Z260015 HANDOUT MEMO

Maricopa County — Planning & Zoning (2026-06-11)

View PDF Item 10 Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 93145 characters
DATE:  
June 10, 2026 
 
TO: 
 Planning & Zoning Commission   
 
From: 
 Nick Schlimm, Planner  
 
SUBJECT: 
 Z260015 – Trulieve Dispensary Happy Valley    
 
 Agenda Item: #10 
 
 
 
Since the publication of the staff report for the referenced case, staff have received 40 notices of 
opposition from residents and owners of 25 properties throughout the northwest valley. To date, 
none of the opposition items have come from properties within 300’ of the subject parcel. The 
property is located approx. 400’ south of the SWC of 115th Ave. & Happy Valley Pkwy. Most of the 
opposition items have been received from property owners in the City of Peoria, as well as from 
Sun City and Sun City West. The consensus of the opposition is concern that allowing a marijuana 
dispensary or establishment as one of the permitted uses at the subject property will create 
unwanted impacts to the local community, including increased traffic, crime, and pollution, 
unwanted odors, lower property values, and a negative influence on children and young adults. 
 
 
Attachments: 
 
300’ Opposition Map (1 page) 
 
 
 
5-Mile Radius Opposition Map (1 page) 
 
 
 
Notices of Opposition (64 pages)

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Sent:
Thursday, June 4, 2026 8:44 PM
To:
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
Subject:
Case #z260015
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
 
I live in Vistancia and am concerned over the proposed dispensary since it will not be under Peoria 
jurisdiction and I just don’t want it in the neighborhood.   Lorie Cooper 13645 w Tyler Trl Peoria Az  
Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Sent:
Thursday, June 4, 2026 9:05 PM
To:
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
Subject:
Opposed to Marijuana Dispensary Happy Valley
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Hi Nicholas, 
 
As a resident of Vistancia, I oppose the proposed marijuana dispensary at 115th Ave and Happy Valley 
Road. Our community has limited access points, and placing a dispensary at this location would 
increase access to marijuana in the area. Research suggests that greater access can lead to increased 
use and higher rates of impaired driving and fatal accidents. Please do not approve this dispensary at 
115th Ave and Happy Valley Road. 
 
Recreational Marijuana Dispensaries and Fatal Car Crashes 
https://dspace.mit.edu/entities/publication/7c3e9660-3fce-494b-9091-227defbcc3f0  
 
Thank you, 
Keri Jones 
12360 W Milton Dr, Peoria, AZ 85383

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Rachel Applegate (PND)
Sent:
Friday, June 5, 2026 6:38 AM
To:
Nicholas Schlimm (PND); Darren Gerard (PND); Ronald Quarles (PND)
Subject:
FW: Proposed location of marijuana dispensary
 
 
From: Brian Adair 
 
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2026 6:10 PM 
To: PND PZAppeal 
 
Subject: Proposed location of marijuana dispensary 
 
I am writing in opposition to the proposed marijuana dispensary slated to be locat ed on Happy Valkey Road just west of the QT location on Happy Value Road and State Route 303. I live in the Trilogy sub division neighb orhood just west of the 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBanner End 
I am writing in opposition to the proposed marijuana dispensary slated to be located on Happy Valkey 
Road just west of the QT location on Happy Value Road and State Route 303. I live in the Trilogy sub 
division neighborhood just west of the proposed building location. In my opinion this business is out of 
charioter for that 
 area and it could bring the wrong element of people to visit this store. I urge the commissioners to 
deny the approval of the facility as submitted. There are many other locations better suited for this 
type of business. For example state Route 60 (aka Grand  Blvd) is more suited for this type of 
business. Property values in housing would be negatively impacted.  In addition this location would 
draw a type of customer that is an element not needed or wanted. Please use your authority to deny 
this business a building permit.  
Sent from my iPhone

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Rachel Applegate (PND)
Sent:
Friday, June 5, 2026 6:39 AM
To:
Nicholas Schlimm (PND); Darren Gerard (PND); Ronald Quarles (PND)
Subject:
FW: Case #: Z260015
 
 
From: Brent Crawley @ TPA 
  
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2026 9:47 PM 
To: PND PZAppeal 
 
Subject: Case #: Z260015 
 
I strongly appeal the proposed Marinuana Dispensary associat ed with this case. As a local business ow ner and father of sev eral children - this would not bring the neighborhood any inherent value, but I believe it would only attract utilizers 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBanner End 
I strongly appeal the proposed Marinuana Dispensary associated with this case.  
 
As a local business owner and father of several children - this would not bring the 
neighborhood any inherent value, but I believe it would only attract utilizers of 
Marijuana to our neighborhood.  
 
Thank you

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Ali V 
Sent:
Friday, June 5, 2026 8:57 AM
To:
PND PZAppeal; Nicholas Schlimm (PND); District4; District 3
Subject:
Public Comment Regarding Proposed Marijuana Dispensary near 115th avenue and 
Happy Valley 
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
For context: Case #: Z260015 Applicant: Trulieve Dispensary Happy Valley 
County Planning & Zoning meeting: Thursday, June 11, 2026 at 9:30aCounty 
Board of Supervisors meeting: Wednesday, July 15, 2026 at 9:30am Location: 
Board of Supervisors Auditorium: 205 W. Jefferson Street, Phoenix, AZ 
 
Dear Members of the Board, 
I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed marijuana 
dispensary and respectfully ask that the Board carefully consider the potential 
impacts on the surrounding community before making its decision. 
First and foremost, I am concerned about public safety. The proposed location is 
situated near a family-oriented residential area with many young children. As a 
new parent I know how our community continues to grow, it is important that 
development decisions prioritize the safety and well-being of residents and 
ensure that new businesses are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. 
Traffic is another significant concern. This area is already heavily congested, and 
the intersection near the proposed site has experienced an increase in traffic 
collisions in recent years. A dispensary is likely to generate additional vehicle 
traffic throughout the day, which could further strain an already busy roadway 
and create additional safety risks for drivers, pedestrians, and nearby residents. 
I am also concerned about potential noise and odor impacts. While regulations 
may help mitigate these issues, the possibility of increased noise, loitering, and 
marijuana-related odors could negatively affect the quality of life for neighboring 
residents and families who have chosen to live in this area. 
Finally, I encourage the Board to consider the overall character of the 
neighborhood. This is a residential, family-oriented community, and it is important 
that new development aligns with the existing character and long-term vision for

2
the area. Residents have invested in this neighborhood because of its family-
friendly environment, and any proposed use should be evaluated based on its 
compatibility with those established community values. 
For these reasons, I respectfully urge the Board to consider the impacts on public 
safety, traffic, noise and odor, and neighborhood character when evaluating this 
proposal. 
Thank you for your time and consideration. 
Please do not hesitate to reach out with any questions or concerns. I am happy 
to assist further.  
Sincerely, 
Ali Pardi

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Lana Fierro 
Sent:
Friday, June 5, 2026 9:59 AM
To:
PND PZAppeal; Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
Subject:
Opposition to Proposed Dispensary at 115th Avenue and Happy Valley Road
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Dear Planning and Zoning Commission Members, 
I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed marijuana dispensary at the corner of 115th 
Avenue and Happy Valley Road. 
My primary concern is the location of this business in close proximity to established residential 
neighborhoods. This intersection serves as a major access point for many residents, families, and 
children who live nearby. I believe a dispensary at this location would not be compatible with the 
character of the surrounding community. 
I am also concerned about the potential increase in traffic and congestion at an already busy 
intersection. Additional vehicle activity, customer traffic, and delivery operations could negatively 
impact safety and quality of life for nearby residents. 
While I understand that marijuana dispensaries are legal businesses, I believe the county should 
carefully consider whether this particular location is appropriate. Residential areas deserve thoughtful 
planning that prioritizes neighborhood character, public safety, and the long-term interests of the 
community. 
I respectfully request that the Planning and Zoning Commission and Board of Supervisors deny approval 
of this proposed dispensary or require it to be located in an area that is more appropriate and further 
removed from residential neighborhoods. 
Thank you for your time and consideration of community input on this matter. 
Sincerely, 
Lana and John Fierro 
11969 W. Jessie Ln 
Sun City, AZ 85373

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Taylor Poweziak 
Sent:
Friday, June 5, 2026 10:19 AM
To:
PND PZAppeal; Nicholas Schlimm (PND); District4; District 3
Subject:
Opposition to Proposed Trulieve Dispensary Near Residential Neighborhood (Case 
#Z260015)
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
To Whom It May Concern, 
I am writing to express my opposition to Case #Z260015, the proposed Trulieve dispensary planned for 
our community on 115th and Happy Valley.  
As a resident of the area, I am very concerned about the impact this business may have on the character, 
safety, and quality of life of our neighborhood. While I understand that marijuana businesses are legal 
and regulated, I do not believe this location is appropriate due to its proximity to homes and families. We 
specifically moved to this neighborhood because of the amount of families and children who often play 
outside and ride their bikes in the area. Putting a dispensary right next door jeopardizes the safety of our 
children and the children in our neighborhood.  
My concerns include: 
 
Potential impacts on neighborhood safety and security. SPECIFICALLY the safety of our children. 
 
