PowerPoint Presentation (Added on 12/9/22)
Extracted text (via pymupdf)
2874 characters
Performance Based Contracts - Update December 13th, 2022 Overview 2 Staff will be requesting to negotiate contracts with vendors and bring forward to council Background 3 • On September 25th, 2018, council voted to enter a linking agreement with Midstate Energy for Energy Performance Contracting Services • On October 8th, 2019, council voted to enter a linking agreement with McKinstry for Energy Performance Contracting Services • On March 23rd, 2021, council discussed the benefit of Performance Based Contracting and preliminary assessments. • On June 8th, 2021, authorized staff to proceed with investment grade audits for Energy Performance Contracting Services with Midstate Energy and McKinstry LLC • On October 25th, 2022, council discussed the investment grade audit results and project scopes. Energy Saving Performance Contracts Process 4 Performance Contract Includes guaranteed savings Investment Grade Audit Measures identified, quantified Preliminary Assessment Identifies locations, systems, measures Council approval in June of 2021 Council Approval Required We Are Here Council approval in October of 2019 5 Total Performance Based Contract Summary Preliminary Assessment (2021) Investment Grade Audit (2022) Project 1 and 2 total cost $7,965,255 $10,042,479 Total Annual Energy Saving $527,066 $478,487 Total Capital Contribution $2,175,000 $1,976,617 Total Project Cost minus Capital Contribution $5,790,255 $8,065,862 Total Payback without Capital Contribution 15.1 years 21 years Total Payback with Capital Contribution 11 years 16.9 years Q: Was maintenance included in the solar cost? A: Yes. There is 3 years of solar maintenance included in the cost, plus inverter replacements built in at year 15. This does not include cleaning because that is an operational service and does not fit the definition of capital. 6 Council Questions Q: What is the estimated O&M savings? A: Estimated savings is $84,000 annually 7 Council Questions Q: Did staff check with other cities/organizations? A: Yes. After the October workshop we reached out and got information for the following organizations. City of Phoenix, AZ, City of Boulder, CO, ASU Downtown, ASU Tempe, Phoenix Convention Center, Town of Payson, AZ, City of Ogden, UT, Jefferson County, CO, City of Ballwin, MO, City of Florissant, MO, City of Maplewood, MO, City of North Vernon, IN, City of O’Fallon, MO, City of Perryville, MO, City of Richmond Heights, MO, City of Washington, MO, City of Ferguson, MO, City of Noblesville, IN and City of Austin, TX. 8 Council Questions 9 City of Austin Comparison 10 City of Austin Comparison 11 Next Step • Staff to negotiate a contract for each vendor for council approval. • It is the goal to present contracts with the budget request and demonstrate that it will not impact planned capital projects