CPA2019013 Z2019112 BOS REPORT.PDF

Maricopa County — Formal (2020-09-16)

View PDF Item 5 Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 73976 characters
September 2, 2020 
CPA2019013 & Z2019112 
Page 1 of 4 
Report to the Board of Supervisors 
Prepared by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department 
 
 
 
Board Hearing Date: 
September 2, 2020 
 
Case #s/Title:  
1. CPA2019013 – Rose Estates 
 
2.  Z2019112 – Rose Estates  
 
Supervisor District: 
4 
 
Applicant/Owner:  
Jordan Rose, Rose Law Group, PC 
 
Requests: 
1. CPA2019013 - Comprehensive Plan Amendment of the White 
Tanks/Grand Ave. Area Plan land use designations of Mixed-
Use Employment, Open Space, and Small Lot Residential (2-5 
du/ac) to Small Lot Residential (2-5 du/ac) and Open Space; 
and  
 
 
2.  Z2019112 - Zone Change from Rural-43 to R1-6 RUPD 
 
Site Location: 
Northeast corner of the intersection of 115th Ave. (Alignment) 
and Williams Dr. (Alignment) in the Peoria area 
 
Site Size: 
Approx. 163 acres 
 
County Island Status: 
Yes (City of Peoria)  
Additional 
Comments: 
The proposal is to accommodate a future residential 
subdivision envisioned to contain 440 single-family residences 
and a mix of active/passive open spaces. There are no 
outstanding concerns from reviewing agencies. There is no 
known opposition. The City of Peoria was informed about the 
proposal and of the date of this report have not received any 
comments concerning this request.    
 
 
Prior to the 8/6/20 Planning and Zoning Commission the 
language of condition ‘c.2’ was changed due to a concern 
by the applicant that a MCDOT Traffic Impact Plan (TIP) that 
includes the extension of Williams Drive across the Agua Fria 
River to Deer Valley Road would have to be completed prior 
to the platting process.  Originally, Stipulation ‘c.2’ read as 
follows:  
 
 
 
Any approval and progression in the entitlement process is 
contingent on the completion of MCDOT TIP TT0248 which 
includes extension of Williams Drive across the Agua Fria River

September 2, 2020 
CPA2019013 & Z2019112 
Page 2 of 4 
to Deer Valley Road which is intended to provide access to 
the site. 
 
 
The Commission modified condition ‘c.2’ of Z2019112 is as 
follows: 
 
 
Any approval and progression in the entitlement process is 
contingent on the completion progression of MCDOT TIP 
TT0248 which includes extension of Williams Drive across the 
Agua Fria River to Deer Valley Road which is intended to 
provide access to the site. 
 
Commission  
 
Recommendations: 
On 8/6/20, the Commission voted 6-0 to recommend 
approval of CPA2019013 subject to conditions ‘a’ –‘d’:  
 
a. 
Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the CPA Land 
Use Exhibit, entitled “Rose Estates”, consisting of one (1) full sized sheet, dated June 
2020, and stamped date received on June 10, 2020, except as modified by the 
following conditions. 
 
b. 
Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the CPA 
Narrative Report, entitled “Rose Estates”, consisting of 11 pages, dated June 2020, 
and stamp date received on June 10, 2020, except as modified by the following 
conditions. 
 
c. 
The total number of residential dwelling units on the site shall not exceed 440.  
 
d. 
The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the 
applicant, with the consent of the landowner.  The granting of this approval allows 
the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the uses existing on the 
date of application, subject to conditions.  In the event of the failure to comply 
with any condition, the property shall revert to the land use designation that 
existed on the date of application.  It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that 
either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not 
reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or 
possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the 
property from the value it held on the date of application due to such change of 
the land use.  The land use enhances the value of the property above its value as 
of the date the land use change is granted and reverting to the prior land use 
designation results in the same value of the property as if the land use change had 
never been granted. 
 
On 1/30/20, the Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of Z2019112 subject to 
conditions ‘a’ – ‘j’ with modification to condition ‘c.2’:  
 
a. 
Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Zoning 
Exhibit, entitled “Rose Estates”, consisting of one (1) full size sheet, dated June 2020, 
and stamp date received on June 10, 2020, except as modified by the following 
conditions.

September 2, 2020 
CPA2019013 & Z2019112 
Page 3 of 4 
b. 
Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Zone 
Change Narrative Report, entitled “Rose Estates”, consisting of 10 pages, dated 
June 2020, and stamp date received on June 10, 2020, except as modified by the 
following conditions. 
 
c. 
The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply:  
 
1. 
Without the submittal of a precise plan of development, no development 
approval is inferred by this review, including, but not limited to number of 
proposed building lots, drainage design, access, roadway widths and 
roadway alignments. These items will be addressed as development plans 
progress and are submitted to the County for further review and/or 
entitlement. 
 
2. 
Any approval and progression in the entitlement process is contingent on 
the progression of MCDOT TIP TT0248 which includes extension of Williams 
Drive across the Agua Fria River to Deer Valley Road which is intended to 
provide access to the site. 
 
3. 
A Traffic Impact Study must be submitted as part of the Preliminary Plat 
application. 
 
4. 
Any new development on the subject premises must provide for at least 
two (2) paved accesses from the site to an improved public roadway. 
 
5. 
Encroachment into FEMA Zone AE and FW floodplains/floodways is 
extremely 
restrictive. 
The 
applicant 
must 
address 
development 
requirements (e.g.  CLOMR/LOMR) required to develop the site in the 
manner proposed as plans progress and are submitted to the County for 
further review and/or entitlement. 
 
6. 
The applicant must address how public improvements, residences and 
other improvements necessary for development of the site (e.g.  retention 
basins) will be protected from scour along the Agua Fria River (33,000 CFS) 
as development plans progress and are submitted to the County for further 
review and/or entitlement. A significant portion of the site outside of the 
regulatory floodplains is contained within a mapped lateral migration 
erosion zone. 
 
7. 
Engineering review of re-zone cases are conceptual in nature. All 
development and engineering design shall be in conformance with 
Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies 
and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT 
Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and 
best practices at the time of application for construction. 
 
d. 
The following R1-6 RUPD standards shall apply: 
 
1. 
Minimum Front Setback of 10 feet 
2. 
Minimum Rear Setback of 15 feet 
3. 
Minimum Lot Area of 5,175 square feet

September 2, 2020 
CPA2019013 & Z2019112 
Page 4 of 4 
4. 
Minimum Lot Width of 45 feet 
5. 
Maximum Lot Coverage of 55% 
 
e. 
Prior to the approval of any Final Plat, the developer shall obtain a Certificate of 
100-Year Assured Water Supply from the Arizona Department of Water Resources.  
 
f. 
Prior to the approval of any Final Plat, the developer shall abandon all Patent 
Easements on the site.   
 
g. 
All outdoor lighting shall conform to Section 1112 of the Maricopa County Zoning 
Ordinance.  
 
h. 
The property owner(s) and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if 
the County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with 
conditions.  
 
i. 
Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for 
initiating a revocation of this Zone Change as set forth in the Maricopa County 
Zoning Ordinance.  
 
j. 
The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the 
applicant, with the consent of the landowner.  The granting if this approval allows 
the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on 
the date of application, subject to conditions.  In the event of the failure to comply 
with any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date 
of application.  It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due 
to the failure to comply with any conditions. Does not reduce any rights that 
existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and 
that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held 
on the date of application due to such revocation of the Zone Change.  The Zone 
Change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the 
Zone Change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value 
of the property as if the Zone Change never been granted. 
 
Presented by: 
 
Martin Martell, Planner 
Reviewed by: 
 
Darren Gerard, AICP, Planning Manager   
 
Attachments: 
 
8/6/20 P&Z Packet (38 pages)  
 
 
P&Z Handout Memo (1 page)  
 
 
CPA Resolution (2 pages)  
 
 
  
 
 
Note: 
8/6/20 Draft P&Z Minutes are not available as of the writing of this report, but can be 
provided upon request later when available.

