August 30, 2022 Draft Minutes

City of Glendale — Regular Meeting (2023-04-18)

View PDF Item a Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 17780 characters
DRAFT MINUTES 
 
CITIZEN BOND ELECTION COMMITTEE  
CITY HALL, 4th FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM 
5850 W. GLENDALE AVE. 
GLENDALE, ARIZONA 85301 
AUGUST 30, 2022 
5:30 P.M. 
 
 
 
 
 
1. CALL TO ORDER  
Chair Baker called the meeting to order at 5:31 p.m.  
 
2. ROLL CALL   
Present: 
 Lisa Baker, Committee Chair 
 
 Alicia Rubio, Committee Vice Chair (arrived during agenda item #7) 
Connie Kiser, Committee Member 
Sam McConnell, Committee Member 
Michael Socaciu, Committee Member 
 
Absent:  
None 
 
 
Also Present: 
Vicki Rios, Assistant City Manager 
Levi Gibson, Budget and Finance Interim Director 
Jamsheed Mehta, Interim Assistant City Manager 
John Kennedy, Public Facilities, Recreation & Special Events Director 
Michelle Woytenko, Field Operations Director 
John Murphy, Engineering Department 
Randa Abdelazim, Budget and Finance Management Assistant 
Thomas Carlson, RBC Capital Markets 
William DeHaan, Greenberg Traurig 
 
3. CITIZEN COMMENTS 
None.   
 
4. INTRODUCTION OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS 
Presented by: Vicki Rios, Assistant City Manager 
 
Previously done during roll call.  
 
5. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES 
a. Citizen Bond Election Committee Minutes of 02/01/2022 
A motion was made by Committee Member Connie Kiser, second by Committee Member Michael 
Socaciu, to approve the Citizen Bond Election Committee February 1, 2022 meeting minutes as 
written.   
AYE:  
Committee Chair Lisa Baker 
Committee Member Connie Kiser  
Committee Member Sam McConnell  
Committee Member Michael Socaciu  
Other: 
Committee Vice Chair Alicia Rubio (ABSENT)  
 
6. PURPOSE AND ROLE OF THE BOND COMMITTEE 
Presented by: Vicki Rios, Assistant City Manager  
Presented by: Levi Gibson, Budget and Finance Interim Director

Minutes of the  
Citizen Bond Election Committee 
August 30, 2022 
Page 2 
 
 
Mr. Gibson presented the following information: 
Purpose and Role of the Bond Committee: 
• 
Review Financial Information 
o Understand the City’s Capital Improvement Plan 
• 
Review Ballot Language 
o Make recommendations to City Council 
• 
Community Outreach 
o Member of the Bond Committee 
o Private citizen / resident of Glendale   
Role of City Staff 
• 
Educate and Inform 
o Bond Committee, Community, and Voters 
• 
Support the Bond Committee 
o Facilitate meetings 
o Provide information:  
 
Financial  
 
Election 
 
Federal, state, and local laws 
 
Ms. Rios stated that staff’s role was to support the Committee.       
 
7. OVERVIEW OF THE CITY’S BUDGET PROCESS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) 
Presented by: Lisette Camacho, Budget and Finance Director 
Presented by: Levi Gibson, Budget and Finance Interim Director 
 
[Committee Vice Chair Alicia Rubio entered the meeting during the agenda item.] 
 
Mr. Gibson gave a presentation, which included information on the following: 
Budget Overview 
• 
Budget Process 
o Staff Prepares 5-Year Financial Forecast 
o Develop Base Operating Budget Requests 
o Develop and Balance CIP 
o Present Draft Budget 
o Council Adopts Final Budget 
o Staff Prepares Budget Book 
• 
Budget Components 
o Revenues 
o Expenditures:  Operating, CIP, Debt Service, Contingency 
• 
Balanced Budget: Required by the State of Arizona 
• 
FY22-23 Total Budget Appropriation:  $1.07 billion 
o Operating Budget: 
$546 million (51%) 
o Capital:  
 
$288 million (27%) 
o Contingency: 
 
$139 million (13%) 
o Debt: 
 
 
$  97 million (  9%) 
• 
FY22-23 Operating Budget:  $546 million / Departmental breakout was provided. 
CIP Overview 
• 
Elements of a Capital Improvement Plan 
o Assets valued over $50,000 with a useful life of 5 or more years. 
o Land, buildings, streets and improvements, plants, large equipment

