Applicants Notice of Appeal Letter, dated March 2024

City of Glendale — Regular Meeting (2024-05-28)

View PDF Item 24 Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 2982 characters
GAMMAGE & BURNHAM, P.L.C. 
ATTORNEYS AT LAW 
40 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE 
20TH FLOOR 
PHOENIX, ARIZONA  85004 
Cameron C. Artigue 
cartigue@gblaw.com 
 
 
7390.1.3792475.1 
 
TELEPHONE (602) 256-0566 
FACSIMILE (602) 256-4475 
___________________ 
WRITER’S DIRECT LINE 
(602) 256-4418 
 
March 20, 2024 
 
 
Via USPS First Class Mail and  
Email (w/o Enclosure): tperry@glendaleaz.com   
 
Tabitha Perry 
Deputy Director, Development Services-Planning 
City of Glendale 
Development Services Department 
5754 West Glenn Drive 
Glendale, AZ. 85301 
 
Re: Appeal of Zoning Interpretation ZIV24-01 
 
Dear Ms. Perry: 
Pursuant to Section 35.6.210.D of the City of Glendale’s Unified Development Code 
(UDC), this is an appeal of the above-referenced zoning interpretation letter issued on February 
16, 2024, as ZIV24-01.  In prior communications with our office, you have confirmed that there 
is no specific deadline for an appeal under the UDC.  The required fee of $524.14 is being 
submitted along with the mailed copy of this letter.     
 As outlined below, we submit that the interpretation is erroneous and should be modified.   
The City’s “Park 303” PAD Ordinance (Ordinance No. 020-42) contains stipulations 
regarding outdoor advertising that are typical of many of the City’s PAD ordinances. The 
Ordinance specifies that development “shall be in conformance” with the site plan, which includes 
billboards.  Stipulation 6 recites that, at the time of the Park 303 PAD approval in 2020, billboards 
were “expressly not permitted” under the provisions of the City’s 1993 Zoning Ordinance.  But 
Stipulation 6 anticipated amendment of these standards, and stated that billboards “shall be 
permitted”—meaning that permits shall be issued—if “ordinances are amended at a future dated 
(sic) that would allow them as proposed in the PAD.” 
  The City’s new UDC satisfies that requirement because it permits both digital and static 
billboards along the 303 Freeway, as specified in UDC Table 4.300-1.  Moreover, the UDC 
specifies in two places that the controlling standards for outdoor advertising are the standards 
specified in the underlying PAD.  The UDC states that any previously approved PAD “will guide 
and control” all development.  UDC Section 35.1.108.B.  Even more clearly, UDC Section 
35.4.310.B.4.k states that the outdoor advertising standards set by the UDC “do not supersede

Tabitha Perry 
March 20, 2024 
Page 2 
 
7390.1.3792475.1 
 
provisions of any PAD in existence before the effective date of this ordinance.”  For these reasons, 
we respectfully submit that the analysis in ZIV24-01 should be modified.   
We will offer additional materials and arguments in support of our position at a later date.     
Thank you for your attention to this matter, and feel free to contact this office with any 
questions.   
 
Best regards, 
GAMMAGE & BURNHAM, P.L.C. 
 
By  Cameron C. Artigue 
 
CCA/ejv 
Enclosure 
ecc:  kkazmerski@glendaleaz.com (w/o Enclosure)