PAD Narrative

City of Glendale — Regular Meeting (2022-04-26)

View PDF Item 26 Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 69524 characters
7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 1 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
CENTERLINE ON GLENDALE 
GORMAN & COMPANY 
CITY OF GLENDALE 
VACANT (AGRICULTURAL) PROPERTY SURROUNDING SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 
67TH AVENUE AND GLENDALE AVENUE 
GPA21-11 AND ZON21-27 
 
 
PROPOSED MINOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONING NARRATIVE 
SUBMITTED OCTOBER 19, 2021 
SECOND SUBMITTAL NOVEMBER 15, 2021 
THIRD SUBMITTAL REVISED DECEMBER 31, 2021   
 
 
Received
[4 FEB 2022]
PLANNING DIVISION

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 2 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
Applicant:  Gorman & Company 
Brian Swanton, President and CEO 
Dan Klocke, Development Project Manager 
Phone: 602-430-8345 
Email: dklocke@gormanusa.com   
2030 E Osborn Road | PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85016 
 
Architect:  CCBG 
Brian Cassidy 
Phone: 602-258-2211 
Email: bcassidy@ccbg-arch.com 
102 E. Buchanan St. 
Phoenix, AZ 85007 
 
Counsel:  Gammage & Burnham 
Manjula Vaz and Stephen Anderson 
Phone: 602-256-4422 
Email: sanderson@gblaw.com 
40 N Central Ave, 20th Floor 
Phoenix, AZ  85004

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 3 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
 
Table of Contents 
1. 
Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 4 
2. 
Regulatory Requests ........................................................................................................................ 6 
3. 
Site Location and Context ................................................................................................................ 7 
4. 
Detailed Description of the Proposed Community ......................................................................... 9 
5. 
General Plan Amendment Request ............................................................................................... 14 
6. 
PAD Findings ................................................................................................................................... 18 
7. 
List of Allowed and Prohibited Uses .............................................................................................. 21 
8. 
Landscaping .................................................................................................................................... 23 
9. 
Design Standards ............................................................................................................................ 24 
10. 
Sign Standards ............................................................................................................................ 28 
11. 
Circulation and Access ................................................................................................................ 29 
12. 
Utilities and Services .................................................................................................................. 31 
13. 
Phasing ........................................................................................................................................ 32 
14. 
Amendments .............................................................................................................................. 33 
15. 
Conclusion .................................................................................................................................. 35 
 
 
List of Exhibits 
Exhibit 1 – Site Plan 
Exhibit 2 – Proposed General Plan Amendment Map 
Exhibit 3 – Proposed Rezoning Map 
Exhibit 4 – Aerial Map of Site 
Exhibit 5 – Valley Metro Bus Stops 
Exhibit 6 – Design Review Materials

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 4 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
1. 
Executive Summary 
 
On behalf of the developer, Gorman & Company (“Gorman”), we are pleased to 
submit this minor General Plan Amendment and Rezoning application for the 
Centerline on Glendale project (the “Community”).  Gorman plans to develop the 
Community on the 14.6 gross acres located southeast of the intersection of N. 67th 
and W. Glendale Avenues (“Site”).  Specifically, Centerline on Glendale will be a 
highly amenitized Community comprised of 368 residential units, spread across 
multiple buildings ranging from one to four stories in height.  See Exhibit 1, Site 
Plan.   
The greater Phoenix area is experiencing a housing crisis.  While jobs are plentiful, 
housing is not – particularly affordable housing.  This issue is particularly acute in 
Glendale, which has a markedly higher poverty rate than the County as a whole: 
Glendale has an 18% poverty rate, whereas Maricopa County overall is 12.2%.  
Working with City of Glendale staff, Gorman has identified an opportunity to 
develop a significant affordable housing project on the Site.  In the words of City 
staff:  
The Project will add much needed inventory to our community and will 
help increase housing choice for many of the residents we serve through 
our programs as well as the greater community.  This new development is 
crucial to addressing the growing gap of affordability and the need for 
quality units in Glendale.   
Gorman is a nationally recognized developer of affordable housing committed to 
community revitalization and stability. Since 1984, Gorman has developed 
thousands of affordable dwellings across the country, including two projects in the 
City of Glendale, the Glendale Enterprise Lofts on Glendale at 63rd Avenue, and 
Ironwood Village, a formerly troubled apartment complex at 45th Avenue south of 
Glendale.  In Arizona alone, Gorman has built 1,500 units, is under construction on 
500 units, and in pre-development on 2,500 more units.  Gorman would like to 
extend its record of accomplishment both across the Valley and in the City of 
Glendale with this Community.   
In addition to the well-documented affordability crisis, Centerline on Glendale is 
poised to help the City advance a different goal.  Ten years ago, the City adopted 
the Centerline Overlay District (Section 6.800) in an effort to spur redevelopment 
of parcels along Glendale Avenue in and near downtown Glendale.  That regulatory

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 5 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
signal to developers has had mixed success.  The continued vacancy on this Site is 
illustrative of the continuing struggle to draw investment to the Overlay District.  
Again, in the words of City staff:  
The location is also ripe for a catalyst development to encourage 
redevelopment of the neighboring area.   
Gorman is excited by the opportunity suggested by the Overlay District and 
presented by this Site, and is prepared to invest $90 million on this Site, one of the 
most significant investments in the history of the Overlay District.     
Gorman looks forward to presenting details regarding the Centerline on Glendale 
Community, and to securing City approvals necessary to move forward with long 
overdue, vertical development at this Site.

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 6 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
2. 
Regulatory Requests 
In order to develop Centerline on Glendale, Gorman is requesting a minor General 
Plan Amendment and a rezoning.   
General Plan.  The City’s current General Plan designation for the Site is High 
Density Residential (HDR) 12-20.  It should also be noted that the Market area of 
the Centerline Overlay District, where the Site is located, encourages 25 du/ac, 
significantly above the current General Plan designation.  As indicated above, 
Gorman is proposing to develop 368 units of affordable housing, at a density of 
25.14 du/ac, about what the Overlay District would allow.   
Gorman is seeking to designate the Site for Downtown Mixed Use (DMU).  See 
Exhibit 2, Proposed General Plan Amendment Map.  Per Table 1 of the City General 
Plan, because the Site is located in Area A, is less than 20 acres, and seeks to change 
the General Plan designation from HDR 12-20 to DMU, this proposal is a minor 
General Plan Amendment.  It therefore can be processed concurrently with our 
rezoning request.    
Rezoning.  Gorman is also seeking to rezone the Site from R-4, which allows 
multifamily residential uses already, to Planned Area Development, PAD.  See 
Exhibit 3, Proposed Rezoning Map.  The general concept of a PAD is to provide 
flexibility for innovative projects that bring benefits to the community and the City.  
In the specific words of the Ordinance (Section 5-901), the PAD should:  
Encourage residential development to provide a mixture of housing types 
and designs. … Encourage innovative development or redevelopment 
concepts for all land use types to provide a greater variety and intensity of 
uses. 
This Community redevelops a Site the City targeted for redevelopment ten years 
ago, and it provides 368 affordable units to a City that is desperately short of 
affordable housing options.  This is precisely the type of redevelopment project for 
which the City should engage its PAD zoning option.

