HDR, INC.
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
DI
© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2024 Maxar ©CNES (2024) Distribution Airbus DS
RD
LONDON
235TH AVE
US 60
LOGISTICS PARK & LOGISTICS CENTER
BNSF PHOENIX INTERMODAL FACILITY,
211TH AVE
211TH AVE
LEGEND:
BNSF PHOENIX INTERMODAL FACILITY, LOGISTICS PARK & LOGISTICS CENTER
SINGLE FAMILY - RURAL
MIXED USE EMPLOYMENT
BNSF PROPERTY LIMITS
N
0 200
1000
SCALE 1"=1000'
2
2
AREA PLAN LAND USES
2023 WHITE TANKS GRAND AVENUE
PROPOSED
OF
SM
REV
DATE
DESCRIPTION
BY
APP
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
CHECKED BY
APPROVED BY
DATE
SUB
CONTRACT NO.
DRAWING NO.
REVISION
SCALE
SHEET NO.
COMPANY.
AGREEMENTS WITH BNSF RAILWAY
NOT PROVIDED FOR IN
NOT BE USED FOR ANY PURPOSE
HELD CONFIDENTIAL AND SHALL
RAILWAY COMPANY AND SHALL BE
REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF BNSF
FURNISHED HEREWITH SHALL
CATIONS, AND/OR INFORMATION
ALL PLANS, DRAWINGS SPECIFI-
INFORMATION CONFIDENTIAL
TEL (602) 522-7700
PHOENIX, AZ 85012
SUITE 2500
20 E. THOMAS ROAD
HDR, INC.
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
DI
© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2024 Maxar ©CNES (2024) Distribution Airbus DS
RD
LONDON
235TH AVE
US 60
LOGISTICS PARK & LOGISTICS CENTER
BNSF PHOENIX INTERMODAL FACILITY,
211TH AVE
211TH AVE
LEGEND:
BNSF PHOENIX INTERMODAL FACILITY, LOGISTICS PARK & LOGISTICS CENTER
SINGLE FAMILY - RURAL
MIXED USE EMPLOYMENT
AREA OF PROPOSED LAND USE
BNSF PROPERTY LIMITS
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Case No. CPA2024006
Submitted: May 31, 2024
Resubmitted: October 8, 2024
PHOENIX INTERMODAL FACILITY, LOGISTICS
PARK AND LOGISTICS CENTER
P a g e | 2
Phoenix Intermodal Facility, Logistics Park and Logistics Center
October 8, 2024
12870.1.5027406.4
DEVELOPMENT TEAM
Owner/Applicant:
BNSF Railway Company
2650 Lou Menk Drive, MOB2
Fort Worth, Texas 76131
Lacy A. Kreger
General Director of Strategic Programs
t. (817) 867-6845
e. lacy.kreger@bnsf.com
Kyle W. Cooper
Director of Strategic Programs
t: (817) 867-6366
e. kyle.cooper@bnsf.com
Legal Representative:
Gammage & Burnham PLC
Susan E. Demmitt
40 North Central Avenue, 20th Floor
Phoenix, Arizona 85004
t. (602) 256-4456
e. sdemmitt@gblaw.com
P a g e | 3
Phoenix Intermodal Facility, Logistics Park and Logistics Center
October 8, 2024
12870.1.5027406.4
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & INTRODUCTION
BNSF Railway Company (“BNSF”) is proposing development of a regional rail-served
Intermodal Facility, Logistics Park and Logistics Center (the “Development”) on
approximately 4,321 acres generally located between 211th and 235th Avenues, along
US-60/Grand Avenue in northwest Maricopa County (“Overall Site”).
To facilitate development, BNSF filed a Major Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Area
Plan Amendment (case no. CPA2024006) (“Application”) to update the land use
designation on the south approximate 839 acres of the Overall Site from Single-Family
Rural land use, with areas of Floodway and Flood Hazard Area land use, to Mixed-Use
Employment land use. Historically, the land use designation for the 839 acres, in the
2000 White Tank Grand Avenue Area Plan, was Industrial. During the County’s 2023
update to the White Tank Grand Avenue Area Plan, the 839 acres was intended to be
included in a land use designation change for the Overall Site to Mixed-Use
Employment. In what appears to be a technical oversite, the 2023 White Tank Grand
Avenue Area Plan classification for the Overall Site, less the 839 acres, was updated to
Mixed Use Employment, but the 839 acres appears to have been inadvertently modified
from Industrial to Single-Family Rural land use instead of Mixed Use Employment. This
Application rectifies that error. No change in land use designation is required for the
balance of the Overall Site given that it was appropriately updated to Mixed Use
Employment in 2023.
BNSF has also filed a rezone application (case no. Z2024072) to change the zoning on
the Overall Site from Rural-43 Wickenburg Scenic Corridor Overlay and Rural-43 to
Heavy Industrial District WSCO with an Industrial Unit Plan of Development Overlay
(“IND-3 WSCO IUPD”) and Heavy Industrial District with an Industrial Unit Plan of
Development Overlay (“IND-3 IUPD”). With this Application and change in land use
designation, the Overall Site will have a consistent land use designation of Mixed-Use
Employment and will mirror the land use designation of the City of Surprise’s General
Plan and will align with the planned IND-3 zoning district for the Overall Site.
The Development will be a master-planned logistics facility that will accommodate the
transportation, storage, and distribution of goods and materials throughout the Phoenix
metropolitan area and the greater southwest. The Development is a first-of-its-kind
transportation and logistics hub intended to efficiently and sustainably respond to the
dynamic and rapidly changing needs of BNSF’s customer base, offering them
streamlined supply chain solutions.
The Development will be comprised of three distinct yet interrelated components:
▪ The Intermodal Facility (“IMF”) consists of approximately 1,770 acres located on the
northernmost portion of the Overall Site. The IMF serves as a rail terminal where
P a g e | 4
Phoenix Intermodal Facility, Logistics Park and Logistics Center
October 8, 2024
12870.1.5027406.4
trailer and containerized freight is transferred between rail and truck. Containers
and trailers will arrive at the IMF via rail or truck and will be distributed within the
Development or shipped off-site to continue moving through the supply chain.
▪ The Logistics Park (“LP”) consists of approximately 1,420 acres located between
the IMF to the north and the Logistics Center (discussed below) to the south. BNSF
has partnered with LPAZ, LLC for development of the Logistics Park. The LP will
provide national and regional companies with state-of-the-art distribution and
warehouse capacity in close proximity to the IMF. From an operations perspective,
the LP will function similar to a typical master-planned industrial park where
customers buy or lease buildings or suites to accommodate their manufacturing,
warehousing, and distribution needs.
▪ The Logistics Center (“LC”) consists of approximately 1,131 acres located on the
southernmost portion of the Overall Site. The LC will offer a greater degree of rail
service flexibility for BNSF customers by connecting them to customizable shovel-
ready sites with direct rail service in an industrial park environment. BNSF will
actively manage the multi-customer, multi-commodity development, which is
designed to accommodate both manifest mixed freight and unit train single
commodity customers.
Primary access to the Development will be via an at-grade vehicular access point along
US 60 when the development opens in 2028. Secondary vehicular access to the
Development is anticipated to occur along 211th Avenue. Future additional permanent
access to US 60 will be evaluated as development plans are formalized. Additionally,
various offsite roadway and intersection improvements, as outlined in the separate
Traffic Impact Analysis for the Development, are anticipated to be constructed to
accommodate traffic from the Development.
2. ABOUT BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
In today’s dynamic global economy, railroads continue to be the most cost-effective,
safe, and efficient transportation option globally. Efficiencies in rail transportation ensure
businesses remain competitive in the regional, national, and global marketplace. With
a rail network of 32,500 miles spanning across 28 states and three Canadian provinces,
BNSF is one of North America’s leading freight transportation companies. BNSF's
expansive rail network and mission to provide consistent, efficient service to its
customers make it a key player in connecting consumers with the global marketplace.
Since 2000, BNSF has invested more than $80 billion in expanding and maintaining its
expansive railway network. Unlike other modes of transportation, railroad companies own
and maintain their right of way, including the construction, maintenance and repair of a
P a g e | 5
Phoenix Intermodal Facility, Logistics Park and Logistics Center
October 8, 2024
12870.1.5027406.4
private “rail highway” that delivers tremendous transportation value for its customers and the
nation. These substantial investments in rail infrastructure reflect BNSF’s strong commitment
to a safe and reliable rail network. As a result of its unwavering commitments to safety, and
moving the commodities that our nation depends upon, and significant investments in rail
infrastructure, BNSF remains one of the top transporters of the products and commodities
that help feed, clothe, supply, and power communities throughout Arizona, the United States,
and around the globe.
As BNSF and the industries it serves adapt to shifting marketplace needs, evolving
supply chains, and significant technological advancements, BNSF has identified a need
for additional rail capacity in the Phoenix metro area. BNSF has committed to
developing an integrated intermodal network that supports BNSF’s rail operations while
offering industries the option to co-locate their business operations with BNSF for
significant cost savings, increased efficiency, and less environmental impact.
BNSF is working proactively to expand its domestic inland intermodal capacity where
population, development, and goods consumption are growing the fastest. BNSF has
long-anticipated rapid growth in the Phoenix submarket and began the initial plans for
the Intermodal Facility when BNSF acquired the first one-third of the Overall Site in 2004.
Following the exponential growth that the Phoenix Metro area has experienced over the
past two decades, BNSF invested additional capital to acquire another approximately
3,500 acres in 2022. BNSF views Arizona as an important region to expand and
advance its intermodal network capacity and views the Development as a long-term
investment and commitment to its customers and consumers in Arizona and beyond.
3. SITE LOCATION AND SURROUNDINGS
The Development encompasses approximately 4,321 acres located in northwest
Maricopa County between the cities of Surprise and Morristown. The Overall Site is
generally bounded by 211th Avenue to the east, undeveloped Arizona State Trust Land
and State Route 74 to the north, the 235th Avenue alignment to the west, and US-
60/Grand Avenue to the southwest. The 5,500-acre former Chrysler Proving Grounds
is located to the east across 211th Avenue, within the City of Surprise.
Given its location along US-60, a major highway with existing adjacent rail access, the
Overall Site is well positioned to accommodate a regional-scale intermodal facility and
logistics hub. The Overall Site also has convenient vehicular access via US-60 to SR
303, and to State Route 74 via the 211th Avenue alignment, which in turn provides easy
access to the greater regional and interstate transportation network.
P a g e | 6
Phoenix Intermodal Facility, Logistics Park and Logistics Center
October 8, 2024
12870.1.5027406.4
4. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL
The Development will be a first in class, regional logistics hub consisting of three
separate, yet fully integrated, components: Intermodal Facility (“IMF”), Logistics Park
(“LP”), and Logistics Center (“LC”). The Development will also include on-site water
and wastewater treatment facilities.
The IMF and the adjacent LP and LC will benefit from direct and convenient access to
the existing railroad tracks that parallel US-60. The Development will tie into the existing
rail network to optimize supply chain operations, allowing for the efficient movement of
goods and materials via rail, while also reducing environmental impacts. The
Development will also generate significant jobs and promote economic development by
allowing businesses to co-locate within the Development. The creation of the rail-served
logistics hub will facilitate the efficient delivery of goods and materials and will bolster
the regional supply chain, helping to sustainably support current and future growth of
business and industry across the region. The combined facilities of the IMF, LP and LC
also afford customers the opportunity to reduce trucking distances in the region,
reducing air emissions, highway and road maintenance costs, and improving highway
and road safety.
P a g e | 7
Phoenix Intermodal Facility, Logistics Park and Logistics Center
October 8, 2024
12870.1.5027406.4
A. INTERMODAL FACILITY
The IMF consists of approximately 1,770 acres located on the northernmost portion of
the Overall Site. The IMF serves as a rail terminal where trailer and containerized freight
is transferred between rail and truck. Containers and trailers will arrive at the IMF via
rail or truck and will be distributed within the Development or shipped off-site to continue
moving through the supply chain. The IMF will provide domestic rail intermodal
transportation services including expedited container and trailer services, standard
container services, and temperature-controlled capacity for all such services in
response to the diverse needs of BNSF’s customer base.
From a physical development standpoint, the IMF will consist of a series of parallel “strip
tracks” for handling of intermodal freight. Once spotted on the strip tracks, containers
will be transferred on and off railcars with lift equipment. The IMF will also include
organized container parking and stacking areas to stage for facility departure whether
via truck or rail. To accommodate employee operations, the IMF will include a limited
number of centrally located buildings for facility management, security, and
maintenance operations.
P a g e | 8
Phoenix Intermodal Facility, Logistics Park and Logistics Center
October 8, 2024
12870.1.5027406.4
B. LOGISTICS PARK
The LP consists of approximately 1,420 acres located between the IMF to the north and
the LC to the south. BNSF has partnered with LPAZ, LLC for development of the
Logistics Park. LPAZ, LLC is a joint venture between affiliates of CRG and The Kroenke
Group, both of which are national developers and owners of commercial real estate,
including industrial and warehouse projects throughout the United States. The LP will
provide national and regional companies with state-of-the-art distribution and
warehouse capacity in close proximity to the IMF. The LP has been intentionally
designed to provide needed flexibility and adequate capacity to support BNSF’s growing
customer base. Transportation costs represent a significant portion of distribution and
logistics expenses for businesses, and co-locating at the LP provides valuable cost
savings and improves supply chain efficiency for BNSF’s customers by providing direct
and convenient access to BNSF’s intermodal capacity. In addition to the financial
benefits, there are also numerous environmental benefits associated with co-location,
including a meaningful reduction in the number of truck miles driven, which reduces
carbon emissions and utilizes less fossil fuel.
From an operations perspective, the LP will function similar to a typical master-planned
industrial park where customers buy or lease buildings or suites to accommodate their
manufacturing, warehousing, and distribution needs. The LP is planned to have enough
capacity to comfortably accommodate up to eighteen million square feet of leasable
space at full buildout, which will provide needed state-of-the-art logistics space for
BNSF’s customers in the region.
P a g e | 9
Phoenix Intermodal Facility, Logistics Park and Logistics Center
October 8, 2024
12870.1.5027406.4
C. LOGISTICS CENTER
The LC consists of approximately 1,131 acres located on the southernmost portion of
the Overall Site. The LC will offer a greater degree of rail service flexibility for BNSF
customers by connecting them to customizable shovel-ready sites with direct rail service
in an industrial park environment. BNSF will actively manage the multi-customer, multi-
commodity development, which is designed to accommodate both manifest mixed
freight and unit train single commodity customers. The LC will allow tenants to focus
their time and efforts on their operations while utilizing BNSF’s facilities and expertise to
grow their business and rail operations in the expanding Phoenix region. The LC will
provide additional flexibility to accommodate the storage and shipment of a variety of
bulk commodities such as steel products, aggregates, agricultural products, pipe, and
liquids to support the needs of the local economy.
Locating at a BNSF LC increases speed to market allowing customers to reach new
markets faster and more efficiently. Buildings within the LC are anticipated to be smaller
than those within the LP and will be tailored to meet the needs of specific end users.
P a g e | 10
Phoenix Intermodal Facility, Logistics Park and Logistics Center
October 8, 2024
12870.1.5027406.4
5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN / WHITE TANK GRAND AVENUE AREA
PLAN ANALYSIS and AMENDMENT
In 2016, the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors adopted the Vision 2030
Comprehensive Plan (“Comprehensive Plan”), which is intended to promote economic
prosperity, maintain a vibrant quality of life, and facilitate continued growth in a
coordinated, harmonious, and responsible manner. The Comprehensive Plan
recognizes that sensible planning can help build a strong economy and result in a more
efficient growth and effective development.
The Comprehensive Plan explains Maricopa County’s policies and expectations for the
development of unincorporated areas but given the size of Maricopa County it is neither
possible nor practical for the Comprehensive Plan to consider site-specific issues. To
address this, Maricopa County has adopted “Area Plans” designed to respond to local
context. The Overall Site is subject to the 2023 White Tank Grand Avenue Area Plan
(“2023 Area Plan”), which designates the southern approximately 839 acres of the
Overall Site primarily as Single-Family Rural land use, with areas of Floodway and Flood
Hazard Area land use, with the balance of the Overall Site designated as Mixed Use
Employment. Importantly, prior to the 2023 Area Plan being adopted, the 2000 White
Tank Grand Avenue Area Plan designated this same 839 acre portion of the Overall Site
as Industrial. When the balance of the Overall Site was modified to Mixed Use
Employment in 2023, to match the City of Surprise General Plan designation for the
Overall Site of Mixed Use Employment, the 839 acres appears to have been
inadvertently modified on the County’s maps from Industrial to Single Family Rural
instead of Mixed Use Employment. County records do not provide any insight as to why
the 839 acres was modified with the 2023 Area Plan, but this Application seeks to re-
establish the longstanding non-residential classification for the 839 acres and reinstate
land use consistency for the Overall Site. The remaining north portion (+/- 3,500 acres)
of the Overall Site is designated Mixed Use Employment land use, which accommodates
industrial, office, research, warehousing, and other similar uses. The Overall Site is also
subject to the Wickenburg Scenic Corridor Overlay, which designates it as a Potential
Growth Area.
The below exhibits show the Overall Site outlined in red. Within the graphic from the
2000 White Tank Grand Avenue Area Plan exhibit, the gray portion of the site represents
the 839 acres that was formerly Industrial. In the 2023 White Tank Grand Avenue Area
Plan exhibit, that same 839 acres is shown as Single Family Rural while the balance of
the Overall Site was modified to Mixed Use Employment. These two exhibits highlight
the apparent mapping error that occurred within the 2023 Area Plan.
