03.BA250081 BOA Staff Report

Report to the Board of Adjustment 
Prepared by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department 
 
 
Case:   
 
 
BA250081– Romanek Residential Variance 
 
Hearing Date:  
 
February 12, 2026 
 
Supervisor District: 
 
1 
____________________________________________________________________________________________ 
 
Applicant:  
Morgan Busby, Busby Permits 
 
Property Owner: 
Paul Romanek 
 
Request: 
Variance to the development standard of the Maricopa County Zoning 
Ordinance to permit: 
 
1) 
Proposed height of 35’ where 30’ is the maximum permitted in an area 
subject to hillside slope per MCZO Article 901.3. 
 
Site Location: 
APN 503-04-048 @ 51434 N and 295th Ave., in the Wickenburg area. 
 
Site Size: 
 
 
218,370 sq. ft.  
 
Current Use / Zoning: 
Rural 43/ Single-family residence 
 
Open Violation: 
N/A 
 
Background: 
1. 
May 4, 2024: Deed recorded conveying property to current owner.  
 
2. 
October 10, 2025: application for building permit; BLDR2508368. 
 
3. 
December 17, 2025: application for subject variance.  
 
Existing On-Site and Surrounding Zoning/Land Use: 
 
4. 
On-site: 
Rural-43 / Vacant 
 
North:  
Rural-43  
South:  
Rural-43  
East: 
 
295th Ave then Rural-43  
 
West:  
Rural-43  
 
 
Variance Request: 
 
5. 
The applicant proposes to vary the building height to 35’ where 30’ is the maximum height 
permitted per the MCZO 901.3. According to the applicant, this is to accommodate practical 
grading corrections to the constrained buildable area. Approval of this variance request will 
facilitate construction of a proposed 3,574 sq. ft. single-family residence.

Page 2 of 8 
 
Excerpt from proposed site plan

Page 3 of 8 
 
Photographs of subject site provided by applicant

Page 4 of 8 
 
 
6. 
The proposed single-family residence is in an area having a natural slope of at least 15% and is 
subject to hillside development standards.  The height of any building on property having a natural 
slope of 15% or greater shall not exceed 30’ measured vertically from the natural grade. The 
applicant explains that because the western portion of the site is within the floodway the 
residence must be located at the southeastern portion of the site affected by the steep slope and 
a low natural grade near the footprint of the residence.  As a result of varying the proposed 
finished floor, the building roof height exceeds the 30’ maximum height above the natural grade 
by approximately 4.8’. 
 
 
Site Analysis: 
 
7. 
This site is bordered to the east directly by 295th Ave.  The site is drained by multiple washes. Its 
topography features a dramatic transition from a steep slope on the southeast to a gentle slope 
across the remainder of the site, which sits within the floodway. This is depicted on the site plan 
(see figure on page 2 of this report). These conditions encumber the building envelope.  
 
Aerial photo of subject site 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BA250081

Page 5 of 8 
 
Aerial image & surrounding environs  
 
 
Zoning District map 
  
 
 
Zoning District Standard: 
 
8. 
The following table is included to illustrate and contrast the standards for the underlying zoning 
district with those proposed by the owner (Note: changes to proposed standards are indicated in 
bold). 
 
 
 
 
Standard 
 
Rural-43   
Zoning 
District 
Proposed with 
Variance

Page 6 of 8 
 
Min. Front Yard Setback (residence to east property line)  
40-feet 
n/a 
Min. Rear Yard Setback (west property line) 
40-feet 
n/a 
Min. Side Yard Setback (residence to south property line) 
30-feet 
n/a 
Maximum Height (above the natural grade) 
30-feet 
35-feet 
Minimum Lot Area 
43,560-sq. ft. 
n/a 
Minimum Lot Width 
145-feet 
n/a 
Lot Coverage 
25% 
n/a 
 
Note: Standards indicated in bold do not meet base zoning standards 
 
  
 
State Statute / County Zoning Ordinance Tests - ARS § 11-816.B.2 and MCZO Article 303.2.2 states the 
Board of Adjustment may, “Allow a variance from the terms of the ordinance if, owing to peculiar 
conditions, a strict interpretation would work an unnecessary hardship and if in granting the variance the 
general intent and purposes of the zoning ordinance will be preserved.”  
 
9. 
Statutory Test -1 Does the applicant’s property contain any peculiar condition– Discuss and 
explain what is/are the peculiar conditions facing the property and include reference to the 
Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance Regulations or Development Standards to be varied.   
 