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 7 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
3. 
Site Location and Context 
Location.  The Site is the approximate 14.6 acres of L-shaped, currently vacant 
(agricultural) land southeast of the intersection of 67th and Glendale Avenues.  See 
Exhibit 4, Aerial Map.  Because the Site itself is currently farmed, it is essentially flat 
and ready for vertical development.   
The Site enjoys superb local street access due to its direct access to both 67th and 
Glendale Avenues.  The adjacency to two arterial streets is an especially important 
feature for an affordable housing Community, because automobile ownership is 
substantially reduced below other subdivisions.  Specifically, the Valley Metro bus 
routes 70 and GUS1 are instantly accessible at the northwest corner of the Site.   
There is also a bus stop at the southwest corner of the Site, along 67th Avenue.  
There are total of eight (8) Valley Metro Bus Stops within 1,000 feet of the Site.  See 
Exhibit 5, Valley Metro Bus Stops, noting that is likely unusual that a bus map would 
be included in a rezoning proposal, much less this early in such a narrative.  
Therefore, the Site is ideally positioned to capitalize on safe and convenient public 
transit access.   
The south perimeter of the Site is adjacent to Ocotillo Road, which is convenient 
for a different group of non-automobile owners: children.  Harold Smith 
Elementary is down the street, as is the Swift Kids Branch of the Boys and Girls Club.  
As a result of its open, urban design, detailed further below, the Community will 
provide direct pedestrian access out its southern perimeter, so the children can 
walk to and from school and the Club.  To ensure safety and reduce its vehicular 
impact on Octotillo Road, Gorman will be foregoing a driveway along this frontage, 
and prohibiting left turn lanes out of the project onto southbound 67th Avenue, 
thus reducing the amount of left turns onto Ocotillo.  In addition, Gorman will be 
undergrounding the overhead power lines along Ocotillo, further enhancing the 
pedestrian experience.  These multi-modal opportunities make this Site an ideal 
location.   
Context.  The Site wraps the southeast corner of the intersection of Glendale 
Avenue and 67th Avenue, which is occupied by a Maricopa County Community 
Services Center, zoned C-3 and R-4.  The Glendale Manor Apartments, zoned R-4, 
spans almost the entire eastern perimeter of the Site. There is a commercial strip 
mall immediately south of Glendale Avenue, just north of the Glendale Manor 
Apartments and abutting the Site on the east side. These are the only three

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 8 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
developed properties that are adjacent to the Site, and the only three places 
where Gorman plans to provide a traditional block wall.   
The balance of the Site is adjacent to street frontages, and in those locations, 
Gorman plans to forego the traditional perimeter wall, and instead have its 
project directly address and embrace the street frontages, embodying the urban 
redevelopment envisioned by the Overlay District and putting eyes on the street 
to enhance neighborhood safety.  Using the PAD tool, the Community will reduce 
setbacks to ten feet in all of these locations to achieve that urban design.  Units in 
the Community that face the street frontages will have traditional front porch 
stoops.  And along Glendale Avenue, the heart of the Overlay District, the 
Community will have an energized, urban ground floor with community services 
and public places.   
The Community does have some neighbors across its street frontages as well.  To 
the north, across Glendale Avenue, are commercial (C-2) and residentially (R-3) 
zoned properties. The property due north of the Site is currently vacant and 
unimproved.  The property to the south, across Ocotillo Road, consists of two-
story, multi-family residential housing (R-4).  The property west of the Site, across 
67th Avenue, includes the San Martin two-story apartments (R-4).   
We have already noted the presence of the County facility at the southeast corner 
of the intersection of 67th Avenue and Glendale.  The other three corners have 
commercial businesses on them, but it is the northwest corner of the intersection 
that has the most community services attracting regular, local use (as opposed to, 
say, the transmission shop at the northeast corner).  As a result, it is important to 
provide safe pedestrian paths that encourage safe crossings of the intersection, and 
Gorman has designed the community to do just that.   
As detailed above, the proposed Community will not only be compatible with its 
neighbors, it will enhance this area and the Glendale Avenue Centerline Overlay 
District, by bringing long overdue investment to an infill, greenfield Site.

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 9 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
4. 
Detailed Description of the Proposed Community 
This Community is indeed providing critically needed affordable housing, and 
indeed it might be sufficient to stop there in describing the community benefits of 
Gorman’s proposal.  But this Community does so much more than that.  We have 
already indicated above that the Community has a street-facing urban design that 
takes advantage of the multi-modal opportunities right outside its perimeters.  
Beyond that, there are multiple other features of the Community design here that 
make unique use of the PAD zoning option to create an innovative, multi-million 
dollar reinvestment on this greenfield site.     
Gorman’s urban design approach replaces suburban sprawl with urban verticality, 
a vast parking field of hot asphalt with multimodal transportation options, and 
remote and walled off structures with buildings that embrace the space of the 
public sidewalks and streets.  Thus, an increase in height is offset by a significant 
reduction in lot coverage.  An increase in density brings more people into a 
neighborhood that needs energy and investment, while providing more housing 
options to an underserved populace.  A reduction in setbacks puts eyes on the 
streets, where residents will be accessing the local school, bus stop, and nearby 
stores.  Driveways have been limited – none on Ocotillo – and carefully laid out to 
enhance the architecture of the Community.  
The Community consists of 368 affordable units, a density of 25.14 du/ac.  These 
homes are spread across eight buildings, seven of them three stories and 40 feet 
tall, and the eighth, facing Glendale Boulevard, consisting of four stories and 60 
feet tall.  The additional height along Glendale Avenue results from architectural 
embellishments on the top floor, and allows this building to house ground floor 
spaces available for public uses, energizing the street level.  The four buildings along 
each of the three street frontages face the street at a 10 foot setback, with front 
door units on the ground floor, facing the street.  There is no perimeter wall along 
the streets, giving the community an open, urban campus feel.  Instead of a field of 
unoccupied parking facing the streets, all the parking is interior to the Community, 
and it is sharply reduced below the Ordinance requirements.  Gorman knows that 
its residents do not own cars at the same proportion as other projects.  In fact on 
its new construction urban projects, Gorman averages .73 spaces per unit. 
While the design itself may be the primary amenity for residents, there are other 
amenities spread throughout the Site.  There will be a traditional, single story 
amenity building within the center of the Site, featuring a community room, leasing

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 10 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
office, outdoor splash pad and playground area.  And indeed, Gorman has located 
its 67th Avenue driveway specifically to align with this smaller building and amenity 
area, to create a real sense of entry for residents and visitors alike.  But this 
Community has other, unusual amenities folded into its design.  Key among these 
is a pedestrian path that encircles the entirety of the Site.  Residents who utilize 
this path can cover seven-tenths of a mile without ever leaving the Community.  
This path has the added benefit of making it easy and attractive for resident to take 
advantage of the previously mentioned pedestrian amenities of the Site, whether 
it be the proximity of the shopping to the northwest or the school to the southeast.  
The walking path will be at least five feet wide and be shaded with trees.  There will 
also be a separate dog park within the Community.  In addition, there is a large 
shaded and amenitized  area in the space between Buildings B and C, so that 
residents of the northern part of the Site have immediate access to their open 
space.  Thus, although Gorman is seeking modest reductions in the City’s typical 
public and private open space standards, residents of Centerline at Glendale will 
continue to enjoy an abundance of both in a novel, open, urban campus, while still 
securing the quality affordable homes they and the City need. 
The ground floor of the Glendale Avenue building warrants separate discussion of 
its function as an amenity to the Community and the surrounding neighborhood.  
This is a key to Gorman’s efforts to realize the City’s urban redevelopment goals.  
The Community will have an overall theme of health and wellness.  The ground 
floor along Glendale Road will host community facility services including residential 
units, general retail, a combination of healthy food, exercise/fitness/wellness, 
some possible medical care and commercial kitchen/cooking options for residents. 
There will be residential units above the ground flood.  The idea is to create a sense 
of wellbeing for all of the residents and the public, as most of this will be open to 
the public.  There will be six (6) dedicated parking spaces for the general public to 
use to visit these non-residential spaces. 
The significant parking reduction also merits separate comment.  The impact of 
suburban parking requirements on housing affordability and the urban heat island 
are now well documented.  In October 2018, the American Planning Association 
reported, “Planners' shifting strategies toward parking are now supported by a 
growing body of evidence that parking requirements negatively impact multifamily 
housing, especially affordable projects.  In a nutshell, building parking costs a lot, 
and that cost usually ends up raising tenant rents.”  The APA report went on to note 
that municipalities across the country reducing parking requirements are especially

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 11 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
focused on locations near transit options – like this Site – and in special planning 
districts – again, like this Site.  The City’s investment in the public transit system 
should be supported by encouraging developers and future residents to use that 
system.  This reduction in parking is standard for Gorman projects, as every project 
has reduced parking because residents often use public transportation to save 
money. Further, Gorman does not provide reserved parking spaces for its residents.  
Gorman makes this request for reduced parking not just out of a perceived need, 
but on the basis of a vast array of experience.  Gorman knows its residents are 
transit users, and have a sharply reduced desire for parking lots.   
The specific Development Standard deviations Gorman is proposing are set forth in 
the Table below.  It should be noted that for financing purposes, Gorman may 
divide the Site into two parcels.  As a result, some of the PAD standards have been 
modified to provide for that flexibility.  As a primary example, the Community is 
proposed at 368 units, which is less than 26 du/ac for the overall Site.  However, 
because the Site may be divided, Gorman has proposed a standard of 30 du/ac.  
That is solely to ensure that, should the Site be divided, each parcel will meet the 
PAD standards (as opposed to suggesting that there may be more units overall). 
Centerline on Glendale 
Development Standards Table 
 