Increased traffic and congestion on local streets. 
 
The effect a dispensary may have on nearby property values. 
 
The incompatibility of this type of commercial use with the residential character of the 
surrounding area. 
 
Concerns about increased loitering and other unintended consequences that could affect 
residents' sense of safety and enjoyment of their neighborhood. 
Many residents chose this community because of its family-oriented environment. Introducing a 
marijuana dispensary so close to residential areas may fundamentally change the character of the 
neighborhood and create concerns for homeowners and families. 
I respectfully request that the Planning & Zoning Commission and Board of Supervisors deny this 
application or require the applicant to seek an alternative location that is more appropriate and less 
impactful to nearby residents. 
Thank you for considering the concerns of the residents who will be directly affected by this proposal. I 
ask that this letter be included in the public record for Case #Z260015. 
Sincerely,

2
Taylor Poweziak 
12311 W. Patrick Ln  
Sun City West, AZ  
 
601-284-6962

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Misty Walden 
Sent:
Friday, June 5, 2026 10:28 AM
To:
District 3
Subject:
Subject: Opposition to Proposed Trulieve Dispensary on Happy Valley (Case #Z260015)
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
 
 
To Whom It May Concern, 
I am writing to express my opposition to Case #Z260015, the proposed Trulieve dispensary planned for 
our community. 
As a resident of the area, I am concerned about the impact this business may have on the character, 
safety, and quality of life of our neighborhood. While I understand that marijuana businesses are legal 
and regulated, I do not believe this location is appropriate due to its proximity to homes and families. 
My concerns include: 
Increased traffic and congestion on local streets. 
Potential impacts on neighborhood safety and security. 
The effect a dispensary may have on nearby property values. 
The incompatibility of this type of commercial use with the residential character of the surrounding area.
Concerns about increased loitering and other unintended consequences that could affect residents' 
sense of safety and enjoyment of their neighborhood. 
Many residents chose this community because of its family-oriented environment. Introducing a 
marijuana dispensary so close to residential areas may fundamentally change the character of the 
neighborhood and create concerns for homeowners and families. 
I respectfully request that the Planning & Zoning Commission and Board of Supervisors deny this 
application or require the applicant to seek an alternative location that is more appropriate and less 
impactful to nearby residents. 
Thank you for considering the concerns of the residents who will be directly affected by this proposal. I 
ask that this letter be included in the public record for Case #Z260015. 
 
 
Sincerely, 
Misty Walden 
22114 n 119th dr 
Sun city, Az 85373 
 
928-308-0833

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
B Smith 
Sent:
Friday, June 5, 2026 10:29 AM
To:
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
Subject:
Subject: Opposition to Proposed Trulieve Dispensary on Happy Valley (Case #Z260015)
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
To Whom It May Concern, 
I am writing to express my opposition to Case #Z260015, the proposed Trulieve dispensary planned for 
our community. 
As a resident of the area, I am concerned about the impact this business may have on the character, 
safety, and quality of life of our neighborhood. While I understand that marijuana businesses are legal 
and regulated, I do not believe this location is appropriate due to its proximity to homes and families. 
My concerns include: 
Increased traffic and congestion on local streets. 
Potential impacts on neighborhood safety and security. 
The effect a dispensary may have on nearby property values. 
The incompatibility of this type of commercial use with the residential character of the surrounding area.
Concerns about increased loitering and other unintended consequences that could affect residents' 
sense of safety and enjoyment of their neighborhood. 
Many residents chose this community because of its family-oriented environment. Introducing a 
marijuana dispensary so close to residential areas may fundamentally change the character of the 
neighborhood and create concerns for homeowners and families. 
I respectfully request that the Planning & Zoning Commission and Board of Supervisors deny this 
application or require the applicant to seek an alternative location that is more appropriate and less 
impactful to nearby residents. 
Thank you for considering the concerns of the residents who will be directly affected by this proposal. I 
ask that this letter be included in the public record for Case #Z260015. 
Sincerely, 
Becky Smith  
11743 W. Via Montoya Dr 
Sun City, AZ 
  
602 405 9137

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Nate Bowman 
Sent:
Friday, June 5, 2026 10:33 AM
Subject:
Opposition to Proposed Trulieve Dispensary Near Residential Neighborhood (Case 
#Z260015)
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
To Whom It May Concern, 
 
I am writing to express my opposition to Case #Z260015, the proposed Trulieve dispensary planned for 
our community on 115th and Happy Valley. 
 
As a resident of the area, I am very concerned about the impact this business may have on the character, 
safety, and quality of life of our neighborhood. While I understand that marijuana businesses are legal 
and regulated, I do not believe this location is appropriate due to its proximity to homes and families. We 
specifically moved to this neighborhood because of the amount of families and children who often play 
outside and ride their bikes in the area. Putting a dispensary right next door jeopardizes the safety of our 
children and the children in our neighborhood. 
 
My concerns include: 
- Potential impacts on neighborhood safety and security. SPECIFICALLY the safety of our children. 
- Increased traffic and congestion on local streets. 
- The effect a dispensary may have on nearby property values. 
- The incompatibility of this type of commercial use with the residential character of the surrounding 
area. 
- Concerns about increased loitering and other unintended consequences that could affect residents' 
sense of safety and enjoyment of their neighborhood. 
 
Many residents chose this community because of its family-oriented environment. Introducing a 
marijuana dispensary so close to residential areas may fundamentally change the character of the 
neighborhood and create concerns for homeowners and families. 
 
I respectfully request that the Planning & Zoning Commission and Board of Supervisors deny this 
application or require the applicant to seek an alternative location that is more appropriate and less 
impactful to nearby residents. 
 
Thank you for considering the concerns of the residents who will be directly affected by this proposal. I 
ask that this letter be included in the public record for Case #Z260015. 
 
Sincerely, 
 
Nate Bowman

2
10226 W Jessie Ln  
Peoria, AZ, 85383 
602-618-8023

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Rachel Applegate (PND)
Sent:
Friday, June 5, 2026 10:36 AM
To:
Nicholas Schlimm (PND); Darren Gerard (PND); Ronald Quarles (PND)
Subject:
FW: Opposition to Proposed Trulieve Dispensary on Happy Valley (Case #Z260015)
 
 
From: Brittany Wilson 
  
Sent: Friday, June 5, 2026 10:22 AM 
To: PND PZAppeal 
 
Cc: District 3 
 
Subject: Opposition to Proposed Trulieve Dispensary on Happy Valley (Case #Z260015) 
 
To Whom It May Concer n, I am writing to express my opposition to Case #Z260015, the proposed Trulieve dispensary planned for our commu nity. As a resident of the area, I am concerned about the impact this business may have on the character , safety, 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBanner End 
 
 
To Whom It May Concern, 
I am writing to express my opposition to Case #Z260015, the proposed Trulieve dispensary planned for 
our community. 
As a resident of the area, I am concerned about the impact this business may have on the character, 
safety, and quality of life of our neighborhood. While I understand that marijuana businesses are legal 
and regulated, I do not believe this location is appropriate due to its proximity to homes and families. 
My concerns include: 
Increased traffic and congestion on local streets. 
Potential impacts on neighborhood safety and security. 
The effect a dispensary may have on nearby property values. 
The incompatibility of this type of commercial use with the residential character of the surrounding area.
Concerns about increased loitering and other unintended consequences that could affect residents' 
sense of safety and enjoyment of their neighborhood. 
Many residents chose this community because of its family-oriented environment. Introducing a 
marijuana dispensary so close to residential areas may fundamentally change the character of the 
neighborhood and create concerns for homeowners and families. 
I respectfully request that the Planning & Zoning Commission and Board of Supervisors deny this 
application or require the applicant to seek an alternative location that is more appropriate and less 
impactful to nearby residents. 
Thank you for considering the concerns of the residents who will be directly affected by this proposal. I 
ask that this letter be included in the public record for Case #Z260015. 
Sincerely, 
[Your Name] 
[Your Address] 
[City, State ZIP] 
[Email Address]

2
[Phone Number]

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Rachel Applegate (PND)
Sent:
Friday, June 5, 2026 10:37 AM
To:
Nicholas Schlimm (PND); Darren Gerard (PND); Ronald Quarles (PND)
Subject:
FW: Opposition to Proposed Trulieve Dispensary on Happy Valley (Case #Z260015)
 
 
From: kattie raduenz 
  
Sent: Friday, June 5, 2026 10:29 AM 
To: PND PZAppeal <
 
Subject: Opposition to Proposed Trulieve Dispensary on Happy Valley (Case #Z260015) 
 
To Whom It May Concer n, I am writing to express my opposition to Case #Z260015, the proposed Trulieve dispensary planned for our commu nity. As a resident of the area, I am concerned about the impact this business may have on the character , safety, 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBanner End 
 
To Whom It May Concern, 
 
I am writing to express my opposition to Case #Z260015, the proposed Trulieve dispensary planned for 
our community. 
As a resident of the area, I am concerned about the impact this business may have on the character, 
safety, and quality of life of our neighborhood. While I understand that marijuana businesses are legal 
and regulated, I do not believe this location is appropriate due to its proximity to homes and families. 
My concerns include: 
Increased traffic and congestion on local streets. 
Potential impacts on neighborhood safety and security. 
The effect a dispensary may have on nearby property values. 
The incompatibility of this type of commercial use with the residential character of the surrounding area.
Concerns about increased loitering and other unintended consequences that could affect residents' 
sense of safety and enjoyment of their neighborhood. 
Many residents chose this community because of its family-oriented environment. Introducing a 
marijuana dispensary so close to residential areas may fundamentally change the character of the 
neighborhood and create concerns for homeowners and families. 
I respectfully request that the Planning & Zoning Commission and Board of Supervisors deny this 
application or require the applicant to seek an alternative location that is more appropriate and less 
impactful to nearby residents. 
Thank you for considering the concerns of the residents who will be directly affected by this proposal. I 
ask that this letter be included in the public record for Case #Z260015. 
 
