12. TA250001 PZ Staff Report
Extracted text (via pymupdf)
1351840 characters
TA250001
Page 1 of 5
Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission
Prepared by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
Case:
TA250001 – Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance Update
Hearing Date:
November 6, 2025
Supervisor Districts:
All
Applicant:
Staff-initiated
Request:
Text Amendment to update the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance
(MCZO)
EROP:
This item is being processed through the County’s Enhanced Regulatory
Outreach Program (EROP). Proposed language of the Maricopa County
Zoning Ordinance is located with the report attachments in legislative-edit.
TA250001
Page 2 of 5
Project and Discussion:
1.
The Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance (MCZO) was originally adopted by the Board of
Supervisors (BOS) in 1969. It serves as the primary regulatory instrument to manage growth and
development in the unincorporated regions of the County. The MCZO is an essential tool to
implement the broader land use goals of the Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan. It has been
amended multiple times over the years. TA250001 is a comprehensive update and modernization
of the MCZO to better serve the community. This update, a 2025 initiative of Chairman Galvin, is
intended to provide clarity through improved ordinance language, visual graphics, charts or tables
where appropriate, replacing dense paragraphs of text in order to create a more user-friendly
document. The update also incorporates state-mandated changes to address accessory dwelling
units (ADU) and short-term rentals (STR). Additionally, the MCZO has been updated with modern
land use references, consolidated land use categories, and updated development standards to
reflect technological advances, industry standards and best practices.
2.
Planning & Development (PND) conducted a comprehensive review of the MCZO throughout 2023
- 2024. Staff from multiple disciplines collaborated to identify issues, evaluate areas for
improvement and develop recommendations. These discussions addressed application
processes, development standards, regulations, related permitting, and areas requiring further
research and analysis. This effort resulted in a redlined version of the MCZO, which served as the
foundation for MCZO draft version 1.
3.
The BOS appointed an MCZO Update Task Force (TF) of volunteer representatives from various
sectors of the community planning, land and housing development industry. The TF collaborated
with staff through in-person and virtual working sessions to identify key focus areas and
recommend specific action items for the update. Their review produced numerous action items
recommended for consideration. Many of these items have been slated for further analysis and
research and although not included at this time may be the subject of future MCZO amendments.
The TF organized its work into the following topic categories:
•
Development Standards and Design Requirements
•
Residential Housing Policy
•
Permitting and Administrative Procedures
•
Use Regulations and Zoning Districts
•
Rural Area and Infrastructure Considerations
•
Public Health, Safety and Nuisance Controls
4.
Public notice and outreach included a questionnaire published on the PND website. It contained
10 questions aligned with the topic categories and was made available to the public from June
5th through September 12th. A total of 301 people responded with feedback to the questionnaire.
The questionnaire addressed topics such as simplifying the MCZO, including new and emerging
uses, reducing residential setbacks, increasing lot coverage, increasing building heights, flexible
parking requirements, housing availability, and improving quality of life in rural and
unincorporated regions.
5.
Additional public outreach included two Stakeholder Workshops on June 5th and August 28th. Both
workshops allowed staff to receive comments from in-person and virtual attendees. The initial
workshop included a presentation regarding the regulatory update, focus areas and projected
timeline for public input and completion. The second workshop focused on project progress,
enhancements, sample use tables, the public review schedule, and instructions for submitting
online comments. Stakeholder workshop #1 had 108 registrants with a total of 20 in-person and
TA250001
Page 3 of 5
56 virtual attendees. Stakeholder workshop #2 included 162 registrants with a total of 10 in-
person and 81 virtual attendees.
6.
Michael Baker International (MBI) was contracted in July to assist with posting MCZO Draft
Version #1 for public review and comment using the Konveio on-line platform. The public
comment period ran from September 12th and through October 17th. MBI compiled and redlined
comments, updated formatting and language, and added illustrations. As part of the County-wide
initiative to enhance accessibility, the updated MCZO will comply with digital accessibility
standards, including those related to branding colors, fonts, and content layout. A total of 155
comments were received on draft version #1.
7.
The proposed MCZO update being presented for consideration includes the following
modifications and enhancements:
1.
Updated and clarified definitions, removed outdated language, and created new
definitions for emerging technologies such as Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS)
and Data Centers.
2.
Consolidated 201 land uses into 137 and presented them in a single Use Table.
3.
Displayed development standards in tables and charts.
4.
Added graphic images for clarity.
5.
Introduced measurement rounding.
6.
Transferred Temporary Use Permit appeals from the Board of Adjustments to the
Planning & Zoning Commission (to improve processing timelines).
7.
Decreased certain minimum front setbacks.
8.
Increased the maximum height by 5’ for some zoning districts.
9.
Removed Plan of Development requirements for single buildings containing four or
fewer dwelling units on a single lot of record.
10. Added landscaping requirements in commercial and industrial zoning.
11. Required refuse collection screening in commercial and industrial zoning.
12. Added headlight glare screening in commercial and industrial zoning.
13. Increased the maximum height for industrial zoning to 60’.
14. Set regulations on short term rentals (STR) - only one dwelling unit on a property may be
utilized as an STR, prohibits sex offenders, prohibits venue use/events/etc., owner must
live on property with an ADU.
15. Updated the Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) standards to comply with new state law,
limited height of detached ADUs to 18’ outside the building envelope, required a single
access point, limited size of ADUs to minimum required by Arizona Revised Statute on
lots of one acre or less, on lots greater than one acre ADUs shall be no greater than the
primary dwelling unit.
16. Included standards for private, non-commercial events
17. Updated animal keeping standards as an accessory use for single-family zoning districts
allowing up to 6 chickens with required enclosures in accordance with state law. There
will be no limitation on animal keeping in rural zoning districts.
18. Created a Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) setback of 100’ from property lines and
500’ from existing residential uses.
19. Combined classes 3 and 4 into one class for both the Hwy 74 Scenic Corridor and
Wickenburg Hwy Scenic Corridor.
20. Reduced parking requirements for commercial and industrial uses, allows parking study
during the first POD review to justify reductions, , updated shared parking provisions, and
reduced, parking requirements for self-storage to 4 spaces based on associated office
use.
TA250001
Page 4 of 5
21. Updated the right-of-way (ROW) setbacks and assigned review authority to MCDOT.
22. Updates the drainage regulations.
23. Updated Community Residence/Recovery Community standards: codified the
“protection period” (the time during which distancing is protected); extended the period
from six months to one year, with a possible six-month administrative extension; allowed
55+ assisted living homes one additional licensed caregiver (increasing occupancy from
10 to 11 residents); limited staff on-site to three at a time and ten total; and clarified that
mental health treatment must remain consistent with traditional residential settings.
24. Created a Special Use Permit category for special event venues with mandatory
standards related to size of property, parking, food and beverage service, amplified
music, traffic direction, etc.
25. Created Temporary Use Permit table and allowed Temporary Use Permit uses in most
zoning districts.
26. Updated the violation and compliance section to conform to state law.
8.
To compliment the above changes, new graphics were added to improve clarity, and a new land
use matrix and development standards tables were developed for ease of use with consolidated
information in a single location. These consolidations eliminate the need to reference multiple
chapters to determine permitted land uses and development standards in the various zoning
districts. This update also eliminates duplicate language and results in a reduction of 17 chapters
down to 14, and a reduction of 53 pages (and 15,000 words) from the ordinance. The MCZO will
allow for word search and quick links to reference for a more user-friendly document. Overall, the
update eliminates outdated terms, modernizes definitions, consolidates content, and ensures
consistency with current statutory requirements.
9.
The proposed amendments are consistent with the Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan’s
policies promoting efficient land use, balanced growth, and protection of rural character while
supporting sustainable infrastructure and housing opportunities.
10.
Several public comments identified items requiring additional research and analysis. These
topics may be addressed in future ordinance amendments.
11.
TA250001 was processed through the Enhanced Regulatory Outreach Program (EROP) with
posting and notification to all EROP registrants, approximately 3,000 parties. PND also sent out
e-mail notification to approximately 1,323 additional contacts from various agencies, registered
area of interest groups and other interested parties.
12.
Staff introduced the MCZO update at the May 22, 2025 Zoning Infrastructure, Policy, Procedure &
Ordinance Review (ZIPPOR) meeting of the Commission outlining the project and timeline. Staff
provided a subsequent update on June 12, summarizing Stakeholder Workshop #1, after which
the Commission voted 6–0 to initiate TA250001.
13.
PND extends appreciation to all community members who have responded and provided input to
the MCZO update. The TF was instrumental in assisting staff with focusing and prioritizing
potential action items. The input and recommendations from staff, members of the public and TF
resulted in an abundance of recommendations many of which PND will need to process further
research and analysis with anticipated future ordinance amendments and enhancements. The
accelerated timeline for producing the proposed MCZO update document could not have been
met without these collaboration efforts. Implementation of the MCZO update will meet Chairman
Galvin’s 2025 initiative, will allow for additional housing availability, and will align the ordinance
with the Arizona Revised Statues.
TA250001
Page 5 of 5
Recommendation:
14.
Staff recommends the Commission adopt a motion to recommend approval of TA250001 for the
Board of Supervisors to approve the updated Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.
Presented by:
Rachel Applegate, Planning Supervisor, Adam Cannon, Senior Planner and Ronald Quarles, Senior
Planner
Reviewed by:
Tom Ellsworth, Planning Director and Darren Gerard, Planning Manager
Attachments:
MCZO Redline Draft Version 2 (413 pages)
Questionnaire Survey Summary (155 pages)
MCZO Draft Version 1 Public Comment Report Konveio Summary (9 pages)
Public comments received (69 pages)
Maricopa County
Zoning Ordinance
Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
301 W. Jefferson St., Suite 170
Phoenix, AZ 85003
November 15, 2023
Adopted 1969
Reformatted 2001 and 2025
Latest Revision 2025
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 27, 2025
page TOC-1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS
Section
Page
101
Short Title
1-1
102
Declaration
1
103102
Effective Date
1-1
104103
Purpose
1-1
105104
Interpretation
1-2
106105
Separability Clause
1-2
107106
Repeal of Conflicting Ordinances
1-2
108107
General Rules for Construction of Language
1-32
108
General Rule for Measurements
1-3
109
Summary of Planning Authorities for Decisions and Appeals
1-3
CHAPTER 2 – DEFINITIONS
Section
Page
201
Definitions
2-1
CHAPTER 3 – ADMINISTRATION
Section
Page
301
Board of Supervisors - Reserved
1
302301
Planning and Zoning Commission - Reserved
3-1
303302
Board of Adjustment
13-2
3-304303
Zone Change Amendments
43-7
305304
Citizen Review Process
123-15
306305
Plan of Development (POD) Process
153-18
307306
Administrative Actions and Appeal
163-21
CHAPTER 4 – ZONING
Section
Page
401
Establishment of Zoning Districts and Boundaries Thereof
4-1
402
Boundaries
4-3
403
Lands Not Previously Zoned
4-45
404
Lands Previously Zoned by Other Jurisdictions
4-45
405
Lots Divided by Zoning District Boundaries
54-5
CHAPTER 5 – RURAL ZONING DISTRICTS AND DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS
Section
Page
501
Rural-190 – 190,000 Square Feet Per Dwelling UnitPurpose
of Rural and Residential Zoning Districts
5-1
502
Rural-70 – 70,000 Square Feet Per Dwelling Unit Rural &
Residential Zoning Districts Development Standards
115-3
503
Rural-43 – One Acre Per Dwelling Unit Purpose of
Commercial Zoning Districts
135-6
504
Commercial Zoning District Development Standards
5-7
505
Purpose of Industrial Zoning Districts
5-10
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 27, 2025
page TOC-2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
506
Industrial Zoning Districts Development Standards
5-11
CHAPTER 6 – SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
USE TABLE, ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND
CONDITIONS
Section
Page
601
R1-35 – 35,000 Square Feet Per Dwelling UnitUse
Regulations
6-1
602
R1-18 – 18,000 Square Feet Per Dwelling UnitAccessory
Uses Incidental to the Uses Table
96-25
603
R1-10 – 10,000 Square Feet Per Dwelling UnitUse
Standards and Conditions
106-29
604
R1-8 – 8,000 Square Feet Per Dwelling Unit
12
605
R1-7 – 7,000 Square Feet Per Dwelling Unit
13
606
R1-6 – 6,000 Square Feet Per Dwelling Unit
15
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
Section
Page
701
R-2 – Two Family Residential
1
702
R-3, R-4, R-5 – Multiple Family Residential
3
CHAPTER 8 – COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
Section
Page
801
C-S – Planned Shopping Center
1
802
C-O – Commercial Office
4
803
C-1 – Neighborhood Commercial
9
804
C-2 – Intermediate Commercial
16
805
C-3 – General Commercial
24
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
Section
Page
901
Ind-1 – Planned Industrial
1
902
Ind-2 – Light Industrial
8
903
Ind-3 – Heavy Industrial
14
CHAPTER 10 7 – OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
Section
Page
1001701
PAD – Planned Area Development Overlay
7-1
1002702
RUPD – Residential Unit Plan of Development
7-45
1003
CUPD – Commercial Plan of Development
7
1004
IUPD – Industrial Plan of Development
9
1005
PD – Planned Development Overlay
11
1006
SC – Senior Citizen Overlay
12
1007
Westside Military Airbase
14
703
SC (Senior Citizen)
7-12
1008704
Wickenburg Highway Scenic Corridor
157-14
1009705
Highway 74 Scenic Corridor
217-21
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 27, 2025
page TOC-3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1010706
Military Airport and Ancillary Military Facility
257-25
CHAPTER 11 8 – GENERAL REGULATIONS
Section
Page
1101801
Applying General Provisions
8-1
1102802
Parking Regulations
8-1
1103803
Loading and Unloading Regulations
68-11
1104804
Right of Way Acquisition
78-12
1105805
Setback LinesTransportation, Access and Future Right-of-
Way Lines
78-13
1106806
Accessory Buildings and Uses
88-14
1107807
Number of Principal Buildings on a Lot
98-17
1108808
Adjustment Permitting an Additional Dwelling Unit
98-17
1109809
Additional Lot Area and Dimension Regulations
108-17
1110810
Additional Yard and Open Space Regulations
108-17
1111811
Additional Height Regulations
128-19
1112812
Outdoor Light Control Provisions
208-28
1113813
Flood Control Regulations
8-3425
1114814
Location of Mobile Homes, Travel Trailers, Aircraft, Boats,
Camping Trailers, Truck Campers & Motor Homes
258-34
1115815
Amateur Radio Antennas and Antenna Support Structures
8-3526
816
Property Maintenance
8-36
CHAPTER 12 9 – DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
Section
Page
1201901
Hillside Development Standards
9-1
1202902
Wireless Communication Facilities
9-5
1203903
Mobile Home Parks
9-1213
1204904
Protected Development Rights
149-16
1205905
Drainage Provisions
179-18
1206906
Renewable Energy Systems
309-34
1207907
Community Residences and Recovery Communities
339-36
CHAPTER 13 10 – USE REGULATIONS
Section
Page
13011001
Special Uses
10-1
13021002
Temporary Uses
810-10
1303
Conditional Uses
15
13041003
Exempted Uses
1610-18
13051004
Nonconforming Uses
1710-19
13061005
Relief from Development Standards due to Government
Action
1710-20
CHAPTER 14 11 – SIGN REGULATIONS
Section
Page
14011101
General Signage Regulations
11-1
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 27, 2025
page TOC-4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
14021102
Rural and Residential Zoning Districts
1011-9
14031103
Commercial Zoning Districts
1211-12
14041104
Industrial Zoning Districts
2211-23
14051105
Overlay Zoning Districts
2511-25
14061106
Mobile/Manufactured Home Parks
2611-27
Sign Table by Zoning District
2811-28
Chapter 15 12 – VIOLATION, PENALTY & ENFORCEMENT
Section
Page
15011201
Violation, Penalty & Enforcement
12-1
15021202
Violation
12-2
15031203
Penalty
12-3
15041204
Enforcement
12-3
Chapter 16 13 – FEES
Section
Page
16011301
Purpose
13-1
16021302
Fees
13-1
16031303
Fees for Appeals
13-8
16041304
Application Fees for Variance
13-8
16051305
Temporary Use Permits
13-8
16061306
Outstanding Fees and Fines
13-9
16071307
Other License Fees
13-9
Chapter 17 14 – INDEX & APPENDICES
Section
Page
1701
Index
17-1
1702
Appendices
17-8
17031401
Revisions/AdditionsOrdinance Update and Amendments
14-9
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 1-1
CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS
Chapter 1 | Introductory Provisions
Section 101.
Short Title*1
This Ordinance may be cited known and cited as the "The Zoning Ordinance for the
Unincorporated Area of Maricopa CountyMaricopa County Zoning Ordinance" (or “this
Ordinance”) and abbreviated as the “MCZO”.
Date of Revisions
*1
Revised 4-01-85
Section 102. Declaration
An Amended Zoning Ordinance for the Unincorporated Area of Maricopa County, Arizona,
dividing the unincorporated area of said county into zoning districts appropriate for various
classes of residential, business and industrial uses; providing for the establishment of setback
lines; providing for adequate light, air, and parking facilities; providing for expediting traffic
within the zoning districts; establishing the percentage of a lot or parcel which may be covered
by buildings, and the size of yards and other open spaces.
Section 102.
103Effective Date
This Ordinance shall becomewas first adopted and became effective on May 29, 1969.
Section 103.
104Purpose*2,*3
This Amended Zoning Ordinance is designed to promote the public health, peace, safety,
comfort, convenience and general welfare of the citizens of Maricopa County; to guide, control
and regulate the future growth and development in order to promote orderly and appropriate
use of land in the entire unincorporated area of said county; to protect the character and the
stability of residential, business and industrial areas of Maricopa County; to facilitate existing or
potential traffic movements; to provide adequate light, air and parking facilities; to secure
safety from fire and other dangers; and to prevent overcrowding of land and undue congestion
of population; and to prevent the concentration of adult oriented facilities and marijuana
facilities which haves been determined to be a cause to neighborhood deterioration and blight
through an increase in crime and diminution of property values. The provisions of this
Ordinance should have neither the purpose nor effect of imposing a limitation or restriction on
the content of any communicative materials, including adult oriented materials. Similarly, it is
not the intent or effect of the Ordinance to restrict or deny access to materials protected by the
First Amendment. In preparation of this Ordinance consideration has been given to Sections
11-801 through 11-823through 11-808 and 11-821 through 11-830 of the Arizona Revised
Statutes, and to all studies and surveys made in the past in connection therewith, including, but
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 1-2
CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS
not limited to, the following reports and studies of present conditions and prospective future
growth:
1. Part I of Comprehensive Plan for Maricopa County - History, Economics, Physical
Features;Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan and Area Plans;
2. Part II of the Comprehensive Plan for Maricopa County - Population, Community Growth,
Existing Land Use; Part III of the Comprehensive Plan for Maricopa County - A Report Upon
Future General Land Use; Major Street and Highway Plan; Transportation System Plan
3. Present and Future Water Use and its Effect on Planning in Maricopa County; The
Economy of Maricopa County; Area Plans.Parks and Recreation Plan.
Date of Revisions
*2
Revised 8-23-90
*3
Revised 8-21-93
Section 104.
105Interpretation
In interpreting and applying the regulations of this Ordinance, they shall be held to be the
minimum requirements for the promotion of the public health, safety and general welfare. It is
not intended by this Ordinance to interfere with or abrogate or annul any ordinances, rules,
regulations or permits previously adopted or issued, and not in conflict with any of the
regulations of this Ordinance, or which shall be adopted or issued pursuant to law relating to
the use of buildings or premises and likewise not in conflict with this Ordinance; nor is it
intended by this Ordinance to interfere with or abrogate or annul any easements, covenants, or
other agreements between parties, except that if this Ordinance imposes a greater restriction,
this Ordinance shall regulate. The department shall apply and interpret this ordinance and may
issue directives as necessary.
Section 105.
106Separability Clause
Should any chapter, section or regulation of this Ordinance be declared by the courts to be
unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a
whole, or any portion thereof other than the chapter, section or regulation so declared to be
unconstitutional or invalid.
Section 106.
107Repeal of Conflicting Ordinances
All ordinances or portions of ordinances in conflict with this Ordinance, or inconsistent with the
regulations of this Ordinance, are hereby repealed to the extent necessary to give this
Ordinance full force and effect.
Section 107.
108General Rules for Construction of Language*4
All words used in the present tense shall include the future tense. All words in the singular
number shall include the plural number, and all words in the plural number shall include the
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 1-3
CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS
singular number. The word "structure" includes the word "building", the word "shall" is
mandatory and not directory, and the word "may" is permissive.
Section 108.
General Rule For Measurements
Wherever this Ordinance requires numerical calculations, and the result of a calculation is a
fraction of a whole number, the results shall be rounded as follows:
1. General Rounding: Fractions of one-half (0.5) or greater shall be rounded up to the nearest
whole number and fractions of less than one-half (0.5) shall be rounded down to the
nearest whole number, except as otherwise provided.
2. For parking spaces, fractions of a whole number shall be rounded up to the nearest whole
number.
Section 109.
Summary of Planning Authorities for Decisions and Appeals
Decision Type
Reference (Linked)
Recommendation Body Decision Authority
Appeal Authority
Administrative
Applications
Section 306
(Administrative
Actions and Appeal)
Zoning Inspector
Zoning Inspector
Hearing Officer
retained by
Maricopa County
Amendments to
Zoning Ordinance or
Zoning District
Boundaries
Section 303
(Amendments)
Planning and Zoning
Commission
Board of Supervisors
Superior Court
Area Plans,
Comprehensive
Plans and
Comprehensive Plan
Amendments
ARS/Maricopa County
Comprehensive Plan
Planning and Zoning
Commission
Board of Supervisors
Superior Court
Enforcement Actions
Chapter 12 (Violation,
Penalty, and
Enforcement)
-
Zoning Inspector
Hearing Officer
retained by
Maricopa County
Extensions to
Temporary Use
Permit
Section 1002
(Temporary Use
Permits)
-
Planning and Zoning
Commission
Superior Court
Interpretation
Section 302 (Board of
Adjustment)
-
Director
Board of
Adjustment
Special Use Permit
Section 1001 (Special
Use Permits)
Planning and Zoning
Commission
Board of Supervisors
Superior Court
Temporary Use
Permit
Section 1002
(Temporary Use
Permits)
Director or Designee
Director or Designee /
Planning and Zoning
Planning and
Zoning
Commission (Upon
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 1-4
CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS
Commission (Upon
Opposition Received)
Administrative
Denial)
Variances
Section 302 (Board of
Adjustment)
-
Board of Adjustment
Superior Court
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-1
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
Chapter 2
| Definitions
Section 601.Section 201.
Definitions
For the purpose of this Ordinance, certain words are hereby defined:
ACCESSORY BUILDING / STRUCTURE:
A building, structure or manufactured/mobile home which that is subordinate to, and the use
of which is incidental to, that of the principal building or use on the same lot.*46
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT:
A habitable space either attached to or detached from an existing principal single-family
dwelling of greater square footage than the accessory dwelling unit on a property sharing
driveway access with the principal single-family dwelling.
ACCESSORY USE:
A use that is customarily incidental and subordinate to the principal use of a lot or a building.
including guests or household staff, or accessory vehicle parking or storage located on the same
lot therewith.
ADJUDICATED PERSON:
A person who, by determination of a court, board, commission or other lawful authority, has
been convicted of a criminal offense, and having been subsequently sentenced, is actively on
parole or probation and is ordered to reside at a specific address and/or has registered as a sex
offender. Residency by two or more such persons (who are not spouses or minor children
related by blood or adoption) at the same address shall create a Group Care Facility. *62
ADULT ORIENTED FACILITIES:
Any use of land or building/structure subject to the Maricopa County Ordinance for Adult
Oriented Businesses and Adult Service Providers.*58
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-2
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
AIRPORT:
A landing area used regularly by aircraft for receiving or discharging passengers or cargo.
1. Helipad: An area on a heliport established for the landing or takeoff of helicopters.
2. Heliport: A landing area solely for the use of helicopters. A heliport may include more
than one helipad.
3. Landing Area: Any locality, either land or water, including airports and landing fields, which
is used or intended to be used for the landing and takeoff of aircraft, whether or not
facilities are provided for the shelter, servicing or repair of aircraft or for receiving or
discharging passengers or cargo.
4. Landing Area Boundary: The outer limit of the land or water of a landing area.
ALLEY:
A passage or way open to public travel which that affords generally a secondary means of
vehicular access to abutting lots and is not intended for general traffic circulation.
ALLEY LINE:
The boundary which that separates the right-of-way of an alley from the abutting property.
AMATEUR RADIO ANTENNA:
The arrangement of wires or metal rods used in the sending and receiving of electromagnetic
waves by amateur radio operators.*29
AMATEUR RADIO ANTENNA SUPPORT STRUCTURE:
Any structure, mast, pole, tripod, or tower utilized for the purpose of supporting amateur radio
antennas for the purpose of transmission or reception of electromagnetic waves by amateur
radio operators.*29
AMBIENT LIGHT:
The existing light condition surrounding an areathat comes from multiple directions and
provides general illumination. The light source may be sunlight natural or artificial light or a
combination of both.
APPEAL:
A request for review of the Drainage Administrator's interpretation or application of the
provisions of this Regulation.*46
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-3
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
AREA DRAINAGE MASTER STUDY:
A study to develop stormwater hydrology for a watershed, to define drainage systems, identify
potential flood hazard areas, drainage problems and recommend solutions and standards for
sound floodplain and stormwater management. The ADMS identifies alternative solutions to a
given flooding or drainage problem. An Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) identifies the
preferred alternative. An ADMP, unique to the subject watershed provides minimum criteria
and standards (for flood control and drainage) for land use and development.
*46AREA OF JURISDICTION:
That part of the County without outside the corporate limits of any municipality.
AREA PLAN:
A land use plan adopted by the Board of Supervisors for a portion specific areas of the County
as identified within the County’s Comprehensive Plan.*17
AUTOMOBILE GRAVEYARD:
ANY ESTABLISHMENT OR PLACE OF BUSINESS WHICH IS MAINTAINED, USED, OR OPERATED
FOR STORING, KEEPING, BUYING OR SELLING WRECKED, SCRAPPED, RUINED OR DISMANTLED
MOTOR VEHICLES OR MOTOR VEHICLE PARTS. AN AUTOMOBILE GRAVEYARD MAY INCLUDE
REPAIR FACILITIES AS AN ANCILLARY USE.*12AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE:
A motor vehicle that performs all driving functions under all conditions without a human
operator.
BASEMENT:
That portion of a building between floor and ceiling which that is partly below and partly above
grade, but so located that the vertical distance from grade to floor below is less than the
vertical distance from grade to ceiling.
BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM (BESS):
A facility that stores electrical energy in battery cells, modules or other devices for later use in
providing electricity to the grid or enhancing the reliability and efficiency of the electric system.
A BESS includes associated structures, equipment, and controls necessary for safe and effective
operation.
For purposes of this ordinance, a BESS shall be considered utility-scale when designed for
energy market participation or grid services and when not primarily intended to serve on-site
end-use load. Residential, commercial, and industrial systems installed behind the customer
meter or serving on-site consumption shall be considered distributed generation and are
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-4
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
exempt from this definition.
BED AND BREAKFAST:
Establishments providing not more than 5 guest rooms for lodging on a less than weekly basis
in an operator- or owner-occupied dwelling unit, with incidental eating and drinking service
provided from a single kitchen for lodgers and residents only.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-5
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
BILLBOARD EMBELLISHMENT:
Letters, figures, characters, or representations in cutouts, irregular forms, or similar
ornamentation attached to or superimposed upon a billboard to provide a three-dimensional
effect.*61
BILLBOARD(S):
A billboard(s), utilizing digital message technology capable of changing the message or copy on
the sign electronically, such that, the alphabetic, pictographic, or symbolic informational
content can be changed or altered electronically on a fixed display surface composed of
electronically illuminated or electronically actuated or motivated elements. This includes
billboards with displays that have been preprogrammed to display only certain types of
information (i.e., time, date, temperature) and billboards whose informational content can be
changed or altered by means of computer-driven electronic impulses. A freestanding sign that
advertises a business, product, service, or activity not sold, produced, manufactured, furnished,
or available on the property where the sign is located.A freestanding sign that advertises a
business, product, service, or activity not limited to those sold, produced, manufactured,
furnished, or available on the property where the sign is located. Billboards may be static,
illuminated, or digital. *61
BILLBOARD(S) – DIGITAL:
A billboard(s), utilizing digital message technology capable of changing the message or copy on
the sign electronically, such that, the alphabetic, pictographic, or symbolic informational
content can be changed or altered electronically on a fixed display surface composed of
electronically illuminated or electronically actuated or motivated elements. This includes
billboards with displays that have been preprogrammed to display only certain types of
information (i.e., time, date, temperature) and billboards whose informational content can be
changed or altered by means of computer-driven electronic impulses.*61
BILLBOARD – FREEWAY:
A billboard located along designated freeways within the County, specifically Interstate 17
(south of Carefree Highway), Interstate 10, State Route Loop 101, State Route Loop 202, State
Route Loop 303, State Route 24, Northern Parkway, and U.S. Highway 60 (Superstition
Freeway).
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-6
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
BILLBOARD(S) – STATIC:
A billboard(s) with a fixed message, which may have lighting that changes no more than once in
a 24-hour period.*61
BLADE SWEEP:
The circumference of the outermost tip of a blade or set of blades that a wind
generating system (wind turbine) traces while the blades are in motion.*41
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
The Board of Supervisors of Maricopa County.
BOARDING HOUSE:
A building where, for compensation and by prearrangement for definite periods, meals or
lodging and meals, are provided for three or more persons, but not exceeding 20 persons.
BUILDABLE AREA:
The portion of a lot which is within the envelope formed by the required yards setbacks. See
"YARD, REQUIREDSETBACKS".
BUILDING:
A structure having a roof supported by columns or walls for housing, shelter or enclosure of
persons, animals, chattels or property of any kind.
BUILDING HEIGHT:
The vertical distance from grade to the highest point of the coping of a flat roof; to the deck line
of a mansard roof or the height of the highest gable, hip or gambrel roof.*10
BUILDING SITE:
The area extending laterally a minimum distance of 10 feet beyond the foundation or support
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-7
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
of a building.*46BUILDING, ACCESSORY:A building which is subordinate to, and the use of which
is incidental to that of the principal building, structure or use on the same lot - (see Structure,
Accessory). *41BUILDING, COMMUNITY:
A public building designed or used for community activities of an educational, recreational or
public service nature.
BUILDING, PRINCIPAL:
A building in which is conducted the principal use of the lot on which it is situated. In a
residential zoning district any dwelling is deemed to be the principal building on the lot on
which it is situated.
CARETAKER:
A person whose assigned duties may include maintaining property, caring for farm animals,
providing security, or providing care for a person having a documented medical condition.
*25CARPORT:
A roofed structure with two or more open sides under which a vehicle may be driven.
CELLAR:
That portion of a building between floor and ceiling which that is partly below and partly above
grade, but so located that the vertical distance from grade to floor below is greater than the
vertical distance from grade to ceiling.
CEMETERY, FUNERAL & INTERMENT SERVICES:
A cemetery as defined in Arizona Revised Statutes includes public, religious and municipal land
for sale of burial plots. A cemetery includes pet cemeteries, mausoleums, and accessory uses
such as mortuaries. A cemetery specifically does not include land for private, family burial plots
of ten or fewer registered with the Arizona Department of Health Services and that will be
considered accessory and customarily incidental to a permitted primary use in the Rural zoning
districts.
CHARTER SCHOOL:
A primary, elementary, or secondary school established by contract with a district governing
board, the State Board of Education or the State Board for Charter Schools or University or
Community College District pursuant to A.R.S. Article 8, Chapter 15, to provide learning that will
improve pupil achievement and receives a predominant amount of its financing from public
funds.*42
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-8
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
CHORD:
A line drawn parallel to where the points of a front line connect with the fronting street.
COMMERCIAL CENTER:
A development on a single parcel or multiple contiguous parcels containing a common
commercial zoning district designation and served by common driveways, parking areas and/or
amenities.
COMMISSION:
The County Planning and Zoning Commission of Maricopa County.
COMMUNITY BUILDING:
A public building designed or used for community activities of an educational, recreational or
public service nature.
COMMUNITY RESIDENCE:
Except as required by state law, a residential living arrangement for six to ten unrelated
individuals with disabilities or who are elderly or who are minors, and live-in staff living as a
single housekeeping unit in a single dwelling unit where residents are in need of the mutual
support furnished by other residents as well as the support services, if any, provided by the
staff. Residents may be self-governing or supervised by a sponsoring entity or its staff, which
provides habilitative or rehabilitative services related to the residents’ disabilities. A community
residence seeks to emulate a family to foster normalization of its residents and to integrate
them into the surrounding community. Its primary purpose is to provide shelter in a family–like
environment. Supportive inter-relationships between residents are an essential component.
Medical and mental health treatment shall not comprise treatment beyond that which would
be provided in the confines of a traditional family residential setting. Treatment shall be
accessory to residency in the home.
Community residences include, but are not limited to, those residences that conform to this
definition that are licensed by the Arizona Department of Health Services, including but not
limited to adult care homes, elder care homes, child care homes, and sober living homes,
certified by the Arizona Recovery Housing Association, or awarded an Oxford House Charter.
The term “community residence” does not include any other group living arrangement for
unrelated individuals who are not disabled, or any shelter, rooming house, boarding house,
transient occupancy, or other use as defined in this Ordinance. *62
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-9
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The plan adopted by the Board of Supervisors which meets the requirements of Title 11,
Section 805 of Arizona Revised Statutes governing County Planning and Zoning.*17
CONDITIONAL USE:
A use of property permitted on a permanent basis within a zoning district as long as required
conditions are met.*55
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT:
The permit issued for a conditional use in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 13, Section
1303. *55
CORRAL:
A pen or enclosure for confining animals.
DATA CENTER:
A facility primarily used for the processing, management, or storage of digital information,
housing computer servers, data storage equipment, and related infrastructure. Data centers
typically include backup power systems, environmental controls, network connectivity, and
security measures, and may operate continuously. For zoning purposes, the term includes
facilities engaged in activities such as telecommunications and storage systems, central and
graphical processing, neural networks, quantum computing, data routing, server farms,
cryptocurrency mining or processing, virtual private networks, virtual servers, artificial
intelligence training or processing, image processing, cloud computing, and email services. The
term also encompasses telecom hotels, carrier hotels, co-location centers, and similar facilities
used for these purposes.
DESIGN FLOW:
The peak flow and peak volume of rainfall resulting from the design storm generated within a
defined area.*46
DESIGN STORM:
The 100-year rainfall event that produces the design flow.*46
DESIGN STORM/RETENTION:
The 100-year, 2-hour rainfall event.*46
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-10
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
DETOXIFICATION FACILITY:
A facility where an individual or individuals receive physiological and/or medicinal treatment for
the removal of toxic substances related to substance use disorder. A detoxification facility is not
a community residence or recovery community residence.
*62DEVELOPMENT:
Any man-made change to property, including but not limited to, buildings or other structures,
mining, dredging, filling, grading, landscaping, paving, excavation or drilling operations.*46
DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN:
A plan approved by Maricopa County in accordance with Section 207 of the County's
Subdivision Regulations which that establishesd the future development patterns for an area
(usually one or more square miles).*25
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
Regulations pertaining to setbacks, building height, building separation, lot coverage, lot area
and lot width .*38
DILAPIDATED BUILDING OR STRUCTURE:*54
Means any real property structure that is in such disrepair or is damaged to the extent that its
strength or stability is substantially less than a new building or it is likely to burn or collapse and
its conditions endangers the life, health, safety, or property of the public. The Building Official
shall determine whether a building or structure is dilapidated. Dilapidated buildings or
structures as determined by the Building Official shall include, but not be limited to, those
buildings or structures that meet any or all of the following criteria:
1.
The building or structure’s interior walls or other vertical structural members, list, lean or
buckle to such an extent that a plumb line passing through the center of gravity falls
outside of the middle third of its base.
2.
The building or structure, exclusive of the foundation, has thirty-three percent (33%) or
more damage or deterioration to the supporting member or member’s structural
assembly, or fifty-five percent (55%) damage or deterioration to the non-supporting
enclosing our outside walls or covering.
3.
The building or structure is infested by rodents, insects or other noxious pests, rendering
it uninhabitable.
A. The building or structure exhibits conditions that present actual hazards or dangers.
B. The building or structure has been vacant and unsecured for more than forty-eight
(48) hours, on more than one (1) occasion, during a previous twelve (12) month
period.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-11
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
C. The building or structure or their contents represents an imminent health or fire
hazard.
DIRECTOR:
The Director of the Maricopa County Department of Planning and Development.*4
DISABILITY:
The term “disability” means, with respect to an individual – (a) A physical or mental impairment
that substantially limits one or more activities of such individual; (b) a record of such an
impairment; or being regarded as having such an impairment as per 42 U.S. Code § 12102.
People with disabilities do not include individuals who are currently using alcohol, illegal drugs,
or using legal drugs to which they are addicted or individuals who constitute a direct threat to
the health and safety of others. A (i) physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one
or more major life activities of an individual; (ii) history or record of such an impairment; or (iii)
being regarded as having such an impairment. Current illegal use of or addiction to a controlled
substance is not a disability.*62
DORMITORY:
A building or that portion thereof other than a community residence, recovery community,
hotel, motel, boarding house, halfway house, fraternity house, or sorority house containing
three (3) or more rooming units or guest rooms or sleeping facilities for more than five (5)
persons. Such rooming units or guest rooms shall be for residential purposes only. *62
DRAINAGE:
Runoff which flows over land as a result of precipitation. This shall include sheetflow and flows,
which may concentrate in local drainage systems with or without defined channels.*46
DRAINAGE ADMINISTRATOR:
The Director of the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department or his duly
authorized representative.*46
DRAINAGE CLEARANCE:
The approval by the Drainage Administrator of a grading and drainage plan to develop a site.
This plan may be a site plan, or engineered grading and drainage plan.*46
DRAINAGE CLEARANCE (FINAL):
A document issued by the Drainage Administrator when a final inspection has been completed
which that indicates that the site was developed in accordance with the approved plan.*46
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-12
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
DRAINAGE DESIGN MANUAL:
Drainage Design Manual for Maricopa County: Volume I - Hydrology, Volume II - Hydraulics, and
Volume III - Best Management Practices and Erosion Control.*46
DRAINAGE EASEMENT:
A legal right or privilege to use an area defined and established to receive or convey runoff.*46
DRAINAGE REPORT/PLAN (AREA):
A drainage plan based on a defined watershed which that may include more than one political
jurisdiction.*46
DRAINAGE REPORT/PLAN (CONCEPTUAL):
An overview drainage plan providing a minimum of drainage information with order of
magnitude value for peak flows and retention requirements. Requirements shall be
determined by the topography and proposed use of the site.*46
DRAINAGE REPORT/PLAN (DEVELOPMENT):
A drainage plan which that may cover all or a portion of a development. A report/plan
generally of greater detail and encompassing a smaller area than a Drainage Report/Plan
(Master).*46
DRAINAGE REPORT/PLAN (MASTER):
A preliminary drainage plan encompassing all future phases or units within a development. A
report/plan generally of greater detail and encompassing a smaller geographic area than a
Drainage Report/Plan (Area).*46
DRAINAGE REPORT/PLAN (SITE):
A drainage plan for a single lot or the smallest increment of development. A report/plan
generally of greater detail than a Drainage Report/Plan (Development).*46
DRAINAGE SYSTEM:
A system of lakes, rivers, creeks, streams, washes, arroyos, channels, closed conduits, or other
topographic features on, through, or over which stormwaters flow at least periodically.*46
DRAINAGE WAIVER:
A grant of relief from the requirements of this Regulation which permits construction or other
uses of property in a manner that would otherwise be prohibited or restricted by this
Regulation.*46
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-13
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
DRIVEWAY:
A surface of concrete, asphalt, crushed granite, or other material approved by the Planning and
Development Department leading from a roadway to existing or future development on
property.
DWELLING:
A building or portion thereof designed or used exclusively for residential occupancy, including
single-family, two-family and -multiple family- dwellings, but not including hotels, boarding and
lodging houses. This also includes accessory dwelling units ancillary to a single-family dwelling.
DWELLING GROUP:
A group of three or more buildings which occupy a parcel of land in one ownership and have a
yard in common.
DWELLING UNIT:
One or more persons occupying a premise and living as a single housekeeping unit as
distinguished from a group occupying a boarding house, lodging house, or hotel or community
residence or recovery community as herein defined.
DWELLING UNIT, ACCESSORY:
A habitable space either within or added to an existing primary dwelling unit, or within a
separate structure on the same lot as the primary dwelling unit used to house family or
guests of the occupants of the primary dwelling unit without compensation.*36, *39
DWELLING, MULTIPLEMULTI-FAMILY:
A building or portion thereof designed for occupancy by three or more families.
DWELLING, SINGLE-FAMILY:
A building designed for occupancy by one family, including factory-built dwellings, site-built
dwellings, modular homes, manufactured homes and mobile homes. A mobile home or
manufactured home shall be permittedis a single family dwelling provided it shall be is
permanently affixed to the property and further provided it has been rehabilitated and
approved by the State of Arizona Office of Manufactured Housing.*47
DWELLING, TWO--FAMILY:
A building designed for occupancy by two families each residing in a separate dwelling.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-14
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
EASEMENT
A segment of land that grants legal right to occupy or use land for specific purpose, such as
access. A non-possessory right for limited purpose to use and/or enter onto real property of
another without possessing it.
EASEMENT, PRIVATE ACCESS
A private right-of-way for the purpose of providing ingress and egress for a property or
properties that does not have adequate public street frontage, that is not dedicated to the
public and that is owned by the underlying owners of land over which it crosses for the benefit
of the named grantor and grantee(s) and their successors and assigns.
EASEMENT, VEHICULAR NON-ACCESS (VNAE):
An easement prohibiting vehicular access to and from a public street.**9
EASEMENT, SOLAR ACCESS:* 41
An easement in which the owner of a property (grantor) agrees to maintain the airspace above
the grantor’s property in such a manner as to not inhibit the ability of the grantee’s property to
receive the sunlight that would normally pass through the grantor’s airspace in the absence of
any structures or landscaping.
EMERGENCY HOUSING:
Temporary shelter required due to a natural disaster or fire.*25
EROSION:
The wearing away of the ground surface as a result of the movement of wind, water, ice and
other geologic agents.*46
FALL PROTECTION DEVICE:
A barrier constructed of metal pipe rail or wooden rail, metal view fence, or transparent
sheeting used for the purpose of preventing a human being from falling from an elevated
surface.*48
FAMILY:
An individual living alone or any number of persons related by blood, marriage, adoption or
guardianship, and domestic staff; or two unrelated individuals in a domestic partnership who
have made a commitment to share their lives, living as a single housekeeping unit along with
their children including step children, adopted children, and children under guardianship and
domestic staff; or a group of not more than five (5) unrelated persons living together as single
housekeeping unit. *62
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-15
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
FARM:
An area which is used for the commercial production of farm crops such as vegetables, fruit
trees, cotton, grain and other crops and their storage on the area, as well as the raising thereon
of farm poultry and farm animals, such as horses, cattle, sheep and swine for commercial
purposes but not including commercial pen feeding, commercial feed lots or the commercial
feeding of garbage or offal to swine or other animals. The term "farm" includes the operating
of such an area for one or more of the above uses, including dairy farms, with the necessary
accessory uses for treating or storing the produce, provided that the operation of any such
accessory use is secondary to that of the farm activities, and provided further that the farm
activities do not include commercial pen feeding or commercial feed lots or the commercial
feeding of garbage or offal to swine or other animals.*46.
FEED LOT, COMMERCIAL:
A livestock feeding or handling facility operated for the purpose of accommodating the needs
of others in whole or in part for a fee or fees paid to the operator or owners for the accommo-
dations, materials and services received.
FOOD AND BEVERAGE USES:
Establishments engaged in the preparation and sale of food or beverages for on-site
consumption, take-out, or retail sale, including but not limited to bakery shops, delicatessens,
ice cream shops and similar uses.
FOOD PRODUCTION:
Facilities engaged in the large-scale preparation, processing, or manufacturing of food or
beverages for wholesale or distribution, including but not limited to wholesale bakeries,
bottling plants, breweries, dairy processing facilities and similar uses.
FENCE:
A vertical, linear, unroofed structure, usually constructed of wire, posts, boards, or rails, used
for the purpose of delineating a boundary or functioning as a barrier.*48
FLOOR AREA:
For purposes of computing offstreet parking requirements, fFloor area shall meanis the gross
floor area of an enclosed building or buildings.*5, *19, *37 determined specifically for purposes of
computing off-street parking requirements.
FREEWAY (REGARDING BILLBOARD(S)):
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-16
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
For the purpose of the location of Off-Site Advertising Signs (Billboard(s)) only, Interstate 17 (I-
17) south of Carefree Highway, Interstate 10 (I-10), Arizona State Route (SR) Loop 101, SR Loop
202, SR Loop 303, SR 24, Northern Parkway, and U.S. Highway 60 (U.S. 60 – Superstition
Freeway). Billboards are a prohibited use on any other freeway now existing or to be
constructed within the County.*61
GARAGE, PRIVATE:
An accessory building or portion of a principal building designed or used for the parking or
temporary storage of motor vehicles of occupants in the building to which such garage is
accessory, but not including the parking or temporary storage of delivery or truck motor
vehicles having a capacity in excess of 10,000 lbs. gross vehicle weight.*26
GARAGE, PUBLIC:
A building or portion thereof, other than a private garage, designed or used for servicing,
repairing, equipping, hiring, selling or storing motor vehicles.
GARDEN:
A private facility for the cultivation of fruits, vegetables, flowers and ornamental plants by one
person., and permitting aAccessory sales of products cultivated on site are permissible.*51
GARDEN, COMMUNITY:
A private or public facility for the cultivation of fruits, vegetables, flowers and ornamental
plants by more than one person. Accessory sales of products cultivated on site are
permissible.*51
GENERAL RETAIL AND SERVICES
Establishments engaged in the sale, rental, repair or service of goods and equipment, or the
provision of personal or business services to the public.
GOVERNMENT ACTION:
An action by the government, defined as federal, state, county or municipal agencies only,
including but not limited to, a government’s acquisition of real property by purchase, eminent
domain, or government error, which results in a building, lot, parcel or tract of land not meeting
the requirements of this ordinance.*38
GRADE:
The lowest point of elevation of the surface of the ground, paving or sidewalk at any point
adjacent to a structure or fence/wall. For purposes of calculating structure, building or
fence/wall heights, existing established grade shall be utilized on subdivision land and natural,
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-17
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
undisturbed grade shall be utilized on unsubdivided land.*16
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-18
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
GRID-CONNECTED:
An electrical generating system whereby electricity is allowed to enter into the electrical utility
grid solely through a bi-directional revenue meter that measures the flow of electricity from the
power grid to the building and back to the grid when it produces more energy than is needed
for consumption.*41
GROUP CARE FACILITY:
A dwelling unit shared by any class of residents under supervised care and/or treatment
beyond that which would be provided in the confines of a traditional residential setting, who do
not qualify as a Community Residence or Recovery Community. *62
GROUP HOME - DELETED*62 GUEST:
Any transient person who rents or occupies a room for sleeping purposes.
GUEST HOUSE:
A habitable space within a separate structure on the same lot as the primary dwelling unit used
to house family or guests without compensation.*39
GUEST RANCH:
A building or group of buildings containing two or more guest rooms, other than a boarding
house, hotel or motel, and including outdoor recreational facilities such as, but not limited to,
horseback riding, swimming, tennis courts, shuffleboard courts, barbecue and picnic facilities,
and dining facilities intended for the use primarily by guests of the guest ranch, . but not
including bars and restaurants which cater primarily to other than guests of the guest ranch.
GUEST ROOM:
A room which is designed for occupancy by one or more guests for sleeping purposes, but
having no without cooking facilities. and not including dormitories.A guest room is not a
dormitory. This does not include a dormitory as defined herein.
HALFWAY HOUSE:
A facility that functions similarly to a dormitory and may house individuals that have been
placed there by a court-order and/or with a substance abuse use disorder. The length of
tenancy is limited, and occupants may be subject to a curfew. A halfway house is not a
Community Residence or Recovery Community. *62
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-19
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
HEARING OFFICER:
The individual(s) appointed by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors to hear and decide
civil proceedings established by an Ordinance, regulation, or provision enacted or adopted by
the Board of Supervisors under the authority granted by ARS Title 11, Chapter 6 County
Planning and Zoning.
HANDICAPPED - DELETED*62
HILLSIDE DISTRICT
That area within the defined as County hillside in Chapter 9 of the Maricopa County Zoning
Ordinance.*46
HILLSIDE LOT OR PARCEL:
A lot or parcel of land which is required to comply with Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance,
Chapter 129, Section 1201901, Hillside Development Standards.*32
HOME DAYCARE:
The care, supervision and guidance of a child or children, unaccompanied by a parent, guardian
or custodian, on a regular basis, for periods of less than twenty-four hours per day, in a place
other than the child’s or the children’s own home or homes.*44
HOME OCCUPATION, COTTAGE INDUSTRY:
An accessory use of a property that involves manufactureproduction, or the provision or sale of
goods and/or services. This is a use that does not meet the conditions of Residential Home
Occupation and that this requires legislative approval of a Special Use Permit by the Board of
Supervisors.*57
HOME OCCUPATION, RESIDENTIAL:
An accessory use of a property that involves limited manufactureproduction, or the provision,
or sale of goods and/or services, as outlined in the Use Regulations of Chapter 6 of the Rural
and Single Family Residential Zoning Districts. This use may be administratively approved
subject to conditions.*57
HOSPITAL:
An institution for the diagnosis, treatment, or other care of human ailments. The term hospital
is deemed to include sanitarium, preventorium, clinic, rest home, nursing home, convalescent
home, behavioral health residential facility, and maternity home.
HOTEL:
A building in which lodging or boarding and lodging are provided for more than 20 persons and
offered to the public for compensation and in which ingress and egress to and from all guest
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-20
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
rooms are made through an inside lobby or office.
HOTEL, RESORT:
A building or group of buildings, other than a motel, boarding house or lodging house,
containing individual guest rooms, suites of guest rooms, and dwelling units, and which that
furnish services customarily provided by hotels.
HOUSEHOLD STAFF:
A person who is paid for performing household duties such as cooking, cleaning, chauffeuring,
nursing, caring for children, or similar activities.
INDOOR ENTERTAINMENT:
Amusement and entertainment establishments conducted entirely within an enclosed building,
including but not limited to bowling alleys, dance halls, nightclubs and similar uses, excluding
adult-oriented facilities as defined in this Ordinance.
INDUSTRIAL CENTER:
A development on a single parcel or multiple contiguous parcels containing commonwithin the
same industrial zoning district designation and served by common driveways, parking areas
and/or amenities.
INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING – GENERAL:
Industrial uses involving the manufacturing, assembly, processing, packaging, or treatment of
goods and materials, including but not limited to the production of appliances, electronics,
optical goods, precision instruments, ceramics, textiles, paper products, plastics, metals, glass
products, food products, cosmetics, and pharmaceuticals. General manufacturing typically
involves larger-scale operations heavier machinery, and a broader range of materials, and may
produce greater noise, odor, vibration, traffic or other off-site impacts than light
manufacturing.
INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING – LIGHT
Industrial uses of a smaller scale or lower intensity, typically involving the manufacturing,
assembly, or processing of goods with minimal environmental or noise impacts, including but
not limited to precision instruments, jewelry, small electronics, musical instruments, handicraft
products, and similar light-fabrication activities. Light manufacturing generally consists of
cleaner, quieter, and smaller-scale operations that produce limited off-site impacts.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-21
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
JUNK/SALVAGE YARD
Any establishment or place of business which is maintained, used, or operated for storing,
keeping, buying or selling wrecked, scrapped, ruined or dismantled motor vehicles or motor
vehicle parts or metal sold for scrap. The term “junk” includes old or scrap copper, brass, rope
rags, batteries, paper, trash, wood and rubber debris, wasted or junked, dismantled or wrecked
automobiles, or parts thereof, iron, steel and other old or scrap ferrous or nonferrous
materials. The term “salvage yard” includes garbage dumps and sanitary fills. A junk/salvage
yard may include repair facilities as an ancillary use.
JUNKYARD:*54
An establishment or place of business which is maintained, operated, or used for storing,
keeping, buying, or selling junk, or for the maintenance or operation of an automobile
graveyard. The term “junk” includes old or scrap copper, brass, rope, rags, batteries, paper,
trash, wood and rubber debris, waste or junked, dismantled or wrecked automobiles, or parts
thereof, iron, steel, and other old or scrap ferrous or nonferrous materials. The term "junkyard"
includes garbage dumps and sanitary fills.
KENNEL:
Any premises that are used for the commercial breeding, boarding, training, grooming or
bathing of dogs, cats, and/or other small domesticated household pets (not farm animals), or
for the breeding or keeping of dogs for racing purposes.*13
LABOR CAMP:
Any camp or similar place of temporary abode, established by or for the care of workmen
workers engaged in construction, repair or alteration work on roads or highways, railroads, or
in lumbering or agricultural operations, or in other industrial activities.
LAND USE:
The purpose or purposes for which land or a building is occupied, maintained, arranged,
designed, or intended.
LAUNDRY, SELF-SERVICE:
A building within which clothes washing and drying machines, and clothes dry cleaning
machines, either coin operated or attendant operated, are provided on a rental basis for use by
individuals for doing their own laundry and dry cleaning. Self-service laundry does not include
outdoor drying facilities.
LEGAL NONCONFORMING USE:
The lawful use of any building, lot, parcel or tract of land existing at the time this Ordinance, or
amendments thereto, become effective which that otherwise does not conform with the use
regulations of the zoning district in which it is located.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-22
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
LOADING AND UNLOADING SPACES:
A permanently maintained space for the purpose of receiving or shipping and transporting of
goods, wares, or commodities on the same lot as the principal building accessible to a street or
alley and not less than ten feet in width, 20 feet in length, and 14 feet in height.
LODGING HOUSE:
A building where lodging only, without meals, is provided for compensation to three or more
persons, but not exceeding 20 persons.
LOT:
Any lot, parcel, tract of land, or combination thereof, shown on a plat of record or recorded by
metes and bounds that is occupied or intended for occupancy by a use permitted in this
Ordinance, including one principal building together with its accessory buildings, the open
spaces and parking spaces required by this Ordinance, and having its principal frontage upon a
street or upon an officially approved place.
LOT AREA:
The area of a horizontal plane within the lot lines of a lot.
LOT COVERAGE:
The percentage of the area of a lot which that is
occupied by all buildings. The first two (2) feet of
roof overhang from the exterior walls of the primary
building, and the first one (1) foot of roof overhang
from the exterior walls of all accessory buildings,
shall are not be included in the lot coverage.*33, *41
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-23
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
LOT DEPTH:
For lots having front and rear lot lines which
that are parallel, the shortest horizontal
distance between such lines; for lots having
front and rear lot lines which that are not
parallel, the shortest horizontal distance
between the midpoint of the front lot line and
the midpoint of the rear lot line; and for
triangular shaped lots, the shortest horizontal
distance between the front lot line and a line
within the lot parallel to and at a maximum
distance from the front lot line, having a length
of not less than ten feet.
LOT FRONTAGE:
That portion of a lot abutting a roadway or street.
LOT LINE:
Any line bounding a lot.
LOT LINE, FRONT:
The boundary of a lot which that separates the lot from the street; and in the case of the corner
lot, the front lot line is the shorter of the two lot lines separating the lot from the street except
that where these lot lines are equal or within 15 feet of being equal, either lot line may be
designated the front lot line but not both. In the case of residential lots located within a tract
or a commercial pad located within a parking lot which that have no direct street frontage, the
front lot line must be designated by the applicant at the time of subdivision approval or prior to
zoning clearance if no subdivision is required. A front lot line evaluation and determination by
the Zoning Inspector may be requested in circumstances where a lot is shaped peculiarly or has
unorthodox street frontage and the front is difficult to determine.*26, *30.
LOT LINE, REAR:
The boundary of a lot that which is most distant from, and is, or is most nearly, parallel to the
front lot line; except that in the absence of a rear lot line as is the case ofsuch as a the
triangular shaped lot, the rear lot line may be considered as a line within the lot, parallel to and
at a maximum distance from the front lot line, having a length of not less than ten feet.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-24
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
LOT LINE, SIDE:
The boundary of a lot which that is not a front lot line or a rear lot line.
LOT OF RECORD:
A lot that which is part of a subdivision, the plat of which has been recorded in the office of the
County Recorder of Maricopa County; or a lot, parcel or tract of land, the deed of which has
been recorded in the office of the County Recorder of Maricopa County.
LOT THROUGH (DOUBLE FRONTAGE):
A lot that is not a corner lot but having a pair of opposite lot lines abutting two streets, and
which is not a corner lot. that has frontgagte on two streets that is parallel or nearly parallel to
each other. On such lot, both lot lines are front lot lines, except that where a non-access
easement has been established on such a lot, the front lot line shall be considered as that lot line
most distant from the lot line containing the non-access easement.*9.
LOT WIDTH:
For rectangular lots, lots having side lot lines not parallel, and lots on the outside of the curve of
a street, the distance between side lot lines measured at the required minimum front yard line
on a line parallel to the street or street chord; and for lots on the inside of the curve of a street,
the distance between side lot lines measured 30 feet behind at the required minimum front
yard line on a line parallel to the street or street chord.
LOT, CORNER:
A lot which that has an interior angle of 135 degrees or less at the intersection of two street
lines. A lot abutting upon a curved street is considered a corner lot if the tangents to the curve
at the points of intersection of the side lot lines intersect at an interior angle of 135 degrees or
less.
LOT, INTERIOR:
A lot other than a corner lot.
LOT, KEY:
A lot adjacent to a corner lot having its side lot line in common with the rear lot line of the
corner lot and fronting on the street that which forms the side boundary of the corner lot. See
Chapter 8, 811.5.4.3 for exhibit.
MANUFACTURED HOME:
A residential dwelling unit manufactured after June 15, 1976 and built to the Manufactured
Housing Construction and Safety Standards and the State of Arizona Installation Requirements
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-25
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
for Manufactured Housing. The term “manufactured home” does not include recreational
vehicles or modular (factory built) buildings.
MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENTFACILITIES:
In accordance with Arizona Revised Statutes, an entity licensed by the Arizona Department of
Health Services as follows:
1.
Marijuana Establishment to (a) operates as:
A. a single retail location at which the licensee may sell marijuana and marijuana
products to consumers, cultivate marijuana and manufacture marijuana products;
B. (b)a single off-site cultivation location at which the licensee may cultivate marijuana,
process marijuana and manufacture marijuana products, but from which marijuana
and marijuana products may not be transferred or sold to consumers; or
C. (c )a single off-site location at which the licensee may manufacture marijuana
products and package and store marijuana and marijuana products, but from which
marijuana and marijuana products may not be transferred or sold to consumers. *60
2. Nonprofit Medical Marijuana Dispensary that operates as a not-for-profit entity that
acquires, possesses, cultivates, manufactures, delivers, transfers, transports, supplies, sells
or dispenses marijuana or relates supplies and educational materials.
or
2.3. Dual Licensee that operates as a non-profit marijuana dispensary and a marijuana
establishment
MARIJUANA TESTING FACILITY:
In accordance with Arizona Revised Statutes, an entity that is licensed by the Arizona
Department of Health Services to analyze the potency of marijuana and test marijuana for
harmful contaminants. *60
MCDOT:
Maricopa County Department of Transportation.*25MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY:An entity
defined in Arizona Revised Statutes that acquires, possesses, cultivates, manufactures, delivers,
transfers, transports, supplies, sells or dispenses marijuana or related supplies and educational
materials.*43, *49, *52 *60
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-26
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY OFFSITE CULTIVATION LOCATION:
THE ADDITIONAL LOCATION WHERE MARIJUANA IS CULTIVATED BY A MEDICAL MARIJUANA
DISPENSARY AS REFERENCED IN ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES.*43, *49, *52*60
MOBILE HOME:
A dwelling unit built prior to June 15, 1976, on a permanent chassis, capable of being
transported in one or more sections and designed to be used with or without a permanent
foundation as a dwelling in approved locations when connected to on-site utilities. The term
"mobile home" does not include recreational vehicles or factory -built buildings.*3, *8, *11
MOBILE HOME/MANUFACTURED HOME PARK:
Any parcel of land upon which two or more mobile homes or manufactured homes occupied
for dwelling or sleeping purposes, are located regardless of whether or not a charge is made for
such accommodations.
MOBILE HOME/MANUFACTURED HOME SPACE:
A plot of ground within a mobile home park or travel trailer park designed for the
accommodation of one mobile home/manufactured home or travel trailer together with its
accessory structures including carports or other off-street parking areas, storage lockers,
ramadas, cabanas, patios, patio covers, awnings and similar appurtenances.
MODULAR HOME (FACTORY -BUILT HOME):
A dwelling unit that is either wholly or in substantial part manufactured at an off-site location
according to the Arizona Department of Housing requirements to be assembled on site, except
that it does not include a manufactured home, mobile home, park model, or recreational
vehicle as defined by this Chapter.
MOTEL:
A building or group of buildings containing guest rooms or dwelling units, some or all of which
have a separate entrance leading directly from the outside of the building with garage or
parking space located on the lot and designed, used, or intended wholly or in part for the
accommodation of automobile transients. Motel includes motor courts, motor lodges and
tourist courts, but not mobile home parks or travel trailer parks.
NON-LIVABLE BUILDING:
A building on a residential lot used solely for the parking of vehicles, workshop, the storage of
equipment or material, the keeping of livestock and other similar uses but not designed,
constructed or utilized for human habitation. Open metal patio covers shall also be considered
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-27
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
non-livable.*46 *50
NUDITY OR A STATE OF NUDITY:*24 MEANS:
1.
The appearance of a human anus, male genitals, female genitals, or female breast; or
2.
A state of dress which fails to opaquely cover a human anus, male genitals, female
genitals, or areola of the female breast.
OFF-GRID:
An electrical generating system whereby electricity is not allowed to enter into the electrical
utility grid by any means.*41
OFF-SITE ADVERTISING SIGN/OFF -SITE SIGN: SEE BILLBOARD(S)*61
OFF-SITE RUNNOFF:
Runoff produced from precipitation that which falls outside the limits of a development and
which that drains through a development or the site of proposed development.*46
ON-SITE RUNNOFF:
Runoff produced from precipitation which that falls within the limits of a development
including easements and dedicated rights-of-way.*45
OPEN METAL PATIO COVER:
An attached one story metal framed structure, for recreational uses, not exceeding 12 feet in
height and not an integral part of the principal residence. The open or glazed area of the longer
wall and one additional wall must be equal to at least 65 percent of the area below a minimum
height of 6 feet 8 inches measured from the floor.*50
OUTDOOR ENTERTAINMENT
Entertainment enterprises conducted outdoors including but not limited to outdoor
amusement parks; circus and carnival grounds having permanent facilities; drive-in or outdoor
theaters; outdoor race tracks; permanent facilities for rodeos, auctions, swap meets,
campgrounds, and sites rented for private parties including outdoor amplified music; zoos,
including the keeping of wild or exotic animals on a private or commercial basis and other
similar uses.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-28
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
OXFORD HOUSE:
A self-governed Community Residence for people in recovery from substance use disorder that
has been issued a “Conditional Charter” or “Permanent Charter” by Oxford House World
Services, or successor organization providing oversight; where there is no limit on length of
residency; where the use of alcohol or any illegal drug is prohibited; where any misuse of legal
drugs is prohibited; where any resident who violates this prohibition is expelled from the
dwelling; where the residents pay the costs of the dwelling, including rent and utilities; and,
where through a majority vote, the residents establish policies that govern living in the Oxford
House, including the manner in which applications for residence are approved. *62
PARK:
Any public or private non-commercial, not-for-profit land established and intended for
recreational, educational, cultural, natural area or wildlife preservation, scenic or aesthetic use
intended for leisure time enjoyment. This definition shall not be construed to include entry
features or landscape buffers around the perimeter of a subdivision that serve no other active
or passive recreational purpose. This definition shall not be construed to include recreational
facilities where activity takes place completely indoors.*40
PARKING LOT:
An area, other than a street or alley, devoted to unenclosed parking spaces.
PARKING SPACE,HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBLE:
A rectangular area not less than 18 feet in length for the full required width. The parking space
and access aisle widths shall be as required by accessibility standards currently adopted by
Maricopa County. A rectangular area of not less than 12 feet in width and 18 feet in length,
together with independent access from an aisle or driveway.*20
PARKING SPACE, STANDARD:
A rectangular area of not less than nine feet in width and not less than 18 feet in length,
together with independent access from an aisle or driveway to be used by automobiles.*5, *19
PARKING SPACE/LOT, PAVING:
The material used for permanently surfacing a parking space and/or lot which that may include
any of the following: at a minimum asphalt millings bound with a liquid emulsifier; or asphaltic
concrete; cement concrete; penetration treatment of bituminous material and a seal coat of
bituminous and mineral aggregate; or the equivalent of the above as approved by the
Department of Planning and Development and complies with the County’s air quality
standards.*20
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-29
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
PATENT EASEMENT:
Created by the Federal Government pursuant to the Small Tract Act of 1938 to provide a
corridor for roadway and utilities through small tracts conveyed to private ownership.
PERSON:
An individual, developer or his their agent, firm, partnership, association, corporation,
municipality, or agent of the aforementioned groups, or its agencies or political subdivisions.*45
PLACES OF PUBLIC ASSEMBLY:
For purposes of establishing parking requirements, tThe following uses shall beare considered
places of public assembly uses for purposes of parking requirements: churches, elementary,
junior high and high schools both public and private, colleges and universityuniversities, both
public and private, funeral homes, museums, libraries, private clubs, lodges, community
buildings, theaters, auditoriums, arenas, indoor and outdoor stadiums, health spas, gyms,
tennis/handball court facilities, hospitals, rest homes, orphanages, nursing homes and
institutions of a religious, charitable or philanthropic nature and uses similar to the above
uses.*20
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission of Maricopa County made up of individuals appointed by
the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors to advise the Board on planning and zoning
matters.*21
PRIVATE HILLSIDE ROAD:
A thoroughfare providing recorded vehicular access to more than one property, in which any or
all properties over which the access traverses, falls within the purview of the Hillside
Development Standards. (This does not apply to roadways under the jurisdiction of the
Maricopa County Department of Transportation).*32
PRINICPAL BUILDING:
A building where the principal use is conducted on the lot on which it is situated. In a
residential zoning district any dwelling is deemed to be the principal building on the lot on
which it is situated.
PRINCIPAL BUILIDNG OR USE:
The main use of land or a building as distinguished from an accessory use.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-30
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
PRIVATE SCHOOL:
A primary, elementary, secondary school, college, or university established and controlled
privately and supported by endowment and tuition and do not include commercial daycare, day
nursery or preschool component.*42
PUBLIC SCHOOL:
A primary, elementary, secondary school, college, or university that is directly administered
under the authority of a governmental body and that receives a predominant amount of its
financing from public funds. *42
PUBLIC UTILITIES
Services provided to the public for water, gas, electricity, telephone and cable television,
including distribution, collector and feeder lines, pumping or booster stations along pipelines,
and substations along electric transmission lines. (This does not include public utility treatment
and generating plants, see Utility Treatment and Generating Plants definition.)
RAINFALL EVENT:
The amount of rain falling in a specified period of time.*45
RECOVERY COMMUNITY:
Multiple dwelling units located on a single parcel, or a series of adjacent lots under unified
ownership, not to exceed a total area of three gross acres, providing a drug-free and alcohol-
free living arrangement for people in recovery from substance use disorder or behavioral health
disorder, (i) that are not held out to the general public for rent or occupancy and, (ii) which
taken together, do not emulate a single family and are under the auspices of a single entity or
group of related entities. The term does not include any other group living arrangement for
unrelated individuals who are not disabled nor does it include any shelter or halfway house,
community residence, assisted living facility, rooming house, boarding house, transient
occupancy, or other use as defined in this Ordinance. Medical and mental health treatment
shall not comprise treatment beyond that which would be provided in the confines of a
traditional family residential setting. *62
RECREATION VEHICLE:
A vehicular or portable unit mounted on a chassis and wheels, designed and constructed to be
installed with or without a permanent foundation for human occupancy. as a residence, not
more than 12 feet in width, nor more than 40 feet in length and containing no more than 400
square feet in total floor area. Total width of said unit including all tipouts, slide-outs, hinged
extensions, or solid frames shall not exceed 12 feet. For purposes of measuring length, the
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-31
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
recreation vehicle hitch and/or tongue shall be excluded. The term "recreation vehicle" shall
include travel trailers, camping trailers, truck campers, park models and motor homes.**11
RECREATION VEHICLE (DESTINATION):
A recreation vehicle which that is designed for, and is to be used for, permanent residential use
in a travel trailer/recreation vehicle park or at other approved locations. The term recreation
vehicle (destination) includes park model travel trailers.**11.
RECREATION VEHICLE (OVERNIGHT):
A recreation vehicle which that is not designed for, or to be used for, permanent residential use
in a travel trailer/recreation vehicle park or at other approved locations.**11
RECREATION VEHICLE PARK:
Any parcel of land upon which two or more recreation vehicles for dwelling or sleeping
purposes are located regardless of whether or not a charge is made for such
accommodations.**11
RENEWABLE ENERGY:
Energy derived primarily from sources other than fossil fuels or nuclear fission.*41
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEM:
A device or assemblage of devices which that create, capture and/or store renewable energy.*41
RENEWABLE WATER SOURCE:
Water that is derived from sources other than groundwater as defined by the Arizona
Department of Water Resources.*41
RESPONDENT:
A person who is the defendant in a violation case or who initiates an appeal of a decision of an
administrative action by the Zoning Inspector or their designee or of the decision of the Board
of Adjustment. *62
RETAIL AND SERVICES – LIGHT:
Retail and service establishments of a smaller scale, typically serving local or neighborhood
markets, including but not limited to specialty shops, personal care services, small-scale repair
services, pharmacies, and similar uses. These uses generally occupy smaller buildings, have
limited outdoor activity, and produce minimal off-site impacts.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-32
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
RETAIL AND SERVICES – REGIONAL:
Retail and service establishments of a larger scale or broader service area, including but not
limited to vehicle dealerships, equipment sales and rental, wholesale outlets, auction facilities,
and similar uses. These uses typically occupy larger sites, may include significant outdoor sales
or storage, and attract customers from a wider geographic area.
RETENTION SYSTEM:*45
A system which that retains runoff in a controlled manner through the use of storage facilities.
Stored runoff is either evacuated by percolation or released to the downstream drainage
system after the storm event.
REVENUE METER:
A device that measures the flow of electricity for the purpose of allowing the electrical utility
provider to determine the amount of electricity consumed by a retail customer. This device is
typically owned by the electrical utility provider and is located at the service panel located at
the customer end of the service entrance section.*41
REVENUE METER, BI-DIRECTIONAL:
A revenue meter that measures the flow of electricity in both directions as would be the case in
a renewable energy system where the electrical utility provider is purchasing excess electricity
from the retail customer - (see Revenue Meter).*41
RIGHT-OF-WAY (ROW; R/W)
Property right granted for the purpose of constructing, installing, operating and/or maintaining
highways, roads, streets, alleys and ways, and bridges.
RIGHT-OF-WAY (MARICOPA COUNTY)
Right-of-Way not opened and declared by the Board of Supervisors.
RIGHT-OF-WAY (OTHER)
Right-of-Way not opened and declared by the Board of Supervisors.
ROAD OR ROADWAY:
That area, whether public or private, between right-of-way lines, dedicated, reserved or
provided for roadway purposes, access (right-of-way) easements and patent easements and
other uses not inconsistent therewith. *45
RUBBISH, JUNK, TRASH, DEBRIS AND FILTH: *54
Shall include, but not be limited to: ordinary litter, refuse, waste, or rubble and remains thereof
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-33
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
and similar material including the waste or rubble of any dilapidated building or littered plant
matter.
SALES, GARAGE/YARD:
Garage/yard sales or outdoor home parties that are held for the sale of goods or services at a
dwelling are not considered a home occupation provided these sales do shall not exceed six
individual days in one year.*57
SCENIC CORRIDOR:
An area visible from a highway, waterway, railway, or major hiking, biking, or equestrian tail
that provides vistas or wide views.
For the purpose of the location of Off-Site Advertising Signs (Billboard(s)), in Maricopa County,
scenic corridor shall refer to the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zoning Districts (as set forth in Chapter
10) and scenic corridor district policy guidelines (Carefree Highway, Castle Hot Springs,
McMickem Dam, Olive Avenue, El Rio, I-17 North of Carefree Highway and 7th Street/New River
Road) including any future scenic corridor overlay zoning districts and policy guideline scenic
corridors.*61
SCHOOL:
An institution of learning, such as preschools, day nurseries, nursery schools, charter schools
and, public and private schools, that which offer instruction in several branches of learning and
study, but not including business colleges, dancing schools, riding academies, or trade or
vocational schools or preschools, nurseries, daycare or nursery schools.*31*42
SERVANT:A person who is paid for performing household duties such as cooking, cleaning,
chauffeuring, nursing, caring for children, or similar activities.*25
SERVICE STATION:
A building or use devoted to the retail sale of fuels, lubricants, and other supplies for motor
vehicles, including minor repair activities which that are subordinate to the sale of petroleum
products.
SETBACK:
A line measured from a roadway, future right-of-way line or property line that establishes the
buildable area on the lot.
SETBACK LINE:
A line measured from a roadway, future right-of-way line or property line the future
right-of-way line of a street or property line, as applicable.*14
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-34
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
SHORT TERM RENTAL:
A single-family dwelling or an accessory dwelling leased, without signage, for a duration of 30
consecutive days or fewer to individuals other than registered sex offenders. is considered a
short-term rental (STR) if the lease duration is for 30 days or fewer. The STR must be the entire
unit (not by the room nor by the bed) to an individual/party (other than a registered sex
offender) but there shall be no signage, site specific website, special events / public assembly,
commercial activities, or other identification of a commercial operation. The lessee shall not be
nor shall include any registered sex offender(s).
SIGN:
Any words, lettering, parts of letters, figures, numerals, phrases, sentences, emblems, devices,
designs, trade names or marks or combinations thereof, whether permanent or variable, by
which anything is made known, such as the designation of an individual, a firm, an association,
a profession, a business, a commodity, product, or idea.
SIGN, AREA:
The total square footage or area of a sign mounted as individual letters and /or graphics against
a wall or on other structure. For calculations purposes, the area shall be completely contained
within a circle, square, or rectangle. The sign area shall be clearly defined by a boundary line,
frame, contrasting colors, textures, materials and/or combination of materials designed to
differentiate the sign area from the background against which it is placed. The area of any
double-faced or “v” shaped sign shall be the area of the largest single face.
SIGN, CENTER IDENTIFICATION:
A freestanding sign which that identifies users located within a commercial or industrial
center.*59
SIGN, DIRECTORY:
A sign to identify the location of various buildings, offices, or businesses within a complex.
SIGN, ELECTRONIC MESSAGE DISPLAY (EMD):
The Board of Supervisors finds that Electronic Message Display (EMD) signs are a more intense
sign than a static sign. EMD signs may display words, symbols, figures, and images. They may
be light emitting diode (LED) displays digitally controlled by electronic communications or
electronic changedchanged electronically by remote or automatic means. EMD’s may also
include recorded or televised video. EMD’s are categorized by levels as follows:
1. Level 1 EMD’s are all or part of a sign that contains static messages only or changes static
copy no more frequently than once every eight (8) seconds and shall not have “fade” or
“dissolve” transitions, or full animation or video, or similar subtle transitions or frame
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-35
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
effects that have the appearance of moving text or images.
2. Level 2 EMD’s are all or part of a sign that contains static messages with “fade” or
“dissolve” transitions or similar subtle transitions or frame effects that do not have the
appearance of moving text or images, full animation nor video.
3. Level 3 EMD’s are all or part of a sign that contains messages with “travel” or “scrolling”
transitions, or similar transitions and frame effects that have text or animated images that
appear to move or change in size, or be revealed sequentially rather than all at once, but
are not video or televised messages.
4. Level 4 EMDs are all or part of a sign that contains full animation, televised or video
displays.
SIGN, FREESTANDING:
Freestanding signs are not wall signs, billboards, or freeway pylon signs, but a structure
supported by a pole or architecturally designed base (not including wall signs, billboards or
freeway pylon signs).
SIGN, FREEWAY PYLON:
An identification sign located on property abutting a freeway, or part of a complex or center
abutting a freeway, that is oriented to and intended to be read from the freeway for the
purpose of identifying an associated commercial, industrial, or mixed-use development and
tenants within that integrated, planned development.
SIGN, HEIGHT:
The height of the sign shall be the vertical dimension from the highest point of the structure to
the lowest finish grade adjacent to the sign.
SIGN, MENU BOARD:
A freestanding sign with or without a speaker box, displaying the bill of farefood items or
products of a drive-in or drive-thru restaurant.
SIGN, OFF-SITE (BILLBOARD):
A sign, except billboard signs, portraying information which that directs attention to an idea,
issue, point of view, candidate, entity, business, commodity, service, entertainment, product or
attraction sold, offered, or existing elsewhere than upon the property where the sign is located.
SIGN, PROJECTING:
A type of wall sign attached to a building or other structure and extending in whole or in part
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-36
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
more than fifteen (15) inches beyond the building line including awnings and canopies
extending from sides of buildings.
SIGN, ROOF:
A sign affixed on a structure mounted, above, or over the roof of a building or structure so that
it projects above the eave line of a roof, or the lowest horizontal roof edge extending beyond
exterior wall. The top of the parapet wall, or the wall extending above the roof edge, shall be
considered the eave line. The lowest point of a mansard style roof, which features four sides
each with two distinct slopes, shall be considered the eave line. Where a parapet wall is
combined with a mansard roof, the eave line shall be the top of the parapet.*15
SIGN, RURAL OR RESIDENTIAL IDENTIFICATION:
Any on-site, non-commercial sign in a Rural or Residential zoning district intended to identify
the name of the resident, and/or street number or apartment number of the dwelling unit.
SIGN, TEMPORARY:
Includes any sign not permanently attached to the ground or other permanent structure of a
sign designed to be transported, including, but not limited to, signs made as A-frames or T-
frames; menu and sandwich board signs; flags, banners, balloons used as signs; umbrellas used
for commercial messages; and signs attached to or painted on vehicles or trailers parked and
visible from the public right-of-way, unless said vehicle travels in the normal day-to-day
operations of the business, whether containing a permanent message or a message that
changes periodically.
SIGN, VARIABLE:
A sign or portion of a sign designed to allow a change of copy manually, or by remote or by
automatic means including tri-visions and electronic, digital, or video message displays.
SIGN, WALL:
A sign mounted flat against, projecting from or painted on the wall, awning, or parapet of a
building or structure in such a manner that the wall becomes the supporting structure for or
forms the background surface of the sign.
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX (CONDOMINIUM):
A group of single-family dwellings designed for individual separate ownership or rentals with
unified management that provides common services and outdoor recreational facilities, but not
including public bars, public restaurants or any commercial activity in connection therewith.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-37
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
SOLAR GENERATING SYSTEM, PHOTO-VOLTAIC:
A renewable energy technology that converts photons of light directly into electrical energy.
For purposes of this Ordinance, technologies that concentrate photons of light for the purpose
of increasing photo-voltaic efficiency is considered a photo-voltaic solar generating system and
not a concentrating solar generating system.*41
SOLAR POWER, CONCENTRATING (CSP):
Thermal-electric power generation that utilizes parabolic dish, parabolic trough, linear fresnell,
or power technology as its mechanism for generating heat.*41
SOLAR, CONCENTRATING:
A renewable energy technology that focuses and collects heat energy from the sun and utilizes
that head energy for the purpose of doing work. Concentrating solar does not include devices
which that concentrate photons of light onto a photo-voltaic cell for the purpose of increasing
photo-voltaic efficiency in a photo-voltaic solar generating system.*41
SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA:
The area included within the delineated floodplains of Maricopa County as adopted by the
Federal Emergency Management Agency.*45
SPECIAL USE:
A use of property whose characteristics or impacts do not allow the use to be permitted in a
zoning district without approval that is characterized as special by the Board of Supervisors in
accordance with the provisions of Chapter 13 10, Section 1301 1001.*25
SPECIAL USE PERMIT:
The permit issued for a special use in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 1310.*25
STORY:
That portion of a building, other than a cellar, included between the surface of any floor and
the surface of the floor next above it, or, if there be no floor above it, then the space between
the surface of such floor and the ceiling or roof above it.
STREET:
All property dedicated or otherwise reserved for public or private street uses, or having thereon
a public easement for such use. A street shall not include commercial/industrial parking lots or
single family/multi-family common tract areas used for ingress/egress. These parking lots and
common tract areas shall be deemed to meet the legal access requirements of this
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-38
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
Ordinance.*26
STREET LINE:
The boundary which that separates the right-of-way of a street from the abutting property.
STREET SIDE:
The portion of a lot, yard or easement that is adjacent to a street.
STRUCTURAL ALTERATION:
Any change in the supporting members of a building, such as bearing walls or partitions,
columns, beams or girders, or any complete rebuilding of the roof or exterior walls.
STRUCTURE:
1. Anything manufactured or constructed by humans, as opposed to that occurring in nature,
which that is affixed, anchored, or otherwise attached to or below the surface of the
ground.*27 *41
2. Anything manufactured or constructed by humans, as opposed to that occurring in nature,
which that is attached to something having been affixed, anchored or otherwise attached
to or below the surface of the ground.*27, *41
STRUCTURE, ACCESSORY:
A structure which is subordinate to, and the use of which is incidental to that of the principal
building, structure or use on the same lot - (see Building, Accessory).*41
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT:
Uses of properties that maintain of or enhance economic opportunity and community well-
being while protecting and restoring the natural environment upon which people and
economies depend. Sustainable development meets the needs of the present without
compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs at the same level of
consumption.*41
TEMPORARY USE:
A use of property permitted on a temporary basis within a zoning district as long as required
conditions are met and a Temporary Use Permit is approved in accordance with the provisions
of Chapter 10, Section 1002.*34
TEMPORARY USE PERMIT:
The permit issued for a temporary use in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 103,
Section 10302.*34
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-39
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
TRAVEL TRAILER PARK:
Any parcel of land upon which two or more travel trailers or recreational vehicles for dwelling
or sleeping purposes are located regardless of whether or not a charge is made for such
accommodations.
TRAVEL TRAILER SPACE:
A plot of ground within a mobile home / manufactured home park or travel trailer park
designed for the accommodation of one travel trailer or recreational vehicle together with its
accessory structures including carports or other off-street parking areas, storage lockers,
ramadas, cabanas, patios, patio covers, awnings and similar appurtenances.
USE:
THE PURPOSE OR PURPOSES FOR WHICH LAND OR A BUILDING IS OCCUPIED, MAINTAINED,
ARRANGED, DESIGNED, OR INTENDED.
USE, ACCESSORY:
A USE WHICH IS CUSTOMARILY INCIDENTAL AND SUBORDINATE TO THE PRINCIPAL USE OF A
LOT OR A BUILDING, INCLUDING BONA FIDE SERVANT QUARTERS, OR ACCESSORY VEHICLE
PARKING OR STORAGE AND LOCATED ON THE SAME LOT THEREWITH.*26
USE, PRINCIPAL:
THE MAIN USE OF LAND OR A BUILDING AS DISTINGUISHED FROM AN ACCESSORY USE.
UTILITY-SCALE:
An electrical generating system whereby electricity is allowed to enter into the electrical utility
grid by means other than a bi-directional revenue meter bi-directional revenue meter.*41
UTILITY TREATMENT AND GENERATING PLANTS:
Facilities designed to generate and distribute energy (e.g. electrical, nuclear, solar, etc.) and to
process and treat sewage, wastewater, and water to provide safe drinking water and other
services. Treatment and generating plants may also include attendant facilities and
appurtenances to the above uses as well as uses associated with service to the public of gas,
telephone and cable television. Where an electrical generating plant is in operation,
evaporation ponds and other appurtenances may be permitted provided such evaporation
ponds or appurtenances are associated within the facility being served.
WALL:
A vertical, linear, unroofed structure, usually constructed of concrete or masonry, used for the
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-40
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
purpose of delineating a boundary or functioning as a barrier.*48
WALL, RETAINING:
Any wall that is constructed for the purpose of holding back earth for the purpose of making a
transition in elevation from one grade to another. Retaining walls located on lands not
considered Hillside as defined by Article 1201901.2.1 are subject to the provisions of Article
1111811.5. Any retaining walls located on lands considered Hillside shall be subject to the
provisions outlined in Section 91201.*48
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-41
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
WAREHOUSES, MINI:
Buildings which that are composed of contiguous individual rooms which that are rented to the
public for the storage of personal property and which that have independent access and locks
under the control of the tenant; but excluding the storage of explosive, corrosive or noxious
materials, such as dust, fumes, or noise that could be dangerous, injurious, distasteful,
pernicious or obnoxious to man, other organisms or properties; and further excluding any other
use otherwise permitted in the zoning district in which the mini-warehouse is located.*2
WAREHOUSING AND STORAGE:
Buildings used for the rental of space to the public for the storage of merchandise, commodities
or personal property and where access is under the control of the building management, but
excluding the warehousing and storage of explosive, corrosive or noxious materials, such as
dust, fumes or noise that could be dangerous, injurious, distasteful, pernicious or obnoxious to
man, other organisms or properties.*2
WEEDS:
Shall include any uncultivated vegetation of a combustible nature with an associated fire hazard
which that cannot be reasonably contained on the property where it exists and shall include,
but not be limited to: dried grass higher than six inches (6”); or other dried
vegetation higher than six inches (6”); tumbleweeds, branches or clippings; or dead trees,
bushes or shrubs.*54
WIND GENERATING SYSTEM, LARGE:
A renewable energy technology that utilizes a wind turbine generator with an electrical output
greater than 100 kilowatts.*41
WIND GENERATING SYSTEM, SMALL:
A renewable energy technology that utilizes a wind turbine generator with an electrical output
of 100 kilowatts or less.*41
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES:
Facility composed of a support structure whether or not mounted on a building/structure and
which that supports antennae and other necessary attachments used exclusively for wireless
transmission purposes, all of which that are used as part of a communications or information
system.*22, *55
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-42
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY, CONCEALMENT ELEMENT:
Standards to limit height, diameter or design of a wireless communication facility in order to
mitigate adverse visual impact.
