Extracted text (via pymupdf)
35524 characters
PLANNING AND ZONING
Development Services Department
10000 N. El Mirage Road, El Mirage, Arizona 85335
623-876-2996; Fax 623-876-4605; TDD 623-933-3258
www.elmirageaz.gov
1
MEMORANDUM
Development Application Review Comments
TO:
John Ulibarri, Gervasio & Assoc., Inc.
FROM
Jose A. Macias, Senior Planner
Development Services Department, Planning & Zoning
RE:
PZ23-12-22 Petroleum Plant Expansion Conditional Use Permit
DATE:
January 22, 2024
Mr. Ulibarri,
Please see the review comments provided by the El Mirage Technical Advisory Committee
(TAC) for the conditional use permit and site plan zoning application mentioned above.
BUILDING & SAFETY – Brigham Bennett
1. No comment.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT – Tom Doyle
2. No comment.
ENGINEERING – Bryce Christo
3. See attached memorandum.
FIRE DEPARTMENT – Jason Napier
4. No comment.
PLANNING & ZONING – Jose A. Macias
5. Please add the following statement to the site plan. a. “Any change of use or occupancy
of any building or buildings, including additions thereto requiring more parking, shall
not be permitted until such additional parking spaces as required by this chapter are
furnished.”
6. A final plat will be required to record any lot combinations, easements, and/or dedication
of land before issuing the Certificate of Occupancy. The final plat application will be
submitted to the Zoning Administrator for processing, which will be reviewed by staff
and approved by the City Council. Separate fees apply.
7. On the final landscape plan, provide the plant material and specifications from the
Arizona Nursery Association (ANA) standards.
2
8. Natural topping of landscaped areas. All landscaped areas shall be finished with natural
topping material which may include, but are not limited to the following: turf,
groundcover, planting, decomposed granite (two inches minimum depth), river run rock,
expanded shale, or bark.
9. The preliminary landscape plan has been reviewed and approved by the Senior Planner as
part of the development site plan review. The preliminary landscape plan will be included
in the zoning application staff report and presented to the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council where additional stipulations may be imposed.
10. The final landscape plan shall be in conformance with the approved preliminary plan and
any stipulated changes or additions and shall be approved by the Zoning Administrator or
designee prior to the issuance of a building permit.
11. All changes in landscape plans before, during, or after preliminary or final landscape plan
approval and/or landscape installation shall be approved by the Zoning Administrator or
his or her designee.
The Planning Commission and City Council shall, in addition to any other conditions,
impose the following general conditions upon every conditional use permit granted.
12. The right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all
general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure.
13. All of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land and shall
be binding upon the owner of the land, his or her successors, or assigns.
14. All conditions specifically stated under any conditional use listed in this chapter shall
apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, his or her successors, or assigns.
15. All of the special conditions shall be consented to in writing by the applicant.
16. The proposed use of the fuel processing facility shall not create noise, vibrations, or odor.
17. The landscape area shall be maintained with weed and dust control material.
18. Applicant shall submit construction documents to the Building Safety Division for permit
review and approval.
19. The applicant has one calendar year to submit construction documents and satisfy the
conditions outlined in the permit.
20. If the application has been granted, the permit shall be issued upon the signature of the
Senior Planner / Zoning Administrator, and any conditions, automatic termination date,
or period of review shall be stated on the permit.
POLICE DEPARTMENT – Andrew Vanderwerf
21. No comment.
PUBLIC WORKS – Scott Ketchmark
22. No comment.
If you have any questions regarding these comments or would like a follow up meeting or call,
please feel free to contact my office.
Engineering
Development Services Department
10000 N El Mirage Road, El Mirage 85335
623-972-8116; Fax 623-876-4605; TDD 623-933-3258
www.elmirageaz.gov
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Jose Macias, Planner/GIS
FROM:
Bryce Christo, P.E., Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT:
Fuel Processing Operators – West Expansion Site Plan Review
DATE:
01-19-24
Below are the Engineering Division’s comments for the above referenced submittal provided in
December 2023. These items will have to be addressed prior to the Planning and Zoning
Meeting.