Sincerely, 
Kattie raduenz 
11957 W Dos Rios Dr  
Sun City 85373

2
6235567905 
 
Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Angela Bowman 
Sent:
Friday, June 5, 2026 10:45 AM
To:
PND PZAppeal; Nicholas Schlimm (PND); District4; District 3
Subject:
Opposition to Case #Z260015 – Proposed Trulieve Dispensary
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
To Whom It May Concern, 
I am writing as a resident of the surrounding area to express my strong opposition to Case #Z260015, the 
proposed Trulieve dispensary at 115th Avenue and Happy Valley Road. 
My family chose this neighborhood because of its safe, family-oriented environment. It is a community 
where children regularly play outside, ride bicycles, and spend time with neighbors. The proposed 
location places a marijuana dispensary in close proximity to homes and families, and I do not believe this 
use is appropriate for a residential area such as ours. 
While I understand that marijuana dispensaries are legal businesses, their placement matters. I am 
particularly concerned about the message this sends to families and the potential impact on the safety, 
character, and long-term desirability of our neighborhood. 
My concerns include: 
 
The safety and well-being of the many children who live, play, and travel throughout the area. 
 
Increased traffic and congestion on roads already heavily used by residents. 
 
The incompatibility of a marijuana dispensary with the residential character of the surrounding 
neighborhoods. 
 
The potential for increased loitering and other activity that could diminish residents’ sense of 
security. 
 
The risk of reduced property values and diminished marketability of nearby homes. Many 
homeowners have made significant financial investments in this community, and the introduction 
of a dispensary adjacent to residential neighborhoods could negatively affect buyer perception 
and demand. 
 
The long-term impact on the reputation and character of a community that has been built around 
families and homeownership. 
Many residents specifically chose this area because it offers a welcoming environment for raising 
children. Approving this proposal would fundamentally alter the nature of the neighborhood and could 
have lasting consequences for homeowners, families, and future residents.

2
I respectfully urge the Planning & Zoning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to deny Case 
#Z260015 or require the applicant to seek a more appropriate location farther from residential 
neighborhoods. 
Thank you for your consideration of the concerns of the residents who will be most directly affected by 
this proposal. Please include this letter in the public record for Case #Z260015. 
Sincerely, 
Angela Bowman 
10226 W Jessie Ln 
Peoria, AZ 85383 
623-210-5587

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Baily Shultz 
Sent:
Friday, June 5, 2026 10:46 AM
To:
PND PZAppeal; Nicholas Schlimm (PND); District4; District 3
Subject:
Opposition to Proposed Trulieve Dispensary Near Residential Neighborhood (Case 
#Z260015) 
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
 
To Whom It May Concern, 
I am writing to express my opposition to Case #Z260015, the proposed Trulieve dispensary 
planned for our community on 115th and Happy Valley.  
As a resident of the area, I am very concerned about the impact this business may have on the 
character, safety, and quality of life of our neighborhood. While I understand that marijuana 
businesses are legal and regulated, I do not believe this location is appropriate due to its 
proximity to homes and families. We specifically moved to this neighborhood because of the 
amount of families and children who often play outside and ride their bikes in the area. Putting a 
dispensary right next door jeopardizes the safety of our children and the children in our 
neighborhood.  
My concerns include: 
    •    Potential impacts on neighborhood safety and security. SPECIFICALLY the safety of our 
children.  
    •    Increased traffic and congestion on local streets. 
    •    The effect a dispensary may have on nearby property values. 
    •    The incompatibility of this type of commercial use with the residential character of the 
surrounding area. 
    •    Concerns about increased loitering and other unintended consequences that could affect 
residents' sense of safety and enjoyment of their neighborhood. 
Many residents chose this community because of its family-oriented environment. Introducing a 
marijuana dispensary so close to residential areas may fundamentally change the character of the 
neighborhood and create concerns for homeowners and families. 
I respectfully request that the Planning & Zoning Commission and Board of Supervisors deny this 
application or require the applicant to seek an alternative location that is more appropriate and 
less impactful to nearby residents. 
Thank you for considering the concerns of the residents who will be directly affected by this 
proposal. I ask that this letter be included in the public record for Case #Z260015

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Tanner Wetnight 
Sent:
Friday, June 5, 2026 10:49 AM
To:
PND PZAppeal; Nicholas Schlimm (PND); District4; District 3
Subject:
Opposition to Proposed Trulieve Dispensary Near Residential Neighborhood (Case 
#Z260015)
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
 
To Whom It May Concern, 
I am writing to express my opposition to Case #Z260015, the proposed Trulieve dispensary planned for 
our community on 115th and Happy Valley.  
As a resident of the area, I am very concerned about the impact this business may have on the character, 
safety, and quality of life of our neighborhood. While I understand that marijuana businesses are legal 
and regulated, I do not believe this location is appropriate due to its proximity to homes and families. We 
specifically moved to this neighborhood because of the amount of families and children who often play 
outside and ride their bikes in the area. Putting a dispensary right next door jeopardizes the safety of our 
children and the children in our neighborhood.  
My concerns include: 
    •    Potential impacts on neighborhood safety and security. SPECIFICALLY the safety of our children.  
    •    Increased traffic and congestion on local streets. 
    •    The effect a dispensary may have on nearby property values. 
    •    The incompatibility of this type of commercial use with the residential character of the surrounding 
area. 
    •    Concerns about increased loitering and other unintended consequences that could affect 
residents' sense of safety and enjoyment of their neighborhood. 
Many residents chose this community because of its family-oriented environment. Introducing a 
marijuana dispensary so close to residential areas may fundamentally change the character of the 
neighborhood and create concerns for homeowners and families. 
I respectfully request that the Planning & Zoning Commission and Board of Supervisors deny this 
application or require the applicant to seek an alternative location that is more appropriate and less 
impactful to nearby residents. 
Thank you for considering the concerns of the residents who will be directly affected by this proposal. I 
ask that this letter be included in the public record for Case #Z260015. 
Sincerely, 
Tanner Wetnight  
12311 W. Patrick Ln  
Sun City West, AZ  
 
601-284-6962

2

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Allen Vestal 
Sent:
Friday, June 5, 2026 12:28 PM
To:
PND PZAppeal; Nicholas Schlimm (PND); District4; District 3
Subject:
Opposition to Proposed Marijuana Dispensary at 115th & Happy Valley | Case 
#Z260015
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
 
Hello, 
 
I am a resident near 115th Avenue and Happy Valley Road writing to oppose the proposed Trulieve 
dispensary (Case #Z260015). 
 
My concerns are straightforward: this location will negatively impact public safety, worsen already 
congested traffic at that intersection, and is simply out of character for our family-oriented community.
 
Please deny this application and enter my opposition into the public record. 
 
Thank you, 
Allen 
CrossRiver HOA Resident 
 
Sent from my iPhone

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Shauna Casillas 
Sent:
Friday, June 5, 2026 1:16 PM
To:
PND PZAppeal; Nicholas Schlimm (PND); District4; District 3
Subject:
Case# Z260015
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
 
 
Hello, 
 
I am a resident near 115th Avenue and Happy Valley Road writing to oppose the proposed Trulieve 
dispensary (Case #Z260015). 
 
My concerns are straightforward: this location will negatively impact public safety, worsen already 
congested traffic at that intersection, and is simply out of character for our family-oriented community.
 
Please deny this application and enter my opposition into the public record. 
 
Thank you, 
 
CrossRiver HOA Resident 
Sent from my iPhone

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Rachel Applegate (PND)
Sent:
Friday, June 5, 2026 1:55 PM
To:
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
Subject:
FW: Opposition to Proposed Trulieve Dispensary Near Residential Neighborhood (Case 
#Z260015) 
 
 
From: Zach Poweziak 
  
Sent: Friday, June 5, 2026 1:52 PM 
To: PND PZAppeal 
 
Subject: Opposition to Proposed Trulieve Dispensary Near Residential Neighborhood (Case #Z260015)  
 
To whom it may concern, I am writing in opposition is a proposal for a Trulieve Dispensary in my neighb orhood. I do not want this in my neighb orhood. For those who use this service there ar e a number dispensary near enough that they are not 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBanner End 
To whom it may concern, 
I am writing in opposition is a proposal for a Trulieve Dispensary in my neighborhood. I do not want 
this in my neighborhood.  For those who use this service there are a number dispensary near enough 
that they are not an inconvenience.  I purchased a home in this neighborhood because it was out of 
the way. There was limited access to the neighborhood which kept outside traffic down and made it 
safe for my children.  The addition of the Deer valley-Williams rd and the QT gas station has already 
caused an increase in pass through traffic and added vandalism to the neighborhood 
parks.  Additionally adding a less then family friendly business to the neighborhood will bring more 
people there who are not interested in the peace and safety of the children outside.  This is a 
neighborhood not a shopping center.  Any business doesn’t belong.  Even the QT gas station should 
have been down the road at a major street like lake pleasant and Happy Valley.  Please do not add to 
this mistake by adding more in the neighborhood. Do not approve this project it is not needed nor 
wanted here.   
 
