PZ-7 Z2019019 BOS REPORT 2 OF 2.PDF
Extracted text (via pymupdf)
41915 characters
. RECEIVED APR 3 2019,
To: Mr. Eric Smith
Planner
Maricopa County Planning & Development
501 N. 44th St Suite 200 Phoenix, AZ 85008
From: Mr. Robert Thul
35119 N. 10th St Phoenix, AZ 85086
602-885-1960
I am sending this letter to you today regarding my concerns of having a commercial business located less
than 300 FT from my residence. The business in discussion is Anchorpoint Welding, ELC at 35011 N. 10t h
St, Phoenix, AZ 85086, Parcel No. 211-52-105B, business owner by the name of Jonathan Thiele, Case
No. Z2019019.
First and foremost, I would like to declare that I am NOT in support of the (above) commercial business
receiving permits to be able to operate in my residential zoned area.
Various reasons consist of:
1- Consistent Daily Noise Pollution
2- Poorer Air Quality within my Proximity due to Large Machinery and Equipment
3- higher Traffic Amounts on N. 10th St., of which (above) business is located on the "non-paved
private portion" of N. 10th St. of which there will be an increase in costs Incurred to the property
owners in the neighborhood, for example, with,pothole repairs, drainage repairs etc.
4- JHome values in the neighliorhoix1 may decrease iminensely due to activity and operations of a
Corrimereial Business Allowance
5- Theft and Crime may increase in our neighborhood with the hiring of various employees needed
to operate a commercial business, as these "so called employees" are-considered "non-
residents" of our residential zoned area
6- There is always an uncertainty of how much any business can impact a residential
neighborhood. Most importantly regarding Growth of a business; the "now" and "projection
forward in years", therefore, the (above) concerns/ risks may in fact escalate, leaving that
"unknown burden to the property owners" of N. 10th St
7- Once a commercial business is allowed and permitted in a residential zone, others may want to
potentially follow, leaving many "unknowns" on all (above) concerns within our neighborhood
I would like to have N. 10th St zoned as Residential ONLY, NON Commercial. Thank you for allowing
me to shire my Viewpoint drythii Matter. lith available for cOnversation if yqu'deerh appropriate.
NEW myna/
DESERT HILLS
Macelotion, Inc.
New River/Desert Flills Community Association, Inc.
PO Box 75068
New River, AZ 85087-1000
Phone: 602-739-1235
Website: www.NRDHCA.org
President's emails: Ed@NRDHCA.com
Date:
April 30, 2019
Darren Gerard
Maricopa County Planning and Development
501 North 44th Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dear Darren Gerard,
The New River/Desert Hills Community Association (NR/DHCA) Board has a quorum
for the following comment:
Case: Z2019019
Recommendation: DENIAL
Due to the objectives covered in our Board's analysis attached.
See our Board's analysis for more explanation.
Respectfully,
Alan Muller, Director
New River/Desert Hills Community Association
Attachment: Board's analysis
New River/Desert Hills Community Association Board
Date: April 30, 2019
Case: Z2019019
To: Eric Smith/Darren Gerard
Related Case: V201801196
Review by date: N/A
Planner:: Eric Smith
Type Case: P & Z
J BOA
E TAO
n other
Current Zoning: R-43
Property APN: 211-52-105-B
Owners: Jonathan Thiele
Applicant: Michael P. Rolland
Current Use: Residential/Cottage Ind.
Developer:
Request for: SUP A 35011 N 10th St
Background: Code Violation attached to property for using as a business in
R43 zoning'
Opinion: After meeting with the owners and viewing the parcel located in a residential
RU-43 area approximately 3/4 mite N. of Carefree Hwy we have come to the conclusion
that the commercial use is not a correct application for this residential neighborhood.
if the SUP were allowed, it would set precedent for ALL RU-43 parcels and would turn
this beautiful, residential community into a commercial district without rezoning.
Recommendation:
Denial H Approval
Respectfully submitted,
NRDHCA Board
No manufacturing In a
Other R1143 area
April 27, 2019
Maricopa County Planning and Development Dept
501 (444th St Suite MD
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Atten: Mr. Eric Smith
RE: Special Use Permit, for the property located at 35011 N 10th St, Phoenix, AZ Case #
Z2019019
Dear Mr. Smith;
My name is Jeanette Reynolds and I am the medical power of attorney and caregiver for
Raymond R Reynolds who resides at and owns the property located at 34845 N. 10th Street,
Phoenix, AZ. Mr Reynolds is currently in the hospital and has requested that I write this letter
on his behalf. Mr. Reynolds would like to object to the issuance of a special use permit to a Mr.
J Thiele that would allow a commercial business to be conducted on a property currently zoned
residential, located at 35011 N. 10th St, Phoenix, AZ. Mr Reynolds recently had a bone marrow
transplant which has totally eliminated his immune system and will have a severely
compromised immune system for a minimum of a year while the new cells grow.
This proposed commercial business is approximately 100' from the door that Mr Reynolds uses
to access his house. Because of his compromised immune system Mr. Reynolds cannot be
exposed to fumes, dust and other airborne toxins that this business may genera te. The outdoor
use of commercial equipment to move heavy materials, as well as welding and grinding would
cause an undue hardship on Mr Reynolds making him a virtual prisoner in his own home. All
doors and windows would have to be kept closed at all times and Mr. Reynolds would be
denied the right to simply sit or walk on his own property. The simple act of getting into a
vehicle for his doctor appointments would put him at risk.
This property was bought in the mid 70s as a residential property and has been used as such
continually since then. Mr Reynolds respectfully requests that this special use permit be denied
allowing him the right to continue to use his property in the manner that it was designed for,
residential..
