Extracted text (via pymupdf)
33823 characters
1 Andrew Lorentzen (PND) From: Rachel Applegate (PND) Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2024 9:57 AM To: Andrew Lorentzen (PND) Subject: FW: Online Form Submittal: Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged From: noreply@civicplus.com <noreply@civicplus.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2024 8:49 AM To: PND PZAppeal <PNDPZAppeal@maricopa.gov> Subject: Online Form Submittal: Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation Objection Form If the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval of a particular case it will be placed on a consent agenda for the Board of Supervisors hearing. However, if ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation Objection Form If the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval of a particular case it will be placed on a consent agenda for the Board of Supervisors hearing. However, if this objection form is received within 15 calendar days following Commission hearing, then the agenda item will be placed on the regular agenda for the Board of Supervisors hearing. Name Rick Wilson Email Address 98rwilson@gmail.com Address Field not completed. City Field not completed. State Field not completed. Zip Code Field not completed. Phone Number 6027224358 Fax Number Field not completed. 2 Case Number / Project Name Z2023014 Planning & Zoning Commission Hearing Date 8/21/24 Reason for the Objection of the Subject Case Concerns for effect on neighborhood and school and church in immediate vicinity. This is residential area. Thank you! Electronic Signature Agreement I agree. Electronic Signature Rick (Richard) Wilson Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. Against Case #Z2023014 Indifferent Case #Z2023014 For Case #Z2023014 Digital Signature Against Case #Z2023014 Updated: 7/24/24 $*$,167 :KLWH%DUQ(YHQW&HQWHU &DVH1XPEHU = 2EMHFWLRQRI3ODQQLQJDQG=RQLQJ&RPLVVLRQ5HFRPPHQGDWLRQRISURSRVHG6SHFLDO8VH3HUPLW 3ULQW6LJQDWXUH 6LJQDWXUH $GGUHVV &RPPHQW 'DWH Name City State Postal Code Country Signed On Kelli Payne Phoenix AZ US 5/6/2024 Kelli Mullins Gilbert AZ 85234US 5/6/2024 Laura Heidenreich US 5/6/2024 Katie Dew Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/6/2024 Kristi Jansen Phoenix AZ 85020US 5/6/2024 Cornelis Jansen Phoenix AZ 85020US 5/6/2024 Traci Payne Phoenix AZ 85035US 5/6/2024 Jessica Allen Phoenix AZ 85008US 5/6/2024 Schuyler David Mesa AZ 85202US 5/6/2024 Kirkland Allen Phoenix AZ 85013US 5/6/2024 Scott Hancock Mesa AZ 85208US 5/6/2024 Kerri Throckmorton Phoenix AZ 85053US 5/6/2024 Kyle Throckmorton Phoenix AZ 85014US 5/6/2024 David Allen Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/7/2024 Rebecca Payne Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/7/2024 Jafar Razmi Phoenix AZ 85041US 5/7/2024 Leila Ladani Mesa AZ 85205US 5/7/2024 Alta M Krutckoff Gilbert AZ 85295-1906 US 5/8/2024 Cameron Stewart Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/8/2024 Valerie Speltz Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/8/2024 Jacqueline Hatch Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/8/2024 Nathan Mullins Phoenix AZ 85295US 5/8/2024 Ryleigh Clouse Gilbert AZ 85234US 5/8/2024 Cam Resch Gilbert AZ 85234US 5/8/2024 Sophia Nichols Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/8/2024 Lauryn Porter Phoenix AZ 85006US 5/8/2024 Ashlyn Boynton Mesa AZ 85204US 5/8/2024 Lynessa Nichols Gilbert AZ 85296US 5/8/2024 Gracie Nichols Scottsdale 85250US 5/8/2024 Breck Mullins Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/8/2024 Salvador Moreno Phoenix AZ 85014US 5/8/2024 Stacey Epperson Phoenix AZ 85033US 5/8/2024 Joseph Butler Phoenix AZ 85017US 5/8/2024 Travis Epperson Phoenix AZ 85033US 5/8/2024 Melissa Resch La Vergne TN 37086US 5/8/2024 Dustin Resch Lebanon TN 37087US 5/8/2024 Samuel Razmi Gilbert AZ 77036US 5/8/2024 Randy Krutckoff Pinetop-LakesideAZ 85929US 5/8/2024 Shannon Bangerter Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/8/2024 Stacey Hancock Mesa AZ 85208US 5/8/2024 Abby Hancock Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/8/2024 Gail McLeese Washington DC 20017US 5/8/2024 Stop Online School Dallas TX 78748US 5/8/2024 Arian Hatch Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/8/2024 Jordan Hatch Gilbert AZ 85234US 5/8/2024 Austin Scarlett Queen Creek AZ 85142US 5/8/2024 Sam Hancock Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/8/2024 Cooper Darling Mesa AZ 85205US 5/8/2024 Kyson Fuentes Phoenix AZ 85014US 5/8/2024 From change.org website. Kelson Walker Provo UT 84606US 5/8/2024 Mallory Scarlett San Tan Valley AZ 85144US 5/8/2024 Ellie Brown Queen Creek AZ 85142US 5/8/2024 