Z2023146 BOS REPORT_.PDF

Maricopa County — Formal (2024-05-08)

View PDF Item 20 Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 87407 characters
May 8, 2024 
Z2023146 
Page 1 of 3 
 
 
 
 
Report to the Board of Supervisors 
Prepared by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department 
 
Board Hearing Date: 
May 8, 2024 
 
Case #/Title:   
 
 
Z2023146 – Dollar General Tonopah  
 
Supervisor District: 
5 
 
Applicant/Owner:  
Chris Bertch, AICP, The WLB Group, Inc. / James Speros 
 
Request: 
Zone change with overlay from Rural–43 to C-1 CUPD 
 
Site Location: 
Generally located 2,650 feet east of the SEC of 331st Ave and 
Baseline Rd. in the Buckeye area 
 
Site Size: 
Approximately 1.64 acres 
 
County Island Status: 
N/A 
Additional 
Comments: 
The proposed zoning is to facilitate the potential future location of 
a neighborhood scale retail store. There was some initial concern 
on the project from City of Buckeye as the conceptual site plans 
and elevations did not align with their design guidelines. While the 
site is currently several miles from the city’s jurisdictional boundary 
it is within Buckeye’s municipal planning boundary and assumedly 
Buckeye will be the ultimate annexing municipality. Staff notes that 
city staff confirmed that they have been working closely with the 
applicant as they prepare final designs for the site and the initial 
concern had been satisfied.  It is important to note that the primary 
function of the CUPD overlay is to limit the uses on site to only those 
feasible without urban water and sewer connections.  There are no 
outstanding concerns from reviewing agencies. There is no known 
public opposition. 
  
Commission  
 
Recommendation: 
On 4/11/24, the Commission voted 5-0 to adopt a motion 
recommending the Board of Supervisors approve Z2023146 
subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘h’:  
 
a.
Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the zoning exhibit 
entitled “Zoning Exhibit “, consisting of 2 full-size sheets, dated February 7th, 2024, and 
stamped received February 27th, 2024, except as modified by the following conditions. 
Staff may determine slight refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the 
approved site plan.  Minor and major amendments to the site plan will be determined in 
accordance with Chapter 3 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.

May 8, 2024 
Z2023146 
Page 2 of 3 
 
b.
Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the narrative report 
entitled “Dollar General Project Narrative (2nd submittal)”, consisting of 10 pages, dated 
February 27th, 2024 and stamped received February 27th, 2024, except as modified by the 
following conditions. 
 
c.
The CUPD overlay is applied to restrict the use of the site.  Until such time as the site is 
served by sewer, uses on the site shall only be those acceptable to the Maricopa County 
Environmental Services Department (MCESD) that can be accommodated by septic 
systems.  A public water system and public sewer system shall be required prior to 
establishment of any non-residential use that requires potable water. 
 
d.
The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 
  
1.
Without submittal of a precise plan of development, no development approval is 
inferred by this review, including, but not limited to number of proposed building 
lots/units, drainage design, access and roadway alignments.  These items will be 
addressed as development plans progress and are submitted to the County for further 
review and/or entitlement. 
2.
The traffic impact study is being reviewed for the future entitlement (POD) 
applications(s) 
3.
Engineering review of re-zone cases is conceptual in nature. All development and 
engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 if the Maricopa County 
Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for 
Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, 
standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 
 
e.
Documentation that the City of Buckeye has reviewed proposed site layout shall be 
provided prior to approval of any plan of development on site. 
 
f.
Prior to submittal of plan of development, the subject parcel shall have completed a minor 
land division as per the legal description provided by the applicant so that the area subject 
to the zone change is it’s own parcel. 
 
g.
Administrative approval of a plan of development will be required prior to approval and 
issuance of construction permits to develop and establish use of the site. Prior to 
issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency 
fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in 
accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection 
service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, 
local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. 
 
h.
The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, 
with the consent of the landowner.  The granting of this approval allows the property to 
enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, 
subject to conditions.  In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property 
shall be considered for reversion to the zoning that existed on the date of application in 
accordance with Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance requirements and procedures. .  It is, 
therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with 
any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, 
divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the 
property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the

May 8, 2024 
Z2023146 
Page 3 of 3 
zone change.  The zone change enhances the value of the property above its value as of 
the date the zone change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same 
value of the property as if the zone change had never been granted. 
 
 
Presented by: 
 
Joseph Mueller, Planner 
Reviewed by: 
 
Darren Gérard, AICP, Planning Manager   
 
Attachment: 
 
4/11/24 P&Z Packet (53 pages)  
 
 
Note: 
4/11/24 Draft P&Z Minutes are not available as of the writing of this report, but can be 
provided upon request later when available.

Z2023146 
Page 1 of 6 
Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission 
Prepared by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
Case: 
Z2023146 – Dollar General Tonopah  
 
 
 
 
Hearing Date: 
April 11, 2024 
 
Supervisor District: 
5 
 
 
 
  
 
Applicant: 
Chris Bertch, AICP, The WLB Group, Inc.  
 
Owner: 
James Speros 
   
Request: 
Zone change with overlay from Rural–43 to C-1CUPD 
 
  
 
Site Location: 
Generally located 2,650 feet east of the SEC of 331st Ave and Basline Rd. in 
the Buckeye area 
 
  
Site Size: 
1.41 acres 
 
Density: 
N/A 
 
County Island:  
No 
 
 
County Plan: 
Old US 80 Area Plan – Rural Densities (0-1 d.u. per a.c.) 
 
 
Municipal Plan: 
Buckeye – Agricultural  
 
Municipal Comments: 
City of Buckeye  
 
Support/Opposition: 
None known 
 
Recommendation: 
Approve with conditions

Z2023146 
Page 2 of 6 
Project Summary: 
 
1.
The applicant is proposing a zone change over a 1.41 acre portion of the subject 10 acre property 
from Rural–43 to C-1.  The applicant provided a legal description of the subject area and has 
indicated the intention to conduct a land division upon approval.  The proposed zoning is to 
facilitate the potential location of a Dollar General on site; although staff notes that there is not a 
plan of development on file and final use could be any allowed within the C-1 zoning district if the 
request is approved.  The City of Buckeye expressed concern over the proposal from both a 
technical perspective over concern of site access onto Baseline Rd. and ultimate right-of-way 
consideration, as well as from an aesthetic perspective.  The narrative details steps the applicant 
has taken to work with the city so that final design of the site aligns with the city’s guidelines as 
closely as possible.  These efforts have been confirmed and commended by Buckeye staff. 
 
2.
The subject property does not have recent history prior to the pursuit of the current proposal.  The 
preapplication meeting to discuss the zone change request was held on June 13, 2023.  
Subsequently, the applicant formally applied for the zone change on November 27, 2023 and the 
initial technical advisory committee meeting was held on January 2, 2024. 
 
2024 aerial image

Z2023146 
Page 3 of 6 
 
Zoning Map 
 
 
 
Existing On-Site and Adjacent Zoning / Land Use: 
 
3.
On-site: 
 
Rural - 43 / Vacant 
North: 
Baseline Rd. then IND-2 IUPD / Vacant (entitled for utility scale solar)  
South: 
Rural - 43 / Vacant 
East: 
Rural - 43 / Vacant 
West: 
R1-35 / Vacant 
West: 
Rural-43 / Hickman’s Egg Ranch Inc 
 
 
Utilities and Services: 
 
4.
Water: 
 
On site well 
Wastewater: 
On site septic 
School District: 
Buckeye Union High School District 
Fire: 
Buckeye Valley Fire District 
Police:  
Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office  
 
Right-of-Way: 
 
5.
The following table includes existing and proposed half-width right-of-way and the future 
classification based upon the Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) Major 
Streets and Routes Plan.   
 
Street Name 
Half-width Existing R/W 
Half-width Proposed R/W 
Future Classification 
Baseline Rd 
55’ 
55’ 
Principle Arterial

Z2023146 
Page 4 of 6 
 
Adopted Plan: 
 
6.
Imagine Buckeye 2040 (adopted August 28, 2018; amended June 7, 2022): Defines agriculture 
land uses as those that shall be designated for active agriculture uses, as well as accessory 
agricultural uses and large lot residential.  Development should be low impact and retain rural 
character of the area.  
 
7.
Old US Highway 80 Area Plan (Adopted:) Calls for rural development that is considerate of the 
existing rural lifestyle, preservation of hillsides and floodplains, and compatible with the natural 
environment.  Development shall be of low density due to limited or non-existent urban services. 
 
Public Participation Summary: 
 
8.
The applicant met all public participation requirements by posting the site with two signs and 
sending notice of application to all property owners within 300’ of the subject site.  The applicant 
did not report any communication from the public on the matter.  Likewise, staff have not received 
any public comment on the proposed zone change. 
 
9.
Staff does note that the City of Buckeye provided initial comment on the proposal and conveyed 
concern over the request.  The concerns revolved around the aesthetics of the proposed Dollar 
General as well as concern that the city may require a larger ultimate right-of-way than MCDOT 
once Baseline Rd. becomes maintained by the city in the future.  While the subject property is 
several miles from Buckeye’s current jurisdictional boundary it is within the planning area for the 
city.  As such county staff recommended that the applicant work with the city to hammer out 
details of the proposed development so that the site can mirror the city’s expectations as close 
as possible.  Staff received communication from both the city and the applicant that they have 
been working closely together on the eventual development plan for the site.  City staff confirmed 
that their concerns have been eased and commended the applicant for their willingness to work 
with the city. 
 
Outstanding Concerns from Reviewing Agencies: 
 
10.
N/A 
 
Staff Analysis: 
 
11.
Staff notes that while the proposed C-1 CUPD zoning may not be an exact match to the designated 
land uses in the Old US Highway area plan nor the Image Buckeye 2040 general plan, which both 
designate the area as rural/agricultural, the desired neighborhood commercial zoning on a 
relatively small site seems to be of low impact to the rural character of the area.  Provided 
neighborhood commercial services on a small scale, as this site will be able to do, will help 
support both agricultural and large lot residential uses in the area consistent with both the county 
and City of Buckeye land use designations for the area.  Additionally, the proposed overlay will 
limit uses to just those feasible on well/septic. The applicant has been working with the City of 
Buckeye on final design and development of the site.  Since there is no plan of development 
submitted to county staff, nor is site design part of this analysis, staff recommends condition “e” 
that documentation from the City of Buckeye is provided with submittal of a plan of development 
that they have reviewed the final proposed design of the site.

Z2023146 
Page 5 of 6 
12.
Additionally, staff notes that there is a large agricultural operation run by Hickmann Egg Farm to 
the west and the land north of Baseline Rd. is zoned IND-2 IUPD for a photovoltaic solar facility.  
Given current and expected development trends in the area small scale commercial seems 
appropriate for the subject site.  Staff recommends condition “f” to ensure the property undergoes 
a minor land division upon approval following the legal description  so that proposed zoning does 
not result in a single parcel within two separate zoning designations. 
 
Recommendation: 
 
13.
Staff recommends the Commission adopt a motion recommending that the Board of Supervisors 
approve Z2023146 subject to the following conditions ‘a’ – ‘h’: 
 
a.
Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the zoning exhibit 
entitled “Zoning Exhibit “, consisting of 2 full-size sheets, dated February 7th, 2024, and 
stamped received February 27th, 2024, except as modified by the following conditions. 
Staff may determine slight refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the 
approved site plan.  Minor and major amendments to the site plan will be determined in 
accordance with Chapter 3 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. 
 
b.
Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the narrative report 
entitled “Dollar General Project Narrative (2nd submittal)”, consisting of 10 pages, dated 
February 27th, 2024 and stamped received February 27th, 2024, except as modified by the 
following conditions. 
 
c.
The CUPD overlay is applied to restrict the use of the site.  Until such time as the site is 
served by sewer, uses on the site shall only be those acceptable to the Maricopa County 
Environmental Services Department (MCESD) that can be accommodated by septic 
systems.  A public water system and public sewer system shall be required prior to 
establishment of any non-residential use that requires potable water. 
 
d.
The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 
  
1.
Without submittal of a precise plan of development, no development approval is 
inferred by this review, including, but not limited to number of proposed building 
lots/units, drainage design, access and roadway alignments.  These items will be 
addressed as development plans progress and are submitted to the County for further 
review and/or entitlement. 
2.
The traffic impact study is being reviewed for the future entitlement (POD) 
applications(s) 
3.
Engineering review of re-zone cases is conceptual in nature. All development and 
engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 if the Maricopa County 
Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for 
Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, 
standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 
 
e.
Documentation that the City of Buckeye has reviewed proposed site layout shall be 
provided prior to approval of any plan of development on site. 
 
f.
Prior to submittal of plan of development, the subject parcel shall have completed a minor 
land division as per the legal description provided by the applicant so that the area subject 
to the zone change is it’s own parcel.

Z2023146 
Page 6 of 6 
 
g.
Administrative approval of a plan of development will be required prior to approval and 
issuance of construction permits to develop and establish use of the site. Prior to 
issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency 
fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in 
accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection 
service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, 
local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. 
 
h.
The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, 
with the consent of the landowner.  The granting of this approval allows the property to 
enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, 
subject to conditions.  In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property 
shall be considered for reversion to the zoning that existed on the date of application in 
accordance with Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance requirements and procedures. .  It is, 
therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with 
any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, 
divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the 
property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the 
zone change.  The zone change enhances the value of the property above its value as of 
the date the zone change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same 
value of the property as if the zone change had never been granted. 
 
 
Presented by: 
Joseph Mueller, Planner 
Reviewed by: 
Matthew Holm, AICP, Planning Supervisor 
 
Attachments: 
Case Map (1 page) 
 
Land Use Plan (reduced 8.5”x11”, 1 page) 
 
Narrative Report (10 pages) 
 
Narrative Appendix (25 pages) 
 
MCESD comments (1 page) 
 
DPR comments (1 page) 
 
City of Buckeye (6 pages) 
 
Legal Description (2 pages)

/
0DULFRSD&RXQW\3ODQQLQJ	'HYHORSPHQW3KRHQL[$=

*URVV$FUHVDSSUR[
*HQHUDWHG0DUFK$0
=
$SSOLFDWLRQ1DPH
/HJDO'HVFULSWLRQ
'ROODU*HQHUDO7RQRSDK('5
$SSOLFDQW
&DVH$GGUHVV

&KULV%HUWFKIRU7KH:/%*URXS
$SSOLFDQW3KRQH(PDLO
3DUFHO3ULPDU\

FEHUWFK#ZOEJURXSFRP
0DSVFDOH
6XSHUYLVRU'LVWULFW1R
(
=21(&+$1*()5205872&1232'






ROJECTARRATIVEŒºNDUBMITTAL
ONEHANGEFROM•¼»TO•¹


ORAOLLARENERALETAILTORE
¹‰º•ILE	ASTOFTHE	»»¹STVENUEASELINEOAD
ARICOPAOUNTY

ARICOPAOUNTYASE·‚º¸º»•¹¼¾






















ICINITYAP



















UBMITTEDTO‚
ARICOPAOUNTYLANNINGANDEVELOPMENT
½¸¹ORTH¼¼THTREET€UITEº¸¸
HOENIX€À½¸¸À


NITIALUBMITTAL‚OVEMBERºÁ€º¸º»
ºNDUBMITTAL‚
EBRUARYº¿€º¸º¼
DDRESS‚
»º½¸¹ƒASELINEDƒ
ONOPAHÀ½»½¼

SSESSORšSARCELUMBER‚
‚¼¸¹•»¸•¸¹»	

1


º¸º»•¹¼¾OLLARENERALONEHANGE‰‰ºNDUBMITTAL

º



ROJECTEAM


EVELOPER
HEUPEELMERROUP
C‰OIKEANTLE€ITECQUISITIONS
»¹¹¼	À¹STTREET
ULSA¿¼¹»¿
‚Á¹Àƒ½¹¸ƒ»¸º¿
	‚MMANTLE­RUPEHELMERƒCOM

RCHITECT
	NGINEERING€
C‰OLANETCHAN€RESIDENT
OXº¹»¾
ANDPRINGS¿¼¸¾»
‚Á¹Àƒ½¹¼ƒ¼ºÀ»
	‚ALAN­AABENGƒCOM

PPLICANT‰LANNER‰	NGINEER‰ANDSCAPERCHITECT
HEROUP€
NCƒ
C‰OHRISERTCH€

¹¾¸¸ROADWAYOAD·¹½¸
EMPEÀ½ºÀº
‚¼À¸ƒ¿»¾ƒ¹¾¸¸
	‚CBERTCH­WLBGROUPƒCOM

ROPERTYWNER
AMESPEROS
¹º¹¸	ORTHERNVENUE
HOENIXÀ½¸º¸
‚¾¸ºƒÁº¸ƒº½½¿
	‚SPEROSJD­AOLƒCOM




URPOSEOFEQUEST

HEROUP€
NCƒ€ONBEHALFOFHEUPEELMERROUP€ISRESUBMITTINGTHISONEHANGE
SUBMITTALPACKAGEFORAPROPOSEDOLLARENERALRETAILSTORETOBELOCATEDONE•HALF•MILEEASTOF
THESOUTHEASTCORNEROFOUTH»»¹STVENUEANDASELINEOAD€WITHINUNINCORPORATEDARICOPA
OUNTYƒLANOFEVELOPMENTŒWILLBESUBMITTEDSUBSEQUENTLY€UPONAPPROVALOFTHEONE
HANGEREQUESTƒHISSUBMITTALISAFOLLOW•UPTOTHEMEETINGHELDWITHARICOPAOUNTY
LANNINGANDEVELOPMENTTAČONANUARYº€º¸º¼ƒ