Thank you for considering the concerns of the residents who will be directly affected by this proposal. 
I ask that this letter be included in the public record for Case #Z260015. 
 
Sincerely, 
Zach Poweziak  
12137 Villa Hermosa CT  
623 202-4889

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Theresa Cutrano 
Sent:
Friday, June 5, 2026 3:10 PM
To:
PND PZAppeal; Nicholas Schlimm (PND); District4; District 3
Subject:
Case #Z260015 - Proposed Trulieve Dispensary
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Hello, 
 
I am a resident near 115th Avenue and Happy Valley Road writing to oppose the proposed Trulieve 
dispensary (Case #Z260015). 
 
My concerns are straightforward: this location will negatively impact public safety, worsen already 
congested traffic at that intersection, and is simply out of character for our family-oriented community. 
 
Please deny this application and enter my opposition into the public record. 
 
Thank you, 
 
CrossRiver HOA Resident 
Theresa Cutrano 
 
 
 
Sent from my Galaxy

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Bernadine Huff 
Sent:
Friday, June 5, 2026 3:14 PM
To:
PND PZAppeal; Nicholas Schlimm (PND); Debra Lesko; COB Agenda Comments; Clerk of 
the Board of Supervisors - COBX
Subject:
#Z260015 Trulieve Dispensary 
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Subject: Opposition to Case # Z260015 – Trulieve Dispensary Happy Valley Application – Request 
for Denial 
Date: 6/5/2026 
To: Maricopa County Planning & Zoning Commission / Board of Supervisors 
c/o: Planning & Development Department 
 
Nicholas Schlimm, 
Re: Strong Opposition to Approval of Trulieve Dispensary Happy Valley (Case # Z260015) – County 
Planning & Zoning Meeting (June 11, 2026) and Board of Supervisors Hearing (July 15, 2026) 
Dear Commissioners and Supervisors, 
I am writing as a resident of the Peoria/Mesquite District area in Maricopa County to formally oppose the 
proposed Trulieve Dispensary Happy Valley at the location under consideration in Case # Z260015. I 
respectfully request denial of this application due to the well-documented negative impacts that 
marijuana dispensaries have on public safety, traffic safety, and quality of life in nearby residential 
neighborhoods. 
Public Safety and Crime Concerns 
While some broader studies on legalization show mixed or neutral aggregate effects, neighborhood-level 
research reveals significant localized risks. A University of Colorado Denver study of Denver 
neighborhoods found that areas with one or more medical or recreational dispensaries experienced 
crime rate increases ranging from 26% to 1,452% higher than neighborhoods without them, particularly 
in robbery and aggravated assault.  Dispensaries often handle large amounts of cash and high-value 
products, making them targets and drawing related criminal activity into surrounding areas. Similar 
patterns of increased disorder and property crime have been observed in other jurisdictions with high 
dispensary density. 
In Arizona, the proliferation of dispensaries has coincided with ongoing challenges in managing 
associated crime, including robberies and burglaries at cannabis businesses. Adding another dispensary 
in the Happy Valley/Mesquite area would exacerbate these pressures on local law enforcement and 
heighten risks for families and residents in this growing suburban community. 
Traffic Safety and Impaired Driving

2
Marijuana impairment impairs reaction time, judgment, coordination, and distance perception—effects 
that compound dangerously on Arizona roads. Arizona leaders have highlighted sharp rises in cannabis-
impaired driving: DUI arrests for impaired driving increased from approximately 5,200 in 2023 to 8,100 
in 2025, while marijuana-related accidents rose from 254 in 2020 to 421 in 2024.  Broader data shows 
serious marijuana-related traffic accidents requiring emergency treatment surged dramatically post-
legalization in multiple states.  
The proposed site near residential zones and major roadways in the Happy Valley area would increase 
traffic volume from customers, delivery services, and operations, amplifying risks of impaired driving 
incidents in a region already contending with growth-related congestion. This is particularly concerning 
for families, schools, and vulnerable road users. 
Additional Community Impacts 
•  Odor, Nuisance, and Property Values: Dispensaries frequently generate persistent cannabis odors, 
leading to complaints and mitigation requirements (as seen with Trulieve facilities elsewhere). This 
would degrade livability in nearby homes. 
•  Youth Access and Social Costs: Greater proximity increases normalization and potential diversion 
risks for minors in a family-oriented district. 
•  Over-Saturation: Maricopa County already has numerous dispensaries; additional ones in suburban 
pockets strain resources without clear community benefit. 
Trulieve, as applicant, has faced various operational and compliance issues in Arizona and other states 
(including product labeling concerns and facility odor complaints), further underscoring the need for 
caution.  
I urge the Commission and Board to prioritize resident safety, deny this application, and place any related 
item on the regular agenda if objections are filed. Residents near the proposed site strongly oppose this 
use, consistent with the notice process. 
Thank you for considering this opposition and protecting our community’s safety and quality of life. I am 
available for any questions and plan to attend or submit comments as allowed. 
Sincerely, 
Daniel & Bernadine Huff  
11972 W Camino Vivaz  
Sun City, AZ 85372  
 
623-206-4109

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Kavin Cole 
Sent:
Friday, June 5, 2026 5:39 PM
To:
PND PZAppeal; Nicholas Schlimm (PND); District4; District 3
Subject:
Opposition to Case #z260015-Trulieve
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Subject: Opposition to Case # Z260015 – Trulieve Dispensary Happy Valley Application – Request for 
Denial 
 
Date: 6/6/26 
 
To: Maricopa County Planning & Zoning Commission / Board of Supervisors 
c/o: Planning & Development Department 
 
Nicholas Schlimm, 
 
Re: Strong Opposition to Approval of Trulieve Dispensary Happy Valley (Case # Z260015) – County 
Planning & Zoning Meeting (June 11, 2026) and Board of Supervisors Hearing (July 15, 2026) 
 
Dear Commissioners and Supervisors, 
 
I am writing as a resident of the Peoria/Mesquite District area in Maricopa County to formally oppose the 
proposed Trulieve Dispensary Happy Valley at the location under consideration in Case # Z260015. I 
respectfully request denial of this application due to the well-documented negative impacts that 
marijuana dispensaries have on public safety, traffic safety, and quality of life in nearby residential 
neighborhoods. 
 
Public Safety and Crime Concerns 
While some broader studies on legalization show mixed or neutral aggregate effects, neighborhood-level 
research reveals significant localized risks. A University of Colorado Denver study of Denver 
neighborhoods found that areas with one or more medical or recreational dispensaries experienced 
crime rate increases ranging from 26% to 1,452% higher than neighborhoods without them, particularly 
in robbery and aggravated assault.  Dispensaries often handle large amounts of cash and high-value 
products, making them targets and drawing related criminal activity into surrounding areas. Similar 
patterns of increased disorder and property crime have been observed in other jurisdictions with high 
dispensary density. 
In Arizona, the proliferation of dispensaries has coincided with ongoing challenges in managing 
associated crime, including robberies and burglaries at cannabis businesses. Adding another dispensary 
in the Happy Valley/Mesquite area would exacerbate these pressures on local law enforcement and 
heighten risks for families and residents in this growing suburban community.

2
Traffic Safety and Impaired Driving 
Marijuana impairment impairs reaction time, judgment, coordination, and distance perception—effects 
that compound dangerously on Arizona roads. Arizona leaders have highlighted sharp rises in cannabis-
impaired driving: DUI arrests for impaired driving increased from approximately 5,200 in 2023 to 8,100 in 
2025, while marijuana-related accidents rose from 254 in 2020 to 421 in 2024.  Broader data shows 
serious marijuana-related traffic accidents requiring emergency treatment surged dramatically post-
legalization in multiple states.  
 
The proposed site near residential zones and major roadways in the Happy Valley area would increase 
traffic volume from customers, delivery services, and operations, amplifying risks of impaired driving 
incidents in a region already contending with growth-related congestion. This is particularly concerning 
for families, schools, and vulnerable road users. 
 
Additional Community Impacts 
•  Odor, Nuisance, and Property Values: Dispensaries frequently generate persistent cannabis odors, 
leading to complaints and mitigation requirements (as seen with Trulieve facilities elsewhere). This 
would degrade livability in nearby homes. 
•  Youth Access and Social Costs: Greater proximity increases normalization and potential diversion 
risks for minors in a family-oriented district. 
•  Over-Saturation: Maricopa County already has numerous dispensaries; additional ones in suburban 
pockets strain resources without clear community benefit. 
 