“We are requesting a variance from MCZO Chapter 2, building height can not exceed 30' above 
natural grade. The roof height that we are seeking is 4.8 feet above the maximum height allowed. 
The peculiar conditions creating the hardship are primarily the property’s steep natural slope and a 
localized low point in the existing grade near the residence footprint, which establishes an unusually 
low original natural grade reference and reduces allowable building height even though the 
proposed finish floor elevation remains reasonable for drainage and construction. Practical 
correction through grading or relocation is constrained by the hillside setting and limited buildable 
area, there is little flexibility to shift the footprint without triggering other constraints, and significant 
cut/fill to “raise” the controlling grade would require disproportionate earthwork and increased 
disturbance.“ 
 
10. 
Statutory Test 2 – Does applying the requirements of the Ordinance to the applicant’s property 
create an Unnecessary Hardship – Explain how the peculiar condition identified in #1 causes an  
unnecessary hardship to the property when the requirements of the Maricopa County Zoning 
Ordinance are applied.  Explain how the that the peculiar condition of the property came to be and 
whether the condition was created by the applicant or someone in the property’s line of title. 
Explain the proposed use of the property with the variance request. Identify and explain all 
peculiar conditions on your property in regard to the following areas: slope, narrowness, 
shallowness, irregular shape, location, washes, vegetation, and easements, etc. Explain how 
enforcement of the Zoning Regulations or Development Standards would impose a hardship on 
the property. 
 
“The peculiar condition is not self created and is not the result of any action of the property owners. 
The slope and localized grade depression are existing natural topographic features of the property 
that predate the proposed project and were not caused by the owner’s design choices, subdivision 
actions, or voluntary grading intended to circumvent the MCZO. The proposed home is being 
designed to fit within the property’s constrained building area and to minimize disturbance; the 
height impact arises specifically because the MCZO measurement method ties maximum height to 
the site’s existing grade condition, especially the localized low point rather than from any self-
imposed hardship.”

Page 7 of 8 
 
11. 
Statutory Test 3 – General Intent and Purpose of the Zoning Ordinance – Discuss the purpose 
of the zoning requirement from which the variance is being sought. Then, discuss and explain 
how, provided statutory tests #1 and #2 are satisfied, the granting of the requested variance 
would preserve the general intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. 
 
“Granting the requested variance would not negatively impact the general intent and purpose of the 
Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance because the request is limited in scope and does not change 
the allowed land use, density, or character of development on APN 503-04-048. The property will 
continue to be used for a single family residence, which is consistent with the zoning district’s 
intended residential use. The variance is being requested only to address a minor roof-peak 
exceedance of 4.8 feet, that results from the site’s unique existing grade condition and the MCZO 
Chapter 2 method of measuring building height from grade.” 
 
Findings:  
 
12. 
The applicant has the burden of proving to the Board that, in accordance with the standard set 
forth in ARS §11-816.B.2 and MCZO Article 303.2.2, the property requires a variance. To grant the 
relief, the applicant must prove, and the Board must find and identify, a physical condition of the 
applicant’s property that is peculiar and not common to the area or the universe of the zoning 
district. Also, any such peculiarity must not have been created either by the applicant or anyone 
in the chain of title. If the Board determines that there is no such peculiar physical condition, its 
inquiry stops, and the application must be denied. 
 
If the Board identifies a peculiar physical condition of the applicant’s property which is not self-
imposed, then the applicant must prove, and the Board must find and identify, an unnecessary 
hardship imposed upon the property due to the strict application of the requirements of the zoning 
ordinance which the applicant wishes to have varied such that there is no viable use of the 
property without the variance.  
 
If the Board identifies a peculiar physical condition of the property which is not self-imposed, and 
that in applying the requirements of the zoning ordinance to the property, because of the peculiar 
physical condition, an unnecessary hardship exists, the applicant must prove, and the Board must 
find and identify, how the granting of the variance will preserve the general intent and purpose of 
the zoning ordinance. 
 
To approve the variance the Board must make findings and articulate them in motion 
memorializing the above.   
 