HE PPLICANT IS SEEKING ONE HANGE FROM •¼» URAL ESIDENTIAL TO •¹ EIGHBORHOOD
OMMERCIALƒHEPROPERTYISCURRENTLYZONED•¼»URALESIDENTIAL€WHICHALLOWSFORLARGE•LOT
RESIDENTIALUSESOFRURALCHARACTERƒCCORDINGTOTHEARICOPAOUNTYONINGRDINANCEŒ€
THEPRINCIPALPURPOSEOFTHISZONINGDISTRICTISTO›CONSERVEANDPROTECTFARMSANDOTHEROPENLAND
USES„FOSTER ORDERLY GROWTH IN RURAL AND AGRICULTURAL AREAS„œƒ NDER THIS ZONING€ A RETAIL
ESTABLISHMENTSUCHASAOLLARENERALRETAILSTOREISNOTPERMITTEDƒITHTHEADJACENTPARCELSAND
MUCH OF THE LANDS IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY SIMILARLY ZONED LARGE•LOT RESIDENTIAL€ THERE LACKS
OPPORTUNITIESTOCREATEABALANCEOFCOMMERCIALRETAILUSESAMONGLARGE•LOTRESIDENTIALTYPESƒ
MENDINGTHEDESIGNATIONTO•¹COULDBEADVANTAGEOUSTOALOCALECONOMYBYPROVIDINGJOBSAND
OČERINGPRODUCTSANDSERVICESTHATMEETTHECOMMUNITYšSNEEDSƒ


ESCRIPTIONOFROPOSAL

HEPROPOSEDOLLARENERALSTOREWILLOCCUPYAPARCELOFAPPROXIMATELY¹ƒ¾¼ACRESOFLANDTHAT
ISCURRENTLYVACANTƒHISPARCELISAPORTIONOFALARGERVACANTPARCELOFAPPROXIMATELY¹¸ƒ½ÁACRES€
IDENTIĉEDASARICOPAOUNTYSSESSORšSARCELUMBER¼¸¹•»¸•¸¹»	HEPROPERTYADDRESSIS
GENERALLYRECOGNIZEDAS»º½¸¹ASELINEOAD€ONOPAHÀ½»½¼ANDISLOCATEDWITHINA
PORTIONOFTHEORTHEASTUARTEROFECTION»€OWNSHIP¹OUTH€ANGE½ESTOFTHEILAAND
ALTIVERASEANDERIDIAN€ARICOPAOUNTY€RIZONAƒ

HE PPLICANT IS PROPOSING A ¹º€¾¿¸ SQUARE•FOOT€ ONE•STORY OLLAR ENERAL COMMERCIAL RETAIL
STORE€WITHAPROPOSEDBUILDINGHEIGHTOFº¸FEETƒHESTOREWILLBESERVICEDBYAWATERWELLAND
TANKFACILITYLOCATEDATTHESOUTHEASTCORNEROFTHEBUILDINGƒOLIDWASTEANDREFUSECOLLECTIONFROM
THESTORE‰SITEWILLBEACCOMMODATEDBYAWASTERECEPTACLEENCLOSURELOCATEDATTHESOUTHWEST
CORNEROFTHEPROPERTY€SCREENEDBYA•BLOCKWALLENCLOSURESIXŒ¾FEETINHEIGHTƒº½•FOOT•
WIDELANDSCAPESETBACKISPROPOSEDBEHINDTHE¿¸•FOOTULTIMATERIGHT•OF•WAYOFASELINEOAD€IN
FRONT OF THE PARKING AREA ŒAS PER THE ITY OF UCKEYE EVELOPMENT ODEƒ HE WEST PROPERTY
BOUNDARY WILL INCORPORATE A SIX•FOOT•HIGH SOLID BLOCK WALL AS A SCREENING MEASURE€ AS THE
NEIGHBORINGPROPERTYISZONED¹•»½ƒHISMAINTAINSCOMPLIANCEWITHTHEƒ

HEPROPOSEDBUILDINGISORIENTEDNORTHTOWARDASELINEOADFORMAXIMUMVISIBILITYƒHEPROJECT
PROPOSESATOTALOF½¹PARKINGSTALLS€INCLUDINGTHREEŒ»•ACCESSIBLESTALLS€INCOMPLIANCEWITH
THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS IDENTIĉED IN  ECTION ¹¹¸ºƒ TANDARD STALL DIMENSIONS WILL
MEASURE¹¸FEETWIDEANDº¸FEETDEEP€AND•ACCESSIBLESTALLSWILLMEASURE¹ºFEETWIDEAND
º¸FEETDEEPƒ


º¸º»•¹¼¾OLLARENERALONEHANGE‰‰ºNDUBMITTAL

¼


UTDOORLIGHTINGWILLBEREĊECTEDDOWNANDAWAYFROMADJACENTPROPERTIESANDWILLCOMPLYWITH
THEPROVISIONSIDENTIĉEDBYECTION¹¹¹ºƒFREESTANDING›OLLARENERALœPYLONSIGNIS
PROPOSEDTOBELOCATEDONTHESITE€ADJACENTTOTHEASELINEOADRIGHT•OF•WAY€INCONFORMANCE
WITHECTION¹¼¸»ƒHISSIGNAGEDETAILISINCLUDEDINTHEPPENDIXOFTHISREPORTƒ

HENORMALHOURSOFOPERATIONFORTHEOLLARENERALSTOREWILLBESEVENDAYSAWEEK€À‚¸¸TO
¹¸‚¸¸ƒTYPICALSHIFTWILLCONSISTOFATLEASTTWOŒºEMPLOYEESƒOLLARENERALSTORESCARRYA
VARIETYOFDAILYHOUSEHOLDITEMSATDISCOUNTEDPRICESŒGENERALLY¼¸æCHEAPERTHANMOSTGROCERS
ANDDISCOUNTRETAILERS€INCLUDINGPRODUCE€MEAT€DAIRYPRODUCTSANDPERISHABLEFOODSƒ

ITHOVER¹¼€¸¸¸STORESANDALMOST¹¸¸YEARSINOPERATION€OLLARENERALHASBEENPROACTIVEIN
BUILDINGACONSIDERABLE NATIONALPRESENCEBYREDUCINGFOODINSECURITYACROSSTHE COUNTRYƒHE
RETAILERHASMADEANIMPACTBYOČERINGAVARIETYOFFOODOPTIONS€INCLUDINGTHECOMPONENTSOFA
NUTRITIOUSMEAL€ATAČORDABLEPRICESINCOMMUNITIESTHATOTHERCOMPANIESEITHERCANNOTORWILLNOT
SERVEƒOLLARENERALHASSUCCESSFULLYBUILTAND OPERATEDSEVERALSTORES THROUGHOUTARICOPA
OUNTY€ASTHERETAILERHASDEMONSTRATEDTHEABILITYTOBEANASSETTOTHESERURALCOMMUNITIESAND
HOPESTOMAINTAINAPRESENCEINREGIONSINNEEDOFARELIABLEGENERALSTOREANDMIGHTNOTOTHERWISE
HAVEACCESSTOONEƒHISMAKESTHEPROPOSEDZONECHANGEAVALUABLEBENEĉTTOTHECOMMUNITYƒ

























ô
1
ERIALAPOFUBJECTITE
9DFDQW
ϰϬϭͲϯϬͲϬϭϯ


º¸º»•¹¼¾OLLARENERALONEHANGE‰‰ºNDUBMITTAL

½

ELATIONSHIPTOURROUNDINGROPERTIES

HELDÀ¸REALANANDTHEONOPAH•RLINGTONREALANARETWOACTIVEARICOPAOUNTY
REALANSTHATGOVERNLANDUSEINTHEIMMEDIATEAREAOFTHEUBJECTITEƒHEYBOTHINCLUDELAND
USEPLANSTHATWORKINCONCERTWITHTHEARICOPAOUNTYOMPREHENSIVELANŒISIONº¸»¸ƒHE
ANDSECLASSIĉCATIONFORTHEUBJECTITEISIDENTIĉEDASURALENSITIESŒ¸•¹DU‰ACINTHELD
À¸REALAN€WHICHGOVERNSLANDUSESOUTHOFASELINEOADƒHELANDNORTHOFASELINEOAD
ISGOVERNEDBYTHEONOPAH•RLINGTONREALAN€WHICHDESIGNATESTHELANDUSENORTHOFTHEUBJECT
ITEASURALENSITIESŒ¸•¹DU‰AC€ALTHOUGHAAJOROMPREHENSIVELANMENDMENTŒWAS
APPROVEDINº¸º¸TOAMENDTHEZONINGANDLANDUSEDESIGNATIONSOFANASSEMBLAGEOFTATE•AND
PRIVATELY•OWNEDPARCELS€INCLUDINGANASSEMBLAGEOFPARCELSTOTHENORTH€OPPOSITEASELINEOADƒ
HEAMENDEDTHISLANDUSEFROMURALENSITIESTOTILITIES€WHICH€ACCORDINGTOTHE
SUBMITTAL TO THE OUNTY€ WILL ALLOW FOR THE EXPANSION OF A PROPOSED PHOTOVOLTAIC Œ SOLAR
GENERATIONFACILITYWITHENERGYSTORAGEANDASSOCIATEDFACILITIESƒ

URRENTLY€THECHARACTERISTICSOFTHEUBJECTITEAREANALOGOUSTOMUCHOFTHELANDSURROUNDING
THESITEƒ	XCEPTFORICKMANšS	GG
ARMJUSTWESTOFTHESITE€THEADJACENTPROPERTIESAREPRIMARILY
VACANTWITHSPARSEDESERTLANDSCAPING€GENERALLYĊATTOPOGRAPHYWITHLITTLETONOPHYSICALFEATURESƒ
HEEGGFARMPROPERTYCONSISTSOFSHADEDSTRUCTURES€FEEDLOTS€ANDUNPAVEDROADWAYSWITHMINOR
PARKINGAREASƒHEUBJECTISNOTLOCATEDINANYKNOWNĊOODWAYSORĊOODPLAINSƒ

HEONINGANDOMPREHENSIVELANANDSEINFORMATIONFORTHEPROPERTIESENCOMPASSINGTHE
UBJECTITEISIDENTIĉEDINTHETABLESANDDIAGRAMSBELOWƒMAPILLUSTRATINGEACHPARCELšSLOCATION
INRELATIONTOONEANOTHERISALSOLOCATEDINTHEPPENDIXƒ


IRECTION FROM
UBJECTITE




LDIGHWAYÀ¸
REALANANDSE

	XISTING
ONING


	XISTINGSE
UBJECTITE
¼¸¹•»¸•¸¹»	
URALENSITIESŒ¸•¹DU‰AC
•¼»
ACANT
OUTH
¼¸¹•»¸•¸¹»
URALENSITIESŒ¸•¹DU‰AC
•¼»
ACANT
	AST
¼¸¹•»¸•¸¹»
URALENSITIESŒ¸•¹DU‰AC
•¼»
ACANT
EST
¼¸¹•»¸•¸¹º
URALENSITIESŒ¸•¹DU‰AC
•¼»
ICKMANšS	GG
ARM
EST
¼¸¹•»¸•¸¹º
URALENSITIESŒ¸•¹DU‰AC
¹•»½
ACANT
ORTH
TATERUSTAND
URALENSITIESŒ¸•¹DU‰AC”
‰‰TILITIES””

•º
ACANTŒ
UTUREHOTOVOLTAICOLAR

ACILITY

”RIGINALANDSEPERADOPTEDONOPAH‰RLINGTONREALAN
””ANDSEHASSINCEBEENAMENDEDTO›TILITIESœ€PERº¸º¸•¸¸¹










º¸º»•¹¼¾OLLARENERALONEHANGE‰‰ºNDUBMITTAL

¾












































 


6,7(
/HJHQGǕ&LW\RI%XFNH\H*HQHUDO3ODQ/DQG8VH
$JULFXOWXUH
5XUDO

1
dŚĞ^ƵďũĞĐƚ^ŝƚĞĂŶĚĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƉƌŽƉĞƌƟĞƐĂƌĞŶŽƚ
ůŽĐĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶƵĐŬĞLJĞ͛ ƐũƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƟŽŶ͖ ŚŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ 
ƚŚĞLJĚŽĨĂůůǁŝƚŚŝŶƵĐŬĞLJĞ͛ ƐŽǀĞƌĂůůƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐĂƌĞĂ͘ 
%DVHOLQH5G
ITYOFUCKEYEENERALLANANDSE
/HJHQGǕ0DULFRSD&RXQW\$UHD3ODQ/DQG8VH
5XUDO'HQVLWLHVGXDF2OG86+Z\

8WLOLWLHV7RQRSDK$UOLQJWRQ

%DVHGRQ&3$$SSOLFDWLRQ
6,7(
1
%DVHOLQH5G
ARICOPAOUNTYREALANANDSE
6,7(
/HJHQGǕ([LVWLQJ=RQLQJ
,1'/LJKW,QGXVWULDO
585XUDODFUH'8
56LQJOH)DPLO\6)'8
ARICOPAOUNTY	XISTINGONING
¹•»½
1
%DVHOLQH5G


º¸º»•¹¼¾OLLARENERALONEHANGE‰‰ºNDUBMITTAL

¿

OCATIONANDCCESSIBILITY

HEUBJECTITEISINASPARSELYPOPULATEDAREAAPPROXIMATELY¼¸MILESWESTOFDOWNTOWNHOENIX
ANDHASDIRECTPHYSICALACCESSTOASELINEOAD€APAVED€PUBLICRIGHT•OF•WAYWITHONELANEIN
EACHDIRECTIONCURRENTLYMAINTAINEDBYARICOPAOUNTYƒHENEXT•CLOSESTPAVED€PUBLICROADWAY
IS»»¹STVENUE€ANORTH•SOUTHARTERIALROADWAYLOCATEDAPPROXIMATELYONE•HALF•MILEWESTOFTHE
UBJECTITEƒICKMANšS	GGANCHANDPROCESSINGPLANTISLOCATEDJUSTSOUTHWESTOFTHEUBJECT
ITEƒ HE ALO ERDE UCLEAR ENERATING TATION IS APPROXIMATELY ĉVE Œ½ MILES WEST AND IS
CONSIDEREDAMAJORASSETTOTHEREGION€EMPLOYINGABOUTº€¸¸¸WORKERSANDISTHECOUNTRYšSLARGEST
CLEAN•AIRENERGYPRODUCERƒ


NTERSTATE¹¸ISAMAJOREAST‰WEST THOROUGHFARELOCATEDAPPROXIMATELY ½ƒ½MILESNORTH OFTHE
UBJECTITEANDCANBEACCESSEDVIA»»ÁTHVENUETOTHEWESTƒESTALOMEIGHWAYISAN
IMPROVEDROADWAYWITHONELANEINEACHDIRECTIONLOCATEDAPPROXIMATELYONEMILEWESTOFTHE
UBJECTITE€GENERALLYEXTENDINGNORTHWESTTOWARD
NTERSTATE¹¸ƒ