*55WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY, MAXIMUM HEIGHT:
For a wireless communication facility tower mounted facility, the vertical distance from grade
to the highest point of the support structure and all antennas and attachments excluding
architectural features for stealth design. For a facility co-locating on a building/structure other
than a wireless communication facility tower, the vertical distance from the point the facility is
affixed to the structure to the highest point of the wireless communication facility including all
attachments.*55
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY, SETBACK:
For a wireless communication facility tower mounted facility, the horizontal distance from lot
line to the outer plane extended to grade of all attachments excluding architectural features for
stealth design.*55
YARD:
The open space at grade level between a building and the adjoining lot lines, except as
otherwise provided in this Ordinance. In measuring a yard for the purpose of determining the
width of a side yard, the depth of a front yard or the depth of a rear yard, the minimum
horizontal distance between the lot line and the principal building is to be used; however, on
any lot wherein a setback line has been established by the regulations of this Ordinance for any
street abutting the lot, such measurement is to be taken from the principal building to the
setback line (see "YARD, REQUIRED").*53
YARD, FRONT:
A yard extending across the front width of a lot and being the minimum horizontal distance
between the street line and the principal building, other than steps, unenclosed balconies and
unenclosed porches. The front yard of a corner lot is the yard adjacent to the designated front
lot lineshortest of the two property lines along a street.*53
YARD, REAR:
A yard extending between the side lot lines and being the minimum horizontal distance
between the rear lot line and the rear of the principal building, other than steps, unenclosed
balconies or unenclosed porches. On corner lots and interior lots, the rear yard is in all cases at
the opposite end of the lot from the front yard.*28, *53
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-43
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
YARD, REQUIRED:
The minimum open space as specified by the regulations of this Ordinance for front, rear and
side yards, as distinguished from any yard area in excess of the minimum required in the
designated zoning district (see "BUILDABLE AREA").
YARD, SIDE:
A yard between the building and the side lot line of a lot and extending from the front yard to
the rear yard and being the minimum horizontal distance between a side lot line and the side of
the principal building, other than steps, unenclosed balconies or unenclosed porches. An
interior side yard is defined as the side yard adjacent to a common lot line.*28, *53
ZONING DISTRICT:
Any portion of the unincorporated area of Maricopa County in which the same zoning
regulations apply.
ZONING CLEARANCE:
The issuance of a permit or authorization by the Zoning Inspector indicating that a proposed
building, structure or use of land meets all the standards contained in this Ordinance.*1, *4
ZONING INSPECTOR:
The Director of the Maricopa County Department of Planning and Development or his their duly
authorized representative. All references in this ordinance to the Zoning Inspector shall also
include anyone appropriately designated to act by the Zoning Inspector.*1, *4
Date of Revisions
*1
Revised 12-30-74
*32
Effective 10-4-01 – TA2000010
*2
Added 5-2-77
*33
Effective 5-5-06 – TA2006001
*3
Revised 6-6-77
*34
Effective 7-7-06 – TA2003005
*4
Revised 10-3-77
*35
Effective 9-15-06
*5
Revised 5-11-81
*36
Effective 1-19-07 – TA2003002
*6
Revised 6-1-81
*37
Effective 1-19-07 – TA2006007
*8
Revised 3-15-82
*38
Effective 2-16-07 – TA2005001
*9
Revised 8-15-83
*39
Effective 11-14-08 – TA2008005
**9
Added 8-15-83
*40
Added 8-19-09 – TA2009007
*10
Revised 4-1-85
*41
Effective 11-19-10 – TA2009014
*11
Revised 4-7-86
*42
Effective 11-3-10 – TA2010013
**11
Added 4-7-86
*43
Effective 12-28-10 – TA2010017
*12
Revised 5-18-87
*44
Effective 2-11-2011 – TA2010014
*13
Revised 10-19-87
*45
Effective 10-19-11 – TA2011012
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 22, 2025
page 2-44
CHAPTER 2 - DEFINITIONS
*14
Revised 2-6-89
*46
Effective 10-19-11 – TA2011017
*15
Added 11-2-89
*47
Effective 1-11-12 – TA2010012
*16
Revised 5-16-90
*48
Effective 8-22-12 – TA2012009
*17
Added 8-23-90
*49
Effective 9-30-11 – TA2011001
*18
Revised 9-12-90
*50
Effective 11-14-12 – TA2012023
*19
Revised 4-3-91
*51
Effective 7-17-13 – TA2012011
*20
Added 4-3-91
*52
Effective 1-29-14 – TA2013014
*21
Renumbered 4-3-91
*53
Effective 5-29-14 – TA2013009
*22
Added 4-5-92
*54
Approved 10-8-14 – TA2014008
*23
Added 4-15-93
*55
Approved 6-10-15 – TA2014001
*24
Revised 8-21-93
*56
Effective 5-26-17 – TA2016001
*25
Added 2-20-94
*57
Effective 5-26-17 – TA2016004
*26
Revised 5-06-94
*58
Effective 5-26-17 – TA2016005
*27
Revised 7-23-94
*59
Effective 2-9-11 – TA2007006
*28
Revised 6-5-96
*60
Effective 3-11-21 – TA2020002
*29
Effective 1-17-98
*61
Effective 12-15-21 – TA2018001
*30
Effective 7-2-99
*62
Effective 3-11-22 – TA2020001
*31
Effective 11-19-99
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 3-1
CHAPTER 3 - ADMINISTRATION
Chapter 3
| Administration
Section 301.
Board of Supervisors
Section 302.Section 301.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Reserved.
Article 301.1.
Commissioners:
The Planning & Zoning Commission is composed of ten (10) commissioners,
two (2) commissioners are appointed from each of the five (5) supervisor
districts. Each commissioners shall be a resident of the supervisor district
from which he or she is appointed. The appointments shall be for staggered
terms as outlined in ARS §11-802. Commissioners are appointed and/or
removed by the Board of Supervisors.
Article 301.2.
Powers and duties:
The Planning & Zoning Commission shall have only the powers and duties
prescribed by A.R.S. §11-802 which are more particularly described as
follows:
301.2.1.
The Commission shall act in an advisory capacity to the Board of Supervisors
and may motion for a recommendation in connection with planning
application relating to development within the unincorporated regions of
Maricopa County. The Planning & Zoning Commission evaluates proposals
to conserve and promote the public health, safety, convenience and general
welfare.
Article 301.3.
Hearings and Bylaws:
Hearings of the Planning & Zoning Commission shall be held at the call of
the Chairman, regularly at least once a month with ZIPPOR meetings to be
held once per quarter in February, May, August and November and at such
other times deemed necessary for the transaction of business. All such
hearings shall be open to the public. The Planning & Zoning Commission
shall keep minutes of its proceedings, showing the vote of each
commissioner and shall also keep records of its hearings and other official
actions. The Planning & Zoning Commission shall adopt its own bylaws of
procedure and elect its own officers.
Article 301.4.
Temporary Use Permits:
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 3-2
CHAPTER 3 - ADMINISTRATION
In addition to the powers and duties described in ARS § 11-802, the Planning
and Zoning Commission may grant, upon application, Temporary Use
Permits or extensions thereof.
301.4.1.
Process: Temporary Use Permits shall be processed in accordance with
Section 1002.
301.4.2.
Public Hearings: Upon receipt of a letter of protest or request for extension
for any Temporary Use Permit, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall
hold public hearing thereon after giving public notice thereof by adequately
posting the area of concern in such application at least ten days in advance
of the public hearings as well as due notice to registered parties of interest,
and decide the same within a reasonable time.
301.4.3.
Limitations: Any Temporary Use Permit granted under the terms of this
Ordinance shall expire by limitation of substantial construction, in
accordance with the plans for which such Temporary Use Permit was
granted, which has not been completed within the time granted in the
conditions of approval from the date of granting said Temporary Use
Permit, or if judicial proceedings to review the Planning and Zoning
Commission's decision shall be instituted one year from the date of entry of
the final order in such proceedings, including all appeals.
301.4.4.
Time Extension: Prior to the expiration of a time sensitive stipulation for
Temporary Use Permits, an applicant may apply to the Planning and Zoning
Commission for a stipulation modification under the original case number
subject to a continuance fee to allow a single time extension not to exceed
60 days.
Section 303.Section 302.
Board of Adjustment
Article 303.1.Article 302.1.
Membership*13
The Board of Adjustment is composed of five (5) members, one (1) member
is appointed from each of the five (5) supervisor districts. Each member
shall be a resident and taxpayer of the supervisor district from which he or
she is appointed. The appointments shall be for staggered terms of four (4)
years each. Members are appointed and/or removed by the Board of
Supervisors.
Article 303.2.Article 302.2.
Powers and Duties:*1, *3, *4, *5, *8, *10, *12, *13,
The Board of Adjustment shall have only the powers and duties prescribed
by §A.R.S. 11-816807, which are more particularly described as follows:
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 3-3
CHAPTER 3 - ADMINISTRATION
303.2.1.302.2.1.
Interpret the Zoning Ordinance when the meaning of any word, phrase, or
section is in doubt, when there is dispute between the appellant and the
Zoning Inspector (Enforcing Officer), or when the location of a zoning district
boundary is in doubt.
303.2.2.302.2.2.
Allow a Variance from the terms of the Ordinance when, a condition of the
land is peculiar and not self-created in the line of titleowing to peculiar
conditions, a strict interpretation would workof the Ordinance creates an
unnecessary hardship, if inas long as granting such Variance the general
intent and purposes of the Zoning Ordinance will be preserved.
303.2.3.
Under no circumstances shall there be granted a Variance to allow a use of
property not permitted by the regulations for the zoning district in which
such property is located or where such Variance is specifically prohibited
within this Ordinance. No variance to Chapter 1310, Sections 1302 1002 or
Chapter 118, Section 1115 815 shall be considered.303.2.3Grant, upon
application and filing of a letter of protest or request for extension or a
Variance to the requirements for by-right temporary model home sales
complexes and temporary construction office/yard complexes (all of which
shall be considered appeals to the Board of Adjustment), for Temporary Use
Permits as required by this Ordinance.
303.2.4.302.2.4.
In addition to the Powers and Duties outlined in Article 3023.2 of this
Ordinance, the Board of Adjustment shall not modify, waive, or otherwise
vary any standard or regulation identified in Chapter 107, Section 1010 710
of this Ordinance without a specific finding that military airport or ancillary
military facility compatibility is preserved pursuant to Arizona Revised
Statute §28-8481C.*14
303.2.5.302.2.5.
Code enforcement review as outlined in Articles 1504.3.7–
1504.3.111204.3.6 – 1204.3.10 of this ordinance.*16
Article 303.3.Article 302.3.
Meetings and Rules:*1, *3, *4, *11, *13
Meetings of the Board of Adjustment shall be held at the call of the
Chairman, regularly at least once a month and at such other times deemed
necessary for the transaction of business. All such meetings shall be open to
the public. The Chairman, or in his absence, the Vice-Chairman, may
administer oaths and compel the attendance of witnesses. The Board of
Adjustment shall keep minutes of its proceedings, showing the vote of each
member upon each request or if absent or failing to vote, indicating such
facts, and shall also keep records of its hearings and other official actions. A
copy of every rule or regulation, every Variance and every order,
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 3-4
CHAPTER 3 - ADMINISTRATION
requirement, decision or determination of the Board of Adjustment shall be
filed with the Director and shall be a public record. The Board of
Adjustment shall adopt its own rules of procedure and elect its own officers.
Article 303.4.Article 302.4.
Appeals:*3, *13
An appeal to the Board of Adjustment may be taken by any person who
feels that there is an error or doubt in the interpretation of the Ordinance or
that due to unusual circumstances attaching to the person’s property an
unnecessary hardship is presentbeing indicted on the person. The appeal
shall state whether it is a plea for an interpretation or a Variance and the
grounds for the appeal. Such appeal shall be taken within a reasonable
time, not to exceed 60 days or such lesser period as may be provided by the
rules of the Board of Adjustment, by filing with the Director Zoning
Inspector and with the Board of Adjustment a notice of appeal specifying
the grounds thereof. The Director Zoning Inspector shall forthwith transmit
to the Board of Adjustment all papers constituting the record upon which
the action appealed from was taken. Such an appeal shall stay all
proceedings in the matter appealed from unless the Director Zoning
Inspector certifies to the Board of Adjustment that, by reason of the facts
stated in the certificate, the stay would in the opinion of the Director Zoning
Inspector cause imminent peril to life or property. In such case, proceedings
shall not be stayed, except by a restraining order granted by said Board of
Adjustment or by a court of record on application and notice to the Zoning
Inspector from whom the appeal is taken. Said Board of Adjustment shall fix
a time for hearing the appeal and give notice thereof to the parties in
interestto the appeal and the public as set forth herein.
Article 303.5.Article 302.5.
Application for Variance*1, *3, *8, *13, *25
Application for any Variance from the regulations development standards of
this Zoning Ordinance shall be made to the Board of Adjustment. Such
applications shall be made on forms prescribed by the Board of Adjustment,
shall be filed with the Director, and shall be accompanied by:
303.5.1.
Accurate site plans to scale and a description of the property involved,
description of the request or requests, preliminary floor plans and elevation
of all proposed buildings. The zoning inspector may authorize omission of
any or all of the plans and drawings required by this section of they are not
necessary.
303.5.2.
Deleted per TA2019002 effective 11/6/2020.*17
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 3-5
CHAPTER 3 - ADMINISTRATION
303.5.3.302.5.1.
Reasons for requesting the Variance including a detailed description of a
statutorily based hardship and evidence that granting of said Variance will
not in any way adversely impact the intent and purpose of the Zoning
Ordinance.
Article 303.6.Article 302.6. Public Hearings:*8, *13
303.6.1.302.6.1.
Appeals: Upon receipt in proper form of appeals concerning interpretation
or administration of the Zoning Ordinance, the Board of Adjustment shall
hold a public hearing thereon after giving public notice thereof by posting of
the hearing agenda as well as due notice to the parties in interest to the
appeal, and decide the same within a reasonable time.
303.6.2.302.6.2.
Variance or Temporary Use Permit: Upon receipt in proper form of an
application for any Variance to the regulations of this Ordinance or upon
receipt of a letter of protest or request for extension for any Temporary Use
Permit, the Board of Adjustment shall hold public hearing thereon after
giving public notice thereof by adequately posting the area of concern in
such application at least ten days in advance of the public hearings as well
as due notice to registered parties of interest, and decide the same within a
reasonable time.
303.6.3.
Deleted 07-07-06. (TA2003005)
303.6.4.302.6.3.
No application shall be scheduled for hearing by any board or commission
acting pursuant to the “Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance (MCZO)”, or
administratively approved unless and until all fees and fines owed to the
Department as a result of any activity or inactivity attributable to the
property that is the subject of the application are brought current and paid
in full or any amounts owed pursuant to an agreement of compliance are
current, as the case me may be. This requirement shall not be waived by
the board/commission.*12, *15
Article 303.7.Article 302.7.
Appeal of a Decision Made by the Board of
Adjustment:*4, *13
A person aggrieved in any manner by an action of the Board of Adjustment
may within 30 days of such action, appeal to the Superior Court and the
matter shall be heard de novo. (from the beginning).
Article 303.8.
Limitations:
Any Variance or Temporary Use Permit granted under the terms of this
Ordinance shall expire by limitation of substantial construction, in
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 3-6
CHAPTER 3 - ADMINISTRATION
accordance with the plans for which such Variance or Temporary Use Permit
was granted, which has not been completed within one year from the date
of granting said Variance or Temporary Use Permit, or if judicial proceedings
to review the Board of Adjustment's decision shall be instituted one year
from the date of entry of the final order in such proceedings, including all
appeals.*8
Article 303.9.
Time Extension:*13
Prior to the expiration of a time sensitive stipulation, an applicant may apply
to the Board of Adjustment for a stipulation modification under the original
case number subject to a continuance fee to allow a single time extension
not to exceed 60 days.
Date of Revisions
*1
Revised 12-30-74
*11
Effective 2-4-00
*3
Revised 10-3-77
*12
Effective 6-1-2009 – TA2009003
*4
Revised 2-26-79
*13
Effective 11-7-09 – TA2009011
*5
Revised 4-14-80
*14
Effective 3-17-10 – TA2009012
*8
Revised 2-20-94
*15
Effective 6-1-10 – TA2010003
**8
Added 2-20-94
*16
Effective 11-03-10 – TA2010009
*10
Effective 1-17-98
*17
Effective 11-6-20 – TA2019002
Section 304.Section 303.
Zone Change Amendments
Article 304.1.Article 303.1.
Authority:
The Board of Supervisors may from time to time, after receiving report and
recommendation thereupon by the Commission and after public hearings
required by law, amend zoning district boundaries or the regulations herein
or subsequently established. Amendments may be initiated either by the
property owner or by the Commission on its own motion.*14
Article 304.2.Article 303.2.
Zone Change Amendments Initiated by Property
Owner(s):*14
304.2.1.303.2.1.
Any property owner or authorized agent of a property owner desiring an
amendment or change in the Zoning Ordinance changing the zoning district
boundaries within an area previously zoned shall file an application for the
amendment or change with the staff of the Board of Supervisors.
304.2.2.303.2.2.
Upon receipt of the application, staff of the Board of Supervisors shall
submit it to the Commission for report and recommendation. Prior to
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 3-7
CHAPTER 3 - ADMINISTRATION
presenting its report and recommendation to said Board, the Commission
shall hold public hearing thereon after giving at least 15 days notice thereof
by publication once in a newspaper of general circulation in the seat of
Maricopa County (Phoenix) and by posting of the area included in the
proposed change. The posting shall be in no less than two places with at
least one notice for each one-quarter mile of street frontage along
perimeter public rights-of-way so that the notices are visible from the
nearest public right-of-way. If there is no perimeter right-of-way, the
posting shall be placed so that it is clearly visible from the nearest public
right-of-way or on sites selected by the Department in order to ensure
visibility.
304.2.3.303.2.3.
The Commission shall also send notice by first class mail to each real
property owner as shown on the last assessment of the property within 300
feet of the proposed amendment or change and each county or municipality
which is contiguous to the area of the amendment or change. The notice
sent by mail shall include, at a minimum, the date, time and place of the
hearing on the proposed amendment or change including a general
explanation of the matter to be considered; a general description of the
area of the proposed amendment or change; and notification that if 20% of
the property owners by area and number within the zoning area300 feet of
the subject property file protests, an supermajority affirmative vote of
three-fourths of all members of the Board will be required to approve the
rezoning.
304.2.4.303.2.4.
If the Planning Commission has held a public hearing, the Board may adopt
the recommendations of the Planning Commission through use of a consent
calendar without holding a second public hearing if there is no objection,
request for public hearing or other protest. If there is an objection, a
request for public hearing or a protest, the Board of Supervisors shall hold
public hearing on such petitions giving at least 15 days notice thereof by
publication once in a newspaper of general circulation in the seat of
Maricopa County (Phoenix) and by adequate posting of the area of concern
in said petition at least 15 days in advance of the public hearing. After
holding the public hearing, the Board of Supervisors may adopt the
petitioner'’s proposed change provided that if 20% of the owners by
number and by area, of all property within 300 feet of the proposed change,
file a protest, such a change shall not be made except by a three-fourths
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 3-8
CHAPTER 3 - ADMINISTRATION
vote of all members of the Board of Supervisors. However, except that the
required number of votes shall in no event be less than a majority of the full
members of the Board. *17
304.2.5.303.2.5.
In calculating the owners by area for a protest, only that portion of a lot or
parcel of record situated within 300 feet of the property to be rezoned shall
be included. In calculating the owner by number or area, County property
and public rights-of-way shall not be included.
304.2.6.303.2.6.
As used in the Ordinance, legal protests for the purposes of requiring a
three-fourths vote of the Board of Supervisors as referenced in Article
3034.2.4 shall be subject to the following:*27
1. The legal protest shall be filed in writing with the Department by 12:00
noon on the Friday prior to the public hearing before the Board of
Supervisors.
2. The legal protest shall clearly state opposition to the amendment or
change.
3. The legal protest shall be filed by the record property owner of any
property located within 300 feet of the proposed amendment or
change. In the event title shall be held in multiple parties, the filing by
any such party shall be sufficient.
4. The legal protest shall indicate the Assessor Parcel Number of the
parcel(s) owned by the party filing the opposition.
304.2.7.303.2.7.
No application shall be scheduled for hearing by any board or commission
acting pursuant to the “Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance (MCZO)”, or
administratively approved unless and until all fees and fines owed to the
Department as a result of any activity or inactivity attributable to the
property that is the subject of the application are brought current and paid
in full or any amounts owed pursuant to an agreement of compliance are
current, as the case maye be. This requirement shall not be waived by the
board/commission.*26, *27, *28
Article 304.3.Article 303.3.
Zone Change Amendments Initiated by the
Commission:*14, *19
304.3.1.303.3.1.
Amendments initiated by the Commission are subject to the same public
hearing requirements set forth herein Chapter 3, Section 3034, Article
3034.2 (amendments initiated by property owners).
304.3.2.
Notice by first class mail of proceedings that are not initiated by the
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 3-9
CHAPTER 3 - ADMINISTRATION
property owner involving rezoning of land to a more restrictive zone shall be
sent to each real property owner, as shown on the last assessment of the
property, of the area to be rezoned and all property owners, as shown on
the last assessment of the property, within 300 feet of property to be
rezoned. **10, *11
A "more restrictive zone" shall be interpreted to mean:
1. Zoning from one category to another category; or,
2. Zoning from a less restrictive use to a more restrictive use within
categories as shown on the following table:
CATEGORY A:
(More Restrictive)
(Less Restrictive)
Rural-190 Rural Zoning District
Rural-70 Rural Zoning District
Rural-43 Rural Zoning District
CATEGORY B:
(More Restrictive)
(Less Restrictive)
R1-35 Single-Family Residential Zoning District
R1-18 Single-Family Residential Zoning District
R1-10 Single-Family Residential Zoning District
R1-8 Single-Family Residential Zoning District
R1-7 Single-Family Residential Zoning District
R1-6 Single-Family Residential Zoning District
R-2 Limited Multiple-Family Residential Zoning District
R-3 Limited Multiple-Family Residential Zoning District
R-4 Limited Multiple-Family Residential Zoning District
R-5 Limited Multiple-Family Residential Zoning District
CATEGORY C:
(More Restrictive)
(Less Restrictive)
C-O Commercial Office Zoning District
C-S Planned Shopping Center Zoning District
C-1 Neighborhood Commercial Zoning District
C-2 Intermediate Commercial Zoning District
C-3 General Commercial Zoning District
CATEGORY D:
(More Restrictive)
(Less Restrictive)
IND-1 Planned Industrial Zoning District
IND-2 Light Industrial Zoning District
IND-3 Heavy Industrial Zoning District
CATEGORY E:
Any Special Use
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 3-10
CHAPTER 3 - ADMINISTRATION
CATEGORY F:
Hillside Development Overlay Zoning District
CATEGORY G:
Senior Citizen Overlay Zoning District
CATEGORY H:
Residential Unit Plan of Development
CATEGORY I:
Industrial Unit Plan of Development
CATEGORY J:
Commercial Unit Plan of Development
Article 304.4.Article 303.4.
Amendments to Zoning Ordinance Standards: **11, *21
304.4.1.303.4.1.
Proceedings involving one or more of the following proposed changes or
related series of changes in the standards governing land uses, shall include
notice to real property owners provided by one of the methods discussed
below:
1. A 10% or more increase or decrease in the number of square feet or
units that may be developed.
2. A 10% or more increase or reduction in the allowable height of
buildings.
3. An increase or reduction in the allowable number of stories of
buildings.
4. A 10% or more increase or decrease in setback or open space
requirements.
5. An increase or reduction in permitted uses.
Prior to the first hearing on such changes, notice shall be sent by first class
mail to each real property owner, as shown on the last assessment, whose
real property is directly affected by the changes; or and the change shall be
published in a display ad covering not less than one-eighth of a full page in a
newspaper of general circulation in the County.*20
304.4.2.303.4.2.
303.4.2.
For amendments to Zoning Ordinance standards or uses, the
Department will send notice by first class mailof an application submittal to
persons who register their names and addresses with the Department
County’s Enhanced Regulatory Outreach Program (EROP) as being
interested in receiving such notice of regulatory amendments. A fee of
$5.00 per year will be charged for the provision of this service payable
initially upon registration and yearly thereafter.
303.4.3.
Area of interest groups which includes homeowners associations, other
organized groups and agencies may register to receive planning cases
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 3-11
CHAPTER 3 - ADMINISTRATION
applications with the Department. The registration is available on the
Planning and Development website with submittal of the representative
contact name, group name, mail and e-mail addresses. The area of interest
contact information will be uploaded to the County GIS system available to
the public.
Article 304.5.Article 303.5.
Amendment Approved by the Board: **10, *11, ***11, *18
A decision by the Board of Supervisors involving rezoning of land which
changes the zoning classification of such land or amends Zoning Ordinance
standards or uses shall not be effective until the dedication of required
right-of-way but not prior to 31 days after final approval of the change in
classification, standard or use by the Board. Unless a resident files a written
objection with the Board of Supervisors, the rezoning may be enacted as an
emergency measure that becomes effective immediately by a four-fifths
majority vote of the board.
Article 304.6.Article 303.6.
Conditional Zoning:***11
304.6.1.303.6.1.
The Board of Supervisors may approve a change of zone conditioned on a
schedule for development of the specific use or uses for which rezoning is
requested. When the Board of Supervisors adopts the zoning amendment,
it may impose a schedule of development including, but not limited to, a
date by which construction shall commence or dates by which phases of
development of the property for the use approved shall be substantially
completed.**9, ***10
304.6.2.303.6.2.
The owner or developer of property which was rezoned conditioned on
compliance with a schedule of development shall obtain a Certificate of
Occupancy submit to the Department a certified statement of compliance
prior to the expiration of any time limits imposed by the Board. If the
certified statement of complianceCertificate of Occupancy is not filed or the
Department independently determines that the property has not been
improved for the use for which it was conditionally approved, a public
hearing shallmay be set before the Commission for considering of rescinding
the zone change approval. The findings and recommendation of the
Commission shall be forwarded to the Board of Supervisors for public
hearing to determine compliance with the schedule of development, grant
an extension, or cause the property to revert to its former zoning
classification. Notification by registered mail of both the hearing before the
Commission and the hearing before the Board shall be sent to the owner
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 3-12
CHAPTER 3 - ADMINISTRATION
and applicant who requested the rezoning. Notice of public hearing shall be
as set forth in Chapter 3, Section 3043., Article 3034.2. herein.
Article 304.7.Article 303.7.
Reconsideration of Denied Petition Zoning
Application:*2, ***9, ***10, ***11
If an application petition for amendment is withdrawn by the applicant or
denied by the Board of Supervisors, that petition application shall not be
refiled nor shall there be filed with the Board of Supervisors any other
petition application for the same amendment within a period of one year
unless in the opinion of the Commission there is a change of circumstances
warranting such filing. This waiting period will not be applied to applications
withdrawn by the applicant prior to action by the Board of Supervisors.
Article 304.8.Article 303.8.
Compliance with County Plans:*12, *23
All applications for changes of Zoning District boundaries must be in general
compliance with the County's adopted Comprehensive Plan and/or any
adopted area plan.
Article 304.9.Article 303.9. Site Plan Amendments:*22, *25
304.9.1.303.9.1.
Holders of approved Special Use Permits, Plans of Development, and Unit
Plans of Development may apply to amend associated site plans as set forth
in the provisions of this Ordinance.*25
304.9.2.303.9.2.
Amendments to approved site plans may be categorized as major or minor.
In determining the status of proposed amendments, the Department of
Planning and Development shall adhere to the procedures and criteria of
this Article.
304.9.3.303.9.3.
Applications for amendments to approved site plans shall include the
appropriate fee as described in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance and
the appropriate submittal requirements as required by the Planning and
Development Department. No application shall be scheduled for hearing by
any board or commission acting pursuant to the “Maricopa County Zoning
Ordinance (MCZO)”, or administratively approved unless and until all fees
and fines owed to the Department as a result of any activity or inactivity
attributable to the property that is the subject of the application are
brought current and paid in full or any amounts owed pursuant to an
agreement of compliance are current, as the case maye be. This
requirement shall not be waived by the board/commission.*26, *28
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 3-13
CHAPTER 3 - ADMINISTRATION
304.9.4.303.9.4.
3034.9.4. Unit Plans of Development that were originally processed
through the Board of Supervisors may be amended administratively, either
as a Major or Minor Amendment, as set forth in the provisions of this
Ordinance. If, however, the amendment changes or alters a development
standard or stipulation of approval, then the amendment shall be processed
through the Planning and Zoning Commission and Board of Supervisors for
approval. Major Amendments to Special Use Permits shall be processed
through the Planning and Zoning Commission and Board of Supervisors for
approval.*25
304.9.5.303.9.5.
Minor Amendments shall be reviewed by staff of the Planning and
Development Department and other County Departments as deemed
necessary, according to standard administrative procedures. Staff will
recommend approval, approval subject to conditions, or denial.
304.9.6. An applicant may appeal a staff decision in writing to the Planning
and Development Department Director within two weeks30 days of the
staff decision. Such appeal shall state the purpose and subject of the
proposed amendment, the date of the staff decision, and the justification
for an alternate decision.
304.9.7.303.9.6.
Major Amendments:
1. An amendment will be considered major if the proposed amendment
involves one or more of the following:*25
A. change altering any condition or stipulation of approval;
B. An increase of more than 10% in the following:
i.
Building size, dimensions, or height of any proposed or
existing structure to be retained,
ii.
The number of parking spaces,
iii.
The size of landscaped areas, or
iv.
The size or height of approved signs.
C. A decrease of more than 10% in setback;
D. A change in the location of buildings, parking areas, access
drives, recreational amenities, exterior lighting, signs or
fencing or landscaping used as buffering/screening, if such
change would significantly and/or materially increase
potential adverse impacts on adjacent property as
determined by the Zoning Inspector;
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 3-14
CHAPTER 3 - ADMINISTRATION
E. The request is for a different type of land use;
F. Non-compliance with existing Zoning Ordinance standards;
G. A written objection by the Maricopa County Department of
Transportation, the Maricopa County Flood Control District,
or the Maricopa County Department of Environmental
Services;
H. The request is found by the Zoning Inspector to be a Major
Amendment.
304.9.8.303.9.7.
Minor Amendments:
1. An amendment will be considered minor if the proposed amendment is
not a Major Amendment. In general, Minor Amendments are small
adjustments to the details of a site plan that allow continued
compliance with an approved site plan and that do not substantively or
materially alter the original character and/or intent of the approved site
plan.
2. The Zoning Inspector shall make the final determination of whether an
amendment is a Minor Amendment.
Date of Revisions
*2
Revised 9-13-71
*18
Revised 8-21-96
**9
Added 8-04-86
*19
Effective 5-15-98
***9
Renumbered 8-04-86
*20
Effective 6-21-98
**10
Added 12-07-87
*21
Effective 1-15-99
***10
Renumbered 12-07-87
*22
Effective 2-07-03 – TA2002001
*11
Revised 2-06-89
*23
Effective 9-07-07 – TA2007012
**11
Added 2-06-89
*25
Effective 9-22-08 – TA2007016
***11
Renumbered 2-06-89
*26
Effective 6-01-09 – TA2009003
*12
Added 8-23-90
*27
Effective 7-17-09 – TA2008009
*14
Revised 8-06-93
*28
Effective 6-01-10 – TA2010003
*17
Revised 8-21-96
Section 305.Section 304.
Citizen Review Process*24
Article 305.1.Article 304.1.
Upon application for revision a change in the Zoning Ordinance changing to
change the zoning district within an area previously zoned as set forth in
Chapter 13, Section 3034, Articles 3034.2 and 3034.3 herein or upon
application requesting a special use as set forth in Chapter 1310, Section
1301 1001 herein, a citizen review process shall be conducted. The
purposes of the citizen review process shall be the following:
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 3-15
CHAPTER 3 - ADMINISTRATION
1. Adjacent landowners and other potentially affected citizens will be
notified of the application and substance of the proposed change in
zoning district or special use.
2. Adjacent landowners and other potentially affected citizens will be
provided an opportunity to express any issues or concerns they may
have with the proposed rezoning or special use before any public
hearing required as set forth in Chapter 3, Section 3034, Articles 3034.2
and 3034.3 herein.
Article 305.2.Article 304.2.
Prior to any application that requires a citizen review process, the applicant
shall conduct a pre-application meeting with the Planning Department.
Article 305.3.Article 304.3.
Within 30 days upon of submitting an application that requires a citizen
review process, the applicant shall post the property included in the
proposed change. The posting shall be in no less than two places with at
least one notice for each quarter mile of frontage along perimeter right-of-
way so that the notices are visible from the nearest public right-of-way.
Each notice shall be a minimum of six square feet in area and shall be
laminated.Each notice shall be manufactured in accordance with
specifications set forth in the application packet. The posting shall include,
at a minimum, a brief description of the area of the proposed amendment
or change, a general explanation of the nature of the proposed amendment
or change, the name of the applicant, and contact information for the
applicant. A signed affidavit along with photographic evidence shall be
submitted to staff demonstrating proof of posting within 30 days of
application submittal.
Article 305.4.Article 304.4.
Within 30 days upon of submitting an application that requires a citizen
review process, the applicant shall also send notice by first class mail to each
real property owner as shown on the last assessment of the property within
three hundred feet of the proposed amendment or change. The notice by
mail shall include, at a minimum, a description of the area of the proposed
amendment or change, a general explanation of the nature of the proposed
amendment or change, the name of the applicant, and contact information
for the applicant. A copy of the notice and an affidavit demonstrating proof
of such notification shall be submitted to staff within 30 days of application
submittal.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 3-16
CHAPTER 3 - ADMINISTRATION
Article 305.5.Article 304.5.
Every application that requires a citizen review process shall include a
citizen participation plan. The citizen participation plan, at a minimum, shall
include the following information:
1. Which Identification of the residents, property owners, interested
parties, political jurisdictions and public agencies that may be affected
by the application.
2. How those interested in and potentially affected by an application will
be notified that an application has been made.
3. How those interested and potentially affected parties will be informed
of the substance of the change, amendment, or development proposed
by the application.
4. How those potentially affected or otherwise interested parties will be
provided an opportunity to discuss the applicant’s proposal with the
applicant and express any concerns, issues or problems they may have
with the proposal in advance of the public hearing.
5. The applicant’s schedule for completion of the citizen participation
plan.
6. How the applicant will keep the Planning Department informed on the
status of their citizen participation efforts.
Article 305.6.Article 304.6.
The level of citizen interest and area involvement will vary depending on the
nature of the application and the location of the site. The target area for
early notification will be determined through a coordinated effort of the
applicant and staffthe Planning and Development Department. The
Planning DirectorZoning Inspector shall resolve any disputes that may arise
while arriving at determining the target area. At a minimum, the target area
shall include the following:
1. Real property owners within the noticing area set forth in item
3054.4 herein;
2. The head of anyAny homeowners association within the required
noticing area set forth in item 3045.4 herein;
3. Other potentially affected citizens in the target area who have
requested that they be placed on the routing list maintained by
the Planning Department.
Article 305.7.Article 304.7.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 3-17
CHAPTER 3 - ADMINISTRATION
These requirements apply in addition to any notice provisions set forth in
Chapter 3, Section 304303, Articles 3043.2 and 3043.3 herein.
Article 305.8.Article 304.8.
The applicant may submit a citizen participation plan and begin
implementation prior to formal application at their discretion. This shall not
occur until after the required pre-application meeting and consultation with
planning department staff.
Article 305.9.Article 304.9.
The citizen participation plan shall include a written report on containing the
results of the citizen participation effort prior to notice of public hearing set
forth in Chapter 3, Section 3034, Articles 3043.2 and 3034.3 herein. At a
minimum the citizen participation report shall include the following
information:
1. Details and techniques the applicant used to involve the public,
including:
A. Dates and locations of any and all meetings where citizens were
invited to discuss the applicant’s proposal;
B. Content, dates mailed, and number of mailings, including letters,
meeting notices, newsletters and other publications;
C. The An exhibit depicting the location of residents, property owners,
and interested parties receiving notices, newsletters or other
written materials.
D. The number of people that participated in the process.
2. A summary of perceived or real concerns, issues and problems
expressed during the process, including:
A. The substance of the concerns, issues, and problems;
B. How the applicant has addressed or intends to address perceived or
real concerns, issues, and problems expressed during the process;
and,
C. Perceived or real concerns, issues and problems with which the
applicant disagrees, which the applicant cannot address, or which
the applicant chooses not to address, including an explanation of
the applicant’s reasoning.
Date of Revisions
*24
Effective 6-1-01 TA2000005
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 3-18
CHAPTER 3 - ADMINISTRATION
Section 306.Section 305.
Plan of Development (POD) Process*1
Article 306.1.Article 305.1.
All development involving non-residential zoning districts, two-family or
multi-family residential development in a two-family residential zoning
district or multi-family residential zoning district, or property with a Unit
Plan of Development (UPD), Planned Area Development (PAD), or Planned
Development (PD) overlay shall be subject to a plan of development (POD)
approval as set forth in the provisions of this Ordinance. A preliminary plat
may serve as a POD for residential projects. A single building with no more
than four units on one lot of record shall not require a POD. PODs shall be
required in two-family and multi-family zoning district when there are two
or more buildings on a single parcel.
Article 306.2.
A preliminary plat may serve as a POD for residential projects. A single
building with no more than four units on one lot of record shall not require
a POD. PODs shall be required in two-family and multi-family zoning districts
when there are two or more buildings on a single parcel.
Article 306.3.Article 305.2.
A POD may be processed through the Planning and Zoning Commission and
Board of Supervisors for approval concurrent with a zone change request
(under the zone change application) or it may be processed administratively
(under a separate POD application) as set forth in the provisions of this
Ordinance. All zone change requests that require a POD shall be processed
as a zone change with overlay and be charged accordingly. Separate POD
requests will be chargeds accordingly. Residential UPD requests shall
require separate submittal of a preliminary plat application per the
Maricopa County Subdivision regulations.
Article 306.4.Article 305.3.
An application and phasing plan, if proposed, for a POD shall be submitted
to the Planning and Development Department through the One Stop Shop
(OSS) on thean official forms provided by the Department. The application
shall satisfy the submittal requirements as well as pertinent regulations as
set forth in the provisions of this Ordinance or from other county
departments. The application shall contain sufficient information for staff to
determine information for staff to determine whether the proposal meets
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 3-19
CHAPTER 3 - ADMINISTRATION
the requirements of the County. A pre-application meeting is
recommended.
Article 306.5.Article 305.4.
A POD is a precise plan. Staff shall review the POD in accordance with
submittal requirements, regulations, and policies. If staff determines that
the proposal is consistent with the purposes and intent of the Ordinance
and other pertinent regulations and policies, then staff shall grant approval
and may impose stipulations as deemed necessary to satisfy the provisions
of this Ordinance or other applicable regulations and policies. Staff may
also find that conditions required for approval do not exist and, therefore,
deny the request. Alternatively, staffStaff may forward the request to the
Planning and Zoning Commission for a recommendation to the Board of
Supervisors when the POD is included with a zone change. A POD request
shall be required to be forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Commission
for a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors as required with a Special
Use Permit or Military Compatibility Permit.
Article 306.6.Article 305.5.
The applicant may file a request to Aappeals of an administrative decision
regarding a POD request within two (2) weeks of said decision. The appeal
shall be forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Commission for a
recommendation to the Board of Supervisors.
Article 306.7.Article 305.6.
For all development subject to a POD, and approved POD and subsequent
building permits are required prior to the commencement of any
construction or development on the site. The applicant shall ensure that
required building permits for the site or first phase shall be issued within
two (2) years of the date of approval of the POD. Prior to the date of
expiration, the applicant may file a single request via a Minor Amendment
application for a one (1) year time extension authorized by the Director of
Planning and Development. If the time frame has expired, the applicant
shall submit a new POD application.
Article 306.8.Article 305.7.
Any change or modification to an approved POD shall be considered an
amendment to the POD. Staff shall determine whether changes constitute a
Minor or Major Amendment according to the provisions set forth in this
Ordinance.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 3-20
CHAPTER 3 - ADMINISTRATION
Article 306.9.Article 305.8.
Non-compliance with stipulations of POD approval shall be considered a
zoning violation. No application shall be scheduled for hearing by any board
or commission acting pursuant to the “Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance
(MCZO)”, or administratively approved unless and until all fees and fines
owed to the Department as a result of any activity or inactivity attributable
to the property that is the subject of the application are brought current and
paid in full or any amounts owed pursuant to an agreement of compliance
are current, as the case me be. This requirement shall not be waived by the
board/commission.*2, *3
Date of Revisions
*1
Effective 9-22-08 – TA2007016
*2
Effective 6-2-2009 – TA2009003
*3
Effective 6-1-2010 – TA2010003
Section 307.Section 306.
Administrative Actions and Appeal*1
Article 307.1.Article 306.1.
Requests for uses by right subject to conditions, requests for a reasonable
accommodation under Article 1207907.3.7, and other requests not subject
to a legislative process as required by the provisions of this Ordinance or
state law may be processed administratively as set forth in the provisions of
this Ordinance.
Article 307.2.Article 306.2.
Applications subject to administrative approval shall be submitted to the
Planning and Development Department on an official form provided by the
Department. The application shall satisfy the submittal requirements as well
as all pertinent ordinances and regulations. The application shall request
sufficient information for the Department to determine if the proposal
satisfies the requirements of all applicable ordinances, rules and
regulations.
Article 307.3.Article 306.3.
The Department Staff shall review applications for administrative approval
in accordance with all applicable ordinances, rules and regulations. If staff
determinesit is determined that the proposal is consistent with all
applicable ordinances, rules and regulations, then staff the Department shall
grant approval and may impose conditions necessary to ensure that the
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 3-21
CHAPTER 3 - ADMINISTRATION
proposal does not negatively impact the health, safety or general welfare of
the citizens of Maricopa County. If Staff finds that the application cannot be
administratively granted, the application shall be denied.
Article 307.4.Article 306.4.
A respondent may file an appeal of the decision of Zoning Inspector or their
designee by submitting an Appeal Form. Such an appeal must be received by
Planning and Development no later than 5:00 p.m., thirty (30) days
following a decision on an application subject to an administrative action.
Article 307.5.Article 306.5.
A respondent shall completely and accurately fill out an Appeal Form and
may provide supplemental information if so desired, except that the
supplemental information shall be in summary and limited to a one page
narrative.
Article 307.6.Article 306.6.
The Appeal Form may be submitted electronically to the Zoning Inspector or
their designee in the manner as specified by the Zoning Inspector on the
Appeal Form.
Article 307.7.Article 306.7.
Staff The Department will review the Appeal Form for administrative
completeness. An appeal of the Zoning Inspector’s decision will be
scheduled for hearing before a Hearing Officer hired retained by Maricopa
County pursuant to A.R.S. § 11-815 (E) within thirty (30) days after filing the
appeal. The Appeal Form and supplemental information shall be
transmitted to the Hearing Officer for review at least one week prior to
hearing.
Article 307.8.Article 306.8.
All appeals of the same administrative action shall be consolidated and
presented to the Hearing Officer as a single matter.
Article 307.9.Article 306.9.
The Hearing Officer shall may reverse the decision of the Zoning Inspector
only upon a finding that the decision was arbitrary, capricious, unreasonable
or was not supported by the evidence presented to the Zoning Inspector by
the appellant.
Article 307.10.Article 306.10.
The decision of the Hearing Officer shall be provided to Staff the
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 3-22
CHAPTER 3 - ADMINISTRATION
Department within five business days following the hearing. Upon delivery
to Staffthe Department, the decision shall become final and effective. Staff
The Department shall provide a copy of the hearing officer’s decision to the
applicant within five business days of receipt from the hearing officer. If the
Hearing Officer rules in favor of the applicant, the permit or license shall be
issued by the Zoning Inspector or their designee within fourteen (14)
business days.
Article 307.11.Article 306.11.
If the respondent does not agree with the determination of the Hearing
Officer, the respondent may file an appeal pursuant to A.R.S. § 11-816(D).
Date of Revisions
*1
Effective 3-11-2022 – TA2020001
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 4-1
CHAPTER 4 - ZONING
Chapter 4 | Zoning
Section 401. Establishment of Zoning Districts and Boundaries Thereof
For the purpose of this Ordinance, that part of Maricopa County outside the corporate limits of
any municipality is hereby classified into the following zoning districts:
Article 401.1.
Rural Zoning Districts:
401.1.1.
Rural - 190
Rural Zoning District - 190,000 Square Feet Per per
primary Dwelling Unit
401.1.2.
Rural - 70
Rural Zoning District - 70,000 Square Feet Per per
primary Dwelling Unit
401.1.3.
Rural - 43
Rural Zoning District - 1 Acre 43,560 Square Feet Per
per primary Dwelling Unit
Article 401.2.
Single Family Residential Zoning Districts:
401.2.1.
R1 - 35
Single-Family Residential Zoning District - 35,000
Square Feet Per Dwelling Unit
401.2.2.
R1 - 18
Single-Family Residential Zoning District - 18,000
Square Feet Per Dwelling Unit
401.2.3.
R1 - 10
Single-Family Residential Zoning District - 10,000
Square Feet Per Dwelling Unit
401.2.4.
R1 - 8
Single-Family Residential Zoning District - 8,000
Square Feet Per Dwelling Unit
401.2.5.
R1 – 7*2
Single-Family Residential Zoning District - 7,000
Square Feet Per Dwelling Unit
401.2.6.
R1 - 6
Single-Family Residential Zoning District - 6,000
Square Feet Per Dwelling Unit
Article 401.3.
Multiple Family Residential Zoning Districts:
401.3.1.
R - 2
Two-Family Residential Zoning District - 6,000 Square
Feet per lot with a minimum lot area per dwelling unit of
4,000 square feet
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 4-2
CHAPTER 4 - ZONING
401.3.2.
R - 3
Multiple-Family Residential Zoning District - 6,000
Square Feet per lot with a minimum lot area per
dwelling unit of 3,000 square feet
401.3.3.
R - 4
Multiple-Family Residential Zoning District - 6,000
Square Feet per lot with a minimum lot area per
dwelling unit of 1,000 square feet
Article 401.4.
Commercial Zoning Districts:
4301.4.1. C - S
Planned Shopping Center Zoning District
401.4.2.
C - O*3
Commercial Office Zoning District
401.4.3.
C - 1
Neighborhood Commercial Zoning District
401.4.45. C - 2
Intermediate Commercial Zoning District
401.4.5.
C - 3
General Commercial Zoning District
Article 401.5.
Industrial Zoning Districts:
401.5.1.
IND - 1
Planned Industrial Zoning District
401.5.2.
IND - 2
LightGeneral Industrial Zoning District
401.5.3.
IND - 3
Heavy Industrial Zoning District
Article 401.6.
Overlay Zoning Districts:
401.6.1.
PAD
Planned Area Development Overlay
401.6.2.
RUPD
Residential Unit Plan of Development
401.6.3.
CUPD
Commercial Plan of Development
401.6.4.
IUPD
Industrial Plan of Development
401.6.5.
PD*7
Planned Development Zoning District
401.4.65.
SC
Senior Citizen Overlay Zoning District
401.6.6.
WESTSIDE-
Westside Military Airbase Overlay Zoning District
MILITARY
AIRBASE
401.4.86. WICKENBURG
Wickenburg Scenic Corridor Overlay Zoning District
SCENIC
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 4-3
CHAPTER 4 - ZONING
CORRIDOR
401.4.97.
HWY 74 SCENIC Highway 74 Scenic Corridor Overlay Zoning District
CORRIDOR
401.4.8.
MILITARY
Overlay Zoning District
AIRPORT AND
ANCILLARY
MILITARY FACILITY
401.6.7.401.6.5. WIRELESS
Wireless
Communications
Facilities
Use
District
COMMUNICATION
FACILITY USE
DISTRICTS
401.6.8. AD*4
Airport District (See Separate Ordinance)
401.6.9.
MHR Manufactured Housing Residential Zoning District—Deleted 7-23-94
Date of Revisions
*2
Added 11-3-75
*8
Added 8-01-91
*3
Added 12-12-77
*9
Added 1-09-92
*4
Added 12-11-78
*10
Added 4-05-92
*5
Added 5-30-79
*11
Added 6-06-94
*7
Added 7-1-85
Section 402. Boundaries
Article 402.1.
Boundary Lines on the Zoning District Maps:
The boundaries of the aforesaid zoning districts are shown electronically upon
the maps designated as “PlanNetZoning District Maps”. The zoning district
maps, along with all the notations, references, and other maps, along with all
the notations, references, and other information shown thereon, are a part of
this Ordinance and have the same force and effect as if said maps and all the
notations, references and other information shown thereon were all fully set
forth or described herein.
Article 402.2.
Boundary Determination:
Where uncertainty exists with respect to the boundaries of any zoning district
as shown on the zoning district maps, the following rules shall apply or as
determined by the zoning inspector.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 4-4
CHAPTER 4 - ZONING
402.2.1.
Where zoning district boundaries are indicated as approximately following street or
alley lines or the centerlines thereof, such lines shall be construed to be the zoning
district boundaries.
402.2.2.
Where zoning district boundaries are so indicated that they approximately
follow the lot lines, such lot lines shall be construed to be the zoning district
boundaries.
402.2.3.
Where zoning district boundaries are indicated as approximately following the
line of any stream, irrigation canal or other waterway or railroad right-of-way,
or the boundary line of public land, the center of such stream, canal or
waterway, or of such railroad right-of-way, or the boundary line of such public
land shall be construed to be the zoning district boundaries.
402.2.4.
Where a zoning district boundary divides a lot or parcel of land, the location of
such boundary, unless indicated by dimensions shown on the zoning district
maps, shall be determined by the use of the scale appearing on said maps.
Further, such zoning district line shall be treated as a property line for applying
all zoning district requirements.*13
402.2.5.
Where such boundaries have been changed by the Board of Supervisors
pursuant to Chapter 3, Section 304. of this Ordinance and where such changed
boundaries are shown on detailed maps, the detailed maps shall govern in an
event there is any difference between the boundaries shown on the zoning
district maps adopted as part of this Ordinance, or subsequent amendments
thereto, and the detailed maps.
Article 402.3.
Public Way Vacation:
Whenever any street, alley or other public way is vacated by the Board of
Supervisors, the zoning districts adjoining each side of such street, alley or
public way shall be considered as extended to the center of such vacation and
all area included in the vacation shall then and henceforth be subject to all
appropriate regulations of the extended zoning districts.
Article 402.4.
Zoning of Right-of-Way:
Zoning is applicable on all property, except public street rights-of-way. Use of
public street rights-of-way for other than public street purposes requires
approval by the appropriate agency.*14
Date of Revisions
*13 Added 6-5-96
*14
Added 07-20-07 — TA2007005
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 4-5
CHAPTER 4 - ZONING
Section 403. Lands Not Previously Zoned
Lands which for reason of law, change in ownership or for any other reason, come under the
authority of Maricopa County after this Ordinance becomes effective and which have not been
zoned prior thereto by any other jurisdiction having zoning authority, shall be subject to the
regulations of the Rural-190 Zoning District until such time as soon as practicable thereafter
public hearings are held as required by law for the expressed purpose of zoning such lands
pursuant to this Ordinance.
Section 404. Lands Previously Zoned by Other Jurisdictions
Lands which for reason of law, change in ownership or for any other reason, come under the
authority of Maricopa County after this Ordinance becomes effective and which have been zoned
prior thereto by another jurisdiction having zoning authority, shall retain such zoning until such
time as soon as practicable thereafter public hearings are held as required by law for the
expressed purpose of zoning such lands pursuant to this Ordinance.
Section 405. Lots Divided by Zoning District Boundaries
Whenever a lot of record existing at the effective date of this Ordinance or any applicable
subsequent amendment thereto is divided by a zoning district boundary, the regulations
applicable to the zoning district in which 50% or more of the lot area of such lot is located may
apply to the entire area of such lot, provided that the greatest distance from said zoning district
boundary to any lot line of such lot in the zoning district in which less than 50% of its area is
located shall not exceed 25 feet. Such distance shall be measured perpendicular to said zoning
district boundary.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 5-1
CHAPTER 5 - ZONING DISTRICTS AND
ZONING DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Chapter 5
| Rural Zoning Districts
Section 501.
RURAL-190 (Rural Zoning District - 190,000 Square Feet Per Dwelling Unit)
Article 501.1.
Purpose:
The principal purpose of this zoning district is to conserve and protect farms
and other open land uses, foster orderly growth in rural areas, prevent urban
and agricultural land use conflicts, and encourage sustainable development.
The primary purpose of requiring large minimum lots of not less than 190,000
square feet in area is to discourage small lot or residential subdivisions where
public facilities such as water, sewage disposal, parks and playgrounds, and
governmental services such as police and fire protection are not available or
could not reasonably be made available. Principal uses permitted in this
zoning district include both farm and non-farm residential uses, farms, and
recreational and institutional uses.*26
Article 501.2.
Use Regulations:
A building or premises shall be used only for the following purposes:
1. One single-family dwelling per lot of record.*5
2. Churches and houses of worship, including accessory columbariums
provided that the building area of the columbarium shall not exceed 10%
of the total building area of the church building(s).*8, *39
3. Gardens, community gardens and farms, as defined in Chapter 2.*37
4. Community residences, subject to the provisions and standards of Section
1207. *43
5. Schools, elementary and high.*19, *27, *39
6. Public and private forests and wildlife reservations.
7. Service to the public of water, gas, electricity, telephone and cable
television. The foregoing shall be deemed to include without limitation,
distribution, collector and feeder lines, pumping or booster stations along
pipelines, and substations along electric transmission lines. (This does not
include public utility treatment and generating plants.)*5, *18, *39
8. Golf courses including clubhouses located thereon, but not including
miniature courses or practice driving tees operated for commercial
purposes.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 5-2
CHAPTER 5 - ZONING DISTRICTS AND
ZONING DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
9. Libraries, museums, parks, playgrounds and community buildings,
provided such uses are conducted on a nonprofit basis.*1
10. Home occupations, subject to the following:*10, *39, *41
a. The entrepreneur of a home occupation shall reside in the dwelling
on the property in which the business operates.
b. The number of persons who are employed in connection with the
occupants, but who are non-residents of the dwelling on the
property in which the business operates, shall not exceed three,
unless the non-resident employees are an immediate family member
(spouse, child, sibling, parent, grandparent, grandchild, step parent,
step child, step sibling) whether related by adoption or blood. *42
c.
The business shall be conducted entirely within a completely
enclosed building, other than allowance for limited outdoor storage
per item ‘n’ below. Physical business activity other than storage may
occur within the area described per item ‘n’ below except that no
mechanical equipment or power tools shall be operated out of doors,
and in no instance shall any outdoor activity exceed the height of
screening and not to exceed eight (8) feet.
d. The home occupation shall not interfere with the delivery of utilities
or other services to the area.
e. The business shall not generate any noise (if the noise would be
considered to have an adverse impact on the surrounding residential
neighborhood per the Maricopa County Noise Ordinance), vibration,
smoke, dust, odors, heat, glare, or electrical interference with radio
or television transmission in the area that would exceed that
normally produced by a dwelling unit in a zoning district used solely
for residential purposes.
f.
No mechanical equipment or power tools shall be used, except that
used for normal household purposes if the noise would be
considered to have an adverse impact on the surrounding residential
neighborhood per the Maricopa County Noise Ordinance.
g.
No toxic, explosive, flammable, radioactive, or other similar material
shall be used, sold, or stored on the site.
h. There shall be no change to the residential appearance of the
premises, except that a separate business entrance shall be
permitted. A maximum four (4) square foot sign shall be permitted,
and the sign shall otherwise meet the requirements of Article 1402.2
of this Ordinance.
i.
Unless a passenger vehicle accessory to the residence or an
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 5-3
CHAPTER 5 - ZONING DISTRICTS AND
ZONING DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
employee, not more than one vehicle used in commerce shall be
permitted in connection with the home occupation. Said vehicle shall
be stored in an enclosed garage.
j.
The number of customers, clients, or students on the premises shall
not exceed five at any time.
k.
No non-resident employees, customers, clients, or students shall be
permitted on the premises for business purposes between the hours
of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.
l.
Deliveries from commercial suppliers (vehicle weight greater than
10,000 lbs.) shall not restrict traffic circulation, and shall occur
between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
m. If the home occupation requires that any non-resident employees,
customers, clients, or students visit the property, a minimum of one
(1) additional off-street parking space shall be provided per Chapter
11, Section 1102. of this Ordinance. The maximum number of
additional off-street parking spaces permitted shall be six.
n. The outdoor storage of materials shall be limited to a maximum of
25% of the total lot area and shall not be located within any required
front or street side yard. Any outdoor storage shall be completely
fenced with a solid masonry wall or wood fence to obstruct the view
to a height equal to the elevation of the tallest materials to be stored
with a maximum height of stored materials of eight feet.
o. All outdoor lighting shall be shielded so as not to direct or reflect light
upon adjoining land, shall not be constructed within 20 feet of any
adjoining property under other ownership, and shall not exceed 20
feet in height.
p. Deleted per TA2019003 – effective 11-6-20*42
q. If these conditions cannot be met, a Special Use Permit per Section
1301 of this Ordinance shall be required.*42
11. Plant nurseries and greenhouses for the propagation, cultivation and
wholesale distribution of plants produced on the premises, provided such
uses do not include retail sales. Open storage is limited to plants or
packaged fertilizer, and the buildings and structures used in connection
therewith set back from all lot lines a distance of not less than 50 feet.
12. Corrals for the keeping of horses.
13. Fences or freestanding walls per Article 1111.5 of this Ordinance, except
for entry feature structures to a residence, ranch or farm, subject to the
following:*24
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 5-4
CHAPTER 5 - ZONING DISTRICTS AND
ZONING DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
1. The entry feature shall be over a driveway, and limited to one entry
feature per parcel;
1. The entry feature shall not contain lighting fixtures.
1. The entry feature shall observe a maximum height of 24’, a maximum
width of 30’, and the structural support components shall be no
greater than 3’ in diameter or 3’ square.
1. The entry feature shall observe a minimum opening of 12’ in width
and 16’ in height;
1. Any signage incorporated into the entry feature shall be a maximum
of 24 square feet, shall be contained within the exterior dimensions
of the entry feature, and shall not obstruct the minimum opening
dimensions prescribed in Article 501.2.19.4 above.
Note: Those utility companies which are regulated by the Arizona Corporation Commission may
be allowed increased fence heights due to national, state or local safety standards.*7
14. Accessory dwelling unit (ADU)/guest house.*22, *23, *33
a. Only one ADU/guest house shall be permitted where at least one, but
no more than one, single family residence exists on the property.*23
b. An ADU/guest house may not be rented or leased separate from the
primary structure.*23
24’ max
16’ min
3’
max
12’ min
30’ max
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 5-5
CHAPTER 5 - ZONING DISTRICTS AND
ZONING DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
c.
An ADU/guest house shall not have a separate address or mailbox
from the principal dwelling.*23
15. Accessory buildings and uses customarily incidental to the above uses,
including:*11, *31
a. Amateur radio antennas and antenna support structures.*39
b. Private swimming pool along with incidental installations, such as
pumps and filters, provided the following standards, and those in the
current County Building Code, are met and maintained: *21
1.
Such pool and incidental installations are located in other than
the required front yard.
2.
Such pools are set back from all lot lines a distance of not less
than three feet.
3.
All fish ponds and other contained bodies of water, either above
or below ground level, with the container being 18 inches or
more in depth and wider than eight feet at any point measured
on the long axis shall conform to the location and enclosure
requirements for swimming pools as provided in the current
County Building Code.*21, *39
4.
Irrigation and storm water retention facilities and the water
features in public parks and golf courses are exempt from the
fencing requirements for swimming pool barriers as provided in
the current County Building Code.*21
5.
It is the responsibility of the property owner to ensure that any
pool enclosure fence and its appurtenances (e.g., gates, latching
devices, locks, etc.) are maintained in safe and good working
order. No person shall alter or remove any portion of a
swimming pool enclosure except to repair, reconstruct or
replace the enclosure in compliance with provisions of
swimming pool barriers as provided in the current County
Building Code.*6, *7, *9, *11, *12, *17, *21
c.
Private tennis court or private outdoor recreational structures,
provided that such court or structure is not constructed within 20
feet of any adjoining property under separate ownership, and
provided that tennis court fences or walls or recreational structures
shall not exceed 14 feet in height.*2, *40
d. Servant's quarters with kitchen facilities provided that the servant's
quarters are integral to the primary dwelling unit and does not
exceed 35% of its area.**11
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 5-6
CHAPTER 5 - ZONING DISTRICTS AND
ZONING DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
e. Accessory use lights provided that a permitted accessory use exists.
The lights must be located on the property and shielded so as not to
direct or reflect light upon adjoining land, shall not be constructed
within 20 feet of any adjoining property under other ownership, and
shall not exceed 20 feet in height.*40
f.
Public equestrian uses accessory to a single-family residence limited
to the following:*25
1.
The boarding of up to five (5) horses and/or other equine not
owned by the private property owner and/or resident.
Documentation of ownership shall be maintained when more
than five (5) horses and/or other equine are kept on the
property.
2.
Non-commercial public activities (no admission fee shall be
charged) involving up to a maximum of 24 persons (including
staff, participants and spectators).
3.
All structures shall meet minimum setback requirements and
the maximum lot coverage requirement. All parcels must meet
minimum lot area and width requirements.
4.
Any public equestrian use that cannot meet these conditions will
require a Special Use Permit in accordance with Article
1301.1.14 of this Ordinance.*39
g.
Renewable energy systems as set forth in Section 1206 of this
Ordinance. Where renewable energy systems involve the generation
of storage of electricity, only grid-connected or off-grid systems are
permitted.*26
h. Roadside stands offering for sale only farm products produced on the
premises.*34
16. Emergency housing: Temporary shelter required due to a natural disaster
or fire or other circumstances determined to constitute an emergency by
the zoning inspector. *11, *15
17. Model home sales complex, temporary real estate offices and temporary
construction administrative offices/yard complex - as part of an
approved, recorded subdivision provided that the following conditions
are met:*21, *38,*39
a. The uses are only associated with the developer/owner and
subdivision or project in which they are located.*39
b. Upon sale of the development, cessation of the need for the use (95%
buildout), or cessation of the use, all structures, modifications to
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 5-7
CHAPTER 5 - ZONING DISTRICTS AND
ZONING DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
structures and uses related to the temporary facility shall be
removed. Cessation of use shall been deemed to have occurred if
there have been no active building permits for a one (1) year period
of time.*39
c.
Those uses of structures allowed shall meet all building code
requirements.
d. All necessary permits must be issued prior to placement on the site.
e. Temporary flagpoles of up to 60 feet in height are allowed for model
home sales complexes. These temporary flagpoles must be removed
at the cessation of use as outlined above.*39
f.
Signage shall follow the General Sign Regulations, Residential
Identification, and development standards for Commercial On-Site
Wall signs and Commercial On-Site Freestanding signs. No Electronic
Message Displays are allowed. *38
g.
All items stored on site shall only be those required for the
construction on site.
h. The allowed uses may encroach into setback areas.
18. Home daycare for up to four (4) children with the following
stipulations:*29
a. The owner/operator of the daycare shall reside in the dwelling unit
in which the daycare operates.*42
b. The rear and/or side yard is enclosed and provides a minimum of 75
sq. ft. per each child occupying the outdoor activity area.
c.
There shall be no signs, advertising, display or other indications of
the daycare on the premises.
d. The total number of children under compensated care shall not
exceed four (4) at any one time.
e. The residential address of the business shall not be listed in any
business directly or in any advertising.
f.
There shall be no change to the residential appearance of the
premises, including the creation of separate or exclusive business
entrance(s).
g.
No pick-up or drop off of children shall be permitted on the premises
between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.
19. Offices for homeowners associations (HOA) and other HOA related uses
such recreation centers and ancillary uses, maintenance facilities, storage
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 5-8
CHAPTER 5 - ZONING DISTRICTS AND
ZONING DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
facilities, horse stables and other facilities for the benefit of subdivision /
master-planned community residents.*39
Article 501.3.
Height Regulations:
The height of buildings shall not exceed 30 feet.*30
Article 501.4.
Yard Regulations:
The required yards as follows:
1. Front Yard:
a. There shall be a front yard having a depth of not less than 60 feet.
a. For through lots, a front yard shall be provided along both front lot
lines.
a. Yards along each street side of corner lots shall have a width equal to
not less than one half the depth of the required front yard. Yards
along each street side of corner lots shall otherwise conform with
regulations applicable to front yards.
1. Side Yard: There shall be a side yard on each side of a building having
a width of not less than 30 feet.
1. Rear Yard: There shall be a rear yard having a depth of not less than 60
feet.
Article 501.5.
Intensity of Use Regulations:
The intensity of use regulations are as follows:*32
1. Lot Area: Each lot shall have a minimum lot area of 190,000 square
feet.
1. Lot Width: Each lot shall have a minimum lot area of 300 feet.
1. Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit: The minimum lot area per dwelling unit
shall be 190,000 square feet.
2. Lot Coverage: The maximum lot coverage shall be 10% of the lot
area.*44
Article 501.6.
Parking Regulations:
The parking regulations are as provided in Chapter 11, Section 1102.*26
Article 501.7.
Sign Regulations:
The sign regulations are as provided in Chapter 14, Section 1401.*26
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 5-9
CHAPTER 5 - ZONING DISTRICTS AND
ZONING DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Date of Revisions
*1
Revised 1-24-72
*16
Effective 5-16-98
*31
Effective 9-30-11 – TA2011001
*2
Added 4-7-75
*17
Effective 8-6-99
*32
Effective 10-19-11 – TA2011013
**3
Deleted 8-11-75
*18
Effective 11-19-99
*33
Effective 10-19-11 – TA2011014
*4
Revised 1-3-77
*19
Effective 11-19-99
*34
Effective 10-19-11 – TA2011017
*5
Revised 11-8-82
*20
Deleted 11-19-99
*35
Effective 1-11-12 – TA2010012
*6
Revised 8-15-83
*21
Effective 7-07-06 – TA2003005
*36
Effective 1-11-12 - TA2007018
*7
Revised 4-1-85
*22
Effective 1-19-2007 – TA2003002
*37
Effective 7-17-13 – TA2012011
*8
Revised 4-10-89
*23
Effective 11-14-2008 – TA2008005
*38
Effective 12-12-12 – TA2012024
*9
Revised 1-04-90
*24
Effective 7-17-09 – TA2009008
*39
Approved 10-8-14 – TA2014006
*10
Revised 9-12-90
*25
Effective 9-18-09 – TA2008006
*40
Approved 5-4-16 – TA2015004
**10
New 9-12-90
*26
Effective 11-19-10 – TA2009014
*41
Effective 5-26-17 – TA2016007
**10
Renumbered 9-12-90
*27
Effective 11-3-10 – TA2010013
*42
Effective 11-6-20 – TA2019003
*11
Revised 2-20-94
*28
Effective 12-28-10 – TA2010017
*43
Effective 3-11-22 – TA2020001
**11
Added 2-20-94
*29
Effective 2-11-2011 – TA2010014
*44
Effective 11-1-23 – TA2023003
*15
Revised 6-5-96
*30
Effective 3-16-11 – TA2010022
Section 502.
RURAL-70 (Rural Zoning District - 190,000 Square Feet Per Dwelling Unit)
Article 502.1.
Purpose:
The principal purpose of this zoning district is to conserve and protect farms
and other open land uses, foster orderly growth in rural areas, prevent urban
and agricultural land use conflicts, and encourage sustainable development.
The primary purpose of requiring large minimum lots of not less than 70,000
square feet in area is to discourage small lot or residential subdivisions where
public facilities such as water, sewage disposal, parks and playgrounds, and
governmental services such as police and fire protection are not available or
could not reasonably be made available. Principal uses permitted in this
zoning district include both farm and nonfarm residential uses, farms and
recreational institutional uses.*2
Article 502.2.
Use Regulations:
The use regulations are the same as those in the Rural-190 Zoning District.
Article 502.3.
Height Regulations:
The height of buildings shall not exceed 30 feet.*3
Article 502.4.
Yard Regulations:
The required yards as follows:
1. Front Yard:
a. There shall be a front yard having a depth of not less than 60 feet.
a. For through lots, a front yard shall be provided along both front
lot lines.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 5-10
CHAPTER 5 - ZONING DISTRICTS AND
ZONING DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
a. Yards along each street side of corner lots shall have a width
equal to not less than one half the depth of the required front
yard. Yards along each street side of corner lots shall otherwise
conform with regulations applicable to front yards.
1. Side Yard: There shall be a side yard on each side of a building having
a width of not less than 30 feet.
1. Rear Yard: There shall be a rear yard having a depth of not less than 60
feet.
Article 502.5.
Intensity of Use Regulations:
The intensity of use regulations are as follows:*4
1. Lot Area: Each lot shall have a minimum lot area of 70,000 square feet.
1. Lot Width: Each lot shall have a minimum lot area of 250 feet.
1. Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit: The minimum lot area per dwelling unit
shall be 70,000 square feet.
2. Lot Coverage: The maximum lot coverage shall be 15% of the lot
area.*5
Article 502.6.
Parking Regulations:
The parking regulations are as provided in Chapter 11, Section 1102.*2
Article 502.7.
Sign Regulations:
The sign regulations are as provided in Chapter 14, Section 1401.*2
Date of Revisions
*1
Revised 10-13-70
*4
Effective 10-19-11 – TA2011013
*2
Effective 11-19-10 TA2009014
*5
Effective 11-1-23 – TA2023003
*3
Effective 3-16-11 TA2010022
Section 503.
RURAL-43 (Rural Zoning District - One Acre Per Dwelling Unit)
Article 503.1.
Purpose:
The principal purpose of this zoning district is to conserve and protect farms
and other open land uses, foster orderly growth in rural and agricultural
areas, prevent urban and agricultural land use conflicts, and encourage
sustainable development, but when governmental facilities and services,
public utilities and street access are available, or can reasonably be made
available, applications for change of this zoning district to any single-family
residential zoning district will be given favorable consideration. Principal uses
permitted in this zoning district include both farm and non-farm residential
uses, farms and recreational and institutional uses.*2
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 5-11
CHAPTER 5 - ZONING DISTRICTS AND
ZONING DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Article 503.2.
Use Regulations:
The use regulations are the same as those in the Rural-190 Zoning District.
Article 503.3.
Height Regulations:
The height of buildings shall not exceed 30 feet.*3
Article 503.4.
Yard Regulations:
The required yards as follows:
1. Front Yard:
a.
There shall be a front yard having a depth of not less than 40 feet.
a.
For through lots, a front yard shall be provided along both front lot
lines.
a.
Yards along each street side of corner lots shall have a width equal to
not less than one half the depth of the required front yard. Yards
along each street side of corner lots shall otherwise conform with
regulations applicable to front yards.
1. Side Yard: There shall be a side yard on each side of a building having a
width of not less than 30 feet.
1. Rear Yard: There shall be a rear yard having a depth of not less than 40
feet.
Article 503.5.
Intensity of Use Regulations:
The intensity of use regulations are as follows:*4
1. Lot Area: Each lot shall have a minimum lot area of one acre.
1. Lot Width: Each lot shall have a minimum lot area of 145 feet.
1. Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit: The minimum lot area per dwelling unit shall
be one acre.
2. Lot Coverage: The maximum lot coverage shall be 25% of the lot area.*5
Article 503.6.
Parking Regulations:
The parking regulations are as provided in Chapter 11, Section 1102.*2
Article 503.7.
Sign Regulations:
The sign regulations are as provided in Chapter 14, Section 1401.*2
Date of Revisions
*1
Revised 10-13-70
*4
Effective 10-19-11 – TA2011013
*2
Effective 11-19-10 TA2009014
*5
Effective 7-17-13 – TA2012033
*3
Effective 3-16-11 TA2010022
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 21, 2025October 17, 2025
page 5-1
CHAPTER 5 - RURAL ZONING DISTRICTS ZONING DISTRICTS AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Chapter 5
| Zoning Districts and Development
Standards
Section 501.
Purpose of Rural and Residential Zoning Districts
Article 501.1.
Rural Zoning Districts
501.1.1.
RURAL-190 (190,000 square feet), RURAL-70 (70,000 square feet) &
RURAL-43 (43,560 square feet): The principal purpose of these zoning
districts is to conserve and protect farms and other open land uses, foster
orderly growth in rural areas, prevent urban and agricultural land use
conflicts, and encourage sustainable development. The primary purpose of
requiring large minimum lots of not less than the minimum lot area required
in each zoning district is to discourage small lot or residential subdivisions
where public facilities such as water, sewage disposal, parks and
playgrounds, and governmental services such as police and fire protection
are not available or could not reasonably be made available. Principal uses
permitted in these zoning districts include both farm and non-farm
residential uses, farms and recreational and institutional uses.
Article 501.2.
Single-Family Residential Zoning Districts
501.2.1.
R1–35 (35,000 square feet), R1-18 (18,000 square feet), R1-10 (10,000
square feet), R1-8 (8,000 square feet), R1-7 (7,000 square feet) & R1-6
(6,000 square feet):The principal purpose of these zoning districts is to
conserve, protect, and encourage sustainable single-family residential
development where minimum lots of not less than the minimum lot area
required in each zoning district, are suitable and appropriate taking into
consideration existing conditions, including present use of land, present lot
sizes, future land use needs, and the availability of public utilities. Principal
uses permitted in these zoning districts include single-family dwellings,
churches, schools, parks, playgrounds, and other community facilities.
Article 501.3.
Multiple-Family Residential Zoning Districts
501.3.1.
R-2 (Two-Family Residential Zoning District). The principal purpose of this
zoning district is to provide for the efficient use of land and facilities by
single-family attached or detached dwellings and limited multiple-family
residential projects, taking into consideration sustainable development
practices, and existing conditions, including present use of land, future land
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 21, 2025October 17, 2025
page 5-2
CHAPTER 5 - RURAL ZONING DISTRICTS ZONING DISTRICTS AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
use needs, and the availability of public utilities. The minimum lot required
is 6,000 square feet in area, and the minimum lot area required for each
dwelling unit is 4,000 square feet. Principal uses permitted in this zoning
district include single-family, duplexes, limited multiple-family dwellings,
and other uses permitted in the single-family residential zoning district.
501.3.2.
R-3, R-4, & R-5 (Multiple-Family Residential Zoning Districts): The principal
purpose of these zoning districts is to provide for multiple-family residential
developments in locations which are suitable and appropriate, taking into
consideration existing conditions, sustainable development practices, and
including present use of land, future land use needs, and the availability of
public utilities. The minimum lot area required for each dwelling unit in each
of the districts is as follows: 3,000 square feet for R-3; 2,000 square feet for
R-4; and 1,000 square feet for R-5. Principal uses permitted in these zoning
districts include two-family dwellings, duplexes, multiple-family dwellings,
dormitories, and the uses permitted in the single-family residential zoning
district. The R-5 zoning district also allows all land uses within the C-1 zoning
district.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 21, 2025October 17, 2025
page 5-3
CHAPTER 5 - RURAL ZONING DISTRICTS ZONING DISTRICTS AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Section 502.
Rural & Residential Zoning Districts Development Standards
Development Standards
RU-190
RU-70
RU-43
R1-35
R1-18
R1-10
R1-8
R1-7
R1-6
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-5
Additional Notes
Lot Area Minimum (sq. ft.)
190,000
70,000
43,560
35,000
18,000
10,000
8,000
7,000
6,000
6,000
6,000
6,000
6,000
Minimum Lot Area required for each dwelling
unit in the Multiple Family Zoning Districts
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
See figures.
Lot Width Minimum (ft.)
300
250
145
145
120
80
80
70
60
60
60
60
60
Lot Coverage Maximum
10%
15%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
45%
50%
60%
60%
60%
60%
Primary Structure
Front (ft.) – setback minimums
60
60
40
40
10 or
18**
10 or
18**
10 or
18**
10 or
18**
10 or
18**
10
10
10
10
See figures.
** 10’ minimum but no less than 18’ to
the plane of the front-facing garage.
Through lots require a front yard on both
front lot lines.
Side, street (ft.) – setback minimums
30
30
20
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
See figures.
Side, interior (ft.) – setback minimums
30
30
20
20
10
7
7
5
5
5
5
5
5
See figures.
Rear (ft.) – setback minimums
60
60
40
40
30
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
See figures.
Height Maximum (ft.)
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
40
40
40
See figures.
Accessory Structure Setbacks and Rear/Side Yard Lot Coverage
Front (ft.) – setback minimums
60
60
40
40
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
See figures.
Side, street (ft.) – setback minimums
30
30
20
20
15
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
See figures.
Side, interior (ft.) – setback minimums
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
See figures.
Rear (ft.) – setback minimums
3
See figures.
Rear and Side Required Yard Coverage
Maximum
30%
See Section 806
Height Maximum (ft.)
Same as Primary Structure
See figures.
Additional Regulations
All Rural & Residential Zoning Districts - Other than at the discretion of the Zoning Inspector, a parcel shall not receive electrical power without the establishment of a primary or principal use.
R-2, R-3, R-4, and R-5 (Two-Family, Multiple-Family Residential Zoning Districts) - All multi-family residential development in the R-2, R-3, R-4, or R-5 Zoning Districts shall be subject to a plan of development approval as set
forth in the provisions of this Ordinance. A single building with no more than four units on one lot of record shall not require a POD. PODs shall be required in two-family and multi-family zoning districts when there are two or
more buildings on a single parcel. Multi-family uses, which were developed prior to September 22, 2008 shall be exempt from the Plan of Development process; provided, however, that in the event all two-family or multi-
family structures located on the property are removed or destroyed in excess of 75% of value, the property shall, without regard to the original date of development, require a Plan of Development.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 21, 2025October 17, 2025
page 5-4
CHAPTER 5 - RURAL ZONING DISTRICTS ZONING DISTRICTS AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Figure 1 — Rural and Residential Zoning Setbacks
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 21, 2025October 17, 2025
page 5-5
CHAPTER 5 - RURAL ZONING DISTRICTS ZONING DISTRICTS AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Figure 2 — R-2 Zoning Setbacks and minimum lot area per dwelling unit.
Number of Dwelling Units (DU) calculation: Total Lot area (sq. ft.) divided by the minimum lot
area (sq. ft.).
Example 8,000 sq. ft. lot area / 4,000 sq. ft. min lot area per DU per zoning development standard
= 2 dwelling units.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 21, 2025October 17, 2025
page 5-6
CHAPTER 5 - RURAL ZONING DISTRICTS ZONING DISTRICTS AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Figure 3 — R-3 Zoning Setbacks and minimum lot area per dwelling unit.
Number of Dwelling Units (DU) calculation: Total Lot area (sq. ft.) divided by the minimum lot
area (sq. ft.).
Example 9,000 sq. ft. lot area / 3,000 sq. ft. min lot area per DU per zoning development standard
= 3 dwelling units.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 21, 2025October 17, 2025
page 5-7
CHAPTER 5 - RURAL ZONING DISTRICTS ZONING DISTRICTS AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Figure 4 — R-4 Zoning Setbacks and minimum lot area per dwelling unit.
Number of Dwelling Units (DU) calculation: Total Lot area (sq. ft.) divided by the minimum lot
area (sq. ft.).
Example 8,000 sq. ft. lot area / 2,000 sq. ft. min lot area per DU per zoning development standard
= 4 dwelling units.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 21, 2025October 17, 2025
page 5-8
CHAPTER 5 - RURAL ZONING DISTRICTS ZONING DISTRICTS AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Figure 5 — R-5 Zoning Setbacks and minimum lot area per dwelling unit.
Number of Dwelling Units (DU) calculation: Total Lot area (sq. ft.) divided by the minimum lot
area (sq. ft.).
Example 8,000 sq. ft. lot area / 1,000 sq. ft. min lot area per DU per zoning development standard
= 8 dwelling units.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 21, 2025October 17, 2025
page 5-9
CHAPTER 5 - RURAL ZONING DISTRICTS ZONING DISTRICTS AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Section 503.
Purpose of Commercial Zoning Districts
Article 503.1.
Commercial Zoning Districts
503.1.1.
C-O (Commercial Office Zoning District): The principal purpose of this
zoning district is to provide for well-designed and attractive business and
professional office facilities on sites in appropriate locations while
encouraging sustainable building practices. This zoning district would
constitute a transition between other commercial land uses and residential
neighborhoods, providing a buffer between residential neighborhoods and
nonresidential areas. Along major transit corridors, this district is intended
to achieve walkable and transit-oriented office and professional uses.
Principal uses in this zoning district include professional, semi-professional,
and business office uses.
503.1.2.
C-S (Planning Shopping Center Zoning District): The principal purpose of
this zoning district is to provide for well-designed and attractive retail
shopping facilities on sites not less than five (5) acres in size and in
appropriate locations to serve adjacent and nearby residential
neighborhoods while encouraging sustainable building practices. Permitted
uses in this zoning district include the retail sale of merchandise and services
customarily considered as shopping center uses.
503.1.3.
C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial Zoning District): The principal purpose of
this zoning district is to provide for smaller shops and services in convenient
locations to meet the daily needs of families in the immediate residential
neighborhoods.
503.1.4.
C-2 (Intermediate Commercial Zoning District): The principal purpose of
this zoning district is to provide for the sale of commodities, the
performance of services, and other activities in locations for which the
market area extends beyond the immediate residential neighborhoods
while encouraging sustainable building practices.
503.1.5.
C-3 (General Commercial Zoning District):The principal purpose of this
zoning district is to provide for commercial uses concerned with wholesale
or distribution activities in locations where there is adequate access to
major streets or highways.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 21, 2025October 17, 2025
page 5-10
CHAPTER 5 - RURAL ZONING DISTRICTS ZONING DISTRICTS AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Section 504.
Commercial Zoning Districts Development Standards
Development Standards
C-O
C-S
C-1
C-2
C-3
Additional Notes
Lot Area Minimum (sq. ft.)
12,000
217,800 (5 acres)
6,000
6,000
6,000
Lot Width Minimum (ft.)
60
N/A
60
60
60
Lot Coverage Maximum
35%
25%
60%
60%
60%
All Structures
Front (ft.) – setback minimums
10
10
10
10
10
*See figures.
Through lots require a front yard on
both front lot lines.
Side, street (ft.) – setback minimums
15
50
15
10
10
*See figures.
Side, interior (ft.) – setback minimums
5
50
None required /
10 (adjacent to Rural or
Residential Zoning District)
None required /
10 (adjacent to Rural or
Residential Zoning District)
None required /
10 (adjacent to Rural or Residential
Zoning District)
*See figures.
Rear (ft.) – setback minimums
5
50
None required
25 (adjacent to Rural or
Residential Zoning District)
None required
25 (adjacent to Rural or
Residential Zoning District)
None required
25 (adjacent to Rural or Residential
Zoning District)
*See figures.
Height Maximum (ft.)
30 /
within 20’ of Rural or
Residential Zoning District, no
building to exceed 15’ in height
40
40
40
40
*See figures.
Additional Regulations for All Commercial Zoning Districts
Dust Control
In any multi-phase commercial project, all areas of a parcel which have been graded or the surface disturbed in any way, and which are not currently under development shall be
revegetated or surfaced to minimize wind-blown dust by a plan approved by the Department of Planning and Development.
Enclosure of Uses
All activity (except required on-site parking, loading or unloading) including incidental or accessory storage and display area shall be within a completely enclosed building, unless
otherwise specifically noted herein.
Landscaping/Buffering
There shall be a solid fence, wall and suitable planting minimum six feet in height where the side or rear lot lines or boundaries of the lot area adjacent to a rural or residential zoning
district.
The required front yard All street frontage of the lot shall be landscaped with drought-tolerant plants including grass, trees, shrubs or natural vegetation. There shall be a minimum of one
tree and three shrubs every 20 feet. Trees shall be a minimum 2-inch caliper at the time of installation.
The required side yards shall be landscaped with drought-tolerant plants including trees, shrubs or natural vegetation. At least 4% of the gross parking area shall be landscaped with grass,
trees, shrubs, or natural vegetation.
Any part of the lot not used for buildings, other structures, parking and vehicular and pedestrian access shall be landscaped with grass, trees, shrubs, xeriscaping or natural vegetation.
All landscaped areas shall be provided with water bibs or an automatic sprinkler system.
Parking/Loading/Unloading
Parking regulations are as provided in Chapter 8, Section 802. Loading and Unloading regulations are as provided in Chapter 8, Section 803.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 21, 2025October 17, 2025
page 5-11
CHAPTER 5 - RURAL ZONING DISTRICTS ZONING DISTRICTS AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Additional Regulations for All Commercial Zoning Districts
Plan of Development
All commercial development shall be subject to a plan of development approval as set forth in the provisions of this Ordinance.
Commercial uses which were developed prior to September 22, 2008 shall be exempt from the Plan of Development process; provided, however, that in the event all commercial structures
on the property are removed or destroyed in excess of 75% of value, the property shall, without regard to the original date of development, require a Plan of Development.
Outdoor Lighting
Any outdoor lighting shall be in conformance with provisions in Chapter 8, Section812. All outdoor lighting shall be placed so as to reflect light away from any adjoining rural or residential
zoning district.
Screening
All refuse collection areas shall be screened from view from all public streets. The front property line shall be screened with a 3’ screen wall, berm or hedge to minimize headlight glare.
Signage
The sign regulations are as provided in Chapter 11, Section 1103.
Walls and Perimeter Screening
A minimum 6’ solid wall is required adjacent to Rural or Residential zoning or any alley. Commercial outdoor uses shall be enclosed to a height of not less than 6’ with walls, fences of view
obscuring material.
No outdoor commercial use shall encroach into any required setback adjacent to street and storage of material shall not exceed the height of screening.
Access gate in said solid wall shall be constructed of view-obscuring material.
C-S Zoning District Specific Regulations
Landscaping
Any part of the shopping center site not used for buildings or other structures, loading and access ways, or pedestrian walks shall be landscaped with grass, trees, or shrubs or natural
vegetation.