Respectfully,
"Jeannette Reynolds for
Raymond R Reynolds
Mr. Eric Smith
C/O Maricopa County Planning and Development Dept
501 W 44th St Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
RE: Opposition to Special Use Permit, for the property located at 35011 N 10th St, Phoenix, AZ Case #
Z2019019, parcel #211-52-105B
Dear Mr. Smith;
My name is Jeannette Reynolds and I own two contiguous parcels with the address of 34831 N 10th St,
Phoenix, AZ. The parcel numbers are, 211-52-057B and 211-211-52-057C. I would like to object to the
issuance of a special use permit to a Mr. J Thiele that would allow a commercial business to be
conducted on a property currently zoned residential, located at 35011 N. 10th St, Phoenix, AZ. My
reasons for opposing this permit are as follows:
This proposed business is not a reasonable sized, homebased business but is actully boardering on an
industrial use. I purchased my property in the mid 70's and moved here because I wanted to live in a
nice rural, residential area. Now as a disabled senior citizen my quality of life is being severly effected.
Since the applicant has applied for this use permit, he has continued operating his business with no
regard for his neighbors. He has kept an inventory of up to 40+ flat beds to be installed on pickup trucks,
utilizing a forklift to unload deliveries of the beds, and to move them around the property as more are
delivered or he installs them. This creates a noise issue as well as a dust concern in an area that a high
incident of valley fever. In addition he operates at all hours and days of the week. He may be working at
6am or 11pm. As a neighbor I have had to exsist with excessive noise, loud music, loud talking, grinding,
beating on metal and the backup alarm on the forklift. This may occur any day of the week, includig
Saturday, Sunday and holidays. Again he has shown no concern for the effect this has on his neighbors.
This has created a hardship for me as I can no longer enjoy simple outdoor activities on my property. I
do not have air conditioning so even having my windows open in the summer to cool the house has
become difficult.
Please help keep our neighborhood with the rural/residential enviorment that it is currently zoned as
and deny this reqrest for a special use permit. If he doesn't show respect for his neighbors now, I fear
with the issuance of the permit, it will only get worse. Thank you.
Respectfully,
Jeannette Reynolds
34831 N. 10th St
Phoenix, AZ 85086
RECEIVED DEC 03 201
RECEIVED 1)..0 93 2019
December 1, 2019
Case fl22019019
Dear Mr_ Smith,
I'm writing in opposition to the Special Use Permit requested by Anchorpoint Welding for operating a
welding business out of a residence, parcel number 211-52-105B. My family purchased 35845 N 10' h St.
(Parcel # 211-52-109-X) in 1974, and built a house in 1977 to reside, and raise their families in a nice
peaceful residential area, In June of 2019, my father, Raymond R eynolds passed away after being
confined to his house for several months prior to his hospitalization, because recent increase In dust and
odors in the area
There are multiple reasons that I oppose the approval of the special use permit AnChOrpoint Welding is
requesting. The main point of entry to our house is on the northside, which faces parcel #211-52-105B,
The wall, hoists and the oversized building is not something that I would like to see when I look out my
door every morning, and with my wife's health issues (Chronic Migraines, Multiple Chemical
Sensitivities, and Chronic Coccidiornycosis, aka valley Fever, which left her with her severe asthma),
approval of this request would limit our ability to utilize our property, affecting my family's quality of
life, and violating our civil rights to enjoy a peaceful existence. My Family moved out of the city to enjoy
a peaceful life with beautiful views of the desert. With the changes that Anchorpoint Welding is
proposing, It will dramatically affect the peaceful residential area by converting it into commercial,
permanently changing the ambience that everyone that moved out there to enjoy.
I am not just speaking as a rl generation property owner in the area, I am speaking on behalf all the
people's fife the Anchorpoint Welding would affect.
Please don't allow our neighborhood to turn into an industrial complex.
Upon his passing my father left the property to myself and my siblings. I'm including a copy of the
beneficiary deed to show ownership. The property has been placed in a family trust, and I am still a
shared owner.
Ronald Reynolds
Planning & Development
Department
DATE:
December 11, 2019
TO:
Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM:
Eric R. Smith, Planner
SUBJECT:
Z2019019 - Anchor Point Welding
Agenda Item: 17
After writing of the staff report for Z2019019, staff has received five (5) additional
opposition documents (1 letter and 4 emails). These documents have been included as
attachments to this memo for your considerations.
Attachments: Additional Opposition Documents (5 pages)
502 N. 44th Street, Suite 200 • Phoenix, AZ 85008 • (602) 506-2364 • (602) 506-3711 fax
>Internet: www.maricopa.gov/planning
vt.,149._
Mr. Eric Smith
C/O Maricopa County Planning and Development Dept
501 W 44th St Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85008
RE: Opposition to Special Use Permit, for the property located at 35011 N 10th St, Phoenix, AZ
Case # Z2019019, parcel #211-52-105B
Dear Mr. Smith;
My name is Jeannette Reynolds and I own two contiguous parcels with the address of 34831 N
10th St, Phoenix, AZ. The parcel numbers are, 211-52-057B and 211-211-52-057C. I would like
to object to the issuance of a special use permit to a Mr. J Thiele that would allow a commercial
business to be conducted on a property currently zoned residential, located at 35011 N. 10th St,
Phoenix, AZ. My reasons for opposing this permit are as follows:
This proposed business is not a reasonable sized, homebased business but is actully boardering
on an industrial use. I purchased my property in the mid 70's and moved here because I wanted
to live in a nice rural, residential area. Now as a disabled senior citizen my quality of life is being
severly effected. Since the applicant has applied for this use permit, he has continued operating
his business with no regard for his neighbors. He has kept an inventory of up to 40+ flat beds to
be installed on pickup trucks, utilizing a forklift to unload deliveries of the beds, and to move
them around the property as more are delivered or he installs them. This creates a noise issue
as well as a dust concern in an area that a high incident of valley fever. In addition he operates
at all hours and days of the week. He may be working at 6am or 11pm. As a neighbor I have had
to exsist with excessive noise, loud music, loud talking, grinding, beating on metal and the
backup alarm on the forklift. This may occur any day of the week, includig Saturday, Sunday and
holidays. Again he has shown no concern for the effect this has on his neighbors. This has
created a hardship for me as I can no longer enjoy simple outdoor activities on my property. I
do not have air conditioning so even having my windows open in the summer to cool the house
has become difficult.