HECLOSESTINCORPORATEDJURISDICTIONTOTHEUBJECTITEISTHEITYOFUCKEYEƒUCKEYEšSCITY
LIMITS ARE APPROXIMATELY TWO Œº MILES EAST OF THE PROPERTY AT OHNSON OAD€ BUT THE OVERALL
PLANNINGAREAFORUCKEYEEXTENDSWESTOFTHEPROPERTYTO»»¹STVENUEƒHEREFORE€THEUBJECT
ITEFALLSWITHINTHEITYOFUCKEYEšSPLANNINGAREABOUNDARIESWITHAANDSEESIGNATIONOF
›GRICULTUREœƒLTHOUGHTHESITEISCURRENTLYLOCATEDINANUNINCORPORATEDAREAOFARICOPAOUNTY€
ITISLIKELYTHAT€INTHEFUTURE€THESITEANDSURROUNDINGPROPERTIESWILLBEANNEXEDINTOTHEITYOF
UCKEYEƒHEREFORE€THEPROJECTTEAMHASMADETHEEČORTTOPREPAREADEVELOPMENTPLANTHAT
MEETSTHEITYšSREQUIREMENTSTOTHEGREATESTEXTENTPOSSIBLE€WHILESTILLMAINTAININGCOMPLIANCE
WITH THE OUNTYšS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDSƒ LANNING STAČ FROM THE ITY OF UCKEYE PROVIDED
COMMENTSONTHEINITIALSUBMITTALOFTHISONEHANGEAPPLICATION€WITHTHOSECOMMENTSBEING
DISTRIBUTEDANDDISCUSSEDDURINGTHEANUARYº€º¸º¼MEETINGƒHEPROJECTTEAMORGANIZEDA
SEPARATEVIRTUALMEETINGWITHTHEITYOFUCKEYESTAČSUBSEQUENTTOTHEMEETING€ANDTHE
COMMENTSHAVEBEENACKNOWLEDGEDANDADDRESSEDASPARTOFTHISFOLLOW•UPSUBMITTAL€INCLUDING
VARIOUSMODIĉCATIONSTOTHEROPOSEDITELANƒHESECOMMENTSANDRESPONSESCANBEFOUNDIN
THEPPENDIXƒ


IRCULATIONYSTEM

HEROPERTYISGENERALLYBOUNDEDONTHENORTHBYASELINEOAD€AMAJOREAST‰WESTTHOROUGHFARE
EXTENDINGTHROUGHMUCHOFTHEHOENIXMETROAREAANDACCOMMODATINGASIGNIĉCANTNUMBEROF
DAILY TRIPSƒ HIS PORTION OF ASELINE OAD IS A  MAINTAINED ROADWAY THAT IS MUCH LESS
TRAVELEDWITHONLYONEVEHICULARTRAVELLANEINEACHDIRECTIONƒERTHEOADWAYTANDARD
ANUAL€THISSECTIONOFASELINEOADISCURRENTLYCLASSIĉEDASAURALINOROLLECTOR€WHILETHE
PROPOSED ROADWAY CLASSIĉCATION IS A URAL RINCIPAL RTERIALƒ  ½½•FOOT  ROADWAY
DEDICATIONISCURRENTLYSHOWNFORTHEFUTUREHALF•RIGHT•OF•WAYOFASELINEOAD€BUTIFASELINE
OADISTOBEFULLYBUILTOUTASAURALRINCIPALRTERIALROADWAY€A¿½•FOOTHALF•RIGHT•OF•WAYWOULD
TYPICALLYBEREQUIREDƒOWEVER€ASPREVIOUSLYDISCUSSED€THISPORTIONOFASELINEOADFALLSWITHIN


º¸º»•¹¼¾OLLARENERALONEHANGE‰‰ºNDUBMITTAL

À

THEITYOFUCKEYEšSLANNINGREA€WHERETHEITYšSROADWAYCLASSIĉCATIONSYSTEMIDENTIĉES
ASELINEOADASARINCIPALRTERIALROADWAYWITHA¹¼¸•FOOTTOTALRIGHT•OF•WAYƒ
URTHERDISCUSSION
BETWEENTHEPROJECTTEAM€ARICOPAOUNTYLANNINGANDEVELOPMENTTAČANDITYOFUCKEYE
LANNING TAČ LED TO THE DETERMINATION THAT THIS PORTION OF ASELINE OAD WILL EVENTUALLY BE
MANAGEDBYTHEITYOFUCKEYE€ANDTHEREFORESHALLFOLLOWTHEDIMENSIONSOFTHEITYšSRINCIPAL
RTERIALCROSS•SECTION€INCORPORATINGAHALF•RIGHT•OF•WAYWIDTHOF¿¸FEETƒ
TISTHEINTENTOFTHE
DEVELOPER TO BUILD A RIGHT•OF•WAY THAT COMPLIES WITH THE ITY OF UCKEYEšS REQUIREMENTS OF A
RINCIPALRTERIALROADWAYWHILEALSOTAKINGINTOCONSIDERATIONTHESTANDARDSPECIĉCATIONS
FORANYTEMPORARYROADWAYIMPROVEMENTSSUCHASPAVING€ACCESS€TURNLANES€ETCƒHEITYOF
UCKEYERINCIPALRTERIALROSS•ECTIONCANBEREFERENCEDINTHEPPENDIXƒ

ECAUSETHEWESTBOUNDARYLINEOFTHEUBJECTITELINESUPWITHTHEHALF•MILEPOINTBETWEEN
SECTIONLINES€ANACCESSROADWAYWILLBEPROPOSEDATTHISLOCATIONƒHISROADWAYWILLNOTONLYOČER
INGRESS‰EGRESSTOTHEUBJECTITEBUTWILLBEPLANNEDSUCHTHATNEIGHBORINGPARCELSTOTHEWEST
ANDSOUTHWILLALSOBEACCESSIBLEFROMASELINEOADƒ
TISTHEINTENTOFTHEDEVELOPERTOOČERFULL
VEHICULARACCESSTOTHEOLLARENERALSTORETHEREFORE€IFASELINEOADISTOBEIMPROVEDASA
RINCIPAL RTERIAL PER ITY OF UCKEYE ROADWAY DESIGN SPECIĉCATIONS€ A MEDIAN BREAK AT THIS
LOCATIONWILLBEINCORPORATEDTOALLOWFULL•ACCESSTOTHESITEŒFORLEFT•TURNSƒ
TISLIKELYTHATARIGHT•
TURNLANEONASELINEOADWILLBEINCORPORATEDASANINGRESSPOINT€BASEDONTHEOUTCOMEOFTHE
TRAČICIMPACTANALYSISƒ

HELOCATIONOFTHEACCESSPOINTONASELINEOADWASALSOCHOSENDUETOITšSALIGNMENTWITHTHE
MIDPOINTANDHALF•MILEPOINTBETWEENTHEECTIONLINESONE•MILEAPARTƒHILETHISISTHEOPTIMAL
LOCATIONFORAROADWAYCONNECTIONTOASELINEOAD€ITFALLSSHORTOFTHESTANDARDFORTHEMINIMUM
WIDTHBETWEENINTERSECTIONSONARTERIALROADWAYS€WHICHIS»¸¸FEETƒNEXISTINGACCESSDRIVEWAY
TOTHEICKMAN	GG
ARMSITEISLOCATEDAPPROXIMATELYºÀ¸FEETWESTOFTHEPROPOSEDACCESSDRIVEƒ
HISDETAILWASADDRESSEDDURINGCONVERSATIONSWITHARICOPAOUNTYLANNINGANDEVELOPMENT
STAČDURINGTHEMEETING€ASWELLASITYOFUCKEYELANNINGSTAČDURINGTHEVIRTUALMEETING
BETWEENTHEPROJECTTEAMANDTHEITY€ANDTHECONSENSUSWASTHATTHEOUNTYANDITYWOULD
ALLOWRELIEFFROMTHISSTIPULATIONƒ

OACCOMMODATETHEPARKINGNEEDS€Œ½¹PARKINGSTALLSINCLUDINGTHREEŒ»ACCESSIBLEPARKING
STALLSAREPROPOSEDƒHEDRIVEAISLESWILLBECONSTRUCTEDWITHHEAVYDUTYASPHALTPAVEMENT€WITH
STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT USED FOR THE PARKING STALLSƒ  LOADING AND UNLOADING AREA€
INCLUDINGTHETRASHRECEPTABLEPAD€WILLBECONSTRUCTEDWITHCONCRETEPAVEMENT€ANDTHETRASH
RECEPTACLESWILLBESCREENEDBYASIXŒ¾FOOT•HIGHBLOCKWALLONTHREESIDESƒ


EVELOPMENTCHEDULE

HEPROJECTISPROPOSEDTOBEDEVELOPEDINONEPHASEƒHEANTICIPATEDCONSTRUCTIONTIMEFORTHE
PROJECTISAPPROXIMATELY¹º¸•¹½¸DAYS€ANDASSUMINGREVIEWS€RESUBMITTALSANDAPPROVALSARE
PROCESSEDATTHESTANDARDINTERVALSANDTIMEFRAMES€THEDEVELOPERPLANSTOOPENDURING¹ORº
OFº¸º½ƒ


º¸º»•¹¼¾OLLARENERALONEHANGE‰‰ºNDUBMITTAL

Á

UBLICTILITIESAND
ACILITIES

HEUBJECTITE‰PROPOSEDOLLARENERALRETAILSTOREIS‰WILLBESERVEDBYTHEFOLLOWINGPUBLIC
UTILITIESANDACCOMPANYINGSERVICEPROVIDERS‚



UBLICTILITIES
ERVICEROVIDERS

IREROTECTION
UCKEYEALLEY
IREISTRICT
OLICEROTECTION
ARICOPAOUNTYHERIȒSČICEŒ
ATER

RIVATEELLN•ITE
ASTEWATER 
EPTICN•ITE
AS


OUTHWESTAS
	LECTRIC

RIZONAUBLICERVICEŒ
ELEPHONE

OXOMMUNICATIONS
EFUSE

RIVATEONTRACTOR
CHOOLISTRICT
UCKEYE NION IGH CHOOL ISTRICT ‰ IBERTY
	LEMENTARYCHOOLISTRICT

PPENDIX



A. Maricopa County Comments and Responses  
B. City of Buckeye Comments and Responses
C. Traffic Consultant Response to MCDOT RE: Traffic Statement 
D. Existing and Proposed Zoning Exhibit
E. Legal Description of Subject Site
F. Proposed Site Plan (3 Pages)
G. City of Buckeye Boundary and Planning Area Map
H. Pylon Sign Detail
I. Baseline Road Right-of-Way Cross-Section Details 
 
 







301 W. Jefferson St. Suite 170  ƒ Phoenix, AZ  85003 ƒ (602) 506-7629 ƒ 
Joseph.Mueller@maricopa.gov
                   561                                                                 ¾Internet:  www.maricopa.gov/planning½                                                    
 
TO: 
 
Chris Bertch, The WLB Group, Inc. 
 
DATE:  
December 29, 2023 
 
FROM: 
Joseph Mueller, Planner   
 
RE: 
Dollar General Tonopah 
 
CASE #: 
Z2023146 – 1st Review Comments    
 
 
  
The Planning Division has the following comments, questions, and requirements 
regarding the requested zone change. 
 
 
General Comments 
 
1) 
Staff have not yet received evidence of site posting nor the notarized affidavit for the 
public participation process (located in application packet).  These items are to be 
completed within 30 days of submittal.  Please provide as soon as you can. 
Completed on 1/2/2014 
 
2) 
Please see attached response from City of Buckeye.  The city has expressed some 
general opposition over the proposed zone change request, but has offered some 
conditions, that if followed, would ease their opposition.  Since the subject site is within 
the city’s municipal planning boundary, staff will take the city’s position and requests 
into strong consideration while assessing the proposed zone change.  Staff 
recommends revising documents to accommodate the city’s preferred conditions.  
Staff will likely incorporate these requests into the recommended conditions of 
approval presented to the planning and zoning commission/Board of Supervisors.
Responses to the City of Buckeye staff comments are included with this submittal. 
 
 
3) 
Please provide a legal description of just the portion of the parcel that is included in 
the zone change request so that the zoning may be properly mapped in the county 
systems if approved.
Provided under separate cover, attached to Accella project dashboard.  
 
4) 
Please include a zoning exhibit for the site that consists of a scaled depiction of the 
subject property, a legal description, and contains the proposed zoning district.  The 
conceptual site plan may still be included as an exhibit to the revised narrative. 
      Provided under separate cover, attached to Accella project dashboard.
 
5) 
Staff has some concern over the lack of urban water/sewer services to the property.  
While the proposed Dollar General store, as well as most C-1 uses, are typically 
compatible with well/septic systems some uses included in the suite of allowed uses 
under C-1 zoning may not be (example: restaurant services).  Staff typically prefers 
sites reliant on well/septic to include a CUPD overlay when seeking commercial zone

Planning & Development  
Department 
 
 
 
301 W Jefferson ƒ Phoenix, AZ  85008 ƒ (602) 372-0318 ƒ (602) 506-3711 fax 
                                                                                             ¾Internet:  www.maricopa.gov/planning½                                               
change entitlements as to not include uses not compatible with septic as part of the 
entitlement.  Please address in the narrative. 
 
     Dollar General is the end user of the site. Any future entitlements, while not anticipated, 
                will preclude uses that are not compatible with septic. 
 
Narrative 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Submittal Documents 
 
Please submit the following documents via e-mail or server to Attention: Joseph 
Mueller: 
 
 
Zoning Exhibit 
 
Narrative 
 
Photographic evidence of site posting/notarized affidavit 
 
 
  
This packet includes all review comments from the following County agencies: 
9 MCESD  
9 Engineering

Page 1 of 1
Jeri Loucks, PECFM 
Planning & Development 
301 W. Jefferson St., Suite 170 
Phoenix, Arizona 85003 
Phone: (602) 506-6332 
www.maricopa.gov/planning 
Email address: 
jeri.loucks@maricopa.gov 
Planning & Development 
 
Engineering Plan Review 
Date:
December 19, 2023
Memo To:
Darren Gerard, AICP, Planning Manager, Department of Planning & 
Development
Attn:
Warren Rivera, Planner, Planning & Development Services
From:
Jeri Loucks, P.E.C.F.M., Engineering Supervisor, Planning & 
Development Services
cc:
Michael Norris, P.E., Engineering Manager, Planning & Development
Subject:
Z2023145 - Zone Change to C-1 (no POD)
(E1 Memo)
Job Site Address:East of 331st Avenue & Baseline Road
APN(s):
401-30-013E
This application is to specify zoning for future development and does not include a 
Plan of Development.
PND Engineering Plan Review (DPR, FCD and PND Transportation) has reviewed the 
1st submittal of the Zone Change application routed for review on November 29, 2023,
and has no objections subject to the following conditions:
1. Without the submittal of a precise plan of development, no development approval 
is inferred by this review, including, but not limited to number of proposed building 
lots/units, drainage design, access and roadway alignments. These items will be 
addressed as development plans progress and are submitted to the County for 
further review and/or entitlement.
2. The traffic impact study is being reviewed for the future entitlement (POD) 
application(s).
3. Engineering review of re-zone cases is conceptual in nature. All development and 
engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa 
County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain 
Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current 
engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for 
construction.
Please contact me if you have any questions or require any additional information.

Page | 1  
 
Subdivision 
Infrastructure  
& Planning Program 
301 W. Jefferson St. 
Phoenix, AZ 85003 
 
S u b d i vi s io n @ m a ri co p a .go v 
e s d .m a r i c o pa .g o v 
 
 
 
 
 
The Maricopa County Environmental Services Department (MCESD) has completed review 
for the Dollar General Tonopah.  Zone Change from RU-43 to C-1 (no POD)   planning case(s). 
Please note the following MCESD requirements for site development: 
Drinking Water –  
Onsite Wastewater –  
A Notice of Intent to Discharge application for an onsite wastewater treatment (septic) 
system is required for any construction. Application must be submitted to the MCESD 
Onsite Wastewater Program. 
x 
Wastewater is not permitted to discharge to an adjacent parcel’s septic system. 
 
For Onsite Wastewater related questions, please contact the Onsite Program at (602) 506-
6666 or by email at septicquestions@maricopa.gov. 
Additional Notes –  
Environmental Services does not require these items for condition of approval of  Z2023146, however 
these items must be addressed with the development of the site. Environmental Services does not 
require additional review of this case. 
 
*It should be noted that this document does not approve the referenced project. Comments are provided 
for the benefit of the applicant for MCESD permit requirements and as an advisory to Maricopa County 
Planning and Development Department. Other Maricopa County agencies may have additional 
requirements. Final review and approval will be made through Planning and Development Department 
procedures. Applicant may need to submit separate applications to the Maricopa County Environmental 
Services Department for approval of proposed facilities regulated by the Department. Review of any such 
application will be based on current regulations at the time of application. 
 
