Services Agreement

City of Glendale — Regular Meeting (2021-06-08)

View PDF Item 31 Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 92466 characters
1 
 
SERVICES AGREEMENT 
BETWEEN CITY OF GLENDALE, ARIZONA AND 
NATIONAL DEMOGRAPHICS, INC. 
THIS SERVICES AGREEMENT (herein “Agreement”) is made and entered into by and 
between the City of Glendale Arizona, ("the Client") at 5850 W. Glendale Avenue, Glendale, AZ 
85301 (“Client”) and National Demographics Inc., a California corporation (“Consultant”) at PO 
1520 N Pacific Ave, Glendale, CA 91202.  Client and Consultant are sometimes individually 
referred to as “Party” or collectively as “Parties”. 
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:   
1. 
SERVICES OF CONSULTANT 
1.1 
Scope of Services.  In compliance with all of the terms and conditions of 
this Agreement, Consultant shall perform the work or services set forth in the “Scope of Services,” 
attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference.  Consultant warrants it has 
the experience and ability to perform all work and services required hereunder and that it shall 
diligently perform such work and services in a professional and satisfactory manner.   
1.2 
Compliance With Law.  All work and services rendered hereunder shall be 
provided in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of any 
federal, state, or local governmental agency of competent jurisdiction. 
1.3 
Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments.  Consultant shall obtain at its sole 
cost and expense such licenses, permits, and approvals as may be required by law for the 
performance of the services required by the Agreement. 
2. 
COMPENSATION 
2.1 
Contract Sum.  For the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, 
Consultant shall be compensated as specified in Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this 
reference.  Payments will be made by Client within thirty (30) working days of Client's receipt of 
invoices. 
2.2 
Invoices.  Each month Consultant shall furnish to Client an original invoice 
for all work performed during the preceding month in a form approved by Client.  By submitting 
an invoice for payment under this Agreement, Consultant is certifying compliance with all 
provisions of the Agreement.  Contractor shall not invoice Client for any duplicate services 
performed by more than one person.  
Client may independently review each invoice submitted by Consultant to 
determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the 
provisions of this Agreement.  Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred 
by Consultant which are disputed by Client, Client will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to 
be paid within thirty (30) days of receipt of Consultant’s correct and undisputed invoice.  In the

2 
 
event any charges or expenses are disputed by Client, the original invoice shall be returned by 
Client to Consultant for correction and resubmission.  Review and payment by Client of any 
invoice provided by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies provided 
herein or any applicable law.  
2.3 
Additional Services.  Client shall have the right at any time during the 
performance of the services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra work beyond that 
specified in the Scope of Services or make changes by altering, adding to, or deducting from said 
work.  No such extra work or change may be undertaken unless a written order is first given by 
the Contract Officer to Consultant, describing in detail the extra work or change and the reason(s) 
therefor and incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum for the actual cost of the 
extra work or change, and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are 
subject to the written approval of Consultant.   
No claim for an adjustment in the contract amount or time for performance shall be valid 
unless the procedures established in this Section are followed. 
3. 
PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE 
3.1 
Time of Essence.  Time is of the essence in the performance of this 
Agreement.  
3.2 
Time for Performance.  Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to 
this Agreement upon the effective date of this Agreement. 
3.3 
Force Majeure.  The time period(s) as may be specified for performance of 
the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to 
unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of Consultant, 
including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, 
earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, 
litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including Client, if Consultant shall within ten 
days after the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of 
the delay.  The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the 
time for performing the services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the judgment 
of the Contract Officer such delay is justified.  The Contract Officer shall extend the time for 
performance in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 2.3.  The Contract Officer’s 
determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement.  In no event shall 
Consultant be entitled to recover damages against Client for any delay in the performance of this 
Agreement, however caused, Consultant’s sole remedy being extension of the Agreement pursuant 
to this Section. 
3.4 
Term; Effective Date.  Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 
7 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until completion of the 
services but not exceeding one year after the date hereof.  The Effective Date of this Agreement 
shall be June 9, 2021.

3 
 
4. 
COORDINATION OF WORK 
4.1 
Representative of Consultant.  Douglas Johnson, President of Consultant is 
hereby designated as being the representative of Consultant authorized to act on its behalf with 
respect to the work and services specified herein and to make all decisions in connection therewith.  
All personnel of Consultant and any authorized agents shall be under the exclusive direction of the 
representative of Consultant.  Consultant shall utilize only competent personnel to perform 
services pursuant to this Agreement.  Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain 
the stability and continuity of Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, and shall keep Client informed 
of any changes. In the event that Client, in its sole discretion, at any time during the term of this 
Agreement, desires to reassign any staff or subcontractor of Consultant, Consultant shall, 
immediately upon a Reassign Notice from Client of such desire of Client, reassign such persons 
or persons. 
4.2 
Contract Officer.  Michael Bailey, Attorney for the Client,  is hereby 
designated as being the representative Client authorized to act on its behalf with respect to the 
work and services specified herein and to make all decisions in connection therewith (the “Contract 
Officer”).  Client shall have the right to designate another Contract Officer by providing written 
notice to Consultant, and may designate deputy Contract Officers as needed. 
4.3 
Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment.  Consultant shall not 
contract with any entity to perform in whole or in part the work or services required hereunder 
without the express written approval of Client.  Neither this Agreement nor any interest herein 
may be assigned or transferred, voluntarily or by operation of law, without the prior written 
approval of Client.  Any such prohibited assignment or transfer shall be void. 
4.4 
Independent Contractor.  Neither Client nor any of its employees shall have 
any control over the manner, mode, or means by which Consultant, its agents or employees, 
perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth.  Consultant shall perform all 
services required herein as an independent contractor of Client with only such obligations as are 
consistent with that role.  Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any 
of its agents or employees are agents or employees of Client, or that it is a member of a joint 
enterprise with Client. 
5. 
INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION 
5.1 
Insurance Coverages.  Consultant shall procure and maintain, at its sole cost 
and expense, in a form and content satisfactory to Client, during the entire term of this Agreement 
including any extension thereof, the following policies of insurance which shall cover all elected 
and appointed officers, employees, and agents of Client: 
(a) 
Comprehensive General Liability Insurance.  A policy of comprehensive 
general liability insurance written on a per occurrence basis for bodily injury, personal injury, and 
property damage.  The policy of insurance shall be in an amount not less than $1,000,000.00 per 
occurrence or if a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply 
separately to this contract/location, or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the occurrence 
limit.

4 
 
(b) 
Worker’s Compensation Insurance.  A policy of worker’s compensation 
insurance in such amount as will fully comply with the laws of the State of California and which 
shall indemnify, insure, and provide legal defense for Consultant and Client against any loss, 
claim, or damage arising from any injuries or occupational diseases occurring to any worker 
employed by or any persons retained by Consultant in the course of carrying out the work or 
services contemplated in this Agreement.  
(c) 
Automotive Insurance.  A policy of comprehensive automobile liability 
insurance written on a per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage in an amount not less 
than either (i) bodily injury liability limits of $100,000 per person and $300,000 per occurrence 
and property damage liability limits of $150,000 per occurrence or (ii) combined single limit 
liability of $1,000,000.  The policy shall include coverage for owned, non-owned, leased, and hired 
cars. 
(d) 
Professional Liability.  Professional liability insurance appropriate to 
Consultant’s profession.  This coverage may be written on a “claims made” basis, and must include 
coverage for contractual liability.  The professional liability insurance required by this Agreement 
must be endorsed to be applicable to claims based upon, arising out of, or related to services 
performed under this Agreement.  The insurance must be maintained for at least 3 consecutive 
years following the completion of Consultant’s services or the termination of this Agreement.  
During this additional 3-year period, Consultant shall annually and upon request of Client submit 
written evidence of this continuous coverage. 
(e) 
Additional Insurance.  Policies of such other insurance, as may be required 
in the Special Requirements. 
(f) 
Subcontractors.  Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insureds 
under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and certified endorsements for each 
subcontractor.  All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated 
herein.  
5.2 
General Insurance Requirements.  All of the above policies of insurance 
shall be primary insurance and shall name Client and each of their its officers, employees, and 
agents as additional insureds, and any insurance maintained by the Client or any of their officers, 
employees, or agents shall apply in excess of, and not contribute with, Consultant’s insurance.  The 
insurer is deemed hereof to waive all rights of subrogation and contribution it may have against 
Client, its officers, employees, and agents and their respective insurers.  The insurance policy must 
specify that where the primary insured does not satisfy the self-insured retention, any additional 
insured may satisfy the self-insured retention.  All of said policies of insurance shall provide that 
said insurance may not be amended or cancelled by the insurer or any party hereto without 
providing thirty-days’ prior written notice by certified mail return receipt requested to Client.  In 
the event any of said policies of insurance are cancelled, Consultant shall, prior to the cancellation 
date, submit new evidence of insurance in conformance with this Section 5.1 to the Contract 
Officer.  No work or services under this Agreement shall commence until Consultant has provided 
Client with Certificates of Insurance or appropriate insurance binders evidencing the above 
insurance coverages and said Certificates of Insurance or binders are approved by Client.  Client 
reserves the right to inspect complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies at any