CPA2019013 & Z2019112 
Page 1 of 10 
 Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission 
Prepared by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department 
 
 
 
Case: 
CPA2019013 & Z2019112 – Rose Estates  
 
 
 
 
Hearing Date: 
August 6, 2020  
 
Supervisor District: 
4 
 
 
  
 
Applicant: 
Jordan Rose, Rose Law Group, PC 
 
Owner: 
Larry & Patricia Rose 
 
Requests: 
1) Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) to change the White 
Tanks/Grand Ave. Area Plan land use designation from Mixed-Use 
Employment, Open Space, and Small Lot Residential (2-5 du/ac) to 
Small Lot Residential (2-5 du/ac) and Open Space; and  
 
2) Zone change from Rural-43 to R1-6 RUPD  
 
  
 
Site Location: 
Northeast corner of the intersection of 115th Ave. (alignment) and 
Williams Dr. (alignment) in the Peoria area.   
 
  
Site Size: 
163 acres  
 
Density: 
2.7 du/ac 
 
County Island:  
Yes (City of Peoria)  
 
 
County Plan: 
White Tanks/Grand Ave. Area Plan – Mixed-Use Employment, Open 
Space, and Small Lot Residential (2-5 du/ac) 
 
Municipal Plan: 
City of Peoria – Medium Density Residential (5-8 du/ac)  
 
and Park/Open Space 
 
Municipal Comments: 
None received to date  
 
Support/Opposition: 
None known 
 
Recommendations: 
1) Approve with conditions  
 
2) Approve with conditions

CPA2019013 & Z2019112 
Page 2 of 10 
Project Summary: 
 
1. 
The applicant is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) for an 
approximately 163 acre site generally located at the northeast corner of the alignments 
of 115th Ave. and Williams Dr. in the Peoria area.  Currently, the White Tanks/ Grand Ave. 
Area Plan designates the site with 12 acres of Mixed-Use Employment, 95 acres of Open 
Space, and 56 acres of Small Lot Residential (2-5 du.ac).  The applicant’s request is to 
amend the plan’s land-use designations by having the majority of the site as Small Lot 
Residential (2-5 du.ac) and keep a portion of the site’s existing Open Space designation 
intact.  The areas that will remain with a designation of Open Space are areas adjacent 
to and part of the Agua Fria River.  This amendment will transform the existing abandoned 
ranch and sand/gravel quarries of the site into a residential neighborhood that is 
compatible with the adjacent residential land uses of the area.    
 
2. 
In addition to the CPA proposal, the applicant is requesting a zone change with overlay 
from the current Rural-43 to R1-6 RUPD (Residential Unit Plan of Development).  This is 
being requested in order to develop a 163 gross acre single-family residential community 
with ample open space and a comparable density found in the adjacent residential 
subdivisions to the west of the site. The proposed community is envisioned to contain 440 
residential lots with a mix of passive/active open space.  This development will highlight 
the site’s proximity to the Agua Fria River by placing circulation routes and home sites 
that will follow the natural, western terrace of the river. One impetus for this request is the 
planned extension of Deer Valley Rd. planned to bridge over the river from the existing 
Deer Valley Rd. southeast of the site connecting to Williams Dr. to the west of the site.  This 
new street extension will cross the southern boundary of the site and create the primary 
access to the new community.  The neighborhood is envisioned to offer a combination 
of various sized lots that will stay within the proposed RUPD development standards.   
 
3. 
The site had been ranched with livestock grazing for the past 90 years.  In 2001, the north 
portion of the ranch was leased to Vulcan Materials for a sand and gravel operation.  
Presently, seven of the parcels of the site have a mining exemption for the extraction of 
sand and gravel that is used in the manufacturing of concrete (LU20010064).  Although, 
the mining exemption is still active, physical mining operations have not been active for 
the last eight years and the mining exemption will be relinquished once this CPA with 
zone change is approved.  Since the development of the areas mining operations, areas 
to the east and west have developed as single-family residential neighborhoods. 
Moreover, with the development of the Loop 303 Freeway to the northwest of the site 
and the imminent expansion of Deer Valley Rd. has demonstrated that the site is ready 
for a residential community. However, site development will require: restoration of land 
that has been used for mining; the abandonment of existing Patent Easements that 
crisscross the site; channelization of an existing wash; and construction of engineered 
defenses along the west banks of the Agua Fria River.   
 
4. 
The applicant is requesting an RUPD zoning overlay to allow for smaller lot sizes, narrower 
lot widths, reduced front and rear yard setbacks, and greater lot coverages than what is 
found in the R1-6 zoning district (see table on next page).

CPA2019013 & Z2019112 
Page 3 of 10 
Regulation  
Base Zoning District 
Regulations (R1-6) 
Proposed Zoning District  
Regulations (R1-6 RUPD) 
Maximum Structure Height 
                 30’  
                   30’  
Minimum Front Yard  
                 20’ 
                   10’ 
Minimum Side Yard  
                  5’  
                    5’ 
Minimum Street Side Yard 
                 10’ 
                   10’ 
Minimum Rear Yard  
                 25’ 
                   15’ 
Minimum Lot Width  
                 60’  
                   45’  
Maximum Lot Size  
             6,000 SF  
                 5,175’ 
Maximum Lot Coverage  
                 50% 
                   55% 
Minimum Lot Area per 
Dwelling Unit  
             6,000 SF  
                6,000 SF 
Average Lot Area per 
Dwelling Unit 
              6,000 SF 
               15,590 SF 
Parking  
        2 spaces per  
        dwelling unit  
         2 spaces per  
         dwelling unit  
 
 
2020 Aerial Photo

CPA2019013 & Z2019112 
Page 4 of 10 
                               White Tanks/Grand Ave. Land Use Exhibit 
 
                                        
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                       Zoning Map

CPA2019013 & Z2019112 
Page 5 of 10 
 
 
 
 
                      CPA Exhibit 
 
 
 
 
 
                 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                 Zoning Exhibit

CPA2019013 & Z2019112 
Page 6 of 10 
Existing On-Site and Adjacent Zoning / Land Use: 
 
5. 
On-site: 
 
Rural-43 / Inactive Mining & Inactive Ranching 
North: 
Rural-43 / Inactive Mining  
South: 
Rural-43/ Natural Desert 
East: 
Rural-43/ Agua Fria River 
West: 
Rural-43 / Natural Desert 
 
 
Utilities and Services: 
 
6. 
Water: 
 
EPCOR 
Wastewater: 
EPCOR 
School District: 
Peoria Unified School District 
Fire: 
Arizona Fire & Medical Authority  
Police:  
MCSO 
 
Right-of-Way: 
 
7. 
Primary access to the future subdivision will be from a future E/W connection between 
Williams Dr. to the west and Deer Valley Rd. to the southeast with a new bridge across 
the Agua Fria River.  The proposed right-of-way for the Deer Valley Rd. extension would 
be 65 feet from either side of the street’s centerline for a total of 130 feet of right-of-way. 
Secondary access to the site will be from either a future Pinnacle Peak Rd. extension from 
the west or a future 115th Ave. extension from the north.  Within the site, there is a 
proposed collector street which will have half width right-of-way of 30 feet for a total of 
60 feet.  This new collector roadway will link the future Deer Valley Rd. to the future 
Pinnacle Peak Rd. or 115th Ave. expansions with access to all of the internal local streets 
within the site.  The proposed local streets will be public and offer rights-of-way of 25 feet 
from either side of the roadway’s centerline for a total of 50 feet of right-of-way.  Within 
the rights-of-ways of the proposed internal streets of the site, there is a plan to add five 
foot wide sidewalks on either side of travel lanes.     
 
8. 
The following table includes existing and proposed half-width right-of-way and the future 
classification based upon the Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) 
Major Streets and Routes Plan.   
 
Street Name 
Half-width  
Existing R/W 
Half-width 
Proposed R/W 
Future Classification 
Deer Valley Rd. 
       65’ 
        65’ 
        Principal Arterial 
115th Ave.   
       40’ 
        40’ 
        Major Collector 
Pinnacle Peak Rd. 
       40’ 
        30’ 
        Major Collector 
 
Adopted Plans: 
 
9. 
White Tanks/Grand Ave. Area Plan (adopted December 6, 2000): The site has three 
different land-use designations.  The majority of the site is classified as Open Space. This 
category denotes areas best suited for open space or recreational uses, where any 
residential use is permitted to be one dwelling unit per acre.  The second largest portion 
of the site is designated as Small Lot Residential (2-5 du/ac).  This category identifies areas 
where increased residential density is appropriate and urban services are readily

CPA2019013 & Z2019112 
Page 7 of 10 
available.  The smallest portion, located in the northwest of the site, is in the Mixed-Use 
Employment land use category, which are in locations identified as major planning areas, 
with an emphasis on cohesive and compressive planned environments.  Generally uses 
permitted in this designation includes offices, light industrial, business/research parks, 
schools, and major medical facilities.   
 