Trulieve, as applicant, has faced various operational and compliance issues in Arizona and other states 
(including product labeling concerns and facility odor complaints), further underscoring the need for 
caution.  
 
I urge the Commission and Board to prioritize resident safety, deny this application, and place any 
related item on the regular agenda if objections are filed. Residents near the proposed site strongly 
oppose this use, consistent with the notice process. 
Thank you for considering this opposition and protecting our community’s safety and quality of life. I am 
available for any questions and plan to attend or submit comments as allowed. 
 
Sincerely, 
 
Kavin Durand  
 
11921 W Daley Ln  
Sun City, AZ 85374 
 
 
 
623-341-4503 
 
Sent from my iPhone

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Adriela Phelps 
Sent:
Friday, June 5, 2026 6:28 PM
To:
District 3; District4; PND PZAppeal; Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
Subject:
Personal concerns
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
 
Dear Commissioners and Supervisors, 
 
I am writing as a resident of the Peoria/Mesquite District area in Maricopa County to formally oppose the 
proposed Trulieve Dispensary Happy Valley at the location under consideration in Case # Z260015. I 
respectfully request denial of this application due to the well-documented negative impacts that 
marijuana dispensaries have on public safety, traffic safety, and quality of life in nearby residential 
neighborhoods. 
Public Safety and Crime Concerns 
While some broader studies on legalization show mixed or neutral aggregate effects, neighborhood-level 
research reveals significant localized risks. A University of Colorado Denver study of Denver 
neighborhoods found that areas with one or more medical or recreational dispensaries experienced 
crime rate increases ranging from 26% to 1,452% higher than neighborhoods without them, particularly 
in robbery and aggravated assault.  Dispensaries often handle large amounts of cash and high-value 
products, making them targets and drawing related criminal activity into surrounding areas. Similar 
patterns of increased disorder and property crime have been observed in other jurisdictions with high 
dispensary density. 
In Arizona, the proliferation of dispensaries has coincided with ongoing challenges in managing 
associated crime, including robberies and burglaries at cannabis businesses. Adding another dispensary 
in the Happy Valley/Mesquite area would exacerbate these pressures on local law enforcement and 
heighten risks for families and residents in this growing suburban community. 
Traffic Safety and Impaired Driving 
Marijuana impairment impairs reaction time, judgment, coordination, and distance perception—effects 
that compound dangerously on Arizona roads. Arizona leaders have highlighted sharp rises in cannabis-
impaired driving: DUI arrests for impaired driving increased from approximately 5,200 in 2023 to 8,100 in 
2025, while marijuana-related accidents rose from 254 in 2020 to 421 in 2024.  Broader data shows 
serious marijuana-related traffic accidents requiring emergency treatment surged dramatically post-
legalization in multiple states.  
The proposed site near residential zones and major roadways in the Happy Valley area would increase 
traffic volume from customers, delivery services, and operations, amplifying risks of impaired driving 
incidents in a region already contending with growth-related congestion. This is particularly concerning 
for families, schools, and vulnerable road users. 
Additional Community Impacts

2
•  Odor, Nuisance, and Property Values: Dispensaries frequently generate persistent cannabis odors, 
leading to complaints and mitigation requirements (as seen with Trulieve facilities elsewhere). This 
would degrade livability in nearby homes. 
•  Youth Access and Social Costs: Greater proximity increases normalization and potential diversion 
risks for minors in a family-oriented district. 
•  Over-Saturation: Maricopa County already has numerous dispensaries; additional ones in suburban 
pockets strain resources without clear community benefit. 
Trulieve, as applicant, has faced various operational and compliance issues in Arizona and other states 
(including product labeling concerns and facility odor complaints), further underscoring the need for 
caution.  
I urge the Commission and Board to prioritize resident safety, deny this application, and place any 
related item on the regular agenda if objections are filed. Residents near the proposed site strongly 
oppose this use, consistent with the notice process. 
Thank you for considering this opposition and protecting our community’s safety and quality of life. I am 
available for any questions and plan to attend or submit comments as allowed. 
 
Sincerely, 
Adriela Phelps  
11724 W Patrick Lane, Sun City, AZ 85373 
CrossRiver HOA Resident

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
David Steel 
Sent:
Friday, June 5, 2026 9:26 PM
To:
PND PZAppeal; Nicholas Schlimm (PND); District4; District 3
Subject:
(Case #Z260015
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
 
Hello, 
 
I am a resident near 115th Avenue and Happy Valley Road writing to oppose the proposed Trulieve 
dispensary (Case #Z260015). 
 
My concerns are straightforward: this location will negatively impact public safety, worsen already 
congested traffic at that intersection, and is simply out of character for our family-oriented community. 
 
Please deny this application and enter my opposition into the public record. 
 
Thank you, 
 
CrossRiver HOA Resident

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Sent:
Friday, June 5, 2026 10:22 PM
To:
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
Subject:
Marijuana Dispensary near 303
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
I understand the Maricopa BOS has input into a proposed dispensary on an island of land adjacent to 
Peoria near 303 & Happy Valley. I live in Trilogy and would have strong objections to such a retail 
outlet. There are other locations that sell this product and I feel it has negative repercussions, 
including driver safety issues. Anything you could do to curtail this type of development would be 
appreciated. 
Steve Kolter 
Trilogy Resident 
Precinct Committeeman LD28 
Sent from my iPhone

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Marcie Cambigue 
Sent:
Saturday, June 6, 2026 7:46 AM
To:
Nicholas Schlimm (PND); District4; District 3
Subject:
Case #Z260015
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
Hello, 
 
I am a resident near 115th Avenue and Happy Valley Road writing to oppose the proposed Trulieve 
dispensary (Case #Z260015). 
 
My concerns are straightforward: this location will negatively impact public safety, worsen already 
congested traffic at that intersection, and is simply out of character for our family-oriented community. 
 
Please deny this application and enter my opposition into the public record. 
 
Thank you, 
 
CrossRiver HOA Resident

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Wayne and Carol Crane 
Sent:
Sunday, June 7, 2026 4:02 PM
To:
PND PZAppeal; Nicholas Schlimm (PND); 
; District 3
Subject:
Case #Z260015 Trulieve dispensary
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
We are residents near 115th Avenue and Happy Valley Road writing to oppose the proposed Trulieve 
dispensary (Case Z260015). 
 
Our concerns are straightforward: this location will negatively impact safety, worsen already congested 
traffic at that intersection, and is simply out of character for our family-oriented community. 
 
In addition, we came from Colorado and saw the negative impact that dispensaries had on family 
neighborhoods. 
 
Please deny this application and enter our opposition into the public record. 
 
Thank you, 
Wayne and Carol Crane 
Crossriver HOA Residents

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Rachel Applegate (PND)
Sent:
Monday, June 8, 2026 7:15 AM
To:
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
Subject:
FW: Online Form Submittal: Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission 
Recommendation
 
 
From: 
  
Sent: Friday, June 5, 2026 2:07 PM 
To: PND PZAppeal 
 
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation 
 
Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation Objection Form If the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval of a particular case it will be placed on a consent agenda for the Board of Supervisors hearing. How ever, if 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBanner End 
Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
Objection Form  
If the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval of a particular case it 
will be placed on a consent agenda for the Board of Supervisors hearing. However, 
if this objection form is received within 15 calendar days following Commission 
hearing, then the agenda item will be placed on the regular agenda for the Board of 
Supervisors hearing. 
Name
Zach Poweziak 
Email Address
Address
12137 w villa hermosa ct 
City
Sun city  
State
Az 
Zip Code
85373 
Phone Number
623 2024889 
Fax Number
Field not completed. 
Case Number / Project 
Name 
Z260015

2
Planning & Zoning 
Commission Hearing 
Date 
June 11,2026 
Reason for the 
Objection of the Subject 
Case 
There is not good reason to allow the development of a 
commercial business in a neighborhood, especially a 
Dispensary that is going to bring unwanted traffic into and out 
of the community. There are plenty of space available just 
down the road at four corners. I moved to this neighborhood so 
my children would be safe to play outside. It was bad enough 
when the bridge was added and the QT . Do not add to those 
mistakes.  
Electronic Signature 
Agreement 
I agree. 
Electronic Signature
Zachary J. Poweziak  
 
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Rachel Applegate (PND)
Sent:
Monday, June 8, 2026 7:16 AM
To:
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
Subject:
FW: Online Form Submittal: Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission 
Recommendation
 
 
From: 
 
Sent: Friday, June 5, 2026 6:27 PM 
To: PND PZAppeal 
 
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation 
 
Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation Objection Form If the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval of a particular case it will be placed on a consent agenda for the Board of Supervisors hearing. How ever, if 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBanner End 
Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
Objection Form  
If the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval of a particular case it 
will be placed on a consent agenda for the Board of Supervisors hearing. However, 
if this objection form is received within 15 calendar days following Commission 
hearing, then the agenda item will be placed on the regular agenda for the Board of 
Supervisors hearing. 
Name
Mikkel Deal 
Email Address
Address
24609 N 115th Ave. 
City
Sun City 
State
Arizona 
Zip Code
85373 
Phone Number
2109130733 
Fax Number
Field not completed. 
Case Number / Project 
Name 
Z260015

2
Planning & Zoning 
Commission Hearing 
Date 
06/11/2026 
Reason for the 
Objection of the Subject 
Case 
As a resident of this neighborhood and a parent of young 
children, I strongly oppose the proposed marijuana dispensary 
at this location. The facility would be visible from my home and 
situated in close proximity to areas where neighborhood 
children regularly gather, play, and socialize. 
 