5 
 
time.  Any failure to comply with the reporting or other provisions of the policies including 
breaches or warranties shall not affect coverage provided to Client. 
The insurance required by this Agreement shall be satisfactory only if issued by 
companies qualified to do business in California, rated “A” or better in the most recent edition of 
Best Rating Guide, The Key Rating Guide, or in the Federal Register, and only if they are of a 
financial category Class VII or better, unless such requirements are waived by the Contract Officer 
or other designee of Client due to unique circumstances. 
5.3 
Indemnification.  To the full extent provided by law, Consultant agrees to 
indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the Client and each of their officers, employees and agents 
against, any and all actions, suits, claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, 
obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities, including paying any legal costs, attorney’s fees, or 
paying any judgment (herein “claims or liabilities”) that may be asserted or claimed by any person, 
firm, or entity arising out of or in connection with Consultant’s or any of its officers’, employees’, 
agents’ or subcontractors’ performance of the work or services pursuant to this Agreement; 
provided, that the duty to indemnify and hold harmless are only to the extent any claims or 
liabilities are caused Consultant, or any of its officers, agents, employees, agents or subcontractors. 
6. 
RECORDS, REPORTS, AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION 
6.1 
Records.  Consultant shall keep, and require subcontractors to keep, such 
ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other 
documents relating to the disbursements charged to Client and services performed hereunder (the 
“books and records”), as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement 
and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the performance of such services and shall keep such 
records for a period of three years following completion of the services hereunder.  The Contract 
Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all times during normal business 
hours of Client, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make records and transcripts from 
such records.   
6.2 
Reports.  Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract 
Officer such reports concerning the performance of the services required by this Agreement or as 
the Contract Officer shall require.   
6.3 
Confidentiality and Release of Information. 
(a) 
All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in 
performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the 
public domain or already known to Consultant.  Consultant shall not release or disclose any such 
information or work product to persons or entities other than Client without prior written 
authorization from the Contract Officer.  
(b) 
Consultant shall not, without prior written authorization from the Contract 
Officer, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, 
response to interrogatories, or other information concerning the work performed under this 
Agreement.  Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided 
Consultant gives Client notice of such court order or subpoena.

6 
 
(c) 
If Consultant provides any information or work product in violation of this 
Agreement, then Client shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for 
any damages, costs and fees, including attorneys’ fees, caused by or incurred as a result of 
Consultant’s conduct. 
(d) 
Consultant shall promptly notify Client if Consultant is served with any 
summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, 
request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party 
regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under.  Client retains the right, but has no 
obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding.  
Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with Client and to provide Client with the opportunity to 
review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. 
6.4 
Ownership of Documents.  All studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, 
reports, records, drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, documents and other 
materials (the “documents and materials”) prepared by Consultant in the performance of this 
Agreement shall be the property of Client and shall be delivered to Client upon request of the 
Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement, and Consultant shall have no claim 
for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by Client of its full 
rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the documents and materials hereunder.  
Moreover, Consultant with respect to any documents and materials that may qualify as “works 
made for hire” as defined in 17 U.S.C. § 101, such documents and materials are hereby deemed 
“works made for hire” for Client.  
7. 
ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION  
7.1 
California Law.  This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and 
governed both as to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the 
State of California.  Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim, or matter arising out of or in 
relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, 
State of California. 
7.2 
Disputes; Default.  In the event Consultant is in default under the terms of 
this Agreement, Client shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant 
for any work performed after the date of default.  Instead, Client may give notice to Consultant of 
the default and the reasons for the default.  The notice shall include the timeframe in which 
Consultant may cure the default.  This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be 
extended, if circumstances warrant.  During the period of time Consultant is in default, Client shall 
hold all invoices and shall proceed with payment on the invoices only when the default is cured.  
If Consultant does not cure the default, Client may take necessary steps to terminate this 
Agreement under this Article.   
7.3 
Legal Action.  In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may 
take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct, or remedy any default, to recover damages 
for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or 
injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement.  
Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement,

7 
 
the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or 
more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, 
of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. 
7.4 
Termination Prior to Expiration of Term.  This Section shall govern any 
termination of this Contract except as specifically provided in the following Section for 
termination for cause.  Client reserves the right to terminate this Contract at any time, with or 
without cause, upon fifteen-days’ written notice to Consultant, except that where termination is 
due to the fault of Consultant, the period of notice may be such shorter time as may be determined 
by the Contract Officer.  In addition, Consultant reserves the right to terminate this Contract at any 
time, with or without cause, upon sixty-days’ written notice to Client, except that where 
termination is due to the fault of Client, the period of notice may be such shorter time as Consultant 
may determine, but no less than fifteen days.  Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Consultant 
shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the 
Contract Officer.  Except where Consultant has initiated termination, Consultant shall be entitled 
to compensation for all services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination 
and for any services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with this 
Agreement or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer.  In the event Consultant has 
initiated termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation only for the reasonable value of 
the work product actually produced hereunder.  In the event of termination without cause pursuant 
to this Section, the terminating party need not provide the non-terminating party with the 
opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 7.2. 
7.5 
Termination for Default of Consultant.  If termination is due to the failure 
of Consultant to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, Client may, after compliance with the 
provisions of Section 7.2, take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or 
otherwise, and Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the 
services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that Client shall 
use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and Client may withhold any payments to 
Consultant for the purpose of set-off or partial payment of the amounts owed Client as previously 
stated. 
8. 
MISCELLANEOUS 
8.1 
Covenant Against Discrimination.  Consultant covenants that, by and for 
itself, its heirs, executors, assigns and all persons claiming under or through them, there shall be 
no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons on account of race, 
color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class in the 
performance of this Agreement.  Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants 
are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, 
creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, or other protected class. 
8.2 
Non-liability of Client Officers and Employees.  No officer or employee of 
Client shall be personally liable to Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event of any 
default or breach by Client or for any amount, which may become due to Consultant or to its 
successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement.

8 
 
8.3 
Facilities and Equipment.  Except as otherwise provided, Consultant shall, 
at its own cost and expense, provide all facilities and equipment necessary to perform the services 
required by this Agreement.  In no event shall Client be required to furnish any facilities that may 
involve incurring any direct expense, including but not limited to computer, long distance 
telephone, network data, internet, or other communication charges, vehicles, and reproduction 
facilities.  
8.4 
Payment of Taxes.  Consultant is solely responsible for the payment of 
employment taxes incurred under this Agreement and any federal and state taxes. 
8.5 
Notice.  Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, or 
communication either party desires or is required to give to the other party shall be in writing and 
shall be personally delivered, sent by pre-paid First Class U.S. Mail, registered or certified mail, 
postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or delivered or sent by facsimile with attached evidence 
of completed transmission, and shall be deemed received upon the earlier of (i) the date of delivery 
to the address of the person to receive such notice if delivered personally or by messenger or 
overnight courier; (ii) three (3) business days after the date of posting by the United States Post 
Office if by mail; or (iii) when sent if given by facsimile.  Any notice, request, demand, direction, 
or other communication sent by facsimile must be confirmed within forty-eight (48) hours by letter 
mailed or delivered.  Other forms of electronic transmission such as e-mails, text messages, instant 
messages are not acceptable manners of notice required hereunder. Notices or other 
communications shall be addressed as follows:.  
If to Client: 
Julie K. Bower 
 
City Clerk 
 
5850 W. Glendale Ave. 
 
Ste. 450 
 
Glendale, AZ 85301  
 
If to Consultant: 
National Demographics , Inc. 
P.O. Box 5271 
Glendale, CA 91221 
Attn:  Douglas Johnson, President 
Office: 818.254.1221 
 
8.6 
Integration; Amendment.  It is understood there are no oral agreements 
between the parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels 
any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between 
the parties regarding the subject matter hereof, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement.  
This Agreement may be amended at any time by the mutual consent of the parties by an instrument 
in writing. 
8.7 
Severability.  In the event that part of this Agreement shall be declared 
invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such 
invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining portions of this Agreement 
which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties

9 
 
hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either party of the 
basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless. 
8.8 
Waiver.  No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by any 
party shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver.  A party’s consent to or 
approval of any act by the other party requiring the party’s consent or approval shall not be deemed 
to waive or render unnecessary the other party’s consent to or approval of any subsequent act.  Any 
waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other 
default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 
8.9 
Counterparts.  This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of 
which shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same 
instrument. 
8.10 
Corporate Authority.  The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of 
the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly 
authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this 
Agreement, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) the entering 
into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is 
bound.  
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date 
and year first-above written 
CONTRACTOR: 
 
 
 
 
CLIENT: 
NATIONAL DEMOGRAPHICS, INC. 
 