10. 
City of Peoria General Plan 2010: The Peoria General Plan designates the majority of the 
site as Medium Density Residential with a residential density of five to eight dwelling units 
per acre with a target density of six dwelling units per acre.  This designation denotes 
areas intended to fulfill the need for small lot or attached single-family or multi-family 
residences which are compatible with abutting single-family residential districts. 
Moreover, this category supports a suburban lifestyle and provides an appropriate 
transition between less intense residential areas, more urban neighborhoods and non-
residential uses.  The rest of the site is designated as Park/Open Space in the Peoria 
General Plan. This category accommodates the full range of public, private, and semi-
private passive or active recreational opportunities.  
 
Public Participation Summary: 
 
11. 
The applicant has completed the requirement for notification to all of the property 
owners within 300 feet of the subject site and interested parties. Furthermore, the 
applicant has met the site posting requirements.  As of the writing of this report there have 
been no comments or concerns.     
 
Outstanding Concerns from Reviewing Agencies: 
 
12. 
Reviewing agencies have no outstanding comments or concerns.  The City of Peoria was 
also notified about this CPA and zone change request but had not commented as of the 
date of writing this report. 
 
Staff Analysis: 
 
13. 
Staff supports the proposed amendment to the White Tanks/Grand Ave. Area Plan.   The 
removal of 12 acres of Mixed-Use Employment land-designation would have a minimal 
impact on a land-use designation that is over one square mile in size.  Moreover, the 12 
acres of Mixed-Use Employment that is currently on the site is far from any existing arterial 
roadways, where mixed-use employment land-uses would be successful.  The proposed 
expansion of the site’s existing Small Lot Residential (2-5 du/ac) land-use category into 
areas currently designated as Open Space would impact sections of open space, but 
the plan to encourage open space, retention areas, and recreational uses along the 
west bank of the river which would mitigate any impact on the areas presently 
designated as Open Space.  It will be the responsibility of a future developer to address 
areas of FEMA Zone AE and Floodway on the site to ensure there will minimal impact to 
the natural flows of both the Agua Fria River and washes found on the site. The proposed 
density of 2.7 du/ac is far less than the City of Peoria’s General Plan designation for the 
majority of the site as medium density (5-8 du/ac). However, the this lower density is 
appropriate for this site due to the close proximity to the Agua Fria River to allow for more 
open space with recreational uses.

CPA2019013 & Z2019112 
Page 8 of 10 
14. 
Staff supports the proposed rezone from Rural-43 to R1-6 RUPD.   R1-6 RUPD is compatible 
with the existing subdivisions to the west and east.  The location of the site will allow easy 
access to the Loop 303 Freeway and is a few miles from several shopping centers.  
According to the applicant, the RUPD overlay will allow flexibility in creating a community 
that would closely match today’s suburban homebuyer’s preferences with generous 
open space and amenities.   
 
Recommendations (two Motions - CPA2019013 & Z2019112): 
 
15. 
For the reasons outlined in this report, staff recommends the Commission motion for 
Approval of CPA2019013, subject to conditions ‘a’ –‘d’: 
 
a. 
Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the CPA Land 
Use Exhibit, entitled “Rose Estates”, consisting of one (1) full sized sheet, dated June 
2020, and stamped date received on June 10, 2020, except as modified by the 
following conditions. 
 
b. 
Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the CPA 
Narrative Report, entitled “Rose Estates”, consisting of 11 pages, dated June 2020, 
and stamp date received on June 10, 2020, except as modified by the following 
conditions. 
 
c. 
The total number of residential dwelling units on the site shall not exceed 440.  
 
d. 
The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the 
applicant, with the consent of the landowner.  The granting of this approval allows 
the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the uses existing on the 
date of application, subject to conditions.  In the event of the failure to comply 
with any condition, the property shall revert to the land use designation that 
existed on the date of application.  It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that 
either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not 
reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or 
possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the 
property from the value it held on the date of application due to such change of 
the land use.  The land use enhances the value of the property above its value as 
of the date the land use change is granted and reverting to the prior land use 
designation results in the same value of the property as if the land use change had 
never been granted. 
 
16. 
For the reasons outlined in this report, staff recommends the Commission motion for 
Approval of Z2019112, subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘j’: 
 
a. 
Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Zoning 
Exhibit, entitled “Rose Estates”, consisting of one (1) full size sheet, dated June 2020, 
and stamp date received on June 10, 2020, except as modified by the following 
conditions.   
 
b. 
Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Zone 
Change Narrative Report, entitled “Rose Estates”, consisting of 10 pages, dated

CPA2019013 & Z2019112 
Page 9 of 10 
June 2020, and stamp date received on June 10, 2020, except as modified by the 
following conditions. 
 
c. 
The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply:  
 
1. 
Without the submittal of a precise plan of development, no development 
approval is inferred by this review, including, but not limited to number of 
proposed building lots, drainage design, access, roadway widths and 
roadway alignments. These items will be addressed as development plans 
progress and are submitted to the County for further review and/or 
entitlement. 
 
2. 
Any approval and progression in the entitlement process is contingent on 
completion of MCDOT TIP TT0248 which includes extension of Williams Drive 
across the Agua Fria River to Deer Valley Road which is intended to provide 
access to the site. 
 
3. 
A Traffic Impact Study must be submitted as part of the Preliminary Plat 
application. 
 
4. 
Any new development on the subject premises must provide for at least 
two (2) paved accesses from the site to an improved public roadway. 
 
5. 
Encroachment into FEMA Zone AE and FW floodplains/floodways is 
extremely 
restrictive. 
The 
applicant 
must 
address 
development 
requirements (e.g.  CLOMR/LOMR) required to develop the site in the 
manner proposed as plans progress and are submitted to the County for 
further review and/or entitlement. 
 
6. 
The applicant must address how public improvements, residences and 
other improvements necessary for development of the site (e.g.  retention 
basins) will be protected from scour along the Agua Fria River (33,000 CFS) 
as development plans progress and are submitted to the County for further 
review and/or entitlement. A significant portion of the site outside of the 
regulatory floodplains is contained within a mapped lateral migration 
erosion zone. 
 
7. 
Engineering review of re-zone cases are conceptual in nature. All 
development and engineering design shall be in conformance with 
Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies 
and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT 
Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and 
best practices at the time of application for construction. 
 
d. 
The following R1-6 RUPD standards shall apply: 
 
1. 
Minimum Front Setback of 10 feet 
2. 
Minimum Rear Setback of 15 feet 
3. 
Minimum Lot Area of 5,175 square feet 
4. 
Minimum Lot Width of 45 feet

CPA2019013 & Z2019112 
Page 10 of 10 
5. 
Maximum Lot Coverage of 55% 
 
e. 
Prior to the approval of any Final Plat, the developer shall obtain a Certificate of 
100-Year Assured Water Supply from the Arizona Department of Water Resources.  
 
f. 
Prior to the approval of any Final Plat, the developer shall abandon all Patent 
Easements on the site.   
 
g. 
All outdoor lighting shall conform to Section 1112 of the Maricopa County Zoning 
Ordinance.  
 
h. 
The property owner(s) and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if 
the County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with 
conditions.  
 
i. 
Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for 
initiating a revocation of this Zone Change as set forth in the Maricopa County 
Zoning Ordinance.  
 
j. 
The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the 
applicant, with the consent of the landowner.  The granting if this approval allows 
the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on 
the date of application, subject to conditions.  In the event of the failure to comply 
with any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date 
of application.  It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due 
to the failure to comply with any conditions. Does not reduce any rights that 
existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and 
that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held 
on the date of application due to such revocation of the Zone Change.  The Zone 
Change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the 
Zone Change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value 
of the property as if the Zone Change never been granted.  
 
