Extracted text (via pymupdf)
61286 characters
November 16, 2022 Z2022119 Page 1 of 4 Report to the Board of Supervisors Prepared by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department Board Hearing Date: November 16, 2022 Case #/Title: Z2022119 – Villages at Pleasant River II Supervisor District: 4 Applicant/Owner: Brian Greathouse/ EMC Management, LLC Request: Zone change from Rural-43 to R-5 RUPD Site Location: Generally located ¼ mile southeast of the SEC of Happy Valley Pkwy. and 115th Ave. in the Peoria area Site Size: Approximately five acres County Island Status: Yes (City of Peoria) Additional Comments: The requested zone change on this site to R-5 RUPD would match the R-5 RUPD zoning of the adjacent property that was rezoned last year. The rezone on this property will be part of the second phase of a multi-family development, known as Villages at Pleasant River. The site is within the municipal planning area of Peoria and their general plan designates the site as Park/Open Space. The City has not commented. There are no outstanding concerns from reviewing agencies. There is no known opposition. Commission Recommendation: On 10/20/22, the Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of Z2022119 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘j’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Zoning Exhibit entitled “Villages at Pleasant River“, consisting of one full-size sheet, dated August 30, 2022, and stamped received August 31, 2022, except as modified by the following conditions. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “Villages at Pleasant River II”, consisting of nine pages, dated August 31,2022, and stamped received August 31, 2022, except as modified by the following conditions. November 16, 2022 Z2022119 Page 2 of 4 c. The two properties (APN 201-21-057 and APN 201-21-049B) shall be combined prior to the submission of building permits. d. A Plan of Development of the single project must be approved prior to submission of any building permits . e. The following Planning Engineering comments shall apply: 1. The Drainage waiver DRB2021006 must be approved prior to issuance of any building permits. 2. There are Special Flood Hazard Areas on the site. Any encroachment into these Special Flood Hazard Areas requires a Floodplain Use Permit issued concurrently with the building permit. 3. The project site is within the jurisdiction of Maricopa County. However, Happy Valley Parkway adjacent to the site is under the City of Peoria jurisdiction. Developer must coordinate with the City of Peoria for approval of proposed access onto Happy Valley Parkway. 4. The County has no objections to the proposed site access on 115th Avenue utilizing future QT commercial driveway. However, if the proposed development is constructed prior to the planned QT facility, developer must provide half-street improvements on 115th Avenue as outlined in the approved QT master plan by Maricopa County. 5. The proposed development is located in a Federal Patent Easement Area. Applicant will be required to go through Federal Patent Easement Abandonment Process prior to building permit approval. No encroachments allowed within the patent easements unless abandoned or otherwise approved by MCDOT Planning. 6. A 60-foot replacement easement will be required for a local roadway along the eastern boundary of the proposed development to provide access for neighboring properties. 7. The proposed development is located along a section line alignment on the south requiring setbacks be based upon a future half width right-of-way of 55-feet, per Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance Section 1105. However, this section line requirement along the south property line is no longer required. 8. The subject site is not located within the County’s Urbanized Area; and thus, will not require a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) from the County. This does NOT preclude the requirement to obtain a Construction General Permit (CGP) Notice of Intent to Discharge (NOI) from the State (ADEQ), as may be required. 9. Without the submittal of a precise plan of development, no development approval is implied by this review, including, but not limited to drainage design, access and roadway alignments. These items will be addressed as November 16, 2022 Z2022119 Page 3 of 4 development plans progress and are submitted to the County for further review and/or entitlement. 10. Any development must ensure that historic drainage patterns are maintained at the up and downstream limits of development. 11. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. f. The required infrastructure of the site must be permitted in conjunction or prior the submission of permits for individual housing units. Any phasing shall be identified on site plans of the Plan of Development. If infrastructure is to be phased, the phased improvement must be able to stand alone, and the phased infrastructure must be completed prior to the housing units being served by that infrastructure. g. The following R-5 RUPD development standards shall apply: 1. Minimum front yard of three feet. 2. Minimum rear yard of three feet . 3. Minimum interior side yard of three feet . 4. Minimum street side yard of three feet . 5. Required guest parking of zero percent. 6. Maximum height for residential perimeter wall signs of eight feet. h. Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for initiating a revocation of this zone change as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. i. The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions. j. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the Zone Change. The Zone Change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Zone Change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Zone Change had never been granted. November 16, 2022 Z2022119 Page 4 of 4 Presented by: Martin Martell, Planner Reviewed by: Darren Gérard, AICP, Planning Manager Attachment: 10/20/22 P&Z Packet (27 pages) 10/20/22 P&Z Handout (1 page) 10/20/22 Updated Application (1 page) 10/20/22 Updated Deed (8 pages) Note: 10/20/22 Draft P&Z Minutes are not available as of the writing of this report, but can be provided upon request later when available. Z2022119 Page 1 of 8 Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission Prepared by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department Case: Z2022119 – Villages at Pleasant River II Hearing Date: October 20, 2022 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant: Brian Greathouse, Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A. Owner: EMC Management, LLC Request: Zone change from Rural-43 to R-5 RUPD Site Location: Generally located ¼ mile southeast of the SEC of Happy Valley Pkwy. and 115th Ave. in the Peoria area Site Size: Approximately 5 gross acres Density: 11 du/ac County Island: Yes (City of Peoria) County Plan: White Tank/Grand Ave. Area Plan – Small Lot Residential (2 -5 du.ac)/Open Space Municipal Plan: Plan Peoria 2040 – Park/Open Space Municipal Comments: None received to date Support/Opposition: None known Recommendation: Approve with conditions Z2022119 Page 2 of 8 Project Summary: 1. The applicant is requesting a zone change from Rural-43 to R-5 RUPD on an approximately five-acre site of undisturbed desert. The site is located approximately ¼ mile southeast of the southeast corner of Happy Valley Pkwy. and 115th Ave. in the Peoria area. The site is located west of the Agua Fria River that crosses the site’s southeast corner. The adjacent property was rezoned from Rural-43 to R-5 RUPD late last year for future multi-family development, known as the Villages at Pleasant River, and the intent of this request is to change the zoning on the subject property to match the adjacent R- 5 RUPD zoning on the adjacent property and incorporate this five-acre site into the neighboring parcel to act as a second phase of the Villages at Pleasant River. 