CITY OF GLENDALE, ARIZONA 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
a municipal corporation 
 
By: ____________________________ 
 
By: ____________________________ 
       Douglas Johnson, President/CEO 
 
       Kevin Phelps, City Manager 
       P.O. Box 5271 
       Glendale, CA 91221 
 
 
 
ATTEST: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
____________________________ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Julie K. Bower, City Clerk 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
APPROVED AS TO FORM: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
____________________________ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Michael Bailey, City Attorney

B-1 
 
EXHIBIT “A” 
NDC Proposal

National Demographics Corporation 
Phone: (818) 254-1221 
P.O. Box 5271 
info@NDCresearch.com 
FAX (818) 254-1221 
Glendale, CA 91221 
www.NDCresearch.com 
A Proposal to 
Glendale 
for Demographic Services 
By National Demographics Corporation 
Douglas Johnson, President 
February 11, 2021 
Exhibit A

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 1 
 
 
 
February 11, 2021 
Ryan Lee, Intergovernmental Programs Manager 
City of Glendale 
5850 W Glendale Ave 
Glendale, AZ 85301 
 
Dear Mr. Lee, 
Thank you for the opportunity to provide this proposal to Glendale. NDC has more 
than 40 years of experience districting and redistricting hundreds of cities, school 
districts and other local jurisdictions across Arizona and the southwest, including the 
city’s initial move to by-district elections, the City’s 2011 redistricting, and similar work 
for Surprise, Peoria, Phoenix, Mesa and Yuma County (a full client list is available at 
www.ndcresearch.com/clients/). We welcome the opportunity to bring the firm’s 
expertise and skills to assist the City. 
For each project, there are certain required basic elements, and there are several options 
that the City can include or leave out at its option. NDC carefully tailors each project 
to the needs and goals of the individual client partner. NDC also welcomes the 
opportunity to work with our clients to encourage public participation in this process, 
as we offer several tools developed specifically for public engagement in districting and 
redistricting. 
The attached proposal consists of a brief introduction; specific proposed project 
elements and options; timeline and cost information; conclusion; and signature section. 
NDC looks forward to working with you on this effort. Please call or email anytime if 
you have any questions, concerns, or requests regarding this proposal. 
Sincerely, 
 
Douglas Johnson 
President

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 2 
 
 
Table of Contents 
 
Brief History of National Demographics Corporation ........................................... 3 
Company Philosophy .................................................................................................... 4 
Professionalism .................................................................................................. 4 
Partnership .......................................................................................................... 4 
Local Leadership and NDC’s Non-Partisan Approach ............................... 4 
Openness ............................................................................................................. 5 
Public Engagement ............................................................................................ 5 
Project Software ................................................................................................. 6 
NDC Approach to Public Engagement ..................................................................... 6 
The Three E’s of Public Participation: Engage, Educate, and Empower 6 
Sample Public Participation Mapping Tool ................................................... 7 
Sample Online Mapping Tool ......................................................................... 8 
Sample NDC “Interactive Review Map”   ..................................................... 8 
The NDC Team ............................................................................................................. 9 
NDC Current Organization Chart .................................................................. 9 
Recognition of NDC’s Expertise .............................................................................. 10 
NDC Testimonials ...................................................................................................... 14 
Impeccable References ............................................................................................... 15 
Summary Scope of Work ........................................................................................... 16 
Detailed Project Scope of Work ............................................................................... 17 
Details of Optional Project Elements ...................................................................... 21 
Advisory or Independent Redistricting Commissions ............................... 21 
Outreach Assistance ........................................................................................ 21 
Project Website ................................................................................................ 21 
Background on Online Mapping Tool Options ......................................... 22 
Paper- and Excel-based Public Mapping Tools .......................................... 25 
Project Pricing .............................................................................................................. 26 
Other Potential Project-Related Expenses: ............................................................. 26 
Additional Analysis ...................................................................................................... 27 
Requested Payment terms: ......................................................................................... 27 
Exception: “Still Balanced” Jurisdictions ................................................................. 27 
Exception: “Minimal Changes” Scope of Work ..................................................... 28 
Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 29 
Proposal Acceptance ................................................................................................... 30 
Resumes of NDC President Dr. Douglas Johnson and  
Vice President Dr. Justin Levitt ..................................................................... 33

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 3 
 
 
 
Brief History of National Demographics Corporation 
NDC has served hundreds of local governments since our founding in 1979. 
While most of NDC’s work is in California and Arizona, the firm has performed 
projects in all regions of the country, serving clients as varied as the States of 
Mississippi, Arizona, Florida and Illinois; Clark County (Nevada); the California 
counties of Merced, San Bernardino, and San Diego; the San Diego Unified 
School District; the City of Oakland; Yuma County (Arizona); the Arizona cities 
of Glendale, Mesa, Peoria, Phoenix, and Surprise; and relatively smaller 
jurisdictions such as the City of Bradbury and Clay Elementary School District. 
The company is especially well known for its districting and redistricting work 
with local governments. NDC has established a reputation as the leading 
demographic expert on the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA), having 
performed demographic assessments of potential CVRA liability and/or moves 
to by-district elections for over 350 jurisdictions. No company has been 
responsible for addressing the electoral demographic needs of more local 
governments, as NDC has districted and/or redistricted more than 250 counties, 
school districts, cities, water districts, and other local jurisdictions.  
Nationally recognized as a pioneer in good government districting and 
redistricting, NDC has unmatched expertise in the issues, questions, and 
decisions jurisdictions face in any discussion regarding districting, redistricting, 
the California and Federal Voting Rights Act and related election system choices.

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 4 
 
 
Company Philosophy 
Professionalism 
NDC’s personnel are nationally recognized as leaders in the districting field and 
are responsible for numerous books and articles on the subject. NDC possesses 
all the hardware and software necessary to meet the districting and redistricting 
needs of any jurisdiction, and its personnel have unmatched experience in the 
line-drawing side of this work, as well as in developing the databases used for 
these purposes. But more important are the firm’s interpersonal skills and the 
team’s understanding of the perspective of all parties in this process.  
Partnership 
In recognition of the vital role these groups play in informing and assisting their 
members, NDC is a sponsor of the California League of Cities, the California 
Special Districts Association, and we are currently finalizing our sponsorship of 
the California School Boards Association and the California Association of 
Counties. 
For years, NDC has frequently appeared on panels organized by these 
organizations to share information with their members about the California 
Voting Rights Act, the Census, and the districting and redistricting rules and 
process. 
NDC also assists the League of Cities and CSBA with negotiations and suggested 
language for legislation on districting/redistricting and the California Voting 
Rights Act. 
Local Leadership and NDC’s Non-Partisan Approach 
NDC is an advisor and technical resource. The firm’s role is to assist our clients 
in implementing our clients’ goals and directions within the complicated 
demographic and legal constraints of the project. NDC shares its experience and 
expertise, but the final plan is selected by the jurisdiction’s elected leaders, not 
NDC. The firm is sometimes criticized, usually by people from outside of the 
client jurisdiction, for not acting as an advocate or proselytizer for what these 
outsiders think is “right” for the client. But NDC team members are expert 
advisors, not proselytizers. NDC guides our clients through the process to a map 
that meets all legal requirements and the goals of our client – not the goals of 
outside critics. NDC welcomes the chance to assist each client through this 
process following the direction of the jurisdiction's elected leadership, key staff 
members, and the entire community.

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 5 
 
 
Understandably, a common question in every redistricting whether there is any 
influence of any improper political bias on the process. NDC’s four decades of 
success working for jurisdictions with all-Democratic leadership, jurisdictions 
with all-Republican leadership, and every possible combination in between, 
reflects our steadfast dedication to non-partisan service. The NDC team includes 
members who worked or served in Republican positions before coming to NDC, 
and members who worked or served in Democratic positions, and obviously 
every team member holds their own personal political beliefs. Arriving at work, 
each of us puts our personal political feelings aside and focuses on implementing 
the policy goals and directions of our clients using NDC’s non-partisan, 
professional and expert guidance regarding the requirements and options facing 
each client. We believe most of our clients would be hard-pressed to guess which 
NDC team members are registered as independents or with any political party, 
and we are proud to have satisfied customers and clients whose partisan leanings 
(even in their non-partisan local government offices) similarly cross the entire 
partisan spectrum. 
Openness 
Any change in election systems can have momentous implications for the 
distribution of political power in a jurisdiction and for access by groups and 
individuals to the governance process. Not surprisingly, such changes often 
attract considerable public attention, sometimes generate intense controversy, 
and may draw charges of manipulation and abuse of power. It is crucial, 
therefore, that the jurisdiction establish, at the beginning, a process that is not 
only fair, but that is seen to be fair, to all contending groups and individuals.  
Public Engagement 
NDC pioneered the “transparent districting” approach that involves the public 
at every stage of the process and the company invented the "public participation 
kit" back in 1990. But NDC’s most valuable service is the firm’s experience 
transforming often contentious and passionate debates into thoughtful, 
constructive discussions focused on the options and outcomes rather than 
individual personalities. NDC also has considerable experience working with 
translators in public forums and providing materials in English and Spanish. 
NDC’s approach has been widely praised in the media, and NDC has worked 
extensively with all types of press including radio, television, newspaper, and new 
media.