 
 
 
Project Name: Dollar General Tonopah.  
Zone Change from RU-43 to C-1 (no 
POD)   
Primary Contact Name:  Chris Bertch 
Planning Application Type: Zone Change 
APN(s):  401-30-013E 
Reviewer: Souren Naradikian, P.E. 
Email: Souren.Naradikian@maricopa.gov 
Phone: 602-372-2907 
Planner Name:  Joseph Mueller 
Planning Case #:  Z2023146 
Date: December 7, 2023 
 
Water and Waste Management Division

Planning & Development
Building Plan Review 
Mark Sipes, PE, SE, CBO 
Planning & Development 
301 W. Jefferson St., Suite 170 
Phoenix, Arizona 85003 
Phone: (602) 506.7145 
www.maricopa.gov/planning 
Email address: 
mark.sipes@maricopa.gov 
Date:
02 Jan 2024
Memo To:
Darren Gerard, AICP, Planning Manager, Department of Planning & 
Development
Attn:
Joseph Mueller, Planner, Planning & Development Services
From:
Mark Sipes, P.E., S.E., CBO, Chief Building Official, Planning & 
Development Services
cc:
Toral Patel, Building Examiner Supervisor
Oscar Torres, Building Examiner Supervisor
Subject:
Z2023146 Dollar General
APN(s):        401-30-013E
Building Review has reviewed the first submittal plan and report for the subject 
application and has the following comments:
DRAINAGE PLAN REVIEW
1. The currently adopted building codes are the ICC 2018 IBC, IPC, IMC, IEBC and the 
2017 NEC.
2. Please consult with fire authority having jurisdiction regarding the permits for fire
department access and systems requirements including sprinklers and alarms. This 
site appears to be within the South County Fire & Medical jurisdiction, please call 
623.544.5400 to verify.

MCDOT -- TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 
REVIEW COMMENT SHEET 
1 of 2 
Project Name: Tonopah Dollar General 
Location:  32501 W Baseline Rd Tonopah 
MCDOT File No.: Z2023146 
Date: 12/21/23 
Reviewer: Toni Middleton 
Phone No.: 602.506.0074
Consultant: Greenlight Traffic Engineering 
Project No.:   
Plans Sealed By: Collette Frohlich, PE 
Consultant Code: 
A = Will Comply        B = Deleted 
C = Consultant to Evaluate
Item 
Number 
Page 
Number 
 
Comments
Consultant 
Reply 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
=  =  = 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1. 
 
      2. 
 
       
 
       
      3. 
 
 
      4. 
 
 
       
 
       
 
 
      5. 
       
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
=  =  = 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
General 
 
General 
 
 
 
 
General 
 
 
 General 
 PG 2&3  
 
 
 
 
 
 
General  
 
1st REVIEW (TS) 
 
Consultant:  Please use the code and respond to each comment in the 
Consultant Reply Column.  This sheet is for our record, please answer every 
question and sign and date your acknowledgement or the plans will be 
sent back to complete the process.  Send back the marked-up plans and a 
new set of plans along with this comment sheet.  Thank you for your 
cooperation. 
=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  = 
General Project Summary: 
 
The proposed development is a 12,670 square foot Dollar General (APN 401-
30-013E) located along the south side of Baseline Rd, approximately a half 
mile east of 331st Ave. The development is entirely within unincorporated 
MCDOT jurisdiction and anticipates generating a total of 807 total daily trips 
with 39 AM peak hour trips and 85 PM peak hour trips.  
 
The development is proposing one (1) full access point on the south side of 
Baseline Rd. Baseline’s Rd is a two-way undivided roadway with a future 
classification of a rural principal arterial roadway.  
 
Review Comments: 
 
Update the study to reflect the anticipated build out and opening year.  
 
The future classification of Baseline Rd is rural principal arterial roadway. 
Developer is to provide half-street improvements along the site frontage per 
MCDOT RDM, Figure 5.2 meeting the rural principal arterial roadway cross-
section, excluding curb gutter and sidewalks. 
 
As part of the half-street improvements, provide 75’ ROW to MCDOT along 
site frontage of Baseline Rd. 
 
The development is proposing a full access driveway.  Update the report to 
include a turn lane analysis to analyze the proposed driveway for right-turn 
and left-turn lane requirements in and out of the site. Provide trip distribution 
entering and leaving the site. Traffic counts for analysis should reflect the 
estimated total daily trips and turning movement counts for both AM and PM 
peak hour. Demonstrate the trip generation and distribution calculations used 
in the study. 
 
A crash data and collision discussion will need to be included in the updated 
report.  
 
 
Use CODE 
"A", "B","C" 
in this column 
next to every 
comment. 
 
 
 
=  =  =  =

MCDOT -- TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 
REVIEW COMMENT SHEET 
2 of 2 
Project Name: Tonopah Dollar General 
Location:  32501 W Baseline Rd Tonopah 
MCDOT File No.: Z2023146 
Date: 12/21/23 
Reviewer: Toni Middleton 
Phone No.: 602.506.0074
Consultant: Greenlight Traffic Engineering 
Project No.:   
Plans Sealed By: Collette Frohlich, PE 
Consultant Code: 
A = Will Comply        B = Deleted 
C = Consultant to Evaluate
Item 
Number 
Page 
Number 
 
Comments
Consultant 
Reply 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
=  =  = 
 
 
6. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
       
 
 
        
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
=  =  = 
 
 
General 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1st REVIEW (TS) 
 
Consultant:  Please use the code and respond to each comment in the 
Consultant Reply Column.  This sheet is for our record, please answer every 
question and sign and date your acknowledgement or the plans will be 
sent back to complete the process.  Send back the marked-up plans and a 
new set of plans along with this comment sheet.  Thank you for your 
cooperation. 
=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  = 
 
 
MCDOT’s minimum driveway spacing criteria is 360’ on arterial roadways. 
Study shall clearly illustrate the distance and spacing between the sites 
proposed driveway access and the adjacent access located just west of the 
proposed development (parcel 401-30-012B). 
 
 
 
 
 
The Traffic Statement is NOT Approved. 
 
 
 
 
 
Signature: _____________________________________ Date: ___________ 
 
Use CODE 
"A", "B","C" 
in this column 
next to every 
comment. 
 
 
 
=  =  =  =

1
Joseph Mueller (PND)
From:
Ken Galica <kgalica@buckeyeaz.gov>
Sent:
Monday, December 11, 2023 2:49 PM
To:
Joseph Mueller (PND)
Cc:
Adam Copeland; Brian Craig; Hobart Wingard; John Willett; Scott Zipprich
Subject:
RE: Z2023146 - Dollar General Tonopah 
This Message Is From an External Sender  
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Good afternoon Joseph,  
 
The property upon which the Dollar General is proposed is located within the City of Buckeye’s planning area. As it is 
likely that, in the future, it and surrounding properties will be annexed into the City of Buckeye, we would request for 
the development to meet our requirements to the greatest extent possible. Note that our General Plan, which 
designates the site for Agricultural use, wouldn’t support zoning that accommodated the retail use proposed. Ideally, 
the use itself wouldn’t be supported – however,  if the criteria listed below were addressed, that would remove most of 
the City’s objection:  
 
x 
Baseline Road adjacent to the project is currently under MCDOT responsibility. Per the City’s Transportation 
Master Plan, Baseline Road is classified as a Major Arterial roadway and should have 70’ of ROW. While the 
application indicates that they have no desire to annex into the City in the ‘near future”, there is a good 
possibility that Baseline Road adjacent to the project will become the City’s responsibility. As such Baseline Road 
should be planned to City standards (dedicate 70’ of ROW). In addition, as a Major Arterial (or even as an 
Arterial), full access median breaks are located at the ½ mile locations (or western boundary of the project). This 
median break should provide access to the entire parcel (and the parcel on the west side of the project, 403-30-
012A), as well as the parcel to the south (401-30-013D). The parcel should provide a cross access to the 
remainder of the parcel to be able to access the future full movement access. 
x 
Dollar General commonly utilizes a pre-manufactured metal building that would not be permitted under the 
City’s architectural design requirements. City requests that if the pre-manufactured metal building prototype is 
used here, a façade be constructed around the structure so that it minimizes the extent of metal visible, with 
sufficient articulation and massing to meet the various requirements contained in Section 5.8 of the Buckeye 
Development Code (Commercial Building Standards and Guidelines).  
x 
City requests that a 25’ landscape setback be provided adjacent to Baseline Road, at the back of ULTIMATE right-
of-way (70’ half street as noted in the first bullet point). No parking, structures, or drive-aisles (except for the 
driveway providing access to Baseline) should encroach into this setback. Tree and shrub plantings should be as 
outlined in Section 5.4.3.B of the Buckeye Development Code (Site Perimeter Landscaping) 
x 
City requests that parking lot landscape islands be provided a minimum of every 10 spaces, with each island 
containing a minimum of 1 tree and 5 shrubs in accordance with Buckeye Development Code Section 5.4.3.C 
(Landscaping Inside Parking Areas).  
 
If we can work together to achieve a development as close to City standards as possible, we would very much appreciate 
it.  
 
Thank you!

2
Ken Galica 
Principal Planner 
Development Services Department  
(623) 349-6214 
From: Joseph Mueller (PND) <Joseph.Mueller@Maricopa.Gov>  
Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2023 1:56 PM 
To: Robert Olmstead <Rolmstead@AFMA.Az.gov>; Robert Rowley (EMG) <ROBERT.ROWLEY@Maricopa.Gov>; 
todd.williams@aps.com; Bruce Monson (EMG) <Bruce.Monson@Maricopa.Gov>; jeffery.caulkins@aps.com; 
travis.icard@aps.com; brian.woodward.@maricopa.gov; madison.wisler@maricopa.gov; dmheisler1@aol.com; 
ronsatt@ev1.net; Tyler Williford <twilliford@azgfd.gov>; Teigan Williams <tstruck@azgfd.gov>; Ken Galica 
<kgalica@buckeyeaz.gov>; dhenning@westvalleyview.com; tvcc.events@gmail.com; Ron Gross <rongrossltd@cox.net>; 
redletter@azdot.gov; Philip Hilliker (MCSO) <P_Hilliker@MCSO.maricopa.gov>; Paul Roetto <proetto1950@gmail.com>; 
Scott Wilken <swilken@azmag.gov>; Kurt Cotner <kcotner@azmag.gov>; Project Evaluation Program - Game and Fish 
<pep@azgfd.gov>; pe@azland.gov; bfenske@azdot.gov; jgarcia@azdot.gov; dkrantz@citytocitycre.com; Frank 
McWilliams (MCSO) <FrankMcWilliams@MCSO.maricopa.gov>; agarza@azmag.gov; Teresa Retterbush (PRK) 
<Teresa.Retterbush@Maricopa.Gov> 
Subject: Z2023146 - Dollar General Tonopah  
[NOTICE:  This message originated outside of the City of Buckeye -- DO NOT CLICK on links or 
open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.] 
Good afternoon, 
We have received the above request for a proposed zone change from Rural-43 to C-1 neighborhood commercial.  The 
subject site APN 401-30-013E is about 1.41 acres in size and is located ½ mile east of the SEC of 331 Ave and Baseline Rd 
in the Tonopah area. 
The applicant has indicated this is to facilitate a proposed Dollar General store but please note there is not a Plan of 
Development associated with the requested zoning entitlement, so the end user may differ from the current indication 
(within the bounds of the requested C-1 zoning).   
The Technical Advisory Committee meeting will be held January 2, 2024. 
Please let me know if you have any questions, comments, or concerns. 
Kind regards, 
Joseph Mueller 
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 
301 W Jefferson St Phoenix, AZ 85003
Planner 
O:   602-506-7629     
MARICOPA.GOV 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube








( IJ ČĖIJ ô ô Ř Ė IJ Čϙ ѧ ϙ „ īÍ IJ IJ ĖIJ Čϙ ѧ ϙ ‹ ŪŘ Ž ô ƅ Ė IJ Čϙ ѧ ϙ ˜Ř æÍ IJ ϙ " ôŜ Ė ČIJ ϙ ѧ ϙ [ÍIJ î Ŝ è Íŕ ô ϙ Ř è ē Ė ťôè ťŪ Ř ôϙ͕͐͏͏
ϙ®ϙŘĺÍîſÍƅϙ‡îϙ‹ŪĖťôϙ͔͐͏
ϙѧϙ“ôıŕôϠϙ¾ϙ͔͗͑͗͑
ϙѧϙ͓͗͏
ϟ͖͕͒
ϟ͐͏͏͏
ϙѧϙŕēĺôIJĖƄЬſīæČŘĺŪŕϟèĺıϙ
(IJČĖIJôôŘĖIJČϙѧϙ„īÍIJIJĖIJČϙ
‹ŪŘŽôƅĖIJČϙѧϙ˜ŘæÍIJϙ"ôŜĖČIJϙ
[ÍIJîŜèÍŕôϙŘèēĖťôèťŪŘôϙ
ϙ
ϙ ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
>ôæŘŪÍŘƅϙ͑͗
Ϡϙ͑͏͓͑
ϙ
ϙ
“ĺϡϙϙ
aÍŘĖèĺŕÍϙĺŪIJťƅϙ„īÍIJIJĖIJČϙÍIJîϙ"ôŽôīĺŕıôIJťϠϙèϯĺϙVĺŜôŕēϙaŪôīīôŘϙ
ϙ
>Řĺıϡϙ
ēŘĖŜϙ‡ϟϙôŘťèēϠϙI„ϙ
ϙ
“ēôϙ®[ϙ@ŘĺŪŕϙϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
‹ŪæĤôèťϡϙ
¾͑͏͑͒
ϱ͓͕͐
ϙ"ĺīīÍŘϙ@ôIJôŘÍīϙ“ĺIJĺŕÍēϙϱϙ“ϙaôôťĖIJČϙſϯϙaÍŘĖèĺŕÍϙĺŪIJťƅϙ„īÍIJIJĖIJČϙ‹ťÍċċϙϙ
ϙ
ĖťƅϙĺċϙŪèħôƅôϙĺııôIJťŜϙÍIJîϙŕŕīĖèÍIJťϙ‡ôŜŕĺIJŜôŜϙϙϙ
ϙ
“ēôϙċĺīīĺſĖIJČϙĖŜϙÍϙŜŪııÍŘƅϙĺċϙîĖŜèŪŜŜĖĺIJŜϙæôťſôôIJϙťēôϙĖťƅϙĺċϙŪèħôƅôϙϼiϽϙÍIJîϙ“ēôϙ®[ϙ@ŘĺŪŕϙϼ„ŘĺĤôèťϙ“ôÍıϽϟϙ
“ēôϙæÍŜĖŜϙċĺŘϙťēôŜôϙèĺIJŽôŘŜÍťĖĺIJŜϙèôIJťôŘôîϙÍŘĺŪIJîϙċôôîæÍèħϙŘôèôĖŽôîϙċŘĺıϙťēôϙiϙĖIJϙŘôŜŕĺIJŜôϙťĺϙÍϙŕŘĺŕĺŜôîϙ¾ĺIJôϙ
ēÍIJČôϙÍŕŕīĖèÍťĖĺIJϙċĺŘϙťēôϙ"ĺīīÍŘϙ@ôIJôŘÍīϙŘôťÍĖīϙŜťĺŘôϙīĺèÍťôîϙĖIJϙŪIJĖIJèĺŘŕĺŘÍťôîϙaÍŘĖèĺŕÍϙĺŪIJťƅϠϙċĖīôîϙæƅϙťēôϙ„ŘĺĤôèťϙ
“ôÍıϙĖIJϙbĺŽôıæôŘϙĺċϙ͑͏͑͒
ϟϙ“ēôŜôϙèĺııôIJťŜϙſôŘôϙŜôIJťϙŽĖÍϙôıÍĖīϙċŘĺıϙaŘϟϙXôIJϙ@ÍīĖèÍϙϼ„īÍIJIJôŘϽϙſĖťēϙťēôϙiϙťĺϙ
ĺŪIJťƅϙŜťÍċċϙÍIJîϙŕŘĺŽĖîôîϙťĺϙťēôϙ„ŘĺĤôèťϙ“ôÍıϙîŪŘĖIJČϙťēôϙ“ôèēIJĖèÍīϙîŽĖŜĺŘƅϙĺııĖťťôôϙϼ“ϽϙıôôťĖIJČϙĺIJϙVÍIJŪÍŘƅϙ͑ Ϡϙ͑͏͓͑
ϟϙ‹ŪæŜôŗŪôIJťϙťĺϙťēôϙıôôťĖIJČϙſĖťēϙťēôϙĺŪIJťƅϠϙťēôϙ„ŘĺĤôèťϙ“ôÍıϙŜèēôîŪīôîϙÍϙċĺīīĺſϱŪŕϙèÍīīϙĺIJϙVÍIJŪÍŘƅϙ͐͏
Ϡϙ͑͏͓͑
ϙ
ſĖťēϙiϙŜťÍċċϙèĺIJŜĖŜťĖIJČϙĺċϙXϟϙ@ÍīĖèÍϙÍIJîϙVĺēIJϙ®Ėīīôťϙϼ“ŘÍċċĖèϙ(IJČĖIJôôŘϽϙťĺϙČÍĖIJϙèīÍŘĖťƅϙĺIJϙťēôĖŘϙèĺııôIJťŜϙÍIJîϙôIJŜŪŘôϙ
ťēôϙ„ŘĺĤôèťϙ“ôÍıϙĖŜϙŕĺŜĖťĖĺIJôîϙťĺϙôċċôèťĖŽôīƅϙıĺŽôϙċĺŘſÍŘîϙſĖťēϙťēôϙŕŘĺŕĺŜôîϙ"ĺīīÍŘϙ@ôIJôŘÍīϙŕŘĺĤôèťϟϙϙϙ
ϙ
îîŘôŜŜĖIJČϙťēôϙiϙèĺııôIJťŜϙſĖīīϙŘôŜŪīťϙĖIJϙÍϙIJŪıæôŘϙĺċϙıĺîĖċĖèÍťĖĺIJŜϙťĺϙťēôϙŕŘĺŕĺŜôîϙ"ĺīīÍŘϙ@ôIJôŘÍīϙ‹Ėťôϙ„īÍIJϠϙ
ŕÍŘťĖèŪīÍŘīƅϙēĺſϙĖťϙŘôīÍťôŜϙťĺϙÍŜôīĖIJôϙ‡ĺÍîϙŘĖČēťϱĺċϱſÍƅϙĖıŕŘĺŽôıôIJťŜϟϙīťēĺŪČēϙŜŪæıĖťťÍīŜϙÍIJîϙÍŕŕŘĺŽÍīŜϙċĺŘϙťēĖŜϙ
ÍŕŕīĖèÍťĖĺIJϙÍŘôϙċÍèĖīĖťÍťôîϙťēŘĺŪČēϙaÍŘĖèĺŕÍϙĺŪIJťƅϙÍIJîϙťēôϙĺŪIJťƅϙĺÍŘîϙĺċϙ‹ŪŕôŘŽĖŜĺŘŜϠϙiϙĖŜϙÍīŜĺϙÍϙŜťÍħôēĺīîôŘϙ
ĖIJϙťēĖŜϙŕŘĺèôŜŜϙîŪôϙťĺϙťēôϙŕŘĺĤôèťϙŜĖťôЍŜϙīĺèÍťĖĺIJϟϙϙ
ϙ
®ēĖīôϙèŪŘŘôIJťīƅϙŜĖťŪÍťôîϙĖIJϙÍIJϙŪIJĖIJèĺŘŕĺŘÍťôîϙÍŘôÍϙĺċϙaÍŘĖèĺŕÍϙĺŪIJťƅϠϙťēôϙŕŘĺĤôèťϙŜĖťôϙīĖôŜϙſĖťēĖIJϙťēôϙ„īÍIJIJĖIJČϙŘôÍϙ
æĺŪIJîÍŘĖôŜϙĺċϙťēôϙiϟϙ“ēôϙ„īÍIJIJĖIJČϙŘôÍϙæĺŪIJîÍŘƅϙĖŜϙÍIJϙÍŕŕŘĺŽôîϙæĺŪIJîÍŘƅϙċĺŘϙċŪťŪŘôϙiϙŕīÍIJIJĖIJČϙÍèťĖŽĖťĖôŜϙÍIJîϙ
ťēôϙ ÍIJťĖèĖŕÍťôîϙ ċŪťŪŘôϙ îôŽôīĺŕıôIJťϙ īĖıĖťŜϙ ċĺŘϙ ťēôϙ Ėťƅϟϙ ®ēĖīôϙ ťēôϙ èŪŘŘôIJťϙ iϙ ĤŪŘĖŜîĖèťĖĺIJÍīϙ æĺŪIJîÍŘƅϙ ĖŜϙ īĺèÍťôîϙ
ÍŕŕŘĺƄĖıÍťôīƅϙ͐ ϟ͗ ϙıĖīôŜϙôÍŜťϙĺċϙťēôϙŕŘĺĤôèťϙŜĖťôϠϙťēôϙ„īÍIJIJĖIJČϙŘôÍϙæĺŪIJîÍŘƅϙôƄťôIJîŜϙſôŜťϙťĺϙ͒͐͐
ťēϙŽôIJŪôϠϙĺIJôϱēÍīċϙ
ıĖīôϙ ſôŜťϙ ĺċϙ ťēôϙ ŕŘĺĤôèťϙ ŜĖťôϟϙ ‹ťôÍîƅϙ ŕĺŕŪīÍťĖĺIJϙ ČŘĺſťēϙ ÍIJîϙ îôŽôīĺŕıôIJťϙ ĺċϙ ŽÍèÍIJťϙ īÍIJîϙ ēÍŜϙ ŘôŜŪīťôîϙ ĖIJϙ ŜôŽôŘÍīϙ
ÍIJIJôƄÍťĖĺIJŜϙſĖťēĖIJϙťēôϙ„īÍIJIJĖIJČϙŘôÍϠϙÍIJîϙĖťϙèÍIJϙæôϙÍŜŜŪıôîϙťēÍťϙÍťϙŜĺıôϙŕĺĖIJťϙæƅϙſÍƅϙĺċϙÍIJIJôƄÍťĖĺIJϠϙťēôϙiϙſĖīīϙ
ēÍŽôϙťēôϙŘĖČēťϙťĺϙČĺŽôŘIJϙîôŽôīĺŕıôIJťϙÍèťĖŽĖťƅϙĖIJϙťēôϙÍŘôÍϠϙĖIJèīŪîĖIJČϙťēôϙŜŪæĤôèťϙŕŘĺŕôŘťƅϟϙŜϙÍϙŘôŜŪīťϠϙaÍŘĖèĺŕÍϙĺŪIJťƅϙ
ŜťÍċċϙēÍŜϙĖIJîĖèÍťôîϙťĺϙťēôϙ„ŘĺĤôèťϙ“ôÍıϙťēÍťϙſēĖīôϙťēôŘôϙĖŜϙÍIJϙôƄŕôèťÍťĖĺIJϙĺċϙÍîôŗŪÍťôīƅϙÍîîŘôŜŜĖIJČϙťēôϙĺŪIJťƅϙ“ϙ
èĺııôIJťŜϠϙťēôϙŘôıÍŘħŜϙıÍîôϙæƅϙťēôϙiϙŜēÍīīϙÍīŜĺϙæôϙČĖŽôIJϙèĺIJŜĖîôŘÍťĖĺIJϢϙĖIJϙċÍèťϠϙĖťϙſÍŜϙŜťÍťôîϙťēôϙ„īÍIJIJĖIJČϙÍIJîϙ
¾ĺIJĖIJČϙĺııĖŜŜĖĺIJϙÍIJîϙĺŪIJťƅϙĺÍîϙĺċϙ‹ŪŕôŘŽĖŜĺŘŜϙſĖīīϙèĺIJŜĖîôŘϙťēôŜôϙŘôŗŪôŜťŜϙÍŜϙèĺIJîĖťĖĺIJŜϙĺċϙÍŕŕŘĺŽÍīϟϙIťϙĖŜϙťēôϙ
ĺŪIJťƅЍŜϙŕĺŜĖťĖĺIJϙťēÍťϙťēôϙĖťƅЍŜϙèĺııôIJťŜϙŜēĺŪīîϙČôIJôŘÍīīƅϙťÍħôϙŕŘôèôîôIJèôϙĺŽôŘϙĺŪIJťƅϙŜťÍIJîÍŘîŜϙϼĖIJϙťēôϙôŽôIJťϙťēôϙ
ŜťÍIJîÍŘîŜϙîĺϙIJĺťϙÍīĖČIJϠϙŜŪèēϙÍŜϙťēôϙÍŜôīĖIJôϙ‡ĺÍîϙċŪīīϙ‡i®ϙſĖîťēϙÍťϙæŪĖīîϱĺŪťϽϟϙ“ēôϙĺŪIJťƅϙĺÍŘîϙĺċϙ‹ŪŕôŘŽĖŜĺŘŜϠϙťēôϙ
ŕŘĖıÍŘƅϙîôèĖŜĖĺIJϱıÍħôŘϙĺIJϙ¾ĺIJôϙēÍIJČôŜϙÍIJîϙĺťēôŘϙîôŽôīĺŕıôIJťϙıÍťťôŘŜϠϙſĖīīϙÍīŜĺϙťÍħôϙĖIJťĺϙèĺIJŜĖîôŘÍťĖĺIJϙťēôϙ„ŘĺĤôèťϙ
“ôÍıЍŜϙ èĺīīÍæĺŘÍťĖŽôϙ ôċċĺŘťŜϙ ſĖťēϙ ťēôϙ iϙ ôÍŘīƅϙ ĖIJϙ ťēôϙ ŕŘĺèôŜŜϙ ĖIJϙ ôIJŜŪŘĖIJČϙ Íϙ îôŜĖČIJϙ ťēÍťϙ ĖŜϙ èĺıŕīĖÍIJťϙ ſĖťēϙ iϙ
ŜťÍIJîÍŘîŜϟϙϙ
ϙ
aÍħĖIJČϙôċċĺŘťŜϙťĺϙŘôŜŕĺIJîϙťĺϙťēôϙiЍŜϙèĺııôIJťŜϙĖŜϙôŜŜôIJťĖÍīϙċĺŘϙťēôϙ„ŘĺĤôèťϙ“ôÍıϙťĺϙôIJŜŪŘôϙÍϙŕīÍIJϙċĺŘϙťēôϙ"ĺīīÍŘϙ
@ôIJôŘÍīϙŕŘĺĤôèťϙĖŜϙŽĖôſôîϙÍťϙċÍŽĺŘÍæīƅϙæƅϙæĺťēϙĺŪIJťƅϙÍIJîϙĖťƅϙŜťÍċċϟϙôīĺſϙÍŘôϙťēôϙèĺııôIJťŜϙôƄťŘÍèťôîϙċŘĺıϙťēôϙôıÍĖīϙ
ċŘĺıϙaŘϟϙ@ÍīĖèÍϙîÍťôîϙ͐ ϯ͑ ϯ͑͏͓͑
ϠϙŕŘĺŽĖîôîϙĺIJϙæôēÍīċϙĺċϙťēôϙiϟϙ“ēôϙÍŕŕīĖèÍIJťЍŜϙŘôŜŕĺIJŜôŜϙÍŘôϙŜēĺſϙŜēĺſIJϙŪIJîôŘϙ
ôÍèēϙèĺııôIJťϡϙ
ϙ


