Citizen Participation Plan - Final Report
Extracted text (via pymupdf)
35136 characters
10957.8.3156292.2 7/22/2022 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION FINAL REPORT NWC 67TH AVE & MARYLAND AVE 67 Flats and Juniper Square PROPOSED MINOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA22-04), REZONE (ZON22-07) AND DESIGN REVIEW (DR22-24) Northwest Corner of 67th Avenue and Maryland Avenue Vacant (Agricultural) Property Applicant: Dominium Development & Acquisition Prepared by: Gammage & Burnham 40 North Central Avenue, 20th Floor Phoenix, AZ 85004 Tel: (602) 256-4446 dnewcombe@gblaw.com Contact: Dennis M. Newcombe First Submittal: June 15, 2022 Final Submittal: July 22, 2022 10957.8.3156292.2 2 7/22/2022 1. Brief Description of Proposed Project On behalf of Dominium Development & Acquisition (“Dominium” or “Applicant”), this Citizen Participation Plan documents the implementation of public outreach for Minor General Plan Amendment (GPA22-04), Rezoning (ZON22-07) and Design Review (DR22-24) applications (“Applications”). The Applicant intends to develop an affordable housing community on the approximate 30 acres of vacant agricultural land surrounding the southeast corner of 67th Avenue and Maryland Avenue (the “Property”). The vicinity map is attached in Tab A. The Applicant is requesting the following: Minor General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation of approximately 14.894 gross acres (13.084 net acres) of the eastern portion of the Property from High Density Residential: 12.0 – 20.0 du/ac (HDR 20) to High Density Residential 20.0 – 30.0 du/ac (HDR 30); and Rezone to Planned Area Development rezoning to develop a 605-unit multifamily residential community, comprised of 221 age-restricted, independent senior living units for adults 55 years and older and 384 multifamily residential units; and Design Review for detailed review of proposed development. 2. Describe Public Notices, Meetings, Related Other Publicity A project notification list was created that includes property owners within 500 feet of the subject site. The list was derived from public records on file with the Assessor’s Office of Maricopa County. Please see Tab B for the mailing list that was generated for this public outreach effort. A copy of the Neighborhood Meeting notification letter is provided in Tab C. Public notification was completed through mailing notifications via the U.S. Postal Service and a neighborhood meeting. The Neighborhood and Notification Area map is attached in Tab D. 3. Identify Who May/Will Be Directly and Indirectly Affected by Your Proposal and Anyone Who Expressed Interest or Believes They Will Be Affected Notification was sent to all parties who may be affected, including property owners within 500 feet, Home Owners Associations, Registered Neighborhoods and Neighborhood Leaders, all of the Neighborhood Meeting attendees, and any additional interested parties who directly or indirectly expressed interest or concern. During the course of the public participation process, the Applicant maintained a list of individuals who expressed comments and concerns and followed up with those who requested more information at the Neighborhood Meeting. 10957.8.3156292.2 3 7/22/2022 4. Identify Any Concerns the Above Individuals May Have The Applicant and development team have thoughtfully contemplated the project from the perspective of individuals affected or otherwise interested, as well as some of the concerns these individuals may have. At this time, the Applicant is not aware of any apparent development issues. However, any concerns or issues which arose from public participation have been recorded and are addressed in the Citizen Participation Plan. 5. How Will They Be Provided an Opportunity to Discuss the Proposal with the Applicant If Issues or Questions Continue or Suddenly Arise After Distribution of the Notification Letter. Following the initial filing notification, interested parties and residents within 500 feet of the Property were sent a notification of application for review and comment. Individuals were free to call the Applicant or the City of Glendale Planning Division at any time during the application review process. A public neighborhood meeting was held to inform the area stakeholders about the development proposal and to provide an opportunity for citizen comments and / or ask questions regarding the project. See Tab E, Neighborhood Meeting Attendee Sheet. The Project site will have notice signs posted as required to inform residents of the proposal and public hearing dates. Public notices will be mailed and published, by the City of Glendale, to notify residents of Planning Commission and City Council hearing dates. 