Extracted text (via pymupdf)
178246 characters
Board Members
Bill Gates, Chairman, District 3
Clint Hickman, Vice Chairman, District 4
Jack Sellers, District 1
Thomas Galvin, District 2
Steve Gallardo, District 5
County Manager
Joy Rich
Clerk of the Board
Juanita Garza
Meeting Location
Supervisors’ Auditorium
205 W. Jefferson
Phoenix, AZ 85003
"The mission of Maricopa County is to provide
regional leadership and fiscally responsible,
necessary public services to its residents so
they can enjoy living in healthy and safe
communities”
FORMAL MEETING
MINUTES
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Maricopa County, Arizona
(and the Boards of Directors of the Flood Control District, Library District,
Stadium District, Improvement Districts and/or Board of Deposit)
Table of Contents
Board
Page
Board of Supervisors
1
Improvement District
No Meeting
Flood Control District
94
Library District
No Meeting
Stadium District
No Meeting
Board of Deposit
No Meeting
Wednesday, April 20, 2022
9:30 AM
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 2 of 96
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - JUNTA DE SUPERVISORES
1.
ROLL CALL - LISTA
The Board of Supervisors of Maricopa County, Phoenix, Arizona, convened in Formal Session at
9:30 AM on Wednesday, April 20, 2022, in the Supervisors' Auditorium, 205 W. Jefferson Phoenix,
AZ 85003, with the following members present: Bill Gates, Chairman, District 3; Clint Hickman,
Vice Chairman, District 4; Jack Sellers, Supervisor, District 1; Thomas Galvin, Supervisor, District
2; Steve Gallardo, Supervisor, District 5. Also present: Juanita Garza, Clerk; Kelly Gardiner,
Minutes Coordinator; Theresa Dockcarter, Minutes Coordinator; Joy Rich, County Manager; Anne
Longo, Legal Counsel; Betsy Pregulman, Legal Counsel.
2.
INVOCATION - INVOCACIÓN
Mariana Sandoval offered the invocation.
3.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - JURO FIDELIDAD A LA BANDERA
Mariana Sandoval led the assemblage in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag.
Supervisor Gallardo thanked Ms. Sandoval for providing the invocation and leading the
pledge. He noted she is a strong leader in the west valley. She has served on a school
board and is now a candidate for the state legislature and stated she is one of those
leaders that never gives up. He thanked her for her service to the residents of Maricopa
County.
4.
PET SHOWCASE BY MARICOPA COUNTY ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL -
PRESENTACIÓN DE ANIMALES DOMESTICOS POR EL DEPARTAMENTO DE
CONTROL Y CUIDADO DE ANIMALES
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FORMAL
4. Pet Showcase by Maricopa County Animal Care and Control
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Interested call
602-506-PETS (7387)
ID #A4717404
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 3 of 96
Callie Best from Animal Care and Control introduced Cora, a three-year-old Chihuahua
who came to the shelter as a stray. Cora is a sweet but nervous dog and is about three-
years old. For adoption information visit Pets.maricopa.gov.
Chairman Gates asked the Clerk if there were any announcements or corrections to
the agenda. The Clerk said item #27 would be continued to the May 4, 2022, meeting
per the department’s request.
PRESENTATIONS - PRESENTACIÓNES
5.
NATIONAL THERAPY ANIMAL DAY PROCLAMATION
Proclaim April 30, 2022, as National Therapy Animal Day. (C-06-22-643-X-00)
Juanita Garza, Clerk of the Board, read the proclamation. A copy of the proclamation
is on file with the Clerk of the Board's Office and retained in accordance with LAPR
retention guidelines.
Motion to approve by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Thomas
Galvin
Supervisor Gallardo commented on the importance of therapy animals that are used to
comfort people in so many different circumstances of life. He remarked on the value of
animals in our lives.
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin, Steve Gallardo
Chairman Gates mentioned this is National Volunteer Week. He noted Maricopa
County Public Health Clinical Volunteer Team and the Medical Reserve Corp are being
honored nationally and will receive three awards for their volunteer service during the
pandemic. He named Janet McNally, a medical volunteer who joined the team in 2020.
Ms. McNally was an outstanding contributor to all departments of public health. She is
recognized for 690 hours of volunteer time given to assist in the vaccination efforts. He
mentioned Jan and Steve Hertzfeld who volunteered countless hours to the COVID
response. The Chairman noted 860 hours of volunteer time between the two.
PLANNING AND ZONING HEARINGS - AUDIENCIAS DE PLANIFICACIÓN
Y DESARROLLO
***The Board of Supervisors will now consider matters related to Planning and Zoning.***
PLANNING AND ZONING CONSENT HEARINGS - AUDIENCIAS DE CONSIENTA
6.
HIDDEN WATERS RANCH
Case #: DMP2021004
Supervisor District: 4
Applicant & Owners: Kyle Barichello, RVI Planning & Landscape Architecture / 339th and I
10 LLC
Request: Development Master Plan Major Amendment of approx. 200 acres of the Hidden
Waters Ranch DMP (ref: DMP2006007).
Site Location: Generally located south of the I-10 between 339th Ave. and 351st Ave. and
north of Buckeye Rd.
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 4 of 96
Commission Recommendation: On 3/24/22, the Commission voted 7-0 to recommend
approval of DMP2021004 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘p’:
a. Development shall be in substantial conformance with the Development Master Plan
document entitled “Hidden Waters Ranch Development Master Plan Major Amendment #2”,
a bound document, dated revised February 10, 2022, and stamped received, including the
exhibits, maps, and appendices, except as modified by the following stipulations.
b. Changes to the Hidden Waters Ranch Development Master Plan with regard to use and
intensity, or changes to any of the stipulations approved by the Maricopa County Board of
Supervisors, shall be processed as a revised application with approval by the Board of
Supervisors upon recommendation by the Maricopa County Planning and Zoning
Commission. Revised applications shall be in accordance with the applicable Development
Master Plan Guidelines, subdivision regulations, and zoning ordinance in effect at the time
of application(s) submission. The Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
may approve minor changes administratively as outlined in the Maricopa County
Development Master Plan Guidelines in effect at the time of amendment. Non-compliance
with the approved Hidden Waters Ranch Development Master Plan narrative report, maps,
and exhibits, or the stipulations of approval will be treated as a violation in accordance with
the provisions of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.
c. All stipulations of approval shall remain in effect in the event of a change in name of the
Hidden Waters Ranch Development Master Plan.
d. The property owner and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the County
takes action to rescind approval of this Development Master Plan due to noncompliance with
any of the approved stipulations.
e. Prior to approval of any zone change, the master developer shall enter into a development
agreement with Maricopa County. Further, prior to approval of any zone change this
development agreement shall be signed by both the master developer and the designated
Maricopa County representative(s) and provided to the Maricopa County Planning and
Development Department for public record.
f. The master developer shall be responsible for the construction of all public and private on-
site roads within the Hidden Waters Ranch Development Master Plan. Further, the Hidden
Waters Ranch homeowner’s association shall be responsible for the maintenance and
upkeep of all private roads, public open spaces and public facilities, washes, parks, roadway
median landscaping, landscaping within public rights-of-way, and all pedestrian, bicycle, and
multi-use paths.
g. Prior to approval of each final plat, the master developer shall submit to the Maricopa
County Planning and Development Department a landscape inventory and salvage plan
which identifies and assesses the native vegetation within the development parcels, and
which determines the preservation/disposition for each of the selected native vegetation.
h. Landscaping of all common areas and open spaces, except for identified recreational
areas, within Hidden Waters Ranch shall consist of indigenous and near-native plant species
of a xeriphytic nature.
i. Until annexation of the entire development master plan takes place, the master developer
shall notify all future Hidden Waters Ranch Development Master Plan residents that they are
not located within an incorporated city or town, and therefore will not be represented by, or
be able to petition a citizen-elected municipal government. Notification shall also state that
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 5 of 96
residents will not have access to municipally managed services such as police, fire, parks,
water, wastewater, libraries, and refuse collection. Such notice shall be included on all final
plats, be permanently posted on the front door of all home sales offices on not less than an
8 ½ inch by 11-inch sign, and be included in all homeowner association covenants,
conditions, and restrictions (CC & Rs).
j. All Park facilities shall be completed concurrently with residential development of the
respective plat on which the park is shown.
k. One (1) elementary school site dedication at a minimum of 14.3 acres. shall be reserved
for the Saddle Mountain Unified School District at the location identified on the Hidden
Waters Ranch land use plan. If at a future date State Land areas adjacent to the amended
areas of the DMP are rezoned from residential to industrial use, SMUSD leadership may
agree to reduce or eliminate the school reservation.
l. The following Maricopa County Department of Emergency Management stipulations shall
apply:
1. Any areas not covered by the existing Outdoor Warning Siren System used to alert
residents within the 10-mile Emergency Planning Zone of the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating
Station in time of emergency shall be required to include additional sirens, at the developer’s
cost, in order to provide adequate warning for the residents of that development, using
technical information concerning the siren system obtained from the Emergency Planning
Department at the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station. In addition, adequate signage
available from the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Emergency Planning Department
shall be required to be posted on the site to inform the public of the presence of a nuclear
generating station in the vicinity and outlining actions to take upon receiving warning
notification.
2. The developer shall ensure that public safety information regarding nuclear emergencies
is initially provided to any new residents or building occupants. The applicant shall obtain
this information from the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station – Emergency Planning
Department. All costs associated with the duplication and dissemination of the initial
distribution shall be assumed by the applicant. Thereafter, the Palo Verde Nuclear
Generating Station will provide this public safety information annually.
m. The following Flood Control District of Maricopa County stipulations shall apply:
1. The owner or his representative shall submit a Conditional Letter of Map Revision prior to
any preliminary plat approvals.
n. The following Engineering stipulations shall apply:
1. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with the Drainage
Regulation and current policies, standards, and best practices at the time of application for
construction. No variance from Drainage Regulations or drainage engineering design
standards is granted or entitled under this DMP.
2. Drainage review of planning, zoning and/or Development Master Plans cases is for
conceptual design only and does not represent final design approval nor shall it entitle
applicants to future designs that are not in conformance with Drainage Regulation and design
policies and standards. Modeling submitted with this DMP is for conceptual level analysis
only. All plats shall be submitted with appropriate and detailed model to reflect existing and
proposed development conditions.
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 6 of 96
3. Without the submittal of a precise plan of development, no development approval is
inferred by this review, including, but not limited to drainage design, access, and roadway
alignments. These items will be addressed as development plans progress and are
submitted to the County for further review and/or entitlement.
4. Any development must ensure that historic drainage patterns are maintained at the up
and downstream limits of development.
5. A traffic impact study must be submitted with any future entitlement application(s) (i.e.
preliminary plat or plan of development) for the purpose of determining any offsite roadway
improvements.
6. Changes to previous right-of-way dedication requirements for Section Line and Mid-
Section Alignments within the development site will be further evaluated at the time of future
entitlement applications.
7. Any development must provide for at least two (2) paved points of access to existing and
improved public roads.
8. Except as modified as part of this application or stipulated herein, the Drainage, Flood
Control and Transportation (MCDOT) conditions of DMP2008006 shall remain in effect.
9. Applicant to notify ADOT of proposed development through the Red Letter Process,
RedLetter@azdot.gov, due to proximity and proposed access to I10 and the future I11
corridor.
10. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of
the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain
Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current
engineering policies, standards, and best practices at the time of application for construction.
o. The following Luke Air Force Base condition shall apply:
1. The master developer shall notify future occupants/tenants that they are located near a
military airport with the following language:
“You are locating in a residential dwelling outside the “territory in the vicinity of a military
airport,” however aircraft flying in this area are authorized to fly as low as 1,500 feet above
the ground. You will be subject to direct overflights and noise by Luke Air Force Base jet
aircraft in the vicinity.
Luke Air Force Base executes an average of approximately 165 overflights per day. Although
Luke’s primary flight paths are located within 20 miles from the base, jet noise will be
apparent throughout the area as aircraft transient to and from the Barry M. Goldwater
Gunnery Range and other flight areas.
Luke Air Force Base may launch and recover aircraft in either direction off its runways
oriented to the southwest and northeast. Noise will be more noticeable during overcast sky
conditions due to noise reflections off the clouds.
Luke Air Force Base’s normal flying hours extend from 7:00 a.m. until approximately
midnight, Monday through Friday, but some limited flying will occur outside these hours and
during most weekends.
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 7 of 96
For further information, please check the Luke Air Force Base website or contact the
Maricopa County Planning and Development Department.”
Such notification shall be permanently posted on not less than a 3 foot by 5-foot sign in front
of all leasing and home sales offices and be permanently posted on the front door of all
leasing offices on not less than 8½ inch by 11-inch sign.
p. At its discretion, the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department may
administratively approve up to a 5% change in the gross area of any parcel that is subject to
a planned area development zoning overlay. Such change, either individually or
cumulatively, shall not result in a change of any land use category by 5% or greater. Changes
greater than 5% either individually or cumulatively shall be processed as a revised
application with approval by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors upon
recommendation by the Maricopa County Planning and Zoning Commission. (C-44-22-170-
X-00)
Chairman Gates asked the Clerk if there were any registered speakers or comments
received on items #6 or #7. The Clerk said there was one speaker, Kyle Barichello,
applicant for both items, in favor and available to speak only if necessary.
Motion to concur with Planning Commission recommendation for approval subject to
conditions ‘a’ – ‘p’ by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Jack Sellers
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin, Steve Gallardo
7.
HIDDEN WATERS RANCH
Case #: Z2021141
Supervisor District: 4
Applicant & Owners:
Kyle Barichello, RVI Planning & Landscape Architecture / 339th
and I 10 LLC
Request: Zone change from Rural-43 PAD, R1-7 RUPD PAD, R1-6 RUPD PAD, R-2 RUPD
PAD to IND-2 PAD
Site Location: Generally located south of the I-10 between 339th Ave. and 351st Ave. and
north of Buckeye Rd.
Commission Recommendation: On 3/24/22, the Commission voted 7-0 to recommend
approval of Z2021141 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘s’:
a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Zoning Exhibit
entitled “Hidden Waters Ranch”, consisting of 6 full-size sheets, stamped received February
10, 2022, except as modified by the following conditions. Staff may determine slight
refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan. Minor and
major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of the
Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.
b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report
entitled “Major Zone Change Amendment application (PAD)”, consisting of 17 pages, dated
February 10, 2022, and stamped received February 10, 2022, except as modified by the
following conditions.
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 8 of 96
c. All transformers, back-flow prevention devices, utility boxes and all other utility related
ground mounted equipment shall be painted to complement the development and shall be
screened with landscape material where possible. All HVAC units shall be ground-mounted
or screened with a continuous parapet for commercial projects.
d. The following Engineering conditions shall apply:
1. Without the submittal of a precise plan of development, no development approval is
inferred by this review, including, but not limited to drainage design, access, and roadway
alignments. These items will be addressed as development plans progress and are
submitted to the County for further review and/or entitlement.
2. Any development must ensure that historic drainage patterns are maintained at the up
and downstream limits of development.
3. A traffic impact study must be submitted with any future entitlement application(s) (i.e.
preliminary plat or plan of development) for the purpose of determining any offsite roadway
improvements.
4. Changes to previous right-of-way dedication requirements for Section Line and Mid-
Section Alignments within the development site will be further evaluated at the time of future
entitlement applications.
5. Any development must provide for at least two (2) paved points of access to existing and
improved public roads.
6. Except as modified as part of this application or stipulated herein, the Drainage, Flood
Control and Transportation (MCDOT) conditions of Z2007073 shall remain in effect.
7. Applicant to notify ADOT of proposed development through the Red Letter Process,
RedLetter@azdot.gov, due to proximity and proposed access to I10 and the future I11
corridor.
8. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the
Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain
Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current
engineering policies, standards, and best practices at the time of application for construction.
e. The following Maricopa County Department of Transportation conditions shall apply:
1. The Developer has previously provided a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) that was previously
approved under the original case #Z2007073. Subsequent TIS submittals shall comply with
then MCDOT requirements and indicate offsite improvements necessary to accommodate
the anticipated traffic demands. The TIS shall be updated with each development phase to
reflect current conditions and any changes to the development plan. Since the only existing
traffic generator in the area of this development is the truck stop at the SW corner of I-10
and 339th Ave., which also abuts this development, there is still a concern of how Hidden
Waters traffic (Phase 1 – 2) and the truck stop traffic will interact, especially at the 339th
Ave./Roosevelt St. intersection. MCDOT will require that Hidden Waters coordinate with the
truck stop concerning off-site improvements prior to any plan or plat approval. Intersection
improvement plans shall also include dual left turn lanes EB to NB and a right turn lane SB
to EB and all underground conduit and pullboxes for the future signal. The project must
comply with all recommendations in the MCDOT approved TIS.
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 9 of 96
2. The Developer shall provide the ultimate full or half-width of right-of-way for all public
roadways. Right-of-way shall be provided as follows:
A) Buckeye Road: 100 Feet (Half-width)
B) Harrison Street: 40 Feet (Half-width); 80 Feet (Full-width)
C) Van Buren Street: 65 Feet (Half-width); 130 Feet (Full-width)
D) Roosevelt Street: Western Boundary to 341st Avenue
55 Feet (Half-width); 110 Feet (Full-width)
(THE TIS NEEDS TO DOCUMENT NON-STANDARD R/W.)
E) 343rd Avenue, Buckeye Road to Van Buren Street:
40 Feet (Half-width); 80 Feet (Full-width)
343rd Avenue, Van Buren Street to Northern Project Boundary:
55 Feet (Half-width); 110 Feet (Full-width)
(THE TIS NEEDS TO DOCUMENT NON-STANDARD R/W.)