2. Whereas the Villages at Pleasant River is a single-story multifamily residential development with 246-units on a 24.7-acre site, this second phase will contain 55-single-storied units on a five-acre site. Once the second phase is incorporated into the residential development there will be an overall total of 297 dwelling units for the combined properties, which will have an overall density of 10.0 du/ac on the site. The developer will submit a Plan of Development (POD) Major Amendment for administrative approval of the multi-family residential development on the overall site. The development’s amenities will include a community swimming pool, community clubhouse, dog park, car wash area, barbeque grills, covered ramadas, and active open space areas. Pedestrian connectivity throughout the community will be provided by sidewalks and pathways from the units to the amenity areas. There will be six-foot-high theme walls around the site’s perimeter and decorative access gates. The cornerstone of this development is to provide much needed multifamily housing options for young families, working professionals and retires in an area predominated by single-family housing. 3. Primary access to the site will be provided by a new access road to 115th Ave. and from the northeast boundary of the neighboring property to Happy Valley Pkwy. From there internal driveways will link the property to the rest of the site. Throughout the parcel there are 33-foot wide Federal Patent Easements that will need to abandon prior to the POD Amendment and the submission of building permits. 4. On December 8, 2021, the Board approved a zone change from Rural-43 to R-5 RUPD on the adjacent property (Z2021067). After this approval the developer was approached by the property owner of the subject parcel with an interest to sell their lot, which was completed a few months later. On March 22, 2022, the applicant met in a pre- application meeting, where staff directed the applicant to complete a zone change of R-5 RUPD on the lot to match the neighboring property, followed by a major amendment of the Z2021067 POD for the combined properties (PA2022035). On July 19, 2022, the applicant met with Technical Advisory Committee staff to discuss the first technical review of this case. 5. The applicant is requesting to vary several R-5 development standards that will match the varied standards of Z2021067 to keep consistency between the two properties since this will be a single site after this zone change is approved (see table on the next page). The first is to reduce the required perimeter yards to three feet to accommodate future covered attached patios of each unit which will be setback three feet to property lines. A second varied standard is to eliminate the required guest parking from 20% of the required parking to zero to main constancy with the neighboring RUPD. A final request is Z2022119 Page 3 of 8 to vary the maximum height of wall signs from the required six feet to eight feet to maintain constancy with the neighboring RUPD. Z2022119 Page 4 of 8 Z2022119 Page 5 of 8 Existing On-Site and Adjacent Zoning / Land Use: 6. On-site: Rural-43 / Natural desert North: R-5 RUPD / Natural desert South: Rural-43 / Natural desert East: Rural-43 / Ephemeral riverbed West: R-5 RUPD / Natural desert Utilities and Services: 7. Water: EPCOR Wastewater: EPCOR School District: Peoria Unified School District Fire: North County Fire & Medical Police: MCSO Right-of-Way: 8. The property is not adjacent to any MCDOT right-of-way and access to the parcel will be via internal driveways from the neighboring property. Adopted Plans: 9. White Tank/Grand Ave. Area Plan (adopted December 6, 2000): The area plan is a way to encourage planned community developments while preserving a variety of lifestyles and a high quality of life. The subject site is designated as Small Lot Residential (2 – 5 du/ac), which identifies areas where increased residential density development is appropriate and urban services are available. Since the proposed density of the site will be greater than what is desired for this site, the applicant has adequately addressed in the Narrative Report of why this proposal is consistent with the goals / policies of the Area Plan and County’s Comprehensive Plan. 10. Plan Peoria 2040 General Plan: The Peoria General Plan designates the site as Park / Open Space, which denotes areas best suited for open space and recreation. It would be up to the City of Peoria to determine if this proposed density would necessitate the need for a General Plan Amendment or not, as of the writing of this report there has been no comments from Peoria concerning this request. Public Participation Summary: 11. The applicant completed the requirements for notification to all the property owners within 300-feet of the subject site and to area stakeholders. During the applicant’s public participation process staff received no concern, support, or opposition for this request. Outstanding Concerns from Reviewing Agencies: 12. There are no outstanding concerns from reviewing agencies. The City of Peoria was notified, and staff have not received any comments regarding this future development. Z2022119 Page 6 of 8 Staff Analysis: 13. Staff supports this rezoning and proposed multifamily residential development. The general area is predominated with single-family residences and providing an expanded multifamily residential alternative brings beneficial, housing diversity. This is a fast-growing region of the County with future and existing commercial, residential, and industrial developments. Proximate access to both Happy Valley Pkwy. and the Loop 303 Freeway improves viability of multi-family residential. A major retail center is 1¾ miles to the east in Peoria and there are nearby recreational areas. The requested varied development standards are reasonable and would be compatible with the adjacent commercially zoned property to the west. Moreover, the Agua Fria River to the east will act as a natural setback from the more rural residential uses further to the east. Recommendation: 14. Staff recommends the Commission adopt a motion recommending that the Board of Supervisors approve Z2022119 subject to the following conditions ‘a’ – ‘j’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Zoning Exhibit entitled “Villages at Pleasant River“, consisting of one full-size sheet, dated August 30, 2022, and stamped received August 31, 2022, except as modified by the following conditions. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “Villages at Pleasant River II”, consisting of nine pages, dated August 31,2022, and stamped received August 31, 2022, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The two properties (APN 201-21-057 and APN 201-21-049B) shall be combined prior to the submission of building permits. d. A Plan of Development of the single project must be approved prior to submission of any building permits . e. The following Planning Engineering comments shall apply: 1. The Drainage waiver DRB2021006 must be approved prior to issuance of any building permits. 2. There are Special Flood Hazard Areas on the site. Any encroachment into these Special Flood Hazard Areas requires a Floodplain Use Permit issued concurrently with the building permit. 3. The project site is within the jurisdiction of Maricopa County. However, Happy Valley Parkway adjacent to the site is under the City of Peoria jurisdiction. Developer must coordinate with the City of Peoria for approval of proposed access onto Happy Valley Parkway. 4. The County has no objections to the proposed site access on 115th Avenue utilizing future QT commercial driveway. However, if the proposed Z2022119 Page 7 of 8 development is constructed prior to the planned QT facility, developer must provide half-street improvements on 115th Avenue as outlined in the approved QT master plan by Maricopa County. 5. The proposed development is located in a Federal Patent Easement Area. Applicant will be required to go through Federal Patent Easement Abandonment Process prior to building permit approval. No encroachments allowed within the patent easements unless abandoned. 6. A 60-foot replacement easement will be required for a local roadway along the eastern boundary of the proposed development to provide access for neighboring properties. 7. The proposed development is located along a section line alignment on the south requiring setbacks be based upon a future half width right-of-way of 55-feet, per Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance Section 1105. However, this section line requirement along the south property line is no longer required. 8. The subject site is not located within the County’s Urbanized Area; and thus, will not require a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) from the County. This does NOT preclude the requirement to obtain a Construction General Permit (CGP) Notice of Intent to Discharge (NOI) from the State (ADEQ), as may be required. 9. Without the submittal of a precise plan of development, no development approval is implied by this review, including, but not limited to drainage design, access and roadway alignments. These items will be addressed as development plans progress and are submitted to the County for further review and/or entitlement. 10. Any development must ensure that historic drainage patterns are maintained at the up and downstream limits of development. 11. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. f. The required infrastructure of the site must be permitted in conjunction or prior the submission of permits for individual housing units. Any phasing shall be identified on site plans of the Plan of Development. If infrastructure is to be phased, the phased improvement must be able to stand alone, and the phased infrastructure must be completed prior to the housing units being served by that infrastructure. g. The following R-5 RUPD development standards shall apply: 1. Minimum front yard of three feet. 2. Minimum rear yard of three feet . Z2022119 Page 8 of 8 3. Minimum interior side yard of three feet . 4. Minimum street side yard of three feet . 5. Required guest parking of zero percent. 6. Maximum height for residential perimeter wall signs of eight feet. h. Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for initiating a revocation of this zone change as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. i. The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions. j. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the Zone Change. The Zone Change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Zone Change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Zone Change had never been granted. Presented by: Martin Martell, Planner Reviewed by: Matthew Holm, AICP, Planning Supervisor Attachments: Case Map (1 page) Zoning Exhibit (reduced 8.5”x11”, 1 page) Narrative Report (9 pages) MCDOT comments (3 pages) DPR comments (4 pages) MCESD comments (1 page) MARICOPA COUNTY / Maricopa County Planning & Development - Phoenix, AZ 4 Gross Acres: 5 approx. Generated September 30, 2022 09:07 AM Z2022119 Application Name: Legal Description Villages at Pleasant River II EDR Applicant Case Address , TT4N RR1E 06 Brian Greathouse for Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A. 25105 N 115TH Ave Applicant Phone/Email Parcel Primary: 602.234.9903 bgreathouse@bcattorneys.com SUN CITY AZ 85373 Map scale 1:1,736 Supervisor District No. 201-21-057 ZONE CHANGE FROM RU-43 TO R-5 RUPD TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF SINGLE STORY M-F DEVELOPMENT. 5.3585 in 60' INGRESS/EGRESS & PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT Plotted: 08/30/22 - 4:17 PM, By: bchristoffersen File: M:\1191 Empire-Village at 115th-Maricopa Cnty\DWG\Exhibits\1191_Conceptual Plan Phase 2.dwg, ---> TSC-11x17H Project No: Date: 08/30/2022 1191 MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA VILLAGE AT PLEASANT RIVER Z2022119 ZONING EXHIBIT SCALE IN FEET 150 300 0 SCALE IN FEET APN 201-21-049B VILLAGE AT PLEASANT RIVER LLC EXISTING ZONING R-5 RUPD APN 201-21-057 BAYHAM EDYTHE J / ET AL EXISTING ZONING RU-43 (PROPOSED R-5 RUPD) W HAPPY VALLEY PARKWAY UTILITY COMMITMENT TABLE WATER EPCOR WASTEWATER EPCOR POLICE MARICOPA COUNY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT FIRE ARIZONA FIRE & MEDICAL AUTHORITY SCHOOL DISTRICT PEORIA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT EXISTING ZONING RU-43 APN 201-21-058A HILBURN, MICHAEL EXISTING ZONING RU-43 APN 201-21-051A HILBURN, MICHAEL EXISTING ZONING RU-43 CITY OF PEORIA R/W CITY OF PEORIA R/W APN 201-21-055F GSA HAPPY VALLEY LP EXISTING ZONING C-3 APN 201-21-054D QUIKTRIP CORPORATION EXISTING ZONING C-1 BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT EXISTING ZONING RU-43 NET AREA: 5.00 AC (217,800 S.F.) GROSS AREA: 5.00 AC (217,800 S.F.) EXISTING ZONING: RU-43 (MARICOPA COUNTY) PROPOSED ZONING: R5/RUPD (MULTIPLE RESIDENCE) SITE DATA TABLE Z2022119 RECEIVED 31.AUG 22 Narrative Report FOR Village at Pleasant River II EAST AND SOUTH OF THE SEC CORNER OF 115th AVENUE AND HAPPY VALLEY PARKWAY Case No. Z2022119 1st Submittal: June 14, 2022 2nd Submittal: August 11, 2022 3rd Submittal: August 31, 2022 Z2022119 RECEIVED 31.AUG 22 1 DEVELOPMENT TEAM Developer EMC Management, LLC Attn: Shelby Duplessis 6617 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 101 Scottsdale, AZ 85250 