6. How Will These Individuals be Informed of Any Changes After the Initial Contact? If any material changes or amendments to the proposed development had occurred after the Applicant’s initial notice of filing had been mailed to residents and interested parties (“affected parties”), the affected parties would have been informed of those changes during the neighborhood meeting and would have been given opportunities to comment or ask questions regarding the project. If any such changes occur after the neighborhood meeting, the Applicant will contact the affected parties by letters, phone calls, personal visits or a meeting (if necessary). 7. How Will You Keep Glendale Planning Staff Updated on the Status of Your Citizen Participation Efforts? The Applicant has informed Glendale Planning Staff of the status of their Citizen Participation efforts via phone calls and e-mails as needed, and through this Citizen Participation Final Report. SUMMARY/FINAL REPORT The Applicant hosted a virtual neighborhood meeting via Zoom on July 6, 2022, at 6:00 p.m. The meeting began at 6:00 p.m. and ended at 7:00 p.m. Six residents attended. The Applicant provided a presentation on the project and then took questions from the 10957.8.3156292.2 4 7/22/2022 audience. The attendees had questions about building height, traffic, bus stop locations, graffiti, illegal dumping, stormwater drainage and the PAD process. The Applicant answered all questions and provided their contact information for residents to continue to reach out with questions and/or comments. 8. Implementation Schedule / Dates of Completion Below is the project schedule as it relates to public involvement and citizen participation: 1. Pre-application submitted 11/16/2021 2. Citizen Participation Plan submitted for approval 06/15/2022 3. Distribution of Initial Notices 06/21/2022 4. Number of weeks allowed for responses 2 weeks 5. Cut-off date for responses 07/20/2022 6. Citizen Part. Plan Final Report Submitted 07/22/2022 EXHIBITS Tab A – Vicinity Map Tab B – Mailing Notification List Tab C – Notice of Filing and Virtual Neighborhood Meeting Notification Letter Tab D – Neighborhood and Notification Area Map Tab E – Neighborhood Meeting Attendee Sheet Tab F – Neighborhood Meeting Summary and Follow Up VICINITY MAP W Ocotillo Rd W Maryland Ave N 63RD AVE N 71ST AVE N 73RD AVE 67 Flats and Juniper Square (6504 N. 67th Avenue) 10957.8.3166959.1 GAMMAGE & BURNHAM, PLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW 40 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE 20TH FLOOR PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85004 June 21, 2022 Re: Northwest Corner of 67th and Maryland Avenues – 67 Flats and Juniper Square Applications for Minor General Plan Amendment (GPA22-04), Rezoning to PAD (ZON22- 07) and Design Review (DR22-24) Notice of Filing and Virtual Neighborhood Meeting Invitation Dear Property Owner or Interested Party: This firm represents Dominium Development & Acquisition (“Applicant”), one of the nation’s largest and most innovative multi-family housing development and management companies. The Applicant currently manages over 30,000 residential units across 23 states and continues to create housing opportunities that exceed expectations of quality, design and amenities by understanding the needs of the communities in which they develop. The Applicant is excited to develop the approximate 30-acre, vacant property at the northwest corner of 67th Avenue and Maryland Avenue (the “Property”) into a high-quality housing development that will fulfill the City’s need for family and senior housing. Specifically, the proposal includes a family housing development called 67 Flats, and a senior housing development called Juniper Square. (See Attached: Property Location Map and Proposed Site Plan.) The Property is currently designated in the City of Glendale’s General