Narrative
1. The current zoning for Parcel 501-45-015V is CP which is Commerce Park only.
2. It appears that a re-zoning of the property is being requested. Please state what zone is
desired for this site.
3. Phase I only notes the installation of a new fence. Once the fence is installed, is the
property planned to be used for parking, storage, etc. prior to the construction of Phase
II?
4. The offsite improvements in Olive Avenue will be required in Phase II.
5. How many employees are there at the existing site and how many are anticipated to be
added for Phase II, III and IV. How many employees will there be in the ultimate
buildout?
6. What are the proposed building heights?
7. Update the Narrative to match the Site Plan. The Narrative refers to a 3,500 sf lab
building and 3,500 sf office. The Site Plan shows a 5,000 sf lab building, 3,500 sf
operations building and 4,000 sf storage building.
8. Update the years in the Project Schedule.
9. Since this project is planned to be developed in multiple phases, a Phasing Plan per
Chapter 1, Section F of the City’s Design & Development Standards Manual (DDSM)
will be required.
The below items will have to be addressed during the Construction Plan Submittal.
Site Plan
10. Show the building setback lines based on the classification that the property is planned to
be re-zoned to.
11. Project Data
a. Why is the 4,000 sf storage building not included in the parking calculations?
b. As noted, 2 ADA spaces are required. One shall be a standard ADA space (8’
space and 5’ aisle) and 1 shall be a van accessible space (8’ space and 8’ aisle or
11’ space and 5’ aisle).
2
c. Provide the Building Coverage of the site.
12. Parking
a. When parking spaces are adjacent to a sidewalk, the sidewalk shall be a minimum
of 6 feet wide or 5 feet wide with parking blocks.
b. Parking spaces shall be striped with a minimum of 4-inch painted lines.
13. The existing half right of way of Olive Avenue is shown as 50 feet wide but it is currently
55 feet wide.
14. The project is responsible for widening Olive Avenue to connect the curb line on the west
side of the APN501-45-015V to the curb line on APN 501-45-015J. Also required is the
dedication of 10 feet of right of way (for a total of 65 feet) and an 8-foot wide Public
Utility Easement (PUE) along the Olive Avenue frontage, vertical curb and gutter, an
eight-foot-wide sidewalk (detached and meandering if possible), bike lane, streetlights
and landscaping/irrigation. The project will also be responsible for any deceleration
lanes.
15. No walls shall be placed within the PUE.
16. It is believed that the 30 foot right of way of 121st Avenue has previously been dedicated
to the City. If this is inaccurate, please include this dedication with the Final Plat.
17. The proposed driveway shall be per MAG or City details. A stop sign shall be placed at
the proposed driveway. Verify that the existing and proposed driveways have a minimum
throat of 50 feet or more if the trucks that visit this site are longer.
18. The proposed driveway would be an exit only type per the TIA.
19. Show the sight distance requirements at the existing and proposed driveways per City
Detail EM-158.
20. 6-inch MAG type curbing is required around all driveways and parking lots. Curb that
carries drainage shall include a gutter. The curbing shall be no closer than 3 feet to any
property line.
21. Any fire lane/emergency access route shall be designed to handle 75,000 lbs. or more if
the site will accommodate larger vehicles. A Geotechnical Report will be required for this
project, and it should provide a recommended design section for this access road.
22. Provide a template that shows how a vehicle with a minimum inside radius of 19.5 feet
and the outside radius of 45 feet can maneuver through the site. The template shall be 20
feet wide.
23. Show how traffic is intended to flow onsite. Signage shall be placed where necessary
(i.e., “Do Not Enter”, “One Way”, etc.).
24. What is being proposed just west of the existing driveway, east of the Future Storage
Building? Parking is not allowed within a driveway entrance.
25. Label all existing and proposed fences, walls, exterior signs and lighting.
26. Side slopes adjacent to the public right of way, areas where pedestrian access is permitted
and within Public Utility Easements (PUE) shall be 6:1 or flatter. There shall be at least
two feet of level ground between any wall or vertical obstruction and the top of any side
slope grading.
27. The proposed retention basins shall be located a minimum of 4 feet away from any
structures and shall not be located within any building setbacks, easements, or fire lanes.
