DES monitoring

City of Glendale — Regular Meeting (2024-11-21)

View PDF Item a Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 6196 characters
City of Glendale - Presentation on Monitoring
November 21, 2024

Michelle Thomsen
Emergency Services Program Manager
Community Action Programs and Services
(CSBG, LIHEAP, STCS, NHN)
MThomsen@azdes.gov
Arizona Department of Economic Security
Child and Community Services Division
Introduction

➔Background
➔Goal of Monitoring
➔Monitoring Practices
➔Grant Recipient Selection
➔3 Phases of the Compliance Monitoring Process
◆Pre-Monitoring
◆Monitoring Engagement
◆Post-Monitoring
➔Findings and Recommendations
➔SFY25 Monitoring Schedule and Previous Monitoring Outcomes
Agenda

➔CSBG Act of 1998 and LIHEAP Statutes
CSBG-eligible entities and LIHEAP recipients are required to be 
monitored on-site at least once every three years
➔Hybrid monitoring process takes place over two weeks and includes 
an on-site visit
➔CCSD CAPS conducts compliance monitoring of a sample of 
subgrantee programs
Background

•
Ensure that programs are operating in accordance with federal statutes
•
Provide an opportunity to assist in areas in need of improvement
•
Understanding how federal and state requirements are being 
implemented
•
Analyze subgrantee programmatic and fiscal policies and procedures
•
Monitoring subgrantee recipient practices, sample case files, and 
financial transactions
•
Gathering information on noteworthy practices and strategies
•
Providing training and technical assistance, when needed
Goal of Monitoring

•
The overall health of an agency
•
The effectiveness of the board of directors (CSBG only)
•
The CSBG project funding (CSBG only, as applicable)
•
The accuracy of application intake and applicant funding assistance
•
Administrative and leadership capacity of agency management
•
The strength of the agency, the Network, and other contractors
•
Performance Management Framework to include Organizational 
Standards and ROMA (CSBG only). 
Monitoring Practices

•
Criteria-based process to select subgrantees each year for compliance 
monitoring 
•
Assess and prioritize subgrantee data and information to determine who 
would benefit most from compliance monitoring
•
Several data sources used to select subgrantees such as risk assessments 
and annual independent single audit reports
•
Number and severity of audit findings and the results from previous 
compliance monitoring
•
Prioritizes agencies that have not participated in compliance monitoring in the 
previous 3 years
Grant Recipient Selection

➔Agencies provide pre-selected documents for CCSD to review and prepare for 
monitoring
◆Request for information is sent 4-6 weeks prior to the monitoring engagement
➔Includes Contract Compliance Review (CCR) document requests and case file 
requests
◆A selected group of case files for CSBG, LIHEAP, STCS, and NHN, as applicable
➔On-site visits, interviews, and observations and scheduled
➔Completion of provided Contract Compliance Review (CCR) documents related to 
Administration, Fiscal, and Programs
Compliance Monitoring Process - Pre-Monitoring

➔Begins with an entrance interview to include all state and agency staff who will participate 
in the monitoring process
➔On-site and remote compliance monitoring event
◆Utilization of a monitoring protocol and questionnaire
◆Questionnaire is used to interview agency staff and conduct observation of activities
◆Questionnaires are used to guide the discussion and cover most areas of program 
and fiscal operations
◆The general areas of the protocol include reviewing the following areas of compliance 
with the federal statutes, applicable state and federal regulations, and the agency’s 
policies and procedures
Compliance Monitoring Process - Monitoring Engagement

❖Personnel Review with Human Resource Staff
➢Five random employee files are selected
❖Billing Review with Fiscal Staff
➢Review of invoice and fiscal documentation submitted for billing. At least one invoice is 
selected to obtain samples from all funding lines
❖Board Member Interviews
➢For CSBG only - Interviews are conducted with at least one low-income representative 
and one from either the private sector or an elected official/representative.
❖CSBG Program Interview with agency management staff
❖LIHEAP Program Interview with agency management staff
❖The monitoring engagement ends with an exit interview
Compliance Monitoring Process - Monitoring Engagement

➔Compile all observations made during pre-monitoring and the monitoring engagement 
and identifies any findings, recommendations, and noteworthy practices
➔CCSD CAPS drafts an initial monitoring report
◆The initial monitoring report is issued to the agency within 30 calendar days of 
completing the monitoring engagement and will list Findings and 
Recommendations for the agency. 
◆The agency has 30 calendar days from the issuance of the initial report to 
respond
◆CCSD CAPS will request the agency provide a plan to address deficiencies as 
well as a narrative for implementing recommendations
Compliance Monitoring Process - Post-Monitoring

Findings identify contract deficiencies that must be corrected. 
•
A Corrective Improvement Plan (CIP) must be provided for each Finding
•
A CIP must detail logical steps the agency will take to correct the finding expeditiously. 
•
The CIP will be reviewed and approved by CCSD CAPS staff and monitored to ensure 
the agency’s compliance. 
•
Failure to submit or implement a CIP may result in further negative actions
Recommendations identify areas in which CCSD strongly encourages an improvement
•
The agency must develop and submit a narrative response for each recommendation 
and identify a methodology for implementation.
•
If the agency chooses not to implement a recommendation, the narrative must provide 
a valid justification to be reviewed and approved by CCSD
Findings and Recommendations

SFY25 Monitoring Schedule
Anticipated Month
Agency
Type
September 2024
Gila County Community Services
On-Site
November 2024
City of Phoenix Human Services
On-Site
February 2025
City of Glendale
On-Site
April 2025
Wildfire, Inc
On-Site
June 2025
NACOG
On-Site
Monitoring scheduled for 01/27/2025 - 02/07/2025
Last monitoring was in March 2022
1 Finding amd 1 Recommendation regarding missing items in Personnel files

Questions