Plan for “High Density Residential 12-20 dwelling units per acre” and is zoned R-4 (Multiple Residence) district which will allow for a multi-residence development(s). The purpose of this letter is to inform you that we recently filed applications with the City of Glendale (“City”) to develop the Property in order to make the proposed housing opportunity possible. The proposed Minor General Plan Amendment (GPA22-04) will change a portion of the Property’s land use designation from High Density Residential 12-20 dwelling units per acre (HDR 20) to High Density Residential 20.0 – 30.0 du/ac (HDR 30) on a portion of the Property specifically fronting 67th Avenue to accommodate the senior housing and the proposed overall density on the Property. (See Attached: Proposed General Plan Map.) With that said, the Applicant is proposing to develop 605 residential senior and family units on the Property, resulting in a density of 20.31 dwelling units per acre within three (3) and four (4) story residential buildings to maintain openness. It should be noted, the R-4 Zoning District allows for buildings 30 feet in height and the Planned Area Development (PAD) will allow a minor increase in height as well as parking modification to accommodate the senior/family housing proposal (ZON22-07). (See Attached: Proposed Site Plan and Conceptual Rendering.) The Design Review application (DR22-24) will allow for architectural and other development details to be reviewed and approved by the City to ensure that the project is compatible with the surrounding area. This letter is being sent to all property owners within 500-feet of the Property and additional persons at the request of the City of Glendale Planning Department. We are required to use the Maricopa County TELEPHONE (602) 256-0566 FACSIMILE (602) 256-4475 ___________________ WRITER’S DIRECT LINE (602) 256-4446 dnewcombe@gblaw.com 10957.8.3166959.1 2 of 2 Assessor’s Tax Parcel information to create our mailing notification list for owners of property location within the notification area. If you know a neighbor who did not receive notice or if you have sold this property in the interim, please forward this correspondence to the neighbor or current property owner. I have included a site plan with this letter for your review. A virtual neighborhood meeting will take place on Wednesday, July 6, 2022, at 6:00 p.m. via Zoom. If you have any concerns or questions for the Applicant, please call me at (602) 256-4446 or e-mail me at dnewcombe@gblaw.com. You are invited to attend a virtual neighborhood meeting: NWC 67th Avenue & Maryland – 67 Flats and Juniper Square Virtual Neighborhood Meeting Wednesday, July 6, 2022, at 6:00 p.m. via Zoom https://www.gblaw.com/67thandmaryland/ Instructions to join the Zoom meeting: 1. Type in the Zoom meeting address listed above. 2. Fill out the registration form that appears. This is a virtual sign in sheet that must be filled out prior to joining the meeting. If you do not complete this form, you will NOT be able to join the meeting. 3. Submit the form and join the meeting! The meeting registration form will be shared with the City and will also be used to keep you informed of future meetings and hearings via e-mail, as well as traditional mail. At the beginning of the meeting, we will provide a brief overview of the meeting procedures and instructions for asking questions. You may also make your opinions known to the City of Glendale by contacting George Gehlert, the Planner Project Manager, at (623) 930-2597 or ggehlert@glendaleaz.com. Your comments will be made part of the case file. Sincerely, GAMMAGE & BURNHAM PLC By Dennis M. Newcombe Senior Land Use Planner Enclosures: Property Location Map Proposed General Plan Map Proposed Site Plan Conceptual Rendering PROPERTY LOCATION MAP W Ocotillo Rd W Maryland Ave N 63RD AVE N 71ST AVE N 73RD AVE Subject Property (6504 N. 67th Avenue) Proposed General Plan Land Use Map W. MARYLAND AVE W. OCOTILLO ROAD Juniper Square and 67 Flats Project Site HDR 20 HDR 20 HDR 20 DMU HDR 20 MHDR 8 MHDR 12 GC MDR 5 POS EDU MDR 5 HDR 30 Subject Property Centerline Overlay District N. 67TH AVE N'\6 SINGLE FALLY -Sr i} if 20' SEIBA CK Ri _6 SINGL1E 21VIEW FENCE ON Ti F 4 SCREEN WALL W SIERRA VISTA DR _ R1.6 SINGLE FAMI4 381 SETBACK FOR 3 101Y +1':1' BLDG