PAD Narrative

City of Glendale — Regular Meeting (2021-11-04)

View PDF Item 8 Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 51905 characters
Ergas 303 
 
 
 
 
 
PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT 
 
 
Zoning Case: ZON21-20_ 
SR21-0063 
 
NEC of Cotton Lane and  
the Orangewood Avenue Alignment 
 
Glendale, AZ 
 
 
 
 
 
Draft: June 8th, 2021 
Submitted: June 29th, 2021 
Re-submitted: September 9th, 2021 
Revised: October 13th, 2021 
 
Received 10-13-2021

The Ergas Group - Ergas 303  
Planned Area Development  
Glendale, Arizona 
2 
PROJECT TEAM  
  
Developers:  
The Ergas Group  
  
  
 
Ryan Companies US  
Julian Ergas  
  
  
  
  
3900 E. Camelback Road, Suite 100  
1185 Georgia St W, Unit 1045 
 
Phoenix, AZ 85018-2653  
Vancouver, BC V6E 4E6 
 
  
(602) 322-6100  
(604) 687-2310  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Architect:   
Ryan A+E, Inc.  
3900 E Camelback Road, Suite 100  
Phoenix, AZ 85018-2653  
(602) 322-6100  
  
Civil Engineer:   
Hunter Engineering Inc.  
Jake Earley, PE  
10450 N. 74th Street, Suite 200  
Scottsdale, AZ 85258  
(480) 991-3985  
  
Traffic Engineer:  
Southwest Traffic Engineering, LLC   
Andrew Smigielski, PE, PTOE, PTP  
3838 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1810  
Phoenix, AZ 85012  
(602) 266-7983  
  
Landscape Architect:   
Laskin & Associates, Inc.  
Hardy Laskin, RLA  
67 E Weldon Avenue, Suite 230  
Phoenix, AZ 85012  
(602) 840-7771  
  
Planning:   
Hunter Engineering, Inc.  
Michael S. Buschbacher II, AICP  
10450 N. 74th Street, Suite 200  
Scottsdale, AZ 85258  
(480) 991-3985

The Ergas Group - Ergas 303  
Planned Area Development  
Glendale, Arizona 
3 
  
  
TABLE OF CONTENTS  
  
  
1. 
Project Introduction & Overview ..................................................................... 4  
2. 
Regional Context ............................................................................................... 5  
3. 
Site Analysis ..........................................................................................................5  
3.1 Existing Zoning Classification ............................................................... 5  
3.2 Existing Permitted Land Use ................................................................ 6  
3.3 Regional Drainage & Landform ......................................................... 6  
3.4 Existing Roadway Network .................................................................. 6  
3.5 Existing Easements & Planned Utilities ................................................ 7  
3.6 Annexation Benefits………………………………………………………..7  
4. 
Modified Regulatory Development Standards .............................................. 8  
4.1 Purpose and Intent .............................................................................. 8  
4.2 Permitted Uses ...................................................................................... 8  
4.3 Uses Subject to Conditions ................................................................ 11  
4.4 Accessory Uses ................................................................................... 11  
4.5 Site Plan............................................................................................... 12  
4.6 Revised Development Standards .................................................... 12  
4.7 Revision Justifications......................................................................... 15  
 
  
(Height, FAR, Parking, Signage)  
4.8 Performance Standards .................................................................... 16  
 
  
(Nuisances, Enclosure, Hazards, Dark Skies)  
4.9 Site Buffers, Screening, Parking & Adjacency .................................17  
5. 
Landscape Design .......................................................................................... 18  
6. 
Architecture Form & Character .................................................................... 18  
7. 
Signage ............................................................................................................ 20  
8. 
Infrastructure and Utilities ............................................................................... 20  
9. 
Development Phases ..................................................................................... 22  
10. 
Summary .......................................................................................................... 22  
11. 
Consistency with Surrounding PAD’s ............................................................ 22  
  
LIST OF EXHIBITS ......................................................................................................... 23

The Ergas Group - Ergas 303  
Planned Area Development  
Glendale, Arizona 
4 
 
1. Project Introduction and Overview  
The Ergas Group and Ryan Companies (the “Developers”) plans to develop an 
approximately 64-acre property located at the NEC of Cotton Lane and 
Orangewood Avenue alignment (the “Property”), see Aerial and Vicinity Map 
attached as Exhibit 1. This application requests approval of a Planned Area 
Development (“PAD”) to allow for industrial, distribution, commercial and 
warehouse uses in a development called Ergas 303. The Applicant seeks to 
develop the Property as per the City of Glendale’s PAD process for the site 
following the light industrial and commercial zoning standards with modifications 
to allow for a high-tech industrial development with multiple, midsized 
warehouse buildings nearby the expanding State Route 303 Loop transportation 
corridor.  
  
The Property has been used for agricultural purposes for many years and is 
unimproved with no buildings. State Route 303 Loop runs along the eastern 
boundary of the site from a ½ mile south of Northern Avenue to just south of the 
Orangewood Avenue alignment. Cotton Lane is the western boundary for the 
site.  
  
The property is proposed to be annexed into Glendale, transferring the IND-2 
zoning standards from the County to the City. Since IND-2 allows commercial 
uses, there is no equivalent zoning classification that also encompassed 
commercial uses in the City of Glendale. As a result, the equivalent zoning was 
determined to be PAD which allowed all of the uses that the County’s IND-2 
allows. This PAD goes one step further to allow additional commercial and retail 
uses.  
  
This project seeks to further refine the PAD to modify development standards to 
more closely resemble those in recent similar PADs within the Loop 303 Corridor. 
The uses within the PAD are compatible with the City of Glendale General Plan 
designation of Regional Mixed Use (RMU) for this property. RMU allows for Luke 
Compatible Land Use (LCLU) in addition to Planned Commercial (PC) and 
comply with state statute 28-8481 concerning land uses within the vicinity of a 
military installation. No residential uses will be proposed for this project.  
  