Monica Darling Gilbert AZ 85296US 5/8/2024 Avery Darling Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/8/2024 Payton Darling Gilbert AZ 85234US 5/8/2024 Luke Niu Gilbert AZ 85296US 5/8/2024 koren hansen Phoenix AZ 85031US 5/8/2024 Boden Darling Gilbert AZ 85296US 5/8/2024 Maggie Darling Phoenix AZ 85035US 5/8/2024 kaitlyn ramirez Phoenix AZ 85009US 5/8/2024 Michael Darling Phoenix AZ 85020US 5/8/2024 Brooklynn Darling Phoenix AZ 85037US 5/8/2024 Lauren Hassell Mesa AZ 85209US 5/8/2024 Daphne Darling Gilbert AZ 85297US 5/8/2024 Jennifer Kriloff Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/8/2024 Abrianna Castellano Queen Creek AZ 85142US 5/8/2024 Breezy Fuentes Gilbert AZ 85297US 5/8/2024 Tami Baumgartner Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/8/2024 Layton Kriloff Gilbert AZ 85296US 5/9/2024 Lorelei Wahl Phoenix AZ 85020US 5/9/2024 Paris Woodhouse Goodyear AZ 85395US 5/9/2024 Michael Bloomer Chandler AZ 85249US 5/9/2024 Jacob Ash Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/9/2024 Trisha Willard Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/9/2024 Stacy Ash Phoenix AZ 85043US 5/9/2024 Jayme Richins Phoenix AZ 85008US 5/9/2024 Marcus Ramirez Gilbert AZ 85297US 5/9/2024 Bob Parrish Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/9/2024 Kelly Parrish Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/9/2024 Donovan Hansen Phoenix AZ 85003US 5/9/2024 Jacee Haws Mesa AZ 85206US 5/9/2024 Wes Erwin Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/9/2024 Julie Benson Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/9/2024 Sara Allen Phoenix AZ 85008US 5/9/2024 Cheryl Andress Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/9/2024 Linda Payne Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/9/2024 Teresa Ibanez Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/9/2024 Scott Connell Gilbert AZ 85234US 5/9/2024 Autumn Mortensen Mesa AZ 85210US 5/9/2024 Janette Hansen Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/9/2024 Jennifer McClellan Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/9/2024 Jacob Richins Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/9/2024 Robert Zoller Gilbert AZ 85205US 5/9/2024 Benjamin Arredondo Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/9/2024 kaden Richins Gilbert AZ 85296US 5/9/2024 Christina Zoller Mesa AZ 85205US 5/9/2024 Detlef Hilpercht Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/9/2024 Richard Wilson Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/9/2024 Amber Monroy Gilbert AZ 85234US 5/9/2024 alan thatcher Gilbert AZ US 5/9/2024 Janae Wilson Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/9/2024 Angel Thatcher Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/9/2024 Peter Sturgeon Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/9/2024 Heather Caffall Chandler AZ 85224US 5/9/2024 Donna Bradshaw Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/9/2024 Trevor Caffall Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/9/2024 Alena Skinner Gilbert AZ 85296US 5/9/2024 Fred Heidenreich Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/9/2024 Sarah Sturgeon Phoenix AZ 85008US 5/9/2024 Robert Gardner Phoenix AZ 85032US 5/9/2024 Kensey Burns Gilbert AZ 85234US 5/9/2024 Nolan Butler Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/9/2024 Betty Butlee Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/9/2024 Brandon Skinner Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/9/2024 David Brazil Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/9/2024 Marcia Swisher Scottsdale AZ 85251US 5/9/2024 Ganes Mcculloch Gilbert AZ 85233US 5/9/2024 Nikola McCulloch Gilbert AZ 85233US 5/9/2024 Judah Garrison US 5/9/2024 William Hayes Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/9/2024 Kelly Clark Salt Lake City UT 84109US 5/9/2024 Lindsay Johnston Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/9/2024 Rosalyn Gilbert Phoenix AZ 85008US 5/9/2024 Shawn Dotson Phoenix AZ 85008US 5/9/2024 Melanie Sturgeon Gilbert AZ 85295US 5/10/2024 John Heidenreich Phoenix AZ 85295US 5/11/2024 Brian Skinner Phoenix AZ 85295US 5/11/2024 Michael Mortensen Phoenix AZ 85013US 5/16/2024 DATE: November 6, 2024 TO: Board of Supervisors From: Andrew Lorentzen, Planner SUBJECT: Z2023014 – White Barn Events Center Agenda Item: #11 Since the publishing of the BOS report for the White Barn Events Center updated conditions of approval ‘a’ through ‘x’ have been proposed, attached. The applicant, Mr. Rodney Jarvis, and Mr. Paul Gilbert, who represents some of the neighborhood opposition are in agreement with these modified conditions. Staff had concern with two of the new conditions ‘d’ and ‘e’. The latter references the Town of Gilbert Land Development Code, Table 3.4.4.B.1. The applicant has indicated their proposed site plan is consistent with the referenced code. The former calls for the Board to hold a meeting to review the SUP every two years. Staff spoke to both gentlemen regarding new condition ‘d’ and they’ve agreed to replace it with the following language: d. The applicant shall submit a status report to the Maricopa County Planning & Development Department every two years from the date of Board approval. The status report shall detail how the applicant has complied with all conditions of SUP approval. The Department may accept and administratively approve the status report or schedule the matter for consideration of SUP amendment or revocation by the Board with recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission. Additionally, the applicant has submitted 181 additional signatures of support bringing the total to 337 members of the public in support. To date staff has received comment or signatures from 337 individuals in support and 278 names in opposition with an additional 128 names on a change.org petition opposed. Three appeal forms have been provided by residents within the 300’ buffer, staff notes a Super-Majority vote has been triggered with this case. Attachments: Email from Paul Gilbert (1 page) Proposed conditions of approval ‘a’ through ’x’ (4 pages) Town of Gilbert Land Development Code, Table 3.4.4.B.1. (1 page) Additional support signatures (20 pages) This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. From: Paul Gilbert To: "Tom.Ellsworth@maricopa.gov"; "Darren.Gerard@Maricopa.Gov" Cc: "jacksellers6@gmail.com"; "richard.bohan@maricopa.gov"; "bohanr001@mail.maricopa.gov"; "rqjarvis@gmail.com" Subject: Case Z2023014 – Proposed White Barn Event Center Revised Stipulations Date: Tuesday, November 5, 2024 4:16:32 PM Attachments: image001.png Proposed Stipulations 2024 11 05.pdf Dear Tom and Darren, Attached to this correspondence you will find a copy of the revised stipulations which have been agreed to by myself and Rod Jarvis in connection with the Event Center Application. We would appreciate your making these stipulations available at the Board of Supervisors hearing tomorrow. Please feel free to call me if you have any concerns otherwise, we will see you tomorrow. Best regards, Paul Paul E. Gilbert Paul E. Gilbert Founding Partner Gilbert Blilie PLLC 701 N. 44th Street | Phoenix, AZ 85008 Direct: 480.429.3002 | Main: 480.429.3000 Email: pgilbert@gilbertblilie.com Assistant: Claudia Carr 480.429.3012 |ccarr@gilbertblilie.com Gilbert Blilie Legal Notice: Please note that my email has changed. Please update your contact information for me to include my new email address listed in my signature above. This electronic message (including any attachment) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Sections 2510-2521, is confidential, and may be legally privileged. Also, email is not a secure form of communication and as such can be intercepted by entities not connected with either party included on the email. If this email has been sent to you in error, please reply to advise the sender of the error and then immediately Proposed White Barn Events Center SƟpulaƟons Case #Z2023014 1 a. Development of the site shall be in substanƟal conformance with the site plan enƟtled “White Barn Wedding Venue“, consisƟng of 8 full-size sheets, dated June 24, 2023 and stamped received October 2, 2023 except as modified by the following condiƟons. b. Development of the site shall be in substanƟal conformance with the narraƟve report enƟtled “White Barn Events Center”, consisƟng of 8 pages, dated March 20, 2024 and stamped received March 20, 2024 except as modified by the following condiƟons. c. This special use permit shall expire on June 12, 2034, or upon terminaƟon of the use for a period of 90 or more consecuƟve days, whichever occurs first. All site improvements associated with the SUP shall be removed within 90 days of such expiraƟon or terminaƟon of use. d. The Board of Supervisors shall hold SUP update meeƟngs every 2 years with the property owner to ensure the sƟpulaƟons are being complied with and no new negaƟve effects impact the neighborhood due to the events held on the property under this SUP. These biannual updates shall be held during regularly scheduled Board of Supervisor hearings and be open for public comment. e. The project shall be in compliance with the following development regulaƟons in the Town of Gilbert Land Development Code: 1. Development shall meet or exceed the dimensional standards of the Community Commercial zoning district as outlined in Table 3.4.4.B.1. 