F) 339th Avenue: 100 Feet (Half-width)
G) 335th Avenue: 40 Feet (Half-width)
The above references interior and perimeter roads. (The project boundary is the centerline
of all perimeter roadways and/or roadway alignments.) Full-width right-of-way shall be
provided where the entire roadway is within the development (interior roadways). Half-width
right-of-way shall be provided where “half” of the roadway is within the development
(perimeter roadways). Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated at any intersections where
future dual left turn lanes are possible. The widened right-of-way section shall accommodate
the length of the left turn lane, including reverse curves.
The Developer shall reserve sufficient right-of-way for transportation facilities in compliance
with the MAG Hassayampa Study, including sufficient right-of-way for widening of I-10.
3. The Developer shall be responsible for design and construction of the ultimate full-width
of all interior roadways, and the ultimate half-width of all perimeter roadways, unless
approved otherwise by MCDOT. All roadways must meet all county standards in effect at the
time they are improved. (This includes but is not limited to the “MCDOT Roadway Design
Manual,” including TIS infrastructure requirements and the “Drainage Policies and Standards
for Maricopa County.”) Half-width roadways must be designed and constructed so as to
safely carry two-way traffic until the ultimate roadway is constructed. Roadway improvement
plans must be approved and permitted by MCDOT. The Developer shall relocate well site(s)
and/or provide additional right-of-way in the event of conflict with any transportation facilities.
4. The Developer shall be responsible for design and construction of the ultimate full-width
of all interior roadways, and the ultimate half-width of all perimeter roadways, unless
approved otherwise by MCDOT. All roadways must meet all county standards in effect at the
time they are improved. (This includes but is not limited to the “MCDOT Roadway Design
Manual,” including TIS infrastructure requirements and the “Drainage Policies and Standards
for Maricopa County.”) Half-width roadways must be designed and constructed so as to
safely carry two-way traffic until the ultimate roadway is constructed. Roadway improvement
plans must be approved and permitted by MCDOT. The Developer shall relocate well site(s)
and/or provide additional right-of-way in the event of conflict with any transportation facilities.
5. The Developer shall provide all-weather access to all parcels and lots, and on all arterial
roadways.
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 10 of 96
6. The Developer shall provide and make available a minimum of two access points to each
development phase and/or subdivision unit.
7. The Developer shall design the development to promote pedestrian, bicycle, and other
alternative modes of transportation to public facilities within and adjacent to the site, by
means in addition to the roadway system. Crossings of arterials at other than signalized
intersections may be required to be grade separated. The Development shall prepare a
comprehensive multimodal transportation and circulation plan (the “Multimodal Plan”) which
addresses public transit, bicycle, pedestrian, golf cart, equestrian, and other alternative uses.
The Multimodal Plan must be approved before subsequent approval of any roadway
improvement plans.
8. If streetlights are provided, installation shall be provided by the Developer. If streetlights
are within public rights-of-way, a Street Light Improvement District (SLID) or comparable
authority shall be established to provide operation and maintenance. The Developer should
contact the Office of Superintendent of Streets (602-506-8797) to initiate the SLID process.
9. The Developer shall design landscaping to comply with all county requirements and to
conform to the MCDOT Roadway Design annual. The Developer (or as assigned to the
Homeowner’s Association (HOA)) shall be responsible for maintenance of landscaping
within public rights-of-way.
10. The Applicant shall provide a construction traffic circulation plan. The construction traffic
circulation plan must be approved by MCDOT.
11. The Applicant shall comply with all applicable local, state, and federal requirements.
(Dust control, noise mitigation, AZPDES, 404 permitting, etc.)
12. The Developer shall provide written documentation of ADOT’s review and response with
each phase. ADOT documentation shall be received before any development phasing and/or
final plat approval, or at the discretion of MCDOT.
f. All interior streets within the proposed development are to be constructed to minimum
County standards.
g. The following Drainage Review stipulations shall apply:
1. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with the Drainage
Regulation, Drainage Policies and Standards and current engineering policies, standards
and best practices at the time of application for construction.
2. Drainage review of this zone change cases is for conceptual design only and does not
represent final design approval nor shall it entitle applicants to future designs that are not in
conformance with the Drainage Regulation and design policies and standards.
3. All proposed construction within a delineated floodplain must obtain a floodplain use permit
from the Flood Control District of Maricopa County.
h. The following Flood Control District stipulations shall apply:
1. The effective floodplain and floodway limits need to be shown on both the final plat and
the grading plan.
2. The electronic HEC-RAS files for the final hydraulic calculations need to be provided.
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 11 of 96
3. Calculations for the lowest floor elevation for the lots within the floodplain are needed.
4. The lowest floor elevation for all lots within the floodplain must be shown on the grading
plan.
5. The lowest floor elevations for all lots within the floodplain must be at least two (2) feet
above the 100-year water surface elevation. If this area is to be removed by a Letter of Map
Revision (LOMR), then a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) will be needed. A
LOMR will be required prior to the final plat approval of the built infrastructure if a CLOMR
was issued by FEMA.
6. A note needs to be added to the final plat listing the lots located within the floodplain. In
addition, the note needs to state that until a LOMR is approved by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA), the finished floor will need to be elevated to the regulatory
food elevation, and flood insurance will be required.
7. No buildings will be allowed in the floodway.
i. Prior to issuance of any permits for development of the site, the applicant/property owner
shall obtain the necessary encroachment permits from the Maricopa County Department of
Transportation (MCDOT) for landscaping or other improvements in the right-of-way.
j. All outdoor lighting shall conform to the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.
k. Development of the site shall be in compliance with all applicable Maricopa County Air
Quality rules and regulations.
l. An archeological survey shall be submitted to and approved by the Arizona State Historic
Preservation Office prior to issuance of a grading permit. The applicant must contact the
State office prior to initiating disturbance of the site. The applicant shall provide the Planning
and Development Department with written proof of compliance with this stipulation.
m. Development and use of the site shall comply with requirements for fire protection
measures as deemed necessary by the applicable fire department. Prior to issuance of
zoning clearance or Final Plat/Plan of Development approval, the applicant shall seek review
and comment from the applicable fire protection agency and shall provide written
confirmation that the site will be developed in accordance with their requirements.
n. Prior to zoning clearance or Final Plat approval, developer(s) and/or builder(s) shall
establish emergency fire protection services, covering all real property contained within the
project area during course of construction and shall obtain a ‘will serve’ letter substantiating
coverage from the appropriate Fire Department servicing the site.
o. The applicant or his successor shall obtain approval of any development plans from the
Office of the Arizona State Fire Marshal prior to any construction.
p. Amendments to the site plan and narrative report shall be processed as a revised
application in accordance with Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance Article 304.9.
q. Noncompliance with the conditions of approval will be treated as a violation in accordance
with the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. Further, noncompliance of the conditions of
approval may be grounds for the Planning and Zoning Commission to take action in
accordance with Chapter 3 (Conditional Zoning).
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 12 of 96
r. Non-compliance with the regulations administered by the Maricopa County Environmental
Services Department, Maricopa County Department of Transportation, Drainage Review
Division, Planning and Development Department, or the Flood Control District of Maricopa
County may be grounds for initiating a revocation of this Zone Change as set forth in the
Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.
s. The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the County
takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with stipulations. (C-44-22-172-X-00)
Motion to concur with Planning Commission recommendation for approval subject to
conditions ‘a’ – ‘s’ by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Jack Sellers
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin, Steve Gallardo
PLANNING AND ZONING REGULAR HEARINGS - AUDIENCIAS DE AGENDA REGULAR
8.
VERTICAL BRIDGE/T-MOBILE AZ-5068 (CONT. FROM 8/4/21)
Case #: Z2021044
Supervisor District: 3
Applicant & Owner: Gary Cassel, Clear Blue Services / Superior L & L LLC
Request: Special Use Permit for a new wireless communication facility (WCF) in the Rural-
43 RUPD zoning district
Site Location: Approx. 750 ft. southeast of the SEC of 7th Ave. and Desert Hills Dr. in the
New River area
Recommendation: On 7/8/21, the Commission voted 7-0 to recommend denial of Z2021044.
(C-44-22-171-X-00)
Chairman Gates asked Tom Ellsworth, Planning and Development Director, and Darren
Gerard, Assistant Director of Planning and Development to come forward.
Mr. Ellsworth provided background for the case noting it is a request for a special use
permit (SUP) for a new wireless communication facility or cell tower in a Rural 43 RUPD
zoning district.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FORMAL
Z2021044
Vertical Bridge
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 13 of 96
Mr. Ellsworth noted that the use of a cell tower is allowed by right within the rural 43
zoning district. However, there are certain development standards that must be met from
chapter 12 of the zoning ordinance. Specifically, the setbacks of the proposal and the
diameter of the array.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FORMAL
Z2021044
Vertical Bridge
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FORMAL
Z2021044
Vertical Bridge
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 14 of 96
Mr. Ellsworth talked about the modifications requested by the applicant on the slides
below. There has been significant opposition to this request. This case has been heard
several times by the Planning and Zoning Commission: July 2021 recommending denial
based on the opposition to the case and the applicant not addressing the concerns; and
on August 4, 2021, recommending a continuance so the applicant could consider the
proposal further. Mr. Ellsworth also noted that due to the number of people in opposition,
approximately 124 in the form of petition signatures, emails, and letters, and four of the
letters are from people within 300 feet of the site, this triggered a supermajority vote. He
continued naming the areas of concern.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FORMAL
Z2021044
Vertical Bridge
Applicant modified the project request with the following:
•
Proposed monopole height lowered from 80’ to 65’;
•
Proposed monopole appearance changed from being painted brown to have a “Corten”
brown finish;
•
Proposed array diameter lessened from 13’ to 9.5’; and
•
The proposed monopole and ground equipment will be located within a 30 ft. x 35 ft.
compound screened by 10 ft. tall solid CMU walls.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FORMAL
Z2021044
Vertical Bridge
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 15 of 96
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FORMAL
Z2021044
Vertical Bridge
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FORMAL
Z2021044
Vertical Bridge
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FORMAL
Z2021044
Vertical Bridge
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 16 of 96
Chairman Gates asked his colleagues if they had any questions and asked the Clerk if
there were any registered speakers or comments for item #8. The Clerk responded there
were several people present who wished to speak in opposition, on the webinar, and by
emails.
Chairman Gates gave his instructions to those who plan to speak, allowing 10 minutes
for each side.
Jacob Maskovich, a local attorney with Bryan, Cave, Leighton, Paisner, representing the
applicant, explained the nature of the applicant’s business and those who would be
served by this cell tower as seen on the slide below.
Mr. Maskovich gave a brief overview of the project as seen on the slide below. He stated
that the proposed cellular tower started as an 80-foot tower and was reduced to 65 feet
after input from the community.
Applicant
Vertical Bridge Development, LLC
Vertical Bridge is in the wireless telecommunications
industry and places, constructs, modifies, operates,
and manages telecommunication infrastructure on
behalf of its clients, cellular service providers, across
the United States.
Vertical Bridge seeks to be a good corporate partner
with Maricopa County and its citizens.
Page 2 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
Project Overview
Approximately 750 feet southeast of the southeast
corner of 7th Avenue and Dessert Hills Drive, in the
New River area.
65-foot tall Monopole
Page 3 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 17 of 96
Mr. Maskovich explained the need for the tower as indicated on the slide below saying
that Vertical Bridge does not build on speculation but to fill a need.
Below is a slide illustrating the coverage area that currently exists and explained the
map coloring.
Need for Tower
T-Mobile has identified a coverage gap in this area and
has determined that a tower is needed at this location
and at least this height is needed to remedy that gap.
The Tower is needed to improve in-building coverage.
Might be able to take call indoors, but signal likely will not
be consistent
Data service will greatly suffer at current coverage
Page 4 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
LTE PCC Outdoor – Existing LTE Coverage
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 18 of 96
The map below illustrated the intended cell and data coverage with the proposed cell
tower at 65 feet that would serve those in the immediate area as well as the many who
live in the adjacent communities.
The slide below shows the increased coverage with an 80-foot tower.
PCC Outdoor – Existing LTE Coverage with
Proposed PH33952D @ 61 ft. Ant Centre,
3xSector @ 120\220\300
PCC Outdoor – Existing LTE Coverage with
Proposed PH33952D @ 76 ft. Ant Centre,
3xSector @ 120\220\300
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 19 of 96
Mr. Maskovich reviewed the following slides regarding the need for reliable service now
and in the future.
He referred to the slides below and said community members need for reliable data
coverage became more apparent during the pandemic.
Need for Tower
Reliable service is more important than ever:
“The vast majority of Americans—97%—now own a cellphone of
some kind.” As of February 2021, 85% of Americans own a
smartphone. This is a drastic increase in smartphone ownership
since May 2011, wherein only 35% of Americans owned a
smartphone.
The number of smartphone users in the United States is estimated
to rise from 298 million in 2021 to 311.53 million in 2025.
Page 8 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
Need for Tower
Reliable service is more important than ever:
Since 2003, the percentage of American adults and children living
in wireless-only households has steadily increased.
In 2021, a CDC survey found 68% of U.S. adults and 79.1% of U.S.
children live in wireless-only households.
A state-specific CDC survey found 71.2% of Arizona adults used
only wireless telephones in 2019. In 2019, only 2.4% of Arizona
adults used exclusively landline telephones, and only 2.1% of
Arizona adults used no phone at all.
Arizona’s wireless-only telephone use was higher in 2019 than the
percentage of wireless-only Americans in 2021.
Page 9 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 20 of 96
In the slides below, Mr. Maskovich explained the importance of location for cell towers
to work together as an interconnected network, overlapping coverage to work efficiently
as a whole. The need for interconnection is why engineers evaluated the area and
pinpointed this location.
Need for Tower
Reliable service is more important than ever:
Especially the case during pandemic
-
There was a statistically significant increase of 5.5% from
the first six months in 2020 to the first six months in 2021
in the percentage of adults and children in the United
States living in wireless-only households.
Critical for E911 service
-
Approximately 240 million calls are made to 911 in the
United States each year, and 80% of those calls are made
from wireless devices
Page 10 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 21 of 96
Location of the Tower
Each wireless service facility must be located on a cell
tower of sufficient height and must be placed within a
limited area within each cell so that each facility
provides a line-of-sight communications signal that
reaches all of the surrounding cells and can properly
interact with surrounding antenna facilities to provide
seamless, reliable coverage throughout a given
geographic area.
Page 12 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
There is No Better Location for the Tower
Carrier provided limited search ring that would meet its
objectives
Over 35 properties considered
Issues: flood plain; owners not interested; property not
suitable (lack of access; configuration; other existing
uses)
Page 14 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 22 of 96
Below are parcels that were considered for the cell tower.
Mr. Maskovich said the slide below shows the initial search ring on the left and the
potential sites “pinned”. The search ring on the right with the “pin” in the center is the
current proposed site for the cellular tower. He said this area is primarily rural at this time
but development is coming as seen in the last decade.
There is No Better Location for the Tower
Page 15 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
Location
Location
Location
Location
APN 211-50-015A
APN 211-50-022G
APN 211-50-027H
APN 211-50-026S
APN 211-50-007C
APN 211-50-016B
APN 211-50-032E
APN 211-50-004E
APN 211-50-023E
APN 211-50-019N
APN 211-50-032B
APN 211-50-034E
APN 211-50-020J
APN 211-50-020G
APN 211-50-018B
APN 211-50-080
APN 211-50-O37F
APN 211-50-011D
APN 211-50-032D
APN 211-50-026J
APN 211-50-012N
APN 211-50-017F
APN 211-86-001A
APN 211-5-004K
APN 211-50-016E
APN 211-50-028G
APN 211-50-009A
APN 211-23-013
APN 211-23-012
APN 211-23-264
APN 211-23-316
APN 211-73-032A
APN 211-23-023
APN 211-23-263
APN 211-23-024B
APN 211-73-039A
APN 211-73-093A
APN 211-73-032B
APN 211-73-038D
There is No Better Location for the Tower
Page 16 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 23 of 96
The slide below shows a site that was proposed that has an existing 75 foot cellular
tower.
In the following slides, a letter of request from Vertical Bridge was addressed to the fire
chief and the response that followed. In a more recent communication and request, the
fire station representative provided the obstacles with placing the tower on fire station
property.
Cannot Place Tower on Fire Station Property
Page 17 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
The Daisy Mountain Fire Station
#145 is 2400 feet west of the
proposed tower site
Cannot Place Tower on Fire Station
Property
On Jan 7, 2019, at 3:49 PM, Parrish Silva <psilva@velocitel.com > wrote:
Dear Chief Johnson:
T-Mobile would like to explore the placement of a wireless communicaƟons
facility on the parcel of Daisy Mountain Fire StaƟon – 142. The proposed wireless
telecommunicaƟons facility will be located on the parcel at 41104 N. Daisy
Mountain Drive, Phoenix, AZ 85086 (APN: 203 -06-143G). The following
aƩachment represents the general lease terms proposed.
Finally, please reach out to me with any quesƟons or concerns. Thank you in
advance for your Ɵme and hospitality.
Regards,
Parrish Silva
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 24 of 96
Cannot Place Tower on Fire Station
Property
From: Daniel Johnson<danny.johnson@dmfd.org>
Sent: Monday, January 7, 20195:11 PM
To: Parrish Silva
Cc: Darren Snodgrass; James Crowther; Elizabeth Rossi;ChrisƟne.Bryden@T-Mobile.com; Ashton
Burns; Alan Zangle
Subject: Re: PH33952 - Anthem - StaƟon 142 - T-Mobile - 1-7-19
It will never get approved by the Fire Board or the Anthem Community Council. Been down
that road many Ɵmes.
