Minutes 05/18/26 Study Session
Extracted text (via pymupdf)
18283 characters
MINUTES
WICKENBURG COMMON COUNCIL
STUDY SESSION MEETING /
JOINT MEETING WITH THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Monday, May 18, 2026 - 3:00 P.M.
155 N. TEGNER - COUNCIL CHAMBERS
WICKENBURG, ARIZONA 85390
A. CALL TO ORDER – Mayor Bratcher called the meeting to order at 3:03 PM
B. ROLL CALL
Present:
Mayor BG Bratcher
Vice Mayor Brian Jones
Councilmember Kristy Bedoian
Councilmember Shawn Clark
Councilmember Margaret Nyberg
Councilmember Rebecca Rovey
Councilmember Art Rubash
Staff Present:
Troy Smith, Town Manager (Via Zoom)
Tarah Mayerhofer, Human Resources Director/Acting Town Manager
Trish Stuhan, Town Attorney
Steve Boyle, Community Development Director
Amy Brown, Town Clerk
Cason Chambers, Public Works Director
Les Brown, Police Chief
Robert Martinez, Finance Director
Ed Temerowski, Fire Chief
C. ITEMS OF BUSINESS
1. Presentation and Update Regarding the Draft Zoning Code
Steve Boyle, Community Development Director, introduced this meeting as a
joint meeting with the Town Council and Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z)
to get input on the zoning code. The town website has a place to submit
comments and includes a copy of the clean draft zoning code as well as the red
lined version. The zoning code was originally done by Matrix Design Group with
a draft constructed. The town then hired Upfront Planning and Entitlements LLC
to conduct the public input portion of the zoning code and bring a final version to
the town. In March there was an updated draft zoning code that is online and in
Town Council Minutes of May 18, 2026
Page 2 of 10
the packet. The new laws have been incorporated into the code, and it has been
reviewed to make sure it matches the town’s General Plan.
Jessica Sarkissian, Upfront Planning and Entitlements LLC, stated that she
specializes in codes for more rural areas, but has a lot of experience in writing
planning documents and codes. She started with the purpose of the zoning code.
The last Zoning Code was done in 2011 and needs to be updated to reflect new
state and federal requirements and new uses. She plans to streamline and
remove inconsistencies between sections which made it difficult to implement. It
will also align with the approved General Plan and town vision. They will update
the Zoning Districts to allow more flexibility and clarify standards into tables and
add more illustrations for clarification into definitions and signs. It will also clarify
existing zoning “Legacy Districts” and their continued allowed development
standards and uses.
The process for updating the zoning code includes the following:
•
Released draft to public for review and comment and requested suggestions
on improvement based on initial Matrix draft
•
199 people attended 1st Open House and 14 attended the 2nd Open House
•
Received over 121 email / voicemail and online officially submitted comments
to date
•
Updated Zoning Code draft from 1st and 2nd open house and public comment
reviews
•
Seeking more stakeholder input on the Sign Section and other specific areas
such as Lighting over the summer
•
The next draft of the zoning code will be released in the fall after the input that
is received at this meeting, online and from the stakeholder meetings
Ms. Sarkissian stated that they have fixed some of the punctuation, code
reference section numbers, corrected city to town and other similar formatting
and typographical changes. Grammar checks will continue and be finalized once
the red lined versions are complete. Mayor Bratcher stated that she would
always like to see the red lined version.
Ms. Sarkissian continued with the review of the code by article.