Minutes of the  
Citizen Bond Election Committee 
August 30, 2022 
Page 3 
 
 
o Ten-Year Plan (only FY22-23 is adopted as part of the FY22-23 Budget) 
o Projects in Years 1 to 5 have identified funding sources. 
o Financial Policy: 
 
Improve existing assets 
 
Replace existing assets as needed 
 
Construct new assets 
• 
CIP Funding Sources 
o Enterprise Funds 
 
Water/Sewer: 
• 
Funding can come from G.O. Bonds, revenue bonds, revenue 
obligations, or cash financing  
• 
Debt service paid from future Water/Sewer fee revenue 
 
Landfill:  Paid by Landfill user fees 
 
Solid Waste:  Paid by Solid Waste user fees 
o General Obligation Bonds (G.O. Bonds) 
 
Debt issuance must be authorized by the Voters 
 
Streets, Public Safety, Parks, Government Facilities, Open Space/Trails, 
Libraries, and Flood Control 
 
Debt service paid by Secondary Property Tax 
o Pay-As-You-Go:  Cash-funded projects  
o Transportation Sales Tax 
 
Half-cent sales tax 
 
Improve service for all modes of transportation 
o Highway User Revenue Funds (HURF) 
 
Restricted Special Revenue Fund 
 
Right of Way acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and 
repair 
o Development Impact Fees 
 
One-time charges to developers for new development 
 
New or expanded infrastructure 
o Grants 
 
Federal or state grant funding 
 
Often require a City match contribution to the project 
• 
10-Year Draft CIP by Project Type: $1,367.7 million / Departmental breakout was provided. 
• 
10-Year Draft CIP by Funding Source $1,367.7 million / Source breakout was provided. 
 
The agenda item was concluded.  
 
8. PRESENTATION ON GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 
Presented by: Levi Gibson, Budget and Finance Assistant Director 
Guest Presenter: Thomas Carlson, RBC Capital Markets 
 
 
Mr. Gibson gave a presentation on General Obligation (G.O.) Bonds, which included details on the 
following: 
o G.O. Bonds:  Details on constitutional limits were provided.  
o Information Pamphlet for Bond Election 
o Arizona Revised Statute 35-454 
o Details on specific information that must be included in the pamphlet were provided.  
 
Ms. Rios explained Glendale’s flat levy policy in general.

Minutes of the  
Citizen Bond Election Committee 
August 30, 2022 
Page 4 
 
 
Vice Chair Rubio asked if the Committee Members could submit statements for or against the bond 
propositions.  Ms. Rios confirmed the Committee Members could make statements as private 
citizens.   
 
9. PRESENTATION ON 2021 LEGISLATION ABOUT RE-PURPOSING BOND AUTHORITY 
Presented by: William DeHaan, Greenberg Traurig 
Mr. DeHaan shared a summary of H.B. 2821- Repurposing Bond Elections) 
o Allows Council to call an election to change the purposes for which the monies derived from 
the sale of bonds authorized at a prior election may be spent, provided the bonds have not 
been issued. 
o Requires the Council to order the election to be held on the first Tuesday following the first 
Monday in November, the same day as typical bond elections. 
o Requires the election notice and procedures to be conducted in the same manner as typical 
bond elections. 
o Requires, at least 35 days before the election, the Council to mail an informational pamphlet 
to each household within the political subdivision with a registered voter.  Details on 
information required in the pamphlet were displayed.   
o Requires the ballot to contain the words “change capital improvements, yes” and “change 
capital improvements, no” and requires the voter to signify their desired choice. 
o The last permitted election date is November 5, 2024.   
 
Mr. DeHaan suggested conducting a repurpose election in 2024, if the Committee intended to do 
so, not in the same year as a request for new bonds.   
 
Committee Member Socaciu asked if the Committee was being asked to hold a repurpose election 
or if it was optional.  Ms. Rios relayed that Chair Baker had requested information on this topic.  
Ms. Rios explained that there is bond authority in certain categories that is not being used, so there 
are opportunities for repurposing.  She said the Committee could make a recommendation to 
Council if the Committee wanted to pursue a repurposing question and if so, the intended 
timeframe.  Mr. Gibson stated that the opportunity for the question was in 2023 or 2024, as it was a 
limited opportunity.  Ms. Rios said that if the process were popular, it was possible the deadline 
could be extended; however, no city had yet used repurposing to her knowledge.   
 
Chair Baker asked if repurposing should be kept in mind when the Committee was discussing 
potential bond questions for the fall.  Ms. Rios relayed this was the reason the item was placed on 
the agenda. Ms. Rios said it could be confusing for the citizens to consider new bonds and 
repurposing at the same time, however, the Committee could discuss the various options.   
 