While the site is located outside of the Luke Air Force Base noise contour of 65 
DNL, it is within close proximity to the air force base. Industrial land uses for these 
properties are the most appropriate, considering the accident potential and 
noise impacts from daily activities conducted on and around the base due to 
flight activities.  
  
 
As noted above, the property is adjacent to the west side of State Route 303 
Loop, from approximately ½ mile south of Northern Avenue. The property is

The Ergas Group - Ergas 303  
Planned Area Development  
Glendale, Arizona 
5 
bounded by farmland on three sides. A residential neighborhood within 
Unincorporated Maricopa County is to the west of the site along Cotton Lane 
from the Orangewood alignment to Northern Avenue. The adjacent property 
to the north is also vacant farmland along with a U-Haul Moving and Storage  
Facility.   
  
  
2. Regional Context  
A regional freeway with local arterial access from both Northern and Glendale 
Avenues serves the site via Cotton Lane. Water is provided to the property from 
Epcor Utilities, a regional provider of water and sewer. Sewer will also be 
provided by Epcor. The development of Ergas 303 will contribute to this growing 
regional industrial corridor.  
  
The general area was originally mostly agriculture and large lot residential. These 
land uses have over time encroached and surrounded the nearby Luke Air 
Force Base, putting the viability of operating an air force base in question during 
the early part of 2002. In March of 2003, a Regional Compatibility Plan was 
developed for western Maricopa County to respond to the growth beginning to 
surround Luke Air Force Base.  
  
The goal was to limit the potential for aviation accidents in residential 
neighborhoods and a boundary was put in place around the Air Force base.  
The City of Glendale created the Luke Compatible Land Use (LCLU) designation 
which allows for industrial uses such as Light Industrial (M-1) and discourages the 
future development of residential neighborhoods within certain distances from 
the military flight paths.  
  
One of the first elements implemented to protect the base was the 
development of the State Route Loop 303 Freeway. This freeway bisects the 
area between the White Tank Mountains and the Agua Fria River creating a new 
business friendly corridor, now known as the Loop 303 Corridor. Twenty years 
later, the market has caught up with the intent of the plan and many of the 
properties nearby are currently being developed with companies such as 
Whiteclaw, Redbull and others locating along this new industrial corridor.  
  
By developing warehouse and other light industrial uses adjacent and around 
Luke Air Force Base, undesirable land uses for flight operations are being 
removed from development consideration and in turns helps keep the base in 
operation and support the mission of the base to continue to function as a 
critical service to the region, state and country. This helps support the mission of 
Luke Air Force Base. It should be noted that the site is outside of the Luke Air 
Force Base 65 DNL noise contour.

The Ergas Group - Ergas 303  
Planned Area Development  
Glendale, Arizona 
6 
3. Site Analysis  
The site plan is for the development of an approximately 64-acre property 
located at the NEC of Cotton Lane and the Orangewood Avenue Alignment. 
This application requests approval of a Planned Area Development (“PAD”) to 
allow for industrial, distribution, warehouse and general commercial uses in a 
development called Ergas 303.  
  
  
3.1 Existing Zoning Classification  
The Property is zoned IND-2 with a small portion zoned IND-1, as per Maricopa 
County’s Zoning Ordinance. The property will seek annexation into the City of 
Glendale.  The zoning equivalent to IND-2 in the county will then be converted 
to the closest similar zoning classification in the City of Glendale, which will most 
closely match the (M-1) Light Industrial zoning designation, with development 
standards modified by this PAD. See Zoning Map attached as Exhibit 3.   
  
The proposed PAD with all uses from M-1 & C-2 zoning will be consistent with PAD 
zoning on nearby properties in the area along the Loop 303 corridor and along 
both Cotton Lane on the west and Sarival Avenue on the east side of the Loop 
303 corridor.  The corridor is experiencing rapid growth as a major industrial and 
distribution area for the region due to its proximity to Interstate 10. The Legal 
Description for the Project is attached as Exhibit 10.  
  
3.2 Existing Permitted Land Uses  
With annexation into the City of Glendale, the current Maricopa County 
Comprehensive Plan Land Use classification of Rural Densities (0-1du/ac) will be 
converted to the closest similar Land Use classification, which is Regional Mixed 
Use. As mentioned above this use allows a mix of uses in addition to LCLU and 
Planned Commercial (PC). The proposed use of warehouse/ commercial for 
this site will is consistent with the Glendale General Plan land use designations. 
This application is consistent with Luke Compatible Land Use Area which 
recommends non-residential uses as well as safe and compatible 
development, See the General Plan Map shown as Exhibit 4. Constructing an 
industrial 
distribution 
and 
warehouse/commercial 
development 
is 
in 
conformance with the existing City of Glendale General Plan for the Property.  
  
3.3 Regional Drainage & Landform  
The site generally drains from the northwest to southeast, with gradual drainage 
flows across the site. While the site appears relatively flat, the site has 
approximately 10’ of fall from the northwest corner of the site. For many years, 
regional storm drainage hindered large scale development in this area. With the 
addition of new regional studies these sites have become easier to develop. 
Arterial roadways which had acted as weirs in the past, are now being mitigated 
with the addition of each new development. Grading and drainage studies

The Ergas Group - Ergas 303  
Planned Area Development  
Glendale, Arizona 
7 
required by the City of Glendale Engineering Department will continue to help 
modify the regional drainage and promote development in the area.  
  
3.4 Existing Roadway Network  
The site is bound by arterial streets on the south and west sides of the property.  
The eastern edge of the property is bound by State Route Loop 303. Cotton 
Lane will be developed into a Maricopa County Department of Transportation 
(MCDOT) Urban Minor Arterial street cross-section, with a 65-foot half street right 
of way dedication. Final street right of way width will be determined by 
Maricopa County Department of Transportation and coordinated with the City 
of Glendale for its ultimate disposition once the property is annexed into the 
City. Additionally, access points onto Cotton Lane will need to be approved by 
MCDOT. Any phasing of Cotton Lane will need to be coordinated with and 
approved by MCDOT.  
  