Ownership
The shopping center site and the buildings and appurtenant facilities shall be in a single ownership, or under management or supervision of a central authority; or under management or
supervision of a central authority; or they shall be subject to other supervisory lease or ownership control as may be necessary to carry out the purpose of regulations relating to the C-S
Zoning District.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 21, 2025October 17, 2025
page 5-12
CHAPTER 5 - RURAL ZONING DISTRICTS ZONING DISTRICTS AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Figure 6 — Commercial Zoning Setbacks
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 21, 2025October 17, 2025
page 5-13
CHAPTER 5 - RURAL ZONING DISTRICTS ZONING DISTRICTS AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Section 505.
Purpose of Industrial Zoning Districts
Article 505.1.
Industrial Zoning Districts
505.1.1.
IND-1 (Light Industrial Zoning District): The principal purpose of this zoning
district is to provide sufficient space in appropriate locations for certain
types of business and manufacturing uses that are quiet, attractive and well-
designed including appropriate screening and/or landscape buffers to afford
locations close to existing residential uses, so that people can live and work
in the same neighborhood.
505.1.2.
IND-2 (General Industrial Zoning District): The principal purpose of this
zoning district is to provide for light industrial uses in locations which are
suitable and appropriate taking into consideration the land uses on adjacent
or nearby properties, access to a major street or highway, rail service or
other means of transportation, and the availability of public utilities while
encouraging sustainable development practices. Principal uses permitted in
this zoning district include the manufacture, compounding, processing,
packaging or treatment of materials which do not cause or produce
objectionable effects that would impose hazard to adjacent or other
properties by reason of smoke, soot, dust, radiation, odor, noise, vibration,
heat, glare, toxic fumes, or other conditions that would affect adversely the
public health, safety and general welfare.
505.1.3.
IND-3 (Heavy Industrial Zoning District): The principal purpose of this
zoning district is to provide for the most intense industrial uses in locations
which are suitable and appropriate, taking into consideration land uses on
adjacent or nearby properties, access to a major street or highway, rail
service, or other means of transportation. Principal uses permitted in this
zoning district include the industrial uses that are not permitted in any other
zoning district.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 21, 2025October 17, 2025
page 5-14
CHAPTER 5 - RURAL ZONING DISTRICTS ZONING DISTRICTS AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Section 506.
Industrial Zoning Districts Development Standards
Development Standards
IND-1
IND-2
IND-3
Additional Notes
Lot Area Minimum (sq. ft.)
35,000
6,000
6,000
Lot Width Minimum (ft.)
150
60
60
Lot Coverage Maximum
60%
All Structures
Front (ft.) – setback minimums
20
*See figures. Through lots require
a front yard on both front lot lines.
Side, street (ft.) – setback minimums
10
*See figures.
Side, interior (ft.) – setback minimums
None required / 10 (adjacent to Rural or Residential Zoning District)
*See figures.
Rear (ft.) – setback minimums
10
25 /
10 (adjacent to Rural or Residential Zoning District)
25 /
10 (adjacent to Rural or Residential Zoning District)
*See figures.
Height Maximum (ft.)
60
*See figures.
Additional Regulations for All Industrial Zoning Districts
Dust Control
In any multi-phase industrial project, all areas of a parcel which have been graded or the surface disturbed in any way, and which are not currently under development shall be revegetated
or surfaced to minimize wind-blown dust by a method or plan approved by the Department of Planning and Development.
Enclosure of Uses
In the IND-1 and IND-2 zoning districts, all uses except for parking, loading, unloading or storage shall be conducted within a completely enclosed building. In the IND-3 zoning district, all
uses may be conducted outdoors.
Landscaping/Buffering
There shall be a solid fence, wall and suitable planting six feet in height where the side or rear lot lines or boundaries of the lot are adjacent to a rural or residential zoning district. All street
frontage of the lot shall be landscaped with drought-tolerant plants including trees, shrubs or natural vegetation. There shall be a minimum of one tree and three shrubs every 20 feet.
Trees shall be a minimum 2-inch caliper at the time of installation.
The required side yards shall be landscaped with drought-tolerant plants including trees, shrubs or natural vegetation. 4% of the gross parking area shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs,
or natural vegetation. Any part of the lot not used for buildings, other structures, parking and vehicular and pedestrian access shall be landscaped with grass, trees, shrubs, xeriscaping or
natural vegetation. All landscaped areas shall be provided with water bibs or an automatic sprinkler system.
Plan of Development
All industrial development shall be subject to a plan of development approval as set forth in the provisions of this Ordinance.
Outdoor Lighting
For industrial uses, which were developed prior to October 15, 1984, an as-built plan which requires a zoning clearance may serve as the plan of development. When the owner or
authorized agent wants to make a change to the property, this as-built plan indicating the changes may be submitted. The Zoning Inspector may approve changes as long as any expansion
is part of the existing land use, does not conflict with existing codes, does not exceed one hundred percent of the area of the original development, and does not adversely impact the
surrounding areas or drainage conditions. These changes may include, but are not limited to parking covers, interior remodeling, additions to the buildings or new buildings.
Screening
All refuse collection areas shall be screened from view from all public streets. The front property line shall be screened with a 3’ screen wall, berm or hedge to minimize headlight glare.
Signage
The sign regulations are as provided in Chapter11, Section 1104.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 21, 2025October 17, 2025
page 5-15
CHAPTER 5 - RURAL ZONING DISTRICTS ZONING DISTRICTS AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Additional Regulations for All Industrial Zoning Districts
Walls and Perimeter
Screening
Industrial sites and/or uses shall be enclosed to provide effective site screening from adjoining properties, uses or streets as follows:
• Adjacent to any rural or residential zone, automobile parking shall be screened from view.
• A solid masonry wall, not less than six feet in height shall be required along and adjacent to any side or rear property line abutting any rural or residential zone boundary, or any alley
abutting such zone boundary.
• Further, any access gates shall be constructed of view-obscuring material to provide effective site screening.
• The perimeter of any portion of a site which any outdoor use of any industrial nature is permitted shall be enclosed to a height of not less than six feet by building walls, walls or fences
of any view-obscuring material.
• No outdoor industrial use or enclosure thereof shall encroach into any required setback area adjacent to any street, nor shall any storage products or materials exceed the height of
any such enclosure.
IND-1 Zoning District Specific Regulations
Landscaping
Required yards adjacent to any street shall be landscaped and shall not be occupied by any use or structure including parking or loading spaces except for drives and roadways, signs and
lighting as permitted in this Ordinance.
Any part of a site not used for buildings, parking, driveways, storage, loading, sidewalks, etc. shall be landscaped and maintained.
Landscaped areas shall include an approved mixture of drought tolerant or other plant materials, and organic and non-organic ground cover materials.
The approval of the above mixture of landscape materials shall be by the Board of Supervisors upon recommendation of the Commission.
An automatic irrigation system shall be provided and maintained to all landscaped areas requiring water.
All landscaped areas adjacent to vehicular parking and access areas shall be protected by six-inch vertical concrete curbing in order to control storm water flows and minimize damage by
vehicular traffic.
Walls and Perimeter
Screening
Industrial sites and/or uses shall be enclosed to provide effective site screening from adjoining properties, uses or streets by the use of walls, berms and landscape plantings or combinations
thereof as follows:
• Adjacent to any rural or residential zone, automobile parking shall be screened from view.
• A solid masonry, concrete or earthen product wall not less than six feet in height or approved landscaped berms, landscape screening or combinations thereof shall be required along
and adjacent to any side or rear property line abutting any rural or residential zone boundary, or any alley abutting such zone boundary.
• Further, any access gates shall be constructed of view-obscuring materials to provide effective site screening. Approval of the alternative screening methods listed above shall be by
the Board of Supervisors upon recommendation of the Commission.
• The perimeter of any portion of a site upon which any outdoor use of an industrial nature is permitted, shall be screened to a height of not less than six feet in height by building walls,
walls or fences of any view obscuring material, approved landscaped berms, landscape screening or combinations thereof.
• No outdoor industrial use or enclosure thereof shall encroach into any required setback area adjacent to any street, nor shall any storage products or materials exceed the height of
any such enclosure.
• Approval of the alternative screening methods listed above shall be by the Board of Supervisors upon recommendation of the Commission.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 21, 2025October 17, 2025
page 5-16
CHAPTER 5 - RURAL ZONING DISTRICTS ZONING DISTRICTS AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Figure 7 — Industrial Zoning Setbacks
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 6-1
CHAPTER 6 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ZONING DISTRICTS
Chapter 6
| Single Family Residential Zoning
Districts
Section 601.
R1-35 (Single Family Residential Zoning District - 35,000 Square Feet Per
Dwelling Unit)
Article 601.1.
Purpose:
The principal purpose of this zoning district is to conserve, protect, and
encourage sustainable single-family residential development where
minimum lots of not less than 35,000 square feet in area are suitable and
appropriate taking into consideration existing conditions, including present
use of land, present lot sizes, future land use needs, and the availability of
public utilities. Principal uses permitted in this zoning district include
single-family dwellings, churches, schools, parks, playgrounds and other
community facilities.*25
Article 601.2.
Use Regulations:
A building or premises shall be used only for the following purposes:
1. One single-family dwelling per lot of record.*6
2. Churches and houses of worship, including accessory columbaria
provided that the building area of the columbarium shall not exceed 10%
of the total building area of the church building(s).*9, *25
3. Community residences, subject to the provisions and standards of
Section 1207.*46
4. Schools, elementary and high.*21, *26, *42
5. Service to the public of water, gas, electricity, telephone and cable
television. The foregoing shall be deemed to include without limitation,
distribution, collector and feeder lines, pumping or booster stations
along pipelines, and substations along electric transmission lines. (This
does not include public utility treatment and generating plants.)*6, *26, *42
6. Golf courses including clubhouses located thereon, but not including
miniature courses or practice driving tees operated for commercial
purposes.
7. Libraries, museums, parks, playgrounds and community buildings,
provided such uses are conducted on a nonprofit basis.*2
8. Home occupations, subject to the following:*11, *42, *44
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 6-2
CHAPTER 6 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ZONING DISTRICTS
a. The entrepreneur of a home occupation shall reside on the
property in the dwelling in which the business operates.
b. The number of persons who are employed in connection with the
occupants, but who are non-residents of the dwelling on the
property in which the business operates, shall not exceed three,
unless the non-resident employees are an immediate family
member (spouse, child, sibling, parent, grandparent, grandchild,
step parent, step child, step sibling) whether related by adoption
or blood. *42
c.
The business shall be conducted entirely within a completely
enclosed building, other than allowance for limited outdoor
storage per item ‘n’ below. Physical business activity other than
storage may occur within the area described per item ‘n’ below
except that no mechanical equipment or power tools shall be
operated out of doors, and in no instance shall any outdoor
activity exceed the height of screening and not to exceed eight
(8) feet.
d. The home occupation shall not interfere with the delivery of
utilities or other services to the area.
e. The business shall not generate any noise (if the noise would be
considered to have an adverse impact on the surrounding
residential neighborhood per the Maricopa County Noise
Ordinance), vibration, smoke, dust, odors, heat, glare, or
electrical interference with radio or television transmission in the
area that would exceed that normally produced by a dwelling unit
in a zoning district used solely for residential purposes.
f.
No mechanical equipment or power tools shall be used, except
that used for normal household purposes if the noise would be
considered to have an adverse impact on the surrounding
residential neighborhood per the Maricopa County Noise
Ordinance.
g.
No toxic, explosive, flammable, radioactive, or other similar
material shall be used, sold, or stored on the site.
h. There shall be no change to the residential appearance of the
premises, except that a separate business entrance shall be
permitted. A maximum four (4) square foot sign shall be
permitted, and the sign shall otherwise meet the requirements of
Article 1402.2 of this Ordinance.
i.
Unless a passenger vehicle accessory to the residence or an
employee, not more than one vehicle used in commerce shall be
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 6-3
CHAPTER 6 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ZONING DISTRICTS
permitted in connection with the home occupation. Said vehicle
shall be stored in an enclosed garage.
j.
The number of customers, clients, or students on the premises
shall not exceed five at any time.
k.
No non-resident employees, customers, clients, or students shall
be permitted on the premises for business purposes between the
hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.
l.
Deliveries from commercial suppliers (vehicle weight greater
than 10,000 lbs.) shall not restrict traffic circulation, and shall
occur between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
m. If the home occupation requires that any non-resident
employees, customers, clients, or students visit the property, a
minimum of one (1) parking space shall be provided per Chapter
11, Section 1102 of this Ordinance. The maximum number of
additional off-street parking spaces permitted shall be six.
n. The outdoor storage of materials shall be limited to a maximum
of 25% of the total lot area and shall not be located within any
required front or street side yard. Any outdoor storage shall be
completely fenced with a solid masonry wall or wood fence to
obstruct the view to a height equal to the elevation of the tallest
materials to be stored with a maximum height of stored materials
of eight feet.
o. All outdoor lighting shall be shielded so as not to direct or reflect
light upon adjoining land, shall not be constructed within 20 feet
of any adjoining property under other ownership, and shall not
exceed 20 feet in height.
p. Deleted per TA2019003 – effective 11/6/20*45
q. If these conditions cannot be met, a Special Use Permit per
Section 1301 of this Ordinance shall be required.*45
9. Fences or freestanding walls per Article 1111.5 of this Ordinance.*5, *6, *8,
*35, *37
10. Accessory dwelling unit (ADU)/guest house.*24, *32, *36
a. Only one ADU/guest house shall be permitted where at least one,
but no more than one, single family residence exists on the
property.*24
b. An ADU/guest house may not be rented or leased separate from
the primary structure.*24
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 6-4
CHAPTER 6 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ZONING DISTRICTS
c.
An ADU/guest house shall not have a separate address or mailbox
from the principal dwelling.*24
11. Accessory buildings and uses customarily incidental to the above uses,
including:*30
a. The keeping of a farm animals limited to the following:*39
1.
Up to five (5) chicken hens.
2.
Corrals for the keeping of horses, provided such corrals are
located in the rear yard, set back from all lot lines a distance
of not less than 40 feet and contain at least 1,200 square
feet of area for each horse kept therein. The keeping of
horses on properties located in residential zoning districts
in other than permitted corral areas is prohibited.
b. Private swimming pool along with incidental installations, such as
pumps and filters, provided the following standards, and those in
the current County Building Code, are met and maintained: *23
1.
Such pool and incidental installations are located in other
than the required front yard.
2.
Such pools are set back from all lot lines a distance of not
less than three feet.
3.
All fish ponds and other contained bodies of water, either
above or below ground level, with the container being 18
inches or more in depth and wider than eight feet at any
point measured on the long axis shall conform to the
location and enclosure requirements for swimming pools as
provided in the current County Building Code.*23, *42
4.
Irrigation and storm water retention facilities and the water
features in public parks and golf courses are exempt from
the fencing requirements for swimming pool barriers as
provided in the current County Building Code.*23
5.
It is the responsibility of the property owner to ensure that
any pool enclosure fence and its appurtenances (e.g., gates,
latching devices, locks, etc.) are maintained in safe and
good working order. No person shall alter or remove any
portion of a swimming pool enclosure except to repair,
reconstruct or replace the enclosure in compliance with
provisions of swimming pool barriers as provided in the
current County Building Code.*7, *9, *11, *12, *19, *23
c.
Private tennis court or private outdoor recreational structures,
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 6-5
CHAPTER 6 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ZONING DISTRICTS
provided that such court or structure is not constructed within 20
feet of any adjoining property under separate ownership, and
provided that tennis court fences or walls or recreational
structures shall not exceed 14 feet in height.*3, *13, *40
d. Servant's quarters with kitchen facilities provided that the
servant's quarters are integral to the primary dwelling unit and
does not exceed 35% of its area.**13
e. Accessory use lights provided that a permitted accessory use
exists. The lights must be located on the property and shielded so
as not to direct or reflect light upon adjoining land, shall not be
constructed within 20 feet of any adjoining property under other
ownership, and shall not exceed 20 feet in height.**13, *43
f.
Renewable energy systems as set forth in Section 1206 of this
Ordinance. Where renewable energy systems involve the
generation or storage of electricity, only grid-connected or off-
grid systems are permitted.*25
g.
Amateur radio antennas and antenna structures.*42
12. Emergency housing: Temporary shelter required due to a natural
disaster or fire or other circumstances determined to constitute an
emergency by the zoning inspector.**13, *17
13. Model home sales complex, temporary real estate offices and temporary
construction administrative offices/yard complex - as part of an
approved, recorded subdivision provided that the following conditions
are met: *23, *40, *42
a. The uses are only associated with the developer/owner and
subdivision or project in which they are located.*42
b. Upon sale of the development, cessation of the need for the use
(95% buildout), or cessation of the use, all structures,
modifications to structures and uses related to the temporary
facility shall be removed. Cessation of use shall been deemed to
have occurred if there have been no active building permits for a
one (1) year period of time.*40, *42
c.
Those uses of structures allowed shall meet all building code
requirements.
d. All necessary permits must be issued prior to placement on the
site.
e. Temporary flagpoles of up to 60 feet in height are allowed for
model home sales complexes. These temporary flagpoles must be
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 6-6
CHAPTER 6 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ZONING DISTRICTS
removed at the cessation of use as outlined above.*42
f.
Signage shall follow the General Sign Regulations, Residential
Identification, and development standards for Commercial On-
Site Wall signs and Commercial On-Site Freestanding signs. No
Electronic Message Displays are allowed. *40
g.
All items stored on site shall only be those required for the
construction on site.
h. The allowed uses may encroach into setback areas.
14. Home daycare for up to four (4) children with the following
stipulations:*28
a. The owner/operator of the daycare shall reside in the dwelling
unit in which the daycare operates.*45
b. The rear and/or side yard is enclosed and provides a minimum of
75 sq. ft. per each child occupying the outdoor activity area.
c.
There shall be no signs, advertising, display or other indications
of the daycare on the premises.
d. The total number of children under compensated care shall not
exceed four (4) at any one time.
e. The residential address of the business shall not be listed in any
business directly or in any advertising.
f.
There shall be no change to the residential appearance of the
premises, including the creation of separate or exclusive business
entrance(s).
g.
No pick-up or drop off of children shall be permitted on the
premises between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.
15. Gardens and community gardens as defined in Chapter 2.*38
16. Offices for homeowners associations (HOA) and other HOA related uses
such recreation centers and ancillary uses, maintenance facilities,
storage facilities, horse stables and other facilities for the benefit of
subdivision / master-planned community residents.*42
Article 601.3.
Height Regulations:
The height of buildings shall not exceed 30 feet.*29
Article 601.4.
Yard Regulations:
The required yards as follows:
1. Front Yard:
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 6-7
CHAPTER 6 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ZONING DISTRICTS
a.
There shall be a front yard having a depth of not less than 40 feet.
b. For through lots, a front yard shall be provided along both front lot
lines.
c.
Yards along each street side of corner lots shall have a width equal
to not less than half the depth of the required front yard. Yards
along each street side of corner lots shall otherwise conform with
regulations applicable to front yards.
2. Side Yard: There shall be a side yard on each side of a building having a
width of not less than 20 feet.
3. Rear Yard: There shall be a rear yard having a depth of not less than 40
feet.
Article 601.5.
Intensity of Use Regulations:
The intensity of use regulations are as follows:*31
1. Lot Area: Each lot shall have a minimum lot area of 35,000 square feet.
1. Lot Width: Each lot shall have a minimum lot area of 145 feet.*1
1. Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit: The minimum lot area per dwelling unit shall
be 35,000 square feet.
2. Lot Coverage: The maximum lot coverage shall be 30% of the lot area.*41
Article 601.6.
Parking Regulations:
The parking regulations are as provided in Chapter 11, Section 1102.*25
Article 601.7.
Sign Regulations:
The sign regulations are as provided in Chapter 14, Section 1402.*25
Date of Revisions
* 1
Revised 10-13-70
*19
Effective 8-6-99
*35
Effective 8-22-12 – TA2012009
* 2
Revised 1-24-72
*20
Effective 11-19-99
*36
Effective 01-19-07 – TA2003002
* 3
Added 4-7-75
*21
Effective 11-19-99
*37
Effective 9-18-10 – TA2010001
* 4
Revised 1-3-77
*22
Deleted 11-19-99
*38
Effective 7-17-13 – TA2012011
*5
Revised 6-6-77
*23
Effective 07-7-06 – TA2003005
*39
Effective 7-17-13 – TA2012012
*6
Revised 11-8-82
*24
Effective 11-14-08 – TA2008005
*40
Effective 12-12-12– TA2012024
*7
Revised 8-15-83
*25
Effective 11-19-10 – TA20090014
*41
Effective 10-8-14– TA2014002
*8
Revised 4-1-85
*26
Effective 11-3-10 – TA2010013
*40
Effective 12-12-12– TA2012024
*9
Revised 4-10-89
*27
Effective 12-28-10 – TA2010017
*41
Approved 10-8-14 TA2014002
*11
Revised 9-12-90
*28
Effective 2-11-11 – TA2010014
*42
Approved 10-8-14 TA2014006
*12
Revised 7-5-91
*29
Effective 3-16-11 – TA2010022
*43
Approved 5-4-16 TA2015004
*13
Revised 2-20-94
*30
Effective 9-30-11 – TA2011001
*44
Effective 5-26-17 TA2016007
**13
Added 2-20-94
*31
Effective 10-19-11 – TA2011013
*45
Effective 11-6-20 TA2019003
*14
Added 7-23-94
*32
Effective 10-19-11 – TA2011014
*46
Effective 3-11-22 TA2020001
*17
Revised 6-5-96
*33
Effective 1-11-12 – TA2010012
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 6-8
CHAPTER 6 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ZONING DISTRICTS
*18
Effective 5-16-98
*34
Effective 1-11-12 – TA2007018
Section 602.
R1-18 (Single Family Residential Zoning District - 35,000 Square Feet Per
Dwelling Unit)
Article 602.1.
Purpose:
The principal purpose of this zoning district is to conserve, protect, and
encourage sustainable single-family residential development where
minimum lots of not less than 18,000 square feet in area are suitable and
appropriate taking into consideration existing conditions, including present
use of land, present lot sizes, future land use needs and the availability of
public utilities. Principal uses permitted in this zoning district include single-
family dwellings, churches, schools, parks and playgrounds and other
community facilities.*2
Article 602.2.
Use Regulations:
The use regulations are the same as those in the R1-35 Zoning District.
Article 602.3.
Height Regulations:
The height of buildings shall not exceed 30 feet.*3
Article 602.4.
Yard Regulations:
The required yards as follows:
1. Front Yard:
a.
There shall be a front yard having a depth of not less than 30 feet.
b. For through lots, a front yard shall be provided along both front lot
lines.
c.
Yards along each street side of corner lots shall have a width equal
to not less than half the depth of the required front yard. Yards
along each street side of corner lots shall otherwise conform with
regulations applicable to front yards.
2. Side Yard: There shall be a side yard on each side of a building having a
width of not less than ten feet.
3. Rear Yard: There shall be a rear yard having a depth of not less than 30
feet.
Article 602.5.
Intensity of Use Regulations:
The intensity of use regulations are as follows:*4
1. Lot Area: Each lot shall have a minimum lot area of 18,000 square feet.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 6-9
CHAPTER 6 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ZONING DISTRICTS
1. Lot Width: Each lot shall have a minimum lot area of 120 feet.
1. Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit: The minimum lot area per dwelling unit shall
be 18,000 square feet.
2. Lot Coverage: The maximum lot coverage shall be 35% of the lot area.*5
Article 602.6.
Parking Regulations:
The parking regulations are as provided in Chapter 11, Section 1102.*2
Article 602.7.
Sign Regulations:
The sign regulations are as provided in Chapter 14, Section 1402.*2
Date of Revisions
*1
Revised 11-07-83
*4
Effective 10-19-11 – TA2011013
*2
Effective 11-19-10 – TA2009014
*5
Effective 10-8-14 – TA2014002
*3
Effective 3-16-11 – TA2010022
Section 603.
R1-10 (Single Family Residential Zoning District - 10,000 Square Feet Per
Dwelling Unit)
Article 603.1.
Purpose:
The principal purpose of this zoning district is to conserve, protect, and
encourage sustainable single-family residential development where
minimum lots of not less than 10,000 square feet in area are suitable and
appropriate taking into consideration existing conditions, including present
use of land, present lot sizes, future land use needs and the availability of
public utilities. Principal uses permitted in this zoning district include single-
family dwellings, churches, schools, parks and playgrounds and other
community facilities.*2
Article 603.2.
Use Regulations:
The use regulations are the same as those in the R1-35 Zoning District.
Article 603.3.
Height Regulations:
The height of buildings shall not exceed 30 feet.*3
Article 603.4.
Yard Regulations:
The required yards as follows:
1. Front Yard:
a.
There shall be a front yard having a depth of not less than 20 feet.
b. For through lots, a front yard shall be provided along both front lot
lines.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 6-10
CHAPTER 6 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ZONING DISTRICTS
c.
Yards along each street side of corner lots shall have a width equal
to not less than half the depth of the required front yard. Yards
along each street side of corner lots shall otherwise conform with
regulations applicable to front yards.
2. Side Yard: There shall be a side yard on each side of a building having a
width of not less than seven feet.
3. Rear Yard: There shall be a rear yard having a depth of not less than 25
feet.
Article 603.5.
Intensity of Use Regulations:
The intensity of use regulations are as follows:*4
1. Lot Area: Each lot shall have a minimum lot area of 10,000 square feet.
1. Lot Width: Each lot shall have a minimum lot area of 80 feet.
1. Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit: The minimum lot area per dwelling unit shall
be 10,000 square feet.
2. Lot Coverage: The maximum lot coverage shall be 40% of the lot area.*5
Article 603.6.
Parking Regulations:
The parking regulations are as provided in Chapter 11, Section 1102.*2
Article 603.7.
Sign Regulations:
The sign regulations are as provided in Chapter 14, Section 1402.*2
Date of Revisions
*1
Revised 11-7-83
*4
Effective 10-19-11 – TA2011013
*2
Effective 11-19-10 – TA2009014
*5
Effective 10-8-14 – TA2014002
*3
Effective 3-16-11 – TA2010022
Section 604.
R1-8 (Single Family Residential Zoning District - 8,000 Square Feet Per
Dwelling Unit)
Article 604.1.
Purpose:
The principal purpose of this zoning district is to conserve, protect, and
encourage sustainable single-family residential development where
minimum lots of not less than 8,000 square feet in area are suitable and
appropriate taking into consideration existing conditions, including present
use of land, present lot sizes, future land use needs and the availability of
public utilities. Principal uses permitted in this zoning district include single-
family dwellings, churches, schools, parks and playgrounds and other
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 6-11
CHAPTER 6 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ZONING DISTRICTS
community facilities.*2
Article 604.2.
Use Regulations:
The use regulations are the same as those in the R1-35 Zoning District.
Article 604.3.
Height Regulations:
The height of buildings shall not exceed 30 feet.*3
Article 604.4.
Yard Regulations:
The required yards as follows:
1. Front Yard:
a.
There shall be a front yard having a depth of not less than 20 feet.
b. For through lots, a front yard shall be provided along both front lot
lines.
c.
Yards along each street side of corner lots shall have a width equal
to not less than half the depth of the required front yard. Yards
along each street side of corner lots shall otherwise conform with
regulations applicable to front yards.
2. Side Yard: There shall be a side yard on each side of a building having a
width of not less than seven feet.
3. Rear Yard: There shall be a rear yard having a depth of not less than 25
feet.
Article 604.5.
Intensity of Use Regulations:
The intensity of use regulations are as follows:*4
1. Lot Area: Each lot shall have a minimum lot area of 8,000 square feet.
1. Lot Width: Each lot shall have a minimum lot area of 80 feet.
1. Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit: The minimum lot area per dwelling unit shall
be 7,000 square feet.
2. Lot Coverage: The maximum lot coverage shall be 45% of the lot area.*5
Article 604.6.
Parking Regulations:
The parking regulations are as provided in Chapter 11, Section 1102.*2
Article 604.7.
Sign Regulations:
The sign regulations are as provided in Chapter 14, Section 1402.*2
Date of Revisions
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 6-12
CHAPTER 6 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ZONING DISTRICTS
*1
Revised 11-3-75
*4
Effective 10-19-11 – TA2011013
*2
Effective 11-19-10 – TA2009014
*5
Effective 10-8-14 – TA2014002
*3
Effective 3-16-11 – TA2010022
Section 605.
R1-7 (Single Family Residential Zoning District - 7,000 Square Feet Per
Dwelling Unit)
Article 605.1.
Purpose:
The principal purpose of this zoning district is to conserve, protect, and
encourage sustainable single-family residential development where
minimum lots of not less than 7,000 square feet in area are suitable and
appropriate taking into consideration existing conditions, including present
use of land, present lot sizes, future land use needs and the availability of
public utilities. Principal uses permitted in this zoning district include single-
family dwellings, churches, schools, parks and playgrounds and other
community facilities.*2
Article 605.2.
Use Regulations:
The use regulations are the same as those in the R1-35 Zoning District.
Article 605.3.
Height Regulations:
The height of buildings shall not exceed 30 feet.*3
Article 605.4.
Yard Regulations:
The required yards as follows:
1. Front Yard:
a.
There shall be a front yard having a depth of not less than 20 feet.
b. For through lots, a front yard shall be provided along both front lot
lines.
c.
Yards along each street side of corner lots shall have a width equal
to not less than half the depth of the required front yard. Yards
along each street side of corner lots shall otherwise conform with
regulations applicable to front yards.
2. Side Yard: There shall be a side yard on each side of a building having a
width of not less than five feet.
3. Rear Yard: There shall be a rear yard having a depth of not less than 25
feet.
Article 605.5.
Intensity of Use Regulations:
The intensity of use regulations are as follows:*4
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 6-13
CHAPTER 6 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ZONING DISTRICTS
1. Lot Area: Each lot shall have a minimum lot area of 7,000 square feet.
1. Lot Width: Each lot shall have a minimum lot area of 70 feet.
1. Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit: The minimum lot area per dwelling unit shall
be 7,000 square feet.
2. Lot Coverage: The maximum lot coverage shall be 45% of the lot area.*5
Article 605.6.
Parking Regulations:
The parking regulations are as provided in Chapter 11, Section 1102.*2
Article 605.7.
Sign Regulations:
The sign regulations are as provided in Chapter 14, Section 1402.*2
Date of Revisions
*1
Revised 11-3-75
*4
Effective 10-19-11 – TA2011013
*2
Effective 11-19-10 – TA2009014
*5
Effective 10-8-14 – TA2014002
*3
Effective 3-16-11 – TA2010022
Section 606.
R1-6 (Single Family Residential Zoning District - 6,000 Square Feet Per
Dwelling Unit)
Article 606.1.
Purpose:
The principal purpose of this zoning district is to conserve, protect, and
encourage sustainable single-family residential development where
minimum lots of not less than 6,000 square feet in area are suitable and
appropriate taking into consideration existing conditions, including present
use of land, present lot sizes, future land use needs and the availability of
public utilities. Principal uses permitted in this zoning district include single-
family dwellings, churches, schools, parks and playgrounds and other
community facilities.*1
Article 606.2.
Use Regulations:
The use regulations are the same as those in the R1-35 Zoning District.
Article 606.3.
Height Regulations:
The height of buildings shall not exceed 30 feet.*2
Article 606.4.
Yard Regulations:
The required yards as follows:
1. Front Yard:
a.
There shall be a front yard having a depth of not less than 20 feet.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 6-14
CHAPTER 6 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ZONING DISTRICTS
b. For through lots, a front yard shall be provided along both front lot
lines.
c.
Yards along each street side of corner lots shall have a width equal
to not less than half the depth of the required front yard. Yards
along each street side of corner lots shall otherwise conform with
regulations applicable to front yards.
2. Side Yard: There shall be a side yard on each side of a building having a
width of not less than five feet.
3. Rear Yard: There shall be a rear yard having a depth of not less than 25
feet.
Article 606.5.
Intensity of Use Regulations:
The intensity of use regulations are as follows:*4
1. Lot Area: Each lot shall have a minimum lot area of 6,000 square feet.
1. Lot Width: Each lot shall have a minimum lot area of 60 feet.
1. Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit: The minimum lot area per dwelling unit shall
be 6,000 square feet.
2. Lot Coverage: The maximum lot coverage shall be 50% of the lot area.*3
Article 606.6.
Parking Regulations:
The parking regulations are as provided in Chapter 11, Section 1102.*1
Article 606.7.
Sign Regulations:
The sign regulations are as provided in Chapter 14, Section 1402.*1
Date of Revisions
*1
Effective 11-19-10 TA2009014
*3
Effective 10-8-14 – TA2014002
*2
Effective 3-16-11 TA2010022
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-1
CHAPTER 6 - ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
Chapter 6
|
Zoning Districts Uses Table,
Accessory Uses and Use Standards
and Conditions
Section 601.
Use Regulations
A building or premises shall be used only for the following purposes:
Rural, Residential, Multi-family, Commercial and Industrial Zoning District
Uses tables.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-2
CHAPTER 6 -– ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
P – Permitted, S – Special Use Permit, POD - Plan of Development, TUP – Temporary Use Permit, and/or * additional information
Zoning District Uses
Rural-190
RU-70
RU-43
R1-35
R1-18
R1-10
R1-8
R1-7
R1-6
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-5
C-O
C-S
C-1
C-2
C-3
IND-1
IND-2
IND-3
Additional
Information
RESIDENTIAL
One Single-family dwelling -
per lot of record. Includes
short term rentals.
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
*Article 602.2.
Multifamily (>2 units)
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Accessory dwelling unit
(ADU)/guest house which may
include a leased short term
rental.
P*
P*
P*
P*
P*
P*
P*
P*
P*
P*
P*
P*
P*
P*
P*
P*
P*
P*
P*
*Article 602.3.
Emergency housing:
Temporary shelter required
due to a natural disaster or
fire or other circumstances
determined to constitute an
emergency by the zoning
inspector
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Home daycare for up to four
(4) children with the following
stipulations
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
NP
NP
P
P
P
P
P
P
* Article 602.4.
Mobile Home Parks and
Manufactured Home Parks
POD*
POD*
POD*
POD*
POD*
POD*
POD*
* Section 903.
RESIDENTIAL - GROUP LIVING
Boarding houses
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Community residences,
subject to the provisions and
standards of Section
1207.907.
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
* Section 907.
Dormitories
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Halfway houses
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Recovery communities within
1,200 linear feet of the closest
recovery community or
community residence under
Article 1207.3.7.1.a 907.
S **
S **
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
* Section 907.
** Article 1001.1.9.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-3
CHAPTER 6 -– ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
Zoning District Uses
Rural-190
RU-70
RU-43
R1-35
R1-18
R1-10
R1-8
R1-7
R1-6
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-5
C-O
C-S
C-1
C-2
C-3
IND-1
IND-2
IND-3
Additional
Information
ACCOMMODATIONS
Guest ranches, bed and
breakfast establishments,
resorts, hotels and motels.
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Travel trailer or recreation
vehicle (RV) parks provided
that
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
POD
S *
S *
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
* Article 1001.1.4.
AGRICULTURAL
Agricultural chemicals
(storage, mixing, sale and
distribution)
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
POD
Not including
manufacturing
Commercial feed lots with
outdoor storage
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
POD
POD
POD
POD
Corrals for the keeping of
horses
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Cotton gins
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
POD
Not including the
manufacturing or
processing of by
products
Farm animal (horse, cattle and
other farm animal) medical
clinics and surgical referral
hospitals, subject to the
following standards
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
* Article 1001.1.7.
Farms as defined in Chapter 2
NP
P
NP
P
NP P
POD
POD
Gardens and community
gardens and farms, as defined
in Chapter 2
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Industrial agriculturally
oriented operations and
facilities, aquacultural facilities
with breeding and holding
lakes and ponds.
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
POD
Storage/maintenance of
specialized agricultural
equipment
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
POD*
POD
POD
POD
POD
* Inside storage of
agricultural
equipment in C-2
zoning only.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-4
CHAPTER 6 -– ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
Zoning District Uses
Rural-190
RU-70
RU-43
R1-35
R1-18
R1-10
R1-8
R1-7
R1-6
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-5
C-O
C-S
C-1
C-2
C-3
IND-1
IND-2
IND-3
Additional
Information
The keeping of a farm animals
limited to the following
P*
P*
P*
P **
P **
P
**
P **
P **
P **
P **
P **
P **
P **
P
P
P
P
P
P
*No limit on
number of farm
animals in rural
zoning districts.
** In R1-35 see
Additional
Regulations Article
603.1.
BILLBOARDS
Billboards
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
POD
S *
POD
S *
POD
S *
POD
S *
POD
S *
* Article 1001.1.8.
COMMERCIAL - EDUCATIONAL
Business schools
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Educational training to include
conservatories or studios: Art,
dancing or music, trade
schools
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
COMMERCIAL - ENTERTAINMENT (See definition of Indoor Entertainment and Outdoor Entertainment in Chapter 2)
Amusement enterprises and
outdoor amusement parks
and bowling alleys.
POD
POD
POD
POD
Circus and carnival grounds
having permanent facilities -
outdoor entertainment for
permanent facilities
POD
POD
POD
POD
Dance halls and nightclubs,
including outdoor amplified
music, except adult oriented
facilities as defined under
Chapter 2 of this ordinance
POD
POD
POD
POD
Drive in or outdoor theaters
POD
POD
POD
POD
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-5
CHAPTER 6 -– ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
Zoning District Uses
Rural-190
RU-70
RU-43
R1-35
R1-18
R1-10
R1-8
R1-7
R1-6
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-5
C-O
C-S
C-1
C-2
C-3
IND-1
IND-2
IND-3
Additional
Information
Outdoor Entertainment
POD
POD
POD
POD
Outdoor race tracks [use
within Outdoor Entertainment]
POD
POD
POD
POD
Permanent facilities for
rodeos, auctions, swap meets,
campgrounds, and sites
rented for private parties [use
within Outdoor Entertainment]
POD
POD
POD
POD
Zoos, including the keeping of
wild or exotic animals on a
private or commercial
basis[use within Outdoor
Entertainment]
POD
POD
POD
POD
Land use involving large
assemblage of people
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
POD
POD
POD
POD
Miniature golf courses and
driving ranges
POD *
POD
POD
POD
POD
* Inside use only in
C-2 zoning.
Pool halls or billiard centers
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Private clubs and fraternal
organizations
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Special Event Venues
(indoor/outdoor uses)
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
POD
POD
POD
POD
* Article 1001.1.10.
Theaters
POD*
POD*
POD*
POD*
POD*
* Not including a
drive in theater and
adult oriented
facilities as defined
under in Chapter 2
COMMERCIAL - FOOD & BEVERAGE (See Food and Beverage Uses definition in Chapter 2)
Food and Beverage
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Bakery Shops Food and
Beverage [use within Food &
Beverage]
POD/P
C
POD/P
C
POD/P
C
POD/P
C
POD/P
C
POD/P
C
POD/P
C
Including baking on
the premises for
on-site sales only
(bakery shops).
Delicatessen shops [use within
Food & Beverage]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-6
CHAPTER 6 -– ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
Zoning District Uses
Rural-190
RU-70
RU-43
R1-35
R1-18
R1-10
R1-8
R1-7
R1-6
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-5
C-O
C-S
C-1
C-2
C-3
IND-1
IND-2
IND-3
Additional
Information
Ice cream shops, including
manufacturing of ice cream on
the premises [use within Food
& Beverage]
POD/P
C
POD/P
C
POD/P
C
POD/P
C
POD/P
C
POD/P
C
POD/P
C
For on-site sales
only
Bars, including retail sales of
package goods for off site
consumption
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
* Including retail
sales of package
goods for off-site
consumption,
provided that there
is no entertainment
or music audible
offsite.
Catering establishments
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
* Not utilizing any
manufacturing
process or outside
storage of
materials or
vehicles.
Drive in restaurants and
refreshment stands Fast Food
with drive in
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Liquor stores
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
* Limited to retail
sales of package
goods for off-site
consumption
Restaurants and cafes,
including drive-through
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
Article 603.2.
Restaurants and cafes,
including patios, cocktail
lounges, and outside dining
and drinking areas, provided
there is no amplified
entertainment or music
audible off-site
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
* May not have
outdoor music or
entertainment
COMMERCIAL - GENERAL RETAIL & SERVICES (see General Retail and Services definition in Chapter 2)
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-7
CHAPTER 6 -– ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
Zoning District Uses
Rural-190
RU-70
RU-43
R1-35
R1-18
R1-10
R1-8
R1-7
R1-6
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-5
C-O
C-S
C-1
C-2
C-3
IND-1
IND-2
IND-3
Additional
Information
Automobile, boat sales
(including outdoor display
area), golf cart sales, new and
used, and rentals (Indoor
sales)
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
* Provided all sales,
service, and repair
activities are
conducted within a
building
Automobile repair shops and
garages, including an outside
vehicle storage area to be
used for vehicles under repair
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
* Shall be
completely
screened from any
street or
surrounding
property, and
further provided all
repair operations
are conducted
within a building
Awning and canvas stores.
General Retail
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Art metal and ornamental iron
shops [use within General
Retail]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Blueprint, photostat and
reproduction (copy) services
[use within General Retail]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Cabinet and carpenter shops
[use within General Retail]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Department stores - [use
within General Retail]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Electrical fixtures and
appliance sales, repair and
service [use within General
Retail]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Furniture stores including:
New, used, finished or
unfinished merchandise [use
within General Retail]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Gas (butane or propane),
retail sales [use within General
Retail]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-8
CHAPTER 6 -– ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
Zoning District Uses
Rural-190
RU-70
RU-43
R1-35
R1-18
R1-10
R1-8
R1-7
R1-6
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-5
C-O
C-S
C-1
C-2
C-3
IND-1
IND-2
IND-3
Additional
Information
Paint and wall paper stores
[use within General Retail]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Plumbing shops [use within
General Retail]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Rental services: Household,
lawn, garden, sickroom or
office equipment [use within
General Retail]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Retail sale of merchandise,
services, recreational and
otherwise, parking area and
other facilities customarily
considered as shopping center
uses. [use within General
Retail]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Taxidermists [use within
General Retail]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Tinsmith Shops [use within
General Retail]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Upholstery shops [use within
General Retail]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Health spas - and public gyms -
[use within General Retail]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Automobile laundries Carwash
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
*Provided steam
cleaning is confined
to a building
Feed stores
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
POD *
POD
POD
POD
POD
*Inside only in C-2
otherwise Special
Use Permit is
required
Cash Advance and Payday
Loan Facilities
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Pet shops
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Including the
treatment or
boarding of cats,
dogs or other small
animals
Self-storage facilities
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-9
CHAPTER 6 -– ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
Zoning District Uses
Rural-190
RU-70
RU-43
R1-35
R1-18
R1-10
R1-8
R1-7
R1-6
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-5
C-O
C-S
C-1
C-2
C-3
IND-1
IND-2
IND-3
Additional
Information
COMMERCIAL - LIGHT RETAIL & SERVICES (see definition of Retail and Services - Light in Chapter 2)
Light Retail Services
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Antique Shops [use within
light retail services]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Arcades [use within light retail
services]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Automobile parts and supplies
[use within light retail services]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Barber and Beauty Shops [use
within light retail services]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Secretarial or answering
services [use within light retail
services]
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
POD
NP
NP
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Candy shops [use within light
retail services]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Clock and watch repair shops
[use within light retail services]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Craft and hobby shops [use
within light retail services]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Dress shops - [use within light
retail services]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Clothing and dry good shops,
including clothing and
costume rental [use within
light retail services]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Florist shops [use within light
retail services]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Interior decorator shops [use
within light retail services]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Jewelry shops [use within light
retail services]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-10
CHAPTER 6 -– ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
Zoning District Uses
Rural-190
RU-70
RU-43
R1-35
R1-18
R1-10
R1-8
R1-7
R1-6
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-5
C-O
C-S
C-1
C-2
C-3
IND-1
IND-2
IND-3
Additional
Information
Key, locksmith or gun shops
[use within light retail services]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Precision, optical and musical
instrument repair shops [use
within light retail services]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Drugstores Pharmacies - and
soda fountains Restaurant
[use within light retail services]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Radio and television shops,
including repair [use within
light retail services]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Shoe repair shops [use within
light retail services]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Tailor shops [use within light
retail services]
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Art Galleries and photography
and art studios
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Banks and financial
institutions (not include
Payday loan facilities)
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Book, Stationary & Gift Shops
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
* Except adult
oriented facilities
Cleaning agencies, laundry
agencies, pressing
establishments and self-
service laundries, including
self-service dry cleaning
machines
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
* No cleaning of
clothes on premises
Gasoline service stations
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
* All incidental
repair work must
be conducted
wholly within an
enclosed building
and repair work
cannot constitute
more than 60% of
floor area.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-11
CHAPTER 6 -– ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
Zoning District Uses
Rural-190
RU-70
RU-43
R1-35
R1-18
R1-10
R1-8
R1-7
R1-6
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-5
C-O
C-S
C-1
C-2
C-3
IND-1
IND-2
IND-3
Additional
Information
Grocery stores and meat
markets
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
* No slaughtering
of animals or
poultry on the
premises.
Offices
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Professional Office - Business
office in which chattels or
goods, wares or merchandise
are not commercially created,
repaired, sold or exchanged -
make this a condition.
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
MARIJUANA
Medical Marijuana Dispensary
Facilities and/or Marijuana
Establishment as defined in
Chapter 2 of this Ordinance
subject to all rules adopted by
the Arizona Department of
Health Services and to the
following conditions
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
*Article 603.3.
Medical Marijuana Dispensary
and/or Marijuana
Establishment and/or Medical
Marijuana Offsite Cultivation
Location facilities as defined in
Chapter 2 of this Ordinance
subject to all rules adopted by
the Arizona Department of
Health Services and to the
following conditions:
Marijuana Offsite Cultivation
(including dispensary and/or
establishment)
POD *
POD *
POD *
*Article 603.4.
COMMERCIAL - MEDICAL
Laboratories, medical or
dental or clinical
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-12
CHAPTER 6 -– ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
Zoning District Uses
Rural-190
RU-70
RU-43
R1-35
R1-18
R1-10
R1-8
R1-7
R1-6
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-5
C-O
C-S
C-1
C-2
C-3
IND-1
IND-2
IND-3
Additional
Information
Veterinary hospitals and
clinics and kennels for dogs,
cats and small animals
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
COMMERCIAL - PLANT NURSERIES
Plant nurseries and
greenhouses (wholesale only)
for the propagation,
cultivation and wholesale
distribution of plants
produced on the premises,
provided such uses do not
include retail sales. Open
storage is limited to plants or
packaged fertilizer, and the
buildings and structures used
in connection therewith set
back from all lot lines a
distance of not less than 50
feet
P
P
P
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Plant nurseries (retail only)
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
COMMERCIAL - REGIONAL RETAIL & SERVICES (See definition of Retail and Services - Regional in Chapter 2)
Regional Retail & Services
POD
POD
POD
POD
Auction sales, including swap
meet operations [use within
regional retail & services]
POD
POD
POD
POD
Automobile dealership with
outdoor storage including
sales, service and rental. Boat
sales service and rental. [use
within regional retail &
services]
POD
POD
POD
POD
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-13
CHAPTER 6 -– ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
Zoning District Uses
Rural-190
RU-70
RU-43
R1-35
R1-18
R1-10
R1-8
R1-7
R1-6
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-5
C-O
C-S
C-1
C-2
C-3
IND-1
IND-2
IND-3
Additional
Information
Equipment rentals and sales,
but not including equipment
customarily used for heavy
construction [use within
regional retail & services]
POD
POD
POD
POD
Mobile home, travel trailer
and recreation vehicle sales
and service [use within
regional retail & services]
POD
POD
POD
POD
Printing, lithography and
publishing establishments [use
within regional retail &
services]
POD
POD
POD
POD
Stone monument sales [use
within regional retail &
services]
POD
POD
POD
POD
Wholesale stores [use within
regional retail & services]
POD
POD
POD
POD
Commercial storage, or
impoundment (not to include
salvage operations,
dismantling or sale of parts) of
automobiles, motor vehicles,
mobile homes, manufactured
homes, travel trailers,
recreation vehicles, boats and
aircraft
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
POD
POD
POD
POD
*Sites of not less
than one acre
Commercial
storage/impoundment (≥1
acre)
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
POD
POD
POD
POD
Autos, RVs, boats,
aircraft; no salvage
operations
Kennels
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
POD
POD
POD
POD
Landscape material sales
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
*Article 603.5.
Pawn Shop
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Truck stops
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
*Article 603.6.
COMMERCIAL - STORAGE
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-14
CHAPTER 6 -– ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
Zoning District Uses
Rural-190
RU-70
RU-43
R1-35
R1-18
R1-10
R1-8
R1-7
R1-6
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-5
C-O
C-S
C-1
C-2
C-3
IND-1
IND-2
IND-3
Additional
Information
Commercial storage of mobile
homes, manufactured homes,
travel trailers, recreation
vehicles, boats and aircraft
POD
POD
POD
POD
COMMERCIAL - TELEVISION & RADIO
Radio and television
broadcasting stations and
studios
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
* Not including
transmitter towers
and stations
COMMERCIAL
Adult oriented facilities as
defined under Chapter 2,
subject to the following
conditions
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
* Article 603.7.
FUNERAL & INTERMENT SERVICES
Private, family burial plots of
ten or fewer.
P
P
P
Cemeteries, including pet
cemeteries and mausoleums,
including accessory uses such
as mortuaries
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
POD
Funeral homes, mortuaries
and chapels
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
COMMERCIAL - HOA OFFICES, RECREATIONAL FOR AMENITIES
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-15
CHAPTER 6 -– ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
Zoning District Uses
Rural-190
RU-70
RU-43
R1-35
R1-18
R1-10
R1-8
R1-7
R1-6
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-5
C-O
C-S
C-1
C-2
C-3
IND-1
IND-2
IND-3
Additional
Information
Offices for homeowners
associations (HOA) and other
HOA related uses such
recreation centers and
ancillary uses, maintenance
facilities, storage facilities,
horse stables and other
facilities for the benefit of
subdivision / master-planned
community residents
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
NP
P
P
P
P
P
P
COMMUNICATION
Primary or accessory
commercial television,
microwave and radio
transmitter, receiving stations
and towers and dishes,
including earth stations
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
POD
Wireless communication
facilities
PO
D *
S **
PO
D *
S **
POD
*
S **
POD
*
S **
POD
*
S **
PO
D *
S **
POD
*
S **
POD
*
S **
POD
*
S **
POD
*
S **
POD
*
S **
POD
*
S **
POD *
S **
POD
*
S **
POD *
S **
POD *
S **
POD *
S **
POD *
S **
POD *
S **
POD *
S **
POD *
S **
* Section 902. for
development
standards.
** SUP - Article
1001.1.6. for WCF
exceeding
standards.
CONSTRUCTION
Construction equipment,
including sales, service, rental
and storage
POD
POD
Lumber yards
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
* Not including
industrial milling or
planning
operations
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-16
CHAPTER 6 -– ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
Zoning District Uses
Rural-190
RU-70
RU-43
R1-35
R1-18
R1-10
R1-8
R1-7
R1-6
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-5
C-O
C-S
C-1
C-2
C-3
IND-1
IND-2
IND-3
Additional
Information
Temporary construction
administration offices/yard
complex –which may include a
security office or residence for
a security guard provided that
the following conditions are
met
POD *
POD
*
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
* Article 603.8.
HOME OCCUPATION / COTTAGE INDUSTRY
Home occupations
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
* Article 603.9.
Home occupations, cottage
industry that do not meet the
conditions of Article 501.2.10
in Rural Zoning Districts or
that do not meet the
conditions of Article 601.2.8
in Single-Family Zoning
Districts 603.9
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
POD *
* Article 1001.1.5.
INDUSTRIAL - FOOD PRODUCTION (See definition of Food Production in Chapter 2)
Food Production
POD
POD
Bakeries, wholesale [use
within Food Production]
POD
POD
Bottling plants or breweries
[use within Food Production]
POD
POD
Dairy products, processing of
[use within Food Production]
POD
POD
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-17
CHAPTER 6 -– ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
Zoning District Uses
Rural-190
RU-70
RU-43
R1-35
R1-18
R1-10
R1-8
R1-7
R1-6
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-5
C-O
C-S
C-1
C-2
C-3
IND-1
IND-2
IND-3
Additional
Information
Custom meat processing
plants including slaughtering,
butchering and temporary
storage of products.
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
POD
Not including
rendering or
refining of by
products, storage
of offal, tanning or
storage of hides,
wholesale or retail
sales
Frozen food lockers, including
processing
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
but not * Not to
include
slaughtering of
animals
Packing houses, fruits or
vegetables
POD*
POD*
* Not including
processing
INDUSTRIAL - GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
Battery Energy Storage
Systems subject to conditions
POD *
POD *
* Article 603.10
Auto. Vehicle fleet, drone /
UAV Depots, Taxi-stations and
facilities
POD
POD
Data Centers with
compensatory power
generation
POD
POD
INDUSTRIAL - GENERAL INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING (see definition of Industrial Manufacturing - General in Chapter 2)
General Industrial
Manufacturing
POD
POD
Aircraft firms including sales,
service and rental [use within
General Industrial
Manufacturing]
POD
POD
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-18
CHAPTER 6 -– ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
Zoning District Uses
Rural-190
RU-70
RU-43
R1-35
R1-18
R1-10
R1-8
R1-7
R1-6
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-5
C-O
C-S
C-1
C-2
C-3
IND-1
IND-2
IND-3
Additional
Information
Manufacture of pottery and
figurines or other similar
ceramic products using only
previously pulverized clay [use
within General Industrial
Manufacturing]
POD
POD
Manufacturing or assembly of
electrical appliances,
electronic instruments and
devices, optical goods,
precision instruments, radios
and phonographs, including
the [use within General
Industrial Manufacturing]
POD
POD
Including
manufacture of
small parts only,
such as coils,
condensers,
transformers and
crystal holders
Manufacturing, compounding,
assembling or treatment of
articles or merchandise from
the following previously
prepared materials: bone,
cellophane, canvas, cloth,
cork, feathers, felt, fiber, fur,
glass, hair, leather, paper,
plastics, precious or semi
precious metals or stones,
light sheet metal, shell,
textiles, tobacco, wire, yarns.
[use within General Industrial
Manufacturing]
POD
POD
wood not involving
planing mills, and
paint not
employing a boiling
process
Manufacturing, compounding,
assembling, processing,
packaging or treatment of
products such as candy, drugs,
perfumes, pharmaceuticals,
perfumed toilet soaps,
toiletries [use within General
Industrial Manufacturing]
POD
POD
Not including the
refining or
rendering of fats
and oils
INDUSTRIAL - INDUSTRIAL CLEANING
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-19
CHAPTER 6 -– ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
Zoning District Uses
Rural-190
RU-70
RU-43
R1-35
R1-18
R1-10
R1-8
R1-7
R1-6
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-5
C-O
C-S
C-1
C-2
C-3
IND-1
IND-2
IND-3
Additional
Information
Cleaning plants, including
carpets and dyeing
POD
POD
INDUSTRIAL - LIGHT INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING (see definition of Industrial Manufacturing - Light in Chapter 2)
Light Industrial Manufacturing
POD
POD
POD
Art needlework, handweaving
and tapestries [use within
Light Industrial
Manufacturing]
POD
POD
POD
Books, hand binding and
tooling [use within Light
Industrial Manufacturing]
POD
POD
POD
Compounding of cosmetics
and pharmaceutical products
[use within Light Industrial
Manufacturing]
POD
POD
POD
Jewelry, manufacture from
precious metals and minerals
[use within Light Industrial
Manufacturing]
POD
POD
POD
Manufacture and assembly of
clay, leather, metal and glass
products of a handicraft
nature [use within Light
Industrial Manufacturing]
POD
POD
POD
Manufacture and assembly of
medical, dental and drafting
instruments [use within Light
Industrial Manufacturing]
POD
POD
POD
Manufacture and assembly of
electrical or electronic
apparatus, musical
instruments, games and toys
[use within Light Industrial
Manufacturing]
POD
POD
POD
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-20
CHAPTER 6 -– ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
Zoning District Uses
Rural-190
RU-70
RU-43
R1-35
R1-18
R1-10
R1-8
R1-7
R1-6
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-5
C-O
C-S
C-1
C-2
C-3
IND-1
IND-2
IND-3
Additional
Information
Manufacture and assembly of
optical goods and equipment,
watches, clocks and other
similar precision instruments -
[use within Light Industrial
Manufacturing]
POD
POD
POD
Any other office, laboratory,
manufacturing and assembling
uses
POD *
POD *
POD *
*Article 603.11.
INDUSTRIAL - STORAGE
Storage and maintenance of
specialized machinery and
equipment used specifically in
agriculture or rural areas
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
POD
POD
POD
POD
Storage, mixing and/or
blending, sale and distribution
of agricultural chemicals
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
POD
Not the
manufacturer
thereof
INDUSTRIAL
Development of earth
products
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
POD *
* Clay, coal, gas,
gravel, minerals,
sand, stone,
topsoil not to
include extraction
except for IND-3.
Experimental and proving
grounds
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
POD
POD
Outdoor storage including
wholesale and retail sales of
landscape materials, storage
rental yards, construction
yards and similar, interim
industrial uses.
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
POD
POD
* For a period not
exceeding ten years
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-21
CHAPTER 6 -– ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
Zoning District Uses
Rural-190
RU-70
RU-43
R1-35
R1-18
R1-10
R1-8
R1-7
R1-6
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-5
C-O
C-S
C-1
C-2
C-3
IND-1
IND-2
IND-3
Additional
Information
Laboratories, experimental,
photo or motion picture,
research or testing, and
Marijuana Testing Facilities
POD
POD
POD
Motion picture producing
POD
POD
POD
Training centers, industrial
POD
POD
Truck terminals, including
service and storage
POD
POD
Warehousing, storage and
wholesale distribution
facilities
POD
POD
POD
MEDICAL & GROUP CARE FACILITIES
Group care facilities and
hospitals and institutions of an
educational, religious,
charitable or philanthropic
nature, homes for the aged,
nursing homes, convalescent
homes and community
residences or recovery
communities that do not meet
the requirements of Article
1207.3 and other group care
facilities including for
adjudicated residents
S ** S **
S **
S **
S **
S **
S **
S **
S **
S **
S *
S *
S **
S **
S **
S **
POD
**
POD
**
POD
**
POD
**
POD
**
*Recovery
communities only
permitted in R-3 &
R-4 with a Special
Use Permit. Article
1001.1.9.
** Section 907.
Hospitals and group care
facilities and detoxification
facilities
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
PUBLIC & SEMI-PUBLIC USES
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-22
CHAPTER 6 -– ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
Zoning District Uses
Rural-190
RU-70
RU-43
R1-35
R1-18
R1-10
R1-8
R1-7
R1-6
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-5
C-O
C-S
C-1
C-2
C-3
IND-1
IND-2
IND-3
Additional
Information
Churches and houses of
worship, including accessory
columbariums
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Provided that the
building area of the
columbarium shall
not exceed 10% of
the total building
area of the church
building(s).
Day nurseries and nursery
schools, including a
playground and playground
equipment
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Shall be screened
from Rural and
Residential.
Libraries, museums, parks,
playgrounds and community
buildings, provided such uses
are conducted on a nonprofit
basis
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Parking lots and public garages
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
POD *
* Subject to parking
standards in
Section 802.
Privately owned or operated
stations for fire protection,
police or security service,
ambulance, or other
emergency service providers
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
POD
S
S
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
POD
Public facilities such as
libraries, museums, parks,
playgrounds, community
buildings including police
stations, post offices and
other community service
buildings used for non-
commercial non profit
purposes
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Schools which include only K-
12 public, private and charter
schools
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
RECREATIONAL & OPEN SPACE
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-23
CHAPTER 6 -– ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
Zoning District Uses
Rural-190
RU-70
RU-43
R1-35
R1-18
R1-10
R1-8
R1-7
R1-6
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-5
C-O
C-S
C-1
C-2
C-3
IND-1
IND-2
IND-3
Additional
Information
Golf courses including
clubhouses located thereon
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
* Not including
miniature courses
or practice driving
tees operated for
commercial
purposes.
Public and private forests and
wildlife reservations
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Public equestrian uses
accessory to a single-family
residence limited to the
following:*
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
P *
* Article 603.12.
Public riding and boarding
stables
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
POD
* Article 1001.1.3.
Recreational open air facilities,
including but not limited to
lakes, swimming pools and
tennis courts. (This does not
include personal recreation on
private property.)
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
POD
POD
POD
POD
RENEWABLE ENERGY
Utility-scale concentrating
solar power (CSP) generating
facilities or photo-voltaic solar
generating facilities of any
output capacity are allowed as
either a primary or accessory
use within the IND-2 zoning
district subject to the
development standards of
that district
POD *
POD *
* Article 906.
TEMPORARY LAND USES
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-24
CHAPTER 6 -– ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
Zoning District Uses
Rural-190
RU-70
RU-43
R1-35
R1-18
R1-10
R1-8
R1-7
R1-6
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-5
C-O
C-S
C-1
C-2
C-3
IND-1
IND-2
IND-3
Additional
Information
Model home sales complex,
temporary real estate offices
and temporary construction
administrative offices/yard
complex. - as part of an
approved, recorded
subdivision provided that the
following conditions are met
P or
TUP
P or
TUP
P or
TUP
P or
TUP
P or
TUP
P or
TUP
P or
TUP
P or
TUP
P or
TUP
P or
TUP
P or
TUP
P or
TUP
P or
TUP
P or
TUP
P or
TUP
P or
TUP
P or
TUP
P or
TUP
P or
TUP
*Model Home Sales
Complex Not
Permitted in C-O &
C-S Zoning Districts
TRANSPORTATION
Airports, runways/airstrips,
helipads/heliports and other
landing areas
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
S *
POD
POD
Article 811.3. OFZ
and RPZ standards.
*Article 1001.1.1.
Bus depots
POD
POD
POD
POD
UTILITIES
Public Utilities
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Utility Treatment and
Generating Plants
POD *
POD *
* Article 603.13.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-25
CHAPTER 6 - ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
Section 602.
Accessory Uses Incidental to the Uses Table
Article 602.1. Uses considered to be customarily incidental and accessory to the uses
listed in the previous tables as determined by the zoning inspector.
Article 602.2. One Single Family dwelling per lot of record. Includes short term rentals
subject to the following standards:
1. A Short-Term Rental (STR) is the use of a single-family dwelling or an
approved accessory dwelling unit for lease or rent for a duration of no
more than 30 consecutive days.
2. In accordance with State Statute, the owner of a short-term rental must
reside on the property if the property contains an accessory dwelling
unit and if a certificate of occupancy, certificate of completion or similar
final approval for the accessory dwelling unit was issued by the county
on or after September 14, 2024. This paragraph does not apply to an
owner of a vacation rental or short-term rental if the property contains
an accessory dwelling unit and the certificate of completion, the
certificate of occupancy or a similar final approval for the accessory
dwelling unit was issued on or before September 13, 2024.
3. The STR must be rented as a whole unit to a single party or individual.
Partial rentals (e.g., by the room or by the bed) are prohibited.
4. Only one (1) STR unit may be rented per parcel at any given time.
5. The following are prohibited in connection with any STR:
A. Use of the property for commercial events, public assembly, or
special gatherings, including weddings, banquets, or similar
functions.
B. Signage, site-specific websites, or any external identification
suggesting commercial operation.
C. Operation of any retail, food service, or other commercial
enterprise from the STR.
6. The STR may not be rented, leased, or occupied by any person who is a
registered sex offender, and the lessee may not include such individuals
as a member of the renting party.
Article 602.3. Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)
1. In accordance with Arizona State Statute, ADUs are a permitted uses on
any lot or parcel zoned for single-family residential use. A public
hearing, variance, or special permit shall not be required.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-26
CHAPTER 6 - ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
2. Number of Units.
A. At least one attached and one detached ADU shall be permitted on
each lot or parcel where a single-family dwelling is allowed.
B. On lot or parcel one acre or larger, at least one additional detached
ADU shall be permitted provided that at least one ADU on the lot be
a deed restricted-affordable dwelling unit to be rented to
households earning up to eighty percent of the area median
income.
3. Size.
A. No ADU shall exceed the size of the principal dwelling.
B. On lot or parcel less than one acre, the size of the ADU shall be a
maximum of 75% of the primary dwelling unit or 1,000 square feet
whichever is less.
4. Occupancy and Tenancy.
A. ADUs may be leased or occupied independently of the principal
dwelling as long-term rental housing.
B. No familial, marital, or employment relationship is required
between occupants of the principal dwelling and the ADU.
5. Design Standards. ADUs shall be subject to the same height, lot
coverage, and frontage standards as single-family dwellings within the
zoning district. Except that:
A. Detached ADUs may be built in the required rear yard and/or the
required side yard but shall not occupy more than 30% of any
required yard and shall not be nearer than five feet to any side or
rear lot line.
B. Detached ADUs that encroach into the required side or rear yard
shall be limited to a height of 18 feet.
C. All ADUs shall share a single access point to the street with the
primary residence; internal driveways may diverge from this point.
6. Any ADU lawfully established prior to adoption of this Article that does
not meet current standards may be continued as a legal nonconforming
use. Alterations or expansions must comply with this Article.
7. No more than one ADU may be used as a short-term rental. (See also,
Article 602.2.2)
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-27
CHAPTER 6 - ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-28
CHAPTER 6 - ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
Article 602.4.
Home Daycare for up to Four (4) Children with the Following
Stipulations Conditions:
1. The owner/operator of the daycare shall reside in the dwelling unit in
which the daycare operates. *42
2. The rear and/or side yard is enclosed and provides a minimum of 75 sq.
ft. per each child occupying the outdoor activity area.
3. There shall be no signs, advertising, display or other indications of the
daycare on the premises.
4. The total number of children under compensated care shall not exceed
four (4) at any one time.
5. The residential address of the business shall not be listed in any business
directly or in any advertising.
6. There shall be no change to the residential appearance of the premises,
including the creation of separate or exclusive business entrance(s).
7. No pick-up or drop off of children shall be permitted on the premises
between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.
Article 602.5. Renewable Energy Systems
Only as an accessory use as set forth in Section 906. Where renewable
energy systems involve the generation or storage of electricity, only grid-
connected or off-grid systems are permitted.
Article 602.6. Private swimming pool and incidental installations.
Private swimming pools along with incidental installations, such as pumps
and filters, provided such pools and incidental installations are located in
other than the required front yard and provided such pools are set back
from all lot lines a distance of not less than three feet. Pools and spas must
meet all barrier requirements as provided in the current U.B.C.
Article 602.7.
Private tennis Sports Court or Private Outdoor Recreational
Structures Subject to the Following Standards:
1. Provided that such court or structure is not constructed within 20 feet of
any adjoining property under separate ownership, and provided that
tennis sports court fences or walls or recreational structures shall not
exceed 14 feet in height.
2. Provided that such courts are not constructed within 20 feet of any
adjoining property not internal to the multiple-family development and
provided that tennis court fences or walls shall not exceed 12 feet in
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-29
CHAPTER 6 - ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
height and further provided that any lights for the tennis courts shall be
subject to a use permit and shall be placed so as to not direct or reflect
light upon adjoining land, and subject lights shall be in conformance with
standards in Chapter 11, Section 1112. (Outdoor Light Control
Provisions) herein. More than one tennis sports court is permitted so
long as the primary use of the property is residential and so long as the
court or courts are accessory to the residential use and maintained
exclusively for the use of residents of the parcel on which it is located.
Article 602.8. Private Events
1. Private, non-commercial events incidental to the established use on a
parcel, are permitted by-right in all zoning districts.
2. Private events shall have no commercial sales of food and beverage on-
site.
3. Private events may have a maximum of 30 attendees onsite at one time;
otherwise a Special Use Permit for a Special Event Venue or Temporary
Use Permit for a Temporary Event shall be required.
4. No commercial food and beverage sales shall occur onsite.
5. The requirement to obtain a Special Use Permit or Temporary Use
Permit may be waived at the discretion of the Zoning Inspector or their
designee for wakes and celebrations of life.
6. Political gatherings and in-home religious or church gatherings without a
commercial component shall be permitted as a private event with no
limitation on the number of attendees subject to safe occupancy as
determined by the Zoning Inspector or their designee.
Section 603.
Use Standards and Conditions
Article 603.1. The Keeping of Farm Animals
No limit on number of farm animals in Rural zoning districts. In the R1-35
zoning district subject to the following conditions:
1. Up to five (5) six (6) chicken hens. Lots less than 1 acre in size with a
recorded subdivision community, the enclosure for the chicken hens
shall not exceed the height of the perimeter fencing of the lot.
2. Corrals for the keeping of horses, provided such corrals are located in
the rear yard, set back from all lot lines a distance of not less than 40
feet and contain at least 1,200 square feet of area for each horse kept
therein. The keeping of horses on properties located in residential
zoning districts in other than permitted corral areas is prohibited.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-30
CHAPTER 6 - ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
Article 603.2. Restaurants and Cafes, including Drive-Through
Not including those having dancing, shows or drive-in car service. The sale of
alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption only may be permitted as an
accessory use if the kitchen facilities do not exceed 20% of floor area. Patios,
cocktail lounges and outside dining and drinking areas shall be limited to a
space serving no more than 50 patrons and no entertainment or music shall
be audible off site.
Article 603.3.
Medical Marijuana Dispensary Facilities and/or Marijuana
Establishment as defined in Chapter 2 of this Ordinance subject to
all rules adopted by the Arizona Department of Health Services and
to the Following Conditions:
1. Medical Marijuana Dispensaries and/or Marijuana Establishments shall
not be located within 1,500 feet of any other Medical Marijuana
Dispensary and/or Marijuana Establishments. *23
2. Medical Marijuana Dispensaries and/or Marijuana Establishments shall
not be located within 1,500 feet of: *23
A. A church; or
B. A public or private elementary or secondary school; or
C. A public or private day care center, preschool, nursery,
kindergarten, or similar use; or
D. A public park or playground; or
E. An adult oriented facility.
3. For purposes of measuring separation distances required in this section,
the measurements shall be taken in a straight line from the closest
exterior wall of the subject building to the closest boundary line of any
affected parcel without regard to intervening structures or objects or
political boundaries.
4. A Medical Marijuana Dispensary and/or Marijuana Establishment
lawfully operating is not rendered in violation of these provisions by the
subsequent location of a church, public or private elementary or
secondary school, a kindergarten or preschool or similar use, or a park
or playground within 1,500 feet of the Medical Marijuana Dispensary
and/or Marijuana Establishment and/or Medical Marijuana Offsite
Cultivation Location. *23
5. This provision shall not be construed as permitting any use or act which
is otherwise prohibited or made punishable by law.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-31
CHAPTER 6 - ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
6. The facility may only have retail sale / dispersal of product, with
cultivation, extraction and infusion to the on-site retail sale / dispersal of
product. A Marijuana Establishment as defined in Chapter 2 of this
Ordinance shall be limited to type ‘A’ only. *23
Article 603.4.
Medical Marijuana Dispensary and/or Marijuana Establishment and/or
Medical Marijuana Offsite Cultivation Location facilities as defined
in Chapter 2 of this Ordinance subject to all rules adopted by the
Arizona Department of Health Services and to the following
conditions: Marijuana Offsite Cultivation (Including Dispensary
and/or Establishment) Subject to the Following Conditions:
1. Medical Marijuana Dispensaries and/or Marijuana Establishment and/or
Medical Marijuana Offsite Cultivation Location facilities shall not be
located within 1,500 feet of any other Medical Marijuana
Dispensary.*23
2. Medical Marijuana Dispensaries and/or Marijuana Establishment and
Medical Marijuana Offsite Cultivation Locations shall not be located
within 1,500 feet of: *23
A. A church; or
B. A public or private elementary or secondary school; or
C. A public or private day care center, preschool, nursery,
kindergarten, or similar use; or
D. A public park or playground; or
E. An adult oriented facility.
3. For purposes of measuring separation distances required in this section,
the measurements shall be taken in a straight line from the closest
exterior wall of the subject building to the closest boundary line of any
affected parcel without regard to intervening structures or objects or
political boundaries.
4. A Medical Marijuana Dispensary and/or Marijuana Establishment and/or
Medical Marijuana Offsite Cultivation Location facilities lawfully operating
is not rendered in violation of these provisions by the subsequent location
of a church, public or private elementary or secondary school, a
kindergarten or preschool or similar use, or a park or playground within
1,500 feet of the Medical Marijuana Dispensary and/or Marijuana
Establishment and/or Medical Marijuana Offsite Cultivation Location. *23
5. This provision shall not be construed as permitting any use or act which is
otherwise prohibited or made punishable by law.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-32
CHAPTER 6 - ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
Article 603.5. Landscape Material Sales
Provided all incidental equipment and supplies, including fertilizer and
empty cans, are kept within a completely enclosed building or within an
area enclosed on all sides by a solid fence or wall at least six feet in height,
and no goods, materials or objects are stacked higher than the fence or wall
so erected.
Article 603.6. Truck Stops
With customary accessory facilities including but not limited to restaurant,
convenience retail, motel, truck wash, and minor repair facilities but not
including major repair, freight storage, freight handling, warehousing or
distribution facilities.
Article 603.7.
Adult Oriented Facilities as Defined Under Chapter 2, Subject to the
Following Conditions:
1. Adult oriented facilities shall not be located within 1,500 feet of any
other adult oriented facility.
2. Adult oriented facilities shall not be located within 1,500 feet of:
A. A church; or
B. A public or private elementary or secondary school; or
C. A public or private day care center, preschool, nursery,
kindergarten, or similar use; or
D. A public park or playground; or
E. A medical marijuana dispensary or a medical marijuana offsite
cultivation location. *18
3. For purposes of measuring separation distances required in this section,
the measurements shall be taken in a straight line from the closest
exterior walls of any affected structures without regard to intervening
structures or objects or political boundaries.
4. An adult oriented business lawfully operating is not rendered in violation
of these provisions by the subsequent location of a church, public or
private elementary or secondary school, a park or playground, or a
medical marijuana dispensary or medical marijuana offsite cultivation
location within 1,500 feet of the adult oriented business. *18
5. This provision shall not be construed as permitting any use or act which
is otherwise prohibited or made punishable by law.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-33
CHAPTER 6 - ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
Article 603.8.
Temporary Construction Administration Offices/Yard Complex –
Which May Include a Security Office or Residence for a Security
Guard Provided that the Following Conditions Are Met:
1. The uses are only associated with the developer/owner and subdivision
or project in which they are located.*14
2. Upon sale of the development, cessation of the need for the use (95%
buildout), or cessation of the use, all structures, modifications to
structures and uses related to the temporary facility shall be removed.
*14
3. Those uses of structures allowed shall meet all building code
requirements.
4. All items stored on site shall only be those required for the construction
on site.
5. The allowed uses may encroach into setback areas.
6. All necessary permits must be issued prior to placement on the site.
Article 603.9. Home Occupations Subject to the Following:
1. The entrepreneur of a home occupation shall reside in the dwelling on
the property in which the business operates.
2. The number of persons who are employed in connection with the
occupants, but who are non-residents of the dwelling on the property in
which the business operates, shall not exceed three, unless the non-
resident employees are an immediate family member (spouse, child,
sibling, parent, grandparent, grandchild, step parent, step child, step
sibling) whether related by adoption or blood. *42
3. The business shall be conducted entirely within a completely enclosed
building, other than allowance for limited outdoor storage per item ‘n’
below. Physical business activity other than storage may occur within
the area described per item ‘n’ below except that no mechanical
equipment or power tools shall be operated out of doors, and in no
instance shall any outdoor activity exceed the height of screening and
not to exceed eight (8) feet.
4. The home occupation shall not interfere with the delivery of utilities or
other services to the area.
5. The business shall not generate any noise (if the noise would be
considered to have an adverse impact on the surrounding residential
neighborhood per the Maricopa County Noise Ordinance), vibration,
smoke, dust, odors, heat, glare, or electrical interference with radio or
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-34
CHAPTER 6 - ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
television transmission in the area that would exceed that normally
produced by a dwelling unit in a zoning district used solely for residential
purposes.
6. No mechanical equipment or power tools shall be used, except that used
for normal household purposes if the noise would be considered to have
an adverse impact on the surrounding residential neighborhood per the
Maricopa County Noise Ordinance.
7. No toxic, explosive, flammable, radioactive, or other similar material
shall be used, sold, or stored on the site.
8. There shall be no change to the residential appearance of the premises,
except that a separate business entrance shall be permitted. A
maximum four (4) square foot sign shall be permitted, and the sign shall
otherwise meet the requirements of Article 1402.21102.1 of this
Ordinance.
9. Unless a passenger vehicle accessory to the residence or an employee,
not more than one vehicle used in commerce shall be permitted in
connection with the home occupation. Said vehicle shall be stored in an
enclosed garage.
10. The number of customers, clients, or students on the premises shall not
exceed five at any time.
11. No non-resident employees, customers, clients, or students shall be
permitted on the premises for business purposes between the hours of
10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.
12. Deliveries from commercial suppliers (vehicle weight greater than
10,000 lbs.) shall not restrict traffic circulation, and shall occur between
8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
13. If the home occupation requires that any non-resident employees,
customers, clients, or students visit the property, a minimum of one (1)
additional off-street parking space shall be provided per Chapter 118,
Section 1102802. of this Ordinance. The maximum number of additional
off-street parking spaces permitted shall be six.
14. The outdoor storage of materials shall be limited to a maximum of 25%
of the total lot area and shall not be located within any required front or
street side yard. Any outdoor storage shall be completely fenced with a
solid masonry wall or wood fence to obstruct the view to a height equal
to the elevation of the tallest materials to be stored with a maximum
height of stored materials of eight feet.
15. All outdoor lighting shall be shielded so as not to direct or reflect light
upon adjoining land, shall not be constructed within 20 feet of any
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 6-35
CHAPTER 6 - ZONING DISTRICTS USES TABLE,
ACCESSORY USES AND USE STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS
adjoining property under other ownership, and shall not exceed 20 feet
in height.
16. Deleted per TA2019003 – effective 11-6-20 *42 If these conditions
cannot be met, a Special Use Permit per Section 1301 1001.1.5. of this
Ordinance shall be required. *42
Article 603.10. Battery Energy Storage Systems
Include the distancing of 100' from all lot lines and 500' minimum
separation for battery enclosures from residential structures.
Article 603.11. Any Other Office, Laboratory, Manufacturing and Assembling Uses
Which do not create any danger to the public health, safety and general
welfare in surrounding areas and which do not create any offensive noise,
vibration, smoke, dust, odor, heat or glare and which, by reason of high
value in relation to size and weight of merchandise received and shipped
create very little truck traffic.
Article 603.12.
Public Equestrian Uses Accessory to a Single-Family Residence
Limited to the Following:
1. The boarding of up to five (5) horses and/or other equine not owned by
the private property owner and/or resident. Documentation of
ownership shall be maintained when more than five (5) horses and/or
other equine are kept on the property.
2. Non-commercial public activities (no admission fee shall be charged)
involving up to a maximum of 24 persons (including staff, participants
and spectators).
3. All structures shall meet minimum setback requirements and the
maximum lot coverage requirement. All parcels must meet minimum lot
area and width requirements.
4. Any public equestrian use that cannot meet these conditions will require
a Special Use Permit in accordance with Article 1301.1.141001.1.3. of
this Ordinance.*39
Article 603.13.
Utility Scale concentrating solar power (CSP) generating facilities or
photo-voltaic solar generating facilities of any output capacity are
allowed subject to the following:
As either a primary or accessory use within the IND-2 or IND-3 zoning
district subject to the development standards of that district and provided
that any water consumed during the production of electricity by the
generating facility is supplied from a “renewable water source” as defined
by this Ordinance.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 7-1
CHAPTER 7 - MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ZONING DISTRICTS
Chapter 7
| Multiple Family Residential Zoning
Districts
Section 701.
R-2 (Two-Family Residential Zoning District)
Article 701.1.
Purpose:
The principal purpose of this zoning district is to provide for efficient use of
land and facilities by single-family attached or detached dwellings and limited
multiple-family residential projects taking into consideration sustainable
development practices, and existing conditions, including present use of land,
future land use needs and the availability of public utilities. The minimum lot
required is 6,000 square feet in area and the minimum lot area required for
each dwelling unit is 4,000 square feet. Principal uses permitted in this zoning
district include single-family, two-family, and limited multiple-family
dwellings and other uses permitted in the single-family residential zoning
district.*6,
Article 701.2.
Use Regulations:
A building or premises shall be used only for the following purposes:
1. Any use permitted in the R1-35 Zoning District, subject to all the
regulations specified in the use regulations for such R1-35 Zoning
District.
2. Two-family and multiple-family dwellings.*4
3. Accessory buildings and uses customarily incidental to the above uses,
including:
a. Private tennis courts provided that such courts are not
constructed within 20 feet of any adjoining property not internal
to the multiple-family development and provided that tennis
court fences or walls shall not exceed 12 feet in height and further
provided that any lights for the tennis courts shall be subject to a
use permit and shall be placed so as to not direct or reflect light
upon adjoining land, and subject lights shall be in conformance
with standards in Chapter 11, Section 1112. (Outdoor Light
Control Provisions) herein. More than one tennis court is
permitted so long as the primary use of the property is residential
and so long as the court or courts are accessory to the residential
use and maintained exclusively for the use of residents of the
parcel on which it is located.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 7-2
CHAPTER 7 - MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ZONING DISTRICTS
b. Private swimming pools along with incidental installations, such
as pumps and filters, provided such pools and incidental
installations are located in other than the required front yard and
provided such pools are set back from all lot lines a distance of
not less than three feet. Pools and spas must meet all barrier
requirements as provided in the current U.B.C.*3
c.
Renewable energy systems as set forth in Section 1206 of this
Ordinance. Where renewable energy systems involve the
generation or storage of electricity, only grid-connected systems
are permitted.*6
Article 701.3.
Height Regulations:
The height of buildings shall not exceed 30 feet.*7
Article 701.4.
Yard Regulations:
The required yards as follows:
1. Front Yard:
a.
There shall be a front yard having a depth of not less than 20 feet.
b. For through lots, a front yard shall be provided along both front lot
lines.
c.
Yards along each street side of corner lots shall have a width equal
to not less than half the depth of the required front yard. Yards
along each street side of corner lots shall otherwise conform with
regulations applicable to front yards.
2. Side Yard: There shall be a side yard on each side of a building having a
width of not less than five feet.
3. Rear Yard: There shall be a rear yard having a depth of not less than 25
feet.
Article 701.5.
Intensity of Use Regulations:
The intensity of use regulations are as follows:*8
1. Lot Area: Each lot shall have a minimum lot area of 6,000 square feet.
2. Lot Width: Each lot shall have a minimum lot area of 60 feet.
3. Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit: The minimum lot area per dwelling unit shall
be 4,000 square feet.
4. Lot Coverage: The maximum lot coverage shall be 60% of the lot area.*9
Article 701.6.
Parking Regulations:
The parking regulations are as provided in Chapter 11, Section 1102.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 7-3
CHAPTER 7 - MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ZONING DISTRICTS
Article 701.7.
Sign Regulations:
The sign regulations are as provided in Chapter 14, Section 1403.
Article 701.8.
Outdoor Lighting:
Any outdoor lighting used shall conform to the standards as provided in
Chapter 11, Section 1112.
Article 701.9.
Additional Regulations:*4
1. All two-family or multi-family residential development in the R-2 Zoning
District shall be subject to a plan of development approval as set forth in
the provisions of this Ordinance.
2. Two-family or multi-family uses, which were developed prior to
September 22, 2008 shall be exempt from the Plan of Development
process; provided, however, that in the event all two-family or multi-
family structures located on the property are removed or destroyed in
excess of 75% of value, the property shall, without regard to the original
date of development, require a Plan of Development.*5
Date of Revisions
*1
Revised 2-4-85
*6
Effective 11-19-10 – TA2009014
*2
Revised 4-1-85
*7
Effective 3-16-11 – TA2010022
*3
Effective 8-6-99
*8
Effective 10-19-11 – TA2011013
*4
Effective 9-22-08 – TA2007016
*9
Approved 10-8-14 – TA2014002
*5
Effective 1-16-09 – TA2008008
Section 702.
R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential Zoning District),
R-4 (Multiple-Family Residential Zoning District) &
R-5 (Multiple-Family Residential Zoning District)*2
Article 702.1.
Purpose:
The principal purpose of these zoning districts are to provide for multiple-
family residential developments in locations which are suitable and
appropriate taking into consideration existing conditions, sustainable
development practices, and including present use of land, future land use
needs, and the availability of public utilities. The minimum lot area required
for each dwelling unit in each of the districts is as follows: 3,000 square feet
for R-3; 2,000 square feet for R-4; and 1,000 square feet for
R-5. Principal uses permitted in these zoning districts include two-family
dwellings, multiple-family dwellings, dormitories and the uses permitted in
the single-family residential zoning district.*9, *14
Article 702.2.
Use Regulations:
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 7-4
CHAPTER 7 - MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ZONING DISTRICTS
A building or premises shall be used only for the following purposes:
1. Any use permitted in the R1-35 Zoning District, subject to all the
regulations specified in the use regulations for such R1-35 Zoning
District.
2. Two-family dwellings
3. Multiple-family dwellings
4. Dormitories*14
5. Recovery communities*15:
a. Permitted as a Special Use in the R-3 and R-4 zoning districts.
b. Permitted subject to the provisions and standards of Section
1207 in the R-5 zoning district.
6. Any use permitted in the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial Zoning District
may be located in the R-5 Multi-Family Residential Zoning District.*13
7. Mobile Home Parks subject to the standards outline in Section 1203 of
this Ordinance may be located in the R-5 Multi-Family Residential
Zoning District.*13
8. Accessory buildings and uses customarily incidental to the above uses
including:
a. Private tennis courts provided that such courts are not
constructed within 20 feet of any adjoining property under
other ownership and provided that tennis court fences or walls
shall not exceed 12 feet in height and further provided that any
lights for the tennis courts shall be subject to a use permit and
shall be placed so as to not direct or reflect light upon adjoining
land, and subject lights shall be in conformance with standards
in Chapter 11, Section 1112. (Outdoor Light Control Provisions)
herein. More than one tennis court is permitted so long as the
primary use of the property is residential and so long as the
court or courts are accessory to the residential use and
maintained exclusively for the use of residents of the parcel on
which it is located.*1
b. Private swimming pools along with incidental installations, such
as pumps and filters, provided such pools and incidental
installations are located in other than the required front yard
and provided such pools are set back from all lot lines a distance
of not less than three feet. Pools and spas must meet all barrier
requirements as provided in the current U.B.C.*6
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 7-5
CHAPTER 7 - MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ZONING DISTRICTS
c.