Vice Chair Rubio expressed concern about getting the message out to both English and Spanish 
speakers.   
 
Ms. Rios said all of the ballot language will be in both English and Spanish, which was required.  
She said, as a private citizen, committee members could spread the message in various ways and 
even form a political action committee (PAC).  She explained that staff was a resource for the 
Committee, but could not advocate in any way on the bond election.   
 
Committee Member Socaciu asked if the City needed the Committee to act specifically on the 
repurposing question, or if Council would take action.  Ms. Rios said the Committee was in place to 
make a recommendation to Council, however, Council could decide to accept or decline the 
recommendation, revise it, or add to it.

Minutes of the  
Citizen Bond Election Committee 
August 30, 2022 
Page 5 
 
 
The agenda item was concluded.  
 
10. GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND ELECTION PROCESS 
Presented by: Levi Gibson, Budget and Finance Assistant Director 
Presented by: William DeHaan, Greenberg Traurig 
 
Mr. Gibson presented information on the Prohibition on Use of City Resources in regards to a bond 
election, which was enacted in 1996 and amended in 2013 and 2015.    
 
The Draft 2023 Tentative Bond Election Timeline was presented.  Discussion was held regarding 
pros and cons of a bond election as a special election, during a non-presidential voting year.      
 
11. GENERAL OBLIGATION (G.O.) BONDS 
Presented by: Vicki Rios, Assistant City Manager  
Presented by: Levi Gibson, Budget and Finance Interim Director 
 
Mr. Gibson gave a presentation on the following: 
o Details on constitutional limits were provided. 
o Property Tax   
o Primary Levy Limit 
 
Can be used for any General Fund expense 
 
Allowable 2% increase per year 
o Secondary Levy Limit 
 
Debt service on G.O. bonds only 
 
Currently flat levy.  A slight growth is assumed for construction.   
o Glendale’s Property Tax is comprised of (approximately): 
 
Schools 62% 
 
City of Glendale (Primary Levy)  4% 
 
City of Glendale (Voter Approved)  13% 
 
County 14% 
 
Special Districts 7% 
o An example of a Property Tax Bill for a home was displayed which showed the 
difference between the rate and levy for 2019 versus 2020.  This shows how the levy 
can remain flat, while the rate changes due to change in property value.  
o Debt Management Policy – Flat Levy Policy  
o Adopted by City Council in October 2020. 
o The City Council will not authorize the issuance of new G.O. bonds if the levy 
amount required to pay the debt service on the existing G.O. bonds plus the new 
G.O. bonds exceeds the amount of the current year’s tax levy plus an amount of up 
to 2% per year for new growth (i.e. new property added to the tax rolls) 
o Existing G.O. Debt Service + New G.O. Debt Service must be less than or equal to 
the Current Levy + 2% Growth   
o The following charts were displayed and explained: 
o Secondary Property Tax History:  FY15 through FY22 
o G.O. Debt Service Capacity – Principal and Interest:  2020 through 2038 
 
The agenda item was concluded.   
 
12. GENERAL OBLIGATION (G.O.) BOND FUNDED CAPITAL PROJECTS 
Presented by: Vicki Rios, Assistant City Manager  
Presented by: Levi Gibson, Budget and Finance Interim Director

Minutes of the  
Citizen Bond Election Committee 
August 30, 2022 
Page 6 
 
 
 
Mr. Gibson gave a presentation, which included information on the following: 
Previous Bond Elections 
• 
1981, 1987, 1999, 2007: Total amounts for the following: bonds authorized, issued through 
June 30, 2022, and authorized but unissued.  
• 
2007 Bond Election and FY2022-31 CIP:  Ballot question verbiage, samples of projects 
completed with 2007 bond funding, CIP for FY2022-31, and projects requiring additional 
voter authorization were provided for the following departments: 
o Public Safety  
o Streets and Parking 
o Flood Control 
o Parks and Recreation 
 
Committee Member Socaciu asked when the park estimates were obtained.  Mr. Gibson relayed 
the cost estimates were updated annually.  Ms. Rios said the projects were last estimated in 
September or October of 2021, however, inflation was included in the estimates.  Mr. Gibson 
explained the various resources used to develop the five-year forecasts.  Committee Member 
Socaciu asked if the updated numbers would be provided to the Committee in October with new 
inflation estimates.  Ms. Rios stated that the different departments will provide a presentation to the 
Committee. She explained that in the 10-Year CIP, the out-years are less accurate than the closer 
years. She said the Committee could recommend more or less than the estimates.  However, she 
said the ultimate decision was up to Council.   
 