3.5 Existing Easements & Planned Utilities  
There is a 100’ APS easement for high tension power lines that run through the 
middle of the site from north to south. As mentioned above, Epcor Utilities serves 
the site and has both a sewer and water easement through the middle of the 
property, just inside the APS easement. APS owns a small parcel of property 
south of the project along Glendale Avenue that is reserved for an electric 
power substation to serve the area as it is developed.  
  
3.6 Annexation Benefits  
Annexation provides many benefits including economic ones. Based on other 
similar projects in the Loop 303 Corridor, the annexation area could generate a 
positive net fiscal impact to the City by 2025-2026 with revenues exceeding 
expenditures quickly with current market conditions. In addition, potential for 
desired growth, job creation and other opportunities will likely be realized on this 
site.   
  
Over the long term, Ergas 303 is projected to generate a positive net fiscal 
impact to the City of Glendale given the expected characteristics of this 
development, which are very similar to others in the area. This site will increase 
the inventory of leasable industrial spaces that the City has to offer and will add 
new jobs to the area. In terms of fiscal results, the ultimate impacts will depend 
on whether the space is leased, or owner occupied and the density of 
employment, however revenues significantly exceed expenditures based on 
assumptions of previous analysis in the corridor.  
  
The site will further the growth of the City and as a result build civic pride and 
sense of community through the opportunities brought by new industrial and 
commercial development. Since this annexation is consistent with the 2019 City 
of Glendale Annexation Policy it will provide long term benefits that the City 
want to have in Glendale. This allows the City to effectively manage urban

The Ergas Group - Ergas 303  
Planned Area Development  
Glendale, Arizona 
8 
development, allow for the efficient planning and provision of services, create 
a stronger community, and ensure high quality developments in accordance 
with City standards.  
  
 It should also be noted that both Commercial and Industrial Design 
expectations, including those revised development standards within this PAD, 
will be followed as is appropriate for the final design as the project moves 
forward into Design Review and Construction Documents. These revised 
development standards improve the marketability of the site, to help cast a 
wider net to bring in new revenue generating business for the City.   
   
4. Modified Regulatory Development Standards  
The intent of the Ergas 303 PAD is to allow industrial; manufacturing, 
ecommerce, general commercial and office uses as well as development 
standards that ensure appropriate flexibility for such developments. The PAD 
allows industrial, commercial and employment uses that are compatible with 
the nearby Loop 303 Freeway Corridor and are in conformance with the 
underlying zoning and uses along this freeway and for this property.  
  
4.1 Purpose and Intent  
The plans, exhibits and images presented herein are conceptual only and 
intending to convey the type, intensity and quality of development expected 
at this location. While a specific user(s) has not been identified at this time, the 
site is anticipated to develop fast. Subsequently a design review application 
(site plan, building architecture, landscaping, signage, grading, etc.) will be 
submitted by the design team for administrative review to City staff.  
  
4.2 Permitted Uses  
This PAD and its permitted uses defined below are intended to accommodate 
general 
commercial 
uses, 
office, 
light 
manufacturing, 
assembling, 
warehousing, e-commerce, and wholesale activities. Associated office and 
related retail uses are also included within this district. The manufacturing or 
assembly of finished products is also allowed, so long as the primary use of the 
property is not the basic processing and compounding of raw materials.  
  
Uses currently permitted, subject to conditions, conditional use permits, 
accessory and temporary use permits in both Industrial (M-1, M-2) and in 
commercial (C-1 & C-2) zoning district of the Glendale Zoning Ordinance shall 
be included within this PAD. In addition, specific supporting uses such as offices 
for professional, administrative, clerical, financial, medical, business or 
professional services; medical, dental and clinical laboratories/research 
facilities; business support services; data center, call centers and data recovery 
centers; wholesale sales and distribution of finished goods shall also be included 
in this PAD. A table with uses allowed for these four zoning districts has been 
complied below for reference as Table A. These uses shall be consistent with

The Ergas Group - Ergas 303  
Planned Area Development  
Glendale, Arizona 
9 
their respective zoning designation development standards, except as 
modified in Table 1, Comparative Development Standards.  
  
Table A – Permitted Land Uses  
Use Category & 
Specific Use Type  
Glendale Zoning Districts  
M-1  M-2  C-1  C-2  
Proposed 
PAD  
INDUSTRIAL USE:  
  
  
  
  
  
Manufacturing/Assembly  
P  
P  
-  
-  
P  
Food Processing  
P  
P  
-  
-  
P  
Textile Mill  
P  
P  
-  
-  
P  
Leather  
P  
P  
-  
-  
P  
Stone, clay, and glass  
P  
P  
-  
-  
P  
Fabricated metal  
P  
P  
-  
-  
P  
Machinery  
P  
P  
-  
-  
P  
Electrical Machinery, equipment, and 
supplies  
P  
P  
-  
-  
P  
Transportation Equipment  
P  
P  
-  
-  
P  
Wood products, finished  
P  
P  
-  
-  
P  
Food and kindred products (except 
those with specific permit approval)  
-  
P  
-  
-  
P  
  
Plastics and plastic products  
-  
P  
-  
-  
P  
Primary metal industries  
-  
P  
-  
-  
  
Non-Manufacturing  
  
  
  
  
  
Wholesalers  
P  
P  
-  
-  
P  
Transportation, communication and 
other  
public utility storage and equipment 
yards  
-  
P  
-  
-  
P  
Lumber and building material yards  
P  
P  
-  
-  
P  
Contract Construction  
P  
P  
-  
-  
P  
Trucking and warehousing  
P  
P  
-  
-  
P  
Recycling Center or Automated 
Collection  
Center  
P  
P  
-  
-  
P  
Recreational Vehicle Storage  
P  
P  
-  
-  
P