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 6 
 
 
Project Software 
NDC uses Caliper Corporation’s Maptitude for Redistricting software for 
processing public map submissions and drawing NDC’s draft maps and Board-
directed revisions. Maptitude for Redistricting can open and use the standard 
“Shapefile” and “File Geodatabase” GIS data formats, and Maptitude for 
Redistricting can export all files to “Shapefile” and “File Geodatabase” formats. 
NDC uses ESRI’s ArcGIS Online to present those maps for Board, Staff and 
Public review in an easy-to-use, interactive format. NDC also uses ArcGIS Pro 
for some specialized Geographic Information System (GIS) analysis; for opening 
and reviewing data received from clients or from other jurisdictions; and when 
needed for final map post-adoption processing for delivery to the jurisdiction 
and to the County Registrar. Microsoft PowerPoint is also used for many 
presentations, though NDC is currently experimenting with a possible move to 
ESRI’s “Story Maps” for some presentations. 
NDC Approach to Public Engagement 
The Three E’s of Public Participation: Engage, Educate, and Empower 
NDC’s “Three E’s” approach recognizes the complex and daunting nature of 
districting and redistricting projects, while emphasizing the importance of public 
participation in such projects. 
Given the complexity of the issue, the public cannot be expected to jump in with 
constructive ideas and input without encouragement. So NDC’s approach begins 
with the first “E”: Engage. NDC works with our clients to get the word out 
about why the project matters – and how input from residents can be a decisive 
element of the project. 
Once their interest is engaged, the second “E” is Educate. Most media coverage 
of this topic focuses on congressional gerrymandering, giving the entire field a 
tainted and hopeless feel. NDC works with our clients to explain how local 
districting and redistricting is based on neighborhoods and communities – not 
national politics. We educate the public on the data, requirements and goals of 
redistricting, and on the many options residents have to formulate and share their 
own maps or other constructive input. 
The third “E” is Empower. For those projects where the level of public interest 
and engagement justify the expense, NDC offers an unmatched array of paper, 
Excel-based, and online mapping tools that residents can use to draw detailed, 
population-balanced maps for consideration by the jurisdiction.

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 7 
 
 
When included in a project, NDC has seen considerable public interest in these 
optional public participation tools. Often five, ten or even twenty or thirty draft 
maps are proposed by community residents. And NDC developed a highly 
refined and proven methodology for efficiently guiding our clients through 
selecting and refining a map, even when starting from 10, 20, 30 or more initial 
draft maps. 
For those jurisdictions where the expense of the optional mapping tools is too 
high, NDC always welcomes any letters, comments, or hand-drawn maps that 
residents wish to submit during the districting or redistricting process. 
For every project, at no extra expense, NDC includes an online “interactive 
review map” that allows residents to analyze draft maps zooming in and out, 
searching for specific addresses, and by changing between street maps, satellite 
images, and other underlying base maps. 
Samples of these tools are shown on the following pages, and additional details 
on each of them appears later in this proposal. 
 
Sample Public Participation Mapping Tool

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 8 
 
 
Sample Online Mapping Tool  
 
Sample NDC “Interactive Review Map”  
(used to view and evaluate, not to draw, maps)

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 9 
 
 
The NDC Team 
NDC’s 40 years of service to local governments is grounded in our academic 
founding and decades of professional relationships with all forms of local 
governments. Each NDC team member has been extensively trained in the legal 
requirements, demographic details, and complicated personal and community 
interests involved in every districting and redistricting project. And every NDC 
team member has been briefed on the wide range of unusual and bizarre 
challenges NDC has encountered over our more than 250 successfully 
completed local government projects. Whatever question or situation arises, your 
NDC team can handle it. 
NDC President Dr. Douglas Johnson leads all team training and closely monitors 
the progress of every client project. NDC President Dr. Johnson and Vice 
President Dr. Levitt are always available to all clients, and typically are personally 
involved whenever particularly unusual or complex situations arise. And each 
NDC project has an NDC Consultant or Senior Consultant as a primary point 
of contact to ensure seamless information flows and continuity. All NDC project 
leaders are a fully trained Consultants or Senior Consultants with years of 
experience working with local government elected leadership and top staff 
members. Each NDC team leader brings their personal expertise in 
demographics, city governance, school district governance and/or special district 
management to every project. And each team leader has particular expertise and 
focus in specific geographic areas. All team members resumes are available on 
www.ndcresearch.com/about-us/. 
NDC Current Organization Chart 
NDC President 
Douglas Johnson, Ph.D. 
NDC Vice President 
Justin Levitt, Ph.D. 
Senior Consultants 
Shalice Tilton 
Robert McEntire, Ed.D. 
Jeff Tilton, Ed.D. 
Consultants 
Kristen Parks 
Daniel Phillips, Ph.D. 
Shannon Kelly 
Jeff Simonetti 
Todd Tatum 
Ivy Beller Sakansky 
Douglas Yoakam 
Records Manager 
Michele Lewis

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 10 
 
 
Recognition of NDC’s Expertise 
Both national and local organizations have recognized NDC’s unmatched 
experience and expertise in the Census, districting, and redistricting. 
National Recognition 
Nationally, the National Conference of State Legislatures hosted NDC as a 
panelist at five different forums held for state legislators and legislative staff from 
across the country. NDC President Douglas Johnson addressed these forums on 
the following topics: 
1. Citizen Voting Age Data from a line-drawer's viewpoint 
2. Communities of Interest in Redistricting: A key to drawing 2011 plans (and 
for their defense) 
3. The Key to Successful Redistricting 
4. Communities of Interest In Redistricting: A Practical Guide 
5. The Arizona Independent Redistricting Commissions' experiences with the 
first-ever independent redistricting 
In addition: 
 The National League of Women Voters hosted NDC President Douglas 
Johnson at a 2006 conference on “Building a National Redistricting Reform 
Movement,”  
 Texas Tech University hosted Dr. Johnson as a panelist at its “Symposium 
on Redistricting;”  
 The Arizona League of Cities and Towns hosted Dr. Johnson as a panelist 
on “Redistricting Law and the Voting Rights Act: What It Means for Your 
City or Town in 2011” and 
 The Arizona Bar Association hosted Dr. Johnson as a panelist on 
“Communities of interest and technology in redistricting.” 
California League of Cities Recognition 
The California League of Cities hosted NDC as panelists over a dozen times to 
date: 
General Meeting panel: 2006 and 2015 
Executive Forum panel: 2018 and 2020 
City Clerk Department panel: 2014, 2017, 2018, twice in 2019, and 2020 
City Manager Department panel: 2015 and 2019 
City Attorney Department panel: 2018

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 11 
 
 
Inland Empire Chapter presentation: 2016 
South Bay Chapter presentation: 2020 and 2021 
Recognition by Additional California Organizations 
Other California organizations and conferences since 2011 recognizing NDC’s 
expertise in this field include: 
2020 
California County 
Counsel Assoc. 
2021 Redistricting - What Local 
Government Attorneys Need to Know 
2020 
“Voice of San 
Diego” Politifest 
Redistricting--What it means for our 
community 
2020 
County Committee 
Secretaries Annual 
Summit 
The California Voting Rights Act 
2020 
Rose Institute of 
State and Local 
Government 
2021 Redistricting: New Rules for California 
Local Governments 
2020 
California Special 
Districts Association 
California Voting Rights Act Challenge 
Factors 
2020 
Associated Cities of 
California – Orange 
County 
2021 Redistricting: The Rules have Changed 
2020 
California Municipal 
Law Conference 
Municipal Redistricting in 2021: New Rules 
of the Road 
2019 
California 
Association of 
School Business 
Officials 
Transitioning to By-Trustee-Areas Elections 
2019 
USC City/County 
Fellowship Program 
The Challenges of Municipal Election 
Districts 
2019 
California Special 
Districts Association 
District Elections and the California Voting 
Rights Act 
2018 
California Special 
Districts Association 
Converting From At-Large to By-District 
Elections Under the California Voting 
Rights Act 
2018 
Riverside County 
Bar Assoc. 
Redistricting and the California Voting 
Rights Act 
2018 
California School 
Board Assoc. 
Voter Districts: The Link Between Strong 
Community Engagement and a Successful 
Process

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 12 
 
 
2017 
California School 
Board Assoc. 
15 Years with the California Voting Rights 
Act: Lessons Learned and Challenges Ahead 
2017 
UC’s National Public 
Service Law 
Conference 
Moderator, “Voting Rights 101” 
2016 
Los Angeles County 
School Business 
Officials 
CVRA: What CBO’s Need to Know 
2016 
Los Angeles County 
School Trustees 
Assoc. 
The CVRA: What School Board Members 
Need to Know 
2015 
Associated Cities of 
California – Orange 
County 
The California Voting Rights Act 
2015 
California School 
Board Assoc. 
The California Voting Rights Act: What 
Board Members Must Know 
2015 
Los Angeles County 
School Boards 
Assoc. 
CVRA & Districting: The Demographer’s 
Perspective 
2011 
Channel Cities Club 
Lunch Keynote: “California's next 
experiment: independent, public 
redistricting” 
 
