Extracted text (via pymupdf)
28110 characters
MAG Agreement No. 1137A-0P Task Order 26
1
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT AGREEMENT BETWEEN
MARICOPA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
AND CITY OF GLENDALE FOR THE
ARTERIAL PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS NORTH
This agreement (“Agreement”) is between the Maricopa Association of Governments (“MAG”), an Arizona
non-profit corporation, and the City of Glendale an Arizona municipal corporation (“CITY”), collectively
referred to as the “Parties,” or individually as a “Party.”
This Agreement shall become effective as of the last date of execution below and shall continue in full force
and effect until June 30, 2025. MAG and CITY view this Agreement as a mutually beneficial relationship.
A) Statutory Authorization Agreement
The Parties are authorized to enter into this Agreement by Arizona Revised Statutes §§ 28-6308 and 28-
6353.
B) Purpose of the Agreement
The purpose of this Agreement is to identify and define the level of financial participation by CITY and MAG
to prepare the ARTERIAL PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS NORTH (“PROJECT”).
The PROJECT will be completed through a MAG On-Call Contract using a consultant(s) from the approved
Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Design Assistance FY 2022-2025 Pedestrian And Bicycle Facilities Design
Assistance Program On-Call (1137-DA) And Active Transportation Services On-Call Consultant list. The
cost of this PROJECT will not exceed $72,471.
C) Mission/Goal Statement
The goal of the PROJECT is to provide a Project Assessment for the ARTERIAL PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
IMPROVEMENTS NORTH for the CITY.
D) Study Funding
1.
MAG is the recipient of Surface Transportation Block Grant Program Funds as described in the
amendments and modifications to the Fiscal Year 2022-2025 Transportation Improvements Plan (TIP).
2.
The consultant contract for the PROJECT will be for an amount not to exceed $72,471. Subject to the
availability of funding and approval of their respective governing bodies, funding for the PROJECT will
be shared among the Parties as follows:
The original amount allocated to the CITY for the PROJECT is $72,471. Subject to the availability of
funding and approval of their respective governing bodies, funding for the PROJECT will be shared
among the Parties as follows.
Maricopa Association of Governments
$ 68,340
94.3%
CITY/TOWN match
$ 4,131
5.7%
Total / Subtotal
$ 72,471
100%
3.
Cost adjustments: The MAG/CITY proportional share for the awarded funds is to be split 94.3/5.7 for
any amount less than or equal to original allocated amount of $72,471. If at any time during the Project
MAG anticipates that there will be cost overruns, MAG will immediately notify CITY and schedule a
meeting to discuss the status of the Project. If the cost for the consultant is more than the original
allocated amount (including proportional share), it will be the CITY’s responsibility to cover excess
costs.
MAG Agreement No. 1137A-0P Task Order 26
2
4.
CITY financial participation is limited to paying CITY’S share including additional CITY local funds as
provided in paragraphs 3 above. It shall be MAG’s responsibility to enter into the consultant contract.
5.
MAG will invoice CITY for CITY’S share within thirty (30) calendar days of execution of this Agreement.
CITY shall make payment to MAG within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of invoice. The financial
contribution of both Parties shall be deposited into the specified account no later than sixty (60)
calendar days after payment of invoice. MAG shall maintain billing accounts and financial records
during and for three (3) years after the completion of this Agreement and will produce the same to
CITY upon CITY’S written request.
6.
All notices or demands required to be given pursuant to the terms of this Agreement shall be given to
the other Party in writing, delivered in person, sent by confirmed email, deposited in the United States
mail, postage prepaid, registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, or deposited with any
commercial air courier or express service at the addresses set forth below, or to such address as the
Parties may substitute by written notice given in the manner described in this paragraph.
For MAG:
Ed Zuercher
Executive Director
Maricopa Association of Governments
302 North First Avenue, Suite 300
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
602-254-6300
For the CITY
Patrick Sage
Transportation Planner
3210 Myrtle Ave, Suite 112
Glendale, AZ 85301
623-930-2945
Notices shall be deemed received on date delivered, if delivered by hand; on the day it is sent by
confirmed email; on the second day after its deposit with any commercial air courier or express service;
or, if mailed, ten (10) calendar days after the notice is deposited in the United States mail as above
provided; and on the delivery date indicated on receipt if delivered by certified or registered mail. Any
time period stated in a notice shall be computed from the time the notice is deemed received. Notices
sent by confirmed email shall also be sent by regular mail to the recipients at the above addresses.