13. 
Based upon what the applicant has submitted and the staff analysis in this report, staff offers the 
following positive and/or negative observations the Board may consider in its findings: 
 
• 
The applicant has demonstrated that there is a peculiar condition facing the property in 
that site on the western part of it is a floodway. 
• 
The applicant has demonstrated that due to applying the requirements of the MCZO to 
this property, the peculiar condition(s) create an undue physical hardship not self-created 
in the line of title that prevents reasonable development of the property.  
• 
The applicant has demonstrated that the general intent and purpose of the MCZO will be 
preserved despite the variance because the variance would allow for minimal site 
development to preserve keep the parcel’s current topography to the greatest possible 
extent. 
 
14. 
And further, if the Board finds the applicant has satisfied the statutory test, and has stated its 
findings on the record, the grant of this variance will memorialize the following:

Page 8 of 8 
 
 
a) 
Variance approval establishes a 35’ maximum building height for APN 503-04-048. 
 
Presented by: 
Evelyn Amekudzi, Planner 
Reviewed by: 
Darren V. Gérard, AICP, Planning Manager  
 
Attachments: 
Case Map (1 page) 
 
Application / Supplemental Questionnaire (1/2 pages) 
 
Site Plan (3 pages) 
 
Floor Plan and Elevations (2 pages)

/
Maricopa County Planning & Development - Phoenix, AZ
4
Gross Acres: 5 approx.
Generated January 29, 2026 3:16 PM
BA250081
Application Name:
Legal Description
Romanek Residence
Applicant
Case Address
7N 4W 17
Morgan Busby
51434 N 295TH AVE
Applicant Phone/Email
Parcel Primary:503-04-048
(425) 377-4589
WICKENBURG, AZ 85390
Map scale 1:1,635
Supervisor District No.
Residential Variance to allow for the roof height to exceed 30' from natural grade to 34' from natural
grade due to the dip in the naturally occurring topography

