Extracted text (via pymupdf)
5277 characters
CENTERLINE ON GLENDALE GPA21-11 and ZON21-27 Planning Commission – March 24, 2022 Alex Lerma Planning Project Manager Request 2 1) Minor General Plan Amendment from HDR-20 (High Density Residential 12-20 du/ac) to DMU (Downtown Mixed Use); and 2) Zone change from R-4 (Multiple Residential) to PAD (Planned Area Development). Applicant: Stephen W. Anderson on behalf of Gammage & Burnham, PLC, representing Saia Family Limited Partnership 3 CITY HALL SITE Vicinity Map Located east of the southeast corner of 67th Avenue and Glendale Avenue. 4 Aerial 5 General Plan 6 Zoning Map Proposed Development Standards: 7 Standard Existing (R-4) Development Standards Proposed PAD Development Standards Density and Number of Dwelling Units 20 du/ac 30 du/ac; 368 units maximum for the overall site Building Setbacks (street frontage) 20 feet, increase 1 foot to 1 foot ratio for buildings over 20 feet 10 feet Minimum Perimeter (non- street frontage external to the overall site) 20 feet, increase 1 foot to 1 foot ratio for buildings over 20 feet 20 feet Accessory Building Setbacks Per Section 7.301 of the Glendale Zoning Ordinance Per Section 7.301 of the Glendale Zoning Ordinance Minimum Net Lot Area 6,000 SF 5 acres Minimum Width 60 feet 300 feet Minimum Depth 94 feet 200 feet Proposed Development Standards: 8 Standard Existing (R-4) Development Standards Proposed PAD Development Standards Private Open Space 100 SF per dwelling unit 70 SF per dwelling unit Public Open Space 30% exclusive of parking areas 23 % exclusive of parking areas Lot Coverage 50% 30% Parking (Multi-family) Studio or 1 Bedroom: 1 space 2 or more Bedrooms: 2 spaces 1 Designated guest space for every 3 units 689 spaces 488 spaces for the overall site. 482 spaces are unreserved, and intended for residents. 6 spaces will be reserved for visitor parking for the ground floor of Building A. If the project is phased, there must be at least 245 spaces provided with any single phase. Proposed Development Standards: 9 Standard Existing (R-4) Development Standards Proposed PAD Development Standards Building Heights (Maximum Structure Height) 30 feet, two story maximum for principal buildings Building A: 4 stories (60 feet) Building B thru D and F thru I: 3 stories (40 feet) Building E: 1 story (25 feet) Walls 6’ on property lines No screen walls required adjacent to public right- of-way; 6’ screen walls along shared property lines with private properties adjacent to the overall site. 10 Conceptual Site Plan 11 Conceptual Landscape Plan Conceptual Building Elevations 12 Gracie’s Village 13 14 Public Involvement • Notice mailed October 21st. • Virtual neighborhood meeting was held on November 3rd. • Request advertised in The Arizona Republic on March 2nd. • Hearing notices mailed on March 4th. • Property posted on-site March 4th. 15 • The proposed amendment is consistent with several of the Goals and Policies depicted within the Envision Glendale 2040 including development by sound growth management, tying the project to existing and future transportation systems and providing housing options that meet the range of socioeconomic needs. Finding & Analysis 16 Finding & Analysis • The project meets the intent of the PAD zoning district by creating a mix of residential and commercial uses. • The projects proposed land uses will complement existing land uses and provide commercial and housing options along a major intersection. 17 Finding & Analysis • This development will serve a need in the community for an otherwise site that has remained vacant and undeveloped for several years. • The applicant has provided extensive design initiatives of the buildings and the overall site to achieve a more urban style design of the site. 18 • No perimeter wall will be required along the project's street frontage, providing the project with more of a welcoming environment. • The on-site traffic is adequately planned to permit safe and efficient circulation. Finding & Analysis 19 • The Transportation Department has reviewed the project’s Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) and have approved the findings. • All applicable city departments have reviewed request and have recommended approval of the application. Stipulations have been added to ensure quality development. Finding & Analysis 20 Should the Planning Commission motion to recommend approval of GPA21-11, it should be as written. Should the Planning Commission motion to recommend approval of ZON21-27, it should be subject to the following stipulations: Recommendation Continued: 21 1.Development shall be in substantial conformance to the PAD Booklet entitled “Centerline on Glendale,” date stamped February 4, 2021. 2.A turn lane on 67th Avenue northbound shall be required, such land shall be designed to a length of 150’ turn land + 100’ Taper. Continued: 22 3.A 30’ X 30’ right-of-way triangle shall be dedicated at the corner of 67th Avenue and Ocotillo Road. 4.The new sidewalk on 67th Avenue shall be 6- feet wide and detached from the curb. CENTERLINE ON GLENDALE GPA21-11 and ZON21-27 Planning Commission – March 24, 2022 Alex Lerma Planning Project Manager