2. All refuse and recycling enclosures shall be screened from public view. f. Events shall be limited to weddings and no more than two corporate events per calendar month only. c.g. An on-site sepƟc system shall be prohibited for this SUP. The project shall be served by the Town of Gilbert sewer system. h. The project shall require a 6’ 8’ CMU wall on the north, east and south property lines for noise atenuaƟon purposes, except where adjacent to the Life Church property. i. All seaƟng and gathering areas shall be setback at minimum 20’ feet from any property line. d.j. A conƟnuous row of large canopy 36” box trees shall be placed along the north, east, and south perimeter of the property at minimum 30-feet on center, except where adjacent to the Life Church property. e.k. All outdoor lighƟng shall be shielded so that illuminaƟon does not trespass onto neighboring properƟes and is directed downward at a minimum 20-degree angle beneath the horizontal plane of the botom of the shielding l. All commercial outdoor acƟvity shall be moved indoors by 9:00 PM. m. All events shall cease by 11:00 PM. Proposed White Barn Events Center SƟpulaƟons Case #Z2023014 2 f.n. Events with over 75 invitees shall provide for a traffic control officer from either the Maricopa County Sherrif’s Department, Town of Gilbert Police Department, or other authorized third-party traffic control specialist to manage atendees exiƟng an event and ensure any non-resident vehicles are not uƟlizing the local roadways (i.e., Frye Road and Fairview Street). All local residents shall be given priority through any controlled access point. All traffic control and/or right-of-way permits shall be obtained when necessary. o. Amplified music and dancing are prohibited in outdoor areas. Further, any amplified noise must conform to Maricopa County Noise Ordinance (P-23) that was adopted February 15, 2006 and is regulated by the MCSO. SecƟon IV Noise: C. Radios and Sound AmplificaƟon Devices It shall be unlawful for any person to operate any radio, loudspeaker, musical instrument, or other sound producing, sound reproducing, or sound amplificaƟon equipment that emits noise that can be heard from within closed residenƟal structures located within 500 feet of the boundary of the property from which such noise emanates. p. All outdoor sound system speakers shall be permanently ground mounted, facing inward, at the four corners of the outside areas. No portable speakers shall be permited for use outdoors. q. Noise resulƟng from any acƟviƟes on the premises shall be limited to no more than 50 decibels (dB) along the north, east, and south property line. A noise study indicaƟng the expected noise levels along the perimeter of the property, as well as the miƟgaƟon measures that will be implemented to accomplish a maximum of 50 dB along the perimeter shall be completed prior to issuance of any site plan approval or building permits. r. Noise monitors shall be installed every 30 feet along the north, east, and south property line of the premises. The property owner shall keep records of the decibel levels from such noise monitors throughout the duraƟon of the SUP and make the data collected available upon request. Repeated instances of noise levels exceeding 50 dB resulƟng from acƟviƟes on the premises may result in the revocaƟon of this SUP. g.s. Signs shall be posted around the parking area and other outdoor gathering areas noƟfying atendees to be mindful and respecƞul of the adjacent neighbors. Signs shall read “NoƟce: this venue is located in a residenƟal neighborhood. Please be mindful and respecƞul of neighboring residents. Keep all noise to a minimum while outdoors.” The signs shall be a minimum of 36 inches by 36 inches. The sign text shall be at minimum 3 inches in height. h.t. Prior to issuance of iniƟal building permits, all parcels shall be combined to create a single parcel matching the SUP area. i.u. The following Planning Engineering condiƟons: 1. Unpermited walls/fences on the subject property shall be addressed with the submital for building permits for the site development. It shall be demonstrated that the walls/fences do not create an adverse drainage impact to the site or surrounding properƟes. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits for development of the site, the owner/applicant must provide evidence that the Town of Gilbert has approved the Traffic Report. Proposed White Barn Events Center SƟpulaƟons Case #Z2023014 3 3. Access to the site parking lot shall be via a one-way entrance (north) and one-way exit (south), or as otherwise approved by the Town of Gilbert. 