28. Add markers to any offsite scuppers, etc. per City Detail EM-559.
29. Drainage
a. The finished floor elevations are required to be a minimum of 12 inches above the
100-year high-water level of any adjacent retention basin and 14 inches above the
ultimate outfall of the site.
b. The site is responsible for retaining that drainage from the site and the adjacent
half right of way of Olive Avenue along the project frontage.
3
c. Label the overflow elevations for each basin and the low outfall of the lot.
30. Dry wells shall be set 0.3’ above the bottom of the basin.
31. A proposed storm drain connection between Basin 1 and Basin B is shown . Is this
feasible with the difference in elevations of the two basins?
32. The site shall be master metered with backflow preventers at both connection points.
Meters shall be within the right of way and backflow preventers shall be on private
property, but not within a Public Utility Easement, separated by a minimum of 5 feet.
33. An 8-inch water main shall be looped on site with hydrants spaced every 300 feet or as
determined by the Fire Department. This main will be private and any hydrants within
the project site will be private and painted Safety Red per City Detail EM-360. All
hydrants require markers per MAG Detail 122.
34. Water valves are recommended along the main every 500 feet and at locations so that the
maximum number of hydrants to be out of service is 2.
35. A fire hydrant is required along Olive Avenue, 500 feet west of the one at the intersection
of Olive Avenue and 121st Avenue. This hydrant will be public and painted Safety
Yellow per City Detail EM-360.
36. The proposed sanitary sewer main will be public between the existing tie-in manhole to
the north of the site and SMH-3. These manholes will require an epoxy coating. The
onsite sewer main between SMH-3 and SMH-6 will be private.
37. Show the horizontal and vertical clearances between utilities on the plans. Verify that the
clearances adhere to MAG Detail 404 and City Detail EM-402.
38. Per City Code Section 155.057, all overhead utility lines, 13kV and under, shall be placed
underground. This includes all electrical, communication, cable, etc. facilities along
Olive Avenue. This may require the undergrounding beyond the site boundary to the next
convenient power pole or junction element. Relief from this requirement per may be
requested from City Council if additional electrical lines (over 13kV) will remain on the
poles after the undergrounding.
39. Each proposed driveway shall have at least one streetlight.
40. Any light or combination of lights which cause light on a public street, other than lights
specifically intended for that purpose, shall not exceed one foot candle as measured from
the center line of the street. Provide a Photometric Plan to show the foot candles along
the centerline of Olive Avenue to verify that the proposed lighting will not exceed the
maximum limit.
41. A trash enclosure shall be proposed on site per City Detail EM-113.
42. Offsite Improvements – Olive Avenue
a. Label any storage and taper lengths.
b. Left turn lanes shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and right turn lanes shall be a
minimum of 11.5 feet wide.
c. The minimum longitudinal slope shall be 0.25% for Olive Avenue.
d. The cross slope of Olive Avenue shall be between 1% and 3% with 2% preferred.
e. A Signage and Striping Plan will be required.
f. A raised median will be required along the project frontage.
43. Plans shall include applicable City Notes. Call out MAG, City, etc. details to be used.
Use the City’s Design & Development Standards Manual (DDSM) as a guide for the final
design.
Exterior Elevations
44. The provided elevations are for the future operation building. Are elevations available for
the 5,000 sf lab building or 4,000 sf storage building?
4
Preliminary Landscape Plan
45. Add City Landscaping and Irrigation Notes (City Detail EM-101-4) to the plan set.
46. Show the sight distance requirements at the existing and proposed driveways per City
Detail EM-158.
47. DG is required on all non-paved areas both on site and within the right of way adjacent to
the project site.
48. All plantings at maturity shall maintain a minimum of 6 feet of clearance from all fire
hydrants and fire suppression devices per City Detail EM-361.
49. Add a note to the plans that the maintenance for all landscaping and irrigation shown on
the plans will be the responsibility of the property owner.
50. Show the botanical and common names of the vegetation to be used.
51. Irrigation plans will be required. A separate landscaping service, meter and backflow
preventer is required.