Article 1: Title, Purpose and General Regulations
•
Clarified and revised according to legal review, Vested Development rights
and Prohibited Uses for clarification especially addressing existing illegal uses
and development
•
Revised legal non-conforming section according to legal review and town’s
authority
•
Clarified existing zoning uses and development standards to continue until
owner-initiated rezone
•
Clarified throughout that it must be an existing legal non-conforming, not just
a non-conforming
Town Council Minutes of May 18, 2026
Page 3 of 10
Article 2: Reviewing Authorities
•
Removed Final Subdivision plans from public hearings are required by new
state statute
•
Clarified title of Community Development Director throughout
Article 3: Authority and Administration
•
Clarified timelines as calendar or working days and table of processes
responsible for reviewing
•
Clarified public notice requirements for posting and neighborhood meetings
by ARS but town may exceed
•
Provided more detail for the pre-application, zoning amendments and PAD
process of materials required
•
Removed revocation process of an approved PAD that has not developed
within 5 years as any change in zone, including revocation, interpreted by
multiple zoning attorneys, requires owner’s notification and a full public
hearing process, it is not administrative
Article 4: Zoning Districts
•
Removed Final Subdivision plans from public hearings are required by new
state statute
•
Clarified title of Community Development Director throughout
•
Clarified “legacy district” and modified well head protection per legal to ensure
water system protection
•
Provided equation for calculating density that is less complex and in line with
standard codes
•
Density applies to the home per acre, accessory buildings do not count
towards density
•
Reduced heights to all be for 30’ residential SF uses and 35’ and 45’ for RM1
and RM2 higher density
•
Included max densities for rural residential districts and defined density
calculation for gross and net
•
Removed architectural window and door requirements into a separate
document
•
Removed Lot Area minimums for high density as they will be determined by
meeting the setbacks and lot coverage, open space, parking and retention
needs
•
Clarified that town can only request to rescind a PAD
•
Updated text in the Heritage Area Overlay for its intent and location and
design element requests including minimum lot area of 3,000 square feet
•
There is a clause for RM1 and RM2 that the structure height shall be limited
to 30 feet when the structure is within 35 feet of AR, R1, R2, R3, R4, or R5
districts
Town Council Minutes of May 18, 2026
Page 4 of 10
There was discussion regarding the heights in RM1 and RM2. Director Boyle
stated there is very little RM2 in the town. Currently RM1 is at 30 feet and RM2 is
at 40 feet with the proposal to go to 35 feet in RM1 and 45 feet in RM2. There is
a maximum story of 2 stories for RM1 and 3 for RM2.
Consensus of Council and P&Z was that it was okay to increase due to the limit
on the number of stories and the clause if they are next to other residential areas.
There was discussion regarding the notification of 300 feet with a
recommendation to change it to 600 feet or 1,000 feet for more notification. It
Town Council Minutes of May 18, 2026
Page 5 of 10
was also brought up that in 14-3-7E1 the neighbors that are within 150 feet of the
property may protest a rezone with 20% of the owners that then has to go to the
Town Council with a vote of ¾ in order for the rezone to be approved. Town
Attorney Stuhan stated that this protest provision is from ARS 9-462.04H.
Director Boyle stated that the 300 feet notification is the minimum in state law. In
addition to the notification to the neighbors, the property is posted with a large
sign, and the information is in the newspaper.
Consensus of Council and P&Z was to change the notification to 600 feet
minimum with more if determined by the Community Development Director to be
necessary.
Article 5: Uses and Use Standards
•
Added Single RV Home as permitted use in rural residential districts
•
Changed RV living for temporary guests subject to the following:
o Shall be allowed on private property with an existing single-family
residential use
o Camping shall be in a RV or travel trailer only, with a self-contained
sewage collection system
o No more than one (1) temporary guest RV on a single property, unless
four (4) acres or more, then one additional guest RV would be permitted
for each acre over 4 acres up to a max of (4) temporary RVs. A permit
would likely be required for tracking purposes with a small fee. This was
requested in multiple public comments as well as both open house forums
to address the busy roping and equestrian season. This does not include
non-guest RVs stored on site.
o A temporary use permit (TUP) shall be required for all guest RV or travel
trailers if staying over two (2) months but less than a year (12 months)
o An exception shall be granted to allow temporary RVs during the
construction of a residence while there is an active building permit for the
site on which the owner to temporarily reside
Mayor Bratcher recommended having everyone register their RV’s with an
annual permit for the property so that it would be easier to regulate as the town
would know how many RV’s have been permitted per property. The number
would go with the property, not each RV, so if someone had different relatives or
visitors visiting, the town would just have to make sure it didn’t exceed the
number permitted. In addition, there can be water issues if it is a shared well that
is not designed to have 4 addition units using the water. Sewer issues can
happen if they are dumping into a septic system that is designed for the house
only, not additional units. The permit would allow the town to look at the electric,
water, and sewer situation to make sure it is safe to have the number of RV’s
being requested.