W1
W1
W1
W1
W1
W1
W3
W2
W2
W2
W2
W2
W2
W2
W2
W2
W2
W4
W2
D8
D7
D4
D4
D4
D2
D4
D3
D3
D5
D1
D2
D2
D2
D4
UP
1
A-8
2
A-8
W1
W1
W1
W1
W1
W1
W1
W2
W2
W2
W2
W2
W2
W2
W4
W2
D3
D4
D2
D3
D5
D5
D3
D4
D6
D4
D5
DN
1
A-8
2
A-8
-0" HIGH
ES
BUILDING LINE
7" / 12"
7" / 12"
7" / 12"
7" / 12"
2" / 12"
2" / 12"
INTERIOR PARTITION
1/2" GYPSUM WALL BOARD
(5/8" TYPE-X BETWEEN GARAGE AND LIVABLE)
2x4 WOOD STUDS AT 24" O.C.
1/2" GYPSUM WALL BOARD
BATT INSULATION WHERE INDICATED ON PLAN
5 1/2"
INTERIOR PARTITION
1/2" GYPSUM WALL BOARD
2x4 WOOD STUDS AT 16" O.C.
1/2" GYPSUM WALL BOARD
BATT INSULATION WHERE INDICATED ON PLAN
EXTERIOR PARTITION
FINISH PER ELEVATIONS
TWO LAYERS WRB
SHEATHING PER STRUCTURAL
2x6 WOOD STUDS AT 16" O.C.
BATT INSULATION, FULL CAVITY, R-19
1/2" GYPSUM WALL BOARD
(TYPE-X BETWEEN GARAGE AND LIVING AREA)
3 1/2"
5 1/2"
A
B
C
PORCH
KITCHEN
DINING AREA
GREAT ROOM
PORCH
OFFICE
PANTRY
HALL
BATH
BEDROOM
UTILITY
MUD
POWDER
LAUNDRY
GARAGE
RANGE
REFR
W
D
60' - 0"
20' - 0"
6' - 0"
7' - 2"
3' - 5"
3' - 9"
1' - 9"
43' - 3"
10' - 0"
5' - 3"
8' - 10"
9' - 4"
7' - 1"
10' - 3"
33' - 0"
8' - 0"
15' - 0"
9' - 11"
7' - 9"
14' - 3"
11' - 5"
7' - 0"
6' - 6"
7' - 4"
5' - 9"
11"
14' - 8"
14' - 8"
14' - 8"
14' - 8"
7' - 4"
_12'-11"
_6'-3"
3' - 3"
2' - 8"
7' - 3"
2' - 11"
2' - 10"
3' - 2"
2' - 10"
5' - 11"
2' - 4"
3' - 10"
11' - 6"
4' - 6"
80' - 0"
20' - 2"
8"
18' - 9"
9"
A
B
C
C
2' - 0" 2' - 5"
2' - 5"
8' - 0"
6' - 8"
5/8" 
TYPE-X 
GWB
A
A
C
C
A
A
C
C
*
29' - 9"
12' - 10"
6' - 0"
11' - 1"
1' - 1"
4' - 0"
6' - 4"
6' - 6"
4' - 0"
11' - 8"
7' - 0"
7' - 3"
01
04
02
OPEN TO BELOW
HALLWAY
W.I.C.
MASTER BATH
MASTER BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
A
C
C
C
C
C
A
A
D
A
2' - 7"
15' - 5"
2' - 9"
3' - 8"
4' - 10"
2' - 10"
11' - 9"
19' - 10"
1' - 8"
2' - 0"
2' - 3"
3' - 0"
13' - 11"
2' - 10"
6' - 5"
6' - 6"
11' - 11"
6' - 10"
6' - 0"
7' - 2"
3' - 9"
3' - 5"
5' - 5"
4' - 10"
2' - 0"
3' - 8"
2' - 1"
5' - 4"
10"
3' - 7"
5' - 9"
9' - 7"
A
1' - 9"
43' - 3"
5' - 3"
8' - 10"
9' - 4"
12' - 8"
7' - 2"
15' - 5"
4' - 5"
13' - 2"
10' - 3"
9' - 2"
2' - 1"
5' - 9"
A
A
C
E
E
C
C
03
www.workroomaz.com
Scale
Project number
Date
Drawn by
Checked by
623-920-5106
info@workroomaz.com
© 2025 workroom STUDIO. All rights reserved. 
These drawings and specifications are the 
property of the designer and are protected by 
copyright law. They shall not be used, 
reproduced, or copied in whole or in part for any 
purpose other than for this specific project 
without the written permission of the designer.
As indicated
A03
FLOOR PLANS & ROOF
PLAN
25017
Romanek Residence
Paul Romanek
November 11, 2025
DMF
APN: 503-04-048
N 295TH AVE
WICKENBURG, AZ 85390
GENERAL NOTES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
ALL WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT SHALL COMPLY WITH 
APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES AND ACCEPTED INDUSTRY 
STANDARDS, AS ENFORCED BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING 