Ѐ͑ Ё
͐
ϟ ÍŜôīĖIJôϙ‡ĺÍîϙÍîĤÍèôIJťϙťĺϙťēôϙŕŘĺĤôèťϙĖŜϙèŪŘŘôIJťīƅϙŪIJîôŘϙa"i“ϙŘôŜŕĺIJŜĖæĖīĖťƅϟϙ„ôŘϙťēôϙĖťƅЍŜϙ“ŘÍIJŜŕĺ؝͝ĖĺIJϙ
aÍŜťôŘϙ„īÍIJϠϙÍŜôīĖIJôϙ‡ĺÍîϙĖŜϙèīÍŜŜĖċĖôîϙÍŜϙÍϙaÍĤĺŘϙŘťôŘĖÍīϙŘĺÍîſÍƅϙÍIJîϙŜēĺŪīîϙēÍŽôϙ͖͏
Ѝϙĺċϙ‡i®ϟϙ®ēĖīôϙťēôϙ
ÍŕŕīĖèÍťĖĺIJϙĖIJîĖèÍťôŜϙťēÍťϙťēôƅϙēÍŽôϙIJĺϙîôŜĖŘôϙťĺϙÍIJIJôƄϙĖIJťĺϙťēôϙĖťƅϙĖIJϙťēôϙЌIJôÍŘϙċŪťŪŘôЋϠϙťēôŘôϙĖŜϙÍϙČĺĺîϙ
ŕĺŜŜĖæĖīĖťƅϙťēÍťϙÍŜôīĖIJôϙ‡ĺÍîϙÍîĤÍèôIJťϙťĺϙťēôϙŕŘĺĤôèťϙſĖīīϙæôèĺıôϙťēôϙĖťƅЍŜϙŘôŜŕĺIJŜĖæĖīĖťƅϟϙŜϙŜŪèēϙÍŜôīĖIJôϙ
‡ĺÍîϙŜēĺŪīîϙæôϙŕīÍIJIJôîϙťĺϙĖťƅϙŜťÍIJîÍŘîŜϙϼîôîĖèÍťôϙ͖͏
Ѝϙĺċϙ‡i®ϽϟϙIIJϙÍîîĖťĖĺIJϠϙÍŜϙÍϙaÍĤĺŘϙŘťôŘĖÍīϙϼĺŘϙôŽôIJϙÍŜϙ
ÍIJϙŘťôŘĖÍīϽϠϙċŪīīϙÍèèôŜŜϙıôîĖÍIJϙæŘôÍħŜϙÍŘôϙīĺèÍťôîϙÍťϙťēôϙοϙıĖīôϙīĺèÍťĖĺIJŜϙϼĺŘϙſôŜťôŘIJϙæĺŪIJîÍŘƅϙĺċϙťēôϙ
ŕŘĺĤôèťϽϟϙ“ēĖŜϙıôîĖÍIJϙæŘôÍħϙŜēĺŪīîϙŕŘĺŽĖîôϙÍèèôŜŜϙťĺϙťēôϙôIJťĖŘôϙŕÍŘèôīϙϼÍIJîϙťēôϙŕÍŘèôīϙĺIJϙťēôϙſôŜťϙŜĖîôϙĺċϙ
ťēôϙŕŘĺĤôèťϠϙ͓͏͒
ϱ͒͏
ϱ͏͐͑
ϽϠϙÍŜϙſôīīϙÍŜϙťēôϙŕÍŘèôīϙťĺϙťēôϙŜĺŪťēϙϼ͓͏͐
ϱ͒͏
ϱ͏͐͒
"Ͻϟϙ“ēôϙŕÍŘèôīϙŜēĺŪīîϙŕŘĺŽĖîôϙÍϙ
èŘĺŜŜϙÍèèôŜŜϙťĺϙťēôϙŘôıÍĖIJîôŘϙĺċϙťēôϙŕÍŘèôīϙťĺϙæôϙÍæīôϙťĺϙÍèèôŜŜϙťēôϙċŪťŪŘôϙċŪīīϙıĺŽôıôIJťϙÍèèôŜŜϟϙϙ
ϙ
"ĖŜèŪŜŜĖĺIJϙϯϙ‡ôŜĺīŪťĖĺIJϙæôťſôôIJϙĖťƅϙĺċϙŪèħôƅôϙϼiϽϙÍIJîϙ®[ϙϙ
ƒ “ôÍıϙÍČŘôôîϙťĺϙŕŘĺŽĖîôϙċŪīīϙÍèèôŜŜϙĖıŕŘĺŽôıôIJťŜϙĺIJϙ"ĺīīÍŘϙ@ôIJôŘÍīϙŕÍŘèôīϠϙÍŽĺĖîĖIJČϙIJôôîϙċĺŘϙèŘĺŜŜϱÍèèôŜŜϙ
ÍČŘôôıôIJťŜϙſĖťēϙIJôĖČēæĺŘĖIJČϙŕÍŘèôīϙĺſIJôŘŜēĖŕϟϙ"ŘĖŽôſÍƅϙťĺϙæôϙîôŜĖČIJôîϙŕôŘϙiϙŜťÍIJîÍŘîŜϙϼ͓͒
ϱċĺĺťϱſĖîôϙ
îŘĖŽôſÍƅϽϟϙ
ƒ aôîĖÍIJϙæŘôÍħϙèÍIJϙæôϙÍîĤŪŜťôîϯĺċċŜôťϙťĺϙÍèèĺııĺîÍťôϙ"ĺīīÍŘϙ@ôIJôŘÍīϙÍèèôŜŜϙîŘĖŽôſÍƅϙϼîĺôŜϙIJĺťϙēÍŽôϙťĺϙæôϙ
ĺċċŜôťϙÍťϙôƄÍèťīƅϙÍťϙοϱıĖīôϙŕĺĖIJťϽϟϙ
ƒ „ôŘϙV®ϙϼVĺēIJϙ®ĖīīôťϠϙĖťƅϙĺċϙŪèħôƅôϙ“ŘÍċċĖèϙ(IJČĖIJôôŘϽϠϙĖťϙĖŜϙĺħÍƅϙťĺϙèĺIJŜťŘŪèťϙťēôϙÍèèôŜŜϙîŘĖŽôϙĺIJťĺϙÍŜôīĖIJôϙ‡ĺÍîϙ
ôIJťĖŘôīƅϙĺIJϙĺŪŘϙèīĖôIJťЍŜϙŕŘĺŕôŘťƅϙťēôŘôæƅϙIJĺťϙēÍŽĖIJČϙťĺϙÍèŗŪĖŘôϙôÍŜôıôIJťŜϙċŘĺıϙ"Xϙ‡ôÍīťôèϙÍIJîϙFĖèħıÍIJϙ(ČČϙ
>ÍèĖīĖťƅϟϙ V®ϙ ÍèħIJĺſīôîČôŜϙ ťēÍťϙ ťēĖŜϙ ſĺŪīîϙ ŕīÍèôϙ ťēôϙ ÍèèôŜŜϙ îŘĖŽôϙ ĤŪŜťϙ ĺċċϙ ťēôϙ ıĖîϱŜôèťĖĺIJϙ īĖIJôϙ ÍIJîϙ ťēĖŜϙ ĖŜϙ
ÍèèôŕťÍæīôϙťĺϙēĖıϟϙFôϙĖIJîĖèÍťôîϙťēÍťϙſôϙŜēĺŪīîϙŕŘĺŽĖîôϙÍϙèŘĺŜŜϙÍèèôŜŜϙôÍŜôıôIJťϙťĺϙÍīīĺſϙÍèèôŜŜϙĖIJťĺϙ"Xϙ
‡ôÍīťôèϙÍIJîϙFĖèħıÍIJŜϙÍIJîϙťēÍťϙſôϙıÍƅϙIJôôîϙÍϙťôıŕĺŘÍŘƅϙèĺIJŜťŘŪèťĖĺIJϙôÍŜôıôIJťϙϼ“(ϽϙċŘĺıϙ"Xϙ‡ôÍīťôèϙÍIJîϙ
FĖèħıÍIJŜϙťĺϙèĺIJŜťŘŪèťϙťēôϙÍèèôŜŜϙîŘĖŽôϙϼIϙſĺŪīîϙŘôèĺııôIJîϙŕĺŜĖťĖĺIJĖIJČϙťēôϙÍèèôŜŜϙîŘĖŽôϙŜŪèēϙťēÍťϙſôϙîĺϙIJĺťϙ
IJôôîϙ“(ϟϙ“ēôϙîŘĖŽôϙſĖîťēϙĖŜϙ͓͒
ϙċôôťϙťĺϙÍīīĺſϙŕŘĺŕôŘϙŽôēĖèīôϙıĺŽôıôIJťϙÍIJîϙťĺϙÍīīĺſϙÍϙťŘÍŽôīϙīÍIJôϙĖIJťĺϙťēôϙŜĖťôϠϙÍϙ
īôċťϙťŪŘIJϙīÍIJîϙÍIJîϙÍϙŘĖČēťϙťŪŘIJϙīÍIJôϙϼôÍèēϙ͐͑
ϙċôôťϙſĖîôϽϟϙϙϙ
ƒ „ôŘϙV®ϠϙťēôϙôIJťĖŘôϙēÍīċϙŜťŘôôťϙĺċϙÍŜôīĖIJôϙ‡ĺÍîϙîĺôŜϙIJĺťϙIJôôîϙťĺϙæôϙèĺIJŜťŘŪèťôîϙſĖťēϙťēôϙ"ĺīīÍŘϙ@ôIJôŘÍīϙŕŘĺĤôèťϟϙϙ
FôϙŘôèĺııôIJîŜϙÍϙſôŜťæĺŪIJîϙīôċťϱťŪŘIJϙīÍIJôϙÍIJîϙÍIJϙôÍŜťæĺŪIJîϙŘĖČēťϱťŪŘIJϙīÍIJôϙĖIJťĺϙťēôϙŜĖťôϟϙϙϙ
ƒ V®ϙèĺııôIJťôîϙťēÍťϙċĺŘϙÍèèôŜŜϙċŘĺıϙÍŜôīĖIJôϙ‡ĺÍîϙťĺϙťēôϙŜĖťôϠϙÍIJϙÍîîĖťĖĺIJÍīϙċĖŽôϙϼ͔ Ͻϙċôôťϙĺċϙ‡i®ϙĖŜϙŘôŗŪĖŘôîϙťĺϙ
èĺIJŜťŘŪèťϙÍϙŘĖČēťϱťŪŘIJϙīÍIJôϙϼťēĖŜϙ͔ ϙċôôťϙĖŜϙIJĺťϙĖIJèīŪîôîϙĖIJϙťēôϙ͖͏
ϙċôôťϙĺċϙēÍīċϱŘĺſϽϟϙIťϙĖŜϙÍŜŜŪıôîϙťēôϙ͔ ϙċôôťϙſĺŪīîϙ
èĺıôϙċŘĺıϙťēôϙŕŘĺŕôŘťƅϙĺſIJôŘϙťĺϙťēôϙſôŜťϙϼ"Xϙ‡ôÍīťôèϽϙŜĖIJèôϙťēôϙīĺèÍťĖĺIJϙĺċϙťēôϙÍèèôŜŜϙîŘĖŽôϙſĖīīϙIJĺťϙÍīīĺſϙ
ôIJĺŪČēϙŜŕÍèôϙťĺϙēÍŽôϙťēôϙŘĖČēťϱťŪŘIJϙīÍIJôϙôIJťĖŘôīƅϙĺIJϙĺŪŘϙèīĖôIJťЍŜϙŕŘĺŕôŘťƅϟϙϙ
ƒ “ēôϙſôŜťϙÍèèôŜŜϙîŘĖŽôϙèÍIJϙŘôıÍĖIJϙÍIJϙЊÍèèôŜŜϙîŘĖŽôЋϠϙťĺϙÍīīĺſϙĖIJČŘôŜŜϯôČŘôŜŜϙťĺϙťēôϙ"ĺīīÍŘϙ@ôIJôŘÍīϙ„ÍŘèôīϙÍŜϙ
ſôīīϙÍŜϙťēôϙIJôĖČēæĺŘĖIJČϙŕÍŘèôīŜϙťĺϙťēôϙſôŜťϙÍIJîϙŜĺŪťēϠϙÍŜϙĺŕŕĺŜôîϙťĺϙÍϙıĖîϱŜôèťĖĺIJϙīĖIJôϙŕŪæīĖèϙŘĺÍîϙĺŘϙèĺīīôèťĺŘϙ
ŜťŘôôťϟϙV®ϙèĺııôIJťôîϙťēÍťϙēôϙîĺôŜϙIJĺťϙŜôôϙťēôϙIJôôîϙċĺŘϙÍϙŕŪæīĖèϙŘĺÍîϙĖIJϙťēĖŜϙÍŘôÍϙťēÍťϙſĺŪīîϙèĺIJIJôèťϙÍŜôīĖIJôϙ
‡îϙťĺϙ‹ÍīĺıôϙFſƅϙťĺϙťēôϙŜĺŪťēϟϙ
ϙ
‡ôŜŕĺIJŜôϙťĺϙiϙĺııôIJťŜϙ
ƒ èèôŜŜϙîŘĖŽôϙ͓͒
ϙċôôťϙĖIJϙſĖîťēϙèĺIJIJôèťĖIJČϙťĺϙÍŜôīĖIJôϙ‡ĺÍîϙſĖīīϙæôϙôIJťĖŘôīƅϙīĺèÍťôîϙĺIJϙĺŪŘϙīĖôIJťЍŜϙŕŘĺŕôŘťƅϠϙ
ŕÍŘÍīīôīϙťĺϙĖťŜϙſôŜťôŘIJϙæĺŪIJîÍŘƅϟϙϙèŘĺŜŜϱÍèèôŜŜϙôÍŜôıôIJťϙıÍƅϙæôϙČŘÍIJťôîϙťĺϙťēôϙÍîĤÍèôIJťϙŕŘĺŕôŘťƅϙĺſIJôŘŜϙťĺϙ
ťēôϙſôŜťϙťĺϙÍīīĺſϙŪŜôϙĺċϙťēĖŜϙÍèèôŜŜϙîŘĖŽôϟϙϙϙ
ƒ͖͏
ϙċôôťϙĺċϙēÍīċϱŘĖČēťϱĺċϱſÍƅϙſĖīīϙIJôôîϙťĺϙæôϙČŘÍIJťôîϙæƅϙŕŘĺŕôŘťƅϙĺſIJôŘϙťĺϙaÍŘĖèĺŕÍϙĺŪIJťƅϙÍŜϙÍϙèĺIJîĖťĖĺIJϙĺċϙťēĖŜϙ
ŘôƏĺIJĖIJČϟϙϙϙ
ϙ͑
ϟ "ĺīīÍŘϙ@ôIJôŘÍīϙèĺııĺIJīƅϙŪťĖīĖƏôŜϙÍϙŕŘôϱıÍIJŪċÍèťŪŘôîϙıôťÍīϙæŪĖīîĖIJČϙťēÍťϙſĺŪīîϙIJĺťϙæôϙŕôŘıĖťťôîϙŪIJîôŘϙťēôϙ
ĖťƅЍŜϙ ÍŘèēĖťôèťŪŘÍīϙ îôŜĖČIJϙ ŘôŗŪĖŘôıôIJťŜϟϙ Ėťƅϙ ŘôŗŪôŜťŜϙ ťēÍťϙ Ėċϙ ťēôϙ ŕŘôϱıÍIJŪċÍèťŪŘôîϙ ıôťÍīϙ æŪĖīîĖIJČϙ
ŕŘĺťĺťƅŕôϙĖŜϙŪŜôîϙēôŘôϠϙÍϙċÍëÍîôϙæôϙèĺIJŜťŘŪèťôîϙÍŘĺŪIJîϙťēôϙŜťŘŪèťŪŘôϙŜĺϙťēÍťϙĖťϙıĖIJĖıĖƏôŜϙťēôϙôƄťôIJťϙĺċϙıôťÍīϙ
ŽĖŜĖæīôϠϙſĖťēϙŜŪċċĖèĖôIJťϙÍŘťĖèŪīÍťĖĺIJϙÍIJîϙıÍŜŜĖIJČϙťĺϙıôôťϙťēôϙŽÍŘĖĺŪŜϙŘôŗŪĖŘôıôIJťŜϙèĺIJťÍĖIJôîϙĖIJϙ‹ôèťĖĺIJϙ͔ ϟ͗ ϙ
ĺċϙťēôϙŪèħôƅôϙ"ôŽôīĺŕıôIJťϙĺîôϙϼĺııôŘèĖÍīϙŪĖīîĖIJČϙ‹ťÍIJîÍŘîŜϙÍIJîϙ@ŪĖîôīĖIJôŜϽϟϙϙϙ
ϙ
"ĖŜèŪŜŜĖĺIJϙϯϙ‡ôŜĺīŪťĖĺIJϙæôťſôôIJϙiϙÍIJîϙ®[ϙϙ
ƒ èèĺŘîĖIJČϙťĺϙÍIJϙôıÍĖīϙċŘĺıϙaŘϟϙīÍIJϙôťèēÍIJϠϙ„ŘĺĤôèťϙŘèēĖťôèťϠϙťēôϙŜťŘŪèťŪŘôϙèÍIJϙĖIJèĺŘŕĺŘÍťôϙæŘĖèħϙſÍĖIJŜèĺťϙ
ſĖťēϙ(I>‹ϙϼ(ƄťôŘĖĺŘϙIIJŜŪīÍťĖĺIJϙ>ĖIJĖŜēĖIJČϙ‹ƅŜťôıϽϙĺIJϙċŘĺIJťϙÍIJîϙŜĖîôϙċÍëÍîôϟϙ