Danny Johnson
Deputy Chief
Daisy Mountain Fire Department
623-363-2279
Cannot Place Tower on Fire Station
Property
Fire Station confirmed in late 2021 that it will
not permit Vertical Bridge to place its tower on
its property and that it is not feasible for
Vertical Bridge to do so.
The existing tower cannot accommodate an
additional carrier or additional equipment.
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 25 of 96
Mr. Maskovich provided various views from 7th Avenue: the first slide is a current view,
the second being a simulated view with the proposed tower below.
Current View Looking East
Page 22 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
View with Tower Looking East
Page 23 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 26 of 96
The next two slides are from Desert Hills Drive, the first is current, the second simulated
with the tower in view.
Current View Looking South
Page 24| © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
View with Tower Looking South
Page 25 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 27 of 96
Mr. Maskovich gave a summary of the many outreach efforts in the slides below.
Community Outreach Efforts and Changes to
Tower from Original Submission
Page 26 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
May 18, 2021 we held a virtual TAC meeting
We engaged in phone calls and visits to parcel owners for
neighboring property owners ahead of that meeting.
June 1, 2021 we held a 2-hour community meeting at the
New River Church. This meeting was memorialized in
mailings to attendees and in video recording of the meeting.
Vertical Bridge provided its information to the local
community association and invited comments and questions
be submitted regarding the proposed tower.
Community Outreach Efforts and Changes to
Tower from Original Submission
Page 27 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
We had a Zoom meeting with the District 3 County
Supervisor's staff on August 25, 2021
On September 22, 2021, we had a meeting with a
group of community objectors to discuss concerns.
On October 18, 2021, we had a Zoom meeting with the
District 3 County Supervisor's staff
On November 1, 2021, we had a Zoom call with a
group of community objectors
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 28 of 96
Mr. Maskovich reviewed the nature of opposition in the following slides. In the two
examples below, the general opposition was stated and then a concession was made
by both parties regarding height, color, and attenuation wall height.
Community Outreach Efforts and Changes to
Tower from Original Submission
Page 28 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
On December 16, 2021, we held a community meeting
at the nearby middle school.
The next day, on December 17, we held a virtual
community meeting for any community members
unable to attend the in-person meeting. This meeting
lasted about two hours.
Substantial changes were made to the proposed tower
to address comments by community members
Community Objections Addressed
Page 29 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 29 of 96
Mr. Maskovich reviewed the following slides explaining the changes to the tower
appearance.
Community Objections Addressed
Page 30 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
Changes to Tower – Appearance
Page 31 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
Corten-like exterior
Tower will look like existing utility poles in the area
It will match the corten color requested by community
members
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 30 of 96
Mr. Maskovich referred the slide below and expressed concern that the community
preference for the Corten finish likely would be negatively impacted by water resulting
in rust.
He said Vertical Bridge would paint the towers to match the pole nearby.
Changes to Tower – Appearance
Page 32 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
Corten
Changes to Tower – Appearance
Page 33 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
Nearby Pole
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 31 of 96
Changes to Tower – Appearance
Page 34 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
Changes to Tower – Appearance
Page 35 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 32 of 96
In the following slides, Mr. Maskovich reviewed the changes that were proposed in
response to the community opposition.
Changes to Tower - Wall
Page 37 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
Increase height of wall surrounding tower from 8 feet
to 10 feet to address comments about noise from
tower equipment.
In any event, the equipment is virtually silent.
There will be no noise pollution from the tower.
The equipment is open -air cooled with a small, internal
fan, so there is no AC equipment, which generated noise
on older towers.
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 33 of 96
Changes to Tower - Noise
Page 38 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
Changes to Tower - Lighting
Page 39 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
All of the lights are below the wall level, which will
mitigate the level of light coming from the site.
The lights are not on all of the time—The lights are
only used when maintenance is needed on the tower.
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 34 of 96
He reviewed the slides below concerning variances.
Need for Setback Variance
Page 41 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
Tower poses no fall hazard.
The distance between the tower and all of the lot lines
is more than the height of the tower.
Even if the tower fell, it is engineered to collapse down
upon itself.
There is no lot in the search ring that would meet the
2:1 setback ordinance.
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 35 of 96
Supervisor Galvin asked Mr. Maskovich to return to slide 35 (seen below) concerning
the equipment, sound, and wall height. Mr. Maskovich stated that slide 35 showed an
example of old technology that has a large and noisy cooling system attached. The
newer tower equipment is virtually silent. Supervisor Galvin asked to see the slide for
lighting (seen below). Mr. Maskovich explained the lights are pointed downward and
only come on when someone is on site.
Need for Antennae Array Variance
Page 42 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
Vertical Bridge needs additional diameter for antennae
arrays so that the antennas do not interfere with one
another and so that the tower provides proper
coverage.
The more you compact antennae arrays or shorten
tower, the more likely tower proliferation becomes.
Changes to Tower - Noise
Page 38 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 36 of 96
Chairman Gates stated 10 minutes would be provided to the opposition.
Keith Paffrath, resident, asked that the Board deny the SUP. He said several
representatives from his community and several on the phone also oppose this SUP.
Changes
To Tower –
Lighting
Page 40 | © BRYA N C A V E LEIGHTO N PA ISNER
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 37 of 96
He said the above slide indicates parcels initially in opposition to the Planning and
Zoning presentation. He reviewed the slide below and said the circles are currently the
parcels in opposition, likely about 150, surrounding this proposed sight.
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 38 of 96
The slide above covered notification requirements and Mr. Paffrath said the expressed
concern for the lack of signage giving notice of the proposed tower fell on deaf ears. He
disputes there has been a proper approach to notification.
He explained the following slide shows the proposed site proximity to parcel owners and
the well that provides water to the property owners. He said he was worried that this
project could potentially contaminate the ground water and cited safety concerns.
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 39 of 96
Mr. Paffrath stated the following picture is what the applicant says the tower will look
like, but the following picture is a more accurate depiction.
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 40 of 96
Mr. Paffrath commented on the community meetings as summarized in the slide above.
He stated that nobody in the community supports this project except the property owner
who stands to make a profit and T-Mobile.
Mr. Paffrath touched on the following slides with brief comments.
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 41 of 96
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 42 of 96
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 43 of 96
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 44 of 96
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 45 of 96
In the slide above, Mr. Paffrath said Vertical Bridge approached the Daisy Mountain Fire
Department and the fire department had some very specific parameters to follow and
Vertical Bridge did not want to comply with those requirements.
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 46 of 96
Amanda Amy Rakofsky, resident, stated safety is her main concern. She asked Vertical
Bridge if she would be notified when they would come and work on the tower. She was
told no she did not need notification because the work would be done between midnight
and 5:00 a.m. and she would not be disturbed. She said the individual who bought the
vacant property where the tower will stand, does not live in the community, and so will
not be negatively impacted as the other neighbors will be.
David Packman, resident, expressed his opposition to the SUP. He said he is not against
technology advancement, but this is not the right location.
Chairman Gates asked the Clerk to read the names of the opposition into the record.
Alan Muller
Lincoln Hunter
Fredrick Kreutzberger
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 47 of 96
Evelyn Felice
Alice Felice
Renee Hunter
Harry Decker
Vivian Decker
Carol Williams
John Williams
Darr Colburn
Chairman Gates asked if anyone had registered to speak in support of the SUP. The
Clerk responded there were none.
Chairman Gates offered Mr. Maskovich some time to rebut the previous comments
made by the community members in opposition.
Mr. Maskovich noted that each notification requirement had been met and Vertical
Bridge went above and beyond with the meetings held to hear the opposition. He said
the residents indicated they do not want a tower at this location at all. Mr. Maskovich
stated that what was heard today was a community that is opposed to any cellular tower
of any shape, size or location. They want an effective prohibition on wireless
communication facilities in this area. He said there is not another site to address the
gap in this area. Mr. Maskovich concluded that all the stated oppositions have been
addressed and it comes down to the community simply not wanting it in their
neighborhood.
Supervisor Hickman asked about the leakage of lead batteries into the ground water.
He asked if there are steps taken in case of a catastrophic failure. Mr. Maskovich stated
he had not heard of the concern before but said the cell tower and equipment are
engineered to protect the environment.
Chairman Gates asked Mr. Ellsworth if all notification requirements were met. Mr.
Ellsworth confirmed all the statutory and ordinance requirements were given.
Chairman Gates acknowledged the history and compliance that was given. He stated
despite the applicant meeting the requirements, he could not support the project.
Supervisor Sellers acknowledged the Planning Commission’s involvement and the
recommendation from the Commission to deny the request.
Motion to concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission for denial by
Supervisor Jack Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Clint Hickman
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin, Steve Gallardo
~ Supervisor Gallardo left the meeting during item #9 and would not return ~
9.
LUXURY STORAGE RV & BOAT (CONTINUED FROM APRIL 6, 2022)
Case #: Z2021034
Supervisor District: 3
Applicant & Owner: Thomas Hart, RA/ Thomas A. Hart Architecture & Planning, LLC / Shawn
Schwanbeck, Luxury Storage RV & Boat, LLC
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 48 of 96
Request: Special Use Permit (SUP) for commercial storage of RVs, boats and vehicles in
the Rural-43 zoning district
Site Location: 600’ east of the SEC of Carefree Hwy. and 12th St. in the Desert Hills area
Commission Recommendation: On 3/10/22, the Commission voted 7-0, to recommend
approval Z2021034 subject to the following conditions ‘a’ – ‘q’:
a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled
“Luxury Storage RV & Boat, LLC“, consisting of three full-size sheets, dated December 14,
2021, and stamped received December 28, 2021, except as modified by the following
conditions. Staff may determine slight refinements to remain in substantial conformance with
the approved site plan. Minor and major amendments to the site plan will be determined in
accordance with Chapter 3 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.
b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report
entitled “Luxury Storage RV & Boat, LLC”, consisting of eleven pages, dated December 14,
2021, and stamped received December 28, 2021, except as modified by the following
conditions.
c. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply:
1. Drainage review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only and does
not represent final design approval nor shall it entitle applicants to future designs that are not
in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance and the
Maricopa County Drainage Policies and Standards.
2. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the
Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance and current engineering policies, standards, and best
practices at the time of application for construction.
3. The entire site and adjacent half-streets’ runoff shall be retained onsite. If portions of
adjacent right-of-way are controlled by other jurisdictions, the adjacent half-streets’ runoff
shall be retained unless separately addressed by the other jurisdictions.
4. Retention basins with stormwater depths exceeding one foot shall provide one foot of
freeboard and all retention basins shall drain within 36 hours per County requirements.
d. The Following MCDOT conditions shall apply:
1. There shall be a Right-In/Right-Out access only to the site and there shall be no left turn
from the site or left turn from westbound Carefree Hwy. thru traffic to the site.
2. There shall be a right-turn deceleration lane at the main entry driveway to limit site traffic
impact to eastbound thru traffic on Carefree Hwy.
e. This special use permit is valid for a period of ten years and shall expire on April 6, 2032,
or upon termination of the use for a period of 90 or more days, whichever occurs first. All site
improvements associated with the special use permit shall be removed within 90 days of
such expiration or termination of use.
f. There shall be no repair of RVs or boats on the site.
g. There shall be a maximum lot coverage of 50% on the site.
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 49 of 96
h. There shall be minimum interior side and rear yards of 15-feet on the site.
i. There shall be a minimum front yard adjacent to the Highway right-of-way of 50-feet with
no average front setback.
j. All landscaping shall consist of indigenous trees, plants, shrubs, and groundcover typical
of the Upper Sonoran Desert, preserving existing vegetation where possible and any
landscaping used shall be drought tolerant with low water consumptive landscaping
materials.
k. Any rooftop mechanicals, ground mechanicals, parking areas, trash enclosures, and
transformers shall be screened.
l. All materials and colors used in screening walls, buildings, covered RV wash bay, and
parking shade canopies must be muted and compatible with the desert environment and the
architecture of the main office.
m. There shall be no reflective glass used in any building.
n. All outdoor lighting shall be dark sky compliant, low intensity, fully shielded, and directed
downward at least 20% below the horizontal plane at bottom of light fixture so that no
illumination occurs off site. All light poles or standards shall have a maximum height of 16-
feet from surface grade of the parking lot, treated to minimize glare, placed at intervals, and
setback a minimum of 20-feet from adjacent properties.
o. The developer must complete habitat and special status species evaluation and submit to
the Arizona Game and Fish Department for review prior to the submission of building permits.
p. Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for initiating a
revocation of this Special Use Permit as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.
q. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant,
with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy
uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject
to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, and at the time of
expiration of the Special Use Permit, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on
the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to
the failure to comply with any conditions, or the expiration of the Special Use Permit, does
not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess
the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it
held on the date of application due to such revocation or expiration of the Special Use Permit.
The Special Use Permit enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date
the Special Use Permit is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value
of the property as if the Special Use Permit had never been granted.) (C-44-22-162-X-00
Chairman Gates asked the Clerk if there were registered speakers or comments for
this item. The Clerk reported there is one from the applicant, Shaine Alleman and two
registered to speak in support. In opposition, there is Georgia Ehmann and Philip
Palmer. There are three registered to speak in opposition only if necessary, Kelly
Charais, Vern Wittenberg, and Frank DeGeorge. The Clerk stated there were nine
registered to speak in support only if necessary. They are: Sherise Martin, Phillip
Garcia, Isaac Leavitt, Brian Schwanbeck, Vince Hils, Mike Stewart, John Rowland,
Kevin Southard, and Ashley Hutson.
Tom Ellsworth, Director of Planning and Development, provided an overview of this
item, noting it is for a Special Use Permit (SUP) for commercial storage of RVs, boats
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 50 of 96
and vehicles in a Rural-43 zoning district. He provided slides for the local location as
well as a broader view of the area.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FORMAL
Z2021034
Luxury Storage RV & Boat
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FORMAL
Z2021034
Luxury Storage RV & Boat
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 51 of 96
The slide below depicts the site plan for this item as well as some of the project details.
This case was heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission on March 10, 2022 and
recommended approval with a 7-0 vote with conditions as stated in the agenda.
Mr. Ellsworth informed the Board there is significant opposition to the project. The
concerns were that the project was not compatible with rural residential land use in the
surrounding area, increased traffic, light pollution, and possible stormwater
contamination.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FORMAL
Z2021034
Luxury Storage RV & Boat
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FORMAL
Z2021034
Luxury Storage RV & Boat
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 52 of 96
Mr. Ellsworth stated the significant opposition would trigger the need for a majority vote
by the Board of Supervisors.
Shaine Alleman, Tiffany Bosco, representing the applicant, thanked the Board for their
time. He noted the slide below provided the general orientation of the proposed site.
Mr. Alleman stated this location was selected due to the demand for this type of
business in the area.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FORMAL
Z2021034
Luxury Storage RV & Boat
Regional Context Aerial Map
Luxury Storage RV & Boat - Carefree Highway, Maricopa County, Arizona
Subject
Property
12th Street
14th Street
APN: 211-74-002A
Acres: 8.71
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 53 of 96
He noted on the following slide, this area is a part of the Daisy Mountain/New River
Area Plan. There has been significant outreach concerning this plan and the list on the
right side of the slide shows all the outreach in 2018-2019 leading up to its approval.
Daisy Mountain / New River Area Plan
Luxury Storage RV & Boat - Carefree Highway, Maricopa County, Arizona
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 54 of 96
He noted on the following slide the Carefree Highway is the one commercial area in
the Area Plan.
Mr. Alleman noted one of the things seen on the slide below is this is a commercial
corridor with a variety of commercial uses in place.
Daisy Mountain / New River Area Plan
Luxury Storage RV & Boat - Carefree Highway, Maricopa County, Arizona
Subject Property
Daisy Mountain / New River Area Plan – Commercial Corridor
Luxury Storage RV & Boat - Carefree Highway, Maricopa County, Arizona
Commercial Corridor
Desert Hills
Centre
Tuscani Pointe
ChrisƟanson
Holdings
Center
Urban Hauling
& Dump Trailer
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 55 of 96
He said the following slides show the commercial development in this area.
Mr. Alleman reviewed the Development Standards slide below to compare the
commercial zoning standards with the SUP proposal.
Daisy Mountain / New River Area Plan – Commercial Corridor
Luxury Storage RV & Boat - Carefree Highway, Maricopa County, Arizona
Tuscani Pointe
• Discount Tire
• Nail Shop
• Mortgage Co.
• Restaurants
• Legacy Sports
Arena
• DenƟst
• Marijuana
Dispensary
• Pool ConstrucƟon
Co.
• Pet Grooming
• Medical Clinic
Desert Hills Centre
Development Standards
Special Use Permit
Luxury Storage RV & Boat - Carefree Highway, Maricopa County, Arizona
This proposal is seeking a Special Use Permit
(not hard C-1/C-2 zoning)
Standard
C-1 / C-2
Zoning
SUP
(Proposed)
Height (max.)
30’
16’
Side Setback (min.)
10’
15’
Rear Setback (min.)
25’
93’ / 15’
Wall Height (min.)
6’
8’
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 56 of 96
He provided details from the site plan below.
The floodplain map below showed the area washes are outside the property. He said
there is a stipulation to work with staff in order to meet all drainage requirements.
