PC Presentation

City of Glendale — Regular Meeting (2024-09-26)

View PDF Item 5 Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 4529 characters
VARIANCE FINDINGS 
ZTA24-01
Planning Commission Hearing – September 26, 2024
Alex Lerma 
Senior Planner

Request
2
Amend the Unified Development Code (UDC) Section 35.6.209 
Variances and Appeals and bring the section into conformance 
with Arizona Revised State Statute 9-462.06. 
Applicant / Owner:
Planning Commission Initiated/ City of Glendale

0bjective 
3
The intent of this request is to bring Section 35.6.209 of the 
Unified Development Code into compliance with Arizona Revised 
State Statutes.

Objective 
4
STRICKEN LANGUAGE
•
General  
•
Variance Criteria  
ADOPTED LANGUAGE
•
Purpose 
•
Findings for a Variance 
•
Guidelines for NOT Granting 
Variance 
•
Application Process

Current Standard  
5
35.6.209 Variances and Appeals
A. General 
Variances from zoning regulations pertaining to development 
standards; setbacks, lot dimensions, or other development 
standards where such a variance will not be detrimental to public 
interest, health, safety, or welfare. No variance shall be granted to 
permit a use not otherwise permitted in the applicable zoning 
district.

Current Standard  
6
B. Variance Criteria
Relief from established development standards shall not be 
arbitrary nor open-ended or universal across multiple properties. 
Upon filing a variance for consideration, the applicant shall 
present evidence that demonstrates the following:
1. Existing unique circumstances or conditions on the subject 
property that prevents the universal application of the zoning 
standard.

Current Standard  
7
2. The literal interpretation of the Unified Development Code would 
deprive the appellant of rights commonly enjoyed by other 
properties in the same zoning district. 
3. Any hardship caused by the provisions of the Unified Development 
Code is more than personal inconvenience or a financial hardship 
and is not the result of actions by the applicant. 
4. Granting the variance will not interfere with or alter the appropriate 
and legal use of adjacent conforming properties in the same zoning 
district.

Proposed Standard   
8
A. Purpose
The purpose of a variance is to restore equity when, due to special 
circumstances or conditions, the ordinance restricts one property 
more severely than other properties in the same zoning district. 
The circumstances or conditions must be beyond the control of 
the owner and relate to the property as opposed to the owner. 
Personal hardship or inconvenience does not justify a variance. 
The burden of proof is on the property owner.

Proposed Standard   
9
B. Findings for a Variance
The Board of Adjustment shall make the following findings 
based on the evidence in the record prior to granting a 
variance:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions applicable to 
the property including its size, shape, topography, location, 
or surroundings which were not self-imposed by the 
owner;

Proposed Standard   
10
2. Due to the special circumstances, the strict application of the 
Zoning Ordinance would deprive the property of privileges 
enjoyed by other properties in the same classification in same 
zoning district;
3. Granting the variance will not have a detrimental effect on the 
property, adjoining property, the surrounding neighborhood, 
or the City in general.

Proposed Standard   
11
C. The Board of Adjustment shall not grant a variance when:
1. The special circumstances applicable to the property are     
self-imposed by the owner. This includes:
a. A hardship that has been intentionally, knowingly, or 
recklessly created.
b. The failure of the owner to consider other reasonable 
alternatives, which do not require a variance.

Proposed Standard   
12
c. The variance would constitute a change to the uses 
permitted in any zoning district. 
d. The variance would constitute a grant of special 
privileges inconsistent with the limitations on other 
properties in the zoning district.

Public Involvement 
13
• Notice mailed June 24, 2024.
• Hearing notices mailed on August 30, 2024. 
• Request advertised in The Arizona Republic on 
September 4, 2024.

Findings & Analysis
14
•
The proposed amendment supports the goals of the 
General Plan by providing a clear and concise process for a 
variance approval or denial that is consistent with Section 
9-462.06 of the Arizona Revised Statute.

Recommendation   
15
Staff recommends Planning Commission forward a 
recommendation of approval of ZTA24-01, as presented.

VARIANCE FINDINGS 
ZTA24-01
Planning Commission Hearing – September 26, 2024
Alex Lerma 
Senior Planner