P a g e | 11
Phoenix Intermodal Facility, Logistics Park and Logistics Center
October 8, 2024
12870.1.5027406.4
P a g e | 12
Phoenix Intermodal Facility, Logistics Park and Logistics Center
October 8, 2024
12870.1.5027406.4
An important feature of the Comprehensive Plan is how it considers other jurisdictions’
plans for future growth. Maricopa County coordinates with these jurisdictions where
practical to ensure consistent growth patterns. Specifically, the City of Surprise (“City”)
General Plan extends into this unincorporated area of Maricopa County. Accordingly,
Maricopa County recognizes the City’s General Plan and the need to coordinate
planning with the City. In March 2023, the Surprise City Council approved a Major
General Plan Amendment changing the land use designation on the northern
approximately 3,500 acres of the Overall Site to Employment Character Area for
business park and employment land uses, thus matching the existing Employment
Character Area that existed on the southern approximately 839 acres of the Overall Site
within the City’s General Plan. The Comprehensive Plan and 2023 Area Plan highlight
the importance of collaboration between Maricopa County and the local communities
within the 2023 Area Plan. Maricopa County generally refers to municipal plans—in this
case the City of Surprise—when making decisions involving property located in
unincorporated Maricopa County.
This Application requests a Major Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Area Plan
Amendment to re-designate the southern approximately 839 acres of the Overall Site
as Mixed-Use Employment land use as was intended in 2023. With this change, the
Overall Site will have a consistent land use designation of Mixed-Use Employment and
will mirror the land use designation of the City’s General Plan and will align with the
planned IND-3 zoning district for the Overall Site.
A.
VISION
2030
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN
&
SUSTABILITY
WITH
SURROUNDING LAND USES
This area of Maricopa County is “rural” with large lot rural residential homes along 211th
Avenue. To the south is the community of Wittman and to the northwest is the
community of Circle City, along with an airport-oriented residential development at 235th
Avenue & Joy Ranch Road. To the east, across 211th Avenue is the 5,500 acre Grand
Vista project on the former Chrysler Proving Grounds, which is entitled for more than
16,000 residential units in a master-planned community setting. Except for these limited
pockets of existing development, the majority of the area around the Overall Site is
undeveloped desert, with very little development to the north and west.
This Major Comprehensive Plan Amendment constitutes an overall improvement and is
not solely for the good or benefit of BNSF. The Application requests to reinstate the land
use designation of the south approximately 839 acres of the Overall Site from Single-
Family Rural land use, with areas of Floodway and Flood Hazard Area land use, to Mixed-
Use Employment land use. This Application contemplates a land use designation
amendment which will “right size” the area to be sufficient size to develop a regional
P a g e | 13
Phoenix Intermodal Facility, Logistics Park and Logistics Center
October 8, 2024
12870.1.5027406.4
employment center that establishes a core of jobs that will support the larger
surrounding area as it develops with the current and planned residential uses over time.
Within this narrative report, BNSF has identified goals, objectives, and policies for plan
elements and provided responses for how the Development further supports this goal,
objectives, and policies. The Comprehensive Plan considers various growth-related
topics that will affect Maricopa County’s future. Each topic—known as elements—
examine key issues that shape the goals and policies that Maricopa County uses to
make informed and effective land use decisions. These goals, objectives, and policies
are as follows:
Land Use
The Land Use Element maintains that functional, balanced, fiscally efficient, and
economically viable land use patterns are important priorities.
• Land Use Goal #1: Achieve balanced and efficient development patterns.
• Land Use Goal #2: Provide leadership on land use issues.
• Land Use Goal #3: Protect public health, safety, and well-being.
• Land Use Policy #7: Maricopa County supports coordinating land use and
infrastructure with state agencies, counties, and municipalities.
• Land Use Policy #10:
Maricopa County supports coordinated planning
efforts between local, state, and federal agencies.
• Land Use Policy #14:
Maricopa County supports compliance with
watercourse master plans are area drainage plans.
• Land Use Policy #17:
Maricopa County supports balanced land use
patterns that include various residential, retail, non-retail employment, and
public and civic land uses.
• Land Use Policy #18:
Maricopa County supports flexible design and
zoning techniques when used to established balanced and efficient land used
patterns, and when used to protect important environmental and open space
areas and connections.
Response: This area of Maricopa County is “rural” with some large lot residential homes
along 211th Avenue. To the south is the community of Wittman and to the northwest is the
community of Circle City, along with an airport-oriented residential development at 235th
P a g e | 14
Phoenix Intermodal Facility, Logistics Park and Logistics Center
October 8, 2024
12870.1.5027406.4
Avenue & Joy Ranch Road. Except for these limited pockets of development, the majority of
the area around the Overall Site is undeveloped desert, with very little development to the
north and west, provided that, to the east, across 211th Avenue is the 5,500 acre Grand Vista
project on the former Chrysler Proving Grounds, which is entitled for more than 16,000
residential units in a master-planned community setting. Approval of this Application, as
noted, restores a long-held non-residential classification for the 839 acre portion of the
Overall Site. The attendant IND-3 IUPD rezone application will include specific buffering,
landscaping, and other design elements that will inform the building environment with the
goal of establishing standards and guidelines that will ensure a quality visual environment
that help define the area as it builds out.
• Land Use Policy #13:
Where necessary Maricopa County supports
wildfire prevention and mitigation measures in the design of development.
Response: BNSF and the development team will clear and grub vegetation within the
Development as part of construction. In addition, fire hydrants, along with other required
fire suppression equipment, will be installed throughout for fire prevention. Plans will be
submitted to Maricopa County to ensure proper and orderly development.
Aside from fire protection, BNSF’s Resource Protection division utilizes a Police Team
for law enforcement and security. BNSF’s Police Team are provided police authority
from the State and local governments and are authorized interstate authority by the
Federal Government. BNSF’s Police Team will closely coordinate with surrounding local
police agencies.
• Land Use Policy #22:
Maricopa County supports reducing the impacts
of new development on environmentally sensitive areas, including native
wildlife (flora and fauna) habitat and corridors.
Response: The transition from residential land use to a master planned employment
facility will provide a better opportunity to evaluate and address, if needed, any wildlife
and/or endangered species needs. Specifically, during the rezoning process, there will
be an opportunity to establish site appropriate open space, buffers, and/or wash
corridors that will provide linkages to habitat and offset any real or perceived impacts of
the development of the area. This condition will be superior to the single-lot residential
development currently allowed under Maricopa County jurisdiction that often leads to
individual single-lot environments that are disconnected—a condition that can street
wildlife habitat and corridors. BNSF has and will continue to work with Arizona Game &
Fish as the Development progress through the entitlement process.
Transportation
P a g e | 15
Phoenix Intermodal Facility, Logistics Park and Logistics Center
October 8, 2024
12870.1.5027406.4
The Transportation element establishes Maricopa County’s support for coordinating
future growth with an efficient transportation system. The Transportation element also
emphasizes the importance of an efficient transportation system to the region’s
economy and air quality.
• Transportation Goal #1:
Promote and protect public health through a safe
transportation system.
• Transportation Goal #2:
Contribute to a safe, seamless, and effective
transportation system.
• Transportation Goal #3:
Coordinate land use decisions with transportation
investments to help the country exercise sound financial management and
build the county’s fiscal strength.
• Transportation Policy #1:
As
necessary,
Maricopa
County
supports
preserving future road alignments called for in country-recognized
transportation plans, especially mid-section line, section line and arterial roads;
parkways; freeways; and interchanges.
• Transportation Policy #2: Maricopa County supports compliance with its
Major Streets and Routes Plan.
• Transportation Policy #4: Maricopa County supports using the preferred
funding methods identifies in the Cost of Development element to pay for
transportation improvements necessary for new development.
• Transportation Policy #15: Maricopa County supports regional mobility and
safety by integrating state, county, and local traffic management systems.
• Transportation Policy #17: Maricopa County supports state, county and local
partnerships for interjurisdictional traffic operations and management.
• Transportation Policy #6:
Maricopa County supports municipal annexation
of roads that are adjacent to county islands.
• Transportation Policy #7: Maricopa County supports constructing roads in
county islands to the standards of the surrounding city or town where these
roads are intended to be annexed by the city or town.
• Transportation Policy #8: Maricopa County supports partnerships with
cities and towns in cost sharing for road repairs and improvements.
P a g e | 16
Phoenix Intermodal Facility, Logistics Park and Logistics Center
October 8, 2024
12870.1.5027406.4
Response: A detailed Traffic Impact Study Report is being submitted to Maricopa
County to evaluate the traffic generation, and more importantly, the appropriate
transportation system improvements necessary to support the Development. There will
be new roads and access to and from the area to support the Development, which will
benefit the larger community by replacing a lower quality roadway network with more
modern roadways and by establishing easy access to property not currently access from
improved routes.
Primary access to the Development will be via an at-grade vehicular access point along
US 60 when the development opens in 2028. Secondary vehicular access to the
Development is anticipated to occur along 211th Avenue. Future permanent access to
US 60 will be evaluated as development plans are formalized. Additionally, various
offsite roadway and intersection improvements are anticipated to be constructed to
accommodate traffic from the Development.
Environmental
The Environment Element identifies Maricopa County’s foremost concerns with respect
to its environmental issues, and potential strategies for lessening the impact that
development has on its environment. Particular attention focuses on air quality, water
quality, wildlife protection, and natural and cultural resources.
• Environmental Goal #1:
Provide regional leadership to promote all aspects
of regional environmental quality.
• Environmental Policy #2: To help improve air quality Maricopa County
supports balanced and efficient land use patterns where employment, retail
and residential land uses are proximate rather than separate.
• Environmental Policy #3:
To help protect water quality Maricopa County
supports compliance with its Drinking Water program and its Water and
Wastewater Treatment program.
• Environmental Policy #4:
Maricopa County supports innovative project
design and development techniques that protect important plant and animal
habitat and migration corridors.
• Environmental Policy #5:
As directed by the State Historic Preservation
Office and Arizona Game & Fish Department, Maricopa County supports
cultural resource and biological surveys being completed – and needed
mitigation measures established – prior to new development.
Response: BNSF will employ best practices in the construction and operation of the
Development to address air quality, water quality, and native plan and wildlife habitat
P a g e | 17
Phoenix Intermodal Facility, Logistics Park and Logistics Center
October 8, 2024
12870.1.5027406.4
considerations. Design techniques and issue specific mitigation measures will be
included in the companion rezoning application and will be addressed in future specific
site plan applications. No cultural resources have been identified. In addition, there are
no historical properties.
Economic Growth
The Economic Growth Element includes strategies that Maricopa County can use to
help create a diverse and resilient economy. Opportunities focus on locating
employment proximate to where people live, supporting small and start-up businesses,
and supporting industries that require a lot of land but not urban services or
infrastructure.
• Economic Growth Goal #1: Contribute to an effective regional economy.
• Economic Growth Goal #2: Have a diverse and balanced economy to
promote long-term economic stability and economic resiliency.
• Economic Growth Goal #4: Create and grow a diverse business climate.
• Economic Growth Policy #1:
Maricopa County supports orderly and
balanced land use patterns that include Basic and Non-Basic sector
businesses, especially in master planned communities and similar urban
development.
• Economic Growth Policy #5:
Maricopa Country supports programs that
attract a variety of Basic Sector industry clusters that have long-term, stable
growth prospects.
• Economic Growth Policy #6:
Maricopa County supports efforts to
recruit prospective business and industries to the county, and efforts to retain
existing businesses and industries.
• Economic Growth Policy #8:
Maricopa County supports continuously
assessing its regulations and processes to enhance effectiveness, ensure
quality service, increase efficiency, and establish a competitive advantage.
• Economic Growth Policy #9:
Maricopa County supports implementing
Vision 2030 in a clear and consistent way to help businesses make long term
investment decisions.
Response: Economic vitality is a regional issue for the future of Maricopa County (and
surrounding cities and towns) tied to its ability to continue to secure and maintain a
P a g e | 18
Phoenix Intermodal Facility, Logistics Park and Logistics Center
October 8, 2024
12870.1.5027406.4
stable and diverse employment base, which this Application only further supports. The
Development responds to a regional need at a site location that provides all of the “parts”
need for a successful economic and employment focused development.
The Development will significantly enhance the tax base (with development of a
significant amount of taxable business spaces), as well as serve as a “primer” location
for the attraction of businesses with world-wide footprints to Maricopa County. The
proposed Development will support numerous jobs and will be a significant area of
Maricopa County’s employment upon build-out.
Growth Areas
The Growth Areas element pinpoints areas suitable for urban growth because they have
appropriate and efficient levels of urban services and infrastructure. The Growth Areas
element also explains where and when urban growth should occur to help establish
sensible and efficient land use patterns.
• Growth Areas Goal #1:
Achieve orderly urban growth that is fiscally and
environmentally responsible, protects public health and safety, and promotes
sensible annexation patterns.
Response: The Development strengthens Maricopa County’s assets to employ a
strategic approach to planning. This area of Maricopa County is unique in that it has
direct access to both US 60 (for roadway supported users) and the railroad (for rail
supported users) as well as SR74 and Loop 303, and provides access to a significant
number of residences, both current and planned. As such, this Development achieves
a context appropriate land use that supports a variety of compatible mobility choices
and services. In addition, locating a regional land use with various modes of
transportation supports further growth and activity in and around the area. Given its
setting, the Overall Site and surrounding area has been identified as an area of targeted
growth, which BNSF reinforces through its proposed Development.
Water Resources
The Water Resources element focuses on strategies to help ensure that an adequate
water supply is available to meet future growth. Since water supply and allocation are
regulated at the state level, strategies in this element target water conservation and
water quality protection efforts that Maricopa County can implement at a local level.
• Water Resources Goal #1: Promote and protect public health with a clean
water supply.
P a g e | 19
Phoenix Intermodal Facility, Logistics Park and Logistics Center
October 8, 2024
12870.1.5027406.4
• Water Resources Goal #2: Provide leadership to promote regional water
quality and water use.
• Water Resources Policy #7: Maricopa County supports low water use and
drought tolerant landscaping.
Response: BNSF is committed to being a safe and responsible water user and intends
to construct standalone on-site water and wastewater systems that comply with all
federal, state and local design standards to safeguard public health. In designing those
systems and during the permitting process, BNSF intends to promote regional
collaboration by engaging with the City of Surprise to explore potential infrastructure
interconnections to support regional needs. While BNSF will be a large industrial water
user, it intends to minimize its water consumption by installing modern fixtures, using
responsible landscaping, and potentially recharging any effluent that it generates on-
site.
Energy
The Energy element is the newest in this plan and includes policies to promote
renewable energy, energy conservation and overall, more efficient energy use.
• Energy Goal #1:
Provide leadership to promote regional environmental
quality.
• Energy Goal #3:
Have balanced and efficient development patterns.
• Energy Goal #4:
Increase Energy efficiency in new development.
• Energy Policy #1:
Maricopa County supports energy efficient design and
construction of new development.
Response: The Development considers the area’s character and context when
designing new and expanding existing infrastructure. BNSF will closely collaborate with
utility providers whenever possible during engineering & design efforts in order to take
into consideration community goals or plans. BNSF strives to promote sustainable and
efficient development, while also creating local jobs.
Cost of Development
The Cost of Development element specifies ways to help ensure that new development
pay its fair share towards the cost of additional infrastructure and services needed to
serve new development. The Cost of Development element also identifies current cost
P a g e | 20
Phoenix Intermodal Facility, Logistics Park and Logistics Center
October 8, 2024
12870.1.5027406.4
sharing methods, recommends future cost sharing strategies, and includes ways to
ensure reasonable application of the recommended strategies.
• Cost of Development Goal #1:
Exercise sound financial management and
build the County’s fiscal strength.
• Cost of Development Goal #2:
New Development pays its prober and
reasonable share of the costs of new infrastructure, services, and other public
improvements.
• Cost of Development Policy #1:
Maricopa County supports recouping the
costs of its products and services without unfairly burdening those most in
need of its products and services.
Response: The Development will create a robust and healthy environment for BNSF
and other businesses, and future economic growth in the area, thus enhancing
employment and workforce, and ensuring that costs associated with development of the
Overall Site does not place an economic burden on the community. Development of the
Overall Site will contribute to the investment for a more prosperous Maricopa County.
B.
2023 WHITE TANKS GRAND AVENUE AREA PLAN
The 2023 Area Plan establishes comprehensive and broad goals and policies for each
topic area or element in the plan. These goals and policies are intended to support the
goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and the priorities of the 2023 Area Plan.
The proposed amendment supports and furthers the following goals and policies of the
2023 Area Plan:
Land Use
Balancing the development needs across the region and within the White Tanks Grand
Avenue [WTGA] area is top priority for Maricopa County. There is a recognized need
for development and intensity for various land uses. The following goals and policies
have been identified to guide land use decisions for the Overall Site.
• Land Use Policy #1: Maricopa County supports continued coordination with
federal, state, and local agencies to ensure a balanced mix of land uses in the
region.
• Land Use Policy #2: Maricopa County supports development within the
WTGA planning area with commensurate services or infrastructure and
development that adequately mitigates negative impacts to surrounding lands
or communities.