HGT OAR ICY 0' R , R1 -'6N :SINGLE FAMILY I 30' ROW COMPACTOR REFUSE & RECYCLE BLDG5 TYPE I 3 STORY BLDG 4 TYPE I 3 STORY BLDG 11 TYPE II - r 3 STORY BLDG 2 TYPE I 3 STORY R-4 MULTI -FAMILY CARPORT (TYP.) MULTI USE AREA CLUBHOUSE .1/41* Viir7 MEL ram" wify ma-K. VISIBILITY TRIANGLES illk it TODD ,. ASSOCIATES 602-952-8280 / TODDASSOC.COM 21-2052-02 1 BLDG 6 TYPE II 3 STORY FITNESS CALL B BUS FIEL BLDG 12 TYPE I 3 STORY 10' LANDSCAPE SETBACK BLDG 13 TYPE I 3 STORY BLDG 14 TYPE I 3 STORY 38' SEThArK-FOR 331-0-RV +11:1' BLDG HGT OVER 20' diD °MINIUM BLDG 7 TYPE I 3 STORY PARCEL LINE CAPE SEA, CK 6 CM-U WALJ. 20 SETBACK EXISTING 6' C7 _ 6/641 WALL GATE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES R-4 MULTI -FAMILY R-4 MULTI -FAMILY MULTI USE AREA PARCEL LINE LOADING IPS (SENIOR GATE SENIOR 4 STORY 2' VIEW FENCE ON TO OF 4' SCREEN WALL 411 MARYLAND AVE CARPORT (TV?.) LEASING / CLUBHOUSE @ FIRST LEVEL 1:1 BLDG HGT OVER 20' 38' SETBACK FOR 3 STORY +11:1' BLDG HGT OVER 20' Qin 20' SETBACK 0" 30' 60' 120' SCALE: 1" = 601-0" Residences @ NWC 67th & Maryland Glendale, AZ REZONING SUBMITTAL March 10, 2022 CALL B X VI 1BILITYt ANGLES I I ri ROW W FENCE ON OF 4' SCF EEN WALL N GATE M-1 38' SETBACK FOR 3 STORY I +11:11 BLDG HGT OVER 20' VISIBILITY I er TRIANGLES MONUM NT I SIGN R-4 R-4 R-4 49' SETBACK FOR 4 STORY +1:1 BLDG HGT OVER 20' V- VISIBILITY TRIANGLES SMIGONN \IMEINI 20' SE\EB CK EW FEN ON OF 4' StREEN WALL \ MONNENT SIGN VISIBILITY TRIANGLES R-4 RETAIL ENTRY C-2 RETAIL / R-4 CHURCH OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN Preliminary Not For Construction 0 In SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME TREES (LARGE) ACACIA ANEURA PROSOPIS HYBRID 'LESLIE ROY' CITRUS SPECIES EUCALYPTUS PAPUANA PARKINSONIA DESERT MUSEUM' ERA/ONUS VELUONA TANTEX PISTACIA X TED PUSH' QUERCUS VIRGIANA 'CATHEDERAL oAr TREES (SMALL) CAESALPINIA SIERRA SUN CHITALPA X TASHKANTENSIS 'PINK DAWN' GORDA BOISSIERI P1STACIA LENTISCUS SOPHORA SECUNDIFLORA CHAMAEROPS HUMUS PHOENIX DACYLIFERA SHRUBS BOUGAINVILLEA BARBARA KARST BOUGAINVILLA X ROSENKA CAESALPINIA PULCHERRIMA GAMMA MACROCARPA 'TUTTLE FiCUS NMDA COLUMNS LEUCOPHYLLUM 'LYNNS LEGACY MUHLENBERGIA RIGERS MUHLENBERGIA LINDHEIMERI MUHLENBERGIA CAP1LLARIS OLEA EUROPAEA 'LITHE OLLIE ROSA SIP. ICEBERG' RUELLIA BRITONIANA 'KATIE RUELLIA PENINSULARIS DODONAEA VISCOSA TECOMA X CRIMSON FLARE" TECOMA X SIERRA APRICOT TECOMA SIAM 'GOLD STAR' TECOMA X 'SOLAR FLARE XYLOSMA CONGESTUM 'COMPACTA* ACCENIS COMMON NAME MULGA TREE Igo S. LESUE ROY MESQUITE / x24 CITRUS x 'ROBERTSON' 17x1 s. GHOST GUM 35/i..Xr DESERT MUSEUM PALO VERDE 2545' FANTEX ASH 2545 RED PUSH PISTACHE 3Talf CATHEDERAL UVE OAK 41XxoCr CAL. 15 GAL 15 Gal. 36" 88.B 36" B&B 48' BOX 24' BOX 24' Box 24' BOX MEXICAN BIRD OF PARADISE 1" iOxIO CHITALPA TREE TEXAS OLIVE AAASTIC TREE 2" 151120' TEXAS MOUNTAIN LAUREL 1^ 1550 5' MEDITERRANEAN PALM 15 G/36" 10 all. SIVE( h X wl EMITTERS -me - yam We 29 6')(3' 3 410-20-6.36 GPH 25 sa 3 -XBT-20-6, 36 GPH • &KA' 3 410-20-6. 36 GPH 6 5x..S 3 -XBT-20-6, 36 GPH 12 9'xt 23 9'x4 3 481-20-6.36 6PI-1 55 9'x6' 4 -X131-20-6. 36 GPH 52 9'X4' 3 -XFIT-20-6, 36 GPH 23 sa Multi 3 4(81-20-6.36 GPH 32 ffxS Std. 3 481-20-6.36 GPH 37 5x3 Multi 3 -XBT-20-6, 36 GPH 16 frx5 Std. 3 -XI31-20-6. 36 GPH 7 5x3Mulli 3 -XBT-20-6, 36 GPH 2 -XBT-10PC. 2 GPH BUBBLERS DATE PALM 25 T.F.. 0 BARBARA KARST DOUG. ROSENKA BOUGAINVILLEA RED BIRD OF PARADISE TURF NATAL PLUM INDIAN LAUREL COLUMNS HYBRID TEXAS SAGE DEER GRASS AUTUMN GLOW GRASS PINK MUHLY GRASS DWARF OLIVE WHITE ICEBERG SHRUB BLUE DWARF RUELLIA BAJA RUELLIA HOP BUSH 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL. 15 GAL 5 GAL. 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL. 