FY24-25 CDBG Public Service Application Matrix & Review Sheets
Extracted text (via pymupdf)
3766 characters
CDBG Public Services Grant Application Matrix FY 2024-25 Application Financial Impact = % Capacity & Prior Performance Quality of Application # of People Served Total Points Maximum Points and Percentage: 5 5 10 20 15 20 20 15 10 20 20 160.0 Organization No - ineligible No - 0 pts No - 0 pts 90%-100% - 0 pts No - 0 pts < 50 - 5 pts >$500 - 0 pts < 1 year - 0 pts -- Yes - 5 pt Yes - 5 pt Yes - 20 pts 75%-89% - 5 pts Yes - 20 pts 51 < > 100 - 10 pts $300-$500 - 5 pts 1 < > 3 years - 3 pts 50%-74% - 10 pts 101 < > 500 - 15 pts $100-$300 - 10 pts 3 < > 5 years - 5 pts New applicant - 5 pts <50% - 15 pts > 500 - 20 pts <$100 - 15 pts > 5 years - 10 pts New applicant - 10pts No - 20 pts 3% 3% 6% 13% 9% 13% 13% 9% 6% 13% 13% 100% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Attended Grant Orientation Complete with all required attachments Administrative costs are 10% or less** Requested funding as percentage of total program costs ( leveraged funds ) Provided Audited Financials Per unit cost of assistance (grant funds) History / Age of Program Timely Expenditures and Performance Reporting Previous Monitoring Findings? Minor details/errors - 5 pts Untimely with no communication -0 pts Yes and unable to correct and reimburse - ineligible Highly detailed/clear objectives - 10 pts Untimely with proactive communication - 5 pts Have not been monitored in 3 or more years - 5 pts Untimely with program improvement plan and satisfactory progress- 10 pts Timely with several corrections needed - 10 pts Yes and easily resolved - 15 pts Timely and few corrections - 15 pts Timely with rare corrections - 20 pts FY 2022-23 CDBG Public Services Applications Summary 100.00% #VALUE! #NAME? 0 #VALUE! #NAME? 0 #VALUE! #NAME? 0 #VALUE! #NAME? 0 #VALUE! #NAME? 0 #VALUE! #NAME? 0 #VALUE! #NAME? 0 #VALUE! #NAME? 0 #VALUE! #NAME? 0 #VALUE! #NAME? 0 #VALUE! #NAME? 0 #VALUE! #NAME? 0 #VALUE! #NAME? 0 #VALUE! #NAME? 0 #VALUE! #NAME? 0 #VALUE! #NAME? 0 #VALUE! #NAME? 0 #VALUE! #NAME? 0 #VALUE! #NAME? 0 #VALUE! #NAME? 0 #VALUE! #NAME? 0 #VALUE! #NAME? 0 #VALUE! #NAME? 0 #VALUE! #NAME? 0 #VALUE! #NAME? Total Requested Funding: $- $- Estimated Funding Available: $360,000 Balance to Allocate: $360,000 Organization Requested Funding Recommended Funding Staff Score Chair Vice Chair Comm. Comm. Comm. Comm. Comm. Comm. Median with Staff Sc City of Glendale Public Services Grant Application Staff Review Worksheet Agency Name: Project/Program Name: Activity Summary/Description: National Objective: Proposed Vulnerable Populations Y/N Seniors $ % Youth (general) Total Budget: ### Youth aging out of foster care Requested Funding: ### Families with children Non-Glendale funds: ### People with physical and/or mental disabilities Victims of domestic violence Current grant recipient? Veterans If yes, complete the following: Victims of crimes or sex trafficking Number of current awards outstanding: Persons living with AIDS Total funding currently under contract: % Migrant farm workers Total unreimbursed funding: #DIV/0! Illiterate adults Other Prior grant recipient? Other If yes, complete the following: ### Other Timely completion? Monitoring findings? Notes: Met performance goals? For all applicants All application materials submitted? Financials include findings? Administrative Costs: #DIV/0! 1 Seniors 2 Youth (general) 3 Youth aging out of foster care 4 Families with children 5 People with physical and/or mental disabilities 6 Victims of domestic violence 7 Veterans 8 Victims of crimes or sex trafficking 9 Persons living with AIDS 10 Migrant farm workers 11 Illiterate adults 12 Other LMI - Area LMI - Limited clientele LMI - Direct Benefit S/B - Area URG None - does not qualify Y N N/A