P a g e | 21
Phoenix Intermodal Facility, Logistics Park and Logistics Center
October 8, 2024
12870.1.5027406.4
• Land Use Policy #6: Maricopa County supports high-quality commercial
centers and well-designed office, business, and industrial parks that are
properly located within the WTGA planning area and that proximate to
populated areas and transportation facilities.
Response: This Application will ensure consistency with the City of Surprise’s
“Employment” land use designation and supports a “core” of larger scale users, which
is compatible with and complementary of this Application. Development of this Overall
Site will, over time, result in development in the immediate area, which contributes to a
balanced land use pattern.
The attendant IND-3 IUPD rezone application will include specific buffering,
landscaping, and other design elements that will inform the building environment with
the goal of establishing standards and guidelines that will ensure a quality visual
environment that help define the area as it builds out.
Over time, this Development will support other development in an area that is planned
to develop over time, resulting in a superior mix of land uses on the Overall Site and in
the surrounding area.
Transportation
The following goals and policies have been identified to aid in improving the
transportation network on the Overall Site and within the surrounding area.
• Transportation Goal #1:
Coordinate land use decisions with transportation
investments to maintain and expand the existing transportation network and
responsibly accommodate growth.
• Transportation Goal #2:
Promote and protect public health by improving
roadway safety and mitigating traffic congestion.
• Transportation Policy #2:
Maricopa County supports the enforcement of
minimum street standards and subdivision requirements to ensure adequate
secondary or emergency access for emergency vehicles, as well as applicable
MCDOT standards for all new collector and arterial roads.
• Transportation Policy #3:
Maricopa County supports developer(s) taking
responsibility for the construction of new roads that provide access to new
development. Upon completion of construction, roads that are of regional or
community-wide significance should be dedicated to a local jurisdiction or
Maricopa County, as appropriate.
P a g e | 22
Phoenix Intermodal Facility, Logistics Park and Logistics Center
October 8, 2024
12870.1.5027406.4
Response: A Traffic Impact Study Report will be reviewed and approved by the County
that will evaluate not only traditional modes of transportation but will address emerging
trans and mobility options. In addition, the Development is a complex facility, as such,
it will allow for the use of a variety of mobility options, not only for people, but also goods
and materials that can be shipped efficiently via rail, truck, or combinations thereof to
best fit distribution, delivery, and transport needs of each business. Flexibility in
transportation options is the future of transportation modality.
Primary access to the Development will be via an at-grade vehicular access point along
US 60 when the development opens in 2028. Secondary vehicular access to the
Development is anticipated to occur along 211th Avenue. Future permanent access to
US 60 will be evaluated as development plans are formalized. Additionally, various
offsite roadway and intersection improvements are anticipated to be constructed to
accommodate traffic from the Development.
Growth Areas
According to Maricopa Association of Governments (“MAG”) data, the White Tanks
Grand Avenue area is expected to grow significantly over the next forty years. MAG’s
projections are driven by proposed and potential development within this area, along
with consideration of proscribed land uses for undeveloped areas. Employment growth
will accompany population growth within the White Tank Grand Avenue planning area.
The Overall Site has been identified as a Growth Area (“Growth Area A”). The 2023
Area Plan states, “This area has been under high development pressure over the last
decade and is projected to have . . . job growth. This area contains . . . the BNSF
industrial project going through preliminary entitlement in the City of Surprise.” The
following goals and policies have been identified as supporting the proper growth,
planning, and management of the development proposal to ensure the quality of region,
along with road, water, and sewer infrastructure:
• Growth Area Policy #1:
Maricopa County supports new development
located within designated potential growth areas as long as the development
is provided with the appropriate level of services and infrastructure.
• Growth Area Policy #6:
Maricopa
County
supports
non-residential
development within the growth areas that is compatible with established
development and mitigates adverse effects such as traffic congestion, strain
on water supply, and viewshed obstruction.
• Growth Area Policy #7:
Maricopa
County
supports
a
planned
concentration of a variety of uses within the potential growth areas as long as
P a g e | 23
Phoenix Intermodal Facility, Logistics Park and Logistics Center
October 8, 2024
12870.1.5027406.4
users are served adequately and designed to provide transition and buffers
between established uses.
Response: The Development strengthens Maricopa County’s assets to employ a
strategic approach to planning. This area of Maricopa County is unique in that it has
direct access to both US 60 (for roadway supported users) and the railroad (for rail
supported users) and for a significant number of residences, both current and planned.
As such, this Development achieves a context appropriate land use that supports a
variety of compatible mobility choices and services. In addition, locating a regional land
use with various modes of transportation supports further growth and activity in and
around the area. Given its setting, the Overall Site and surrounding area has been
identified as an area of targeted growth, which BNSF reinforces through its proposed
Development.
Economic Growth
The key economic factor for the White Tank Grand Avenue planning area is
diversification of business and the employment base. As the area continues to grow, it
will offer a broader range of businesses and employment opportunities. The economic
growth goals and policies supported with the Development proposal are as follows:
• Economic Growth Goal #2:
Support an economic environment that
nurtures locally based employment and economic opportunity.
• Economic Growth Policy #1:
Maricopa County supports coordination
with the Arizona Commerce Authority, Greater Phoenix Economic Council
(GPEC), WESTMARC, and other organizations to support industry clusters
that will provide long term, stable growth in the area.
Response: In the short term, this Application will have no impact to adjacent or nearby
land, as it only establishes policy for subsequent entitlement actions. In the longer term,
this Application will establish policy support for the eventual entitlement and
development of a regional supporting employment center that will be the location of a
number of different businesses and corresponding diversity in job types. This area is in
the “path of growth” as development expands northwest along the US 60 corridor.
Regardless of this Application, growth and change are coming to the area.
Water Resources
Due to the southwest climate, water infrastructure is important to the continued growth
of the area. BNSF intends to construct standalone water infrastructure to serve the
Overall Site. BNSF is acquiring Type 2 grandfathered groundwater rights that will allow
it to operate wells at the Overall Site. BNSF is prepared to comply with all applicable
P a g e | 24
Phoenix Intermodal Facility, Logistics Park and Logistics Center
October 8, 2024
12870.1.5027406.4
Arizona Department of Water Resources laws and regulations. The Development
supports the following Water Resource goals and policies of the 2023 Area Plan:
• Water Resources Goal #1: Balance water availability with growth.
• Water Resources Policy #1: Maricopa County supports appropriately scaled
water service in potential growth areas that are not currently served by a
Community Water System.
• Water Resources Policy #2: Maricopa County supports appropriately scaled
sewer service, greywater reclamation, and rainwater harvesting efforts in
potential growth areas that are not currently covered by existing sewer
infrastructure or providers.
Response: BNSF is committed to being a safe and responsible water user. It intends to
construct standalone on-site water and wastewater systems that comply with all state
and local design standards to safeguard public health. In designing those systems and
during the permitting process, BNSF intends to promote regional collaboration by
engaging with the City of Surprise to explore potential infrastructure interconnections to
support regional needs. While BNSF will be a large industrial water user, it intends to
minimize its water consumption by installing modern fixtures, using responsible
landscaping, and potentially recharging any effluent that it generates on-site.
Energy, Utilities, & Public Facilities
The Energy Element addresses incentives for efficient use of energy. Additionally, it
addresses other utilities and facilities within the White Tank Grand Avenue planning area.
The entirety of the area is served by Arizona Public Service (APS) for electricity service
and Southwest Gas for natural gas service. It is anticipated the Maricopa County
Sheriff’s Office along with the North County Fire & Medical District and the Circle City-
Morristown Fire District will be the responding police and fire agencies, respectively.
The Development supports the following goals and policies of the Energy, Utilities, &
Public Facilities Element:
• Energy, Utilities, and Public Facilities Goal #1:
Ensure Maricopa County
has adequate infrastructure to accommodate utilities and waste disposal
before growth is permitted in unincorporated areas.
• Energy, Utilities, and Public Facilities Goal #2:
Ensure there are adequate
public facilities, including police and fire, before growth is permitted in
unincorporated areas.
P a g e | 25
Phoenix Intermodal Facility, Logistics Park and Logistics Center
October 8, 2024
12870.1.5027406.4
Response: The Development considers the area’s character and context when
designing new and expanding existing infrastructure. BNSF will closely collaborate with
utility providers whenever possible during engineering & design efforts in order to take
into consideration community goals or plans. BNSF strives to promote sustainable and
efficient development, while also creating local jobs.
***
While each element addresses a unique growth-related issue, in combination they
reinforce the core principles of the Comprehensive Plan and promote consistent
implementation of the policies and recommendations. Ultimately, the Comprehensive
Plan builds on past successes and uses the core principles to direct sensible decisions
that meet Maricopa County’s mission, values, and priorities. While the Comprehensive
Plan does not address every growth-related challenge, it can help Maricopa County
achieve a healthy, vibrant, and prosperous future.
6. TR IC D CIRCUL TIO
A Traffic Impact Study Report (“TISR”) is being prepared by an independent third party
firm for the Development and will be submitted as part of this Application. The TISR
analyzes traffic volume data, takes into consideration the Maricopa Association of
Governments’ regional travel demand model, accounts for the City of Surprise 2035
General Plan, and utilizes information and methodologies provided by the Maricopa
County Department of Transportation (“MCDOT”) and the Arizona Department of
Transportation (“ADOT”). The scope of the TISR has been coordinated with MCDOT
and ADOT to identify various intersections in and around the project area, along with
current and projected traffic patterns along the surrounding roadway network. Traffic
data from BNSF’s Intermodal Facility and Logistics Park in Kansas City was also
evaluated as part of the TISR at the request of ADOT. For the TISR, it is assumed that
the Development will be operational in 2028. Importantly, given the co-location of the
IMF, LP and LC, a significant number of internal trips will be captured between the
various internal components of the Development, thus reducing traffic impacts offsite
and throughout the region.
At this time, BNSF has high-level conceptual site plans for the Development. The
specifics of the Development, including land uses, building square footages and building
layouts, and specific traffic data, including internal access drive and roadway locations,
will be determined as development planning progresses. Based on discussions with
MCDOT and ADOT, primary access to the Development will be via an at-grade vehicular
access point along US 60 when the development opens in 2028. Secondary vehicular
access to the Development is anticipated to occur along 211th Avenue. Future
permanent access to US 60 will be evaluated as development plans are
P a g e | 26
Phoenix Intermodal Facility, Logistics Park and Logistics Center
October 8, 2024
12870.1.5027406.4
formalized. Additionally, various offsite roadway and intersection improvements are
anticipated to be constructed to accommodate traffic from the Development. Access
points to the Development, offsite roadway improvements, including timing of required
roadway improvements, will be determined in coordination with MCDOT and ADOT as
part of review of the TISR, and as future specific Final Plans of Development are
reviewed and approved.
7. DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE AND PHASING
BNSF is working to obtain zoning approval for the Development by early 2025 and
intends to process the initial Plans of Development in 2025. It is anticipated that
construction will begin in mid-late 2025, with the Development becoming operational by
2028.
Doug Jones, P.E., CFM
Planning & Development
301 W. Jefferson St., Suite 170
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
Phone: (602) 372-0790
www.maricopa.gov/planning
Email address:
Doug.Jones@maricopa.gov
Planning & Development
Engineering Plan Review
Date:
July 01, 2024
Memo To:
Darren Gerard, AICP, Planning Manager, Department of Planning &
Development
Attn:
Joel Landis, Planner, Planning & Development Services
cc:
Bob Fedorka, PE, Engineering Manager, Planning & Development
From:
Doug Jones, PE, CFM, Engineering Supervisor, Planning &
Development
Subject:
Z2024072 – BNSF Intermodal Zone Change w/out POD
APN(s):
503-17-488, 503-13-910
Engineering Review has reviewed the first submittal routed for review on 06/10/2024,
for the subject application and has the following requirement.
1. Due to the stated desired timing of POD approval, and the scope of this
project, following discussions with MCDOT, a Traffic Impact Statement is
required with this zone change request.
a. Per MCDOT: It's crucial that the TIS is completed and evaluated prior
to any zoning changes being approved by the Board of Supervisors
(BOS), especially given the potential traffic impacts of a project of this
size.
Engineering has no additional objections subject to the following conditions:
1. Any new site improvements will require a Plan of Development. The future
entitlement (Plan of Development/plat) submittal will require a Grading and
Drainage Plan and Drainage Report sealed by a civil engineer registered in the
state of Arizona to show conformance to the County Drainage Regulations,
(MCZO 1205.7.2)
2. Future development must maintain historic flows entering and exiting the site.
3. Provide the required retention volume for the 100 year, 2 hour storm event,
plus one (1) foot of freeboard, for the Plat/POD area. Provide plan notes
requiring retention basin(s) to drain within 36 hours. (MCZO 1205.7.6-2.a & c)
4. See https://apps.pnd.maricopa.gov/plansubmittalchecklist for the most up to
date interactive Engineering Plan Review checklist.
Page 2 of 4
5. The site contains regulated floodplains associated with the Witmann Wash
and its tributaries. Floodplain Use Permits will be required for any disturbance
to the floodplain.
6. Re-delineation of floodplains requires submission of a FEMA CLOMR/LOMR
administered by the Flood Control District. Work within FEMA Floodways is
highly restrictive. Any buildings within the Floodway portions would require a
re-delineation of the floodways.
7. Road improvements and additional right-of-way shall be determined by
MCDOT Traffic Design and MCDOT Permits based on submittal of a Traffic
Impact Study.
8. Applicant to notify ADOT of development through the Red Letter Process,
RedLetter@azdot.gov, due to proximity to US60 and SR74.
9. Applicant to comply with BNSF Railroad requirements
10. Without the submittal of a plan of development, no development approval will
be inferred by the engineering review, including, but not limited to drainage
design, access and roadway alignments. These items will be addressed as
development plans progress and are submitted to the County for further
review and/or entitlement.
11. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design
only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with
Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and
Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway
Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices
at the time of application for construction.
All plans and reports should be developed and formatted to document that
the project is designed to meet all County regulations, ordinances and design
standards.
It is incumbent upon the engineer to demonstrate compliance with all
regulatory requirements and County design standards.
Please contact me with any questions.
Page 3 of 4
DRAINAGE PLAN REVIEW REFERENCES:
The Drainage Regulations are listed in Section 1205 of the MCZO:
https://www.maricopa.gov/documentcenter/view/272
Maricopa County Drainage Policies and Standards Manual:
https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/Home/View/2369
For Additional Information See:
https://www.maricopa.gov/1635/Drainage-Review
FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT OF MARICOPA COUNTY REFERENCES:
Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County:
https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/630
For Additional Information See:
https://www.maricopa.gov/3847/Flood-Control-District
PND TRANSPORTATION REFERENCES:
Residential Driveway Guidelines
https://www.maricopa.gov/documentcenter/view/362
Roadway Design Manual
http://www.mcdot.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/24883
Maricopa County Resolution for ROW Permits
https://www.maricopa.gov/documentcenter/view/364
For Additional Information See:
https://www.maricopa.gov/156/MCDOT
PND STORMWATER QUALITY (SWPPP) REFERENCES:
Storm Water Quality Management and Discharge Control Regulation
https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/6577
Air Pollution Control Regulations Rule 310
https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/5354
For Additional Information See:
https://www.maricopa.gov/3980/Water-Sewage-Stormwater-Waste
Abbreviations Key:
Drainage:
DD =
Department Directive (See: http://www.maricopa.gov/1911/Department-
Directives)
MCZO =
Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance
DPSM =
Maricopa County Drainage Policies and Standards
SSA =
State Standard Attachment
Page 4 of 4
DDMV1=
Maricopa County Drainage Design Manual – Hydrology
DDMV2 = Maricopa County Drainage Design Manual – Hydraulics
Flood Control:
FRMC =
Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County
PND Transportation:
RDM =
MCDOT Roadway Design Manual
RDG =
MCDOT Residential Design Guidelines
MSRP =
MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
PND Storm Water:
SWMDCR= Maricopa County Storm Water Quality Management and Discharge Control
Regulation
DDMV3=
Maricopa County Drainage Design Manual – Erosion Control
APCR=
Maricopa County Air Pollution Control Regulations – Rule 310
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
Outlook
CPA2024006/Z2024072 BNSF INTERMODAL FACILITY 211TH AVE TO 235TH AVE
From Bernadette Martinez <bmartinez@azdot.gov>
Date Mon 6/17/2024 9:18 AM
To
Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>; nsobraske@gblaw.com <nsobraske@gblaw.com>
Cc
Peggy Fehlman <pfehlman@azdot.gov>; George Williams <gwilliams2@azdot.gov>; Jerome Choy
<jchoy@azdot.gov>; Damaris Gomez <dgomez3@azdot.gov>; Jody Murphy <jmurphy@azdot.gov>
RE: Notice Number: CPA2024006/Z2024072
Subject Name:BNSF INTERMODAL FACILITY
APN:
Subject Address:211TH AVE TO 235TH AVE
Thank you for the notification of the above-referenced proposed development.
ADOT is neutral on zoning matters. As such, ADOT has no concerns or comments. ADOT reserves
comment until review of the preliminary site plans and traffic impact analysis/statement (if required) for
this project. Please notify ADOT once the project is through zoning and moving forward.
ADOT traffic engineering may offer additional comments, it is recommended that the developer
ascertain if a traffic study or permit will be necessary.
Regional Traffic Engineer Contact - CentralRTE_Review@azdot.gov
Permit Encroachment Process Link - https://azdot.gov/business/permits/encroachment-permits
Permit Encroachment General Mailbox is: CentralPermit@azdot.gov
ADOT reserves the right to review any future plans, additions and/or changes to this development in
regards to any impact they may have on the State Highway System.