This requirement for duplication notice is not intended to change the effective date of the notice sent
by confirmed email.
7.
In the event that the MAG funds required for performance of this Agreement are withdrawn or are not
available for funding, this Agreement, without penalty to any of the Parties, may be immediately
terminated; and any unspent financial contribution paid by CITY will be returned to CITY.
8.
After the PROJECT has been completed and the final retainage invoice has been paid to the
consultant, the CITY will invoice MAG within 30 days for reimbursement of CITY’S SHARE that has
not been spent (if any).
E) General Terms and Conditions of the Agreement
1.
Governing Law. This Agreement is entered into in Arizona and shall be construed and interpreted
under the laws of the State of Arizona.
2.
Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal or unenforceable, that
MAG Agreement No. 1137A-0P Task Order 26
3
provision shall be severed from the Agreement, and the remaining provisions shall otherwise remain
in full force.
3.
Hold Harmless. MAG and CITY (each as “Indemnitor”) agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless
the other Party (as “Indemnitee”) from and against any and all claims, losses, liability, costs, or
expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees) (hereinafter collectively referred to
as "Claims”) arising out of the bodily injury of any person (including death) or property damage and
any other claims (including, but not limited to, claims of derivative or vicarious liability), which are
caused by the act, omission, negligence, misconduct or other fault of the Indemnitor, its officers,
officials, agents, employees or volunteers.
4.
This Agreement shall not be construed to imply authority to perform tasks, or accept any responsibility,
not expressly set forth herein.
5.
This Agreement shall be strictly constructed against the creation of a duty or responsibility unless the
intention to do so is clearly and unambiguously set forth herein.
6.
This Agreement shall be subject to cancellation for conflict of interest without penalty or further
obligations as provided by A.R.S. § 38-511.
7.
This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding of the Parties and supersedes all previous
representations, written or oral, with respect to the services specified herein. This Agreement may not
be modified or amended except by a written document, signed by authorized representatives of each
Party.
8.
Each Party hereby warrants and represents that it has full power and authority to enter into and perform
this Agreement, and that the person signing on behalf of each has been properly authorized and
empowered to enter into this Agreement. Each Party further acknowledges that it has read this
Agreement, understands it, and agrees to be bound by it.
9.
Each of the following shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement and an event of default
("Default") hereunder: A Party's failure to observe or perform any of the material covenants, conditions
or provisions of this Agreement to be observed or performed by that Party ("Defaulting Party"), where
such failure continues for a period of thirty (30) days after the Defaulting Party receives written notice
of such failure from the non-defaulting party, provided however that such failure shall not be a Default
if the Defaulting Party has commenced to cure the Default within such thirty (30) day period and
thereafter is diligently pursuing such cure to completion, but the total aggregate cure period shall not
exceed ninety (90) days unless the Parties agree in writing that additional time is reasonably necessary
under the circumstances to cure the default. In the event a Defaulting Party fails to perform any of its
material obligations under this Agreement and is in Default, the non-defaulting party, at its option, may
terminate this Agreement. Further, upon the occurrence of any Default and at any time thereafter, the
non-defaulting party may, but shall not be required to, exercise any remedies now or hereafter
available to it at law or in equity.
10. This Agreement is subject to all applicable provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act (Public
Law 101-336, 42 U.S.C. 12101-12213) and all applicable Federal regulations under the Act, including
28 CFR Parts 35 and 36. The Parties to this Agreement shall comply with Executive Order Number
2009-09 issued by the Governor of the State of Arizona and incorporated by reference regarding “Non-
Discrimination.”
11. Non-Availability of Funds: Every obligation of the Parties under this Agreement is conditioned upon
the availability of funds appropriated or allocated for the fulfillment of such obligations. If funds are not
allocated and available for the continuance of this Agreement, this Agreement may be terminated by
the Parties at the end of the period for which the funds are available. No liability shall accrue to the
Parties in the event this provision is exercised, and the Parties shall not be obligated or liable for any
future payments as a result of termination under this paragraph.
MAG Agreement No. 1137A-0P Task Order 26
4
12. In the event of any controversy, which may arise out of this Agreement, the Parties agree to abide by
arbitration as is set forth for public works contracts if required by A.R.S. § 12-1518.