The Ergas Group - Ergas 303  
Planned Area Development  
Glendale, Arizona 
10 
Laundry, dry cleaning and dyeing  
establishments retail or wholesale, 
including bulk storage  
P  
P  
-  
-  
 
P  
Vehicle repair, minor and major  
P  
P  
-  
-  
P  
Support Office  
  
  
  
  
  
Administrative offices directly related to a 
permitted use  
P  
P  
-  
-  
P  
Restaurants  
P  
P  
-  
-  
P  
Business Support Services-office supply, 
photocopy, and delivery services  
P  
P  
-  
-  
P  
Trade or business schools  
P  
P  
-  
-  
P  
Seasonal sales and special events  
C  
C  
-  
-  
P  
Wireless communication facilities  
C  
C  
-  
-  
C  
Lodges and fraternal associations within 
300 feet from a residential use  
C  
C  
-  
-  
C  
Commercial aviation businesses  
C  
C  
-  
-  
C  
Drive-in Theater  
C  
P  
-  
-  
C  
Commercial retail sales and services  
C  
C  
P  
P  
P  
Commercial Kennels, animal shelters, 
and veterinary hospitals with outdoor 
boarding or exercise facilities  
C  
C  
-  
-  
  
C  
Manufacturing or processing of 
chemicals and allied products  
-  
C  
-  
-  
C  
Dyeing and finishing of textile products  
-  
C  
-  
-  
C  
Manufacturer of rubber products  
-  
C  
-  
-  
C  
Automobile wrecking and salvage yards  
-  
C  
-  
-  
C  
Manufacturer of fireworks, matches, or 
pyrotechnics or other potentially 
explosive processes  
-  
C  
-  
-  
  
C  
Central mixing plants for cement or 
concrete  
-  
C  
-  
-  
C  
Processing of fish, poultry, or meat 
products  
-  
C  
-  
-  
C  
Rendering or refining of fats and oils  
-  
C  
-  
-  
C  
Storage and processing of scrap metals  
-  
C  
-  
-  
C

The Ergas Group - Ergas 303  
Planned Area Development  
Glendale, Arizona 
11 
Incidental commercial retail sales other 
than those otherwise permitted  
-  
C  
P  
P  
P  
Asphalt and asphalt products processing  
-  
C  
-  
-  
C  
Fiberglass products manufacturing  
-  
C  
-  
-  
C  
COMMERCIAL USE:  
  
  
  
  
  
Retail stores. General merchandising 
including food stores, apparel, and 
accessory stores  
-  
-  
P  
P  
P  
Barber shops and beauty salons  
-  
-  
P  
P  
P  
Laundry, cleaning, and dry-cleaning 
establishments (wholesale)  
-  
-  
P  
-  
P  
Laundry, cleaning, and dry-cleaning 
establishments (retail)  
-  
-  
P  
-  
P  
Medical and dental offices, excluding 
veterinarians  
-  
-  
P  
-  
P  
Childcare center  
-  
-  
P  
P  
P  
Music or dance schools  
-  
-  
P  
P  
P  
Financial institutions, real estate and 
insurance offices  
-  
-  
P  
-  
P  
Restaurants-full service  
-  
-  
P  
-  
P  
Repair services for small appliances, 
bicycles, watches, musical instruments, 
and similar items  
-  
-  
P  
P  
p  
Churches  
-  
-  
P  
P  
P  
Professional and administrative offices  
-  
-  
P  
P  
P  
Business support services  
-  
-  
P  
P  
P  
Seasonal sales and special events  
-  
-  
C  
P  
P  
Wireless communication facilities  
-  
-  
C  
P  
p  
Convenience uses  
-  
-  
C  
-  
P  
Automotive service stations with minor 
auto repair, not to include body repair, 
motor repair, or painting  
-  
-  
C  
C  
   
C  
Any single retail use that is greater than 
seventy-five thousand (75,000) square 
feet of gross floor area  
-  
-  
C  
C  
  
C  
Donation centers  
-  
-  
C  
C  
P  
Restaurants  
-  
-  
-  
P  
P

The Ergas Group - Ergas 303  
Planned Area Development  
Glendale, Arizona 
12 
Retail stores - General merchandising, 
including variety and specialty stores  
-  
-  
-  
P  
  
P  
Retail stores -Food  
-  
-  
-  
P  
P  
Retail stores -Apparel and accessories  
-  
-  
-  
P  
P  
Retail stores – Hardware stores  
-  
-  
-  
P  
P  
Professional, administrative, and business 
offices  
-  
-  
-  
P  
P  
Small appliance repair shops  
-  
-  
-  
P  
P  
Mortuaries  
-  
-  
-  
P  
P  
Commercial parking lots  
-  
-  
-  
P  
P  
Indoor recreational facilities  
-  
-  
-  
P  
P  
Veterinary clinics, all activities within an 
enclosed building  
-  
-  
-  
P  
C 
Appliance, furniture, and household 
equipment rentals  
-  
-  
-  
P  
P  
Medical or dental clinics  
-  
-  
-  
P  
P  
Business Schools  
-  
-  
-  
P  
P  
Financial Institutions  
-  
-  
-  
P  
P  
Bar or cocktail lounge  
-  
-  
-  
P  
P  
Live entertainment facilities which 
include music by more than one (1) 
musician  
-  
-  
-  
C  
 
P  
P-Permitted by Right, C-Conditioned/Conditional 
Use Permit, NP-Not Permitted   
  
  
4.3 Uses Subject to Conditions  
There are some uses that require additional review to be allowable within the 
M1 zoning designation. For example, uses such as seasonal sales and special 
events are subject to administrative review standards. All uses subject to 
conditions per section 5.843 of the Glendale Zoning Ordinance shall be included 
by right, along with uses subject to conditional use permits per section 5.844   
  
4.4 Accessory Uses  
All uses subject to conditions per section 5.845 of the Glendale Zoning 
Ordinance shall be included by right, which specifically include Amateur radio 
towers, Satellite earth stations, cell towers and may include billboard in the case 
of a code update in the future.