Special Use Permit Site Plan
Luxury Storage RV & Boat - Carefree Highway, Maricopa County, Arizona
• Fully secured, gated, and
shaded for 311 spaces of RV &
Boat storage
• Low acƟvity, low profile with
16’ RV covers
• Main entry is gated and is
right-in, right-out only – A right
turn decel lane is provided
• 8’ perimeter screen wall
• MoƟon-acƟvated security
lighƟng from 10pm-6amand
abide by County Outdoor
LighƟng requirements
• LighƟng is dark-sky compliant,
under-mounted and pointed
downward for screening from
adjacent properƟes
• Parking spaces setback 75’
from Carefree Highway
• Landscaping provides
aestheƟcally pleasing
environment
15’
15’
15’
93’
75’
Maricopa County – Floodplain Viewer
Luxury Storage RV & Boat - Carefree Highway, Maricopa County, Arizona
APN: 211-74-002A
Acres: 8.71
Subject
Property
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 57 of 96
Mr. Alleman reviewed the summary slide below.
Chairman Gates asked his colleagues if there were any questions. He thanked
everyone for coming down to the meeting and asked the Clerk to call on registered
speakers in opposition who would have a total of 10 minutes to speak.
~ Supervisor Gallardo left the meeting and would not return ~
Georgia Ehmann, resident, spoke in opposition and commented on a letter received
from Mr. Alleman in April 21, 2021. She called to tell him it was a rural area and her
property abuts the proposed site and to notify her of any meetings regarding this
project. She received another letter in July 2021 about a property in Mesa. She called
Mr. Alleman again about the Carefree Highway project, and stated it was not wanted
in her area. Ms. Ehmann noted she nor her six neighbors ever received the notice
required to be sent to property owners within 300 feet. She commented on the lighting
for the proposed business that would shine into her bedroom window and complained
about a drainage ditch that is going to run behind her property and reiterated her
opposition.
Phillip Palmer, resident, spoke in opposition and stated he has not received any of the
notifications the applicant said were sent out. He noted even if the zoning is
commercial, the due process for the SUP must be followed. The applicants are not
stakeholders in the neighborhood and do not have to worry about a negative impact.
He stated the outreach Mr. Alleman described had to do with the Daisy Mountain/New
River Plan and nothing to do with the proposed business. He reiterated there has been
no involvement by the applicant to contact affected residents to mitigate concerns.
SUMMARY
• Special Use Permitis consistentwith:
• New River / Daisy MountainArea Plan;
• Carefree HighwayScenic Corridor;
• All other CountyOrdinanceand Plan Documents
• Applicanthas discussedSUP with:
• New River PreservaƟonGroup
• AnthemCommunityCouncil
• New River/Desert Hill CommunityAssociaƟon(NRDHCA)
• New River Desert Hill Group
• Other neighbors
• Received supportleƩers from NRDHCA and 8 other propertyowners
• Applicant has made revisions to site plan in response to suggesƟons from
public outreach work
• Full staffsupportand P&Z unanimousrecommendaƟonfor approval
• Applicantagrees with all 21 CondiƟons of Approval
Special Use Permit
Luxury Storage RV & Boat - Carefree Highway, Maricopa County, Arizona
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 58 of 96
Kelly Charais, resident, spoke in opposition stating none of the residents affected have
been approached. She presented drone footage seen below illustrating the amount of
light there is from her front yard on 14th Street.
Ms. Charais said the slide below is an example of the size building they were planning
to put next to her property and she does not want this monstrosity build next door. She
said she is concerned with a business that will operate 24/7 with lights, traffic, and
environmental factors related to RV and boat storage. Ms. Charais talked about the
nearby Sonoran Preserve that is being disturbed.
Chairman Gates asked Mr. Ellsworth about notification compliance. Mr. Ellsworth
stated the requirements and said the applicant met the requirements. He explained
how his office compares the applicant’s notification list with the property owner listing
from the Assessor’s Office. He said unfortunately there is no way to determine if the
property owners actually received the notification.
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 59 of 96
Supervisor Hickman asked how long a sign is posted about a hearing and Mr. Ellsworth
stated the ordinance requires it must be posted 15 days prior to the hearing; however,
Planning and Development ask that they post a sign when the application is received.
Chairman Gates asked Mr. Alleman to return to the podium. Chairman Gates asked
about lighting requirements and Mr. Alleman referred to stipulation “n” concerning the
proposed lighting and read the requirements. Mr. Alleman stated the applicant would
be agreeable to adding a stipulation limiting the hours of operation (6:00 a.m. until 10:00
p.m.). Supervisor Gates asked about stipulations regarding landscaping. Mr. Alleman
reviewed the stipulations concerning landscaping and is adding a stipulation
concerning the placement and maturity of trees on the east and south boundaries.
Referred to as stipulation “r”., he read the stipulation regarding size and type of
landscape trees for the eastern and southern boundaries.
Supervisor Galvin asked if the type of trees would be a natural desert tree selection
and would the maintenance of the trees be included in a stipulation. Mr. Ellsworth stated
the type of trees to be planted and said the trees would be maintained per the
stipulations.
Chairman Gates asked about noise and Mr. Alleman stated the hours of operation
would be in place to address the noise as with the lighting. He also stated tree size
would be added to the stipulations.
Chairman Gates said he understood the opposition’s concerns, but this is a commercial
corridor. He urged the applicant to have further discussions with the neighbors.
Supervisor Hickman spoke about the posting requirements stating there have always
been problems. He stated he and his colleagues always hear about there being no
outreach. He said this needs to be considered in strategic planning.
Motion to approve as amended to include the two additional stipulations regarding
hours of operation, 6 a.m. to 10 p.m., and size of landscape trees, 36” box, and subject
to conditions “a” – “s” by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Thomas
Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
FORMAL MEETING RECESSED
Chairman Gates recessed the Formal Board meeting to reconvene in the Special Meeting.
FORMAL MEETING RECONVENED
Chairman Gates reconvened the Formal Board meeting and continued with the remaining items
on the agenda.
STATUTORY HEARINGS - AUDIENCIAS LEGALES
If you would like to send a comment or question regarding one of the statutory hearing items,
please send email to Agenda.Comments@maricopa.gov
Transportation Statutory Hearings - Audiencias Legales de Transportación
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 60 of 96
10.
ROAD FILE DECLARATIONS - DECLARACIONES DE CARRETERA
Approve, by resolution, petitions to open and declare the following roads into the county
highway system. This action will serve as notice of the Board of Supervisors’ acceptance of
all U.S. Patent easements, reservations, rights-of-way, or properties along the alignments
into the Maricopa County highway system and will also authorize the maintenance and
acquisition of the necessary rights-of-way through donation, purchase, or condemnation.
a.
ROAD FILE NO. A705
Convene a hearing for Road File No. A705 to Open and Declare the following
described alignment into the County Transportation System.
Therefore, pursuant to provisions in A.R.S. §§ 11-251, 28-6701, 28-6702 and 28-
6703, it is recommended by the County Engineer, that the Board of Supervisors
Open and Declare the following described alignment into the County Transportation
System, Road File No. A705.
Legal description and map identified as Exhibits "A” and “B” are attached.
In addition, direct the Clerk of the Board to record the Board of Supervisors resolution
with the County Recorder.
(General Vicinity: Lindsay Road from Spur Road to Appleby Road and lying in
Supervisory District No. 1) (C-64-22-198-X-01)
Chairman Gates asked the Clerk if there were any registered speakers or comments
received on items #10 and #11. The Clerk said none were received.
Motion to approve by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Thomas
Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
b.
ROAD FILE NO. A706
Convene a hearing for Road File No. A706 to Open and Declare the following
described alignment into the County Transportation System.
Therefore, pursuant to provisions in A.R.S. §§ 11-251, 28-6701, 28-6702 and 28-
6703, it is recommended by the County Engineer, that the Board of Supervisors
Open and Declare the following described alignment into the County Transportation
System, Road File No. A706.
Legal description and map identified as Exhibits "A” and “B” are attached.
In addition, direct the Clerk of the Board to record the Board of Supervisors resolution
with the County Recorder.
(General Vicinity: Val Vista Drive and Ocotillo Road in Unincorporated Maricopa
County. Supervisory District No. 1) (C-64-22-200-X-01)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Thomas
Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin, Steve Gallardo
Absent: Steve Gallardo
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 61 of 96
11.
PATENT EASEMENT ABANDONMENT: ROAD FILE NO. PAB-0181
Convene a hearing for Road File No. PAB-0181 to consider the request to abandon a portion
of a Federal Patent Easement Number 1150142 lying in the Northwest quarter of Section 6
– T4N, R3E of the Gila and Salt River Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona. Located in the
general vicinity of Briles Road and 17th Avenue and known as Assessor Parcel Number 210-
11-014B. Notice conditions and the request for comment requirements have been met.
Supervisory District No. 3 (C-64-22-145-X-01)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Thomas
Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
COUNTY OFFICERS - OFICIALES DE CONDADO
Assessor - Asesor
12.
STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM GOVERNMENT PROPERTY LEASE TAX
Under A.R.S. § 42-11102(C), the Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) may elect to
have the taxes on its income producing properties based upon their full cash value as
determined by this Office ("voluntary contributions") or pursuant to A.R.S. § 42-6201 et seq.,
it may provide for a government property lease tax ("GPLET"). The ASRS has timely notified
the Assessor's Office that it is electing to have its sole property in Maricopa County taxed
under the GPLET framework for tax year 2022. That property is a high-rise office building
located at 3300 N. Central Ave, Phoenix (APN #118-37-021P). The computed tax due on or
before December 1, 2022, is $26,080. (C-12-22-008-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Thomas
Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
Board of Supervisors - Junta de Supervisores
13.
APPOINTMENT TO THE MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH
Approve the appointment of Dr. Matthew Farber to the Board of Health, representing
Supervisorial District 2. The term of service will be effective as of Board approval through
December 31, 2024, filling the unexpired term of previous member, Robin Schaeffer. (C-06-
22-646-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Thomas
Galvin
Supervisor Galvin acknowledged Dr. Matthew Farber, a resident of Scottsdale, and
briefly commented on Dr. Farber’s accomplishments.
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 62 of 96
Clerk of the Board - Secretaria de la Junta
14.
SPECIAL EVENT LICENSE FOR WILD ARIZONA
Pursuant to A.R.S. § 4-203.02, approve a Special Event Liquor License Application filed by
Brian Stultz for Wild Arizona at McDowell Mountain Regional Park at 16300 McDowell
Mountain Drive, Fort McDowell, Arizona 85264 to be held on Saturday, May 21, 2022, from
7:00 pm to 12:00 am. (Supervisorial District 2) (C-06-22-611-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Thomas
Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
15.
SPECIAL EVENT LICENSE FOR WILD ARIZONA
Pursuant to A.R.S. § 4-203.02, approve a Special Event Liquor License Application filed by
Brian Stultz for Wild Arizona at Usery Mountain Regional Park at 3939 North Usery Pass
Road, Mesa, Arizona 85207 to be held on Saturday, July 23, 2022, from 7:30 pm to 12:00
am. (Supervisorial District 2) (C-06-22-610-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Thomas
Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
Constables - Condestables
16.
FY 2022 CONSTABLES BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
In accordance with A.R.S. 42-17106(B), approve the following amendments to the FY 2022
budget:
Increase the revenue and expenditure authorities for Constables (D250) General Fund (100)
Non-Recurring (NRNP) budget by $4,986.
Revenues and expenditures for the Constables Ethics, Standards and Training Board
(CESTB) grant awarded in FY 2021 for equipment-training ammunition did not post until FY
2022, creating a need for an additional $4,986 in budget authority for FY 2022.
Grant revenues are not local revenues for the purpose of the constitutional expenditure
limitation and therefore, expenditure of the funds is not prohibited by the budget law. The
budget adjustment does not alter the budget constraining the expenditure of local revenues
duly adopted by the Board pursuant to A.R.S. 42-17105. (C-25-22-014-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Thomas
Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 63 of 96
County Attorney - Procurador del Condado
17.
SUPPLEMENTAL VICTIM COMPENSATION FUNDING FROM THE ARIZONA
CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION
Approve acceptance of an additional $50,000 in State grant funds from the Arizona Criminal
Justice Commission for award VC-22-008. These funds come from the FY2021-2022
Arizona Crime Victim Compensation program administered by the Arizona Criminal Justice
Commission. The additional $50,000 raises the State funds received to $607,625 for
FY2021-2022 and the total grant amount to $1,799,500. The funds will terminate on June
30, 2022.
These monies are to be used for the benefit of victims of crime through the Maricopa County
Victim Compensation Program and cannot be used for indirect costs (Agreement, Page 7,
Paragraph 35).
The Maricopa County Attorney's Office's composite indirect cost rate for FY22 is 20.3%, or
$10,150 of the additional award. The recoverable indirect cost of administering this grant is
$0; the non-recoverable indirect cost is $10,150. Non-recoverable indirect costs will be
covered by the departmental general fund budget. There is no requirement of match funds.
This grant is competitive and does not require ongoing cash contributions after the grant
period end date. Grant revenues are not “local revenues” for the purpose of the constitutional
expenditure limitation, and therefore expenditure of the funds is not prohibited by budget law.
This funding directly supports the overall mandated function of providing victim services. (C-
19-22-121-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Jack Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Thomas Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
18.
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH PHOENIX CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
Approve the fourth amendment to agreement with Phoenix Children's Hospital on behalf of
the Maricopa County Attorney to update the list of Advocacy Centers and Providers
(Attachment A) and revise Compensation and Reimbursement (Attachment C) to incorporate
a new section 4. All other sections of Attachment C remain unchanged.
The revised section 4 is as follows:
4. MCAO will reimburse Phoenix Children’s Hospital $819 for each skeletal examination in
cases of suspicious deaths of children under the age of two years old without having to
consult the Medical Examiner’s Office to gain approval to do the postmortem skeletal survey.
The terms of this agreement will become effective upon approval of the Board of Supervisors.
Authorize the Chairman to sign any and all documents related to this action. (C-19-17-045-
M-06)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Jack Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Thomas Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin,
Absent: Steve Gallardo
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 64 of 96
Sheriff - Alguacil
19.
MONTHLY DONATIONS REPORT - FEBRUARY
Accept the monthly donations report from MCSO for the month of February with a cash value
of $348. Also accept the non-cash donations report from MCSO for the month of February
with a non-cash value of $762.
All the cash and non-cash donations were designated for MASH, the Maricopa County
Sheriff’s Animal Safe Haven where evidentiary animals seized in criminal animal abuse
cases are housed and cared for. (C-50-22-140-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Jack Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Thomas Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
20.
IGA WITH SALT RIVER PIMA-MARICOPA INDIAN PD FOR SWORN BASIC TRAINING
ACADEMY
Approve an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between Maricopa County on behalf of the
Sheriff’s Office (MCSO) and Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Police Department
(Salt River Police) regarding the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office Sworn Basic Training
Academy. This Agreement allows Salt River Police law enforcement recruits to participate in
scheduled MCSO Sworn Basic Training Academies at a cost of $750 per registrant. The
term is effective retroactive from July 1, 2021, through December 31, 2023, and when signed
by all parties. The former agreement expired June 30, 2021. (C-50-22-141-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Jack Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Thomas Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
21.
IGA WITH THE TOWN OF GILBERT FOR COOPERATIVE LAW ENFORCEMENT
TRAINING OPERATIONS
Approve an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between the Town of Gilbert ("Host
Agency") and Maricopa County by and through the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office ("Non-
host agency") for the purpose of conducting joint law enforcement training or attending law
enforcement training hosted by either Party. Such training may include, but is not limited to,
recruit and in-service academy training and specialty schools for both sworn and civilian
personnel. Training fees will be established by and through the respective Chief of Police.
A separate written agreement for each cooperative law enforcement training operation listing
specific terms that the Non-Host Agency shall pay to the Host Agency for training shall be
signed by both Parties prior to the start of training.
This Agreement shall become effective on the date of the final signature of all the Parties
and shall terminate June 30, 2026. This agreement shall automatically renew for additional
five (5) year terms under the same terms and conditions, including any adopted amendments
in effect at the time of renewal. (C-50-22-142-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Jack Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Thomas Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 65 of 96
Treasurer - Tesorero
22.
OFFERS ON TAX DEEDED LAND PARCEL 400-33-139
Pursuant to A.R.S. § 42-18303, the foregoing parcel was offered for sale at auction. No bids
were received for the parcel at the auction, but thereafter the following bids were received.
Please consider the cash offers, or any additional cash bids which were offered and
submitted to the Treasurer’s e-mail portal no later than 3:00pm on Tuesday 4/19/2022, on
the following Tax Deeded Land parcel. A.R.S.§42-18303 allows the county to sell property
in the county held by the State by tax deed to the highest bidder for cash.
Parcel Number – 400-33-139
Date Previously Offered – Nov 2021
Offer #1
Purchaser / Name for the Deed – 26 Sylvia LLC/Mark Ivanich
Amount of Offer – $300.00
Offer #2
Purchaser / Name for the Deed – Joaguin Mercado
Amount of Offer – $1,000.00
Offer #3
Purchaser / Name for the Deed – Roxanne Hudson
Amount of Offer – $250.00
If the Board accepts the offer on the subject property, direct the Treasurer’s Office accept
payment and prepare the Quit Claim Deed to convey the property to winning bidder and
deliver to the Clerk of the Board for further processing. Pursuant to A.R.S. §42-18303(C),
the proceeds of the winning bid shall be paid to the county treasurer. After deducting and
distributing interest, penalties, fees, and costs charged against the parcel, the treasurer shall
apportion the remainder according to ARS 42-18303(C).
None of the three bidders has any legal interest in the property and none are an adjacent
parcel owner. The subject property lies within Supervisorial District 5. Crossroads are S.
