PowerPoint Presentation (Added 6/17/21)
Extracted text (via pymupdf)
6177 characters
Bond Committee
June 22, 2021
2
Overview
• General Obligation (G.O.) Bonds
• Information on Successful Bond Elections
• Consensus on 2022 Bond Election
• Formation of a Bond Committee
• 2022 Bond Election Timeline
3
General Obligation (G.O.) Bonds
• Paid for using secondary property tax
– Assumes a flat levy
• Must be authorized by voters
• Constitutional limits
– Based on Net Assessed Full Cash Value
– Outstanding G.O. debt may not exceed:
• 20% for combined water, sewer, public safety, streets, transportation,
open space, and parks
• 6% for general municipal purpose
• 2021 legislation allows for repurposing bond authority
4
G.O. Bond Additional Authorization Needed
Current G. O. Bond
Voter Authorization
FY2022-FY2031
CIP
Remaining G.O. Bond
Voter Authorization
Fiscal Year
Needed
Landfill
15,540,000 22,528,582 (6,988,582)
FY25-26
Operations Center
6,200,000 - 6,200,000
Library
17,096,000 23,966,220 (6,870,220)
FY25-26
Cultural Facility
13,132,000 3,172,624 9,959,376
Economic Development 22,047,000 - 22,047,000
Governmental Facilities 23,745,000 23,583,670 161,330
Public Safety
92,436,320 60,812,544 31,623,776
Streets and Parking
17,662,295 131,039,994 (113,377,699)
FY22-23
Transit
6,750,000 - 6,750,000
Open Space/Trails
50,280,437 22,924,277 27,356,160
Parks and Recreation
12,505,888 100,079,181 (87,573,293)
FY22-23
Flood Control
9,503,744 16,464,435 (6,960,691)
FY24-25
Water and Sewer
10,000,000 - 10,000,000
5
Information on Successful 2020 Bond Election
• City of Tempe
– All Five (5) Bond Questions Totaling $349M Passed
• Water and Sewer Improvements ($134M)
• Street Improvements and Storm Drains ($74M)
• Public Safety ($34M)
• Park Improvements and Community Services ($45M)
• Municipal Infrastructure Preservation (62M)
– No Bond Committee
– Public Outreach
• Bond Election Virtual Community Forum (YouTube, 224 Views)
• Article on Tempe Today
• Tempe Chamber of Commerce Voter’s Guide
6
Information on Successful 2020 Bond Election
• City of Tempe
– Endorsement from Tempe Chamber of Commerce
– Election Signs
– Publicity Pamphlet
• Tax impact of $170.88 per year for residence valued at $250k
• Four (4) Arguments FOR the Bonds
– Mayor and Council
– Chair of Tempe Neighborhood Advisory Commission
– Tempe Fire Fighters
– Mayor
• No Arguments AGAINST the Bonds
7
Information on Successful 2020 Bond Election
• City of Mesa
– One (1) Bond Question Totaling $100M for Street and Highway Passed
– No Bond Committee
– Public Outreach
• 4 Public Meetings
• 5 Focus Groups
• 8 Individual Stakeholder Interviews
– Election Signs
8
Information on Successful 2020 Bond Election
• City of Mesa
– Publicity Pamphlet
• Tax impact of $45 per year for residence valued at $250k
• Five (5) Arguments FOR the Bonds
– Chamber of Commerce
– Visit Mesa
– United Mesa Firefighters
– Mayor
– Connecting Mesa’s Neighborhoods
• No Arguments AGAINST the Bonds
9
Information on Successful 2019 Bond Election
• City of Scottsdale
– All Three (3) Questions Totaling $319M Passed
• Parks, Recreation, and Senior Services ($112.6M)
• Community Spaces and Infrastructure ($112.3M)
• Public Safety and Technology ($94.1M)
– Council Capital Improvement Plan Sub-committee
• 3 Council Members appointed by the Mayor
• Tasked to review the CIP and developed a list of 67 necessary projects but
lacked funding
– Public Outreach (Feb 19 through March 12)
• Six (6) Public Meetings (211 total attendees)
• Online Engagement (10,910 page views)
• For The Best Scottsdale Political Action Committee (PAC)
10
Information on Successful 2019 Bond Election
• City of Scottsdale
– Publicity Pamphlet
• Tax impact of $71.93 per year for a residence valued at $250k
• 59 Combined Arguments FOR the Bonds
– Mayor and Council
– Former Mayors and Council Members
– For The Best Scottsdale PAC
– Chamber of Commerce
– CEO and Presidents of Businesses
• Two (2) Arguments AGAINST the Bonds
– Parks, Recreation, and Senior Services
– In 2015, created a Citizen’s Bond Oversight Committee
11
Information on Successful 2007 Bond Election
• City of Glendale
– Five Propositions totaling $270M
• 4 of the 5 passed
• Economic Development Bond failed
– Established a 70-member bond committee
• 5 Subcommittees
• Held 12 committee meetings
• Committee and Subcommittees made recommendations to add or remove
projects and increase the amount requested
– Publicity Pamphlet
• No arguments FOR or AGAINST the bonds
12
Consensus on 2022 Election
•
No Bond Committee
•
Form a Bond Committee
– Citizens
– Councilmembers
– Size of committee
• Citizen participation
– Public Meetings
– Focus Groups
– Surveys
– Citizens Bond Oversight Committee (post election)
13
Bond Committee
• The role of the committee:
– Review financial information
– Review bonding capacity
– Assess need for additional voter authorization
– Recommend ballot language
• Composition of the committee
– Community “Influencers”
• Vested interest in the community
• HOA Presidents
• Business Leaders
• Members of the Chamber of Commerce
14
Potential Bond Election Timeline
• Assuming an election in November 2022
– Formation of bond committee
Aug 2021
– Appoint committee members
Sept 2021
– Committee meetings
Oct 2021 – Mar 2022
– Notify the County of election
Apr 2022
– Public outreach
Apr 2022 – Aug 2022
– Updates to Council
Monthly
15
Questions?