Grid renewable energy systems as set forth in Section 1206 of
this Ordinance. Where renewable energy systems involve the
generation or storage of electricity, only grid-connected or off-
grid systems are permitted.*9
Article 702.3.
Height Regulations:
The height of buildings shall not exceed 40 feet.*10
Article 702.4.
Yard Regulations:
The required yards as follows:
1. Front Yard:
a.
There shall be a front yard having a depth of not less than 20 feet.
b. For through lots, a front yard shall be provided along both front lot
lines.
c.
Yards along each street side of corner lots shall have a width equal
to not less than half the depth of the required front yard. Yards
along each street side of corner lots shall otherwise conform with
regulations applicable to front yards.
2. Side Yard: There shall be a side yard on each side of a building having a
width of not less than five feet.
3. Rear Yard: There shall be a rear yard having a depth of not less than 25
feet.
Article 702.5.
Intensity of Use Regulations:
The intensity of use regulations are as follows:*11
1. Lot Area: Each lot shall have a minimum lot area of 6,000 square feet.
2. Lot Width: Each lot shall have a minimum lot area of 60 feet.
3. Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit: The minimum lot area per dwelling unit shall
be as follows:
a.
R-3 Zoning District - 3,000 square feet per dwelling unit
b. R-4 Zoning District - 2,000 square feet per dwelling unit
c.
R-5 Zoning District - 1,000 square feet per dwelling unit
4. Lot Coverage: The maximum lot coverage shall be 60% of the lot area.*12
Article 702.6.
Parking Regulations:
The parking regulations are as provided in Chapter 11, Section 1102.
Article 702.7.
Sign Regulations:
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 7-6
CHAPTER 7 - MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ZONING DISTRICTS
The sign regulations are as provided in Chapter 14, Section 1402.
Article 702.8.
Additional Regulations:*7
1. All multi-family or two-family residential development in the R-3, R-4,
or R-5 Zoning Districts shall be subject to a plan of development
approval as set forth in the provisions of this Ordinance.
2.
Two-family or multi-family uses, which were developed prior to
September 22, 2008 shall be exempt from the Plan of Development
process; provided, however, that in the event all two-family or multi-
family structures located on the property are removed or destroyed in
excess of 75% of value, the property shall, without regard to the
original date of development, require a Plan of Development.*8
Date of Revisions
*1
Revised 4-1-85
*9
Effective 11-19-10 – TA2009014
*2
Revised 4-7-86 – Effective 1-1-88
*10
Effective 3-16-11 – TA2010022
*4
Added 4-15-93
*11
Effective 10-19-11 – TA2011013
*5
Revised 1-20-94
*12
Approved 10-08-14 – TA2014002
*6
Effective 8-06-99
*13
Approved 10-08-14 – TA2014004
*7
Effective 9-22-08 – TA2007016
*14
Approved 10-08-14 – TA2014006
*8
Effective 1-16-09 – TA2008008
*15
Effective 3-11-22 – TA2020001
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-1
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
Chapter 7
| Overlay Zoning DistrictsChapter 10 |
Overlay Zoning Districts
Section 1001.Section 701.
PAD (Planned Area of Development)*1
Article 1001.1.Article 701.1.
Purpose:
The Planned Area Development (PAD) Overlay Zoning District is intended to
accomplish the following:
1. Permit and encourage the unified planning of large areas in order to
achieve the mixture, variety and cohesiveness of land uses and
amenities that such large- scale planning makes possible.
2. Establish development parameters for land uses, densities and
intensities, and design standards, while allowing final detailed site plans
and parcel descriptions to be deferred to the time of subdividing or site
planning.
3. Assure both the County and the property owner that the development
approved under a PAD may be carried out over a specified time.
4. Promote sustainable development practices.*2
Article 1001.2.Article 701.2.
General Provisions:
1. The PAD District is an overlay zoning district which may be combined
with any of the zoning districts set forth in this Ordinance, including
Rural and Residential Districts, Commercial Districts, Industrial Districts,
Unit Plans of Development (RUPD, CUPD and IUPD), and Special Uses
(SUP).
2. The minimum site area for a PAD shall be 160 acres.
3. Parameters for development are established through approval of a
General Development Plan for the entire PAD site. Prior to development
on any site within a PAD, approval of Specific Development Plans is
required. Specific Development Plans provide the details of
development for individual development parcels in the PAD.
Article 1001.3.Article 701.3.
Use Regulations:
1. Uses permitted within the PAD District shall be limited to those
permitted in the zoning districts with which the PAD District is
combined, as set forth in the General Development Plan.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-2
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
2. Height regulations, yard regulations, and intensity of use regulations
shall be those required in the zoning districts with which the PAD
District is combined, as set forth in the General Development Plan.
Variations in these development standards may be approved through
concurrent use of Unit Plans of Development (RUPD, CUPD and IUPD) in
combination with the PAD and underlying zoning districts.
Article 1001.4.Article 701.4.
Required Plan Submittal:
1. Applications for a PAD shall be filed and processed in the same manner
as other amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. Notice and procedures
for public hearings shall conform to the procedures prescribed in
Chapter 3, Section 3034.
2. The PAD application shall be accompanied by a General Development
Plan which shall consist of the following:
A. Map(s) showing at least the following:
i.
Boundary of the proposed PAD District.
ii.
General boundaries, approximate acreage, and proposed land
use of each development parcel (including the different types
and densities of residential use), and the corresponding zoning
district for each land use.
iii.
General location of any known public uses, such as schools,
parks, recreational facilities and trails.
iv.
Approximate location of all arterial and collector streets.
v.
Landscaping concept plan.
vi.
Topographic character of the land, with identification of any
areas in the Hillside District (see Chapter 129, Section
1201901.).
vii.
Conceptual/preliminary drainage plan.
viii.
General phasing boundaries.
B. Development narrative including at least the following:
i.
Development narrative including at least the following:
ii.
Description of the proposed PAD and the nature of the
development proposed.
iii.
Discussion of the internal and external land use relationships
and compatibility.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-3
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
iv.
Discussion of the proposed public features provided.
v.
Identification of utilities and services to be provided for the
development.
vi.
Schedule of development parcels listing land use, proposed
underlying zoning district, approximate acreage, density or
intensity limit, and applicable development standards.
vii.
Overall density proposed.
viii.
Landscaping concepts.
ix.
Phasing plan and anticipated timing for implementation of the
development.
x.
Master street plan, including street widths and cross-sections.
xi.
Traffic report including information on trip generation for each
development unit, traffic volumes and capacity analysis.
xii.
Restrictive covenants (if applicable).
xiii.
Legal description of the PAD boundary.
3. Upon approval of the General Development Plan by the Board of
Supervisors, the PAD Zoning District shall be established on the site in
accordance with provisions of Chapter 3, Section 3043. However, no
development shall be permitted until a Specific Development Plan has
been approved for the parcel to be developed.
4. The Commission may recommend and the Board of Supervisors may
approve conditions to the approval of a PAD including maximum
density/intensity, maximum building heights, maximum lot coverage,
minimum setbacks, timing and phasing, and other reasonable
considerations deemed necessary to promote the purpose of this
Ordinance.
5. Major changes to an approved PAD General Development Plan shall be
processed in the same manner as the initial application. Minor
amendments may be administratively approved by the Department of
Planning and Development. For the purposes of this section the
following shall be considered a major change to the approved PAD
General Development Plan:
A. A change in individual zoning district category.
B. A change in individual zoning district area by 5% or more.
C. A change in the number or a substantial change in the location of
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-4
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
major streets.
D. Any change that is determined by the Planning & Development
Department Director to warrant review by the Planning & Zoning
Commission and Board of Supervisors.
Article 1001.5.Article 701.5.
Specific Development Plan:
1. Submittal and approval of a Specific Development Plan is required prior
to development of any parcel within a PAD.
2. The Specific Development Plan shall be generally consistent with the
development parameters set forth in the General Development Plan.
Refinements in site configuration and development parcel size are
allowable, as long as any limitations applied to the overall PAD are met.
A legal description of the development parcel shall be included with
application for the Specific Development Plan. Application for the
Specific Development Plan shall include information showing the
development parcel in the context of the approved PAD and in relation
to any other approved Specific Development Plans in the PAD, along
with an accounting of density or intensity if limits were stipulated in the
PAD approval.
3. For residential parcels, the Specific Development Plan shall be a final
plat or an approved Special Use Permit, processed in the same manner
and with the same requirements set forth in the County Subdivision
Regulations or this Ordinance.
4. For non-residential parcels, the Specific Development Plan shall be a site
plan processed in the same manner and with the same requirements set
forth for a precise plan of development in Chapter 103, Section
1005305.
Date of Revisions
*1
Effective 3-31-00
*2
Effective 11-19-10 – TA2009014
Section 1002.Section 702.
RUPD (Residential Unit Plan of Development)*21
Article 1002.1.Article 702.1.
The purpose of a Unit Plan of Development (UPD) is to allow limitation on the
entitled uses and variations to the development standards of the underlying
zoning district in which a development or project is located. Such limitations
and variations may be warranted due to aspects of the site and surrounding
community or for projects that require special design techniques or flexibility
due to considerations including, but not limited to, the physical limitations of
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-5
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
the project site, as well as innovative or sustainable project design
techniques. The purpose of the Residential Unit Plan of Development is to
allow largescale residential development where variation in development
standards is warranted due to topography, innovative or sustainable project
design, or other considerations.*25
Article 702.2.
The following UPD overlay zoning districts may be established:
1. A Residential Unit Plan of Development (RUPD) may be established in
any rural or residential zoning district. A site subject to an RUPD may
reduce the minimum required lot area but the average lot area per
primary dwelling unit, exclusive of the area occupied by streets, shall not
be less than that required by the underlying zoning district.
2. A Commercial Unit Plan of Development (CUPD) may be established in
any commercial zoning district but not in any other zoning district.
3. An Industrial Unit Plan of Development (IUPD) which may be established
in any industrial zoning district but not in any other zoning district.
Article 1002.2.Article 702.3.
The owners or authorized agents of a site may submit to the Board of
Supervisors a plan to develop a Residential Unit Plan of DevelopmentUPD.
Plans, drawings and specifications shall be in sufficient detail so that
reviewing bodies can fully evaluate the proposal and its effects.
Article 1002.3.Article 702.4.
The plan shall be referred to the Planning & Zoning Commission for its review,
and recommendation at a public hearing. Notice and procedures for public
hearings shall conform to the procedures prescribed in Chapter 3, Section
3043.
Article 1002.4.Article 702.5.
The Commission, having heldafter holding a public hearing, shall then present
its recommendation and the plan to the Board of Supervisors for
consideration and public hearing. Notice and procedures for public hearings
shall conform to the procedures prescribed in Chapter 3, Section 3043.
Article 1002.5.Article 702.6.
The recommendation of the Commission shall include the reasons for
approval or disapproval of the plan, . If the Commission recommends and if
recommended for approval, its recommendation shall include specific
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-6
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
evidence and facts. showing the following:
1. The buildings shall be used only for singlefamily dwellings, twofamily
dwellings, multiplefamily dwellings or manufactured houses, customary
accessory uses, and community facilities.*1The use(s) of the site will
conform to the permitted uses as listed in the use regulations of the
zoning district in which it is located.
2. The average lot area per dwelling unit or manufactured house, exclusive
of the area occupied by streets, shall not be less than that required by
the zoning district regulation otherwise applicable to the site.*1The
proposed development will not adversely affect adjacent properties or
the permitted uses thereof.
3. The proposed development was designed, and will be constructed, in a
manner consistent with sustainable development practices. *25
4. For a site subject to an RUPD, the average lot area per dwelling unit or
manufactured house, exclusive of the area occupied by streets, shall not
be less than that required by the zoning district regulation otherwise
applicable to the site.
5. For a site subject to a CUPD, the project will have access to, and frontage
along, a paved street or sufficient capacity for the proposed use(s).
6. For a site subject to an IUPD, the project will have access to a major
street or highway, rail service or other means of transportation.
3.7.
For a site subject to an IUPD, the project will not adversely affect
the public health, safety, and general welfare by causing or producing
objectionable effects that would impose hazard to adjacent or other
properties by reason of smoke, soot, dust, radiation, odor, noise,
vibration, heat, glare, toxic fumes or other undesirable conditions.
Article 1002.6.Article 702.7.
The recommendation of the Commission may include reasonable conditions
as deemed necessary to promote the purpose of the Ordinance including, but
not limited to, specification or regulation of the following:
1. Yards and open spaces.
2. Fences, walls, or other types of site screening.
3. Points of vehicular and pedestrian ingress and egress.
4. Signs.
5. Landscaping and its maintenance.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-7
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
6. Outdoor lighting.
7. The number of parking spaces required and the surface of parking areas;
however, parking space size and driveway design must meet standard
requirements.
8. Noise, vibration, odor, and other potentially dangerous or objectionable
elements, for a site subject to a CUPD or an IUPD.
6.9.
Those uses which are permitted and those which are prohibited.
7.10.
Time limit for the start of construction.
Article 1002.7. A Residential Unit Plan of Development may be established in any
rural or residential zoning district but not in any other zoning district.
Article 1002.8.Article 702.8.
Major Amendments to a Residential Unit Plan of DevelopmentUPD shall be
processed in the same manner as the initial plan. If, however, the amendment
does not alter a development standard or stipulation of approval, then it may
be processed administratively, either as a Major or Minor Amendment to the
plan or as a plat, as set forth in the provisions or of this Ordinance or the
Subdivision Regulations.*23
An accessory dwelling unit/guest house, with or without additional kitchen
facilities, may be permitted as an accessory use, if specifically set forth in the
plan. An accessory dwelling unit/guest house shall be developed in
accordance with Article 501.2.14 if in a Rural zoning district or in accordance
with Article 601.2.10 if in a Residential zoning district unless different
standards are specifically set forth in the plan.*22, *24
Date of Revisions
*1
Revised 6-22-81
*23
Effective 9-22-08 – TA2007016
*21
Effective 5-16-98
*24
Effective 11-14-2008 – TA2008005
*22
Effective 01-19-2007 – TA2003002
*25
Effective 11-19-10 – TA2009014
Section 1003.
CUPD (Commercial Unit Plan of Development)*21
Article 1003.1.
The purpose of the Commercial Unit Plan of Development is to allow
variations in development standards in commercial projects which require
special design techniques or flexibility due to topography, innovative or
sustainable project design, or other considerations.*23
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-8
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
The owners or authorized agents of a site may submit to the Board of
Supervisors a plan to develop a Commercial Unit Plan of Development. Plans,
drawings and specifications shall be in sufficient detail so that reviewing
bodies can fully evaluate the proposal and its effects.
Article 1003.2.
The plan shall be referred to the Commission for its review and
recommendation at a public hearing. Notice and procedures for public
hearings shall conform to the procedures prescribed in Chapter 3, Section
304.
Article 1003.3.
The Commission having held public hearing shall then present its
recommendation and the plan to the Board of Supervisors for consideration
and public hearing. Notice and procedures for public hearings shall conform
to the procedures prescribed in Chapter 3, Section 304.
Article 1003.4.
The recommendation of the Commission shall include the reasons for
approval or disapproval of the plan, and if recommended for approval,
specific evidence and facts showing the following:
The use(s) of the property will conform to the permitted uses as listed in the
use regulations of the commercial zoning district in which it is located.
The project will have access to, and frontage along, a paved street of
sufficient capacity for the proposed use(s).
The proposed development will not adversely affect adjacent properties or
the permitted uses thereof.
The proposed development was designed, and will be constructed, in a
manner consistent with sustainable development practices.*23
Article 1003.5.
The recommendation of the Commission may include reasonable conditions
as deemed necessary to promote the purpose of this Ordinance including, but
not limited to, specification or regulation of the following:
Yards and open spaces.
Fences, walls, or other types of site screening.
The number of parking spaces required, and the surface of parking areas;
however, parking space size and driveway design must meet standard
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-9
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
requirements.
Noise, vibration, odor, and other potentially dangerous or objectionable
elements.
Points of vehicular and pedestrian ingress and egress.
Signs.
Landscaping and its maintenance.
Outdoor lighting.
Time limit for the start of construction.
Article 1003.6.
E. A Commercial Unit Plan of Development may be established in any
commercial zoning district (C-S, C-O, C-1, C-2 or C-3) but not in any other
zoning district.
Article 1003.7.
Major Amendments to a Commercial Unit Plan of Development shall be
processed in the same manner as the initial plan. If, however, the amendment
does not alter a development standard or stipulation of approval, then it may
be processed administratively, either as a Major or Minor Amendment, as set
forth in the provisions of this Ordinance.*22
Date of Revisions
*21
Effective 5-16-98
*22
Effective 9-22-08 – TA2007016
*23
Effective 11-19-10 – TA2009014
Section 1004.
IUPD (Industrial Unit Plan of Development)*4, *21
Article 1004.1. The purpose of the Industrial Unit Plan of Development is to allow
variations in development standards in industrial projects that require special
design techniques or flexibility due to topography, innovative or sustainable
project design, or other considerations. *23
Article 1004.2. The owners or authorized agents of a property may submit to the
Board of Supervisors a plan to develop an Industrial Unit Plan of Development.
Plans, drawings and specifications shall be in sufficient detail so that
reviewing bodies can fully evaluate the proposal and its effects.
Article 1004.3. The plan shall be referred to the Commission for its review and
recommendation at a public hearing. Notice and procedures for public
hearings shall conform to the procedures prescribed in Chapter 3, Section 304.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-10
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
Article 1004.4. The Commission having held a public hearing shall then present its
recommendation and the plan to the Board of Supervisors for consideration
and public hearing. Notice and procedures for public hearings shall conform to
the procedures prescribed in Chapter 3, Section 304.
Article 1004.5. The recommendation of the Commission shall include the reasons
for approval or disapproval of the plan, and if recommended for approval,
specific evidence and facts showing the following:
• The subject project will not adversely affect adjacent properties or the
public health, safety, and general welfare by causing or producing
objectionable effects that would impose hazard to adjacent or other
properties by reason of smoke, soot, dust, radiation, odor, noise,
vibration, heat, glare, toxic fumes or other undesirable conditions.
8. The project will have access to a major street or highway, rail service or other means of
transportation.
9. The use(s) of the property will conform to the permitted uses as listed in the use
regulations of the industrial zoning district in which it is located.
10. The proposed development was designed, and will be constructed, in a manner consistent
with sustainable development practices. *23
Article 1004.6. The recommendation of the Commission may include reasonable
conditions as deemed necessary to promote the purpose of the Ordinance,
including but not limited to specification or regulation of the following:
•
Yards and open spaces.
11. Fences, walls, or other types of site screening.
12. Points of vehicular and pedestrian ingress and egress.
13. Signs.
14. Outdoor lighting.
15. Landscaping and its maintenance.
16. The number of parking spaces required, and the surface of parking areas;
however, parking space size and driveway design must meet standard
requirements.
17. Noise, vibration, odor, and other potentially dangerous or objectionable
elements.
18. Time limit for the start of construction.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-11
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
Article 1004.7. An Industrial Unit Plan of Development may be established in any
industrial zoning district (IND-1, IND-2, or IND-3) but not in any other zoning
district.
Article 1004.8. Major Amendments to an Industrial Unit Plan of Development shall
be processed in the same manner as the initial plan. If, however, the
amendment does not alter a development standard or stipulation of approval,
then it may be processed administratively, either as a Major or Minor
Amendment, as set forth in the provisions of this Ordinance. *22
Date of Revisions
*4
Added 10-15-84
*21
Effective 5-16-98
*22
Effective 9-22-08 – TA2007016
*23
Effective 11-19-10 – TA2009014
Section 1005.
PD (Planned Development)*1
Article 1005.1.
Purpose:
The principal purpose of the Planned Development Overlay Zoning District is
to establish a basic set of conceptual parameters for the development of land
and supporting infrastructure, which is to be carried out and implemented by
precise plans at the time of actual development. Conceptual plans for
Planned Development Overlay Development should describe the general land
use concept being proposed, along with information necessary to identify the
nature, scale, intent and impact of development. Precise plans for actual
development refine the concept proposal to a detail level.
Article 1005.2.
General Provisions:*2
• The Planned Development Overlay Zoning District is an overlay zone and
may be combined with any other zoning district or combination of
districts listed in Chapter 4, Section 401.
19. All portions of a lot, parcel or combinations, thereof, within the Planned
Development Overlay Zoning District as designated on the zoning district
maps shall be subject to the regulations and procedures set forth in this
Section, except as otherwise noted herein.
Article 1005.3.
Use Regulations:
The use regulations which apply to property in any zoning district with which
the Planned Development Overlay Zoning District has been combined shall
remain the same as specified in the primary zoning district, except that
development in accordance with these procedures shall apply in all cases.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-12
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
Article 1005.4.
Other Regulations:
The height, yard, intensity of use, parking, loading and unloading, and
additional regulations which apply to property in any zone district with which
the Planned Development Overlay Zoning District has been combined shall
remain the same as specified in the primary zoning district unless otherwise
specified herein.
Article 1005.5.
Procedural Regulations:
The Planned Development Overlay Zoning District may be combined with any
primary zone and made a part of the Zoning District maps prior to approval
of plans herein specified. However, before any development of property so
designated with the "PD" Overlay is authorized, a plan of development is
required as set forth in the provisions of this Ordinance.*5
Article 1005.6. DELETED WITH TA2007016 EFFECTIVE 9-22-08
Date of Revisions
*1
Added 7-1-85
*3
Revised 7-18-90
*2
Revised 6-30-86
*4
Revised 7-18-90
*5
Effective 9-22-08 – TA2007016
Section 1006.Section 703.
SC (Senior Citizen)*1
Article 1006.1.Article 703.1.
Purpose:
The SC (Senior Citizen Overlay) Zoning District is intended to provide for
planned residential development, designed specifically for residency by
persons of advanced age.
Article 1006.2.Article 703.2.
Use Regulations:
1. The SC (Senior Citizen Overlay) Zoning District is an overlay zone and
shall be combined with any rural or residential zoning district and not
with any other zoning district, (e.g., Rural-190 (SC), R1-35 (SC), R-5 (SC),
etc.).
2. The regulations which apply to property in any zone with which the SC
Zoning District is combined shall remain the same, except as to the
matters specified in this Section. This Section shall apply in lieu of or in
addition to and shall supersede the corresponding regulations of such
zone with which the SC Zoning District is combined.
3. Temporary use for underage occupancy. Continued occupancy in this
district in the dwelling unit by an underage spouse, because of the death
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-13
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
or long term medical relocation of the spouse meeting the age
requirement, shall be exempt from this provision. This exemption shall
continue only so long as the remaining spouse maintains a sole occupant
status. Upon change from a sole occupant status, the age requirements
of this district for occupancy shall be met. Otherwise, a Temporary Use
Permit for underage occupancy shall be required for occupancy of any
underage person beyond the 90 days permitted in Article
1006.6.1703.6.1. *3
Article 1006.3.Article 703.3.
Height Regulations:
No Any building shall be constructed that exceeds two stories in height,
unless it shall contains elevators for the use of itsthe occupants.
Article 1006.4.Article 703.4.
Intensity of Use Regulations:
The Senior Citizen Overlay Zoning District shall only be established on parcels
of five or more contiguous acres which may include existing or proposed
subdivided lots and public or private rights-of-way and easements.
Article 1006.5.Article 703.5.
Parking Regulations:
The required parking spaces as delineated in the underlying zoning district
shall be located within 200 feet of the unit it is to serve.
Article 1006.6.Article 703.6.
Additional Regulations: **3
1. Each dwelling unit, if occupied, shall be occupied by at least one person
not less than 55 years of age and no person 18 years of age or under
shall reside in any dwelling unit for a period of time exceeding 90 days.
*2, *3
2. Age restrictions listed in Article 1006.6.1703.6.1 above shall not apply to
any resident who is a qualified individual with disabilities per the
definition of disability in Chapter 2.*5
3. The following criteria shall be met and maintained for each planned
residential development: *3, *4, *5
A. At least 80% of the dwelling units shall be occupied by at least one
person 55 years of age or older per unit.
B. Policies and procedures which demonstrate an intent to provide
housing for persons 55 years of age or older shall be published and
adhered to.
C. It is the responsibility of the residents and/or owners of properties
to provide evidence that the above criteria are met and will be
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-14
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
maintained.
(NOTE: The above criteria are based on the requirements contained in Section
100.304 of the Rules and Regulations for implementation of the Federal Fair
Housing Amendment Act of 1988).
Article 1006.7.Article 703.7.
Public Hearing Notice and Procedure:
The use and application of this Overlay Zoning District shall be consistent with
all other zoning districts in this Ordinance. Notice and procedure for public
hearing shall conform to the procedures prescribed in Chapter 3, Section
3034. hereof.
Date of Revisions
*1
Added 5-30-79
**3
Revised 2-20-94
*2
Revised/Effective 8-10-89
*4
Revised 6-5-96
*3
Added 2-20-94
*5
Revised 7-26-23
Section 1007.
WESTSIDE MILITARY AIRBASE*1, *2
THIS SECTION HAS BEEN REPEALED
Date of Revisions
*1
Added 1-09-92
*2
Repealed 3-17-2010 – TA2009012
Section 1008.Section 704.
WICKENBURG HIGHWAY SCENIC CORRIDOR
Article 1008.1.Article 704.1.
Purpose:
The principal purposes of the WICKENBURG HIGHWAY SCENIC CORRIDOR
Overlay Zoning District are:
1. To maintain the scenic beauty that now exists along the Wickenburg
Highway.
2. To encourage orderly and sensitive development within the scenic
corridorScenic Corridor.
3. To encourage safe and efficient traffic flow along the Wickenburg
Highway.
4. To encourage and improve the economic, social and physical living
environment for the residents within the Scenic Corridor.
5. To encourage sustainable development practices. *3
Article 1008.2.Article 704.2.
General Provisions:
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-15
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
1. The Wickenburg Highway Scenic Corridor Overlay Zoning District
encompasses lands within two miles of the edge of the right-of-way of
both sides of the Wickenburg Highway (U.S. Highway 60-89) extending
from Bell Road (Surprise) to the Town of Wickenburg corporate limits.
2. Persons with property divided by the Scenic Corridor boundary or
intensity levels (Classes 1-43) are required to comply with the district
standards only for that segment of the property within the boundary
according to Chapter 4, Section 405. of the Maricopa County Zoning
Ordinance.
3. When standards and requirements differ between the Scenic Corridor
Overlay Zoning District and the existing primary zoning district
classification, the more restrictive regulation shall apply.
4. All new development shall be required to conform with the Scenic
Corridor Overlay Zoning District regulations. Existing uses shall be
governed as provided by Chapter 13, Section 1305., Non-Conforming
Uses, of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.
5.4.
The Wickenburg Highway Scenic Corridor Overlay Zoning District
is divided into four three intensity levels according to location and
physical features of the Scenic Corridor. These are as follows:
A. Class 1: One-quarter miles to two miles from Wickenburg Highway
Right-of-way.
B. Class 2: 300 feet to one-quarter mile from Wickenburg Highway
Right-of-way.
C. Class 3: Zero to 300 feet from Wickenburg Highway Right-of-way;
from Rocking Hills Drive alignment (Morristown) north to the Town
of Wickenburg.
D. Class 4: Zero to 300 feet from Wickenburg Highway Right-of-way;
from Rocking Hills Drive alignment south to Bell Road (Surprise).
Article 1008.3. USE REGULATIONS:
Uses allowed within the Scenic Corridor Overlay District shall remain the
same as specified in the primary district with which the Overlay District has
been combined. However, because of the amount and proliferation of
existing commercial zoning, additional commercial zoning (C-O, C-S, C-1, C-2,
C-3) will be discouraged. To accommodate needed commercial uses, transfer
of commercial zoning within the scenic corridor is allowed. Commercial
Zoning may be changed to another commercial classification of equal or less
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-16
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
intensity (where C-O is the least intense and C-3 is the most intense). To
encourage commercial development in the appropriate areas, bonus ratios
will be allowed in certain circumstances. Ratios vary according to class
designation as follows:
TRANSFER OF COMMERCIAL ZONING BONUS RATIO*
•
Class 3 to Class 1 or 2
2
(Arterial Intersections)
6. Class 3 to Class 4
2
(Activity Centers)
7. Class 4 to Class 1 or 2
2
(Arterial Intersections)
8. Class 4 (Non-activity Center)
1.5
to Class 4 (Activity Centers)
Note: *Ten acres of C-2 Zoning in Class 3 could be used to designate 20 acres
of C-2 Zoning (or C-1, C-O, C-S) in Classes 1, 2 or 4 at arterial intersection or
activity centers.
Article 1008.4.Article 704.3.
Standards
The following standards apply in each intensity level Class category: *2
1. CLASS 1:
A. Land Use Plan: Rezonings shall be consistent with the Scenic Corridor
Plan (Goals and Policies and Land Use Plan).
2.1.
CLASS 2:
A. Land Use Plan: Rezonings shall be consistent with the Scenic Corridor
Plan (Goals and Policies and Land Use Plan).
B.A. Building Height: Building heights for new development shall be
limited to 33 feet above grade.
3.2.
CLASS 3:
A. Land Use Plan: Rezoning shall be consistent with the Scenic Corridor
Plan (Goals and Policies and Land Use Plan).
B.A. Building Height: Building heights for new development shall be
limited to 33 feet above road grade.
C.B. Screening: All non-residential uses shall comply with the following
provisions in regard toregarding screening:
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-17
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
xiv.
Outdoor storage of all items except display goods shall be
located to the rear of the principal building, and screened with a
solid fence.
xv.
Loading areas shall be screened and located to the rear of
structures.
xvi.
All parking areas shall be screened from the Wickenburg
Highway.
xvii.
Natural drought- tolerant landscaping with vegetation
indigenous to the Upper Sonoran Desert shall be placed in front
of any wall facing the Wickenburg Highway.
D.C. Signs: The sign regulations are as provided in Chapter 1411,
Section 1405 1105 hereof.
E.D. Architecture: All non-residential uses shall meet the following
architectural standards:
i.
A minimum of 80% of surface material, excluding doors and
windows, shall be made to appear as if natural materials were
used in construction. The use of reflective glass shall be
prohibited.
ii.
All accessory structures and improvements must be similar in
style and appearance to the architecture of the principal
building.
F.E. Access: The number of access points to the Wickenburg Highway
shall be minimized. A minimum separation of one-half mile between
access points on either side of the highway is required unless
otherwise approved by the Board of Supervisors after finding that no
alternative is available. Common access points will be encouraged
for all new development. All intersections of local roads shall be at
90 degrees (right angle) with the Wickenburg Highway.
G. Slope: Development on steep slopes within Class 3 shall be regulated
by the following provisions:
iii.
Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 12, Section 1201.,
Hillside Development Standards, shall apply to all development
of slopes greater than 15%.
iv.
The existing natural slope of property for all new development
shall be maintained according to the following schedule:
SLOPE
PERCENTAGE OF PROPERTY
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-18
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
GRADIENT
TO KEEP EXISTING NATURAL
SLOPE
0 to 5 %
25%
5 to 15%
60%
15 to 25%
80%
25 % +
90%
H.F. Landscape Setback: All structures, parking areas, and other
improvements, except driveways and free-standing signs, shall be set
back a minimum of 25 feet from the ultimate right-of-way line of the
Wickenburg Highway (U.S. 60-89). For lots less than 250 feet in
depth, the minimum setback shall be 10% of the lot depth except
that the minimum setback shall not be less than that required by the
underlying zoning district. Existing natural vegetation within the
required landscape setback shall be preserved. Additional natural
desert vegetation indigenous to the Upper Sonoran Desert shall be
provided if there is insufficient existing vegetation.
I. Noise Abatement: Residential uses adjacent to the Wickenburg
Highway or the Santa Fe Railroad shall include noise abatement
improvements when warranted.
Noise Abatement: Residential uses adjacent to the Wickenburg Highway or the Santa Fe
Railroad shall include noise abatement improvements when warranted.
4. CLASS 4:
A. Land Use Plan: Rezonings shall be consistent with the Scenic
Corridor Plan (Goals and Policies and Land Use Plan).
B. Building Height: Building Heights for new development shall be
limited to 33 feet above road grade.
C. Screening: All non-residential uses shall comply with the following
provisions in regard to screening:
i.
Outdoor storage of all items except display goods shall be
located to the rear of the principal building, and screened with a
solid fence.
ii.
Loading areas shall be screened and located to the rear of
structures.
iii.
All parking areas are to be screened from the Wickenburg
Highway.
iv.
Natural drought tolerant landscaping shall be placed in front of
any wall facing the Wickenburg Highway.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-19
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
D. Signs: The sign regulations are as provided in Chapter 14, Section
1405. hereof.
E. Architecture: All non-residential uses shall meet the following
architectural standards:
i.
A minimum of 80% of surface material, excluding doors and
windows shall be made to appear as if natural materials were
used in construction. The use of reflective glass shall be
prohibited.
ii.
All accessory structures and improvements must be similar in
style and appearance to the architecture of the principal
building.
F. Access: Direct access to the Wickenburg highway from adjacent
property shall be prohibited, except existing development will be
allowed temporary access until an alternative method of access is in
place. The following access controls shall be implemented as funding
becomes available and/or development is approved.
i.
Access points shall be limited to one half mile along the
Wickenburg Highway.
ii.
All intersections of local roads shall be at ninety degrees (right
angles) with the Wickenburg Highway.
iii.
An alternate internal circulation plan which uses existing access
points at railroad crossings shall be developed for that area east
of the Wickenburg Highway.
iv.
A frontage road and/or an alternate internal circulation plan shall
be developed for those areas west of the Wickenburg Highway
which are undeveloped and have parcels of sufficient size to
accommodate an internal traffic design.
v.
Where property adjacent to the Wickenburg Highway (to the
west) is developed or there are small parcels for which an
alternate method of access cannot be developed, a frontage road
shall be constructed on or within Arizona Department of
Transportation right-of-way, where possible and necessary.
vi.
Improvements, and right-of-way dedications when necessary, for
access including frontage roads, signalization and intersections
shall be the responsibility of new development.
G. Landscape Setback: All structures, parking areas, other improvement
except driveways and free-standing signs, shall be setback a
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-20
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
minimum of 25 feet from the ultimate right-of-way line of the
Wickenburg Highway (U.S. 60-89). For lots less than 250 feet in
depth except that the minimum setback shall not be less than that
required by the underlying zoning district. Existing natural vegetation
within the required landscape setback shall be preserved. Additional
natural desert vegetation shall be provided if there is insufficient
existing vegetation.
H. Noise Abatement: Residential uses adjacent to the Wickenburg
Highway or the Santa Fe Railroad shall include noise abatement
improvements when warranted.
I. If additional right-of-way acquisition is needed, the Railroad will be
considered as a viable option.
Date of Revisions
*1
Added 8-1-91
*2
Effective 9-22-08 – TA2007016
*3
Effective 11-19-10 – TA2009014
Section 1009.Section 705.
HIGHWAY 74 SCENIC CORRIDOR*1
Article 1009.1.Article 705.1.
Purpose:
The HIGHWAY 74 SCENIC CORRIDOR Overlay Zoning District establishes
criteria that encourage preservation of the natural and cultural landscape and
its scenic quality along Highway 74. The specific purpose of this Overlay
Zoning District is to:
1. Protect scenic land and associated views and viewsheds of natural,
cultural and visual resources along Highway 74, while also recognizing
the legitimate expectations of property owners and the County's overall
land use and economic needs and goals.
2. Preserve Upper Sonoran Desert and hillside landforms to the greatest
extent feasible for the benefit of residents, and visitors, and as an
economic resource to Maricopa County in tourism and recreation
activities.
3. Protect designated recreational areas, such as regional parks, by
minimizing any potentially negative impacts from adjacent
development.
4. Encourage innovative and sensitive planning, as well as high- quality
design and construction techniques for development along Highway 74.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-21
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
5. Encourage safe and efficient traffic flow along Highway 74.
6. Enhance the economic, social and physical living environment for the
residents.
7. To eEncourage sustainable development practices. *3
Article 1009.2.Article 705.2.
General Provisions:
1. The Highway 74 Scenic Corridor Overlay Zoning District is comprised of
all land 500 feet from each side of the centerline of the Highway 74
right-of-way, from the east boundary line of Section 3027, Township 6
North, Range 1 EastWest, Gila and Salt River Base Meridian to the west
boundary line of Section 17 of Township 6 North, Range 3 West, Gila and
Salt River Base and Meridian.
2. Property divided by the Scenic Corridor boundary shall are required to
comply with the district standards only for that segment portion of the
property within the boundary according tset forth in o Chapter 4,
Section 405 of the Maricopa County Zoning Property divided by the
Overlay Zone boundary is regulated by the district standards only for
that segment of the property within the zone.
•3. When standards and requirements differ between the Scenic Corridor
Overlay District and the existing primary zoning district classification, the
more restrictive regulation shall apply.
Article 1009.3. Permitted Uses:
Uses permitted are those allowed by the primary zoning district with which
the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zoning District is combined unless prohibited
herein.
Article 1009.4.Article 705.3.
Standards:
In addition to the standards of the underlying zoninge district, the following
standards shall apply:*2
•1. Height Regulations: 20 feet within 250 feet of the centerline of Highway
74 and 33 feet from 250-500 feet of the centerline of Highway 74.
2. For residential uses, 20 feet within 250 feet of the centerline of Highway 74 and 30 feet
from 250-500 feet of the centerline of Highway 74.
3. For nonresidential uses, 20 feet within 250 feet of the centerline of Highway 74 and 33
feet from 250-500 feet of the centerline of Highway 74.
4. Slopes: In addition to the standards in Chapter 12, Section 1201. (Hillside Development
Standards), the following standards shall apply:
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-22
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
SLOPE
GRADIENT
PERCENTAGE OF PROPERTY
TO REMAIN NATURAL OR TO
BE REVEGETATED
0 to 5 %
25%
5 to 15%
45%
15 % +
65%
5. In locating required natural areas, attention shall be given to preservation of washes
and significant natural features on the property and should be incorporated into the
drainage plan.
6.2.
Setback from Highway 74: Within the Scenic Corridor area, all structures,
fences, parking areas and other improvements except driveways and signs, shall be
setback an average of 75 feet and a minimum of 50 feet from the property line to allow
an undulating rather than a linear setback and to accommodate the unique terrain and
natural features of the site. Existing vegetation within the required setback shall be
preserved with the exception of the driveway. Additional vegetation, if provided, shall
be native vegetation indigenous to the Upper Sonoran Desert.
7.3.
Screening: All uses shall comply with the following screening standards:
A. All service and outside storage areas shall be screened from public
rights-of-way not less than the height of equipment to be screened.
Screening shall consist of a solid decorative wall six feet in height to
conceal trash containers, loading docks, transformers and other
mechanical and/or electrical equipment.
B. All mechanical rooftop equipment must be screened to the height of
the tallest equipment and/or integrated with the building design.
8.4.
Access: The number of access points to Highway 74 from any one development
within the Scenic cCorridor zone shall be limited to one driveway unless a traffic impact
study demonstrates the need for additional driveways.except as follows:
A. A traffic impact study demonstrates the need for additional
driveways due to traffic conditions, and
B. The governmental jurisdiction concurs with that study and then
allows additional driveways as required.
9.5.
Signs: The sign regulations are as provided in Chapter 114, Section 14051105.2
hereof.
10.6.
Parking: 5% of all surface parking area for non-residential development shall be
landscaped with native vegetation indigenous to the Upper Sonoran Desert. Perimeter
landscaping shall not be included in the 5 % and shall not be counted towards the
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-23
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
requirements of Chapter 118, Section 1102802.
11. Archaeological Survey: Prior to the issuance of Zoning Clearance, an archaeological
survey shall be required for all development with exceptions granted by the State
Historic Preservation Officer.
12.7.
Lighting: Low level lighting is encouraged. All on-site lighting shall be shielded so
as to not illuminate any area outside of the site. The source of light shall not exceed 18
feet in height. All outdoor lighting shall conform to Chapter 118, Section 1112812. of
the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.
13.8.
Architectural Design: All developments shall select materials and colors that are
muted and compatible with the desert environment and help reduce visual contrast,
heat gain and glare. Design features are to be included on all sides of a building.
14. Density Bonus: To encourage areas of no development within the Corridor, a transfer of
density for residential development equal to twice the base zoning will be allowed in
property outside and adjacent to the non-developed portion of the property (when the
development proposes no development within the Corridor). To receive the density
bonus, a non-development easement agreement must be prepared and submitted as
part of an accompanying rezoning request for increased density. Upon approval of the
increased density request, the easement shall be recorded prior to zoning clearance.
15. Environmental Evaluation: For those projects not guided by the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969, a request for a habitat and special status species evaluation shall be
made by the developer to the Arizona Game and Fish Department with information
forwarded within 45 days to the appropriate County agency. Mitigation and protection
measures based on the evaluation shall be reviewed by staff and incorporated into the
recommendation to the Commission with final action by the Board of Supervisors.
16.9.
Utilities: Utility lines shall be located underground.
Section 1010.Section 706.
MILITARY AIRPORT AND ANCILLARY MILITARY
FACILITY*1
Article 1010.1.Article 706.1.
Authority:
The MILITARY AIRPORT AND ANCILLARY MILITARY FACILITY Overlay Zoning
District is enacted pursuant to authority granted by Arizona Revised Statutes
§11-814.
Article 1010.2.Article 706.2.
Purpose:
The purpose of the Military Airport and Ancillary Military Facility Overlay
Date of Revisions
*1
Effective 6-6-94
*2
Effective 9-22-08 – TA2007016
*3
Effective 11-19-10 – TA2009014
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-24
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
Zoning District is to adopt and enforce zoning regulations for property in the
high noise or accident potential zone to assure development compatible with
the high noise or accident potential generated by military airport and ancillary
military facility operations that have or may have an adverse effect on public
health and safety in compliance with Arizona Revised Statutes §28-8461 and
§28-8481 as ordered by the Superior Court of Arizona in the case of Arizona
State, et al. v. Maricopa County, et al. (case no. CV 2008-091301). In all cases
where there is or may be a conflict between this Military Airport and Ancillary
Military Facility Overlay Zone and the underlying zone, the terms of this
Military Airport and Ancillary Military Facility Overlay Zone shall control.
Article 1010.3.Article 706.3.
Location:
The Military Airport and Ancillary Military Facility Zoning Overlay District is
defined as those areas located within the High Noise or Accident Potential
Zone as defined in Arizona Revised Statutes §28-8461.
Article 1010.4.Article 706.4.
Definitions:
For the purpose of this Section, the following are hereby defined:
USE COMPATIBILITY AND CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION (UCCD):
A determination by Luke Air Force Base that a proposed use not specifically
identified pursuant to Article 1010710.6.1 of this Ordinance is compatible
and consistent with the high noise or accident potential of a military airport
or ancillary military facility.
DAY/NIGHT NOISE LEVEL (LDN):
A 24 hour, time-weighted annual average noise level. It is a measure of the
overall noise experienced during an entire day.
MILITARY COMPATIBILITY PERMIT:
The permit approved by the Board of Supervisors in accordance with this
Section, and which allows for the development of uses that are consistent
and compatible with the high noise or accident potential of a military airport
or ancillary military facility.
PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT:
A precise plan that establishes and identifies specific and detailed
parameters for the phased or non-phased development of land and
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-25
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
supporting infrastructure to be carried out at the time of actual
development.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-26
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
Article 1010.5.Article 706.5.
Military Compatibility Determination:
1010.5.1.706.5.1.
Any proposed land use not specifically identified as consistent and
compatible with the high noise or accident potential of the military airport
or ancillary military facility pursuant to Article 1010706.6.1 of this Military
Airport and Ancillary Military Facility Overlay Zone shall, as a pre-condition
to the filing of an application for a Military Compatibility Permit and Plan of
Development, require an individual Use Compatibility and Consistency
Determination (UCCD) by Luke Air Force Base.
1010.5.2.706.5.2.
A UCCD may be obtained on a form provided by the Department, or by any
signed document by an authorized representative of Luke Air Force Base
that states the proposed use on the specific property is “consistent and
compatible with the high noise or accident potential of the military airport
or ancillary military facility.” All requests for UCCD shall be directed through
the Planning and Development Department who will forward the
appropriate UCCD form to Luke Air Force Base for review and determination
prior to application for a Military Compatibility Permit and Plan of
Development. The applicant shall pay the appropriate UCCD processing fees
at the time of submittal of the UCCD request to the Planning and
Development Department.
Article 1010.6.Article 706.6.
Use Compatibility And Consistency:
1010.6.1.706.6.1.
Before any proposed use of property can be considered for approval, a
determination of land use compatibility and consistency must be made in
accordance with the following:
Ldn Ldn Ldn Ldn Ldn
65-69 70-74
75-79 80-84 85+_ APZ 1 APZ 2
Residential
Residential uses other than
No (13) No (13) No (13) No (13) No
No No
the residential uses listed below
Single family residential Yes (9,19) Yes (10,19) Yes (11,19) No (13) No (13) No
No (13)
that is the subject of
zoning approved on or
before December 31, 2000, or
on or before December 31 of
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-27
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
the year in which the property
becomes territory in the
vicinity of a military
airport, that permits one
dwelling unit per acre or less
Single family residential Yes (9,19) Yes (10,19) Yes (11,19) Yes (12,19) No (13) No No (13)
that is the primary residence
for persons engaging in
agricultural use and ancillary
residential buildings incident to
the primary agricultural use
Ldn Ldn Ldn Ldn Ldn
65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85+_ APZ 1 APZ 2
Transportation,
communications, and utilities
Railroad and rapid rail transit
Yes Yes (5) Yes (6) Yes (7) No
No
Yes (15)
Highway and street right-of-way
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes
Motor vehicle parking
Yes Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes (15) Yes (15)
Communications (noise sensitive) Yes
Yes (2) Yes (3) No
No
Yes (15) Yes (16)
Utilities Yes
Yes
Yes
No No Yes (15) Yes (16)
Other transportation, Yes
Yes (5) Yes (6) Yes (7) Yes (8) Yes (15) Yes (16)
communications, and utilities
Commercial/retail trade
Wholesale trade
Yes Yes (5) Yes (6) Yes (7) No
No
Yes
Building materials-retail
Yes
Yes (5) Yes (6) Yes (7) No
No
Yes
General merchandise-retail
Yes
Yes (1) Yes (2) No No
No No
Food-retail
Yes
Yes (1) Yes (2) No No No
No
Automotive and marine
Yes
Yes (5) Yes (6) No
No
No
No/Yes (17)
Apparel and accessories-retail
Yes Yes (1) Yes (2) No No
No No
Eating and drinking places
Yes
Yes (1) Yes (2) No No
No No
Furniture and home
Yes
Yes (1) Yes (2) No No
No
No/Yes (17)
furnishings-retail
Other retail trade Yes
Yes (1) Yes (2) No No
No No
Personal & business services
Finance, insurance, real estate
Yes
Yes (1) Yes (2) No No
No Yes
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-28
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
Personal services Yes
Yes (1) Yes (2) No
No
No Yes
Business services Yes
Yes (1) Yes (2) No
No
No
Yes
Repair services
Yes
Yes (5) Yes (6) Yes (7) No
No
Yes
Contract construction services
Yes
Yes (5) Yes (6) No
No
No
Yes
Indoor recreation services
Yes
Yes (5) Yes (6) No
No
No
Yes
Other services
Yes
Yes (5) Yes (6) No
No
No
Yes
Industrial/manufacturing
Food and kindred products
Yes
Yes (5) Yes (6) Yes (7) No
No
Yes (16)
Textile mill products
Yes
Yes (5) Yes (6) Yes (7) No
No
Yes (16)
Apparel
Yes
Yes (5) Yes (6) Yes (7) No
No
Yes (16)
Lumber and wood products
Yes
Yes (5) Yes (6) Yes (7) No
No
Yes (16)
Furniture and fixtures Yes
Yes (5) Yes (6) Yes (7) No
No
Yes (16)
Paper and allied products
Yes
Yes (5) Yes (6) Yes (7) No
No
Yes (16)
Printing and publishing
Yes
Yes (5) Yes (6) Yes (7) No
No
Yes (16)
Chemicals and allied products
Yes
Yes (5) Yes (6) Yes (7) No
No
No
Petroleum refining, and
Yes
Yes (5) Yes (6) Yes (7) No
No
No
related industries
Ldn Ldn Ldn Ldn Ldn
65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85+_ APZ 1
APZ 2
Rubber and miscellaneous plastic
Yes
Yes (5) Yes (6) Yes (7) No
No
Yes (16)
Stone, clay and glass products
Yes
Yes (5) Yes (6) Yes (7) No
No
Yes (16)
Primary metal industries
Yes
Yes (5) Yes (6) Yes (7) No
No
Yes (16)
Fabricated metal products
Yes
Yes (5) Yes (6) Yes (7) No
No
Yes (16)
Professional, scientific, and
Yes
Yes (1) Yes (2) No
No
No
No
controlling instruments
Miscellaneous manufacturing
Yes
Yes (5) Yes (6) Yes (7) No
No
Yes (16)
Public and quasi-public
services
Government services Yes (1) Yes (2) Yes (2) No
No
No
Yes (16)
Cultural activities,
Yes (1) Yes (2) No
No
No
No
No
including churches
Medical and other health services
Yes (1) Yes (2) No
No
No
No
No
Cemeteries
Yes (5) Yes (6) Yes (7) No
No No
Yes
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-29
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
Nonprofit organizations
Yes (1) Yes (2) No No No
No Yes
Correctional facilities Yes (1) Yes (2) Yes (3) Yes (4) No
No
Yes
Other public and quasi-public Yes (1) Yes (2) No No No No
Yes (16)
Services
Outdoor recreation
Playgrounds and
neighborhood parks
Yes
Yes
No No
No
Yes (15) Yes
Community and regional
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes (15) Yes
Nature exhibits
Yes
No No No
No
No
No
Spectator sports, incl. arenas Yes (14) Yes (14) No
No
No
No
No
Golf courses and riding stables
Yes
Yes (5) Yes (6) No
No
Yes (15)
Yes
Water based recreational areas
Yes
Yes (5) Yes (6) No
No
No
No
Resort and group camps
Yes (1) Yes (2) No No
No
No
No
Auditoriums and concert halls
Yes (6) Yes (7) No
No
No
No
No
Outdoor amphitheaters and
Yes (14) Yes (14) Yes (14) No
No
No
No
music shells
Other outdoor recreation
Yes
Yes (14) Yes (14) No
No
No
No
Resource production,
extraction and open space
Agriculture (except livestock)
Yes (9) Yes (10) Yes (11) Yes (12) Yes (13) Yes (13) Yes (13)
Livestock farming and animal
Yes (9) Yes (10) Yes (11) Yes (12) Yes (13) Yes (13) Yes (13)
breeding
Forestry activities
Yes (9) Yes (10) Yes (13) Yes (13) Yes (13) No
Yes
Fishing activities and related
Yes
Yes
No No No
No No
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-30
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
Services
Ldn Ldn Ldn Ldn Ldn
65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85+_ APZ 1 APZ 2
Mining activities
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No Yes (16)
Permanent open space
Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes
Yes
Water areas (not incidental to
Yes
Yes
No
No No
No No
farming)
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-31
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
Ldn 65-69
Ldn 70-74
Ldn 75-79
Ldn 80-84
Ldn 85+
APZ 1
APZ 2
Residential
Residential uses other than the residential
uses listed below
No (13)
No (13)
No (13)
No (13)
No
No
No
Single family residential that is the subject
of
zoning approved on or
before December 31, 2000, or
on or before December 31 of
the year in which the property
becomes territory in the
vicinity of a military
airport, that permits one
dwelling unit per acre or less
Yes (9,19)
Yes (10,19)
Yes (11,19)
No (13)
No (13)
No
No (13)
Single family residential that is the primary
residence
for persons engaging in
agricultural use and ancillary
residential buildings incident to
the primary agricultural use
Yes (9,19)
Yes (10,19)
Yes (11,19)
Yes (12,19)
No (13)
No
No (13)
Transportation, communications and utilities
Railroad and rapid rail transit
Yes
Yes (5)
Yes (6)
Yes (7)
No
No
Yes (15)
Highway and street right-of-way
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Motor vehicle parking
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes (15)
Yes (15)
Communications (noise sensitive)
Yes
Yes (2)
Yes (3)
No
No
Yes (15)
Yes (16)
Utilities
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes (15)
Yes (16)
Other transportation, communications and
utilities
Yes
Yes (5)
Yes (6)
Yes (7)
Yes (8)
Yes (15)
Yes (16)
Commercial/retail trade
Wholesale trade
Yes
Yes (5)
Yes (6)
Yes (7)
No
No
Yes
Building materials-retail
Yes
Yes (5)
Yes (6)
Yes (7)
No
No
Yes
General merchandise-retail
Yes
Yes (1)
Yes (2)
No
No
No
No
Food-retail
Yes
Yes (1)
Yes (2)
No
No
No
No
Automotive and marine
Yes
Yes (5)
Yes (6)
No
No
No
No/Yes (17)
Apparel and accessories-retail
Yes
Yes (1)
Yes (2)
No
No
No
No
Eating and drinking places
Yes
Yes (1)
Yes (2)
No
No
No
No
Furniture and home furnishings-retail
Yes
Yes (1)
Yes (2)
No
No
No
No/Yes (17)
Other retail trade
Yes
Yes (1)
Yes (2)
No
No
No
No
Personal & business services
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-32
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
Ldn 65-69
Ldn 70-74
Ldn 75-79
Ldn 80-84
Ldn 85+
APZ 1
APZ 2
Finance, insurance, real estate
Yes
Yes (1)
Yes (2)
No
No
No
Yes
Personal services
Yes
Yes (1)
Yes (2)
No
No
No
Yes
Business services
Yes
Yes (1)
Yes (2)
No
No
No
Yes
Repair services
Yes
Yes (5)
Yes (6)
Yes (7)
No
No
Yes
Contract construction services
Yes
Yes (5)
Yes (6)
No
No
No
Yes
Indoor recreation services
Yes
Yes (5)
Yes (6)
No
No
No
Yes
Other services
Yes
Yes (5)
Yes (6)
No
No
No
Yes
Industrial/manufacturing
Food and kindred products
Yes
Yes (5)
Yes (6)
Yes (7)
No
No
Yes (16)
Textile mill products
Yes
Yes (5)
Yes (6)
Yes (7)
No
No
Yes (16)
Apparel
Yes
Yes (5)
Yes (6)
Yes (7)
No
No
Yes (16)
Lumber and wood products
Yes
Yes (5)
Yes (6)
Yes (7)
No
No
Yes (16)
Furniture and fixtures
Yes
Yes (5)
Yes (6)
Yes (7)
No
No
Yes (16)
Paper and allied products
Yes
Yes (5)
Yes (6)
Yes (7)
No
No
Yes (16)
Printing and publishing
Yes
Yes (5)
Yes (6)
Yes (7)
No
No
Yes (16)
Chemicals and allied products
Yes
Yes (5)
Yes (6)
Yes (7)
No
No
No
Petroleum refining, and related industries
Yes
Yes (5)
Yes (6)
Yes (7)
No
No
No
Rubber and miscellaneous plastic
Yes
Yes (5)
Yes (6)
Yes (7)
No
No
Yes (16)
Stone, clay and glass products
Yes
Yes (5)
Yes (6)
Yes (7)
No
No
Yes (16)
Primary metal industries
Yes
Yes (5)
Yes (6)
Yes (7)
No
No
Yes (16)
Fabricated metal products
Yes
Yes (5)
Yes (6)
Yes (7)
No
No
Yes (16)
Professional, scientific, and controlling
instruments
Yes
Yes (1)
Yes (2)
No
No
No
No
Miscellaneous manufacturing
Yes
Yes (5)
Yes (6)
Yes (7)
No
No
Yes (16)
Public and quasi-public services
Government services
Yes (1)
Yes (2)
Yes (2)
No
No
No
Yes (16)
Cultural activities, including churches
Yes (1)
Yes (2)
No
No
No
No
No
Medical and other health services
Yes (1)
Yes (2)
No
No
No
No
No
Cemeteries
Yes (5)
Yes (6)
Yes (7)
No
No
No
Yes
Nonprofit organizations
Yes (1)
Yes (2)
No
No
No
No
Yes
Correctional facilities
Yes (1)
Yes (2)
Yes (3)
Yes (4)
No
No
Yes
Other public and quasi-public services
Yes (1)
Yes (2)
No
No
No
No
Yes (16)
Outdoor recreation
Playground and neighborhood parks
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes (15)
Yes
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-33
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
Subject to the restrictions in this ordinance, land Uses identified as “yes” have been found to be consistent and compatible with the high noise or accident potential of the military airport or ancillary military facility, and
a Military Compatibility Permit and Plan of Development may be considered by the Board of Supervisors.
Land Uses identified as “no” have been found to be inconsistent and incompatible with the high noise or accident potential of the military airport or ancillary military facility. However, if Maricopa County and the military
airport mutually agree that such use or uses is/are compatible and consistent with the high noise or accident potential of the military airport or ancillary military facility, the use or uses can be allowed. A UCCD will be
required to make such a determination.
(1) Measures to achieve an outdoor to indoor noise reduction level of twenty-five decibels pursuant to this Ordinance must be incorporated into the design and construction of all buildings and Maricopa County must
make an express finding, as part of approval, that use of noise reduction level criteria will not alleviate outdoor noise.
(2) Measures to achieve an outdoor to indoor noise reduction level of thirty decibels pursuant to this Ordinance must be incorporated into the design and construction of all buildings and Maricopa County must make an
express finding, as part of approval, that use of noise reduction level criteria will not alleviate outdoor noise.
(3) Measures to achieve an outdoor to indoor noise reduction level of thirty-five decibels pursuant to this Ordinance must be incorporated into the design and construction of all buildings and Maricopa County must
make an express finding, as part of the approval, that use of noise reduction level criteria will not alleviate outdoor noise.
(4) Measures to achieve an outdoor to indoor noise reduction level of forty decibels pursuant to this Ordinance must be incorporated into the design and construction of all buildings and Maricopa County must make an
express finding, as part of the approval, that use of noise reduction level criteria will not alleviate outdoor noise.
(5) Measures to achieve an outdoor to indoor noise reduction level of twenty-five decibels must be incorporated into the design and construction of portions of buildings where the public is received, office areas, noise
Ldn 65-69
Ldn 70-74
Ldn 75-79
Ldn 80-84
Ldn 85+
APZ 1
APZ 2
Community and regional
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes (15)
Yes
Nature exhibits
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Spectator sports, incl. arenas
Yes (14)
Yes (14)
No
No
No
No
No
Golf courses and riding stables
Yes
Yes (5)
Yes (6)
No
No
Yes (15)
Yes
Water based recreational areas
Yes
Yes (5)
Yes (6)
No
No
No
No
Resort and group camps
Yes (1)
Yes (2)
No
No
No
No
No
Auditoriums and concert halls
Yes (6)
Yes (7)
No
No
No
No
No
Outdoor amphitheaters and music shells
Yes (14)
Yes (14)
Yes (14)
No
No
No
No
Other outdoor recreation
Yes
Yes (14)
Yes (14)
No
No
No
No
Resource production, extraction and open space
Agriculture (except livestock)
Yes (9)
Yes (10)
Yes (11)
Yes (12)
Yes (13)
Yes (13)
Yes (13)
Livestock farming and animal breeding
Yes (9)
Yes (10)
Yes (11)
Yes (12)
Yes (13)
Yes (13)
Yes (13)
Forestry activities
Yes (9)
Yes (10)
Yes (13)
Yes (13)
Yes (13)
No
Yes
Fishing activities and related services
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Mining activities
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes (16)
Permanent open space
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Water areas (not incidental to farming)
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-34
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
sensitive areas or where normal noise level is low.
(6) Measures to achieve an outdoor to indoor noise reduction level of thirty decibels must be incorporated into the design and construction of portions of buildings where the public is received, office areas, noise sensitive
areas or where normal noise level is low.
(7) Measures to achieve an outdoor to indoor noise reduction level of thirty-five decibels must be incorporated into the design and construction of portions of buildings where the public is received, office areas, noise
sensitive areas or where normal noise level is low.
(8) Measures to achieve an outdoor to indoor noise reduction level of forty decibels must be incorporated into the design and construction of portions of buildings where the public is received, office areas, noise sensitive
areas or where normal noise level is low.
(9) Measures to achieve an outdoor to indoor noise reduction level of twenty-five decibels must be incorporated into the design and construction of new residential buildings or expansions of existing residential buildings.
(10) Measures to achieve an outdoor to indoor noise reduction level of thirty decibels must be incorporated into the design and construction of new residential buildings or expansions of existing residential buildings.
(11) Measures to achieve an outdoor to indoor noise reduction level of thirty-five decibels must be incorporated into the design and construction of new residential buildings or expansions of existing residential buildings.
(12) Measures to achieve an outdoor to indoor noise reduction level of forty decibels must be incorporated into the design and construction of new residential buildings or expansions of existing residential buildings.
(13) No new residential buildings or expansions of existing residential buildings are permitted.
(14) Compatible if special sound reinforcement systems are installed.
(15) No aboveground buildings or structures.
(16) No new buildings or improvements or expansion of nonagriculture buildings or improvements for uses that result in the release of any substance into the air that would impair visibility or otherwise interfere with
operating aircraft, such as any of the following:
(a) Steam, dust and smoke.
(b) Direct or indirect reflective light emissions.
(c) Electrical emissions that would interfere with aircraft and air force communications or navigational aid systems or aircraft navigational equipment.
(d) The attraction of birds or waterfowl such as operation of sanitary landfills or maintenance of feeding stations.
(e) Explosives facilities or similar activities.
(17) If located in the extended portion of accident potential zone two in territory of Maricopa County described in section 28-8461, paragraph 9, subdivision (a).
(18) Uses not listed are presumed to not be compatible. If Maricopa County and the military airport mutually agree that an individual use is compatible and consistent with the high noise or accident potential of the
military airport or ancillary military facility, the use shall be presumed to be compatible.
(19) Building permits for new residences and expansions of existing residences are only allowed if 1) the landowner acquired a “vested” property right on or before January 1, 2010; or 2) if Maricopa County and the
military airport mutually agree that an individual use is compatible and consistent with the high noise or accident potential of the military airport or ancillary military facility pursuant to A.R.S. §28-8481(J); or 3) pursuant
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-35
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
to a military land use variance granted pursuant to Article 1010.10 of this ordinance. For the purposes of this section, A landowner will be deemed to have a “vested” property right only if the landowner (a) had a building
permit or special use permit for a residential use, and (b) undertook substantial physical construction on the site pursuant to that building permit, or incurred substantial monetary expenditures for construction on the
site pursuant to that building permit, or made considerable contractual commitments pursuant to that building permit.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-36
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
For residential land uses:
1010.6.2.706.6.2.
For proposed residential land uses identified with a “yes” in paragraph
1010706.6.1 that do not require approval of a preliminary and final plat, the
applicant shall proceed forward to apply for building permits pursuant to
the rules and requirements of this Ordinance.
For non-residential land uses:
1010.6.3.706.6.3.
For proposed non-residential land uses identified with a “yes” in paragraph
1010706.6.1 the applicant shall apply for a Military Compatibility Permit and
Plan of Development pursuant to Article 1010706.7 and other applicable
requirements of this Ordinance.
1010.6.4.706.6.4.
For proposed non-residential land uses that are not specifically identified in
paragraph 1010706.6.1, a UCCD shall be required pursuant to Article
1010706.5. Upon receipt of a UCCD, the applicant shall apply for a Military
Compatibility Permit and Plan of Development pursuant to Article
1010706.7 and other applicable requirements of this Ordinance.
Other Requirements:
1010.6.5.706.6.5.
Approval of a Military Compatibility Permit also requires approval of a Plan
of Development pursuant to Section 306 305 of this Ordinance. At the
discretion of the applicant, the required Plan of Development may be filed
concurrently with or separately from the application for a Military
Compatibility Permit. If filed concurrently, a single application covering both
cases is required. If filed separately, then separate applications are required.
1010.6.6.706.6.6.
A determination of compatibility and consistency pursuant to Article
1010706.6.1 or by UCCD does not guarantee approval of a Military
Compatibility Permit or a Plan of Development; such approval shall be at the
discretion of the Board of Supervisors pursuant to Article 1010706.7 of this
Ordinance.
Article 1010.7.Article 706.7.
Military Compatibility Permit Procedures:
If the required application for Plan of Development is submitted concurrent
with the application for Military Compatibility Permit, the following
procedures shall apply:
1010.7.1.706.7.1.
The applicant shall apply for a Military Compatibility Permit with Plan of
Development together as a single application, with supporting statements,
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-37
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
identifying the proposed use of the buildings, structures, and premises, to
the Board of Supervisors. These applications and supporting statements
shall be referred to the Commission for its review, report, recommendation,
and public hearing.
1010.7.2.706.7.2.
The Commission, having held a public hearing, shall then present its report,
recommendation, and the plans, together with the supporting statement, to
the Board of Supervisors for consideration and public hearing. Notice and
procedure for public hearing shall conform to the procedures prescribed in
Section 304 of this Ordinance.
1010.7.3.706.7.3.
The recommendation of the Commission shall include its reasons for
approval or disapproval of such plans and supporting statement, and if
recommended for approval, specific evidence and facts showing that the
use is compatible and consistent with the high noise or accident potential of
a military airport or ancillary military facility, that all county standards and
requirements will be followed, and that necessary safeguards will be
provided for the protection of adjacent property or the permitted uses
thereof.
1010.7.4.706.7.4.
The recommendation of the Commission may include variations of the
standards and requirements of the underlying zoning district including, but
not limited to the following:
• Yards and open spaces.
• Fences and walls, or other screening.
• Parking areas, street improvements, including provision of service
roads or alleys when practical and necessary, except for paving
requirements unless it can be shown that the paving alternative
will comply with the Maricopa Association of Government's
Particulate Plan for PM-10 by reducing particulate pollution.
• Regulation of points of vehicular ingress and egress.
• Regulation of signs.
• Landscaping and maintenance thereof.
• Maintenance of grounds.
• Control of noise, vibration, odor and other potentially dangerous
or objectionable elements.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-38
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
• Time limits may be imposed for the commencement of
construction and/or review and further action by the Commission;
and/or a time limit within which the Military Compatibility Permit
and Plan of Development shall cease to exist.
1010.7.5.706.7.5.
The Commission shall not vary any standard or requirement without a
specific finding that military airport or ancillary military facility compatibility
is preserved pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes.
1010.7.6.706.7.6.
The Board of Supervisors shall not approve any application unless it finds
that the proposed use on the specific property is consistent and compatible
with the high noise or accident potential of the military airport or ancillary
military facility.
1010.7.7.706.7.7.
Amendments shall be processed in the same manner as the initial plans and
supporting statement of proposed use.
1010.7.8.706.7.8.
Non-compliance with the stipulations of the Military Compatibility Permit or
Plan of Development approval shall be considered a zoning violation.
If the required application for Plan of Development is submitted separately
from the application for Military Compatibility Permit, the following
procedures shall apply:
Military Compatibility Permit:
1010.7.9.706.7.9.
Upon receipt of an application for a Military Compatibility permit, the Board
of Supervisors shall submit it to the Commission for report and
recommendation. Prior to presenting its report and recommendation to said
Board, the Commission shall hold public hearing thereon after giving at least
15 days notice thereof by publication once in a newspaper of general
circulation in the seat of Maricopa County and by posting of the area
included in the proposed Military Compatibility Permit. The posting shall be
in no less than two places with at least one notice for each one-quarter mile
of frontage along perimeter public rights-of-way so that the notices are
visible from the nearest public right-of-way.
1010.7.10.706.7.10.
The Commission shall also send notice by first class mail to each real
property owner as shown on the last assessment of the property within 300
feet of the proposed Military Compatibility Permit and each county or
municipality which is contiguous to the area of the Military Compatibility
Permit. The notice sent by mail shall include, at a minimum, the date, time,
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-39
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
and place of the hearing on the Military Compatibility Permit including a
general explanation of the matter to be considered, a general description of
the area of the Military Compatibility Permit, and notification that if 20% of
the property owners by area and number within the Military Compatibility
Permit area file protests, an affirmative vote of three-fourths of all
members of the Board will be required to approve the Military Compatibility
Permit.
1010.7.11.706.7.11.
If the Planning Commission has held a public hearing, the Board may adopt
the recommendations of the Planning Commission through use of a consent
calendar without holding a second public hearing if there is no objection,
request for public hearing, or other protest. If there is an objection, a
request for public hearing, or a protest the Board of Supervisors shall hold a
public hearing on such petitions giving at least 15 days notice thereof by
publication once in a newspaper of general circulation in the seat of
Maricopa County, and by adequate posting of the area of concern in said
petition at least 15 days in advance of the public hearing. After holding the
public hearing the Board of Supervisors may adopt the petitioner's proposed
Military Compatibility Permit provided that if 20% of the owners, by number
and by area of all property within 300 feet of the proposed Military
Compatibility Permit, file a protest such Military Compatibility Permit shall
not be approved except by a three-fourths vote of all members of the Board
of Supervisors. However, except that the required number of votes shall in
no event be less than a majority of the full members of the Board.
1010.7.12.706.7.12.
In calculating the owners by area for a protest, only that portion of a lot or
parcel of record situated within 300 feet of the property subject to the
Military Compatibility Permit shall be included. In calculating the owner by
number or area, County property and public rights-of-way shall not be
included.
1010.7.13.706.7.13.
A decision by the Board of Supervisors involving a Military Compatibility
Permit shall not be effective until the dedication of required right-of-way,
but not prior to 31 days after final approval of the Military Compatibility
Permit by the Board. Unless a resident files a written objection with the
Board of Supervisors, the Military Compatibility Permit may be enacted as
an emergency measure that becomes effective immediately by a four-fifths
majority vote of the board.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-40
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
1010.7.14.706.7.14.
The Board of Supervisors shall not approve any application unless it finds
that the proposed use on the specific property is consistent and compatible
with the high noise or accident potential of the military airport or ancillary
military facility.
1010.7.15.706.7.15.
If a petition for Military Compatibility Permit is withdrawn by the applicant
or denied by the Board of Supervisors, that petition shall not be refiled nor
shall there be filed with the Board of Supervisors any other Military
Compatibility Permit for the same parcel(s) within a period of one year
unless in the opinion of the Commission there is a change of circumstances
warranting such filing.
1010.7.16.706.7.16.
Non-compliance with the stipulations of Military Compatibility Permit
approval shall be considered a zoning violation.
1010.7.17.706.7.17.
Any change or modification to an approved Military Compatibility Permit
shall be considered an amendment to the approved Military Compatibility
Permit, and shall be processed accordingly pursuant to the provisions of this
Ordinance. Staff shall determine whether the change constitutes a Minor or
Major Amendment according to the provisions set forth in this Ordinance.
Plan of Development:
1010.7.18.706.7.18.
All development that requires a Military Compatibility Permit pursuant to
this Ordinance shall be subject to Plan of Development approval as set forth
in the provisions of this Ordinance. A preliminary plat shall serve as a Plan of
Development for applicable residential projects. For industrial and
commercial projects, a separate plan of development shall be approved,
along with preliminary and final plat approval as applicable, which shall be
subject to the Maricopa County Subdivision Regulations, the Military Airport
and Ancillary Military Facility Overlay Zoning District and other provisions of
this Ordinance, and other applicable county regulations and ordinances.
1010.7.19.706.7.19.
A Plan of Development that is required as part of a Military Compatibility
Permit shall be processed through the Planning and Zoning Commission and
Board of Supervisors for approval in the manner outlined in this Ordinance.
1010.7.20.706.7.20.
An application and phasing plan, if proposed, for a Plan of Development
shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department through
the One Stop Shop (OSS) on an official form provided by the Department.
The application shall satisfy the submittal requirements as well as pertinent
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-41
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
regulations as set forth in the provisions of this Ordinance or from other
county departments. The application shall contain sufficient information for
staff to determine whether the proposal meets the requirements of the
County.
1010.7.21.706.7.21.
A Plan of Development is a precise plan in which the standards and
regulations of the underlying zoning district shall remain the same unless
otherwise modified by the Board of Supervisors. However, the Board of
Supervisors shall not vary any standard or regulation without a specific
finding that the military airport or ancillary military facility compatibility is
preserved pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes.
1010.7.22.706.7.22.
For all development subject to a Plan of Development, an approved Plan of
Development and subsequent building permits are required prior to the
commencement of any construction or development on the site. The
applicant shall ensure that required building permits for the site or first
phase are issued within two (2) years of the date of approval of the Plan of
Development. Prior to the date of expiration, the applicant may file a single
request via a Minor Amendment application for a one (1) year time
extension authorized by the Director of Planning and Development. If the
time frame has expired, the applicant shall submit a new Plan of
Development application.
1010.7.23.706.7.23.
Any change or modification to an approved Plan of Development shall be
considered an amendment to the Plan of Development, and shall be
processed accordingly pursuant to the provisions of this Ordinance. Staff
shall determine whether the change constitutes a Minor or Major
Amendment according to the provisions set forth in this Ordinance.
1010.7.24.706.7.24.
Non-compliance with the stipulations of Plan of Development approval shall
be considered a zoning violation.
Article 1010.8.Article 706.8.
Citizen review process:
1010.8.1.706.8.1.
Upon application for a Military Compatibility Permit and/or Plan of
Development, a citizen review process shall be conducted. The purposes of
the citizen review process shall be the following:
1. Adjacent landowners and other potentially affected citizens will be
notified of the application and substance of the proposed Military
Compatibility Permit and/or Plan of Development.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-42
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
2. Adjacent landowners and other potentially affected citizens will be
provided an opportunity to express any issues or concerns they may
have with the proposed Military Compatibility Permit and/or Plan of
Development before any public hearing required as set forth in this
Ordinance.
1010.8.2.706.8.2.
Prior to any application for a Military Compatibility Permit and/or Plan of
Development, the applicant shall conduct a pre-application meeting with
the Planning and Development Department.
1010.8.3.706.8.3.
Within 30 days upon submitting an application for a Military Compatibility
Permit and/or Plan of Development, the applicant shall post the property
included in the proposed development. The posting shall be in no less than
two places with at least one notice for each quarter mile of frontage along
perimeter right-of-way so that the notices are visible from the nearest
public right-of-way. Each notice shall be a minimum of six square feet in
area and shall be laminated. The posting shall include, at a minimum, a brief
description of the area of the Military Compatibility Permit and/or Plan of
Development, a general explanation of the nature of the proposed Military
Compatibility Permit and/or Plan of Development, the name of the
applicant, and contact information for the applicant. A signed affidavit along
with photographic evidence shall be submitted to staff demonstrating proof
of posting within 30 days of application submittal.
1010.8.4.706.8.4.
Within 30 days of submitting an application for a Military Compatibility
Permit and/or Plan of Development the applicant shall also send notice by
first class mail to each real property owner as shown on the last assessment
of the property within three hundred feet of the proposed Military
Compatibility Permit and/or Plan of Development. The notice by mail shall
include, at a minimum, description of the area of the proposed Military
Compatibility Permit and/or Plan of Development, a general explanation of
the nature of the proposed Military Compatibility Permit and/or Plan of
Development, the name of the applicant, and contact information for the
applicant. A copy of the notice and an affidavit demonstrating proof of such
notification shall be submitted to staff within 30 days of application
submittal.
1010.8.5.706.8.5.
Every application for a Military Compatibility Permit and/or Plan of
Development shall include a citizen participation plan. The citizen
participation plan, at a minimum, shall include the following information:
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-43
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
1. Which residents, property owners, interested parties, political
jurisdictions and public agencies may be affected by the application.
2. How those interested in and potentially affected by an application will
be notified that an application has been made.
3. How those interested and potentially affected parties will be informed
of the substance of the proposed Military Compatibility Permit and/or
Plan of Development.
4. How those affected or otherwise interested will be provided an
opportunity to discuss the applicant’s proposal with the applicant and
express any concerns, issues or problems they may have with the
proposal in advance of the public hearing.
5. The applicant’s schedule for completion of the citizen participation plan.
6. How the applicant will keep the Planning Department informed on the
status of their citizen participation efforts.
1010.8.6.706.8.6.
The level of citizen interest and area of involvement will vary depending on
the nature of the application and the location of the site. The target area for
early notification will be determined through a coordinated effort of the
applicant and staff. The Planning Director shall resolve any disputes that
may arise while arriving at the target area. At a minimum, the target area
shall include the following:
1. Real property owners within the noticing area set forth in Article
1010706.8.4 herein;
2. The head of any homeowners association within the noticing area set
forth in Article 1010706.8.4 herein;
3. Other potentially affected citizens in the target area who have
requested that they be placed on the routing list maintained by the
Planning Department.
1010.8.7.706.8.7.
The applicant may submit a citizen participation plan and begin
implementation prior to formal application at their discretion. This shall not
occur until after the required pre-application meeting and consultation with
planning department staff.
1010.8.8.706.8.8.
The citizen participation plan shall include a written report on the results of
the citizen participation effort prior to notice of public hearing set forth in
this Ordinance. At a minimum the citizen participation report shall include
the following information:
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-44
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
1. Details and techniques the applicant used to involve the public,
including:
A. Dates and locations of any and all meetings where citizens were
invited to discuss the applicant’s proposal;
B. Content, dates mailed, and number of mailings, including letters,
meeting notices, newsletters and other publications;
C. The location of residents, property owners, and interested parties
receiving notices, newsletters or other written materials;
D. The number of people that participated in the process.
2. A summary of perceived or real concerns, issues and problems
expressed during the process, including:
A. The substance of the concerns, issues, and problems;
B. How the applicant has addressed or intends to address perceived or
real concerns, issues, and problems expressed during the process;
and,
C. Perceived or real concerns, issues and problems with which the
applicant disagrees, which the applicant cannot address, or which
the applicant chooses not to address, including an explanation of the
applicant’s reasoning.
Article 1010.9.Article 706.9.
Compatible Uses:
1010.9.1.706.9.1.
Maricopa County and Luke Air Force Base mutually agree that the following
uses are compatible and consistent with the high noise or accident potential
of the military airport or ancillary military facility on any property and do not
require an individual Use Consistency and Compatibility Determination or a
Military Compatibility Permit:
1. Non-habitable accessory uses to an existing and properly permitted
primary use, defined as an accessory structure not occupied by people
and not provided with mechanical means of air, ventilation, and/or heat.
No accessory structure or building appurtenance may exceed 30 feet in
height.
Article 1010.10.Article 706.10. Military Land Use Variance; Process
1010.10.1.706.10.1.
Upon written request of the Attorney General of Arizona only, the Board of
Supervisors shall consider granting a military land use variance pursuant to
A.R.S. §28-8481(C) that would permit a variation from the land use
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-45
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
regulations outlined in A.R.S. §28-8481(J) and Article 1010706.6, Section
1010706.6.1 of this ordinance.
1010.10.2.706.10.2.
Upon the written request pursuant to Section 1010706.10.1 of this
ordinance, the military land use variance shall be scheduled for
consideration by the Board of Supervisors at a public meeting. Should the
Board of Supervisors approve the military land use variance request, notice
of such approval shall be sent to the Attorney General of Arizona within
three business days after such approval. Notice of such approval shall also
be sent to the affected property owner(s) which shall also include a detailed
explanation of the implications of the military land use variance.
Article 1010.11.Article 706.11. General provisions:
1010.11.1.706.11.1.
Persons with property divided by the Military Airport and Ancillary Military
Facility Overlay Zoning District are required to comply with the provisions of
this Section only for that segment of the property within the overlay zoning
district. Where the Military Airport and Ancillary Military Facility Overlay
Zoning District divides a lot or parcel of land, the Military Airport and
Ancillary Military Facility Overlay Zoning District line shall be treated as a
property line for applying all provisions of this Section.
1010.11.2.706.11.2.
When standards and requirements differ between the Military Airport and
Ancillary Military Facility Overlay Zoning District and the existing zoning
district classification, the more restrictive regulation shall apply.
1010.11.3.706.11.3.
All new uses of land shall be required to conform with the Military Airport
and Ancillary Military Facility Overlay Zoning District. Existing uses of land
and buildings shall be governed as follow:
1. Any use of land, buildings, or structures, lawfully existing at the time this
Section or amendments thereto become effective, may be continued
even though such use does not conform with the regulations of this
Section or amendments thereto.
2. In the event that a nonconforming use of land, building, or structure is
discontinued for a period of 12 consecutive months, any future use
thereof shall be in conformity with the regulations of this Section.
3. In the event that a nonconforming use of land, building or structure is
destroyed by fire, explosion, act of God, or act of the public enemy to
the extent of 75% of its value, according to the appraisal thereof by
competent appraisers, then and without further action by the Board of
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 7-46
CHAPTER 7 – MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS
Supervisors, the future use thereof shall from and after the date of such
destruction be subject to all the regulations of this Section or
amendments thereto.
4. A nonconforming use of land, building, or structure shall not be
enlarged, extended, reconstructed, or altered unless such enlargement,
extension, reconstruction, or alteration conforms with the regulations of
this Section.
Date of Revisions
*1
Added 3-17-10 – TA2009012
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 8-1
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
Chapter 8
| Commercial Zoning Districts
Section 801.
C-S (Planned Shopping Center Zoning District)
Article 801.1.
Purpose:
The principal purpose of this zoning district is to provide for well designed
and attractive retail shopping facilities on sites not less than five (5) acres in
size and in appropriate locations to serve adjacent and nearby residential
neighborhoods while encouraging sustainable building practices. Permitted
uses in this zoning district include the retail sale of merchandise and services
customarily considered as shopping center uses.*11
Article 801.2.
Use Regulations:
A building or premises shall be used only for the following purposes:*14
1. Retail sale of merchandise, services, recreational and otherwise, parking
area and other facilities customarily considered as shopping center uses.
2. Uses permitted on the shopping center site, according to the rural or
residential zoning district regulations in effect prior to the establishment
of the C S Zoning District on said site, as the only alternative in the event
that the C S Zoning District is not used for the purpose for which it was
specifically intended; namely, a shopping center.
3. Emergency housing - Temporary shelter required due to a natural
disaster or fire or other circumstances determined to constitute an
emergency by the zoning inspector.**5, *6
4. Temporary construction administrative offices/yard complex – which
may include a security office or residence for a security guard provided
that the following conditions are met:*14
a.
The uses are only associated with the developer/owner and
subdivision or project in which they are located.*14
b. Upon sale of the development, cessation of the need for the use
(95% buildout), or cessation of the use, all structures, modifications
to structures and uses related to the temporary facility shall be
removed.*14
c.
Those uses of structures allowed shall meet all building code
requirements.
d. All items stored on site shall only be those required for the
construction on site.
e. The allowed uses may encroach into setback areas.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 8-2
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
f.
All necessary permits must be issued prior to placement on the site.
5. Renewable energy systems are not permitted as a primary use but may
be permitted as an accessory use as set forth in Section 1206 of this
ordinance. Where renewable energy systems involve the generation or
storage of electricity, only grid-connected or off-grid systems are
permitted.*11
Article 801.3.
Height Regulations:
The height of buildings shall not exceed 40 feet.*12
Article 801.4.
Yard Regulations:
The buildings shall set back from all lot lines bounding the shopping center
site or in the absence of lot lines, the boundaries delineating the shopping
center site, a distance of not less than 50 feet.
Article 801.5.
Intensity of Use Regulations:
The maximum lot coverage shall be 25% of the area in the shopping center
site.
Article 801.6.
Parking Regulations:
The parking regulations are as provided in Chapter 11, Section 1102. hereof.*4
Article 801.7.
Sign Regulations:
A comprehensive sign package shall be approved that conforms to the sign
regulations as provided in Chapter 14, Section 1404 and 1406 thereof. The
comprehensive sign package should include, but is not limited to, letter and
logo sizes, letter style, colors, texture, lighting methods, sign type, and
architectural features. The comprehensive sign package shall be reviewed
concurrently with the precise plan of development.*8
Article 801.8.
Loading and Unloading Regulations:
The loading and unloading regulations are as provided in Chapter 11, Section
1103. hereof.
Article 801.9.
Additional Regulations:
The additional regulations are as follows:
1. The shopping center buildings shall be designed and built as a whole,
unified, and single project.
2. Any part of the shopping center site not used for buildings or other
structures, loading and access ways, or pedestrian walks shall be
landscaped with grass, trees or shrubs.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 8-3
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
3. Any outdoor lighting shall be in conformance with provisions in Chapter
11, Section 1112. hereof. Any outdoor lighting shall be placed so as to
reflect light away from any adjoining rural or residential zoning district.*1
4. Walls and screening:
a. A solid wall, not less than six feet in height, shall be required along
and adjacent to any side or rear property line abutting any rural or
residential zone boundary, or any alley abutting such zone boundary
at the time of development of the commercial property. Further, any
access gates in said solid wall shall be constructed of view obscuring
material to provide effective site screening.**2
b. The perimeter of any portion of a site not adjacent to a rural or
residential zone boundary upon which any outdoor use of a
commercial nature is permitted shall be enclosed to a height of not
less than six feet by building walls, walls or fences of any view
obscuring material. No outdoor commercial use or enclosure thereof
shall encroach into any required setback area adjacent to any street,
nor shall any storage products or materials exceed the height of any
such enclosure.
5. In any multi-phase commercial project, all areas of a parcel which have
been graded or the surface disturbed in any way, and which are not
currently under development shall be revegetated or surfaced to
minimize wind-blown dust by a plan approved by the Department of
Planning and Development.*5
6. The shopping center site and the buildings and appurtenant facilities shall
be in a single ownership, or under management or supervision of a central
authority; or under management or supervision of a central authority; or
they shall be subject to other supervisory lease or ownership control as
may be necessary to carry out the purpose of regulations relating to the
C-S Zoning District.
7. All commercial development shall be subject to a plan of development
approval as set forth in the provisions of this Ordinance.*9
8. Commercial uses which were developed prior to September 22, 2008 shall
be exempt from the Plan of Development process; provided, however,
that in the event all commercial structures on the property are removed
or destroyed in excess of 75% of value, the property shall, without regard
to the original date of development, require a Plan of Development.*10
Article 801.10.
DELETED WITH TA2007016 EFFECTIVE 9-19-08
Article 801.11.