Tuthill Road and W Pecos Rd. (C-43-22-096-X-00)
Chairman Gates asked the Clerk if there was any other outside interest in bidding on
this property or if there was anyone present to bid on this property. The Clerk said there
was no other outside interest in bidding. Chairman Gates asked for a motion on this
item.
Motion to accept offer #2 as stated on the agenda for approval by Supervisor Clint
Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Thomas Galvin
The Clerk called the roll with the following result:
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
23.
OFFERS ON TAX DEEDED LAND PARCEL 400-33-138
Pursuant to A.R.S. § 42-18303, the foregoing parcel was offered for sale at auction. No bids
were received for the parcel at the auction, but thereafter the following bids were received.
Please consider the cash offers, or any additional cash bids which were offered and
submitted to the Treasurer’s e-mail portal no later than 3:00pm on Tuesday 3/09/2021, on
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 66 of 96
the following Tax Deeded Land parcel. A.R.S.§42-18303 allows the county to sell property
in the county held by the State by tax deed to the highest bidder for cash.
Parcel Number – 400-33-138
Date Previously Offered – Nov 2021
Offer #1
Purchaser / Name for the Deed – 26 Sylvia llc/Mark Ivanich
Amount of Offer – $300.00
Offer #2
Purchaser / Name for the Deed – Joaguin Mercado
Amount of Offer – $1,000.00
Offer #3
Purchaser / Name for the Deed – Roxanne Hudson
Amount of Offer – $300.00
If the Board accepts the offer on the subject property, direct the Treasurer’s Office accept
payment and prepare the Quit Claim Deed to convey the property to winning bidder and
deliver to the Clerk of the Board for further processing. Pursuant to A.R.S. §42-18303(C),
the proceeds of the winning bid shall be paid to the county treasurer. After deducting and
distributing interest, penalties, fees, and costs charged against the parcel, the treasurer shall
apportion the remainder according to ARS 42-18303(C).
None of the three bidders has any legal interest in the property and none are an adjacent
parcel owner. The subject property lies within Supervisorial District 5. Crossroads are S.
Tuthill Road and W Pecos Rd. (C-43-22-097-X-00)
Chairman Gates asked the Clerk if there was any other outside interest in bidding on
this property or if there was anyone present to bid on this property. The Clerk said there
was no other outside interest in bidding. Chairman Gates asked for a motion on this
item.
Motion to accept offer #2 as stated on the agenda for approval by Supervisor Thomas
Galvin, seconded by Supervisor Jack Sellers
The Clerk called the roll with the following result:
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
COUNTY MANAGEMENT - ADMINISTRADORES DEL CONDADO
Assistant County Manager - Sub Directora de Condado - Lee Ann Bohn
24.
ACCEPTANCE OF RESIGNATION BY MARICOPA COUNTY WORKFORCE
DEVELOPMENT BOARD CHAIRMAN MATTHEW MCGUIRE
Approval for the following action regarding the Maricopa County Workforce Development
Board (MCWDB) as set forth below:
1. Accept the resignation of Chairman Matthew McGuire for the Business category of the
Maricopa County Workforce Development Board.
The MCWDB is established and receives its authority in accordance with the Workforce
Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA), which was signed into law on July 22, 2014, as
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 67 of 96
Public Law 113-128. The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors (BOS) shall have final
authority.
The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors approves the appointments, reappointments and
accepts the resignations of MCWDB members.
Supervisory District: All Districts (C-95-22-058-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Thomas Galvin, seconded by Supervisor Clint
Hickman
Supervisor Hickman stated Mr. McGuire enjoyed his work on this board and working
with Ms. Bohn. He left the health care industry and is no longer qualified to serve on
this board. He thanked Mr. McGuire for his service.
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
25.
APPOINTMENT OF MARICOPA COUNTY WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD
MEMBER
Appoint Grenee Martacho-Celuch, Chief Executive Officer, Concord General Contracting to
the
Small
Business
Category
OF
THE
MARICOPA
COUNTY
WORKFORCE
DEVELOPMENT BOARD, effective upon approval through June 30, 2025. Ms. Martacho-
Celuch would fill the vacant small business category, due to the recent resignation of former
Maricopa County Workforce Development Board Member Collin Stewart.
The MCWDB is established and receives its authority in accordance with the Workforce
Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA), which was signed into law on July 22, 2014, as
Public Law 113-128. The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors (BOS) shall have final
authority.
The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors approves the appointments, reappointments and
accepts the resignations of MCWDB members.
Supervisory District: All Districts (C-95-22-057-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Thomas Galvin, seconded by Supervisor Clint
Hickman
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
COUNTY OFFICES AND DEPARTMENTS - DEPARTAMENTOS Y
OFICINAS DEL CONDADO
Air Quality - Calidad del Aire
26.
AGREEMENT WITH THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
FOR THE TRAVEL REDUCTION PROGRAM
Approve agreement to a Government Services Contract (GSC) (EV22-0026) between the
Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) and Maricopa County Air Quality
Department (MCAQD) in the not-to-exceed amount of $872,692. The purpose of this
agreement is to fund the continued implementation of the Maricopa County Travel Reduction
Program (TRP). This agreement is effective July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023.
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 68 of 96
An amount of up to $200,000.00 will be passed through to the Regional Public Transportation
Authority as an external service provider upon separate agenda and approval for services
provided between July 1, 2022, and June 30, 2023.
This item has been included in the FY2023 MCAQD budget to be approved by the Board of
Supervisors. Grant revenues are not local revenues for the purpose of the constitutional
expenditure limitation, and therefore expenditures of these revenues are not prohibited by
the budget law. (C-85-22-037-X-00)
Blue Crowley, resident, expressed his opinions and concerns with Valley Metro.
Motion to approve by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Thomas
Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
27.
LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH ARIZONA CENTER FOR NATURE CONSERVATION
Approve and execute License Agreement No. P-50394 between Arizona Center for Nature
Conservation, an Arizona nonprofit corporation (“Licensor”) and Maricopa County
(“Licensee”) for use of property at 455 North Galvin Parkway, Phoenix, AZ, 85008.
This License Agreement allows Maricopa County Air Quality Department (MCAQD), as a
part of their Clean Air Kiosk project, to install and maintain an engaging, interactive air quality
educational kiosk and monitoring equipment on the property. The agreement will be effective
upon execution by all parties for a term of two (2) years, commencing May 1, 2022, through
April 30, 2024. The agreement may be extended for two (2) additional two-year (2) terms
upon Maricopa County (“Licensee”) 60-days’ prior written notice to Licensor. Either Party
may terminate the agreement with or without cause with ninety (90) days’ advance written
notice to the other party. There is no cost to the County for use of the property.
This licensed property is located in Supervisorial District 1. (C-85-22-038-X-00)
The Clerk announced at the beginning of the meeting this item would be continued to
the May 4, 2022 meeting per the department request. No action taken on this item.
Animal Care and Control Services - Servicios de Control y Cuidado de Animales
28.
SHELTERING AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH TOWN OF
YOUNGTOWN FOR ANIMAL SERVICES
Approve a Sheltering Agreement and an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between
Maricopa County Animal Care and Control and Town of Youngtown for animal sheltering
and control services. The initial term of the agreement provides services from July 1, 2022,
through June 30, 2027, with the option of renewals as set forth in paragraph 5 of the
Sheltering Agreement and paragraph 4 of the IGA. The Town of Youngtown agrees to pay
the annual sum of $1,884 for sheltering services provided during the initial term of the
Agreement, as set forth in Appendix A of the Agreement; and agrees to pay the annual sum
of $11,831 for animal control services provided during the initial term of the IGA Agreement,
as set forth in Appendix A of the Agreement. (C-79-22-155-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Jack Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Clint Hickman
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 69 of 96
29.
SHELTERING AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH TOWN OF QUEEN
CREEK FOR ANIMAL SERVICES
Approve a Sheltering Agreement and an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between
Maricopa County Animal Care and Control and Town of Queen Creek for animal sheltering
and control services. The initial term of the agreement provides services from July 1, 2022,
through June 30, 2027, with the option of renewals as set forth in paragraph 5 of the
Sheltering Agreement and paragraph 4 of the IGA. The Town of Queen Creek agrees to pay
the annual sum of $0 for sheltering services provided during the initial term of the Agreement,
as set forth in Appendix A of the Agreement and agrees to pay the annual sum of $41,113
for animal control services provided during the initial term of the IGA Agreement, as set forth
in Appendix A of the Agreement. (C-79-22-156-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Jack Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Clint Hickman
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
30.
SHELTERING AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH SALT RIVER PIMA-
MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY FOR ANIMAL SERVICES
Approve a Sheltering Agreement and an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between
Maricopa County Animal Care and Control and Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community
for animal sheltering and control services. The initial term of the agreement provides services
from July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2027, with the option of renewals as set forth in
paragraph 5 of the Sheltering Agreement and paragraph 4 of the IGA. The Salt River Pima-
Maricopa Indian Community agrees to pay the annual sum of $36,396 for sheltering services
provided during the initial term of the Agreement, as set forth in Appendix A of the
Agreement; and agrees to pay the annual sum of $1,232 for animal control services provided
during the initial term of the IGA Agreement, as set forth in Appendix A of the Agreement.
(C-79-22-157-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Jack Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Clint Hickman
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
31.
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE WITH HLP, INC (VET IMPORT SOFTWARE)
Approve and execute a one-year agreement in the Competition Impracticable between
Maricopa County and HLP, Inc. and the Animal Care and Control to renew the annual support
and maintenance of CMS software for a one-year term. This agreement will be in effect from
July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2023, at a cost of $267,240.00. The original agreement was
approved by the Board of Supervisors under Agenda # C-79-14-088-3-00. (C-79-22-158-X-
00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Jack Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Clint Hickman
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
32.
PETCO LOVE GRANT AGREEMENT
Approve the application and acceptance of grant funds from Petco Love Agreement (the
“Agreement”) in the amount not-to-exceed $150,000. The grant provides funding for a
mandated service, which is to support lifesaving objectives at the Maricopa County Animal
Care & Control. The grant award begins upon execution and ends on April 30, 2023.
Authorize the Chairman to sign the Agreement and authorize the Animal Care and Control
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 70 of 96
appointed authority and/or designee to sign other grant-related documents, such as reporting
requirements, etc., as applicable to administer the grant.
In accordance with A.R.S. §42-17106(B), authorize the increase of revenue and expenditure
authority in the Animal Care and Control (D790) Animal Control Grants Fund (573) Non-
Recurring Non-Project (NRNP) appropriation group by $150,000 in Fiscal Year 2022.
The grant allows a 0% rate or $0 for indirect costs. The Maricopa County Department of
Finance has calculated the Fiscal Year 2022 indirect cost rate at 14.30% or $21,450. The
recoverable cost rates for administering this grant is $0 and the Animal Care and Control will
absorb the non-recoverable indirect cost of $21,450 into the department’s operating budget
over the next two fiscal years.
This grant is non-recurring, and a cash or in-kind contribution is not applicable. There are no
future or ongoing contributions required following the grant period.
Funding for this agreement is provided by a Grant from Petco Love and was competitively
bid. The grant cannot be used in any way that decreases the allocation or budget of
governmental funds for animal welfare purposes. This request will increase the grant budget
appropriation in the Animal Control Grants Fund (573) to accommodate revenues and
expenditures authorized by the grant. Grant revenues are not local revenues for the purpose
of the constitutional expenditure limitation and, therefore, expenditure of the funds is not
prohibited by the budget law. The approval of this action does not alter the budget
constraining the expenditures of local revenues duly adopted by the Board pursuant to
A.R.S. §42-17105. (C-79-22-160-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Jack Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Clint Hickman
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
Enterprise Technology - Tecnología Empresarial
33.
AMEND TECHNOLOGY POLICY - PHYSICAL ACCESS AND SECURITY OF
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
Amend Technology Policy, Physical Access, and Security of Confidential Information -
A2239 - adopted by Maricopa County's Board of Supervisors on 12/10/2014 (C-49-15-029-
6-00). The proposed changes were needed to update definitions and clarify intent of
previously undefined terminology. The Office of Enterprise Technology has also expanded
the policy to include employees’ remote workstations - to maintain security and privacy, as
many departments have adopted a hybrid work model. These proposed modifications better
articulate expectations of departments to develop, adopt, and adhere to formal, documented,
physical, and environmental protection procedures. (C-49-15-029-6-01)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Jack Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Clint Hickman
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 71 of 96
Environmental Services - Servicios Ambientales
34.
DONATIONS
In accordance with County Policy A2508, accept the monthly donation report received from
Environmental Services for the months of December 2021, January 2022, and February
2022 for a cash value of $820. (C-88-22-016-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Jack Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Clint Hickman
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
Finance - Finanzas
35.
FUNDS TRANSFERS; WARRANTS - TRANSFERENCIAS DE FONDOS; WARRANTS
Approve regular and routine fund transfers, warrant reports 03/18/2022 through 03/31/2022,
from the operating funds to clearing funds including payroll, journal entries, allocations,
loans, and paid claims and authorize the issuance of the appropriate related warrants.
Pursuant to A.R.S. §11-217(D) and A.R.S. §11-623, said warrants and claims are on file in
the Clerk of the Board’s office and retained in accordance with LAPR approved retention
schedule. (C-18-22-136-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Jack Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Clint Hickman
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
Human Resources - Recursos Humanos
36.
MARKET ADJUSTMENTS 4/18/22 IMPLEMENTATION
Pursuant to A.R.S. §11-251 (38) and 251 (51), approve the market ranges below and direct
the Office of Budget and Finance to adjust the department’s FY 2023 operating expenditure
budgets between the tentative and final budget adoption for the annualized funding to
implement the market adjustments as recommended by Human Resources. With the ever-
increasing recruitment and retention challenges, Human Resources has identified the need
to implement market adjustments for attorneys. (C-31-22-083-X-00)
Updated Salary Ranges:
o Attorney Senior Law Researcher: $34.65 - $51.93 ($72,072 - $108,014)
o Attorney: $34.65 - $67.31 ($72,072 - $140,005)
o Attorney I: $34.65 - $51.93 ($72,072 - $108,014)
o Attorney II: $41.35 - $56.75 ($86,008 - $118,040)
o Attorney III: $44.30 - $67.31 ($92,144 - $140,005)
o Attorney V: $64.43 - $85.70 ($134,000-$178,256))
o Attorney IV: $53.00 - $76.93 ($110,240-$160,014)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Thomas Galvin, seconded by Supervisor Jack Sellers
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 72 of 96
37.
MARKET RANGES
Pursuant to A.R.S §11-251 (38) and 251 (51), approve the addition, replacement, and/or
deletion of Market Ranges to the authorized comprehensive listing of employee
compensation Market Ranges previously approved by the Board of Supervisors and approve
the addition and/or replacement of bi-weekly stipends for management/professional
assignments (MPA) based upon the employee’s full-time equivalent (FTE) status. (C-31-22-
085-X-00)
Update Ranges:
Attorney $34.65 $67.31 $72,072 $140,005
Attorney I $34.65 $51.93 $72,072 $108,014
Attorney II $41.35 $56.75 $86,008 $118,040
Attorney III $44.30 $67.31 $92,144 $140,005
Attorney IV $53.00 $76.93 $110,240 $160,014
Attorney Senior Law Researcher $34.65 $51.93 $72,072 $108,014
Attorney V $64.43 $85.70 $134,014 $178,256
Investigations Supervisor (Defense) $35.00 $47.75 $72,800 $99,320
IT Division Manager $49.80 $82.15 $103,584 $170,872
Parks Specialist $17.00 $28.25 $35,360 $58,760
Mental Health Director $55.85 $86.05 $116,168 $178,984
Motion to approve by Supervisor Thomas Galvin, seconded by Supervisor Jack Sellers
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
38.
EMPLOYEE DISCOUNT VENDOR DONATION
In accordance with the County’s Policy for Receiving Donations (A2508), accept a cash
donation of $75.00 from Get Away Today. After Board acceptance of this donation, the
total amount will be deposited into the County’s General Fund.
Get Away Today is a member of Benefairs, the County’s employee discount program
provider. The County’s relationship with Benefairs was originally approved by the Board
on the 03/13/2019 agenda (C-31-01-015-8-01). With every employee discount purchase
made by County employees, a donation to the County is made. (C-31-22-084-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Thomas Galvin, seconded by Supervisor Jack Sellers
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
Human Services - Servicios Humanos
39.
APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT GRANT
FUND
In accordance with A.R.S. §42-17106(B), authorize the following amendments to FY 2022
budget:
Approve an increase in the appropriated budget for Human Services Department (D220)
Human Services Grant fund (222), Operating (OPER) in the amount of $4,764,288 in
revenues and $4,764,288 in expenditures as identified on the Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Agenda
Item Financial Impact Form on file in the Office of the Clerk of the Board and retained in
accordance with LAPR approved retention schedule. The appropriation adjustment brings
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 73 of 96
the Human Services Fund (222), Operating (OPER) budget to the total amount of
$58,163,429.
FUND 222-OPER-FY2022 $4,764,288 Revenue and Expenditures
Approve an increase in the appropriated budget for Human Services Department (D220)
Human Services Grant fund (222), Non-Recurring Non-Project (NRNP) in the amount of
$43,389,188 in revenues and $43,389,188 in expenditures as identified on the Fiscal Year
2021-2022 Agenda Item Financial Impact Form on file in the Office of the Clerk of the Board
and retained in accordance with LAPR approved retention schedule. The appropriation
adjustment brings the Human Services Fund (222), Non-Recurring Non-Project (NRNP)
budget to the total amount of $82,039,725.