4. Access to and from the site shall only be provided along Greenfield Road north of the site. All traffic shall be directed away from the American Leadership InsƟtute driveway located south of the site. DirecƟonal signage shall be posted on site to direct atendees to the appropriate exit to the Greenfield Road (north). 3.5. Owner/applicant shall coordinate with the Town of Gilbert for any offsite improvements, ROW requirements and access. Provide County of TOG approved offsite improvement plans during building permit phase. 4.6. SWPP provided during building permit phase. 5.7. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with SecƟon 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain RegulaƟons for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best pracƟces at the Ɵme of applicaƟon for construcƟon. 6.8. Based on the conceptual design nature of the informaƟon submited, changes to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the site’s drainage infrastructure. 7.9. Detailed Grading and Drainage (Site Infrastructure) Plans and Drainage report must be submited with the applicaƟon for Building Permits. j.v. Noncompliance with any of the condiƟons assigned to the approval of this SUP by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors may be grounds for revocaƟon in accordance with the requirements and procedures as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. k.w. The granƟng of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granƟng of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permited by the zoning exisƟng on the date of applicaƟon, subject to condiƟons. In the event of the failure to comply with any condiƟon, and at the Ɵme of expiraƟon of the SUP, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of applicaƟon. It is, therefore, sƟpulated and agreed that either revocaƟon due to the failure to comply with any condiƟons, or the expiraƟon of the Special Use Permit, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of applicaƟon to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminuƟon in value of the property from the value it held on the date of applicaƟon due to such revocaƟon or expiraƟon of the SUP. The SUP enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the SUP is granted and reverƟng to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the SUP had never been granted. l.x. Prior to issuance of a building permit, writen confirmaƟon will be required from the emergency fire protecƟon jurisdicƟon having authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their regulaƟons and requirements, and that emergency fire protecƟon service will be Proposed White Barn Events Center SƟpulaƟons Case #Z2023014 4 provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the cerƟficate of occupancy, local fire protecƟon jurisdicƟon review and approval will be required. Formal Meeting Minutes 11/06/2024 Page 10 of 62 Motion to concur with the Planning Commission recommendation for approval subject to conditions ‘a’ through ‘i’ as noted on the agenda by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Bill Gates Ayes: Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin, Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Steve Gallardo PLANNING AND ZONING REGULAR HEARINGS - AUDIENCIAS DE AGENDA REGULAR 11. WHITE BARN EVENT CENTER (CONT. FROM 8/21/24) Case #: Z2023014 Supervisor District: 1 Applicant & Owner: Rodney Jarvis / Greenfield Properties LLC Request: Special Use Permit (SUP) for a wedding venue / events center within the Rural-43 zoning district Site Location: Generally located SE of the SEC of San Tan Village Parkway & Greenfield Rd. Commission Recommendation: On 5/9/24, the Commission voted 7-1 to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve Z2023014 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘l’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the site plan entitled “White Barn Wedding Venue“, consisting of 8 full-size sheets, dated June 24, 2023 and stamped received October 2, 2023 except as modified by the following conditions. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the narrative report entitled “White Barn Events Center”, consisting of 8 pages, dated March 20, 2024 and stamped received March 20, 2024 except as modified by the following conditions. c. This special use permit shall expire on June 12, 2034, or upon termination of the use for a period of 90 or more consecutive days, whichever occurs first. All site improvements associated with the SUP shall be removed within 90 days of such expiration or termination of use. d. The project shall require a 6’ CMU wall on the north, east and south property lines for noise attenuation purposes. e. All outdoor lighting shall be shielded so that illumination does not trespass onto neighboring properties and is directed downward at a minimum 20-degree angle beneath the horizontal plane of the bottom of the shielding f. All commercial outdoor activity shall be moved indoors by 9:00 PM. g. Amplified music and dancing are prohibited in outdoor areas. Further, any amplified noise must conform to Maricopa County Noise Ordinance (P-23) that was adopted February 15, 2006 and is regulated by the MCSO. Section IV Noise: C. Radios and Sound Amplification Devices It shall be unlawful for any person to operate any radio, loudspeaker, musical instrument, or other sound producing, sound reproducing, or sound amplification equipment that emits noise that can be heard from within closed residential structures located within 500 feet of the boundary of the property from which such noise emanates. Formal Meeting Minutes 11/06/2024 Page 11 of 62 h. Prior to issuance of initial building permits, all parcels shall be combined to create a single parcel matching the SUP area. i. The following Planning Engineering conditions: 1. Unpermitted walls/fences on the subject property shall be addressed with the submittal for building permits for the site development. It shall be demonstrated that the walls/fences do not create an adverse drainage impact to the site or surrounding properties. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits for development of the site, the owner/applicant must provide evidence that the Town of Gilbert has approved the Traffic Report. 3. Access to the site shall be via a one-way entrance (north) and one-way exit (south), or as otherwise approved by the Town of Gilbert. 4. Owner/applicant shall coordinate with the Town of Gilbert for any offsite improvements, ROW requirements and access. Provide County of TOG approved offsite improvement plans during building permit phase. 5. SWPP provided during building permit phase. 6. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 7. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the site’s drainage infrastructure. 8. Detailed Grading and Drainage (Site Infrastructure) Plans and Drainage report must be submitted with the application for Building Permits. j. Noncompliance with any of the conditions assigned to the approval of this SUP by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors may be grounds for revocation in accordance with the requirements and procedures as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. k. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, and at the time of expiration of the SUP, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, or the expiration of the Special Use Permit, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation or expiration of the SUP. The SUP enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the SUP is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the SUP had never been granted. l. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection Formal Meeting Minutes 11/06/2024 Page 12 of 62 service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. (C-44-25-013-X-00) Tom Ellsworth, Planning and Development Director and Darren Gerard, Planning Division Manager, came forward to present on item 11. Chairman Sellers announced that each side, in favor or in opposition, would be given 10 minutes each to present their case. Mr. Ellsworth gave an overview of White Barn Event Center, saying it is a Special Use Permit (SUP) within the rural 43 zoning district. Mr. Ellsworth explained in more detail the location and surrounding neighborhood. Formal Meeting Minutes 11/06/2024 Page 13 of 62 Mr. Ellsworth said the applicant would like this wedding event center to include a reception hall and chapel with parking to accommodate approximately 100 vehicles. He said this request has received significant attention with 337 individual letters of support and 278 individual letters in opposition. The opposition included a petition to appeal the Planning and Zoning Commission’s decision. Mr. Ellsworth said that due to the opposition numbers within the 300 feet, a Super Majority vote is triggered to approve this SUP. Formal Meeting Minutes 11/06/2024 Page 14 of 62 The opposition focused on traffic, noise, lighting, public safety, and general compatibility of the land use. The Planning and Zoning Commission voted in favor with several conditions. The applicant and a land use attorney hired by some of the property owners, met and came up with stipulations that would help mitigate some of the issues stated. A copy of those stipulations was provided to the Board and Mr. Ellsworth read from the document, some of the conditions. Rod