Standard 
Existing (R-4) 
Development 
Standards 
Proposed Development 
Standards 
Density and Number of Dwelling 
Units 
20 du/ac 
30 du/ac; 368 units 
maximum for the overall 
site 
Building Setbacks (street frontage) 
20 feet, 
increase 1 foot 
to 1 foot ratio 
for buildings 
over 20 feet 
10 feet

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 12 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
Accessory Building Setbacks 
Per Section 
7.301 of the 
Glendale Zoning 
Ordinance 
Per Section 7.301 of the 
Glendale Zoning 
Ordinance 
Minimum Perimeter Setback (non-
street frontage external to the 
overall site) 
20 feet, 
increase 1 foot 
to 1 foot ratio 
for buildings 
over 20 feet 
20 feet 
Minimum Net Lot Area 
6,000 SF 
5 acres 
Minimum Width 
60 feet 
300 feet 
Minimum Depth 
94 feet 
200 feet 
Private Open Space 
100 SF per 
dwelling unit 
70 SF per dwelling unit 
Public Open Space 
30% exclusive of 
parking areas 
23% exclusive of parking 
areas 
Lot Coverage 
50% 
30% 
Parking (Multi-family) 
Studio or 1 
Bedroom: 1 
space 
2 or more 
Bedrooms: 2 
spaces 
1 Designated 
guest space for 
every 3 units 
689 spaces 
488 spaces for the overall 
site. 482 spaces are 
unreserved, and intended 
for residents. 6 spaces 
will be reserved for visitor 
parking for the ground 
floor of Building A.  If the 
project is phased, there 
must be at least 245 
spaces provided with any 
single phase.   
Building Heights (Maximum 
Structure Height) 
30 feet, two 
story maximum 
Building A: 4 stories (60 
feet)

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 13 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
for principal 
buildings 
Buildings B thru D and F 
thru I: 3 stories (40 feet) 
Building E: 1 story (25 
feet) 
Walls 
6’ on property 
lines 
No screen walls required 
adjacent to public rights-
of-way; 6’ screen walls 
along shared property 
lines with private 
properties adjacent to the 
overall site 
 
The PAD allows Gorman and the City to work together to narrowly shape the 
development standards for the Site to allow a strong level of City control and 
oversight of Gorman’s proposal.  Unless a use or standard for development is 
specifically revised herein, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Glendale, Arizona as 
adopted and periodically amended, is applicable to the Centerline on Glendale 
PAD. The intent and purpose of this PAD is to establish the permitted uses, 
development standards and amended provisions of the Zoning Ordinance that will 
govern this development.

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 14 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
5. 
General Plan Amendment Request 
To reiterate, according to the City General Plan Land Use Map, the Site is currently 
designated for multi-family use at the High Density Residential 12-20 du/ac range.  
The Community will require a minor amendment to change the land use 
designation to Downtown Mixed Use (DMU).  The uses proposed for the Project 
are consistent with this designation.  The DMU designation seeks to provide a mix 
of uses, including vertical residential integration with an enhanced pedestrian 
experience and a reduction in automobile dependency.  The DMU designation 
expressly seeks to energize the Glendale Avenue frontage, a key component of the 
Centerline on Glendale design.  The DMU permits multi-family residential units with 
a minimum density of 12 du/ac. Gorman is proposing a density of 25.14 du/ac, 
more than twice the minimum requirement.   
The General Plan Amendment meets the following goals and policies of the General 
Plan.   
Goal LU‐3: Land use ties into existing and future transportation systems.   
As detailed above, Gorman selected this site because of its heavy proximity to bus 
lines.  Thus, this project meets this Goal, and all of its underlying policies, including 
Policy LU-3.6, which calls for a minimum density of 15 du/ac within a quarter mile 
of intense transit service areas.  Here, those bus routes are literally on our 
doorstep.   
Goal LU‐4: Mixed-use projects provide urban clusters with housing, retail, 
restaurants and integrated transit facilities in Glendale. 
Centerline on Glendale meets this Goal, and all of its underlying policies.  The 
current General plan designation does not allow Mixed Uses, but the DMU 
designation does, thus allowing the Community’s proposed ground floor uses 
facing Glendale Avenue.  In addition, the Community specifically meets Policy LU‐
4.4, which aspires to vertically mixed uses.   
Policy HE-1.1:  The City should partner with the private sector to achieve goals for 
safe, affordable housing and coordinate housing programs and services to ensure 
consistency with the current Consolidated Plan.   
The support of City staff in guiding this private sector, affordable housing project 
has been essential to its advancement to date.

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 15 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
Goal HE‐3: Glendale has housing options that meet the range of socioeconomic 
needs of the City’s current and future residents. 
Centerline on Glendale meets this goal, and most of its underlying policies.  In 
particular, the City’s support via fee waivers and accelerated processing, as 
envisioned by Policy HE-3.1, has been essential.   
Policy HE‐5.2: The City shall encourage housing developments to incorporate the 
highest possible cost‐ and quality‐effective level of amenities, sustainable design, 
durability, and architectural quality.  
This Community will have high quality architectural design outside and amenities, 
fixtures and finished inside.   
Goal GA‐4:  Growth Areas are connected by a mix of pedestrian, bicycle, transit and 
vehicular connectivity. 
The General Plan identifies the Glendale Centerline area as one of the City’s Growth 
Areas, where, “Particular attention is directed toward preserving residential 
affordability and value in areas principally along the planning area periphery.”  That 
is an apt description of this proposal.  The PAD reduction in parking is an essential 
element of meeting Goal GA-4’s emphasis on transit and walkability, as opposed to 
an auto-dominant development.   
Goal UD‐3: Glendale’s City Center is revitalized, vibrant, and easily identified 
through wayfinding, signage, and gateways.   
The Urban Design section of the General Plan specifically references Glendale and 
67th Avenue.  Gorman’s urban design approach abandons perimeters walls, and 
presents an open, campus setting, with an energized ground floor along Glendale 
Avenue and front stoops along our other street frontages.   
Policy CRR‐1.8: The City shall develop strategic and proactive intervention efforts 
for property redevelopment, rehabilitation, and maintenance on properties 
beginning to show signs of decline, so as to prevent further progression of blight, 
distress, underutilization or deterioration. 
This Community represents a massive investment in a long-vacant property that 
will bring new residents and new energy to this neighborhood and to Glendale 
Avenue.

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 16 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
Goal CRR‐2: Infill development is a top priority. 
This Community is the essence of infill development.  Centerline on Glendale 
advances all of the politics associated with this goal.  The PAD modifications 
implement Policy CRR‐2.3, which suggests that “The City shall prepare and 
implement infill construction incentives, including zoning ordinance revisions, to 
remove impediments to qualified infill projects.”  The density, height, and suburban 
parking standards of the R-4 District are all impediments to this Community.     
Goal CRR‐3: Underutilized properties are redeveloped and reused.   
The Site is a farm field in the middle of the City.  It needs to be put to more 
productive use to serve the needs of the citizens of Glendale, and to take advantage 
of the existing infrastructure investments the City has made.   
Goal ED‐3.  Redevelopment of the Centerline area, inclusive of Downtown Glendale 
promotes economic growth.   
This Community represents a significant, private sector investment in a long vacant 
property at the western gateway to the Centerline area.  The density increase 
proposed within this PUD meets Policy ED‐3.1, which states, “The City should 
expand housing opportunities to increase population in the area to support 
ongoing commercial and retail development.” 
Goal ED‐6:  The Centerline Redevelopment area has a long-term plan to ensure its 
viability and sustainability.  
The policies and ambitions of the Glendale Centerline Overlay provided Gorman 
with the vision it needed to pursue and design this Community.   
Policy CoD‐2.5: The City should provide developers with code or fee incentives to 
revitalize and/or redevelop older commercial uses near residential neighborhoods 
and residential uses to benefit the City aesthetically while more efficiently 
accessing infrastructure elements and public services.   
To reiterate, Gorman appreciates the City’s fee waiver to encourage this bold infill 
investment project.