FUND 222-NRNP-FY2022 $43,389,188 Revenue and Expenditures
Approve an increase in the appropriated budget for Human Services Department (D220)
Human Services Grant fund (217), Operating (OPER) in the amount of $1,482,032 in
revenues and $1,482,032 in expenditures as identified on the Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Agenda
Item Financial Impact Form on file in the Office of the Clerk of the Board and retained in
accordance with LAPR approved retention schedule. The appropriation adjustment brings
the Human Services Fund (217), Operating (OPER) budget to the total amount of
$8,157,815.
FUND 217-OPER-FY2022 $1,482,032 Revenue and Expenditures
The appropriation adjustment is necessary as the carry forward amounts of prior year grants
and award amounts of new grants differ from the amount approved in the Fiscal Year 2021-
2022 Budget Appropriation. Grant revenues are not local revenues for the purpose of the
constitutional expenditure limit, and therefore expenditures of these revenues are not
prohibited by the budget law. The approval of this budget adjustment does not alter the
budget constraining the expenditures of local revenues duly adopted by the Board pursuant
to A.R.S. 42-17105. The indirect cost rate is 22.2% as approved by the Department of Health
and Human Services. Most of the grants for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 allow for indirect cost
recovery as reflected in the funding agreements.
Supervisory District: All (C-22-22-090-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Thomas Galvin, seconded by Supervisor Jack Sellers
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
40.
AMENDMENT TO THE IGA WITH ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY
FOR COMMUNITY ACTION SERVICES PROGRAM
Approve revenue Amendment No. 6 to the Intergovernmental Agreement (Agreement)
between Arizona Department of Economic Security (DES) and Maricopa County,
administered by its Human Services Department (County).
The purpose of Amendment No. 6 is to:
1. Revise the Itemized Services Budget for the period of July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2022.
2. In accordance with the Alert issued on February 16, 2022, the revised allocations are as
follows:
a. The total value of the budget is revised from $10,897,565 to $12,272,938.62 as detailed
in the attached itemized service budget. The itemized service budget is added and attached.
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 74 of 96
The funding amount shall be increased by $1,375,373.62.
Funds will be utilized to provide assistance to eligible low-income residents in Maricopa
County, assistance may include eviction prevention services, rent, mortgage, and utility
assistance.
Acceptance of this Amendment will not impact the County General Fund.
FY 2022: $1,375,373.62 Revenue & Expenditures
Supervisory District: All (C-22-20-039-3-06)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Thomas Galvin, seconded by Supervisor Jack Sellers
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
Medical Examiner - Médico Forense
41.
AMENDMENT TO GRANT FUNDS FROM ARIZONA CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION
FOR THE PAUL COVERDELL FORENSIC SCIENCE IMPROVEMENT GRANTS
PROGRAM
Approve Amendment No. 1 to a(n) Agreement between Arizona Criminal Justice
Commission and Maricopa County through the Office of Medical Examiner in the not-to-
exceed amount of $7,575. This amendment is funded by a grant from Arizona Criminal
Justice Commission, CV 21-22-002. The purpose of this amendment is to increase the
amount of the grant award and revise the grant period. This amendment is effective from
April 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022. An extension of the grant through September 30, 2023,
can be requested to Arizona Criminal Justice Commission. Approve the Chief Medical
Examiner to sign all documents related to an extension. All other terms and conditions of the
Agreement remain in full force and effect.
The grant award is reoccurring and has been awarded to the department in previous years.
The cash or in-kind match is not applicable. Indirect cost is $1,585.45. Future ongoing cash
contributions are not required after the grant period. The grant award is not a mandated
function but provides a benefit to the citizens by training and educating our Medical
Examiners. The grant award is non-competitive. There are no costs that will need to be
absorbed by the department’s operating budget.
Pursuant to ARS §42-17106(B), Direct the Office of Budget and Finance to increase the
Medical Examiner (D290) Medical Examiner Grant Fund (224) Operating (OPER) FY 2023
Revised revenue and expenditure budget by $2,129 at the beginning of FY 2023. Grant
revenues are not local revenues for the purpose of the constitutional expenditure limitation
and therefore, expenditure of the funds is not prohibited by the budget law. This budget
adjustment does not alter the budget constraining the expenditure of local revenues duly
adopted by the Board pursuant to A.R.S. §42-17105.
All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect. The grant
allows a 0% rate for indirect costs, or $0 which may be incurred by the Office of Medical
Examiner or Maricopa County for the administration of this grant. The Maricopa County
Department of Finance has calculated the Office of Medical Examiner's composite indirect
cost rate at 20.93%, or $1,585.45. The recoverable indirect cost of administering this grant
is $0; the non-recoverable indirect cost is $1,585.45. (C-29-21-015-X-00-01)
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 75 of 96
Motion to approve by Supervisor Jack Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Thomas Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
42.
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT WITH DR. CHERYL NIBLO
Approve an Independent Contractor Agreement with Dr. Cheryl Niblo to provide forensic
pathology services for the Maricopa County Medical Examiner’s Office. This agreement is
effective May 1, 2022, at a rate of $2000/day. The term of the agreement is for one (1) year
from the effective date, unless terminated earlier. Upon agreement by both parties, the
Office of the Medical Examiner may renew the term for additional one-year terms up to a
maximum of ten (10) years. (C-29-22-017-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Jack Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Thomas Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
Procurement Services - Servicios de Adquisiciones
43.
220034-ROQ, PUBLIC HEALTH FACILITY RENOVATIONS - GOODYEAR
Approve and award a professional services contract in a not to exceed amount of
$607,259.00 between Maricopa County and DWL Architects & Planners, Inc, (Phoenix, AZ)
to provide design services of the renovations of the Public Health Facility, located in
Goodyear, AZ. (C-73-22-089-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Jack Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Thomas Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
44.
220163-RFP, FIRE SUPPRESSION, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS AND FIRE
EXTINGUISHERS
Approve the contract for award to Climatec, LLC DBA: Climatec BTG at an estimate of $
1,200,000.00 over one (1) year until April 30, 2023, with four (4) one-year renewal options.
The effective date of the contract will be May 1, 2022. The purpose of the contract is to
provide to Maricopa County fire suppression systems and back flow testing, inspection, and
preventative maintenance program for the Maricopa County Facilities Management
Department at various County owned buildings; fire alarm systems monitoring, testing,
inspection, service, and preventative maintenance for the Maricopa County Facilities
Management Department at various County owned buildings; full service maintenance for
portable fire extinguishers for the Facilities Management Department (FMD) or other County
departments; firefighter air system testing. (C-73-22-090-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Jack Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Thomas Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
45.
220049-DBB, DOWNTOWN FUELING STATION & CAR WASH
Approve and award a Design Bid Build contract between Maricopa County and TSG
Constructors LLC for $3,487,000.00 with an estimated completion date of three hundred
calendar days from the official notice to proceed. The purpose of the contract is to provide
construction services to construct the new Downtown Fueling Station and Car Wash as well
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 76 of 96
as to demo/decommission the underground fuel tanks, its associated systems, and car wash
currently located at 401 W. Jefferson. Any adjustments to the project budget and funding
associated with this contract will be addressed in the FY 2023 budget, prior to any other
decisions related the utilization of one-time funding. (C-73-22-092-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Jack Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Thomas Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
46.
220166-RFP, AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Approve the third round of contracts and related exhibits, as applicable, (Special Terms and
Conditions Agreement, Declaration, and Proposed Deed of Trust) solicited by the County to
provide Maricopa County with increased affordable housing stock in Maricopa County. The
Maricopa County Human Services Department (MCHSD) sought responses from for-profit
or non-profit affordable housing developers and community partners to increase the number
of affordable housing units. The third round of contracts for award is to: Arm of Save the
Family Foundation of Arizona in the amount of $1,229,600.00 and MHMP 19 Glendale Senior
Apartments, LLLP in the amount of $9,500,000.00 for a period of two years and two months
until June 30, 2024, with two years and six months of renewal options. The effective date of
the contracts will be April 20, 2022. (C-73-22-081-X-02)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Jack Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Thomas Galvin
Supervisor Sellers stated affordable housing development is an important item. He and
his colleagues have been working in their own communities and with various
organizations and municipalities to address affordable housing.
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
Public Fiduciary - Fiduciario Público
47.
ADDITION TO FLEET
Approve a permanent addition to the fleet for a mini cargo van. This will be a transfer vehicle
number 971801 - 2018 Nissan NV200 Cargo Van from Assessor’s Office (D120) to Public
Fiduciary (D340). The fair market value for the vehicle is $22,700.00 plus an estimated dollar
amount of $1000.00 for Get Ready cost for a total of $23,700.00 to be paid back to the
General Fund (100) by Public Fiduciary (D340) Coronavirus Fiscal Recovery Fund (296)
Non-Recurring Non-Project (NRNP). (C-56-22-002-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Thomas Galvin, seconded by Supervisor Clint
Hickman
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
Public Health - Salud Pública
48.
IGA WITH ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES FOR SENATE BILL 1847
FUNDING
Approve Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) Contract No. CTR059338 between Arizona
Department of Health Services (ADHS) and Maricopa County by and through its Department
of Public Health (MCDPH). Funding is to address important public health issues and
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 77 of 96
communities affected by drug addiction and incarceration. The term of this Agreement is
retroactive back to July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2024. The grant award provides a not-to-
exceed amount of $1,024,333 annually for three (3) years, bringing the total amount to
$3,073,000.00. The Year 1 budget period is effective July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2022.
This is a new grant and a one-time funding opportunity. It was a non-competitive grant
opportunity and there is no cash or in-kind match required. Should the grant cease, on-going
contributions should not be required. This is not a mandated service but provides a benefit
to our citizens by addressing public health issues related to substance use disorder, and
other justice involved issues related to drug.
MCDPH’s indirect rate for FY 2021-22 is 17.97%. The full indirect costs are estimated at
$156,033.43 all of which are recoverable. All program costs are allocated to the grant so
there will be no additional burden on the department’s operating budget. Departmental
indirect rates are reestablished at the beginning of each fiscal year and the future indirect
rates will be collected at the corresponding rates.
Grant revenues are not local revenues for the purpose of the constitutional expenditure
limitation, and therefore, expenditure of the funds is not prohibited by the budget law.
Approval of this action does not alter the budget constraining the expenditure of local
revenues duly adopted by the Board pursuant to A.R.S. §42-17105. The overall grant budget
will be adjusted as necessary to accommodate this grant through a future reconciliation.
Funds for this grant are provided by ADHS and do not impact the County’s general fund. (C-
86-22-142-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Thomas Galvin, seconded by Supervisor Clint
Hickman
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
49.
IGA WITH ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES FOR BRFSS SURVEY
Approve Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between Arizona Department of Health
Services (ADHS) Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Systems (BRFSS) and Maricopa
County by and through its Department of Public Health (MCDPH), Office of Epidemiology
(OE) for the development and enhancement of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance
System (BRFSS). This IGA allows MCPDH to obtain BRFSS survey data from ADHS for a
total not-to-exceed amount of $115,000 for the budget period January 1, 2022, through July
31, 2023. This IGA allows for the County to extend the agreement for additional one-year
periods, not to exceed a total extended term of five years.
This IGA is exempt from procurement procedures, pursuant to Section MC1-1001 of the
Maricopa County Procurement Code. (C-86-22-146-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Thomas Galvin, seconded by Supervisor Clint
Hickman
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
50.
INTERN AFFILIATION AGREEMENT WITH THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
SERVICES TO PROVIDE CLINICAL NUTRITION TRAINING FOR DIETETIC
INTERNSHIP
Approve the Affiliation Agreement with the Arizona Department of Health Services to provide
clinical nutrition training experience for graduate students in the dietetic internship. The
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 78 of 96
agreement is non-financial, and the term is to be from July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2032.
(C-86-22-144-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Thomas Galvin, seconded by Supervisor Clint
Hickman
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
51.
PURCHASE ORDER FOR IGA WITH ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES
FOR DENTAL SEALANT SERVICES PROGRAM
Approve Purchase Order (PO) No. PO0000411818 for Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA)
No. ADHS18-175153 between Arizona Department of Health Services (ADHS) and
Maricopa County through its Department of Public Health (MCDPH), Office of Oral Health
(OOH). This PO replaces PO0000333695 and is effective through December 31, 2022, for
the total not-to-exceed amount of $145,404. This amount is inclusive of the $20,000
approved with Amendment 1 (C-86-18-060-3-14) of the IGA on March 3, 2022. The IGA term
is January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2022.
MCDPH’s indirect rate for FY22 is 17.97%. Indirect costs are estimated at $22,148.96 all of
which is recoverable. Departmental indirect rates are reestablished at the beginning of each
fiscal year and future indirect costs will be collected at the corresponding rate.
The Dental Sealant grant award is reoccurring and has been awarded to MCDPH in previous
years. This grant does not require an in-kind match, indirect costs are fully recoverable, and
ongoing contributions are not required. The grant award is not a mandated function but
provides a benefit to the citizens by providing the dental sealant services necessary to
promote oral health and provide authorized preventive dental services to at-risk children in
Maricopa County. The grant award is competitive. All program costs are allocated to the
grant so there will be no additional burden on the department’s operating budget.
Grant revenues are not local revenues for the purpose of the constitutional expenditure
limitation, and therefore expenditure of the revenues is not prohibited by the budget law. This
IGA does not alter the budget constraining expenditures of local revenues duly adopted by
the Board pursuant to A.R.S. §42-17105. The overall grant budget will be adjusted as
necessary to accommodate this grant through a future reconciliation. Funds for this grant are
provided by ADHS and do not impact the County’s general fund. (C-86-18-060-3-15)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Thomas Galvin, seconded by Supervisor Clint
Hickman
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
52.
APPOINTMENTS TO THE RYAN WHITE PLANNING COUNCIL
Accept the following resignations from the Greater Phoenix Ryan White HIV Services
Planning Council (Council).
1. Rodney L. Lofton (Health & Social Service Providers: Ryan White Part A ASO/CBO),
resignation effective 3/17/2022.
1. Anthony Holscher (Community Member), reappointment. Term effective for 3-year term
4/24/2022 – 4/23/2025.) Approve the following reappointments to the Greater Phoenix Ryan
White HIV Services Planning Council (Council). All terms will be effective upon Board
approval. (C-86-22-143-X-00)
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 79 of 96
Motion to approve by Supervisor Thomas Galvin, seconded by Supervisor Clint
Hickman
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
53.
RESCIND AMENDMENT AND APPROVE IGA WITH VALLEYWISE HEALTH
Rescind approval of Amendment 2 to the IGA between Valleywise Health and Maricopa
County by and through its Department of Public Health action item C-95-19-005-3-02
approved on March 9, 2022. In addition, approve the new IGA between Maricopa County
Department of Public Health, Ryan White Program and Maricopa County Special Health
Care District, DBA Valleywise Health. This new IGA is retroactive, beginning March 1, 2022,
thru February 28, 2025. The IGA has a not-to-exceed amount of $2,000,000 annually, for a
total of $6,000,000 over the term of the IGA.
The purpose of this IGA is to provide medically necessary health care and support services
for low-income individuals with HIV infection who do not have sufficient health care coverage
or financial resources for coping with HIV/AIDS. (C-86-22-145-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Thomas Galvin, seconded by Supervisor Clint
Hickman
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
54.
AMENDMENT TO RFP CONTRACT WITH ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
SERVICES FOR HIGH-RISK PERINATAL PROGRAM/NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE
PROGRAM COMMUNITY HEALTH NURSING PROGRAM
Approve Amendment 4 to the ADHS Contract for Community Nursing Services CTR046941
awarded by the Arizona Department of Health Services (ADHS) High Risk Perinatal Program
(HRPP) with Maricopa County by and through its Department of Public Health (MCDPH).
The funding for this program is “as needed” based on client visits/enrollments and is
estimated at a not-to-exceed amount of $590,000 for the budget period August 1, 2022,
through June 30, 2023 (Year 4). Payment on an as needed basis allows ADHS greater
flexibility in allocating funds based on the services being provided. The contract term is from
August 1, 2019, through June 30, 2023.
The Department of Public Health indirect rate for FY22 is 17.97%. The indirect costs are
estimated at $89,872.85 and are fully recoverable. The HRPP NICP grant award is
reoccurring and has been awarded to the department in prior years. This competitive grant
does not require an in-kind match, indirect cost is fully recoverable, and ongoing cash
contributions are not required. The grant award is not a mandated function but provides a
benefit to the citizens by providing developmental follow-up through home-based services
for families whose children received intensive or special care immediately after birth and for
children with identified special health care needs. All program costs are allocated to the
grant so there will be no additional burden on the department’s operating budget.
Grant revenues are not local revenues for the purpose of the constitutional expenditure
limitation and therefore expenditure of the revenues is not prohibited by the budget law. This
action does not alter the budget constraining expenditures of local revenues duly adopted
by the Board pursuant to A.R.S. §42-17105. The overall grant budget will be adjusted as
necessary to accommodate this grant through a future reconciliation. Funding for this grant
will be provided by ADHS and will not affect the County’s general fund. (C-86-20-008-3-08)
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 80 of 96
Motion to approve by Supervisor Thomas Galvin, seconded by Supervisor Clint
Hickman
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
Real Estate - Bienes Raíces
55.
SPECIAL USE PERMIT WITH THE US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST
SERVICE
Approve and execute a Special Use Permit (SUP) with US Department of Agriculture Forest
Service, for operating and maintaining the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Aid Stations at Apache,
Canyon, and, Saguaro Lakes, and adjacent to Bartlett Lake; operating and maintaining a
multi-agency boat storage facility near Horseshoe Lake; operating and maintaining a first aid
station, administrative site and boater information at Blue Point, and storage and fuel facility
at Old Blue Point; use and maintenance of barns and corrals at Goldfield; as shown on the
maps labeled as Appendices A through A.6; and authorized improvements and associated
facilities further described in Appendix B hereby incorporated into this SUP; and authorize
the Board of Supervisors to sign all other documents approved by legal counsel required as
part of the SUP. The US Department of Agriculture Forest Service has waived the SUP land
use fee. The SUP will expire on December 31, 2050.