Phone: (480) 546-7906 Architect Felten Group Attn: Andrew Wheeler 18325 N. Allied Way, Suite 200 Phoenix, AZ 85054 Phone: (602) 867-2500 Civil Engineer Terrascape Attn: Pim Van Der Giessen 645 East Missouri Avenue, Suite 160 Phoenix, AZ 85012 Phone: (480) 454-8001 Landscape Architects McGough-Adamson Attn: Nick Adamson 535 E. McKellips Road, #131 Mesa, AZ 85203 Phone: (602) 997-9093 Traffic Engineer Y2K Attn: Chris Williams 1921 S. Alma School Rd., Suite 204 Mesa, AZ 85210 Phone: (602) 380-8686 Zoning Entitlements Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A. Attn: Brian Greathouse 1850 N. Central Ave., Suite 1700 Phoenix, AZ 85004 Phone: (602) 234-9903 2 INTRODUCTION Village at Pleasant River II (“VPR II”) is a proposed single story multifamily residential development on approximately 5 acres located east and south of the southeast corner of 115th Avenue and Happy Valley Parkway, in Maricopa County, Arizona (“Site”). EMC Management, LLC (“EMC”) has already received rezoning reapproval for 246 dwelling units on 24.69 acres located north of the Site (known as Village at Pleasant River – “VPR”). EMC is acquiring the Site to include additional development area for VPR. The approved Plan of Development for Village at Pleasant River will be amended in the future to incorporate Village at Pleasant River II into one overall residential community. The proposed development on the Site (VPR II) will include approximately 55 dwelling units, consisting of 1-bedroom, 2-bedroom and 3-bedroom units. There will be a total of approximately 297 dwelling units within VPR and VPR II. PURPOSE OF REQUEST This request is for a Zone Change from RU-43 to R-5 RUPD (Residential Unit Planned Development) to allow the development of a high-quality single story multifamily development on the Site, consistent with the already rezoned R-5 RUPD property to the north (Village at Pleasant River). The additional units will be integrated into the Village at Pleasant River residential development. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL The proposed community will add more diverse housing options to this underutilized vacant Site with needed, unique living options for those who work in the area or want easy access to major thoroughfares, like Happy Valley Pkwy and Loop 303, for convenient commuting. The buildings will incorporate enhanced architecture and high- quality building materials with an appealing color scheme consistent with the previously approved units to the north. The intention is to seamlessly incorporate the additional 55 units into the Village at Pleasant River. Utilizing identical building materials and design elements will facilitate the integration of the additional units creating a cohesive multifamily community. The development will include approximately 18 1-bedroom units, 28 2-bedroom units and 9 3-bedroom units. Pedestrian connections throughout the proposed community will provide easy access to the open spaces, clubhouse, and pool. The generous amenities and pedestrian connectivity will facilitate a comfortable, community feel for residents. This development will provide much needed multifamily living options for residents in the area, including families, working professionals, and retirees and more. 3 CONSISTENCY WITH COUNTY’S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND WHITE TANK/GRAND AVE PLAN The proposed development is consistent with the County’s Comprehensive Plan and White Tank/Grand Ave Plan. The proposed community promotes the following goals and policies enumerated in the County’s Vision 2030 Comprehensive Plan: • Land Use Goal #1: Achieve balanced and efficient development patterns. The proposed multifamily development will help achieve balanced and efficient development in the area by fulfilling a need for quality multifamily housing. The surrounding area consists of undeveloped land, commercial properties, and large single-family residential lots. A quality multifamily option with easy access to all areas of the Valley via the existing transportation infrastructure in the area which is readily accessed by Happy Valley Parkway will help the County achieve a balanced and efficient development pattern. • Land Use Goal #4: Exercise sound financial management through land use decisions that build the County’s fiscal strength. The proposed community will build the County’s fiscal strength by providing quality housing options for those who wish to work in the area. The additional residents will promote the local economy by shopping, dining, entertaining, etc. in the area. Furthermore, additional housing options will allow industry and the area’s job market to grow while providing a good quality of life for members of the work force. • Land Use Policy #7: Maricopa County supports coordinating land use and infrastructure planning with state agencies, counties, and municipalities. The Site’s developers have worked with MCDOT and the City of Peoria to improve the land use patterns in the area. The developers will continue to work with the City to improve the frontage and landscaping along Happy Valley Parkway. • Land Use Policy #17: Maricopa County supports balanced land use patterns that include various residential, retail, non-retail employment, and public and civic land uses. The proposed development will support the County’s balanced land use pattern by providing a needed multifamily residential option for this area of the County. Nearby properties include vacant, undeveloped land, commercial development, and single-family residential lots. The proposed development will provide variety, thus achieving a balanced land use pattern. • Land Use Policy #30: To promote safe and active lifestyles Maricopa County supports interconnected trails, parks, preserves, open space, recreation centers and similar features in new urban development. 4 The proposed multifamily community will promote a safe and active lifestyle by providing various amenities. The planned amenities include multiple open spaces, pool, pedestrian connections, clubhouse and other opportunities for recreation and interactions as members of a close-knit community. • Economic Growth Goal #1: Contribute to an effective regional economy. The proposed development will bring additional consumers to the area with convenient access to regional transportation systems. Residents will work, shop, dine, and engage in various recreational and civic activities that will bolster the regional economy. • Economic Growth Goal #3: Attract knowledge industries in a range of Basic Sector clusters, and attract the knowledge workers they need by achieving quality of place and quality of life. The Site will help attract workers needed for industries by providing quality of place and quality of life. Industry workers will have comfortable, quality living spaces with access to numerous amenities. Residents will have access to a pool, dog park, clubhouse, open spaces, and more. Furthermore, the amenities will help create a tight-knit community adding to the residents’ overall quality of life. • Open Space Goal #4: Have quality neighborhood parks and open space with