52. The raised median shall be landscaped and irrigated. The City can provide examples of
other median landscaping upon request.
Deed
53. No comments.
Preliminary Drainage Report
54. Use the City Runoff Coefficients per City Code Section 155.054(B)(6)(a). Concrete =
0.95, roofs/asphalt = 0.85, grass = 0.15 and desert/rock lawn = 0.70.
55. The basin areas shall be included in the calculations.
56. Verify the areas in the report as they differ slightly then the ones shown on the Site Plan.
57. Drainage Area Exhibit - Provide the volume required and provided calculations for the
“Containment Area” and the adjacent portion of 121st Avenue.
58. Calculations for any curb openings, wall opening, catch basins, scuppers, etc. will be
required. This includes pipe capacity, inlet capacity and scupper openings, as applicable.
59. Provide dry well calculations to show any basin over 1 foot deep will drain within 36
hours. The City recommends using a dry well percolation rate of 0.10 cfs for design.
60. Street calculations for an arterial street (Olive Avenue) shall verify that:
a. 10 year flows can be carried within the curb and maintain a 12 foot dry lane in
each direction.
b. 100 year flows can be carried within the right of way with a maximum depth of 6
inches over the crown.
ALTA Survey
61. The “status” in the title block is labeled as Preliminary.
62. Flood Zone - The FIRM Zone is X (Shaded), not AE.
63. Site Information – Parcels 501-45-015H and J are zoned EI and Parcel 501-45-015V is
zoned CP.
64. Verify the location of Schedule B, Note 6 on Sheet 2 which is currently shown in the
middle of Lot 2. Is this correct?
65. Should the line within the right of way, between Parcels 1 and 2, be light and dashed?
Topographic Survey
66. No comments.
5
Phase I Environmental Assessment
67. Page 13 – A portion of the SQG bullet point states “no violations, enforcement actions
and/or documented release incidents were not reported in the EDR database”. Is this
sentence correct?
68. Pages 20 & 21 – The PFOA/PFOS bullet point refers to a previous penalty in 2000 while
a later sentence states no violations were reported. Is this accurate?
Preliminary Water Report
69. Design Criteria
a. The minimum domestic service size is 1 inch.
b. The minimum fire service size is 6 inches unless the Fire Department approves a
small diameter.
70. Demands
a. Show calculations for the average day demand, max day demand and peak hour
demand per the City’s Water System Design Criteria.
b. How was the 3,500 gpm fire flow determined? Fire Flow can only be reduced to
50% with approval from the Fire Department.
c. The developer is required to schedule and perform their own fire flow test.
Contact the City’s Public Works Department (623-876-4251) to act as a witness
to the test one week prior to the scheduled date.
71. The water loop around the site shall be a minimum of 8 inches.
Preliminary Sewer Report
72. Section II – A 10 inch main cannot connect to an 8 inch downstream main. However, the
8 inch main is only a 10 foot long stub which can be removed and the new 10 inch main
can be connected directly to the existing manhole. The main north of this manhole is 18
inches.
73. Section IV
a. The slope of 0.32% minimum is acceptable except the last run of pipe shall be a
minimum of 1.00%.
b. Show calculations for the average day demand, dry weather peak hour demand
and wet weather peak hour demands per the City’s Wastewater System Design
Criteria.
Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA)
74. A Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) from KE Design was provided along with the TIA
prepared by SWTE.
75. Study Methodology – Bullet Point 4 - Capacity analysis shall be performed for the
opening year of 2025 and 5 years in the future, or 2030.
76. The Site Plan included in the report does not match the one provided with the City
submittal. The 3,500 sf operations building is not included.
77. Existing Conditions – 1st Paragraph – Olive Avenue, east of the project site, is a four lane
undivided road.
78. Existing Traffic Data
a. 2nd Paragraph – Revise to “narrowing two way center left turn lane”
b. 3rd Paragraph – Was any multiplier added to the traffic counts since school was
not in session?