Please help keep our neighborhood with the rural/residential enviorment that it is currently
zoned as and deny this req rest for a special use permit. If he doesn't show respect for his
neighbors now, I fear with the issuance of the permit, it will only get worse. Thank you.
Respectfully,
J6tinnette Reynolds
34831 N. 10th St
Phoenix, AZ 85086
'I
Eric Smith (PND)
From:
Stevie Reno <sreno_iinsure@cox.net >
Sent:
Friday, December 6,2019 11:29 AM
To:
Eric Smith (PND)
Subject:
case Z2019019
Hello,
I am writing to submit my formal protest to a zoning change for Anchorpoint Welding. Our parcel number is 211-52-
107B.
I oppose this change as I am very concerned about the existing noise coming from the property as it is and feel this will
only get worse with a special use permit as a welding business. This is a quiet residential area and that is one of the
reasons we purchased here. To allow one neighbor to purchase a property for only business use is opening the door for
other with would drop our property value and reduce the quality of life here. Please record my opposition to this
request for special use permit. Please confirm receipt.
Thank you,
Stephanie Reno
35043 N loth a Phoenix, AZ 85086
sreno iinsure@cox.net
1
Eric Smith (PND)
From:
Denice Reynolds <neice3206@aol.com >
Sent:
Wednesday, December 4, 2019 10:29 AM
To:
Eric Smith (PND)
Subject:
Case number Z2019019
I am writing in regards to case number Z2019019 parcel number 211-52105B. My name is Denice Reynolds Griffin. I am
opposed to the permit being requested for parcel Number 211-52105B. My family bought parcel number 211-52109X,
211-52057B, and 211-52057C in the mid 70s to move away from the city to a rural area. The hearing has been even
happened yet and there are dozens of rigs already being worked on. We are already concerned about the dust, noise,
and fumes caused by this property. Our entrance is to the north side of the property along with the front door to the
house which is Ames parcel 211-52105B. I am a partial owner of Parcel 211-52109X. In the a puzzle of this hearing the
other two parcels belong to my Jeanette Reynolds who has also lived there since 1974. This is going to be damaging to
my mothers health at her age and my stepfather's. I am on the trust to these two parcels as well. This leaves five
generations that have shared these parcels please keep our property of 45 years safe from commercial case number
Z2019019.
If you have any further questions for me feel free to call me at 602-488-5945
Sent from my iPhone
1
Eric Smith (PND)
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Michael Sankey <ms4344@msn.com >
Wednesday, December 4, 2019 5:53 PM
Eric Smith (PND)
Stevie
Case# Z2019019 Archpoint Welding
Mr. Smith,
I recently received a post card concerning the hearing for this business. The postcard states that a letter must
be received by the Friday before the hearing which is set for 12/12/19. Will this email suffice as a letter? I
plan to attend the hearing
I am not in support for this to be approved. This is a residential area. The property that this case is based is a
house. The owner does not live at the property and the property is used as a business.
If this is approved does this mean that I can request a permit to build a Jiffy Lube if my neighbors support it or
my neighbors can turn their property into a commercial business?
Please advise if my email will suffice as a letter of protest. I will mail a copy tomorrow.
Thank you
Mike Sankey
35043 N. 10th ST
Phoenix, AZ 85086
1
Case # Z2019019
November 30, 2019
Dear Mr. Smith,
I'm writing in opposition to the special use permit for the welding business being run out of a
residence. Parcel number 211-52-105B. I am a shared owner to the property next door to the south.
Parcel number 211-52-109x. My property was previously owned by my father, who unfortunately
passed in June of this year. He was also strongly opposed to this business. My father, who loved the
outdoors, was limited in his final months and needed to stay close to home. This business made it tough
for my him to enjoy the outdoors of his own property. Noise and dust among other things kept him
indoors. He knew my fathers' condition, and never stopped. It is understood that if the welding
operation gets their special use permit, they would probably be required to build a wall. But that won't
block the view of his hoists. It won't block the view of an oversized workshop. It won't stop the dust. It
won't stop the noise. It won't stop the fumes. It won't reduce customer traffic.
My family has owned this land since the mid-70s. They/we didn't move to the Desert Hills area
to live in an industrial neighborhood.
The individual that is requesting the special use permit has not been playing by the rules. Why
should we assume that he will moving forward? His yard is full of equipment and is an industrial blight
on the neighborhood. There are plenty of areas that are zoned accordingly for his type of business.
Please don't allow our neighborhood to turn into an industrial complex.
Thank you
John P Reynolds
P.S. I'm including a copy of the beneficiary deed to show ownership. As the property has been placed in
a family trust since then. I'm still a shared owner.