 
Presented by: 
Martin Martell, Planner 
Reviewed by: 
Matthew Holm, AICP, Planning Supervisor 
 
Attachments: 
CPA Case Map (1 page) 
 
Zone Change Case Map (1 page) 
 
CPA Land Use Exhibit (reduced 8.5”x11”, 1 page 
 
Zoning Exhibit (reduced 8.5” x 11”), 1 page 
 
CPA Narrative Report (11 pages) 
 
Zone Change Narrative Report (10 pages) 
 
MCESD comments (1 page) 
 
DPR comments (2 pages)

MARICOPA COUNTY
/
Maricopa County Planning & Development - Phoenix, AZ
4
Gross Acres: 71 approx.
 
Generated July 16, 2020 09:50 AM
CPA2019013
Application Name:
Legal Description
Rose Estates
Applicant
Case Address
, TT4N RR1E 07, TT4N RR1E 16
JORDAN ROSE for ROSE LAW GROUP
11410 W CALLE LEJOS 
Applicant Phone/Email
Parcel Primary:
480.291.0743
JROSE@ROSELAWGROUP.COM
SUN CITY  AZ 85373
Map scale 1:12,341
Supervisor District No.
200-11-004B,  201-22-022,  201-22-042+
GENERAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR 11.9 ACRE MIXED USE EMPLOYMENT & 59 ACRE
OPEN SPACE TO 70.9 ACRE SMALL LOT RESIDENTIAL (2-5 DU/AC) TO SMALL LOT RESIDENTIAL (2-5

MARICOPA COUNTY
/
Maricopa County Planning & Development - Phoenix, AZ
4
Gross Acres: 163 approx.
 
Generated July 16, 2020 09:52 AM
Z2019112
Application Name:
Legal Description
Rose Estates
Applicant
Case Address
T04N R01E 018, TT4N RR1E 07, TT4N RR1E 16
JORDAN ROSE for ROSE LAW GROUP
11410 W CALLE LEJOS 
Applicant Phone/Email
Parcel Primary: 200-11-004B
480.291.0743
JROSE@ROSELAWGROUP.COM
SUN CITY  AZ 85373
Map scale 1:12,341
Supervisor District No.
201-22-022,  201-22-042,  201-22-043A+
REZONING OF 162.6 ACRE OF RURAL-43 TO R-1-6 RUPD

CPA2019013
Generally located at 11410
W. Lejos, Sun City, AZ 85373
June, 2020

ROSE ESTATES 
A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY 
REQUEST FOR A 
GENERAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT &  
WHITE TANK/GRAND AVE. AREA PLAN AMENDMENT 
Case # CPA2019013 
October 2019 
Revised February 2020 
Revised June 2020

Rose Estates Comprehensive Plan Amendment | 3 
PROJECT TEAM 
PROPERTY OWNER REPRESENTATIVE 
Rohit K. Tripathi 
4600 E. Washington St. Suite 300 
Phoenix, AZ 85034 
Rohit@Rohittripathi.com 
Jordan Rose  
7144 E. Stetson Dr. Suite 300 
Scottsdale, AZ 85251 
480.505.3936 
Jrose@roselawgroup.com 
Darrell Wilson, Rob Gubser & Zach Hilgart 
2141 E. Highland Ave. Suite 250 
Phoenix, AZ 85016 
602.490.0535 
www.hilgartwilson.com 
Dawn Cartier 
10605 N. Hayden Road, #140 
Scottsdale, AZ 85260 
480.659.4250 
www.civtech.com

Rose Estates Comprehensive Plan Amendment | 4 
I. 
Executive Summary 
A. 
Site History 
Larry Dale Rose Etal (“Owner”) has owned the approximately 162.9-acre subject 
property and the northern adjacent 50 acres for over 90 years.  The subject parcel 
has long standing RU-43 zoning within unincorporated Maricopa County.  In 
2001, the subject area and adjoining acreage to the north obtained a “Mining 
Exemption” (LU20010064) for aggregate mining practice.  Vulcan Materials, a 
construction aggregate mining company, has leased the property for the two past 
decades.  Although the Mining Exemption and lease are still active today, physical 
mining operations have not been active on the site since 2011. 
The extension of the Loop 303 freeway in 2003 brought growth to the area, 
including expansion of the City of Peoria’s jurisdictional boundary and 
development of adjacent County land.  As Deer Valley Road, which is the southern 
boundary of the property, is set to be extended and complete within a short time 
frame, this land is now ready to transition to a type of development more 
compatible the growing surrounding area.  Because of these transportation 
additions, the site has really become a redevelopment and infill project to the larger 
area.  Exhibit A – Vicinity Map shows the subject and surrounding area. 
B. 
Purpose of Request 
The property owner (“Applicant”) is requesting an amendment to the White 
Tank/Grand Avenue Area Plan and related Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map for 
approximately 78.61 acres located approximately 1,618 feet south of the southeast 
corner of 115th Avenue alignment and Hatfield Road (the “Subject Area” or “Site”).  
See Exhibit A, Vicinity Map, attached.   
The land use for the Site is currently designated as 12.1 ac “Mixed Use 
Employment,” 94.79 acres of “Open Space” and 56.1 acres of “Small Lot Residential 
(2-5 du/ac)”.  See Exhibit B – Existing and Proposed Comprehensive Plan Land 
Use Map.  In order to facilitate the planned development, the request is to amend 
all of the existing Mixed Use Employment and a portion of the Open Space to Small 
Lot Residential (totaling 78.61 acres) and combine those areas with the existing 
56.1 acres already designated as Small Lot Residential. This combined area will 
equate to approximately 134.71 acres of Small Lot Residential land use.  
 This amendment will permit the redevelopment of a vacant mining site by offering 
a community with comparable density and product size as found in the general 
vicinity and just to the west of the property.  A supplemental Zoning Amendment 
application (application # Z2019112) for the entire 162.9-acre site is also being 
requested concurrently.  
A General Comprehensive Plan Amendment (“CPA”) is being requested Pursuant 
to Maricopa County’s Comprehensive Plan Appendix D, Category 3 Standard 
Comprehensive Plan Amendment which applies to “… changes of 640 acres or 
less… and are standard amendments…”

Rose Estates Comprehensive Plan Amendment | 5 
The proposed community is envisioned to include up to 440 lots, with common 
passive and active open space.  The project site highlights the proximity to the Agua 
Fria River by placing circulation routes and homesites accordingly.  Additionally, 
with the extension of Deer Valley Road and the associated bridge improvements, 
vehicular and pedestrian connection to the east and west is anticipated. 
C. 
On Site and Regional Location 
The overall project property is approximately 162.9 acres within unincorporated 
Maricopa County and has unified ownership by the Owner.  The site is located +/-
1,618 feet south of the southeast corner of 115th Avenue alignment and Hatfield 
Road (portions of APN # 201-22-042, 201-22-043A, 201-22-043B, 201-22-045, 
201-22-046, 201-22-047, 201-22-022, 200-11-004B).  Approximately 2,700 feet 
to the east of the Site lies the City of Peoria jurisdictional boundary and further to 
the west is Sun City and the City of Surprise city limits.  The Site is +/-3,700’ south 
of the Happy Valley/Loop 303 interchange and adjacent to the future Deer Valley 
Road extension. 
The Site is conveniently located east of the Loop 303, just south of the Happy Valley 
Road full interchange.  The Loop 303 provides quick access to other regional 
transportation routes like Interstate 17 and Interstate 10.  The Agua Fria River runs 
along the eastern side of the property with Arizona State Land adjacent to the 
western boundary 
The surrounding area is made up of existing and developing residential 
communities, in addition to Arizona State Land, Bureau of Land Management and 
other quarry sites.  Table 1-On Site and Surrounding Uses, Comprehensive Plan 
and Zoning Designations below provides a summary of the general area. 
Table 1: On Site & Surrounding Uses, Comprehensive Plan, & Zoning Designations 
Land Uses 
Comprehensive Plan 
Zoning 
Site 
Vacant 
Small Lot Residential (2-5 du/ac), Open Space, 
& Mixed Use Employment 
RU-43 
North 
Inactive Mining Site 
Mixed Use Employment & Open Space 
RU-43 
East 
BLM/Agua Fria River 
Open Space 
RU-43 
South 
Vacant 
Open Space & Small Lot Residential 
RU-43 
West 
Arizona State Trust 
Land/ Vacant 
Small Lot Residential 
RU-43 
D. 
Existing Conditions 
The irregular shaped parcel assemblage is primarily vacant and undeveloped, with 
exception of the past mining activity that took place on the northernmost parcels. 
Additionally, portions of the Site are designated by FEMA as Floodway and