ADOT would like to remind the developer there is ADOT Right of Way in the area and
they must not encroach upon it without a permit. No work shall begin on ADOT right
of way until said permit is obtained.
We appreciate receiving the notice, and the opportunity to review and comment. I am happy to assist
with any other questions or concerns.
Bernadette Martinez
Transportation Construction Technician IV
Central District
2140 W. Hilton Ave, MD 700
Phoenix, AZ 85009
602.712.2086
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 1:01 PM Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov> wrote:
Hello,
The above applications have been filed in Maricopa County jurisdiction for a Major Comprehensive
Plan Amendment (CPA) and Zone Change with Overlay to IND-3 WSCO IUPD to develop an intermodal
cargo facility, logistics park, and logistics center coinciding with the bounds shown in the below image,
planning cases CPA2024006 and Z2024072, the BNSF Intermodal Facility. As a party within the area of
interest or on our enhanced notification list, this email is to make you aware of this application.
I have attached the zoning exhibit and narrative for both cases to this email. A technical advisory
committee meeting (TAC) will be held on July 2 beginning at 1:45 pm and ending at 3:15 pm. Please
let me know if you would like to attend these meetings or if you have further questions or comments
regarding this case via email.
The application materials related to the above referenced case are available for download from the
On-line Permit Manager:
https://accela.maricopa.gov/CitizenAccessMCOSS/Default.aspx
Under Planning Services select ‘Search Applications’
Enter the case numbers CPA2024006 and/or Z2024072 and click enter
New page will load with case information, at the top next to Record Info
Click on the arrow drop down and select Attachments.
Please note that materials may be unavailable through Accela after this week due to our switching of
permitting systems. They will be available on our new permitting website after June 17.
Maricopa County Logo
Joel Landis
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
301. W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003
Planner
O: 602-506-8358
MARICOPA.GOV
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube
Page | 1
Subdivision
Infrastructure
& Planning Program
301 W. Jefferson St.
Phoenix, AZ 85003
S u b d i v i si o n @m ar i co p a.g o v
esd .m ar i co p a.g o v
The Maricopa County Environmental Services Department (MCESD) has completed review
for the BNSF Intermodal planning case(s). Please note the following MCESD requirements for
site development:
Drinking Water –
Per the Safe Drinking Water Act, any water system that supplies more than 25 people or 15
service connections per day for at least 60 days per year is classified as a Public Water
System (PWS).
•
A Public Water System application and a New Source Approval application are
required and must be submitted to the MCESD’s Drinking Water Program. A water
quality analysis report will be required with submittal and is good within one-year of
testing.
An Approval to Construct application is required to be submitted to the MCESD’s Treatment
Program for all water treatment facilities.
•
For questions, please contact the Water/Wastewater Treatment Program at (602)
372-2861 or email treatmentplantprogram@maricopa.gov
An Approval to Construct application is required to be submitted to the MCESD’s
Subdivision & Infrastructure Program for all water system infrastructure.
•
For questions, please contact the Subdivision and Infrastructure Program at (602)
506-1058 or email subdivision@maricopa.gov
For additional Drinking Water related questions, please contact the Drinking Water program
at (602) 506-6935 or by email at sdwquestions@maricopa.gov.
Treatment –
An Approval to Construct application is required to be submitted to the Water/Wastewater
Treatment Program for all wastewater treatment facilities.
Project Name: BNSF Intermodal
Primary Contact Name: Susan Demmitt
Planning Application Type: Zone Change
with Overlay
APN(s): Various
Reviewer: Ryan Hall, P.E.
Email: Ryan.Hall@maricopa.gov
Phone: 602-918-1241
Planner Name: Joel Landis
Planning Case #: CPA2024006 &
Z2024072
Date: July 1, 2024
Water and Waste Management Division
Page | 2
An Aquifer Protection Permit (APP) is required for all new wastewater treatment facilities or
existing wastewater treatment facilities being modified. The Arizona Department of
Environmental Quality (ADEQ) reviews, approves and issues APPs.
•
Please contact ADEQ’s Groundwater Protection Program at (602) 771-4999 or email
azpdes@azdeq.gov for additional information about this requirement.
A Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) 208 plan certification is required if the new
wastewater facility/system is not already identified in the existing MAG 208 plan. The MAG
reviews and approves MAG 208 plan certifications.
•
Please contact MAG’s Water Quality Advisory Committee at (602) 254-6300 or
email mag@azmag.gov for additional information about this requirement.
Note:
•
A MAG 208 certification must be obtained prior to an Approval To Construct
application being submitted to the MCESD’s Treatment Program.
For treatment related questions, please contact the Water/Wastewater Treatment Program
at (602) 372-2861 or email treatmentplantprogram@maricopa.gov.
Subdivision and Infrastructure –
An Approval to Construct application is required and must be submitted to MCESD’s
Subdivision & Infrastructure Program for water, reclaimed water and/or wastewater system
infrastructure.
Design or consulting engineers should confer with the MCESD before proceeding with
detailed designs of major waste treatment works and drinking water treatment works and
infrastructure. It is advisable to submit, for preliminary consideration, Water and
Wastewater Master Plan Reports containing a general description of the proposed plant,
works, or systems.
For subdivision related questions, please contact the Subdivision and Infrastructure
Program at (602) 506-1058 or email subdivision@maricopa.gov.
Additional Notes –
*It should be noted that this document does not approve the referenced project. Comments are provided
for the benefit of the applicant for MCESD permit requirements and as an advisory to Maricopa County
Planning and Development Department. Other Maricopa County agencies may have additional
requirements. Final review and approval will be made through Planning and Development Department
procedures. Applicant may need to submit separate applications to the Maricopa County Environmental
Services Department for approval of proposed facilities regulated by the Department. Review of any such
application will be based on current regulations at the time of application.
July 30, 2024
SENT VIA EMAIL
Joseph Mueller, Planner
Martin Martell, Planner
Joel Landis, Planner
Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
301 W. Jefferson Street, Suite 170
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Subject:
CPA24003: Major Comprehensive Plan Amendment – Belmont Industrial
CPA24004: Major Comprehensive Plan Amendment – Preserve at Goldfield Ranch
CPA24005: Major Comprehensive Plan Amendment – Grande Verde Energy Solar Project
CPA24006: Major Comprehensive Plan Amendment – BNSF Intermodal Facility
Dear Mr. Mueller, Mr. Martell, and Mr. Landis:
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on Maricopa County Major Comprehensive
Plan Amendments CPA240003, CPA24004, CPA24005 and CPA24006 for industrial, rural low
density residential, solar energy, and intermodal/logistics facility projects in the county.
The Belmont Industrial major comprehensive plan amendment area is located generally north of
Interstate 10, about 40 miles west of central Phoenix, adjacent to ADOT’s preferred alignment for
I-11. If the proposed I-11 ultimately comes to fruition, the subject property will be located at the
intersection of I-10 and I-11. This proposed amendment will facilitate development of uses to
support trade and commerce.
The Preserve at Goldfield Ranch major comprehensive plan amendment area is located generally
north of State Route 87, east of the Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation. The proposed amendment
requests to change the Preserve DMP land use designation to Rural Densities, resulting in a
reduced residential density. As the amendment site area is undeveloped or developed at very
low densities, this request is compatible with surrounding area.
The Grande Verde Energy Solar project is located at the intersection of State Highway 85 and
Komatke/Gas Pipeline Road, about 10 miles south of the Town of Buckeye and 25 miles north of
Gila Bend. The proposed solar energy generation and storage project is located in a region of
high solar exposure, including other existing solar energy farms and energy production uses, and
is in proximity to adequate energy transmission infrastructure. The project should have minimal
impact on surrounding properties and generation of renewable energy would be a benefit to the
region.
The BNSF intermodal/logistics facility is located between the City of Surprise and Morristown on
the east side of U.S. Highway 60, south of State Road 74. The proposed Intermodal Facility,
Logistics Park and Logistics Center will connect with the existing road and rail networks providing
employment and economic development to the region.
Pima County Development Services Department, Planning Division has no opposition to the
proposed major comprehensive plan amendments.
Sincerely,
Anita McNamara, AICP
Senior Planner
Pima County Development Services Department, Planning Division
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
Outlook
CPA240006 Major Comprehensive Plan Amendment-Comments
From Javier Barraza <Javier.Barraza@yumacountyaz.gov>
Date Tue 7/9/2024 11:41 AM
To
Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
Mr. Landis,
The Yuma County Planning and Zoning Division has reviewed Case CPA240006. At this time, we have
no comments to offer other than the following observation: Last year the Yuma County Board of
Supervisors approved two major amendments (contiguous properties) the changed the land use to
Industrial two allow the rezoning of the properties from Rural Area-40 acre minimum to Heavy Industrial
to allow the development of an inland port within an industrial park. Inland Ports
According to Wikipedia:
Inland Ports: An inland intermodal or multimodal facility directly connected by freight rail or
highway to a seaport is known as a dry port. It operates as a hub for the shipment of sea cargo to
inland destinations. Dry ports often include value-added services such as customs clearance, trans
loading, warehousing, distribution, manufacturing, and/or facilities for the maintenance of rail
and road cargo carriers.
Many dry ports have been established as industrial parks owned and operated by private entities
and may include freight rail investment. Because they are not usually fixed locations and may
operate within non-contiguous borders, these inland ports serve as the connector between freight
rail, air cargo, and trucking shipments for both manifest and intermodal freight located in multiple
locations. They may also be a designated U.S. Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) to better meet import-
export needs.[1]
We look forward to seeing this project come to fruition.
Best regards,
Javier Barraza
Senior Planner, Planning & Zoning Division
Department of Development Services
2351 W 26th Street
Yuma, AZ 85364
Telephone: (928) 817-5150
Main Telephone: (928) 817-5000
Javier.Barraza@yumacountyaz.gov
[1]
https://gorail.org/ports/inland-ports-key-freight-rail-partners
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
Outlook
RE: TAC Meeting: CPA2024006/Z2024072 - BNSF Intermodal Facility
From RAHN, JENNIFER L CIV USAF AETC 56 FW/CVE <jennifer.rahn@us.af.mil>
Date Mon 6/17/2024 3:17 PM
To
Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
Cc
56 FW/CIT Community Initiative <56FW.CIT.CommunityInitiative@us.af.mil>
Good afternoon Mr. Landis,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on the comprehensive plan amendment and zoning application for the BNSF Intermodal Facility. This
application proposes the rezoning of 4,321 acres for the development of a rail-served intermodal facility, logistics park, and logistics center. The proposed
location is located generally between 211th and 235th Avenues to the northeast of US-60 in unincorporated Maricopa County, AZ. The parcel is outside of the
Luke AFB 1988 JLUS 65 Ldn “high noise or accident potential zone” as identified by A.R.S. § 28-8461 and is inside the “territory in the vicinity of a military airport”
also defined by A.R.S. § 28-8461.
Luke AFB follows A.R.S. § 28-8481 when evaluating compatible land use within the “territory in the vicinity of a military airport”. Subject to the results of an FAA
Obstruction Evaluation/Airport Airspace Analysis and Spectrum Analysis (OE/AAA), this request will not negatively impact the flying and base operations at Luke
AFB. However, we reserve the right to comment as the development matures and site plans become available.
If green infrastructure will be included as part of the overall development, please ensure the project is submitted for an informal review through the DoD Siting
Clearinghouse for Energy, Installations, and Environment. The project narrative may be sent to: osd.dod-siting-clearinghouse@mail.mil. This response is also
conditional upon their approval/input.
Additionally, it should be noted that certain investments and real estate transactions within the military installation footprint of Luke AFB may be subject to review
by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) to determine the effect of such transactions on the national security of the United States.
The CFIUS regulations, Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act of 2018 (FIRRMA) provisions, and related resources can be found on the Department
of the Treasury’s website: http://www.treasury.gov/cfius.
Respectfully,
Jenn Rahn
Senior Planner, Community Initiatives Team
56th Fighter Wing
Luke AFB AZ 85309
Office: 623-856-9981
DSN: 896-9981
From: Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2024 1:00 PM
Cc: nsobraske@gblaw.com; Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] TAC Meeting: CPA2024006/Z2024072 - BNSF Intermodal Facility
Hello,
The above applications have been filed in Maricopa County jurisdiction for a Major Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) and Zone Change with
Overlay to IND-3 WSCO IUPD to develop an intermodal cargo facility, logistics park, and logistics center coinciding with the bounds shown in the
below image, planning cases CPA2024006 and Z2024072, the BNSF Intermodal Facility. As a party within the area of interest or on our enhanced
notification list, this email is to make you aware of this application.
I have attached the zoning exhibit and narrative for both cases to this email. A technical advisory committee meeting (TAC) will be held on July 2
beginning at 1:45 pm and ending at 3:15 pm. Please let me know if you would like to attend these meetings or if you have further questions or
comments regarding this case via email.
The application materials related to the above referenced case are available for download from the On-line Permit Manager:
https://accela.maricopa.gov/CitizenAccessMCOSS/Default.aspx
Under Planning Services select ‘Search Applications’
Enter the case numbers CPA2024006 and/or Z2024072 and click enter
New page will load with case information, at the top next to Record Info
Click on the arrow drop down and select Attachments.
Please note that materials may be unavailable through Accela after this week due to our switching of permitting systems. They will be available on
our new permitting website after June 17.
Joel Landis
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
301. W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003
Planner
O: 602-506-8358
MARICOPA.GOV
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube
July 3, 2024
Mr. Joel Landis
Maricopa County Planner
301 W Jefferson St.
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Electronically submitted to: Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov
RE:
BNSF Intermodal Facility Major Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zoning
Change
Dear Mr. Landis:
The Arizona Game and Fish Department (Department) appreciates the opportunity to review the
BNSF Intermodal Facility Major Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zoning Change
(Project). The Project is located along US-60 within the Wickenburg Highway Scenic Corridor,
southeast of Morristown within 4,321-acres of undeveloped lands. The Project would include a
Major Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the White Tanks Grand Avenue Plan to rezone
portions of the site from Single Family Rural Scenic Corridor to Mixed Use Employment Scenic
Corridor, as well as rezone lands designated for Rural-43 to Heavy Industrial in order to
accommodate a new transportation logistics hub. The Department understands the Project would
involve the construction of multiple new buildings, the use of heavy equipment, construction of
new roads, heavy soil disturbance, construction and use of groundwater wells, and a sewer
system.
Under Title 17 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, the Department, by and through the Arizona
Game and Fish Commission, has jurisdictional authority and public trust responsibilities to
conserve and protect the state’s fish and wildlife resources. In addition, the Department manages
threatened and endangered species through authorities of Section 6 of the Endangered Species
Act and the Department’s Section 10(a)(1)(A) permit. It is the mission of the Department to
conserve and protect Arizona's diverse fish and wildlife resources and manage for safe,
compatible outdoor recreation opportunities for current and future generations. For your
consideration, the Department provides the following comments based on the agency's statutory
authorities, public trust responsibilities, and special expertise related to wildlife resources and
recreation.
The attached Arizona Online Environmental Review Tool (ERT) report (HGIS-22234) identifies
Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN), as identified in Arizona’s State Wildlife Action
Plan (SWAP), and Species of Economic and Recreational Importance that have been documented
AZGFD Comments - BNSF Intermodal facility Major Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zoning Change
July 3, 2024
Page 2
or predicted within the buffered project footprint, as well as associated best management practice
recommendations. Please note that the SWAP was recently updated, and the Department has an
interactive website, Arizona Wildlife Conservation Strategy , that includes the most recent list of
1
SGCN species statewide to help navigate and identify conservation opportunities. The following
are recommendations based on the information provided in your letter and the resources
identified in the ERT:
●
The western burrowing owl, a special status species that is regulated under the Migratory
Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), has been recorded within 2-miles of the project. If suitable
habitat for this species is present within or adjacent to the project area, the Department
recommends conducting an occupancy survey for western burrowing owls to determine if
this species occurs within the project footprint. Guidelines for conducting this survey are
found in Burrowing Owl Project Clearance Guidance for Landowners . Please note that
2
the survey should be conducted by a surveyor who is certified by the Department or has
similar training and qualifications. If an active burrowing owl burrow is detected, please
contact the Department and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
for direction, in
3
accordance with the Guidelines.
●
The Sonoran desert tortoise, which is a federal and state species of special concern, could
occur in the project area. The Department recommends conducting surveys, in
accordance with the Desert Tortoise Survey Guidelines for Environmental Consultants ,
4
to determine the presence of this species or its habitat. If tortoises are identified, please
refer to and implement the Recommended Standard Mitigation Measures for Projects in
Sonoran Desert Tortoise Habitat and Guidelines for Handling Sonoran Desert Tortoises
5
Encountered on Development Projects .
6
●
The Department recommends a qualified biologist survey for bird species within the
project area to better understand potential impacts from this project. Point counts are the
preferred method for breeding bird surveys. These surveys are conducted twice a year
during the breeding season, which is mid-January through June in this area; McLaren et
al. (2019) outline protocols. Additional surveys for Bendire’s and LeConte’s thrashers,
7
two bird species of conservation concern, are recommended; protocols are outlined in the
2024 Thrasher Clearance Protocol .
8
●
If wildlife are encountered during Project activities, the Department recommends moving
them out of harm’s way, no more than 0.25 mile outside the Project boundary within
similar habitat.