"14
Rwand,
ft' a yrpwad Rone5. ,-,1 RE-1n RrOrlg
34345 Nli)'" si
'VC,R6
2,Cir? • 16 6•-:=F-43'1
Fv. ,3
'
KRAUS:qt.!
RT.
I .1
S042'-g
• IT AY.A)
VAT "Eq7uAr
rt.31,4ai..41'
ond Rortak) ernth the undersigmd5 P`t,t0110, dio bei.-eby ecnvey
to dioltri Reyaeldg, Floariito. ileirizo/dA ztnd D:;t1lbt.' &r._61014
tOATOS3 ;',"3.17,M,P511,0)11,
grayttee effective en ?,fty deAth, all rights, t xid igierefit in that f,'-crtain, property situ5teo
MARICOPA COUNTY, StaT ArU7ONA znd fk-fisoiteJ
LEGAL. -DESC.;:,
NI':
hi)
n49,ChFe ':trete
t NE:ma:0
Commati - mr 34?45 N 0th
Phmnix, AZ
PROPVITY EV.;
A. 11-1134
Dwed j
cATE OF ARY7,0N.<9
1..70UNT V OF MAR ICOV-1,5
/
'kJ.. .2.
••
••
-
•)-.\ A
_
-
„ • N,
,
•
:%., I" -,.., J"."- 1 ,,,J:
, s..!
P %
-i..." 7. 1, ,;.c..- /?..
''' f
•
2
'
:--
•
..
:
---
,..4
'
.
..
../
. -
.
..
.
-
/
/-'
3 '///
7
,f
/1
'
7
/
->,777, 7
',/
> l
->..-
7..
1
77
.
'\.
7
/:V/tXY / /-
2;i
. .
"
,''7
1
./
•-
—t
;•'
/ p.
-: \-
„"
-
- ,
/
Rachel Applegate (PND)
Subject:
FW: Special Use Permit Z2019019
Original Message
From: Jeannette R. <jeannette_reynolds@hotmail.com >
Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2019 5:39 AM
To: PND PZAppeal <PNDPZAppeal@maricopa.gov>
Subject: Re: Special Use Permit Z2019019
I would like to submit a formal request to appeal the decision to approve the special use permit for Anchorpoint
Wielding to be located at 35011 N. 10th St. The recommended approval took place at the hearing conducted on
December 12, 2019. My basis for this appeal is:(1) of the 20 letters in support many if not all of them or not within 300
feet of this proposed business. The majority of us that are adjacent to this property are not in support of this. We are
the ones that this will have the most adverse affect on, taking away our quality of life and reducing our property values;
(2) the property that is adjacent to this proposed business has been placed in my family trust. This property is on the
south side where there is nothing more than a chain-link fence. There were no stipulations to correct this issue. All
activity and storage will be visible from this property severely affecting the ability to enjoy the property at 34845 N 10th
St; (3) it is my understanding that a very large building will be placed at the south east corner of this property which
again would adversely affect the property on the south with the noise and dust as work is conducted moving trucks,
truck beds and other items back and forth into the building with a forklift in addition to causing a visual blight.
The letters of support was a form letter drawn up by the lawyer representing the business owner and do not accurately
represent the properties that will most seriously be negatively affected.
Respectfully,
Jeannette Reynolds
34831 N 10th St
602 348-7211
Sent from my iPhonet from my iPhone
1
Rachel Applegate (PND)
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Rachel Applegate (PND)
Friday, December 27, 2019 8:08 AM
Eric Smith (PND)
Rachel Applegate (PND)
FW: SUP #Z2019019
SUP Appeal_0001.pdf; 20191225_141510.jpg; 20191225_135535,jpg; 20191225_
135511jpg; 20191225_135453,jpg
From: Ron Reynolds <reynolds_racing@cox.net >
Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2019 8:40 PM
To: PND PZAppeal <PNDPZAppeal@maricopa.gov >
Subject: FW: SUP #Z2019019
I would like to formally appeal the request of SUP #Z2019019. I have attached a letter addressing my issues with this
request along with photos of my parcel and what we will be able to see daily. As you can see in some of the photos the
property owner is currently stacking trunk beds higher than the existing wall, which would interfere with the views of
the adjoining neighbors.
I am asking you to please reconsider the recommendation for approval of SUP #Z2019019
That you for your time
Ronald Reynolds
1
December 20, 2019
Case ttZ2019019
Dear Maricopa County Zoning Appeal Board,
I'm writing to formally appeal, the Maricopa County's Planning and Zoning Commission's
recommendation of approval of the Special Use Permit requested by Anchorpoint Welding for operating
a welding and vehicle modificationbusiness out of a residence, at 35011 N, 10 St. (parcel 211-52-
105B), My family purchased 35845 N 10 th St, (Parcel 11211 -S2 - 109 - X) in 1974, and built a house in 1977
to reside, and raise their families in a nice peaceful residential area. In June of 2019, my father,
Raymond Reynolds passed away after being confined to his house for several months prior to his
hospitalization, because recent increase in dust and odors in the area.
There are multiple reasons that I oppose the approval of the special use permit that Anchorpoint
Welding is requesting. The main point of entry to our house Is on the northside, which faces parcel
l4211-52-105B. The increased traffic, the hoists and the proposed oversized building and is not
something that I would like to see when I look out my door every morning and will affect the property
value, it does not appear that these conditions were taken into consideration with their
recommendation. Currently my wife has multiple health issues (Chronic Migraines, Multiple Chemical
Sensitivities, and ChronicCoccidiomycosis, aka Valley Fever, which left her with her severe asthma),
approval of this request would limit our ability to utilize our property, affecting my family's quality of
life, and violating our civil right to enjoy a peaceful existence. My family moved out of the city to enjoy a
peaceful life with beautiful views of the desert. The changes that Anchorpoint Welding is proposing will
dramatically affect this peaceful residential area by converting it into a commercially zoned parcel and
permanently changing the ambience that everyone moved here to enjoy.