Town Council Minutes of May 18, 2026
Page 6 of 10
Ms. Sarkissian stated that basically, there would be the following number of RV’s
allowed based on the number of acres:
• 1 – unless over 4 acres
• 2 – 5 acres
• 3 – 6 acres
• 4 – 7 or more acres
There was lots of discussion of issues with this including having an RV for
personal use stored on your property or for family visits. In addition, it was
recommended to define RV, trailer, and horse trailer. The town didn’t want to
discourage the winter visitors or ropers from staying in town but also didn’t want
to allow too many RVs on one property which can affect neighborhoods.
Consensus of Council and P&Z was to let Ms. Sarkissian work on this section
based on the input from the group to try to find a good compromise.
Article 5: Uses and Use Standards (cont.)
Horse Arenas
• Commercial Horse Arenas must be established on no less than five (5)
acres
• Private Horse Arenas may be placed on private property with no minimum
lot size, provided they meet the accessory building setback requirements
of the underlying district
Horse Arena, Commercial: An exercise space, generally rectangular,
sufficiently large to allow for competitive events, practice, and/or live performance
event training activities related to rodeo, barrel racing, dressage or similar
events.
Horse Arena, Private: An exercise space to allow for typically equestrian uses
including but not limited to: turnouts, riding and training activities
Horse Boarding and Training are listed as permitted in AR and R1 (R1-175, R1-
87) and Conditionally Permitted in R2 (R1-35) zones. They are not listed as
permitted in the R3 (R1-18, R1-12) zone as it is more urban/ dense.
Accessory Roping Arenas, turnouts, stables, paddocks, and training acres
accessory to residential use are listed as permitted Accessory buildings in AR,
R1 and R2 zones. They are also listed as accessory uses for commercial in C3,
RR, I1, I2 and I3.
o Noise: Horse Arenas will comply with all applicable noise ordinances
within this Town Code. Use of a public address system shall conclude with
the end of the event.
Town Council Minutes of May 18, 2026
Page 7 of 10
o Dust: Commercial Horse Arenas will perform dust mitigation activities that
include methods for controlling dust such as the applying of water during
morning or evening events when applicable.
o Lighting: Lighting will comply with standards of the Lighting Code; Article
14-6-8
o Manure Management: Manure shall be actively managed to either contain
it on site or be properly disposed on the property to manage smell and
pests. No manure stockpiling or composting will be located within 20 feet
of a property line. Spreading throughout the pasture or arena is permitted.
Home Occupations for: Animal Boarding/ Equestrian / Horse Corrals
•
One (1) farm animal per 10,000 sq ft of property, this does not include
poultry
•
Offspring of animals maintained on the same property that are less than 6
months old or that have not been weaned, shall not be subject to the
maximum animal number
•
Cattle are permitted in the rear yard or side yard on properties less than 5
acres and within the front yard on properties greater than 5 acres. This
does not include cattle temporarily (less than a month) on site for events.
•
Hours of Operation. Outdoor home occupation activities are permitted
from 6:00AM to 10:00PM. No illuminated lights, noise, or outdoor activities
are permitted outside these hours aside from animal maintenance.
•
Manure Management: Manure shall be actively managed to either contain
it on site or be properly disposed of for all animals on the property to
manage smell and pests. No manure stockpiling or composting will be
located within 20 feet of a property line.