Chair Baker had thought that the Murphy Park renovations were included in the City Hall 
renovations.  Ms. Rios explained that the Murphy Park renovations, as planned currently, will 
require additional authorization.  
 
Vice Chair Rubio asked if the bonding process was a mechanism for maintenance of City facilities 
or streets.  Ms. Rios said bond funds must be used on a project over $50,000 and have a five year 
useful life.  Ms. Rios assured bonds were not used for maintenance and the streets included will be 
fully reconstructed.  Mr. Carlson concurred that bond funds were used only for improvement of 
capital assets, not maintenance.  Ms. Woytenko said staff proposes prioritization of projects to 
Council, however, Council can change or re-reprioritize the list.    
 
13. PRESENTATION ON THE START OF A POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE 
Presented by: William DeHaan, Greenberg Traurig 
 
Mr. DeHaan shared information on establishing a Political Action Committee (PAC), including when 
to form a PAC, where to register a committee, filing a statement of organization, components or a 
statement of organization, chairperson and treasurer information, and finalizing a statement of 
organization.  He said a PAC could spend funds to advocate for an election, such as buying 
advertisement, signage, and mailers.  He noted that he was a City resource as well and therefore, 
could not advocate for the election.  Ms. Rios stated that any of the Committee Members could 
form a PAC for or against the bonds.   
 
Committee Member Kiser asked if the Committee Members could do similar advocating as 
individuals.  Mr. DeHaan replied in the positive with the stipulation that less than $1,300 is spent 
and in-kind donations would count towards the spending limit.   
 
Chair Baker noted that a PAC must have less than quorum, if established by Committee Members.

Minutes of the  
Citizen Bond Election Committee 
August 30, 2022 
Page 7 
 
 
 
14. REVIEW AND APPROVE THE TENTATIVE TIMELINE OF FUTURE MEETINGS 
Presented by: Levi Gibson, Budget and Finance Interim Director 
 
Mr. Gibson presented the Draft 2023 Tentative Bond Election Timeline. 
 
Discussion was held regarding if moving forward with the timeline as present would indicate that 
the Committee was recommending moving forward with a bond election.  Committee Member 
Socaciu surmised the meeting timeline could be approved, with the knowledge that if the 
Committee decides not to recommend a bond election or something changed, the timeline could be 
revised or meetings cancelled.   
 
A motion was made by Committee Member Michael Socaciu, second by Committee Member 
Connie Kiser, to approve 2023 Bond Election Timeline for the Citizen Bond Election Committee, as 
presented. 
AYE:  
Committee Chair Lisa Baker 
Committee Vice Chair Alicia Rubio  
Committee Member Connie Kiser  
Committee Member Sam McConnell  
 
Committee Member Michael Socaciu 
 
Ms. Rios announced the Committee will be informed when the timeline is presented to Council at a 
Workshop and will inform Council of the discussion held at this meeting.  
 
15. STAFF REPORT 
Ms. Rios announced that Ms. Lisette Camacho, who served as Budget and Finance Director, has 
resigned from her position with the City and Mr. Gibson is filling the role in the interim, while 
recruitment is being conducted.  Ms. Rios also announced that Mr. Jack Friedline, who served as 
an Assistant City Manager, has resigned and Mr. Jamsheed Mehta is the Interim Assistant City 
Manager.   
 
16. COMMITTEE COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS 
None.     
 
17. NEXT MEETING 
The next regular meeting of the Citizen Bond Election Committee will be held on October 4, 2022 at 
5:30 p.m., in the 4th Floor Conference Room, located at 5850 West Glendale Avenue, Glendale, 
Arizona, 85301.   
 
18. ADJOURNMENT 
A motion was made by Committee Vice Chair Alicia Rubio, second by Committee Member Michael 
Socaciu, to adjourn the meeting at 7:32 p.m.   
AYE:  
Committee Chair Lisa Baker 
Committee Vice Chair Alicia Rubio  
Committee Member Connie Kiser  
Committee Member Sam McConnell  
Committee Member Michael Socaciu

Minutes of the  
Citizen Bond Election Committee 
August 30, 2022 
Page 8 
 
 
 
 
The Citizen Bond Election Committee meeting minutes of February 1, 2022 were submitted and 
approved this 30th Day of August 2022. 
 
_______________________________ 
Levi Gibson 
Budget and Finance Interim Director