adequate and appropriate recreation amenities in urban residential development. The proposed multifamily community will provide various amenities including open spaces and opportunities for recreation. Residents will have access to a pool, dog park, clubhouse, and pedestrian connections within the community. Residents will also have easy access to outdoor activities nearby, such as hiking on a number of trails cultivated by the County and nearby municipalities. • Water Resources Policy #7: Maricopa County supports low water use and drought tolerant landscaping. The proposed development will utilize drought tolerant landscaping throughout the Site. • Energy Goal #4: Increase energy efficiency in new development. The proposed development will increase energy efficiency consistent with new construction throughout the County. The Site will incorporate thoughtful design techniques incorporating modern and efficient building materials. The proposed multifamily community promotes the following goals and objectives enumerated in the Maricopa County Eye to the Future White Tank/Grand Avenue Area Plan: 5 • Land Use Goal L1: Promote efficient land development that is compatible with adjacent land uses, is well integrated with the transportation system, and is sensitive to the natural environment. The proposed development is an efficient use of the now underutilized and undeveloped land adjacent to Happy Valley Parkway. The proposed multifamily community is compatible with the nearby commercial and single-family residential uses. The Site will provide a quality housing option for area residents and commuters while providing easy access to all areas of the Valley via arterial streets/parkways and interstate freeways. • Policy L1.2.4: Encourage the use of flexible planning and design techniques. The proposed community is a creative, unique design incorporating aspects of single-family style living within a multifamily community. This creative design facilitates the flexible planning that will benefit the area and those who wish to live or work in the White Tank/Grand Ave area. • Policy T1.1.3: Preserve scenic corridors where appropriate and implement access management measures on primary roads. The proposed development will not have a negative impact on any scenic corridors. Primary access to the Site will be via 115th Avenue rather than Happy Valley Parkway. The Site will be developed with attention to traffic and road concerns. • Policy E1.1.4: Adequate control of on and off-site drainage should be required prior to development. The Site will implement a carefully considered drainage plan. • Objective E1.4: Support adequate opportunities for outdoor recreation that are sensitive to the environment. The Site will offer several opportunities for outdoor recreation that are sensitive to the environment. Residents will be able to walk outdoors and engage in various outdoor play activities within the community. Residents will also have easy access to nearby hiking and other outdoor activities. • Economic Development Objective ED1.5: Improve housing conditions in unincorporated communities. The Site will provide quality housing options for area residents looking for a multifamily option. The proposed development will fulfill the area’s need for additional housing options as the area now offers predominantly single-family housing. Residents of the unincorporated area will benefit from a quality, multifamily community with access to the highways and other areas of the Valley. • Policy ED 1.5.3: Encourage housing design and improvement techniques that increase energy efficiency. 6 The proposed development will incorporate modern design techniques and efficient materials. The Site will promote energy efficiency consistent with other new construction in the County. RELATIONSHIP TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES The overall Village at Pleasant River residential community (the previously rezoned 24.69 acres and additional 5-acre Site) is bordered on the north by Happy Valley Parkway, the future site of the QT gas station to the west, and vacant land to the south and east. There is an existing self-storage facility southwest of the Site which can provide additional storage for the proposed community’s residents. The development will benefit the area since there is a need for a quality multifamily housing options in the area. LOCATION AND ACCESSIBILITY The existing roadways that will provide access to/from the Site are 115th Ave and Happy Valley Parkway. Happy Valley Parkway is designated as a principal arterial road/parkway and 115th Ave is designated as an arterial road. The proposed multifamily community will have its primary entrance/exit on the western side of the Site with access to/from 115th Ave and a secondary entrance/exit to the east with access to/from Happy Valley Parkway. Existing regional transportation facilities that serve the area are Loop 303, Loop 101 and Grande Ave/Route 60. Loop 303 is less than a mile from the Site. Grand Ave/Route 60 can be accessed to the southwest of the Site via the interchange with Loop 303. Loop 101 can be accessed to the southeast of the Site via the interchange with Grand Ave/ Route 60 or various streets, including 83rd Ave or Bell Road. CIRCULATION SYSTEM The onsite circulation and parking layout have been designed to provide a safe and convenient flow for residents and guests. Residents will have adequate space to comfortably move throughout the Site with clear visibility of the route, other drivers as well as pedestrians. Residents will navigate through the Site to conveniently located parking in the form of garages and surface parking spaces. The Site will provide an additional approximately 126 parking spaces. Additionally, the onsite circulation layout will allow easy access to Village at Pleasant River community trash compactor and car wash as well as the other amenities. DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE The Site will likely be constructed as a second phase to Village at Pleasant River, pending timing and schedule of a Major Amendment to the Plan of Development and abandonment of patent easements. 7 COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES There are no adjacent or nearby community parks or amenities. The nearest parks are located approximately 4 miles northeast of the Site (Paloma Regional Park) and approximately 2 miles southeast of the Site (Alta Vista Park). The Site will provide valuable amenities for area residents. Residents will have access to a clubhouse, pool, carwash, and large open spaces. Residents will have the opportunity to gather and enjoy the amenities while developing a sense of community. The Site is located in the Peoria Unified School District. The nearest school is Zuni Hills Elementary located more than 2 miles southeast of the Site. The Site is surrounded by mostly vacant desert land. The proposed multifamily community will not have any negative impacts on any school district, parks or other amenities in the area. PUBLIC UTILITIES AND SERVICES Water: EPCOR Sewer: EPCOR Police: Maricopa County Sheriff’s Department Fire: Arizona Fire & Medical Authority Refuse: Private Refuse Company DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE The R-5 RUPD Development Standards Comparison Table is provided below: REGULATION BASE ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS (R-5) PROPOSED ZONING REGULATIONS (R-5 RUPD) Height 40’ 40’ Min. Front Yard 20’ 3’ Min. Side Yard 5’ 3’ Min. Street-Side Yard 10’ 3’ Min. Rear Yard 25’ 3’ Min. Lot Area 6,000 sq. ft. 6,000 sq. ft. Min. Lot Width 60’ 60’ Min. Lot Area per Dwelling Unit 1,000 sq. ft. 1,000 sq. ft. 8 Max. Lot Coverage 60% 60% Parking 2 parking spaces per DU; 20% for guest parking; 5% for ADA accessible parking. 