JURISDICTION.
THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ALL 
EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS AT THE JOB SITE 
PRIOR TO BID SUBMISSION, FABRICATION, SHOP 
DRAWINGS, OR START OF CONSTRUCTION. DO NOT SCALE 
DRAWINGS—WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL GOVERN.
ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE CONTRACT 
DOCUMENTS AND ACTUAL SITE CONDITIONS SHALL BE 
BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT AND 
OWNER’S REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY. VERBAL NOTICE 
IS REQUIRED WITHIN EIGHT (8) HOURS OF DISCOVERY, 
FOLLOWED BY WRITTEN NOTICE WITHIN TWO (2) 
CALENDAR DAYS, INCLUDING THE PROPOSED CORRECTIVE 
ACTION.
PRIOR TO BEGINNING EACH PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION, 
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD-VERIFY CONDITIONS AND 
COORDINATE WITH ALL TRADES. WHERE CONFLICTS OR 
INCONSISTENCIES ARE FOUND, NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT 
BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH WORK.
ALL SUB-TRADES AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DIRECT 
TECHNICAL QUESTIONS, CHANGES, OR CLARIFICATIONS TO 
THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR, WHO SHALL CONSOLIDATE 
AND SUBMIT THEM TO THE ARCHITECT AS NEEDED.
GENERAL NOTES AND DETAILS SHOWN OR IMPLIED ON THE 
DRAWINGS APPLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT UNLESS 
EXPLICITLY NOTED OTHERWISE. WORK REASONABLY 
INFERABLE FROM THE DOCUMENTS IS CONSIDERED PART 
OF THE CONTRACTOR’S SCOPE.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE TIMING, 
ACCESS, AND INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS OF ALL 
TRADES. ENSURE THAT ALL CUTTING, PATCHING, AND 
FINISH INTEGRATION IS PROPERLY EXECUTED ACCORDING 
TO THE DOCUMENTS.
STEEL IN CONTACT WITH SOIL MUST BE PROTECTED WITH 
ONE COAT OF WR MEADOWS MEL-ROL LM 
WATERPROOFING MEMBRANE, OR EQUIVALENT, 
CONFORMING TO ASTM STANDARDS (C836, D412, D1970, 
C794, 412, E96, D751, D4833).
DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR WALLS ARE MEASURED TO THE 
OUTER FACE OF STRUCTURAL SHEATHING. AT INTERIOR 
PARTITIONS, DIMENSIONS ARE TAKEN TO THE FACE OF 
FRAMING (STUDS), NOT TO THE FINISHED SURFACE.
ENERGY REQUIREMENTS
WINDOW U-FACTOR
=
0.40
ROOF R-VALUE
=
R-38 MIN. (R-43 PROVIDED)
WOOD FRAME WALL
=
R-13 MIN. (R-19 PROVIDED)
N
N
N
PARTITION TYPES
WINDOW SCHEDULE
KEYED NOTES
KITCHEN ISLAND AND COUNTERTOPS, REFER TO ELECTRICAL 
DRAWINGS FOR RECEPTACLES.
OUTDOOR HVAC UNIT, REFER TO MECHANICAL.
ATTIC ACCESS LADDER
WOOD BURNING FIREPLACE W/ FACTORY BUILT CHIMNEY. 
ACUCRAFT AMERICAN SERIES UL-127. INSTALL PER 
MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS. 
01
02
 1/8" = 1'-0"
1 FLOOR PLAN - FIRST FLOOR
 1/8" = 1'-0"
2 FLOOR PLAN - SECOND FLOOR
 1/8" = 1'-0"
3 ROOF PLAN
DOOR SCHEDULE
No.
Description
Date
*20 MIN. FIRE RATED DOOR AT GARAGE TO MUDROOM
03
04

