PROHIBITION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION, HARASSMENT, AND RETALIATION (HR2406) 11-18-2020.PDF

Maricopa County — Formal (2020-11-18)

View PDF Item 43 Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 14200 characters
MARICOPA COUNTY INTERNAL POLICY 
 
 
 
Policy Title: 
PROHIBITION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION, 
HARASSMENT, AND RETALIATION 
Policy Number: 
HR2406 
Current Adoption 
Date: 
11-18-2020 
Current 
Implementation Date: 
11-18-2020 
Approved by: 
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 
Board Agenda 
Number: 
C-31-15-037-6-02 
Original Adoption 
Date: 
07-1998 
 
I. 
PURPOSE 
Maricopa County is an equal opportunity employer. The purpose of this Policy is to outline Maricopa County’s 
prohibition against Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation and to outline a complaint and investigation 
procedure for employees who believe they have witnessed or been subjected to Harassment, Discrimination, 
or Retaliation. Maricopa County also seeks to address unprofessional and discourteous conduct, which, if 
allowed to continue, could potentially rise to the level of, or lead to, a violation of law or this Policy. 
II. AUTHORITY 
This Policy is authorized by the Board of Supervisors pursuant to A.R.S. § 11-251. 
III. APPLICATION 
This Policy applies to all employees and volunteers of Maricopa County appointed departments as well as 
the Flood Control District of Maricopa County and the Maricopa County Library District (Special Districts). 
The Board of Supervisors is authorized to jointly adopt policies applying to the Special Districts under the 
Intergovernmental Agreement, C-06-18-393-6-00, approved on April 11, 2018. 
This Policy also applies to employees of County elected offices unless the elected official has implemented 
a similar policy specific to his or her office. 
IV. DEFINITIONS 
A. Appointing Authority: An elected official, the single administrative, or executive head of a 
Department/Special District, or the designated representative authorized to act in this capacity. 
B. Department Human Resources: The employee’s assigned internal human resources office. If there is 
no departmental human resources office, then it refers to the department’s assigned HR Liaison. 
C. Discrimination: Different treatment in the terms, conditions, and privileges of employment because of 
an individual’s Protected Characteristic. 
D. Employee Relations: The Employee Relations division of the County Human Resources Department. 
E. Harassment: Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors and other conduct of a sexual 
nature, or treatment of an individual based on a Protected Characteristic that is not welcome, is 
offensive, interferes with work effectiveness, or that creates an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work 
environment. Not all conduct that is unpleasant or upsetting constitutes harassment. 
F. Protected Activity: Employees’ good faith expressed opposition to an employer’s practice that they 
have a reasonable belief to be Discrimination (e.g., complaining of alleged Discrimination or Harassment 
against oneself or another, filing a charge of Discrimination, or exercising legal rights such as requesting

Policy Title: 
PROHIBITION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION, 
HARASSMENT, AND RETALIATION 
Policy Number: 
HR2406 
Current Adoption 
Date: 
11-18-2020 
 