●
Maintaining habitat connectivity is a priority for the Department, and wildlife movement
corridors are important for wildlife to respond to changing environmental conditions. The
Department recommends maintaining the ephemeral washes that occur in the project area
in their natural state without fencing or other barriers to wildlife movement. These washes
8 https://drive.google.com/file/d/12KcjHlK5_x2ZoVG1xc6EiqYUCNXUmFDK/view?usp=drive_link
7 https://www.birdconservancy.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2020-Field-Protocol-for-Spatially-Balanced-Sampling.pdf
6 https://s3.amazonaws.com/azgfd-portal-wordpress/PortalImages/files/wildlife/2014%20Tortoise%20handling%20guidelines.pdf
5 https://s3.amazonaws.com/azgfd-portal-wordpress/PortalImages/files/wildlife/MitigationMeasures.pdf
4 https://s3.amazonaws.com/azgfd-portal-wordpress/PortalImages/files/wildlife/2010SurveyguidelinesForConsultants.pdf
3 https://www.fws.gov/office/arizona-ecological-services/contact-us
2 https://s3.amazonaws.com/azgfd-portal-wordpress/PortalImages/files/wildlife/nongame/eagles/BurrowingOwlClearanceProtocol_
2009.pdf
1 https://awcs.azgfd.com
AZGFD Comments - BNSF Intermodal facility Major Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zoning Change
July 3, 2024
Page 3
serve multiple functions in the ecosystem, including landscape-level conveyance corridors
for wildlife movement. Additionally, an identified Wildlife Connectivity Movement
Corridor intersects the project area. More information about those layers can be found in
the ERT report and on the Department website . Information about how these models were
9
developed and available GIS layers are linked to this website. The Department does not
typically share GIS layers but can discuss options related to specific projects.
○
Riparian areas are important movement corridors for wildlife. To the extent
possible, a minimum buffer of 100 feet should be maintained around the major
washes.
In addition, the Department provides the following overarching recommendations in regards to
habitat restoration and wildlife.
●
Please ensure the project complies with Arizona Native Plant Law regulations . A Native
10
Plant Inventory may also be needed to be conducted to identify, record, and coordinate
plant salvage efforts for species that are Protected under the Arizona Native Plant Law.
●
Minimize the potential introduction or spread of exotic invasive species, including aquatic
and terrestrial plants, animals, insects, and pathogens. Precautions should be taken to wash
and/or decontaminate all equipment utilized in the project activities before entering and
leaving the site. Please review the Arizona Department of Agriculture’s website for a list
of prohibited and restricted noxious weeds and the Arizona Native Plant Society for
recommendations on control methods. To view a list of documented invasive species or to
report invasive species in or near your project area visit iMapInvasives – a national
cloud-based application for tracking and managing invasive species.
○
To build a list: zoom to your area of interest, use the identify/measure tool to draw
a polygon around your area of interest, and select “See What’s Here” for a list of
reported species. To export the list, you must have an account and be logged in.
You can then use the export tool to draw a boundary and export the records in a csv
file.
●
Artificial lighting could impair the ability of nocturnal animals to navigate (e.g., owls,
migratory birds, bats, and other nocturnal mammals) and may affect wildlife behavior and
populations (Davies et. al. 2013 ). The Department recommends using only the minimum
11
amount of light needed for safety. If feasible, “warmer” narrow spectrum lighting (amber,
orange, red) is wildlife-friendly and should be used as often as possible to minimize the
number of species affected by lighting. It is also beneficial that all lighting is shielded,
canted, or cut to minimize the amount of upward shining light.
●
The Department’s Wildlife Compatible Fencing Guidelines
provide information on how
12
fencing impacts wildlife, ways to design fencing to prevent wildlife entanglement and
impalement, and to ensure wildlife movement is not restricted. The Department developed
these guidelines to assist landowners, project managers, land management agencies, and
others in designing wildlife compatible fences. The focus is on fence design rather than
12 https://s3.amazonaws.com/azgfd-portal-wordpress/PortalImages/files/wildlife/planningFor/wildlifeFriendly
Guidelines/110125_AGFD_fencing_guidelines.pdf
11 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3657119
10 https://agriculture.az.gov/plantsproduce/native-plants
9 https://live-azgfd-main.pantheonsite.io/wildlife-conservation/planning-for-wildlife/planning-for-wildlife-identifying-corridors
AZGFD Comments - BNSF Intermodal facility Major Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zoning Change
July 3, 2024
Page 4
detailed fence construction specifications. The goal is to provide guidance in designing a
fence that will achieve its objective with minimum impact to wildlife.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide input on the BNSF Intermodal Facility Major
Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zoning Change. For further coordination, please contact
Bobby Lamoureux at rlamoureux@azgfd.gov, or 480-262-9427
Sincerely,
Joshua Hurst
Regional Supervisor
cc:
Ginger Ritter - Project Evaluation Program Supervisor
Kelly Wolff – Habitat, Evaluation, and Lands Program Manager, Region 6
Attachment: ERT Species Report HGIS 22234
AZGFD #M24-06125135
Arizona Environmental Online Review Tool Report
Arizona Game and Fish Department Mission
To conserve Arizona's diverse wildlife resources and manage for safe, compatible outdoor recreation
opportunities for current and future generations.
Project Name:
BNSF Intermodal Facility
Project Description:
Construction of a 4321-acre logistics hub along an existing railway.
Project Type:
Development Outside Municipalities (Rural Development), Commercial/industrial (mall) and associated
infrastructure, New construction or expansion
Contact Person:
Robert Lamoureux
Organization:
Arizona Game and Fish
On Behalf Of:
AZGFD
Project ID:
HGIS-22234
Please review the entire report for project type and/or species recommendations for the location
information entered. Please retain a copy for future reference.
Page 1 of 11
Arizona Game and Fish Department
project_report_bnsf_intermodal_facility_79097_81359.pdf
Project ID: HGIS-22234
Review Date: 6/13/2024 04:03:01 PM
Disclaimer:
1. This Environmental Review is based on the project study area that was entered. The report must be
updated if the project study area, location, or the type of project changes.
2. This is a preliminary environmental screening tool. It is not a substitute for the potential knowledge
gained by having a biologist conduct a field survey of the project area. This review is also not intended to
replace environmental consultation (including federal consultation under the Endangered Species Act),
land use permitting, or the Departments review of site-specific projects.
3. The Departments Heritage Data Management System (HDMS) data is not intended to include potential
distribution of special status species. Arizona is large and diverse with plants, animals, and
environmental conditions that are ever changing. Consequently, many areas may contain species that
biologists do not know about or species previously noted in a particular area may no longer occur there.
HDMS data contains information about species occurrences that have actually been reported to the
Department. Not all of Arizona has been surveyed for special status species, and surveys that have been
conducted have varied greatly in scope and intensity. Such surveys may reveal previously
undocumented population of species of special concern.
4. Arizona Wildlife Conservation Strategy (AWCS), specifically Species of Greatest Conservation Need
(SGCN), represent potential species distribution models for the State of Arizona which are subject to
ongoing change, modification and refinement. The status of a wildlife resource can change quickly, and
the availability of new data will necessitate a refined assessment.
Locations Accuracy Disclaimer:
Project locations are assumed to be both precise and accurate for the purposes of environmental review. The
creator/owner of the Project Review Report is solely responsible for the project location and thus the correctness
of the Project Review Report content.
Page 2 of 11
Arizona Game and Fish Department
project_report_bnsf_intermodal_facility_79097_81359.pdf
Project ID: HGIS-22234
Review Date: 6/13/2024 04:03:01 PM
Recommendations Disclaimer:
1. The Department is interested in the conservation of all fish and wildlife resources, including those
species listed in this report and those that may have not been documented within the project vicinity as
well as other game and nongame wildlife.
2. Recommendations have been made by the Department, under authority of Arizona Revised Statutes
Title 5 (Amusements and Sports), 17 (Game and Fish), and 28 (Transportation).
3. Potential impacts to fish and wildlife resources may be minimized or avoided by the recommendations
generated from information submitted for your proposed project. These recommendations are preliminary
in scope, designed to provide early considerations on all species of wildlife.
4. Making this information directly available does not substitute for the Department's review of project
proposals, and should not decrease our opportunity to review and evaluate additional project information
and/or new project proposals.
5. Further coordination with the Department requires the submittal of this Environmental Review Report with
a cover letter and project plans or documentation that includes project narrative, acreage to be impacted,
how construction or project activity(s) are to be accomplished, and project locality information (including
site map). Once AGFD had received the information, please allow 30 days for completion of project
reviews. Send requests to:
Project Evaluation Program, Habitat Branch
Arizona Game and Fish Department
5000 West Carefree Highway
Phoenix, Arizona 85086-5000
Phone Number: (623) 236-7600
Fax Number: (623) 236-7366
Or
PEP@azgfd.gov
6. Coordination may also be necessary under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and/or
Endangered Species Act (ESA). Site specific recommendations may be proposed during further
NEPA/ESA analysis or through coordination with affected agencies.
Page 3 of 11
Arizona Game and Fish Department
project_report_bnsf_intermodal_facility_79097_81359.pdf
Project ID: HGIS-22234
Review Date: 6/13/2024 04:03:01 PM
Page 4 of 11
Arizona Game and Fish Department
project_report_bnsf_intermodal_facility_79097_81359.pdf
Project ID: HGIS-22234
Review Date: 6/13/2024 04:03:01 PM
Page 5 of 11
Arizona Game and Fish Department
project_report_bnsf_intermodal_facility_79097_81359.pdf
Project ID: HGIS-22234
Review Date: 6/13/2024 04:03:01 PM
Page 6 of 11
Arizona Game and Fish Department
project_report_bnsf_intermodal_facility_79097_81359.pdf
Project ID: HGIS-22234
Review Date: 6/13/2024 04:03:01 PM
Page 7 of 11
Arizona Game and Fish Department
project_report_bnsf_intermodal_facility_79097_81359.pdf
Project ID: HGIS-22234
Review Date: 6/13/2024 04:03:01 PM
Special Status Species Documented within 3 Miles of Project Vicinity
Scientific Name
Common Name
FWS
USFS
BLM
NPL
SGCN
Aspidoscelis sonorae
Sonoran Spotted Whiptail
2
Athene cunicularia hypugaea
Western Burrowing Owl
SC
S
S
2
Note: Status code definitions can be found at https://www.azgfd.com/wildlife-conservation/on-the-ground-
conservation/state-wildlife-action-plan/state-wildlife-action-plan-status-definitions/.
Special Areas Documented that Intersect with Project Footprint as Drawn
Scientific Name
Common Name
FWS
USFS
BLM
NPL
SGCN
Canis lupus baileyi
10J area Zone 2 for Mexican Wolf
LE,XN
Important Connectivity Zone
Wildlife Connectivity
Note: Status code definitions can be found at https://www.azgfd.com/wildlife-conservation/on-the-ground-
conservation/state-wildlife-action-plan/state-wildlife-action-plan-status-definitions/.
Species of Greatest Conservation Need Predicted that Intersect with Project Footprint as Drawn, based on
Predicted Range Models
Scientific Name
Common Name
FWS
USFS
BLM
NPL
SGCN
Ammospermophilus harrisii
Harris' Antelope Squirrel
Anaxyrus microscaphus
Arizona Toad
SC
S
2
Aquila chrysaetos
Golden Eagle
S
2
Artemisiospiza nevadensis
Sagebrush Sparrow
Athene cunicularia hypugaea
Western Burrowing Owl
SC
S
S
2
Auriparus flaviceps
Verdin
2
Buteo regalis
Ferruginous Hawk
SC
S
2
Calypte costae
Costa's Hummingbird
2
Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus
Cactus Wren
2
Chaetodipus baileyi
Bailey's Pocket Mouse
2
Chilomeniscus stramineus
Variable Sandsnake
2
Colaptes chrysoides
Gilded Flicker
S
2
Columbina inca
Inca Dove
2
Corynorhinus townsendii pallescens Pale Townsend's Big-eared Bat
SC
S
S
1
Empidonax wrightii
Gray Flycatcher
2
Eumops perotis californicus
Greater Western Bonneted Bat
Falco mexicanus
Prairie Falcon
2
Falco peregrinus anatum
American Peregrine Falcon
Falco sparverius
American Kestrel
2
Gopherus morafkai
Sonoran Desert Tortoise
CCA
S
S
1
Incilius alvarius
Sonoran Desert Toad
2
Lanius ludovicianus
Loggerhead Shrike
SC
2
Lasiurus blossevillii
Western Red Bat
S
2
Lasiurus cinereus
Hoary Bat
2
Page 8 of 11
Arizona Game and Fish Department
project_report_bnsf_intermodal_facility_79097_81359.pdf
Project ID: HGIS-22234
Review Date: 6/13/2024 04:03:01 PM
Species of Greatest Conservation Need Predicted that Intersect with Project Footprint as Drawn, based on
Predicted Range Models
Scientific Name
Common Name
FWS
USFS
BLM
NPL
SGCN
Lasiurus xanthinus
Western Yellow Bat
S
2
Macrotus californicus
California Leaf-nosed Bat
SC
S
2
Megascops kennicottii
Western Screech-owl
Melanerpes uropygialis
Gila Woodpecker
2
Melospiza lincolnii
Lincoln's Sparrow
2
Melozone aberti
Abert's Towhee
S
2
Micrathene whitneyi
Elf Owl
Myotis velifer
Cave Myotis
SC
S
2
Myotis yumanensis
Yuma Myotis
SC
2
Nyctinomops femorosaccus
Pocketed Free-tailed Bat
2
Parabuteo unicinctus
Harris's Hawk
2
Passerculus sandwichensis
Savannah Sparrow
2
Perognathus amplus
Arizona Pocket Mouse
2
Phrynosoma solare
Regal Horned Lizard
2
Pooecetes gramineus
Vesper Sparrow
2
Spizella breweri
Brewer's Sparrow
2
Tadarida brasiliensis
Brazilian Free-tailed Bat
Toxostoma bendirei
Bendire's Thrasher
2
Toxostoma lecontei
LeConte's Thrasher
S
2
Species of Economic and Recreation Importance Predicted that Intersect with Project Footprint as Drawn
Scientific Name
Common Name
FWS
USFS
BLM
NPL
SGCN
Callipepla gambelii
Gambel's Quail
Odocoileus hemionus
Mule Deer
Pecari tajacu
Javelina
Puma concolor
Mountain Lion
Zenaida asiatica
White-winged Dove
Zenaida macroura
Mourning Dove
Page 9 of 11
Arizona Game and Fish Department
project_report_bnsf_intermodal_facility_79097_81359.pdf
Project ID: HGIS-22234
Review Date: 6/13/2024 04:03:01 PM
Project Type: Development Outside Municipalities (Rural Development), Commercial/industrial (mall) and
associated infrastructure, New construction or expansion
Project Type Recommendations:
During the planning stages of your project, please consider the local or regional needs of wildlife in regards to movement,
connectivity, and access to habitat needs. Loss of this permeability prevents wildlife from accessing resources, finding
mates, reduces gene flow, prevents wildlife from re-colonizing areas where local extirpations may have occurred, and
ultimately prevents wildlife from contributing to ecosystem functions, such as pollination, seed dispersal, control of prey
numbers, and resistance to invasive species. In many cases, streams and washes provide natural movement corridors
for wildlife and should be maintained in their natural state. Uplands also support a large diversity of species, and should
be contained within important wildlife movement corridors. In addition, maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem functions
can be facilitated through improving designs of structures, fences, roadways, and culverts to promote passage for a
variety of wildlife. Guidelines for many of these can be found
at: https://www.azgfd.com/wildlife-conservation/planning-for-wildlife/planning-for-wildlife-wildlife-friendly-guidelines/.
Consider impacts of outdoor lighting on wildlife and develop measures or alternatives that can be taken to increase
human safety while minimizing potential impacts to wildlife. Conduct wildlife surveys to determine species within project
area, and evaluate proposed activities based on species biology and natural history to determine if artificial lighting may
disrupt behavior patterns or habitat use. Use only the minimum amount of light needed for safety. Narrow spectrum bulbs
should be used as often as possible to lower the range of species affected by lighting. All lighting should be shielded,
canted, or cut to ensure that light reaches only areas needing illumination.
Minimize the potential introduction or spread of exotic invasive species, including aquatic and terrestrial plants, animals,
insects and pathogens. Precautions should be taken to wash and/or decontaminate all equipment utilized in the project
activities before entering and leaving the site. See the Arizona Department of Agriculture website for a list of prohibited
and restricted noxious weeds at https://www.invasivespeciesinfo.gov/unitedstates/az.shtml and the Arizona Native Plant
Society https://aznps.com/invas for recommendations on how to control. To view a list of documented invasive species or
to report invasive species in or near your project area visit iMapInvasives - a national cloud-based application for tracking
and managing invasive species at https://imap.natureserve.org/imap/services/page/map.html.
To build a list: zoom to your area of interest, use the identify/measure tool to draw a polygon around your area of
interest, and select “See What’s Here” for a list of reported species. To export the list, you must have an
account and be logged in. You can then use the export tool to draw a boundary and export the records in a csv
file.
Minimization and mitigation of impacts to wildlife and fish species due to changes in water quality, quantity, chemistry,
temperature, and alteration to flow regimes (timing, magnitude, duration, and frequency of floods) should be evaluated.
Minimize impacts to springs, in-stream flow, and consider irrigation improvements to decrease water use. If dredging is a
project component, consider timing of the project in order to minimize impacts to spawning fish and other aquatic species
(include spawning seasons), and to reduce spread of exotic invasive species. We recommend early direct coordination
with Project Evaluation Program for projects that could impact water resources, wetlands, streams, springs, and/or
riparian habitats.