13. The Parties shall comply with the applicable requirements of A.R.S. § 41-4401.
14. The Parties shall comply with all applicable laws, rules, regulations and ordinances, as may be
amended.
15. In accordance with Arizona law, attached is the written determination of each Party's legal counsel
that the Parties are authorized under the laws of this State to enter into this Agreement and that the
Agreement is in proper form.
(Signature page follows)
MAG Agreement No. 1137A-0P Task Order 26
5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement.
CITY, an Arizona municipal corporation
By:
Jerry P. Weiers
Mayor
Date:
Attest:
By:
Julie Bower
City Clerk
Maricopa Association of Governments, an Arizona non-profit corporation
By:
Ed Zuercher
Executive Director
Date:
Reviewed as to form by General Counsel for Maricopa Association of Governments, and Counsel
for the CITY
I have reviewed the above referenced Agreement between MAG and the CITY, an agreement proper in
form and within the powers and authority granted to the CITY under the laws of the State of Arizona.
No opinion is expressed as to the authority of MAG to enter into this Agreement.
Michael Bailey
Kathryn Gasior
City Attorney
Maricopa Association of Governments
General Counsel
MARICOPA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (“MAG”)
TASK ORDER NO. 26
ON-CALL CONTRACT NO. 1137A-0P, JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC
PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES DESIGN ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ON-CALL
ARTERIAL PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS NORTH
MAG PROJECT NO. 0600-0145-24-E001-1137A-0P.000026
TASK ORDER SUMMARY
This project will address pedestrian safety and connectivity in the City of Glendale (CITY) for six missing
sidewalk segments on three arterial streets (Union Hills Drive, 59th Avenue, and Beardsley Road) to bridge
gaps in the existing pedestrian facility network. Arterial streets in Glendale are typically configured with at
least 4 travel lanes (2 in each direction) and a center left turn lane or raised median. One section of Union
Hills Drive that will be addressed by this project also includes a 20-foot-wide frontage road, in addition to
the four arterial travel lanes and raised center median. The proposed project locations host many high-
volume destinations for pedestrians including grocery stores and other retail centers; public facilities like
the Foothills Recreation & Aquatics Center and Foothills Skate Park; a post office; multiple parks and
recreational trails including the Skunk Creek Linear Park; libraries; religious institutions; medical complexes
and doctors’ offices, and other commercial developments. The AADT on the arterial streets where the new
sidewalks will be located ranges from 18,600 to 29,600 AADT. This project will identify the location and
preferred design for approximately 8,000 linear feet of concrete sidewalk where gaps are present.
Sidewalks will be 6 feet in width to meet the City design standards. The project will also install curb and
gutter, streetlights, and curb ramps to meet City of Glendale and ADA standards. The installation of a HAWK
will also be evaluated.
The tasks outlined in this Task Order will be carried out by Jacobs Engineering, Group, Inc.
(CONSULTANT). The project assessment and preliminary engineering will reference the City of Glendale
Active Transportation Plan 2019, City of Glendale Engineering Design Standards 2015, the MAG Active
Transportation Plan 2020, MAG Complete Streets Guide 2011, National Association of City Transportation
Officials (NACTO) Urban Street Design Guide 2013, and American Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Standards. Studies will also include pertinent City of Glendale standards
for multi-modal connectivity.
The Scope of Services described below shall not be modified except at MAG’s request or with MAG’s
concurrence. Any services rendered by CONSULTANT that MAG considers to be outside the Scope of
Services of this Task Order shall not be the responsibility of MAG.
TOTAL TASK ORDER BUDGET
The CONSULTANT budget is attached. The total amount of this Task Order shall not exceed $72,471.53
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Task 1. Project Management, Initial Coordination and Finalize Scope
The CONSULTANT will meet with MAG and the CITY to review the project boundaries, approach,
schedule, and administrative procedures needed to complete the project. The CONSULTANT will
also visit the project site to discuss design issues and recommendations for specific site conditions.
At this time, the stakeholder list will include the CITY and MAG. This project will address the missing
sidewalk segments, missing streetlights, and driveway improvements on Union Hills Drive, 59th
Avenue and Beardsley Road. The table below lists the project roadway segments and details
associated with each segment like length and reason for inclusion in the project.