Trusted Advisor to Local Government and Redistricting Reform Groups 
NDC acted as an informal advisor to the California League of Cities and the 
California School Board Association during the debate over the AB849 “FAIR 
MAPS Act” in 2019. 
NDC acted as an informal advisor to the California League of Cities during the 
debate over AB1276 (revising the FAIR MAPS Act provisions) in 2020. 
NDC provided ideas, advice, maps and research to the 2008 Common Cause-led 
coalition that drafted and successfully advocated for Proposition 11, which 
created California’s State-level Independent Redistricting Commission. 
Advisor to Charter Review Commissions on Redistricting Provisions 
NDC advised the following groups on the redistricting and voting rights 
provisions of their charter revisions and ordinances: 
2016 
City of El Cajon charter revision and public education outreach

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 13 
 
 
2015/16 
Castaic Lake Water Agency and Newhall County Water District 
merger 
2015/16 
City of Corona Charter Revision 
2011/12 
Pasadena Unified advisor to Charter Revision Commission 
creating a redistricting commission and moving District to by-
district elections 
2009/10 
City of Menifee advisor to by-district-elections ordinance 
language committee 
2006-08 
City of Modesto advisor to Charter Revision Commission 
creating an independent redistricting commission and public 
education outreach 
2003 
City of Goleta ordinance writing and public education outreach 
 
Expert Witness and Litigation Consultant 
NDC President Douglas Johnson served as an expert witness in the following 
election and redistricting law cases: 
2020 
Chestnut v Merrill (Alabama) 
2019 
City of Redondo Beach vs State of California 
2019 
Ruiz-Lozito vs West Contra Costa Unified School District 
2019 
Common Cause v Lewis (North Carolina) 
2018 
Phillip Randolph Institute v Smith (Ohio) 
2018 
League et al. v. Johnson (Michigan) 
2017 
Luna v County of Kern 
2018 
Covington v State of North Carolina 
2016 
Garrett v City of Highland 
2015 
Jamarillo v City of Fullerton 
2015 
Harris vs Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission 
2015 
Solis v Santa Clarita Community College District 
2015 
Jauregui et al vs City of Palmdale 
2014 
Diego v City of Whittier 
NDC Staff also served as litigation consultants for jurisdictions in the following 
California Voting Rights Act cases: 
1. Anaheim 
2. Carson 
3. Compton 
4. Escondido 
5. Modesto 
6. Poway 
7. Santa Clarita 
8. Whittier 
9. Santa Clarita Community 
College District 
10. Tulare Health Care District

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 14 
 
 
NDC Testimonials 
Here is a sampling of what people have to say about NDC: 
“Here's a great expert. . . . today you bring him in for what sounds like good 
information, very smart man up here.” 
United States Fourth District Court Judge James A Wynn, Covington v 
North Carolina, United States District Court for the Middle District of 
North Carolina, Case No. 1:15CV399 
“I have worked on Congressional, Legislative, Los Angeles County and Los 
Angeles City redistricting maps on behalf of the Latino Caucus and grassroots 
Latino organizations for over 30 years. Douglas Johnson is one of the top 
redistricting experts in California, and he is who I would pick to draw a map for 
me anywhere in the state.” 
Alan Clayton, retired Executive Director of the Los Angeles County 
Chicano Employees Association 
“The excel spreadsheet is a fantastic tool. Just plug in the letter by district and 
on the tab see a running total of population by assigned district. It's cool.” 
Modesto resident’s comment, June 16, 2008 
“One of the first, and in retrospect one of the best, decisions made by our 
commission was to hire Douglas Johnson and his colleagues at National 
Demographics Corporation as our primary consultants. I have never had the 
opportunity to work with a more highly qualified, hard-working, dedicated, 
professional and classy individual or group than Mr. Johnson and his associates 
at NDC.” 
Jim Huntwork, Arizona Independent Redistricting Commissioner 
(Republican) 
“In addition to his technical expertise, Doug had a keen sense of how to help us 
navigate the complexities of the process. He understands redistricting better than 
any person I know. He has a unique ability to synthesize that which is very 
complicated and make it very understandable for the public. He frequently would 
present various options, without representing any position, clearly delineating 
differences and challenges of each option in a clear and succinct manner.” 
Josh Hall, Arizona Independent Redistricting Commissioner (Democrat)

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 15 
 
 
“It was a great pleasure to work with Doug Johnson and NDC during the first 
Independent redistricting effort in Arizona. Doug and his staff were professional, 
efficient, responsive, and even-handed. They listened very carefully to the 
instructions given by the commission and performed each mapping task without 
bias of any kind. I would highly recommend NDC to any jurisdiction, or 
commission, wishing to have a successful redistricting process.” 
Steven W. Lynn, Chair, Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission 
(Independent) 
“Thank you for all of your hard work, assistance, and patience with me during 
this year of CVRA conversion to by-area trustee elections. Your continual 
reassurance and support in dealing with all of the details was sincerely 
appreciated.  We all have jobs to do, but when working with all of you I felt that 
you always went the extra mile to support our District with excellent customer 
service.  The multiple revisions, extra conference calls, and follow up suggestions 
made a difference to Scott, Linda, and me.  I personally enjoyed joking around 
with each of you while remaining professional in all presentations. It was a 
pleasure working with all of you. “ 
Jennifer Williams, Ed. D., Fullerton Joint Union High School District, 
Executive Director Administrative Services 
“Thank you for taking time out of your busy schedule to participate in the City 
Official Roundtable I hosted on the 2020 U.S. Census at the Redondo Beach 
Performing Arts Center. I appreciate that you shared your expertise on the 
Census to the government officials who were present. It is critical that we work 
together to ensure that everyone is counted in the upcoming Census.” 
Ted W. Lieu, Member of Congress, California 33rd District. 
 
Impeccable References 
All of NDC’s former clients – without exception – can be contacted for 
references. The following is only a sample of references: 
Mr. Graham Mitchell. City Manager. City of El Cajon. 200 Civic Center Way. El 
Cajon. CA 92020. (619) 441-1716. GMitchell@cityofelcajon.us. 
Mr. Jason Stilwell. City Manager. City of Santa Maria. 110 E. Cook Street. Santa Maria. 
CA 93454-5190. (805) 925-0951 ext. 2200. jstilwell@cityofsantamaria.org. 
Mr. Marcus Walton. Communications Director. West Contra Costa Unified. 1108 
Bissell Ave., Room 211-215. Richmond, CA 94801. 510-205-3092. mwalton@wccusd.net.

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 16 
 
 
Mr. Jonathan Vasquez. Superintendent. Los Nietos School District. 8324 S. 
Westman Ave., Whittier, CA 90606. (562) 692-0271 Ext. 3212 jonathan_vasquez@lnsd.net. 
Ms. Jennifer Fitzgerald, Mayor, City of Fullerton. 303 W. Commonwealth Avenue. 
Fullerton, CA 92832. (714) 402-3106. jennifer@curtpringle.com. 
Mr. James Atencio. Assistant City Attorney. City of Richmond. 450 Civic Center 
Plaza. Richmond, CA 94804. 510-620-6509. James_Atencio@ci.richmond.ca.us. 
Ms. Isabel Montenegro. Administrative Assistant. Inglewood Unified. 401 South 
Inglewood 
Avenue, 
Inglewood, 
CA 
90301. 
310-419-2799. 
imontenegro@inglewood.k12.ca.us.  
Ms. Pam Abel. Superintendent. Modesto City Schools. 426 Locust Street. Modesto. 
CA 95351-2631. (209) 574-1616. able.p@mcs4kids.com. 
Mr. Darrell Talbert. City Manager. City of Corona. 400 S Vicentia Avenue. Corona. 
CA 92882-2187. 951.279.3670. Darrell.Talbert@ci.corona.ca.us. 
Mr. David Silberman. Deputy County Counsel. San Mateo County. 400 County 
Center. 6th Floor. Redwood City. CA 94063. 650-363-4749 dsilberman@smcgov.org. 
Judge Hugh Rose (retired). Chairman. City of Modesto Districting Commission. 
508 King Richard Lane. Modesto. CA  95350. Phone (209) 522-0719. Email: 
hhrose@hotmail.com. 
Ms. Lucinda Aja. City Clerk, City of Buckeye, Arizona. 100 N Apache Rd, Suite A, 
Buckeye, AZ  85326. Phone (623) 349-6007. Email: laja@buckeyeaz.gov. 
 
Summary Scope of Work 
NDC tailors each project to the needs and goals of each jurisdictions. Below is 
a typical NDC-suggested timeline and description of project elements.  
The dates provided below are general guidelines and will vary according to the 
goals, project choices, and deadlines of each jurisdiction. 
March - April 
Project Planning and decisions on public mapping 
tools, whether to use a commission, and other 
project options. Begin project communications 
and outreach. 
May – July 
Any mapping tools prepared with preliminary 
population data; initial pre-draft-map hearing(s) 
held.

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 17 
 
 
August - November 
Census data received and processed; draft maps 
prepared, considered, and revised (in hearings 
and, if desired, less formal public workshops) 
December – February 
Final plan revisions made and plan adopted and 
implemented. 
 