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 17 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
Goal C‐2: Public transit as a viable alternative mode of travel.   
To make public transit more viable, the system needs riders.  This Community will 
bring hundreds of new residents to an intersection with at least a half dozen routes 
and stops within 1,000 feet.   
Goal C‐8: Land use ties into existing and future transportation systems. 
This project is deeply integrated into the transit system.  The PAD reduction in 
parking will encourage residents to use the transit system.   
Goal EP‐9: Urban heat island effects are minimized through development 
techniques. 
Gorman has proposed a significant reduction in unnecessary parking at this site, 
which will substantially reduce the heat island impact of unused parking.

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 18 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
6. 
PAD Findings 
As previously indicated, the proposed Community is a classic example of a 
reinvestment proposal that merits deployment of the City’s PAD zoning district.  
The primary justification for use of the PAD is to provide much-needed affordable 
housing, a benefit to the City.  The second, and more local, justification for use of 
the PAD is to jumpstart the Centerline Overlay District, which has sought to 
encourage redevelopment of vacant properties along Glendale Avenue.   
Many of the design features of the Centerline on Glendale project use the PAD to 
achieve these municipal aspirations.  For example, the DMU General Pan 
designation seeks to reduce the focus on vehicular use; the PAD here is essential to 
reduce the parking supply and advance that goal.  Likewise, the DMU designation 
seeks vertically integrated buildings along Glendale Avenue, with ground floor 
public uses and residential above.  The PAD height increase here allows this 
Community to realize that ambition.  One of the purposes of the PAD is to allow 
flexibility in design, building arrangement and development standards to support 
redevelopment.   
Section 5.901 of the City’s Zoning Ordinance sets forth the specific intent of the 
PAD District as follows.   
A. 
Encourage creative and effective use of land and circulation systems to 
accommodate changes in land development technologies. 
The R-4 development standards simply cannot accommodate an urban design of 
affordable housing like the Centerline on Glendale.  Indeed, even the Overlay 
District is insufficiently visionary to respond to Gorman’s design approach.  This 
Community puts its buildings, including ground floor public uses and individual 
front porches, close to the street.  This Community uses vertical buildings to reduce 
its structural footprint on the site, allowing a more open design and a greater 
number of affordable housing opportunities.  This Community acknowledges multi-
modal transportation options for all generations by being centrally located for 
pedestrians – including schoolchildren – and transit users, and deemphasizing the 
need for multiple cars for every home.  None of these things are possible without 
the use of the PAD to allow greater height and density, and to reduce setbacks and 
parking requirements.

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 19 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
B. 
Encourage residential development to provide a mixture of housing types 
and design. 
To reiterate, Gorman is proposing to inject 368 affordable homes into a market that 
is desperately short of them.  This is the mixture that is currently missing from the 
City’s housing market.  The PAD’s flexible design standards make this needed 
addition financially viable.  For example, the reduction in parking, as detailed 
above, is an essential financial component of affordable housing projects, making 
the construction itself financeable, and controlling rents for residents who cannot 
afford of fleet of cars and do not need to pay for the asphalt to house them.  Absent 
this flexibility available only with the PAD, the City loses the benefit of more 
affordable housing.   
The PAD also allows the innovative design features.  For example, the replacement 
of perimeter walls with front porches is only possible with a setback reduction.  The 
vertically integrated building along Glendale Avenue is only possible with the height 
increase of the PAD.   
C. 
Encourage innovative development or development concepts for all land 
use types to provide a greater variety and intensity of uses. 
Like the DMU General Plan designation, this provision of the PAD recognizes the 
need for a “greater … intensity” of uses.  People are the key to bringing energy to 
areas of the City that lack investment.  The proposed increase in density is the direct 
PAD modification of an R-4 standard to meet this expressly stated goal of multiple 
City regulatory documents.     
D. Provide a process which relates the urban design and scale of project to 
the unique characteristics of the site. 
The Centerline on Glendale PAD will accommodate the urban design and 
appropriate scale of the Project to the unique characteristics of the Site.  The City’s 
long range plans seek a more urban, more energized Glendale Avenue frontage.  
This Community provides that with a vertically integrated building that requires 
height that only the PAD can provide.  Urban design means deemphasizing the role 
of the automobile, as expressly stated by the DMU designation, and creating a 
more walkable and transit oriented footprint instead.  Gorman’s design does that 
by eliminating unneeded parking, and by reorienting its homes to the streets.  
Neither of these City design goals can be achieved without a PAD.

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 20 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
E. 
Require the nature and intensity of development to be supported by 
adequate utilities, transportation, drainage, and common open spaces to 
serve the development and to minimize impact on existing or future 
adjacent development. 
One of the advantages of an overlooked, underutilized, infill property like the Site 
is that it is already served by existing utilities.  This narrative has already spoken at 
great length about the existing visible infrastructure in this neighborhood, like the 
bus stops, the School, the Boys and Girls Club, and the local shopping.  But it is not 
surprising to learn that the Site is equally well-served by the utility-level 
infrastructure the City has invested in.  That starts with Glendale and 67th Avenue 
themselves, but immediately extends to include the water lines and wastewater 
lines in those adjacent streets that can serve the Site now.  Likewise, the Site has 
electrical lines running on three sides, including one along Ocotillo Road that 
Gorman will be undergrounding.   
As previously detailed, open space and similar amenities are key component of the 
Community.  That includes the open nature of the design itself, opening up the Site 
instead of walling it in, encouraging pedestrian engagement around the perimeter 
of the Site and into the neighborhood beyond.   
The Centerline on Glendale project clearly meets this aspect of the PAD Ordinance.   
F. 
Encourage development that is consistent with the policies and the 
guidelines established in any specific plan and the General Plan. 
As has been exhaustively made clear, Centerline on Glendale embraces multiple 
aspects of multiple City planning documents.  This includes the DMU, where the 
Community provides density, height, mixed uses, and a multi-modal design 
approach.  This includes the PAD, which, as just noted above, seeks greater 
intensity.  And while meeting so many various land use and design goals of so many 
different City documents is indeed a welcome redevelopment opportunity, 
underlying them all is the City’s critical need for affordable housing.   
All images included in the PAD are conceptual representations of the character and 
quality of the development. Future plans and documents with specific designs for 
the future development will be processed through the City’s process in accordance 
with Section 3.600-Design Review.

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 21 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
7. 
List of Allowed and Prohibited Uses 
Multifamily Residential is the sole permitted primary use throughout the entire 
site, with the exception of the ground floor of Building A.  In Building A, multifamily 
residential is the sole permitted primary use above the ground floor.   
 
On the ground floor, Building A, permitted uses are as follows:   
 
• Commercial daycare 
• Community facility services 
• Galleries and studios 
• General retail  
• Financial institutions 
• Fitness businesses such as gyms, yoga studios, etc. 
• Laundry, cleaning, and dry cleaning establishments, limited as follows: 
1.Maximum of one thousand (1,000) square feet of floor area to be 
occupied by or devoted to machinery to be used for laundry, cleaning, 
dyeing, and finishing work. 
2.Retail service to individual customers only and no wholesaling of any 
commodity or service shall be permitted. 
• Medical offices 
• Personal service businesses, such as beauty shops and barber shops 
• Professional, business, and administrative offices 
• Residential and commercial kitchens 
• Residential units 
• Restaurants, cafeterias, delicatessens, self-service and take-out restaurants, 
and outdoor dining allowed when ancillary to restaurant use, and catering 
services, when ancillary to a primary restaurant use 
• Social professional youth organizations 
 
Building E is intended to provide accessory uses to the multifamily residential uses 
on site.  This would include but not be limited to a leasing office, a management 
office, a clubhouse, meeting and work rooms, kitchen, parcel storage, bicycle 
storage, and an exercise room.    
 
 
The following uses are prohibited in the Centerline on Glendale PAD:

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 22 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
 
1. 
Adult Oriented Businesses. 
2. 
Alternative tower structures. 
3. 
Automobile Sales or Storage. 
4. 
Check Cashing Facilities. 
5. 
Communication Towers 
6. 
Drive-thru restaurants. 
7. 
Hotels, including conference and convention facilities. 
8. 
Medical Marijuana Establishments. 
9. 
Pawn Shops. 
10. Parks and General Recreation. 
11. Swap Meet.