I believe this use is incompatible with the family-oriented 
character of our community. While marijuana may be permitted 
under state law, it remains illegal under federal law, and I do 
not believe a retail establishment dedicated to the sale of such 
products is an appropriate addition to a residential area where 
children and families live. 
 
In evaluating this proposal, I urge the County to consider 
whether the project will meaningfully enhance the quality of life, 
safety, and overall well-being of nearby residents. In my view, 
this development would not contribute positively to the 
neighborhood, would not make the area safer for families, and 
would diminish the community character that residents have 
worked hard to maintain. 
 
For these reasons, I respectfully request that the County deny 
approval of this application. 
Electronic Signature 
Agreement 
I agree. 
Electronic Signature
Mikkel E. Deal 
 
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Rachel Applegate (PND)
Sent:
Monday, June 8, 2026 7:16 AM
To:
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
Subject:
FW: Online Form Submittal: Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission 
Recommendation
 
 
From: 
 
Sent: Friday, June 5, 2026 6:31 PM 
To: PND PZAppeal 
 
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation 
 
Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation Objection Form If the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval of a particular case it will be placed on a consent agenda for the Board of Supervisors hearing. How ever, if 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBanner End 
Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
Objection Form  
If the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval of a particular case it 
will be placed on a consent agenda for the Board of Supervisors hearing. However, 
if this objection form is received within 15 calendar days following Commission 
hearing, then the agenda item will be placed on the regular agenda for the Board of 
Supervisors hearing. 
Name
Lise Deal 
Email Address
Address
24609 N 115th Ave. 
City
Sun City 
State
Arizona 
Zip Code
85373 
Phone Number
2108600772 
Fax Number
Field not completed. 
Case Number / Project 
Name 
Z260015

2
Planning & Zoning 
Commission Hearing 
Date 
06/11/2026 
Reason for the 
Objection of the Subject 
Case 
As a mother and a resident of this neighborhood, I strongly 
oppose the proposed marijuana dispensary at this location. 
 
My concern is not theoretical. Substance abuse has affected 
members of my extended family, and I have personally 
witnessed the lasting emotional, financial, and personal 
consequences that addiction can have on individuals and the 
people who love them. Those experiences have made me 
especially mindful of the environments in which my children are 
being raised and the messages our community sends about 
substance use. 
 
This proposed dispensary would be visible from my home and 
located near areas where neighborhood children regularly play, 
gather, and spend time with friends. As a parent, I do not 
believe that a business dedicated to the sale of marijuana is an 
appropriate or beneficial addition to a family-oriented 
residential area. 
 
When considering this application, I ask the County to carefully 
weigh not only the potential economic benefits, but also the 
impact on neighborhood character, family life, and the well-
being of residents. From my perspective, this project would not 
improve our community, would not make our neighborhood 
safer or more desirable for families, and would introduce a use 
that is inconsistent with the values and environment many 
residents seek to preserve. 
 
For these reasons, I respectfully urge the County to deny 
approval of this proposal. 
Electronic Signature 
Agreement 
I agree. 
Electronic Signature
Lise Deal 
 
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Rachel Applegate (PND)
Sent:
Monday, June 8, 2026 7:17 AM
To:
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
Subject:
FW: Online Form Submittal: Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission 
Recommendation
 
 
From: 
 
Sent: Friday, June 5, 2026 6:48 PM 
To: PND PZAppeal 
 
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation 
 
Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation Objection Form If the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval of a particular case it will be placed on a consent agenda for the Board of Supervisors hearing. How ever, if 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBanner End 
Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
Objection Form  
If the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval of a particular case it 
will be placed on a consent agenda for the Board of Supervisors hearing. However, 
if this objection form is received within 15 calendar days following Commission 
hearing, then the agenda item will be placed on the regular agenda for the Board of 
Supervisors hearing. 
Name
Julene Hansen 
Email Address
Address
26206 N 114th Avenue 
City
Peoria 
State
AZ 
Zip Code
85383 
Phone Number
5209048825 
Fax Number
Field not completed. 
Case Number / Project 
Name 
Z260015 / Trulieve Dispensary Happy Valley

2
Planning & Zoning 
Commission Hearing 
Date 
June 11th 2026 
Reason for the 
Objection of the Subject 
Case 
As a home owner that lives within 1 mile of Happy Valley Rd 
and 115th Ave with children and grandchildren I object to a 
marijuana dispensary going in so close. My concern is the type 
of individuals this will draw in to our neighborhoods with a lot of 
teenagers and children. This will not only impact our home 
values, it will affect our safety. Additionally, this intersection is 
already very dangerous and with more traffic and folks 
potentially under the influence, the danger increases. 
Electronic Signature 
Agreement 
I agree. 
Electronic Signature
Julene Hansen 
 
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Rachel Applegate (PND)
Sent:
Monday, June 8, 2026 7:17 AM
To:
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
Subject:
FW: Online Form Submittal: Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission 
Recommendation
 
 
From: 
 
Sent: Saturday, June 6, 2026 6:33 AM 
To: PND PZAppeal 
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation 
 
Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation Objection Form If the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval of a particular case it will be placed on a consent agenda for the Board of Supervisors hearing. How ever, if 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBanner End 
Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
Objection Form  
If the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval of a particular case it 
will be placed on a consent agenda for the Board of Supervisors hearing. However, 
if this objection form is received within 15 calendar days following Commission 
hearing, then the agenda item will be placed on the regular agenda for the Board of 
Supervisors hearing. 
Name
Alan Davis 
Email Address
Address
24895 N. 114th Ave. 
City
Sun City 
State
Arizona 
Zip Code
85373 
Phone Number
623-694-1605 
Fax Number
Field not completed. 
Case Number / Project 
Name 
Case Z260015

2
Planning & Zoning 
Commission Hearing 
Date 
June 11 2026 
Reason for the 
Objection of the Subject 
Case 
We love a short distance from the place and do not want this in 
our neighborhood. Bad for kids and adults. 
Electronic Signature 
Agreement 
I agree. 
Electronic Signature
Alan Davis  
 
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Rachel Applegate (PND)
Sent:
Monday, June 8, 2026 7:17 AM
To:
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
Subject:
FW: Online Form Submittal: Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission 
Recommendation
 
 
From: 
 
Sent: Saturday, June 6, 2026 8:10 AM 
To: PND PZAppeal 
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation 
 
Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation Objection Form If the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval of a particular case it will be placed on a consent agenda for the Board of Supervisors hearing. How ever, if 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBanner End 
Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
Objection Form  
If the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval of a particular case it 
will be placed on a consent agenda for the Board of Supervisors hearing. However, 
if this objection form is received within 15 calendar days following Commission 
hearing, then the agenda item will be placed on the regular agenda for the Board of 
Supervisors hearing. 
Name
Holly Kurtzeborn  
Email Address
Address
24895 N 114th Ave 
City
Sun City 
State
AZ 
Zip Code
85373 
Phone Number
6095776301 
Fax Number
Field not completed. 
Case Number / Project 
Name 
Z260015

2
Planning & Zoning 
Commission Hearing 
Date 
6/11/26 
Reason for the 
Objection of the Subject 
Case 
This marijuana dispensary would be located half a mile from 
my home. We would like to keep our neighborhood drug free - 
even if it is considered legal. These types of businesses attract 
a certain type of people as customers. Our area of the city is 
nice and desirable to live in and we do not want to bring in the 
riff raff that these businesses attract. We 100% object to this 
dispensary going in so close to our home.  
Electronic Signature 
Agreement 
I agree. 
Electronic Signature
Holly Kurtzeborn  
 
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Rachel Applegate (PND)
Sent:
Monday, June 8, 2026 7:18 AM
To:
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
Subject:
FW: Online Form Submittal: Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission 
Recommendation
 
 
From: 
  
Sent: Saturday, June 6, 2026 8:23 AM 
To: PND PZAppeal 
 
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation 
 
Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation Objection Form If the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval of a particular case it will be placed on a consent agenda for the Board of Supervisors hearing. How ever, if 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBanner End 
Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
Objection Form  
If the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval of a particular case it 
will be placed on a consent agenda for the Board of Supervisors hearing. However, 
if this objection form is received within 15 calendar days following Commission 
hearing, then the agenda item will be placed on the regular agenda for the Board of 
Supervisors hearing. 
Name
Debbie Davis 
Email Address
Address
24895 N 114th Ave 
City
Sun City 
State
AZ 
Zip Code
85373 
Phone Number
6236940827 
Fax Number
Field not completed. 
Case Number / Project 
Name 
Z260015

2
Planning & Zoning 
Commission Hearing 
Date 
June 11, 2026 
Reason for the 
Objection of the Subject 
Case 
I reside near the proposed marijuana dispensary site. 
 