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL. CRIMSON FLARE ESPERANZA 5 GAL SIERRA APRICOT TECOMA 5 GAL GOLD STAR TECOMA 5 GAL. SOLAR FLARE TECOMA 5 GAL. DWARF XYLOSMA 5 GAL Mature Urea 106 Sh x Sw 114 3'h x fw 2 81)4 IOW 106 3'h x 4'w 159 Th x 41'w 171 Sh x 5'w 137 31i x3'w O Thaw O 3h x3w 83 3h x3'w 32 31/ x4W 49 4'h x 64/ 81 411x 64/ 18 lsbxlow O 6'h x6'w O all OW 94 Sh x54/ 119 eh 46W 8 4'h x5W 1 -XBT-10PC, 1 GPH 2 -X131-10PC. 2 GPH 1 -XBT-10PC, 1 GPH 2 -XBT-10PC. 2 GPH 2 -XBT-10PC. 2 GPH 1 -X81-10PC. 1 GPH 1 -XBT-10PC, 1 GPH 1 -XBT-10PC. I GPH 1 -XBT-10PC, 1 GPH 1 -XBT-I0PC. 1 GPH 1 -XBT-10PC. 1 GPH 1 -XBT-I0PC. 1 GPH 1 -XBT-10PC, 1 GPH 1 -XBT-10PC. 1 GPH 1 -XBT-10PC. I GPH 1 -XBT-10PC. I GPH 1 -XBT-10PC, 1 GPH 1 -XBT-10PC. 1 GPH 1 -XBT-10PC, 1 GPH AGAVE PARRY] V. TRUNCATA ALOE X BLUE ELF ALOE BARBADENSIS AGAVE DESMETTANA DASYURION QUADRANGUIATUM EUPHORBIA TIRUCALLI HESPERALOE FUNIFERA HESPERALOE PAR VILORA PEDILANTHUS MACROCARPUS SANSEVIERIA TRIFASCIATA PORTULACARIA AFRA GROUNDCOVERS ARTICHOKE AGAVE BLUE ELF ALOE MEDICINAL ALOE SMOOTH AGAVE MEXICAN GRASS TREE FIRE SOCKS GIANT YUCCA RED YUCCA LADY'S SUPPER MOTHER-IN-LAW TONGUE ELEPHANTS FOOD 5 GAL. 30 181-14 4W 1 -XBT-10PC. 1 GPH 3 GAL. 18 lati x 7w 1 -XBT-I0PC, 1 GPH 5 GAL 0 71/ x 34/ 1 -XEIT-10PC, I GPH 5 GAL 57 3'h x 3w 1 -XBT-10PC. 1 GPH 5 GAL 0 Sh x 5W 2 -XLIT-10PC. 2 GI/H 5 GAL. 51 41i aw 1 -XBT-10PC. 1 GPH 5 GAL. 54 6?, ,c 6W I -XBT-10PC. 1 GPH 5 GAL. 56 3'h x 44/ 1 -X0T-10PC. 1 GPH 5 GAL. 234 rh X 3'w 1 -XBT-10PC. 1 GPH 5 GAL. 30 31/ x 4'w 1 -XBT-I CPC. 1 GPH 5 GAL. 80 3h 44w VINES GROUND PLANE Mcm'E CALLEISTEMON VIMINALIS 'LITTLE JOHN' CARISSA GRANDIFLORA GREEN CARPET EREMOPHILA GLABRA 'MINGENEW GOLD.' LANTANA DALLAS RED' LANTANA 'GOLD MOUND' LANTANA MONIEVIDENSIS SPHAGNE11COLA TRILOBATA BIGNONIA CAPREOLATA LITTLE JOHN BOTTLEBRUSH TUTTLE NATAL PLUM OUTBACK SUNRISE EMU RED LANTANA GOLD MOUND LANTANA PURPLE LANTANA YELLOW DOT CROSS VINE BOUGAINVILLEA BARBARA KARST BOUGAINVILLEA VINE DECOMPOSED GRANITE: 2" DEPTH OF 1/2 SCREENED 'APACHE GOLD' CYNODON DACTYLON TIFF GREEN' TIFF GREEN' SOD TURF COBBLE 3-8" COBBLESTONE / RIP RAP - LOCATION PER PLANS SYNTHETIC TURF: 'KID PLAY BY ARTIFICIAL GRASS SUPERSTORE ALTERNATE NATURAL 'MIDIRON' BERMUDA SOD TURF 5 GAL. 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL. 5 GAL. 5 GAL. 150 Th x 2'w 1 -XBT-10PC. I GPH 381 3'h x 4W 2 -XBT-10PC, 2 GPH 218 I fch x6W 1 -XBT-10PC. 2 GPH 94 th x 4'w 1 -XBT-10PC, 2 GPH 378 2h x 4w 1 -X.13T-10PC. 2 GPH 17 2'h x 3/v 1 -XBT-10PC. I GPH 58 In x 6W 1 -XBT-10PC. 2 GPH 5 GAL 8 13h x 8'w I -XBT-10PC. 1 GPH 5 GAL. 32 icrn x 10'w 1 -XBT-10PC. I GPH 11.0 SITE DATA VICINITY MAP 63RD AVE. 67TH AVE. 71st AVE. 59TH AVE. GRAND AVE. MARYLAND HOME GLENDALE SITE (PURSUANT TO LOKAHI PARKING MASTER PLAN) TODD ASSOCIATES 602-952-8280 / TODDASSOC.COM 21-2052-02 eIDOMINIUM FAMILY LIVING SENIOR LIVING 67 Flats & Juniper Square Glendale, AZ REZONING SUBMITTAL March 10, 2022 67 FLATS ENTRY PERSPECTIVE Preliminary Not For Construction NEIGHBORHOOD NOTIFICATION AREA NAME OF REQUEST: APARTMENTS AT NWC OF 67TH AVENUE AND MARYLAND LOCATION: VACANT PROPERTY AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 67TH AVENUE AND MARYLAND AVENUE REQUEST: The Applicant is requesting 1) a Minor General Plan Amendment from High Density Residential 12-20 dwelling units per acre (HDR 20) to High Density Residential 20.0 – 30.0 du/ac (HDR 30) on a portion of the Property; and 2) a Rezoning from R-4 to PAD. ZONING DISTRICT: R-4 COUNCIL DISTRICT: Ocotillo FORMAL APPLICATION SUBMITTED: Rezone and DR submitted 03/17/2022; GPA submitted 06/15/2022 Attendee Address City State ZIP Ted Morcomb (Current Property Owner) 4737 N Placita De Concha Tucson AZ 85745 Edwin Morcomb (Current Property Owner) 2184 Augusta Place Santa Clara CA 95051 Anna Quast (Current Property Owner) 23815 Piper St. Eastpointe MI 48021 Carole Speth 7019 West Sierra Vista Drive Glendale AZ 85303 Leslie Sheeler 6946 W. Maryland Ave Glendale AZ 85303 Edythe Kohler 6928 W. McLellan Rd Glendale AZ 85303 Zoom Neighborhood Meeting Resident Sign In Sheet - July 6, 2022 GPA22-04 and ZON22-07 Page 1 of 3 RESULTS/SUMMARY OF VIRTUAL NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING JULY 6, 2022, AND FOLLOW UP A. ATTENDANCE/PARTICIPANTS. Development Team/Reps. Rodrigo Dorador Madrigal (Dominium Developer) Kaitlyn Tveit (Dominium, Developer) Sarah Shambrook (Dominium, Developer) Brent Bieser (Todd and Assoc., Architect) Tom Bilsten (Bilsten Consulting, Outreach Consultant) Ashley Marsh (Gammage & Burnham, Legal Rep. for Dominium) Dennis Newcombe (Gammage & Burnham, Senior Land Use Planner) Cheryl Griemsmann (Gammage & Burnham, Land Use Planner) Current Property Owners. Ted Morcomb - 4737 North Placita De Concha, Tucson, AZ Edwin Morcomb - 2184 Augusta Place, Santa Clara, CA Anna Quast - 23815 Piper Street, Eastpointe, MI Community/Residents. Leslie Sheeler - 6946 West Maryland Avenue, Glendale, AZ Carole Speth - 7019 West Sierra Vista Drive, Glendale, AZ Edythe Kohler - 6928 West McLellan Road, Glendale, AZ B. QUESTIONS/ITEMS OF CONCERN Out of 151 notification letters mailed, three (3) community/residents participated in the July 6, 2022, virtual neighborhood meeting. The questions/items of concern were centered around, in no particular order, the following: 1. Will the property be gated? 