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 23 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
8. 
Landscaping  
The Community will comply with the City’s general Landscape standards, including 
the following:  
1. 
All required trees shall be a minimum of fifteen (15) gallons in size and at least 
fifty (50) percent of those trees must be twenty-four (24) inch box or larger 
size. All shrubs shall be a minimum of five (5) gallon in size. All fifteen-gallon 
trees must be a minimum of eight (8) feet in height, four (4) feet in feet in 
spread of two-inches trunk caliper at the ground level. (CGLO Section 19-42) 
2. 
All landscaped areas shall be finished with a natural topping material which 
may include, but not limited to, the following: turf, groundcover, planting, 
decomposed granite (two (2) inches minimum depth), river run rock, 
expanded shale, or bark. A pre-emergent herbicide shall be applied to the 
ground prior to the placement of natural surface materials (decomposed 
granite, river run rock, etc.) in any landscaped area to prevent weed growth. 
(CGLO Section 19-43) 
3. 
The installation of street trees, shrubs, and vegetative groundcover shall be 
required for all applicable projects in an amount equal to or greater than one 
(1) tree and three (3) shrubs for each thirty (30) feet of street frontage, and 
vegetative groundcover occupying a minimum of sixty (60) percent of the 
total street frontage landscaped area. (CGL Section 19-76) 
4. 
On-site parking areas for all applicable development projects shall contain at 
least one (1) landscaped planter, not less than two hundred (200) square feet 
in area and with a minimum width of five (5) feet measured from back of curb 
to back of curb, for every ten (10) parking spaces provided on the site. (CGLO 
Section 19-65) 
5. 
Per GZO Sec. 7.202 A.1, a minimum of 30% of the total site area must be 
landscaping /public open space. 
6. 
All multiple-family residential development shall contain a minimum of one 
(1) tree and two (2) shrubs for each dwelling unit.

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 24 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
9. 
Design Standards 
 
This project has been designed to work within the context of the neighborhood and 
how the City of Glendale envisions the future of Glendale Road.  The units provide 
affordable, attractive living spaces with a strong amenity package that serves the 
residents and the broader community.  The design creates a safe feeling both 
around the perimeter and on the interior by emphasizing a walkable environment, 
pleasant for people of all ages.  Amenities in both the front and central portion of 
the project offer options for residents to socialize with neighbors and find 
important services they need.   
The overall design sets the project apart.  The exterior facing edifices along 
Glendale Road, 67th Avenue and Ocotillo Road present a variety of materials, colors 
and articulations on the building facades to make them attractive and 
interesting.  By fronting active spaces along Glendale and stoops along 67th Avenue 
and Ocotillo, the project creates a welcoming environment, not one which walls off 
anyone who does not live there.  Along Glendale Road large amounts of glass on 
the ground floor create connections between those walking along the sidewalk and 
people inside the building.  The building rooflines on the perimeter streets will be 
varied heights and angles so long flat rooves will not be seen.  Building materials 
will include stucco, articulations with other materials and metal on balconies. 
Balconies and stoops as well as indentations in the building envelope will create 
huge variety and interest making the project pleasant to look at while walking, 
biking or driving by.  Stairways will be on the interior with landings at each floor to 
break up any potential monotony.  There will be no blank walls around the entire 
project.   
The building on Glendale Road and 67th Avenue will be slightly taller than 
surrounding neighbors and that height and positioning near the lot line along with 
lush tree lined sidewalks will create a slightly different feel than neighboring 
projects, but is exactly what the planning for Glendale Road calls for in the 
Centerline Overlay District.  Furthermore, there is sufficient distance from 
neighbors so any height will not be impactful.  These characteristics are the 
hallmark of walkable urban environments.

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 25 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
The site plan has been constructed to build a walkable shaded feeling inside the 
campus with opportunities to exercise and gather throughout even while there is 
an intense urban environment surrounding the project. 
The landscape will be the equivalent of a small forest with over 350 trees planted 
where none currently exist.  A walking path around the perimeter plus intensive 
tree planting and block walls will shield the development from adjacent users and 
create shade.  With balconies and porches on every unit residents can spend time 
outdoors, but are positioned to not impose on their neighbors. 
The reduced use of cars in the development and pushing egress to the major 
arterials of Glendale and 67th Avenue will keep traffic away from the interior 
neighborhood.  The siting of the project at a major intersection though means easy 
access to buses with 8 stops surrounding the site all directly accessed through 
sidewalk connections and at the traffic signal at 7th Ave and Glendale with 
pedestrian crossings.   
However, as it is located near major arterials, noise reduction is very 
important.  Both the large number of trees as well as following green building 
techniques including dual pane windows and heavy insulation will minimize sound 
inside the units.  Placement of building along the street will also shield open spaces 
in the center of the project from loud noise as well.  The financing for this project 
actually requires high energy efficiency which simultaneously reduces noise. 
Accent lighting on the buildings and along paths will create a safe and strong 
nighttime visual without producing light throw on neighbors or into the sky. 
We believe to attract and retain residents an amenity package must be well suited 
for the needs of the residents.  With many families likely living at the project, 
multiple attractions will be placed through the site.  The main leasing/amenity 
building will provide gathering space for residents as well as a computer room for 
adults and children to use.  A 500 SF vending area with healthy food will also be 
provided in this space.  Around the building, playground equipment and a splash 
pad will provide hours of fun for younger children.  Ramadas and barbeques will be 
sprinkled throughout the project so gatherings can regularly occur.  A walking path 
around the perimeter of the development is approximately 7/10 of a mile, 
providing a running/walking trail as well as an easy place to walk pets.  Likewise, a 
small dog park will be located on the east side of the project.  In the front building

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 26 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
on Glendale wellness uses such as a yoga/exercise room and private spaces for 
telehealth will offer more possibilities for residents and potentially the broader 
public. 
The 
inside 
of 
the 
units 
were 
thought 
about 
as 
much 
as 
the 
exteriors.  Washer/dryers will be provided along with ceiling fans, plentiful storage, 
internet connections and outside covered parking.  Low VOC paint and vinyl plank 
flooring along with durable surfaces mean residents are safe and units will stay 
fresh for the long haul. 
The overall project design will create a safe and walkable environment that offers 
quick and easy accessibility for police and fire if ever needed.  Safety vehicles can 
access all buildings and the flow is logical and easy to see.  All apartment front doors 
will have strike plates and peep holes so residents know who is visiting and clear 
visibility in all directions will be the norm.  The overall site plan not only provides 
safety but good relations between buildings and amenity areas so residents always 
feel safe as they walk through the project while being interesting as well.  Seating 
interspersed throughout and pedestrian lighting will also allow residents to relax 
and move throughout the development as well as gather. 
To minimize sun exposure in the morning and afternoon almost all of the buildings 
are facing north/south and as mentioned earlier carports will shade the parking 
lot/cars. The parking areas are not too lengthy and are broken up with trees and 
carports.  Likewise, sidewalks that residents take from their cars will be shaded with 
trees. 
Since many of our residents do not own cars, safe and plentiful sidewalks/paths 
that connect people throughout the project and with the surrounding 
neighborhood is very important.  The project has been designed to facilitate that 
movement.  Likewise, many will cycle to work or surrounding retail.  Direct 
connectivity to the sidewalks around the project will be provided as well as to the 
surrounding bus stops.  Per the landscape plan, all sidewalks will have abundant 
trees and vegetation to minimize heat and sunlight. 
It is important that residents feel comfortable throughout the project so the 
landscape plan will balance heat mitigation with water usage.  Appropriate trees 
and colorful vegetation will be planted around the perimeters of all buildings and 
especially along sidewalks and the walking path.  We want our residents to be able

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 27 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
to go outside during all times of the year so plantings will reflect that desire by 
creating shade and bosc like areas in the larger open spaces. 
On the perimeter of the project block walls will separate adjacent neighbors but a 
more open campus along the roads will create a strong urban environment with 
the buildings fronting on the streets to create buffers and interest. 
As this is a large development, dumpsters will be at multiple enclosed facilities 
throughout the projects so residents do not need to walk far. 
We believe this project speaks to the desires of the city and community for a new 
more urban design which is attractive and begins the changes along Glendale 
Avenue called for ten years ago.  Inside the development however a calm 
environment that caters to residents need for shade, gathering, amenities and a 
healthy lifestyle is abundant.  This mixture will help begin the revitalization of 
Glendale Avenue envisioned by the city. 
In conjunction with the submittal of this PUD, Gorman is submitting elevations of 
all buildings indicating their heavily articulated design, a colored landscape plan, 
and photographs used during community outreach of Gorman’s “Gracie’s Village” 
project in Tempe, reflecting a recent use by Gorman of varied, modern, and urban 
exterior finishes, high design interior common areas, and market-rate interior 
finishes.  See Exhibit 6, Design Review Materials.  These are three of the five items 
required during the Design Review process, omitting only a materials board and 
signage design.   
Centerline on Glendale will be subject to design review pursuant to Section 3-600 
of the City Zoning Ordinance.