This item is in Supervisor District 2. (C-78-22-084-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Thomas Galvin, seconded by Supervisor Jack Sellers
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
56.
NOTICE OF REVOCABLE NON-EXCLUSIVE LICENSE AGREEMENT TERMINATION
WITH THE UNITED FOOD BANK
Approve early termination of Revocable Non-Exclusive License Agreement P-50336
(“Agreement”) between Maricopa County and The United Food Bank, Inc., an Arizona non-
profit corporation, (“UFB”) located at 358 E. Javelina, Mesa and authorize the Director of
Maricopa County Real Estate Department to give written notice to UFB for the termination.
The license allows UFB to use a portion of the County-owned parking lot to park their
contractor trucks, trailers, pool cars and staff vehicles. The United Food Bank will continue
to sublease the County-owned warehouse space at 358 E. Javelina, Mesa.
The Agreement expires October 9, 2022, unless terminated earlier as provided for in the
Agreement. Due to construction of the Southeast Justice Center and the reconfiguration of
the parking lots, the County is notifying United Food Bank that the Agreement will be
terminated effective July 15, 2022. There is no termination fee.
This licensed property is located in Supervisorial District 2. (C-78-20-003-L-02)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Thomas Galvin, seconded by Supervisor Jack Sellers
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 81 of 96
Transportation - Transportación
57.
CONTRACT WITH TRISTAR ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, INC. FOR
NORTHERN PARKWAY: EL MIRAGE ALTERNATIVE ACCESS CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION
Approve the Consultant Services Contract No. 2022-012 with Tristar Engineering and
Management, Inc. in the amount not-too-exceed $862,325.01 for Construction
Administration Services for MCDOT Northern Parkway: El Mirage Alternative Access,
TT0498.
The construction will build 1.07 miles of new mainline roadway construction on the new
Northern Parkway alignment, Butler Drive, 129th Avenue, and Dysart Road including
drainage catch basins; roadway curbs; concrete sidewalk; irrigation; signing and pavement
markings; lighting; and landscaping.
Supervisory District No. 4 (C-64-22-225-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Thomas
Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
58.
CONTRACT NO. 2022-027 WITH AECOM FOR ON CALL PROFESSIONAL
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SERVICES
Approve Contract No. 2022-027 with AECOM Technical Services, Inc., for On-Call
Professional Transportation Planning Services. Contract performance will be for a period of
seven hundred thirty (730) calendar days from the Board award date and may be renewed,
if mutually agreed to by both the consultant and the County, for an additional three (3) one-
year periods or the expenditure of $1,000,000, whichever occurs first.
A broad range of planning support services are anticipated under this On-Call Professional
Transportation Planning Services contract. The Consultant will provide professional services
in the area of general transportation planning (corridor studies, ADA assessments, data
analysis, cost analysis, multi-modal, etc.), process improvement oversight, project
programming, grant writing assistance, travel forecast, policy development, and federal-aid
highway program support.
Supervisory District No. 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 (C-64-22-227-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Thomas
Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
59.
CONTRACT NO. 2022-030 WITH JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. FOR ON CALL
PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SERVICES
Approve Contract No. 2022-030 with Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. for On-Call Professional
Transportation Planning Services. Contract performance will be for a period of seven
hundred thirty (730) calendar days from the Board award date and may be renewed, if
mutually agreed to by both the consultant and the County, for an additional three (3) one-
year periods or the expenditure of $1,000,000, whichever occurs first.
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 82 of 96
A broad range of planning support services are anticipated under this On-Call Professional
Transportation Planning Services contract. The Consultant will provide professional services
in the area of: general transportation planning (corridor studies, ADA assessments, data
analysis, cost analysis, multi-modal, etc.), process improvement oversight, project
programming, grant writing assistance, travel forecast, policy development, and federal-aid
highway program support.
Supervisory District No. 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 (C-64-22-228-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Thomas
Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
60.
CONTRACT NO. 2022-029 WITH KITTLESON & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR ON CALL
PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SERVICES
Approve Contract No. 2022-029 with Kittleson & Associates for On-Call Professional
Transportation Planning Services. Contract performance will be for a period of seven
hundred thirty (730) calendar days from the Board award date and may be renewed, if
mutually agreed to by both the consultant and the County, for an additional three (3) one-
year periods or the expenditure of $1,000,000, whichever occurs first.
A broad range of planning support services are anticipated under this On-Call Professional
Transportation Planning Services contract. The Consultant will provide professional services
in the area of general transportation planning (corridor studies, ADA assessments, data
analysis, cost analysis, multi-modal, etc.), process improvement oversight, project
programming, grant writing assistance, travel forecast, policy development, and federal-aid
highway program support.
Supervisory District No. 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 (C-64-22-229-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Thomas
Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
61.
CONTRACT NO. 2022-028 WITH MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL FOR ON CALL
PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SERVICES
Approve Contract No. 2022-028 with Michael Baker International for On-Call Professional
Transportation Planning Services. Contract performance will be for a period of seven
hundred thirty (730) calendar days from the Board award date and may be renewed, if
mutually agreed to by both the consultant and the County, for an additional three (3) one-
year periods or the expenditure of $1,000,000, whichever occurs first.
A broad range of planning support services are anticipated under this On-Call Professional
Transportation Planning Services contract. The Consultant will provide professional services
in the area of general transportation planning (corridor studies, ADA assessments, data
analysis, cost analysis, multi-modal, etc.), process improvement oversight, project
programming, grant writing assistance, travel forecast, policy development, and federal-aid
highway program support.
Supervisory District No. 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 (C-64-22-230-X-00)
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 83 of 96
Motion to approve by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Thomas
Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
62.
CONTRACT NO. 2022-026 WITH BURGESS & NIPLE FOR ON CALL PROFESSIONAL
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SERVICES
Approve Contract No. 2022-026 with BURGESS & NIPLE for On-Call Professional
Transportation Planning Services. Contract performance will be for a period of seven
hundred thirty (730) calendar days from the Board award date and may be renewed, if
mutually agreed to by both the consultant and the County, for an additional three (3) one-
year periods or the expenditure of $1,000,000, whichever occurs first.
A broad range of planning support services are anticipated under this On-Call Professional
Transportation Planning Services contract. The Consultant will provide professional services
in the area of general transportation planning (corridor studies, ADA assessments, data
analysis, cost analysis, multi-modal, etc.), process improvement oversight, project
programming, grant writing assistance, travel forecast, policy development, and federal-aid
highway program support.
Supervisory District No. 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 (C-64-22-231-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Thomas
Galvin
Blue Crowley, resident, spoke about industry standards for bus stops. He noted agenda
items for the Regional Public Transportation Authority (RPTA) and the Maricopa
Association of Governments (MAG) meeting tomorrow that he will be attending.
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
63.
EASEMENT, RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND RELOCATION ASSISTANCE DOCUMENTS
Approve easements, right-of-way documents, and relocation assistance for highway and
public purposes as authorized by road file resolutions or previous Board of Supervisors’
action.
A. D24174 – SO – Project #TT0611 – Dove Valley Road (171st Ave to 163rd Ave) – APN:
503-50-009H – Jose R. Sanabria and Deborah Sanabria
A2. Warranty Deed for the sum of $11,793.50 A1. Purchase Agreement and Escrow
Instructions (C-78-22-086-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Thomas
Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
64.
ANNEXATION BY THE CITY OF LITCHFIELD PARK: ORDINANCE NO. 22-257
Pursuant to ARS §9-471(O), approve the annexation by the City of Litchfield Park of County
right-of-way within: Camelback Road from Village Parkway to 127th Avenue, in accordance
with Ordinance No. 22-257.
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 84 of 96
City of Litchfield Park has adopted Ordinance No. 22-257 annexing County Road right of
way and has requested mutual consent of the Board of Supervisors pursuant to ARS §9-
471(O).
(General Vicinity Camelback Road (Village Parkway to 127th Ave). Supervisory District No.
4) (C-64-22-224-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Thomas
Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY - AUTORIDAD PARA EL
DESARROLLO INDUSTRIAL
65.
ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS FOR THE BENEFIT
OF CHOICE ACADEMIES, INC., D/B/A ADAMS TRADITIONAL ACADEMY
Adopt a resolution to approve the proceedings of The Industrial Development Authority of
the County of Maricopa for the issuance of its Education Revenue Refunding Bonds (Choice
Academies, Inc. Project), Series 2022 in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed
$16,000,000 (C-18-22-134-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Thomas Galvin, seconded by Supervisor Clint
Hickman
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
66.
ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS FOR THE BENEFIT
OF OTTAWA UNIVERSITY
Adopt a resolution to approve the proceedings of The Industrial Development Authority of
the County of Maricopa for the issuance of its Educational Facilities Revenue Bonds (Ottawa
University), Series 2022, in a principal amount not to exceed $65,000,000 (C-18-22-135-X-
00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Thomas Galvin, seconded by Supervisor Clint
Hickman
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
SETTING OF HEARINGS - CONFIGURACIÓN DE AUDIENCIAS
~All hearings will be held at 9:30 am, 205 W. Jefferson, Phoenix, unless otherwise noted~
~Todas las audiciones será tenidas a las 9:30 de la Mañana, 205 W. Jefferson, Phoenix,
amenos que de otromodo notado~
Clerk of the Board Setting of Hearings - Configuración de Audiencias de la Secretaria de la
Junta
67.
SETTING OF HEARING FOR THE PROPOSED DON JO ACRES IRRIGATION WATER
DELIVERY DISTRICT IMPACT STATEMENT
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 85 of 96
1. Pursuant to A.R.S. § 48-261 and § 48-263, set a hearing date to receive the impact
statement for the proposed Don Jo Acres Irrigation Water Delivery District. The hearing date
is set for Wednesday, April 20, 2022, at 9:30 a.m., 205 W. Jefferson, Phoenix, AZ 85003.
2. Pursuant to A.R.S. § 48-261(C), approve a bond in the amount of $250 to be filed with
the Board by the persons proposing the district to cover cost incurred by the County.
The Clerk of the Board of Supervisors shall post a notice of the hearing in at least three
conspicuous public places in the area of the proposed district and shall publish a notice twice
in a daily newspaper at least ten days before the hearing. A notice of hearing will be sent to
each property owner within the proposed district boundaries.
At the hearing on April 20, 2022, the Board will hear those who appear for and against the
proposed district and shall determine whether the district will promote public health, comfort,
convenience, necessity, or welfare. If the Board of Supervisors determines that the public
health, comfort, convenience, necessity, or welfare will be promoted, it shall approve the
impact statement and authorize the persons proposing the district to circulate petitions within
the following proposed boundaries of the district:
Lot 1 of LE-DON-JO-ACRES, a Subdivision of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest
Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 16, Township 1 North, Range 5 East, of the Gila
and Salt River Base and Meridian according to the Plat of Record in the Office of the County
Recorder of Maricopa County, Arizona, Recorded in Book 33 of Maps, Page 35;
EXCEPT the West 151 feet of said Lot 1;
TOGETHER WITH
Lot 2 of LE-DON-JO-ACRES, a Subdivision of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest
Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 16, Township 1 North, Range 5 East, of the Gila
and Salt River Base and Meridian according to the Plat of Record in the Office of the County
Recorder of Maricopa County, Arizona, Recorded in Book 33 of Maps, Page 35;
EXCEPT the West 153 feet of said Lot 2;
TOGETHER WITH
Lot 3 of LE-DON-JO-ACRES, a Subdivision of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest
Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 16, Township 1 North, Range 5 East, of the Gila
and Salt River Base and Meridian according to the Plat of Record in the Office of the County
Recorder of Maricopa County, Arizona, Recorded in Book 33 of Maps, Page 35;
EXCEPT the West 153 feet of said Lot 3;
TOGETHER WITH
The East 268 Feet of Lot 4 of LE-DON-JO-ACRES, a Subdivision of the Southwest Quarter
of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 16, Township 1 North, Range
5 East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian according to the Plat of Record in the
Office of the County Recorder of Maricopa County, Arizona, Recorded in Book 33 of Maps,
Page 35;
TOGETHER WITH
That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of
Section 16, Township 1 North, Range 5 East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian,
Maricopa County, Arizona;
Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Section 16; Thence East along the South line
of said Southwest Quarter 454.85 Feet to the Point of Beginning;
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 86 of 96
Thence North along the East line of LE DON JO ACRES, according to Book 33 of Maps,
Page 35, records of Maricopa County, Arizona; a distance of 660.22 Feet to a point on the
North line of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of
said Section 16;
Thence East along the North line of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the
Southwest Quarter of said Section 16, a distance of 132 Feet;
Thence South, parallel to the East line of said LE DON JO ACRES, a distance of 660.22
Feet to a point on the South line of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the
Southwest Quarter of said Section 16;
Thence West along the South line of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the
Southwest Quarter of said Section 16, a distance of 132 Feet to the Point of Beginning;
EXCEPT the South 170.22 Feet Thereof;
TOGETHER WITH
STAPLES MANOR, a Subdivision of the South Half of the Southwest Quarter of the
Southwest Quarter of Section 16, Township 1 North, Range 5 East, of the Gila and Salt River
Base and Meridian according to the Plat of Record in the Office of the County Recorder of
Maricopa County, Arizona, Recorded in Book 81 of Maps, Page 28;
TOGETHER WITH
The North 302 Feet of the East 139.6 Feet of the South Half of the Southwest Quarter of the
Southwest Quarter of Section 16, Township 1 North, Range 5 East, of the Gila and Salt River
Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona;
TOGETHER WITH
Lots 13 through 19, Lots 50 through 53, Lots 68 through 74, Lots 81 and 82, Lots 92 through
94, Lots 107 through 109 of EMERSON MANOR, a Subdivision of the Southwest Quarter of
Section 16, Township 1 North, Range 5 East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian
according to the Plat of Record in the Office of the County Recorder of Maricopa County,
Arizona, Recorded in Book 59 of Maps, Page 20;
TOGETHER WITH
That portion of abandoned alley per fee MCR 2002-0428354
TOGETHER WITH
The West 348 Feet of the Southwest Quarter of Section 16, Township 1 North, Range 5
East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, lying
Southerly of EMERSON MANOR, a Subdivision of the Southwest Quarter of Section 16,
Township 1 North, Range 5 East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian according to
the Plat of Record in the Office of the County Recorder of Maricopa County, Arizona,
Recorded in Book 59 of Maps, Page 20; and also lying Northerly of LE-DON-JO-ACRES, a
Subdivision of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of
Section 16, Township 1 North, Range 5 East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian
according to the Plat of Record in the Office of the County Recorder of Maricopa County,
Arizona, Recorded in Book 33 of Maps, Page 35;
EXCEPTING therefrom the following described property;
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 87 of 96
BEGINNING at the Northwest Corner of said LE-DON-JO-ACRES, thence East along the
North line of said LE-DON-JO-ACRES a distance of 157 Feet, Thence North parallel to and
190 Feet East of the West Line of the Southwest Quarter of Section 16, Township 1 North,
Range 5 East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian according to the Plat of Record
in the Office of the County Recorder of Maricopa County, Arizona, a distance of 85.50 Feet,
Thence East 43 Feet, Thence North parallel to and 233 Feet East of the West line of said
Southwest Quarter of Section 16 a distance of 65.50 Feet, Thence West 80.50 Feet, Thence
North 131 Feet parallel to and 152.50 Feet East of the West line of said Southwest Quarter
of Section 16, Thence West 152.50 Feet to the West line of said Southwest Quarter of
Section 16, Thence South along said West Line to the Westerly Extension of the North line
of said LE-DON-JO-ACRES, Thence East to the Point of Beginning. Supervisorial District 1
(C-06-22-630-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Jack Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Thomas Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
68.
SETTING OF HEARING FOR THE SUBMITTED PETITIONS TO FORM TERRELL
TERRACE IRRIGATION WATER DELIVERY DISTRICT
Pursuant to A.R.S. § 48-3423, set a hearing date to accept the petitions filed for the formation
of the proposed Terrell Terrace Irrigation Water Delivery District as they have been
determined to be signed by a majority of the owners of acreage within the proposed
boundaries of the district. The hearing is set for Wednesday, May 4, 2022, at 9:30 a.m.
The Board will order the Clerk of the Board to publish the petitions and the notice of hearing
twice in a newspaper, the last not being less than 10 days before the hearing and post five
(5) copies of the petitions and notice within the proposed district boundaries in conspicuous
places within the proposed district boundaries described as:
The North half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 27, Township 2
North, Range 3 East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County,
Arizona;
EXCEPT the West 166.09 feet of the South 330.23 feet of the North half of the Southeast
Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 27;
AND
EXCEPT the East 498.30 feet of the South 330.27 feet of the North half of the Southeast
Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 27. (Supervisorial District 3) (C-06-22-633-
X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Jack Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Thomas Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
Transportation Setting of Hearings - Configuración De Audiencias de Transportación
69.
ROAD FILE NO. 5367
Set a hearing for May 18, 2022, for Road File No. 5367 to Open and Declare the following
described alignment into the County Transportation System.
The Maricopa County Department of Transportation has inspected and approved/accepted
the developer constructed roads within the Wigwam Creek North Phase 2 Corrective
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 88 of 96
recorded in MCR 623-10 and has recommended that the Board of Supervisors adopt the
resolution accepting the roads in the subdivision into the County Road system.
