Traffic Study - Exec Smry

City of Glendale — Regular Meeting (2022-09-27)

View PDF Item 33 Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 8604 characters
Urban 95 – Glendale, AZ  
 
Traffic Impact Study 
 
1 
March 2022 
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY  
Vision Capital Partners proposes a mixed-use development (the Project) located in the southwest 
corner of 95th Avenue and Missouri Avenue in Glendale, Arizona. In 2010, the Project originally 
proposed a mixed-use development of 710 multi-family dwelling units (DU), a 300-key hotel, 86,800 
square feet (SF) of retail, and 1,374 KSF of office space. The development now proposes approximately 
1,293 multi-family DU, a 300-key hotel, and approximately 108,900 SF of retail. Access to the site is 
provided by way of Missouri Avenue, 95th Avenue, 96th Avenue, Georgia Avenue, and Orange Drive.  
CivTech, Inc. has been retained by Vision Capital Partners to perform the traffic impact study (TIS) 
for the proposed development. The purpose of this assessment is to address the traffic and 
transportation impacts of the proposed development on the surrounding streets and intersections. 
The following conclusions and recommendations have been documented in this study: 
GENERAL 
• 
The proposed development is anticipated to generate 12,216 weekday daily trips, 705 (231 
in/474 out) trips during the AM peak hour, and 971 (573 in/ 398 out) trips during the PM peak 
hour. 
EXISTING 
• 
The results of the existing conditions analysis indicate that all study intersections operate with 
acceptable levels of service (LOS D or better), with the exception of 95th Avenue and 
Cardinals Way. 
o 
The northbound and southbound overall approaches at 95th Avenue and Cardinals Way 
operate at LOS E during both AM and PM peak hours. The northbound approach operates 
with a delay of 57.9 seconds per vehicle during the AM peak hour and 59.8 seconds per 
vehicle during the PM peak hour. The southbound approach operates with a delay of 61.6 
seconds per vehicle during the AM peak hour and 61.3 seconds per vehicle during the PM 
peak hour. 
BUILD OUT 2025 AND 2030  
• 
The results of the Synchro analysis indicate that most of the study intersections operate with 
overall acceptable levels of service (LOS D or better), with the exception of the following 
intersections.  
• 
The signalized intersection of 95th Avenue and Cardinals Way experienced delay in the 
existing capacity analysis; therefore, delays were carried through into the no build and build 
scenarios of 2025 and 2030. In the 2025 build scenario, the intersection operates with an 
overall intersection delay of 32.4 seconds per vehicle during the AM peak hour and 34.3 
seconds per vehicle during the PM peak hour. The intersection has delay in the northbound 
and southbound approaches during both AM and PM peak hours. The northbound approach 
operates with a projected delay of 64.2 seconds per vehicle during the AM peak hour and 63.2 
seconds per vehicle during the PM peak hour. The southbound approach operates with a