I am not just speaking as a 3r4 generation property owner in the area, I am speaking on behalf of all the
people whose lives the Anchorpoint Welding would affect.
Please don't allow our neighborhood to turn into an industrial complex.
Upon his passing my father left the property to myself and my siblings. I'm including a copy of the
beneficiary deed to show ownership. The property has been placed in a family trust, and I am still a
shared owner.
Respectfully,
Ronald Reynolds
'
LI
ORIGINAL
STATE COP Y
State Pile Number .
102-201tt 025936
STATE OF ARIZONA
DEPAI1TMENT OF HEALTI -I SERVICES-BUREAU OF VITAL RECORDS
CERTIFICATE OF DEATH
I vi:E•E:cul L Li. :A{ ,,V:
1,,
7 ,/,,,,:g I-, -, ',
1
RAYMOND
1 ,1014ALD. REYNOLDS
I fl,
.1 : nelt:7, ari hi
I 1-
....
MAI E
j.
7:.72'672
2
. ,
I
OGIO /2019
r 1.1E0F1,,p1t1
12/111,1946
72 YEARS
II r•requi.u.00..11ITY MIDZI11 014 ..UCA111:111 01 HAM
- = ,
•!._, t.::_...i7.).
INPATIENT - HONORWAL III SCOTTSDALE
8COTTSDA1 C. MARICOPA 852E0
MEDICAL CENTER
II 1.1451, 1 IL 111A144,11
1; 44:WE:or !Davi...me.SIJCC
1Dli 10 111:111 1, 11ARmArk 11 ii. IT 11113011
inliT ELIF 1":I1
Dt VORCED
NOT LISI LP
t.... , 9 4 :4: .11-i.7,5
811CA
.,, al•p7i,:lArli: iLii I M• L1/.11., z,ii 1 orif.i6r, 1.011-1;11,0
SHREVEPOR i LaJISIANA
It (ILL:17...111 1, il II: iA4. FIES:0A:11, i it:;CFLES:i , 1,1iii I 4 WE ccA)!ir,
34845 N 11 LEI SIREET, PHOENIX. MARICOPA, AZ. 85085
.
.. _
0 NOT SPANISH/HISPANICiLANNt
i• r., — I ; ..... ,
WHITE
- Ai 'Ii
-17- (1Cr:Apr.417i, -
GotoiTRUCTInN SUPERI: II I II
RUSSELL. RENO, REYNOLDS
:C, i j1:51 ',' -
EUNICE, INI;''.. WORTHINGTON
-'04.'"..e ;;7-!i ‘'It: it', LAS: ::! '1, cr,
1111 0111AI.iil :, NI -11-L 11111,1. II11 1 11 .11 (1:2-! LL/: I 144
_WA11NE:1 IE. , i REI11e. 1 !
2 1 rtLIMItaiSAP
5_X - V4 1 1-: F
12 Iti 4 43F-W •4
122E :
34831 N UHL I ST REET, PHOENIX, AZ
1:121 ZI i1. ,..l 41:1 r!,:.,41..;..!,2 , !r. , ::::,-
S11ACIOW r.iouNTAIN MORTUARY
2:150 E G'REVNWAY ROAD. PI IOENIX,
850F93
.,,, L7:,U7.-. vt: 1
Ill
r --,7,
I I"
-,:'
AZ, 811522
L".L.., 1 1 - flittp ,,,,, , ,
AL LISOt 1 . WADS'A'OR
IIII 4,...liar.11
1E1252
III L.Entonvani 1111100114 1 1117I 2! 1.111121A/401.1.1c 44 1 14,/14:::. 1S1 re .1 ,(7s- POtl FA, ill r
I:I WIPIL AC LILEAnOU1 1"1 :1113 tAlip.)11ii:.: i AciLily
G' it LENIAVOL) MEMORY LAWN CREMATORY
2liEMATItit ,1
PI-I DENIX, AZ. US
MEPIcAt7c-ERTIFIcAllom sreigm
- ,IMED/Ji , ,,,,,',E c.F 0, ,-11,
MIR 110,83 ,', 11
YSTEM FAI1URE
CAUSE OF DEATH PART 1
I r ti
2 DAYS
CC! .t i ,, - i 1:411 :
Cllit,,,-- TVER.-11ih HOST EhbEASE, GRADE 4 RE ACTORY
_ __
A:=1:1 14 :3 44r44-11 1 :21 11,4?-4
) 1) D-i';
-
) 1. CUE T061(0.1/, COta-61ttliCEC ,
4:4
=
TEM CELL 713.4,41:1-9..
-
11 .4.11Pr43;1 11:11.,f • 147EFIVAL
.iLION 11-15
-
MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME
-
12 MON II IS
CAUSE OF
_
-
-
PEATH PART II
I
NO
I
NATURAL
41 V4041
IC CC,,,,Pirif
DEATH
4I 'mil: i: ii VAT,
1
CERTIMATION
LIF 0E14-111
47 11N1A'!. IN AUT Ill..rr
I 4-:1,.1i WALL /
i
N.110.5' 1 11141 4 11:1; AVA:_ 4•1 11 I'
THE CAS: , i i ., DEt.11-1 ,
To lim IALL : 44 1,11 I 11CVALLithr 111L 1 111
4 111 :1 1iii1 : 1 A1:011-f ..,--141.1 I 1 I ,,,i,114:i1 111 rill.