79. Access
a. 1st Paragraph – It is noted that the hatched out lane on the north side of Olive
Avenue will be restriped as an additional westbound lane. Would this not be
6
better utilized as a deceleration for the main entrance to the site for the large
trucks on a 45 mph roadway?
b. 2nd Paragraph – The first sentence refers to the Pro Petroleum Driveway as the
main driveway “to and from” the existing and proposed sites. The West Driveway
should be the main exit for both sites. It was noted in the TIS that “the proposed
expansion will allow the facility to modify on-site traffic to enter form the
existing driveway, utilize the facility, then proceed through the east parcel to exit
onto Olive Avenue at the new driveway” and that this would “…greatly improve
on-site traffic patterns and at Olive Avenue”.
80. The Legend for many of the Figures list AM Peak Hour twice. Should one be Midday
Peak?
81. Figure 5 – There are only two eastbound through lanes on Olive Avenue at the West
Driveway.
82. Trip Generation – This section refers to 5 additional employees that the proposed site will
gain. What is the total number of employees expected? What are the total number of trips
per day including trucks at buildout.
83. Figure 6 – Is this exhibit showing that 40% of site traffic plan to use the West Access and
60% use the east access?
84. It is noted throughout the TIA that the Prop Petroleum Drive/Olive Avenue “operates at
an inadequate LOS during the weekday AM, MIDDAY and PM peak hours”. The
midday peak is not inadequate.
85. Turn Lane Analysis - Olive Avenue is an arterial roadway so all driveways require a right
turn deceleration lane. The City requires a minimum of 160 feet of storage and a 100-foot
taper. If the developer wishes to remove the requirement for the deceleration lane, a
Request for Design Exception must be provided.
86. Mitigation – 2nd Paragraph - Is this section referring to the West Driveway?
87. Page 27 – The first two paragraphs seem to contradict one another.
88. Provide an exhibit that shows the distances between the following driveways, measured
from nearest face of curb to nearest face of curb: existing Burger King driveway,
proposed FPO driveway, existing FPO driveway and 121st Avenue. Minimum driveway
spacing on an arterial roadway is 250 feet.
Miscellaneous
89. A Final Plat per Chapter 1, Section B-2 of the City’s Design & Development Standard
Manual (DDSM) will be required prior to Certificate of Occupancy. The Plat shall show:
a. All right of way and easement dedications including PUEs, Drainage Easements,
etc.
b. Consolidation of lots or any cross easement/agreements to share access, parking,
drainage, etc.
c. A 1-foot Vehicular Non-Access Easement is required along Olive Avenue except
at legitimate driveways.
d. Right of way and easement dedications from previous Pro Petroleum projects
were never recorded and shall be added to the Final Plat of this project. This
includes the chamfer at the northwest corner of the intersection of Olive Avenue
and 121st Avenue and the water easement along the east side of the existing
driveway. Copies of those legal descriptions are attached.
90. A Geotechnical Report will be required to provide asphalt/concrete pavement sections
including Olive Avenue. Verify the proposed pavement sections can handle 75,000 lbs.
for any fire access lane or more if the trucks entering and exiting the site will be heavier.
7
91. A Haul Permit will be required if 500 cubic yards or more of material will be brought
into or out of the site. This will require a separate application, an exhibit showing the haul
route and insurance from the company performing the haul. The fee is $300.
92. An Approval to Construction (ATC) will be required from MCESD for the water and
sewer line extensions. A copy shall be provided to the City prior to the release of any
Engineering permit.
93. It appears that a septic system may be an alternative for this site. If a septic system is
preferred, the plan review would be performed by Maricopa County and the City would
require a copy of the system installation approval prior to granting Certificate of
Occupancy.
94. A Dust Control Permit from the County will be required prior to the release of any
Engineering permit.
95. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be required per the City’s SWPPP
Guidelines document. A Notice of Intent (NOI) from ADEQ will be required prior to
release of any Engineering permit.
The above comments are meant to be general in nature and are not considered to be all inclusive.
Additional comments will arise during the formal permit submittal.