Page 2 of 5 
a reasonable accommodation based on religion or disability, requesting leave under the Family and 
Medical Leave Act, or filing a workers’ compensation claim). 
G. Protected Characteristic: All characteristics covered by applicable federal or state laws including, but 
not limited to, race, gender, religion, color, national origin, age, disability, sexual orientation, gender 
identity, including transgender status, pregnancy, veteran status, and genetic information. 
H. Retaliation: Adverse treatment or action because the employee engaged in a Protected Activity. 
V. POLICY 
A. Maricopa County provides equal employment opportunities to all employees and applicants for 
employment regardless of any Protected Characteristic or Protected Activity, and strictly prohibits 
Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation, or any conduct that could rise to the level of Discrimination, 
Harassment or Retaliation. This Policy applies to all terms and conditions of employment, including 
recruiting, hiring, placement, promotion, performance management, discipline, termination, reductions 
in force, furloughs, transfers, leaves of absence, compensation, benefits, and training 
B. Each employee, supervisor, manager, and Appointing Authority is responsible for actively promoting the 
establishment and maintenance of a professional workplace, free from Discrimination, Harassment, and 
Retaliation. Retaliation of any kind, including toward any complainant, witness, or other employee, 
applicant, or other individual complying with this Policy or involved in an investigation undertaken pursuant 
to this Policy, is strictly prohibited. 
C. Supervisors and managers shall ensure that all employees are aware of this Policy and the consequences 
of violating it. Failure by a supervisor or manager to immediately report observed or known Discrimination, 
Harassment, or Retaliation is grounds for disciplinary action, up to and including termination. 
D. Determining whether specific conduct constitutes a violation of this Policy depends upon the facts and the 
context in which the conduct occurs as well as the severity or frequency of the conduct. Certain behaviors 
that do not fit the definition of Discrimination, Harassment, or Retaliation under this Policy may be 
nonetheless unprofessional and inappropriate in the workplace and may be prohibited by other County or 
departmental policies that govern professionalism in the workplace. Complaints not based on a Protected 
Characteristic should be handled through HR2405 Employee Workplace Concerns. 
E. The following are examples of conduct that could rise to the level of, or lead to Discrimination or 
Harassment: 
1. Making employment decisions such as hiring, promoting, disciplining, or terminating based on an 
individual’s Protected Characteristic. 
2. Offensive or derogatory comments directed toward a person on account of a Protected 
Characteristic. 
3. Physical conduct such as deliberately impeding or blocking the movement of another, violating an 
individual's "personal space”, or unwelcome touching, patting, pinching, or brushing parts of the body. 
4. Visual (nonverbal) or graphic harassment such as derogatory or suggestive photographs, calendars, 
graffiti, posters, cartoons, drawings, sexually suggestive objects, obscene gestures, or leering, or 
drawing attention to suggestive or pornographic materials. 
5. Jokes or comments based on a Protected Characteristic, including jokes about: 
• 
Race or national origin 
• 
Gender, sexual orientation, or gender identity

Policy Title: 
PROHIBITION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION, 
HARASSMENT, AND RETALIATION 
Policy Number: 
HR2406 
Current Adoption 
Date: 
11-18-2020 
 
Page 3 of 5 
• 
Age (40 or older) 
• 
Religion or religious practices or wardrobe 
• 
An individual’s body, including jokes about a woman’s body during pregnancy 
• 
An individual with a disability 
• 
Jokes of a sexual nature 
6. Using stereotypes or assumptions about people based on Protected Characteristics. 
7. Using technology such as Facebook, Twitter, texting, email, voicemail, and instant message to 
generate, send or display material that is considered obscene, profane, intimidating, threatening, 
defamatory, or which identifies or refers to a Protected Characteristic in derogatory or stereotypical 
terms. This includes material that is intended only as a joke or for amusement purposes. 
F. Immediate and appropriate corrective action must be taken when it has been determined that violations of 
this Policy have occurred. Depending upon the severity and pervasiveness of the behavior, the Appointing 
Authority will determine the appropriate level of discipline. Unprofessional and discourteous behavior that 
does not rise to the level of unlawful Discrimination, Harassment, or Retaliation may still result in discipline, 
up to and including termination. 
VI. COMPLAINT AND INVESTIGATION PROCEDURES 
An employee is not required to directly confront the individual believed to be engaging in discriminatory, 
harassing, or retaliatory behavior. However, employees may certainly choose to advise the person exhibiting 
the unwanted behavior that the behavior is inappropriate, unprofessional, or making them uncomfortable, and 
that they wish the behavior to stop. 
Employees who feel they have been subjected to Discrimination, Harassment, or Retaliation, or who have 
witnessed what they believe to be Discrimination, Harassment, or Retaliation toward another, should promptly 
take the following action(s): 
A. COMPLAINT PROCEDURE 
1. Written Complaints: Employees are encouraged, but not required, to formalize their complaints in 
writing using the Discrimination/Harassment/Retaliation Complaint Form so that an investigation can 
begin promptly. Employees should also provide any supporting information whenever possible (e.g., 
e-mails, pictures, voicemail messages). The form should be submitted to one of the following: the 
Appointing Authority, the County’s Human Resources Director, Employee Relations, Department 
Human Resources, or any combination of these individuals and entities. 
2. Verbal Complaints: If an employee’s complaint is made orally to one of the designated individuals or 
entities listed above, or to an immediate supervisor or manager, the person receiving the complaint 
should immediately document the allegations. The Discrimination/Harassment /Retaliation Complaint 
Form can be used to make a record of the employee’s allegations. It is recommended, but not 
necessary, that the employee making the complaint be asked to review and sign the form upon its 
completion to confirm the accuracy of the information. 
NOTE: Even if individuals complaining about alleged Discrimination, Harassment, or Retaliation state 
that they “just want some advice” or “don’t want any action taken,” those receiving the complaint should 
advise them that they are obligated to record the information and inform the necessary individuals 
(e.g., the Appointing Authority and Employee Relations) so that appropriate action can be taken.