The Department recommends that wildlife surveys are conducted to determine if noise-sensitive species occur within the
project area. Avoidance or minimization measures could include conducting project activities outside of breeding
seasons.
Based on the project type entered, coordination with State Historic Preservation Office may be required
(https://azstateparks.com/).
Trenches should be covered or back-filled as soon as possible. Incorporate escape ramps in ditches or fencing along the
perimeter to deter small mammals and herpetofauna (snakes, lizards, tortoise) from entering ditches.
Page 10 of 11
Arizona Game and Fish Department
project_report_bnsf_intermodal_facility_79097_81359.pdf
Project ID: HGIS-22234
Review Date: 6/13/2024 04:03:01 PM
Communities can actively support the sustainability and mobility of wildlife by incorporating wildlife planning into their
regional/comprehensive plans, their regional transportation plans, and their open space/conservation land system
programs. An effective approach to wildlife planning begins with the identification of the wildlife resources in need of
protection, an assessment of important habitat blocks and connective corridors, and the incorporation of these critical
wildlife components into the community plans and programs. Community planners should identify open spaces and
habitat blocks that can be maintained in their area, and the necessary connections between those blocks to be preserved
or protected. Community planners should also work with State and local transportation planning entities, and planners
from other communities, to foster coordination and cooperation in developing compatible development plans to ensure
wildlife habitat connectivity. The Department's guidelines for incorporating wildlife considerations into community
planning and developments can be found on the Wildlife Friendly Guidelines portion of the Wildlife Planning
page at https://www.azgfd.com/wildlife-conservation/planning-for-wildlife/planning-for-wildlife-wildlife-friendly-guidelines/.
Based on the project type entered, coordination with Arizona Department of Environmental Quality may be required
(http://www.azdeq.gov/).
Based on the project type entered, coordination with Arizona Department of Water Resources may be required
(https://new.azwater.gov/).
Based on the project type entered, coordination with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers may be required
(http://www.usace.army.mil/).
Based on the project type entered, coordination with County Flood Control district(s) may be required.
Development plans should provide for open natural space for wildlife movement, while also minimizing the potential for
wildlife-human interactions through design features. Please contact Project Evaluation Program for more information on
living with urban wildlife at PEP@azgfd.gov or
at https://www.azgfd.com/wildlife-conservation/planning-for-wildlife/project-evaluation-program/ and
https://www.azgfd.com/wildlife-conservation/planning-for-wildlife/planning-for-wildlife-wildlife-friendly-guidelines/.
The Department requests further coordination to provide project/species specific recommendations, please
contact Project Evaluation Program directly at PEP@azgfd.gov.
Project Location and/or Species Recommendations:
Analysis indicates that your project is located in the vicinity of an identified wildlife habitat connectivity feature.
The Statewide Wildlife Connectivity Assessment’s Important Connectivity Zones (ICZs) represent general areas
throughout the landscape which contribute the most to permeability of the whole landscape. ICZs may be used to help
identify, in part, areas where more discrete corridor modeling ought to occur. The reports provide recommendations for
opportunities to preserve or enhance permeability. Project planning and implementation efforts should focus on
maintaining and improving opportunities for wildlife permeability. For information pertaining to the linkage assessment
and wildlife species that may be affected, please refer
to: https://s3.amazonaws.com/azgfd-portal-wordpress/azgfd.wp/wp-
content/uploads/0001/01/23120719/ALIWCA_Final_Report_Perkl_2013_lowres.pdf.
Please contact the Project Evaluation Program (pep@azgfd.gov) for specific project recommendations.
HDMS records indicate that Western Burrowing Owls have been documented within the vicinity of your project area.
Please review the western burrowing owl resource page at https://www.azgfd.com/wildlife-conservation/conservation-and-
endangered-species-programs/burrowing-owl-management/.
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Page 11 of 11
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
Re: [EXTERNAL:] TAC Meeting: CPA2024006/Z2024072 - BNSF Intermodal Facility
Robert Olmstead <Rolmstead@AFMA.Az.gov>
Tue 6/11/2024 3:05 PM
To:Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
Joel,
Please include me on the TAC meeting. AFMA is supportive of this project with the following comments;
The project is not currently within the boundaries of the North County Fire & Medical District, and
would need to annex into the District in order for AFMA to be the AHJ.
Any project would need to comply with IFC 2018 and the local amendments of the North County
Fire & Medical District.
Thank you,
Robert Olmstead
This message is intended only for the named recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), you are
notified that the dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you receive this
message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the sender either at the above e-mail
address or telephone the Arizona Fire & Medical Authority (AFMA) at (623) 544-5400. Thank You.
To ensure compliance with Arizona's open meeting laws, members of the North County, South County and/or
Arizona Fire & Medical Authority's Board of Directors who have received this message may reply directly to
the sender but must not correspond with or send a copy of their reply regarding this message to any other
members of their respective Board(s). Recipients of this message who are not Board members must not
forward this message to any of the North County, South County or AFMA Board Members.
From: Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2024 1:00 PM
Cc: nsobraske@gblaw.com <nsobraske@gblaw.com>; Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
Subject: [EXTERNAL:] TAC Meeting: CPA2024006/Z2024072 - BNSF Intermodal Facility
WARNING: This email originated from outside of AFMA. DO NOT respond, click links or open attachments unless you can
verify this outside sender and trust that the content is safe.
Hello,
The above applications have been filed in Maricopa County jurisdiction for a Major Comprehensive Plan
Amendment (CPA) and Zone Change with Overlay to IND-3 WSCO IUPD to develop an intermodal cargo
facility, logistics park, and logistics center coinciding with the bounds shown in the below image,
planning cases CPA2024006 and Z2024072, the BNSF Intermodal Facility. As a party within the area of
interest or on our enhanced notification list, this email is to make you aware of this application.
I have attached the zoning exhibit and narrative for both cases to this email. A technical advisory
committee meeting (TAC) will be held on July 2 beginning at 1:45 pm and ending at 3:15 pm. Please let
me know if you would like to attend these meetings or if you have further questions or comments
regarding this case via email.
The application materials related to the above referenced case are available for download from the On-
line Permit Manager:
https://accela.maricopa.gov/CitizenAccessMCOSS/Default.aspx
Under Planning Services select ‘Search Applications’
Enter the case numbers CPA2024006 and/or Z2024072 and click enter
New page will load with case information, at the top next to Record Info
Click on the arrow drop down and select Attachments.
Please note that materials may be unavailable through Accela after this week due to our switching of
permitting systems. They will be available on our new permitting website after June 17.
Maricopa County Logo
Joel Landis
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
301. W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003
Planner
O: 602-506-8358
MARICOPA.GOV
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
NO to BNSF
Mariles, Adela <Adela.Mariles@Dignitymemorial.com>
Tue 7/2/2024 12:03 PM
To:Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
Hi Joel,
I am opposed to the BNSF. I work in Sun City. North of the railroad tracks. With the increase amount of trains that
will make a negative impact on myself. As is the highway has an increase of vehicles and now adding a longer wait
to get to our destination will not work. I have family members that have medical attention in the medical facilities
on the north side of the tracks. That is also hard on them and it can be on a matter of life or death.
We do not need more negativity than what we have already. This will just aggravate the situation even more.
Please refrain from this negativity, from this mess.
Think about the harm that you’d be causing. You may not care cause it will not affect you or your wallet. There’s
tons others that will be affected by this irrational decision.
NO! to BNSF.
ADELA MARILES
Office
Manager
O 623.933.0161 F 623.933.2682
Sunland Memorial Park, Mortuary
and Cremation Center
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from
new senders. Always validate the sender first.
Re: BNSF Intermodal Facility Zoning Hearing
Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
Tue 7/2/2024 10:20 AM
To:Al Reece <alan.reece51@gmail.com>
Hello,
Thank you, received.
Joel Landis
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
301. W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003
Planner
O: 602-506-8358
MARICOPA.GOV
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube
From: Al Reece <alan.reece51@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2024 10:16 AM
To: Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
Subject: BNSF Intermodal Facility Zoning Hearing
Hello Joel,
My name is Alan Reece and I would like to express my opposition to the BNSF Intermodal Facility,
Logistics Park and Logistics Center that is proposed for the Wittmann area. I have been a resident of
Circle City for the past 41 years. During that time, I have witnessed the significant growth that has taken
place along the US 60 corridor between Phoenix and Wickenburg. This growth has resulted in Grand
Avenue having reached its maximum traffic capacity. The corridor will be strained to accommodate the
additional truck traffic that would be generated by the BNSF project.
I have also seen the effect of recent development on the limited groundwater resources, whose capacity
to sustain additional growth is under threat. Proposed residential developments in the area have been
put on hold because they are unable to provide an assured water supply. The BNSF project would
further exacerbate this problem.
There is no noise mitigation for communities such as Wittmann, Circle City and Morristown to cushion
against the noise the facility's 24-hour-a-day activities and the resulting truck and rail traffic will
generate.
All these issues will have an extremely negative effect on the lifestyle of the residents in the vicinity of
the proposed facility. For these reasons, I oppose the construction of the BNSF Intermodal Facility,
Logistics Park and Logistics Center in Wittmann. Thank you very much for the opportunity to express my
views on this issue.
Respectfully submitted,
Alan Reece
149 Peretz Circle
Circle City, AZ 85342
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from
new senders. Always validate the sender first.
35428 N 220th Lane Auza
Studium LLC <studiumllc@gmail.com>
Tue 7/2/2024 12:51 PM
To:Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
Good afternoon,
I hope this email finds you well. We received a notice regarding the BNSF. We do not agree with the project and if it should go forward
since our property is being wrapped around we should be bought out. Our property has been worked on since we purchased it in 2015 to
increase the value and the value has now decreased due to your project. Please contact me immediately for additional discussions
Stefanie Auza
Steven Auza
V/r
Stefanie
Stefanie Neuman
Retired Petty Officer U.S. Coast Guard/Certified Process Server/Notary/Paralegal/Private Investigator
www.studiumllc.com
Member of :
FAPPS (Florida Association of Professional Process Servers)
License CPS # 16-806422
License C 1800485
License A 1900248
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from
new senders. Always validate the sender first.
BNSF
Barbara Bowman <barbbowman13@gmail.com>
Mon 7/1/2024 10:40 PM
To:Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
Mr Landis,
Please vote no to BNSF. They have room to expand at their facility closer to Phoenix. This facility in Wittmann is alarmingly close to our
elementary school. It will bring in light pollution, noise, extra traffic congestion, and invite a criminal element along with the industrial
facilities.
We, the residents of Wittmann, enjoy the rural life, the slower pace, and the beautiful night sky. Please don't vote to allow this invasion of
big industry to our lovely community.
Sincerely,
Barbara Bowman
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from
new senders. Always validate the sender first.
BNSF rail rezoning NO
Barbara Ervin <bervinski7@yahoo.com>
Mon 7/1/2024 7:27 PM
To:Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
Dear Mr. Landis,
Please do not allow the rezoning for the proposed BNSF railroad. Traffic on the 60 is terrible and dangerous already, just look at the number
of accidents from Wittmann to the 303, and with additional semi trucks and workers vehicles it will be even more unsafe.
Water supply is already in jeopardy and the noise from the yard will impact the area homeowners. The residents live stock and wildlife will
also be impacted. Keep this area rural.
Barbara Ervin
20740 W. Madre Del Oro Dr.
Wittmann, AZ 85361
Sent from my iPhone
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from
new senders. Always validate the sender first.
BNSF
Beverly Lambert <sunshinehugs1@aol.com>
Tue 7/2/2024 1:56 AM
To:Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
Please vote no to BNSF in Wittmann/ Morristown
Thank you
Steve and Beverly Lambert
22931 W Peakview Rd
Wittmann, AZ. 85361
Sent from my iPhone
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from
new senders. Always validate the sender first.
BNSF objection
Bonnie Carmin <bcarmin@collinscom.net>
Fri 7/19/2024 2:34 PM
To:Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
July 1, 2024
Dear Maricopa County Planning and Zoning Department,
We are writing this to you because we, and many others Maricopa County residents that live in the vicinity of the
proposed BNSF Intermodal Facility, STRONGLY oppose this facility and the impact to our rural residential area.
FACTS ABOUT BNSF:
BNSF has lied repeatedly about their intentions for this land purchased to the public at their meetings with
the community and to the City of Surprise
One week after the purchase of this land was made public, representatives for BNSF gave interviews with
numerous publications with their intention of building the largest Intermodal Facility to date. Even when
confronted with this information, BNSF refused to be forthcoming.
BNSF has one of the worst records when it comes to safety, derailments, most occurring in their own
Intermodal Facilities. Hazmat materials aren't disclosed on their trains running through our towns, cities
and states, yet first responders and the cities are told to use an app if they want to know.
Numerous environmental agencies have reported the health dangers as well as dangers to the environment
that these facilities pose. These Class 1 railroads have found loopholes in the clean air regulations for
locomotives, using the older, non-clean air, carbon spewing locomotive IN the intermodal facilities, such as
this one, because they can no longer be used for long-haul activities.
The public and the City of Surprise has asked them numerous times as to the studies we have requested
before any zoning changes were requested and approved, and again, BNSF has failed to be that "Good
Neighbor" and answer any of the questions as to their plans for security and fire protection.
Every time any of this has been brought up to them, BNSF has danced around the subject, stating they
don't know what they will be doing, so they don't have the studies, so nothing has been done. Yet, workers
are there EVERY DAY, with their trucks going in and out, working on that land.
BNSF has a LONG history of ignoring laws regarding safety, a history of poor maintenance on the tracks and
trains, breaking agreements with cities and tribes, shown a lack of respect and pure dishonesty and just
pays their fines that are imposed on them and goes on their merry way to continue doing what they do,
because revenue is more important than people's lives.
BNSF and UP have led the fight against the Federal Government for stricter safety regulations of trains and
their length. Recent studies have shown that the longer the train, the chances of derailments increase.
Research shows that BNSF utilizes local fire and police for their emergencies and security. We don't have
that kind of resource for them to cover their facility PLUS maintain the safety and security of the public
outside the BNSF footprint. We are lucky if there is an officer within 20 minutes of where we need them to
be when we do need them.
NEGATIVE IMPACT TO THE COMMUNITY:
Studies show higher cancers rates, higher rates of congestive heart failure, higher rates of asthma, adverse
effects such as lower grades, missed days due to health and breathing issues on students whose schools
and homes that are in the vicinity of these types of facilities. (We have 3 that will be in the vicinity),
property values decrease significantly around these areas.
Arizona is in a drought. Studies show that these facilities, with their DAILY dust control, storage tanks for
water, daily washing of their locomotives and cleaning out of their Hazmat tanks use an obscene amount of
water. A few years ago, this same property had an application submitted to the county to build a residential
development of 5000 home but was denied due to the water feasibility study that showed it could not hold
up to the 100-year water requirements. Why is that denied but an industrial facility that will use even more
water being considered?
We have requested the reports from the Army Corps of Engineers for the washes that run through the 6.5
miles of land that they purchased. (Some parcels require FEMA required studies for 100-year flood studies).
We have asked for the ADOT traffic studies since the current roads cannot handle the current amount of
traffic let alone the influx of hundreds of tractor trailers daily.
We have asked for the dust control plans, since, well, we do live in the desert and well, we have dust, what
are their plans to keep the dust down at this facility- again, going back to the water issue, how much water
will it take daily, to keep the dust under control, studies from the EPA on the Air Quality (currently Maricopa
County has an "F" rating and has for the last number of years)
We have asked for the water feasibility studies since this sits on top of the aquifer that provides water to
the communities of Morristown, Circle City, Wittmann and Surprise.
We have asked for the study form AZ Fish and Game for the wildlife study and to see if there are any
protected and endangered species on this land.
We have asked for the projected numbers of the increase of trains and trucks that will be going through the
area.
Maricopa County for the last 8 years has received an F when it comes to air quality. Studies show that these
Intermodal Facilities, with their idling trains and trucks will only increase the pollutants, carbon particulates
and other toxic pollutants into our already horrible air quality.
The quantity of jobs at their facilities isn't great enough to warrant the destruction of
endangered/protected wildlife, the quality and quantity of water, the air quality and health and safety of
your residents. Studies show that most of these facilities employ under 500 employees, most under 100 as
they are all mostly automated and specialized jobs such as locomotive mechanic.
The increased truck traffic on Grand Avenue, the 303, the 93 and 74 will be out of control. The intersection
of Grand/303/163rd Avenue already cannot handle the number of vehicles that it already has. Imagine
adding an additional 800 semi-trucks daily. Currently, there is a minimum of 1 major accident at the
intersection a week, sometimes multiple times a day in that intersection. The trucks have no regard for the
lower speed limits at Center Street and Grand Avenue and the one at the intersection of Grand and the 74.
Daily they run the lights and stop signs at those intersections, with little regard for human life as they blow
through them at approximately 60-80 MPH. Currently the speed limit in Wittmann is 45 MPH.
Two of the major hospitals in the area (Banner Del Webb and Banner Boswell) can only be accessed from
Grand Avenue by crossing the railroad tracks.
The Rose fire outside Wickenburg, which is still under investigation, was possibly caused by BNSF
employees welding on the track where the fire started and with no safety measures taken.
This project, which research shows has been in the works for years, maybe a plus for BNSF, for big
businesses locating to Arizona, but it is not a good fit or a beneficial plan for these communities, the county
residents, the environment, the wildlife, the public and visitors traveling on our roads, our first responders,
our air or our water.