2 parking spaces per DU; 0% for guest parking; 5% for ADA accessible parking. Perimeter Wall Sign Height 6’ 8’ Development Standards - Justifications for Variations to R-5 Base Zoning District The Board of Supervisors approved the same variations to Development Standards in Z2021067 – Villages at Pleasant River. This zoning case (Villages at Pleasant River II) includes property that will be incorporated into one cohesive gated community with Villages at Pleasant River and, therefore, requires the same Development Standards. The proposed development is a hybrid community which includes elements of single family detached homes and elements of a traditional multifamily development, whereby individual units have private backyards. Many of the backyards abut the perimeter of the Site and the backyards will typically be a minimum of 10 feet in depth to the building; however, each backyard will contain an uncovered brick patio that requires a minimum building setback of 3 feet if covered. Therefore, the Site’s layout, unique and special circumstance, and type of hybrid multifamily housing development support the deviations to Development Standards on this Site. Further, there are no adjacent single-family homes in the area. Given the land use compatibility and land use patterns in the area, the proposed variations are appropriate. CONCLUSION This Zone Change Application establishes uses and other criteria that are appropriate for the Site and compatible with the surrounding area. We request the County’s Approval. I:\TSM Traffic Development\1. Projects\North_West_Valley(North of I10_West of I17)\Village at Pleasant River II_Z2022119_Happy Valley Pkwy and 115th Ave\1. Traffic Impact Studies\Village at Pleasant River II_TIS Review Comments.doc MCDOT -- TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REVIEW COMMENT SHEET 1 of 1 Project Name: Village at Pleasant River II – Bayham Parcel (Phase 2) Location: SEC of 115th Avenue and Happy Valley Parkway MCDOT File No.: Z2022119 Date: June 29, 2022 Reviewer: Laxmikanth Narwa, P.E. Phone No.: 602-506-8677 Consultant: Y2K Engineering, LLC Project No.: Plans Sealed By: Christopher B. Williams, P.E. Consultant Code: A = Will Comply B = Deleted C = Consultant to Evaluate Item Number Sheet Number Comments Consultant Reply = = = 1 = = = 1st REVIEW (TIS) Consultant: Please use the code and respond to each comment in the Consultant Reply Column. This sheet is for our record, please answer every question and sign and date your acknowledgement or the plans will be sent back to complete the process. Send back the marked-up plans and a new set of plans along with this comment sheet. Thank you for your cooperation. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = General Project Summary: The proposed residential development is on currently undeveloped land located east of a planned QT Gas Station located in the southeast corner of 115th Avenue and Happy Valley Parkway, in Maricopa County, Arizona. The proposed development (Bayham Parcel) is an extension to Village at Pleasant River (Phase 1) and not affiliated with the Phase 1 development. It is planned to consist of approximately 50 multi-family dwelling units. Project buildout year assumed to be in year 2023 and horizon year to be in year 2028. The proposed development (Phase 2) by itself is forecasted to generate 366 daily trips, with 23 trips occurring during the weekday AM peak hour and 28 trips occurring in the weekday PM peak hour. This traffic volume is included in background traffic conditions for the 2028 horizon year. General Comments: The current Phase 2 development on Bayham Parcel has no new access proposed. The site is expected to utilize the south access roadway (intersection 3 in the study) exclusively for gaining access to the current site. As the traffic impact analyses for Phase 1 development is also presented for current Phase 2 development by adding the Phase 2 site generated traffic as background traffic, County estimates there will be no additional significant impacts to the surrounding roadway system other than what is presented in Phase 1 development study. Therefore, County has no further comments on the current submittal. However, all the relevant comments from the Phase 1 development (attached) also apply to the Phase 2 development. Developer must coordinate with Phase 1 development as necessary for access and other roadway improvements. Traffic Impact Analysis is Approved. Signature: _____________________________________ Date: ___________ Use CODE "A", "B","C" in this column next to every comment. = = = = I:\TSM-Design Branch\Laxmikanth Narwa\TIS Review - In Progress\Village at Pleasant River\Village at Pleasant River_TIS Review Comments - Final.doc MCDOT -- TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REVIEW COMMENT SHEET 1 of 1 Project Name: Village at Pleasant River Location: SEC of 115th Avenue and Happy Valley Parkway MCDOT File No.: Z2021067 Date: August 26, 2021 Reviewer: Laxmikanth Narwa Phone No.: 602-506-8677 Reviewer: Raj Thoutam, P.E. Phone No.: 602-506-8940 Consultant: Y2K Engineering, LLC Project No.: Plans Sealed By: Christopher B. Williams, P.E. Consultant Code: A = Will Comply B = Deleted C = Consultant to Evaluate Item Number Sheet Number Comments Consultant Reply = = = = = = 2nd REVIEW (TIS) Consultant: Please use the code and respond to each comment in the Consultant Reply Column. This sheet is for our record, please answer every question and sign and date your acknowledgement or the plans will be sent back to complete the process. Send back the marked-up plans and a new set of plans along with this comment sheet. Thank you for your cooperation. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Review Comments: First review comments have been addressed; therefore, County has no further comments. Traffic Impact Study is Approved. Signature: _____________________________________ Date: ___________ Use CODE "A", "B","C" in this column next to every comment. = = = = I:\TSM-Design Branch\Laxmikanth Narwa\TIS Review - In Progress\Village at Pleasant River\Village at Pleasant River_TIS Review Comments - Review1.doc MCDOT -- TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REVIEW COMMENT SHEET 1 of 1 Project Name: Village at Pleasant River Location: SEC of 115th Avenue and Happy Valley Parkway MCDOT File No.: Z2021067 Date: June 30, 2021 Reviewer: Laxmikanth Narwa Phone No.: 602-506-8677 Reviewer: Raj Thoutam, P.E. Phone No.: 602-506-8940 Consultant: Y2K Engineering, LLC Project No.: Plans Sealed By: Christopher B. Williams, P.E. Consultant Code: A = Will Comply B = Deleted C = Consultant to Evaluate Item Number Sheet Number Comments Consultant Reply = = = 1 2 3 = = = All Report 1st REVIEW (TIS) Consultant: Please use the code and respond to each comment in the Consultant Reply Column. This sheet is for our record, please answer every question and sign and date your acknowledgement or the plans will be sent back to complete the process. Send back the marked-up plans and a new set of plans along with this comment sheet. Thank you for your cooperation. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = General Project Summary: The proposed development is located on the southeast corner of 115th Avenue and Happy Valley Parkway, Maricopa County, Arizona. The proposed development consists of approximately 246 single-family dwelling units and will be served by two proposed access points. Project buildout year assumed to be in year 2023 and horizon year to be in year 2028. The proposed development is forecasted to generate 1,801 daily trips, with 113 trips occurring during the weekday AM peak hour and 138 trips occurring in the weekday PM peak hour. General Comments: The project site is within the jurisdiction of Maricopa County. However, Happy Valley Parkway adjacent to the site is under the City of Peoria jurisdiction. Developer must coordinate with the City of Peoria for approval of proposed access onto Happy Valley Parkway. County has no objections to the proposed site access on 115th Avenue utilizing future QT driveway. However, if the proposed development is constructed prior to the planned QT facility, developer must provide half-street improvements on 115th Avenue as outlined in the approved QT master plan by Maricopa County. Correct Happy Valley Road callout to Happy Valley Parkway. Traffic Impact Analysis is Not Approved. Signature: _____________________________________ Date: ___________ Use CODE "A", "B","C" in this column next to every comment. = = = = A A A Understood. TIA was submitted to Peoria on 8/11/21. Road name revised as requested. 8/25/21 Doug Jones, P.E., CFM Planning & Development 301 W. Jefferson St., Suite 170 Phoenix, Arizona 85003 Phone: (602) 372-0790 Fax: (602) 506-8762 www.maricopa.gov/planning Email address: Doug.Jones@maricopa.gov Maricopa County Planning & Development Department Date: August 26, 2022 Memo To: Darren Gerard, AICP, Planning Manager, Department of Planning & Development Attn: Martin Martell, Planner, Planning & Development Services cc: Michael Norris P.E., Engineering Manager, Planning and Development Bob Fedorka P.E., Engineering Supervisor, Planning and Development From: Doug Jones P.E., CFM, Plans Examiner, Planning & Development Subject: Z2022119 – Villages at Pleasant River II Zone change without plan of development APN(s): 201-21-057 Engineering Review has reviewed the first plan and report routed for review on 08/11/2022, for the subject application and has no objections provided the following stipulations are part of any approval: DRAINAGE PLAN REVIEW 1. Drainage waiver DRB2021006 was administratively approved on 08/10/2022 and sent for site posting. Once the information is posted on site for 15 days, if there are no complaints, the Drainage Waiver will be approved. Waiver must be approved prior to issuance of any building permits. 2. There are Special Flood Hazard Areas on the site. Any encroachment into these Special Flood Hazard Areas requires a Floodplain Use Permit issued concurrently with the building permit. 3. The project site is within the jurisdiction of Maricopa County. However, Happy Valley Parkway adjacent to the site is under the City of Peoria jurisdiction. Developer must coordinate with the City of Peoria for approval of proposed access onto Happy Valley Parkway. 4. County has no objections to the proposed site access on 115th Avenue utilizing future QT driveway. However, if the proposed development is constructed prior to the planned QT facility, developer must provide half-street improvements on 115th Avenue as outlined in the approved QT master plan by Maricopa County. A building permit for the QT, (B202106291) was issued on 08/22/2022. 5. The proposed development is located in a Federal Patent Easement Area. Applicant will be required to go through Federal Patent Easement Abandonment Process prior to building permit approval. No encroachments allowed within the patent easements unless abandoned. Page 2 of 4 6. A 60’ replacement easement will be required for a local roadway along the eastern boundary of the proposed development to provide access for neighboring properties 7. The proposed development is located along a section line alignment on the south requiring setbacks be based upon a future half width right-of-way of 55’, per Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance Section 1105. This section line requirement is no longer needed. 8. The subject site is not located within the County’s Urbanized Area; and thus will not require a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) from the County. This does NOT preclude the requirement to obtain a Construction General Permit (CGP) Notice of Intent to Discharge (NOI) from the State (ADEQ), as may be required. The following stipulations will apply: 1. Without the submittal of a precise plan of development, no development approval is implied by this review, including, but not limited to drainage design, access and roadway alignments. These items will be addressed as development plans progress and are submitted to the County for further review and/or entitlement. 2. Any development must ensure that historic drainage patterns are maintained at the up and downstream limits of development. 3. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. Please contact me with any questions. Page 3 of 4 DRAINAGE PLAN REVIEW REFERENCES: The Drainage Regulations are listed in Section 1205 of the MCZO: https://www.maricopa.gov/documentcenter/view/272 Maricopa County Drainage Policies and Standards Manual: https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/Home/View/2369 For Additional Information See: https://www.maricopa.gov/1635/Drainage-Review FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT OF MARICOPA COUNTY REFERENCES: Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County: https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/630 For Additional Information See: https://www.maricopa.gov/3847/Flood-Control-District PND TRANSPORTATION REFERENCES: Residential Driveway Guidelines https://www.maricopa.gov/documentcenter/view/362 Roadway Design Manual http://www.mcdot.