1:: ii i L:.4.L...?, 14!ii .. :A . .,Er, --..,t;-• p
CAUSE AND MANNER
Li : ri ,,, I i-o- FE142:0.JCC ,.11“.11 .10C0.!!.1:
ADR:ENIIF : ERIE ;GS
—
41 F.2, TF. CA , : :
L431'0412019
1403 E SI ILA BOULEVARD. scq I rsoALE, Az, 852
,
_
VS-10 Rv 1712(117
Obit: 195L1+111 tibi10/20 .41. 1
,I4y ecp-A t i t
OW 0 412 WV
Ill Ill
EliV1-11A1
EC1" 11
-riFfPir
21*Li)
753- 4
When Recorded Mai to:
Raymond Ronald Reynolds
34845 N 10th St.
Phoenix. AZ 85086
Unofficial
1
Document
MI
2007-1162561 10/26/0r
1 OF 3
:10 PM
fif
BENEFICIARY DEED
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
That I Raymond Ronald Reynolds the undersigned, r tor(s), do hereby convey
to John Reynolds, Ronnie Reynolds and Denise Reynolds as tenants in common,
grantee, effective on my death, all rights, title and interest in that certain properly situated
in tvIARICOPA COINTY, State of ARIZONA and described as follows:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof..
Commonly Known as: 34845 N 10 th Street, Phoenix, AZ
Parcel Number: 211-52-109-X
PROPERTY EXEMPT FROM AFFIDAVIT AND FILING FEES PURSUANT 1 0
A.R.S. 11-1134 b-2
Dated 1 0
.;;
P.02-
J
0,-/-7/7/
Raymon&konald Reynolds Gran r
STATE OF ARIZONA
}SS:
COUNTY OF MARICOPA
This itineliciary Deed wa„*Acknowled
In Wit; ,_-; whereof, I herewith set my
STATE OF ARIZONA
)
}SS:
COUNTY OF NIARICOPA
200711611'361
This Beneficiary Deed was acknowledged before me, a Notary Public, on this
_day of
_
,2002 by
In Witness whereof, I herewith set my hand and official seal.
Notary Public
STATE
'olorado
}SS:
C INT
This Beneficiary Deed was acknowledged befOre me, a Notary Public, on this
day of _ _ .2002 by
In Witness whereof, I herewith set my hand and official seal.
Notary Public
,
20071162561
20051738082
Exhibit A"
DESCRIPTION
THE NORTHERLY PART OF PAR 211-52-057 A & PARCEL 2!1-52-109 G
4
A Portion of the Southwest Quarter of Section 4, T5N, R3E of the G. 8c S.R.B, & M,,
Marieopa County, 4riz.Cuta and is more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at a Brass Cap in a Band Hole at the South Quarter Corner of Section 4, T5N,
11.3E;
thence along the Southerly Line of Section 4, S 89°59'09" W 1318.81' to a Point in Same
and at the Southwest Corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of
Section 4;
thence along the Westerly Line of Said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of
Section 4, N 0019'08" W 1254.04' to a Point in Same and at the Extended Southerly
Line of this Parcel;
thence along the Said Extended Southerly Linenf this Parcel S 89
1 3'12" B 40.00' to the
Southwest Comer of this Parcel and THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
thence along the Eesterl-Y 4iglit-of-Way Line of 10 th Street N 0019'08" W 167.72' to a
, Point in Same and the Northwest Corner otthis Parcel;
thence along the Northerly Line of this Parcel S 89 029119" E 629.26' w the Northeast
Corner of this Parcel;
thence along' the Extended Easterly Line of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of the
Southwest Quarter of Section 4, S 00'04'39" W 167:00' to a Point at the Southeast
Corner of this Parcel;
thence ale V.:, the Southerly Line of t7,-;1* 89.33'12" W 628.10' to THE TRUE POINT
,
OF BEGINNING,
Containing 2.4153 Acres Net of land be the same more or less.
k711,;t:..
\r'l ii,
_
_:-.)_,.._15$,Ii. ; •
i,.."'".'' - --I ..-,. 1
••;egf,"r--- 47, .• '--; -::"---ritfq
_ .= •,,r ../', . ,:fte.:--:"--,Z.°)
!;17i4,2fi I ,1
F917t-7-744
ifiTIA:ti
14 1,
'A;
•
th
ç •
, r•;, - ;:' , ir.a
,Irt-
ASit:.;:i.44;•",,e;',,, --
vi ,i 1Vii)-51k
$.4 :11;0141i:77,e
-0P-1
vri.:7- flip.
0'4_01AZ
-:
Wii:a IA% -
,ZTOOgi V-1
----,?
,,713r.it...:,1
prg x.,J2170,-- •
—
,/,,"--
•,),, • -7 .40.--
. •
- '7`' e.--,"111
7" . '-1.1.7":14- • ;s:
L7'.;i?;pi;i•', -/.7 12_ ,
e r .- - -'r A ,
rr 04.7'
,- 'i-
;1.:.,ig
;,,:•,;.,.-,.:, -A.,4,
Lc:
. .,,,,.
. z.,11,3._:,,%,.: .rxirr:r
..-",:_.........00.
, :;.,_..:,:
•-, .:..._74
:p
. 7;;,
,i1 1. 7.4-;,,,,,
'''-'
4 .
• -"•-_-4, -m...- n ,..........