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 28 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
10. Sign Standards 
 
Signage will conform to Section 7.104.D, Glendale Centerline Overlay District 
standards.

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 29 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
11. Circulation and Access 
 
The Site is adjacent to two major streets, Glendale Avenue and 67th Avenue, and 
is proposing a single driveway onto each of these two streets.   
• The Glendale drive is located at the northeast corner of the site, to allow 
space for the transit stop located along Glendale Avenue.  All movements 
will be allowed at this driveway.   
• The right-in, right-out only driveway on 67th Avenue is located to bring 
visitors and tenants directly into the leasing office and amenity space.  It is 
a welcoming design.  The restriction of the driveway to right-in, right-out 
only movements has multiple advantages.  First, it does not interfere with 
movements from the San Martin Apartments driveway across 67th Avenue, 
so the center lane of 67th Avenue is not impacted by the Community at all.  
In addition, because there will be no southbound traffic exiting from the 
Community onto 67th Avenue, the already low impact on the intersection at 
Ocotillo Road will be even further reduced.     
• While there will be pedestrian access to Ocotillo Street on the south, there 
will be no vehicular access to this local street.   
To reiterate, as a result of these multiple restrictions, the Community will have 
very little vehicular impact on Ocotillo or its intersection  with 67th Avenue.   
Parking is scattered across the Site, and all residents will have vehicular access to 
both driveways, although, presumably, residents will tend to use the drive that is 
closer to their home.  There will be some covered parking available.   
As previously indicated, Gorman expects residents of this Community will want to 
take advantage of the significant mass transit access afforded on the two major 
streets.  This is intended to be a transit oriented project.   
Gorman has submitted a Traffic Impact Study prepared by CivTech along with this 
resubmittal.  The TIS indicates 123 AM peak trips, about two cars per minute, and 
155 PM peak trips, well under three cars per minute.  It should be noted that the 
TIS makes no allowance for the transit oriented nature of the community, or the 
reduced amount of vehicle ownership.  CivTech used normal ITE figures, so the

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 30 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
TIS’s numbers should conservatively exceed the actual traffic which Gorman 
expects.   
Regardless, the CivTech TIS indicates that LOS at surrounding intersections should 
remain acceptable, except at Octoillo and 67th Avenue, which already has some 
operational issues.  This is another good reason for Centerline on Glendale not to 
burden this local street with a driveway.  As a result of the Community’s 
sensitivity to this design question, the Community is only expected to contribute 
3% of the peak hour traffic at that intersection.  It is difficult to imagine a 
greenfield development project having less impact.

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 31 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
12. Utilities and Services 
 
 
Public Utilities and Services Table 
Utility 
Provider 
Water 
City of Glendale 
Sewer 
City of Glendale 
Gas 
Southwest Gas 
Communications 
Cox Communications 
Refuse 
City of Glendale 
Law Enforcement 
City of Glendale 
Fire and Emergency Medical Services 
City of Glendale 
Electric 
SRP 
Telephone 
Cox Communications 
 
As previously detailed, this infill site is ideally positioned to take advantage of 
existing municipal services and investments.

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 32 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
13. Phasing 
 
The Community is envisioned to be developed in one phase but may be developed 
in two phases if warranted by the development funding schedule.

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 33 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
14. Amendments 
 
Due to the need for flexibility/timeliness in the final stages of 
design/development, especially for affordable housing developments, the 
following provisions are intended to provide criteria for Administrative 
Interpretations and for the determination of a Major Amendment or Minor 
Amendment to this PAD.   
 
Administrative Interpretations 
On occasion, it may be necessary to request a formal or informal interpretation 
from the City of Glendale Planning Administrator related to the implementation 
and/or interpretation of the project intent, use, or development standards, as 
may be applicable to the interpretation of the provisions of the City of Glendale 
Zoning Ordinance or to the interpretation of the intent of narrative 
descriptions/statements contained in this PAD application. Such requests for 
interpretation to these provisions will be made in written form to the City of 
Glendale Planning Administrator, or his/her designee, by the Developer or the 
property owner. 
 
Major Amendments 
A Major Amendment is a substantial alteration to the approved PAD, as deemed 
by the Planning Administrator or his/her designee. Major Amendments shall 
comply with the procedural/public hearing requirements set forth in City of 
Glendale Zoning Ordinance and State Statute 
 
Minor Amendments 
The City of Glendale Planning Administrator or his/her designee may allow Minor 
Amendments to the PAD, provided that such proposed Amendments do not rise 
to the level of a Major Amendment as outlined above. Minor Amendments shall 
be acted upon administratively by the Planning Administrator, or his/her 
designee. Unless otherwise required by law, those Amendments determined to

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 34 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
be Minor by the City shall not require public notice or public hearings. The 
following items shall be considered as Minor Amendments to the PAD: 
 
1. 
Any alterations to the PAD narrative which do not directly impact the 
health, safety and welfare for any adjacent property owner or that of the general 
public as determined by the Planning Administrator, or his/her designee; 
2. 
Changes or modifications in any development standard (e.g., building 
setbacks, building height, open space, etc.) by less than 10% in order to 
accommodate for unique circumstances or specific site constraints, so long as the 
change does not conflict with the City of Glendale Building Code; 
3. 
Any analogous interpretations of the List of Uses of the property as set 
forth in the PAD, as determined by the Planning Administrator or his/her 
designee; 
4. 
Minor modifications or adjustments to internal driveway 
alignments/locations and/or parcel configuration, so long as the proposed 
modification does not change the overall intent of the PAD; 
5. 
Other changes not identified above, but deemed appropriate by the 
Planning Administrator, or his/her designee, as long as the change does not 
impact the general health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the City of 
Glendale and does not impact the overall intent of the approved PAD. 
Upon the approval of any proposed Amendment to the PAD, the Amendment 
shall be attached to the PAD as an addendum and shall become a part thereof.

7409.9.2924500.7 
Page 35 of 35 
2/4/2022 
 
15. Conclusion 
 
Gorman is excited to bring the Centerline on Glendale proposal to this vacant, infill 
site at the gateway to the Centerline Overlay District.  Equipped with its experience 
as one of the Valley’s leading affordable housing developers, and excited by the 
innovative design opportunities presented by this centrally located Site, Gorman 
believes this Community will be not just an overdue redevelopment of a greenfield, 
but model of how to shift to a more urban, multi-modal design approach to meet 
the City’s needs and goals.  This creative solution to the City’s substantial need for 
more affordable housing units can only be achieved through the use of the City’s 
PAD zoning designation.  We encourage the City to continue its support for the 
proposed minor General Plan Amendment to DMU and rezoning request to PAD.