DELETED WITH TA2007016 EFFECTIVE 9-19-08
Date of Revisions
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 8-4
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
*1
Revised 4-02-84
*8
Effective 9-21-07 – TA2006013
**2
Added 10-15-84
*9
Effective 9-22-08 – TA2007016
*4
Revised 4-03-91
*10
Effective 1-16-09 – TA2008008
*5
Revised 2-20-94
*11
Effective 11-19-10 - TA2009014
**5
Added 2-20-94
*12
Effective 3-16-11 – TA2010022
*6
Revised 6-05-96
*13
Effective 1-29-14 – TA2013014
*7
Effective 5-16-98
*14
Approved 10-08-14 – TA2014006
Section 802.
C-O (Commercial Office Zoning District)
Article 802.1.
Purpose:
The principal purpose of this zoning district is to provide for well designed
and attractive business and professional office facilities on sites in
appropriate locations while encouraging sustainable building practices. This
zoning district would constitute a transition between other commercial land
uses and residential neighborhoods. Principal uses in this zoning district
include professional, semi-professional and business office uses. *10
Article 802.2.
Use Regulations:
A building or premise shall be used only for the following purposes:
1. Any business office in which chattels or goods, wares or merchandise are
not commercially created, repaired, sold or exchanged.
2. Offices for accountant, architect, chiropodist, chiropractor, dentist,
engineer, lawyer, minister, naturopath, osteopath, physician, surgeon,
surveyor, optometrist, geologist, insurance broker, public stenographer,
real estate broker, stock broker, advertising agency, talent agency,
private employment agency, labor union, marriage counselor, private
detective, telephone message service, professional membership
organization, business association, collection agency, homeowners
associations and other similar professional and semi professional
work.*14
3. Banks, building and loan associations, savings and loan associations, title
insurance companies, trust companies, credit unions, finance companies
and investment companies.
4. Studios for photography, fine or commercial arts or other professional
work.
5. Medical and clinical laboratories.
6. Post Office.
7. Pharmacy, when in conjunction with a medical center consisting of
offices occupied by five or more doctors provided that there shall be no
outside entrance for business purposes, and that no sign or display be
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 8-5
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
located so as to be visible from a public thoroughfare or adjacent
property.
8. Service to the public of water, gas, electricity, telephone and cable
television and sewage including wastewater treatment plants. The
foregoing shall be deemed to include attendant facilities and
appurtenances to these uses, including without limitation, distribution,
collector and feeder lines, pumping or booster stations along pipelines,
and substations along electric transmission lines.*6
9. Emergency housing - Temporary shelter required due to a natural
disaster or fire or other circumstances determined to constitute an
emergency by the zoning inspector.*4, *5
10. Temporary construction administrative offices/yard complex – which
may include a security office or residence for a security guard provided
that the following conditions are met:*14
a.
The uses are only associated with the developer/owner and
subdivision or project in which they are located.*14
b. Upon sale of the development, cessation of the need for the use
(95% buildout), or cessation of the use, all structures, modifications
to structures and uses related to the temporary facility shall be
removed.*14
c.
Those uses of structures allowed shall meet all building code
requirements.
d. All items stored on site shall only be those required for the
construction on site.
e. The allowed uses may encroach into setback areas.
f.
All necessary permits must be issued prior to placement on the site.
11. Renewable energy systems are not permitted as a primary use but may
be permitted s an accessory use as set forth in Section 1206 of this
ordinance. Where renewable energy systems involve the generation or
storage of electricity, only grid-connected or off-grid systems are
permitted.*11
12. Gardens and community gardens as defined in Chapter 2.*12
Article 802.3.
Height Regulations:
The height of buildings shall not exceed 30 feet except that within 20 feet of
any rural or residential zoning district, no building shall exceed 15 feet in
height.*11
Article 802.4.
Yard Regulations:
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 8-6
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
1. Front Yard:
a.
There shall be a front yard having a depth of not less than ten feet.
b. Where the frontage between two intersecting streets is located
partly in the C 0 Zoning District and partly in a rural or residential
zoning district, there shall be a front yard equal to the front yard
required in the adjoining rural or residential zoning district but such
yard need not exceed 25 feet in depth.
2. Side Yard:
a.
There shall be a side yard on each side of a building of not less than
five feet unless otherwise provided herein.
b. Where the lot is adjacent to a rural or residential zoning district,
there shall be a side yard on the side of the lot adjacent to such rural
or residential zoning district having a width of not less than ten feet.
c.
Where a corner lot abuts a rural or residential zoning district
whether or not separated by an alley, there shall be a side yard on
the street side of such corner lot having a width of not less than 15
feet.
3. Rear Yard:
a.
There shall be a rear yard having a depth of not less than five feet.
Article 802.5.
Intensity of Use Regulations:
The intensity of use regulations are as follows:
1. Lot Area: The minimum lot area shall be 12,000 square feet.
2. Lot Coverage: The maximum lot coverage shall be 35% of the lot area.
3. Lot Width: Each lot shall have a minimum width of 60 feet.
Article 802.6.
Parking Regulations:
The parking regulations are as provided in Chapter 11, Section 1102.
Article 802.7.
Sign Regulations:
The sign regulations are provided in Chapter 14, Section 1403.
Article 802.8.
Loading and Unloading Regulations:
The loading and unloading regulations are as provided in Chapter 11, Section
1103.
Article 802.9.
Additional Regulations:
The additional regulations are as follows:
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 8-7
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
1. All refuse collection areas shall be screened from view from all public
streets.
1. There shall be a solid fence, wall and suitable planting six feet in height
where the side or rear lot lines or boundaries of the lot area adjacent to
a rural or residential zoning district.
a.
A solid wall, not less than six feet in height, shall be required along
and adjacent to any side or rear property line abutting any rural or
residential zone boundary, or any alley abutting such zone boundary
at the time of development of the commercial property. Further,
any access gates in said solid wall shall be constructed of view
obscuring material to provide effective site screening.*3
a.
The perimeter of any portion of a site not adjacent to a rural or
residential zone boundary upon which any outdoor use of a
commercial nature is permitted, shall be enclosed to a height of not
less than six feet in height by building walls, walls or fences of any
view obscuring material. No outdoor commercial use or enclosure
thereof shall encroach into any required setback area adjacent to
any street, nor shall any storage products or materials exceed the
height of any such enclosure.
2. Any outdoor lighting shall be in conformance with provisions in Chapter
11, Section 1112. hereof. Any outdoor lighting shall be placed so as to
reflect light away from any adjoining rural or residential zoning district.*2
3. In any multi-phase commercial project, all areas of a parcel which have
been graded or the surface disturbed in any way, and which are not
currently under development shall be revegetated or surfaced to
minimize wind-blown dust by a plan approved by the Department of
Planning and Development.*4
4. All commercial development shall be subject to a plan of development
approval as set forth in the provisions of this Ordinance.*8
5. Commercial uses which were developed prior to September 22, 2008 shall
be exempt from the Plan of Development process; provided, however,
that in the event all commercial structures on the property are removed
or destroyed in excess of 75% of value, the property shall, without regard
to the original date of development, require a Plan of Development.*9
Article 802.10.
Landscaping Regulations
1. The required front yard of the lot shall be landscaped.
1. The required side yards shall be landscaped.
1. Four percent of the gross parking area shall be landscaped with grass,
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 8-8
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
trees, shrubs, or natural vegetation.
1. Any part of the lot not used for buildings, other structures, parking and
vehicular and pedestrian access shall be landscaped with grass, trees,
shrubs or natural vegetation.
1. All landscaped areas shall be provided with water bibs or an automatic
sprinkler system.
Date of Revisions
*1
Added 12-12-77
*8
Effective 9-22-08 – TA2007016
*2
Revised 4-02-84
*9
Effective 1-16-09 – TA2008008
*3
Added 10-15-84
*10
Effective 11-19-10 – TA2009014
*4
Added 2-20-94
*11
Effective 3-16-11 – TA2010022
*5
Revised 6-5-96
*12
Effective 7-17-13 – TA2012011
*6
Effective 11-19-99
*13
Effective 1-29-14 – TA2013014
*7
Effective 07-7-06 – TA2003005
*14
Approved 10-8-14 –TA2014006
Section 803. C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial Zoning District)*1
Article 803.1.
Purpose:
The principal purpose of this zoning district is to provide for smaller shops
and services in convenient locations to meet the daily needs of families in the
immediate residential neighborhoods while encouraging sustainable building
practices. Principal uses permitted in this zoning district include food
markets, drugstores and personal service shops.*16
Article 803.2.
Use Regulations:
A building or premise shall be used only for the following purposes:
1. Antique shops
1. Arcades*22
1. Art galleries
1. Automobile parts and supplies
1. Bakery shops, including baking on the premises for on site sales only.
1. Banks
1. Barber and beauty shops
1. Book, stationery and gift shops except adult oriented facilities as defined
under Chapter 2.*2
1. Business schools (such as: real estate, secretarial, data processing), but
not including trade schools.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 8-9
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
1. Candy shops, including manufacturing of candy on the premises for on-
site sales only.
1. Churches and houses of worship, including accessory columbariums
provided that the building area of the columbarium shall not exceed 10%
of the total building area of the church building(s).*6, *22
1. Cleaning agencies, laundry agencies, pressing establishments and self-
service laundries, including self-service dry cleaning machines, provided
there is no cleaning of clothes on the premises.
1. Clock and watch repair shops
1. Clothing and dry good shops, including clothing and costume rental.
1. Craft and hobby shops, with incidental craft or hobby instruction only.
1. Day nurseries and nursery schools, including a playground and
playground equipment which shall be screened from any adjoining rural
or residential zoning district.
1. Delicatessen shops
1. Dress shops
1. Drugstores and soda fountains
1. Privately owned or operated stations for fire protection, police or
security service, ambulance or other emergency service providers.*18
1. Florist shops
1. Gasoline service stations, provided all incidental repair work is
conducted wholly within a completely enclosed building and space
required for such repair work does not constitute more than 60% of the
floor area.
1. Grocery stores and meat markets, provided there is no slaughtering of
animals or poultry on the premises.
1. Hardware shops
1. Household appliance shops
1. Ice cream shops, including manufacturing of ice cream on the premises
for on-site sales only.
1. Interior decorator shops
1. Jewelry shops
1. Key, locksmith or gun shops
1. Liquor stores limited to retail sales of package goods for off-site
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 8-10
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
consumption.
1. Offices
1. Photographer's and artist's studios
1. Precision, optical and musical instrument repair shops
1. Private clubs and fraternal organizations*22
1. Private schools operated as a commercial enterprise, except trade
schools.
1. Public facilities such as libraries, museums, parks, playgrounds,
community buildings including police stations, post offices and other
community service buildings used for non-commercial non-profit
purposes.
1. Public schools; elementary, high school and college
1. Radio and television shops, including repair
1. Restaurants and cafes, including drive through but not including those
having dancing or shows, or drive in car service. The sale of alcoholic
beverages for on-site consumption only may be permitted as an
accessory use if the kitchen facilities in the restaurant do not exceed 20%
of the floor area. Patios, cocktail lounges and outside dining and drinking
areas shall be limited to a space serving no more than 50 patrons, and
no entertainment or music shall be audible off site.*23
1. Secretarial or answering services
1. Service to the public of water, gas, electricity, telephone, cable television
and sewage including wastewater treatment plants. The foregoing shall
be deemed to include attendant facilities and appurtenances to these
uses, including, without limitation, distribution, collector and feeder
lines, pumping or booster stations along pipelines, and substations along
electric transmission lines.*12
1. Shoe repair shops
1. Tailor shops
1. Variety or notion stores
1. Video rental stores*8, *22
1. Any use permitted in the R-5 Multi-Family Residential Zoning District.*21
1. Accessory buildings and uses customarily incidental to the above uses.
Renewable energy systems are not permitted as a primary use but may
be permitted as an accessory use as set forth in Section 1206 of this
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 8-11
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
Ordinance. Where renewable energy systems involve the generation or
storage of electricity, only grid-connected or off-grid systems are
permitted.*16
1. Emergency housing - Temporary shelter required due to a natural
disaster or fire or other circumstances determined to constitute an
emergency by the zoning inspector.*9, *11
2. Temporary construction administrative offices/yard complex – which
may include a security office or residence for a security guard provided
that the following conditions are met:*13, *22
a.
The uses are only associated with the developer/owner and
subdivision or project in which they are located.*22
b. Upon sale of the development, cessation of the need for the use
(95% buildout), or cessation of the use, all structures, modifications
to structures and uses related to the temporary facility shall be
removed.*22
c.
Those uses of structures allowed shall meet all building code
requirements.
d. All items stored on site shall only be those required for the
construction on site.
e. The allowed uses may encroach into setback areas.
f.
All necessary permits must be issued prior to placement on the site.
3. Gardens and community gardens as defined in Chapter 2.*19
Article 803.3.
Height Regulations:
The height of buildings shall not exceed 30 feet except that the height of any
building or structure within 30 feet of any rural or residential zone boundary
shall not exceed the distance from said building or structure to the zone
boundaries. Streets or alleys may be included in calculating distance.*17
Article 803.4.
Yard Regulations:
1. Front Yard: A minimum of ten feet, and further that where the frontage
between two intersecting streets is located partly in the C-1 Zoning
District, and partly in a rural or residential zoning district, there shall be
a front yard equal to the front yard required in the adjoining rural or
residential zoning district but such yard need not exceed 25 feet in
depth.
2. Side Yard: None required (see Chapter 8, Section 803., Article 803.3.
Height Regulations), except that:
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 8-12
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
a.
Where a lot is adjacent to a rural or residential zoning district, there
shall be a side yard on the side of the lot adjacent to such rural or
residential zoning district having a width of not less than ten feet.
b. Where a corner lot abuts a rural or residential zoning district,
whether or not separated by an alley, there shall be a side yard on
the street side of such corner lot having a width of not less than ten
feet.
c.
If a side yard is otherwise provided, it shall have a width of not less
than three feet.
3. Rear Yard: None required (see Chapter 8, Section 803., Article 803.3.
Height Regulations), except that where a lot abuts a rural or residential
zoning district whether or not separated by an alley, there shall be a rear
yard having a depth of not less than 25 feet.
a.
If a rear yard is otherwise provided, it shall have a depth of not less
than three feet.
Article 803.5.
Intensity of Use Regulations:
The intensity of use regulations are as follows:
1. Lot Area: Each lot shall have a minimum area of 6,000 square feet.
2. Lot Width: Each lot shall have a minimum width of 60 feet.
3. Lot Coverage: The maximum lot coverage shall be 60% of the lot area.
Article 803.6.
Parking Regulations:
The parking regulations are as provided in Chapter 11, Section 1102.
Article 803.7.
Sign Regulations:
The sign regulations are provided in Chapter 14, Section 1404.
Article 803.8.
Loading and Unloading Regulations:
The loading and unloading regulations are as provided in Chapter 11, Section
1103.
Article 803.9.
Additional Regulations:
The additional regulations are as follows:
1. All activity (except required on-site parking, loading or unloading)
including incidental or accessory storage and display area shall be within
a completely enclosed building, unless otherwise specifically noted
herein.
1. Any outdoor lighting shall be in conformance with provisions in Chapter
11, Section 1112. Any outdoor lighting shall be placed so as to reflect
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 8-13
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
light away from any adjoining rural or residential zoning district.*3
1. A building other than the residence of the family of the operator or
caretaker employed on the premises of a commercial use shall not be
used for dwellings unless approved as a Special Use by the Board of
Supervisors.*5, *10
1. Walls and Screening:
a.
A solid wall, not less than six feet in height, shall be required along
and adjacent to any side or rear property line abutting any rural or
residential zone boundary, or any alley abutting such zone boundary
at the time of development of the commercial property. Further,
any access gates in said solid wall shall be constructed of
view-obscuring material to provide effective site screening.*4
a.
The perimeter of any portion of a site not adjacent to a rural or
residential zone boundary upon which any outdoor use of a com-
mercial nature is permitted shall be enclosed to a height of not less
than six feet by building walls, walls or fences of any view-obscuring
material. No outdoor commercial use or enclosure thereof shall
encroach into any required setback area adjacent to any street, nor
shall any storage products or materials exceed the height of any
such enclosure.
1. In any multi-phase commercial project, all areas of a parcel which have
been graded or the surface disturbed in any way, and which are not
currently under development shall be revegetated or surfaced to
minimize wind-blown dust by a plan approved by the Department of
Planning and Development.*9
1. All commercial development shall be subject to a plan of development
approval as set forth in the provisions of this Ordinance.*14
1. Commercial uses which were developed prior to September 22, 2008
shall be exempt from the Plan of Development process; provided,
however, that in the event all commercial structures on the property are
removed or destroyed in excess of 75% of value, the property shall,
without regard to the original date of development, require a Plan of
Development.*15
Date of Revisions
*1
Revised 5-11-81
*13
Effective 07-07-06 – TA2003005
*2
Revised 6-01-81
*14
Effective 9-22-08 – TA2007016
*3
Revised 4-02-84
*15
Effective 1-16-09 – TA2008008
*4
Added 10-15-84
*16
Effective 11-19-10 - TA2009014
*5
Renumbered 1-07-85
*17
Effective 3-16-11 – TA2010022
*6
Revised 4-10-89
*18
Effective 1-11-12 – TA2007018
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 8-14
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
*8
Added
and
renumbered
after
subparagraph Ch. 8, Section 803.2.43
*19
Effective 7-17-13 – TA2012011
*9
Added 2-20-94
*20
Effective 1-29-14 – TA2013014
*10
Revised 5-06-94
*21
Approved 10-08-14 – TA2014003
*11
Revised 6-05-96
*22
Approved 10-08-14 – TA2014006
*12
Effective 11-19-99
*23
Effective 7-10-15 – TA2015002
Section 804. C-2 (Intermediate Commercial Zoning District)*1
Article 804.1.
Purpose:
The principal purpose of this zoning district is to provide for the sale of
commodities and the performance of services and other activities in locations
for which the market area extends beyond the immediate residential
neighborhoods while encouraging sustainable building practices. Principal
uses permitted in this zoning district include automobile sales and services,
furniture stores, hotels and motels, travel trailer parks, restaurants, and some
commercial recreation and cultural facilities such as movies and instruction
in art and music. This zoning district is designed for application at major street
intersections. 17
Article 804.2.
Use Regulations:
A building or premise shall be used only for the following purposes:*21
1. Any use permitted in the C-1 Zoning District subject to all the regulations
specified in the use regulations for such C-1 Zoning District unless the use
is otherwise regulated in this Section.*20
1. Adult oriented facilities as defined under Chapter 2, subject to the
following conditions:*11
a.
Adult oriented facilities shall not be located within 1,500 feet of
any other adult oriented facility.
a.
Adult oriented facilities shall not be located within 1,500 feet of:
1.
A church; or
2.
A public or private elementary or secondary school; or
1.
A public or private day care center, preschool, nursery,
kindergarten, or similar use; or
1.
A public park or playground; or
1.
A medical marijuana dispensary or a medical marijuana offsite
cultivation location.*18
b. For purposes of measuring separation distances required in this
section, the measurements shall be taken in a straight line from
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 8-15
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
the closest exterior walls of any affected structures without regard
to intervening structures or objects or political boundaries.
c.
An adult oriented business lawfully operating is not rendered in
violation of these provisions by the subsequent location of a
church, public or private elementary or secondary school, a park or
playground, or a medical marijuana dispensary or medical
marijuana offsite cultivation location within 1,500 feet of the adult
oriented business.*18
a.
This provision shall not be construed as permitting any use or act
which is otherwise prohibited or made punishable by law.
1. Art metal and ornamental iron shops.
1. Automobile laundries, provided steam cleaning is confined to a
building.
1. Automobile repair shops and garages, including an outside vehicle
storage area to be used for vehicles under repair which shall be
completely screened from any street or surrounding property, and
further provided all repair operations are conducted within a building.
1. New and used, automobile and golf cart sales, and rentals provided all
sales, service, and repair activities are conducted within a building. *10,
*13, *15
1. Awning and canvas stores.
1. Bars, including retail sales of package goods for off-site consumption,
provided that there is no entertainment or music audible offsite.
1. Health spas and public gyms.*2
1. Blueprint, photostat and reproduction (copy) services.
1. Boat sales, including an outside display area, providing all sales and
repair activities are conducted within a building.*15
1. Cabinet and carpenter shops.
1. Catering establishments not utilizing any manufacturing process or
outside storage of materials or vehicles.
1. Conservatories or studios: Art, dancing or music.
1. Department stores.
1. Drive in restaurants and refreshment stands.
1. Electrical fixtures and appliance sales, repair and service.
1. Feed stores, inside storage only.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 8-16
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
1. Funeral homes, mortuaries and chapels.
1. Furniture stores including: New, used, finished or unfinished
merchandise.
1. Gas (butane or propane), retail sales of.*6
1. Hospitals, group care facilities and detoxification facilities.*21 & *24
1. Hotels, resorts, motels.*21
1. Laboratories, medical or dental.
1. Farm animal (horse, cattle and other farm animal) medical clinics and
surgical hospitals.*21
1. Liquor stores.
1. Nurseries, flower and plant sales, provided all incidental equipment and
supplies including fertilizer and empty cans, are kept within a
completely enclosed building or within an area enclosed on all sides by
a solid fence or wall at least six feet in height and no goods, materials
or objects are stacked higher than the fence or wall so erected.
1. Paint and wall paper stores.
1. Parking lots and public garages, subject to parking standards in Chapter
11, Section 1102.
1. Pet shops, including the treatment or boarding of cats, dogs or other
small animals.*21
1. Plumbing shops.
1. Pool halls or billiard centers.
1. Radio and television broadcasting stations and studios, but not
including transmitter towers and stations.
1. Rental services: Household, lawn, garden, sickroom or office
equipment.
1. Restaurants and cafes, including patios, cocktail lounges, and outside
dining and drinking areas, provided there is no amplified entertainment
or music audible off-site.*14, *22
1. Retail stores.
1. Taxidermists.
1. Theaters, but not including a drive in theater and adult oriented
facilities as defined under Chapter 2.*2
1. Tinsmith shops.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 8-17
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
1. Trade schools.
1. Upholstery shops.
1. Veterinary hospitals, clinics and kennels for dogs, cats and small
animals.*21
1. Self-storage facilities.*21
1. Accessory buildings and uses customarily incidental to the above.
1. Medical Marijuana Dispensary Facilities and/or Marijuana Establishment
as defined in Chapter 2 of this Ordinance subject to all rules adopted by
the Arizona Department of Health Services and to the following
conditions:*20 *23
a.
Medical Marijuana Dispensaries and/or Marijuana Establishments
shall not be located within 1,500 feet of any other Medical
Marijuana Dispensary and/or Marijuana Establishments.*23
a.
Medical Marijuana Dispensaries and/or Marijuana Establishments
shall not be located within 1,500 feet of: *23
1.
A church; or
2.
A public or private elementary or secondary school; or
3.
A public or private day care center, preschool, nursery,
kindergarten, or similar use; or
4.
A public park or playground; or
5.
An adult oriented facility.
b. For purposes of measuring separation distances required in this
section, the measurements shall be taken in a straight line from
the closest exterior wall of the subject building to the closest
boundary line of any affected parcel without regard to intervening
structures or objects or political boundaries.
c.
A Medical Marijuana Dispensary and/or Marijuana Establishment
lawfully operating is not rendered in violation of these provisions
by the subsequent location of a church, public or private
elementary or secondary school, a kindergarten or preschool or
similar use, or a park or playground within 1,500 feet of the
Medical Marijuana Dispensary and/or Marijuana Establishment
and/or Medical Marijuana Offsite Cultivation Location.*23
d. This provision shall not be construed as permitting any use or act
which is otherwise prohibited or made punishable by law.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 8-18
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
e. The facility may only have retail sale / dispersal of product, with
cultivation, extraction and infusion to the on-site retail sale /
dispersal of product. A Marijuana Establishment as defined in
Chapter 2 of this Ordinance shall be limited to type ‘A’ only.*23
1. Halfway houses.*24
1. Boarding houses.*24
Article 804.3.
Height Regulations:
The height of buildings shall not exceed 40 feet, except that the height of any
building or structure closer than 40 feet to any rural or residential zone
boundary shall not exceed the distance from said building or structure to the
zone boundaries. Streets or alleys may be included in calculating distance.*19
Article 804.4.
Yard Regulations:
1. Front Yard: A minimum of 10 feet, and further that where the frontage
between two intersecting streets is located partly in the C-2 Zoning
District and partly in a rural or residential zoning district there shall be a
front yard equal to the front yard required in the adjoining rural or
residential zoning district but such yard need not exceed 25 feet in
depth.
2. Side Yard: None required (see Chapter 8, Section 804., Article 804.3.
Height Regulations), except that:
a.
Where a lot is adjacent to a rural or residential zoning district, there
shall be a side yard on the side of the lot adjacent to such rural or
residential zoning district having a width of not less than ten feet.
b. Where a corner lot abuts a rural or residential zoning district,
whether or not separated by an alley, there shall be a side yard on
the street side of such corner lot having a width of not less than ten
feet.
c.
If a side yard is otherwise provided, it shall have a width of not less
than three feet.
3. Rear Yard: None required (see Chapter 8, Section 804., Article 804.3.
Height Regulations), except that where a lot abuts a rural or residential
zoning district whether or not separated by an alley, there shall be a rear
yard having a depth of not less than 25 feet.
a.
If a rear yard is otherwise provided, it shall have a depth of not less
than three feet.
Article 804.5.
Intensity of Use Regulations:
The intensity of use regulations are as follows:
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 8-19
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
1. Lot Area: Each lot shall have a minimum area of 6,000 square feet.
2. Lot Width: Each lot shall have a minimum width of 60 feet.
3. Lot Coverage: The maximum lot coverage shall be 60% of the lot area.
Article 804.6.
Parking Regulations:
The parking regulations are as provided in Chapter 11, Section 1102. hereof.
Article 804.7.
Sign Regulations:
The sign regulations are provided in Chapter 14, Section 1403. hereof.
Article 804.8.
Loading and Unloading Regulations:
The loading and unloading regulations are as provided in Chapter 11, Section
1103. hereof.
Article 804.9.
Additional Regulations:
The additional regulations are as follows:
1. All activity (except required on-site parking, including loading or
unloading areas), incidental or accessory storage and display area shall
be within a completely enclosed building unless otherwise specifically
noted herein.
1. Any outdoor lighting shall be in conformance with provisions in Chapter
11, Section 1112. Any outdoor lighting shall be placed so as to reflect
light away from any adjoining rural or residential zoning district.*3
1. A building other than the residence of the family of the operator or
caretaker employed on the premises of a commercial use shall not be
used for dwellings unless approved as a Special Use by the Board of
Supervisors.*5, *13
1. Walls and Screening:
a.
A solid wall, not less than six feet in height, shall be required along
and adjacent to any side or rear property line abutting any rural or
residential zone boundary, or any alley abutting such zone boundary
at the time of development of the commercial property. Further,
any access gates in said solid wall shall be constructed of
view-obscuring material to provide effective site screening.*4
a.
The perimeter of any portion of a site not adjacent to a rural or
residential zone boundary upon which any outdoor use of a com-
mercial nature is permitted shall be enclosed to a height of not less
than six feet by building walls, walls or fences of any view-obscuring
material. No outdoor commercial use or enclosure thereof shall
encroach into any required setback area adjacent to any street, nor
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 8-20
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
shall any storage products or materials exceed the height of any
such enclosure.
1. In any multi-phase commercial project, all areas of a parcel which have
been graded or the surface disturbed in any way, and which are not
currently under development shall be revegetated or surfaced to
minimize wind-blown dust by a plan approved by the Department of
Planning and Development.*12
1. All commercial development shall be subject to a plan of development
approval as set forth in the provisions of this Ordinance.*15
1. Commercial uses which were developed prior to September 22, 2008
shall be exempt from the Plan of Development process; provided,
however, that in the event all commercial structures on the property are
removed or destroyed in excess of 75% of value, the property shall,
without regard to the original date of development, require a Plan of
Development.*16
Date of Revisions
*1
Revised 5-11-81
*15
Effective 9-22-08 – TA2007016
*2
Revised 6-01-81
*16
Effective 1-16-09 – TA2008008
*3
Revised 4-02-84
*17
Effective 11-19-10 – TA2009014
*4
Added 10-15-84
*18
Effective 12-28-10 – TA2010017
*5
Renumbered 1-07-85
*19
Effective 3-16-11 – TA2010022
*6
Revised 4-01-85
*20
Effective 1-29-14 – TA2013014
*10
Revised 5-16-90
*21
Approved 10-08-14 – TA2014006
*11
Added 8-21-93
*22
Effective 7-10-15 – TA2015002
*12
Added 2-20-94
*23
Effective 3-11-21 – TA2020002
*13
Revised 5-06-94
*24
Effective 3-11-22 – TA2020001
*14
Effective 5-09-97
Section 805.
C-3 (General Commercial Zoning District)*1
Article 805.1.
Purpose:
The principal purpose of this zoning district is to provide for commercial uses
concerned with wholesale or distribution activities in locations where there
is adequate access to major streets or highways while encouraging
sustainable building practices. Principal uses permitted in this zoning district
include retail and wholesale commerce and commercial entertainment.*14
Article 805.2.
Use Regulations:
A building or premise shall be used only for the following purposes:*17
1. Any use permitted in the C-2 Zoning District subject to all the regulations
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 8-21
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
specified in the use regulations for such C-2 Zoning District unless the use
is otherwise regulated in this Section.*16 *19
1. Amusement enterprises and outdoor amusement parks.*17
1. Auction sales, including swap meet operations.
1. Automobile sales, service and rental.
1. Boat sales, service and rental.
1. Bowling alleys.
1. Bus depots.
1. Circus and carnival grounds having permanent facilities.*17
1. Dance halls and nightclubs, including outdoor amplified music, except
adult oriented facilities as defined under Chapter 2 of this ordinance
may not have outdoor music or entertainment.*2, *17, *18
1. Drive in or outdoor theaters.*17
1. Equipment rentals and sales, but not including equipment customarily
used for heavy construction.
1. Frozen food lockers, including processing but not slaughtering of
animals.
1. Hospitals, clinics and kennels for animals.*17
1. Wholesale ice distributing stations.
1. Landscape material sales provided all incidental equipment and
supplies, including fertilizer and empty cans, are kept within a
completely enclosed building or within an area enclosed on all sides by
a solid fence or wall at least six feet in height, and no goods, materials
or objects are stacked higher than the fence or wall so erected.
1. Lumber yards not including industrial milling or planning operations.
1. Miniature golf courses and driving ranges.
1. Mobile home, travel trailer and recreation vehicle sales and service.
1. Outdoor race tracks.*17
1. Permanent facilities for rodeos, auctions, swap meets, campgrounds,
and sites rented for private parties.*17
1. Printing, lithography and publishing establishments.
1. Stone monument sales.
1. Commercial storage of mobile homes, manufactured homes, travel
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 8-22
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
trailers, recreation vehicles, boats and aircraft.*5, *11, *17
1. Truck stops, with customary accessory facilities including but not
limited to restaurant, convenience retail, motel, truck wash, and minor
repair facilities but not including major repair, freight storage, freight
handling, warehousing or distribution facilities.**7
1. Wholesale stores.
1. Zoos, including the keeping of wild or exotic animals on a private or
commercial basis.*17
1. Accessory buildings and uses customarily incidental to the above uses.
Article 805.3.
Height Regulations:
The height of buildings shall not exceed 40 feet, except that the height of any
building or structure closer than 40 feet to any rural or residential zone
boundary shall not exceed the distance from said building or structure to the
zone boundaries. Streets or alleys may be included in calculating distance.*15
Article 805.4.
Yard Regulations:
1. Front Yard: A minimum of ten feet, and further that where the frontage
between two intersecting streets is located partly in the C-3 Zoning
District and partly in a rural or residential zoning district, there shall be a
front yard equal to the front yard required in the adjoining rural or
residential zoning district but such yard need not exceed 25 feet in
depth.
2. Side Yard: None required (see Chapter 8, Section 805., Article 805.3.
Height Regulations), except that:
a.
Where a lot is adjacent to a rural or residential zoning district there
shall be a side yard on the side of the lot adjacent to such rural or
residential zoning district having a width of not less than ten feet.
b. Where a corner lot abuts a rural or residential zoning district
whether or not separated by an alley, there shall be a side yard on
the street side of such corner lot having a width of not less than ten
feet.
c.
If a side yard is otherwise provided, it shall have a width of not less
than three feet.
3. Rear Yard: None required (see Chapter 8, Section 805., Article 805.3.
Height Regulations), except that where a lot abuts a rural or residential
zoning district whether or not separated by an alley, there shall be a rear
yard having a depth of not less than 25 feet.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 8-23
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
a.
If a rear yard is otherwise provided, it shall have a depth of not less
than three feet.
Article 805.5.
Intensity of Use Regulations:
The intensity of use regulations are as follows:
1. Lot Area: Each lot shall have a minimum area of 6,000 square feet.
2. Lot Width: Each lot shall have a minimum width of 60 feet.
3. Lot Coverage: The maximum lot coverage shall be 60% of the lot area.
Article 805.6.
Parking Regulations:
The parking regulations are as provided in Chapter 11, Section 1102. hereof.
Article 805.7.
Sign Regulations:
The sign regulations are provided in Chapter 14, Section 1403. hereof.
Article 805.8.
Loading and Unloading Regulations:
The loading and unloading regulations are as provided in Chapter 11, Section
1103. hereof.
Article 805.9.
Additional Regulations:
The additional regulations are as follows:
1. Site Enclosure and Screening Requirements: Commercial site and/or uses
shall be enclosed to provide effective site screening from adjoining
properties, uses or streets as follows:
a. A solid wall, not less than six feet in height shall be required along
and adjacent to any side or rear property line abutting any rural or
residential zone boundary, or any alley abutting such zone boundary
at the time of development of the commercial property. Further, any
access gates in said solid wall shall be constructed of view obscuring
material to provide effective site screening.
a. The perimeter of any portion of a site not adjacent to a rural or
residential zone boundary upon which any outdoor use of a
commercial nature is permitted shall be enclosed to a height of not
less than six feet by building walls, walls or fences of any view-
obscuring material. No outdoor commercial use or enclosure thereof
shall encroach into any required setback area adjacent to any street,
nor shall any storage products or materials exceed the height of any
such enclosure.
1. Any outdoor lighting shall be in conformance with provisions in Chapter
11, Section 1112. hereof. Any outdoor lighting shall be placed so as to
reflect light away from any adjoining rural or residential zoning district.*3
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 8-24
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
1.
A building other than the residence of the family of the operator or
caretaker employed on the premises of a commercial use shall not be
used for dwellings unless approved as a Special Use by the Board of
Supervisors.*4, *10
1.
In any multi-phase commercial project, all areas of a parcel which have
been graded or the surface disturbed in any way, and which are not
currently under development shall be revegetated or surfaced to
minimize wind-blown dust by a plan approved by the Department of
Planning and Development.*9
1.
All commercial development shall be subject to a plan of development
approval as set forth in the provisions of this Ordinance.*12
1.
Commercial uses which were developed prior to September 22, 2008
shall be exempt from the Plan of Development process; provided,
however, that in the event all commercial structures on the property are
removed or destroyed in excess of 75% of value, the property shall,
without regard to the original date of development, require a Plan of
Development.*13
Date of Revisions
*1
Revised 5-11-81
*12
Effective 9-22-08 – TA2007016
*2
Revised 6-01-81
*13
Effective 1-16-09 – TA2008008
*3
Revised 4-02-84
*14
Effective 11-19-10 – TA2009014
*4
Renumbered 1-07-85
*15
Effective 3-16-11 – TA2010022
*5
Revised 4-01-85
*16
Effective 1-29-14 – TA2013014
**7
Added 4-10-89
*17
Approved 10-08-14 – TA2014006
*9
Added 2-20-94
*18
Effective 5-26-17 – TA2016002
*10
Revised 5-06-94
*19
Effective 3-11-21 – TA2020002
*11
Effective 9-15-06 – TA2006003
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-1
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
Chapter 8
| General Regulations
Section 801. Chapter 11 | General Regulations
Section 1101.Section 801.
Applying General Provisions
The regulations set forth in this Chapter qualify or supplement, as the case may be, the zoning dis-
trict regulations appearing elsewhere in this Ordinance.
Section 1102.Section 802.
Parking Regulations*20, *31
Article 1102.1.Article 802.1.
Minimum Requirements:
There shall be provided parking spaces for each use on a lot based on the
following chart: *8
USE
1102.1.1. - Residential Uses:
Mobile Home and Travel Trailer/RV Park
2.
Single-family (includes mobile homes
on owned lots)
3.
Multiple-family
4.
Fraternities and Sororities
1102.1.2. - Public Assembly Uses: 2
Schools, public, private and
charter*31
2.
All other public assembly uses
MINIMUM PARKING SPACES
One per approved space + spaces to meet the
needs of any commercial, office or public
assembly
Two per dwelling unit
Two per dwelling unit 1 & 2
20% of the required parking must be reserved
for guests.
One and one-half per each sleeping room 2
One per 400 square feet of floor area
One per 200 square feet of floor area
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-2
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
1102.1.3. - Hotels, Motels, Guest Ranches
and Resort Hotels:
1102.1.4. - Office and Commercial Uses:
1102.1.5. - Industrial, Wholesale and
Manufacturing Uses:
1102.1.6. - Warehouse Uses:
One per sleeping room + spaces to meet the
needs of any commercial, office or public
assembly 2
One per 250 300 square feet of floor area + one
per 5,000 square feet of outside display area;
and + one per 100 square feet of outdoor
seating area; and + four spaces per golf course
green 2
One per 600 700 square feet of floor area 2
One per 900 1000 square feet of floor area 2
1 20% of parking spaces shall be reserved for guest parking spaces.
2 5% of parking spaces shall be handicapped parking spaces.
ARTICLE 1102802.1 - Parking Requirements*
Use
Minimum Parking Spaces
Residential Uses
1. Mobile Home & Travel Trailer/RV Park
One per approved space + spaces to meet
the needs of any commercial, office or
public assembly
2. Single-family (includes mobile homes on owned lots) Two per dwelling unit
3. Multiple-family**
Two per dwelling unit + 20% of the
required parking must be reserved for
guest parking spaces
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-3
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
4. Fraternities & Sororities**
One and one-half per each sleeping room
Public Assembly**
1. Schools, public, private and charter
One per 400 square feet of floor area
2. All other public assembly uses
One per 200 square feet of floor area
Commercial Uses**
1. Golf Courses
Four spaces per golf course green
2. Group Care Facilities
One space per employee and 0.25 spaces
per bed over ten residents
3. Hotels, Motels, Guest Ranches and Resort Hotels
One per sleeping room + spaces to meet
the needs of any commercial, office or
public assembly
4. Office and Commercial Uses
One per 250 300 square feet of floor area
ARTICLE 1102802.1 - Parking Requirements*
Use
Minimum Parking Spaces
Commercial Uses**
5. Outdoor Dining
One per 100 square feet
6. Outdoor Displays
One per 5,000 square feet
7. RV/Boat Storage & Mini and Indoor Mini Storage
Facilities
Four spaces per office and two spaces for
caretaker's quarters (if any)
8. Special Events Venue
0.5 spaces per maximum permitted
occupancy on site
Industrial Uses**
1. Industrial, Wholesale & Manufacturing Uses
One per 600 1,000 square feet of floor
area
2. Warehouse Uses
One per 900 1,000 square feet of floor
area
*Parking requirements apply to structures associated with the primary or principal use of the
property.
**Quantity of accessible parking shall be provided based on the requirements of the accessibility
standards currently adopted by Maricopa County.
Article 1102.2.Article 802.2.
Fractional Measurements:
One additional parking space shall be required if the number of required
parking spaces results in a fractional number.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-4
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
Article 1102.3.Article 802.3.
Location: *18
1102.3.1.802.3.1.
Parking spaces shall be located on the same lot as the use they are
intended to serve, or within 600 feet of the use to be served provided assurances
are supplied to the Zoning Administrator that the off-site parking will be
continuously available during normal business hours of the use to be
served.Parking spaces shall be located on the same lot as the use they are
intended to serve, or within 600 feet of the use to be served, provided:
1. Written assurances are supplied to the Zoning Inspector that the off-
site parking will be continuously available during normal business hours
of the use to be served; and
2. Such off-site parking is paved, has a zoning entitlement equal to or
more intense than the use served, and is included in a new or existing
approved Plan of Development.
3. Shared Parking Agreements. The Zoning Inspector or their designee
may approve the use of a shared parking agreement between two or
more separate sites that meet the above requirements, provided the
agreement is in writing, recorded with the County Recorder, and
binding on successors in interest to all affected properties. If the
agreement lapses or is terminated, the affected property must either
secure a new shared parking agreement or provide the full number of
required parking spaces. Failure to do so shall constitute a violation of
this Ordinance.
1102.3.2.802.3.2.
Parking spaces shall be located such that each space has access to the
use to be served without crossing an arterial street, or a railroad right-of-way,
unless requirement is waived by the Zoning Administrator Inspector due to a
written an approved valet parking plan or other provision.*36
1102.3.3.802.3.3.
The number and location of required parking spaces, and the distance
of parking spaces from the use to be served, may be waived by the Zoning
Administrator Inspector with an written approved valet parking plan.*36
802.3.4.
A reduction in required parking spaces may be approved for
commercial, industrial, or multifamily residential developments based on a
professional parking demand study that:
1. Is prepared and signed by a licensed professional engineer or certified
transportation planner;
2. Demonstrates, using relevant data and site-specific factors, that the
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-5
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
reduced parking supply will adequately serve the proposed use without
causing adverse impacts to surrounding properties or public facilities;
3. Considers factors such as unit mix and size (for multifamily), proximity
to transit, bicycle facilities, on-street parking availability, and
transportation demand management measures;
4. Is submitted with the first review of the Plan of Development
application; and
5. Receives approval from both the Planning and Development
Department and MCDOT prior to second review.
Article 1102.4.Article 802.4. Mixed Uses:
The required parking spaces shall be the sum of the required parking spaces
for each of the individual uses.
Article 1102.5.Article 802.5.
Joint Use:
This Ordinance allows the joint use of parking spaces for two or more
buildings or uses if the total spaces equals the spaces required for the
individual buildings or uses during their normal hours of operation,
determined by the Zoning Inspector or their designee with a written
agreement between property owners thefor two or more buildings.
Article 1102.6.Article 802.6.
Handicapped Accessible Parking:
1102.6.1.802.6.1.
Such spaces shall be located on the shortest accessible route to
building entrances. The accessible route shall not be permitted to be used for
drainage.
1102.6.2.802.6.2.
Such spaces shall show the international handicapped accessible
symbol and say "Reserved". Such signs shall be exempted from the Sign
Regulations of this Ordinance.
802.6.3.
Such space shall have an handicapped international accessible symbol
painted on the ground to the rear of the parking space.
Article 1102.7.Article 802.7.
Design Standards:*9, *12
The following parking space/lot design standards shall be complied with:
1102.7.1.802.7.1.
For other than one single-family dwelling unit or one mobile home on
a lot of record, any parking area shall be paved.Parking areas, excluding single-
family residential uses, shall be paved, unless otherwise determined by the
zoning inspector.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-6
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
Type of Material
Compliance with 802.7.1
Paving or Asphalt
Yes
Liquid asphaltic binder/emulsifier with millings
Yes
Stabilized decomposed granite
Yes
Asphalt Millings
No
Decomposed granite
No
1102.7.2.802.7.2.
For one single-family dwelling unit or one mobile home on a lot of
record, any parking area must be paved or in the alternative surfaced with ABC
material.Parking areas for single-family residential uses must be paved or
surfaced with decomposed granite or an ABC materials to minimize dust
pollution. Surfacing alternatives may be approved at the discretion of the Zoning
Inspector or their designee.
1102.7.3.802.7.3.
Parking spaces, aisles, and driveways shall be so arranged as to
require ingress and egress from the lot to a street by forward motion of the
vehicle. *3
1102.7.4.802.7.4.
Parking spaces shall be designed so that vehicles exiting there from
will not be required to back onto or across any sidewalk or street. 3*
1102.7.5.802.7.5.
Adjacent to any rural or residential zone parking areas shall be
screened from view, except when separated by a public street. 3 Any parking
area facing a street shall be screened with a three foot tall solid wall or
landscaped berm to minimize headlight glare.
1102.7.6.802.7.6.
Any lights used to illuminate parking spaces areas shall be so
arranged and screened as to reflect the light away from adjoining lots in rural or
residential districts and from streets or from any residential use in commercial
zoned districts. Such lights shall be in accordance with any adopted County
Outdoor Lighting Ordinance and shall have a maximum height of 18 feet.
1102.7.7.802.7.7.
Parking areas shall be visually screened from abutting road right-of-
way (excluding alleys) by a building or structure a three foot tall solid wall,
landscaped berm or fence of 80% opacity to minimize headlight glare or a strip
of landscaping at least five feet in width.*3
1102.7.8.802.7.8.
Either a wall or a minimum six inches high curb or bumper guard shall
be installed to ensure that no part of a parked vehicle shall extend past any
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-7
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
property line.*3
1102.7.9.802.7.9.
Parking spaces shall be designated by striping.*3
1102.7.10.802.7.10.
The design of roads, pedestrian walks, and open spaces within
parking areas are subject to approval by the Zoning Administrator Inspector and
shall be arranged so that pedestrians are not unnecessarily exposed to and
endangered by vehicular traffic.3
1102.7.11.802.7.11.
Paved and comfortably graded accessible pedestrian walkways shall
be provided from the parking areas to the primary building entrance along lines
of the most intense pedestrian use, particularly from building entrances to
streets, parking areas, and adjacent buildings. 3
1102.7.12.802.7.12.
Only one parking area entrance and one parking area exit; or one
combined parking area entrance and exit is allowed for a lot or parcel along any
one street unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
3* Requirement applies except for a single-family dwellings, a single two-family dwellings, and an individual
mobile homes on a lot of record.
Article 1102.8.Article 802.8.
Parking Area Dimensions: *34
Dimensions of parking spaces and access areas shall be in accordance with
the following:
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-8
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
Figure 1 — SEE PARKING LAYOUT GRAPHIC
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-9
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
Article 1102.9.Article 802.9.
Additional Parking Regulations:
In addition to the above parking requirements, the following requirements
must be met:
1102.9.1.802.9.1.
No Zoning Clearance shall be issued unless the required parking as
indicated in this section is provided.
1102.9.2.802.9.2.
Whenever a Zoning Clearance has been granted, the subsequent use
of the property is conditioned upon the provision of the parking spaces
contained in the approved plans.
1102.9.3.802.9.3.
No addition or enlargement of an existing building or use shall be
permitted unless the parking requirements of this Ordinance are met for the
entire building or use..
1102.9.4.802.9.4.
The parking or storage of a non-accessory vehicle except for normal
deliveries having a gross vehicle weight greater than 10,000 lbs. on any lot in any
rural or residential zoning district is prohibited. *24
1102.9.5.802.9.5.
Not more than three unregistered and/or inoperable motor vehicles
shall be stored on any lot or parcel of land within any rural or residential zoning
district, and such unregistered or inoperable vehicles if stored out of doors shall
be stored in other than the required front yard and such that it is visually
screened by a solid wall or fence from any public or private street right-of-way
unless stored within an attached carport. Such storage shall maintain a five (5)
foot clear path around any structures. *35
1102.9.6.802.9.6.
The use of any required parking area for motor vehicle repair work, or
permanent display, or sales of any kind is prohibited, and any required parking
area shall be available for customer, patron, and employee parking at all
timetimes during normal business hours. Use of the parking area is prohibited
without an appropriate entitlement except that motor vehicle repair may occur
in the event of an emergency.
1102.9.7.802.9.7.
Parking structures, which have no portion above grade, shall not be
included in the calculation of lot coverage for the site.
1102.9.8.802.9.8.
Off-street parking provided for employees of office or commercial or
industrial uses requiring 50 or more spaces shall designate at least 10% of the
total number of parking spaces for use by car and/or van pools, and be clearly
signed, reserved, and managed to that end.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-10
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
1102.9.9.802.9.9.
Off-street parking provided for employees of office or commercial or
industrial uses requiring 100 or more spaces shall designate at least 15% of the
total number of parking spaces for use by car and/or van pools and be clearly
signed, reserved, and managed to that end; and shall design and construct
convenient facilities in order to secure bicycles; and shall design and provide for
needed transit facilities, such as, but not limited to, park and ride parking spaces
and transit stops and shelters as determined by the Regional Public Transit
Authority; and shall provide to the Maricopa County Trip Reduction Office, plans
and programs to reduce total vehicle trips in conformance with the State of
Arizona and Maricopa County goals, policies, regulations, and plans.
1102.9.10.802.9.10.
For those large scale residential and/or commercial developments
that include one or more regulation golf courses and which propose to use golf
carts to meet some of the transportation needs, one of the two required parking
spaces for single-family and multiple-family dwellings may be a golf cart parking
space. Such golf cart parking space shall be a maximum size of six feet in width
by and 12 feet in depth and shall not be used for any purpose other than golf
cart parking. Up to 10% of the required parking spaces at regulation golf courses
in the above large scale developments may be golf cart parking spaces.
1102.9.11.802.9.11.
All drive-through facilities shall have a minimum of 100 linear feet of
queuing space per bay or pick-up window. Queuing lengths shall be a linear
measurement from the point of service.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-11
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
Section 1103.Section 803.
Loading and Unloading Regulations
Article 1103.1.Article 803.1. Commercial buildings:
For all commercial buildings hereafter erected, or for any building converted
to such use or occupancy, there shall be provided one loading and unloading
space not less than ten feet in width, 20 feet in length for each 25,000
square feet of floor area, or fraction thereof, devoted to such use in the
building.
Article 1103.2.Article 803.2.
Wholesale, Manufacturing and Industrial
Buildings:
For all wholesale, manufacturing and industrial buildings hereafter erected,
or for any building converted to such use or occupancy, there shall be
provided one loading and unloading space for each 10,000 square feet of
floor area, or fraction thereof, devoted to such use in the building.
Article 1103.3.Article 803.3.
Location:
The required loading and unloading spaces shall in all cases be on the same
lot as the use they are intended to serve.
Article 1103.4.Article 803.4.
Collective Action:
This Ordinance shall not be construed to prevent the joint use of loading
and unloading spaces for two or more buildings or used if the total of such
spaces when used together is not less than the sum of the spaces required
for the various individual buildings or uses computed separately.
Date of Revisions
*1
Revised 7-17-72
*20
Revised 4-03-91
*2
Added 12-30-74
*24
Revised 5-06-94
*3
Revised 8-11-75
*31
Effective 11-19-99
*8
Revised 10-01-79
*34
Correction 2-25-00
*9
Revised 5-11-81
*35
Effective 7-17-2013 – TA2012016
*12
Revised 8-15-83
*36
Effective 5-23-2014 – TA2013006
*18
Revised 8-05-85, Effective 1-
01-86
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-12
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
Article 1103.5.Article 803.5.
Mixed Uses:
In the case of mixed uses, the required loading and unloading spaces shall
be the sum of the required loading and unloading spaces for the various
uses computed separately, and such spaces for one use shall not be
considered as providing required loading and unloading for any other use.
Section 1104.Section 804.
Right-of-Way Acquisition
The recommendation of the Commission on a proposed zoning district boundary or application
for a Special Use Permit or application for a Military Compatibility Permit or an administratively
approved Plan of Development may include appropriate provision for acquiring right-of-way for
street widening purposes. The amount of land recommended for such acquisition, however,
shall be determined by MCDOT not extend beyond the setback lines set forth in Chapter 11,
Section 1105. hereof. **7, ***9, ***10, ***11
The recommendation of the Commission on a proposed zoning district boundary, application
for a Special Use Permit, application for a Military Compatibility Permit, or an administratively
approved Plan of Development may identify the need for right-of-way to accommodate
planned street widening. Any required dedication of right-of-way shall be imposed, if
applicable, at the time of subdivision plat or development plan approval, and the amount of
land to be dedicated shall be determined by MCDOT based on adopted transportation plans
and proportionality to the development’s impact.
Date of Revisions
**7
Added 4-01-85
***10
Renumbered 12-0-87
***9
Renumbered 8-04-86
***11
Renumbered 2-06-89
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-13
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
Section 1105.Section 805.
Setback Lines Transportation, Access and
Future Right-of-Way Lines
Article 1105.1.Article 805.1. Establishment:
The following setback lines are hereby established for reservation of future
rights-of-way:
1105.1.1.
Cave Creek Road: 105 feet from and on both sides of the centerline
of Cave Creek Road; from the northwest corner of the SW 1/4, Section 14, T4N,
R3E, G&SRB&M, to the southerly line of Section 33, T6N, R4E, G&SRB&M.
1105.1.2.
Scottsdale Road: 105 feet from and on both sides of the centerline of
Scottsdale Road; from the northeast corner of Section 10, T4N, R4E, G&SRB&M,
to the southerly line of Section 3, T5N, R4E, G&SRB&M.
1. Major Streets, Section Line Roads, State and Federal Highways:75 feet
from and on both sides of the centerline of all existing or proposed major
streets, section line roads, State and Federal Highways, where service roads
are required.
1105.1.3.
55 feet from and on both sides of the centerline of all existing or
proposed major streets, section line roads, State and Federal Highways, where
service roads are not required.
1105.1.4.805.1.1.
Collector Streets and MidSection Line Roa40 Transportation System
Plan: 25 feet to 200 Feet from and on both sides of the centerline of all existing
or proposed collector streets and midsection line roadsroutes based upon the
route’s future functional classification listed in the MCDOT Transportation
System Plan and width corresponding to the MCDOT Roadway Design Manual,
both as may be amended, or as determined by MCDOT. If not designated in
Article 805.1.1, then Article 805.1.2 shall apply.
1105.1.5.805.1.2.
Local Streets: Grid Network: 25 feet from and on both sides of the
centerline of all existing or proposed local streets, except that this requirements
shall be increased to 30 feet for local streets abutting properties in
multiplefamily residential, commercial- and industrial zoning districts. Required
setbacks shall be based on the most current version of the County’s
Transportation Improvement Plan, unless otherwise determined by the MCDOT
Planning Division.
1. 65 feet from and on both side of the centerline of all section lines
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-14
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
or as indicated in the Transportation System Plan, as may be
amended.
1.2. 40 feet from and on both sides of the centerline of all existing
midsection lines or as indicated in the Transportation System
Plan, as may be amended.
Article 1105.2.Article 805.2. Measurement:
On any lot wherein a setback line has been established for reservation of
future right-of-way, yards required by the regulations for the zoning district
in which such lot is located shall be measured from the setback
easement/right-of-way ultimate street line (future right-of-way reservation
line). The setback line that includes the future right-of-way shall be enforced
unless a written report letter is received from the MCDOT County Highway
Department stating no future street or a lesser future right-of-way
reservation is recommended along the subject setback line on the subject
property. *19
Article 1105.3.Article 805.3.
Buildings And Structures:
Buildings or structures, other than fences, hereafter erected, altered or
relocated shall not be placed within the aforementioned setback lines. The
setback line that includes the future rightofway shall be enforced unless a
written report letter is received from the County Highway Department
MCDOT stating no future street is recommended along the subject setback
line on the subject property. *19
Section 1106.Section 806.
Accessory Buildings and Use*17, *22
Article 1106.1.Article 806.1.
Construction and Use:
Timing and Construction: An Aaccessory buildings or uses shall not be
constructed or established on a lot until construction of the principal or
primary use building has been actually commenced or the primary use
established.
Use Limitations: Accessory buildings shall not be used for dwelling purposes,
except ifas expressly permitted under this Ordinance, including:
Date of Revisions
*19
Revised 2-06-89
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-15
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
A Residential Unit Plan of Development (Chapter 7, Section 702.9);
Occupancy by caretakers employed on the premises (Chapter 6, Article 602);
Occupancy pursuant to a Temporary Use Permit; or
As an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) pursuant to Article 806.3.
specifically approved in a Residential Unit Plan of Development, pursuant to
the provisions of Chapter 107, Section 1002702., Article 1002702.9, if
approved as an accessory dwelling unit/guest house, pursuant to the
provisions of Chapter 65, Section Article 65012.3.2.14, or Chapter 6, Section
601.2.10Article 602 if approved for occupancy by caretakers employed on
the premises or if occupied pursuant to a Temporary Use Permit. *27, *29, *30,
*31
Article 1106.2.Article 806.2.
Location:
1. Detached accessory buildings and structures may be built in the
required rear yard and/or the required side yard but shall not occupy
more than 30% of any required yard and shall not be nearer than three
feet to any side or rear lot line.
2. In the case of corner lots, accessory buildings shall not be nearer to the
street than a distance equal to not less than one half the depth of the
required front yard occupy the street-side yard of the corner lot; and
when a garage is entered from an alley, it shall not be located nearer than
ten feet to the alley line.
3. Fences and walls may be erected outside of the lot’s principal building
area subject to the height restrictions of Article 811.5 of this Ordinance.
4. Driveway access from accessory structures to County Roads are subject to
approval by MCDOT, and may not be permitted along arterial or collector
roadways. *11, *32
Article 1106.3.
Location on Through Lots:
Accessory buildings on through lots shall be no nearer to either street than a
distance equal to the required front yard of such lot.
Date of Revisions
*11
Revised 3-21-83
*29
Effective 5-16-98
*17
Revised 4-01-85
*30
Effective 1-19-07 – TA2003002
*22
Revised 2-20-94
*31
Effective 11-14-08 – TA2008005
*27
Effective 10-10-97
*32
Effective 10-19-11 – TA2011010
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-16
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
Section 1107.Section 807.
Number of Principal Buildings on a
Lot
Where a lot is located in a multiple-family residential, commercial or industrial zoning district,
more than one principal building may be located on the lot but only when the locations of such
buildings conform to all the open space requirements around the lot for the zoning district in
which the lot is located. Yard regulations in such case may be applied around the principal
buildings as though there were only one principal building on the lot.
Section 1108.Section 808.
Adjustment Permitting an Additional
Dwelling Unit
In zoning districts permitting multiple-family dwellings, if an amount of lot area not allocated to
a dwelling unit is more than 80% of that required for one dwelling unit, such remaining lot area
may be used to satisfy the lot area requirement for an additional dwelling unit.
Section 1109.Section 809.
Additional Lot Area and Dimension
Regulations
Article 1109.1.Article 809.1.
Pre-existing non-conforming lots:
Any lot of record existing at the time this Ordinance became effective, or
amendments thereto become effective, which does not conform with the
lot area or width requirements for the zoning district in which it is located
may be used for any use permitted in that zoning district provided other
applicable regulations of this Ordinance are complied with.
Article 1109.2.Article 809.2.
Lot Area and Dimension:
Any lot, after this Ordinance became effective, or amendments thereto
become effective, shall not be reduced in any manner below the lot area
and dimension requirements of this Ordinance for the zoning district in
which it is located, or if a lot is already less than the minimums so required,
such lot area or dimension shall not be further reduced., unless a variance is
granted by the Board of Adjustment in accordance with Chapter 3, Section
3023.
Article 1109.3.Article 809.3.
Yard, Coverage and Open Space:
Any lot, after this Ordinance or amendments thereto become effective,
shall not be reduced or diminished so as toto cause the yards, lot coverage
or other open spaces to be less than that required by this Ordinance, or to
decrease the lot area per dwelling unit except in conformity with this
Ordinance.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-17
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
Section 1110.Section 810.
Additional Yard and Open Space
Regulations
Article 1110.1.Article 810.1.
Multiple buildings:
Required yard or other open space around any existing buildings, or which is
hereafter provided around any building for the purpose of complying with
this Ordinance shall not be construed as providing a yard or open space for
any other building.
Article 1110.2.Article 810.2.
Multiple Story Buildings:
When an open space is more than 50% surrounded by a building which is
two stories or more in height, the minimum width of the open space shall
be at least 30 feet for two-story buildings, and 40 feet for three-story
buildings.
Article 1110.3.Article 810.3.
Mixed Use Buildings:
Side yards for dwelling units erected above other uses conducted in the
same building are not required in excess of the side yards that would be
required for such building were it not to contain the dwelling units.
Article 1110.4.
Average setbacks: deleted *16
Article 1110.5.
Mobile Home Subdivisions:Porches, ramadas or awnings that are
open on two or more sides and attached to a mobile home shall be excluded
from maximum lot coverage regulations for existing mobile homes that are
located in mobile home subdivisions, provided a mobile home subdivision plat
in connection therewith has been recorded on or before the effective date of
this paragraph and further provided there shall be a minimum distance of ten
feet between structures on adjoining lots.*4
Article 1110.6.Article 810.4.
Exceptions:
Every part of a required yard shall be open to the sky, unobstructed, except
as enumerated in the following:
1110.6.1.810.4.1.
Accessory buildings and renewable energy systems may locate in the
required rear yard and/or the required side yard subject to applicable
regulations elsewhere in this Ordinance. *18, *19
1110.6.2.810.4.2.
Ordinary projections of window sills windowsills, cornices, eaves and
other ornamental features may project a distance not exceeding two feet (2’)
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-18
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
into any required yard.*19, *20
1110.6.3.810.4.3.
Chimneys may project a distance not exceeding maximum of two feet
into any required yard.
1110.6.4.810.4.4.
Fire escapes may project a distance not exceeding maximum of five
feet into any required yard provided such projection shall be distant at least two
feet from any lot line or setback line.
1110.6.5.810.4.5.
Bay windows and balconies of a building may project a distance not
exceeding maximum of three feet into the required front or rear yard, provided
that such features shall not occupy, in the aggregate, more than one-third of the
length of the wall of the building on which they are located.
1110.6.6.810.4.6.
Uncovered stairs and necessary landings may project a distance not
exceeding maximum of six feet into the required front or rear yard, provided
that such stairs and landings shall not extend above the entrance floor of the
building except for a railing not to exceed three feet in height which may extend
above the entrance floor of the building.
1110.6.7.810.4.7.
Terraces, patios, platforms and ornamental features which extend
outward from a building and do not extend more than three (3) feet above grade
may project into any required yard, provided such features shall be distant at
least are a maximum of two (2) feet from any lot line or setback line.*17
Date of Revisions
*4
Added 3-22-76
*18
Effective 11-19-10 – TA2009014
*16
Deleted 2-04-85
*19
Effective 10-19-11 – TA2011010
*17
Effective 02-01-07 – TA2006004
*20
Effective 5-23-14 – TA2013009
Section 1111.Section 811.
Additional Height Regulations
Article 1111.1.Article 811.1.
Public Buildings:
Public or public service buildings, hospitals, institutions, or schools may be
erected to a height not exceeding 60 feet, and churches may be erected to a
height not exceeding 75 feet, if the building is set back from each lot line at
least one foot for each foot of additional building height above the height
limit otherwise permitted in the zoning district in which the building is
located.
Article 1111.2.Article 811.2.
Building Appurtenances:
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-19
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
Chimneys, church steeples, refrigeration coolers, ventilating fans, elevator
bulkheads, fire towers, ornamental towers or spires, and mechanical
appurtenances, except for renewable energy systems located in single-
family, two-family, and multi-family zoning districts, necessary to operate
and maintain the building, may be erected to a height not exceeding 100
feet, if such structure is set back from each lot line at least one foot for each
foot of additional height above the height limit otherwise permitted in the
zoning district in which the structure is located. The above setbacks are
measured from the lot line to the closest point (including overhangs or
other projections) on the structures. Renewable energy systems as
appurtenant structures located within single-family, two-family, and multi-
family zoning districts shall be subject to the height regulations of the
zoning district in which the property is located. *17,*26,*28, *37
Article 1111.3.Article 811.3.
Runways and Landing Strips:
Buildings or structures or any portions thereof, except for navigational aids,
shall not be located in the obstacle free zone (“OFZ”) which shall be defined
as an area which is 60 feet wide along each side of the edge of the runway
of an existing or proposed runway or landing strip and 250 feet wide
centered along the projected runway center line at a distance of 200 feet
from the end or ends of an existing or proposed runway or landing strip
where takeoff and landing is either executed or proposed. A runway
protection zone (“RPZ”) shall be located at the end or ends of the existing or
proposed runway or landing strip where takeoff or landing is either
executed or proposed which shall be a trapezoidal area which is 200 feet
beyond the ends of the runway and centered along the projected runway
centerline. The RPZ shall be 1,000 feet long. The width of the RPZ closest to
the end of the runway or landing strip shall be 250 feet. The width of the
RPZ furthest from the end of the runway or landing strip shall be 450 feet.
Within the RPZ, buildings or structures or any portions thereof shall not be
erected to exceed a height that would interfere with the takeoff or landing
of a plane with a glide angle of one foot vertical for every 20 feet horizontal,
such glide angle to be computed as beginning at the RPZ boundary which is
closest to the end of the runway. The OFZ or RPZ should be located entirely
on the same lot or parcel as the runway or landing strip. In any instance
where any portion of the OFZ or RPZ of a runway or landing strip extends
beyond the lot or parcel of property containing the runway or landing strip,
written consent or avigation easements must be obtained from all adjacent
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-20
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
property owners and all property owners in which the OFZ or RPZ may
wholly or partially lie. The provisions of this paragraph may be waived for
any private airport if it will not conflict with applicable regulations of the
Federal Aviation Administration or Department of Defense requirements.*35,
*41, *42
Article 1111.4.Article 811.4.
Corner LotsSight Visibility Triangles:
The following limitations regulations shall apply to corner lots in all zoning
districts and to driveways in commercial and industrial zoning districts:
1111.4.1.811.4.1.
In all zoning districts no structure, landscaping, fence, wall, terrace or
other obstruction to view in excess of two feet in height, measured from the
lowest established elevation adjacent pavement of the nearest street centerline,
shall be placed within the triangle formed by measuring along street-side and/or
alley-side property lines, future right-of-way and/or access easement lines a
distance of 25 feet from their point of intersection and by connecting the ends of
the respective 25 feet distances.*32 Driveways, parking spaces and trees are
prohibited within the triangle.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-21
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
1111.4.2.811.4.2.
Further, in In commercial and industrial zoning districts no structure,
landscaping, fence, wall, terrace or other obstruction to view in excess of two
feet in height, measured from the established elevation of the nearest street
centerline, shall be placed within the triangle formed by measuring along street-
side property line or future right-of-way and driveway length a distance of 25
feet from their point of intersection and by connecting the ends of the
respective 25 feet distances. *32
1111.4.3.811.4.3.
Within the said triangles, driveways and parking are prohibited A
required sight visibility triangle shall not be permitted to encumber an abutting
parcel. *33
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-22
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
Article 1111.5.Article 811.5.
Fences, Walls, and Retaining Walls:
The following provisions apply to fences, walls, and retaining walls. *36
1111.5.1.811.5.1.
Prohibitions: Concertina wire, razor wire, and electric wire or
electrification of a fence are prohibited below a height of eight (8) feet above
finished grade.*39
1111.5.2.811.5.2.
Retaining walls
1. Retaining walls shall meet the provisions of Article 81111.5 unless a
variance to these standards is granted by the Maricopa County Board of
Adjustment pursuant to Section 3023, or through an approved Unit Plan
of Development as set forth under Sections 1002, 1003, and 1004702.
2. All retaining walls shall be constructed such to include appropriate
moisture barriers and weep holes.
3. Where retaining walls are visible to the public, said retaining walls
should be constructed of split-face concrete masonry unit (CMU), faced
with stucco, brick, tile, stone or other material such to minimize the
visual impact of the wall. Further, the area in front of a retaining wall
that is visible to the public should be suitably landscaped using low
water use plants. If a tier is created by a series of retaining walls and is
visible to the public, the plant species used should not have invasive root
systems or generate severe point loads nor should any tree specimens
used in the landscaping of a tier have a canopy that is wider than the
separation distance between the walls at the tree’s maturity.
4. Retaining walls shall not exceed a height of six (6) feet as measured from
the low side finished grade to the top of the earth being retained, except
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-23
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
as permitted in Article 1201901.4 of this Ordinance.*40
5. Where more than one retaining wall is erected in a series such to serve
as an integral retaining wall system, the height of an individual retaining
wall section shall not exceed six (6) feet as measured from the low side
finished grade of the retaining wall to the top of the earth being
retained by that retaining wall section. The number of retaining walls is
not limited, but where retaining walls are tiered, separation between
retaining walls (centerline to centerline) shall be a minimum of three (3)
feet. Two (2) or more retaining walls separated by a building shall not be
considered a series.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-24
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
6. Where a wall or fence as defined by Article 1111.5.1 above is erected on
top of a retaining wall, the maximum overall height of the retaining wall
combination shall not exceed fourteen (14) feet as measured from the
low side finished grade to the top of the wall or fence. *39
7. Additional fall protection where required by the applicable building code
shall be allowed on top of a retaining wall without affecting the overall
height of the wall, provided said the fall protection is of has a
transparency of 80% or more greater and provided that the height of the
fall protection does not exceed what is required by the building code.
Transparency shall be calculated by taking the area of the empty space
between horizontal and vertical members divided by the outer
dimensions of the fall protection system. Fall protection as provided for
under this article shall be constructed of metal pipe rail or wooden rail,
metal view fence, or transparent sheeting. Other construction materials
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-25
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
shall not receive this exclusion.
8. Walls and solid fences shall contain provision(s) to maintain
historic drainage patterns.
9. A building permit is required for walls/fences over 6' in height,
retaining walls over 18" in height, pool barriers, walls/fences on
hillside lots, corrals, fences to establish a primary use or a wall on
a corner lot abutting a key lot.
10. A drainage clearance (building) permit is required for any fence or
wall over 1' in height or any wall/fence that impacts the historic
flow of surface runoff, regardless of height.
11. Wire strand or pipe rail fencing, with no attached mesh or similar
screening material shall not require a permit unless it is located in
a Special Flood Hazard Area (Floodplain) or is used to establish a
principal use.
12. Fences, walls and gates may not be located in a Maricopa County
Right-of-Way, Other Right-of-Ways or certain public utility
easements that will impact their intended uses. Fences and walls
shall not be permitted within easements or private access
easements.
13. Vehicular fence gates are prohibited on/along Vehicular Non-
Access Easements (VNAE).
8.14.
Issuance of County permit(s) for walls/fences is to verify
drainage impacts and not to evaluate access rights or availability
and does not include verification of property boundaries or
easements which is the responsibility of the owner/applicant.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-26
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
1111.5.3.811.5.3.
Rural, Commercial, and Industrial zoning districts:
1. Fences, hedges or walls located outside of the lot’s buildable area shall
have a maximum height not exceed a height of eight (8) feet as
measured from finished grade, or as measured from the top of an
integral retaining wall . This height shall includinge any columns,
decorative caps, and light fixtures. If a screen wall also serves as a
retaining wall, provisions of retaining walls shall apply. *39
1111.5.4.811.5.4.
Single-family and Multi-family zoning districts:
1. Fences, hedges, walls, or retaining walls, or any combination thereof
located within the required front yard shall a maximum not exceed a
height of eight (8) feet as measured from finished grade, except that any
height above 3’-6” up to a maximum height of eight (8) feet shall be
permitted at an 80% transparency calculated by taking the area of the
empty space between internal members divided by the outer
dimensions of the fence/wall. This shall include chain link, metal pipe or
wooden rail, metal view fence, or transparent sheeting. If a screen wall
also serves as a retaining wall, the provisions of retaining walls shall
apply. *39
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-27
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
2. Fences, hedges or walls located outside of the lot’s buildable area, but
not within the required front yard, shall not exceed a height of eight (8)
feet as measured from finished grade, or as measured from the top of
an integral retaining wall. This height shall include any columns,
decorative caps, and light fixtures. *39
3. When a corner lot abuts a key lot, a fence, wall, or retaining wall located
along the street-side of the corner lot shall be setback from the street-
side property line a distance of not less than half the distance of the
required front yard setback.; however, a fence of 80% transparency or
greater may be installed along the property line.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-28
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
1111.5.5.811.5.5.
Exceptions:
1. Utility companies that are regulated by the Arizona Corporation
Commission may be allowed an increased of fence or wall heights due
to national, state, or local standards.
2. Any Residential Unit Plan of Development per Section 1002 of this
Ordinance, or any Commercial Unit Plan of Development per Section
1003 of this Ordinance, or any Industrial Unit Plan of Development per
Section 1004 of this Ordinance approved by the Board of Supervisors
prior to August 22, 2012 may observe the development standards of
this Section or the approved development standard whichever is the
least restrictive. *39
3. Fences, walls, or retaining walls located on a corner lot shall not exceed
a height of two (2) feet within the required sight visibility triangle as
provided in Article 1111.4.
4.3. The plane of a wall/fence height may be maintained at wash crossings
for spans of up to twenty (20) feet. In these instances the wall/fence
height may exceed eight (8) feet. *39
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-29
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
Article 1111.6.Article 811.6.
Accessory Building and Structure Height:
No building or structure in any zoning district shall exceed the maximum
height permitted for a principal building permitted in the respective zoning
district unless the proposed use has specific height regulation set forth in
this ordinance. *38
Article 1111.7.Article 811.7.
Electric Transmission Lines:
Structures to support electric transmission lines shall observe a maximum
height of 120 feet. *38
Date of Revisions
*17
Revised 4-01-85
*37
Effective 11-19-10 – TA2009014
*26
Effective 6-13-97
*38
Effective 3-16-11 – TA2010022
*28
Effective 1-17-98
*39
Effective 8-22-12 – TA2012009
*32
Effective 2-04-00
*40
Effective 7-17-13 – TA2013002
*35
Effective 9-07-01 – TA2000004
*41
Effective 8-29-14 – TA2013013
*36
Effective 02-01-07 – TA2006004
*42
Effective 5-26-17 – TA2016003
Section 1112.Section 812.
Outdoor Light Control Provisions*13
Article 1112.1.Article 812.1.
Purpose:
These provisions are intended to control the use of outdoor artificial
illuminating devices emitting rays into the night sky which have a
detrimental effect on astronomical observations. It is the intention of this
Ordinance to encourage good lighting practices such that lighting systems
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-30
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
are designed to conserve energy and money, while increasing nighttime
safety, utility, security and productivity.
Article 1112.2.Article 812.2.
Conformance With Applicable Codes:
1112.2.1.812.2.1.
All outdoor artificial illuminating devices shall be installed in
conformance with the provisions of this section and any building code now in
effect or which may hereafter be enacted, as applicable.
1112.2.2.812.2.2.
Where any provisions of the Arizona State Statutes, or any Federal
law, or any companion Ordinance conflicts with the requirements of this outdoor
light control provision, the most restrictive shall govern.
1112.2.3.812.2.3.
The provisions of this section are not intended to prevent the use of
any material or method of installation not specifically prescribed by this
Ordinance.
1112.2.4.812.2.4.
As new lighting technology develops which is useful in reducing light
above the horizontal, consideration shall be given to use of state of the art
technology in keeping with the intent of the Ordinance.
Article 1112.3.Article 812.3.
Definitions:
1112.3.1.812.3.1.
Outdoor Light Fixtures Luminaires: Outdoor artificial illuminating
devices, outdoor luminaires, fixtures, lamps and other devices, permanent or
portable, used for illumination or advertisement. Such devices shall include, but
are not limited to, search, spot or flood lights for:
1. Building and structures;
2. Recreational areas;
3. Parking lot lighting;
4. Landscape lighting;
5. Billboards and other signage (advertising or other);
6. Street lighting.
1112.3.2.812.3.2.
Offsite sign (billboard) external lighting: *15
1. Lighting shall be installed such that the sign is illuminated from top
down to prevent glare and light trespass.
2. Light fixtures luminaires shall be fully shielded.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-31
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
3. Shall consist of no more than four (4) individual luminaires fixtures (or
lamps) per sign face and produces a maximum of 40,000 lumens per
fixture luminaires. *14
1112.3.3.812.3.3.
Individual: Shall mean any private individual, tenant, lessee, owner or
any commercial entity, including but not limited to companies, partnerships,
joint ventures or corporations. *14
1112.3.4.812.3.4.
Installed: Shall mean the initial installation of outdoor light
luminaires fixtures defined herein following the effective date of this Ordinance,
but shall not apply to those outdoor light luminaires fixtures installed prior to
such date, except as provided in Article 1112812.6.1. below *14
Article 1112.4.Article 812.4.
General Requirements:
1112.4.1.812.4.1.
Shielding: All exterior illuminating devices, except those exempt from
this Ordinance and those regulated by Article 1112812.5.3. shall be fully or
partially shielded as required in Article 1112812.4.2.
1. “Fully Shielded” shall mean that those luminaires fixtures so designated
shall be shielded in such a manner that light rays emitted by the
luminairesfixture, either directly from the lamp or indirectly from the
luminairefixture, are projected below a horizontal plane running
through the lowest point of the luminaire fixture where light is emitted.
2. “Partially shielded” shall mean that those luminariesluminairesfixtures
so designated shall conform to the classification of “Cutoff”, defined as
follows:
A. A luminaire light distribution is designated as cutoff when the
candle-power per 1,000 lamp lumens does not numerically exceed
25 lumens (two and one-half percent) at an angle of 90 degrees
above Nadir (horizontal), and 100 lumens (ten percent) at a verti-
cal angle of 80 degrees above Nadir. This applies to any lateral
angle around the luminaire.
1112.4.2.812.4.2.
Filtration: Those outdoor light luminairesfixtures requiring a filter in
Article shall have glass, acrylic or translucent enclosures (Quartz Glass does not
meet this requirement).
1112.4.3.812.4.3.
Requirements for Shielding and Filtering: The requirements for
shielding and filtering light emissions from outdoor light luminairesfixtures shall
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-32
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
be as set forth in the following table:
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-33
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
LFIXTUUMINAIRE LAMP TYPE
SHIELDED
FILTERED
Low pressure sodium1
None
None
High pressure sodium
Fully
None
Metal halide5
Fully
Yes
Fluorescent7
Fully4
Yes2
Quartz3
Fully
None
Incandescent greater than 150 watts
Fully
None
Incandescent, 150 watts or less
None
None
Mercury vapor
Fully6
Yes6
Fossil fuel
None
None
Glass tubes filled with neon, argon,
and krypton
None
None
Other sources
As
approved
by
the
zoning
inspector
………………………………………………………………………
Footnotes:
1.
This is the preferred light source to minimize undesirable light into the night sky affecting
astronomical observations.
2.
Warm white and natural lamps are preferred to minimize detrimental effects.
3.
For the purposes of this ordinance, quartz lamps shall not be considered an incandescent
light source.
4.
Outdoor advertising signs of the type constructed of translucent material and wholly
illuminated from within do not require shielding.
5.
Metal Halide display lighting shall not be used for security lighting after 11:00 p.m. (or
after closing hours if before 11:00 p.m.) unless fully shielded. Metal Halide lamps shall
be in enclosed luminaries.
6.
Recommended for existing fixtures. The installation of Mercury Vapor LuminairesFixtures
is prohibited effective ninety (90) days after the date of adoption of this Ordinance.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-34
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
7.
Outdoor advertising signs may use fluorescent luminairesfixtures. These
luminairesfixtures must be mounted at the top of the sign structure and may be partially
shielded, but not filtered.
Article 1112.5.Article 812.5.
Prohibition:
1112.5.1.812.5.1.
Searchlights: The operation of searchlights for advertising purposes is
prohibited between the hours of 11:00 p.m. and sunrise.
1112.5.2.812.5.2.
Recreational Facilities: No outdoor recreational facility, public or
private, shall be illuminated by non-conforming means after 11:00 p.m., except
to conclude specific recreational or sporting event or any other activity
conducted at a ball park, outdoor amphitheater, arena, or similar facility in
progress prior to 11:00 p.m.
1112.5.3.812.5.3.
Outdoor Building or Landscaping Illumination: The unshielded
outdoor illumination of any building, landscaping, signing or other purpose is
prohibited, except with incandescent fixtures of 150 Watts or less, or low
pressure sodium luminairesfixtures.
1112.5.4.812.5.4.
Mercury Vapor: The installation of Mercury Vapor luminairesfixtures
is prohibited effective 90 days after the date of adoption of this Ordinance.
Article 1112.6.Article 812.6.
Permanent Exemptions:
1112.6.1.812.6.1.
Non-Conforming LuminairesFixtures: All outdoor light luminaires
fixtures installed prior to January 1, 1985, that are equipped with a permanent
automatic shut-off device may remain unchanged, except that the subject light
luminairesfixtures shall not be operated between the hours of 11:00 p.m. and
sunrise. All outdoor light fixtures installed prior to January 1, 1985, that are not
equipped with an automatic shutoff device may remain unchanged. -With
respect to all outdoor light luminaires fixtures installed prior to January 1, 1985,
whether with an automatic shut-off device or not, there shall be no change in
use, replacement, structural alteration, or restoration after discontinuance of
use for a period of 12 consecutive months, unless it thereafter conforms to the
provisions of these regulations. Outdoor light luminaires may remain unchanged
until such time as alteration is proposed and must come into conformance with
this Ordinance.
1112.6.2.812.6.2.
Fossil Fuel Light: Produced directly or indirectly by the combustion of
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-35
CHAPTER 8 - COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTSGENERAL
REGULATIONS
natural gas or other utility-type fossil fuels.
Article 1112.7.Article 812.7.
Other Exemptions from Outdoor Lighting Provisions:
*14
1112.7.1.812.7.1.
Bottom-Mounted Outdoor Advertising Lighting: Any lawfully existing
bottom mounted upward lighting shall be permitted to remain, but shall be
equipped with an automatic device which shuts off the luminairesfixture
between the hours of 11:00 p.m. and sunrise. However, any future alteration to
said billboard sign or support structure shall require the upward lighting to be
removed and replaced with downward lighting in conformance with Article
1112812.3.2. All new billboards are required to be in conformance with Article
1112812.3.2.*16
1112.7.2.812.7.2.
Low Intensity Fixtures: Any outdoor lighting fixture which has a
maximum candle power of less than 1,000 candelas is exempt from these
provisions, if equipped with an automatic device which shuts off the fixture
between the hours of 11:00 p.m. midnight and sunrise.
Article 1112.8.Article 812.8.
1112Procedures for Compliance:*14
1112.8.1.812.8.1.
Applications:
1. Any individual applying for a Zoning Clearance and intending to install
outdoor lighting luminairesfixtures shall, as a part of said application,
submit evidence that the proposed work will comply with provisions in
this ordinance.
2. Utility companies providing a notarized affidavit in which they agree to
comply with the provisions of these regulations shall be exempt from
applying for and obtaining a permit for the installation of outdoor light
fixtures, including residential security lighting.
1112.8.2.812.8.2.
Contents of Application or Submission: The submission shall contain,
but shall not necessarily be limited to the following, all or part of which may be
part of or in addition to the information required elsewhere in the zoning
regulations upon application for the required permit:
1. Plans indicating the location on the premises, the type of illuminating
devices, luminairesfixtures, lamps, supports and other devices, etc.
2. Description of the illuminating devices, luminairesfixtures, lamps,
supports and other devices, etc. This description may include, but is
not limited to, manufacturers' catalog cuts and/or drawings (including
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-36
CHAPTER 8 – General Regulations
sections where required).
3. The above required plans and descriptions shall be sufficiently com-
plete to enable the Zoning Inspector to readily determine whether
compliance with the requirements of this Ordinance will be secured. If
such plans and descriptions cannot enable this ready determination by
reason of the nature or configuration of the devices, luminairesfixtures,
or lamps proposed, the applicant shall submit evidence of compliance
by certified test reports as performed by a recognized testing lab.
Section 1113.Section 813.
Flood Control Regulations*1
This Zoning Ordinance and all amendments hereto shall be consistent with and subject to the
regulations and provisions of the Floodplain Regulations forof Maricopa County.
Section 1114.Section 814.
Location of Mobile Homes, Travel Trailers,
Aircraft, Boats, Camping Trailers, Truck Campers & Motor Homes
The location of mobile homes and travel trailers outside of mobile home parks, travel trailer parks,
and mobile home subdivisions, and the location of aircraft, boats, camping trailers, truck campers
and motor homes for storage shall be subject to the following: *22
Article 1114.1.Article 814.1.
Regulations:
At no time shall the mobile home, travel trailer, aircraft, boat, camping
trailer, truck camper or motor home be occupied or used for living, sleeping
or housekeeping purposes, except as provided below in 814.1.1: *3, *5, *17
1114.1.1.
Mobile homes and travel trailers intended for non-residential use or
for temporary housing shall be subject to securing a Temporary Use Permit;
provided that mobile homes used for quarters for on duty personnel in
connection with publicly or privately owned or operated fire stations shall be
considered to be a non-residential use in any zoning district and be subject to
securing a Temporary Use Permit. *5, *22
Date of Revisions
*13
Added 4-02-84
*15
Effective 9-14-11 – TA2008004
*14
Added 10-29-84
*16
Approved 11-17-21 – TA2018001
Date of Revisions
*1
Added 2-04-74
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-37
CHAPTER 8 – General Regulations
814.1.1.
Location: If a travel trailer, aircraft, boat, camping trailer, truck
camper or motor home is located or stored outside of a garage or carport it shall
be only placed in the rear yard of the lot or side yard of the lot and shall not be
occupied for living, sleeping or housekeeping purposes per Article 814.1., but not
within the required front yard except that for loading and unloading purposes
may be permitted for a period of time not to exceed 72 hours. Such storage shall
maintain a five (5) foot clear path around any structures. *5, *22, *23
Section 1115.Section 815.
Amateur Radio Antennas and
Antenna Support Structures*28
Article 1115.1.Article 815.1.
Maximum Height:
Amateur radio antennas and amateur radio antenna support structures shall
not exceed a maximum height of 120 feet (inclusive of both the support
structure and any attached antennas) in any district.
Article 1115.2.Article 815.2.
Location:
Amateur radio antennas and amateur radio antenna support structures shall
be located inbe in the rear yard, except in Rural and Single Family
Residential zoning districts on a single lotsites of five acres or larger where
such antennas and support structures may be located anywhere on the
buildable area of the lot. *29
Article 1115.3.Article 815.3.
Setbacks:
Amateur radio antennas and amateur radio antenna support structures
must meet the yard requirements of primary buildings or structures of the
zoning district in which they are located. Such setbacks shall be measured
from the lot line to the closest horizontal extension of the antenna support
structure or any attachment, including antennas.
Article 1115.4.Article 815.4.
Support Structures:
Amateur radio antennas and amateur radio antenna support structures shall
be set back an additional one foot (in addition to the yard requirements
noted in Article 1115815.3. above) for every one foot in height which the
antenna or support structure exceeds the height limitation of the zoning
Date of Revisions
*3
Revised 8-11-75
*22
Revised 2-20-94
*5
Revised 1-03-77
*23
Effective 7-17-2013 - TA2012015
*17
Revised 4-01-85
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-38
CHAPTER 8 – General Regulations
district in which it is located. Such additional setback shall be measured
from the lot line to the closest point of the base of the antenna or support
structure.