Appendix A
MAG Agreement No. 1137A-0P Task Order 26
2
Name
Begin
End
Comments
Length
(FT)
Public
Request
Zone
Zone
ID
Unions Hill
Dr
53rd Ave
52nd Ave
Vacant parcel,
private ownership.
Deer Valley HS
across the street.
669.37
North
N4
Union Hills
Dr
55th Ave
East of
55th Ave
Adjacent to FRAC
192.58
North
N5
59th Ave
290 ft North
of
Behrend Dr
650 ft
North of
Behrend
Dr
Missing segment
leading to Post
Office
353.31
North
N1
59th Ave
500 ft North
of
Union Hills
Dr
Kerry Ln
Honeywell frontage;
roadside higher than
street in front of
Honeywell.
1303.19
Yes
North
N2
Beardsley
Rd
1,040 ft east
of
69th Ave
61st Ave
Sidewalk to be
installed adjacent to
WB Beardsley on
the north side of
SR101L
2809.19
Yes
North
N3
Union Hills
Dr
75th Ave
70th Ave
Add sidewalk to
frontage road area;
TA OK with using
existing street
pavement (2 feet)
2640.45
North
N6
Deliverables
1.
Project Management Services
2.
Refined Scope of Services: Based on Site Visit/Kick-off/Programming Meeting with CITY and
MAG, CONSULTANT will refine the detailed list of activities created to address project specific
issues as needed.
3.
Meeting Notes: Documentation of the Kick-off Meeting, including meeting notes that detail
upcoming action items, milestone dates, and deliverables, outline of goals and approach, and
existing data request.
4.
Detailed Schedule: A detailed schedule to reflect milestones, submittal and approval dates
based on feedback from the kick-off meeting.
5.
Site Visit Field Notes: Field notes with photographs of the site visit.
Task 2. Data Collection
The CONSULTANT shall request from the CITY all available relevant information related to the
project area. Data shall include project area As-builts, upcoming project drawings/reports and City
of Glendale utility information (GIS) in the project area.
The CONSULTANT will collect available right-of-way information from the Maricopa County
Assessor’s website, and any utility information by submitting AZ811 tickets. The 15% design plans
for the project will be developed on an aerial background. Aerial images obtained from the Maricopa
County Assessor’s site will be used for this purpose. The CONSULTANT will develop base sheets
for this project.
Deliverables
3
1.
DRAFT Base Map: CONSULTANT will prepare DRAFT Base Map for review by CITY and MAG
2.
Meeting Notes: CONSULTANT will document the Design Coordination Meeting with meeting
notes that include upcoming action items and milestone dates/deliverables, distributed to CITY
and MAG.
Task 3. Data Analysis
CONSULTANT shall provide analysis of the materials and information collected for the project area
to develop preferred pedestrian facilities. The CITY shall provide input on issues and needs to
consider in designing the pedestrian/roadway facilities.
The sub-tasks required to complete this task are as follows:
3.1 Base Map Update: Review and update draft Base Map developed in Task 2 based on
feedback from CITY and MAG.
3.2 Review Proposed Plan(s) Impacts: Review right of way, land use, easements, engineering
constraints, design, maintenance, and utility impacts of the proposed design improvements
and summarize in a memorandum.
3.3 Review Meeting: Attend a meeting to review the preliminary proposed improvements with
CITY and MAG prior to proceeding to the final 15% Design
3.4 Public Meeting: Attend and prepare materials for one public meeting in an online format.
Public feedback will be acquired from online discussion. CITY will set up an online meeting,
post invites and post to COG's website for feedback.
Deliverables
1.
Updated Draft Base Map: CONSULTANT will update draft Base Map based on comments from
for review by the CITY and MAG.
2.
Summary Memorandum: Summarize impacts of proposed improvements.
3.
Preliminary Proposed Improvements: Preliminary Proposed Improvements "roll plot" for review
by CITY and MAG.
4.
Public Meeting Materials: Roll plot (in pdf format) of the proposed improvements, and summary
report of public feedback.
Task 4. Preliminary Design/Project Assessment Report – Draft and Final
The CONSULTANT will prepare a Project Assessment (PA) that summarizes the initial conditions
of the project and a Preliminary Design (PD) document that includes the proposed improvements
on 11”x17” plan sheets with aerial background. CONSULTANT will follow the specific format
provided by MAG for the preparation of the PA document. The PA and PD will be prepared in a
draft format and submitted for review by MAG and the CITY. Following their review, the
CONSULTANT will make requested modifications to the report and plans.