I respectfully request that the Planning and Zoning Commission 
recommend denial of this application. 
 
While I understand that marijuana establishments are legal in 
Arizona, my concern is whether this specific location is 
appropriate and compatible with the surrounding area. I believe 
the proposed dispensary may negatively affect the 
neighborhood by increasing traffic, parking demands, and 
commercial activity beyond what nearby residents reasonably 
expect. 
 
I am also concerned about the proximity of the facility to nearby 
homes, places of worship, parks, schools, and family-oriented 
activities. Even if the applicant meets the minimum zoning 
requirements, the Commission should consider whether the 
use is consistent with the character and long-term vision of the 
area. 
 
In addition, I ask the Commission to carefully evaluate: 
 
* Traffic circulation and parking impacts. 
* Public safety and security concerns. 
* Compatibility with adjacent residential properties. 
* Noise, lighting, and hours of operation. 
* Potential effects on nearby businesses and property owners.
* Whether there are alternative commercial locations that would 
be more appropriate and less disruptive. 
 
Zoning decisions should protect the health, safety, and welfare 
of existing residents. For these reasons, I respectfully ask that 
this application be denied or that substantial conditions be 
imposed to mitigate its impacts on the surrounding community.
 
Thank you for your consideration. 
Electronic Signature 
Agreement 
I agree. 
Electronic Signature
Debbie D Davis 
 
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.

3

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Rachel Applegate (PND)
Sent:
Monday, June 8, 2026 7:18 AM
To:
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
Subject:
FW: Online Form Submittal: Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission 
Recommendation
 
 
From: 
 
Sent: Saturday, June 6, 2026 8:47 AM 
To: PND PZAppeal 
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation 
 
Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation Objection Form If the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval of a particular case it will be placed on a consent agenda for the Board of Supervisors hearing. How ever, if 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBanner End 
Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
Objection Form  
If the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval of a particular case it 
will be placed on a consent agenda for the Board of Supervisors hearing. However, 
if this objection form is received within 15 calendar days following Commission 
hearing, then the agenda item will be placed on the regular agenda for the Board of 
Supervisors hearing. 
Name
Natalie R Davis 
Email Address
Address
24884 N 114th Ave 
City
Sun City 
State
AZ 
Zip Code
85373 
Phone Number
6236936430 
Fax Number
Field not completed. 
Case Number / Project 
Name 
Z260015

2
Planning & Zoning 
Commission Hearing 
Date 
June 11, 2026 
Reason for the 
Objection of the Subject 
Case 
I am writing to formally object to the proposed marijuana 
dispensary located at 115th Ave and happy valley rd.  
 
My concerns are based on the following: 
 
* Zoning compatibility: The proposed site appears inconsistent 
with local zoning regulations, particularly regarding proximity to 
parks and residential areas with families and small children. 
* Public safety: Increased traffic, potential loitering, and 
impaired driving may negatively affect the safety of nearby 
residents and families. 
* Community impact: This location is in a primarily 
residential/family-oriented area, and the proposed use does not 
align with the character of the neighborhood. 
* Process concerns: I request verification that all notification, 
permitting, and public input requirements have been properly 
followed. 
 
Based on these concerns, I respectfully request that this 
proposal be denied or reconsidered for a more appropriate 
location. 
 
Thank you for your time and consideration. 
Electronic Signature 
Agreement 
I agree. 
Electronic Signature
Natalie R Davis 
 
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Rachel Applegate (PND)
Sent:
Monday, June 8, 2026 7:18 AM
To:
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
Subject:
FW: Online Form Submittal: Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission 
Recommendation
 
 
From: 
 
Sent: Saturday, June 6, 2026 9:08 AM 
To: PND PZAppeal 
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation 
 
Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation Objection Form If the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval of a particular case it will be placed on a consent agenda for the Board of Supervisors hearing. How ever, if 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBanner End 
Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
Objection Form  
If the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval of a particular case it 
will be placed on a consent agenda for the Board of Supervisors hearing. However, 
if this objection form is received within 15 calendar days following Commission 
hearing, then the agenda item will be placed on the regular agenda for the Board of 
Supervisors hearing. 
Name
Maerin Mackey  
Email Address
Address
24728 N 114th Ave 
City
Sun city 
State
Az 
Zip Code
85373 
Phone Number
6234517221 
Fax Number
Field not completed. 
Case Number / Project 
Name 
Z260015

2
Planning & Zoning 
Commission Hearing 
Date 
06/11/26 
Reason for the 
Objection of the Subject 
Case 
I am writing to express my objection to the proposed marijuana 
dispensary at the southwest corner on 115th and Happy Valley. 
 
As a resident and property owner of the surrounding 
neighborhood, I am concerned that this business may not be 
compatible with the predominately residential character of the 
area. 
 
The proposed location is close to young family residences and 
may affect the quiet enjoyment of nearby properties. I also 
have concerns about the smell and potential for loitering or 
other activities that could affect neighborhood safety and 
quality of life. 
I am asking the planning and zoning commission to deny this 
permit.  
Electronic Signature 
Agreement 
I agree. 
Electronic Signature
Maerin R Mackey 
 
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Rachel Applegate (PND)
Sent:
Monday, June 8, 2026 7:19 AM
To:
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
Subject:
FW: Case Z260015
 
 
From: Ross Kinzler 
 
Sent: Saturday, June 6, 2026 12:44 PM 
To: PND PZAppeal 
 
Subject: Case Z260015 
 
I’m writing to oppose the placement of a dispensary near 115 th ave. There ar e a tremend ous amount of children living in Dos Rios and Cross River who ride bikes, e-bikes and walk there. It already is not pedestrian friendly! As a point of reference, 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBanner End 
I’m writing to oppose the placement of a dispensary near 115 th ave.  
 
There are a tremendous amount of children living in Dos Rios and Cross River who ride bikes, e-bikes and 
walk there.  It already is not pedestrian friendly! 
 
As a point of reference, last Halloween I stopped counting kids at 800!!! 
 
Please don’t approve this application  
 
Ross Kinzler 
608 213 7545

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Rachel Applegate (PND)
Sent:
Monday, June 8, 2026 7:19 AM
To:
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
Subject:
FW: Subject: Opposition to Case # Z260015 – Trulieve Dispensary Happy Valley 
Application – Request for Denial
 
 
From: Lisa Hull 
 
Sent: Saturday, June 6, 2026 9:45 PM 
To: PND PZAppeal 
Subject: Subject: Opposition to Case # Z260015 – Trulieve Dispensary Happy Valley Application – Request for Denial 
 
To: Maricop a County Planning & Zoning Commission / Board of Supervisors c/o: Planning & Development Department Re: Strong Opposition to Approval of Trulieve Dispensary Happy Valley (Case # Z260015) – County Planning & Zoning Meeting 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBanner End 
 
To: Maricopa County Planning & Zoning Commission / Board of Supervisors 
c/o: Planning & Development Department 
 
Re: Strong Opposition to Approval of Trulieve Dispensary Happy Valley (Case # Z260015) – County 
Planning & Zoning Meeting (June 11, 2026) and Board of Supervisors Hearing (July 15, 2026) 
 
 
Dear Commissioners and Supervisors, 
I am writing as a resident of the Peoria/Mesquite District area in Maricopa County to formally oppose 
the proposed Trulieve Dispensary Happy Valley at the location under consideration in Case # 
Z260015. I respectfully request denial of this application due to the well-documented negative 
impacts that marijuana dispensaries have on public safety, traffic safety, and quality of life in nearby 
residential neighborhoods. 
Public Safety and Crime Concerns 
While some broader studies on legalization show mixed or neutral aggregate effects, neighborhood-
level research reveals significant localized risks. A University of Colorado Denver study of Denver 
neighborhoods found that areas with one or more medical or recreational dispensaries experienced 
crime rate increases ranging from 26% to 1,452% higher than neighborhoods without them, 
particularly in robbery and aggravated assault.  Dispensaries often handle large amounts of cash and 
high-value products, making them targets and drawing related criminal activity into surrounding areas. 
Similar patterns of increased disorder and property crime have been observed in other jurisdictions 
with high dispensary density. 
In Arizona, the proliferation of dispensaries has coincided with ongoing challenges in managing 
associated crime, including robberies and burglaries at cannabis businesses. Adding another 
dispensary in the Happy Valley/Mesquite area would exacerbate these pressures on local law 
enforcement and heighten risks for families and residents in this growing suburban community. 
Traffic Safety and Impaired Driving