Rose Estates Comprehensive Plan Amendment | 6 
Floodplain.  The Site falls within the Maricopa County White Tank/Grand Avenue 
Area Plan and is designated as; 56.1 acres of “Small Lot Residential (2-5 du/ac)” 
with 94.79 ac “Open Space” and 12.1 ac “Mixed Use Employment” land use 
designations.  As previously mentioned, the Site is zoned RU-43 with a Mining 
Exemption.   
E. 
Roads/Transportation Systems Serving the Proposed Project 
Primary access is proposed from future Deer Valley Road, a five lane Arterial 
Roadway, via the proposed extension and expected 2020 build out.  Secondary 
access is envisioned through future improvements to either Pinnacle Peak 
Road alignment to the west or an improved 115th Avenue to the north.   
F. 
Suitability with Surrounding Land Uses 
As previously outlined above in Table 1- On Site & Surrounding Uses, 
Comprehensive Plan, & Zoning Designations, adjacent land is primarily 
vacant, therefore little impact is anticipated.  Larger residential developments 
in the area include Dos Rios, Crossriver, Deer Valley Ranch and Ironwood 
residential communities.  Specific attention to lot size, density, and open space 
has been analyzed in order to provide compatibility with existing development. 
II.
Site Analysis
A. 
Whether the Amendment constitutes an overall improvement to
the Comprehensive Plan and is not solely for the good or benefit 
of a particular landowner or owners at a particular point in time. 
The proposed amendment from “Open Space” and “Mixed Use Employment” to 
“Small Lot Residential (2-5 du/ac)” will serve as an overall improvement to the 
Comprehensive Plan and White Tank/Grand Avenue Area Plan, by developing a 
longstanding vacant piece of infill parcel into a residential community that 
sensitively conforms to existing development and the adjacent Aqua Fria River 
corridor and the Zone AE Floodway designation.  Additionally, the amendment 
integrates the planned Deer Valley Road extension, while also providing additional 
necessary infrastructure improvements. 
B. 
Whether the Amendment will adversely impact all or a portion 
of the planning area by: 
•
Altering acceptable land use patterns to the detriment of the
plan. 
The amendment does not anticipate altering acceptable land use patterns to the 
detriment of the overall plan, as it seeks to unify the land use designation on the 
Site.  Land uses surrounding the Site include vacant Arizona State Land 
Department and BLM land, with larger surrounding uses being primarily 
residential in nature.  An amendment from “Open Space” and “Mixed Use

Rose Estates Comprehensive Plan Amendment | 7 
Employment” to “Small Lot Residential (2-5 du/ac)” will facilitate a planned 
residential community that will be consistent and compatible with the greater area. 
•
Requiring public expenditures for larger and more expensive
infrastructure.
•
Requiring public improvements to roads, sewer, or water
systems that are needed to support the planned land uses.
Given the infill nature of the proposed development, the amendment will not 
require public expenditures for larger and more expensive infrastructure.  This 
proposal responds to the planned Deer Valley Road extension, in which the 
property owner provided right of way in the southwest corner of the Site to aid in 
the development of the public road.  Additionally, any services not already offered 
to the site will be the burden of the developer to provide. 
•
Adversely impacting planned uses because of increased traffic.
A Traffic Impact Analysis will take place to ensure that the proposal does not 
adversely impact traffic for the area.  The Site and surrounding area are primarily 
designated as “Small Lot Residential”, therefore planned residential uses were 
anticipated.  Additionally, the Site and surrounding area benefit from regional 
connectivity due to their close proximity to the Happy Valley/Loop 303 
interchange and the future connection to Deer Valley Road which will provide 
residents with multiple routes for travel. 
•
Affecting the livability of the area of health of safety of present
and future residents.
Instead of negatively affecting the health and safety of existing residents, the 
proposed amendment will provide additional housing options for the area.  
Improved safety in the area is anticipated as a result of new lighting, streets, and 
resident population that will occupy the currently uninhabited area.   
•
Adversely impacting the natural environment or scenic quality
of the area in contradiction to the plan.
Minimal impact to the existing natural environment is anticipated as this 
amendment seeks to re-delineate the Site’s floodplain through the vetted FEMA 
process.  Portions of the Site’s eastern edge, approximately 27.7 acres, will remain 
in the floodway and work as a passive and visual open space for the community. 
C. 
Whether the amendment is consistent with the overall intent of 
the Comprehensive Plan. 
The overall intent of the Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan – Vision 2030 is 
to maintain a high quality of life by; protecting public health and safety, promoting 
stable economic growth, maintaining a healthy environment, providing adequate 
community services, and ensuring that tax money is spent efficiently.  This 
proposal envisions a planned residential community that meets all of these

Rose Estates Comprehensive Plan Amendment | 8 
standards through its commitment to simulate scale and density of surrounding 
development and utilize existing and planned infrastructure.  Additionally, specific 
attention to the goals and policies of the White Tank/Grand Avenue Area Plan were 
analyzed to ensure conformance with the vision of the specific area.  
D. 
The extent to which the amendment is consistent with the 
specific goals and policies contained within the plan. 
This proposal seeks to amend the White Tank/Grand Avenue Area Plan and is both 
consistent and compliant with its specific goals, policies, and objectives.  The Area 
Plan contains four Plan Elements, each of which describes the plan’s goals, 
objectives, and policies in detail.  Each of the elements is listed below, and an 
explanation of how this proposal is consistent with it follows.  
Land Use Element 
Goal L1: Promote efficient land development that is compatible with adjacent 
land uses, is well integrated with the transportation system, and is sensitive to 
the natural environment.  
Objective L1.1: Encourage the timely and orderly expansion of Urban Service 
Area.  
Policy L1.1.2: New residential development with gross densities greater than 1.0 
dwelling unit per acre shall be located within the Urban Service Area. Maximum 
gross densities will be determined based on proximity to urban services and 
infrastructure, and compatibility with adjacent land uses.  
Objective L1.2: Encourage the use of planned communities that provide a variety 
of land uses, housing types, employment opportunities, and offer a safe and 
pleasant living and working environment.  
Consistency with the Land Use Element: 
The proposal meets the above goals, objectives, and policies by tying the residential 
communities to its east and west together and helping to complete the residential 
land use pattern of the area.  Given the surroundings, the proposed planned 
residential community is appropriate because it is within the Urban Service Area 
and is in close proximity to existing urban services and infrastructure. This 
ultimately promotes efficient land development.  Additionally, development of the 
planned residential community will create new housing options for the area while 
populating land that was otherwise vacant and underutilized.  
Transportation Element 
Goal T1: Improve the roadway network to meet future transportation needs, 
promote safety, and mitigate congestion.

Rose Estates Comprehensive Plan Amendment | 9 
Objective T1.1: Determine the preferred location of new roadway connections 
and extensions for the next 20 years.  
Policy T1.1.1: Preserve necessary rights of way to maintain and extend the grid 
system in response to future development.  
Objective T1.4: Encourage the coordinated and timely development of new 
roadways. 
Policy T1.4.1: Recommend standard or compatible roadway cross-sections for 
application by jurisdictions through the planning area. 
Policy T1.4.2: Ensure that alignments and cross-sections of major roadways in 
new master planned communities are consistent with those adopted by the 
appropriate jurisdiction. 
Policy T1.4.3: Review minimum street standards and subdivision requirements 
to ensure adequate access for emergency vehicles.  
Consistency with the Transportation Element: 
The proposal meets the goals, objectives, and policies of the Transportation 
Element because the planned residential community will utilize existing and 
planned new roadways.  This proposal, which will have frontage along the planned 
Deer Valley Road extension, demonstrates the value and opportunity the new road 
presents.   The timely completion of the Deer Valley Road improvements and the 
Rose Estates community will promote an enhanced circulation network in the 
immediate area and facilitate the opportunity for expansion of development. 
Additionally, the increased population density may promote future transit service 
opportunities in the area.  
Environment Element 
Goal E1: Promote development that considers adverse environmental impacts on 
the natural and cultural environment, preserves highly valued open space, and 
remediates areas contaminated with hazardous materials. 
Objective E1.1: Encourage developments that successfully coexist and are 
compatible with significant natural features.  
Policy E1.1.2: Encourage land uses and development designs that are compatible 
with environmentally sensitive areas such as floodplains, hillsides, wildlife 
habitat, scenic areas, and unstable geologic and soil conditions.  
Policy E1.1.3: Discourage small lot residential and commercial development on 
land with hillside slopes of 10% or greater.