The Ergas Group - Ergas 303  
Planned Area Development  
Glendale, Arizona 
13 
4.5 Site Plan  
To allow for the flexibility needed to respond to current and future market 
conditions, this PAD includes a conceptual site plan to help illustrate how the 
property could be potentially designed and developed with four mid-sized 
warehouse buildings. This concept plan provides flexible development options 
to encourage an appropriate pace of development suitable for the area.  The 
conceptual site plan shows how the site could possibly be developed but does 
not necessarily depict what will be constructed on the site. See Conceptual Site 
Plan as Exhibit 5.  
  
The conceptual site plan indicates potential building areas; however, different 
building configurations could be arranged based on market conditions to 
attract the widest range of uses and allow maximum flexibility for the 
development.  The final site plan could be of different configurations and vary 
in size with additional square feet. Lot coverages would typically remain under 
50% for most design scenarios.  
  
The proposed site plan has a primary point of access from State Route 303 Loop 
from either Northern Avenue or Glendale Avenue and multiple points along 
Cotton Lane. The circulation shown on the site plan provides a conceptual 
framework for moving through the site based on anticipated uses and will 
provide for the separation of cars and trucks where possible. A parking study 
will be completed with an application for Design Review, to justify the parking 
provided for the various projected uses based upon the deviations noted in the 
development standards below and previous parking studies for similar 
developments in the area.   
  
4.6 Revised Development Standards  
The development standards for the Ergas 303 PAD, as per Table 1 below, have 
been developed to provide conditions more conducive to the latest trends in 
warehousing and manufacturing technology. The permitted heights, setbacks 
and parking requirements will encourage the development of highly attractive, 
state of the art, industrial warehouse developments typical of those recently 
approved in this area for development in Glendale, along the 303 Freeway 
Corridor. All other provisions of the previous PAD shall remain in effect within this 
PAD. Uses other than M-1 Light Industrial shall follow the existing City of Glendale 
development standards for their respective zoning designations, with the 
exception of the revised parking standards for office, commercial and retail.

The Ergas Group - Ergas 303  
Planned Area Development  
Glendale, Arizona 
14 
Table 1: Comparative Development Standards Table  
  
  
M-1 Standard  
PAD Proposal  
Min. Net Lot Area  
6,000 SF  
6,000 SF  
Max. Lot Area  
N/A  
N/A  
Building Setbacks  
   
• 
Front Yard  
  
• 
Rear   
  
• 
Side  
  
• 
Street Side  
 
 
  
  25 feet  
  
  
  60 feet  
  
  
  60 feet  
  
       25 feet  
  
  
  
  20 feet  
  
       60 feet2  
  
  
  60 feet2  
  
       25 feet  
Landscape Setbacks  
   
• 
Front  
  
• 
Rear (within Industrial Uses)  
  
• 
Side (within Industrial Uses)  
  
• 
Street Side  
 
 
  
  20 feet  
  
  
  N/A  
  
  
  N/A  
  
             20 feet  
  
  
  
  15 feet  
  
       0’ feet3 
  
    0’ feet3  
  
       20 feet  
          
  
Landscape Setbacks (Where 
loading docks and service drives  
abut residential districts)  
 
Perimeter Landscape Setback  
(excluding all loading areas)  
  
Landscape setback along Cotton  
Lane  
  
 
N/A  
  
  
  
             20 feet  
  
  
N/A  
  
  
15 feet  
(w/8’ screen wall and 
double row of trees)  
  
            10 feet  
  
  
20’ over the  
Maricopa Water 
District easement, 
plus 5’ for tree 
plantings for a total 
of 25’

The Ergas Group - Ergas 303  
Planned Area Development  
Glendale, Arizona 
15 
Max. Building Height  
               30’  
           100’  
Rooftop building 
appurtenances can 
exceed roof height 
up to 115’ maximum 
provided they are 
more than 20’ from 
the building’s roof 
edge. Roof mounted 
equipment shall be 
fully screened from 
the adjacent public 
street views. Material 
silos or other similar 
building specific 
support elements 
may exceed roof  
height up to 100’ 
maximum.)  
Max. FAR  
              0.3  
  
  
.5 
(Mezzanine 
SF 
area excluded from 
FAR  
ratio)  
Auto Parking (Minimum Required) 
 
• Warehouse, Distribution 
& Data Center 
• Office 
• Commercial/Retail 
 
 
Parking Stall Dimensions 
 
 
 
1/600 SF 
1/300 SF 
1/300 SF 
 
 
 
10’x20’ 
 
 
 
1/2,000 SF 
1/500 SF 
1/500 SF 
 
 
 
9’x18’

The Ergas Group - Ergas 303  
Planned Area Development  
Glendale, Arizona 
16 
Signage Height Standards:  
  
• 
Freeway Pylon Sign  
(Square Feet of Sign Area)  
  
• 
Multi-Tenant Pylon Signs  
(Square Feet of Sign Area)  
  
 
Note: Two signs are allowed per   
street frontage at a minimum 
separation of 330’  
  
  
  
Not Permitted  
  
  
10 feet  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Max. Height 50feet  
450 SF1  
  
30 feet  
450 SF1  
  
  
  
  
Maximum Height for Building 
Setback from Residential Property 
No existing 
standard 
The building 
setback should be 
60-feet from a 
residential property 
up to 30-feet in 
building height, 
after which the 
setback increases 
one foot for every 
2-feet of vertical 
building height 
1 – Sign area includes up to 5 multi-tenant signs.  
2 - 60 feet to residential uses: 15 feet to nonresidential uses (per Table 3 of the zoning ord.)  
3 – Zero-foot landscape setback is only between interior property lines between 2 industrial 
properties, when and if the property subdivides in the future. 
 