Page 1 of 2
Public Water Easement
January 17, 2020
When Recorded Return to:
City Clerk, City of El Mirage
10000 N. El Mirage Road
El Mirage, AZ 85335
Exempt under A.R.S. § 11-1134(A)(2)
PUBLIC WATER EASEMENT
GRANTORS:
GRANTEE:
Fuel Processing Operators
City of El Mirage
12126 W. Olive Avenue
10000 N. El Mirage Road
El Mirage, AZ 85335
El Mirage, AZ 85335
For the consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00), and other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, GRANTOR does hereby grant and
convey to GRANTEE, its successors and assigns, a perpetual easement as described herein for
utility purposes, including, but not limited to, the right to erect, construct, install, maintain, use,
operate, inspect, repair, replace and remove delivery and/or water lines and related appurtenances in,
on, over, under, across, above and through the attached described real property situated within
Maricopa County, Arizona, identified in the attached Exhibits A and B.
The GRANTEE shall also have the right and privilege forever to patrol, inspect, alter,
improve, add to, repair and remove such utility facilities, including the right to increase or decrease
the size of the lines, and all other rights and privileges necessary or convenient for the full use and
enjoyment of the easement, servitude and privileges herein granted for the purposes herein
described, including the right of ingress and egress to and from said easement and pipeline over
adjoining property of the GRANTOR, and the right to use existing roads and as much of the surface
of the land, herein above described as may be necessary for the purpose of constructing, inspecting,
maintaining, operating, repairing, replacing, and/or removing the facilities, either in whole or in
part, at the will of GRANTEE.
To have and to hold said easement, servitude and privileges unto the GRANTEE, its
successors and assigns, forever, subject to the conditions and limitations herein contained.
It is agreed that the GRANTOR shall have full use of said easement except for the purpose
for which the same is herein conveyed to the GRANTEE, and except for uses which interfere with
the enjoyment by GRANTEE of the rights and servitude herein conveyed to it, and provided always
that no building or structure of any nature or kind whatsoever, including without limitation fences,
nor any part of same, shall be constructed, installed or placed on or over said easement or any part
thereof by GRANTOR or the successors or assigns of GRANTOR, and that the grade over any
buried facilities shall not be changed by GRANTOR or the successors or assigns of GRANTOR
without the prior written consent of the GRANTEE. The rights and obligations of GRANTEE shall
be construed broadly and consistent with the performance of its obligations to provide utility service
Page 2 of 2
Public Water Easement
January 17, 2020
to its customers.
GRANTEE shall be and remain responsible for the construction, operation, maintenance and
repair of the utility facilities and GRANTOR shall have no responsibility or liability in such
construction, operation, maintenance or repair. GRANTEE shall indemnify and hold GRANTOR
harmless from all injuries and damages arising from GRANTEE’S use of the easement area.
GRANTEE shall return the property to its prior condition after completing the construction,
maintenance or other uses permitted under the foregoing easement.
This Public Water Easement constitutes a perpetual covenant running with the land for the
benefit of the GRANTEE, its successors and assigns.
CAUTION: The above described easement may contain underground facilities the location of
which must be verified as required by Arizona Revised Statutes, Section 40-360.21 et seq. (Arizona
Blue Stake Law) prior to excavation.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument is executed this _____day of ________, ______.
GRANTOR:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
STATE OF ARIZONA
)
) ss.
County of
)
On this _____ day of _______________, 20_____, before me, the undersigned Notary Public,
personally appeared
and
who executed and
acknowledged the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein contained.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and official seal.
Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
Quit Claim Deed
THE GRANTOR Fuel Processing Operators located at 12126 West Olive Avenue, City of El Mirage,
County of Maricopa, State of Arizona, for the consideration of Ten Dollars $10.00 QUIT CLAIM(S) to The
City of El Mirage of 10000 N. El Mirage Road, City of El Mirage, County of Maricopa, State of Arizona, all
interest in the following described real estate in the County of Maricopa, in the State of Arizona, to wit:
SEE EXHIBITS “A” and “B” ATTACHED HERETO AND BY REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF.
Dated this ____ day of ___________, 20___.
___________________________________
Grantor's Signature
___________________________________
Type or Print Name
___________________________________
Grantor's Signature
___________________________________
Type or Print Name
STATE OF____________________________ COUNTY OF___________________________
I, ___________________________________, Notary Public in and for the state ____________________________,
do hereby certify that on this__ day of______, 20__, personally appeared before me__________________________
known to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within instrument and acknowledged that ______
signed the same as _____ free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes herein mentioned.