We strongly request that you seriously consider and weigh the pros and cons of your decision and make the
right choice for your residents, the environment and your natural resources and not be swayed by the
bullying tactics that BNSF is frequently known for to get their way.
Respectfully,
Concerned Maricopa County Residents
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from
new senders. Always validate the sender first.
Re: BNSF objection
Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
Fri 7/19/2024 2:28 PM
To:Bonnie Carmin <bcarmin@collinscom.net>
Hello,
Thank you, received.
Joel Landis
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
301. W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003
Planner
O: 602-506-8358
MARICOPA.GOV
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube
From: Bonnie Carmin <bcarmin@collinscom.net>
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2024 2:18 PM
To: Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
Subject: BNSF objection
We live off of the 211th area north of Wittmann. We bought in this area for the peace and quiet of rural living based on
past county development requirements. Please require Burlington northern to excavate so their tallest light, structure,
and sound generating operation is below existing grade. Please also require them to build an earthen sound and light
attenuation berm 20’ above any light, structure, or sound producing device or equipment. This earthen berm should
surround the entire property boundary with no gaps for sound and light pollution. Also please require them to pay for
traffic improvements along the 60 from the 303 through Wickenburg, along 211th, and the 74 from I17 to the 60. Also
limit BNSF from using any existing dirt roads to residential and agricultural properties as access for construction or
future corridors for operational traffic. They must be required to access off current paved roads for construction and
operations.
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from
new senders. Always validate the sender first.
Zoning plan for Wittmann and Morristown
Carrie Winter <carriew1968@gmail.com>
Mon 7/1/2024 3:43 PM
To:Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
I am a resident of Wittmann and the proposed BNSF hub will be very close to my home, basically in my front yard.
We live out here because we love the quiet and peaceful area we live in, BNSF will virtually destroy the way of life we have built. The size of
the hub and the location will be a huge intrusion to our neighborhood, not to mention our property values.
The size of the facility indicates that it will run 24/7. Bright lights and loud noises will be a constant in our once quiet area.
The building of this hub will also bring more housing developments and retail to our area as well as more traffic on an
already challenging roadway, while some see that as a revenue boon, those of us who live out here do so to escape the congestion of the
city. We do not want that dragged into our community.
We absolutely DO NOT want this rezoning to happen. We DO NOT want BNSF building their hub this close to our home. We DO NOT want
the intrusion that this will bring to our way of life.
Our voices need to be heard and need to override the economic factor.
I am not naive, I understand that BNSF is a huge company with resources that outweigh the people of our community but we have to fight
for this, for our homes, for our way of life and for our future.
Richard and Carrie Winter
22074 W Galvin
Wittmann AZ 85361
(623)826-7061
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from
new senders. Always validate the sender first.
Stop BNSF's destruction
Catherine Woillard <cjwoillard@yahoo.com>
Tue 7/2/2024 8:07 AM
To:Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
1 attachments (1 MB)
floodplain wittman.jpg;
Good Morning, Mr. Landis:
I am writing on behalf of not only myself and my family but the residents of the tiny town of
Wittmann, Arizona. BNSF sent out their plans of development on the 4,000+acres which has
raised many concerns as a homeowner and the negative impact these plans will have on the
community and environment. I am imploring upon Maricopa County and our representatives to
take action to intervene on the monstrosity that BNSF wishes to build. i reside directly off of
211th street on Caravaggio, between the 74 & 60. Concerns are as follows:
1. Creating an Island with my neighborhood: With BNSF's plans to use this land for
commercial purposes will literally turn my neighborhood into a tiny island, surrounded on
all four sides by commercial property as we already have the race track property on the
east-side of 211th. BNSF will completely surround our neighborhood on the West, North,
& South sides of our neighborhood which I understand that there are laws pertaining to
real estate that are supposed to prohibit this type of building.
2. Waterways & floodplains: some over 100 years old which are not supposed to be
touched will be tampered, intercepted, and re-routed: I have attached the flood plains
map currently on file which clearly shows they run North-South through the 4,000+
acreage that BNSF's intermodal and logistics park plans to sit directly on top of. They
actually course around and/or between homes. In the monsoons season, I have a river
that runs through my property already. With their limitless pockets, BNSF clearly does not
view waterways as an issue. BNSF's building plans will significantly alter these
waterways & floodplains, forcing them to shift and create new paths which will ultimately
force them to carve out paths through our properties, wash away landscaping, fill, erode
structures, and other damage. Additionally, my hazard insurance is approved based on
this map, that my home is not in a floodplain. Altering these waterways will increase our
home insurance costs, cause severe damage to our properties and create a financial
burden to us.
3. Endangered/Protected Species: BNSF's 4,000 acres disrupts the habitats and threatens
species that are protected and/or endangered. The Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (a
small bird in our community) and the Sonoran Desert Tortoise both are seen in this
neighborhood. Additionally, there are a myriad of other animal wildlife that reside here
whose habitats are being threatened by BNSF's plans - pollutants from their railroad
trains, machinery, oil, noise pollution, spills, leaks, road construction, and the thousands of
semi trucks will invade this quiet community and the natural habitats for the wildlife. (I
have included paragraphs from the Arizona Conservation Wildlife Strategy that note this)
4. Saguaro Cactus: When I moved to Wittmann, I was told that the saguaro cactus is a
protected plant and that I cannot cut them down. I can only move them on my property.
My question is: what is BNSF going to do with the thousands of saguaro cacti inhabiting
that land and will they be held to the same the regulations and laws?
5. Damage to existing roads and the ongoing expense to the City/County: There is
already a heavy flow of construction trucks, semi's that travel up and down 211th Street as
they make their way to the various construction sites. Potholes continually form from the
weight of these vehicles as they tear up the streets. Crews are sent out regularly to patch
the damage only to have the same trucks chew up the same potholes. The 60 was just
re-paved I'm sure at an extreme expense and yet BNSF is being allowed to flood the
roads with even more traffic, semi's and construction trucks. The cost to the City will be
exponential which trickles down to the residents who will then be required to pay taxes to
support this spike in necessary spending on infrastructure. I can assure you that
taxpayers do not wish to have increased taxes on a project that is already not welcome.
6. Contaminating our Water wells: We are all on a well in this remote area and with trains,
depots, intermodal and logistics parks comes oil spills, toxins, and other pollutants that will
be absorbed in the land and then contaminate the water flows underground and get into
our wells. This leads to illnesses (some terminal) and subsequent lawsuits. Not to
mention, the multiple residents here with livestock and horses who are often used to
generate income for their families, rely on their livestock to stay healthy. Sick horses and
cattle is not cheap. Again with BNSF's deep pockets, are they really going to pay heed to
these standard problems and ensure that our environment, water, and the wildlife habitats
are not harmed? And given that Maricopa County has approved for BNSF to move in and
appears to care more about the money and doing little to protect the residents of these
neighborhoods, I can foresee lawsuits brought against BNSF and Maricopa County for
negligence.
7. Killing home values: Our home values will drop significantly. People who live in
Wittmann came here for the rural lifestyle, the views of the mountains, the peaceful
surroundings, and lack of industrial and commercial operations. They have horses,
livestock, go roping, and farming. Faced with well contamination, floodplains damaging
properties & increasing insurance costs and/or jeopardizing one's ability to obtain
insurance, compounded with the eye-sore of BNSF's industrial plans to put in
warehouses, distribution centers, intermodal center in our backyard will absolutely kill our
home value.
8. Tax Increases to the Community: With BNSF's plans to move in, how do the expenses
of needing to maintain infrastructure, roads, lights, impact the residents? Is Maricopa
County planning on putting this expense on the residents through taxation, fees, increase
of cost-of-living, to support the BNSF destruction? Or is BNSF expected to absorb these
costs? What is BNSF's plan to obtain their own water? Will the County or City of Surprise
be required to tap into city water for BNSF or does BNSF plan to tap into our water? And
who plans on covering all of those expenses? The City? Further, My well cannot support
more than 6-7 residential homes and considering that BNSF will literally be building in my
backyard, I can anticipate that my well be severely compromised, both in having sufficient
water as well as the first water to be poisoned.
It appears Maricopa County has done nothing to address these matters with BNSF. Otherwise,
we would be looking at different plans from BNSF. BNSF is trying to disguise their plans by
requesting a mixed employment zone. Maricopa County has already allowed this mis-labeling
on most of the acreage. But we all know that these are industrial plans with high risk and
potentially life-threatening harm to the residents of Wittman. It is negligent on the part of
Maricopa County to turn a blind eye and not challenge BNSF's plans to contaminate the land.
Further, to allow BNSF to slide plans through as "employment" rather than the truth and to call it
what it is misleading and far from transparent.
I am a very concerned resident and am imploring for the County to step in, and do what's right:
to protect residents of Wittmann, Surprise, Morristown and other surrounding cities, protect the
habitats and wildlife of this neighborhoor. I am imploring that Berkshire Hathaway (who owns
BNSF) to consider alternatives with their plans that will actually support the community rather
than destroy it.
Best regards
Catherine Vuksanovic
*According to the Arizona Conservation Wildlife Strategy Website: "While human and wildlife
safety concerns are of highest priority, construction and modification of transportation corridors
present additional ecological challenges. Ground disturbance associated with roadway
construction, and vehicles traveling on the roadways once operational, can introduce or spread
invasive plant species across right-of-ways and onto adjacent lands. Pollution by toxins,
nutrients, and noise from the transportation corridor can create edge effects on adjacent
hydrology and microclimate, reducing the suitability of the remaining habitats (Murcia 1995;
Reijnen et al. 1995; Boarman and Sazaki 2006; Eigenbrod et al. 2009; Parris and Schneider 2009).
These effects spread into the surrounding landscape and contribute to the loss and degradation
of natural habitat several times larger than the area of the road footprint itself. The effects are
influenced by road and traffic characteristics, landscape topography and hydrology, wind, and
vegetation. In addition, the resulting impacts on wildlife also depend on the sensitivity of the
species in the vicinity.
Road and bridge construction can also directly influence stream characteristics, such as channel
and floodplain configuration, substrate embeddedness, riparian condition, relative prevalence of
woody debris, stream flow rate, and temperature regime (Furniss et al. 1991). The timing,
quantity, quality and location of surface water runoff can change as roadways and related
drainage structures act to intercept, collect, and/or divert water. These factors can accelerate
water delivery and surface flow, thereby increasing the potential for higher magnitude of runoff
in watersheds having roadway developments as compared to those not having such
developments (Wemple et al. 1996).
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from
new senders. Always validate the sender first.
Outlook
Oppose BNSF Rezoning
From Chuck Donnelly <donnelly.farms@outlook.com>
Date Sun 9/22/2024 10:09 AM
To
Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
Joel
My wife and I, own property near 218th avenue and Galvin. We were planning on building our retirement home
starting this fall. Those plans have been put on hold due to BNSF rezoning request.
Initially, I was optimistic that BNSF would do the right thing in protecting the lifestyle and property values of the
existing residences, but after their community meeting on September 4th, I have lost all confidence that this will
occur. They have no plans for protecting the people against noise or light pollution. No setbacks next to
residential property. Railroad tracks and large commercial building only a few hundred feet from existing homes.
No new infrastructure outside of their property borders. Thousands of additional trucks traveling on 211th
avenue daily.
How could anyone think it is a good idea to take residential property, that virtually surrounds and existing
community, and convert it to Heavy, Heavy Industrial property. BNSF railroad has access to hundreds of
thousands of acres that they could develop that would have no impact on existing communities. Why allow them
to destroy our community.
Do you think that any of BNSF’s lawyers, corporate personnel, engineers, or Chicago based developers working on
the project would be willing to live in this neighborhood after completion? Do you think anybody on the
Maricopa Planning and zoning committee would be willing to live in this neighborhood? Do you think anybody on
the Maricopa County board would be willing to live in this neighborhood?
You answer these questions, and you’ll understand why this rezoning is such a horrible idea!
Chuck Donnelly
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from
new senders. Always validate the sender first.
Re: Oppose BNSF
Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
Wed 7/10/2024 12:57 PM
To:Colleen Watson <cgtrin02@yahoo.com>
Hello,
Thank you, received.
Joel Landis
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
301. W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003
Planner
O: 602-506-8358
MARICOPA.GOV
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube
From: Colleen Watson <cgtrin02@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2024 12:47 PM
To: Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
Subject: Oppose BNSF
I oppose BNSF and vote NO to allowing them in the area.
Joe, I live off of the 211th area north of Wittmann. We bought in this area for the peace and quiet of rural living based on past county
development requirements. Please require Burlington northern to excavate so their tallest light, structure, and sound generating operation is
below existing grade. Please also require them to build an earthen sound and light attenuation berm 20’ above any light, structure, or sound
producing device or equipment. This earthen berm should surround the entire property boundary with no gaps for sound and light pollution.
Also please require them to pay for traffic improvements along the 60 from the 303 through Wickenburg, along 211th, and the 74 from I17 to
the 60. Also limit BNSF from using any existing dirt roads to residential and agricultural properties as access for construction or future
corridors for operational traffic. They must be required to access off current paved roads for construction and operations.
Thank you,
Colleen W. Lambert
Sent from my iPhone
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from
new senders. Always validate the sender first.
BNSF
Daniel Crowe <Daniel.Crowe@jmagroup.com>
Mon 7/1/2024 10:36 PM
To:Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
Good Evening Joel,
Please. Anything you can do to prevent BNSF from developing in Wittmann would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
Daniel Crowe
Dealer Performance Manager
Jim Moran & Associates, Inc.
100 Jim Moran Blvd.
Deerfield Beach, FL 33442
p: [480]381-2486 f: [954]596-7955
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
This e-mail transmission contains information intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. Further, it contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or
copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your mail system. Thank you for your compliance.
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from
new senders. Always validate the sender first.
BNSF Railplex - Wittman
Debbie Zimmerman <wizfourfam@cox.net>
Tue 6/25/2024 11:01 AM
To:Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
Mr. Landis,
I am against building the BNSF Railplex in Wittman. I have lived in Asante since 2019. The area
roads cannot handle the additional truck and related vehicle traffic created from suppliers and
employees. Grand Ave from the 303 to Wittman is a hot mess. It has frequent stopped traffic, fatal
accidents and unsafe driving conditions. You cannot stuff all of those additional vehicles onto Grand
Ave, via 303/Grand freeway exits that are already inadequate to handle current vehicle traffic. The
State of Arizona consistently states there is no money to improve the road.
The road infrastructure is already overwhelmed and inadequate to handle the additional truck and
vehicle traffic this facility will create. The noise from the additional train activity will also negatively
impact the areas quality of life due to traffic tie ups and congestion and noise. Just say NO to the
BNSF Railplex in Wittman.
Thank you,
Deborah Zimmerman
16782 W Montana De Oro Dr
Surprise, AZ. 85387
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad
Inquiry #: 80303
Status: Completed
Request Date: 7/2/2024 12:14:43 PM
Inquiry Type: Land Use Planning and Zoning Applications
Customer: Dennis Yost
Address: 30710 N. 229th Ave, Wittmann, AZ, 85361
Contact Via: Email
Email: dlyost1@yahoo.com
Phone: +1 (602) 694-3335
Description: We do NOT want BNSF in our back yards, stop this development now! July 2, 2024 Dear Maricopa County Planning
and Zoning Department, We are writing this to you because we, and many others Maricopa County residents that live in the
vicinity of the proposed BNSF Intermodal Facility, STRONGLY oppose this facility and the impact to our rural residential area.
FACTS ABOUT BNSF: • BNSF has lied repeatedly about their intentions for this land purchased to the public at their meetings with
the community and to the City of Surprise One week after the purchase of this land was made public, representatives for BNSF
gave interviews with numerous publications with their intention of building the largest Intermodal Facility to date. Even when
confronted with this information, BNSF refused to be forthcoming. • BNSF has one of the worst records when it comes to safety,
derailments, most occurring in their own Intermodal Facilities. Hazmat materials aren't disclosed on their trains running through
our towns, cities and states, yet first responders and the cities are told to use an app if they want to know. • Numerous
environmental agencies have reported the health dangers as well as dangers to the environment that these facilities pose. These
Class 1 railroads have found loopholes in the clean air regulations for locomotives, using the older, non-clean air, carbon spewing
locomotive IN the intermodal facilities, such as this one, because they can no longer be used for long-haul activities. • The public
and the City of Surprise has asked them numerous times as to the studies we have requested before any zoning changes were
requested and approved, and again, BNSF has failed to be that "Good Neighbor" and answer any of the questions as to their
plans for security and fire protection. Every time any of this has been brought up to them, BNSF has danced around the subject,
stating they don't know what they will be doing, so they don't have the studies, so nothing has been done. Yet, workers are there
EVERY DAY, with their trucks going in and out, working on that land. • BNSF has a LONG history of ignoring laws regarding safety,
a history of poor maintenance on the tracks and trains, breaking agreements with cities and tribes, shown a lack of respect and
pure dishonesty and just pays their fines that are imposed on them and goes on their merry way to continue doing what they do,
because revenue is more important than people's lives. • BNSF and UP have led the fight against the Federal Government for
stricter safety regulations of trains and their length. Recent studies have shown that the longer the train, the chances of
derailments increase. • Research shows that BNSF utilizes local fire and police for their emergencies and security. We don't have
that kind of resource for them to cover their facility PLUS maintain the safety and security of the public outside the BNSF footprint.