.../ A/W': ..- -_...,-- ,.v,4
...
.4,
I p,, jeld.71
: . . , f, :I,
7., :,...
4a.
... ,_...1
. ..3.7-. 9
<.-
e:re‘Aie
,.Iria:,'• -
. 'fi I
-
_ tr.:L.,- • etrA
,
1
I•I
-
,
-,11111I• - .
• -6'. =
-
_
_:.....„,
____...
_
.." -
mwmingq1L -, •
•...,,,,, - i
• I
_77_
1
•••I
I „-
„
'
if Mk--
SSEEMENEMEENSI 4.007VO4 vf74.. v.. .
Mt*
• II.
Aw••••••••••
tri ' Kii-VieW ritilli-Ziee'A', . • :f f 0" f f ,C - - I
Frill," WI Vi:207/1* */*:,17,71 4;
.4.4 4 - A w 1 * * 4‘
..."..p II kot-vrt-04.4446._ ,) $4,
i
St....6. 4, ..tvo... fil/ • 10
,- -A
.. .40 y *it) 44 iii ...AA
* 44%, 4` t I:,•7_71 ,k0 • ct,,t• 0 44 - " 7 7 te:, :::#4:7. 77.7
777fir'T7r::::• ',
-. . . - A 'A 44 . m r ' r7.• "' SA 'w`740...Av,- "II.: i re: ;2 4,-,..tze. 4,:=1:<%:-A. liv
at!..:14:‘-...:...;;;:i::::::::::,....:•:•:•!,,.....-,et, :I •-..--- . .,., ,tojir
.k.,, .,, _.,...:
Are.ftfr;v4temexi.t _ _
_ y,:::!::: I •"4-:::::$1.://...„0„...!,;;;;:;..41_ . riti. _44:•_ Jr, :,;:. i . , .
-
--lr,
'....',..--.,"--/::,, ',1,6, °-":„.4::;•--Atr,--y!fileM
- • 'it.;:ilif#fiefZi
'
,
-Nromommumnimml
rft":g 714 Ffitia
- 011
,,;;17,Z44. ••,•
I•••
„
2, L....Z.,
"T•3.*
Rachel Applegate (PND)
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Importance:
Rachel Applegate (PND)
Friday, December 27, 2019 2:54 PM
Eric Smith (PND)
Rachel Applegate (PND)
FW: SUP#Z2019019 *URGENT*
High
From: John Reynolds <reynrace@msn.com >
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2019 1:13 PM
To: PND PZAppeal <PNDPZAppeal@nnaricopa.gov >
Subject: SUP#Z2019019 *URGENT*
Importance: High
I would like to formally appeal the request of SUP #Z2019019. Parcel number 211-52-105B. I am a tenant in
common located directly to the south. Parcel 211-52-109X. This plan goes against what the majority our
affected neighbors want. The property owner is already stacking materials higher than the back wall of the
property. We can't allow our residential neighborhood to deteriorate into industrial. My family has owned
this property since the mid 70s. Anchorpoint welding has only been in that location for a short
time. Approximately 2 years. The majority of people who reside in New River and Desert Hills moved out
there for the rural lifestyle. Please keep it that way.
I am asking you to please reconsider the recommendation for approval of SUP #Z2019019
Thank you
John Reynolds
Planning and Development Department
DATE:
January 15, 2020
TO:
Board of Supervisors
FROM:
Darren Gerard, Planning Manager
SUBJECT:
Z2019019 - Anchorpoint Welding
Agenda Item: PZ-15
Staff has received a petition with 29 signatures in support. Staff has also received 14
letters/e-mails of opposition. Staff has calculated the support and opposition received
to date and notes that a Super Majority Vote has been triggered. The trigger is when 20%
or more of the property owners within a 300 radius of the site, by number and area
register opposition to the case. The opposition received accounts for five property owners
within an area of 167,592 sq. ft. This equates to:
33% opposed parcel acreage within 300' buffer
26% opposed parcel numbers within 300' buffer
Staff also notes that Commission recommended condition 'd' listed below:
d. This Special Use Permit shall expire 10 years from the date of approval by the Board
of Supervisors for a period of 90 or more consecutive days, or upon termination of
the use, whichever occurs first. All of the site improvements shall be removed within
60 days of such termination or expiration.
All proposed construction/improvements could be permitted per Rural-43 standards and
the Special Use Permit is only applicable to the Land Use. Therefore the last sentence is
appropriately deleted so that the modified condition reads as follows, with deleted
language struck-through:
d. This Special Use Permit shall expire 10 years from the date of approval by the Board
of Supervisors for a period of 90 or more consecutive days, or upon termination of
the use, whichever occurs first. co-ke . e-i-FR-9-r-ev-e-FR-e-R
44944-19-e-Fe-m-e-v-e-g-1,6/44-R .