    
  4.7 Revision Justifications  
Height - Building height needs to be flexible to meet specific tenant needs. 
Recent market trends for industrial buildings include 50’ clear height inside the 
building and multiple levels of storage platforms or automated systems. Exterior 
tanks and towers are sometimes needed with heights up to 100’. 
Accommodating these trends with appropriate rooftop equipment screening 
necessitates increased building heights. Roof top towers, mechanical 
equipment, silos, tanks and other production support equipment may be 
required to exceed the building height. In such cases, location and treatment 
of such elements shall be considered and incorporated into the overall design 
solution. Placement of these items shall consider their relationship to the 
building size and mass. Building setback are related to building height. Building 
setbacks shall be 60 feet from a residential property up to 30 feet in building

The Ergas Group - Ergas 303  
Planned Area Development  
Glendale, Arizona 
17 
height, after which the setback increases one foot for every two feet of vertical 
building height.  
  
FAR - Additional building floors and mezzanines, as defined in the international 
building code, are two different types of spaces. Unoccupied storage 
mezzanines can potentially contain multi-level automated storage platforms 
that require larger clear heights within a distribution facility. Therefore, a 
delineation has been included to ensure that this type of space is not double 
counted in the FAR values. These new warehousing techniques utilize far fewer 
employees as compared with older traditional warehousing methods.  
  
Parking - Parking ratios have been reduced for warehouse/distribution due to 
the nature of the newer warehouse technologies employed in these state-
ofthe-art facilities. With the use of automated storage systems, fewer 
employees are required. Mezzanine areas are used mostly for storage and as 
such should not be counted when calculating parking requirements. Specific 
tenant plans should be taken into consideration when developments submit 
for Design Review. A site-specific Parking Study shall accompany the final PAD 
and serve as justification for the modified parking standards.  
  
Signage - Signage is a critical tool for the successful development of most 
businesses, including industrial warehouse uses. Due to the height and massing 
of buildings for newer light industrial developments, signage heights need to 
be flexible to meet specific tenant needs. While the City of Glendale’s 
municipal code allows for sign heights of up to 10 feet, taller free-standing 
signage and multi-tenant signage is needed to meet the demand of projects 
with top of building parapet heights of 50 feet plus and potentially with tanks 
and towers up to 100 feet of height.   
  
Typically, businesses that would be attracted to the corridor would anticipate 
some type of signage proximity to the freeway. A freeway pylon signs would 
provide that “proximity” to those businesses and could potentially represent 
up to 5 major tenants and reach heights of up to 50’. Signage area has been 
increased in proportion to the height of signs to provide a balance of sign area 
to for the overall sign structure. While the current City of Glendale code 
currently does not allow digital displays along the freeway, they have been 
included within this PAD in the case of a code update in the future.  Adjacent 
to this site are two existing billboards that are owned by the same owner as 
this development. These billboards will remain in place and an access 
easement will be provided as the site develops, in the case of the sale of one 
or the other or both to unique parties.  
  
4.8 Performance Standards/Use Limitations  
Nuisances - Uses shall be permitted within this district, unless such uses are or 
may become obnoxious or offensive by reason of odor, dust, smoke, noise, 
gas fumes, cinders, vibrations, glare, refuse or air/water pollution emissions.

The Ergas Group - Ergas 303  
Planned Area Development  
Glendale, Arizona 
18 
Enclosures - All uses permitted in this district shall be typically conducted 
within a fully enclosed building unless otherwise permitted. Outdoor storage 
of materials and equipment related to the primary activity is permitted 
provided that the outdoor storage area is screened by an 8’ high wall when 
adjacent to residential districts. Where a residential district abuts the site an 
8foot-high wall will be constructed on the property line to serve as the 
enclosure of the dock doors and outdoor storage areas. Design and height 
shall be approved by the authorized administrative body.  
Hazards - All explosive and hazardous materials and processes require 
approval by Glendale Fire Department. All manufacturing, storage and 
waste processes shall meet all safety and environmental standards as 
administered by the fire department.  
Dark Skies – Lighting photometric plans shall be submitted with each Design 
Review application illustrating that on-site lighting does not exceed one-foot 
candle at the property line.  On-sight lighting shall be dark sky compliant, and 
all lighting shall comply with the City of Glendale Outdoor Light Control 
Ordinance. Pole height shall be 25’ to reduce the number of overall light 
poles.  
4.9 Site Buffers, Screening, Parking & Adjacency  
Landscape buffers and screen wall requirements shall conform to Section 
7.200 of the Glendale Zoning Ordinance except for the noted deviations here 
and in the Table 1 development standards. The design, materials and colors 
for all walls, fences and screening devices visible from public view will be 
uniform in appearance. Internalized pilasters shall be used to support the 
screen walls and therefor external pilaster columns shall not be used. Walls 
shall not be covered in stucco. Parking lot screen wall shall be an average of 
3’ in height to avoid situations where the highest finish grade of an adjacent 
parking area would result in a taller wall. Measurements for wall height are 
from the top of adjacent curb. A wall enclosing truck courts shall be provided 
where appropriate, to help screen the truck dock activities from residential 
uses. Where dock screen walls are less than 100’ from a residential screen wall, 
an additional screen wall will not be required beyond the provided 8’ 
property wall.   
  