2. How close to transit bus stop locations? 3. Density and height discussion. 4. Zoning and General Plan designations currently/proposed. 5. Access points to Maryland Avenue and 67th Avenue 6. Drainage and flooding concerns in the area. 7. Traffic, busy street, and school is close-by. 8. Schools in the area and capacity issues. 9. Landscaping and parking. 10. Quality of design, maintenance, and graffiti. Page 2 of 3 C. RESPONSES AND ITEMS DISCUSSED 1. Both properties’ (i.e., the family and senior living developments) will be gated with view fencing or split solid block with view fencing. 2. There are existing transit stops along 67th Avenue and within easy walking distances to both properties. 3. The overall density is consistent with what has already been approved on the entire property (i.e., 20 du/acre). The proposed PAD zoning district will utilize many of the existing R-4 zoning district development standards, or better. The deviations included in the PAD are to create not only a nice design, but also to create the two (2) distinct housing proposals and products, each utilizing and considering building scale for optimal development/openness. The Minor General Plan Amendment is necessary for the senior living portion, which is located at the hard corner of 67th Avenue and Maryland Avenue is slightly over the density allowed of 20 du/acre with a proposed density of 22 du/acre (whereas the family portion is under 20 du/acre). The request for increased density is designed to support the senior living use and would increase the number of allowed units from 600 units to 605 units. Moreover, the overall density (i.e., of both developments) is at 20.31 du/acre or slightly over the 20 du/acre. There are also significant building setbacks along 69th Avenue, open space, landscaping, and a slight increase in building height for these buildings to 40-feet (whereas residential subdivisions allow up to 30-feet). The increased height is proposed for the senior living development within two (2) 4-story buildings at the immediate corner of 67th Avenue and Maryland Avenue, away from the neighborhood. Typical senior living communities have said building heights which provide for interior amenities within a climate-controlled environment for seniors (e.g., dining rooms, game rooms, etc.), as well as provide for openness outside for outdoor amenities (e.g., pool/spa, game courts, etc.). Typical senior living buildings are taller to shorten walking distances to the elevators, common space, and parking. 4. Property is currently zoned R-4 Multiple Residences with a density allowance of 20 du/ac. The Minor General Plan Amendment request is for the Senior community to be at 22 du/acre and along 67th Avenue as a transition area. 5. The access points along both 67th Avenue and Maryland Avenue disperses traffic efficiently, and meets the fire department code, which requires multiple access points. The entrances will allow for better flow of traffic, spacing, and will be safer overall for the proposed residents of these communities and the neighborhood. 6. We will be adhering to the city’s technical codes/reviews as well as any other additional reviews/approvals from other entities (i.e., SRP). To date, preliminary reviews by our engineer and the city engineering dept. have not indicated any issues with the design. The development will evaluate the drainage situation as well as be designed to maintain its onsite water retention, as required by the City code. Page 3 of 3 7. Traffic report completed by our traffic engineer has been reviewed by the city, which has preliminary been accepted by the city. The abutting remaining ½-streets to the overall property will be fully improved along with sidewalks installed, etc. (specifically Maryland Avenue and 69th Avenue). Moreover, the R-4, high density zoning has been planned for years so the streets network was planned/designed to accommodate the proposed traffic. In addition, multiple access points help to disperse traffic. 