Ѐ͒ Ё

‡ôŜŕĺIJŜôϙťĺϙiϙĺııôIJťϙ
ƒ "ôŽôīĺŕôŘϙĺċϙťēôϙ"ĺīīÍŘϙ@ôIJôŘÍīϙſĖīīϙĖIJèĺŘŕĺŘÍťôϙæŘĖèħϙſÍĖIJŜèĺťϙſĖťēϙ(I>‹ϙϼ(ƄťôŘĖĺŘϙIIJŜŪīÍťĖĺIJϙ>ĖIJĖŜēĖIJČϙ‹ƅŜťôıϽϙ
ĺIJϙťēôϙċŘĺIJťϙÍIJîϙŜĖîôϙæŪĖīîĖIJČϙċÍèÍîôŜϟϙϙϙ
ϙ͒
ϟ ĖťƅϙŘôŗŪôŜťŜϙťēÍťϙÍϙ͔͑
ЍϙīÍIJîŜèÍŕôϙŜôťæÍèħϙæôϙŕŘĺŽĖîôîϙÍîĤÍèôIJťϙťĺϙÍŜôīĖIJôϙ‡ĺÍîϠϙÍťϙťēôϙæÍèħϙĺċϙ˜[“Ia“(ϙ
ŘĖČēťϱĺċϱſÍƅϙϼ͖͏
ЍϙēÍīċϙŜťŘôôťϙÍŜϙIJĺťôîϙĖIJϙťēôϙċĖŘŜťϙæŪīīôťϙŕĺĖIJťϽϟϙbĺϙŕÍŘħĖIJČϠϙŜťŘŪèťŪŘôŜϠϙĺŘϙîŘĖŽôϱÍĖŜīôŜϙϼôƄèôŕťϙ
ċĺŘϙťēôϙîŘĖŽôſÍƅϙŕŘĺŽĖîĖIJČϙÍèèôŜŜϙťĺϙÍŜôīĖIJôϽϙŜēĺŪīîϙôIJèŘĺÍèēϙĖIJťĺϙťēĖŜϙŜôťæÍèħϟϙ“ŘôôϙÍIJîϙŜēŘŪæϙŕīÍIJťĖIJČŜϙ
ŜēĺŪīîϙæôϙÍŜϙĺŪťīĖIJôîϙĖIJϙ‹ôèťĖĺIJϙ͔ ϟ͓ ϟ͒ ϟϙĺċϙťēôϙŪèħôƅôϙ"ôŽôīĺŕıôIJťϙĺîôϙϼ‹Ėťôϙ„ôŘĖıôťôŘϙ[ÍIJîŜèÍŕĖIJČϽϙϙ
ϙ
"ĖŜèŪŜŜĖĺIJϙϯϙ‡ôŜĺīŪťĖĺIJϙæôťſôôIJϙiϙÍIJîϙ®[ϙϙ
ƒ ‹èŘôôIJϙſÍīīŜϙèÍIJϙæôϙæŪĖīťϙſĖťēĖIJϙťēôϙ͔͑
ЍϙīÍIJîŜèÍŕôϙæŪċċôŘϠϙĖIJϙċŘĺIJťϙĺċϙŕÍŘħĖIJČϙÍŘôÍϙϼIJôôîϙťĺϙĖIJèĺŘŕĺŘÍťôϙÍϙ͒ ϟ͔ ϱċĺĺťϙ
ſÍīīϙťĺϙŜèŘôôIJϙŕÍŘħĖIJČϽϟϙ
ƒ ‹ĖČIJÍČôϙÍIJîϙīĖČēťĖIJČϙıÍƅϙÍīŜĺϙæôϙīĺèÍťôîϙſĖťēĖIJϙťēôϙ͔͑
ЍϙīÍIJîŜèÍŕôϙæŪċċôŘϟϙϙ
ƒ aÍŘĖèĺŕÍϙĺŪIJťƅϙŘôŗŪĖŘôŜϙÍϙ͔ ϱċĺĺťϱſĖîôϙīÍIJîŜèÍŕôϙťŘÍèťϙÍīĺIJČϙÍŜôīĖIJôϙϼÍŜϙŜēĺſIJϙĺIJϙ‹Ėťôϙ„īÍIJϽϠϙèĺIJťŘÍŘƅϙťĺϙťēôϙ
ĖťƅЍŜϙ͔͑
ϱċĺĺťϙŘôŗŪĖŘôıôIJťϢϙſĖīīϙîôŽôīĺŕôŘϙæôϙſĖīīĖIJČϙťĺϙŕŘĺŽĖîôϙ͔͑
ϱċĺĺťϙæŪċċôŘϙĖIJϙīôŪϙĺċϙ͔ ϱċĺĺťϙťŘÍèťϟϙϙ
ϙ
‡ôŜŕĺIJŜôϙťĺϙiϙĺııôIJťŜϡϙ
ƒ "ôŽôīĺŕôŘϙĺċϙťēôϙ"ĺīīÍŘϙ@ôIJôŘÍīϙſĖīīϙŕŘĺŽĖîôϙÍϙ͔͑
ЍϙſĖîôϙīÍIJîŜèÍŕôϙŜôťæÍèħϙÍīĺIJČϙťēôϙIJĺŘťēôŘIJϙæĺŪIJîÍŘƅϙĺċϙťēôϙ
ŘôƏĺIJĖIJČϙŜĖťôϙÍIJîϙťŘôôϙÍIJîϙŜēŘŪæϙŕīÍIJťĖIJČϙſĖīīϙæôϙÍŜϙĺŪťīĖIJôîϙĖIJϙ‹ôèťĖĺIJϙ͔ ϟ͓ ϟ͒ ϟϙĺċϙťēôϙŪèħôƅôϙ"ôŽôīĺŕıôIJťϙ
ĺîôϙϼ‹Ėťôϙ„ôŘĖıôťôŘϙ[ÍIJîŜèÍŕĖIJČϽϟϙϙϙ
ƒ Њ"ĺīīÍŘϙ@ôIJôŘÍīЋϙŕƅīĺIJϙŜĖČIJϙÍIJîϙŕÍŘħĖIJČϙīĺťϙīĖČēťĖIJČϙŕĺŜťϙıÍƅϙæôϙīĺèÍťôîϙſĖťēĖIJϙťēôϙīÍIJîŜèÍŕôϙŜôťæÍèħϟϙ
ϙ͓
ϟ ĖťƅϙŘôŗŪôŜťŜϙťēÍťϙŕÍŘħĖIJČϙīĺťϙīÍIJîŜèÍŕôϙĖŜīÍIJîŜϙæôϙŕŘĺŽĖîôîϙÍϙıĖIJĖıŪıϙĺċϙôŽôŘƅϙ͐͏
ϙŜŕÍèôŜϠϙſĖťēϙôÍèēϙĖŜīÍIJîϙ
èĺIJťÍĖIJĖIJČϙ Íϙ ıĖIJĖıŪıϙ ĺċϙ͐ ϙ ťŘôôϙ ÍIJîϙ͔ ϙ ŜēŘŪæŜϙ ĖIJϙ ÍèèĺŘîÍIJèôϙ ſĖťēϙ Ūèħôƅôϙ "ôŽôīĺŕıôIJťϙ ĺîôϙ ‹ôèťĖĺIJϙ͔
ϟ͓ ϟ͒ ϟϙϼ[ÍIJîŜèÍŕĖIJČϙIIJŜĖîôϙ„ÍŘħĖIJČϙŘôÍŜϽϟϙϙϙ
ϙ
"ĖŜèŪŜŜĖĺIJϙϯϙ‡ôŜĺīŪťĖĺIJϙæôťſôôIJϙiϙÍIJîϙ®[ϙϙ
ƒ „ÍŘħĖIJČϙīĺťϙēÍŜϙæôôIJϙŘôèĺIJċĖČŪŘôîϙÍIJîϙīÍIJîŜèÍŕôîϙĖŜīÍIJîŜϙēÍŽôϙæôôIJϙĖIJèĺŘŕĺŘÍťôîϙſēôŘôϙŘôŗŪĖŘôîϟϙϙ
ϙ
‡ôŜŕĺIJŜôϙťĺϙiϙĺııôIJťŜϙ
ƒ "ôŽôīĺŕôŘϙĺċϙťēôϙ"ĺīīÍŘϙ@ôIJôŘÍīϙſĖīīϙŕŘĺŽĖîôϙīÍIJîŜèÍŕôϙĖŜīÍIJîŜϙÍIJîϙŕīÍIJťĖIJČϙſēôŘôϙŘôŗŪĖŘôîϠϙĖIJϙÍèèĺŘîÍIJèôϙſĖťēϙ
Ūèħôƅôϙ"ôŽôīĺŕıôIJťϙĺîôϙ‹ôèťĖĺIJϙ͔ ϟ͓ ϟ͒ ϟϙϼ[ÍIJîŜèÍŕĖIJČϙIIJŜĖîôϙ„ÍŘħĖIJČϙŘôÍŜϽϟϙϙϙ
ϙ
bôƄťϙ‹ťôŕŜϙ
“ēôϙ ®[ϙ @ŘĺŪŕϙ ēÍŜϙ ŕŘôŕÍŘôîϙ ÍIJϙ ŪŕîÍťôîϙ ŜĖťôϙ ŕīÍIJϙ ÍIJîϙ IJÍŘŘÍťĖŽôϙ ŘôŕĺŘťϙ ťēôϙ ŘôċīôèťŜϙ ťēôŜôϙ èĺııôIJťŜϙ ÍIJîϙ
èĺIJŽôŘŜÍťĖĺIJŜϙſĖťēϙaÍŘĖèĺŕÍϙĺŪIJťƅϙÍIJîϙťēôϙĖťƅϙĺċϙŪèħôƅôϙŜťÍċċϠϙÍIJîϙſĖīīϙŘôŜŪæıĖťϙťēôϙŜĖťôϙŕīÍIJϙÍIJîϙIJÍŘŘÍťĖŽôϠϙÍīĺIJČϙ
ſĖťēϙťēôϙĺťēôŘϙŘôŗŪĖŘôîϙĖťôıŜϠϙťĺϙaÍŘĖèĺŕÍϙĺŪIJťƅϙċĺŘϙÍϙċĺīīĺſϱŪŕϙŘôŽĖôſϟϙ“ēôϙ„ŘĺĤôèťϙ“ôÍıϙſĖīīϙèĺIJťĖIJŪôϙťĺϙèĺĺŘîĖIJÍťôϙ
ſĖťēϙťēôϙiϙŜťÍċċϙťĺϙôIJŜŪŘôϙťēôϙŜĖťôϙŕīÍIJϙÍIJîϙĖıŕŘĺŽôıôIJťŜϙıÍĖIJťÍĖIJϙÍϙŘôÍŜĺIJÍæīôϙīôŽôīϙĺċϙèĺIJŜĖŜťôIJèƅϙſĖťēϙiϙ
îôŽôīĺŕıôIJťϙèĺîôϙÍIJîϙôIJČĖIJôôŘĖIJČϙŜťÍIJîÍŘîŜϟϙϙ
ϙ
>ôôīϙċŘôôϙťĺϙèĺIJťÍèťϙıôϙċĺŘϙÍIJƅϙŗŪôŜťĖĺIJŜϙĺŘϙèīÍŘĖċĖèÍťĖĺIJϟϙϙ
ϙ
‡ôČÍŘîŜϠϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ϙ
ēŘĖŜϙ‡ϟϙôŘťèēϠϙI„ϙ
‹Řϟϙ„īÍIJIJôŘϠϙ“ēôϙ®[ϙ@ŘĺŪŕϙ
èæôŘťèēЬſīæČŘĺŪŕϟèĺıϙ
ϙ

Greenlight Traffic Engineering, LLC 
S 14050 N 83rd Ave, Ste 290, Peoria, AZ 85381 
T (602) 499-1339 W greenlightte.com 
1 of 2 
January 31, 2024 
Maricopa County Planning & Development 
301 W Jefferson St, Suite 170 
Phoenix, AZ 85003 
 
Re:  
Tonopah, AZ Dollar General Site | Traffic Impact Statement  
32501 W Baseline Rd, Tonopah, AZ 85354 
 
1st Review Response to Comments 
Greenlight Traffic Engineering, LLC (Greenlight) has prepared our response to comments (RTC) for comments 
received from the Maricopa County Department of Transportation on December 29, 2023. This response to 
comments has been included in the report as an appendix.  
Disposition Code: 
A = Will Comply  B = Agency to Evaluate  C = Consultant to Evaluate  D = No Action Recommended 
 
Item No. 
 
 
 
 
Sheet 
Comment 
Disposition
Response 
1 
General 
Update the study to reflect the anticipated 
build out and opening year. 
D 
The Dollar General is expected to 
open in 2025 as stated in Section 
3.1 of the study. There is no 
additional development planned 
at this time. 
2 
General 
The future classification of Baseline Rd is 
rural principal arterial roadway. Developer 
is to provide half-street improvements 
along the site frontage per MCDOT RDM, 
Figure 5.2 meeting the rural principal 
arterial roadway cross-section, excluding 
curb gutter and sidewalks.   
D 
Since Baseline Road may be 
annexed by the City of Buckeye 
(COB) in the future, Baseline Road 
will be planned as a major arterial 
cross section per COB standards. 
According to discussions with the 
COB, the half-street 
improvements do not need to be 
constructed at this time. 
3 
General 
As part of the half-street improvements, 
provide 75’ ROW to MCDOT along site 
frontage of Baseline Rd. 
A 
Since Baseline Road may be 
annexed by COB in the future, 70’ 
ROW will be provided along the 
site frontage to meet COB 
standards. A statement will be 
added to the Recommendations 
section in the report, “The Project 
will provide 70’ ROW along the 
site frontage to meet City of 
Buckeye standards.”

Greenlight Traffic Engineering, LLC 
S 14050 N 83rd Ave, Ste 290, Peoria, AZ 85381 
T (602) 499-1339 W greenlightte.com 
2 of 2 
Item No. 
 
 
 
 
Sheet 
Comment 
Disposition 
Response 
4 
General, 2, 
3 
The development is proposing a full access 
driveway. Update the report to include a 
turn lane analysis to analyze the proposed 
driveway for right-turn and left-turn lane 
requirements in and out of the site. 
Provide trip distribution entering and 
leaving the site. Traffic counts for analysis 
should reflect the estimated total daily 
trips and turning movements counts for 
both AM and PM peak hour. Demonstrate 
the trip generation and distribution 
calculations used in the study.  
A 
Since Baseline Road may be 
annexed by COB in the future, it 
is anticipated that the County will 
defer to the City’s 
recommendations on turn lanes. 
Figures and tables will be added 
to the study showing the trip 
distribution and assignment at 
the Project driveway, along with 
discussion of the turn lane 
requirements. Storage length 
requirements will also be 
included. 
5 
General 
A crash data and collision discussion will 
need to be included in the updated report.  
A 
A crash data/collision discussion 
will be added to the report. 
6 
General 
MCDOT’s minimum driveway spacing 
criteria is 360’ on arterial roadways. Study 
shall clearly illustrate the distance and 
spacing between the sites proposed 
driveway access and the adjacent access 
located just west of the proposed 
development (parcel 401-30-012B). 
A 
Per discussions with COB, a full 
access driveway will be allowed 
along the west side of the Project 
as it is close to the ¼ mile spacing 
required for full access. The 
spacing between the proposed 
Project driveway the existing 
driveway to the west will be 
provided on the updated site 
plan. The spacing will be included 
in the text in Section 3.1 of the 
study. 
 
Sincerely, 
 
 
Collette Frohlich, PE 
Senior Project Engineer 
collettef@greenlightte.com 
(408) 788-5626

BASELINE ROAD
331
ST  AVENUE
BASELINE ROAD
315
TH AVENUE
311
TH AVENUE
VINEYARD ROAD
SOUITHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD
PROPOSED
DOLLAR
GENERAL
HASSAYAMPA RIVER
CITY
      OF 
         BUCKEYE
MARICOPA
        COUNTY
MARICOPA
        COUNTY
MARICOPA   COUNTY
CITY OF BUCKEYE
SALOME HIGHWAY
1.8 MILES
CITY OF BUCKEYE
MUNICIPAL
PLANNING AREA
BOUNDARY
CITY OF BUCKEYE
MUNICIPAL
PLANNING AREA
BOUNDARY
331
ST  AVENUE
1/4-MI
BUCKEYE CITY
LIMITS
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
BUCKEYE
PLANNING AREA
BOUNDARY
LEGEND
0
1/8-MILE
NORTH

135 South David Lane
Knoxville, TN  37922
Office: 865-539-4001
Fax: 865-539-0851
www.linkengr.com
Artwork is the property of Dollar General. Material herein shall not be copied or reproduced without permission.
File Name: Dollar General Cutsheets 2013
Project #: 13-0181
Date: 04/12/2013
Approved By:
Page       of 33
match Spraylat C8-2633
match Spraylat FM-171
match Black Polyurethane
match Spraylat Black 
Yellow:
Brushed Aluminum:
match PMS Cool Gray 5
match PMS 368C
Cool Gray:
Green:
match Sherwin Williams SW7062
Rock Bottom Gray:
COLOR SPECIFICATIONS
Satin Black (Metal):
Black (Copy):
ELEVATION
SIDE
8" x 8" 
Steel Tube
To be painted
Sherwin Williams
SW7062 Rock 
Bottom Gray
7'-0 1/2" x 14'-0" PYLON
P98
26
14'-0"
12'-2 13/16"
7'-0 1/2"
4'-3 1/2"
14'-11 1/2"
22'-0"
1'-5 1/8"
1'-0 7/8"
2 1/4"
Retainer
98.58 sq. ft.
SQUARE FOOTAGE
ACTUAL
&9)*#*5,
PROPOSED SIGNAGE 
East of SEC 331st Avenue &
Baseline Road 
Maricopa County AZ

Page | 1  
 
Subdivision 
Infrastructure  
& Planning Program 
301 W. Jefferson St. 
Phoenix, AZ 85003 
 
S u b d i vi s io n @ m a ri co p a .go v 
e s d .m a r i c o pa .g o v 
 
 
 
 
 
The Maricopa County Environmental Services Department (MCESD) has completed review 
for the Dollar General Tonopah.  Zone Change from RU-43 to C-1 (no POD)   planning case(s). 
Please note the following MCESD requirements for site development: 
Drinking Water –  
Onsite Wastewater –  
A Notice of Intent to Discharge application for an onsite wastewater treatment (septic) 
system is required for any construction. Application must be submitted to the MCESD 
Onsite Wastewater Program. 
x 
Wastewater is not permitted to discharge to an adjacent parcel’s septic system. 
 
For Onsite Wastewater related questions, please contact the Onsite Program at (602) 506-
6666 or by email at septicquestions@maricopa.gov. 
Additional Notes –  
Environmental Services does not require these items for condition of approval of  Z2023146, however 
these items must be addressed with the development of the site. Environmental Services does not 
require additional review of this case. 
 
*It should be noted that this document does not approve the referenced project. Comments are provided 
for the benefit of the applicant for MCESD permit requirements and as an advisory to Maricopa County 
Planning and Development Department. Other Maricopa County agencies may have additional 
requirements. Final review and approval will be made through Planning and Development Department 
procedures. Applicant may need to submit separate applications to the Maricopa County Environmental 
Services Department for approval of proposed facilities regulated by the Department. Review of any such 
application will be based on current regulations at the time of application. 
 
 
 
 
Project Name: Dollar General Tonopah.  
Zone Change from RU-43 to C-1 (no 
POD)   
Primary Contact Name:  Chris Bertch 
Planning Application Type: Zone Change 
APN(s):  401-30-013E 
Reviewer: Souren Naradikian, P.E. 
Email: Souren.Naradikian@maricopa.gov 
Phone: 602-372-2907 
Planner Name:  Joseph Mueller 
Planning Case #:  Z2023146 
Date: December 7, 2023 
 
Water and Waste Management Division

Page 1 of 1 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jeri Loucks, PECFM 
Planning & Development 
301 W. Jefferson St., Suite 170 
Phoenix, Arizona 85003 
Phone: (602) 506-6332 
www.maricopa.gov/planning 
Email address: 
jeri.loucks@maricopa.gov 
Planning & Development
 
Engineering Plan Review 
Date:    
December 19, 2023 
 
Memo To: Darren Gerard, AICP, Planning Manager, Department of Planning & 
Development 
 
Attn: 
Warren Rivera, Planner, Planning & Development Services 
 
 
From: 
Jeri Loucks, P.E.C.F.M., Engineering Supervisor, Planning & 
Development Services 
 
cc: 
Michael Norris, P.E., Engineering Manager, Planning & Development 
 
Subject:   
Z2023145 - Zone Change to C-1 (no POD) 
 
(E1 Memo) 
Job Site Address: East of 331st Avenue & Baseline Road 
 
APN(s): 
401-30-013E 
 
This application is to specify zoning for future development and does not include a 
Plan of Development. 
 
PND Engineering Plan Review (DPR, FCD and PND Transportation) has reviewed the 
1st submittal of the Zone Change application routed for review on November 29, 2023, 
and has no objections subject to the following conditions: 
 
1. Without the submittal of a precise plan of development, no development approval 
is inferred by this review, including, but not limited to number of proposed building 
lots/units, drainage design, access and roadway alignments. These items will be 
addressed as development plans progress and are submitted to the County for 
further review and/or entitlement. 
 
2. The traffic impact study is being reviewed for the future entitlement (POD) 
application(s). 
 
3. Engineering review of re-zone cases is conceptual in nature. All development and 
engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa 
County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain 
Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current 
engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for 
construction. 
 
Please contact me if you have any questions or require any additional information.