Given under my hand and official seal this ___ day of _______, 20___. Commission expires _____________20___.
___________________________
Notary Public
Exhibit A
Legal Description for
Right-of-Way Ded ication
That portion of the East 302.02 feet of the North 756.46 feet of the South
81,1,.46 feet of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section
25, Township 3 North, Range 1 West of the Gila and Salt River Base and
Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, more particularly described as follows:
COMMENCING at the Southeast corner of said Southwest quarter of the
Southwest quarter of said Section 25;
Thence North 00"15'39" West along the East line of said Southwest quarter
of the Southwest quarter, 55.00 feet to the South line of said North 756.46
feet of the South 81,I.46 feet;
Thence along said South line, North 89"35'24" West, 30.00 feet to the West
line of the East 30.00 feet of said Southwest quarter of the Southwest
quarter of said Section 25, being the intersection of the North Right-of-Way
line of Olive Avenue and West Right-of-Way line of L2Ist Avenue, and the
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence continuing along the South line of said North 756.46 feet of the
South 81,1,.46 feet AND the North line of Olive Avenue Right-of-Way, North
89"35'24" West, 20.00 feet;
Thence North 45"04'29" East, 28.t2 feet to said West line of the East 30"00
feet of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Section 25,
and said West Right-of-Way line of I2Ist Avenue;
Thence along said West line, South 00"15'39" East, 20.00 feet to the TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
,r*KNEZEVTC o
6.L.,n:r--JF
Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT IIBII
RIGHT - OF - WAY DEDICATION
LINE TABLE
L1
L(
L3
L4
L5
N
{
!
ss oo-\ b < oLtVE AVE. JJlf l ^glJ :'r
-
I
A , n20.62, ,, u, i
- ,i-ri'-,
BEGINNING -i j 32? 6z
_..L.._.._.._ .._..j.y_2.:!
.._..[_..L2/Lg.+
(snsrs oF BEART s)
/
s8g"J5'24"a 26 .2g'
/
PO|NT OFJ
R. SEC. 25,
C9MMENCEMENT- 31 /4 COR.
T.SN., R.1W.
T.JN.. R.1W.
RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION
+2OO SQ. FT.
+O.0046 ACRES
30'
R/w
s89'23'56"E 272.O3',
sl
le
!
Rl
l; l"-
:
|-l
lK lo',
|
-l
l-
lr^r
i
ll
nPN: 501-45-015J ' I
rr^
|
,r.vvr
rvvrvv
pl I
l:f
O
>l
r-r
r;
.> r
;lrr-l
lo
t
;l
E6 la
ru
pl
lp
O
'r:l
-,n,,T
n-
r'A\/
lL')
4
El
. "Bl#;^ilAil.rrjB l\:fi?i-''!,i,z,o
=
>l
uLUruA "''n \Z43
J
zsZ.oz'
f is...M
tu NOO"1 s'Jg"W l\
272.02'
3" CITY OF EL MIRAGE
J" MARICOpA CO.
BRASS CAP IN HAND
BRASS CAP FLUSH
HOLE (DOWN 0.J')
N00" 15', 39" \^/
NB9" 33', ?4',W
NB9'35' ?4',W
N45" O4', ?9',E
s00" 1 5' 39" E
55,
30,
20,
28,
?o,
00'
nn,
00'
IC.