Article 1115.5.Article 815.5.
Guy Wire Anchors:
Guy wire anchors may be installed within a required setback, but shall not
be placed within three feet of any lot line, or within any easement, sight
distance triangle, runway or landing strip.
Article 1115.6.Article 815.6.
Number of Allowed Structures:
Nothing in this section shall preclude the installation of two amateur radio
antenna support structures Not more than two amateur radio antenna
support structures will be permitted on any lot in the Rural and Single
Family Residential zoning districts, provided the standards of this section are
met and there is at least 20,000 square feet of lot area for each antenna
support structure. There is no limit to the number of amateur radio
antennas mounted to a building and such structures shall be considered a
building appurtenance. *29
Article 1115.7.Article 815.7.
Deviation from Standards:
No variances to the standards of this section shall be considered, and any
amateur radio antenna or amateur radio antenna support structure
requiring a Any deviation from the standards of this section shall require a
Special Use Permit.
Section 1116.Section 816.
Property Maintenance*1
A person, firm or corporation shall have committed a violation of this Ordinance if such person,
firm or corporation without lawful authority:
Article 1116.1.Article 816.1.
Allows for rubbish, junk, trash, weeds, filth, debris or dilapidated buildings
which constitute a hazard to public health and safety to remain upon
property of which they are the owner or occupant, or to remain upon
sidewalks, streets and alleys contiguous to the property which they are the
owner or occupant.
Article 1116.2.Article 816.2.
1116
Date of Revisions
*28
Effective 1-17-98
*29
Effective 7-10-15 - TA2015001
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 8-39
CHAPTER 8 – General Regulations
Places any rubbish, trash, filth or debris upon any private or public property
located in the unincorporated areas of the County which is not owned or
under the control of the person, firm or corporation.
Date of Revisions
*1
Approved 10-8-14 - TA2014008
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-1
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
Chapter 9
| Development RegulationsChapter 12
| Development Regulations
Section 1201.Section 901.
Hillside*1, *2, *4
Article 1201.1.Article 901.1.
Purpose:
The principal purpose of the hillside development standards is to allow the
reasonable use and development of hillside areas while promoting the
public health, safety, convenience and general welfare of the citizens of
Maricopa County and maintaining the character, identity, and image of
hillside areas. The primary objectives of the hillside development standards
are to encourage the preservation of natural topographic features and to
minimize the scarring of hillside construction.
Article 1201.2.Article 901.2.
General Provisions:
1201.2.1.901.2.1.
All portions of a lot, tract or parcel having a natural slope of 15% or greater
within any horizontal distance with a ten foot (10’) elevation change shall be
subject to the regulations set forth in this Section. Any challenge to a
determination by the Department that any portion of a lot, tract or parcel is
subject to the regulations set forth in this Section, shall include as part of
the challenge a written determination of an Arizona registered civil engineer
supported by sealed topographical plans.*3, *5
1201.2.2.901.2.2.
.The issuance of grading permits, building permits or other approvals of
improvement work on any real property, subject to the regulations in this
Section, shall not be conditioned on altering, modifying or not utilizing
existing grading, construction or other improvements on such real property
to conform to the regulations in this Section if such existing grading,
construction or other improvement was completed in conformance with
valid permits, issued prior to the adoption of this provision.
Article 1201.3.
Use regulations: The use regulations which apply to property in any
zoning district with which hillside development standards apply shall remain
the same as specified in the primary zoning district unless otherwise specified
herein.
Article 1201.4.Article 901.3.
Height Regulations:
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-2
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
The height of all buildings and structures, including retaining walls, on
portions of property having a natural slope of 15% or greater shall not
exceed 30 feet from original natural grade through any building cross
section, measured vertically at any point along that cross section from
original natural grade. This shall not be construed to prevent relief from the
standard with approval of a Special Use Permit in accordance with Section
1301 of this ordinance, a Unit Plan of Development in accordance with
Sections 1002, 1003 or 1004 of this ordinance, or a Variance in accordance
with Section 303 of this ordinance.
Article 1201.5.
Other Regulations: The yard, intensity of use, parking, loading and
unloading, and additional regulations which apply to property in any zoning
district to which hillside development standards apply shall remain the same
as specified in the primary zoning district unless otherwise specified herein.
Article 1201.6.Article 901.4.
Development Standards:
Development standardsThese hillside regulations shall apply only to
development on those portions of a property having a natural slope of 15%
or greater. For purposes of this Article disturbance shall be defined as all
grading, grubbing and clearing; construction activity; erection, placement or
construction of buildings and structures; paving and surfacing of roadways,
driveways, and parking areas; easements for above ground and
underground utility lines; septic systems including but not limited to leach
fields and evaporation ponds drip lines; excavation or filling or combination
thereof, and cut and fill of slopes and associated spill materials.*2
1201.6.1.901.4.1.
Grading and Drainage Requirements: There shall be no grading or other
disturbance on or to any site other than percolation and test borings (100
square feet maximum in size) prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance
and Drainage Clearance, and prior to final approval of complete plans by the
Building Safety Division and the issuance of a Building (grading) Permit.
1. The extent of all disturbance on that portion of a lot which has a natural
slope of 15% or greater, shall be limited to a total disturbance within the
gross lot area not to exceed 75,000 square feet and shall be located
entirely within the buildable area of the lot, except that disturbance
related to the driveway and utility connections may extend outside the
lot’s buildable area to the street line or other lot line. This shall not be
construed to prevent relief from the standard with approval of a Special
Use Permit in accordance with Section 1301 of this ordinance, a Unit Plan
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-3
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
of Development in accordance with Sections 1002, 1003 or 1004 of this
ordinance, or a Variance in accordance with Section 303 of this
ordinance.
2. Sewage Disposal System: All spill materialscomponents of the septic
system shall be contained within the building envelope.
3. All utility lines shall be located underground within the driveway graded
area whenever possible. If this location is not possible, then disturbance
of natural terrain for these lines shall be confined to within four feet of
either side of the lines.
4. The driveway shall be the shortest practical route from the street line to
the lot’s buildable area and shall be the narrowest practical width as
determined by engineering plan review at the time of construction
permitting..
5. Roadways and all related hillside disturbance shall be contained within
dedicated rights-of-way, subdivision private street tracts, or easements.
Roadways within easements areshall be included in the maximum gross
lot disturbance (sq. ft.) calculation.
6. No building or structure shall be placed outside of the lot’s buildable area
within any portion of a required yard that has a natural slope of 15% or
greater. This shall not be construed to prevent relief from the standard
with approval of a Special Use Permit in accordance with Section 1301
1001 of this ordinance, a Unit Plan of Development in accordance with
Section 1002, 1003 or 1004702 of this ordinance, or a Variance in
accordance with Section 303 302 of this ordinance.
7. Drainage: The entrance and exit points and continuity of all natural
drainage channels on a hillside site shall be preserved.
8. All cut and fill slopes shall be completely contained by retaining walls or
by substitute materials acceptable under the provisions of the County’s
adopted Building Code (including riprap materials) except for the
minimum amount of swale grading necessary for drainage purposes.
9. The finished surfaces of any retaining wall shall blend into the natural
setting.
1201.6.2.901.4.2.
Slope Stabilization and Restoration::
1. Vegetation shall be reestablished on all exposed fill slopes, cut slopes,
and graded areas, or areas otherwise disturbed, by means of a mixture of
indigenous grasses, shrubs, trees or cacti to provide a basic ground cover
which will prevent erosion and permit natural revegetation. In lieu of the
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-4
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
reestablishment of indigenous vegetation, all exposed cut slopes shall be
riprapped with stone or chemically stain treated with materials which
blend in with the natural setting.
2. Any slope disturbance in violation of this Section is a violation of this
Ordinance and shall be remediated with a Plan of
ComplianceCompliance agreement that will specifically list the method of
slope stabilization including vegetation, soilscape and contours; will set
deadlines for remediation to be completed; and may be subject to all
remedies as outlined in Chapter 15 12 of this Ordinance.
Article 901.5.
Procedural Regulations:*4
1201.6.3.901.5.1.
All applications for a Zoning Clearance and Drainage Clearance on those
portions of properties having a natural slope of 15% or greater shall contain
the following materials and information:*2
1. Site PlanGrading and Drainage Plan:
A. Contour interval not exceeding five foot intervals. Graphically
depict all portions of properties having a natural slope of 15% or
greater, previously disturbed and proposed disturbance.
B. Site planGrading and Drainage Plan must be submitted on/or along
with a topographic survey prepared by a civil engineer. or
registered land surveyor. Architect drawn plans shall not be
accepted under any circumstance for a lot determined to be
hillside.
C. Scale of the site plan shall be not less than 1"=20'-0".
D. At all structures show sections through site and building at 25'0"
intervals perpendicular to slope, giving maximum building and
structure height conditions in each cross section.
E. Graphically depict all disturbed areas and show the proposed
method of final treatment. or restoration.
F.
A grading and drainage plan is required and shall be prepared and
sealed by an Arizona registered civil engineer.
G. Show location of all proposed utility lines, and septic tank or
sewage disposal areas.
H. Give legal description and property dimensions.
I.
Provide a table on the plan which provides the following
information:*3
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-5
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
i.
Gross area of lot (sq. ft. & percentage)
ii.
Area of lot that is hillside (sq. ft. & percentage)
iii.
Area of hillside on lot that has been previously disturbed (if
applicable). (sq. ft. & percentage)
iv.
Area of hillside on lot that is will be new disturbance (sq. ft. &
percentage), including disturbance during construction.
Date of Revisions
*1
Added 2-15-83
*4
Effective 09-22-08 – TA2007016
*2
Revised 1-4-89
*5
Effective 05-20-14 – TA2013010
*3
Added 10-4-01 – TA2000010
Section 1202.Section 902.
Wireless Communication Facilities*1, *2
Article 1202.1.Article 902.1.
Purpose:
The principal purpose of this Section is to establish the locations in
unincorporated Maricopa County where wireless communication and
information system facilities may be located and the regulations that apply
to their placement. The regulations contained herein are designed to
recognize the need to accommodate the approval of those types of public
utility uses while still recognizing the need to promote the public health,
safety and general welfare of the citizens of Maricopa County. These
regulations establish zoning standards that will protect the integrity of
single-family neighborhoods. and maintain the character, identity, and
image of hillside areas.
Article 1202.2.Article 902.2.
General Provisions
1202.2.1.902.2.1.
Wireless communications facilities are permitted in all zoning districts
subject to the provisions and standards outlined in this Section.
1202.2.2.902.2.2.
Wireless communication facilities are permitted on individual lots of record,
or on lease or easement areas described by metes and bounds of an area
adequate to accommodate the tower structure and associated ground
equipment for at least two carriers.
1202.2.3.902.2.3.
The construction and location of wireless communication facilities and
facilities for wireless information systems shall be subject to the standards
contained in this regulation, unless otherwise noted herein.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-6
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
1202.2.4.902.2.4.
Wireless communication structures in excess of 199 feet in height are
prohibited unless co-locating on an existing structure (other than a wireless
communication facility tower) and unless there is a plan to mitigate
interference with military and commercial aircraft and to mitigate disruption
of avian migration and nesting and to preserve nighttime skies for
astronomical observation, and shall be required to obtain Special Use Permit
approval of the Board of Supervisors. Structures of 199 feet or less in height
shall not have lighting, unless said lighting is specific to the purpose of a
structure upon which a wireless communication facility is co-located. *1
1202.2.5.902.2.5.
Facilities for public safety agencies are exempt from the requirements of
this Section.
1202.2.6.902.2.6.
The standards contained in this Section with regard to height, diameter, and
design are concealment elements to ensure structures do not have an
adverse visual impact or harm the public welfare.
1202.2.7.902.2.7.
Any wireless communication facility properly permitted that existed as of
June 10, 2015 shall be considered legal non-conforming with regard to this
Section. Any change to a legal non-conforming wireless communication
facility shall bring it into conformance with this Section or shall be subject to
a Special Use Permit.
1202.2.8.902.2.8.
Unless qualifying as an Eligible Facilities Request under Section 6409 of the
Spectrum Act – as defined by 47 CFR 1.4001 (B)(3) as amended – any
proposed Wireless Communication Facility that cannot meet the standards
outlined in Article 1202902.3 of this Ordinance shall be required to obtain a
Special Use Permit approval by the Board of Supervisors. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, relief from the standards may be granted with approval of a
Variance pursuant to Section 303 of this Ordinance. *3
Article 1202.3.Article 902.3.
Standards:
The following standards shall apply to Wireless Communication Facilities:*1
1202.3.1.902.3.1.
Location:
1. In Rural, Single-Family Residential or Multiple-Family Residential Zoning
Districts, wireless communication facilities are permitted subject to the
following limitations:*1
A. The maximum height of a wireless communications facility
including the base, platform and attached antennae shall not
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-7
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
exceed 80 feet above grade or no greater than 15 feet above the
height of the structure (other than a wireless communication
facility tower) onto which it will be attached.
B. Up to two wireless communication facilities may be mounted on a
building and may include not more than two microwave antennae
dishes with diameters of not more than one and one half meters
(4.9 feet) each, and each being 15 feet or less in height as
measured above the roofline so long as the supporting structure is
screened.*1
C. Towers and support structures shall have a maximum diameter of
30 inches (2.5 feet).
*Letters reference sub-articles of this Section of the Ordinance.
D. The color of a wireless communication facility shall be compatible
with the surrounding environment. Exposed portions of the tower
structure shall be non-reflective. *1
E. Installation of a wireless communication facility shall avoid
removal of mature trees and cacti unless a plan for their relocation
is approved by the Department. *1
F.
Wireless communication facilities which are installed on properties
on or within 500 feet of a property required to meet Hillside
Development Standards of Chapter 129, Section 1201901. of this
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-8
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
Ordinance shall be required to obtain Special Use Permit approval
of the Board of Supervisors.*1
G. Wireless communication facilities shall be setback 2 feet from all
property lines for each 1 foot in height (including tower and
antenna attachments but not to include architectural features for
stealth design), unless co-locating on a building/structure (other
than a wireless communication facility tower). Structures that are
no greater in height than the maximum permitted building height
for the respective zoning district may be permitted at a minimum 3
foot setback but shall not be located within a required front yard.
*Letters reference sub-articles of this Section of the Ordinance.
H. The maximum diameter of antenna arrays shall be eight feet
measured from circumference line to circumference line through
the center of the tower structure but not including architectural
features for stealth design such as tree limbs, palm fronds, and
windmill blades.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-9
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
*Letters reference sub-articles of this Section of the Ordinance.
I.
The maximum diameter of any microwave dish shall be one and
one half meters (4.9 feet).
*Letters reference sub-articles of this Section of the Ordinance.
J.
All ground-mounted equipment associated with a wireless
communication facility shall be screened visually and to mitigate
noise.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-10
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
K. Unless no greater in height than the maximum permitted building
height for the respective zoning district or designed in a stealth
manner acceptable to staff of the Maricopa County Planning and
Development Department, the tower structure for a new wireless
communication facility shall be located at least 1,000 feet (radius)
from any existing wireless communication facility tower structure.
There is no separation requirement for facilities mounted on a
building/structure (other than a wireless communication facility
tower). A stealth design must observe reasonable site aspects to
affect the stealth design. For example, stealth design as a tree must
have live trees of the respective species imitated and of similar
height located in proximity to the tower.
L.
Unless located within a building, a solid screen wall of a minimum
six feet high, or to the height of intake/exhaust for HVAC and other
equipment if higher, shall be constructed around the facility’s
ground equipment, and shall visually screen all equipment and
mitigate noise. Associated panels for solar power generation do not
require screening.*1
M. Generators will only be permitted for emergency purposes.
N. All ground equipment accessory to the Wireless Communication
Facility shall be setback at least three feet (3’) from a lot line and
shall not be located within a required front yard.
2. In Commercial or Industrial zoning districts, wireless communication
facilities are permitted subject to the following limitations:*1
A. The wireless communication facility, if exceeding the height
requirements of the zoning district in which it is located, shall be set
back from a property line that abuts land located in a Rural or
Residential Zoning District one foot for every one foot in height of
the wireless communication facility (including tower and antenna
attachments but not to include architectural features for stealth
design), unless mounted on a building/structure other than a
wireless communication facility tower. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the wireless communication facility shall be permitted to
be located in alignment with the front of the principal building on
the lot or parcel on which the wireless communication facility is
erected. Structures that are no greater in height than the maximum
permitted building height for the respective zoning district may be
permitted at a minimum 3 foot setback but shall not be located
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-11
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
within a required front yard.*1
*Letters reference sub-articles of this Section of the Ordinance.
B. The maximum height of a wireless communications facility including
the base, platform and attached antennae, shall not exceed 120
feet above grade or 15’ above the height of the structure (other
than a wireless communication facility tower) onto which it will be
attached.*1
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-12
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
C. There is no separation requirement for facilities in Commercial or
Industrial zoning.
D. There is no limit to the number of Wireless Communication
Facilities (including microwave dishes) that may be located on a
building/structure in Commercial or Industrial zoning.
E. All standards of Article 1202902.3.1.1 shall apply to facilities located
within Commercial or Industrial zoning districts, unless specifically
modified by the standards of Article 1202902.3.1.2.
3. Any wireless communications facility or wireless information system
facility proposed to be located on any property, tower or pole
developed primarily for the transport, receiving or distribution of
electricity or as an electric utility station, or other utility compound
such as a water or wastewater treatment facility, are subject to the
following limitations:
A. Such properties, towers or poles include, but are not limited to:
1.
Substations;
2.
Receiving stations;
3.
Generating stations;
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-13
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
4.
Switching yards;
5.
Storage yards;
6.
Communications facilities; and
7.
Existing 500kV, 345kV, 230kV, 115kV, 69kV transmission lines.
B. The overall height of proposed new structures, antennas,
attachments and appurtenances are limited to 125 feet or the
height of the tallest existing structure, whichever is less. Antennas
proposed to be attached onto structures (other than a wireless
communication facility tower) are limited to a maximum height of
15 feet above the height of the structure onto which it will be
attached.
C. Ground equipment may be located on another parcel, but must be
setback at least three feet from any lot line. This does not apply to
the item below.
D. In addition 12kV transmission lines, guy/stub poles, light poles or
towers may have close mount antennas (less than 12 inch radius
and pole mounted equipment.
Date of Revisions
*1
Effective 10-4-01 – TA2000006
*2
Effective 07-10-15 – TA2014001
*3
Effective 11-6-20 – TA2019001
Section 1203.Section 903.
Mobile Home Parks*15
Article 1203.1.Article 903.1.
Standards:
1203.1.1.903.1.1.
Each mobile home space shall have an area of not less than 3,000 square
feet and an average width of not less than 44 feet.
1203.1.2.903.1.2.
Travel trailers or manufactured homes may be located on mobile home
spaces but the minimum setbacks required of mobile homes shall be
provided, and the appropriate sections of County plumbing and health
codes must be complied with.*25
1203.1.3.903.1.3.
Mobile homes, travel trailers, manufactured homes or detached accessory
structures shall be located on mobile home spaces so as to provide a
minimum setback from any mobile home space boundary, including
boundaries in common with the edge of any interior drive or roadway, of
not less than five feet, unless otherwise specified herein. Each mobile home
or travel trailer shall set back from lot lines or required park screening a
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-14
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
distance of not less than ten feet.
1203.1.4.903.1.4.
The minimum distance between mobile homes, travel trailers,
manufactured homes or detached accessory structures, and the minimum
distance between mobile homes or travel trailers and buildings in the same
mobile home park shall be ten feet, unless otherwise specified herein.*25
1203.1.5.903.1.5.
A mobile home park shall provide a minimum ten foot clear unobstructed
area from front lot lines and a minimum ten foot clear unobstructed area
from street side lot lines. These areas shall be provided with appropriate
landscaping, including necessary water maintenance facilities. These clear
unobstructed areas shall not be utilized in determining space boundaries,
dimensions or setbacks.
1203.1.6.
Service buildings to house toilet, bathing and other sanitation facilities and
utilities shall be provided as required by the Maricopa County Health
Department.
1203.1.7.903.1.6.
Street improvements to Maricopa County streets standards for any public
roads bounding the mobile home park shall be made as required by the
Maricopa County Highway Department at the time of development of the
park.
1203.1.8.903.1.7.
Provision for on-site storm water retention/drainage and off-site storm
water drainage both entering and leaving the property shall be as required
by the Maricopa County Department of Planning and Development
Department and the Flood Control District.
1203.1.9.
Each mobile home park shall provide fire protection facilities as required in
the Uniform Fire Code
1203.1.10.903.1.8.
Minimum distance or setbacks required herein shall be the shortest of
horizontal dimensions measured from the nearest portion of the side wall of
a mobile home, manufactured home or travel trailer, or from any attached
patio cover, carport, cabana, ramada or similar appurtenances. Detached
accessory storage structures, containing a maximum area of 100 square feet
and located in the rear one-third of a mobile home space shall not be
included in these distance or setback requirements, unless the mobile home
space is adjacent to a lot line, in which case the minimum distances or
setbacks shall apply. No accessory storage structure shall be located so as
to limit access to utility compartments and services. *24
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-15
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
1203.1.11.903.1.9.
All interior drives or roadways within the mobile home park shall be a
minimum width of 26 feet, exclusive of curbs and walkways, measured from
edge of pavement to edge of pavement. The interior drives or roadways
shall be paved per Maricopa County paving standards (#refrence#).with a
minimum of two inches of asphalt over four inches of A.B.C. or its
equivalent.
1203.1.12.903.1.10.
The mobile home park shall be permanently screened from surrounding lots
by a solid fence, wall, or suitable planting, with a minimum of six feet in
height.
1203.1.13.
The height, yard, and intensity of use regulations of the R1-6 Zoning District
shall apply to buildings located in mobile home parks but not to the mobile
homes or travel trailers or detached accessory buildings containing a
maximum area of 100 square feet located in the rear one-third of a mobile
home space.
1203.1.14.903.1.11.
No zoning clearance for the location of a mobile home or travel trailer on
individual mobile home spaces shall be issued until such time as the
requirements for mobile home park development as listed herein have been
certified as being completed, in accordance with the approved plan of
development, by a licensed engineer.
1203.1.15.
Mobile home subdivision lots shall not be utilized for mobile home park
purposes.
1203.1.16.903.1.12.
Access to all mobile home spaces shall be from the interior of the park.
There shall be no individual access to any mobile home space from a public
street.
1203.1.17.903.1.13.
In mobile home parks that contain ten or more mobile home spaces, there
shall be provided a minimum of 100 square feet of recreational open space
and/or recreational facilities for each mobile home space. Public or private
streets, vehicle storage areas and exterior boundary landscaping areas shall
not be included in calculating recreational open space.
1203.1.18.903.1.14.
The signs identifying mobile home parks shall be subject to the standards as
set forth in Chapter 1411, Article 111406.1.
1203.1.19.903.1.15.
The parking regulations for mobile home parks are as provided in Chapter
118, Article 81102. hereof.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-16
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
1203.1.20.903.1.16.
Any outdoor mobile home park lighting shall be placed so as to reflect light
away from adjoining rural or residential zoning district and shall be in
accordance with any adopted County Outdoor Lighting Ordinance.
1203.1.21.903.1.17.
Mobile home parks that have been developed prior to the effective date of
this Ordinance shall be permitted to meet the Zoning Ordinance setback
requirements for mobile home parks in effect at the time of their
development.
Date of Revisions
*15
Revised 1-7-85
*25
Revised 7-23-94
*24
Revised 5-6-94
Section 1204.Section 904.
Protected Development Rights*1
Article 1204.1.Article 904.1.
Purpose:
This article implements Arizona Revised Statutes Section 11-1201 et seq.,
which allows a county to provide for protected development rights through
approval of Protected Development Right Plans, as defined in this Section.*2,
*3
Article 1204.2.Article 904.2.
Protected Development Right Plans:
A "Protected Development Rights Plan" means a plan for the development
of property approved by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors
pursuant to the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance Chapter 3, Section 306
305 (Plan of Development (POD) process) Chapter 107, Section 1002702,
Article 1002.2 (Residential Unit Plan of Development), Chapter 10, Section
1003, Article 1003.2 (Commercial Unit Plan of Development), and Chapter
10, Section 1004, Article 1004.2 (Industrial Unit Plan of Development) ; and
Maricopa County Subdivision Regulations Chapter 2, Section 203 (Final
Plat).*2, *3
Article 1204.3.Article 904.3.
Protected Development Right:
The protected development right confers on the landowner the right to
undertake and complete the development and use of the property under
the terms and conditions of the protected development right plan, and
precludes enforcement against the property to which the protected
development right applies of any legislative or administrative land use
regulation that would change, alter, impair, prevent, diminish, delay, or
otherwise impact the development or use of the property as set forth in the
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-17
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
Protected Development Right Plan, except under the following
circumstances:
1204.3.1.904.3.1.
With the consent of the landowner.
1204.3.2.904.3.2.
On findings, by ordinance or resolution and after notice and a public
hearing, that natural or man-made hazards on or in the immediate vicinity
of the property, if uncorrected, would pose a serious threat to the public
health, safety and welfare if the project were to proceed as approved in the
Protected Development Right Plan.
1204.3.3.904.3.3.
On findings, by ordinance or resolution and after notice and a hearing, that
the landowner or his representative intentionally supplied inaccurate
information or made material misrepresentations that made a difference in
the approval of the Protected Development Right Plan.
1204.3.4.904.3.4.
On the enactment of a state or federal law or regulation that precludes
development as approved in the Protected Development Right Plan, in
which case the County Board of Supervisors, after notice and a hearing, may
modify the affected provisions, on a finding that the change in state or
federal law has a fundamental effect on the Protected Development Right
Plan.
A protected development right does not preclude the enforcement of a
subsequently adopted overlay zoning classification that imposes additional
requirements and that does not affect the allowable type or density of use,
or ordinances or regulations that are general in nature and that are
applicable to all property subject to land use regulation by the county, such
as building, fire, plumbing, electrical, and mechanical codes.
Article 1204.4.Article 904.4.
Duration of a Protected Development Right:
If approved by the Board of Supervisors, a protected development right
established pursuant to a Protected Development Right Plan is valid for
three years for a non-phased development, five years for a phased
development, and ten years for a phased development that contains at least
one section of land as defined by 43 United States Code 751 or has a gross
acreage of more than 640 acres.
The duration of a protected development right shall be extended for a
maximum of two additional years for a non-phased or phased
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-18
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
development, and ten additional years for a phased development that
contains at least one section of land as defined above or has a gross acreage
of more than 640 acres if the landowner demonstrates that a longer time
period is warranted by relevant circumstances, including the size, type and
phasing of the development on the property, the level of investment of the
landowner, economic cycles or market conditions. Such extensions are
subject to the Board of Supervisors approval.
A protected development right terminates at the end of the applicable period
established under this section. If a building permit has been issued before the
date of termination of a protected development right, the protected
development right remains valid until the building permit expires, but in no
event for longer than one year. On expiration, only principal structures for
which footings or foundations have been completed may be finished under
the protected development right. On the expiration of a protected
development right, development may continue based on a valid building
permit and according to standards in effect at that time. An unexpired
building permit issued for a property with a protected development right does
not expire or shall not be revoked merely because a protected development
right expires under the time limitations specified in this section. Nothing in
this Article precludes development based on common law principals vested
rights or rights granted pursuant to a development agreement.
The commencement of a protected development right period shall be the
effective date of valid approval of the Protected Development Right Plan or July
17, 1994, the effective date of the protected development right statute,
whichever date is later. The protected development right period shall be noted
on the Protected Development Right Plan. Protected Development Right Plans
approved prior to the date of this Chapter may be resubmitted to the
Department with the applicable protected development right period noted on
the plan. *3
Article 1204.5.Article 904.5.
Applicability:
This Chapter shall be applicable to all Protected Development Right Plans, as
defined in Article 1204904.4. above, approved by Maricopa County after
July 17, 1994, the effective date of the protected development rights
enabling statute, if approved and identified as a Protected Development
Right Plan at the time of approval.*2
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-19
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
Date of Revisions
*1
Added 11-20-95
*3
Effective 3-28-12 TA2012001
*2
Effective 5-16-98
Section 1205.Section 905.
Drainage Provisions*1
Article 1205.1.Article 905.1.
Statement of Purpose:
The purpose of this section is to promote and protect the health, peace,
safety, comfort, convenience and general welfare of the citizens of
Maricopa County by regulating grading and drainage of all land within the
unincorporated areas of Maricopa County, Arizona and to minimize the
possible loss of life and property through careful regulation of development,
to protect watershed and, natural waterways, and to minimize soil erosion,
and to ensure that all new development is free from will not create an
adverse drainage conditions.
Article 1205.2.Article 905.2.
Scope:
This section shall apply to all development of land and conditions which may
affect drainage systems and patterns.
Article 1205.3.Article 905.3.
Administration:
This article sets forth the duties and powers of the Drainage Administrator
and the limitations on regulation.
1205.3.1.905.3.1.
Drainage Administrator: The Board of Supervisors of Maricopa County
hasshall appointed the Director of the Maricopa County Planning and
Development Department or a duly authorized representative as the
Drainage Administrator who shall enforce the provisions of this Regulation.
1205.3.2.905.3.2.
Mandatory Duties:
The Drainage Administrator shall:
1. Review drainage reports and plans for all developments of land covered
by this Oordinance and approve such plans when the requirements of
this section are met.
2. Investigate violations and complaints of non-compliance with the
Ordinance.
3. Keep copies of all documents or other submissions made pursuant to
the requirements of this section County’s records retention
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-20
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
requirements.
4. Issue notices or orders necessary to enforce the provisions of this
section.
5. Upon determination that development of land subject to this
Ordinance has proceeded without drainage clearance, take action
necessary to obtain compliance with this Ordinance.
1205.3.3.905.3.3.
Discretionary Powers:
The Drainage Administrator may:
1. Inspect properties for which approval of a drainage clearance and
grading reports and plans has been requested.
2. Inspect properties in response to drainage related complaints. and, Iif
violations are found, require compliance with the provisions of this
Ordinance.
3. Upon determination that all reasonable means to gain voluntary
compliance have been exhausted, record a notice of non-compliance,
lien and/or disclaimer with the Maricopa County Recorder in a manner
so that it appears in the chain of Title of the affected parcel of land.
4. Issue notices of violation pursuant to this Ordinance.
5. Require additional information necessary to make a determination
concerning violations and compliance with the provisions of this
Ordinance.
6. Adopt drainage design standards, guidelines, administrative rules,
procedures and policies to implement and effectuate the purposes of
this section.
7. Establish, collect and regulate fees, which have been approved by the
BOS, for review and inspection of development for which a drainage
clearance is soughtdrainage. Fees maywill be waived for all Federal,
State, County and Municipal governments that are developing in the
unincorporated areas of Maricopa County.
8. Require appropriate financial assurances for one or more of the
following drainage infrastructure projectsfacilities required to obtain a
drainage clearance:
A. Drainage control features which provide protection for the
development, such as dams, levees, dikes and interceptor channels
or canals;
B. Common area retention systems or drainage way conveyance
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-21
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
facilities required for easements affecting two or more tracts or
phases of development;
C. A development that has been interrupted withand a partially
completed drainage system that presents the potential to create an
adverse drainage condition a flood hazard to adjacent property;
D. A project that has more than one phase and the schedule of
construction of all phases is longer than one year.
9. Approve applications for aGrant Drainage Waiver pursuant to Article
1205905.6 of this Ordinance.*3
1205.3.4.905.3.4.
Restriction on Regulation
1. Require a property owner to apply for a drainage clearance to submit
plans for or install or change an existinga drainage system on property
which was already developed as of December 14th, 1994, the effective
date of the Drainage Regulation which this Section supersedes.
2. Require submission of a an application for a drainage clearance drainage
report and plan in connection with the repair or alteration of property as
it was developed as December 14th, 1994, so long as the effect of such
repair or alteration does not increase the potential to create an adverse
drainage condition to the subject property upon drainage would not be
substantial or constitute an increased hazard to that or other properties.
3. A nonconforming business use may expand if such expansion does not
exceed one hundred percent of the area of the original business, unless
the effect thereof upon drainage would constitute a hazard.
4.3.
Compliance with or exemption from this Ordinance does not
relieve any person from liability if that person's actions cause drainage
related flood damage to any other person or property.
5.4.
This Section shall not pertain to or otherwise regulate cities,
counties, towns or other incorporated municipalities, the State or its
agencies or political subdivisions. This paragraph does not exempt
school districts, private utilities, and private emergency or fire services
from compliance with the provisions of this Regulation.
5. Request for exemption by those entities identified in paragraph 4 of this
section must be in writing from the requestor and submitted with the
building permit application.
Article 1205.4.Article 905.4.
Drainage Review Board
Pursuant to the authority granted in ARS § 11-251, the Board of Supervisors
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-22
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
shall appoint each member of the Maricopa County Board of Adjustment as a
member of the Drainage Review Board (DRB) which shall hear requests for
waivers to this section and appeals from interpretations made by the Drainage
Administrator in accordance with the rules of this section.
1205.4.1.905.4.1.
The Drainage Review Board shall select a chair and a vice chair from among
its own members who shall have the power to administer oaths and take
evidence.
1205.4.2.905.4.2.
The Drainage Review Board shall by resolution fix the time and place of its
meetings. The meetings shall be open to the public; minutes of its
proceedings and records of its examinations and other official actions shall
be kept and filed with thein the office of the Maricopa County Planning and
Development Department as a public record.
1205.4.3.905.4.3.
The Drainage Review Board shall adopt rules of procedure consistent with
the provisions of this Ordinance for the conduct of Drainage Review Board
business including establishment of a fee schedule to cover in part
administrative costs incurred in the processing of appeals, drainage
clearances, drainage waivers, plan review for development or
entitlementplans review and performance bonds. The fee schedule shall be
effective when approved by the Board of Supervisors and may be separately
amended from time to time as deemed necessary by the Board of
Supervisors.
Article 1205.5.Article 905.5.
Appeals
1205.5.1.905.5.1.
Appeals of any decision of the Drainage Administrator to the Drainage
Review Board shall be filed with the Drainage Administrator within 30 days
from the receipt of notice of the decision to be appealed and shall be in
writing on a form provided by the Drainage Administrator. The notice of
appeal shall specify the grounds for said appeal.
1205.5.2.905.5.2.
While an appeal is pending, During the pendency of an appeal all matters,
including decisions regarding the proceeding, shall be suspended or stayed
unless the Drainage Administrator certifies to the Drainage Review Board
that by reason of facts surrounding the appeal the stay would, in the
opinion of the Drainage Administrator, cause imminent peril to life or
property. In such cases the other matters shall not be stayed.
1205.5.3.905.5.3.
The Drainage Review Board shall fix a time for hearing the appeal and give
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-23
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
notice to the parties in interest and to the public as set forth herein. The
Drainage Review Board shall hear and decide the appeal within a reasonable
time.
1205.5.4.905.5.4.
After public hearing, the Drainage Review Board shall render its decision
whereby the Board may either affirm or reverse the decision of the Drainage
Administrator.*3
1205.5.5.905.5.5.
Any person aggrieved by a decision of the Drainage Review Board may,
within 30 days of such decision, appeal to Superior Court.*3
Article 1205.6.Article 905.6.
Drainage Waiver
1205.6.1.905.6.1.
The Drainage Administrator shall reviewhear and decide requests for waiver
from the requirements of this section.*3
1205.6.2.905.6.2.
Before granting a waiver the Drainage Administrator shall find that each of
the following criteria is met:*3
a.1. The grant will not result in an increase in the 100-year peak flow or
discharge; and
b.2.
By reason of special physical circumstances, location or
surroundings of the property, strict application of the Regulation would
deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by similar property; and
c.3. The waiver request is the minimum necessary, considering the drainage
relatedflood hazard, to afford relief; and
d.4.
There is a showing of good and sufficient cause; and
e.5.
Granting the waiver will not result in additional threats to public
safety, health, welfare, or extraordinary public expense, create a
nuisance, the victimization of or fraud on the public and that the waiver
does not conflict with existing local laws or ordinances.
1205.6.3.905.6.3.
The Drainage Administrator may attach such conditions or restrictions to
the granting of a waiver as the Drainage Administrator determines
necessary to reduce or eliminate potential threats to public safety, health,
welfare or to public or private property resulting from the granting of the
waiver. The applicant may be required to post bonds, assurances or other
security to guarantee compliance with the conditions and restrictions
imposed.*3
1205.6.4.905.6.4.
Property shall be posted a minimum of fifteen days prior to the Drainage
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-24
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
Administrator’s decision.*3
Article 1205.7.Article 905.7.
General Provisions
This section sets forth the general requirements for Drainage Clearance Review,
including;
Drainage
Report/Plan
(EntitlementDevelopment),
Design
Parameters, and Drainage Report/Plan (Site Development).
1205.7.1.905.7.1.
Drainage Clearance*2
Except as provided for in this Section, a drainage clearance shall be required
for any application for entitlement or development. or substantial
improvement which in the opinion of the Drainage Administrator may have
an adverse effect on existing drainage. Unless substantial construction as
approved by the Drainage Administrator has occurred within 180 days of
issuance of athe building permit, the drainage clearance may be declared
null and void and removal may be ordered of any partially completed or
minor improvements which may adversely affect drainage as determined by
the Drainage Administrator. Upon application, the Drainage Administrator
may approve a renewal of an expired Drainage Clearance for an additional
180 days.
Provided no development is to be located within a retention basin or
drainage way, a drainage clearance shall not be required for: (i) any building
with an area of 200 square feet or less, or (ii) for pipe rail type fencing that is
not permanently affixed to the ground.
An exemption from requirements for Zoning Clearance, Building Permit,
Environmental ServicesHealth Department clearance or other permits does
not constitute an exemption for drainage clearance, unless such exemption
is granted by statute.
A Final Drainage Clearance Inspection must be approvedrequested prior to a
final Certificate of Occupancy for permits issued to construct residential,
commercial, industrial, educational, institutional, and such dwelling units as
condominiums and apartments.
A floor/stemwall/foundation inspection approval is required prior to a
request for a final building inspection for a single family dwelling, additions
thereto or livable accessory buildings.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-25
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
Final drainage inspection approval shall be obtained within ninety (90) days
of the date of notice of deficiencies identifiednoted at the time of the final
drainage inspection. or final Building Inspection, whichever is the longer
period.
1205.7.2.905.7.2.
Drainage Report/Plan (Development)
1. A Grading & Drainage Plan and Drainage Reportdrainage report/plan
shall be required for all subdivisions, development master plans,
commercial, industrial, and multi-family residential developments. A
drainage Grading & Drainage Plan and Drainage Reportreport/plan may
be required for any and all other applications, including development for
a single family residence, as deemed appropriate by the Drainage
Administrator. A revised Grading & Drainage Plan and Drainage
Reportdrainage report may be required for any undeveloped or partially
developed portions of an approved plan when no development or
improvements have occurred for two or more years. The Grading &
Drainage Plan and Drainage Reportreport shall address existing drainage
conditions as compared to drainage conditions at the time of plan
approval. Based upon conclusions of the Grading & Drainage Plan and
Drainage Reportreport, reasonable modifications to the approved plan
may be required by the Drainage Administrator.
2. All drainage Grading & Drainage Plan and Drainage
Reportsreports/plans, including conceptual, shall be prepared, signed
and sealed by an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer and shall
comply with the checklists which are part of the application, together
with any supporting documents deemed necessary to evaluate the
drainage clearance.
1205.7.3.905.7.3.
No On-Lot Retention
In no event shall on-lot retention be permitted on any lot for residential use
that is less than one gross acre.
1205.7.4.905.7.4.
Drainage Report/Plan (Development Master PlanMaster)
1. The amount and degree of hydraulic and hydrologic detail required shall
be determined by the Drainage Administrator based upon the
complexity of the Development Master Planmaster plan.
2. For any development pursuant to a Development Master Plan, the
drainage design master plan, all drainage shall be consistent with the
drainage report and /plan approved for the master planned community.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-26
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
1205.7.5.905.7.5.
Drainage Report/Plan (Preliminary)
1. The amount and degree of hydraulic and hydrologic detail required shall
be determined by the Drainage Administrator based upon the
complexity of the preliminary plan. including Plans of Development and
Preliminary Subdivision Plats.
2. A preliminary Grading & Drainage Plan and Drainage Reportdrainage
report is required for Preliminary Plat or Plan of Development approval.
The preliminary plan and report shall address how off-site and on-site
runoff will be managed; and demonstrate compliance with the retention
volume requirementsrequired. A more detailed report shall be submitted
for Final Plat approval.
1205.7.6.905.7.6.
Design Parameters
The entire drainage retention and runoff conveyance system shall be
designed to eliminate or minimize adverse stormwater runoff effects and
convey the runoff through the development with minimalminimum
detrimental effects to the development or to any other property. No
system shall be approved if the effect may cause an increase in the peak
discharge, volume or velocity of runoff; or change the point of entry or exit
of drainage onto other property during the runoff event. No system shall be
approved that does not conform to Best Management Practice Standards in
controlling erosion and reducing sediment load.
All development shall be based on current engineering policies, standards
and best practices at the time of application for construction, and conform
to the standards and criteria contained in the Maricopa County Drainage
Design Manuals and Drainage Policies and Standards Manual which are
adopted by the County.is adopted and made a part of this Ordinance.
1. Storm Frequency Criteria - The rainfall event, based upon the 100-year
storm duration generating the peak discharge for the area contributing
runoff to the development, shall be used in designing the overall
development drainage system.
2. Retention and Management of Storm Drainage
A. The retention system shall be designed to receive and retain the
volume generated from the 2-hour, 100-year runoff event falling
over the entire development site including all new and project
related improved rights-of-way, excluding off-site flows. Co-
mingling of on and offsite flows is discouraged unless measures to
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-27
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
mitigate increased retention basin maintenance are implemented.
These shall include, but not be limited to, upstream sediment
basins, increased retention volume requirements and/or the use of
dual chamber drywells.
B. Drywell and storm drain volumes shall not be used as part of the
retention volume.
C. On-site retention facilities may include natural depressions,
man-made basins, depressed parking areas, or other methods
which do not result in water being ponded longer than 36 hours.
No more than 25% of public parking areas shown on the plan shall
be used for retention and the maximum depth of the retention
facilities cannot exceed 612 inches in public parking areas. Vehicle
storage areas used for retention, regardless of depth, shall contain
the required number of dual-chamber drywells to drain the basin
within 36 hours. Accessible parking and travel paths shall not be
used for retention. Private parking areas shall not be used for
runoff retention.
D. Retention basins and septic systems shall be separated in
accordance with the Maricopa County Environmental Services
Setback Distance Chart.Retention basins shall not be located within
25 feet of septic system facilities.
E. Utility lines and structures shall not be located within drainage
facilities unless approved in writing by the occupyingby the utility
company. and the Maricopa County Planning and Development
Department.
F.
If reasonable alternatives are not available, stormwater
facilitiesdetention in the County right-of-way may be acceptable
provided the Maricopa County Department of Transportation
approves the design.
G. A right-of-way or public utility easement shall not be designated
for drainage or retention without prior written approval of the
appropriate agency or affected utility.
H. In any landscaping and maintenance agreement, provisions shall
be made for an annual maintenance certification.Within
subdivisions, oOn-site drainage shall be either to the street or to a
designated drainage easement/tract or approved drainage way
with adequate outfall.
I.
Within areas without established drainage infrastructure, drainage
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-28
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
patterns shall remain historic with respect to inflow and outflow
locations and characteristics.
H.J. Within subdivisions, drainage corridors (natural & man-made) that
will convey offsite runoff flow through a development site shall be
located in drainage tracts. Plats must identify maintenance
responsibilities for the drainage tracts.
3. Stormwater Disposal - On-site runoff that has been retained shall be
disposed of within 36 hours either by percolation, drywells or draining
into an approved drainage way. Flows from basins shall not exceed
pre-development flows and shall be in the location and direction of
the historic flows. If runoff is to be conveyed by an underground
system, complete detailed plans shall be submitted. Underground
retention systems must drain within 36 hours.
4. Drywell Design
A. If drywells are to be utilized for stormwater disposal, certification
shall be required indicating that the drywells meet the provisions
of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Arizona
Department of Environmental Quality.
B. Drywells shall be used only for stormwater disposal and not for
disposal or deposit of wastes or other contaminants.
C. Proof of drywell registration with the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Arizona State Department of Environmental Quality
shall be required prior to final as-built approval or issuance of the
finalany drainage clearance.
D. Certification that the drywell meets requirements of this regulation
shall be submitted at the time of installation.
5. Road Design
A. To facilitate drainage, the design of roadways in the system shall
conform to the Drainage Design Manuals, Drainage Policies and
Standards and Maricopa County Department of Transportation
Roadway Design Manualrequirements.
B. Adequate drainage ways shall be constructed to convey the street
design flow if that flow is designed to leave the public
right-of-way. Such drainage ways shall be platted as drainage
easements or as separate tracts with maintenance provisions
designated to the owner or HOA as the case may be. The County
shall not maintain drainage facilities outside of the County right-
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-29
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
of-way.
C. The Drainage Administrator may require construction of a culvert
or bridge where a road crosses a natural drainage way. The size
of the culvert or bridge shall conform to Maricopa County
Department of Transportation standards.
D. If roads are designed to convey runoff, the amount conveyed shall
not exceed design standards. Additional flow shall be conveyed in
storm drains or other drainage ways if the design standards are
exceeded or the depth within local roadways is greater than 8
inches; and 6 inches in highroad classifications (collector, arterial
and parkway)..
E. To prevent back and head cutting, dip sections and culvert
crossings of rights-of-way shall have adequate cutoff walls or
aprons constructed of non-erodible material.
F.
For subdivisions and other residential developments requiring 2
points of access, at least one shall be paved and the other being at
least an Each site shall have one all-weather road access with a
maximum flow of 6 inches in depth over the roadway or overflow
section during the 100-year peak flow event.
6. Finished Floor Elevation - Finished floors of a livable building shall be
elevated a minimum of one foot above the highest grade point within
ten feet of the foundation of the building. In areas without established
drainage infrastructure, the Drainage Administrator may require
higher finished floor elevations, grading and drainage plans or an
engineer’s certification that the finished floor is safe from inundation
during the 100-year peak runoff event to ensure safety. A finished
floor elevation lower than the minimum may be permitted provided it
is determined by technical data and certified by an Arizona Registered
Professional Civil Engineer to be the minimum necessary to be safe
from inundation by the 100-year peak runoff event. Finished floor
elevations may be required to be referenced to a known benchmark.
Non-livable buildings (see definitions) are exempt from this section.
7. Floodplain Development - That portion of a development that is
within a designated special flood hazard area (floodplain) shall comply
with the Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County. If a developer
desires to re-delineate a floodplain, the required data shall be
submitted to the Flood Control District.
Development within a delineated floodplain is not exempt from drainage
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-30
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
and grading requirements of this section.
8. Landscaping - Walls, fences, decorative borders, berms and other
similar structures or features less than one (1) foot in height above
grade located within the building setbacks are permitted without first
obtaining a drainage clearance provided they do not have an adverse
drainage effect on the property adjacent land or obstruct, inhibitretard
or divert any drainage way or other drainage feature.
9. Grading
A. Grading and Drainage Plans submitted for approval shall indicate
preservation of theThe entrance and exit points and continuity of
all natural drainage ways on a development hillside site, and their
preservation shall be provided for in the plan.
B. All Eengineered grading and drainage plans with any cutting or
filling of slopes shall meet the provisions of the Maricopa County
Drainage Policies and Standards ManualComprehensive Building
Code.
C. Subsurface drainage for cuts and fill slopes must maintain the
stability and integrity of the cut or fill slope.
D. Drainage facilities shall be designed to maintain historic drainage
patterns or to convey runoff to the nearest approved drainage
way.
E. Erosion of the ground in the area of discharge shall be
minimizedprevented by installation of non-erosive cutoff walls,
aprons or other approved erosion control devices.
F.
Cut and fill slopes, new and redirected channels must be
protected against erosion by suitable plantings, check dams,
riprap or other approved methods.
1205.7.7.905.7.7.
Development of Drainage Report/Plan for Minor Accessory
Construction on Commercial or Industrial Projects
For minor accessory construction associated with established commercial or
industrialfor commercial projects, a drainage plan development drainage
report/plan shall be required but may not be required to be prepared by an
Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer as determineddirected by the
Drainage Administrator. In such cases the plan shall include but not be
limited to the following information:
1. Plan requirements:
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-31
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
A. Maximum construction disturbance limits.
B. All information required by Article 1205905.7 (General Provisions)
and any other Maricopa County Ordinance regulation.
C. Any supporting information which the Drainage Administrator
deems necessary to evaluate the drainage clearance.
2. Minor accessory construction on commercial or industrial projects shall
be limited to signs, ADA accessible ramps, propane tanks, trash
enclosures, billboards and wireless communication facilities, mobile
storage containers and other projects as determined by the Drainage
Administrator.
3. Projects that include only include minimal ground disturbance and will
not create an adverse impact to the site or surrounding properties shall
be considered as meeting Section 12905.7.7. Projects that include
disturbance of more than 1,500 sq. ft. outside of the building envelope
or 10,000 sq. ft. in total shall not be considered as meeting Section
12905.7.7 and must comply with the requirements of Section 12905.7.
Concurrent projects that cumulatively exceed a total project
construction envelope and disturbance limit of 1,500 sq. ft. shall not be
considered as meeting Section 1205.7.7 and must meet the
requirements of Section 1205.7.
Article 1205.8.
Area Drainage Master Study
Article 1205.9.
Adoption: Whenever an Area Drainage Master Study authorized
under this section has been completed, such plan including uniform rules for
development may be submitted to the Board of Supervisors for adoption as an
Area Drainage Master Plan. If adopted by the Board of Supervisors, the Flood
Control District of Maricopa County shall enforce the Area Drainage Master
Plan under this Ordinance.
Article 1205.10. Public Notification: During the preparation of an Area Drainage
Master Plan, the owners of record of real property within the drainage master
plan area shall be publicly notified by the Flood Control District of Maricopa
County so that the owners may have an opportunity to provide input to the
planning process.
Article 1205.11. Minimum Standards: Requirements for development within an
adopted Area Drainage Master Plan shall meet or exceed the Uniform Drainage
Standards adopted by the Board of Supervisors or this Ordinance. In case of
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-32
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
conflict, the most stringent requirements shall prevail.
Article 1205.12.Article 905.8.
Compliance, Enforcement and Penalties
1205.12.1.
This Article sets forth requirements applicable to all hillside district
developments, except single family residential, and are in addition to the requirements set
forth in Chapters 6, 7, 8, and 9.
1205.12.2.905.8.1.
Deed Restrictions
Recording of deed restrictions which include drainage easements, tracts,
channels or common areas used for drainage purposes to be maintained by the
property owner may be required. Recordation of such deed restrictions shall
be noted on the final plat or other development plans as the case may be.
1205.12.3.905.8.2.
Performance Assurances
Financial assurances may be required by the Drainage Administrator to ensure
construction, completion or maintenance of approved drainage facilities.
Assurances shall be released upon verification of compliance with approved
plans and all provisions of this Ordinance.
1205.12.4.905.8.3.
Regulation Violation
It is a violation of this Ordinance:
1. Tto develop, construct, alter, use, repair, improve, fill, divert, obstruct,
remove or commence the creation, construction, alteration, repair,
improvement, filling, diversion, obstruction or removal of any wash,
culvert, easement, channel, ditch, berm, retention basin, wall fence,
other structure or use which may affect any natural drainage or
improved drainage design or drainage system without obtaining a
drainage clearance from the Drainage Administrator;
2. Ffor any person to place or allow to be placed any fill material, rubbish,
trash, weeds, filth or debris which obstructs, retards or diverts any
natural or improved drainage system upon any private or public
property located in the unincorporated areas of Maricopa County;
3. Ffor failure to maintain any natural drainage system or any drainage
easement, tract, channel or common area created pursuant to this
Regulation;
4. Ffor failure to obtain the required Drainage Clearance or final drainage
inspection approval prior to obtaining a final Certificate of Occupancy
for permits issued to construct residential, commercial, industrial,
educational, institutional, and multi-family dwelling units.such dwelling
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-33
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
units as condominiums and apartments;
5. Ffor failure to obtain the required floor/stemwall/foundation elevation
inspection approval prior to securing a final building inspection for a
single family dwelling including mobile/manufactured home, additions
thereto or accessory buildings;
6. Ffor any owner (builder/developer) to fail to correct any deficiencies
noted at the time of the final drainage inspection. A Final drainage
inspection approval shall be obtained within ninety (90) days of the date
of notice of such deficiencies or final Building Inspection, and/or
occupancy of the dwelling unit, whichever is the longer period.
7. For performing or authorizing Any party who performs or authorizes
work and is in violation of the Ordinance for failure to correct any
deficiencies noted at the time of final drainage inspection if the property
is not compliant with the requirements of this section.
1205.12.5.905.8.4.
Violation Removal
1. If the property owner fails to remove fill material, rubbish, trash,
weeds, filth, debris or any other obstruction that the Drainage
Administrator determines obstructs, retards or diverts a natural or
improved drainage system, after 30 days written notice from the
Drainage Administrator to remove or abate the condition, the Drainage
Administrator may, remove or cause the removal of the fill material,
rubbish, trash, weeds, filth or debris upon the Director’s determination
that failure to remove or abate the condition constitutes a threat to the
public health, safety or welfare.
2. The charge for the removal shall be billed to the property owner and
collected by the County Attorney by use of all appropriate legal
remedies, including but not limited to a lien against the property for the
costs of removal plus attorneys fees and costs of collection.
3. The determination that the condition constitutes a hazard to the public
health, safety or welfare may be appealed in the same manner as
appeals from decisions of the Drainage Administrator as set forth in
Article 1205.6 above and such appeal shall be filed within 30 days of
receipt of the written notice from the Drainage Administrator.
4. The Drainage Administrator shall be under no affirmative duty pursuant
to this Article to either identify violations or undertake their removal.
Removal pursuant to this section is discretionary with the Drainage
Administrator.
5. The property owner shall be liable for any damages caused by failure to
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-34
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
remove or abate the condition.
Article 1205.13.Article 905.9.
Dedications
The Board of Supervisors may require, as a condition of issuance of a drainage
clearance or waiver, dedication, or the use to the County or the Flood Control
District of land necessary for construction of area drainage facilities to be
constructed in accordance with a master drainage plan or development
drainage plan if the need for the facility emanates at least in part from the
proposed development. The amount of land required shall be proportionate to
the amount of runoff contributed by a parcel to the total runoff calculated for
the master drainage plan or development drainage plan.
Article 1205.14.Article 905.10.
Warning & Disclaimer of Liability
The degree of protection from drainage related flooding due to storm water
runoff required by this Ordinance is considered reasonable for regulatory
purposes and is based on engineering and scientific methods of study.
Compliance with this Regulation does not ensure complete protection from
drainage related flooding and is not to be taken as a warranty. Greater storms
may occur or the water damage hazard may be increased by man-made or
natural causes such as silting of channels and canals, pipe and culvert openings
restricted by debris, natural erosion or man-made obstructions or diversions.
This Regulation does not imply that land uses will be free from drainage related
flooding or flood damage. This Regulation shall not create liability on the part
of Maricopa County or any officer or employee thereof for any flood damages
that may result from reliance on this Regulation or any administrative decision
lawfully made there under.
Date of Revisions
*1
Effective 10-19-2011 – TA2011012
*3
Effective 7-17-2013 – TA2013003
*2
Effective 12-14-2011 – TA2011019
Section 1206.Section 906.
Renewable Energy Systems*1
Article 1206.1.Article 906.1.
Purpose:
Promote efficient implementation of small-scale renewable energy systems,
while setting practical guidelines for such implementation that are
respectful of the neighborhood context within which such systems may
occur.
Article 1206.2.Article 906.2.
General provisions:
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-35
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
1206.2.1.906.2.1.
Renewable energy systems, other than utility-scale electrical generating
stations, are allowed as an accessory use within any zoning district, subject
to the provisions of Article 1206906.3.
1206.2.2.
Deleted.*2
1206.2.3.906.2.2.
Utility-scale concentrating solar power (CSP) generating facilities or photo-
voltaic solar generating facilities of any output capacity are allowed as either
a primary or accessory use within the IND-23 zoning district subject to the
development standards of that district and provided that any water
consumed during the production of electricity by the generating facility is
supplied from a “renewable water source” as defined by this Ordinance.
Article 1206.3.Article 906.3.
Development Standards:
1206.3.1.906.3.1.
Location on the Lot *3
Renewable energy systems may be located on the lot in a manner
consistent with any accessory structure in the respective zoning district in
which the lot is located.
1206.3.2.906.3.2.
Lot Coverage
1. Photo-voltaic solar panels and concentrating solar collectors associated
with renewable energy systems shall not constitute an increase to lot
coverage or rear yard coverage unless the panel(s)/collector(s) and
supporting structure(s) in and of itself constitutes a building as defined
in Chapter 2 herein. In which case, the panel(s)/collector(s) shall
contribute to the overall lot coverage of the lot, and if located in the rear
yard, the panel(s)/collector(s) shall contribute to the rear yard coverage
of the lot. Lot coverage and rear yard coverage for photo-voltaic solar
panels and concentrating solar collectors shall be calculated as
enumerated in Article 1206.4.1 below.
2. B)Dish type collectors as typically utilized in sterling engine technologies
shall not constitute an increase to lot coverage or rear yard coverage.
3.2.
C)Small wind generating systems shall not constitute an increase
to lot coverage or year yard coverage.
1206.3.3.906.3.3.
Height Limitations
1. Renewable energy systems located within single-family, two-family, and
multi-family zoning districts shall not exceed the height regulations of
the zoning district in which the property is located.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-36
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
2. Renewable energy systems in other than single-family, two-family, and
multi-family zoning districts shall not exceed the height regulations for
the zoning district in which the property is located unless the system is
appurtenant to a building, in which case the provisions of Article
1111811.2 shall apply.
3. Ground-mounted equipment associated with renewable energy
systems, other than solar panel(s)/collector(s) or wind turbines and their
supporting structures, which is located within a lot’s side yard shall not
exceed six (6) feet in height and shall be screened from view to a height
equal to that of the equipment, or in the case of a commercial
application, placed within a cabinet that is not taller than six (6) feet.
1206.3.4.906.3.4.
Exemption for Certain Off-Grid Solar Panels
Off-grid photo-voltaic solar panels which serve only a single electrical fixture
or appliance, such as low-voltage landscape lighting or similar, are exempt
from the provisions of this section. Photo-voltaic solar panels that are not in
proper working order are subject to the provisions of Article 1206906.6
herein.
Article 1206.4.Article 906.4.
Measurements:
1206.4.1.906.4.1.
If a solar panel(s)/collector(s) associated with a renewable energy system is
deemed to constitute a building as articulated in Article 9012-6.3.2(A)
above, the lot coverage and rear yard coverage shall be calculated based on
the aggregate horizontal area of the solar panel(s)/collector(s), regardless of
angle to the sun or method of installation.
1206.4.2.906.4.2.
The height of a renewable energy system shall be measured relative to the
highest point of the system or supporting structure, whichever is higher. In
the case where a solar array tracks the sun’s movement across the sky, the
height shall be measured relative to the array’s most vertical position.
1206.4.3.906.4.3.
Setbacks to renewable energy systems involving solar shall be measured
relative to the edge of the solar panel(s)/collector(s), or supporting
structure, whichever is closest to the property line from which the setback is
being measured.
1206.4.4.906.4.4.
The height of a renewable energy system involving wind technology shall be
measured relative to the top of the blade sweep at a point where the blade
is in its most vertical position, or to the top of the supporting structure,
whichever is taller.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-37
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
1206.4.5.906.4.5.
Setbacks to renewable energy systems involving wind technology shall be
measured relative to the blade sweep at a point where the tip of the blade,
or edge of the supporting structure, is closest to the property line from
which the setback is being calculated.
Article 1206.5.
The development standards identified in Article 1206.3 of this
section may only be varied by the Board of Adjustment as specified under
section 303 of this Ordinance or in conjunction with a Unit Plan of Development
as specified in Sections 1002, 1003, and 1004 of this Ordinance.
Article 1206.6.Article 906.5.
Access to Sunlight and Wind:
The owner or future owners of a property onto which a renewable energy
system is installed assumes all risk associated with diminished performance
of said system caused by any present or future adjacent structure or
landscaping that may interfere with the system’s ability to produce power at
its rated capacity, regardless of when that adjacent structure or landscaping
is constructed or installed.
Article 1206.7.Article 906.6.
Dilapidation:
Any renewable energy system, including utility scale operations, which
becomes inoperable shall, at the owner’s expense, be made operational or
shall be removed from the property within one (1) year of the date the
system became inoperable.
Date of Revisions
*1
Effective 11-19-10 – TA2009014
*2
Effective 9-16-2011 – TA2011008
*3
Effective 12-12-12 – TA2012026
Section 1207.Section 907.
Community Residences and Recovery
Communities*1
Article 1207.1.Article 907.1.
Purpose:
Setting a framework by which community residences and recovery
communities may locate and operate, and, as warranted, offering a
reasonable accommodation to allow a community residence or recovery
community as required by the Federal Fair Housing Act to locate within the
minimum 1,200 foot spacing distance, to allow a community residence to
operate when no state license or certification is available, or to allow a
community residence to exceed the maximum ten residents.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-38
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
Article 1207.2.Article 907.2.
General Provisions:
1207.2.1.907.2.1.
Community residences are permitted in all zoning districts except for C-O
and C-S, subject to the provisions and standards outlined in this Section.
1207.2.2.907.2.2.
Recovery communities are permitted in R-3 and, R-4 zoning districts via a
Special Use Permit., Recovery communities are permitted in R-5, C-1, C-2, C-
3, IND-1, IND-2 and IND-3 zoning districts subject to the provisions and
standards outlined in this section.
Article 1207.3.Article 907.3.
Standards:
The following standards shall apply as specified to Community Residences
and Recovery Communities:
1207.3.1.907.3.1.
Location:
1. Except as required by state law, a community residence is permitted in
all zoning districts where residences are permitted when it will be
located at least 1,200 linear feet from the closest existing community
residence, group care facility or recovery community as measured from
the nearest lot line of the proposed community residence to the nearest
lot line of the closest existing community residence, group care facility
or recovery community and complies with the other provisions in
Section 1207907.
2. Except as required by state law, a recovery community is permitted in
certain zoning districts where multiple-family housing is permitted when
it will be located at least 1,200 linear feet from the closest existing
community residence, group care facility or recovery community as
measured from the nearest lot line of the proposed recovery community
to the nearest lot line of the closest existing community residence,
group care facility or recovery community and complies with the other
provisions in Section 1207907.
3. A reasonable accommodation may be granted in accordance with Article
1207907.3.7 to locate within 1,200 feet of the closest existing
Community Residence or Recovery Community.
4. Approval of a community residence or recovery community application
confers a protection period of one year which allows the owner to
obtain a Certificate of Occupancy, ADHS licensure and/or certification as
required in Article 907.3.4. The protection period prevents other
owners from establishing a community residence or recovery
community within 1,200 feet of the lot line of the subject property. A
single administrative extension of the protection period of 180 or fewer
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-39
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
days may be granted at the discretion of the Zoning Inspector or their
designee upon evidence of progress towards receiving a Certificate of
Occupancy and licensure. Upon expiration of the protection period,
other property owners may apply for and receive a protection period,
which may preclude establishment of a community residence or
recovery community on the subject property.
1207.3.2.907.3.2.
Maximum Number of People:
1. No more than ten unrelated individuals including live-in staff will occupy
the community residence except that community residences permitted
and licensed as assisted living home for adults older than 55 years in age
may have one additional live-in resident who must be a professionally
certified or licensed caregiver.
2. A reasonable accommodation to exceed ten occupants may be granted
in accordance with Article 1207907.3.7.1.a.
3. No more than three staff per shift may occupy the residence at one
time. The number of total staff shall not exceed the number of residents
living in the community residence.
1207.3.3.907.3.3.
Characteristics of Occupants:
1. Residents shall not be adjudicated.
1207.3.4.907.3.4.
Licensure:
1. No community residence or recovery community shall receive a
Certificate of Occupancy until the owneruse or its operator has been or
will be issued:
A. The license or certification that the State of Arizona requires to
operate the proposed community residence or recovery community
within 1 year of the establishment of a community residence or
recovery community protection period by the Maricopa County
Planning and Development Department; or
B. Provisional certification by the Arizona Recovery Housing
Association and then permanent certification within 180 days of the
date or which provisional certification was granted; or
C. A “conditional” Oxford House Charter within 30 days of the date on
which the first individual occupies the Oxford House and a
“permanent” Oxford House Charter within 180 days after the
“conditional” charter was issued; or
D. When neither the State of Arizona nor the Arizona Recovery
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-40
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
Housing Association does not offer a license or certification a
proposed community residence, and a reasonable accommodation
has been issued in accordance with Article 1207907.
2. A reasonable accommodation may be granted for a community
residence in accordance with Article 1207907.3.7.1.c. to operate when
no state license or certification is available.
3. Upon application to establish a community residence or recovery
community, the community residence or recovery community and/or its
operator shall provide documented evidence that it has applied for any
licensure the State of Arizona requires, for certification by the Arizona
Recovery Housing Association, for an Oxford House Charter.
4. Upon termination, revocation, nonrenewal, or suspension of its license
or certification, a Community Residence or Recovery Community must
be closed within 60 calendar days, and the operator of the Community
Residence or Community Residence must return residents to their
families or relocate them to a safe and secure living environment.
1207.3.5.907.3.5.
Annual Documentation:
1. The operator or owner of a community residence or recovery
community shall provide to the Zoning Inspector or their designee a
copy of its renewed license, certification, or Oxford House Charter
within ten business days of the annual anniversary of being granted
zoning approval. Failure to maintain annual documentation shall be
immediate grounds to deem the community residence or recovery
community and/or its operator in violation of the Zoning Ordinance.
1207.3.6.907.3.6.
Ownership:
1. Any license or permit issued by the Department for a community
residence or recovery community Maricopa County is assigned to the
owner of record or to the principal or chief executive officer of the legal
entity in possession of the property.
2. Any license or permit issued by the Department for a community
residence or recovery community is not transferable and does not run
with the land.
1207.3.7.907.3.7.
Reasonable Accommodation:
1. The Zoning Inspector or their designee may grant a reasonable
accommodation for reasons particular to the proposal of a community
residence or recovery community under one or more of the following
circumstances when it is found that the specified standards are met:
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-41
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
A. A community residence or recovery community is proposed to be
located fewer than the required 1,200 linear feet of an existing
community residence or recovery community may be granted
reasonable accommodation to locate where proposed when it is
found that the applicant has demonstrated by a preponderance of
the evidence that all of the following standards are met:
1.
The proposed community residence or recovery community is
separated from the closest existing community residence or
recovery community by an interstate, freeway, canal, or other
right-of-way at least 300 feet wide; or the proposed
community residence will not interfere with the use of
neighbors without disabilities as role models and the
normalization and community integration of the residents of
the closest existing community residence or recovery
community, and that the presence of other community
residences and/or recovery communities will not interfere with
the normalization and community integration of the residents
of the proposed community residence or recovery community;
and
2.
The proposed community residence in combination with any
existing community residences and/or recovery communities
will not alter the residential character of the surrounding
neighborhood by creating an institutional atmosphere or by
creating or intensifying an institutional atmosphere or de facto
social service district by clustering community residences
and/or recovery communities on a block face or concentrating
them in a neighborhood.
B. Except as required by state law, a reasonable accommodation to
house more than ten unrelated individuals in a community
residence may be approved only when it is found that the applicant
has demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that all of
the following standards are met:
1.
The proposed number of residents greater than ten is
necessary to ensure the therapeutic and/or financial viability of
the proposed community residence; and
2.
The proposed community residence will emulate a biological
family and operate as a functional family rather than as a
boarding or rooming house, nursing home, short term rental,
continuing care facility, motel, hotel, detoxification center,
treatment center, rehabilitation center, institutional use, group
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-42
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
care facility, or assisted living facility that does not comport
with the definition of “community residence,” or any other
nonresidential use; and
3.
Allowing the requested number of residents in the proposed
community residence will not interfere with the normalization
and community integration of the occupants of any existing
community residence or recovery communities and the use of
neighbors without disabilities as role models.
C. When the State of Arizona does not offer a license or certification
for the type of community residence proposed and the population it
would serve, the Arizona Recovery Housing Association does not
offer certification, or the proposed community residence is not
eligible to be granted an Oxford House Charter, a reasonable
accommodation may be issued only when it is found that the
applicant has demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence
that all of the following standards are met:
1.
The proposed community residence will be operated in a
manner essentially similar to that of a licensed or certified
community residence; and
2.
Staff who reside and/or work at the community residence will
be adequately trained in accordance with standards typically
required by state licensing or certification for a community
residence; and
3.
The community residence will emulate a biological family and
be operated to achieve normalization and community
integration; and
4.
The rules and practices governing how the community
residence operates will actually protect the residents from
abuse, exploitation, fraud, theft, neglect, insufficient support,
use of illegal drugs or alcohol, and misuse of prescription
medications.
1207.3.8.907.3.8.
Violation:
1. When a community residence or recovery community and/or its
operator is unable to comply with the conditions set forth in
1207907.3.1., 1207907.3.2., 1207907.3.3., 1207907.3.4, 1207907.3.5.
and 1207907.3.6. above, it shall be deemed to be in violation of the
Zoning Ordinance, its occupants must be relocated to safe and secure
housing, and the community residence or recovery community must be
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 9-43
CHAPTER 9 – INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
vacated within 30 days of being found responsible at hearing.
Date of Revisions
*1
Effective 3-11-22 – TA2020001
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 9-1
CHAPTER 9 - INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
Chapter 9
| Industrial Zoning Districts
Section 901.
IND-1 (Planned Industrial Zoning District)*1
Article 901.1.
Purpose:
The principal purpose of this zoning district is to provide sufficient space in
appropriate locations for certain types of business and manufacturing uses
that are quiet, attractive and well designed including appropriate screening
and/or landscape buffers to afford locations close to existing residential uses,
so that people can live and work in the same neighborhood while encouraging
sustainable development practices.*6, *13
Article 901.2.
Use Regulations:
A building or premises shall be used only for the following purposes:*4, *17
1. Art needlework, handweaving and tapestries.
2. Books, hand binding and tooling.
3. Compounding of cosmetics and pharmaceutical products.
4. Jewelry, manufacture from precious metals and minerals.
5. Laboratories, research, experimental and testing, and Marijuana Testing
Facilities. *18
6. Manufacture and assembly of clay, leather, metal and glass products of
a handicraft nature.
7. Manufacture and assembly of medical, dental and drafting instruments.
8. Manufacture and assembly of optical goods and equipment, watches,
clocks and other similar precision instruments.
9. Manufacture and assembly of electrical or electronic apparatus, musical
instruments, games and toys.
10. Motion picture producing.
11. Offices.
12. Radio and television broadcasting stations and studios, but not including
transmitter towers and transmitter stations.
13. Warehousing, storage and wholesale distribution facilities.
14. Any other office, laboratory, manufacturing and assembling uses similar
to those uses enumerated herein which do not create any danger to the
public health, safety and general welfare in surrounding areas and which
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 9-2
CHAPTER 9 - INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
do not create any offensive noise, vibration, smoke, dust, odor, heat or
glare and which, by reason of high value in relation to size and weight of
merchandise received and shipped create very little truck traffic.
15. Accessory buildings and uses customarily incidental to the above uses.
Renewable energy systems are not permitted as a primary use but may
be permitted as an accessory use as set forth in Section 1206 of this
Ordinance. Where renewable energy systems involve the generation or
storage of electricity, only grid-connected or off-grid systems are
permitted.*13
16. Emergency housing - Temporary shelter required due to a natural
disaster or fire or other circumstances determined to constitute an
emergency by the zoning inspector.**7, *9
17. Temporary construction administration offices/yard complex – which
may include a security office or residence for a security guard provided
that the following conditions are met:*17
a.
The uses are only associated with the developer/owner and
subdivision or project in which they are located.*17
b. Upon sale of the development, cessation of the need for the use
(95% buildout), or cessation of the use, all structures, modifications
to structures and uses related to the temporary facility are
removed.*17
c.
Those uses of structures allowed shall meet all building code
requirements.
d. All items stored on site shall only be those required for the
construction on site.
e. The allowed uses may encroach into setback areas.
f.
All necessary permits must be issued prior to placement on the site.
18. Service to the public of water, gas, electricity, telephone and cable
television and sewage including wastewater treatment plants. The
foregoing shall be deemed to include attendant facilities and
appurtenances to these uses, including without limitation, distribution,
collector and feeder lines, pumping or booster stations along pipelines,
and substations along electric transmission lines.*10
19. Gardens and community gardens as defined in Chapter 2.*15
20. Medical Marijuana Dispensary and/or Marijuana Establishment and/or
Medical Marijuana Offsite Cultivation Location facilities as defined in
Chapter 2 of this Ordinance subject to all rules adopted by the Arizona
Department of Health Services and to the following conditions:*16 *18
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 9-3
CHAPTER 9 - INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
a.
Medical Marijuana Dispensaries and/or Marijuana Establishment
and/or Medical Marijuana Offsite Cultivation Location facilities shall
not be located within 1,500 feet of any other Medical Marijuana
Dispensary. *18
b. Medical Marijuana Dispensaries and/or Marijuana Establishment
and Medical Marijuana Offsite Cultivation Locations shall not be
located within 1,500 feet of: *18
1.
A church; or
2.
A public or private elementary or secondary school; or
3.
A public or private day care center, preschool, nursery,
kindergarten, or similar use; or
4.
A public park or playground; or
5.
An adult oriented facility.
c.
For purposes of measuring separation distances required in this
section, the measurements shall be taken in a straight line from the
closest exterior wall of the subject building to the closest boundary
line of any affected parcel without regard to intervening structures
or objects or political boundaries.
d. A Medical Marijuana Dispensary and/or Marijuana Establishment
and/or Medical Marijuana Offsite Cultivation Location facilities
lawfully operating is not rendered in violation of these provisions by
the subsequent location of a church, public or private elementary or
secondary school, a kindergarten or preschool or similar use, or a
park or playground within 1,500 feet of the Medical Marijuana
Dispensary and/or Marijuana Establishment and/or Medical
Marijuana Offsite Cultivation Location. *18
e. This provision shall not be construed as permitting any use or act
which is otherwise prohibited or made punishable by law.
21. Any use permitted in the C-3 zoning district.*17
Article 901.3.
Height Regulations:
The height of buildings shall not exceed 40 feet, except that the height of any
building or structure closer than 40 feet to any rural or residential zone
boundary shall not exceed the distance from said building or structure to the
zone boundary, except that no building need be less than ten feet in height.
Streets or alleys may be included in calculating distance.*14
Article 901.4.
Yard Regulations:
The required yards are as follows:*5
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 9-4
CHAPTER 9 - INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
1. Front Yard:
a. All properties abutting a public street shall have an open setback area
which shall be landscaped extending for the full width of the
property. This setback shall be parallel to the centerline of the street
and shall be measured from the setback line or the ultimate
right-of-way line of a local street, and shall be of a depth as indicated
as follows:
1.
Abutting any major street, section line road, State or Federal
Highway not less than 20 feet.
2.
Abutting collector streets and midsection line roads and roads
adjoining rural or residential zoning districts not less than 15
feet.*7
3.
Abutting local streets and interior streets of industrial
subdivisions not less than ten feet.
b. For through lots, a front yard shall be provided along both front lot
lines.
c.
For corner lots the yard along each street side of such corner lot shall
conform with the front yard regulations.*7
2. Side Yard: Where the side of a lot is adjacent to a rural or residential
zoning district, there shall be a side yard having a width of not less than
30 feet, of which a minimum of 10 feet shall be landscaped and
continuously maintained. (See Chapter 9, Section 901., Article 901.3. -
Height Regulations).*7
3. Rear Yard: Where the rear of a lot is adjacent to a rural or residential
zoning district there shall be a rear yard having a depth of not less than
30 feet, of which a minimum of 10 feet shall be landscaped and
continuously maintained. (See Chapter 9, Section 901., Article 901.3. -
Height Regulations).*6
Article 901.5.
Intensity of Use Regulations:
The intensity of use regulations are as follows:*5
1. Lot Area: Each lot shall have a minimum lot area of 35,000 square
feet.*6
1. Lot Width: Each lot shall have a minimum width of 150 feet.*6
1. Lot Coverage: The maximum lot coverage shall be 60% of the lot
area.
1. Volume Ratio: The volume of all structures on a lot shall not exceed
the product of the lot area in square feet multiplied by nine feet.*6
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 9-5
CHAPTER 9 - INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
Article 901.6.
Parking Regulations:
The parking regulations are as provided in Chapter 11, Section 1102. hereof
except as provided herein*4, *6
Article 901.7.
Sign Regulations:
The sign regulations are provided in Chapter 14, Section 1404.
Article 901.8.
Loading and Unloading Regulations:
The loading and unloading regulations are as provided in Chapter 11, Section
1103. hereof except as provided herein.*4, *6
Article 901.9.
Additional Regulations:
The additional regulations are as follows:*5
1. All uses except for parking, loading, unloading and storage shall be
conducted within a completely enclosed building.
1. Any outdoor lighting shall be in conformance with provisions in Chapter
11, Section 1112. hereof. Any outdoor lighting shall be placed so as to
reflect light away from any adjoining rural or residential zoning district.
*2
1. Required yards adjacent to any street shall be landscaped and shall not
be occupied by any use or structure including parking or loading spaces
except for drives and roadways, signs and lighting as permitted in this
Ordinance.*6
1. Site Enclosure and Screening Requirements: Industrial sites and/or uses
shall be enclosed to provide effective site screening from adjoining
properties, uses or streets by the use of walls, berms and landscape
plantings or combinations thereof as follows:*6
a.
Adjacent to any rural or residential zone, automobile parking shall
be screened from view.
a.
A solid masonry, concrete or earthen product wall not less than six
feet in height or approved landscaped berms, landscape screening
or combinations thereof shall be required along and adjacent to any
side or rear property line abutting any rural or residential zone
boundary, or any alley abutting such zone boundary. Further, any
access gates shall be constructed of view-obscuring materials to
provide effective site screening. Approval of the alternative
screening methods listed above shall be by the Board of Supervisors
upon recommendation of the Commission.*6
a.
The perimeter of any portion of a site not adjacent to a rural or
residential zoning boundary upon which any outdoor use of an
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 9-6
CHAPTER 9 - INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
industrial nature is permitted, shall be screened to a height of not
less than six feet in height by building walls, walls or fences of any
view obscuring material, approved landscaped berms, landscape
screening or combinations thereof. No outdoor industrial use or
enclosure thereof shall encroach into any required setback area
adjacent to any street, nor shall any storage products or materials
exceed the height of any such enclosure. Approval of the alternative
screening methods listed above shall be by the Board of Supervisors
upon recommendation of the Commission.*6
a.
Landscape Requirements: Minimum site landscape requirements
are as follows: (Note: The Board of Supervisors or the Planning and
Zoning
Commission
may
include
additional
landscape
requirements.)*6
1.
Any part of a site not used for buildings, parking, driveways,
storage, loading, sidewalks, etc. shall be landscaped and
maintained.
1.
Not less than 2% of all vehicle storage or parking areas, nor less
than 8% of the total net lot area, shall be landscaped and
continuously maintained in a healthy condition. The landscaped
area within the storage and parking areas shall not be included
in the calculation for the minimum 8% landscaping requirement
for the total net lot area.
1.
Landscaped areas shall include an approved mixture of drought
tolerant or other plant materials, and organic and non-organic
ground cover materials. The approval of the above mixture of
landscape materials shall be by the Board of Supervisors upon
recommendation of the Commission.
1.
An automatic irrigation system shall be provided and
maintained to all landscaped areas requiring water.*6
1.
All landscaped areas adjacent to vehicular parking and access
areas shall be protected by six inch vertical concrete curbing in
order to control storm water flows and minimize damage by
vehicular traffic.*6
1. In any multi-phase industrial project, all areas of a parcel which have
been graded or the surface disturbed in any way, and which are not
currently under development shall be revegetated or surfaced to
minimize wind-blown dust by a plan approved by the Department of
Planning and Development.*7
1. All industrial development shall be subject to a plan of development
approval as set forth in the provisions of this Ordinance.*12
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 9-7
CHAPTER 9 - INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
1. For industrial uses, which were developed prior to October 15, 1984, an
as-built plan which requires a zoning clearance may serve as the plan of
development. When the owner or authorized agent wants to make a
change to the property, this as-built plan indicating the changes may be
submitted. The zoning inspector may approve changes as long as any
expansion is part of the existing land use, does not conflict with existing
codes, does not exceed one hundred percent of the area of the original
development, and does not adversely impact the surrounding areas or
drainage conditions. These changes may include, but are hot limited to
parking covers, interior remodeling, additions to the buildings or new
buildings.*8DELETED WITH TA2007016 EFFECTIVE 9-19-08
Article 901.10.
DELETED WITH TA2007016 EFFECTIVE 9-22-08
Article 901.11.
DELETED WITH TA2007016 EFFECTIVE 9-22-08
Date of Revisions
*1
Revised 4-9-79
*10
Effective 11-19-99
*2
Revised 4-2-84
*11
Effective 07-7-06 – TA2003005
*3
Revised 10-15-84
*12
Effective 9-22-08 – TA2007016
*4
Revised/Renumbered 10-15-84
*13
Effective 11-19-10 – TA2009014
*5
Renumbered 10-15-84
*14
Effective 3-16-11 – TA2010022
*6
Revised 1-25-88
*15
Effective 7-17-13 – TA2012011
*7
Revised 2-20-94
*16
Effective 1-29-14 – TA2013014
**7
Added 2-20-94
*17
Approved 10-8-14 – TA2014006
*8
Added 5-3-95
*18
Effective 3-11-21 – TA2020002
Section 902. IND-2 (Light Industrial Office Zoning District)*2
Article 902.1.
Purpose:
The principal purpose of this zoning district is to provide for light industrial
uses in locations which are suitable and appropriate taking into consideration
the land uses on adjacent or nearby properties, access to a major street or
highway, rail service or other means of transportation, and the availability of
public utilities while encouraging sustainable development practices.
Principal uses permitted in this zoning district include the manufacture,
compounding, processing, packaging or treatment of materials which do not
cause or produce objectionable effects that would impose hazard to adjacent
or other properties by reason of smoke, soot, dust, radiation, odor, noise,
vibration, heat, glare, toxic fumes, or other conditions that would affect
adversely the public health, safety and general welfare. *8, *12
Article 902.2.
Use Regulations:
A building or premise shall be used only for the following purposes:*5,*15
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 9-8
CHAPTER 9 - INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
1. Any use permitted in the IND-1 Zoning District, including a Medical
Marijuana Dispensary and/or Marijuana Establishment and/or a Medical
Marijuana Offsite Cultivation Location subject to all the regulations
specified in the use regulations for such IND-1 Zoning District unless the
use is otherwise regulated in this Section.*1, *8, *14, *15 *16
1. Airports, runways/airstrips, helipads/heliports, and facilities for
unmanned aerial vehicles.*15
1. Aircraft firms including sales, service and rental.
1. Bakeries, wholesale.
1. Bottling plants or breweries.
1. Cleaning plants, including carpets and dyeing.
1. Construction equipment, including sales, service, rental and storage.
1. Dairy products, processing of.
1. Experimental and proving grounds.*15
1. Farms as defined in Chapter 2.
1. Laboratories, experimental, photo or motion picture, research or testing,
and Marijuana Testing Facilities. *16
1. Manufacturing, compounding, assembling, processing, packaging or
treatment of products such as candy, drugs, perfumes, pharmaceuticals,
perfumed toilet soaps, toiletries, but not including the refining or
rendering of fats and oils.
1. Manufacturing, compounding, assembling or treatment of articles or
merchandise from the following previously prepared materials: bone,
cellophane, canvas, cloth, cork, feathers, felt, fiber, fur, glass, hair,
leather, paper, plastics, precious or semi-precious metals or stones, light
sheet metal, shell, textiles, tobacco, wire, yarns, wood not involving
planing mills, and paint not employing a boiling process.
1. Manufacturing or assembly of electrical appliances, electronic
instruments and devices, optical goods, precision instruments, radios
and phonographs, including the manufacture of small parts only, such as
coils, condensers, transformers and crystal holders.
1. Manufacture of pottery and figurines or other similar ceramic products
using only previously pulverized clay.
1. Packing houses, fruit or vegetable not including processing.
1. Public utility treatment and generating plants including sewage,
wastewater, water, power, electrical, nuclear and solar, and including
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 9-9
CHAPTER 9 - INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
ancillary offices. Attendant facilities and appurtenances to the above
uses as well as uses associated with service to the public of water, gas,
telephone and cable television. Where an electrical generating plant is in
operation, evaporation ponds and other appurtenances may be
permitted provided such evaporation ponds or appurtenances are
associated within the facility being served.*15
1. Training centers, industrial.
1. Truck terminals, including service and storage.
1. Warehousing, storage and wholesale distribution facilities.
1. Any other office, laboratory, manufacturing and assembly uses similar to
those uses enumerated herein which do not create any danger to the
public health, safety and general welfare in surrounding areas and which
do not create any offensive noise, vibration, smoke, dust, odor, heat or
glare, and which by reason of high value in relation to size and weight of
merchandise received and shipped create very little truck traffic.
1. Accessory buildings and uses customarily incidental to the above uses.
Renewable energy systems are not permitted as a primary use but may
be permitted as an accessory use as set forth in Section 1206 of this
Ordinance. Where renewable energy systems involve the generation or
striate of electricity, only grid-connected or off-grid systems are
permitted.*8, *12
Article 902.3.
Height Regulations:
The height of buildings shall not exceed 40 feet, except that the height of any
building or structure closer than 40 feet to any rural or residential zone
boundary shall not exceed the distance from said building or structure to the
zone boundary except that no building need be less than ten feet in height.
Streets or alleys may be included in calculating distance.*13
Article 902.4.
Yard Regulations:
Yard regulations are as follows:
1. Front Yard:
a.