4g-d-e-N, R-T-e-FM-1-11-04-1-0-R
Attachment:
300' support/opposition map (1 page)
Z2019019
Opposition and Support
ITF1
an des.c ned for neneral reference nurnoses onlv. lhewerlUser a areas a Indemnrfv. defend and hold harmless Ma ncooa Coanna. Is aSkers. departments. emn ove es an anents
Eligible parcels: 19
Supporting parcels: 7
Opposition parcels: 5
Supporting parcels sq ft: 181,306.93
Opposition parcels sq ft: 167,591.46
Subject parcels sq ft: 61,557.44
All area inside the 300 buffer: 642,697.33
All area inside the 300' buffer - excluding subject cum Subject Parcel
parcel,
ROW and excluded parcels: 515,018.69
No-response parcels sq ft: 166,120.30
Super Majority opposed parcel acres: 33%
Super Majority opposed parcel number: 26%
Opposition Parcels
I
I 300' Buffer Interior
I
I 300' Buffer Selection
70
35
0 70 Feet
====1111111
=I 300' Buffer
IM Supporting Parcels
www.maricopa.gov/planning
501 North 44th Street, Phoenix, Arizona 85008, (602) 506-3601
IssueTrak # 163501
Page 1 of 2
View Issue #163501
print I back to menus
Add Note
Issue #: 163501
Last Name: CHAPMAN
First Name: JOE
Phone Number: NG
Email Address: backroadranch@aol.com
Permit #: Z2019019
Organization: Planning and Development history
Submitted By: External User, PND on 02-May-2019 3:36PM
history
Division ID:
Subject: FW: Case # Z2019019
Description: Submitted by direct email to rdsaithelpdesk.
From: PD ON CALL PLANNER
Sent: Thursday, 02 May 2019 15:32:13 (UTC-07:00) Arizona
To: pdcustomerservice
Subject: FW: Case # z2019019
From: Backroadranch
Sent: Thursday, 02 May 2019 15:32:02 (UTC-07:00) Arizona
To: PD ON CALL PLANNER
Subject: Case # z2019019
This is a residential area and we do not want this here. I will start up a petition in
the neighborhood if I have too. Thanks
Joe Chapman
Contact Type: Email
Division Type: Development Services
SubType 1: Planning
SubType 2: Support/Opposition for a Project
SubType 3:
SubType 4:
Assigned To: CustomerService, PND on 02-May-2019 3:36PM
details
Adj Time Open: 05:55
Attachments: Issue
163501 (Z2019019 public comment).msg 03-May-2019 10:31AM
Citizen
Information:
details
Close Date:
Closed By:
Total Time Open:
Issue Status:
Priority:
Responsibility
Next Action:
Solution:
Supporting Info
Planning on 03-May-2019 10:08AM
details
Contacted requestor by email.
03-May-2019 10:31AM
Smith, Eric 602-506-4242
05:55
I closed
history
htto://rdsa-sweb01. olandev.mari corm.. 2ov/CSIssue View. aso?IssueNbr=163501 &print—on 05/03/2019
35011 N. 10th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85086.
I am requesting that the Special Use Permit Request for Case #Z2019019 be Denied for the following
reasons:
The location of the Special Use Permit Request is located within an established residential neighborhood
and is land locked by private residences North, South, East, and West of such proposed business.
The location of this proposed business is within an established residential neighborhood that has always
maintained a non- business low traffic volume. The current residential atmosphere will become
nonexistent if such business is allowed to operate within our residential neighborhood and would cause
havoc and safety concerns for all the local residents that reside in and around such property.
As a resident in this neighborhood and living less than a quarter mile from the proposed business, I have
further concerns to include: increased flow of people and traffic, major safety issues concerning
pedestrian adults, school children, equestrian riders. In addition to the increased noise levels, further
business encroachment into the neighborhood, and decreased property values.
Again, please do not allow for the Special Use Permit Request for Case Z2019019 in an established
residential neighborhood.
Thank You,
Dawn Hagerman
35213 N. 10th Street
Phoenix, AZ. 85086
211-52-100
21t-52-107i;
211.52•103C
211-52-icn
211.52-1030
211 ,52-104D
Maricops County
Regional Development Services
GIS Division
ri Ccunty Boundary
Interstate3
State Highway
US Highway
- Major Roads
Residential Streets
I 300 Buffer
Opposition Par ce13
EMI Supporting Parcels
Subject Parcel
I
I 330' Buffer Interior
= 300' Buffer Selection
I _ I Excluded Parcels
111111111•11=
Jan 15. 202011310PM
Opposition Case Summary
* Note: All Area calculations represent the area of the parcel inside the 300' Buffer
Opposition Case Summary
* Note: All Area calculations represent the area of the parcel inside the 300' Buffer
Eligible parcels - excluding subject parcel:
19
Supporting parcels:
7
Opposition parcels:
5
Supporting parcels sq ft:
165,815.75
Opposition parcels sq ft:
167,516.38
Subject parcel sq ft:
61,557.67
All area inside the 300' buffer:
642,507.35
All area inside the 300' buffer - excluding subject parcel, ROW and excluded parcels: 514,965.35
No-response parcels sq ft:
181,633.21
Super Majority opposed parcel acres:
32.53%
Super Majority opposed parcel number:
26.32%
No Response Parcels
Sumortina Parcels
Ormosition Parcels
APN
Area SqFt
Area Acres
APN
Area SqFt
Area Acres
APN
Area SqFt
Area Acres
211-52-103C
30,656.0361
0.7038
211-52-099D
30,259.4798
0.6947
211-52-107B
1,678.7155
0.0385
211-52-106E
43,647.0412
1.002
211-52-100A
5,157.0022
0.1184
211-52-109D
16,446_7099
0.3776
211-52-106G
25,821.971
0.5928
211-52-103D
4,628.9762
0.1063
211-52-109X
90,745.6725
2.0832
211-52-106H
111.2497
0.0026
211-52-106F
27,922.0912
0.641
211-52-057B
29,053.2676
0.667
211-52-106J
9.1917
2.0E-4
211-52-109B
18,694.6746
0_4292
211-52-057C
29,592_0154
0.6793
211-52-109C
43,362.3806
0.9955
211-52-109E
42,934.5551
0.9856
211-52-098C
38,025.3416
0.8729
211-52-098B
36,218.9757
0.8315