We are lucky if there is an officer within 20 minutes of where we need them to be when we do need them. NEGATIVE IMPACT TO
THE COMMUNITY: • Studies show higher cancers rates, higher rates of congestive heart failure, higher rates of asthma, adverse
effects such as lower grades, missed days due to health and breathing issues on students whose schools and homes that are in
the vicinity of these types of facilities. (We have 3 that will be in the vicinity), property values decrease significantly around these
areas. • Arizona is in a drought. Studies show that these facilities, with their DAILY dust control, storage tanks for water, daily
washing of their locomotives and cleaning out of their Hazmat tanks use an obscene amount of water. A few years ago, this same
property had an application submitted to the county to build a residential development of 5000 home but was denied due to the
water feasibility study that showed it could not hold up to the 100-year water requirements. Why is that denied but an industrial
facility that will use even more water being considered? • We have requested the reports from the Army Corps of Engineers for
the washes that run through the 6.5 miles of land that they purchased. (Some parcels require FEMA required studies for 100-year
flood studies). • We have asked for the ADOT traffic studies since the current roads cannot handle the current amount of traffic let
alone the influx of hundreds of tractor trailers daily. • We have asked for the dust control plans, since, well, we do live in the desert
and well, we have dust, what are their plans to keep the dust down at this facility- again, going back to the water issue, how much
water will it take daily, to keep the dust under control, studies from the EPA on the Air Quality (currently Maricopa County has an
"F" rating and has for the last number of years) • We have asked for the water feasibility studies since this sits on top of the
aquifer that provides water to the communities of Morristown, Circle City, Wittmann and Surprise. • We have asked for the study
form AZ Fish and Game for the wildlife study and to see if there are any protected and endangered species on this land. • We
Resolution/Action
Assign To / Completed By:
have asked for the projected numbers of the increase of trains and trucks that will be going through the area. • Maricopa County
for the last 8 years has received an F when it comes to air quality. Studies show that these Intermodal Facilities, with their idling
trains and trucks will only increase the pollutants, carbon particulates and other toxic pollutants into our already horrible air
quality. • The quantity of jobs at their facilities isn't great enough to warrant the destruction of endangered/protected wildlife, the
quality and quantity of water, the air quality and health and safety of your residents. Studies show that most of these facilities
employ under 500 employees, most under 100 as they are all mostly automated and specialized jobs such as locomotive
mechanic. • The increased truck traffic on Grand Avenue, the 303, the 93 and 74 will be out of control. The intersection of
Grand/303/163rd Avenue already cannot handle the number of vehicles that it already has. Imagine adding an additional 800
semi-trucks daily. Currently, there is a minimum of 1 major accident at the intersection a week, sometimes multiple times a day in
that intersection. The trucks have no regard for the lower speed limits at Center Street and Grand Avenue and the one at the
intersection of Grand and the 74. Daily they run the lights and stop signs at those intersections, with little regard for human life as
they blow through them at approximately 60-80 MPH. Currently the speed limit in Wittmann is 45 MPH. • Two of the major
hospitals in the area (Banner Del Webb and Banner Boswell) can only be accessed from Grand Avenue by crossing the railroad
tracks. • The Rose fire outside Wickenburg, which is still under investigation, was possibly caused by BNSF employees welding on
the track where the fire started and with no safety measures taken. This project, which research shows has been in the works for
years, maybe a plus for BNSF, for big businesses locating to Arizona, but it is not a good fit or a beneficial plan for these
communities, the county residents, the environment, the wildlife, the public and visitors traveling on our roads, our first
responders, our air or our water. We strongly request that you seriously consider and weigh the pros and cons of your decision
and make the right choice for your residents, the environment and your natural resources and not be swayed by the bullying
tactics that BNSF is frequently known for to get their way. Respectfully, Concerned Maricopa County Residents
Loc. Address: 211th Ave
Loc. X-Streets: 211rh Ave & Dove Valley road
Board of Supervisors:
Related By:
Permit Number:
Parcel Number:
Edit Customer
Entered By: Web Inquiry - 7/2/2024 12:14:43 PM
Division: Planning
Assigned To: Joel Landis - 7/2/2024 12:18:20 PM
Subject: Land Use Planning and Zoning Applications
Completed By: Joel Landis - 7/2/2024 12:18:20 PM
Attach Files:
Choose Files No file chosen
Upload
Notes/Comments:
EMAILING CUSTOMER THAT WE RECEIVED THEIR OPPOSITION- Joel.Landis -7/2/2024 12:18:20 PM
Department:
Planning and Development
Division:
Planning
Subject:
Land Use Planning and Zoning Applications
Person:
-------
Notes / Comments:
Send Confirmation
Save Comments
Re-open Request
Success!
Record has been marked as Completed.
© 2024 - Maricopa County Planning and Development / Environmental Quality
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from
new senders. Always validate the sender first.
Outlook
Fw: BNSF intermodal zoning request……video by MAG TRANSPORTATION
From DONALD ZIMMERMAN <donald.zimmerman@cox.net>
Date Fri 9/20/2024 11:16 AM
To
Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
Hi Mr. Landis,
Attached is a video put out by the Maricopa Association of Governments pertaining to an ongoing
corridor study of the area of Grand Ave, the 303, and SR 74. The video is about 35 minutes long. I
think the presentation set forth in this video fully explains why the BNSF intermodal zoning request
should be denied at this time. Mayor Hall of the City of Surprise reports in the video that the
intermodal will increase truck traffic by 1500-2000 trucks per day! What the video does not say is that
Grand Ave is a designated Federal truck route and cannot handle its current level of truck traffic. In
my opinion, it is the truck traffic that causes most of the traffic issues in this area. The presentation
also doesn’t provide a timeline as to when road infrastructure will be fully developed.
Please share the video with other Commissioners. I apologize if the video is “old news” to you and
other Commissioners.
Thank you,
Donald Zimmerman
16782 W Montana De Oro Dr
Surprise, AZ. 85387
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad
Begin forwarded message:
On Friday, September 20, 2024, 10:44 AM, Debbie Zimmerman <wizfourfam@cox.net> wrote:
Northwest Valley Presentation and Discussion: April 2024 MAG Transportation Policy
Committee Meeting
Northwest Valley Presentation and
Discussion: April 2024 MAG
Transportation Policy Committee
Meeting
By MAGCommunications
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from
new senders. Always validate the sender first.
BNSF RAILPLEX PROJECT IN WHITMAN, AZ
DONALD ZIMMERMAN <donald.zimmerman@cox.net>
Fri 6/28/2024 6:01 AM
To:Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
Dear sir,
I am writing to voice my opposition to this project. I live in Surprise near Grand Ave and the loop
303. The roadways here are already saturated with heavy traffic, especially heavy truck
traffic. This project will bring a significant increase in the amount of truck traffic on Grand Ave
that is traveling to and from the 303. The traffic problems here are well documented, and I
understand ADOT is reportedly working on a long-term plan to resolve the issues. In my opinion,
the realistic time frame for ADOT to devise, approve, and implement a fix is likely a minimum of 5
years away.
Grand Ave is a primary route for trucks and other traffic heading to Kingman, Las Vegas, and other
points beyond. The infrastructure simply will not handle any additional traffic loads, let alone the
increased railway traffic it will bring. I find it interesting that BNSF originally applied for
annexation of their land for this project with the City of Surprise. BNSF representatives had a
hearing before the City’s Planning and Zoning Commission, and opposition against their project
was voiced at the hearing. Low and behold BNSF withdraws its annexation request and presents
its project to the County for approval. Smells like an end-around play to me.
I am urging a no vote on this project until such time that a roadway management plan is created,
approved, AND IMPLEMENTED. Some ideas I have about improving the traffic issues are as
follows:
- Prohibit commercial truck traffic from Grand Ave (with obvious exception for local traffic
deliveries, etc.). Push the heavy truck traffic up to SR74 (Carefree Highway,) which would allow
for the railplex traffic as well as traffic looking to connect to the 93 for Kingman, Las Vegas, etc.
There has been much improvement work done on 93 for the anticipated I-11, and this seems to be
a logical alternative. Additionally, commercial trucks would have the option to stay on the
Interstate to reach I-40.
- Reconfigure and realign the exit and entrance ramps from 303 onto Grand Ave so that traffic
exiting and entering the 303 extends well beyond 163rd Ave. This might alleviate congestion at
163rd, but Grand Ave would still likely need to be expanded to accommodate the increased traffic.
- Road separation of Grand Ave and 163rd Ave could help alleviate railway traffic issues. This
could likely be done hand-in-hand with 303 ramp reconfiguration.
Thank you for your service to Maricopa County.
Donald Zimmerman
16782 W Montana De Oro Dr
Surprise, AZ. 85387
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from
new senders. Always validate the sender first.
Fwd:
Donna Thompson <dtho123@outlook.com>
Thu 7/18/2024 2:27 PM
To:Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
Subject: Wittmann neighborhood
Joel Landis
Maricopa County
joel.landis@maricopa.gov (mailto:joel.landis@maricopa.gov)
Oppose BNSF
Mr. Landis:
We are writing on behalf residents of the Community of Wittmann, Arizona. BNSF sent out
their plans of development on the 4,000+acres which has raised many concerns as residents
and homeowners, and the negative impact these plans will have on the community and
environment.
We are asking Maricopa County and to take action to intervene on the monstrosity that
BNSF wishes to build.
Concerns are as follows:
1. BNSF's plans to use this land for commercial purposes will literally turn our
neighborhood surrounded on all four sides by commercial property. There are currently laws
to prohibit this type of building.
2. Waterways & floodplains will be intercepted, and re-routed to cause severe damage to our
properties.
3. Disruptive to the habitats and threatens species that are protected and/or endangered.
4. Damage to existing roads and the ongoing expense to the City/County:
5. Contaminating our Water wells
6. Our home values will drop significantly.
7. Tax Increases to the Community
It appears Maricopa County has done nothing to address these matters with BNSF.
BNSF is trying to disguise their plans by requesting a mixed employment zone and changing
from Residential Housing to Commercial Zoning.
It is negligent on the part of Maricopa County to not challenge BNSF's plans to allow BNSF
to slide plans through as "employment" rather than the truth and to call it what it is
misleading and far from transparent.
We are very concerned residents, and are imploring for the County to step in, and do what's
right to protect residents of Wittmann, Surprise, Morristown and surrounding areas, protect
the habitats & wildlife of our neighborhood. I am imploring that Berkshire Hathaway (who
owns BNSF) to consider alternatives with their plans that actually will support the
community rather than destroy it.
Thank you for your consideration.
Donna Thompson
Resident of Restin Road
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from
new senders. Always validate the sender first.
Re: BNSF Facility
Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
Thu 9/5/2024 1:05 PM
To:Doug Krantz <dkrantz@windsormortgage.com>
Hello,
Thank you, received. You may direct further questions or comments to myself or to the applicant,
Gammage & Burnham, who you can reach at sdemmitt@gblaw.com or at nsobraske@gblaw.com.
Joel Landis
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
301. W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003
Planner
O: 602-506-8358
MARICOPA.GOV
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube
From: Doug Krantz <dkrantz@windsormortgage.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2024 12:56 PM
To: Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
Subject: BNSF Facility
Hi Joel,
I am a land owner near the proposed BNSF Facility near Wittmann. I want to inform you that I am
strongly opposed to this facility being built. It will raise safety issues for all the equine activities and will
affect our daily quality of like and our property values are going to be negatively affected.
Please keep this area residential!
Thanks
Doug Krantz
AVP Account Executive
NMLS #473255
Windsor Mortgage Solutions
C:605.999-2334
WindsorMortgage.com
Windsor Mortgage Solutions is a service provided by
Plains Commerce Bank.NMLS#462960
This e-mail message and any attachment(s) may contain confidential information and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the
message and any attachment(s) from your system. Please note that this email is without prejudice to,
and is not to be construed as a waiver of, any rights and/or remedies under any contact, in equity or at
law, all of which continue to be reserved. Thank you.
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from
new senders. Always validate the sender first.
Oppose BNsF and vote NO to allowing them in the area.
Doug Krantz <dkrantz@windsormortgage.com>
Wed 7/10/2024 12:54 PM
To:Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
Hi Joe,
I live off of the 211th area North of Wittmann. We bought in this area for the peace and quiet of rural
living based on past county development requirements. Please require Burlington Northern to excavate
so their tallest light, structure and sound generating operation is below existing grade. Please also
require them to build an earthen sound and light attenuation berm 20 feet above any light, structure or
sound producing device or equipment. This earthen berm should surround the entire property boundary
with no gaps for sound and light pollution. Also, please require them to pay for traffic improvements
along Hwy 60 from 303 through Wickenburg, along 211th and the 74 from I-17 to Hwy 60. Also limit
BNSF from using any existing dirt roads to residential and agricultural properties as access for
construction or future corridors for operational traffic. They must be required to access off current paved
roads for construction and operations.
Sincerely,
Doug Krantz
Doug Krantz
Account Executive Sales Manager
NMLS #473255
Windsor Mortgage Solutions
C:605.999-2334
WindsorMortgage.com
Windsor Mortgage Solutions is a service provided by
Plains Commerce Bank.NMLS#462960
This e-mail message and any attachment(s) may contain confidential information and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any
attachment(s) from your system. Please note that this email is without prejudice to, and is not to be construed as a waiver of, any rights
and/or remedies under any contact, in equity or at law, all of which continue to be reserved. Thank you.
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from
new senders. Always validate the sender first.
BNSF Building in Wittmann!
Dustin Freitag <f3constructionremodeling@gmail.com>
Tue 7/9/2024 3:03 PM
To:Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
Joe, I live off of the 211th area north of Wittmann. We bought in this area for the peace and quiet of rural living based on past county
development requirements. I just built my house here a little over a year ago. I have already had to repair my perimeter fence due to high
volumes of truck traffic coming from the rock quarry on the 74. This plan will only multiply the truck traffic in the area exponentially. Please
require Burlington northern to excavate so their tallest light, structure, and sound generating operation is below existing grade. Please also
require them to build an earthen sound and light attenuation berm 20’ above any light, structure, or sound producing device or equipment.
This earthen berm should surround the entire property boundary with no gaps for sound and light pollution. Also please require them to
pay for traffic improvements along the 60 from the 303 through Wickenburg, along 211th, and the 74 from I17 to the 60. Also please
require them to access their proposed facilities off the US 60 crossing their own tracks. Also limit BNSF from using any existing dirt roads to
residential and agricultural properties as access for construction or future corridors for operational traffic. They must be required to access
off current paved roads for construction and operations”
Dustin Freitag
F3 Construction & Remodeling
602-469-1067
ROC 326677
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from
new senders. Always validate the sender first.
(No subject)
Elizabeth Burruel-Velasco <lizzb0815@gmail.com>
Tue 7/2/2024 12:24 PM
To:Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
NO MORE TRAINS ON GROUND !!
No to BNSF!
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
BNSF
Oldham, Elizabeth <Elizabeth.Oldham@Dignitymemorial.com>
Mon 7/1/2024 1:11 PM
To:Joel Landis (PND) <Joel.Landis@maricopa.gov>
Hello Joel,
My Name is Elizabeth Oldham and I am STRONGLY against the BNSF project. I have lived in the Wittmann Area for
almost 30 years, fought against them back in around 2007 when they wanted to put their inland port 2500 feet
from our school and am VERY aware of their lies, dishonesty and persuasiveness.
I have spent OVER 200 hours researching their horrible reputation, the fact that they have more derailments than
most other Class 1 railroads, the fact that they use every loophole available to get around the FRA and EPA
regulations for Clean Air Requirements, how they and Union Pacific are trying to avoid the restrictions on the
length of trains and the speed requirements. I have done the research on the pollutants that come from their
engines, the water usage for these facilities, the FEMA requirements on the parcels of land they purchased. I have
also documented how they LIED to the City of Surprise and the community for the use of the land right off the
bat.
This community and it’s surrounding communities DO NOT WANT this facility in our backyard (for some almost
literally). We DO NOT want their pollution, their trucks ( Lord knows the roads cannot handle ANY MORE traffic,
let alone 800+ more semi-trucks a day). They have a history of ignoring treaties with the Indian Tribes for land
use, witness tampering, payoffs, witness intimidation on court cases, failure to pay the agreed upon settlements.
They are BAD for this community and county!
They are unethical. They don’t care about the environment, as shown time and time again, they don’t care about
the health of the land, the residents surrounding their facilities or even their own workers as shown by their
continued use of the Souix River Bridge 6 hours before it collapsed, KNOWING that the structural integrity was at
risk. ( Yes, I read the 2 separate articles where they backtracked on their first article stating they took it out of
commission).
They will not bring any more jobs to the area, they have been laying their employees off, promising them jobs if
they are agreeable to relocating because these are specialized jobs.
Please Joel, Please do NOT let them blow smoke and let you think that they are going to do right by us or the
county with this project. There are protected species on those parcels. It sits right on our aquifer. Heck, they
admitted fault when they almost burned down Wickenburg last month, but even lied about that situation! Now
they are paying the landowners and locals to clean up the Railways Easement! That isn’t the responsibility of
those who already lost their homes and properties. Not the job of the locals to do what BNSF should be doing for
the safety of the communities they run through.
All they care about is making money. Nothing else. Please don’t let them screw us like they have with everyone
else.
Thank you,
Elizabeth Oldham
Elizabeth Oldham
Administrative Assistant
Memorial Specialist
O 623-933-0161 F 623-933-2682
Sunland Memorial Park, Mortuary and Cremation Center
www.sunlandmemorial.com