Exhibit 1 
Site Plan

67TH AVENUE
OCOTILLO ROAD
GLENDALE AVENUE
BLDG. 'G'
3-STORY
40,555 S.F.
BLDG. 'F'
3-STORY
22,145 S.F.
BLDG. 'H'
3-STORY
44,741 S.F.
BLDG. 'E'
1-STORY
7,000 S.F.
BLDG. 'I'
3-STORY
64,824 S.F.
BLDG. 'D'
3-STORY
29,920 S.F.
BLDG. 'A'
4-STORY
63,136 S.F.
BLDG. 'C'
3-STORY
44,741 S.F.
BLDG. 'B'
3-STORY
44,741 S.F.
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
TRASH 
ENCLOSURE
TRASH 
ENCLOSURE, SEE 
DETAIL 1/AS501
7
8
7
6
7
7
8
3
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
7
7
7
8
6
7
7
7
8
8
8
6
5
8
8
7
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
5
9
9
8
8
8
8
8
6
9
5
8
8
8
5
8
8
8
8
8
8
8'-8"
2'-8"
20'-1"
77'-0"
6'-0"
80'-0"
6'-0"
80'-0"
6'-0"
87'-0"
80'-0"
6'-0"
60'-0"
26'-0"
80'-0"
80'-0"
6'-0"
50'-0"
27'-3"
70'-0"
6'-0"
70'-0"
27'-2"
26'-0"
40'-0"
16'-6"
40'-0"
26'-0" 6'-0"
87'-0"
87'-0"
6'-0" 25'-11"
80'-0"
6'-0"
70'-0"
6'-0"
80'-0"
91'-9"
57'-0"
6'-0"
80'-0"
6'-0"
70'-0"
5'-9"
33'-0"
10'-0"
9'-2"
26'-0" 6'-0"
90'-0"
90'-0"
6'-0"
90'-0"
6'-0"
90'-0"
40'-0"
6'-0"
80'-0"
6'-0"
80'-0"
6'-0"
80'-0"
6'-0"
8
7
70'-0"
10'-0"
BUILDING 
SETBACK
10'-0" 5'-2"
6'-2"
1'-4"
20'-0"
5'-6"
149'-10"
5'-1"
5'-6"
26'-0" 6'-0"
90'-0"
6'-0"
90'-0"
6'-0"
90'-0"
40'-0"
6'-0"
80'-0"
6'-0"
80'-0"
6'-0"
80'-0"
60'-0"
5'-6"
5'-1"
20'-0"
5'-3"
BUILDING 
SETBACK
EXISTING SITE 
WALL
5'-6"
46'-0"
5'-8"
6'-6"
10'-0"
9'-3"
BUILDING 
SETBACK
5'-11"
62'-3"
81'-5"
62'-3"
6'-1"
6'-2"
20'-6"
20'-6"
5'-0"
8'-5"
62'-3"
19'-9"
5'-8"
8'-8"
62'-3"
9'-1"
5'-0"
20'-6"
20'-0"
31'-0"
62'-3"
5'-10"
10'-0"
5'-8"
EXISTING SITE 
WALL
EXISTING SITE 
WALL
ENTRANCE
EXIT
ENTRANCE/
EXIT
NEW 
PATHWAY
NEW 
PATHWAY
NEW 
PATHWAY
NEW 
PATHWAY
NEW 
PATHWAY
NEW 
PATHWAY
NEW 
PATHWAY
NEW 
PATHWAY
5'-10"
PROPERTY LINE
16'-0"
70'-0"
6'-0"
70'-0"
6'-0"
70'-0"
16'-0"
6'-0"
6'-0"
80'-0"
6'-0"
70'-0"
6'-0"
6'-0"
16'-0"
26'-1"
20'-0"
60'-0"
36'-10"
6'-0"
80'-0"
6'-0"
80'-0"
6'-0"
80'-0"
6'-0"
50'-0"
6'-0"
80'-0"
6'-0"
80'-0"
26'-0"
9'-9"
20'-3"
10'-8"
16'-3"
16'-0"
16'-0"
6'-8"
65'-0"
/
1
AS104
/
1
AS103
TRASH 
ENCLOSURE, SEE 
DETAIL 1/AS501
TRASH 
ENCLOSURE, SEE 
DETAIL 1/AS501
54'-7"
90'-0"
6'-0"
90'-0"
6'-0"
64'-6"
17'-6"
97'-0"
90'-0"
90'-0"
97'-0"
60'-0"
PROJECT DATA
CURRENT CODES
ADDRESS
6529 W. GLENDALE AVE., GLENDALE AZ. 85301
2018 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE
2018 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE
2018 INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE
2018 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CODE
2018 INTERNATIONAL FUEL CODE
2018  INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE
2017 INTERNATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES
DESCRIPTION
A NEW MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND WILL BE MADE UP OF EIGHT 
3 & 4-STORY BUILDINGS WITH AN ADDITIONAL 1-STORY AMENITIES 
BUILDING. THE PROJECT WILL CONSIST OF 368 UNITS RANGING FROM 
700S.F.-1100S.F. 1,2, AND 3 BEDROOMS.
LOCATION
THE PROJECT IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WEST 
GLENDALE AVENUE AND NORTH 67TH AVENUE IN GLENDALE, AZ.
SITE INFORMATION
ZONING - R-4 (CENTERLINE OVERLAY DISTRICT)
APN - 144-07-004B, 144-07-004C, 144-07-004G, 144-07-005C
SIZE - TOTAL - 561,839 S.F. (12.90 ACRES)
   NORTH LOT - 273,107 S.F. (6.27 ACRES)
   SOUTH LOT - 288,732 S.F. (6.63 ACRES)
SETBACKS - 20'-0, 10'-0" AT STREET FRONTAGES
DENSITY - NORTH LOT 182 UNITS/6.27 ACRES = 29 DU/ACRE
   SOUTH LOT 186 UNITS/6.63 ACRES = 28 DU/ACRE
LOT COVERAGE - NORTH LOT 54,748 S.F./273,107 S.F. = 20.0%
SOUTH LOT 63,244 S.F./288,732 S.F. = 21.9%
COMMON OPEN SPACE PROVIDED - NORTH LOT 67,418 S.F. = 24.7%
     SOUTH LOT 84,203 S.F. = 29.2%
PARKING PROVIDED - NORTH LOT 249 SPACES
  SOUTH LOT 247 SPACES
PROJECT CONTACTS
OWNER DEVELOPER:
GORMAN & COMPANY
2030 E. OSBORN RD.
PHOENIX, AZ. 85016
T. (602) 430-8345
CONTACT: DAN KLOCKE
ARCHITECT:
C.C.B.G. ARCHITECTS
102 E. BUCHANAN STREET
PHOENIX, AZ. 85004
T. (602) 258-2211
CONTACT: JOE FITZPARTICK
PARKING
REQUIRED PARKING
= 368/3   = 123
GUEST PARKING (1 SPACE PER 3 UNITS)
= 170(1)  = 170
1 BD (1 SPACES PER UNIT)
= 154(2)  = 308
2 BD (2 SPACES PER UNIT)
=   44(2)  =   88
3 BD (2 SPACES PER UNIT)
= 689 SPACES (1.87 PU)
TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING
PROVIDED PARKING
472 SPACES
STANDARD PARKING
472 SPACES (1.31 PU)
TOTAL PARKING
UNIT MIX
BUILDING 'A'
14
1 BD
34
2 BD
8
3 BD
56
TOTAL
BUILDING 'B'
24
1 BD
18
2 BD
6
3 BD
48
TOTAL
BUILDING 'C'
24
1 BD
18
2 BD
6
3 BD
48
TOTAL
BUILDING 'D'
24
1 BD
18
2 BD
6
3 BD
48
TOTAL
BUILDING 'F'
12
1 BD
12
2 BD
0
3 BD
24
TOTAL
BUILDING 'G'
12
1 BD
18
2 BD
6
3 BD
36
TOTAL
BUILDING 'H'
24
1 BD
18
2 BD
6
3 BD
48
TOTAL
BUILDING 'I'
36
1 BD
18
2 BD
6
3 BD
60
TOTAL
PROJECT TOTAL
170  -   (46%)
1 BD
154  -   (42%)
2 BD
44  -   (12%)
3 BD
368  - (100%)
TOTAL
BUILDING SQ. FT.
=   64,514 S.F.
BUILDING 'A' (4-STORIES)
=   44,741 S.F.
BUILDING 'B' (3-STORIES)
=   44,741 S.F.
BUILDING 'C' (3-STORIES)
=   29,920 S.F.
BUILDING 'D' (3-STORIES)
=     7,000 S.F.
BUILDING 'E' (1-STORY)
=   22,145 S.F.
BUILDING 'F' (3-STORIES)
=   40,555 S.F.
BUILDING 'G' (3-STORIES)
=   44,741 S.F.
BUILDING 'H' (3-STORIES)
=   64,824 S.F.
BUILDING 'I' (3-STORIES)
= 363,181 S.F.
TOTAL
GENERAL SITE PLAN NOTES
1. THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED IN THE CITY OF PHOENIX WATER SERVICE AREA AND HAS BEEN 
DESIGNATED AS HAVING AN ASSURED WATER SUPPLY.
2. DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF THIS SITE WILL CONFORM WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND 
ORDINANCES. 
3. ALL NEW OR RELOCATED UTILITIES WILL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND.
4. STRUCTURES AND LANDSCAPING WITHIN A TRIANGLE MEASURED BACK 10' FROM THE 
PROPERTY LINE AND 20' ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE ON EACH SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAYS 
ENTRANCES WILL BE MAINTAINED AT A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 3'.
5. STRUCTURES AND LANDSCAPING WITHIN A TRIANGLE MEASURING 33'X33' ALONG THE 
PROPERTY LINES WILL BE MAINTAINED AT A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 3'.
6. ANY LIGHTING WILL BE PLACED SO AS TO DIRECT LIGHT AWAY FROM ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL 
DISTRICTS AND WILL NOT EXCEED ONE FOOT CANDLE AT THE PROPERTY LINE. NO NOISE, ODOR, 
OR VIBRATION WILL BE EMITTED AT ANY LEVEL EXCEEDING THE GENERAL LEVEL OF NOISE, 
ODOR, OR VIBRATION EMITTED BY USES IN THE AREA OUTSIDE OF THE SITE.
7. OWNERS OF PROPERTY ADJACENT TO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY WILL HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITY 
FOR MAINTAINING ALL LANDSCAPING LOCATED WITHIN THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY, IN ACCORDANCE 
WITH APPROVED PLANS.
8. ALL ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT AND SATELLITE DISHES SHALL BE SCREENED TO THE HEIGHT OF THE 
TALLEST EQUIPMENT.
9. ALL SERVICE AREAS SHALL BE SCREENED TO CONCEAL TRASH CONTAINERS, LOADING DOCKS, 
TRANSFORMERS, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS AND OTHER MECHANICAL OR ELECTRICAL 
EQUIPMENT FROM EYE LEVEL ADJACENT TO ALL PUBLIC STREETS.
10. BARBED, RAZOR, OR CONCERTINA WIRE (OR SIMILAR) SHALL NOT BE USED ON THIS SITE WHERE 
VISIBLE FROM PUBLIC STREETS OR ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AREAS.
11. ALL SIGNAGE REQUIRES SEPARATE REVIEWS, APPROVALS, AND PERMITS. NO SIGNS ARE 
APPROVED PER THIS PLAN. 
Sheet No.
Sheet Title
D
C
B
A
1
2
3
4
5
D
C
B
A
1
2
3
4
5
GORMAN ARCHITECTURAL, LLC.
Plot Date:
Project No.
Drawn by:
E
E
6
6
C O R P O R A T E  O F F I C E 
2 0 0  N.  M A I N  S T R E E T
O R E G O N,  W I  5 3 5 7 5
Checked by:
Approved by:
Issue Dates:
2/2/2022 12:10:20 PM
C:\TempCAD\Centerline On Glendale - Site_dbiaSZP3Q.rvt
AS102
ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN
OVERALL
CENTERLINE ON GLENDALE
6529 WEST GLENDALE AVENUE
GLENDALE, ARIZONA  85301
Project Number
GORMAN TEAM
TEMPLATE
Checker
Approver
GORMAN TEAM
TEMPLATE
SCALE:   1" = 40'-0"
1
OVERALL PROJECT SITE PLAN
PARKING COUNT
COUNT
TYPE
20
ACCESSIBLE
476
STANDARD
TOTAL PARKING: 496
DATE
DESCRIPTION
0'
20'
40'
10'
SCALE: 1" = 40'-0"
GORMAN ARCHITECTURAL, INC.
2030 E. OSBORN RD
PHOENIX, AZ 85016
T. (608) 712-4145
CONTACT: ADDISON LECY-SIEWERT
496 SPACES
496 SPACES (1.35 PU)