(General Vicinity: Bethany Home Road and El Mirage Road, and in an unincorporated area.
Supervisor District No. 4) (C-64-22-223-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Jack Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Thomas Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
CONSENT AGENDA - AGENDA DE CONSIENTA
Clerk of the Board Consent Agenda - Secretaria de la Junta Agenda de Consienta
70.
DONATIONS PARKS AND RECREATION
In accordance with County Policy A2508, accept the monthly donation report received from
Parks and Recreation for March 2022, for Cash Value of $2,617.26. (C-06-22-629-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Thomas
Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
71.
DUPLICATE WARRANTS
Pursuant to A.R.S § 11-632, approve and ratify the issuance of duplicate warrants to replace
county warrants and school warrants which were either lost or stolen. Necessary affidavits
have been filed with the Board. (C-06-22-625-X-00)
Name
Warrant No
Amount
Dept/School
Genuine Parts Company
3010090106
12.76
Flood Control
Visaudio Designs LLC
3700498173
750.00
Buckeye Union #201
Hope Bendele
3700503240
552.68
Avondale Elementary #44
Faces of AZ LLC
3700511881
1,360.00
Maricopa Regional #509
SUSD Nutrition Services
3700511885
9,180.00
Maricopa Regional #509
RBG Counseling & Consulting
3010109259
2,452.50
County Attorney
Well Health Management
3010104827
3,010.00
Public Health
Motion to approve by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Thomas
Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
72.
STALE DATED WARRANTS
Pursuant to A.R.S. §11-644 the Board of Supervisors finds that claims presented, are
legitimate and that claimants have demonstrated good and sufficient reason for failure to
present the original check or warrant within the allotted time. Accordingly, the claims are
allowed. (C-06-22-626-X-00)
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 89 of 96
Name
Warrant No
Amount
Dept/School
Suminder Singh Sodhl
3010076396
3,000.00
Human Services
Mary Thompson
3010067340
3,200.00
Planning and Development
Fran Warner
914494
381.49
Treasurer
Fran Warner
914510
374.78
Treasurer
Motion to approve by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Thomas
Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
73.
TAX ABATEMENTS
Approve and sign requests for tax abatements from the Treasurer’s Office pursuant to ARS
42-18353 for the parcel numbers, tax years and amounts as listed below: (C-43-22-093-X-
00)
110-17-118 2015-2017 $87,433.67
303-19-110K 1of2 2008-2017 $ 1,857.55
983-74-858 2013-2015 $ 1,411.54
303-19-110K 2of2 2018 $ 27.64
Motion to approve by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Thomas
Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
74.
SETTLEMENT/RESOLUTION OF PROPERTY TAX CASES AND CLAIMS
Pursuant to A.R.S. §§42-16201 through 16258, approve the settlement/resolution of tax
cases and claims as listed: (C-19-22-123-X-00
2021: TX2020-001097 (Northern Investors Limited Partnership) Represented by STOOPS,
DENIOUS, WILSON & MURRY, P.L.C.;
2023: TX2022-000049 (RV 566 LLC) Represented by MORRILL LAW PLC
Motion to approve by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Thomas
Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
75.
SECURED/UNSECURED TAX ROLL CORRECTIONS
Pursuant to A.R.S. §§42-15155, 16002, 16215, 16258, and 19118, approve requests from
the Assessor for corrections of the Secured Tax Rolls Resolutions, as attached and on file
in the Clerk of the Board's office in accordance with LAPR retention guidelines. This reflects
actual tax dollar corrections to the County tax rolls due to administrative corrections of the
Assessor and as a result of property tax appeals. (C-06-22-647-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Thomas
Galvin
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 90 of 96
Absent: Steve Gallardo
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ADDENDUM - ADÉNDUM DE LA JUNTA DE
SUPERVISORES
County Attorney
76.
MARICOPA COUNTY V. MATTHEW J. CHAPMAN, ET AL., MARICOPA COUNTY
SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. CV2021-012671
Approve settlement of Maricopa County v. Matthew J. Chapman, as Trustee under the
Chapman Family Trust dated September 8, 2020, et al., Maricopa County Superior Court
Case No. CV2021-012671, in the amount of $13,644, together with statutory interest, to the
Defendant Property Owners. This item was heard in Executive Session on April 18, 2022.
(C-64-22-234-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Thomas Galvin, seconded by Supervisor Clint
Hickman
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
77.
MARICOPA COUNTY V. CHARLES D. CUNNINGHAM, ET AL., MARICOPA COUNTY
SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. CV2021-012719
Approve settlement of Maricopa County v. Charles D. Cunningham, et al., Maricopa County
Superior Court Case No. CV2021-012719, in the amount of $8,179, together with statutory
interest, to the Defendant Property Owners. This item was heard in Executive Session on
April 18, 2022. (C-64-22-233-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Thomas Galvin, seconded by Supervisor Clint
Hickman
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
78.
MARICOPA COUNTY V. JUNIUS FISHER, ET AL., MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR
COURT CASE NO. CV2021-001988
Approve settlement of Maricopa County v. Junius Fisher, et al., Maricopa County Superior
Court Case No. CV2021-001988, in the amount of $35,771, together with statutory interest,
to the Defendant Property Owners. This item was heard in Executive Session on April 18,
2022. (C-64-22-232-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Thomas Galvin, seconded by Supervisor Clint
Hickman
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
~ Chairman Gates declared a conflict of interest on item #79, passed the gavel to Vice
Chairman Hickman, and left the dais ~
79.
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC CO. V. ARIZ. DEP’T OF REVENUE, MARICOPA CNTY.,
AND YUMA CNTY., NO. TX2022-000115:
Authorize the Attorney General’s Office to represent Maricopa County in San Diego Gas &
Electric Co. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue, Maricopa Cnty., and Yuma Cnty., No. TX2022-
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 91 of 96
000115. A tax appeal for the 2021 and 2022 tax years. This item was heard at the April 18,
2022, Executive session. (C-19-22-126-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Jack Sellers, seconded by Supervisor Thomas Galvin
Ayes: Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
Recused: Bill Gates
~ Chairman Gates returned to the dais and retrieved the gavel ~
Human Services
80.
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE CONTRACT WITH SIKOTAR, LLC DBA: VALLEY
INN
Approve a Competition Impracticable Contract (220250-CI) between Sikotar, LLC DBA:
Valley Inn (“Contractor”), and Maricopa County administered by its Human Services
Department. The purpose of the Contract is for the County to use 59 hotel rooms at the
Valley View Hotel located at 965 East Van Buren Street, Phoenix, AZ 85006, to provide non
congregate shelter to homeless individuals and to mitigate the spread of COVID-19.
Individuals will receive case management services while housed in the hotel.
The County will reimburse the Contractor $70 per room per night, Funds for this Contract will
be provided by Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) 21.027 American Rescue
Plan Act (ARPA). The anticipated spend for this Contract shall not exceed $1,134,390 for
base rent and taxes.
The Contract term is May 2, 2022, through December 31, 2022. This Agreement shall be
effective on May 2, 2022.
The Office of Procurement Services approved a Competition Impracticable for this Contract.
FY2022: $1,134,390 Expenditures
Supervisor Districts: All (C-22-22-092-X-00)
Motion to approve by Supervisor Thomas Galvin, seconded by Supervisor Clint
Hickman
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
MEETING RECESSED
Chairman Gates recessed the Board of Supervisors to convene as the Board of Directors of various
special districts.
MEETING RECONVENED
Chairman Gates reconvened the Board of Supervisors.
CALL TO THE PUBLIC - LLAMADO AL PUBLICO
86.
Public comment on matters pertaining to Maricopa County government. Please see Special
Notice section below for guidance to submit a comment. Note that pursuant to Arizona Open
Meeting Law, Board members may not discuss matters raised under this public comment
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 92 of 96
portion of the meeting; however, an individual Board member may respond to criticism made
by those who have addressed the Board, ask staff to review an issue raised or may ask that
the matter be placed on a future agenda. (Public comment is at the discretion of the
Chairman.) For meetings held by webinar or similar programs: written comments will be
summarized at the meeting noting the topic or topics. All written comments will be forwarded
to each Board Office for their review.
Comentarios del público sobre las materias relacionadas con el gobierno del Condado de
Maricopa. Por favor ver la sección de aviso especial para obtener dirección para enviar un
comentario. Tenga en cuenta que de conformidad con el Derecho de Reunión Abierta de
Arizona, miembros de la Junta no podrán abordar las cuestiones planteadas en esta parte
de comentario público de la reunión, sin embargo, un miembro de la Junta individuo puede
responder a las críticas de quienes se han ocupado de la Junta, pida al personal para
examinar una cuestión planteada o puede pedir que la cuestión se incluya en una agenda
de futuro. (Comentario público es a discreción del Presidente.) Para reuniones celebradas
por medio de seminarios web o programas similares: los comentarios escritos se resumirán
en la reunión tomando nota del tema o temas. Todos los comentarios escritos se remitirán
a cada Oficina de la Junta para su revisión.
The Clerk reported there were two general comments concerning the Maricopa County
Attorney, one concerning wash drainage issues, and one concerning the Superior
Court. All these comments have been shared with the district offices.
Omar Kaif, resident, stated each of the Supervisors received a packet concerning
Animal Care and Control (MCACC). He said he reached out to each Supervisor and
said the Board should care about the individuals and volunteers for MCACC. Mr. Kaif
named the leadership responsible for cultivating an environment of fear, retribution,
nepotism, and intimidation. He loves his County and the dogs, but leadership style has
got to change.
~ Chairman Gates handed the gavel to Supervisor Hickman and left the meeting and would
not return. Supervisor Hickman chaired the rest of the meeting ~
Blue Crowley, resident, reiterated his remarks about RPTA.
SUMMARY OF CURRENT EVENTS - EL RESUMEN DE TEMAS DE
ACTUALIDAD
87.
Supervisors'/County Manager's summary of current events - Resumen de temas de
actualidad de los Supervisores/Administrador del Condado
Supervisor Sellers attended the Farm Breakfast a few weeks ago at Sossaman Farms.
Steve Sossaman spoke about his love of farming even though he is stepping down.
Supervisor Sellers mentioned he and Supervisor Galvin did a coffee and mic event at
the Queen Creek Chamber of Commerce and the guests suggested the Board get past
elections and address topics concerning growth.
Supervisor Galvin had a Farm City Breakfast in Mesa hosted by Mesa Councilman Mark
Freeman and Mrs. Nesbitt, who is 93 years old and owns the property where the
breakfast was held. He said he enjoyed the discussion about farming and the
importance of agriculture in our county.
Supervisor Hickman stated everyone in farming understands the true need to feed
people. He commented he attended a meeting with the Glendale Chamber of
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 93 of 96
Commerce, and they assured him of their support. Supervisor Hickman remarked on
the many people who drive the County forward.
MEETING ADJOURNED
There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned.
_____________________________
Bill Gates, Chairman of the Board
ATTEST:
____________________________
Juanita Garza, Clerk of the Board
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 94 of 96
FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA - AGENDA DE DISTRITO DE
CONTROL DE INUNDACIONES
The Board of Directors for the Flood Control District convened in Formal Session at 9:30 AM on
Wednesday, April 20, 2022, in the Supervisors' Auditorium, 205 W. Jefferson Phoenix, AZ 85003,
with the following members present: Bill Gates, Chairman, District 3; Clint Hickman, Vice
Chairman, District 4; Jack Sellers, Director, District 1; Thomas Galvin, Director, District 2. Absent:
Steve Gallardo, Director, District 5. Also present: Juanita Garza, Clerk; Kelly Gardiner, Minutes
Coordinator; Theresa Dockcarter, Minutes Coordinator; Joy Rich, County Manager; Anne Longo,
Legal Counsel; Betsy Pregulman, Legal Counsel.
81.
IGA WITH THE CITY OF GLENDALE FOR THE 103RD AVENUE LANDFILL DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Approve Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) FCD 2022A004 for the 103rd Avenue Landfill
Drainage Improvement Project (Project) between the City of Glendale (City) and the Flood
Control District of Maricopa County (District). The estimated total Project cost is $1,422,072.
The District’s estimated share of the Project cost is $500,000 and is limited to $500,000; the
City estimated share of the Project cost is $922,072. The City will operate and maintain the
completed Project. This Agreement shall become effective as of the date it has been
executed by all PROJECT PARTNERS and shall expire two years from that date, or upon
Project completion, whichever occurs first.
The City proposed the Project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project
Assistance Program for Fiscal Year 2023. This IGA is proposed in accordance with the terms
of the Small Project Assistance Program, adopted by the Board under Resolution FCD
2009R003A (C-69-09-062-6-01).
The 103rd Avenue Landfill drainage improvements will provide drainage channels with
Flexamat liners, concrete spillways, crossings and rock check dams.
This Agenda Item impacts Supervisorial District 4.) (C-69-22-083-X-00
Motion to approve by Director Thomas Galvin, seconded by Director Clint Hickman
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
82.
IGA WITH THE CITY OF GLENDALE FOR THE APOLLO GARDENS DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Approve Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) FCD 2022A005 for the Apollo Gardens
Drainage Improvement Project (Project) between the City of Glendale (City) and the Flood
Control District of Maricopa County (District). The estimated total Project cost is $613,000.
The District’s estimated share of the Project cost is $459,750 and is limited to $500,000; the
City estimated share of the Project cost is $153,250. The City will operate and maintain the
completed Project. This Agreement shall become effective as of the date it has been
executed by all PROJECT PARTNERS and shall expire two years from that date, or upon
Project completion, whichever occurs first.
The City proposed the Project for the District’s evaluation under the District’s Small Project
Assistance Program for Fiscal Year 2023. This IGA is proposed in accordance with the terms
of the Small Project Assistance Program, adopted by the Board under Resolution FCD
2009R003A (C-69-09-062-6-01).
The Apollo Gardens drainage improvements will provide 450 lineal feet of 30-inch storm
drain along 61st Avenue with catch basins that will outfall to the ACDC.
This Agenda Item impacts Supervisorial District 4.) (C-69-22-084-X-00
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 95 of 96
Motion to approve by Director Thomas Galvin, seconded by Director Clint Hickman
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
83.
CONTRACT FOR GILA BEND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Award Contract FCD 2022C001 On-Call Services to AECOM Technical Services, Inc.,
(Consultant) to provide professional engineering services for the design of levees, channels,
basins, and associated structures for the Gila Bend Drainage Improvement Project
(PROJECT). The contract will be effective for 730 calendar days from the date of execution
or the expenditure of $2,200,000, whichever comes first. The Flood Control District of
Maricopa Country (District) and Consultant will mutually agree to a detailed scope of work
for each work assignment. This is a qualifications-based selection in accordance with the
Maricopa County Procurement Code, Article 5, Paragraph 504 and Article 5 Procurement
Procedures Manual, Chapter II – Section 2.
Preliminary concepts were identified in the Area Drainage Master Plan Update (ADMPU).
The proposed concept consists of a system of levees, channels, and basins. This concept
will be the starting point for further refinement and design under this PROJECT and could
include other project elements as necessary.
This Agenda Item impacts Supervisorial District 5.) (C-69-22-081-X-00
Motion to approve by Director Thomas Galvin, seconded by Director Clint Hickman
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
84.
BIDS AND AWARD FOR 27TH AND OLNEY AVENUES STORM DRAIN PROJECT
Authorize the advertisement of the Invitation for Bids for 27th Avenue and Olney Avenue
Storm Drain Project (Project # [117]), and award of the contract to the lowest responsible
bidder, if the bid is not more than ten percent (10%) over the engineer’s estimate.
The Project elements include a storm drain system along 27th and Olney Avenues from just
west of 24th Drive to 27th Avenue, then north along 27th Avenue to outfall in to 27th Avenue
& South Mountain regional detention basin, catch basins, laterals, sidewalks, and roadway
improvements along Onley Avenue.
The project will reduce flood risk of existing homes and flood related and infrastructure costs
for future residents and development in the City of Phoenix as well as in Maricopa County.
The project is 50/50 cost share between Flood Control District of Maricopa County and the
City of Phoenix.
This Agenda Item impacts Supervisor District 5.) (C-69-22-085-X-00
Motion to approve by Director Thomas Galvin, seconded by Director Clint Hickman
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
85.
EASEMENT, RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND RELOCATION ASSISTANCE DOCUMENTS
Approve easements and right-of-way acquisition documents, appraisal, and relocation
assistance services contracts under $5,000 per Resolution FCD 87-12; Escrow Instructions
per Resolution FCD 87-13; Payment of Tax Notices per Resolution FCD 97-07; License
Formal Meeting Minutes
04/20/2022
Page 96 of 96
Procedures and Fee Schedules per Resolution FCD2002R002; and disposal of easements,
excess real property, and fixtures under $250,000 documents per FCD 1999R016 for Flood
Control purposes.
A. Powerline Floodway – WJ FCD PCN #: 311.01.80 – Item #: F00417 – APN: 304-31-008P
– Mesa-Hawes, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
A1. Purchase Agreement and Escrow Instructions
A2. Flood Control Channel Easement
B1. Non-Exclusive Utility Easement)B. Reems Road Channel and Basin – MC FCD Parcel
#: A022-001 – APN: 501-41-005F ptn. –FCD Permit #: 2021P301 – Maricopa County
Municipal Water Conservation District Number One (C-78-22-085-X-00
Motion to approve by Director Thomas Galvin, seconded by Director Clint Hickman
Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin
Absent: Steve Gallardo
MEETING ADJOURNED
There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned.
_____________________________
Bill Gates, Chairman of the Board
ATTEST:
____________________________
Juanita Garza, Clerk of the Board