Rose Estates Comprehensive Plan Amendment | 10 
Policy E1.1.5: Control land use and development within the 100-year floodplain 
to minimize the threat to life and property.  
Consistency with the Environment Element: 
The proposal seeks to make productive use of underutilized land for a future 
planned residential community.  While the proposal does seek to re-delineate 
portions of the floodplain to allow for residential development, it maintains the 
floodway areas as visual and passive open space.  Properly re-delineating the 
floodplain through the FEMA CLOMR/LOMR process will allow the development 
to successfully coexist and maximize compatibility with the natural features of the 
land.   
Economic Development Element 
Goal ED1: Promote a growing, balanced, efficient, and diversified economy, 
consistent with available resources, that enhances quality employment 
opportunities, improves quality of life, and is sensitive to the natural and cultural 
environment.  
Objective ED1.1: Expand quality employment opportunities by supporting efforts 
that encourage business formation and expansion.  
Objective ED1.5: Improve housing conditions in unincorporated communities. 
Policy ED 1.5.3: Encourage housing design and improvement techniques that 
increase energy efficiency.  
Policy ED 1.5.4: Cooperate with Maricopa County Community Development. 
Consistency with the Economic Development Element:  
The proposal will facilitate a planned residential community that will increase 
residential occupancy, furthering the goals, objectives, and policies of the 
Economic Development Element.  New and existing residents will benefit from the 
integration of the area, as will businesses in the area that depend on a growing 
community.  The planned community will improve housing conditions by offering 
new housing options that incorporate more current housing design and 
improvement techniques that increase energy efficiency.  
E. 
Other pertinent information as requested by the Maricopa 
County Planning Department staff. 
N/A

Rose Estates Comprehensive Plan Amendment | 11 
III.
Conclusion
Rose Estates as proposed, conforms with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Maricopa
County Comprehensive Plan and subsequent White Tank/Grand Avenue Area Plan.  The
proposal works to maximize existing elements of the Site and the surrounding area.  The
proposed comprehensive plan amendment and accompanying rezone will provide the
standards necessary to support a high-quality residential community that complements
the character of the area, is developed in a context sensitive manner reinforcing adjacent
communities and surrounding environs, and highlights the unique opportunity created by
both the proximity to the river corridor and the future Deer Valley Road thoroughfare.

Z2019112
June, 2020
Generally located at 11410
W. Lejos, Sun City, AZ 85373

ROSE ESTATES 
A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY 
REQUEST FOR R1-6 ZONING WITH RUPD OVERLAY 
ON A PORTION OF 11410 W. LEJOS, Sun City, AZ 85373 
CASE # Z2019112 
October 2019 
Revised February 2020 
Revised June 2020

PROJECT TEAM 
PROPERTY OWNER REPRESENTATIVE 
Rohit K. Tripathi 
4600 E. Washington St. Suite 300 
Phoenix, AZ 85034 
Rohit@Rohittripathi.com 
Jordan Rose  
7144 E. Stetson Dr. Suite 300 
Scottsdale, AZ 85251 
480.505.3936 
jrose@roselawgroup.com 
Darrell Wilson, Rob Gubser & Zach Hilgart 
2141 E. Highland Ave. Suite 250 
Phoenix, AZ 85016 
602.490.0535 
www.hilgartwilson.com 
Dawn Cartier 
10605 N. Hayden Road, #140 
Scottsdale, AZ 85260 
480.659.4250 
www.civtech.com

Rose Estates Zone Change | 4 
I. 
Introduction 
A. 
Site History 
Larry Dale Rose Etal (“Owner”) has owned the subject property and the adjacent 
northern 50 acres for over 90 years.  The subject property has long standing RU-
43 zoning within unincorporated Maricopa County.  In 2001, the subject area and 
adjoining acreage to the north obtained a “Mining Exemption” (LU20010064) for 
aggregate mining practice.  Vulcan Materials, a construction aggregate mining 
company, has leased the property for the two past decades.  Although the Mining 
Exemption and lease are still active today, physical mining operations have not 
been active on the site for the past eight years. The Mining Exemption pertaining 
to the subject area will be relinquished upon approval of this zone change 
application. The adjoining 50 acres to the north, however, will retain the Mining 
Exemption. See Appendix 1 – Legal Descriptions of Adjacent Parcels Retaining 
Mining Exemption (LU20010064) for legal descriptions of areas retaining the 
Mining Exemption.   
The extension of the Loop 303 freeway in 2003 brought growth to the area, 
including expansion of the City of Peoria’s jurisdictional boundary and 
development of County land.  As Deer Valley Road, which is the southern boundary 
of the property, is set to be extended and complete within a short time frame, this 
land is now ready to transition to a type of development more compatible with the 
growing surrounding area.  Because of these transportation additions, the site has 
really become a redevelopment and infill project to the larger area.  Exhibit A – 
Vicinity Map shows the subject and surrounding area. 
B. 
Purpose of Request 
Rose Law Group (note there is no genetic relation to Larry Dale Rose) on behalf of 
the Owner proposes a rezoning on the subject 162.9 acres from Rural 43 (RU-43) 
to Single Family Residential – 6,000 Square Feet Per Dwelling Unit (R1-6) with a 
Residential Unit Plan of Development (RUPD) overlay.  Exhibit C – Existing and 
Proposed Zoning Map visually depicts this request.  This is being requested in 
order to create a 162.9 gross acre single family residential community that stands 
to redevelop a vacant mining site by offering a community with comparable density 
and product size as found in the general vicinity and just west of the property.  A 
supplemental Comprehensive Plan Amendment (application # CPA2019013) is 
also being requested concurrently. 
The proposed community is envisioned to include up to 440 lots and an overall 
gross density of 2.7 du/ac, with common passive and active open space.  The 
project site highlights the proximity to the Agua Fria River by placing circulation 
routes and homesites accordingly.  Additionally, with the extension of Deer Valley 
Road and the associated bridge improvements, vehicular and pedestrian 
connection to the east and west is anticipated.

Rose Estates Zone Change | 5 
II.
Site Analysis
A.
Property Location 
The subject property is approximately 162.9 acres within unincorporated Maricopa 
County and has unified ownership by the Owner.  The site is located +/-1,618 feet 
south of the southeast corner of the 115th Avenue alignment and Hatfield Road 
(APN # 201-22-042, 201-22-043A, 201-22-043B, 201-22-045, 201-22-046, 201-
22-047, 201-22-022, 200-11-004B) (the “Site”).  Approximately 2,700 feet to the 
east of the Site lies the City of Peoria jurisdictional boundary and further to the 
west is Sun City and the City of Surprise city limits.  The Site is +/-3,700’ south of 
the Happy Valley 303 interchange and adjacent to the future Deer Valley Road 
extension.  A legal description is provided with this application in Exhibit B-Legal 
Description. 
B. 
Existing Conditions 
The irregular shaped parcel assemblage is primarily vacant and undeveloped, with 
exception of the past mining activity that has happened on the northernmost 
parcels.  Additionally, portions of the site are designated by FEMA as Floodway 
and Floodplain.  The Site falls within the Maricopa County White Tank/Grand 
Avenue Area Plan and is designated as primarily “Small Lot Residential (2-5 
du/ac)” with remnant “Open Space” and “Mixed Use Employment” land use 
designations.  As previously mentioned, the Site is zoned RU-43 with a Mining 
Exemption.   
III.
Description of Proposal
A rezoning is being proposed to entitle the Site to allow for a planned residential
community development.  Rose Estates utilizes the underlying “Single Family Residential
– 6,000 Square Feet Per Dwelling Unit” (R1-6) zoning and proposes a RUPD overlay to
accomplish flexible development standards.  These development standard variations are
outlined in Table 1 – R1-6 Development Standards Comparison.
Rose Estates’ site plan is broken into seven parcels and will include up to 440 lots.  A
combination of 45’ x 115’ and  55’ x 120’ lot sizes are being proposed with the larger lot
depths projected on Parcels 3 and 4.  This results in a total maximum proposed gross
density of 2.7 gross dwelling unit per acre on the subject 162.9 gross acre site. The
anticipated lot sizes may vary during preliminary platting but will be developed in
accordance with the underlying RUPD development standards.
Homesites are designed to respond to and maximize the visual benefits that are afforded
by the adjacent proximity to the Agua Fria River. Additionally, passive open space areas
are strategically located to create visual corridors to the River from the interior of the
Community.  Sensitivity to future adjacent uses to the north are planned via drainage
channels that provide buffering along the northern perimeter of the Community.  See
Exhibit D – Conceptual Site Plan for the proposed parcel layouts and associated lot sizes.
The Site will offer both primary and secondary access. Primary access is gained through
the future Deer Valley Road extension.  Completion of this road extension is planned for
2020 and anticipates full turn access on the site’s southern property boundary.  The
primary entry includes monumentation signage, as well as dramatic views of the Agua Fria