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/24883 Maricopa County Resolution for ROW Permits https://www.maricopa.gov/documentcenter/view/364 For Additional Information See: https://www.maricopa.gov/156/MCDOT PND STORMWATER QUALITY (SWPPP) REFERENCES: Storm Water Quality Management and Discharge Control Regulation https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/6577 Air Pollution Control Regulations Rule 310 https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/5354 For Additional Information See: https://www.maricopa.gov/3980/Water-Sewage-Stormwater-Waste Page 4 of 4 Abbreviations Key: Drainage: DD = Department Directive (See: http://www.maricopa.gov/1911/Department- Directives) MCZO = Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance DPSM = Maricopa County Drainage Policies and Standards SSA = State Standard Attachment DDMV1= Maricopa County Drainage Design Manual – Hydrology DDMV2 = Maricopa County Drainage Design Manual – Hydraulics Flood Control: FRMC = Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County PND Transportation: RDM = MCDOT Roadway Design Manual RDG = MCDOT Residential Design Guidelines MSRP = MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan PND Storm Water: SWMDCR= Maricopa County Storm Water Quality Management and Discharge Control Regulation DDMV3= Maricopa County Drainage Design Manual – Erosion Control APCR= Maricopa County Air Pollution Control Regulations – Rule 310 Subdivision Infrastructure & Planning Program 1001 N. Central Avenue #150 Phoenix, Arizona 85004 Phone: (602) 506-1058 Fax: (602) 506-5813 TDD 602 506 6704 Maricopa County Environmental Services Department Water and Waste Management DATE: June 21, 2022 TO : Martin Martell, Planning & Development Dept. Planner FROM: Souren Naradikian, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Rezone from RU-43 to R-5 RUPD. Z2022119 The Maricopa County Environmental Services Department (MCESD) has reviewed revised documents received from the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department for the above referenced projects. This request is for rezone one parcel from Rural-43 to R-5 RUPD and incorporate this into an adjacent site zoned R-5 RUPD to develop a multi-family development (Z2022119 - Villages @ Pleasant River II) at APN # 201-21-057. Water service EPCOR and sewer service will be provided by EPCOR, MCESD has concerns, ATC for water and sewer must be obtained prior to construction permit approval. Based on the above, MCESD raised no objection to this project to the Planning & Development Department in Accela Automation on June 21, 2022 and can allow the project to proceed at this time subject to the following stipulations: Stipulations: None It should be noted that this document does not approve the referenced project. Comments are provided only as advisory to Maricopa County Planning and Development Department to assist staff to prepare a staff report. Other Maricopa County agencies may have additional requirements. Final review and approval will be made through Planning and Development Department procedures. Applicant may need to submit separate applications to the Maricopa County Environmental Services Department for approval of proposed facilities regulated by the Department. Review of any such application will be based on regulations in force at the time of application. Planning and Development Department DATE: October 20, 2022 TO: Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Martin Martell, Planner SUBJECT: Z2022119– Villages at Pleasant Village II The applicant requests modified language for condition ‘e.5’: The proposed development is located in a Federal Patent Easement Area. Applicant will be required to go through Federal Patent Easement Abandonment Process prior to building permit approval. No encroachments allowed within the patent easements unless abandoned or otherwise approved by MCDOT Planning. Planning and Engineering staff concur with this modification. Zone Change with Overlay /2021 Planning & Development Department ALL FEES ARE DUE AT TIME OF APPLICATION AND ARE NON-REFUNDABLE. ZONE CHANGE WITH OVERLAY APPLICATION REQUEST Project Name Description of Request: Existing Use of Property: Existing Zoning District: Requested Zone Change with Overlay: Related Case Numbers: (List V# if site is subject to code violation): PROPERTY INFORMATION Address (if known): General Location (include nearest city/town): Size in Acres: Square Feet: Legal Description Section: Township: Range: Assessor’s Parcel Number(s): Subdivision Name (if applicable): OWNER’S AUTHORIZED AGENT INFORMATION Name: Contact: Address: City: State: Zip: Phone #: Fax #: Email: PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name: Contact: Address: City: State: Zip: Phone #: Fax #: Email: PROPERTY OWNER AND OWNER’S AGENT AUTHORIZATION I (property owner) authorize (owner’s agent) to file this application on all matters relating to this request with Maricopa County. By signing this form as the property owner I hereby agree to abide by any and all conditions that may be assigned by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Maricopa County Planning and Zoning Commission, or Maricopa County Planning and Development Department staff as applicable, as part of any approval of this request, including conditions, development agreements, and/or any other requirement that may encumber or otherwise affect the use of my property. PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER The property owner acknowledges that the approval being sought by this application may cause a reduction in the existing rights to use, divide, sell or possess the private property that is the subject of this application. The property owner further acknowledges that it is the property owner who has requested the action sought by the filing of this application. Therefore, with full knowledge of all rights granted to the property owner pursuant to A.R.S.§12-1132 through 1138, the property owner does hereby waive any and all claims for diminution in value of the property with regard to any action taken by Maricopa County as result of the filing of this application. Property Owner Signature: Date: VERIFICATION OF APPLICATION INFORMATION I certify that the statements in this application and support material are true. Any approvals or permits granted by Maricopa County in reliance upon the truthfulness of these statements may be revoked or rescinded. Owner or Authorized Agent Signature: Date: CASE INACTIVITY Cases which are not active within six (6) months will be considered inactive and closed by staff. A letter addressing the inactivity will be sent to the owner’s authorized agent or property owner with notification of the case to be closed within thirty (30) days. To pursue entitlement after the closing of the case, a new application and associated fees will need to be filed. Village at Pleasant River II Vacant Rezone from RU-43 to R-5 RUPD for single story multi-family residential development. RU-43 R-5 RUPD Z2021067 East and south of the southeast corner of 115th Avenue and Happy Valley Parkway 5 +/- ac. 217,800 6 4N 1E 201-21-057 Brian Greathouse 1850 N. Central Avene, Suite 1700 Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A. Phoenix AZ 85004 (602) 234-9930 bgreathouse@bcattorneys.com Shelby Duplessis 6617 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 101 The Village at Pleasant River, LLC Scottsdale AZ 85250 (602) 679-4438 shelby@builtempire.com Brian Greathouse, Burch & Cracchiolo Shelby Duplessis on behalf of The Village at Pleasant River, LLC 10-6-22 10-6-22