Detailed Project Scope of Work  
March – April, 2021: Project Planning and Initial Outreach 
a. NDC works with the jurisdiction to prepare a detailed project timeline of 
expected outreach efforts, public forums, formal hearings, draft map dates, 
and final map adoption dates. 
b. NDC works with the jurisdiction staff (or contract specialized outreach staff 
– see notes below about that option if interested) to prepare a project 
outreach plan for all steps of the process covering target audiences, contact 
lists, social media efforts, any potential postcard mailings, utility bill inserts, 
flyers for distribution at schools, media briefings, and community group 
contacts. 
c. Decide what public mapping tool(s) to provide, if any. 
d. Decide whether to use a commission. 
e. Create the project website: NDC will provide advice and text for the 
jurisdiction’s website, or as an optional project element NDC will build a 
project website that the jurisdiction can simply link to from the jurisdiction 
site. 
f. NDC will work with jurisdiction and County Registrar staff to confirm GIS 
boundaries and to identify and include in our redistricting database any 
available GIS data that NDC and the jurisdiction identify are likely to be 
useful as mapping references for NDC, the public, and for the jurisdiction. 
g. Project outreach begins with initial alerts and ‘invitations to participate’ sent 
out to the general public, to overlapping jurisdictions, and to community 
organizations. 
May – July, 2021: Initial Data Analysis and Initial Hearings / Forums 
h. NDC prepares total population estimates for use in initial hearings and any 
public mapping tools.

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 18 
 
 
i. NDC adds socio-economic data from the Census Bureau’s American 
Community Survey to the state demographic data. 
j. NDC matches the demographic database to the existing election areas. 
k. NDC prepares a report regarding the demographics and compliance with 
state and federal criteria of the existing election areas, including maps of 
“protected class” population concentrations and other socio-economic data 
often referenced in redistricting (such as income, education levels, children 
at home, language spoken at home, renters / homeowners, and single-family 
/ multi-family residences). 
l. NDC report is circulated to the jurisdiction and into the project outreach 
messaging. 
m. Hearings / Forums: NDC presents an overview of the redistricting laws and 
criteria, jurisdiction demographics, and the population balance of the 
existing election areas and their compliance (or possible lack thereof) with 
state and federal requirements. 
n. The project timeline and outreach plan are presented to the public for 
comments and feedback, along with a request to the public to provide 
guidance on what residents consider key neighborhoods, communities of 
interest, and other project-related regions in the jurisdiction.  
o. If the optional public mapping tools and/or Public Participation Kit are 
included in the project, their use is demonstrated to the public. 
p. If the optional public mapping tools and/or Public Participation Kit are 
included in the project, NDC provides email and phone support for any 
residents with questions regarding their use. 
q. If the optional public mapping tools and/or Public Participation Kit are 
included in the project, at the jurisdiction’s option additional public forums 
on the use of those tools can be provided. 
r. Outreach efforts continue with messaging to the public, with special focus 
on community groups with an interest in the redistricting. 
August – November, 2021: Draft Mapping Time 
s. 2020 Census total population counts released and California Statewide 
Database completes “prison adjustments” of the data. Total population

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 19 
 
 
counts in outreach materials and mapping tools are updated with the official 
Census data.  
t. If the existing election areas are in compliance with state and federal rules 
and balanced, the jurisdiction decides whether to stop at this “Still 
Balanced” point or to continue with a standard redistricting.  
u. If the existing election areas are in compliance with state and federal rules 
and close to, but not quite, balanced, the jurisdiction decides whether 
conduct only a “Minimal Change” redistricting or to proceed with a full 
“Standard” redistricting project. 
v. Outreach efforts continue with messaging reminding the public of the 
opportunity to provide written or mapped input on how the maps should 
be drawn and welcoming any maps residents with to submit. 
w. The public deadline for submitting any initial draft maps will be 
approximately seven days prior to the official deadline to post all draft maps 
online (to provide NDC time to process any draft maps received, and for 
NDC to develop our own two to four initial draft maps). 
x. All outreach channels are used to inform the public about the opportunity 
to submit draft maps and to encourage participation in the review of the 
upcoming draft maps. 
y. NDC processes all public draft map submissions, drafts NDC’s draft maps, 
summarizes all of the draft maps. The maps, related demographics, and 
summaries are provided by NDC in web-friendly formats. These process 
maps are posted on the project website and on the NDC-provided 
interactive review map. 
z. At the jurisdiction’s option, one or more informal workshops or public 
forums are held to gather residents’ reactions to and preferences among the 
draft maps. 
aa. The jurisdiction holds a hearing to review the draft maps, narrow down the 
list of initial draft maps, and provide direction on any desired new or revised 
maps. 
bb. Time provided for the public to submit any new maps and for NDC to 
provide maps based on the direction at the hearing. During this time, 
additional outreach is conducted to inform interested residents and 
community groups of the selected ‘focus maps’ and the remaining 
opportunities to participate in the process.

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 20 
 
 
December – February, 2022: Map Adoption 
cc. Any new or revised maps, related demographics, and summaries are posted 
on the project website. 
dd. At the jurisdiction’s option, one or more informal workshops or public 
forums are held to gather residents’ reactions to and preferences among the 
remaining maps. 
ee. One or more hearings are held to continue the review and refinement of the 
focus maps and, ultimately, adopt the final map. 
ff. Outreach continues to inform residents and community groups of the 
progress of the project, opportunities for future participation, and, 
ultimately, which map is adopted. 
gg. Following map adoption, NDC coordinates map implementation with the 
County Registrar, informing the jurisdiction staff of the progress, any issues, 
and ultimate completion of that work. 
hh. NDC works with the jurisdiction staff to ensure preservation of all project 
data and records, including GIS-format versions of the adopted map.

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 21 
 
 
Details of Optional Project Elements  
Advisory or Independent Redistricting Commissions 
NDC anticipates that many California jurisdictions will create advisory or 
independent commissions to manage the redistricting process. NDC welcomes 
the use of such commissions, and our pricing does not change for jurisdictions 
creating commissions. But the creation, training, operation and reporting of such 
commissions often leads to more meetings (and a resulting increase in the “per 
meeting” project expenses) than a traditional redistricting process conducted 
primarily by the jurisdiction’s elected leadership. 
Outreach Assistance 
NDC brings topical expertise to your jurisdiction’s outreach efforts, and NDC 
makes available to all clients our library of sample outreach materials including 
op-ed articles, postcards, utility bill inserts, flyers, and social media messages. 
NDC provides all of these materials along with our advice and input on outreach 
strategy and materials to any interested jurisdiction, but we do not have graphic 
artists to customize or design such materials in-house. 
For larger-scale outreach efforts, especially where jurisdictions wish to send 
representatives out to regular meetings of existing community organizations, 
NDC typically works together with a jurisdiction’s in-house communications 
staff and/or with one or more outreach organizations. We have a number of 
firms we recommend, and we would be happy to work with any in-house team 
at the jurisdiction or with any firm or organization the jurisdiction selects. 
Projects with this level of outreach are relatively rare, as most projects can be 
handled by the jurisdiction’s existing communications team using the samples, 
templates and advice NDC provides. 
Project Website 
NDC provides all project materials in website-friendly formats for posting on 
the jurisdiction’s website. At no cost, NDC will provide project website samples 
and website language for use on the jurisdiction’s project website. But for 
jurisdictions that prefer not to take on the challenge of creating and managing a 
rapidly-changing project website, NDC will create, host, and update project 
website (visit to see one such site – though note that site was created prior to 
passage of the new AB849 requirements).

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 22 
 
 
 
Background on Online Mapping Tool Options 
NDC is the unmatched leader in redistricting tools that empower residents to 
review draft maps and to develop and submit their own map proposals. NDC is 
the only firm that has used the online mapping solutions from both ESRI and 
Caliper Corporation in major redistricting projects.  
Only NDC has repeatedly trained members of the public, processed public map 
submissions, and presented the public map proposals to public hearings and 
commission meetings. NDC’s online mapping tool options provide user support, 
hosting, managing, and processing submitted plans for an online interactive 
system that allows public to draw and submit proposed maps through a standard 
web browser.

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 23 
 
 
In the more than 200 California local districting projects between 2012 and 2020, 
NDC is the only consultant providing clients access to Caliper Corporation’s 
“Maptitude Online Redistricting” tool. Even with the technical challenges arising 
from such tools’ power and flexibility, NDC’s training and encouragement 
frequently results in 10, 20, 30 or more different maps drawn by residents of the 
school district or city providing that tool to its residents.

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 24 
 
 
The other primary public mapping tool currently on the market is ESRI’s 
online districting tool. While easy to use, the ESRI product costs significantly 
more. As a result, traditionally only the largest jurisdictions have been able to 
afford it.  
 
When it is time to start the project, NDC will work with each interested client to 
determine which, if any, online mapping tool best meets the goals and budget of 
the jurisdiction.