Jarvis, applicant, Greenfield Properties LLC, spoke about the importance of working together and he thanked the Board and all involved parties for their time. He said there has been an agreement reached and he would not make a presentation but would be available for further questions that people might have. The Clerk said she had 20 speaker slips in opposition who wished to speak and 12 speaker slips in opposition who just registered their position. The Clerk read the 12 names: Melissa Jorgensen, Barbara Payne, Donna Bradshaw, Aaron Bradshaw, Alena Skinner, Brandi Galvan, Laurie Jarvis, Jason Connor Payne, Colton Payne, Kaden Payne, Traci Payne, Elena Silk. Scott Henderson, resident and neighbor, spoke in opposition stating traffic concerns. Amanda Gallagher, resident and neighbor, expressed her opposition for a variety of reasons. She stated the Board was not listening to the people who it will impact the most. Woman, did not state her name, second generation homeowner, stated her opposition and asked to keep the residential properties, residential. Linda Payne, resident and neighbor, spoke in opposition and quoted the Arizona Constitution, and was concerned about the negative impact on children in the neighborhood. Stacy Epperson, resident, spoke in opposition. She said her family has lived in this neighborhood for generations and would like to raise her kids here without the commercial influence. Formal Meeting Minutes 11/06/2024 Page 15 of 62 Mr. Jarvis, returned to the podium to speak. He acknowledged the concerns that were stated and said the stipulations have addressed those concerns. Chairman Sellers said he was not initially enthusiastic about this project and has since had a change in his thinking because of the numerous concessions that have been made. Chairman Sellers asked for more clarification on sound and what constitutes too loud in terms of decibels. An explanation followed that included comparisons with everyday sounds that people are familiar with. Mr. Jarvis said the amplified sounds (music) will be indoors in the reception hall and will be able to be monitored more closely. The following motion was made by Supervisor Bill Gates: Motion to approve item 11 in accordance with modified conditions outlined in the staff memorandum handed out this morning. I understand the applicant’s counsel and an opposition counsel agree with these conditions. The conditions will mitigate potential adverse impacts on nearby residences. The site is appropriate for a public assembly land use. The motion seconded by Supervisor Steve Gallardo Ayes: Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin, Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Steve Gallardo STATUTORY HEARINGS - AUDIENCIAS LEGALES If you would like to send a comment or question regarding one of the statutory hearing items, please send email to Agenda.Comments@maricopa.gov Clerk of the Board Statutory Hearings - Audiencias Legales de la Secretaria de la Junta 12. LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATIONS - APLICACIONES DE LICENCIA DE LICOR This is the time for a public hearing on the applications for liquor licenses. At this hearing, the Board of Supervisors will determine the recommendation to the State Liquor Board as to whether the State Liquor Board should grant or deny license. a. NEW LICENSE FOR THE SQUARE Pursuant to A.R.S. § 4-201, approve an application filed by Paullette Charlene Cano for a New Series 12 Liquor License for The Square at 41111 North Daisy Mountain Drive, #115 & #117, Anthem, Arizona 85086. (AZ 303627) (Supervisorial District 3) (C-06-25-130-X-00) Motion to approve by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Bill Gates Ayes: Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin, Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Steve Gallardo Air Quality Statutory Hearings - Audiencias Legales de Calidad del Aire Chairman Sellers asked the Clerk if there were any registered speakers or comments received for items 13 or 14. The Clerk said none were received. 13. AQ-2024-006-RULE 510 (AIR QUALITY STANDARDS) Convene a public hearing, as required by Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 49-479(b), to solicit comments on incorporating the recently revised primary annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard (PM2.5 NAAQS) into Maricopa County Air Pollution Control Regulations, Rule 510 (Air Quality Standards) and the associated proposed revision to the Arizona State Implementation Plan (SIP). Following the public hearing, the Board is requested to adopt the proposed revision to the rule and to approve submission of the revised rule as a revision to the Arizona SIP.