All properties abutting a public street shall have an open setback
area extending for the full width of the property. This setback shall
be parallel to the centerline of the street and shall be measured
from the setback line or the ultimate right-of-way line of a local
street, and shall be of a depth as indicated below:
1.
Abutting any major street, section line road, State or Federal
highway not less than 20 feet.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 9-10
CHAPTER 9 - INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
2.
Abutting collector streets and midsection line roads not less
than 15 feet.
3.
Abutting local streets and interior streets of industrial
subdivision not less than ten feet.
b. Where the frontage between two intersecting streets is located
partly in the IND-2 Zoning District and partly in a rural, residential or
commercial zoning district, there shall be a front yard equal to the
front yard required in the adjoining rural, residential or commercial
zoning district, but such yard need not exceed 25 feet in depth.
2. Side Yard: None required (see Chapter 9, Section 902., Article 902.3. -
Height Regulations) except that:
a.
Where a lot is adjacent to a rural or residential zoning district, there
shall be a side yard on the side of the lot adjacent to such rural or
residential zoning district having a width of not less than five feet.
b. Where a corner lot abuts a rural or residential zoning district,
whether or not separated by an alley, there shall be a side yard on
the street side of such corner lot having a width of not less than ten
feet.
c.
If a side yard is otherwise provided it shall have a width of not less
than three feet.
3. Rear Yard: None required (see Chapter 9, Section 902., Article
902.3. - Height Regulations) except that where a lot abuts a rural or
residential zoning district whether or not separated by an alley, there
shall be a rear yard having a depth of not less than 25 feet.
Article 902.5.
Intensity of Use Regulations:
1. Lot Area: Each lot shall have a minimum area of 6,000 square feet.
1. Lot Width: Each lot shall have a minimum width of 60 feet.
1. Lot Coverage: The maximum lot coverage shall be 60% of the lot area.
Article 902.6.
Parking Regulations:
The parking regulations are as provided in Chapter 11, Section 1102.*12
Article 902.7.
Sign Regulations:
The sign regulations are provided in Chapter 14, Section 1404.*12
Article 902.8.
Loading and Unloading Regulations:
The loading and unloading regulations are as provided in Chapter 11, Section
1103.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 9-11
CHAPTER 9 - INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
Article 902.9.
Additional Regulations:
The additional regulations are as follows:
1. All uses except for parking, loading, unloading or storage shall be
conducted within a completely enclosed building.
1. Any outdoor lighting shall be in conformance with provisions in Chapter
11, Section 1112. Any outdoor lighting shall be placed so as to reflect
light away from any adjoining rural or residential zoning district. *4, *12
1. Site Enclosure and Screening Requirements: Industrial sites and/or uses
shall be enclosed to provide effective site screening from adjoining
properties, uses or streets as follows:
a.
Adjacent to any rural or residential zone automobile parking shall be
screened from view.
a.
A solid masonry wall not less than six feet in height shall be required
along and adjacent to any side or rear property line abutting any
rural or residential zone boundary, or any alley abutting such zone
boundary. Further, any access gates shall be constructed of view-
obscuring material to provide effective site screening.
a.
The perimeter of any portion of a site not adjacent to a rural or
residential zone boundary upon which any outdoor use of an
industrial nature is permitted shall be enclosed to a height of not
less than six feet by building walls, walls or fences of any
view-obscuring material. No outdoor industrial use or enclosure
thereof shall encroach into any required setback area adjacent to
any street, nor shall any storage products or materials exceed the
height of any such enclosure.
1. All uses shall be maintained in such a manner that they are neither
obnoxious nor offensive by reason of emission of odor, dust, smoke, gas,
noise, vibration, electromagnetic disturbance, radiation or other similar
causes detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare.
1. In any multi-phase industrial project, all areas of a parcel which have
been graded or the surface disturbed in any way, and which are not
currently under development shall be revegetated or surfaced to
minimize wind-blown dust by a plan approved by the Department of
Planning and Development. *9
1. All industrial development shall be subject to a plan of development
approval as set forth in the provisions of this Ordinance. *11
1. For industrial uses, which were developed prior to October 15, 1984, an
as-built plan which requires a zoning clearance may serve as the plan of
development. When the owner or authorized agent wants to make a
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 9-12
CHAPTER 9 - INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
change to the property, this as-built plan indicating the changes may be
submitted. The zoning inspector may approve changes as long as any
expansion is part of the existing land use, does not conflict with existing
codes, does not exceed one hundred percent of the area of the original
development, and does not adversely impact the surrounding areas or
drainage conditions. These changes may include, but are hot limited to
parking covers, interior remodeling, additions to the buildings or new
building. *10Landscaping Regulations
Article 902.10.
DELETED WITH TA2007016 EFFECTIVE 9-22-08
Article 902.11.
DELETED WITH TA2007016 EFFECTIVE 9-22-08
Date of Revisions
*1
Revised 3-29-71
*10
Added 5-03-95
*2
Revised 4-09-79
*11
Effective 9-22-08 – TA2007016
*4
Revised 4-02-84
*12
Effective 11-19-10 – TA2009014
*5
Revised 10-15-84
*13
Effective 3-16-11 – TA2010022
**5
Added 10-15-84
*14
Effective 1-29-14 – TA2013014
*8
Revised 5-16-90
*15
Approved 10-08-14 – TA2014006
*9
Added 2-20-94
*16
Effective 3-11-21 – TA2020002
Section 903. IND-3 (Heavy Industrial Zoning District)*2
Article 903.1.
Purpose:
The principal purpose of this zoning district is to provide for heavy industrial
uses in locations which are suitable and appropriate, taking into
consideration land uses on adjacent or nearby properties, access to a major
street or highway, rail service or other means of transportation, and the
availability of public utilities while encouraging sustainable development
practices. Principal uses permitted in this zoning district include the industrial
uses that are not permitted in any other zoning district.*8
Article 903.2.
Use Regulations:
A building or premise shall be used only for uses permitted in the IND-2
Zoning District subject to all the regulations specified in the use regulations
for such IND-2 Zoning District or any industrial use not listed that is not in
conflict with any federal law, state law or any Ordinance of Maricopa County,
and subject to procedural regulations as listed in Chapter 3, Section 306.
Special Uses may be allowed on any lot in this district as authorized in Chapter
13, Section 1301. Renewable energy systems as set forth in Section 1206 of
this Ordinance may be permitted as either a primary or an accessory use.*4,
*8, *10, *11
Article 903.3.
Height Regulations:
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 9-13
CHAPTER 9 - INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
The height of buildings shall not exceed 40 feet, except that the height of any
building or structure closer than 40 feet to any rural or residential zone
boundary shall not exceed the distance from said building or structure to the
zone boundaries, except that no building need be less than ten feet in height.
Streets or alleys may be included in calculating distance.*9
Article 903.4.
Yard Regulations:
1. Front Yard:
a. All properties abutting a public street shall have an open setback area
extending for the full width of the property. This setback shall be
parallel to the centerline of the street and shall be measured from
the setback line or the ultimate right-of-way line of a local street, and
shall be of a depth as indicated below:
1.
Abutting any major street, section line road, State or Federal
highway not less than 20 feet.
1.
Abutting collector streets and midsection line roads not less
than 15 feet.
1.
Abutting local streets and interior streets of industrial
subdivision not less than ten feet.
a. Where the frontage between two intersecting streets is located
partly in the IND-3 Zoning District and partly in a rural, residential or
commercial zoning district, there shall be a front yard equal to the
front yard required in the adjoining rural, residential or commercial
zoning district, but such yard need not exceed 25 feet in depth.
2. Side Yard: None required (see Chapter 9, Section 903., Article 903.3.
Height Regulations), except that:
a.
Where a lot is adjacent to a rural or residential zoning district, there
shall be a side yard on the side of the lot adjacent to such rural or
residential zoning district having a width of not less than five feet.
b. Where a corner lot abuts a rural or residential zoning district
whether or not separated by an alley, there shall be a side yard on
the street side of such corner lot having a width of not less than ten
feet.
c.
If a side yard is otherwise provided it shall have a width of not less
than three feet.
3. Rear Yard: None required (see Chapter 9, Section 903., Article 903.3. -
Height Regulations), except that where a lot abuts a rural or residential
zoning district whether or not separated by an alley, there shall be a rear
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 9-14
CHAPTER 9 - INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
yard having a depth of not less than 25 feet.
Article 903.5.
Intensity of Use Regulations:
1. Lot Area: Each lot shall have a minimum area of 6,000 square feet.
1. Lot Width: Each lot shall have a minimum width of 60 feet.
1. Lot Coverage: The maximum lot coverage shall be 60% of the lot area.
Article 903.6.
Parking Regulations:
The parking regulations are as provided in Chapter 11, Section 1102.*8
Article 903.7.
Sign Regulations:
The sign regulations are provided in Chapter 14, Section 1404.*8
Article 903.8.
Loading and Unloading Regulations:
The loading and unloading regulations are as provided in Chapter 11, Section
1103.
Article 903.9.
Additional Regulations:
The additional regulations are as follows:*1
1. A building or premise other than the residence, or one mobile home of
the family of the operator or caretaker employed on the premise of a
commercial or industrial use shall not be used for dwellings, mobile
home parks, travel trailer parks, mobile home subdivisions and resort
hotels.
1. Any outdoor lighting shall be in conformance with provisions in Chapter
11, Section 1112. hereof. Any outdoor lighting shall be placed so as to
reflect light away from any adjoining rural or residential zoning district.*3
1. Site Enclosure and Screening Requirements: Industrial sites and/or uses
shall be enclosed to provide effective site screening from adjoining
properties, uses or streets as follows:
a.
Adjacent to any rural or residential zone, automobile parking shall
be screened from view.
a.
A solid masonry wall, not less than six feet in height shall be required
along and adjacent to any side or rear property line abutting any
rural or residential zone boundary, or any alley abutting such zone
boundary. Further, any access gates shall be constructed of view-
obscuring material to provide effective site screening.
a.
The perimeter of any portion of a site not adjacent to a rural or
residential zone boundary upon which any outdoor use of any
industrial nature is permitted shall be enclosed to a height of not
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 17, 2025
page 9-15
CHAPTER 9 - INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
less than six feet by building walls, walls or fences of any
view-obscuring material. No outdoor industrial use or enclosure
thereof shall encroach into any required setback area adjacent to
any street, nor shall any storage products or materials exceed the
height of any such enclosure.
1. Signs shall be subject to the same provisions applying to signs when
located in the IND-2 Zoning District.
1. In any multi-phase industrial project, all areas of a parcel which have
been graded or the surface disturbed in any way, and which are not
currently under development shall be revegetated or surfaced to
minimize wind-blown dust by a method or plan approved by the
Department of Planning and Development.*5
1. All industrial development shall be subject to a plan of development
approval as set forth in the provisions of this Ordinance. *7
1. For industrial uses, which were developed prior to October 15, 1984, an
as-built plan which requires a zoning clearance may serve as the plan of
development. When the owner or authorized agent wants to make a
change to the property, this as-built plan indicating the changes may be
submitted. The zoning inspector may approve changes as long as any
expansion is part of the existing land use, does not conflict with existing
codes, does not exceed one hundred percent of the area of the original
development, and does not adversely impact the surrounding areas or
drainage conditions. These changes may include, but are hot limited to
parking covers, interior remodeling, additions to the buildings or new
buildings.*6
Article 903.10.
DELETED WITH TA2007016 EFFECTIVE 9-22-08
Article 903.11.
DELETED WITH TA2007016 EFFECTIVE 9-22-08
Date of Revisions
*1
Revised 3-29-70
*6
Added 5-3-95
*2
Revised 4-09-79
*7
Effective 9-22-08 – TA2007016
*3
Revised 4-2-84
*8
Effective 11-19-10 – TA2009014
*4
Revised 10-15-84
*9
Effective 3-16-11 – TA2010022
**4
Added 10-15-84
*10
Effective 9-30-11 – TA2011001
*5
Added 2-20-94
*11
Effective 1-29-14 – TA2013014
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 10-1
CHAPTER 13 10 – USE REGULATIONS
Chapter 13 Chapter 10 | Use Regulations
Section 1301.Section 1001.
Special Uses
Article 1301.1.Article 1001.1.
Special Uses:*2,*37,*40,*42
The Board of Supervisors may permit authorize as a Special Use any of the
following uses as identified in the Use Table in any zoning district unless
otherwise specified in this Section:
1301.1.1.
Agriculturally oriented operations and facilities such as but not limited to:*3,
*16 *42
1301.1.2.
Cotton gins, but not including the manufacturing or processing of
by-products.
1301.1.3.
Storage, mixing and/or blending, sale and distribution of agricultural
chemicals, but not the manufacturer thereof.
1301.1.4.
Custom meat processing plants including slaughtering, butchering and
temporary storage of products, but not including rendering or refining of
by-products, storage of offal, tanning or storage of hides, wholesale or retail
sales.
1301.1.5.
Storage and maintenance of specialized machinery and equipment used
specifically in agriculture or rural areas.
1301.1.6.
Commercial aquaculture facilities to include breeding and holding lakes and
ponds.
1301.1.7.
Non-agricultural operations of facilities which were established for and which
continue to be operated primarily for agricultural uses. *16
1301.1.8.1001.1.1.
Runways/airstrips, helipads/heliports and other landing areas provided that
the OFZ or RPZ as defined in Chapter 118, Section 1111811, Article
1111811.3. should be located entirely on the same lot or parcel as the runway
or landing strip. In any instance where any portion of the OFZ or RPZ of a
runway or landing strip extends beyond the lot or parcel of property
containing the runway or landing strip, written consent or aviation easements
must be obtained from all property owners in which the OFZ or RPZ may
wholly or partially lie.*26, *42
1301.1.9.
Cemeteries, including pet cemeteries and mausoleums, including accessory
uses such as mortuaries.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 10-2
CHAPTER 13 10 – USE REGULATIONS
1301.1.10.
Development of earth products, clay, coal, gas, gravel, minerals, sand, stone
and topsoil. *42
1301.1.11.
Experimental and proving grounds.
1301.1.12.
Feed lots, commercial.
1301.1.13.
Feed stores.
1301.1.14.1001.1.2.
Group care facilities and hospitals and institutions of an educational,
religious, charitable or philanthropic nature, homes for the aged, nursing
homes, convalescent homes and community residences or recovery
communities that do not meet the requirements of Article 1207907.3 and
other group care facilities including for adjudicated residents. *11, *13, *42, *44
1301.1.15.
Guest ranches, bed and breakfast establishments, resorts.*42
1301.1.16.
Kennels.
1301.1.17.
Land use involving large assemblage of people.*42
1301.1.18.
Plant nurseries, which are herewith defined as establishments where trees,
shrubs, flowers and other plants are grown on or brought to the premises and
maintained there for the purposes of sale from said premises. Such other
additional products shall be permitted to be sold from the premises as are
customarily incidental to the operation of a plant nursery.
1301.1.19.
Recreational open-air facilities, including but not limited to lakes, swimming
pools and tennis courts. (This does not include personal recreation on private
property.)*42
1301.1.20.1001.1.3.
Public riding and boarding stables, subject to the following requirements: *27
1. Buildings housing animals shall be setback from all property lines a
distance of not less than 100 feet.
2.
There shall be no variance or waiver from this requirement except by
unanimous vote of all members of the Board of Supervisors.
1301.1.21.
Commercial storage, or impoundment (not to include salvage operations,
dismantling or sale of parts) of automobiles, motor vehicles, mobile homes,
manufactured homes, travel trailers, recreation vehicles, boats and aircraft
on sites of not less than one acre. *28, *29
1301.1.22.
Primary or accessory commercial television, microwave and radio
transmitter, receiving stations and towers and dishes, including earth
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 10-3
CHAPTER 13 10 – USE REGULATIONS
stations.
1301.1.23.1001.1.4.
Travel trailer or recreation vehicle (RV) parks provided that:**13
1. Each travel trailer or RV space shall have an area of not less than 1,250
square feet and a width of not less than 25 feet. Only one travel trailer
or RV shall be placed on each space.
2. Travel trailers, RVs and accessory structures shall be located to provide
a minimum setback of not less than five feet from all space lines.
Accessory structures shall not be permitted in overnight parks on travel
trailer or RV spaces.
3. The location of mobile homes on travel trailer or RV spaces shall be
prohibited.
4. The minimum distance between a travel trailer or RV and any building in
the same travel trailer park shall be ten feet. The minimum distance
between a RV and any building in the same travel trailer park shall be ten
feet.
5. Each travel trailer or RV space shall set back from lot lines in common
with street lines a distance of not less than 20 feet and from all other lot
lines a distance of not less than ten feet.
6. The front yard and street side yard areas shall be landscaped in
accordance with a landscape and irrigation plan approved by the zoning
inspector. When a fence of less than six feet is proposed, the landscape
plan shall include adequate trees to provide screening of the park.
7. The travel trailer or RV park shall be screened from surrounding lots by
a solid fence or wall of not less than three and one half feet or more than
six feet in height when located in a front yard or street side yard and by
a solid fence or wall six feet in height when located in any other yard.
Screen walls shall be located on the interior edge of the required front
and street side yard areas.
8. The height, yard, and intensity of use regulations of the C-2 Zoning
District shall apply to buildings located in travel trailer or RV parks.
9.8.
Service buildings to house toilet, bathing and other sanitation
facilities and utilities shall be provided as required by the Maricopa
County Health Code. Said facilities, if required, shall be completed prior
to use of the park.
10.9.
Minimum distances or setbacks required herein shall be the
shortest of horizontal dimensions measured from the nearest portion of
the sidewall of a travel trailer or RV including pullouts, tip-outs, or
portable affixed awnings.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 10-4
CHAPTER 13 10 – USE REGULATIONS
11.10.
Destination park/spaces shall require the issuance of a building
permit prior to the use of the park/space by a travel trailer or RV.
1301.1.24.1001.1.5.
Home occupations, cottage industry that do not meet the conditions of
Article 501.2.10603.9 in Rural Zoning Districts or that do not meet the
conditions of Article 601.2.8 in Single-Family Zoning Districts provided the
entrepreneur shall reside in the dwelling on the property in which the
business operates. *8, *42, *43
1. The recommendation of the Commission may consist of additional
reasonable requirements including but not limited to the following:
A. The number of non-resident employees, clients, customers or
students visiting the site.
B. The hours of operation.
C. Deliveries to the site.
D. The types of materials used in the business.
E. The types and amounts of materials, products and services sold by
the business.
F.
The types and amounts of materials manufactured by the business.
G. The types, amounts and locations of materials stored for use by the
business.
H. The types and sizes of vehicles used in the business.
I.
Parking requirements.
J.
Screening.
K. Landscaping.
L.
Signs.
M. Paved access.
N. Lighting.
1301.1.25.1001.1.6.
Wireless Communication facilities or structures or towers which exceed the
development standards specified in Chapter 129, Section 1202902. of this
Ordinance.*10, *42
1301.1.26.1001.1.7.
Farm animals (horses, cattle and other farm animals) medical clinics and
surgical referral hospitals, subject to the following standards:*20, *42
1. Animals shall not be boarded or lodged except for short periods of
observation incidental to care or treatment.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 10-5
CHAPTER 13 10 – USE REGULATIONS
2.
Any building or corral for the keeping of animals shall maintain a
minimum setback of 40 feet from any property line.
3. All refuse and animal wastes shall be stored within an enclosed building
or within odor-proof closed containers.
1301.1.27.1001.1.8.
Billboard(s) subject to the following*44
1. The billboard(s) is a lawfully existing structure made legal-
nonconforming as of December 15, 2021 with regard to the
requirements of Chapter 14 11 of this Ordinance.
A. The billboard is located in a C-2, C-3, IND-2 or IND-3 zoning district.
B. The billboard may be modified or converted to digital display with
a Special Use Permit.
C. If illuminated the billboard shall be digital or lighting shall be
mounted at the top of the sign face so that it is directed downward
and shielded so that it is only illuminating the sign face in
conformance with Article 1112812.3.2.
D. The Special Use Permit may be approved without an expiration
date or validity period.
2. For billboards subject to governmental action;
A. the static or digital billboard is relocated from a parcel of property,
located within the perimeter boundary of Maricopa County or
within the corporate boundary of a city or town located partially
within Maricopa County and partially within an adjacent county,
that is acquired by a public entity for public use by condemnation,
purchase or dedication.
i.
The static or digital billboard must be removed due to that
governmental action.
ii.
The public entity has not paid just compensation for the static
or digital billboard.
iii.
The standards of the C-2 Zoning District shall apply, except that
the billboard shall be permitted to remain the same size and
height as the original billboard to be relocated.
iv.
No further variance to the C-2 standards may be granted by
either the Board of Supervisors or the Board of Adjustment.
v.
Billboards may not locate in residential zoning districts;
however, they may locate in rural zoning districts.
1301.1.28.
Outdoor storage including wholesale and retail sales of landscape materials,
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 10-6
CHAPTER 13 10 – USE REGULATIONS
storage rental yards, construction yards and similar, interim industrial uses
for a period not exceeding ten years.*29, *30, *32, *42
1301.1.29.
Privately owned or operated stations for fire protection, police or security
service, ambulance, or other emergency service providers.*39
1301.1.30.1001.1.9.
Recovery communities in the R-3 and R-4 districts proposed to be located at
least 1,200 linear feet from the closest recovery community or community
residence and licensed by State of Arizona or certified by the Arizona
Recovery Housing Association when all of the following standards are met. A
reasonable accommodation may be issued to locate within 1,200 linear feet
of the closest recovery community or community residence under Article
1207907.3.7.1.a.*44
1. The proposed recovery community will not interfere with the
normalization and community integration of the residents of any existing
community residence or recovery community and that the presence of
other community residences and/or recovery communities will not
interfere with the normalization and community integration of the
residents of the proposed recovery community; and
2. The proposed recovery community, alone or in combination with any
existing community residences, recovery communities, or congregate
living facilities will not alter the residential character of the surrounding
neighborhood by creating an institutional atmosphere or by creating or
intensifying a de facto social service district by clustering community
residences, recovery communities, or congregate living facilities on a
block or concentrating them in a neighborhood; and
3. The proposed recovery community will be compatible with the
residential uses allowed as of right in the zoning district; and
4. The proposed recovery community, alone or in combination with any
existing community residences and/or recovery communities will not
alter the residential stability of the surrounding neighborhood.
1001.1.10.
Special Event Venues (indoor/outdoor uses):
1. Special event venues subject to the following standards:
A. The subject property shall be greater than 3 acres in size.
B. The subject property shall provide at least 0.5 paved parking spacess
per 1 attendees permitted.
C. All event parking shall occur on-site.
D. No more than one event shall occur each weekend with the choice
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 10-7
CHAPTER 13 10 – USE REGULATIONS
of Friday, Saturday or Sunday for the event.
E. If allowed by the Board of Supervisors, no amplified music shall be
permitted outdoors past 10:00 p.m.
F.
No amplified music shall be permitted during weekday events.
G. Maricopa County Code Enforcement staff shall be granted access to
the entirety of the property through the duration of the event to
investigate complaints received.
H. Maricopa County Environmental Services staff shall be granted
access to inspect food and beverage service at any point during
operating hours.
I.
Traffic direction shall be provided by one or more off-duty officers.
J.
Fire and medical vehicles shall have adequate access to property
frontage and to event attendees. Within the required narrative of
the Special Use Permit, an applicant shall, in detail, specify how
evacuation procedures will occur in emergencies.
K. All catering and/or food and beverage service vehicles shall locate
on-site during the duration of the event and cease service upon the
cessation of an event.
L.
Catering and/or food and beverage service vehicles shall not serve
off-site patrons.
2.
The Board of Supervisors may:
A. Establish hours of operation and the number of events permitted
annually;
B. Establish which day and the number of days during the week an
event may be held, except that only one event shall be permitted
to occur on a weekend day;
C. Allow amplified music until 10:00 p.m. on weekends;
D. Require the hiring of additional off-duty officers to address safety
and traffic issues;
E. Approve and set limits on the number of catering and/or food and
beverage service vehicles present on-site;
F.
Limit setup and teardown hours; and,
G. Set other conditions which the Board deems necessary to promote
the general health and welfare of the community.
Article 1301.2.Article 1001.2.
Submittals:
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 10-8
CHAPTER 13 10 – USE REGULATIONS
Article 1301.3. Before permitting any of the above uses, precise plans
together with a supporting statement or narrative as to the proposed
use of the buildings, structures and premises, shall be submitted to
the Board of Supervisors. These plans and a supporting statement or
narrative shall be referred to the Commission for its review, report,
and recommendation and for public hearing. No application shall be
scheduled for hearing by any board or commission acting pursuant to
the “Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance (MCZO)”, or administratively
approved unless and until all fees and fines owed to the Department
as a result of any activity or inactivity attributable to the property that
is the subject of the application are brought current and paid in full or
any amounts owed pursuant to an agreement of compliance are
current, as the case me may be. This requirement shall not be waived
by the boardBoard/commissionCommission. Notice and procedure for
public hearing shall conform to the procedures prescribed in Chapter
3,
Section
304301.
thereof.*33,
*34REPORT
TO
BOARD
OF
SUPERVISORS:
The Commission having held public hearing shall then present its report and
recommendation and the plans, together with the supporting statement to
the Board of Supervisors for consideration and public hearing. Notice and
procedure for public hearing shall conform to the procedures prescribed in
Chapter 3, Section 304. thereof.
Article 1301.4. RECOMMENDATION:
The recommendation of the Commission shall include its reasons for approval
or disapproval of such plans and a supporting statement, and if
recommended for approval, specific evidence and facts showing that the
public health, safety and general welfare will not be adversely affected, that
ample off-street parking facilities will be provided and that necessary
safeguards will be provided for the protection of adjacent property or the
permitted uses thereof.
Article 1301.5.Article 1001.3.
Variations Of Standards And Requirements:
The recommendation of the Commission may include variations of the
standards and requirements of the underlying zoning district. including, but
not limited to the following:**13.
1301.5.1.
Yards and open spaces.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 10-9
CHAPTER 13 10 – USE REGULATIONS
1301.5.2.
Fences and walls, or other screening.
1301.5.3.
Parking areas, street improvements, including provision of service roads or
alleys when practical and necessary, except for paving requirements unless it
can be shown that the paving alternative will comply with the Maricopa
Association of Government's Particulate Plan for PM-10 by reducing
particulate pollution.
1301.5.4.
Regulation of points of vehicular ingress and egress.
1301.5.5.
Regulation of signs.
1301.5.6.
Landscaping and maintenance thereof.
1301.5.7.
Maintenance of grounds.
1301.5.8.
Control of noise, vibration, odor and other potentially dangerous or
objectionable elements.
1301.5.9.
Time limits may be imposed for the commencement of construction and/or
review and further action by the Commission; and/or a time limit within
which the Special Use shall cease to exist.
Article 1301.6.Article 1001.4.
Nonconforming Use:
Any use that the Board of Supervisors may has permit authorized as a Special
Use, existing at the time this Ordinance or amendments thereto become
effective, shall be considered a nonconforming use unless such use has been
established as a Special Use as herein provided.
Article 1301.7.Article 1001.5.
Amendments:
Major Amendments shall be processed in the same manner as the initial plans
and supporting statement of proposed use. per 303.9.6. Minor Amendments
shall be processed in the same manner as proscribed in MCZO 3043.9.785.
Date of Revisions
*2
Revised 11-8-82
*17 Effective 5-9-97
*33
Effective
6-1-09
-
TA2009003
*3
Revised 8-15-83
*19 Effective 1-17-98
*34
Effective
6-1-10
-
TA2010003
*5
Revised 1-7-85
*20 Effective 1-17-98
*35
Effective
11-3-10
–
TA2010013
*7
Added 4-7-86;Effective 1-
1-88
*22 Effective 5-7-99
*36
Effective
12-28-10
–
TA2010017
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 10-10
CHAPTER 13 10 – USE REGULATIONS
*8
Added 9-12-90
*25 Deleted 11-19-99
*37
Effective
9-30-11
–
TA2011001
*10
Added 4-5-92
*26 Effective 9-7-01
*38
Effective
1-11-12
–
TA2010012
*11
Added 4-15-93
*24 Effective 11-19-99
*39
Effective
1-11-12
–
TA2007018
*13
Revised 2-20-94
*27 Effective
11-19-04
–
TA2003004
*40
Effective
1-29-14
–
TA2013014
**13 Added 2-20-94
*28 Effective
02-4-05
–
TA2004004
*41
Approved
10-8-14
–
TA2014005
*14
Added 5-6-94
*29 Effective
09-15-06
–
TA2006003
*42
Approved
10-8-14
–
TA2014006
*15
Added 7-23-94
*30 Effective
01-19-07
–
TA2003002
*43
Effective
5-26-17
–
TA2016007
*16
Added 2-5-95
*31 Effective
01-19-07
–
TA2006011
Superseded
byTA2014006 – Approved
10-8-14
*44
Effective
3-11-21
–
TA2020001
*44
Effective
12-15-21
–
TA2018001
*32 Effective
11-14-08
–
TA2008005
Section 1302.Section 1002.
Temporary Uses**1
The uses, buildings and structures permitted in this Section shall be established and maintained
so as to provide minimum interference with the use and enjoyment of neighboring uses, buildings
and structures and to ensure public health, safety and convenience. Temporary uses shall be
permitted in any zoning district but only as authorized within this Section.*8, *9
Article 1302.1.Article 1002.1.
Purpose:
1302.1.1.1002.1.1.
The provisions of this article are based on the recognition of buildings,
structures and uses which, because of their unique characteristics:
1. Should not be permitted on a permanent or long-term basis but which
may be either necessary or desirable for a limited period of time;
provided, however, a temporary use may be approved, even where such
use may be appropriate on a permanent or long-term basis, where the
purpose of the temporary use permit is to allow an applicant to satisfy a
plan of compliance entered into with the County to remedy a violation
of this Ordinance, or*7
2. Requires careful regulation especially regarding location, duration of use
and operation.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 10-11
CHAPTER 13 10 – USE REGULATIONS
Article 1302.2.Article 1002.2.
Temporary Uses:
Temporary Uses shall be limited to the following:*2
TUP – Temporary Use Permit, SC – Senior Citizen Overlay, and/or * additional information
Temporary
Uses
Rural Zoning
Single Family
Zoning
Multi-Family
Zoning R-2, R-3, R-4
R-5
C-O
C-S
C-1, C-2 and C-3
Industrial Zoning
Additional
Information
Temporary
Housing
TUP
TUP
TUP
TUP
TUP TUP * Article
1002.2.1
Temporary
Event
TUP
TUP
TUP
TUP
TUP TUP TUP TUP * Article
1002.2.2
Underage
Occupancy
TUP/SC
Only
TUP/SC
Only
TUP/SC
Only
TUP/SC
Only
* Article
1002.2.3
Caretaker(s)
Quarter
TUP
TUP
TUP
TUP
TUP TUP * Article
1002.2.4
Temporary
Seasonal
Sales
TUP
TUP
TUP TUP TUP * Article
1002.2.5
Temporary
Model
Home Sales
Complex
TUP
TUP
TUP
TUP
TUP TUP * Article
1002.2.6
Temporary
Construction
Office/Yard
Complex
TUP
TUP
TUP
TUP
TUP TUP TUP TUP * Article
1002.2.7
Emergency
Housing
TUP
TUP
TUP
TUP
TUP TUP TUP TUP * Article
1002.2.8
Other Uses
TUP
TUP
TUP
TUP
TUP TUP TUP TUP * Article
1002.2.9
1302.2.1.1002.2.1.
Temporary Housing: Temporary housing on the same lot of a permanent
dwelling or use shall be authorized only in the following situations: The owner
of the property is (re)constructing his own permanent dwelling on the
property. This use shall be limited to a maximum time period of years
provided that the building permit for the permanent dwelling remains active.
1302.2.2.1002.2.2.
Temporary Event: Temporary events such as, but not limited to, circuses,
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 10-12
CHAPTER 13 10 – USE REGULATIONS
carnivals, concerts, revivals, horse shows, rodeos, sales promotion events,
and charity events. Any such event shall last no longer than a total of 30 days
within a six-month period. No continuations shall be approved. An applicant
may be required to obtain a local special event permit from a city/town or
MCDOT special event permit for use of right-of-way in addition to such a
temporary event permit. Any application submitted for such a use shall
address the issues and satisfy the requirements as outlined below: *3
1. Site plans – ten (10) copies drawn to scale indicating all activities and facilities
proposed as part of the temporary event use. If the proposed temporary
event is proposed to use a portion of an existing facility or use, an additional
plan showing the entire facility or use as well as the location of the temporary
use is required.
1302.2.3.
Authorization to use the site – a signed copy of the lease or other agreement
which is being used by the owner to allocate the space and time frame of the
temporary event is required.
1302.2.4.
Narrative report – ten (10) copies of a narrative report which addresses the
following items is required:
1302.2.5.
Police protection/traffic control.
1302.2.6.
Water facilities.
1302.2.7.
Food concessions. Quality and quantity of food and location of concessions
must be approved by the Maricopa County Environmental Services
Department (MCESD) prior to issuance of any use permit.
1302.2.8.
Sanitation facilities. All sanitation facilities must be approved by the Maricopa
County Environmental Services Department prior to issuance of any use
permit.
1302.2.9.
Medical facilities and fire protection.
1302.2.10.
Parking areas – identify amount and location of parking for attendees of the
temporary event. Parking shall be required to meet minimum requirements
as outlined in Section 1102 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance
(MCZO). Adequate dust control shall be provided as per Maricopa County
Department of Transportation (MCDOT) and Maricopa County Environmental
Services Department (MCESD) requirements.
1302.2.11.
Access, traffic and parking control – identify ingress/egress for temporary
event.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 10-13
CHAPTER 13 10 – USE REGULATIONS
1302.2.12.
Hours of operation – identify duration of the proposed temporary event
(dates and hours of operation).
1302.2.13.
Illumination – state if proposed and identify how it is to be provided. All
outdoor lighting must comply with Section 1112 of the MCZO.
1302.2.14.
Overnight camping facilities – all overnight camping facilities shall be
reviewed and approved by the MCESD prior to issuance of any use permit.
1302.2.15.
Other – identify the anticipated number of attendees; include any other
information which staff deems necessary.
2. Structures erected pursuant to an approved Temporary Use Permit shall not
require a building permit if standing for a period not to exceed 96 consecutive
hours. The responsible party shall provide documentation, as specified in the
Temporary Use Permit, that said structures were erected and maintained
subject to all applicable building safety codes and manufacturer’s
specifications. The documentation shall be provided to the Department
within two working days following end of the special event to be filed with
the Temporary Use Permit. Failure to provide the required documents will
render the Temporary Use Permit null and void and constitute a zoning
violation in accordance with Chapter 15 of this Ordinance. *6
1302.2.16.1002.2.3.
Underage Occupancy: Temporary occupancy, by reason of exceptional or
unusual family situation, of a dwelling unit located in the Senior Citizen
Overlay Zoning District (Chapter 107, Section 1006703.) by persons not in
conformance with the age limitations of Chapter 107, Section 1006703. This
use shall be limited to a maximum time period of two years. This use shall
only be permitted upon issuance of a Temporary Use Permit. The
requirement to obtain a Temporary Use Permit for this use shall not apply to
any resident who is a qualified individual with disabilities per the definition of
disability in Chapter 2.
1302.2.17.
Nonresidential Use of Mobile Home: Nonresidential use of a mobile home
shall be limited to a maximum time period of six years. In rural and residential
districts only permitted nonresidential uses as identified in each zoning
district may apply for this type of temporary use. This use shall only be
permitted upon issuance of a Temporary Use Permit. Mobile homes intended
for nonresidential use shall include mobile homes used for quarters of on-
duty personnel in connection with publicly or privately owned or operated
fire stations or mobile homes used for the residence of a security guard in
commercial and industrial zoning districts.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 10-14
CHAPTER 13 10 – USE REGULATIONS
1302.2.18.1002.2.4.
Caretaker(s) Quarters: An additional detached accessory dwelling unit for
caretaker(s) may be permitted, provided that all of the following conditions
are met:*3
1. The additional dwelling unit may be a manufactured house, mobile home
or a recreational vehicle. It may not be a site built (permanent) structure.
2. The justification for the caretaker shall not be merely those activities
associated with the normal responsibilities of a resident to maintain his
property, including the care of a limited number of farm animals. An
unusual condition(s) must exist which requires the on-site residency of a
caretaker to perform the duties identified. Said condition(s) shall be
identified as part of the Temporary Use Permit application. An unusual
condition(s) may consist of:
A. Documented extended absences from the property by the
occupant(s) of the principal residence.
B. Medical condition(s), when documented by a notarized statement
from a physician. In the case of a medical caretaker, the caretaker or
the recipient of the care may live in either the principal residence or
the additional permitted residence (caretaker’s quarters).
C. Other similar conditions as determined by the zoning inspector.
3. Only one additional dwelling unit shall be permitted on any property by
approval of a Temporary Use Permit.
1302.2.19.1002.2.5.
Temporary Seasonal Sales: Temporary seasonal sales operations provided
that the following conditions are met:*3
1. Any such use shall be limited to 30 days and shall not be renewed.
Temporary use permits for this type of use shall be permitted not more
than four times during any calendar year.
2. The site shall be cleared of all indications that such a use occurred within
ten days of the termination of the Temporary Use Permit.
3. The parking requirements of Chapter 118, Section 1102 802 shall not
apply to this use. However, approved access and adequate safe parking
shall be required as a condition of approval.
1302.2.20.
An annual status report is not required.
1302.2.21.1002.2.6.
Temporary Model Home Sales Complex: A model home sales complex that
does not meet the requirements outlined in Article 501.2.17601.*3
1302.2.22.1002.2.7.
Temporary
Construction
Office/Yard
Complex:
Temporary
off-site
construction yard and construction office complex that does not meet the
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 10-15
CHAPTER 13 10 – USE REGULATIONS
requirements outlined in Article 501.2.17603.8.*3
1002.2.8.
OTHER USESEmergency Housing: Other uses not listed here Emergency
housing for parcels affected by fire, explosion, act of God, or act of the public
enemy, as determined by the zoning inspector on a case-by-case basis., which
may be appropriate as temporary uses as outlined in Article 1302.2.
Temporary Use Permits for these uses shall be processed in accordance with
Article 1302.3.*3
1302.2.23.1002.2.9.
Other Uses: Other uses not listed here, as determined by the zoning
inspector, which may be appropriate as temporary uses as outlined in Article
131002.2. Temporary Use Permits for these uses shall be processed in
accordance with Article 131002.3.
Article 1302.3.Article 1002.3.
Temporary Use Permit Regulations:
All Temporary Use Permits shall be subject to the following regulations:
1302.3.1.1002.3.1.
Application Requirements:
1. Regulations identified for the zoning district in which the proposed
Temporary Use is located shall apply. Any such regulation may be varied
by the Board of Adjustment.
2. Application procedures and informational requirements for a Temporary
Use Permit and its renewal shall be established by the zoning inspector.
The application shall provide all information needed by the Board of
AdjustmentPlanning and Zoning Commission, should a written letter of
opposition be filed.
3. Upon acceptance of a complete application for a new Temporary Use
Permit, the subject property shall be posted with a "Notice of Application"
for a ten-day period. If a written letter of opposition is received within
the ten-day posting period, the request for a Temporary Use Permit shall
be placed on the Agenda of the first available Board of
AdjustmentPlanning and Zoning Commission Hearing for Resolution and
noticed in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 303301., Article
303.6301.4.2. If no written letter of opposition is received within the
posting period, then a Temporary Use Permit may be approved by the
zoning inspector.*3
1302.3.2.1002.3.2.
Approval of Temporary Use Permit: A Temporary Use Permit shall only be
approved provided that:
1. The proposed use does not create adverse impacts on surrounding
property or residents. The zoning inspector or the Board of
AdjustmentPlanning and Zoning Commission may only approve such a
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 10-16
CHAPTER 13 10 – USE REGULATIONS
proposed use by stipulating additional requirements, provided that said
stipulations substantially reduce all adverse impacts on surrounding
property or residents.
2. The Temporary Use Permit shall be approved for a period of time not
exceeding the authorized limits in Chapter 1310, Section 13021002,
Article 13021002.2. The time period for a Temporary Use Permit shall
commence upon issuance of a Building Permit, its renewal date, or upon
determination of the Board of AdjustmentPlanning and Zoning
Commission or zoning inspector.
3. In a rental lease situation, the Temporary Use Permit shall be approved
for a time period not exceeding the duration of the lease, excluding
options.
4. The permit for the Primary Use has been issued for any Temporary Use
Permit requested under Chapter 1310, Section 13021002, Article
13021002.2.1.
5. Upon approval, a Temporary Use Permit shall be issued to the applicant.
This permit shall indicate the nature of the use approved, its expiration
date, and must be on visible display by the applicant on the property.
Failure to meet this display requirement shall result in revocation of the
Temporary Use Permit if issued a Zoning Citation.
6. No application shall be scheduled for hearing by acting pursuant to the
“Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance (MCZO)”, or administratively
approved unless and until all fees and fines owed to the Department as a
result of any activity or inactivity attributable to the property that is the
subject of the application are brought current and paid in full or any
amounts owed pursuant to an agreement of compliance are current, as
the case me may be. This requirement shall not be waived by the
board/commission. *4, *5
1302.3.3.1002.3.3.
Extension of Temporary Use Permit: The duration of a Temporary Use Permit
shall only be extended by the Board of AdjustmentPlanning and Zoning
Commission. Upon application, the Board Commission may grant a one-time
only extension of the duration of any Temporary Use Permit for up to two
years (except a temporary event or seasonal sales), provided that all other
requirements for the Temporary Use Permit must be met and the applicant
presents justification to the Board Commission of unusual or exceptional
circumstances not of the applicant's own creation. Further, any such request
for extension must be applied for prior to expiration of the current Temporary
Use Permit.
1302.3.4.1002.3.4.
Denial, Termination, or Expiration of Temporary Use Permit: Denial,
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 10-17
CHAPTER 13 10 – USE REGULATIONS
termination or expiration of a Temporary Use Permit shall occur as follows:
1. Denial of a Temporary Use Permit by the zoning inspector, for a reason
other than the Temporary Use Permit has or will exceed its authorized
time frame (Chapter 1310, Section 13021002, Article 13021002.2.) may
be appealed to the Board of AdjustmentPlanning and Zoning Commission
upon submittal of an appropriate application and must be filed within ten
days of any such decision by the zoning inspector. Any appeal by the
applicant shall be placed on the Agenda of the first available Board of
AdjustmentPlanning and Zoning Commission Hearing for Resolution and
noticed in accordance with the Board's Commission’s procedures for
Temporary Use Permits.
2. Any Temporary Use Permit remains in effect only as long as those
conditions regarding the use of the property and control of the use (lease
or ownership) remain as originally approved.
3. Upon denial, expiration, or termination of a Temporary Use Permit, the
Temporary Use shall cease. Furthermore, any temporary or mobile
structures shall be removed within ten days of said expiration or
termination and any required physical alterations to principal or
accessory buildings or structures should be issued permits within ten days
and shall be completed and finalized within 30 days of said expiration.
Article 1302.4.
LOCATION OF TEMPORARY USES
Temporary Uses shall be permitted in zoning districts as follows:
TEMPORARY USES:
PERMITTED ZONING DISTRICTS:
1302.4.1.
Temporary Housing
All Rural Zones
1302.4.2.
Temporary Event
All Rural and Residential Zones,
C-S, C-2, C-3
1302.4.3.
Underage Occupancy
SC Overlay Zone
1302.4.4.
Non-residential Use of
All Zones
a Mobile Home
1302.4.5
Caretaker’s Quarters
All Rural Zones
1302.4.6
Temporary Seasonal Sales
All Rural Zones, C-S, C-1, C-2, C-3Date of
Revisions
**1
Added 2-20-94
*6
Effective 8-22-2012 – TA2012020
*2
Revised 5-06-94
*7
Effective 5-23-2014 – TA2013007
*3
Effective 7-7-06 – TA2003005
*8
Approved 10-8-14 – TA2014006
*4
Effective 6-1-2009 – TA2009003
*9
Effective 7-10-2015 – TA2015003
*5
Effective 6-1-2010 – TA2010003
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 10-18
CHAPTER 13 10 – USE REGULATIONS
Section 1303.
CONDITIONAL USE*1
Article 1303.1.
PURPOSE:
There are certain uses that may be permitted in zoning districts subject to conditions.
Article 1303.2.
CONDITIONAL USES:
Conditional Uses shall be limited to the following:
1303.2.1.
1303.2.1.
Deleted per TA2019001 – effective date 11/6/2020 *2
1303.2.2.
1303.2.2
Uses listed as a Conditional Use in the Use Regulations of a zoning
district.
Article 1303.3.
SUBMITTALS:
All Conditional Use approvals shall be subject to the following:
1303.3.1.
Before permitting any of the above uses, plans together with a narrative or
supporting statement as to the proposed use of the buildings, structures and
premises, shall be submitted to the Department for administrative review
and approval. No application shall be administratively approved unless and
until all fees and fines owed to the Department as a result of activity or
inactivity attributable to the property that is the subject of the application are
brought current and paid in full or any amounts owed pursuant to an
agreement of compliance are current, as the case may be.
1303.3.2.
Application procedures and informational requirements for a Conditional Use
shall be established by the zoning inspector. The application shall provide all
information needed for an administrative approval.
Section 1304.Section 1003.
Exempted Uses
This Ordinance shall not prevent, restrict or otherwise regulate the use or occupation of land or
improvements for railroad, mining, metallurgical, grazing or general agricultural purposes, if the
tract/s concerned is/are five or more contiguous commercial acres in size (Note: One
Commercial acre = 35,00036,000 square feet).*1, *22
Article 1304.1.Article 1003.1.
Property is not exempt from the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance and/or
Building Safety Ordinance unless and until the Maricopa Planning and
Development Department has approved an issued a certificate of exemption
for that property. In order to secure a certificate of exemption, an applicant
Date of Revisions
*1
Effective 7-10-2015 – TA2014001
*2
Effective 11-6-2020 – TA2019001
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 10-19
CHAPTER 13 10 – USE REGULATIONS
shall submit a zoning clearance application, including site plan and other
reasonable supporting documentation.*32
Article 1003.2.
OUnless the zoning inspector determines otherwise, only uses classified by
the Maricopa County Assessor’s Office may be exempted via an approved
exemption for a property. All other uses are subject to zoning ordinance
requirements for the zoning district.
Article 1304.2.Article 1003.3.
Only property classified by the Maricopa County Assessor’s office or the
Arizona Department of Revenue as property used for one of the purposes
enumerated in the first paragraph of this Section is eligible for exemption
under this section. If property has been so classified, and Maricopa County
Planning and Development has issued an approved exemption for the
property, the property is exempt from the Maricopa County Zoning
Ordinance and/or Building Safety Ordinance, unless the Planning and
Development Director or their designee independently determines that all or
part of the property is not used primarily for one or more of the purposes
enumerated in the first paragraph of this section.*32
Article 1304.3.Article 1003.4.
Any structures built under an exemption that do not meet the underlying
zoning district and/or Building Safety Ordinance standards may shall be
required to comply with said standards if, at a future date, the exemption is
no longer applicable.*31
Date of Revisions
*1
Revised 7-17-72
*31
Effective 11-19-99
*22
Revised 2-20-94
*32
Effective 2-4-00
Section 1305.Section 1004.
Nonconforming Uses
Article 1305.1.Article 1004.1.
Continuing Existing Uses:
Unless an earlier date is specified in this Ordinance any building or structure
that was existing, or any use of land that was lawfully existing, as of January
1, 2000 or as of the effective date of subsequent amendments to this
Ordinance may continue even though such use, building or structure does
not conform to the regulations of this Ordinance or amendments thereto
for the zoning district in which it is located, provided the size, shape and
configuration of the parcel remains unchanged since January 1, 2000.*35
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 10-20
CHAPTER 13 10 – USE REGULATIONS
Article 1305.2.Article 1004.2.
Discontinuance of Nonconforming Uses:
1305.2.1.1004.2.1.
In the event that a nonconforming use of land, building or structure is
discontinued and considered abandoned for a period of 12 consecutive
months, any future use thereof shall be in conformity with the regulations of
this Ordinance.
1305.2.2.1004.2.2.
In the event that a nonconforming use of land, building or structure is
destroyed by fire, explosion, act of God or act of the public enemy to the
extent of 75% of its value, according to the appraisal thereof by competent
appraisers, then and without further action by the Board of Supervisors, the
future use thereof shall from and after the date of such destruction, be
subject to all the regulations of this Ordinance or amendments thereto for
the zoning district in which such future use is located.
Article 1305.3.Article 1004.3.
Expansion of a Nonconforming Use:
A nonconforming use of land, building or structure shall not be enlarged,
extended, reconstructed or structurally altered unless such enlargement,
extension, reconstruction or structural alternation and further use of such
property conform with the regulations of this Ordinance for the zoning
district in which such property is located, except that a nonconforming
business use may expand if such expansion does not exceed 100% of the floor
area of the original business.
Article 1305.4.Article 1004.4.
Change Of Nonconforming Use:
If no structural alterations are made, any nonconforming use of land, building
or structure may be changed to another nonconforming use provided the
proposed use is of the same or more restricted classification as evidenced by
a finding and resolution of record by the Board of Adjustment having
jurisdiction.
Section 1306.Section 1005.
Relief from Development Standards Due to
Government Action
Article 1306.1.Article 1005.1.
Government Action:
When a government action results in a building, lot, parcel or tract of land not
meeting the requirements of this ordinance:*33
1. For an undeveloped lot, parcel or tract of land, the government action
shall alter the development standards to the extent alteration is
necessitated by the government action.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 10-21
CHAPTER 13 10 – USE REGULATIONS
2. For a lot, parcel or tract of land that has already been developed as of the
time of the government action, the government action shall alter the
development standards (including setback requirements) applicable to
any improvements already constructed as well as subsequent
improvements.
Date of Revisions
*33
Effective 02-16-07 – TA2005001
*35
Effective 10-10-11 – TA2011011
*34
Effective 10-19-11
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-1
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN REGULATIONS
Chapter 14 Chapter 11| Sign Regulations
Section 1101.
General Signage Regulations
Article 1101.1.
Purpose
The purpose of this Chapter is to promote public safety, create an attractive
business climate, and enhance the physical appearance of the community
through a comprehensive system of reasonable, and consistent, and
nondiscriminatory sign standards and requirements based on aesthetics and
not content of the sign.
These regulations are intended to:
1. Enable the identification of places of residence and business.
2. Permit the communication of information necessary for the conduct of
commerce.
3. Encourage signs that are appropriate to the zoning district in which they
are located and consistent with the category of use to which they
pertain.
4. Regulate signs in a manner so as to not interfere with, obstruct vision of,
or distract motorists, bicyclists or pedestrians, from their ability to see
traffic signals, road hazards, and other motorists, bicyclists, or
pedestrians.
5. Require signs to be constructed, installed, and maintained in a safe and
satisfactory manner.
6. Comply with the Outdoor Light Control Provisions as outlined in this
Ordinance.
Article 1101.2.
Exemptions [All Zoning Districts]:
The following signs are permitted in all zoning districts and exempt from the
regulations of this Chapter:
1. Signs on mailboxes that display the name of the occupant and/or
address on which the property is located.
2. Integral decorative or architectural features of buildings or works of art,
as long as the features do not contain moving parts, lights, or logos.
3. Bulletin boards.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-2
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN REGULATIONS
4. Signs associated with agri-business on property classified with an
agricultural exemption.
5. Public service signs, not exceeding two (2) square feet in area, placed in
the interior of an establishment’s building window or glass door, such as
“open or closed,” “vacancy,” “will return,” “no smoking,” and other
noncommercial messages; placed on the property; warning the public
against trespassing, danger from animals, and road hazards.
6. Signs that constitute an integral part of a vending machine, telephone
booth and/or similar facilities, provided the sign does not interfere with
the sight visibility triangle (SVT) areas.
7. Flags, badge, emblem or insignia of any government or governmental
agency, or of any civic charitable, religious, patriotic, fraternal, or similar
organization, provided the sign does not interfere with the any sight
visibility triangle (SVT) areas.
Article 1101.3.
General Sign Regulations [All Zoning Districts]:
The regulations set forth in this Article qualify further define, outline, or
supplement, as the case may be, the zoning district regulations appearing
elsewhere in this Ordinance. In the event of a conflict between
regulations, the more restrictive applies.
1101.3.1.
Freestanding and projecting signs may be double-faced.
1101.3.2.
When the two faces of a double faced sign have identical dimensions, the
calculation of the overall area of the sign of a double faced sign shall
include only one of the faces.
1101.3.3.
Sign Lighting: signs may be indirectly illuminated provided that the lighting
shall beis in compliance with the provisions as set forth in this Ordinance.
1. No flashing or blinking illumination shall be employed. Lighting shall be
so installed as to avoid any glare or reflection into any adjacent
property or into a street or alley.
2. If located in a Rural or Residential zoning district, no sign shall be lit
between 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.
3. Electronic message displays shall contain at least one photo sensor, and
each sensor shall:
A. be designed to continually operate in direct sunlight; and
B. be situated to measure ambient light; and
C. be contained in a waterproof enclosure which shall allow easy
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-3
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN REGULATIONS
access to the photo sensors; and
D. allow light sensing; and
E. be located in an enclosure that environmentally protects the
components of the EMD; and
F.
be capable of dimming all pixels of the sign collectively to
compensate for surrounding ambient light levels.
4. The EMD display light output shall be as follows:
A. limited to a maximum brightness level of 300 Nits between dusk
and dawn and
B. no more than 0.3 foot candles above ambient light at all times, as
measured using a foot candle meter at a preset distance
depending on sign size. Measuring distances shall be as follows:
i.
0-100 square foot sign to be measured from 100 feet from
the source
ii.
101-300 square foot sign to be measured 150 feet from
source
5. Prior to the issuance of an EMD Sign Permit, the applicant shall provide
a written certification from the sign manufacturer that the light
intensity has been factory pre-set not to exceed the levels specified
within this ordinance, and the intensity level is protected from end-user
manipulation by password-protected software or other method as
deemed appropriate by the Department Director.
6.5. Signs lit with fluorescent or exposed neon or similar tube type
illumination shall not increase the ambient light condition between
sunset and sunrise that existed before installation of the sign.
7.6. The lighting source of on-site signs externally illuminated shall not be
visible from any adjacent residential zoning district.
1101.3.4.
Any sign using plastic zip track or other method of replaceable lettering
shall have a secured cover.
1101.3.5.
No sign may be placed within the street right of way, clear zone distance
and sight visibility triangle or any location where such sign presents a traffic
hazard or otherwise poses a threat to the traffic or pedestrian safety.
1101.3.6.
No movable, animated or audible signs are permitted. Electronic message
displays (EMD) shall not be considered as animation.
1101.3.7.
Roof signs shall not be permitted in any zoning district.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-4
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN REGULATIONS
1101.3.8.
Minimum Display Time: Level 1 and 2 Electronic Message Displays (EMD)
shall not change message more than once every eight (8) seconds.
1101.3.9.
Permanent signs, other than Rural and ResidentialResidence Identification
signs, in Rural and Residential Zoning Districts shall require a construction
permit and zoning clearance.
1101.3.10.
Maintenance of signs:
1. All signs and all components thereof, including supports, braces, and
anchors, shall be kept in a state of good repair.
2. Any sign that no longer correctly directs or exhorts any person,
advertises a bonafide business, lessor, sign company owner, product, or
activity or is damaged, is in disrepair or is vandalized and not repaired
within thirty (30) days of the damaging event, or within thirty (30) days
of the issuance of a permit for the repair if a permit is required, shall
not be permitted in any zone.
3. Any party having control of a sign shall remove any sign that has not
been used to display or support a message during any continuous one
year thirty (30) day period. Failure to remove such sign within thirty
(30) days shall be considered a violation of this ordinance. A sign
carrying a message advertising the sign owner’s company shall be
deemed a valid message, however simply the availability of the sign for
lease shall not be deemed to be “used to display or support a sign or
message” for purposes of this section.
1101.3.11.
Any building permit validly issued and still in effect on February 10, 2011
shall be governed by the requirements of the zoning ordinance for the
unincorporated areas of Maricopa County in effect on the date said permit
was issued.*2
1101.3.12.1101.3.11.
Directory Signs shall be permitted in all districts:
Development Standards: Directory signs:
1. Shall be a freestanding standing monument sign with a base of at least
eighteen (18) inches in height and a maximum sign area of eighteen
(18) square feet.
2. Shall not exceed six (6) feet in height.
3. Shall contain no more than the maximum area of two (2) square feet
for each business listed on the sign plus four (4) square feet for the
name of the building or complex.
4. Shall not be included in calculating the total aggregate area for signage
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-5
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN REGULATIONS
permitted on a parcel or lot for the approved use.
5. The maximum number of shall beShall not exceed one (1) directory
sign for each driveway or entrance into the a Business Park or complex.
1101.3.13.1101.3.12.
Directional Signs shall be permitted in all districts:
Development Standards: Directional Signs:
1. Shall not exceed the following area:
A. In Rural and Residential zoning districts, two (2) square feet.
B. In Commercial and Industrial zoning districts, six (6) square feet.
2. Shall not exceed the following height limitations:
A. In Rural and Residential zoning districts, eight (8) feet.
B. In Industrial and Commercial zoning districts, twelve (12) feet.
3. May be located in or project into required yards, but the sign shall not
be located in or project into any right-of-way, street or alley.
4. Shall not be included in the calculation of the total permitted
permanent identification area of the permitted total aggregate area of
wall signs or the maximum number of freestanding signs as set forth in
the provisions in this Ordinance.
1101.3.14.1101.3.13.
Light Pole Banners shall be permitted in all zoning districts:
1. Shall not be located in the public right-of-way.
2. May be single sided or double sided.
3. The structure on which the banner is mounted shall be permanent and
shall not exceed eighteen (18) feet in height.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-6
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN REGULATIONS
4. Mounted in a pedestrian way the bottom of the banner shall be a
minimum of 9’ from the ground. Mounted along driveways a
minimum of fourteen (14) feet from ground level.
5. May be displayed year around, but shall be maintained free of any
tears or frays.
6. Shall not exceed eighteen (18) sq. ft. 30” x 60”.
Article 1101.4.
Temporary Signs:
Temporary signs provide an important medium through which individuals
may convey a variety of noncommercial and commercial messages.
However, if left completely unregulated, temporary signs can become a
threat to public safety as a traffic hazard and detrimental to property values
and overall public welfare as an aesthetic nuisance.
These regulations are intended to balance the rights of individuals to convey
messages through temporary signs and the right of the public to protect the
public health, safety, and welfare; reduce traffic and pedestrian hazards;
protect property values by minimizing the possible adverse effects and
visual blight caused by temporary signs; promote economic development;
and ensure the fair and consistent enforcement of the temporary sign
regulations specified below.
1101.4.1.
Temporary Signs shall be permitted in all zoning districts:
Development standards: Temporary signs shall not:
1.
A. In Rural and Residential zoning districts, exceed EIGHTEEN (18)
square feet in area.
B. In any zoning district, exceed twelve (12) feet in height.
2. Be placed on a property in excess of 180 days provided that signs per
Articles 14011101.4.5, 14011101.4.6 and 14011101.4.7 may remain in
excess of 180 days but shall be removed from the property within
fourteen (14) days after its the sign’s purpose has been fulfilled. If the
sign is expected to be in place longer than 180 days shall be secured to
the ground and maintained in good repair.*3
3. In Commercial zoning districts, exceed the area allowed for permanent
on-site signage: 14031103.2.2.1 for wall signs and 14031103.2.4.1 for
freestanding signs.
4. In Industrial zoning districts, exceed the area allowed for permanent
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-7
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN REGULATIONS
on-site signage: 14041104.2.2.1 for wall signs and 14041104.2.3.1 for
freestanding signs.
5. If in association with a Commercial or Industrial business be permitted
unless associated with a temporary event or there is a pending, or
simultaneously filled, anfiled application for a permanent sign permit.
1101.4.2.
Shall not be illuminated.
1101.4.3.
Shall obtain a Temporary Use Permit (TUP) for Special Events, when
associated with a special event.
1101.4.4.
Signs advocating a position for or against a candidate for public elective
office or a public question are permitted provided each sign shall:
1. Not be displayed earlier than sixty (60) days prior to an election.
2. Be placed only on private property and not within in public rights-of-
way, intersection “sight triangles”, or roadway clear zones.
3. Be removed within thirty (30) days after the specific election to which
they refer.
4. Comply with all other requirements for temporary signs.
1101.4.5.
Temporary Directional Signs:
1. Shall not exceed twelve (12) square feet in area.
2. Shall not exceed one (1) sign for each entrance and one (1) sign for
each exit.
3. May be located in or project into required yards, but shall not be
located in or project into any right-of-way, street or alley.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-8
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN REGULATIONS
1101.4.6.
Temporary Signs Pertaining to the Sale or Lease of Land:
1. Sign area shall not exceed:
A. For properties containing a total land area less than 1 acre, six (6)
square feet.
B. For properties containing land area of
at least one (1) acre but not more than
five (5) acres, twelve (12) square feet.
C. For properties containing land area
greater than five (5) acre, thirty-two
(32) square feet for the first five (5)
acres and an additional fifteen percent
(15%) over the maximum allowable
sign area for each additional five (5)
acres but in no event shall any sign
exceed one hundred fifty (150) square
feet. provided
D. Aany sign in excess of thirty-two (32)
square feet in area shall require a construction permit and zoning
clearance.
2. All signs pertaining to sale or lease of land
shall be located on the property to which
it pertains and the number shall be limited
to one (1) sign on each street frontage. *3
A. For condominiums, the siting of the
sign shall be on common grounds.
B. For master planned communities,
the sign must be located within the
boundary of the master planned
community to which it pertains.
3. No sign pertaining to sale or lease of land
shall be located in or project into required yard, or any street or alley.
4. Shall include the property address and contact information.
1101.4.7.
Temporary Signs Identifying the Contractors and Subcontractors, If
Any, Engaged in the Construction or Repair of a Building or
Buildings:
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-9
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN REGULATIONS
Development Standards: each temporary signs identifying the contractors
and subcontractors, if any, engaged in the construction or repair of a
building or buildings:
1.
Shall not exceed twenty-four (24) square feet in area.
2.
Shall be located on the property to
which it pertains and the number shall
be limited as follows:
A. Rural and Residential zoning
districts may have one (1) per lot.
B. Commercial and Industrial zoning
districts may have one (1) for each
tenant.
3. May be located in or project into
required yards, but the sign shall not
be located in or project into any right-
of-way, street or alley.
1101.4.8.
Any sign not specifically listed as permitted shall be prohibited.
Section 1102.
Rural and Residential Zoning Districts
Article 1102.1.
Specific Rural and Residential Signage Regulations:
Development standards: All Rural and Residential zoning districts
1. Signs in Rural and Residential zoning districts shall not be located in or
project into any required yard, public rights-of-way, street or alley.
2. A sign shall only be located on the property to which it pertains.
3. No sign area shall exceed twenty-four (24) square feet unless otherwise
stated herein.
4. No variable message signs shall be permitted except as set forth in
Article 14021102.5.
ARTICLE 1102.2. Rural and Residential Identification Signs
Development standards: Identification
signs
1. Shall not exceed two (2) square feet in
area.
2. Shall not exceed eight (8) feet in
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-10
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN REGULATIONS
height.
3. Shall be limited to one (1) sign for each dwelling unit
Article 1102.3.
Entry Features
Entry features over driveways to a residence, ranch or farm are permitted
provided they otherwise comply with the requirements listed in the Use
Regulations for Rural Zoning Districts.subject to the following:
1. The entry feature shall be over a driveway, and limited to one entry
feature per parcel;
2. The entry feature shall not contain lighting fixtures.
3. The entry feature shall observe a maximum height of 24’, a maximum
width of 30’, and the structural support components shall be no greater
than 3’ in diameter or 3’ square.
4. The entry feature shall observe a minimum opening of 12’ in width and
16’ in height;
5. Any signage incorporated into the entry feature shall be a maximum of
24 square feet, shall be contained within the exterior dimensions of the
entry feature, and shall not obstruct the minimum opening dimensions
prescribed in Article 1102.3.4 above.
Article 1102.4.
Perimeter Wall Signs:*3
16’ min
12’ min
30’ max
24’ max
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-11
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN REGULATIONS
1102.4.1.
Development standards: Perimeter Wall Signs
1. Shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in area.
2. Shall not exceed six (6) feet in height.
3. Shall only be located at entry points of the subdivision, church, school
and/or public building.
4. The number shall not exceed two (2) for each entrance.
1102.4.2.
Shall have a base equal to or greater than half the width of the sign.
Article 1102.5.
Signs Identifying Apartment Complexes, Churches, Schools, Care
Facilities, Public Utility Buildings and Facilities, Publicly Owned or
Operated Properties, Libraries, Museums and Community Buildings:
1102.5.1.
Development standards: signs identifying apartment complexes, churches,
schools, care facilities, public utility buildings and facilities, publicly owned
or operated properties, libraries, museums and community building
buildings:
1. Such signs may be placed flat against a wall of a building, perimeter
wall sign or sign may be freestanding. *3
2. No sign shall exceed forty-eight (48) square feet in area.
3. Sign height shall not exceed
A. For freestanding signs twelve (12) feet.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-12
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN REGULATIONS
B. For wall signs Eighteen (18) feet
4. No more than one (1) freestanding sign shall be permitted for each
entrance and each sign shall be located proximate to an entrance.
5. Any sign may be located in required yard, but may not be located
closer than twenty (20) feet to property line.Any sign may be located
in a required yard, but shall not conflict with a sight-visibility triangle.
1102.5.2.
Freestanding signs may have a fixed or variable message.*3
1102.5.3.
No EMD sign shall be permitted in Rural and Residential zoning districts
other than Level 1 signs identifying apartment complexes, churches,
schools, care facilities, public utility buildings and facilities, publicly owned
or operated properties, libraries, museums and community buildings. shall
be permitted in Rural and Residential zoning districts.
Section 1103.
Commercial Zoning Districts
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-13
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN REGULATIONS
Article 1103.1.
Commercial Signage Regulations:
1. Except for Freeway Pylon signs and off-site signs (billboards) in
accordance with Section 1404, signs permitted in a commercial zoning
district, may be located in a required yard, but shall not conflict with a
sight-visibility triangle nor be located in or project into any public rights
of way, street or alley.
2. Signs shall be oriented as follows:
A. Signs permitted in a commercial zoning district other than full-
animation EMD (level 4) electronic signs shall be oriented to the
business street frontage or to common use parking lots,
courtyards, or pedestrian ways on which the business fronts or
takes access.
B. Full-animation EMD (level 4) electronic signs shall be oriented to
pedestrian traffic and common use parking lots, courtyards or
pedestrian ways and shall not be oriented to business streetany
street frontage.
3. On-site signs may have a fixed or variable message. Electronic Message
Display (EMD) signs are permitted as follows:
A. C-1 & C-O zoning district: Level 1 and Level 2 electronic message
display sign;
B. C-2 & C-3 zoning district: Level 1 through 3 electronic message
display sign;
C. C-S zoning district: Levels 1 through 4 electronic message display
sign.
Article 1103.2.
On-Site Signs
Shall be permitted subject to the following development standards:
1103.2.1.
Wall Signs:*3
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-14
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN REGULATIONS
1.
A. The total aggregate area of all wall signs on a property shall not
exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the front face plane of a business
building frontage with a maximum number of one (1) per
business. one (1) front face/plane of a single/multi-tenant
building, or wall plane of an individual business frontage where
more than one (1) tenant occupies the building.
B. Front face plane is measured as a vertical plane from the ground
to top of parapet or eave line of pitched, or mansard roof. Where
a parapet is behind a hip roof, shall follow the eave line.
Wall Sign
Parapet Sign
(Wall)
Roof Sign
(Not Permitted)
Projecting
Sign (Wall)
Awning Sign
(Wall)
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-15
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN REGULATIONS
2. Sign height shall not exceed a maximum of twenty (20) feetthe
maximum building height allowed in the base zoning district.
3. Perimeter Wall Signs:
A. Shall be considered permanent, affixed to the wall and not
temporary signage.
B. The sign shall have a border to clearly define the sign area.
C. Shall only be permitted on a wall directly fronting on an arterial,
secondary or local roadstreet.
D. Shall be included in the total aggregate area of all wall signs signs
and must not exceed fifteen (15) percent of one (1) face/plane of
the wallin accordance with 1403.2.1.1.
E. Area shall not exceed 120 sq. ft.
F.
Height shall not exceed wall height.
1103.2.2.
Service Station Signs:
1. Canopy signs shall be fixed and contain only the business and or logo.
2. The maximum number of signs per canopy shall be two (2).
3. For any one (1) side of the canopy the maximum sign area shallfor
each two (2) linear feet of canopy wall shall be one (1) square foot, not
to exceed twenty-four (24) square feet of signage.
4. No part of the sign shall project from a canopy wall a distance greater
than twelve (12) inches.
5. The total area of canopy signs shall be included in calculation of total
sign area permitted.
6. Change panel price signs in connection with service station; shall be
freestanding, monument type and shall only identify the current
price(s) of fuel sold and cost of the car wash service provided by the
use.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-16
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN REGULATIONS
1103.2.3.
Freestanding Signs, including center identification signs:
1. Shall not exceed one-hundred twenty (120) square feet in sign area.
2. Sign height:
A. Shall not exceed twenty-four (24) feet:
B. Any sign within two-hundred (200) feet of a Rural or Residential
zone or a mobile home subdivision, unless developed for non-
residential use, shall not exceed twelve (12) feet in height.
However, for each five (5) feet beyond the two-hundred (200)
feet as described in the previous section, the maximum may
increase one (1) foot to a maximum height of twenty-four (24)
feet.*4
3. Permitted number: one (1) sign per driveway not to exceed two (2) per
street frontage. for each 200’ of frontage, but in no event shall signs
be located closer to each other than 200 feet on the same parcel
4. In C-2 and C-3 zoning districts, the sign may be a moving, rotating or
revolving sign, but no sign shall rotate faster than seven (7)
revolutions per minute.
1103.2.4.
Menu- Boards For Drive-Thru Restaurants:
1. Shall not exceed one (1)two (2) preview menu boards and one (1)two
(2) ordering menu boards per business.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-17
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN REGULATIONS
2.
Shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet.
3.
Shall not exceed seven (7) feet in height.
4.
Shall be screened by a wall or landscaping so the sign is not visible
from the street.
5.
Containing speakers shall not be located any closer than two-hundred
(200) feet to a Rural or Residential zone. At the discretion of the
Zoning Inspector or their designee, an exception may be
administratively granted if it is demonstrated that soundproofing
and/or sound absorption techniques have been implemented in the
design of the boards such that it is not a nuisance to Rural and
Residential zones.
1103.2.5.
Freeway Pylon Signs shall be permitted in the C-S and C-2 Zoning
Districts only:
Development standards: Freeway Pylon Signs:
1. Shall not exceed sixty-five (65) feet in height unless designed in such a
way as to accommodate Wireless cellular panel antennas in which case
sign height shall not exceed eighty (80) feet.
Any Wireless communication antenna shall be architecturally
integrated into the sign structure to have a seamless appearance. The
associated ground equipment or shelter shall be entirely screened from
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-18
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN REGULATIONS
view by a screen wall matching the sign structure base
or the subject property commercial development
design. The associated equipment area shall not
exceed 600 square feet.
2. Shall not exceed a 2.5-to-1 ratio of height-to-width.
3. Shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the gross area of
the sign structure per face.
4. Shall not be included in the calculation of the total
number of freestanding or wall signs permitted.
5. Shall provide at the base a setback of not fewer than
twenty (20) feet from any property line.
6. Shall provide, at the base, a landscape area extending
to a minimum of four (4) feet beyond the perimeter
section of the sign structure at its widest point.
7. Only Level 1, 2, and 3 electronic message displays (EMD) are permitted
and Level 4 EMD are prohibited.
1103.2.6.
A-Frame (Sandwich Board) shall be permitted in C-1 and C-2 and C-S
zoning districts. A-Frame signs:*1
1. Shall nNot be allowed in public rights-of-way. Shall be placed on a
private sidewalk directly in front of the associated establishment.
2. Shall be pPlaced a maximum distance of two (2) feet from the wall of
the building.
3. Sign doesShall not obstruct the sidewalk and complies with any
applicable provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
4. Shall not exceed twelve (12) sq. ft. in area 36” (w) X 48” (l).
5. Shall be removed at the close of business and only displayed during
regular business hours.
6. Shall not include wWindblown devices including balloons may not be
attached or otherwise made part of the sign.
7. Maximum Shall not exceed one (1) per business or tenant.
8. Shall be non-illuminated.
9. Shall require a zoning clearance.
10. Shall contain no off-site advertising.
11. Shall be pProfessionally made and constructed of durable weather-
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-19
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN REGULATIONS
resistant materials and maintained in good condition.
Article 1103.3.
Off-Site Advertising Signs (Billboards) [C-2 and C-3 Zoning Districts
Only]*5:
1103.3.1.
Static and digital billboards shall be permitted uses in the C-2 and C-3
zoning districts subject to the following conditions:
1. Separation Distance:
A. Distance from other static and digital billboards:
i.
When either an existing or proposed static or digital billboard
is located 3 miles or greater from the boundary of any
incorporated city or town, it shall maintain a radial separation
distance from any other static or digital billboard of 3,000
feet. Measurement shall be from the vertical edge of the sign
face closest to the sign face of the structure to which is being
measured. Measurement shall not cross any freeway.
ii.
When either an existing or proposed static or digital billboard
is located fewer than 3 miles from the boundary of any
incorporated city or town, it shall maintain a radial separation
distance from any other static or digital of 1,000 feet.
Measurement shall be from the vertical edge of the sign face
closest to the sign face of the structure to which is being
measured. Measurement shall not cross any freeway.
2. Setback Requirements: There shall be a minimum 0-footno setback
from any property line, except as follows:
A. No billboard shall be erected located within 100 feet of any
residential zoning district boundary or a parcel boundary of a
residential use in a rural zoning district, whether or not separated
by a public right-of-way. This shall be measured from the vertical
edge of the sign face closest to the zoning district boundary line of
a residential zoning district.
B. No illuminated or digital billboard shall be located within 150 feet
of a residential zoning district boundary or a parcel boundary of a
residential use in a rural zoning district (refer to Chapter 117,
Section 81112). This shall be measured from a vertical edge of the
sign face closest to the parcel/lot line of a residential use in a rural
zoning district.
C. No billboard shall be located within 500 feet from the vertical edge
of the sign face closest to the parcel/lot line of any park, school or
roadside rest area.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-20
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN REGULATIONS
3. No billboard(s) shall have features that emit sound or be audible in any
manner.
4. No billboard(s) shall be located in or within 660 feet of a Scenic Corridor
Overlay Zoning District.
5. No billboard(s) shall be located on any property located within any
Maricopa County Scenic Corridor.
6. Development Standards:
A. Static billboards located greater than 300 feet from the vertical
edge of the sign face closest to the edge of a pavement for an
existing freeway travel lane (not the edge of right-of-way): from of
an existing freeway
i.
Shall be limited to 30 feet in height inclusive of all billboard
embellishments, lighting, and attachments.
ii.
Shall be limited to 300 square feet in sign face area. The
maximum square footage may be exceeded by up to 10% by
use of billboard embellishments.
B. Static and digital billboards located within 300 feet from the
vertical edge of the sign face closest to edge of a pavement for an
existing freeway travel lane (not the edge of right-of-way): of an
existing freeway:
i.
Shall be limited to 48 feet above adjacent grade or elevation
of the main travel lanes of a freeway immediately adjacent to
the billboard or subject property (whichever is greater but not
to exceed 70 feet), inclusive of all billboard embellishments
and attachments, excluding additional 3 feet for top-mounted
lighting fixtures.
ii.
Shall be limited to 672 square feet in sign face area. The
maximum square footage of sign area may be exceeded by up
to 20% by use of billboard embellishments.
7. A billboard may be double-faced or “V” shaped, provided the “V”
shape is designed so that there is no greater than fifty-four (54) inches
between faces at the apex and the angle between the faces of the sign
is no greater than 45 degrees.
Billboards
Sign Face
(Square Feet)
Billboard
Embellishments
Not within 300 Feet of a freeway
300*
10%
Within 300 Feet of a freeway
672*
20%
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-21
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN REGULATIONS
* this maximum square footage applies separately to each side of a double-faced
billboard
8. Any modifications to a billboard within the Military Airport and
Ancillary Military Facility Overlay Zoning District shall require a new
Use Compatibility and Consistency Determination (UCCD) pursuant to
Section 1010710.
9. All lighting shall adhere to Article 1112812.3.2 of the Maricopa County
Zoning Ordinance.
10. General provisions applicable to digital billboards:
A. Digital billboards shall be permitted if:
i.
Located fewer than 3 miles from the vertical edge of the sign
face closest to the scaled corporate limit of a city or town.
from the boundary of an incorporated city or town.
ii.
If within 300 feet of and oriented towards an existing
freeway’s main travel lanes. Orientation to the freeway’s main
travel lanes shall be determined as the sign face being most
closely aligned to a 90-degree angle to the freeway’s main
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-22
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN REGULATIONS
travel lanes rather than to any existing, proposed or planned
freeway on or off ramps, frontage/access roads or proximate
surface streets. as classified by Maricopa County as of
December 15, 2021.
B. Digital billboards shall include optical down angled LED’s, and
horizontal louvers (as well as vertical louvers if within 500 feet of a
residential zoning district boundary or a residential use in a rural
zoning district) extending past the diode at a minimum of .480” to
minimize light trespass.
C. Network time shall be made available on all digital sign faces to
federal, state, and local public safety agencies for emergency
messaging. Such messages shall override all copy for one hour and
shall then be displayed for no fewer than eight seconds in every
minute as long as needed.
D. Digital billboards shall adhere to the provisions of Article
14011101.3 of this Chapter, except that from 11:00 p.m. until
sunrise all digital billboard illumination shall be extinguished, and
all digital billboards shall be equipped with an automatic devicse to
assure compliance. These illumination requirements shall not be
applicable to the display of any Amber Alert or other governmental
emergencies, or for other emergency situations as determined by
the Zoning AdministratorInspector. Further, in the event of an
electronic malfunction the sign shall be shut off until repairs have
been made to restore the electronic messaging system.
E. Display time shall not change-message more than once every 8
seconds. There shall be no animation, flashing, blinking or moving
lights. In the transition between copy changes, there shall be no
sense of movement from one image to the next.
F.
Dimmers on all digital billboards shall be set in the evening hours
(from sunset to 11:00 p.m.) not to exceed 300 nits.
G. The digital billboard shall have an automatic turn-off mechanism in
case of malfunction.
H. All lawfully existing static billboards on December 15, 2021 that
become non-conforming due to Ordinance amendment on said
date may not be modified or converted to digital unless brought
into conformance with all requirements of this Ordinance; with the
exception, that support columns may be relocated a maximum of
20 feet from the existing location, and or replace upward lighting
with downward lighting as stated in 1112812.7.1.
11. A legal non-conforming static billboard that does not meet all
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-23
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN REGULATIONS
requirements of this Article may be modified or converted to digital
with approval of a Special Use Permit in accordance with Article
13011001.1.21 of this Ordinance.
12. Nothing contained in this Ordinance shall affect the existing rights of
any property granted a deviation by legislative or quasi-judicial action
of Maricopa County.
Section 1104.
Industrial Zoning Districts
Article 1104.1.
Industrial Signage Regulations:
1104.1.1.
Signs permitted in an industrial zoning district, may be located in required
yard, but shall not be located in or project into any street or alley.
1104.1.2.
Shall be oriented to the business street frontage or to common use parking
lots, courtyards, or pedestrian ways on which the business fronts or takes
access.
1104.1.3.
On-site signs may have a fixed or variable message.
1104.1.4.
On-site signs may be Level 1, 2, and 3 electronic message displays (EMD).
Level 4 EMD are prohibited.
Article 1104.2.
On-Site Signs
Shall be permitted subject to the following development standards:
1104.2.1.
Wall Signs:*3
Wall Sign
Parapet Sign
(Wall)
Roof Sign
(Not Permitted)
Projecting
Sign (Wall)
Awning Sign
(Wall)
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-24
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN REGULATIONS
1.
A. The total aggregate area of all the wall signs on a property shall
not exceed fifteen percent (15%) of one (1) front face/plane of a
single/multi-tenant building, or wall plane of an individual
business frontage where more than one (1) tenant occupies the
building.
B. Front face plane is measured as a vertical plane from the ground
to top of parapet or eave line of pitched, or mansard roof. Where
a parapet is behind a hip roof, shall follow the eave line.
2.
Sign height shall not exceed a height of twenty (20) feet. the
maximum building height allowed in the base zoning district.
3.
Perimeter Wall Signs:
A. Shall be considered permanent, affixed to the wall and not
temporary signage.
B. The sign shall have a border to clearly define the sign area.
C. Shall only be permitted on a wall directly fronting on an arterial,
secondary or local road.
D. Shall be included in the total aggregate area of all wall signs and
must not exceed a maximum of fifteen (15) percent per building
face/plane. in accordance with 1404.2.1.1.
E. Area shall not exceed 120 sq.ft.
F. Height shall not exceed wall height.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-25
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN REGULATIONS
1104.2.2.
Freestanding Signs, including Center Identification signs:
1. Shall not exceed one-hundred fifty (150) square feet in sign area.
2. Shall comply with the following height standards:
A. Not exceed twenty-four (24) feet provided:
B. Any signs within two-hundred (200) feet of a Rural or Residential
zone or a mobile home subdivision, unless developed for non-
residential use, shall not exceed twelve (12) feet in height.
However, for each five (5) feet beyond the two-hundred (200)
feet, the maximum may increase one (1) foot to the maximum
height of twenty-four (24) feet.*4
3. Permitted number: one (1) sign per driveway entrance or driveway but
in no event shall signs be located closer to each other than 200 feet.
Each such sign shall be located proximate to a driveway entrance.
4. May be a moving, rotating or revolving sign, but no sign shall rotate
faster than seven (7) revolutions per minute.
Article 1104.3.
Off-Site Advertising Signs (Billboards) [Ind-1, Ind-2 and Ind-3 Zoning
Districts Only]*5
1104.3.1.
Off-site advertising signs (billboards) shall be a permitted use in the IND-1,
IND-2 and IND-3 zoning districts subject to all requirements set forth in
Article 14031103.3.1.
Section 1105.
Overlay Zoning District
Article 1105.1.
Wickenburg Scenic Corridor:
Development standards for signs in the Wickenburg Scenic corridor:
1105.1.1.
Class 3: All Class 3 signs shall:
1. Be kept to minimum size and height required for reasonable exposure of
said signs; however no sign shall exceed twelve (12) feet in height.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-26
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN REGULATIONS
2. Be setback from the property line as follows:
A. None for a sign not in excess of eight (8) feet in height.
B. A minimum of fifteen (15) feet for any sign greater than eight (8)
feet in height but not in excess of ten (10) feet in height.
C. A minimum of twenty (20) feet for any sign greater than ten (10)
feet in height but not in excess of twelve (12) feet in height.
3. Not exceed a maximum of one (1) freestanding sign.
4. Be of materials and colors that are muted and compatible with the
desert environment to reduce visual contrast, heat gain and glare.
5. Contain no more than three (3) different colors. One (1) of which shall
match the principal building color.
Article 1105.2.
Class 4: All Class 4 signs shall:
Article 1105.3.
Be kept to a minimum size and height required for reasonable
exposure of said signs, however no sign shall exceed twelve (12) feet in height.
Article 1105.4.
Be setback from the property line as follows:
Article 1105.5.
None for any sign not in excess of eight (8) feet in height.
Article 1105.6.
A minimum of fifteen (15) feet sign greater than eight (8) feet in
height but not in excess of ten (10) feet high.
Article 1105.7.
A minimum of twenty (20) feet sign greater than ten (10) feet in
height but not in excess of twelve (12) feet in height.
Article 1105.8.
Be of materials and colors that are muted and compatible with the
desert environment to reduce visual contrast, heat gain and glare.
Article 1105.9.
Contain no more than three (3) different colors. One (1) of which
shall match the principal building color.
Article 1105.10.Article 1105.2.
HWY 74 Scenic Corridor:
Development standards for signs in the Highway 74 Scenic Corridor shall:
1. Not exceed a maximum of two (2) freestanding monument signs for
each development at each approved entrance, except
A. A greater number of signs may be permitted in connection with a
Development Master Plan approved by the Board of Supervisors.
B.A. tThere shall be no signs on an individual single family home lot.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-27
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN REGULATIONS
2. Be made of durable material and be designed to be consistent with the
architectural treatment of the building they relate to and overall
character of the site.
3. Be, for non-residential uses, consistent with the underlying zoning
district regulation.
Section 1106.
Mobile/Manufactured Home Parks
Article 1106.1.
General Sign Standards:
Development standards for signs in Mobile/Manufactured Home Parks:
1106.1.1.
Shall not exceed twenty-four (24) square feet in sign area.
1106.1.2.
May be illuminated in accordance with the
provisions set forth in this Ordinance.
1106.1.3.
Shall not exceed twelve (12) feet in height.
1106.1.4.
May be located in or projected into
required yards, but shall not be located in
or projected into any street or alley.
1106.1.5.
Shall be permitted only if it shall be located
on the property to which it pertains.
1106.1.6.
Shall be limited to not more than one (1) sign on each street upon which the
Mobile/Manufactured Home Park has a major access.