Sheet No.
Sheet Title
D
C
B
A
1
2
3
4
5
D
C
B
A
1
2
3
4
5
GORMAN ARCHITECTURAL, LLC.
Plot Date:
Project No.
Drawn by:
E
E
6
6
C O R P O R A T E  O F F I C E 
2 0 0  N.  M A I N  S T R E E T
O R E G O N,  W I  5 3 5 7 5
Checked by:
Approved by:
Issue Dates:
2/2/2022 12:04:23 PM
C:\TempCAD\Centerline On Glendale - Site_dbiaSZP3Q.rvt
AS501
ARCHITECTURAL SITE
DETAILS
CENTERLINE ON GLENDALE
6529 WEST GLENDALE AVENUE
GLENDALE, ARIZONA  85301
Project Number
GORMAN TEAM
TEMPLATE
Checker
Approver
GORMAN TEAM
TEMPLATE
1 DETAIL G-934
SCALE:    N.T.S.
2 DETAIL G-954
SCALE:    N.T.S.
DATE
DESCRIPTION

Exhibit 2 
Proposed General Plan Amendment Map

Proposed General Plan Amendment Map
GLENDALE AVE
67TH AVE
Existing
HDR
12-20
GLENDALE AVE
67TH AVE
DMU
Proposed

Exhibit 3 
Proposed Rezoning Map

Proposed Zoning Map
Existing
Proposed
R-4
PAD
GLENDALE AVE
67TH AVE
OCOTILLO RD
GLENDALE AVE
67TH AVE
OCOTILLO RD

Exhibit 4 
Aerial Map of Site

Aerial Map
67TH AVENUE
SUBJECT PROPERTY

Exhibit 5 
Valley Metro Bus Stops

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Subject
Property
Map #
Valley Metro
Stop ID
1
#6631
2
#4243
3
#2549
4
#1336
5
#6630
6
#9244
7
#2527
8
#4257
Valley Metro Bus Stop Locations 
GLENDALE AVE
67TH AVE

Exhibit 6 
Design Review Materials

W Glendale Ave
W Glendale Ave
W Ocotillo Rd
W Ocotillo Rd
N 67th Ave
N 67th Ave
BLDG
BLDG
G
3 Story
3 Story
Multi-Family
Multi-Family
BLDG
BLDG
F
3 Story
3 Story
Multi-Family
Multi-Family
BLDG
BLDG
H
3 Story
3 Story
Multi-
Multi-
Family
Family
BLDG
BLDG
I
3 Story
3 Story
Multi-
Multi-
Family
Family
BLDG
BLDG
D
3 Story
3 Story
Multi-
Multi-
Family
Family
BLDG
BLDG
C
3 Story
3 Story
Multi-
Multi-
Family
Family
BLDG
BLDG
B
3 Story
3 Story
Multi-
Multi-
Family
Family
BLDG
BLDG
A
4 Story
4 Story
Multi-
Multi-
Family & 
Family & 
Amenity
Amenity
BLDG
BLDG
E
1 Story
1 Story
Amenity
Amenity
Resident Dog Park
Resident Dog Park
- Secured By Gates
- Secured By Gates
- Shade Trees
- Shade Trees
- Bench Seating
- Bench Seating
- Play Obstacles
- Play Obstacles
Resident Open Space
Resident Open Space
- Shade Trees
- Shade Trees
- Seating 
- Seating 
- Lawn Games
- Lawn Games
- Open Turf
- Open Turf
Community 
Community 
Center 
Center 
Entrance
Entrance
Leasing 
Leasing 
Entrance
Entrance
Perimeter 
Perimeter 
Walking Trail
Walking Trail
Perimeter Walking Trail
Perimeter Walking Trail
Property Line
Property Line
Resident Amenity Area
Resident Amenity Area
- Tot Lot Play Area (Varying Ages)
- Tot Lot Play Area (Varying Ages)
- Shade Trees
- Shade Trees
- Bench Seating
- Bench Seating
- Open Play Turf
- Open Play Turf
2 February 2022
N:\01\0379401\Graphics\Exhibits\Centerline.indd
Centerline on 
Glendale
Rendered 
Landscape Plan
0’ 
 
50’ 
100’
PROVIDED OPEN SPACE AREA
North Lot
67,418 SF
24.7%
South Lot
84,203 SF
29.2%
Total
151,621 SF
27.0%

Gracie’s Village – Tempe, AZ

Gracie’s Village – Tempe, AZ

Gracie’s Village – Tempe, AZ

Gracie’s Village – Tempe, AZ