The sub-tasks required to complete this task are as follows:
4.1 Initial document preparation: Prepare the written document using the format provided by
MAG. The draft report will document identification of project goals, existing conditions, and
cost estimate. The proposed improvements will be included in the Preliminary Design
document.
4.2 Submit Draft Preliminary Design/Project Assessment document and cost estimate to CITY
and MAG for review.
4.3 Finalize Preliminary Design/Project Assessment Report: CONSULTANT will edit and
revise the PD and PA based on the comments received and prepare a final PD/PA for final
review and approval by MAG and the CITY. The final report will document the identification
4
of project goals, existing conditions, proposed improvements (15% plans) and cost
estimate.
4.4 Submit Final Preliminary Design/Project Assessment Report for Review/Approval: The
plan sheets, draft report and supporting documentation will be organized into a collective
submittal package including the cost estimate. These documents will be submitted for
review by MAG and the CITY and minor adjustments will be addressed.
4.5 The CONSULTANT will prepare an Executive Summary & Statement of Regional
Significance. The summary shall include a map of the area, before pictures, and a brief
description of the project and key recommendations. The goal of the summary is to provide
an explanation of the regional significance of the project, and lessons learned from this
project that could be applied to the other areas of the region to help improve the pedestrian
and bicycle environment. A draft summary report shall be reviewed by the City and MAG
Project Manager. The draft report shall be reviewed, and comments shall be incorporated
into the final report.
The Preliminary Design/Project Assessment report is anticipated to include the following:
• Introduction
• Background Data
• Project Scope
• Project Development Consideration
• Environmental Requirements
(A brief description of Environmental Requirements will be presented in the Project
Assessment based on the information provided by the CITY on Species
investigation (animals and plants), Wetland and Riparian areas, Flood Plain
encroachment, Section 401/404, Section 4-f impacts, Potential contaminants,
Social or economic impacts, Cultural Resources and Scenic or Historic Route)
• Geotechnical and Drainage requirements (Overview summary)
• Right of Way requirements
• Utility Relocation requirements
• Estimated Cost
• Vicinity Map
• Typical Sections
• Schedule
• 15% Plans in 11 " X 17" format and electronic copy
Deliverables
1.
Draft and Final Project Assessment Report. Draft PA will include documenting the identification
of project goals, existing conditions, proposed improvements, cost estimate, and 15% Design
Plans.
2.
Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report, in PDF format.
3.
One electronic medium containing the Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report
in PDF format and original files (InDesign, Word, Excel, etc.), preferred alternative design files
(CAD, GIS), and project photos.
TASK ORDER SCHEDULE
This task order will begin on or about September 1, 2024, and will end on May 31, 2025.
TASK ORDER PROJECT TEAM
Shanthi Krishnan PE, PTOE, RSP1 – Principal Traffic Engineer
Vinay Vanapalli, PE, PTOE, RSP1 – Project Manager
Allen Barakovic, PE, PTOE – QA/QC
5
Mounica Vinayakamurthy, PE – Roadway Engineer
Christiane Quintans – Urban Planner
Isaiah Rubin – Traffic EIT
Eddie Marsh – Roadway EIT
PROJECT NAME:
Arterial Pedestrian Safety Improvements North
CONTRACT NUMBER:
1137A-0P
CONTRACT PERIOD: FROM
4/1/2024
TO
6/30/2025
TASK ORDER NUMBER:
26
TASK ORDER PERIOD: FROM
8/26/2024
TO
4/30/2025
MAG STAFF:
Kay Bork
CONSULTANT REMIT TO ADDRESS:
TAXPAYER ID NUMBER:
95-4081636
* Only type in the BLUE or GREEN areas and be sure to enter entire budget
PRIME CONSULTANT