8. We reached out to the school districts and the elementary district requested a school bus stop, which we have provided for on Maryland Avenue. 9. The proposed PAD limits the density, design, height, and generally sets the development standards so if major changes occur later, then the PAD must be amended, which requires public involvement. The parking study confirms that the two (2) proposed developments will meet the current market demand/observations of “real-world” parking demand in the vicinity area. The senior living community provides more parking than the city’s requirement but is necessary for Dominium and the market demand. The design of the overall property with additional building heights allows for more open space areas/landscaping. 10. High quality design and amenities for both developments by Dominium and the design team, which have created a nice overall cohesive development. D. FOLLOW UP Following the neighborhood meeting, we reached out to the three (3) attendees to address any additional questions/concerns. Attached are emails from/to Ms. Leslie Sheeler whom we reached out to independently (via Tom Bilsten) as well as in response to a specific request from the City Planner (George Gehlert). Tom Bilsten also talked on the telephone with both Ms. Carole Speth and Ms. Edythe Kohler on July 19, 2022, who attended the virtual neighborhood meeting to address any additional comments/concerns. Both were receptive to continued discussions along with possible in person meetings, as needed, and they will advise us on how they want to proceed (if at all) in the future (e.g., via emails or in person meetings). Finally, we have made ourselves available and will continue to do so for any future discussions/meetings with anyone, as requested. 1 ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: LESLIE E SHEELER <safetypest@msn.com> Date: Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 10:36 AM Subject: Re: Dominium Glendale - Request for meeting To: Tom Bilsten <tom.bilsten@gmail.com> Mr. Blisten, I made my concerns quite clear in the "Neighborhood" meeting as difficult as Mr. Newcombe made it. His replies on the part of Dominion were also quite clear. It was also reiterated in my reply to you. Again, I appreciate your offer. I will keep your contact information should the need arise. Respectfully, H. Leslie Sheeler From: Tom Bilsten <tom.bilsten@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 12:28 PM To: LESLIE E SHEELER <safetypest@msn.com> Subject: Re: Dominium Glendale - Request for meeting You are obviously entitled to collect whatever information that you would like from the City, however, they do not always have the ability to answer questions on behalf of the developer or the ability to listen to the concerns of the community and see if any modifications can be made. We would still appreciate the opportunity to get to know you better and hear your concerns firsthand. No pressure, we just wanted to make ourselves available if you wanted to meet. Best, Tom Bilsten Bilsten Consulting Cell-602-561-3932 On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 9:58 AM LESLIE E SHEELER <safetypest@msn.com> wrote: Dear Mr. Blisten, I appreciate the offer. I'm not very keen on your project and do not relish the 3 and 4 story buildings along with the added density in my community so, I'm not too sure that a meeting is in either of our best interests. I will be getting the information I need from the City. 2 Sincerely, H. Leslie Sheeler From: Tom Bilsten <tom.bilsten@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 11:50 AM To: safetypest@msn.com <safetypest@msn.com> Subject: Dominium Glendale - Request for meeting Dear Leslie, My name is Tom Bilsten and I am assisting Dominium with some of their community outreach regarding their proposed project in Glendale. I was on the virtual neighborhood meeting and listened to your questions that night. I have also heard that you have reached out to the City of Glendale with some additional questions. We would love the opportunity to sit down and discuss this project with you. We would really appreciate hearing the questions from you to see if there are any that we already