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 25 
 
 
Paper- and Excel-based Public Mapping Tools 
While online mapping tools are 
very popular, NDC never 
forgets those residents who do 
not have internet access or who 
simply prefer to not drawing 
maps online. 
At no cost with every online 
mapping tool, and as a separate 
option for jurisdictions that for 
budget or other reasons do not 
include an online mapping tool, 
NDC 
offers 
our 
“Public 
Participation Kit.” Each “Kit” 
includes two formats.  
The first, and most simple, Kit 
is a one-page map showing 
streets, 
city 
borders, 
and 
population counts for NDC-
created 
“Population 
Unit” 
geographic areas. Residents 
draw the map they wish to 
propose and add up the 
population counts by hand 
until 
they 
get 
the 
right 
population 
count 
in 
each 
district. All of the directions needed are right on the single-page form. Examples 
of these tools, from our work for the City of Lake Forest, are available here: 
https://drawlf.org/draw-a-map/.  
The second form of offline mapping tool is for those residents who do not want 
to deal with an online mapping tool, but who are already comfortable with 
Microsoft Excel. NDC provides a similar simple one-page map of those same 
“Population Units,” but this time the map shows the Unit ID number rather 
than the population count in that Unit. Residents then enter their preferred 
district assignment for each Population Unit into the pre-formatted Excel 
spreadsheet (also available on the Lake Forest website), and Excel calculates the 
total population and demographics of each District. When the resident has the 
map the way they like it, they simple email in the Excel file.

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 26 
 
 
Project Pricing 
1. Basic Project Elements (covers everything except for per-meeting and  
optional expenses): .......................................................................................... $ 34,500 
2. Per-Meeting expense: 
 In-person attendance, per meeting ............................................................ $ 2,750 
 Virtual (telephonic, Zoom, etc.) attendance, per meeting ...................... $ 1,250 
For each meeting, NDC will prepare meeting materials, including presentation materials and 
maps; present and explain key concepts, including mandatory and traditional redistricting 
criteria and “communities of interest”; facilitate conversations; answer questions; and gather 
feedback on existing and proposed boundaries. 
Per-meeting prices include all travel and other anticipated meeting-related expenses. 
Telephone calls to answer questions, discuss project status, and other standard project 
management tasks do not count as meetings and do not result in any charge. 
3. Optional Project Elements: 
a) Project website ........................................................................................ $ 5,500 
b) Online mapping tool options: 
 Caliper’s “Maptitude Online Redistricting” (MOR) ............ $ 28,000 
 Tuft University’s “DistrictR” .................................................. $ 19,000 
 ESRI Redistricting ................................................................................. * 
c) Public Participation Kit mapping tool: 
i. 
With MOR or ESRI online mapping tool .......... incl. at no add’l charge 
ii. 
Without MOR or ESRI online mapping tool ......................... $ 5,000 
d) Working with independent or advisory redistricting 
commission ....................................................................... no additional charge 
e) Additional outreach assistance ...................................... separately contracted 
* ESRI prices its software on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis. The lowest prices we have 
seen are $80,000 and up. If that is an option the jurisdiction would like to pursue, NDC will 
request a specific price for your jurisdiction from ESRI. 
Other Potential Project-Related Expenses: 
The most common additional project expenses would be any site or staff costs 
for conducting the community forums and the cost of printing or copying paper 
copies of the “Public Participation Kit.” In NDC’s experience, most participants 
will download and print the Kits in their own homes or offices.

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 27 
 
 
Additional Analysis 
NDC is happy to assist with any additional analysis that the client requests at our 
standard hourly rates: 
Principal (Dr. Douglas Johnson) ................. $300 per hour 
Vice President (Justin Levitt) ....................... $250 per hour 
Senior Consultant .......................................... $200 per hour 
Consultant ....................................................... $150 per hour 
Analyst / Clerical ........................................... $50 per hour 
Dr. Johnson is also available for deposition and/or testimony work if needed, at 
$350 per hour. 
Requested Payment terms: 
NDC requests that one-half of the “Basic Project Elements” fee, one-half of the 
“Minimal Changes Fee” fee, or the entire “Still Balanced” project fee be paid 
following the decision on which project will be undertaken, with the balance of 
the project costs paid at the conclusion of the project. 
Exception: “Still Balanced” Jurisdictions  
For a few jurisdictions, the existing election areas will still meet the equal 
population and voting rights act requirements using new 2020 Census data. 
These jurisdictions have the option simply retain the existing map without 
drawing and holding hearings on alternative maps. For jurisdictions electing this 
approach, the project would conclude with that decision and the only project 
expense would be the “still balanced” analysis expense and any per-meeting fees 
(at the per-meeting rates stated above). 
Includes all the services listed below: .............................................................. $ 4,500 
 Compile total population and Citizen Voting Age Population data. 
 Import existing election area lines. 
 Compile population data by election area and calculate population deviations, prepare 
memo summarizing findings. 
“Still Balanced” optional project elements and per-meeting expenses 
Meeting attendance and optional project elements are not included in the 
“minimal change” project base fee. If requested, NDC team members participate 
in “minimal change” project hearings or forums at the same “per meeting”

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 28 
 
 
expenses, and optional project elements are provided at the same prices listed 
for a standard project in the previous section of this proposal. 
Exception: “Minimal Changes” Scope of Work  
The initial NDC population analysis of the existing election areas may conclude 
that a jurisdiction’s election areas are only slightly out of population balance. 
Such a jurisdiction is still required to redistrict, but one or two small changes 
could balance the map without the need for, nor public interest in, an extensive 
series of draft maps and public meetings.  
This project would involve fewer demographic data, fewer draft maps, and fewer 
meetings than a standard project. This “Minimal Changes” approach retains the 
community of interest and other decisions embodied in the already-existing map 
of election areas and makes only the small changes needed to bring that previous 
map into population balance. 
For jurisdictions electing this “minimal changes” approach, the only expense 
would be the initial population analysis, per-meeting fees (at the per-meeting 
rates stated above) for any meetings, and a reduced NDC fee for the 
development, presentation, and implementation of the slightly adjusted map.  
“Minimal Change” basic elements cost, for services listed below: ........... $ 17,500 
 Compile total population and Citizen Voting Age Population data. 
 Compile population data by existing election area and calculate population 
deviations. 
 Prepare memo summarizing findings. 
 Creation of two or three initial draft maps, with basic population and citizen 
voting age population demographics for each election area in each map. 
 Online posting of the draft maps to an interactive review website. 
 Drawing any requested minimal changes to a draft map. 
 Work with the County Registrar of Voters to implement the final adopted 
plan. 
“Minimal Change” optional project elements and per-meeting expenses 
Meeting attendance and optional project elements are not included in the 
“minimal change” project base fee. If requested, NDC team members participate 
in “minimal change” project hearings or forums at the same “per meeting” 
expenses, and optional project elements are provided at the same prices listed 
for a standard project in the previous section of this proposal.

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 29 
 
 
Conclusion 
Since its founding NDC has been the nation’s preeminent company devoted to 
local election systems. To summarize: 
 NDC has more experience in the field of municipal political election systems 
than any other company. 
 NDC’s experience and expertise has been recognized by our hundreds of 
clients, the California League of Cities, the California School Board 
Association, the California Special District Association, and the National 
Conference of State Legislatures. 
 NDC, founded in 1979, has a demonstrated record of financial solvency. 
 NDC’s hardware and software resources were specially designed and acquired 
for districting and redistricting purposes. 
 NDC’s highly respected personnel have impeccable credentials in each aspect 
of the districting and redistricting processes. 
 NDC’s suggested approach has been tested in many jurisdictions. 
 Any NDC client can be contacted for testimonials and reference. 
 NDC has demonstrated experience over many years in working with the press 
and media on local election system issues. 
 Neither the Justice Department nor any Court has ever rejected any of the 
hundreds of local government districting or redistricting plan submitted by 
NDC. 
NDC takes pride in tailoring each project to the needs and goals of each 
individual client. NDC is open to any feedback, concerns, requests, or changes 
regarding this proposal.  
NDC looks forward to the opportunity to work with you on this project.

National Demographics Corporation 
 
Page 30 
 
 
Proposal Acceptance 
The terms of this proposal are available for 90 calendar days from its delivery to 
you. In most situations, NDC is open to extending that period of time to meet 
any particular needs of your jurisdiction. 
If your jurisdiction has specific contract and/or letter of agreement language you 
prefer to use, please provide it and ignore the signature block below. If you 
prefer, simply sign two copies of this proposal in the signature block below and 
return them to NDC. Once signed by NDC, one copy will be returned to you. 
Thank you. 
 
For National Demographics Corporation 
For Glendale  
 
 
 
 
 
Douglas Johnson, President 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Date 
 
Date

Appendix 
 
 
 
Resumes of NDC President Dr. Douglas Johnson and  
Vice President Dr. Justin Levitt are attached.  
 
A client list and resumes of all NDC team members are  
available at www.ndcresearch.com/about-us/.