GROUND LEVEL
0' - 0"
CEILING LEVEL
19' - 0"
FINISH FLOOR LEVEL
0' - 6"
SECOND LEVEL
11' - 0"
ROOF
30' - 0"
GROUND LEVEL
0' - 0"
CEILING LEVEL
19' - 0"
FINISH FLOOR LEVEL
0' - 6"
SECOND LEVEL
11' - 0"
ROOF
30' - 0"
GROUND LEVEL
0' - 0"
CEILING LEVEL
19' - 0"
FINISH FLOOR LEVEL
0' - 6"
SECOND LEVEL
11' - 0"
ROOF
30' - 0"
GROUND LEVEL
0' - 0"
CEILING LEVEL
19' - 0"
FINISH FLOOR LEVEL
0' - 6"
SECOND LEVEL
11' - 0"
ROOF
30' - 0"
GARAGE
MECH ROOM
DINING AREA
HALLWAY
BEDROOM
HALL
HALL
BEDROOM
GROUND LEVEL
0' - 0"
CEILING LEVEL
19' - 0"
FINISH FLOOR LEVEL
0' - 6"
SECOND LEVEL
11' - 0"
ROOF
30' - 0"
GROUND LEVEL
0' - 0"
CEILING LEVEL
19' - 0"
FINISH FLOOR LEVEL
0' - 6"
SECOND LEVEL
11' - 0"
ROOF
30' - 0"
3' - 0"
26' - 3"
A
C
B
B
A
A
C
B
B
B
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
3' - 0"
26' - 3"
C
A
B
B
A
A
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
6" MIN. SPRAY FOAM INSULATION 
AT ROOF SHEATHING
R-43 ESR-2642
6" MIN. SPRAY FOAM 
INSULATION AT ROOF 
SHEATHING
R-43 ESR-2642
THIN BRICK VENEER AT 
INTERIOR FIREPLACE
CUT FLAP IN WATER RESISTIVE BARRIER ABOVE 
OPENING PRIOR TO INSTALLING WINDOW UNIT.
SHEATHING
WATER-RESISTIVE BARRIER (WRB)
WATER RESISTIVE BARRIER SHALL BE WRAPPED 
AROUND THE OPENING SILL & JAMBS PRIOR TO THE 
INSTALLATION OF THE SELF-ADHESIVE FLEXIBLE 
FLASHING.  ALL HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL JOINTS IN 
THE WRB SHALL OVERLAP 6" MINIMUM (TOP OVER 
BOTTOM) AND SECURED WITH TAPE AS SPECIFIED BY 
MANUFACTURER.
SELF ADHESIVE FLEXIBLE SILL FLASHING
WRAP OVER SILL AND DOWN FACE OF EXTERIOR 
WALL (MINIMUM OF 1" PAST SILL FLANGE OF 
WINDOW).
SELF ADHESIVE FLEXIBLE SILL FLASHING
RUN 6" (MINIMUM) UP INSIDE OF EACH JAMB AND FACE 
OF EXTERIOR WALL (MINIMUM OF 1" PAST JAMB 
FLANGES OF WINDOW).
1"  MIN.
DASHED LINE REPRESENTS NAILING FLANGE OF 
FUTURE WINDOW OR DOOR UNIT (INSTALLED AFTER 
OPENING PREPARATION).
6" MIN.
1" MIN.
6"
6"
6"
2"
2"
2"
2"
9" SELF ADHESIVE FLEXIBLE SILL FLASHING
UNDER THE WINDOW & NAILING FLANGES.  
WRAP OVER SILL AND DOWN FACE OF EXTERIOR 
WALL (MIN 1" PAST SILL FLANGE).
6"
6"
SELF ADHESIVE FLEXIBLE SILL FLASHING
UNDER THE WINDOW & NAILING FLANGES.  
RUN 6" UP INSIDE OF EACH JAMB AND FACE OF 
EXTERIOR WALL.
SELF ADHESIVE FLEXIBLE JAMB FLASHING
OVER THE WINDOW NAILING FLANGES.  
LAP OVER AND EXTEND 2" (MIN) PAST THE 
FLEXIBLE SILL FLASHING.
VINYL WINDOW NAILING FLANGE
'HATCHED' AREAS REPRESENTS FLANGE UNDER 
THE SELF ADHESIVE FLEXIBLE FLASHING
VINYL WINDOW NAILING FLANGE OVER THE SELF-
ADHESIVE FLEXIBLE FLASHING AT THE WINDOW SILL
SELF ADHESIVE FLEXIBLE JAMB FLASHING
OVER THE WINDOW NAILING FLANGES.  
EXTEND 2" (MIN) PAST THE WINDOW 
HEAD FLANGE.
2"
2"
SELF ADHESIVE FLEXIBLE HEAD FLASHING
OVER THE WINDOW NAILING FLANGES.  
LAP OVER EXTEND 2" (MIN) PAST THE 
FLEXIBLE JAMB FLASHING (BOTH SIDES).
WATER-RESISTIVE BARRIER (WRB)
WATER RESISTIVE BARRIER SHALL BE WRAPPED 
AROUND THE WINDOW SILL & JAMBS AND 
INSTALLED UNDER THE SILL & JAMB NAILING 
FLANGES & FLEXIBLE FLASHING.  THE WRB SHALL 
BE LAPPED OVER THE HEAD NAILING FLANGE AND 
FLEXIBLE FLASHING.  ALL HORIZONTAL & 
VERTICAL JOINTS IN THE WRB SHALL OVERLAP 6" 
MINIMUM (TOP OVER BOTTOM) AND SECURED 
WITH TAPE AS SPECIFIED BY MANUFACTURER.
EXTERIOR VIEW OF TYPICAL WINDOW
EXTERIOR VIEW OF TYPICAL WINDOW
www.workroomaz.com
Scale
Project number
Date
Drawn by
Checked by
623-920-5106
info@workroomaz.com
© 2025 workroom STUDIO. All rights reserved. 
These drawings and specifications are the 
property of the designer and are protected by 
copyright law. They shall not be used, 
reproduced, or copied in whole or in part for any 
purpose other than for this specific project 
without the written permission of the designer.
As indicated
A05
ELEVATIONS & SECTIONS
25017
Romanek Residence
Paul Romanek
November 11, 2025
DMF
APN: 503-04-048
N 295TH AVE
WICKENBURG, AZ 85390
MATERIAL LEGEND
A
B
METAL WALL PANELS T-GROOVE (NO REVEAL)
FINISH: TBD BY OWNER
MFGR: WESTERN STATES
ESR: ICC-ESR 4730
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF 
FINISH: TBD BY OWNER
MFGR: WESTERN STATES
ESR: ICC-ESR 4729
No.
Description
Date
 1/8" = 1'-0"
3 ELEVATION - NORTH & WEST
 1/8" = 1'-0"
2 ELEVATION - EAST & SOUTH
 1/8" = 1'-0"
1 SECTION
C
MANUFACTURED THIN BRICK VENEER
FINISH: TBD BY OWNER
MFGR: QUALITY STONE VENEER INC.
ESR: ICC-ESR 3151
T: TEMPERED GLAZING
 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
5 EXTERIOR OPENING PREPARATION
 3/4" = 1'-0"
4 WINDOW / DOOR FLASHING