CP Final Report_without labels
Extracted text (via pymupdf)
3683 characters
City of Glendale Citizen Participation Final Report Neighborhood Input Perry, Tabitha 3-1-2025 March 12, 2025 APPROVED City of Glendale Planning Division GPA24-02 & ZON24-02 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This request for approval of a Minor General Plan Amendment and Rezoning request for an approximate 39-acre property located northwest of Ball Park Boulevard and 99th Avenue. The purpose of this request is to obtain approval of a Minor General Plan Amendment, and Rezoning is for a future mixed dense development. The Minor General Plan Amendment (“GPA”) seeks to change the existing BP (Business Park) land use designation to the EMU (Entertainment Mixed Use) land use designation. The companion request seeks to rezone the approximate 39-acre site from the current A-1 (Agriculture) to the requested PAD (Planned Area Development). Various permitted land uses and amended development standards are proposed to allow this property to be developed as a dense development consisting of development comprised of residential and non-residential land uses. The proposal will support high density residential development and various land uses such as restaurants, professional offices, indoor/outdoor recreational, hotel and entertainment venues. Development standards, design element critical and landscaping regulations are included in the proposed PAD that supports the long-term vision shared by the city and property owners in the immediate area. If approved, the minor general plan amendment would support the development vision of to the rezoning to PAD with appropriate development standards that complement the existing surrounding development. ELEMENTS OF THE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PROCESS: Based on various completed and approved PADs in the immediate area, the surrounding property owners are familiar with these types of entitlement requests. We carefully considered how to develop the area, initially consulting with property owners and city personnel. The PAD proposal regulations addressed all foreseeable concerns. A Neighborhood Zoom Meeting served as the first neighborhood outreach effort. On March 28, 2024, we mailed notification letters to property owners within a 300’ radius, inviting them to a 6:00 pm Zoom Meeting. The meeting started at 6:00 with the attendance of the property’s owners, the property owner representative, the council member of the district, and one surrounding property owner. We gave a presentation, and no one raised any concerns. Because of the elapse in time, notification letters were January 7, 2025, providing property owners within 600 ft, with an update on the status of the request for the entitlement requests. During this review period, staff did not receive any inquiries from the notification letter. We sent no notifications to special groups like homeowner or registered neighborhood associations because none existed in the subject area. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION OUTCOME: Since there was no participation, there were no concerns or issues that needed to be taken into consideration or addressed. The proposal reflects development elements are key to the city and provide enhancement to the overall development of the community at large. The appendix includes all required notification processes to which we adhered. Appendix One: March 28, 2024 Notification Map Notification Letter Notification Addresses Appendix Two: January 7, 2025 Notification Map Notification Letter Notification Addresses CONCLUSION: In conclusion, there were no issues or concerns expressed as part of the citizen participation process so there were no actions to be taken.