Douglas Mark Johnson 
 
P.O. Box 5271 
mobile: (310) 200-2058 
Glendale, CA 91221 
office: (909) 624-1442 
djohnson@NDCresearch.com 
fax: (818) 254-1221 
 
 
 
Employment 
President, National Demographics Corporation, 2006 – present. 
Senior Analyst, National Demographics Corporation, 2001 – 2006. 
Fellow, Rose Institute of State and Local Government, 2001 – present. 
Project Manager and Senior Manager at three internet startup companies, 1999 - 2001. 
U.S. Representative Stephen Horn, Legislative Director and System Manager. 1993 – 1997. 
Coro Foundation, Fellowship in Public Affairs. 1992 – 1993. 
Rose Institute for State and Local Government, Student Manager. 1989 – 1992. 
Education 
Claremont Graduate University, Ph.D. in Political Science, 2015. Dissertation: “Independent 
Redistricting Commissions: Hopes and Lessons Learned.” 
UCLA Anderson Graduate School of Management, MBA, 1999. 
Claremont McKenna College, BA in Government (Political Science), 1992. 
 
Academic Honors 
Graduated Cum Laude from Claremont McKenna College. 
Phi Beta Kappa. Philip Roland Prize for Excellence in Public Policy. 
Publications and Articles 
Christian Science Monitor “Let the public help draw voting districts,” October 25, 2013. 
New York Times, "The Case for Open Primaries," February 19, 2009.  
Los Angeles Times Opinion Articles: 
 
“A neighbor’s help on redistricting” June 24, 2007.  
“A Trojan horse primary for the GOP” February 25, 2007.  
“Where a porn palace stood” (article on redevelopment), July 30, 2006. 
Fresno Bee Opinion Article: “The Poison Handshake” June 15, 2004. 
Redistricting in America. Rose Institute of State and Local Government, 2010. 
Restoring the Competitive Edge: California's Need for Redistricting Reform and the Likely 
Impact of Proposition 77. Rose Institute of State and Local Government, 2005. 
"Competitive Districts in California" Rose Institute of State and Local Government, 2005. 
Latinos and Redistricting: “Californios For Fair Representation” and California Redistricting in 
the 1980s. Rose Institute of State and Local Government, 1991. 
Speaker or Panelist 
California School Board Association Annual Education Conference panelist: “The California 
Voting Rights Act: What Board Members Must Know.” December 4, 2015. 
Associated Cities of California – Orange County, Keynote Speaker, Newly Elected Officials’ 
Reception and Dinner, “The California Voting Rights Act,” January 29, 2015. 
California League of Cities, City Manager Department, 2015 Department Meeting: “Opportunity to 
Engage Residents: The California Voting Rights Act.” January 29, 2015. 
California League of Cities, City Clerk Department, 2014 Annual Meeting: “Whose Line Is It 
Anyway: Making the transition from at-large to by-district elections.” September 3, 2014. 
National Conference of State Legislatures, Redistricting and Elections Standing Committee: 2007 
Spring Forum, "The Arizona Independent Redistricting Commissions' experiences with the 
first-ever independent redistricting." 
National Conference of State Legislatures, Redistricting and Elections Standing Committee:  2008 
Spring Forum, "Communities of Interest In Redistricting: A Practical Guide."

Douglas Mark Johnson 
 
National Conference of State Legislatures, Redistricting and Elections Standing Committee: 2009 
Fall Forum, "The Key to Successful Redistricting." 
National Conference of State Legislatures, Redistricting and Elections Standing Committee: 2010 
Spring Forum, "Communities of Interest in Redistricting: A key to drawing 2011 plans (and for 
their defense)." 
National Conference of State Legislatures, Redistricting and Elections Standing Committee: 2011 
Winter Forum, "Citizen Voting Age Data from a line-drawer's viewpoint." 
Luncheon Keynote Speaker, Santa Barbara's Channel Cities Club, "California's next experiment: 
independent, public redistricting," January 18, 2011. 
Annual Conference, Arizona League of Cities and Towns, Presenter at "Redistricting Law and the 
Voting Rights Act: What It Means for Your City or Town in 2011," August 25, 2010. 
Redistricting, The 2010 Census, and Your Budget, Sponsored by the Rose Institute of State and 
Local Government, California League of Cities, October 15, 2009. 
Arizona Election Law 2010 Continuing Legal Education Conference, "Communities of interest and 
technology in redistricting," sponsored by the Arizona State Bar Association, March 2010 
California's New Independent Redistricting Commission, sponsored by the Irvine Foundation and 
the California Redistricting Collaborative, December 15, 2009 
Tribal Association of Sovereign Indian Nations (TASIN) Legislative Day 2009, "The 2010 Census 
and 2011 Redistricting in California," December 2, 2009. 
California School Board Association, "Litigation Issues and the California Voting Rights Act," 
December 4, 2009. 
California Latino School Boards Association, "Introduction to the California Voting Rights Act," 
August 20, 2009. 
Building a National Reform Movement, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2006, conference on redistricting 
reform hosted by the League of Women Voters, Campaign Legal Center, and The Council for 
Excellence in Government 
Texas Tech University, “A Symposium on Redistricting,” May, 2006 
California League of Cities, "Introduction to the California Voting Rights Act." 
Voices of Reform, a project of the Commonwealth Club of San Francisco: multiple forums on 
redistricting and / or term limits, 2006 – 2007 
Classroom speaker at Pepperdine University, the University of La Verne, Pomona College and 
Claremont McKenna College

Justin Mark Levitt 
 
P.O. Box 5271 
mobile: (480) 390-7480 
Glendale, CA 91221 
office: (818) 254-1221 
jlevitt@NDCresearch.com 
fax: (818) 254-1221 
 
 
 
Employment 
Vice-President, National Demographics Corporation, 2012 – present. 
Senior Analyst, National Demographics Corporation, 2003 – 2011. 
Instructor in Political Science, University of California, San Diego, 2012 – present.  
Graduate Research Fellow, Center for US-Mexico Studies, 2010 – present.  
Graduate Research Fellow, University of California, San Diego, 2008 – 2010 and 2013 – 2014. 
Jesse M. Unruh California Assembly Fellow. 2006 – 2007. 
Rose Institute for State and Local Government, Student Manager. 2005 – 2006. 
Education 
University of California, San Diego, Ph.D. Political Science, 2016. Dissertation title: “The Impact 
of Geographic Patterns on Tradeoffs in Redistricting.” 
Claremont McKenna College, BA in Philosophy, Politics and Economics (PPE), 2006.  
Academic Honors 
California Studies Fellow, University of California, San Diego, 2007 – 2009  
Graduated Cum Laude from Claremont McKenna College. 
Publications and Conference Presentations 
Settle, Jamie, Robert Bond, and Justin Levitt.  2011.  “The Social Origins of Adult Political 
Behavior.”  American Politics Research: 39 (2).  239-263 
 
Miller, Kenneth and Justin Levitt.  2007.  “The San Joaquin Valley.”  In The New Political 
Geography of California.  Eds. Frederick Douzet, Thad Kousser, and Kenneth Miller.  Berkeley: 
Institute of Government Studies. 
 
 “The Political Geography of Tradeoffs in Redistricting” Paper presented at the State Politics and 
Policy Conference, Iowa City, IA, 2013 
 
Getting What You Want: A Bargaining Approach to Fair Division in Redistricting.  Paper presented at the 
“Challenging Urban Borders : the geopolitics of immigration and segregation” workshop, 
Berkeley, CA, 2013 and the State Politics and Policy Conference, Houston, TX, 2012 
 
“An Atlas of Public Health in Mexico” (with Alberto Diaz Cayeros).  Paper presented at the 
Hewlett Foundation Conference on Public Health, Mexico City, DF. 2012 
 
“Remoteness and the Territoriality of Public Health” (with Alberto Diaz Cayeros). 
Paper presented at the American Political Science Association conference, Seattle, WA.  2011 
“Initiatives as revealed preferences” 
Paper presented at the American Political Science Association conference, Seattle, WA.  2011 
“No Se Puede: Latino Political Incorporation in Phoenix.”.  Paper Presented at the New Political 
Geography of California conference, Berkeley, CA., 2009

Justin Mark Levitt 
 
 “Political Change in the Central Valley”.  Paper Presented at the Western Political Science 
Association conference, Las Vegas, NV.,2007 
Working Papers  
Hill, Seth, Thad Kousser, Alex Hughes, and Justin Levitt.  ND.  “How Competitiveness Shapes 
Infrequent Primary Voters Response to Receiving a GOTV Mailer.” 
 
Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto and Justin Levitt.  ND. “Remoteness and the Territoriality of Public Health.”  
 
Levitt, Justin.  ND. “Getting What You Want: A Bargaining Approach to Fair Division in Commission-
led Redistricting.” 
 
Teaching Experience 
California State University, Long Beach, Department of Political Science 
Adjunct Professor—POSC 327 (Urban Politics) 
Spring 2016-Present 
Adjunct Professor—POSC 229 (Cases in Policy Analysis) 
Present 
Adjunct Professor—POSC 412 (Law and Social Change) 
Spring 2016-Present 
Adjunct Professor—POSC 399 (California Politics Short Course) 
Present 
 
University of California, San Diego, Department of Political Science 
Co-Instructor—UPS 170 (Regional Governance Reconsidered) 
Spring 2015 
Instructor—Poli 100A (The Presidency) 
Fall 2014 
Instructor—Poli 160AA (Introduction to Public Policy Analysis) 
Fall 2013 
Instructor—Poli 10 (Introduction to American Politics) 
Summer 2013