Policy Title: 
PROHIBITION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION, 
HARASSMENT, AND RETALIATION 
Policy Number: 
HR2406 
Current Adoption 
Date: 
11-18-2020 
 
Page 4 of 5 
3. Supervisors and managers must ensure that their workplace is free of Discrimination, Harassment, 
and Retaliation. They must take each complaint seriously and immediately report any observed or 
learned violations of this Policy to the Appointing Authority, the County’s Human Resources Director, 
Employee Relations, or Department Human Resources. Copies of any complaint forms and 
supporting information must be provided to Employee Relations. Failure to follow this Policy may lead 
to discipline, up to and including termination. 
B. INVESTIGATION PROCEDURE 
1. Upon receipt of a complaint, a prompt and thorough investigation to the extent appropriate will be 
conducted. Depending on the nature of the complaint, the investigation may be conducted by 
Employee Relations, designated individuals within the department of the complainant, or through a 
joint effort between the complainant’s department and Employee Relations. Every effort will be made 
to address the complaint at the lowest possible level depending upon the nature of the complaint. 
2. Employees who have filed a complaint should not be relocated, reassigned, or transferred under any 
circumstances, even if the complainant requests the transfer, without first consulting Employee 
Relations or legal counsel. In some cases, the Appointing Authority may choose to temporarily transfer 
or remove an employee who is alleged to have engaged in discriminatory, harassing, or retaliatory 
behavior from the workplace during the period of time necessary to complete the investigation. 
3. Every employee has an obligation to provide information or other assistance that may be needed in 
order to ensure that a prompt, complete, and fair investigation is conducted. Failure of an employee 
to cooperate in an investigation may lead to discipline, up to and including termination. After the 
investigation, a verbal or written report will be provided by the investigator(s) to the appropriate 
Appointing Authority who will decide the appropriate action. The Appointing Authority may consult with 
the investigator(s) and legal counsel prior to finalizing any decision. 
C. CONFIDENTIALITY 
Complaints under this Policy will be handled with confidentiality, to the greatest extent permitted by law. 
While the investigation is underway, a limited number of individuals will be given information regarding the 
complaint which may include the Appointing Authority, the County’s Human Resources Director, Employee 
Relations, Department Human Resources, legal counsel, departmental staff members involved in the 
investigation process, or management involved in any disciplinary decision following the investigation. 
Employees who are interviewed as part of an investigation must keep the discussions confidential while 
the investigation is pending and may be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including termination, 
for revealing information. 
Investigation and disciplinary records will be maintained by the County and may be subject to disclosure 
under applicable Arizona and federal law. 
 
Revision History 
Version 
Revision Date 
Description of Revision 
1 
07-1998 
Initial version 
2 
01-2002 
Removed language regarding disciplinary action for complaints made in good faith. 
3 
05-20-2015 
Update definitions and language consistent with Merit System Resolution update and laws. 
(C-31-15-037-6-00) 
4 
08-21-2019 
Updated format consistent with policy format and removed reference to a policy that no

Policy Title: 
PROHIBITION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION, 
HARASSMENT, AND RETALIATION 
Policy Number: 
HR2406 
Current Adoption 
Date: 
11-18-2020 
 
Page 5 of 5 
longer exists. (C-31-15-037-6-01) 
5 
11-18-2020 
Added “gender identity, including transgender status” to Protected Characteristic consistent 
with the US Supreme Court’s ruling on June 15, 2020. (C-31-15-037-6-02)