2
Marijuana impairment impairs reaction time, judgment, coordination, and distance perception—effects 
that compound dangerously on Arizona roads. Arizona leaders have highlighted sharp rises in 
cannabis-impaired driving: DUI arrests for impaired driving increased from approximately 5,200 in 
2023 to 8,100 in 2025, while marijuana-related accidents rose from 254 in 2020 to 421 in 
2024.  Broader data shows serious marijuana-related traffic accidents requiring emergency treatment 
surged dramatically post-legalization in multiple states.  
The proposed site near residential zones and major roadways in the Happy Valley area would 
increase traffic volume from customers, delivery services, and operations, amplifying risks of impaired 
driving incidents in a region already contending with growth-related congestion. This is particularly 
concerning for families, schools, and vulnerable road users. 
Additional Community Impacts 
•  Odor, Nuisance, and Property Values: Dispensaries frequently generate persistent cannabis odors, 
leading to complaints and mitigation requirements (as seen with Trulieve facilities elsewhere). This 
would degrade livability in nearby homes. 
•  Youth Access and Social Costs: Greater proximity increases normalization and potential diversion 
risks for minors in a family-oriented district. 
•  Over-Saturation: Maricopa County already has numerous dispensaries; additional ones in suburban 
pockets strain resources without clear community benefit. 
Trulieve, as applicant, has faced various operational and compliance issues in Arizona and other 
states (including product labeling concerns and facility odor complaints), further underscoring the 
need for caution.  
I urge the Commission and Board to prioritize resident safety, deny this application, and place any 
related item on the regular agenda if objections are filed. Residents near the proposed site strongly 
oppose this use, consistent with the notice process. 
Thank you for considering this opposition and protecting our community’s safety and quality of life. I 
am available for any questions and plan to attend or submit comments as allowed. 
Sincerely,

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Rachel Applegate (PND)
Sent:
Monday, June 8, 2026 7:19 AM
To:
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
Subject:
FW: Online Form Submittal: Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission 
Recommendation
 
 
From: 
  
Sent: Saturday, June 6, 2026 11:52 PM 
To: PND PZAppeal 
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation 
 
Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation Objection Form If the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval of a particular case it will be placed on a consent agenda for the Board of Supervisors hearing. How ever, if 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBanner End 
Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
Objection Form  
If the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval of a particular case it 
will be placed on a consent agenda for the Board of Supervisors hearing. However, 
if this objection form is received within 15 calendar days following Commission 
hearing, then the agenda item will be placed on the regular agenda for the Board of 
Supervisors hearing. 
Name
Cassie Moore 
Email Address
Address
11850 West Electra Lane 
City
Sun City 
State
AZ 
Zip Code
85373 
Phone Number
6233859834 
Fax Number
Field not completed. 
Case Number / Project 
Name 
Z260015

2
Planning & Zoning 
Commission Hearing 
Date 
Thursday June 11, 2026 
Reason for the 
Objection of the Subject 
Case 
I do not want this in my neighborhood. I dont want this across 
from a gas station where I am raising my family. That will bring 
all sorts of people into our neighborhood. This is a very family 
oriented neighborhood, we don't want a dispensary.  
Electronic Signature 
Agreement 
I agree. 
Electronic Signature
Cassie moore  
 
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Rachel Applegate (PND)
Sent:
Monday, June 8, 2026 7:19 AM
To:
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
Subject:
FW: Opposition to Case # Z260015 – Trulieve Dispensary – Request for Denial
 
 
From: katlyn hudgins 
 
Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2026 7:00 AM 
To: PND PZAppeal 
; District4 
; District 3 
 
Subject: Opposition to Case # Z260015 – Trulieve Dispensary – Request for Denial 
 
To whom it may concern, I have been a resident near 115th Avenue and Happy Valley Road for over five years and am a homeowner in Crossriver. I am writing you to strongly oppose the proposed Trulieve dispensary (Case #Z260015). Residents and 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender 
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages from new senders. 
Always validate the sender first.  
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBanner End 
To whom it may concern,  
 
I have been a resident near 115th Avenue and Happy Valley Road for over five years and am a 
homeowner in Crossriver. I am writing you to strongly oppose the proposed Trulieve dispensary (Case 
#Z260015). Residents and families living in this area are requesting you deny the application.  
 
This location for a new dispensary will negatively impact public safety, worsen already congested traffic 
at that intersection, and is simply out of character for our family centered communities. There are many 
influenceable children and teens in this area who need a safe and clean area to live. Adding the 
dispensary would increase their risk of drug usage.  
Some reasons why it should be denied:  
 
-Public Safety and Crime Concerns 
While some broader studies on legalization show mixed or neutral aggregate effects, neighborhood-level 
research reveals significant localized risks. A University of Colorado Denver study of Denver 
neighborhoods found that areas with one or more medical or recreational dispensaries experienced 
crime rate increases ranging from 26% to 1,452% higher than neighborhoods without them, particularly 
in robbery and aggravated assault.  Dispensaries often handle large amounts of cash and high-value 
products, making them targets and drawing related criminal activity into surrounding areas. Similar 
patterns of increased disorder and property crime have been observed in other jurisdictions with high 
dispensary density. 
In Arizona, the proliferation of dispensaries has coincided with ongoing challenges in managing 
associated crime, including robberies and burglaries at cannabis businesses. Adding another dispensary 
in the Happy Valley/Mesquite area would exacerbate these pressures on local law enforcement and 
heighten risks for families and residents in this growing suburban community. 
Traffic Safety and Impaired Driving 
Marijuana impairment impairs reaction time, judgment, coordination, and distance perception—effects

2
that compound dangerously on Arizona roads. Arizona leaders have highlighted sharp rises in cannabis-
impaired driving: DUI arrests for impaired driving increased from approximately 5,200 in 2023 to 8,100 in 
2025, while marijuana-related accidents rose from 254 in 2020 to 421 in 2024.  Broader data shows 
serious marijuana-related traffic accidents requiring emergency treatment surged dramatically post-
legalization in multiple states.  
-The proposed site near residential zones and major roadways in the Happy Valley area would increase 
traffic volume from customers, delivery services, and operations, amplifying risks of impaired driving 
incidents in a region already contending with growth-related congestion. This is particularly concerning 
for families, schools, and vulnerable road users. 
Additional Community Impacts 
-Odor, Nuisance, and Property Values: Dispensaries frequently generate persistent cannabis odors, 
leading to complaints and mitigation requirements (as seen with Trulieve facilities elsewhere). This 
would degrade livability in nearby homes. 
-Youth Access and Social Costs: Greater proximity increases normalization and potential diversion risks 
for minors in a family-oriented district. 
-Over-Saturation: Maricopa County already has numerous dispensaries; additional ones in suburban 
pockets strain resources without clear community benefit. 
-Trulieve, as applicant, has faced various operational and compliance issues in Arizona and other states 
(including product labeling concerns and facility odor complaints), further underscoring the need for 
caution.  
 
I urge the Commission and Board to prioritize resident safety, deny this application, and place any 
related item on the regular agenda if objections are filed. We residents living near the proposed site 
strongly oppose its location.  
Thank you for considering our community’s safety and quality of life. I am available for any questions. 
 
Sincerely, 
Katlyn Hudgins  
Crossriver homeowner  
6239103062

1
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
From:
Rachel Applegate (PND)
Sent:
Monday, June 8, 2026 7:20 AM
To:
Nicholas Schlimm (PND)
Subject:
FW: Online Form Submittal: Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission 
Recommendation
 
 
From: 
 
Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2026 1:47 PM 
To: PND PZAppeal 
 
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation 
 
Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation Objection Form If the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval of a particular case it will be placed on a consent agenda for the Board of Supervisors hearing. How ever, if 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart 
This Message Is From an External Sender 
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBanner End 
Objection of Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
Objection Form  
If the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends approval of a particular case it 
will be placed on a consent agenda for the Board of Supervisors hearing. However, 
if this objection form is received within 15 calendar days following Commission 
hearing, then the agenda item will be placed on the regular agenda for the Board of 
Supervisors hearing. 
Name
Jason Davis 
Email Address
Address
24884 N 114th Ave 
City
Sun city 
State
AZ 
Zip Code
85373 
Phone Number
6236938661 
Fax Number
Field not completed. 
Case Number / Project 
Name 
z260015

2
Planning & Zoning 
Commission Hearing 
Date 
June 11th, 2026 
Reason for the 
Objection of the Subject 
Case 
* A marijuana dispensary at this location would increase traffic 
volume, creating more congestion and disrupting the normal 
flow on an already busy road not designed for additional 
commercial use. The intersection of Happy Valley and 115th is 
already under developed for the traffic volume and the bridge 
directly adjacent to the property is already undersized for the 
much needed expansion of 115th ave to 4 lanes instead of 2 
one way lanes. This intersection has one of the highest 
accident frequencies compared to the surrounding areas due to 
traffic flow volumes and underdeveloped roads leading to the 
intersection this property would be adjacent to. 
* The proximity of a dispensary may negatively impact 
surrounding property values, as some buyers may be deterred 
by its location and future planned new home developments 
planned directly across the street. 
* Being next to a dispensary could make the nearby homes 
less desirable, particularly for families seeking a traditional 
residential environment. 
* This type of business does not align with the family-oriented 
character of the neighborhood, which is primarily composed of 
homes and spaces intended for quiet residential living. 
* The presence of a dispensary may alter the overall 
atmosphere of the neighborhood in a way that is inconsistent 
with community expectations and long-term residential stability.
Electronic Signature 
Agreement 
I agree. 
Electronic Signature
Jason Davis 
 
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.