While City development standards call for a 25’ setback where loading docks 
abut residential districts, we feel a properly designed buffer can accomplish 
the intent of that setback at 15’ with additional rows of trees and a 
landscaping, thus creating a softer, green buffer that can better mitigate 
pollution and noise between these uses. We feel that a hard edge with 
minimum plantings and a field of gravel will not accomplish this same affect. 
This 8’ wall combined with a staggered double row of trees and hedge, along 
with the required setback for the adjacent multi-family project to the north 
will mitigate potentially impacts from industrial and commercial development 
in a more environmentally pleasing way. This will help improve Crime

The Ergas Group - Ergas 303  
Planned Area Development  
Glendale, Arizona 
19 
Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) goals by eliminating 
narrow corridors of walls. As a side note, the site may elect to use private 
guards to further provide safety and security. If the project requires Guard 
shacks, they shall be an allowable accessory use within the ROW.  
  
Zero-foot landscape buffers are only allowable between two internal 
industrial properties if the individual buildings are sold and subdivided into four 
smaller properties. This allows to similar industrial uses to share in the benefits 
of being connected to another industrial site. The zero-foot landscape buffer 
is only intended for this specific circumstance and in no way shall be allowed 
on any property lines adjacent to a residential use. The proposed PAD 
standards currently meet the separation requirement of 15’ between an 
industrial/commercial use adjacent to a residential use.  
  
5. Landscape Design  
Landscaping will be designed to complement the building architecture and 
overall design theme for the site. All materials will comply with the City of 
Glendale drought tolerant and drought resistant, low water use plant palette. 
The Cotton Lane frontage landscaping will provide an attractive thematic 
public edge to the property. Perimeter site boundaries will define the parcel 
and provide a pleasing thematic common boundary with adjacent sites. 
Enhanced landscaping will further define potential building entries with 
canopy trees at City-required spacing to provide shading for the parking 
areas. Minimum on-site landscape as a percentage of the total site area shall 
be 5% of the net site area for all uses. Landscape Buffers shall allow for the use 
of site retention. The site will use a fully automated drip irrigation system.  
  
A variety of tree species, combined with a colorful combination of shrubs and 
groundcovers, will provide an overall landscape composition of appropriate 
scale to enhance the overall development and its visual impact on its 
surroundings. A conceptual landscape plan is included with this submittal to 
portray a representative design. More specific details regarding plantings, 
types, locations and quantities will be part of future design review applications 
to address the proportion of landscape materials to specific building design 
and height. On-site parking areas shall provide landscaped planter islands not 
less than 162 sf, based on a 9’x18’ Parking stall standard. Permanent signs shall 
be allowed within these landscape buffer areas. Future building pads shall be 
maintained weed-free until development occurs. All other landscape 
standards within Chapter 19 of the City of Glendale Zoning Ordinance, for M1 
zoning, shall remain in effect for this PAD, except as noted here above and in 
Table 1. See Conceptual Landscape Plan as Exhibit 6.  
  
6. Architecture Form and Character  
Due to the size of this project, a thematic character will be woven into the 
fabric of the Project that unifies the architecture, signage and landscape

The Ergas Group - Ergas 303  
Planned Area Development  
Glendale, Arizona 
20 
during the design review phase of the project. The specific uses combined 
with careful aesthetic considerations for large building masses will inform the 
design process for the architecture. It is good to keep the design of elements 
flexible to allow for the unique identity of the project and of individual tenants 
with unique products or services. The building may take on the characteristics 
of specific tenants or may be generic in nature so the site and building appeal 
to a broader range of potential tenants. Similar architectural styles can be 
found along the nearby Loop 303 Corridor in Glendale and further south in 
adjacent municipalities.   
  
Scale is an important consideration when looking at the overall design. Scale 
of development along the freeway should be appropriate for views at high 
speeds and with encompassing views surrounding the site. It is important to 
maintain a relationship to the area’s landforms and unique characteristics. 
Elements should be easy to identify from vehicles along both Loop 303 and 
Cotton Lane, while set back and buffered from Cotton Lane so the scale of 
the buildings does not dominate the views in the area. The level of 
architectural fenestration and detail will increase adjacent to building entries 
and commercial corners where pedestrian scaled elements should be 
included in the architectural design to emphasize human scale.   
  
Color and pattern will be used to de-emphasize building mass and develop 
visual interest that creates an overall pleasing aesthetic on all sides of the 
building. The color palette may include warm to cool neutral colors that 
embrace the surrounding desert hues. Unique features may include limited 
color accents to provide additional visual interest, while also addressing 
corporate image.  The primary building material will be painted, articulated 
concrete, tilt-up wall panels, and may feature accent materials that provide 
additional texture or colors where areas of enhancement are appropriate. 
Store front glazing will be incorporated at anticipated office areas to provide 
daylight to workspaces. Canopies help the architecture respond to the 
climate by providing shade, shadow and accents to the building. If the 
building is constructed primarily of metal, paint will be low sheen or non-glare 
for the majority of the building surface.  
  
Where appropriate, building parapets will be extended above the roof line to 
provide line of sight screening of roof top equipment from view adjacent to 
public right-of-ways along Cotton Lane. Metal rooftop screens may also be 
used to screen rooftop equipment. Roof drains will be external and use 
architectural features to integrate them into the elevation design. External 
downspouts are included in the color elevations to show how they are 
incorporated into the overall design of the façade. Dock and outdoor 
storage areas adjacent to residential districts will be screened with an 8-foot 
masonry wall with detail and color to complement the building architecture. 
A similar 3’-0” maximum average high wall will screen parking along Cotton 
Lane.

The Ergas Group - Ergas 303  
Planned Area Development  
Glendale, Arizona 
21 
  
A representative architectural elevation exhibit is included to convey a 
representative image of the typical architectural styles. The image shown in 
the elevation is consistent with other similar approved nearby Industrial 
Planned Area Developments. Specific details regarding architecture, 
materials, colors, etc. will be part of the future design review application. See 
Architectural Elevation as Exhibit 7.  
  