Rose Estates Zone Change | 6 
River to the east.  Secondary access is anticipated to be by way of a future extension of 
Pinnacle Peak Road through the adjacent Arizona State Land to the west. This will provide 
direct access to 117th Avenue via a Minor Collector road. As an alternative to Pinnacle Peak 
Road, the second point of access may be provided from the north via improvements to 
115th Avenue connecting north to 117th Avenue/Happy Valley Road, and ultimately 
providing direct access to Arizona State Route 303. If Pinnacle Peak Road is developed, it 
is anticipated that the existing 115th Avenue right-of-way on the site will be abandoned.  
The main internal spine road corresponds with the Urban Minor Collector standard of 60’ 
right of way.  Local Public Streets stem from this main circulation route and are proposed 
with 50’ right of way.  Both street sections include attached 5’ foot sidewalks throughout.  
Each lot will will meet the residential parking requirements of two spaces per unit as 
outlined in Chapter 11 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.  
Rose Estates will provide at least the minimum open space required by the underlying 
zoning district. A centralized linear park is depicted north of the Pinnacle Peak Road 
entrance.  Further depiction of internal open space areas within each parcel will be 
identified during preliminary platting. Internal drainage ways and the Agua Fria River 
account for an additional open space of approximately 22% of the gross area.   Internal 
pedestrian paths connect to the future 5’ sidewalk along Deer Valley Road, therefore 
providing multi-modal access to the larger County and Peoria communities.  Rose Estates 
stands to complete the land use connection between the Crossriver and Deer Valley Ranch 
communities.  Through these networks, community uses will further be supported, 
ultimately contributing to the increased livability of the area. 
A. 
Permitted Uses & Development Standards 
All Permitted Uses, Permitted Conditional Uses, and Accessory Uses under the R1-
6 zoning district in Section 606 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance (the 
“Zoning Ordinance”) shall apply to the Site. 
The development standards for Rose Estates shall conform to the development 
standards identified in Section 606 of the Zoning Ordinance, except as modified 
below, pursuant of Section 1002.  Modification of subject development standards 
are requested in order to create a variety in product/lot size that corresponds to 
the surrounding development pattern.  Additionally, the proposed modifications 
allow for maximization of common open space and preservation of 
environmentally sensitive areas.

Rose Estates Zone Change | 7 
Table 1: R1-6 Development Standards Comparison 
Regulation 
Base Zoning District 
Regulations (R1-6) 
Zoning District 
Regulations (R1-6 RUPD) 
Height (Max.) 
30' 
30' 
Front Yard (Min.) 
20' 
10' 
Side Yard (Min.) 
5' 
5' 
Street-side Yard (Min.) 
10' 
10' 
Rear Yard (Min.) 
25' 
15' 
Lot Area (Min.) 
6,000 sq ft 
5,175 sq ft 
Lot Width (Min.) 
60' 
45' 
Lot Area per Dwelling Unit 
(Min.) 
6,000 sq ft 
6,000 sq ft 
Lot Coverage (Max.) 
50% 
55% 
Parking Spaces (Min.) 
2 per dwelling unit 
2 per dwelling unit 
IV.
Relationship to Surrounding Properties
Given the property’s current and longstanding vacant/non-operational status, the
proposed redevelopment is envisioned to positively impact the surrounding area as it will
bring much needed housing to an established suburban area.  For commercial and other
non-residential uses in the surrounding area, the proposed development will provide
additional rooftops resulting in an increase in customers and potential employees, thereby
adding to the community’s economic vitality.
Adjacent properties to the east, west, and south of the Site are owned by Arizona State
Land and the BLM and are similarly vacant and undeveloped.  Land immediately north of
the Site is an inactive mining site.  Properties in the near vicinity of the Site, located within
one mile generally east and west, are the single-family residential communities of Dos
Rios, Crossriver, Deer Valley Ranch, and Ironwood residential communities.  Since
surrounding land uses are primarily residential, the proposed R1-6 district is consistent
with existing land use patterns and is suitable for the area.  Any visual impacts that may
be caused by the inactive mining site to the north will be reduced by the landscape
buffering,  screening, and drainage channels that are incorporated as a part of this
proposal.  Table 2-On Site and Surrounding Uses, Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
Designations below provides a summary of existing and surrounding land uses.
The proposed development is further supported by the recent design and funding of Deer
Valley Road, because it has been recognized that a new east-west corridor is needed to
serve existing and future development of the area.  This extension includes the
construction of Deer Valley Road from its current condition at 109th Avenue northwest to
the current condition of Williams Drive.  This design includes; an all-weather bridged
crossing over the Agua Fria River, five lanes in total (two in each direction with a
continuous left turn lane), bike lanes, sidewalks, and landscaping.

Rose Estates Zone Change | 8 
Table 2: On Site & Surrounding Uses, Comprehensive Plan, & Zoning Designations 
Land Uses 
Comprehensive Plan 
Zoning 
Site 
Vacant 
Small Lot Residential (2-5 du/ac), Open Space, 
& Mixed-Use Employment 
RU-43 
North 
Inactive Mining Site 
Mixed Use Employment & Open Space 
RU-43 
East 
BLM/Agua 
Fria 
River 
Open Space 
RU-43 
South 
Vacant 
Open Space & Small Lot Residential 
RU-43 
West 
Arizona State Trust 
Land/Vacant 
Small Lot Residential 
RU-43 
V. 
Location & Accessibility 
The Site is conveniently located +/-3,700’ south of the Happy Valley/303 interchange, 
making it highly accessible to both local and regional traffic.  The Site has frontage along 
future Deer Valley Road extension which will build a connection between the east end of 
Williams Drive at 117th Avenue to the west end of Deer Valley Road at 119th Avenue, 
ultimately providing an east-west corridor between 107th Ave. and El Mirage Rd.  This 
construction is highly beneficial to the Site and the surrounding area, as it will provide 
alternative access routes and will alleviate congestion between Sun City West and Peoria. 
As previously mentioned, Deer Valley Road will be the primary access point into the 
community, while Pinnacle Peak Road or 115th Avenue will be utilized as secondary. 
VI.
Circulation System (On & Off-Site)
As previously mentioned, off-site circulation will take access from Deer Valley Road, and
one of either Pinnacle Peak Road or 115th Avenue.  Internal circulation consists of a single
collector road that runs north-south through the development with tributary roads serving
more local traffic.  Each development parcel has at least two points of access on the
collector road, additionally a roundabout is designed as a traffic calming element.  Below
in Table 3 – Roadway Analysis outlines; affected roads, the classification, the current
condition, and any improvements that are necessary as a result of this proposal.  All
necessary improvements will be at the cost of the developer, unless otherwise stated.
Table 3: Roadway Analysis 
Roadway 
Classification 
Future Condition 
Deer Valley Road 
Principal Arterial 
130’ ROW 
(5 lanes, 5’ detached sidewalks)1 
115th Avenue 
Urban Major Collector 
(Proposed) 
80’ ROW 
Future Pinnacle Peak 
Road 
Urban Minor Collector 
(Proposed) 
60’ ROW w/5’ attached sidewalks 
Internal Collector Road 
Urban 
Minor Collector 
60’ ROW w/5’ attached sidewalks 
Internal Local Roads 
Local Street 
50’ ROW 
*Roadway conditions analyzed at adjacent condition
1 – Improvements to be completed by Public funding (Federal Funding & Intergovernmental Agreements)