Original Costs and Rates
Raw Direct
Task 1
Task 2
Task 3
Task 4
Direct
Hourly Rate
Initial Coordination
and Finalize Scope
Data Collection
Data Analysis
Preliminary
Design/Project
Assessment Report
Total Hours
Total Cost
$76.49
40.00
24.00
25.00
40.00
129.00
$9,867.21
$81.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.00
12.00
$974.64
$48.45
20.00
16.00
16.00
24.00
76.00
$3,682.20
$39.22
20.00
16.00
16.00
24.00
76.00
$2,980.72
$129.88
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.00
5.00
$649.40
Mounica Vinayakamurthy
$50.06
24.00
24.00
24.00
96.00
168.00
$8,410.08
Eddie Marsh
$34.80
8.00
4.00
4.00
42.00
58.00
$2,018.40
Christiane Quintans
$36.06
17.00
12.00
12.00
36.00
77.00
$2,776.62
Total Task Hours
129.00
96.00
97.00
279.00
601.00
31,359.27
Total Task Cost
$6,905.86
$5,011.84
$5,088.33
$14,353.24
$31,359.27
Overhead and/or Fringe Audited Rate
0.97
$6,729.07
$4,883.54
$4,958.07
$13,985.80
$30,556.48
Total Labor with Overhead
$13,634.93
$9,895.38
$10,046.40
$28,339.04
$61,915.75
Fee (10% max rate)
0.10
$1,363.49
$989.54
$1,004.64
$2,833.90
$6,191.57
14,998.42
$
10,884.92
$
11,051.04
$
31,172.94
$
68,107.32
$
PRIME CONSULTANT
Task 1
Task 2
Task 3
Task 4
Initial Coordination
and Finalize Scope
Data Collection
Data Analysis
Preliminary
Design/Project
Assessment Report
Total Cost
$0.00
$150.00
$0.00
$0.00
$150.00
-
$
150.00
$
-
$
-
$
150.00
$
Task 1
Task 2
Task 3
Task 4
Initial Coordination
and Finalize Scope
Data Collection
Data Analysis
Preliminary
Design/Project
Assessment Report
Total Cost
$14,998.42
$10,884.92
$11,051.04
$31,172.94
$68,107.32
$0.00
$150.00
$0.00
$0.00
$150.00
$3,461.38
$586.77
$166.06
$0.00
$4,214.21
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
18,459.80
$
11,621.69
$
11,217.10
$
31,172.94
$
$72,471.53
SUBCONSULTANT - NO. 1
UNITED CIVIL GROUP
Task 1
Task 2
Task 3
Task 4
Initial Coordination
and Finalize Scope
Data Collection
Data Analysis
Preliminary
Design/Project
Assessment Report
Personnel
Loaded
Hourly Rate
Task Hours
Task Hours
Task Hours
Task Hours
Total Hours
Total Cost
$195.59
0.00
3.00
0.00
0.00
3.00
$586.77
$133.13
26.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
26.00
$3,461.38
$83.03
0.00
0.00
2.00
0.00
2.00
$166.06
$67.99
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
$0.00
$60.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
$0.00
$83.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
$0.00
$46.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
$0.00
Matt Kerychuk
$44.71
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
$0.00
26.00
3.00
2.00
0.00
31.00
$4,214.21
$3,461.38
$586.77
$166.06
$0.00
$4,214.21
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
UNITED CIVIL GROUP
Total Cost
$3,461.38
$586.77
$166.06
$0.00
4,214.21
$
* Input Raw Hourly Rates to TWO DECIMALS ONLY
** Raw Hourly Rates for Budgets should be current actual when possible
Shanthi Krishnan
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
1501 W Fountainhead Parkway, #401
Tempe, AZ 85282
Vinay Vanapalli
Allen Barakovic
Isaiah Rubin
Pablo Osuna
Total Task Hours
Total Loaded Labor Costs
Total Subconsultant Reimbursable Expenses
Total Labor Budget With Overhead & Fees
Total Prime Reimbursable Expenses
(or) Subconsultant Flat Fee
TOTAL COST SUMMARY
GRAND TOTAL
Total Prime Reimbursable Expenses
Total Subconsultant Costs
Tyrice Haywood
Ryan Fernau
Nick Fatica
Josue Morales
Adjustments
Sarah Simpson
David Kinnear
Lori Goodloe
CONTRACT BUDGET BY TASK ORDER
BUDGET OF DIRECTLY REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
BUDGET OF PERSONNEL BY TASK NUMBER
TOTAL BUDGET
SUBCONSULTANT BUDGET FOR PERSONNEL AND REIMBURSABLES
Field Review Visits Mileage, Misc.
** Input Raw Hourly Rates TWO DECIMAL PLACES ONLY and use most current information
*** Invoices should relfect ACTUAL RATES for Prime Consultant Personnel
Reimbursable Expenses
Total Labor With Overhead and Fee