•
A Conditional Use Permit may be requested to exceed these allowances.
Farm Animal: Domesticated animals raised or kept for use, profit or pure
enjoyment such as but not limited to: horses, ponies, mules, sheep, goats, cattle
and other similar animals. Farm animals do not include household pets such as:
dogs, cats, rabbits, and other similar small animals.
It was mentioned that many of the properties will be grandfathered in with their
uses. It was suggested to change all the references that say 5 acres to 4 acres
as that matches the zoning designated areas.
Consensus of Council and P&Z was to not allow in the front yard unless over ten
acres and not along the street but with normal setbacks. In addition, it was
requested to remove the sheep and goats from the farm animal limit.
Article 6: Development Standards
•
Removed Architectural Design Guidelines, moved to separate guidelines
document per state requirement
•
Removed Site Design references
•
Removed landscape design references
Town Council Minutes of May 18, 2026
Page 8 of 10
•
Modified landscaping to allow native desert non graded desert to be counted
as landscaping area
•
Added landscaping buffer chart for adjacent zones for clarification
•
Modified fence height:
o Fences located within the front yard setback of residential districts shall be
limited to forty-two inches (42”) tall. Rural zones including AR, R1 and R2
are permitted up to 52” height in the front yard provided they do not
encroach into the sight visibility triangle at driveways and corner lots
adjacent to roadways. Entry features, gates, pillars and other
enhancements to mount access gates to are exempt from this overall
height restriction provided they are also out of the sight visibility triangle.
Lighting Standards:
•
Added commercial, industrial and multi-family maximum light output table per
lumen
•
Added single family and duplex maximum light output table per lumen
•
This is similar to the current Western Sky in town code and similar to Yavapai
County’s regulations
Article 7: Sign Regulations
•
Clarified setbacks for political signs with curb and without curbing present
•
Increased maximum signage area permitted for commercial more typical of
other sign standards to add more sign area per business
•
Clarified height and sign clearance requirements
•
Revised tables to match earlier table of permitted sign locations and non-
residential allowances
•
Added criteria for speaker boxes (where you order at the drive-thru)
•
Added review for murals by the Zoning Administrator
•
Updated the Temporary sign table to match temporary sign examples of
permitted or non-permitted
•
Added that consecutive days is not required for max days permitted in a year
for temporary signs
•
Removed portable yard signs from the AR, R and MR districts
Town Council Minutes of May 18, 2026
Page 9 of 10
Ms. Sarkissian stated that the sign regulations are one area that they are still
seeking input with a commercial review group. They will look at flags, banners,
and signs. It was requested to look at real estate signs.
Meeting was recessed at 5:05 PM
Meeting was reconvened at 5:31 PM
2. Discussion and Direction to Staff Regarding the Purchasing Policy Review
Robert Martinez, Finance Director, reported that this is a small change to reflect
that Council approval is needed if the request is for $50,000 and above for any
one transaction except for emergency expenditures.
D. EXECUTIVE SESSION - (Council May Vote to Go Into Executive Session Pursuant
to A.R.S §38-431.03(A)(3) to Receive Legal Advice from the Town Attorney on Any
of the Above Agenda Items.)
E. ADJOURNMENT
MOVED BY Councilmember Margaret Nyberg to adjourn at approximately 5:32 PM
SECONDED BY Councilmember Rebecca Rovey
VOTE: 7 – 0 (Yes – Mayor Bratcher, Vice Mayor Jones, Councilmembers Bedoian,
Clark, Nyberg, Rovey, and Rubash)
Town Council Minutes of May 18, 2026
Page 10 of 10
BG Bratcher, Mayor
ATTEST:
Amy Brown, Town Clerk
CERTIFICATION
I, Amy Brown, the duly appointed and qualified Town Clerk of the Town of Wickenburg,
do hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes
of the study session of the Town Council of Wickenburg, Arizona held on May 18, 2026.
I further certify the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present.
Amy Brown, MMC
Town Clerk