  
  
  
7. Signage  
This development will provide functional and attractive signage that 
compliments the architecture of the overall Ergas 303 site. This PAD 
application sets forth the general location, quantity, and maximum height of 
monument signage for Ergas 303. A freeway pylon signs will occur along State 
Route Loop 303 on each parcel adjacent to the freeway, with 330’ spacing 
between any other sign. Multi-tenant Pylon Signs will occur along Cotton Lane 
to provide proper project identification and wayfinding throughout the site. 
These signs will utilize the established color and materials palette that is 
applied to the building(s) within the Ergas 303 site. A separate Comprehensive 
Sign Package shall be submitted during Design Review to obtain City of 
Glendale approval for all signs.   
  
A total of (1) 50’-tall double-sided, freeway pylon sign is proposed along the 
303 Freeway frontage of the development with 330’ spacing. Thirty (30) foot-
tall, double-sided multi-tenant pylon signs are proposed throughout the 
Project at significant corner and intersections.  Signs adjacent to the freeway 
may deviate from the proposed standards an additional 10 feet in height due 
to the revised site grades and their proximity to the freeway structure.  
  
A Comprehensive Sign Package (CSP) will be provided with consistent 
signage for tenants and users of Ergas 303 with the Design Review submittal. 
The future CSP will contain guidelines for color, materials, location of wall 
signage, allowable areas, illumination and configuration of logo and copy 
presentations. The proposed sign locations in this PAD are conceptual and 
the final determination of sign locations will be identified in the CSP submittal.  
  
8. Infrastructure, Utilities & Access   
Water will be provided to the site by Epcor and is available within the existing 
power corridor that runs north and south through the site.  Epcor has stated 
that they will provide water service to the site via the existing 12-inch water 
main. See the Water Exhibit attached as Exhibit 8.  
Sewer will be provided to the site by Epcor and is available within the existing 
power corridor that runs north and south through the site.  Epcor has stated

The Ergas Group - Ergas 303  
Planned Area Development  
Glendale, Arizona 
22 
that they will provide sewer service to the site via the existing 12-inch sewer 
main. See the Sewer Exhibit attached as Exhibit 9.  
 
The site will be served primarily by Cotton Lane. Roadway improvements for 
the east half of Cotton Lane will be improved within the existing 65’ right-of-
way to Maricopa County standards. Cotton Lane will be coordinated with 
MCDOT for final design, as that, Cotton Lane is currently within the county and 
not a part of the City of Glendale. Coordination will also occur with ADOT as 
that the site is adjacent to property for State Route Loop 303.  
  
It is anticipated that new infrastructure investment will be a part of this 
development as a part of developing with the City of Glendale. Additional 
tax revenues will be generated from the property and will help offset the costs 
to build and maintain new infrastructure for the site. This includes developing 
new local public safety resources to better serve the businesses and residents 
of the area with fire, police and sanitation services. Once annexed into 
Glendale the site will employ new City of Glendale service for fire and police 
and will seek private partnerships for water and sewer, to minimize the impact 
to the City.  
The existing overhead power lines on Cotton Lane will be undergrounded as 
a part of this development. An easement for access will be provided to APS 
for access to their service lines in the middle of the site. The site plan allows for 
the appropriate laydown space needed by APS to provide maintenance 
and emergency access.  
Maricopa Water District has an easement along Cotton Lane that will remain 
in place as per the attached graphic below. The location of this easement is 
also shown on the Site Plan.

The Ergas Group - Ergas 303  
Planned Area Development  
Glendale, Arizona 
23 
  
  
The current property owner for the site is also the property owner for the two 
adjacent parcels with existing billboards. An easement shall be included to 
provide access for these billboard sites through any proposed development.  
  
  
9. Development Phases  
The Property will be developed in phases as market conditions warrant. The 
intent is to install infrastructure and improve the street frontage and access way 
adjacent to each phase. It is anticipated that the initial phase will include at 
least one to two buildings, street frontage improvements and retention basins. 
Plans for individual buildings/phases will be submitted to the City of Glendale to 
ensure proper and orderly development. Please note that any phasing of Cotton 
Lane will be coordinated with MCDOT. 
  
10. Summary  
This PAD and the proposed site plan provide the required entitlements to 
develop the Ergas 303 site. The Property will be zoned PAD and the site is within 
a General Plan land use designation that encourages development for 
parcels within the vicinity of Luke Air Force Base.  The proposed development 
substantially conforms with the development objectives of the General Plan 
for this location. The development will complement the surrounding area and 
provide improved benefits and some new employment opportunities to the

The Ergas Group - Ergas 303  
Planned Area Development  
Glendale, Arizona 
24 
City of Glendale, its residents, and the area in general. See the Site Plan as 
Exhibit 5.  
  
11. Consistency with Surrounding PADs  
Significant portions of this PAD were referenced from several relevant PAD 
documents to provide continuity in development along the State Route Loop 
303 corridor. This PAD has attempted to be consistent with the direction and 
vision of development in the area along the Loop 303 corridor, as requested 
in discussions with City staff to plan for a cohesive corridor solution.  
  
  
  
Note: Prior to the City’s issuance of permit(s) for vertical construction of 
building(s) or other improvements, Developer shall submit FAA form 7460-1 to 
the FAA. Regional Office for the FAA’s determination of whether such 
building(s) or other improvements (as designed) would be a hazard to 
aviation and what additional conditions (if any) are recommended by the 
FAA.  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
LIST OF EXHIBITS  
  
  
  
1. 
Aerial and Vicinity Map  
  
2. 
Parcel Map  
  
3. 
Zoning Map

The Ergas Group - Ergas 303  
Planned Area Development  
Glendale, Arizona 
25 
4. 
General Plan Map  
  
5. 
Conceptual Site Plan  
  
6. 
Conceptual Landscape Plan  
  
7. 
Architectural Elevation Exhibit  
  
8. 
Water Exhibit  
  
9. 
Sewer Exhibit  
  
 
10.  
Legal Description