021121 BOA DRAFT MINUTES

City of Glendale — Regular Meeting (2021-03-11)

View PDF Item a Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 5826 characters
1 
DRAFT MINUTES 
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 
COUNCIL CHAMBERS 
5850 W. GLENDALE AVENUE 
GLENDALE, ARIZONA 85301 
 
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 2021 
4:00 PM 
 
CALL TO ORDER 
The meeting was called to order at 4:00 PM. 
 
ROLL CALL 
Committee members present: Chairperson Cathy Cheshier, Vice Chairperson Benjamin Naber, 
Tammy Gee, Larry Feiner, Kyle Holschlag, and Brian Britton were present. 
 
Committee members absent: None. 
 
City staff present: David Richert (Planning Administrator), Samantha Cope (Administrative 
Support Staff), Alexis Vasquez (Administrative Support Staff), Alex Lerma (Planner), and Russ 
Romney (Deputy City Attorney). 
 
CITIZEN COMMENTS 
Chairperson Cheshier asked for citizen comments, and no citizen comments were made. 
 
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES 
A motion to approve the November meeting minutes was made by Vice Chairperson Naber and 
seconded by Mr. Britton.  All were in favor.  
 
WITHDRAWALS AND CONTINUANCES  
Mr. Richert announced that Habitat for Humanity Variance VAR20-08 will be continued to the 
March 11, 2021 meeting. 
 
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS  
 
A. Leach Variance VAR20-07: A request by Adam Venetis of Trinity Residential Consult-
ing, LLC to reduce the required side yard setbacks to 20 feet where 50 feet is required in 
the A-1 (Agricultural) zoning district. The purpose of the variance is to allow the con-
struction of a new single-family custom home. The site is located east of the NEC of 64th 
Drive and Thunderbird Road with APN: 200-70-009J in the Sahuaro District. Staff Con-
tact: Alex Lerma, Planning Project Manager, 623-930-2810.  
 
Staff Findings 
 
The Board of Adjustment must analyze four findings based on the evidence in the record prior to 
granting a variance.  Each finding is presented below along with staff’s analysis.

2 
 
1. 
There are special circumstances or conditions applicable to the property including 
its size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings, which were not self-imposed by the 
owner; 
 
The shape of the lot creates a special condition. The lot is narrow and deep, therefore limiting the 
options for building. The A-1 development standards were established for lots with a 40 acre 
minimum lot size. The applicant purchased the lot to the west and combined both lots, however 
the lot is still narrow given its depth.  
 
2. 
Due to the special circumstances, the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance 
would deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties of the same classifica-
tion in the same zoning district; 
 
The strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would limit the property to fifty (50) foot side set-
backs and limit the size of the housing product addition.  Properties to the west with the same 
zoning classification have residential buildings with a 20 to 30 foot side yard setback.  
 
3. 
The variance is the minimum necessary to alleviate the property hardship; and 
 
The requested side setbacks are the minimum necessary to construct the desired residential home 
on the lot and allow the same privileges received by the property owners to the west. The two-
story residence building will comply with the required 75 feet front setback and 50 feet rear 
building setback. 
 
4. 
Granting the variance will not have a detrimental effect on the property, adjoining 
property, the surrounding neighborhood, or the city in general. 
 
The requested building setbacks are consistent with other properties in the surrounding area and 
will not detrimentally affect any neighboring properties. 
 
Recommendation: The variance request appears to meet all four findings and should be ap-
proved.  If the Board decides to grant the variance, it should be subject to the following stipula-
tion: 
  
1. Development shall be in conformance with the applicant’s project narrative dated January 
14, 2021 and site plan dated January 5, 2021. 
 
 
Proposed Motion: Move to approve VAR20-07 per the findings and subject to the stipulations 
contained in the staff report. 
 
Chairperson Cheshier opened the public hearing, and with no one wishing to speak she closed 
the public hearing. 
 
After the public hearing closed, the board voted per each finding with the help of Mr. Romney.

3 
 
1. Mr. Holschlag, Mr. Britton, Vice Chairperson Naber, Mr. Feiner, Ms. Gee, and Chairper-
son Cheshier all vote “aye”. 
2. Mr. Holschlag, Mr. Britton, Vice Chairperson Naber, Mr. Feiner, Ms. Gee, and Chairper-
son Cheshier all vote “aye”. 
3. Mr. Holschlag, Mr. Britton, Vice Chairperson Naber, Mr. Feiner, Ms. Gee, and Chairper-
son Cheshier all vote “aye”. 
4. Mr. Holschlag, Vice Chairperson Naber, Mr. Feiner, Ms. Gee, and Chairperson Cheshier 
all vote “aye”, and Mr. Britton vote “no”. 
  
Vice Chairperson Naber made a motion to approve the variance subject to stipulation, and 
it was seconded by Ms. Gee. All voted “aye” in favor, except for Mr. Britton who was op-
posed. Variance granted. 
 
STAFF REPORT 
Ms. Richert did not have a staff report. 
 
BOARD COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS 
 
Goal Setting and Topics of Discussion for the upcoming year: 
Mr. Richert stated that the Board of Adjustment is a quasi-judicial body created to hear request 
for relief from the terms of the zoning ordinance and to hear and decide appeals from 
decisions of the Planning Administrator.  They will continue to hold public hearings and make 
determinations on request for variances and appeals to City Planning Administrator’s decisions 
regarding zoning.  As well as continue training focusing on duties, responsibilities, and open 
meeting law for decision making bodies. 
 
NEXT MEETING 
 
The next meeting will take place on Thursday, March 11, 2021, at 4 PM. 
 
ADJOURNMENT 
Mr. Feiner made a motion to adjourn the meeting, and it was seconded by Mr. Britton.  All 
voted “aye” in favor, and none opposed.