Urban 95 – Glendale, AZ  
 
Traffic Impact Study 
 
2 
March 2022 
projected delay of 60.7 seconds per vehicle during the AM peak hour and 61.9 seconds per 
vehicle during the PM peak hour. 
o 
In the 2030 build scenario, the intersection operates with an overall intersection delay 
of 32 seconds per vehicle during the AM peak hour and 33.8 seconds per vehicle during 
the PM peak hour. The intersection has delay in the northbound and southbound 
approaches during both AM and PM peak hours. The northbound approach operates 
with a projected delay of 64.4 seconds per vehicle during the AM peak hour and 63.7 
seconds per vehicle during the PM peak hour. The southbound approach operates with 
a projected delay of 61 seconds per vehicle during the AM peak hour and 62 seconds 
per vehicle during the PM peak hour. 
o 
Due to the intersection having unacceptable delay in the existing condition and 
background scenario, the developer is not responsible for mitigation recommendations 
at the intersection. To mitigate the delay at the intersection during the peak hours it is 
recommended that the cycle length of the signal be adjusted to 120 seconds from 140 
seconds. With the cycle length adjustment, in the build scenario of 2025, the 
intersection operates with a decreased overall intersection delay of 29.2 seconds per 
vehicle in the AM peak hour and 31 seconds per vehicle in the PM peak hour. The 
intersection has delay in the northbound approach, operating with a projected delay of 
50.3 seconds per vehicle during the AM peak hour and 51.1 seconds per vehicle during 
the PM peak hour. The intersection has delay in the southbound approach, operating 
with a projected delay of 50.1 seconds per vehicle during the AM peak hour and 51.5 
seconds per vehicle during the PM peak hour. 
o 
With the same cycle length adjustment applied to the build scenario of 2030, the 
intersection operates with a decreased overall intersection delay of 29.1 seconds per 
vehicle in the AM peak hour and 30.9 seconds per vehicle in the PM peak hour. The 
intersection has delay in the northbound approach, operating with a projected delay of 
50.3 seconds per vehicle during the AM peak hour and 51.4 seconds per vehicle during 
the PM peak hour. The intersection has delay in the southbound approach, operating 
with a projected delay of 50.3 seconds per vehicle during the AM peak hour and 51.5 
seconds per vehicle during the PM peak hour. 
• 
The signalized intersection of 95th Avenue and Camelback Road experiences delay in both 
2025 and 2030 build conditions during the PM peak hour.  In 2025, the intersection has delay 
in the southbound approach. The southbound approach operates with a projected delay of 
64.1 seconds per vehicle during the PM peak hour. 
o 
In 2030, the intersection has delay in the southbound approach with a projected delay 
of 70.1 seconds per vehicle during the PM peak hour and delay in the eastbound 
approach of 76.6 seconds per vehicle during the PM peak hour.  
o 
To mitigate the delay at the intersection during the PM peak hour it is recommended 
that the signal timing be adjusted by reallocating green time from movements with less 
delay to the movements that have unacceptable delay. With the same mitigation

Urban 95 – Glendale, AZ  
 
Traffic Impact Study 
 
3 
March 2022 
measures in the 2025 and 2030 build scenarios, the intersection experienced a 
decreased delay in both the southbound and eastbound approaches during the PM peak 
hour.  
o 
With signal timing adjustments in 2025, the southbound approach operates with a delay 
of 46.8 seconds per vehicle and 38 seconds per vehicle in the eastbound approach in 
the PM peak hour. In 2030, the southbound approach operates with a delay of 52.3 
seconds per vehicle and 51.4 seconds per vehicle in the eastbound approach in the PM 
peak hour. 
TURN LANE NEEDS 
• 
Figure 11 illustrates the turn lanes needed based on the turn lane analysis performed at the 
proposed intersections and driveways. 
o 
It is recommended that exclusive right-turn lanes be implemented in the westbound 
approach at the intersection of Access G and Orange Avenue. 
o 
It is recommended that exclusive left-turn lanes be implemented in the northbound 
approaches at the intersection of 95th Avenue and Georgia Avenue, 96th Avenue 
and Access B, and 96th Avenue and Access F. 
QUEUE STORAGE 
• 
The recommended storage lengths are provided for study horizon year 2030 using the total 
traffic projections. 
SIGHT DISTANCE 
• 
Unobstructed sight visibility should be provided and maintained at all driveways according to 
the distances calculated and the sight triangles at public intersections shall be maintained at 
all times. Any vegetation and/or trees within the sight distance triangles shall be maintained 
according to City of Glendale requirements.

Cardinals Way
Camelback Rd.
SITE
Montebello Ave.
Missouri Ave.
95th Ave.
Orange Ave.
Georgia Ave.
95th Avenue and Cardinals Way
95th Avenue and Montebello Avenue
95th Avenue and Missouri Avenue
95th Avenue and Orange Avenue
95th Avenue and Camelback Road
96th Avenue and Missouri Avenue
96th Avenue and Access B
96th Avenue and Georgia Avenue
95th Avenue and Georgia Avenue
96th Avenue and Access E
96th Avenue and Access F
Access G and Orange Avenue
Figure 11: Proposed Lane Configurations and Traffic Controls
Urban 95 - Traffic Impact Study
CivTech
2
1
3
F
4
A
5
B
C
E
D
G
5
2
1
3
4
F
G
E
C
D
A
B
LEGEND
NORTH
NORTH
Thru or Turning Movement
Stop Sign
Speed Limit
Traffic Signal
SPEED
L I M I T
40
Two-Way Left Turn-Lane
Raised Median
Improvements by Developer
SPEED
L I M I T
40
SPEED
L I M I T
30
SPEED
L I M I T
35
SPEED
L I M I T
35
SPEED
L I M I T
40
SPEED
L I M I T
40