Rose Estates Zone Change | 9 
VII. Development Schedule
Development phasing will depend on market demand, but conceptual development
parcels have been visually identified on Exhibit D – Conceptual Site Plan.  The site data
table from the Conceptual Land Use Plan has been provided below in Table 4 – Site Data
Table.  All parcel lines, lot sizes, and total number of dwelling units (not to exceed 440
units and a gross density of 2.7 du/ac) and their associated improvements are conceptual
and subject to change during the platting stage.
Table 4: Site Data Table 
Development 
Parcel # 
Typical 
Lot Size 
Lot Count 
Gross Acres 
Density 
(du/gross ac) 
1 
45’ x 115’ 
89 
25.6 
3.5 
2 
45’ x 115’ 
89 
19.3 
4.6 
3 
55’ x 120’ 
81 
23.9 
3.4 
4 
55’ x 120’ 
98 
35.1 
2.8 
5 
45’ x 115’ 
83 
25.6 
3.2 
6 
Lift Station 
- 
1.0 
- 
7 
** 
- 
32.4 
- 
Total 
- 
440 
162.9 
2.7 
**Floodway and Potential 404 wash 
VIII.Community Facilities & Services
The Site is within Peoria Unified School District boundary and specifically designates Zuni
Hills Elementary and Liberty High School as the applicable schools.  Nearby public parks
include Alta Vista Park located less than a mile east of the site.  The proposed development
will also offer both passive and active recreational areas.  Sun City West, Lake Pleasant
Towne Center and Camino a Lago Marketplace are all within close proximity of the site
and offer commercial resources.
IX.
Public Utilities & Services
The Site will have access to necessary public utilities and services such as refuse, sewer,
water, electric, police and fire.  To accommodate wastewater flows, a lift station is
proposed along the southern boundary of the site with final design and layout to be
determined during the improvement plan stage. The following utility companies and
public safety agencies will provide services to Rose Estates:
- 
Water - EPCOR Water
- 
Wastewater - EPCOR Water
- 
Refuse – Waste Management or Parks & Sons
- 
Electric – Arizona Public Service
- 
Police – Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office
- 
Fire – Arizona Fire and Medical Authority
X. 
Conclusion 
Rose Estates as proposed, conforms with the goals, objectives, and policies of the 
Comprehensive Plan as well as the surrounding development of the area.  It works to

Rose Estates Zone Change | 10 
sensitively develop an inactive site by correctly responding to the Agua Fria Floodway.  The 
proposed development will provide a high-quality residential community that 
complements the character of the area, is sensitive to adjacent communities, and 
highlights the unique opportunity to create a high-quality development on a primary piece 
of property in Maricopa County.

Subdivision Infrastructure & 
Planning Program 
1001 N. Central Avenue #150 
Phoenix, Arizona 85004 
Phone: (602) 506-1058 
Fax: (602) 506-5813  
TDD 602 506 6704 
 
 
Maricopa County 
Environmental Services Department  
Water and Waste Management Division 
DATE: 
October 14, 2019  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TO : 
Farhad Tavassoli, Planning & Development Dept. 
 
 
Planner 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FROM: 
Souren Naradikian, P.E. 
 
 
Senior Civil Engineer 
 
SUBJECT:  
Rose Property RU-43 to R1-6. Z2019112 
 
The Maricopa County Environmental Services Department (MCESD) has reviewed 
revised documents received from the Maricopa County Planning and Development 
Department for the above referenced project. This project is a rezoning for subdivision 
development RU-43 to R1-6 at APN# 201-22-022 and 200-11-004B. Water / sewer 
provider will be Arizona-American Water. MCESD has no concerns, ATC for water and 
sewer utilities development must be submitted and approve prior to final plat approval. 
Stormwater -- The parcel is not located in the urbanized unincorporated area, and 
therefore, not regulated by the Maricopa County Stormwater Quality Program. 
 
Based on the above, MCESD raised no objections to the Planning & Development 
Department in Accela: on October 14, 2019 and will allow the project to proceed at 
this time subject to the following stipulations 
 
Stipulations:  
 
 
None. 
 
It should be noted that this document does not approve the referenced project.  
Comments are provided only as advisory to Maricopa County Planning and 
Development Department to assist staff to prepare a staff report.  Other Maricopa 
County agencies may have additional requirements. Final review and approval will be 
made through Planning and Development Department procedures. Applicant may 
need to submit separate applications to the Maricopa County Environmental Services 
Department for approval of proposed facilities regulated by the Department.  Review 
of any such application will be based on regulations in force at the time of application.

Robert Fedorka, P.E. 
Planning & Development 
501 North 44th Street, Suite 200 
Phoenix, Arizona 85008 
Phone: (602) 506-7151 
Fax: (602) 506-8762 
www.maricopa.gov/planning 
Email address: 
RobertFedorka@mail.maricopa.gov 
  
Maricopa County 
Planning & Development Department 
Engineering Plan Review 
  
 
 
 
Date:    
June 15, 2020 
 
Memo To: Darren Gerard, AICP, Planning Manager, Department of Planning & 
Development 
 
Attn: 
Martin Martell, Planner, Planning & Development Services 
 
 
From: 
Robert 
Fedorka, 
P.E., 
Engineering 
Supervisor, 
Planning 
& 
Development Services 
 
cc: 
Michael Norris, P.E., Engineering Manager, Planning & Development 
 
Subject:   
CPA2019013 & Z2019112 Zone Change (to R-1-6 RUPD) 
 
(E3 Memo) 
Job Site Address: Williams Drive (east of 117th Ave.) 
 
APN(s): 
200-11-004B & 022 
 
This application is to specify zoning for future development and does not include a 
Plan of Development. 
 
PND Engineering Plan Review (DPR, FCD and PND Transportation) has reviewed the 
3rd Submittal of the Zone Change and CPA applications routed for review on June 10, 
2020, and has no objections provided that the following conditions are made part of 
any approval: 
 
1. Without the submittal of a precise plan of development, no development approval 
is inferred by this review, including, but not limited to number of proposed 
building lots, drainage design, access(es), roadway widths and roadway 
alignments. These items will be addressed as development plans progress and are 
submitted to the County for further review and/or entitlement. 
 
2. Any approval and progression in the entitlement process is contingent on 
completion of MCDOT TIP TT0248 which includes extension of Williams Drive 
across the Agua Fria River to Deer Valley Road which is intended to provide 
access to the site. 
 
3. A Traffic Impact Study must be submitted as part of the Preliminary Plat 
application. 
 
4. New development on the subject premises must provide for at least two (2) paved 
accesses from the site to an improved public roadway.

5. Encroachment into FEMA Zone AE and FW floodplains/floodways is extremely 
restrictive. The applicant must address development requirements (i.e. 
CLOMR/LOMR) required to develop the site in the manner proposed as plans 
progress and are submitted to the County for further review and/or entitlement. 
 
6. The applicant must address how public improvements, residences and other 
improvements necessary for development of the site (i.e. retention basins) will be 
protected from scour along the Agua Fria River (33,000 cfs) as development plans 
progress and are submitted to the County for further review and/or entitlement. A 
significant portion of the site outside of the regulatory floodplains is contained 
within a mapped lateral migration erosion zone.  
 
7. Engineering review of re-zone cases is conceptual in nature. All development and 
engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa 
County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain 
Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; 
and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of 
application for construction. 
 
 
Please contact me if you have any questions or require any additional information.

Planning and Development Department  
 
 
 
 
 
DATE: 
August 6, 2020 
 
TO: 
Planning and Zoning Commission 
 
FROM: 
Martin Martell, Planner  
 
SUBJECT: 
CPA2019013 & Z2019112 – Rose Estates  
 
Agenda Item: #1 & #2 
 
 
 
Since the publishing of the staff report for the above cases, staff have received a request 
by the applicant to change Stipulation ‘c’ (2) of Z2019112. 
 
Stipulation ‘c’ (2) of Z2019112 reads on the published staff report as the following: 
 
Any approval and progression in the entitlement process is contingent on completion of 
MCDOT TIP TT0248, which includes extension of Williams Drive across the Agua Fria River 
to Deer Valley Road, which is intended to provide access to the site. 
 
The requested change to Stipulation ‘c’ (2) of Z2019112 is as follows:  
 
Any approval and progression in the entitlement process is contingent on progression of 
MCDOT TIP TT0248, which includes extension of Williams Drive across the Agua Fria River 
to Deer Valley Road, which is intended to provide access to the site.