CI CONSCIOUS DISCIPLINE APPROVED.PDF
Extracted text (via pymupdf)
4951 characters
Office of Procurement Services GOODS AND SERVICES COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE FORM This form is to be used when a department believes an acquisition is considered Competition Impracticable and the acquisition dollar amount is above $ ,000. The Chief Procurement Officer can approve purchases up to $100,000. Board of Supervisors approval is required if the acquisition is over $100,000. This form must be submitted for approval to: Office of Procurement Services | 160 S 4th Ave | Phoenix, AZ 85003. Fax number: 602.506.6766. The signed form must be retained in the purchasing file. Unless approved by the Board of Supervisors in a formal agenda item or the Chief Procurement Officer in a formal Contract a CI form is valid from July 1 thru June 30th of each Fiscal Year. DEPARTMENT NAME DEPARTMENT RX# PROPOSED CONTRACT VENDOR NEED IDENTIFIED Date: REQUESTED DELIVERY Date: QUOTED PRICE: Accounting String: Company: Address: City, State: Zip/Postal Code: Phone: Fax: Contact Name: DESCRIPTIONOFGOODSORSERVICESREQUIRED: The estimated cost of this Procurement is: $100k > $100k Is this a Technology Procurement? Yes No COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE CATEGORY (Check applicable box, attach documentation or provide explanation below.) Maricopa County Procurement Code MC1-351 states: “Competition Impracticable” means an acquisition where, competition is impractical because of standardization, warranty, or other factors as approved by the Board of Supervisors. NOTE: The following are unlikely to be sufficient Competition Impracticable justifications: Personal or department preference for a product or vendor Department perception that the vendor is the best qualified (this should be determined through a competitive process) Lack of department planning resulting in limited time to conduct a competitive procurement Special incentive or deal offered (can be assessed in open and competitive solicitation) Department convenience Grant specified (supporting documents attached) Mailing lists, subscriptions or media advertising Warranty voided if service provided by other contract vendor Other (Provide written explanation below) Software license renewals, additions, or upgrades available from only one source Brand compatibility available from only one source (no other distributors) Other proprietary situation SEARCH Asearch was conductedconsistingof: (checkall that apply) Market research Public notice given, list Other vendors contacted Other RESULTS no alternatives were identified no alternatives were deemed acceptable because (explain below): Describe the search from above in detail: PRICE MC1-352-B states: The Using Agency requesting a Competition Impracticable Procurement shall provide written evidence to support a Competition Impracticable determination containing an explanation of why the proposed procurement process is advantageous to the County; and the scope, duration, and estimated total dollar value of the procurement. Price has been fairly and reasonably established by: Comparison to previous comparable purchases from a different vendor Independent estimate Comparison to public sector contract pricing Discount off published catalog pricing Market survey Other, explain: Describe methodology and results (attach any written supporting data, e.g., survey or market analysis): THISISACOMPETITIONIMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT BECAUSE (attach additional page if needed): CERTIFICATIONS I certify: 1) I recognize that the Maricopa County Procurement Code requires the use of competitive solicitations unless exempted by law. I have reviewed the information and materials relevant to this procurement of goods and services, and am requesting approval of an exception to the competitive process for the reasons described; 2) the price to be paid to the proposed vendor is fair, reasonable, and provides the best value to Maricopa County; and 3) this request for an exception to the competitive solicitation process is not the result of inadequate advance planning or for purposes of securing the services of a preferred vendor. Department Head or Department Head Delegate Signature (Required) Printed Name Signature Date Office of Procurement Services The CPO can approve procurements up to $100,000. This request is over $100,000 and must be submitted as an agenda item to the Board of Supervisors for consideration. Recommended to BOS for approval. Printed Name Signature Date Office of Enterprise Technology (This procurement is classified as a technology procurement and must be forwarded to OET for coordination and/or approval. If this procurement request is not approved by OET, the form will be returned to the requestor.) Approved. Recommended purchase is in line with Maricopa County's strategic technology plan or currently installed equipment or service, and is considered to be a competition impracticable procurement. Not Approved. Reasoning: Printed Name Signature Date Save