have answers to as well as what questions we need to do some additional research on to get you the answers you are looking for. It would most likely be myself and Rodrigo from Dominium. I have listed a few dates and times below for you to see if it works within your schedule. We were thinking of the Aloha Tea & Coffee or Dapper & Stout Coffee. Monday, 7/18, from 8-9am, 1:30-7pm Thursday, 7/21, from 4-7pm Please let me know what you think. We really appreciate your time. Tom Bilsten Bilsten Consulting Cell-602-561-3932 1 Dennis M. Newcombe From: Dennis M. Newcombe <dnewcombe@gblaw.com> Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2022 6:01 PM To: LESLIE E SHEELER Cc: ggehlert@glendaleaz.com Subject: Re: 67th and Maryland Dear Ms. Sheeler, Thank you, let me know if you have any issues. As always, I appreciate your continued time and consideration. Be well. Thank you again. Dennis M. Newcombe Senior Land Use Planner 602.256.4446 Direct dnewcombe@gblaw.com | Profile | www.gblaw.com Sent from my iPhone On Jul 14, 2022, at 5:55 PM, LESLIE E SHEELER <safetypest@msn.com> wrote: Mr. Newcombe, I will try the link; thank you. By the way, my name is Ms. Sheeler. Respect goes along way doesn't it? H. Leslie Sheeler From: Dennis M. Newcombe <dnewcombe@gblaw.com> Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2022 7:37 PM To: LESLIE E SHEELER <safetypest@msn.com> Cc: Gehlert, George <GGehlert@glendaleaz.com> Subject: RE: 67th and Maryland Leslie, We uploaded the neighborhood meeting video to the landing page of our website where you originally went to register for the neighborhood meeting. 2 The link is: https://www.gblaw.com/67thandmaryland/ You will see a click “here” hyperlink to see the video. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you again, and be well. Dennis M. Newcombe Senior Land Use Planner Gammage & Burnham | Profile 602.256.4446 Direct From: Dennis M. Newcombe <dnewcombe@gblaw.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2022 5:28 PM To: LESLIE E SHEELER <safetypest@msn.com> Cc: Gehlert, George <GGehlert@glendaleaz.com> Subject: Re: 67th and Maryland Leslie, I am on the road to a meeting in Goodyear this evening, but I will figure out with the office tech. person tomorrow. Thank you again. Be well, and keep cool (it is hot out). Dennis M. Newcombe Senior Land Use Planner 602.256.4446 Direct dnewcombe@gblaw.com | Profile | www.gblaw.com Sent from my iPhone On Jul 13, 2022, at 4:59 PM, LESLIE E SHEELER <safetypest@msn.com> wrote: Mr. Newcombe, Thank you. Would you also have the address/link to the video of that meeting? H. Leslie Sheeler From: Dennis M. Newcombe <dnewcombe@gblaw.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2022 6:11 PM To: safetypest@msn.com <safetypest@msn.com> Cc: Gehlert, George <GGehlert@GLENDALEAZ.com> Subject: 67th and Maryland 3 Leslie, George Gehlert, with the city of Glendale, contacted me and asked that I send you the list of attendees from last week’s meeting. Rodrigo Dorador Madrigal (Dominium developer) Kaitlyn Tveit (Dominium, Developer) Sarah Shambrook (Dominium, Developer) Brent Bieser (Todd and Assoc., Architect) Ashley Marsh (G&B Legal Rep. for Dominium) Tom Bilsten (Bilsten Consulting) Ted Morcomb (current property owner) - 4737 North Placita De Concha, Tucson, AZ Edwin Morcomb (current property owner) - 2184 Augusta Place, Santa Clara, CA Anna Quast (current property owner) - 23815 Piper Street, Eastpointe, MI Leslie Sheeler - 6946 West Maryland Avenue, Glendale, AZ Carole Speth - 7019 West Sierra Vista Drive, Glendale, AZ Edythe Kohler - 6928 West McLellan Road, Glendale, AZ Let me know if you any additional questions. Thank you again for your time, consideration, and (most importantly) your patience - I apologize for any inconvenience/technical difficulties. Dennis M. Newcombe Senior Land Use Planner 602.256.4446 Direct dnewcombe@gblaw.com | Profile | www.gblaw.com 40 North Central Ave., 20th Floor | Phoenix, AZ 85004 This message and any of the attached documents contain information from the law firm of Gammage & Burnham, P.L.C. that may be confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not read, copy, distribute, or use this information, and no privilege has been waived by your inadvertent receipt. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message.