00'
d
a
N
APN: 501-45-015J
r)
l-rd
lr)
RIGHT OT WAY
ntrnraATtoNt\ u
v|U|v.\w/
ffir\('a z\
rf . ?-=!t,\ ^z
o* KNEZEVIC o
NOT TO SCALE
PAGE 1 OF 1
DESCRIPTION
CRITERIA
AVERAGE DAY DEMAND - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Gallons per capita per day (gpcd)(1)
117
Density (people per dwelling unit)(2)
3.35
AVERAGE DAY DEMAND - MULTI-FAMILY/COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL
Land Use Category(3)
Varies
PEAKING FACTORS
Maximum Day / Average Day
1.7
Peak Hour / Maximum Day
1.7
Peak Hour / Average Day
2.9
VELOCITY CRITERIA
Maximum Day Condition
Max Velocity < 5 fps
Peak Hour Condition
Max Velocity ≤ 7 fps
Max Day Plus Fire Flow Condition
Max Velocity < 10 fps
HEAD LOSS CRITERIA
Maximum Day Condition
2 to 7 feet per 1,000 feet of pipe
Peak Hour Condition
< 10 feet per 1,000 feet of pipe
PRESSURE CRITERIA
Max Day Plus Fire Flow Condition
Min Residual Pressure of 20 psi
Peak Hour Condition
Min System Pressure of 40 psi
FIRE DEMAND CRITERIA
Single Family Residential
Determined by Fire Dept.
All Other Land Uses
Determined by Fire Dept.
NOTES:
(1) Average per capita water use per 2012 Water and Wastewater Master Plan provided by Wilson Engineers
(2) Persons per household per US Census Bureau (2020)
(3) Use latest version of City of Phoenix Design Standards Manual for Water and Wastewater Systems.
Other values may be used with prior approval from the Engineering Division
WATER SYSTEM DESIGN CRITERIA
DESCRIPTION
CRITERIA
AVERAGE DAY DEMAND - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Gallons per capita per day (gpcd)(1)
58.5
Density (people per dwelling unit)(2)
3.35
AVERAGE DAY DEMAND - MULTI-FAMILY/COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL
Land Use Category(3)
Varies
PEAKING FACTORS
Dry Weather Peaking Factors (Applied to Average Flows)
Per AAC R18-9-E301.D (see next page)
Wet Weather Peaking Factors (Applied to Peak Flows)
1.17
VELOCITY CRITERIA
Gravity Mains
2 fps ≤ Velocity ≤ 8 fps
Force Mains
3 fps ≤ Velocity ≤ 7 fps
FLOW DEPTH CRITERIA (d/D) FOR DRY WEATHER PEAK HOUR FLOWS
d/D for new sewer with diameter 10 inches or less
0.50
d/D for new sewer with diameter 12 inches and above
0.75 (AAC R18-9-E301.D.e.iii)
FLOW DEPTH CRITERIA (d/D) FOR WET WEATHER PEAK HOUR FLOWS
d/D for designing new sewer pipe
< 0.90
d/D for evaluating existing pipe in developed areas
< 1.00
HEAD LOSS CRITERIA
Gravity pipe
Manning's n=0.013
Pressure pipe
Hazen Williams' C=120
MANHOLES
When smaller pipe joins larger pipe
Match Crowns
Invert drop through manhole
0.20 feet
NOTES:
(1) Average per capita water use per 2012 Water and Wastewater Master Plan provided by Wilson Engineers
(2) Persons per household per US Census Bureau (2020)
(3) Use latest version of City of Phoenix Design Standards Manual for Water and Wastewater Systems. Other
values may be used with prior approval from the Engineering Division
WASTEWATER SYSTEM DESIGN CRITERIA
Upstream Population
Dry Weather Peaking Factor
100
3.62
200
3.14
300
2.90
400
2.74
500
2.64
600
2.56
700
2.50
800
2.46
900
2.42
1,000
2.38
1,001 to 10,000
PF = (6.330 x p-0.231) + 1.094
10,001 to 100,000
PF = (6.177 x p-0.233) + 1.128
More than 100,000
PF = (4.500 x p-0.174) + 0.945
PF = Dry Weather Peaking Factor
p = Upstream Population
AAC R18-9-E301.D
Fire Department
Conditional Use Permit Comments
Date: 1-22-24
Project: FPO Plant Expansion
Project Address/APN: 12126 W Olive Avenue / 501-45-015V
• No comments
Comments generated utilizing the 2018 International Fire Code and the City Municipal Code.
Jason Napier | Fire Marshal
El Mirage Fire Department
13601 N. El Mirage Rd.
El Mirage, Arizona 85335
T. 623-251-3507 | F. 623-583-8257
jnapier@elmirageaz.gov