1
Joseph Mueller (PND)
From:
Ken Galica <kgalica@buckeyeaz.gov>
Sent:
Friday, March 1, 2024 10:23 AM
To:
Joseph Mueller (PND)
Subject:
RE: Z2023146 - Dollar General Tonopah
This Message Is From an External Sender  
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
/ůŽŽŬĞĚĞǀĞƌLJƚŚŝŶŐŽǀĞƌʹŶŽĨƵƌƚŚĞƌĐŽŵŵĞŶƚŽŶŵLJĞŶĚ͘ dŚĂŶŬƐĂŐĂŝŶ͊ 

<ĞŶ'ĂůŝĐĂ
WƌŝŶĐŝƉĂůWůĂŶŶĞƌ
ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚ
;ϲϮϯͿϯϰϵͲϲϮϭϰ
&ƌŽŵ͗ :ŽƐĞƉŚDƵĞůůĞƌ;WEͿф:ŽƐĞƉŚ͘ DƵĞůůĞƌΛDĂƌŝĐŽƉĂ͘ 'Žǀх
^ĞŶƚ͗ &ƌŝĚĂLJ͕ DĂƌĐŚϭ͕ ϮϬϮϰϴ͗ ϰϭD
dŽ͗ <ĞŶ'ĂůŝĐĂфŬŐĂůŝĐĂΛďƵĐŬĞLJĞĂnj͘ ŐŽǀх
^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗ Z͗ ϮϬϮϯϭϰϲͲŽůůĂƌ'ĞŶĞƌĂůdŽŶŽƉĂŚ
΀EKd/͗ dŚŝƐŵĞƐƐĂŐĞŽƌŝŐŝŶĂƚĞĚŽƵƚƐŝĚĞŽĨƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨƵĐŬĞLJĞͲͲKEKd>/<ŽŶůŝŶŬƐŽƌ
ŽƉĞŶĂƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚƐƵŶůĞƐƐLJŽƵĂƌĞƐƵƌĞƚŚĞĐŽŶƚĞŶƚŝƐƐĂĨĞ͘ ΁ 
dŚĂƚŝƐŐŽŽĚƚŽŚĞĂƌ<ĞŶ͊ /͛ ůůŬĞĞƉĂŶĞLJĞŽƵƚĨŽƌĂŶLJĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůĐŽŵŵĞŶƚLJŽƵŵĂLJŚĂǀĞ͘ 
<ŝŶĚƌĞŐĂƌĚƐ͕ 
Joseph Mueller 
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 
301 W Jefferson St Phoenix, AZ 85003
Planner
O: 602-506-7629  
MARICOPA.GOV
Facebookͮ Instagramͮ Twitterͮ YouTube
&ƌŽŵ͗ <ĞŶ'ĂůŝĐĂфŬŐĂůŝĐĂΛďƵĐŬĞLJĞĂnj͘ ŐŽǀх
^ĞŶƚ͗ dŚƵƌƐĚĂLJ͕ &ĞďƌƵĂƌLJϮϵ͕ ϮϬϮϰϰ͗ ϭϵWD

2
dŽ͗ :ŽƐĞƉŚDƵĞůůĞƌ;WEͿф:ŽƐĞƉŚ͘ DƵĞůůĞƌΛDĂƌŝĐŽƉĂ͘ 'Žǀх
^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗ Z͗ ϮϬϮϯϭϰϲͲŽůůĂƌ'ĞŶĞƌĂůdŽŶŽƉĂŚ
dŚĂŶŬƐ͕ :ŽƐĞƉŚ͘ zĞƐ͕ ƚŚŝƐĂƉƉůŝ ĐĂŶƚŚĂƐďĞĞŶŐƌĞĂƚʹǁĞ͛ ǀĞǁŽƌŬĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŵĂŶĚƚŚĞLJŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶǀĞƌLJƌĞĐĞƉƚŝǀĞƚŽŽƵƌĨĞĞĚďĂ ĐŬ͘ /͛ ůůƚĂŬĞĂůŽŽŬĂƚƚŚĞƵƉĚĂƚĞĚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐĂŶĚůĞƚLJŽƵŬŶŽǁŝ ĨǁĞŚĂǀĞĂŶLJĐŽŶĐĞƌŶƐ͕ ďƵƚ/ǁŽƵů Ě
dŚĂŶŬƐ͕ :ŽƐĞƉŚ͘ zĞƐ͕ ƚŚŝƐĂƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚŚĂƐďĞĞŶŐƌĞĂƚʹǁĞ͛ ǀĞǁŽƌŬĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŵĂŶĚƚŚĞLJŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶǀĞƌLJƌĞĐĞƉƚŝǀĞƚŽŽƵƌ
ĨĞĞĚďĂĐŬ͘ /͛ ůůƚĂŬĞĂůŽŽŬĂƚƚŚĞƵƉĚĂƚĞĚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐĂŶĚůĞƚLJŽƵŬŶŽǁŝĨǁĞŚĂǀĞĂŶLJĐŽŶĐĞƌŶƐ͕ ďƵƚ/ǁŽƵůĚĞdžƉĞĐƚǁĞ͛ ůů
ůŝŬĞůLJŚĂǀĞŶŽĨƵƌƚŚĞƌĨĞĞĚďĂĐŬ͘ 
,ĂǀĞĂŐƌĞĂƚǁĞĞŬĞŶĚ͊ 

<ĞŶ'ĂůŝĐĂ
WƌŝŶĐŝƉĂůWůĂŶŶĞƌ
ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚ
;ϲϮϯͿϯϰϵͲϲϮϭϰ
&ƌŽŵ͗ :ŽƐĞƉŚDƵĞůůĞƌ;WEͿф:ŽƐĞƉŚ͘ DƵĞůůĞƌΛDĂƌŝĐŽƉĂ͘ 'Žǀх
^ĞŶƚ͗ dŚƵƌƐĚĂLJ͕ &ĞďƌƵĂƌLJϮϵ͕ ϮϬϮϰϯ͗ ϯϯWD
dŽ͗ <ĞŶ'ĂůŝĐĂфŬŐĂůŝĐĂΛďƵĐŬĞLJĞĂnj͘ ŐŽǀх
^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗ ϮϬϮϯϭϰϲͲŽůůĂƌ'ĞŶĞƌĂůdŽŶŽƉĂŚ
΀EKd/͗ dŚŝƐŵĞƐƐĂŐĞŽƌŝŐŝŶĂƚĞĚŽƵƚƐŝĚĞŽĨƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨƵĐŬĞLJĞͲͲKEKd>/<ŽŶůŝŶŬƐŽƌ
ŽƉĞŶĂƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚƐƵŶůĞƐƐLJŽƵĂƌĞƐƵƌĞƚŚĞĐŽŶƚĞŶƚŝƐƐĂĨĞ͘ ΁ 
'ŽŽĚĂĨƚĞƌŶŽŽŶ<ĞŶ͕ 
/ũƵƐƚƌĞĐĞŝǀĞĚĂƌĞǀŝƐĞĚƐƵďŵŝƚƚĂůĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚŽůůĂƌ'ĞŶĞƌĂůnjŽŶĞĐŚĂŶŐĞĐĂƐĞŽŶĂƐĞůŝŶĞƌĚ͘ ĞĂƐƚŽĨϯϯϭƐƚǀĞ͘ /ƚ
ŝƐŵLJƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚŝŶŐƚŚĂƚƚŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚŚĂƐďĞĞŶǁŽƌŬŝŶŐǁŝƚŚLJŽƵƌĚĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚŽŶƚŚŝƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĂů͘ WůĞĂƐĞůĞƚŵĞŬŶŽǁŝĨ
LJŽƵŚĂǀĞĂŶLJĨƵƌƚŚĞƌĐŽŵŵĞŶƚŽƌ͞ ƉƌĞĨĞƌƌĞĚ͟ ĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐƚŽďĞƚĂŬĞŶŝŶƚŽĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶŽŶƚŚŝƐĐĂƐĞ͘ 
dŚĞƵƉĚĂƚĞĚŶĂƌƌĂƚŝǀĞĨŝůĞŝƐƚŽŽůĂƌŐĞƚŽƐĞŶĚǀŝĂĞŵĂŝůƐŽ/ǁŝůůƐĞŶĚĂĨŝůĞƚƌĂŶƐĨĞƌůŝŶŬƐŚŽƌƚůLJ͘ 
/ǁŝůůŬĞĞƉLJŽƵƵƉĚĂƚĞĚŽŶǁŚĞŶƚŚŝƐŽŶĞŚĞĂĚƐƚŽŚĞĂƌŝŶŐ͘ 
dŚĂŶŬLJŽƵ͊ 
<ŝŶĚƌĞŐĂƌĚƐ͕ 
Joseph Mueller 
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 
301 W Jefferson St Phoenix, AZ 85003
Planner
O: 602-506-7629  
MARICOPA.GOV
Facebookͮ Instagramͮ Twitterͮ YouTube

3

dŚŝƐŵĞƐƐĂŐĞĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐĐŽŶĨŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚŝƐŝŶƚĞŶĚĞĚŽŶůLJĨŽƌƚŚĞŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂů;ƐͿĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĞĚŝŶƚŚĞŵĞƐƐĂŐĞ͘ /Ĩ
LJŽƵĂƌĞŶŽƚƚŚĞŶĂŵĞĚĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĞĞ͕ LJŽƵƐŚŽƵůĚŶŽƚĚŝƐƐĞŵŝŶĂƚĞ͕ ĚŝƐƚƌŝďƵƚĞ͕ ŽƌĐŽƉLJƚŚŝƐĞͲŵĂŝů͘ /ĨLJŽƵĂƌĞŶŽƚƚŚĞ
ŝŶƚĞŶĚĞĚƌĞĐŝƉŝĞŶƚ͕ LJŽƵĂƌĞŶŽƚŝĨŝĞĚƚŚĂƚĚŝƐĐůŽƐŝŶŐ͕ ĚŝƐƚƌŝďƵƚŝŶŐ͕ ŽƌĐŽƉLJŝŶŐƚŚŝƐĞͲŵĂŝůŝƐƐƚƌŝĐƚůLJƉƌŽŚŝďŝƚĞĚ͘ 


dŚŝƐŵĞƐƐĂŐĞĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐĐŽŶĨŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚŝƐŝŶƚĞŶĚĞĚŽŶůLJĨŽƌƚŚĞŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂů;ƐͿĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĞĚŝŶƚŚĞŵĞƐƐĂŐĞ͘ /Ĩ
LJŽƵĂƌĞŶŽƚƚŚĞŶĂŵĞĚĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĞĞ͕ LJŽƵƐŚŽƵůĚŶŽƚĚŝƐƐĞŵŝŶĂƚĞ͕ ĚŝƐƚƌŝďƵƚĞ͕ ŽƌĐŽƉLJƚŚŝƐĞͲŵĂŝů͘ /ĨLJŽƵĂƌĞŶŽƚƚŚĞ
ŝŶƚĞŶĚĞĚƌĞĐŝƉŝĞŶƚ͕ LJŽƵĂƌĞŶŽƚŝĨŝĞĚƚŚĂƚĚŝƐĐůŽƐŝŶŐ͕ ĚŝƐƚƌŝďƵƚŝŶŐ͕ ŽƌĐŽƉLJŝŶŐƚŚŝƐĞͲŵĂŝůŝƐƐƚƌŝĐƚůLJƉƌŽŚŝďŝƚĞĚ͘ 

1
Joseph Mueller (PND)
From:
Ken Galica <kgalica@buckeyeaz.gov>
Sent:
Monday, December 11, 2023 2:49 PM
To:
Joseph Mueller (PND)
Cc:
Adam Copeland; Brian Craig; Hobart Wingard; John Willett; Scott Zipprich
Subject:
RE: Z2023146 - Dollar General Tonopah 
This Message Is From an External Sender  
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county. 
Good afternoon Joseph,  
 
The property upon which the Dollar General is proposed is located within the City of Buckeye’s planning area. As it is 
likely that, in the future, it and surrounding properties will be annexed into the City of Buckeye, we would request for 
the development to meet our requirements to the greatest extent possible. Note that our General Plan, which 
designates the site for Agricultural use, wouldn’t support zoning that accommodated the retail use proposed. Ideally, 
the use itself wouldn’t be supported – however,  if the criteria listed below were addressed, that would remove most of 
the City’s objection:  
 
x 
Baseline Road adjacent to the project is currently under MCDOT responsibility. Per the City’s Transportation 
Master Plan, Baseline Road is classified as a Major Arterial roadway and should have 70’ of ROW. While the 
application indicates that they have no desire to annex into the City in the ‘near future”, there is a good 
possibility that Baseline Road adjacent to the project will become the City’s responsibility. As such Baseline Road 
should be planned to City standards (dedicate 70’ of ROW). In addition, as a Major Arterial (or even as an 
Arterial), full access median breaks are located at the ½ mile locations (or western boundary of the project). This 
median break should provide access to the entire parcel (and the parcel on the west side of the project, 403-30-
012A), as well as the parcel to the south (401-30-013D). The parcel should provide a cross access to the 
remainder of the parcel to be able to access the future full movement access. 
x 
Dollar General commonly utilizes a pre-manufactured metal building that would not be permitted under the 
City’s architectural design requirements. City requests that if the pre-manufactured metal building prototype is 
used here, a façade be constructed around the structure so that it minimizes the extent of metal visible, with 
sufficient articulation and massing to meet the various requirements contained in Section 5.8 of the Buckeye 
Development Code (Commercial Building Standards and Guidelines).  
x 
City requests that a 25’ landscape setback be provided adjacent to Baseline Road, at the back of ULTIMATE right-
of-way (70’ half street as noted in the first bullet point). No parking, structures, or drive-aisles (except for the 
driveway providing access to Baseline) should encroach into this setback. Tree and shrub plantings should be as 
outlined in Section 5.4.3.B of the Buckeye Development Code (Site Perimeter Landscaping) 
x 
City requests that parking lot landscape islands be provided a minimum of every 10 spaces, with each island 
containing a minimum of 1 tree and 5 shrubs in accordance with Buckeye Development Code Section 5.4.3.C 
(Landscaping Inside Parking Areas).  
 
If we can work together to achieve a development as close to City standards as possible, we would very much appreciate 
it.  
 
Thank you!

2
Ken Galica 
Principal Planner 
Development Services Department  
(623) 349-6214 
From: Joseph Mueller (PND) <Joseph.Mueller@Maricopa.Gov>  
Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2023 1:56 PM 
To: Robert Olmstead <Rolmstead@AFMA.Az.gov>; Robert Rowley (EMG) <ROBERT.ROWLEY@Maricopa.Gov>; 
todd.williams@aps.com; Bruce Monson (EMG) <Bruce.Monson@Maricopa.Gov>; jeffery.caulkins@aps.com; 
travis.icard@aps.com; brian.woodward.@maricopa.gov; madison.wisler@maricopa.gov; dmheisler1@aol.com; 
ronsatt@ev1.net; Tyler Williford <twilliford@azgfd.gov>; Teigan Williams <tstruck@azgfd.gov>; Ken Galica 
<kgalica@buckeyeaz.gov>; dhenning@westvalleyview.com; tvcc.events@gmail.com; Ron Gross <rongrossltd@cox.net>; 
redletter@azdot.gov; Philip Hilliker (MCSO) <P_Hilliker@MCSO.maricopa.gov>; Paul Roetto <proetto1950@gmail.com>; 
Scott Wilken <swilken@azmag.gov>; Kurt Cotner <kcotner@azmag.gov>; Project Evaluation Program - Game and Fish 
<pep@azgfd.gov>; pe@azland.gov; bfenske@azdot.gov; jgarcia@azdot.gov; dkrantz@citytocitycre.com; Frank 
McWilliams (MCSO) <FrankMcWilliams@MCSO.maricopa.gov>; agarza@azmag.gov; Teresa Retterbush (PRK) 
<Teresa.Retterbush@Maricopa.Gov> 
Subject: Z2023146 - Dollar General Tonopah  
[NOTICE:  This message originated outside of the City of Buckeye -- DO NOT CLICK on links or 
open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.] 
Good afternoon, 
We have received the above request for a proposed zone change from Rural-43 to C-1 neighborhood commercial.  The 
subject site APN 401-30-013E is about 1.41 acres in size and is located ½ mile east of the SEC of 331 Ave and Baseline Rd 
in the Tonopah area. 
The applicant has indicated this is to facilitate a proposed Dollar General store but please note there is not a Plan of 
Development associated with the requested zoning entitlement, so the end user may differ from the current indication 
(within the bounds of the requested C-1 zoning).   
The Technical Advisory Committee meeting will be held January 2, 2024. 
Please let me know if you have any questions, comments, or concerns. 
Kind regards, 
Joseph Mueller 
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 
301 W Jefferson St Phoenix, AZ 85003
Planner 
O:   602-506-7629     
MARICOPA.GOV 
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube

3
 
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual(s) addressed in the message. If 
you are not the named addressee, you should not disseminate, distribute, or copy this e-mail. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, distributing, or copying this e-mail is strictly prohibited.