Date of Revisions
*1
Effective 9-14-11 – TA2011003
*2
Effective 2-9-11 – TA2007006
*3
Effective 10-31-12 – TA2012003
*4
Effective 7-30-14 – TA2013012
*5
Effective 12-15-21 – TA2018001
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-28
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN TABLE BY ZONING DISTRICT
Zoning District
Signage Category/Type1
EMD2
Maximum Area
Maximum Height
Maximum Number
All Rural and Residential
Zoning Districts
On-Site Permanent Signs
Directional
No
Two (2) SF
Eight (8) feet
One (1) for each entrance and one (1) each exit
Churches, schools, public utility buildings
and facilities, publicly owned or operated
properties, libraries, museums and
community buildings
Yes [level 1]
Forty-eight (48) SF
Wall eighteen (18) feet
Freestanding twelve (12) feet
One (1) for each entrance
Identification
No
Two (2) SF
Eight (8) feet
One (1) per dwelling unit
Entry features
No
Twenty-four (24) SF
Twenty-four (24) feet
One
Subdivisions signs
No
Thirty-two (32) SF
Six (6) feet
Two (2) per entrance
Directory
No
Eighteen (18) SF w/ two (2) SF for each
business and four (4) SF for the name
of complex
Six (6) feet
One (1) per driveway or entrance
Temporary signs
Temporary- directional
NO
Twelve (12) SF
Twelve (12) feet
One (1) for each entrance and one (1) for each exit
Temporary- other
No
Eighteen (18) SF
Twelve (12) feet
No
Temporary - pertaining to sale of land
No
Six (6) SF (<= 1 ac. Of land)
Twelve (12) SF (1-5 ac. Of land)
Greater than five acres refer to article
Twelve (12) feet
One for each street frontage
Temporary - identifying the contractors
and subcontractors, if any, engaged in the
construction or repair of a building
No
Twenty-four (24) SF
Twelve (12) feet
One (1) per lot
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-29
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN TABLE BY ZONING DISTRICT
Zoning District
Signage Category/Type1
EMD2
Maximum Area
Maximum Height
Maximum Number
Commercial
All commercial zoning
districts
On-site permanent signs
Fuel canopy
Yes [change
panel only]
Not to exceed 24 SF
Base zoning district
Two (2) per canopy
Directory
No
Eighteen (18) SF w/ two (2) SF for each
business and four (4) SF for the name
of complex
Six (6) feet
One (1) per driveway or entrance
Directional
No
Six (6) SF
Twelve (12) feet
One (1) for each entrance and one (1) each exit
Freestanding
Yes
One-hundred twenty (120) SF
Twenty-four (24) feet
One (1) per driveway not to exceed two (2) per street frontage
Menu boards for drive-thru
Yes
Thirty-two (32) SF
Seven (7) feet
One (1) preview and one two (ordering)
Wall
Yes
15% of front facebuilding face/ plane
of store frontage
Twenty (20) feet
One (1) per business/tenant
C-S & C-2 only
Freeway Pylon
Yes
50% of gross area of structure
Sixty-five (65) feet
C-2 & C-3 only
Off-site permanent signs (billboards)
Yes, with
limitations
Six-hundred seventy-two (672)
sf/three-hundred (300) SF
Forty-eight (48) feet/thirty
(30) feet
One (1) per 1,000 ft1/3,000 ft
All commercial zoning
districts
Temporary signs
Temporary- directional
No
Twelve (12) SF
Twelve (12) feet
One (1) for each entrance and one (1) for each exit
Temporary -political –candidates
No
Twelve (12) SF
Twelve (12) feet
No
Temporary - pertaining to sale of land
No
Six (6) SF (<= 1 ac. Of land)
Twelve (12) SF (1-5 ac. Of land)
Greater than five acres refer to article
Twelve (12) feet
One (1) for each street frontage
Temporary - identifying the contractors
and subcontractors, if any, engaged in the
construction or repair of a building
No
Twenty-four (24) SF
Twelve (12) feet
One (1) per tenant
Tup may be required
Temporary commercial signs
No
Follow the ordinance for permanent
wall and freestanding sign area
Twelve (12) feet
One (1) per tenant
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 11-30
CHAPTER 1411 – SIGN TABLE BY ZONING DISTRICT
Zoning District
Signage Category/Type1
EMD2
Maximum Area
Maximum Height
Maximum Number
Industrial
All industrial zoning districts On-Site Permanent Signs
Directional
No
Six (6) SF
Twelve (12) feet
One (1) for each entrance and one (1) each exit
Directory
No
Eighteen (18) SF w/ two (2) SF for each
business and four (4) sf for the name of
complex
Six (6) feet
One (1) per driveway or entrance
Freestanding
Yes
One-hundred fifty (150) SF
Twenty -four (24) feet max
One (1) per driveway not to exceed two (2) per street frontage
Wall
Yes
15% front face plane of store frontage Twenty (20) feet
One (1) per business/tenant
IND 2 & IND-3 only
Off-site permanent signs (billboards)
Yes, with
limitations
Six-hundred seventy-two (672)
sf/three-hundred (300) SF
Forty-eight (48) feet/thirty
(30) feet
One (1) per 1,000 ft1/3,000 ft
All industrial zoning districts
Temporary signs
Temporary -directional
No
Twelve (12) SF
Twelve (12) feet
One (1) for each entrance and one (1) for each exit
Temporary- political candidates
No
Twelve (12) SF
Twelve (12) feet
No
Temporary -pertaining to sale of land
No
Six (6) SF (<= 1 ac. Of land)
Twelve (12) SF (1-5 ac. Of land)
Greater than five acres refer to article
Twelve (12) feet
One (1) for each street frontage
Temporary - identifying the contractors
and subcontractors, if any, engaged in the
construction or repair of a building
No
Twenty-four (24) SF
Twelve (12) feet
One (1) per tenant
TUP may be required
Temporary industrial
No
Follow the ordinance for permanent
wall and freestanding sign area
Twelve (12) feet
One (1) per tenant
1 Other restrictions and criteria may apply – See the referenced Article for more information
2 Electronic Message Displays
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 12-1
CHAPTER 15 12 – VIOLATION, PENALTY & ENFORCEMENT
Chapter 15 Chapter
12|
Violation,
Penalty
&
Enforcement
Section 1501.Section 1201.
Violation, Penalty and Enforcement
Article 1501.1.Article 1201.1.
Purpose:
This chapter identifies what constitutes a violation of this Ordinance,
establishes penalties and remedies, and authorizes enforcement procedures.
Article 1501.2.
DEFINITIONS
Article 1501.3.
Hearing Officer: The individual(s) appointed by the Maricopa County
Board of Supervisors to hear and decide all civil proceedings established by any
Ordinance, regulation, or provision enacted or adopted by the Board of
Supervisors under the authority granted by ARS Title 11, Chapter 6 County
Planning and Zoning.
Article 1501.4.
Zoning Inspector: The Director of the Maricopa County Planning and
Development Department or his/her designated representative.
Article 1501.5.Article 1201.2.
Zoning Inspection and Enforcement
1501.5.1.1201.2.1.
Duties: The enforcing officer of this Ordinance shall be the Zoning Inspector,
and it shall also be the duty of the Sheriff of Maricopa County and of all
officers of said County otherwise charged with the enforcement of law to
enforce the provisions of the Ordinance. However, the The Zoning Inspector:
1. Shall receive applications for zoning clearance as required by this
Ordinance.
2. May examine premises for which zoning clearances have been
requested.
3. May make necessary inspections to secure compliance with the
provisions of this Ordinance.
4. Shall, when requested by the Board of Supervisors, or when the
interests of Maricopa County so required, make investigations in
connection with any matter referred to in this Ordinance and
render written reports thereof.
5. Shall further issue such notices or orders as may be necessary for
the purpose of enforcing compliance with the provisions of this
Ordinance.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 12-2
CHAPTER 15 12 – VIOLATION, PENALTY & ENFORCEMENT
5.6. May, upon verification of a violation of this Ordinance by the
enforcing officer, record notice of violation against the property. A
recorded notice of violation shall run with the land and shall
constitute notice to all persons or entities thereafter acquiring
interest in the property. Failure to record a notice of violation shall
not affect the validity of the notice as to persons who received the
notice. When the property is brought into compliance, a
satisfaction of notice of violation shall be recorded.
1501.5.2.
Inspections: See Item 1501.3.1.3.*1, **2
1501.5.3.1201.2.2.
The Zoning Inspector may adopt rules and procedures consistent with this
Ordinance for the implementation thereof.*1, *2
1501.5.4.1201.2.3.
The Zoning Inspector shall keep careful and comprehensive records of
applications for zoning clearances, of inspections made, of reports rendered,
and of notices or orders issued and . He shall further retain on file copies of
all papers documents in connection with zoning clearances for such time as
may be required by law. *1, *2Reports: See Item 1501.3.1.4.**1
1501.5.5.1201.2.4.
Any permit issued that is in conflict with this Ordinance shall be null and void
as if never issued. Permits for uses, buildings or purposes where the same
would be in conflict with the regulations of this Ordinance shall not be issued
and any such permit if issued in conflict with the regulations of this Ordinance
shall be null and void. *1Any permit issued that is in conflict with this
Ordinance shall be null and void as if never issued.
Date of Revisions
*1
Revised 12-30-74
*2
Revised 10-3-77
**1
Deleted 12-30-74
**2
Added 10-3-77
Section 1502.Section 1202.
Violation
Article 1502.1.Article 1202.1.
It shall be unlawful to erect, construct, reconstruct, alter or use any building
or structure within a zoning district without first obtaining a building permit.
Article 1502.2.Article 1202.2.
It shall be unlawful to erect, construct, reconstruct, grade, alter or use any
land within a zoning district in violation of any regulation or any provision of
any Ordinance pertaining thereto.
Article 1502.3.Article 1202.3.
Any such violation of this ordinance shall constitute a public nuisance.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 12-3
CHAPTER 15 12 – VIOLATION, PENALTY & ENFORCEMENT
Section 1503.Section 1203.
Penalty
Article 1503.1.Article 1203.1.
Criminal:
Any person, firm, or corporation determined to be in violation of any such
Ordinance or any part thereof, is guilty of a class 2 misdemeanor. Each and
every day during which the illegal erection, construction, reconstruction,
alteration, maintenance or use continues is a separate offense.
Article 1503.2.Article 1203.2.
Civil:
Article 1503.3.Article 1203.3.
Other Remedies:
If any building or structure is, or is proposed to be, erected, constructed,
reconstructed, altered, maintained or used or any land is altered or is
proposed to be used in violation of any Ordinance, regulation, or provision
enacted or adopted by the Board of Supervisors under ARS Title 11 Chapter
6 County Planning and Zoning, the Board of Supervisors, County Attorney,
Zoning Inspector, or any adjacent or neighboring property owner who is
specially damaged damaged by the violation, in addition to the other
remedies provided by law, may institute injunction, mandamus, abatement
or any other appropriate action or proceedings to prevent, or abate or
remove the unlawful erection, construction, reconstruction, alteration,
maintenance or use.
Section 1504.Section 1204.
Enforcement
Article 1504.1.Article 1204.1.
Withholding of Permits:
The Zoning inspector Inspector shall withhold the issuance of any and all
permits when it appears that the proposed erection, construction,
reconstruction, alteration, maintenance or use does not fully conform to any
all Ordinances, regulations, and or provisions enacted or adopted by the
Board of Supervisors under ARS Title 11 Chapter 6 County Planning and
Zoning.
Article 1504.2.Article 1204.2.
Criminal:
The Zoning Inspector, in consultation with the County Attorney, is authorized
to develop any rules, procedures, processes and forms necessary to
implement criminal proceedings under any ordinance, regulation, or
provision enacted or adopted by the Board of Supervisors under ARS Title 11
Chapter 6 County Planning and Zoning. The County cannot pursue criminal
prosecution of a violation case that was initially opened, and pursued, under
the civil process. This does not restrict the County from pursuing criminal
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 12-4
CHAPTER 15 12 – VIOLATION, PENALTY & ENFORCEMENT
prosecution through a new violation case that is opened and pursued wholly
through the criminal process.
Article 1504.3.Article 1204.3.
Civil:
The Board of Supervisors hereby establishes the position of Hearing Officer
to hear and decide all civil proceedings established by any Ordinance,
regulation, or provision enacted or adopted by the Board of Supervisors
under ARS Title 11 Chapter 6 Planning and Zoning.*31
1504.3.1.
1504.3.2.
Hearing Officer The individual (s) appointed by the Maricopa County
Board of Supervisors to hear and decide all civil proceedings established by
any ordinance, regulation, or provision enacted or adopted by the Board of
Supervisors under the authority granted by ARS Title 11, Chapter 6 County
Planning and Zoning.
1504.3.3.
Zoning Inspector The Director of the Maricopa County Planning and
Development Department or his/her designated representative.
1504.3.4.1204.3.1.
NOTICE
Notice of the hearing shall be personally served on the alleged violator at
least five days prior to the hearing. The zoning inspector shall cause the
notice to be personally served on the alleged violator at least five days before
the hearing. If the zoning inspector is unable to personally serve the notice,
the notice may be served in the same manner prescribed for alternative
methods of service by the Arizona rules of civil procedure. A notice served
upon the alleged violator other than by personal service shall be served at
least thirty days prior to the hearing in accordance with statute including., but
not limited to, service via mail and posting on site.
The notice shall include information regarding the alleged violator’s right to
be represented by counsel or other designated representative and that
failure of the alleged violator to provide timely written notification of an
election to be represented by counsel or other designated representative
constitutes a waiver of that right.
1504.3.5.1204.3.2.
Discovery, Subpoena Power*34
1. No pre-hearing discovery, subpoena for the production of documents or
to compel the appearance of a witness shall be permitted except by
order of the Hearing Officer. absent extraordinary circumstances.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 12-5
CHAPTER 15 12 – VIOLATION, PENALTY & ENFORCEMENT
2. The Hearing Officer may, upon application by a party and good cause
shown, issue a subpoena for the production of documents or to compel
the appearance of a witness.
3.2. The subpoenas Subpoenas shall be served and, on application to the
superior court, enforced in the manner provided by law for the service
and enforcement of subpoenas in civil matters.
1504.3.6.1204.3.3.
Continuance
The hearing Hearing officer Officer may, upon any motion of any party or on
its own motion, continue the hearing for a period not exceeding 60 days, if it
appears that the interests of justice so require. Absent extraordinary
circumstances, no hearing shall be continued by the hearing officerHearing
Officer without notice to both parties. The hearing officerHearing Officer, or
his/her designated administrative assistant, shall cause all parties to be
notified notify both parties in writing of the new hearing date.
1504.3.7.1204.3.4.
Conduct of Hearing
1. the All testimony shall be given under oath. The hearing officerHearing
Officer may administer oaths and affirmations to witnesses. All
testimony shall be given under oath. *34
2.
The hearing officerHearing Officer may, on his own motion, call and
examine witnesses, including the defendantrespondent. No person may
be examined at a hearing except by the hearing officerHearing Officer,
the respondent, the defendant’s respondent’s attorney or designated
representative, the zoning Zoning inspector Inspector or county County
Attorney.
3.
The Arizona rules of evidence shall not apply before the hearing
officerHearing Officer. Any evidence offered may be admitted subject to
a determination by the hearing officer that the offered evidence is
relevant and material and has some probative value to a fact at issue.
This is not to be construed as abrogating any statutory provision relating
to privileged communications.
4.
All witnesses for the county’s case in chief, other than the defendant,
shall be required to testify prior to the defendant being required to
testify or to produce evidence. However, a witness not called to testify
in the county’s case in chief may be called in rebuttal to testify to an issue
raised by the defense.
5.4. The order of proceedings shall be as follows:
A. Testimony of county’s County’s witnesses.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 12-6
CHAPTER 15 12 – VIOLATION, PENALTY & ENFORCEMENT
B. Testimony of defense witnesses.
C. Testimony of county’s County’s rebuttal witnesses, if any.
D. Testimony of defense rebuttal witnesses, if any.
E.
Argument of the parties or their counsel or designated representative,
if permitted by the hearing officerHearing Officer.
F.
Ruling by the hearing officerHearing Officer. The ruling may include
the findings, conclusions and opinion of the hearing officerHearing
Officer.
6.5. A record of tThe proceedings shall be made by audiotape recorded. In
addition, aA record of the proceedings may be made by a court
reporter, if provided by the defendant respondent at the defendant’s
respondent’s expense.
7.6. If no witness for the county County other than the respondent appears
at the time set for the hearing, excluding defendant appears at the time
set for the hearing, the hearing officerHearing Officer shall either
dismiss the complaint or, unless the hearing officer, for good cause
shown, continues the hearing to another date.
7.
If the DEFENDANT respondent fails to appear personally or through
representative OR BE REPRESENTED at the time set for the hearing, THE
ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT SHALL BE DEEMED ADMITTED.. If it
appears from the face of the complaint that the DEFENDANT
respondent is in active military service, no default judgment may be
entered. In such case, the HEARING OFFICERhearing officer may notify
the DEFENDANT’S respondent’s commanding officer, if known, of the
DEFENDANT’S respondent’s failure to appear.
8.
The hearing officer shall close the hearing. They shall enter a written
order following the hearing.
1504.3.8.1204.3.5.
Civil Penalties
If the defendantrespondent is found to be a responsible for a violation of the
zoning ordinance ordinance, after default or hearing, is found responsible the
the hearing officerHearing Officer shall enter judgment impose a non-
compliance penalty and daily non-compliance penalties in accordance with
statue. The Hearing Officer shall not grant additional time to come into
compliance before penalties accrue. for the county, impose civil sanction and
report the judgment to the zoning inspector. The defendant respondent shall
normally correct the violation (s) within 30 days from the hearing date. The
hearing officer Hearing Officer shall outline in the judgment a non-
compliance and daily civil penalty to accrue, should the violation not be
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 12-7
CHAPTER 15 12 – VIOLATION, PENALTY & ENFORCEMENT
abated by the compliance date specified by the hearing officer Hearing
Officer.
1504.3.9.1204.3.6.
Right to Appeal
Immediately following the Hearing Officer’s written order and judgment
imposition of civil sanction after hearing or default, the hearing
officerHearing Officer shall deliver to the defendant respondent a written
notice of his right to appeal to the Board of Adjustment. Such notice shall
state that a right to appeal exists, the applicable time limit, and the location
and manner of filing the notice of appeal, and shall refer the defendant
respondent to the rules governing the appeal process to the Board of
Adjustment.*32
1504.3.10.1204.3.7.
Record on Appeal
The reviewReview of the Hearing Officer’s determination by the Board of
Adjustment shall be limited to the record of proceedings before the hearing
officerHearing Officer and . no No new evidence shall be introducedtaken.
The record of proceedings shall include all pleadings and orders in the hearing
officer’s file, copies of all evidence submitted at the hearing, and a copy of
the audiotape of the hearingrecording of the hearing. If the Board of
Adjustment determines that a transcript of the audiotape is necessary, a
transcript shall be prepared at the county’s expense. A trial de novo (new
trial) is not permitted.*32
1504.3.11.1204.3.8.
Notice of Review
Upon receipt of the record from the hearing officerHearing Officer, the Board
of Adjustment Recording Secretary shall place the appeal on the Board of
Adjustment’s Agenda and shall mail the parties written notice of the time and
place of the hearing. The notice shall be mailed not less fewer than 5 days
prior to the meeting at which the matter will be heard.*32
1504.3.12.1204.3.9.
Review of Hearing
The review shall be limited to an administrative review only. After
consideration of the appeal and review of the record the Board of Adjustment
may affirm the action of the hearing officer or decide that some procedural
error existed and remand for further proceedings.*32
1504.3.13.1204.3.10.
Appeal to Superior Court
Judicial review of the Board of Adjustment’s decision shall be pursuant to
Arizona revised Statutes Title 12, Chapter 7, Article 6.*32
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 12-8
CHAPTER 15 12 – VIOLATION, PENALTY & ENFORCEMENT
Article 1504.4.
OTHER RULES, PROCEDURES AND PROCESSES
The Zoning Inspector in consultation with the Hearing Officer is authorized to develop any other
rules, procedures, processes and forms necessary to implement civil proceedings under any
Ordinance, regulation, or provision enacted or adopted by the Board of Supervisors under ARS
Title 11 Chapter 6 County Planning and Zoning.
Article 1504.5.
ADMINISTRATIVE:
Article 1504.6.
The Zoning Inspector is authorized to develop any other rules,
procedures, processes and forms necessary to implement any other
enforcement action under any Ordinance, regulation, or provision enacted or
adopted by the Board of Supervisors under ARS Title 11 Chapter 6 County
Planning and Zoning.
Article 1504.7.Article 1204.4.
Zoning Clearance:*1, **2, *5, *36
It shall be unlawful to construct, alter, repair or improve, remove or demolish,
or to commence the creation, construction, alteration, removal or demolition
of a building, structure or use without first filing with the Zoning Inspector an
application in writing for and obtaining a Zoning Clearance, except that such
clearance shall not be required for:
1. A non-habitable accessory building or structure that is a single story and
no greater than 200 square feet in floor area. *35
2. Fences or walls with an overall maximum finished height of eight (8) feet
or less, including gates across streets, unless said fence:*37
A. Is part of a pool barrier;
B. Serves to retain soil greater than 18 inches, as measured vertically
from finished grade;
C. Is associated with any hillside development;
D. Is used as a corral;
E. Is the primary use of the property, or
F.
Is on a corner lot abutting a key lot.*8
3. A For project that consists solely of the grading and/or paving of a
recorded public ingress/egress easement located within a non-hillside
area or a hillside roadway area which was disturbed prior to October 4,
2001, in which case the Department shall only require a Zoning Clearance
for the area located within the boundaries of the easement. To
demonstrate entitlement to this exception, the applicant shall provide a
copy of the recorded easement and, if applicable, shall verify that any
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 12-9
CHAPTER 15 12 – VIOLATION, PENALTY & ENFORCEMENT
hillside roadway disturbance existed prior to October 4, 2001. In the
event a grading and paving project involves an ingress/egress easement
over land located within undisturbed hillside or within hillside
disturbance that occurred after October 4, 2001, the applicant shall
demonstrate compliance with the Hillside Regulations as outlined in
Section 1201 901 of this Ordinance.*33
3.4. A Drainage Clearance may be required even when a Zoning Clearance is
not.
Article 1504.8.Article 1204.5.
Limitation Of The Zoning Clearance:*2 *6 *30
A Zoning Clearance shall not be issued for any building or structure on any lot
or parcel unless the owner of the subject lot or parcel guarantees access to
Maricopa County personnel and appropriate emergency service providers for
the purposes of building inspections, zoning enforcement and the provision
of emergency services and any and all public utilities servicing the site. An
owner or his agent, by signing an application for a building permit, guarantees
such access.
Article 1504.9.Article 1204.6.
Expiration Of Zoning Clearances:*3
1504.9.1.1204.6.1.
Any Zoning Clearance authorized under the terms of this Ordinance shall
expire and be considered void under the following circumstances:
1. Six monthsOne-hundred eighty (180) days from the effective date of the
Zoning Clearance provided the use or authorized building construction
to accommodate the use have not actually commenced.
2. If the Building Permit (for which the Zoning Clearance issuance was a
requirement) expires for any reason.
3. If the provisions of this Ordinance, under which the Zoning Clearance was
originally issued, are amended such that the use would not meet the
amended provisions, provided the construction or use has not actually
commenced under valid Building Permit issuance, and provided a
minimum of six monthsOne-hundred eighty (180) days actually elapsed
since the issuance of the Zoning Clearance.
1504.9.2.1204.6.2.
If a Zoning Clearance is expired, it shall be necessary to re-apply for a new
Zoning Clearance in accordance with Chapter 15, Section 1504, Article
1504.5. herein, Planning and Development Department requirements, which
shall be reviewed under the Ordinance provisions in effect at the time of the
re-application.
Article 1504.10.Article 1204.7.
Development Review:*4
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 12-10
CHAPTER 15 12 – VIOLATION, PENALTY & ENFORCEMENT
Prior to the issuance of a permanent Certificate of Occupancy for all buildings
to be occupied by the public and/or a permanent final inspection for
construction of a single-family residence or duplex, construction and/or
development within the unincorporated area shall be in compliance with all
conditions and plans approved by the Board of Supervisors, Board of
Adjustment, and Zoning Clearances issued by staff. The Zoning Inspector shall
enforce this section in the following manner:
1504.10.1.1204.7.1.
Enforce all conditions of approval by the Board of Supervisors or the Board of
Adjustment.
1504.10.2.1204.7.2.
Withhold authorization for a permanent Certificate of Occupancy or
permanent final inspection for any construction or development that has not
complied with the conditions or plans approved by the Board of Supervisors,
Board of Adjustment, and/or staff in the issuance of Zoning Clearances for
Building Permit purposes. The Zoning Inspector may authorize the Chief
Building Official to issue a permanent Certificate of Occupancy or permanent
final inspection without posting the bond required in Chapter 1512, Section
15041204., Article 15041204.87.3. Said authorization may only be given if:
1. The value of the incomplete site improvements is less than $5,000;
2. No hazard to public health, safety and welfare would result; and
3. Written confirmation by the owner that he or she will complete the
required site improvements within a stated and acceptable time frame
has been provided.
Failure to complete the improvements as indicated in writing shall be treated
as a zoning violation in accordance with Sections 1501 through 1503 of this
Ordinance.
1504.10.3.1204.7.3.
Allow a temporary Certificate of Occupancy for all buildings to be occupied
by the public or a temporary final inspection for construction of a single-
family residence or duplex if a financial guarantees in the form of a bond is
provided to the County. An acceptable bond would be payable to the County
in the full amount of the improvement(s) yet to be completed. The Bond
must specify a date for the completion of the improvement(s), which shall be
no later than one year from the date of issuance. The term of the bond shall
be as approved by the Zoning Inspector and may be extended for an
additional year upon application. If the work is not done by the specified
date, the County will cash the bond and deposit the funds in the County's
General Fund. In addition, the County has the authority to require the owner
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025October 17, 2025
page 12-11
CHAPTER 15 12 – VIOLATION, PENALTY & ENFORCEMENT
to complete the improvements or vacate the structure until the
improvements are complete. Notwithstanding any of the above, the Zoning
Inspector may deny a temporary occupancy when he has determined that a
hazard to public health, safety, or general welfare may result.
Article 1504.11.Article 1204.8.
Compliance and Settlement Agreements
The Zoning Inspector is authorized to enter into a compliance or settlement
agreement with a responsible party to (i) establish a plan and deadlines to
bring a property into compliance with this Ordinance; and (ii) compromise
noncompliance fines, daily noncompliance fines and investigative fees with
or without a payment schedule. A compliance or settlement agreement may
be executed at any stage of the code enforcement process. Nothing
contained in an agreement shall be construed as authorizing the continued
violation of the ordinance.
Date of Revisions
*1
Revised 12-30-74
*30
Effective 6-07-98
*2
Added 12-30-74
*31
Effective 4-09-05 – TA2004001
**2
Added 10-03-77
*32
Effective 11-03-10 – TA2010009
*3
Added 5-16-90
*33
Effective 3-16-11 – TA2010020
*4
Added 6-6-91
*34
Effective 9-28-11 – TA2011005
*5
Effective 1-19-01 – TA2000007
*35
Effective 12-14-11 – TA2011019
*6
Revised 10-3-77
*36
Effective 4-25-12 – TA2012006
*8
Effective 9-18-10 – TA2010001
*37
Approved 11-7-14 – TA2014009
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 13-1
CHAPTER 16 13 - FEES
Chapter 16 Chapter 13 | Fees
Section 1301.
Purpose
Article 1301.1.
Purpose:
To consolidate in one location in the Ordinance all regulations relating to
fees, fines and penalties. This Article establishes the amounts and types of
fees, fines and penalties to be charged.
Section 1302.
Fees
Article 1302.1.
Fees: *3, *4, *5, *6, *8, *7, ***9, ***10, ***11, **12, *13, *15, *16, *23, *24, *25, *26, *27
The following fees shall be charged with no provision for refund:
FEE TYPE
FEE
Plan of Development
$1,200 + $100 per acre or portion there
of
Maximum Fee – $50,000
Zoning Change*23 with overlay
$3,000 + $100 per acre or portion there
of
Maximum fee - $50,000
Zone Change
$1,200 + $100 per acre or portion there
of
Maximum Fee - $50,000
Special Use Permit
$3,000 + $100 per acre or portion there
of - Maximum fee - $50,000
Special Use Permit and Military
Compatibility Permit*27
$3,000 + $100 per acre or portion
thereof
Maximum Fee - $50,000
Fee Type
Description
(per offense & conviction)
Minimum Fee
by Use
Minimum Fee
by Use
Single Family
All Other Uses
Civil Fines
Initial
$100
$300
Initial Non-compliance
$200
$500
Daily Non-compliance
$20
$30
Recurrence
$300
$500
Criminal Fines
Class 2
MISDEMEANOR
Class 2
MISDEMEANOR
Investigation Fee Charged when
compliance achieved
by administrative means
Amount equal to
permit or
application
fee
Amount equal to
permit or application
fee
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 13-2
CHAPTER 16 13 - FEES
Request for Use Compatibility and
Consistency Determination (UCCD)
$50 per UCCD request
Text Amendments
$1,000 per Section
Maximum Fee - $5,000
Change to zoning case in process
$100 for each occurrence in process
Comprehensive Plan Amendments,
Development
Master Plans and major Development
Master Plan
amendments
$2,000 + $20 per acre or portion there
of
Maximum fee - $100,000
Minor Development Master
Plan amendments
$1,500 + $10 per acre or portion there
of Maximum fee - $30,000
Minor Amendments to approved site
plans for Special
Use Permits, Plans of Development, and
Unit Plans of Development
$750 + $100 per acre or portion there of
Maximum fee - $5,000
Modification of Stipulation
$500 per stipulation
Minimum fee - $1,000
Maximum fee - $5,000
Major Amendments to approved site
plans for Special
Use Permits, Plans of Development, and
Unit Plans of Development
Charged same as original application fee
Zoning Clearance
Residential - $100
Commercial - $250
Continuance of public hearing
An additional fee shall be charged for any
continuance of a public hearing granted
by the Commission at the request of a
petitioner or petitioner’s representative.
$250
Pre-application meeting fee
$350
Re-initiation of a license administratively
denied
due to time
$50
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 13-3
CHAPTER 16 13 - FEES
Date of Revisions
*3
Revised 1-3-72
*15
Revised 8-21-94
*4
Revised 3-22-76
*16
Added 11-6-95
*5
Revised 3-12-84, Effective 4-
1-84
*19
Effective 5-15-98
*6
Revised 1-7-85
*20
Effective 6-21-98
*7
Revised 4-1-85
*22
Effective 9-17-99
*8
Revised 7-1-85
*23
Effective 3-31-00
***9
Renumbered 8-4-86
*24
Effective 2-7-03 – TA2002001
***10 Renumbered 12-7-87
*25
Effective 6-20-07 – TA2007004
***11 Renumbered 2-6-89
*26
Effective 9-22-08 – TA2007016
**12
Renumbered 8-23-90
*27
Effective 3-17-10 – TA2009012
*13
Revised 8-1-91
*28
Effective 5-22-13 – TA2012029
Grading and Drainage Fee Schedule
Grading and Drainage provisions for Maricopa County, Arizona
The following fees shall be charged for the processing of plan reviews, drainage clearances, appeals, drainage
variances, and performance bonds with no provision for refund. In accordance with Article 1205.3.3.7905.3.3.7
of the Drainage provisions for Maricopa County, the Drainage Administrator may adopt directives for the
effectuation of this fee schedule.
PLANNING AND ZONING
Area Master Plans (Including Development Master Plans
(If concurrent review of DMP, and Plats, lower fee is waived) Up to 640 Acres
$6,000
Plans over 640 Acres
+ $10 / ac.
Maximum Total
$80,000
Plan Amendments (for which a Drainage Review is required by Planning Services) up to
640 Acres
$3,000
Plans over 640 Acres
+ $5 / ac
Maximum Total
$40,000
Zoning Case and UPD Review (without precise plan entitlements)
$60
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 13-4
CHAPTER 16 13 - FEES
Plan of Development Review (with precise plan entitlements) including Special Use
plans (except SFR Special uses)
$1,000
+ $500 ac
Maximum Total
$11,000
Minor Amendment to a Plan of Development including Special Use plans (except SFR
special uses) Including Billboards, WCF or Cellular Sites, and non-livable buildings on
Sites disturbing less than 1 acre
$650
SUP – Modification of Stipulations
$60
Special Use plan for Single Family Residential (SFR) – Including Modification of
Stipulations or Amendments
$210
Subdivisions
Subdivisions - Preliminary Plats
$2000 + $200/ac
Maximum Total
$34,000
Subdivisions - Final Plat
$1000 + $25/ac
Maximum Total
$10,000
Re-Plat for Note Corrections or Easement Adjustments without Drainage Impacts
$60
Other Corrections
$1,000 + $25 ac
Maximum
$10,000
Development Construction Plans
Commercial & Industrial Sites and Uses, Multi-family Residential, Subdivision
Infrastructure, Schools, Golf Courses and Other Recreational Facilities,
Non-Exempted Municipal, Special Districts, Churches, and all other precise plans
$2,000 +$250 ac
Maximum
$42,000
Inspections for Permits on Precise Plans1 with In-Progress Inspections Required
+ $250 ea.
Inspections for Permits on Precise Plans1 with a Final Inspection / As-builts Required
+ $350
Failed Inspection Fee
+ $350
Modification to Issued Permits on Precise Plans1
$2,000 + $125 ac
Maximum Total
$22,000
With Additional Inspections Required for Modified Permits on Precise Plans1
+ $250 ea.
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 13-5
CHAPTER 16 13 - FEES
Minor Accessory Construction On Precise Plans2
$400
With Final Inspection (Required)
+$250
Total
$650
Failed inspection fee for Minor Accessory Construction
+ $250
Modification to issued Permits for Minor Accessory Construction
$250
With Additional Inspections Required for Modified Minor Accessory Construction
+ $250
Major Accessory Construction On Developed Commercial Sites3
$5,000
With Additional Inspections Required for Major Accessory Construction
+ $250 ea.
With a Final Inspection/ As-builts Required
+ $350
Failed Inspection Fee for Major Accessory Construction
+ $250
Modification to Issued Permits for Major Accessory Construction
$2500
With Additional Inspections Required for Modified Major Accessory Construction
+ $250
Residential Site/Drainage Plans
Subdivision lots, Custom lots, Rural Single Family
Approved by Administrative Review
$60
Approved by Site Inspection
+$150
With an In-Progress Inspection Required
+$150
With Final Inspection Required
+$150
Maximum Total
$510
Approved by Engineering Review
$360
With Pre-Issuance Site Inspection (Required)
$150
Minimum Total
$510
With Drainage Report Required for Engineering Review
+$240
With an In-Progress Inspection Required
+$150
With Final Inspection Required
+$150
Maximum Total
$1050
Failed Inspection for Residential Permits
$150
Additional and Concurrent Permits for Engineering Review
+ $30 ea
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 13-6
CHAPTER 16 13 - FEES
In-Progress Inspection Required for Additional and Concurrent Permits
+$150
Multi-Parcel Projects
+ $150/ parcel
Modification to Issued Permits
$250
Modification to Issued Permits on Multi-Parcel Projects
+ $75/ parcel
New SFR in Approved Subdivision – Expedited Process
Lots Approved for Expedited Permit Process with Certified Pad Elevation
$60
Final Inspection Required
+ $150
Other Fees
Drainage Review Board Cases (Variances and Appeals)
Commercial and Subdivision
$1,000
All Other Sites
$250
Board of Adjustment
$100
Special Inspections - Consultations with County Staff (On-site or at County Offices)
SFR
$150
Commercial
$300
Complex Projects
$350
Work begun or completed without a permit
Residential (violation case opened before permit initialization)
$500
Residential (voluntary compliance without a violation case opened)
$250
Commercial including subdivisions (with or without open violation case opened)
Fees Doubled
Pre-Application review and meetings*2
$350
1 Commercial & industrial sites and uses, multi-family residential, subdivision infrastructure,
schools, golf courses and other recreational facilities, non-exempted municipal, special districts,
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 13-7
CHAPTER 16 13 - FEES
churches, and all other precise plans.
2 Sites must have an established primary use, be developed in substantial conformance with the
drainage regulations, and the construction activity must disturb less than one acre. Minor
accessory construction includes, but is not limited to, signs, ada accessibility accessible ramps,
propane tanks, trash enclosures, non-livable and accessory buildings, as defined in section 301.
3 Sites must have an established primary use, be developed in substantial conformance with the
drainage regulations, and the construction activity must disturb less than 5 acres.
Date of Revisions
*1
Effective 10-19-11 – TA2011012
*2
Effective 5-22-13 – TA2012029
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 13-8
CHAPTER 16 13 - FEES
Section 1303.
Fees for Appeals*2, *7
Article 1303.1.
Appeals:*6
The following fees shall be charged for the filing of an appeal concerning the
interpretation or administration of this Ordinance with no provision for
refund:
Fee Type
Fee
Article I. Appeal of Determination of Zoning
Inspector
$300
Article II. Appeal of a license administratively
denied due to time
$150
Date of Revisions
*2
Revised 3-22-76
*7
Revised 8-01-91
*6
Added 4-01-84
Section 1304.
Application Fees for Variance
Article 1304.1.
Application Fees for Variance:*8, *9
The following fees shall be charged for the filing of an application for any
Variance to the regulations of this Ordinance with no provision for refund:
Date of Revisions
*8
Revised 2-20-94
*9
Revised 8-21-94
Section 1305.
Temporary Use Permits
Article 1305.1.
Use Permits:
The following fees shall be charged with no provision for refund:
Fee Type
Min fee by use
Residential Temporary Use Permit
$250
Non-residential Temporary Use Permit
$750
Date of Revisions
Fee Type
Fee
Residential Variance
$250 + $50 for each additional request
Non-Residential Variance
$750 + $100 for each additional request
Blanket Variance
$750 + $100 for each additional request
Continuance of Public Hearing when requested
by applicant prior to the hearing.
$250
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 13-9
CHAPTER 16 13 - FEES
Entire
chapter
Revised & Effective 07-
20-07
Section 1306.
Outstanding Fees And Fines
Article 1306.1.
No application shall be scheduled for hearing by any board or commission
acting pursuant to the “Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance (MCZO)”, or
administratively approved unless and until all fees and fines owed to the
Department as a result of any activity or inactivity attributable to the
property that is the subject of the application are brought current and paid
in full or any amounts owed pursuant to an agreement of compliance are
current, as the case me be. This requirement shall not be waived by the
board/commission. *1, *2
Date of Revisions
*1
Effective 6-01-2009 – TA2009003
*2
Effective 6-01-2010 – TA2010003
Section 1307.
Other License Fees
Article 1307.1.
Other License Fees:
The following fees shall be charged:
Date of Revisions
*1
Effective 5-22-13 – TA2012029
Fee Type
Fee
Re-Initiate Application for License Administratively
Denied due to Time
$50
Pre-Application Meeting
(Non-Residential)
$350
Pre-Application Meeting
(Single-Family Residential)
$50
Pre-Application Meeting
(Single-Family Residential with Violation)
$150
Change to an Application for a License in Progress
$50
Application Added to an Application for a License in
Progress
$50
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 14-1
CHAPTER 17 14 – INDEX & APPENDICES
Chapter 17 Chapter 14| Index & Appendices
Section 1701.
INDEX
Accessory Buildings: 11-8
Additional Dwelling Unit: 11-9
Additional Yard and Open Space: 11-10
Adult Oriented Facilities: 2-1, 8-16
Agriculturally Oriented operations and facilities: 13-1
Aircraft: 11-27
Amateur Radio Antennas: 11-28
Amendments: 3-4
Amendment Approval: 3-8
Amendment Initiated by the Commission: 3-6
Amendments Initiated by Property Owner: 3-4
Amendments to Zoning Ordinance Standards: 3-8
Appeals: 3-2
Applying General Provisions: 11-1
Board of Adjustment: 3-1
Boarding Stables: 13-2
Building Permits: 15-2, 15-3, 15-4, 15-5, 15-7
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 14-2
CHAPTER 17 14 – INDEX & APPENDICES
Campers, Truck: 2-22, 11-27
Camping Trailers: 2-22, 11-27
Caretaker(s) Quarters: 13-10
Churches: 2-21, 5-1, 6-1, 6-10, 6-11, 6-13, 6-14, 6-16, 8-10, 10-27, 11-12, 14-11, 14-12, 16-4, 16-
6,
Citizen Review Process: 3-12, 10-34
Commercial Unit Plan of Development (CUPD): 10-7, 11-19, 12-14
Community Residence: 2-6, 5-1, 6-1, 12-33 – 12-38, 13-2
Compliance with County Plans: 3-9
Construction of Language: 1-3
Construction Office/Yard Complex: 3-1, 5-8, 8-1, 8-5, 8-12, 9-2, 13-12
Corner Lots: 2-36, 11-9, 11-13
Corral: 5-4, 6-4, 15-8
Cottage Industry: 2-14, 13-4
Declaration: 1-1
Definitions: 2-1
Development Review: 15-9
Development Rights, Protected: 12-14
Detoxification Facility, 2-7, 8-18
Drainage: 2-7, 12-17
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 14-3
CHAPTER 17 14 – INDEX & APPENDICES
Effective Date: 1-1
Emergency Housing: 5-8, 6-6, 8-1, 8-5, 8-12, 9-2
Enforcement: 15-3
Events, Temporary: 13-9
Farms: 5-1, 5-11, 5-13, 9-9
Fees: 16-1
Fences, Walls & Screening: 5-4, 6-3, 8-3, 8-18, 8-22, 8-27, 9-6, 9-13, 9-16, 10-6, 10-8, 10-10, 10-
16, 10-18, 15-7
Flood Control: 11-25
General Provisions: 10-1, 11-1
Golf Courses: 5-2, 6-2
Group Care Facility: 2-14, 8-18, 13-2
Halfway House: 2-15, 8-21
Height Regulations, Additional: 11-12
Hillside: 12-1
Home Occupations: 5-2, 6-2, 13-4
Housing, Temporary: 13-8
Industrial Unit Plan of Development (IUPD): 10-9
Interpretation: 1-2
Kennels: 13-2
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 14-4
CHAPTER 17 14 – INDEX & APPENDICES
Lands Not Previously Zoned: 4-4
Lands Previously Zoned by other Jurisdictions: 4-4
Landscaping: 8-3, 8-8, 9-4, 9-6, 10-17, 10-20
Loading and Unloading: 11-6
Lot Area and Dimension: 11-10
Lots Divided by Zoning District Boundaries: 4-5
Mobile Home Parks: 12-12, 13-2
Mobile Home Subdivisions: 11-10, 13-2
Model Home Sales Office: 5-8, 6-6
Motor Homes: 11-25
Noise: 10-8, 10-9, 10-10, 10-18, 10-20, 10-24, 10-25, 10-37
Nonconforming Uses: 13-16
Nonresidential Use of Mobile Home: 13-10
Notice Requirements: 3-3, 3-6
Number of Principal Buildings on a Lot: 11-9
Outdoor Light: 11-20
Overlay Zoning District, HWY 74 Scenic Corridor: 10-21
Overlay Zoning District, Planned Development (PD): 10-10
Overlay Zoning District, Senior Citizens (SC): 10-12
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 14-5
CHAPTER 17 14 – INDEX & APPENDICES
Overlay Zoning District, Westside Military Airbase: 10-14
Overlay Zoning District, Wickenburg Scenic Corridor: 10-15
Oxford House: 2-21
Planned Area Development (PAD): 10-1
Parking Regulations: 11-1
Parking, Additional Regulations: 11-5
Parking, Design Standards: 11-3
Parking, Handicapped: 11-2
Parking, Layout: 11-4
Penalty: 15-2
Plant Nurseries: 5-4, 8-18
Property Maintenance: 2-7, 11-27
Public Hearings: 3-3
Public Way Vacation: 4-4
Purpose: 1-1
Reconsideration of Denied Petition: 3-9
Recovery Community: 2-23, 7-4, 12-33 – 12-38, 13-2
Repeal of Conflicting Ordinances: 1-2
Residential Unit Plan of Development (RUPD): 10-5
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 14-6
CHAPTER 17 14 – INDEX & APPENDICES
Respondent: 2-24, 3-16
Rezoning: 3-4
Riding and Boarding Stables: 13-2
Right of Way, Acquisition: 11-7
Schools: 5-1, 6-1, , 8-11
Separability Clause: 1-2
Setback Lines: 11-7
Sight Triangle: 11-13
Signs: Chapter 14
Special Uses: 13-1
Swimming Pools: 5-6, 6-4, 7-1, 7-5
Temporary Event: 13-9
Temporary Housing: 13-8
Temporary Seasonal Sales: 13-11
Travel Trailers: 11-25
Underage Occupancy: 13-10
Uses, Accessory: 11-8
Uses, Exempted: 13-15
Uses, Nonconforming: 13-16
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 14-7
CHAPTER 17 14 – INDEX & APPENDICES
Uses, Special: 13-1
Use, Temporary: 13-8
Variance: 3-2
Violation: 15-1
Wireless Communication Facilities: 12-5, 13-5
Yard & Space Regulations, Additional: 11-10
Zoning Clearance: 15-7
Zoning Clearance, Expiration of: 15-8
Zoning Clearance, Limitation of: 15-8
Zoning, Conditional: 3-9
Zoning Districts: 4-1
Zoning Districts, Boundaries: 4-3
Zoning Districts, Boundary Lines: 4-3
Zoning Districts, Boundary Determination: 4-3
Zoning Districts, Commercial: 8-1
Zoning Districts, Establishment of: 4-1
Zoning Districts, Industrial: 9-1
Zoning Districts, Multiple Family Residential: 7-1
Zoning Districts, Overlay: 10-1
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 14-8
CHAPTER 17 14 – INDEX & APPENDICES
Zoning Districts, Rural: 5-1
Zoning Districts, Single Family Residential: 6-1
Zoning Inspection: 15-1
Section 1702.
APPENDICES
REQUIREMENTS
FOR THE
HEIGHT, YARD
AND INTENSITY
OF USE
REGULATIONS
FOR RURAL &
RESIDENTIAL
ZONING
DISTRICTS:
ZONING
DISTRICT
MAXIMUM
BUILDING
HEIGHT
MINIMUM YARD REGULATIONS (FEET)
INTENSITY OF USE REGULATIONS
FEET
FRONT
REAR
INTERIOR
SIDE
STREET
SIDE
MIN.
LOT
AREA
(SQ.
FT.)
MIN.
LOT
WIDTH
(FT.)
MIN. LOT
AREA PER
DWELLING
UNIT
(SQ. FT.)
MAX LOT
COVERAGE
(% OF
LOT)
RURAL - 190
30
60
60
30
30
190,000
300
190,000
10
RURAL - 70
30
60
60
30
30
70,000
250
70,000
15
RURAL - 43
30
40
40
30
20
43,560
145
43,560
25
R1 - 35
30
40
40
20
20
35,000
145
35,000
30
R1 - 18
30
30
30
10
15
18,000
120
18,000
35
R1 - 10
30
20
25
7
10
10,000
80
10,000
40
R1 - 8
30
20
25
7
10
8,000
80
8,000
45
R1 - 7
30
20
25
5
10
7,000
70
7,000
45
R1 - 6
30
20
25
5
10
6,000
60
6,000
50
R - 2
30
20
25
5
10
6,000
60
4,000
60
R - 3
40
20
25
5
10
6,000
60
3,000
60
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 14-9
CHAPTER 17 14 – INDEX & APPENDICES
R - 4
40
20
25
5
10
6,000
60
2,000
60
R - 5
40
20
25
5
10
6,000
60
1,000
60
THIS APPENDIX IS ESTABLISHED AS A REFERENCE GUIDE TO THIS ZONING ORDINANCE BUT IT IS NOT AN INTEGRAL
PART THEREOF. WHENEVER THERE IS ANY DIFFERENCE IN MEANING OR IMPLICATION BETWEEN THIS APPENDIX
AND THE TEXT OF THIS ZONING ORDINANCE, THE TEXT OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE SHALL PREVAIL.
Section 1703.Section 1401.
REVISIONS/ADDITIONSOrdinance Update and
Amendments
December [DATE] 2025, Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance Update. File a Public Records
Request to view the November 15, 2023 version for previous language and text amendments.
AMENDMENT
CHANGES/ADDITIONS/DELETIONS
AFFECTED CHAPTERS
DATE
TA2000002
Charter Schools
12
Effective 10-4-01
TA2000004
Airstrip Obstacle Free Zone
11
Effective 9-7-01
TA2000005
Citizen Participation Plans
3
Effective 6-1-01
TA2000006
Cellular Communication Facilities Use
12
Effective 10-4-01
TA2000007
Zoning Clearances & Fence Permits
15
Effective 1-19-01
TA2000010
Hillside Amendments
2, 12
Effective 10-4-01
TA2002001
Administrative Amendments
3
Effective 2-7-03
TA2002004
Zoning Ordinance (New Format)
A new format
(All Chapters)
Effective 6-10-02
TA2003002
Accessory Dwelling Units/Guest Homes
2, 5, 6, 10, 11, 13
Effective 1-19-07
TA2003004
Setbacks/Buildings Housing Animals
13
Effective 11-19-04
TA2003005
Use Permit Streamlined
2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 13, 16, 17
Effective 7-7-06
TA2004001
Civil Enforcement Procedures
15
Effective 4-9-05
TA2004004
Automobile Storage
13
Effective 2-4-05
TA2005001
Government Action Amendment
2, 13
Effective 2-16-07
TA2005007
Wireless Communication Facilities
12
Effective 1-5-07
TA2006001
Chapter 2 Definition, Lot Coverage
2
Effective 5-5-06
TA2006003
Outdoor Storage and Interim Industrial
Use
8, 13
Effective 9-15-06
TA2006004
Terraces and Retaining Walls
11
Effective 2-1-07
TA2006005
Mobile Home Subdivision
2
Effective 8-16-06
TA2006007
Floor Area
2
Effective 1-19-07
TA2006011
Evaporation Ponds and Appurtenances
13
Effective 1-19-07
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 14-10
CHAPTER 17 14 – INDEX & APPENDICES
AMENDMENT
CHANGES/ADDITIONS/DELETIONS
AFFECTED CHAPTERS
DATE
TA2008004
Dark Sky Billboard Lighting
11
Effective 9-14-11
TA2008005
Accessory Dwelling Units
2, 5, 6, 10, 11, 13
Effective 11-14-08
TA2008006
Equestrian Uses
5
Effective 9-18-09
TA2008008
Revision to Plan of Development Process
7, 8
Effective 1-16-09
TA2008009
Super-Majority Vote
3
Effective 7-17-09
TA2009003
Outstanding Fines and Fees
3, 13, 16
Effective 6-1-09
TA2009007
Park Definition
2
Added 8-19-09
TA2009008
Entry Features
5
Effective 7-17-09
TA2009011
Board of Adjustment
3
Effective 11-7-09
TA2009012
Military Compatibility
3, 10, 16
Effective 3-17-10
TA2009014
By-Right Solar and Small Wind
2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
Effective 11-19-10
TA2010001
Key Lot Wall Setbacks
6, 15
Effective 9-18-10
TA2010003
Outstanding Fees and Fines
3, 13, 16
Effective 6-1-10
TA2010009
Code Enforcement Review
3, 15
Effective 11-3-10
TA2010012
Manufactured and Mobile Homes
2, 5, 6, 13
Effective 1-11-12
TA2010013
Charter Schools
2, 5, 6, 13
Effective 11-3-10
TA2010014
Home daycare
2, 5, 6
Effective 2-11-11
TA2010017
Medical Marijuana
2, 5, 6, 8, 13
Effective 12-28-10
TA2010020
Zoning Clearance for Grading and Paving
in Access Easements
15
Effective 3-16-11
TA2010022
Maximum Heights
5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11
Effective 3-16-11
TA2011001
Medical Marijuana Revisions
2, 5, 6, 9, 13
Effective 9-30-11
TA2006013
C-S Signage
8, 14
Effective 9-21-07
TA2007004
Revised Fees
16
Effective 6-20-07
TA2007005
Zoning of Rights-of-Way
4
Effective 6-20-07
TA2007006
Sign Ordinance
14
Effective 2-9-11
TA2007012
Compliance with County Plans
3
Effective 9-7-07
TA2007016
Plan of Development Process
3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 16
Effective 9-22-08
TA2007018
Emergency Service Provider
5, 6, 8, 13
Effective 1-11-12
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 14-11
CHAPTER 17 14 – INDEX & APPENDICES
TA2011002
Charter schools
8
Effective 4-27-11
TA2011003
Sign Regulations for Light Pole Banners
and A-frame signs
14
Effective 9-14-11
TA2011005
Hearing Officer Subpoena Power
15
Effective 9-28-11
TA2011008
Housekeeping for By-Right Solar and
Small Wind
12
Effective 9-16-11
TA2011010
Accessory Structures in Required Side
Yards
11
Effective 10-19-11
AMENDMENT
CHANGES/ADDITIONS/DELETIONS
AFFECTED CHAPTERS
DATE
TA2011011
Continuing Existing Uses
13
Effective 10-10-11
TA2011012
Drainage Regulations
2, 12, 16
Effective 10-19-11
TA2011013
Distance Between Buildings
5, 6, 7
Effective 10-19-11
TA2011014
Accessory Dwelling Units
5, 6
Effective 10-19-11
TA2011017
Farms and Roadside Stands
2, 5
Effective 10-19-11
TA2011018
Hillside
12
Effective 10-19-11
TA2011019
Zoning Clearance and Drainage Clearance 12, 15
Effective 12-14-11
TA2011021
Hillside
12
Effective 12-14-11
TA2012001
Protected Development Rights
12
Effective 3-28-12
TA2012006
Corrals / Zoning Clearance
15
Effective 4-25-12
TA2012009
Wall/Fence Heights and Prohibitions
2, 6, 11
Effective 8-22-12
TA2012020
Temporary Events
13
Effective 8-22-12
TA2012023
Open Metal Patio Covers
2
Effective 11-14-12
TA2012024
Model Home Complex Sign Regulations
5, 6
Effective 12-12-12
TA2012026
Renewable Energy Systems
12
Effective 12-12-12
TA2012003
Sign amendment
14
Effective 10-31-12
TA2012029
P-31 Fee
16
Effective 5-22-13
TA2012011
Community Gardens
2, 5, 6, 8, 9
Effective 7-17-13
TA2012012
Keeping of Animals - Chickens
6
Effective 7-17-13
TA2012015
RV Storage / Parking
11
Effective 7-17-13
TA2012016
Unregistered / Inoperable Vehicles
11
Effective 7-17-13
TA2012033
Rural-43 Lot Coverage
5
Effective 7-17-13
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 14-12
CHAPTER 17 14 – INDEX & APPENDICES
TA2013002
Hillside Retaining Walls
11
Effective 7-17-13
TA2013003
Drainage Waivers
12
Effective 7-17-13
TA2013014
Ordinance No. P-32 / Medical Marijuana
2, 8, 9
Effective 1-29-14
TA2013006
Location of Parking
11
Effective 5-23-14
AMENDMENT
CHANGES/ADDITIONS/DELETIONS
AFFECTED CHAPTERS
DATE
TA2013007
Temporary Uses
13
Effective 5-23-14
TA2013009
Setbacks
2, 11
Effective 5-23-14
TA2013010
Hillside
12
Effective 5-23-14
TA2013012
Commercial Signs
14
Effective 7-30-14
TA2013013
Runways
11
Effective 8-29-14
TA2014001
Wireless Communication Facilities
2, 12, 13
Effective 7-10-15
TA2014002
Residential Lot Coverage
6, 7, 17
Effective 11-7-14
TA2014003
C-1 Use Regulations
8
Effective 10-8-14
TA2014004
R-5 Use Regulations
7
Effective 11-7-14
TA2014005
Billboard SUP
13
Effective 11-7-14
TA2014006
Special Uses / Use Regulations
5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13
Effective 11-7-14
TA2014008
Property Maintenance
2, 11
Effective 11-7-14
TA2014009
Gates (Zoning)
15
Effective 11-7-14
TA2015001
Amateur Radio Antennas
11
Effective 7-9-14
TA2015002
Restaurants and Cafes
8
Effective 7-9-14
TA2015003
Temporary Use
13
Effective 7-9-14
TA2015004
Accessory Recreational Structures
5, 6
Effective 6-3-16
TA2016001
Group Home/Group Care Facility
Definitions
2
Effective 4-26-17
TA2016002
C-3 Nightclubs
8
Effective 4-26-17
TA2016003
Runway and Landing Strips
11
Effective 4-26-17
TA2016004
Home Occupation/Sales, Garage/Yard
Definitions
2
Effective 4-26-17
TA2016005
Adult Oriented Facilities Definition
2
Effective 4-26-17
TA2016007
Home Occupation
2, 5, 6 & 13
Effective 4-26-17
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE | October 28, 2025
page 14-13
CHAPTER 17 14 – INDEX & APPENDICES
TA2019001
Wireless Communication Facilities
12 & 13
Effective 10-7-20
TA2019002
Variance Timeframe
3
Effective 10-7-20
TA2019003
Home Base Business
5 & 6
Effective 10-7-20
AMENDMENT
CHANGES/ADDITIONS/DELETIONS
AFFECTED CHAPTERS
DATE
TA2020002
Marijuana
2, 8 & 9
Effective 3-10-21
TA2018001
Off-Site Advertising Signs (Billboards)
2, 11, 13, 14
Effective 12-15-21
TA2020001
Group Homes
2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13
Effective 3-11-22
TA2023003
Rural Lot Coverage
5 & 17
Effective 11-1-23
1
September 22, 2025
2025
Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance Update
Survey Responses
(301 Total Responses)
June 5, 2025 to
Sept. 12, 2025
September 22, 2025
1. What ideas do you have to simplify the zoning ordinance?
Examples: Fewer zoning districts, consolidated use tables, visual diagrams, less technical language
Skip to Question 2
2
September 22, 2025
1.
Tables and visuals are great. Consolidated info that gets repeated or the
difference between districts is so slight. Move some content into
supplementary use section.
2.
allow mixed used development
3.
Tables and visual diagrams are good. A good definition of terms is a must.
4.
Have a comprehensive definitions section. Concur with examples noted.
Visual examples are highly effective in representing complex items, such as
setback standards, architectural design standards, etc.
5.
Visuals are very helpful. City council must have oversight & their community
input recognized.
6.
Consolidated use tables are a great idea to make the ordinance more user
friendly
7.
Use tables and diagrams for those who may not understand
8.
Visual clear diagrams as to set backs etc. & then ENFORCE THEM. The county
is not even doing a good job of that today
9.
Keep the zoning ordinances that we have.
10.
Keep the zoning ordinances that we have, but a consolidated use table or
chart comparing the rules for each would be helpful
11.
Less technical language.
12.
charts and graphics rather than verbiage
13.
Less technical language
14.
visual diagram and less technical language
15.
"let. each. municipality. determine. their. own. zoning. standards. and
overturn. the. states.
16.
zoning. standards"
17.
Zoning ordinances were put in for a reason and should be kept that way and
not changed on a whim
18.
Anything that keeps BNSF from getting their change
19.
I have none
20.
First of all the zoning ordinance needs to be actually followed by inspectors
and in approval.
21.
Fewer zoning districts, consolidated use tables, visual diagrams, less
technical language
22.
Reducing quantity of zoning districts
23.
Less apartments, less land for churches who don’t contribute to the property
taxes. The apartments are causing water pressure issues with water and
congestion of traffic.
Question 1
1. What ideas do you have to simplify the zoning ordinance?
Examples: Fewer zoning districts, consolidated use tables, visual diagrams, less technical language
Skip to Question 2
3
September 22, 2025
24.
Information explaining the process of zoning districts would be helpful. How
they are decided, and why.
25.
Fewer districts
26.
Less technical language, make it more user friendly.
27.
None
28.
Concise verbiage and detailed diagrams of the zoning ordinances
29.
Fewer zoning districts and visual diagrams
30.
All the above
31.
visual diagrams & less technical language
32.
Make it easy for regular people to go through the process. Lots of us need a
spot for aging parents or family and our houses don’t have enough bed space.
Litchfield park has very strict rules making it overly difficult to put a tiny
dwelling behind the house for parents
33.
None, sorry.
34.
Visual diagrams. Less technical language
35.
Layman terminology
36.
Fewer zoning for more housing developments and apartments, etc.
37.
Restrict Business with W-2 and 1099 Employees form Residential Zoned
Neighborhoods. Current Residential Zones Business Must Confine their
actives to the confines of their property. This includes Street Parking.
38.
All of your examples above, fewer zoning districts, consolidated use tables,
less technical language, visual diagrams. County should be looking closer
before they decide on some of these re-zonings. Too lax.
39.
N/A except those noted below
40.
SHOULD HAVE SEPARATE ZONING DISTRICTS FOR INDUSTRIAL AND
HOUSING.
41.
Less technical language
42.
Less technical language
43.
Do not issue permits to builders if the property doesn’t have water. No more
hauled water.
44.
USE PLAIN ENGLISH.
45.
Visual diagrams, less technical language
46.
Leave the zoning as it is along carefree Hwy, the Scenic by way. No more
commercial zoning, just like Tatum Blvd & Lincoln in Paradise valley NOT Bell
Rd
47.
Visual diagrams are most helpful.
1. What ideas do you have to simplify the zoning ordinance?
Examples: Fewer zoning districts, consolidated use tables, visual diagrams, less technical language
Skip to Question 2
4
September 22, 2025
48.
Faster permitting for smaller projects, less strict drainage requirements, more
visual diagrams, more ability to contact someone and talk about your
protect/faster responses. Ability to text to get quick answers. Video call
review of areas so less driving and less delays for site visits.
49.
Visual diagrams
50.
Easy to understand what is allowed in a zone district. ie: size of warehouse
dictated by volume of truck traffic, industrial by size and noise. All of the
above restricted by distance to residential.
51.
Why do you people feel they have to change things? If you were willing to
make zoning more restrictive that is one thing but loosening, absolutely not!
No to short term rentals in residential neighborhoods.
52.
less technical language. Keep ordinances close to the same as in the past.
53.
Hoa requirements are getting crazy while taking away hoa authority like over
street parking. Stop requiring all the money while limiting the rules. If I have to
pay for my own parks and sidewalks in addition to property taxes allow me to
govern
54.
one page summary sheets with key bullet points and diagrams/illustrations
55.
Less technical language
56.
visual diagrams and less technical language
57.
Residential zoning prohibits short-term/vacation rentals. These properties
degrade neighborhoods, artificially increase prices of housing by decreasing
the supply of housing for families. The inconvenient truth is that no one
wants to live next to an STR
58.
Allow more multi-story and higher density.
59.
Less technical language
60.
Clearer language. More consistency between districts.
61.
All of your suggestions would help
62.
Use less technical language and if the ordinances can be followed county
wide. Less back and forth within areas.
63.
Zone all residential areas as multi family due to homelessness and high rents
so families can live together on the same property that is owned by one of the
family member. I have three adult children who are struggling to pay AZ high
rents, I have a house that I could be turned into a three plex if my area was
rezoned different.
64.
Simple language not subject to interpretation.
65.
Less emphasis on density and more focus on intensity to contain urban
sprawl and dependency on private versus public or walkable transportation.
1. What ideas do you have to simplify the zoning ordinance?
Examples: Fewer zoning districts, consolidated use tables, visual diagrams, less technical language
Skip to Question 2
5
September 22, 2025
66.
Definitely keep zoning at the top of our priority as a community. Rules make
us all better citizens.
67.
visual diagrams
68.
Lower density with no exceptions or variances.
69.
Go back to no buildings over 2 stories except downtown corridor. The skyline
is being ruined
70.
Fewer districts tiny homes
71.
Keep industrial output of RU areas. If there are homes nearby do NOT zone
industrial
72.
More diagrams and plan views could be helpful, spelling out setbacks, zoning
districts, etc.
73.
Only build stand alone houses!!!
74.
Cut down on the county islands within a city.
75.
Make your rules and don’t let developers chip away at the zoning. Buyers
count on the rules for protection of their largest investment - their house - only
to find council members constantly changing zoning!
76.
I support faster enforcement of the existing zoning rules. It takes forever (3
years in a case of a construction yard on a RE35 lot). Businesses are rampant
in residential neighborhoods. Enforcement!!
77.
Make questionnaires and surveys like this easier to find to add input. Then
use less technical language in the zoning regulations and use visual
diagrams. The language used in this questionnaire is good.
78.
Visual diagram
79.
Switch to plain language when possible; keep the same number of zoning
types, review to see if it still makes sense [Maricopa County is very different
than it was 20 years ago].
80.
Visual diagrams, less technical language
81.
All the above!
82.
Fewer districts = less government interference = less red tape = more gets
accomplished.
83.
Use tables, diagrams, less technical language
84.
Visual diagrams. Don't dumb down, educate with clear definitions of
terminology. Include objective and expected outcome.
85.
I would like to see as many visual diagrams as possible and less use of
technical language.
86.
all of the above
1. What ideas do you have to simplify the zoning ordinance?
Examples: Fewer zoning districts, consolidated use tables, visual diagrams, less technical language
Skip to Question 2
6
September 22, 2025
87.
Quit going to California for your ideas. Thats number 1. Simplification of rules
so a fifth grader can understand it, a dumb fifth grader.
88.
Clear wording and less technical language
89.
Visual diagrams will simply the complex language used and allow citizens to
understand what ordinances are being proposed.
90.
visual diagrams
91.
Less technical knowledge and more impact study
92.
Less technical language
93.
Make it so there is no room for interpretation (e.g. is a fence a "structure", can
an exiting well/tank be in the front setback). Get rid of hillside. Make future
ROW more clear. Fix SVT instructions! (e.g. they are NOT clear). Don't ask for
structural on simple overhead entrance gates!!! Nobody has died in this
County because an overhead gate fell on their car.
94.
Simpler language and straight forward procedures
95.
Fewer districts and more visuals
96.
Less technical language
97.
Use plain language and provide clear examples
98.
Less technical language, consolidated use tables, visual diagrams
99.
Less technical language
100. Make it easier to read with less technical language and more diagrams.
101. less technical language, visual diagrams
102. None. Keep as is.
103. Easier website to use
104. visual diagrams and less technical language
105. I’m not sure zoning issues apply to Sun City, currently. However, maybe they
should.
106. Have not had to address any of these issues
107. Fewer zoning districts - Sun City is different and we need Maricopa County to
respect and abide by SCHOA guidelines. ie: no 2 story building add-on or RV
garages (attached or not attached).
108. Adu
109. Base it on Sitley's unsightly example, but don't limit the ability to add to
personal property if done tastefully. Subjective, local voluntary committees to
help alleviate this type of red tape.
110. less technical language
111. Visual diagrams, additional definitions, and direct, simple language
1. What ideas do you have to simplify the zoning ordinance?
Examples: Fewer zoning districts, consolidated use tables, visual diagrams, less technical language
Skip to Question 2
7
September 22, 2025
112. I'm not sure what effect my opinion will have on this survey. If the planning
commission and city council keep cowering down to the developers and their
lawyers and change the zoning anyway what does it matter what the
community wants?
113. more education about what the zoning is now and what are the plans for
changes
114. Visual diagrams are always helpful as well as interactive maps.
115. Keep lower standards in the county and simpler processes. Lower standards
for agricultural properties and farms that should be incentivized and
protected. Not so much concrete and asphalt and expensive engineering.
Don't replace residential with industrial. Don’t overregulate the environment.
116. Visual diagrams; less technical language
117. Zoning districts should be understandable - less technical language & visual
diagrams should be required.
118. n/a
119. Ease up on some of the zoning setback restrictions in over 55 mobile home
parks. They need to accommodate today's living environment and needs as
long as they don't affect safety and security.
120. add visual diagrams where appropriate, and use less technical language
121. "Visual diagrams, less technical language
122. A clear process for how to get approval and what is needed to prepare for an
inspection "
123. "Visual diagrams with less technical language. Restricting manufacturing
124. /light industrial to at least 5 miles from residential/retail areas"
125. visual diagrams, NAOS diagrams
126. Fewer zoning districts, consolidated use tables, visual diagrams, less
technical language
127. The customer knows the ordnance better than the reviewer train them better.
In a rural area fences are on the property line. What is the difference
between front side and rear on a ranch can have stables where ever
128. Visual diagrams include drainage and fire hazards.
129. Convince the State legislature to repeal STR permissive laws and return STR
control to cities. That will put thousands of home on the market, creating a
buyers’ market
130. Fewer districts, clearer language, less legalese
131. Visual diagrams, less technical language
132. Use Visual diagrams and plain English
1. What ideas do you have to simplify the zoning ordinance?
Examples: Fewer zoning districts, consolidated use tables, visual diagrams, less technical language
Skip to Question 2
8
September 22, 2025
133. Less technical language
134. I have no experience with zoning ordinances
135. No comments
136. I don’t know enough to have ideas about it…
137. "City and town ordnances MUST be adhered to.
138. State and county rulings must not dictate zoning! Important t keep character
of neighborhoods and cities/towns"
139. "Allow 5 residential zoning districts
140. Multifamily (apartments) establish common sense setbacks, establish limits
on units per acre
141. Establish a minimum lot size for small starter homes (tiny homes), reduce
setback requirements
142. Single-family lots to be a minimum of 10,000 SF, reduce lot coverage to
reduce density
143. Increase setback requirements for min quarter-acre lots, allow casitas for this
size lot only
144. One-acre lots + increase setback requirements, allow casitas"
145. No
146. Specific zoning districts
147. Consolidated use tables
148. Easy language to read
149. Stop letting democrats make decisions that go against the constitution
150. Enforce what you enact.
151. The technical language and definitions are necessary. Would be hard to
simplify. Good luck.
152. Better control of zoning in rural areas. Stop the invasion by wildcat builders.
153. Examples of approved projects. Templates for different type of projects. List
of engineers, designers, architectures, developers that have approved
projects.
154. This is a poorly considered question inasmuch as: it presumes that average
respondent is conversant with current zoning district definitions and
'consolidated use tables'. The question is also actually two questions,; one
having to do with policy and the other having to do with presentation.
155. Have all entities work together to simplify the codes. What goes for one area
should go across all. That way builders, cities and businesses only have to
work with one set of rules across the county.
1. What ideas do you have to simplify the zoning ordinance?
Examples: Fewer zoning districts, consolidated use tables, visual diagrams, less technical language
Skip to Question 2
9
September 22, 2025
156. You had a great master plan, but because of all the requests for an approval
of rezoning, you are causing major problems in our communities such as
traffic patterns, overcrowding. Balance needs to be the key and you are out of
balance on this.
157. This survey is too vague. You give no exact information and expect
responses. I suggest Maricopa County ask specific questions and provide the
taxpayer with what actions you want to take. That way, the stakeholder can
make their opinions known at the ballot box.
158. More infrastructure include shopping areas for people to use.
159. Zoning needs to consider the existing and surrounding areas. High-density
housing does not belong in an existing single-family home neighborhood.
Housing should not be four and five stories high. Zoning should reflect the
Arizona lifestyle - low density, commuting by car, vegetation to cool our cities.
160. Less technical languages
161. Reduce the number of zones, if it is not heavy industrial it should be mixed
commercial/residential/multi family
162. More outreach is needed for the zoning or rezoning of areas to residents in a
5 mile radius before zoning occurs to determine if there is community
support.
163. "Size Limitations on ADUs and Casitas
164. Need more discussion on developing gated communities pertaining to
setbacks and requirements for local law enforcement, fire department and
emergency medical access. "
165. Ensure the infrastructure is in place to support the development including
roads, parking, water, sewer, etc. None of this should be at taxpayer expense.
166. Plain language, real cause and effect consequences, disclosure of motivating
factors or forces from within the county leadership, and third-party influences.
167. Don’t feel qualified to answer
168. Fewer zoning districts, less technical language, less community input since
that just stops housing starts
169. Consolidated use tables with interactive web features. Provide interactive
diagramming and planning with interactive permit requirements. Get more
information out and regulation of non-state-resident requirements.
170. When zoning for taxes, ensure that areas being taxed for school services have
children attending schools. Arizona Traditions is a 55+ community and pays
for schools that residents cannot enjoy.
171. All of the above plus slow development, a water crisis is inevitable!
1. What ideas do you have to simplify the zoning ordinance?
Examples: Fewer zoning districts, consolidated use tables, visual diagrams, less technical language
Skip to Question 2
10
September 22, 2025
172. Visual diagrams because many in Sun City are illiterate.
173. Stratosphere coordinates of NOAA of lacata ole .
174. "It doesn't make sense that there is a different zoning required for having a
small home business. If there is no impact on traffic or other concerns that
would impact neighbors, utility usage, etc. then the ""plain"" residential zoning
should be sufficient.
175. Zoning for power generation should be considered so the impact of solar
farms and other generation methods can be evaluated and the potential
hazards/risks can be appropriately assessed. But I also think that it's more
appropriate for a solar farm to be on the roof of a mall or other industrial
buildings rather than bare land. I'm not sure our current zoning allows for that.
176. If a community is underrepresented in power generation availability or access,
zoning should provide the data needed to identify potential opportunities and
concerns. While I agree these ordinances should be simplified to allow access
to more people, I think that they should not be so vague as to prevent proper
planning."
177. Make it easier to understand. Tables, Charts, Diagrams are very helpful.
178. visual, leave technical language, but provide definitions or hover overs
179. Less technical language for property owners
180. Reduce number of zoning types
181. visual diagrams and tables are always helpful.
182. More communication to residents who will be impacted by projects. There
should never be someone who says they didn't know about a zoning change.
183. All of the above
184. Plant more trees please. Have a vision to develop a NY style Central Park
either in such a large scale or a smaller (multiple) scale leveraging the unique
characteristics of Arizona (Phoenix metro area has at least 14 major /minor
peaks).
185. Curtail the use of zoning to limit housing and urban development. Stop using
it as a way to limit urbanism and increase sprawl.
186. less technical language and visual diagrams would be helpful
187. Use of tables and visual aids.
188. zoning ordinance should be per the individual application, location, etc.
189. All of the above
190. use of visual diagrams is helpful. Should also also plain language
191. We need strict zoning laws, we have so little water, we need to keep
development to a minimum and develop interior vacant land when possible.
1. What ideas do you have to simplify the zoning ordinance?
Examples: Fewer zoning districts, consolidated use tables, visual diagrams, less technical language
Skip to Question 2
11
September 22, 2025
192. Visual diagrams
193. More visual examples would help the general public understand the
ordinance. We don't need fewer zoning districts.
194. Authorize only developer who sell very small, small, and regular house in the
same neighborhood.
195. Consolidated use tables would be helpful based on zoning districts.
196. test
197. Multi-use districts, no districts just for housing, allow businesses and housing
together
198. Ensuring that plans submitted for approval that are part of an HOA are not
approved without first receiving an approval letter from the HOA.
199. Keep what is established as previously planned, so many adjustments have
been made for big business, builders, and politicians, who are changing the
integrity of residential communities. Commercial zones - planned previously
change as needed...but residential communities should not be attacked for
zoning changes.
200. Define the difference between shade cloth and tarps - people need shade and
we are just going to need more and more of it. As long as the shade cloth is in
good repair - we should be allowed to do whatever we want with it in our
backyard. If you want heavy regulation of neighborhood aesthetics - move
into an HOA. Otherwise, leave us alone expect in extreme circumstances,
particularly in the old Phoenix neighborhoods.
201. Clear enforcement of ordinances.
202. Clearly state requirements, no jargon. No referencing to other sections. No
multiple options in the same zoning district.
203. Simplify, consolidate zoning districts, Use clearer and less technical language,
Include visual diagrams/graphics, Move definitions to Appendix, Make the
electronic document user-friendly to skip to sections, search for key words
204. Fewer zoning districts, less technical language. Less restrictive rules, allowing
more dense building.
205. To simplify the zoning ordinance while promoting clarity and more livable,
walkable communities, I recommend: Consolidating and simplifying zoning
districts so that mixed-use, walkable development is easier to permit without
requiring multiple variances. Creating a single, easy-to-read use table that
clearly outlines what is allowed by right in each district, with fewer
conditional-use ambiguities. Incorporating more visual diagrams and
flowcharts to explain building form, height, frontage, and setback standards,
1. What ideas do you have to simplify the zoning ordinance?
Examples: Fewer zoning districts, consolidated use tables, visual diagrams, less technical language
Skip to Question 2
12
September 22, 2025
so property owners and residents can quickly understand requirements
without needing legal or technical interpretation. Using plain language
wherever possible, while still retaining necessary technical definitions, so the
ordinance is accessible to both professionals and the general public.
Highlighting flexible housing options (ADUs, small multifamily, live-work units)
in clear visual formats to reduce barriers to housing affordability and choice.
This approach would make the MCZO easier to navigate, reduce red tape for
projects that enhance walkability and housing diversity, and improve public
understanding of zoning rules.
206. By-right, ministerial approval for all new projects that meet density and floor
area ratio requirements. This results is much quicker approval times.
207. Fewer zoning districts, fewer zoning categories, more and easier waivers, a
more solid master plan
208. Reduce/eliminate minimum parking requirements. Reduce/eliminate
front/rear and side setback requirements; or allow property owners to
purchase setback from their neighbors. Eliminate the double staircase
requirement on multi-family structures if structure has fire sprinkler system.
Eliminate single-family-only zoning countywide. Eliminate height restrictions
or pin them to raise automatically based on census tract population.
209. Remove ALL regulations that do not directly pertain to safety, energy
efficiency, and regional adaptation.
210. Visual diagrams and less technical language, unless technical language is
required legally. Having a zoning system where used are allowed unless
stated otherwise, instead of the inverse is very helpful. The current code lists
~50 uses that are permitted while other are not, which is difficult to read and
can cause legitimate uses that were not thought of to go through a more
difficult permitting process
211. Streamline and combine zoning districts. Use simpler, more accessible
language. Add visuals such as diagrams or graphics. Relocate definitions to
the Appendix. Make the digital version easy to navigate, search, and jump to
sections
212. 1. Please review how the City of Surprise has its ordinances written.
Additional also cities use this library. It is very easy to navigate and is
searchable. https://library.municode.com/az/surprise/codes/municipal_code
2. The Sun City Home Owners Association (SCHOA) has asked for years for
the County to be clearer in its relationship concerning County ordinances and
HOA CC&Rs. This is still an issue that needs to be addressed by the County in
1. What ideas do you have to simplify the zoning ordinance?
Examples: Fewer zoning districts, consolidated use tables, visual diagrams, less technical language
Skip to Question 2
13
September 22, 2025
helping to educate those residents in HOA communities within
unincorporated areas. This is also a way to protect residents. It’s frustrating
and can be costly for a resident who is given a permit for something that is
not permitted within their CC&Rs and then told they need to remove it. If the
permitting process included a sign off document by those living in an HOA
prior to applying for a permit, this would help tremendously. And it would be a
service that Maricopa County would be providing for their residents as well.
In reviewing the City of Surprise’s website, they list the HOA’s within their city.
This would be a great idea/opportunity for Maricopa County – to list those
HOA’s in unincorporated areas. https://surpriseaz.gov/462/HOA-Community-
Contacts
213. Less technical language, longer appeal times for the community, required
open space
214. Visual diagrams, less technical language, less restrictions on parking/ zoning.
215. Eliminate redundant restrictions. Allow property owners more freedom to
build denser housing if they choose.
216. Combining and simplifying zoning categories, especially to make it easier to
allow mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly development without needing multiple
exceptions.
217. Form based code
218. fewer single family option options, less absolutely useless zoning code
details that makes development worse, leave for interpretation so we can
have unique buildings, base it off of transit regionwide including buses
219. Removal of parking minimums, less restrictions on uses like light commercial
in neighborhoods.
220. Review & update outdated references & standards.
221. More maps. Simplified language.
222. Visual diagrams
223. Being honest you just want to pack more houses on less land to get more
property taxes.
224. visual diagrams and less technical language
225. Fewer zoning districts and make them positive - not just regulating what you
don't want in each district.
226. Make zoning ordinances easy to read for the average person. I like the visual
diagrams idea. QUESTION: Are there current Maricopa County Zoning
requirements/regulations pertaining to Sober Living Group Homes (SLGH) in
Glendale residential areas?
1. What ideas do you have to simplify the zoning ordinance?
Examples: Fewer zoning districts, consolidated use tables, visual diagrams, less technical language
Skip to Question 2
14
September 22, 2025
227. Leave our neighborhoods alone- Stop trying to OVER BUILD STOP TRYING TO
MAKE US LIKE CALIFORNIA
228. Make it compliant with the Plain Writing Act of 2010. Add visual diagrams and
actual sentences that explain zoning implications. For example, "New stores
in this area will be required to have a detached sidewalk 10 feet away from
the road" or "You have to have 15' of space between your side yard and your
neighbor's property line" as opposed to talking about "setbacks."
229. make all setbacks the same regardless of property size. Make all % of area
use the same. Why should a smaller lot be allowed to have more coverage
than a larger lot? Or at the very least adjust the proportions to accurately
reflect the impact on the neighbors. For example a 50% use on a small dense
set of lots is much more impact on the entire neighbors than a 50% use on a
10 acre lot in the area of other 10 acre lots.
230. Every build should require Maracopa County Supervisor approval!
231. None at this time. I don't care about "simplifying" zoning ordinance
232. visual diagrams
233. More simplified language
234. Simplify, consolidate zoning districts, Use clearer and less technical language,
Include visual diagrams/graphics, Move definitions to Appendix, Make the
electronic document user-friendly to skip to sections, search for key words
2. Are there new or emerging uses that should be included in the
ordinance?
Examples: Short-term rentals, food trucks, tiny homes, mobile vending, urban agriculture
Skip to Question 3
15
September 22, 2025
1.
Flex industrial, chip industries, businesses that support chip industries
2.
transit oriented development
3.
Nothing comes to mind.
4.
"In addition to examples, consider creative measures to provide for
technology (cell towers, other communication infrastructure), to provide for
multiple families to dwell within a single-family residence, to care for
different housing needs and types for aging populations.
5.
Another item for consideration is providing transitional buffers between
industrial and sensitive receptor land uses, as well as ensuring road
infrastructure is in alignment with demand from such uses. "
6.
Limit these - short term rentals are causing noise & safety issues in
neighborhoods. Food trucks & mobile vending need to be monitored for
healthy food per RFK jr, tiny homes are a fad & I don’t support large areas of
them. - it’s not healthy to be cramped in such small spaces, I support urban
agriculture & want more support to access fresh , local food.
7.
It would be great if the updated zoning regulations included allowed uses for
wind and solar in certain zones, and special/conditional uses in others.
8.
The County needs to mirror the cities with communications ordinance's.
There have been times that when a building is put up it blocks County Radio
Communications for the Sheriff's Office, Flood Control and other groups.
Also schools and other facilities should be required to put in repeaters for
emergency communications and that not be at the cost of the county. If
cities can require this why not the county?
9.
None of the above in existing neighborhoods only in areas that are developed
to accommodate such uses & don’t interfere with existing neighborhoods.
10.
No
11.
No
12.
tiny homes!
13.
All of the examples shown above including to include home based
businesses.
14.
no
15.
Short time rentals and tiny homes will ruin established neighborhoods and
make them overpopulated increase traffic and diminished the quality of life
for the neighborhood
16.
All of the above.
Question 2
Go Back to Question 1
2. Are there new or emerging uses that should be included in the
ordinance?
Examples: Short-term rentals, food trucks, tiny homes, mobile vending, urban agriculture
Skip to Question 3
16
September 22, 2025
17.
Don’t know of any
18.
Having regulations on short term rentals in the county, there will be more
consistency within communities and neighborhoods.
19.
Yes, Tiny homes!!
20.
home-based businesses
21.
No tiny homes, or short term rentals.
22.
Mobile vending, food trucks, short term rentals should be looked at.
23.
All the above
24.
More renewable sources of energy, solar and wind.
25.
Short term rentals should be banned. They encourage people who already
have a ton of money to snatch up houses and rent them out as vacation
properties, driving property prices up and making housing less affordable for
people looking to buy a residence.
26.
Halfway houses and home businesses restrictions
27.
Corporate ownership of single family housing in residential zones should
either be illegal or like quadruple taxed. Short term rentals should be
registered and also should be quadruple taxed.
28.
Short term rentals air bnb tiny homes food trucks mobile vending selling
food out of homes
29.
Short term rentals
30.
Group homes
31.
Tiny homes, plumbing for them also
32.
NO FOOD TRUCKS OR TINY HOMES IN SCOTTSDALE.
33.
Short term rentals can ruin neighborhoods. They pop up in the middle of HOA
maintained communities, and cause havoc. They should be highly regulated
with zero tolerance for abuse.
34.
Short term rentals, food trucks, tiny homes. Monile vending
35.
Short term rentals , no mandated multiuse housing . Look more at the
architecture plans esp height and esthetics for the neighborhood. Give
incentives to repurpose empty buildings
36.
No shirt term rentals in residential areas
37.
Enforce Street Side Parking Restrictions of RV, Boats and Utility Vehicles
38.
Yes, Short-term rentals, less than one year. urban agriculture. Low density
39.
Looking at DESIGNATED areas for food trucks!!!
Go Back to Question 1
2. Are there new or emerging uses that should be included in the
ordinance?
Examples: Short-term rentals, food trucks, tiny homes, mobile vending, urban agriculture
Skip to Question 3
17
September 22, 2025
40.
ALL OF THE ABOVE ARE ALREADY HAPPENING SO I SUPPOSE SOME RULES
AROUND EACH OF THEM ARE IN ORDER. HECK, I WOULD NOT WANT TO
LIVE NEXT DOOR TO A SHORT TERM RENTAL/PARTY HOUSE.
41.
Tiny homes
42.
Short term rentals
43.
I have to admit being without knowledge about county ordinances. That
being said, I think it is evident that there is a need for tiny homes to be added
to existing residences, either to house aging parents, or to accommodate
grown children who cannot yet afford individual homes of their own. I would
like to see restrictions eased that might prevent or discourage these
additions to residences.
44.
THE AMOUNT OF WATER USEAGE SHOULD BE INCORPERATED INTO
ZONING. A BIG PROBLEM IS SHORT TERM RENTALS. THE SHOULD BE
LIMITED TO ONLY ONE PER SQUARE MILE.
45.
Short term rentals and urban agriculture
46.
I would like to see less small rental communities. More actual master
planned communities with large parks and family venues, a private Catholic
university, something that would give our culture some more social
significance in the west valley. A 5 star hotel in north Peoria.
47.
Short term rentals should be supported, allow food trucks in more
designated areas, get creative with urban live/work units. More options to
allow for tiny homes and creative guest houses like modern prefab units.
48.
Tiny homes
49.
Zoning must be conscience of existing area and responsible to water use
50.
None of this in residential neighborhoods!
51.
no short term rentals, tiny homes, food trucks????, mobile vending?????
52.
Only allow so many short term rentals per city
53.
Every effort should be made to allow individual cities and towns to restrict
short term rentals
54.
Duplexes and Triplexes should be permitted with certain caveats
55.
Any planned apartment complex must make 10% of it's units available at
affordable rate"
56.
Urban gardens would be nice
57.
tiny homes, urban agriculture (allow greenhouses up to 300 square feet),
allow ADUs for unincorporated areas like Sun City.
Go Back to Question 1
2. Are there new or emerging uses that should be included in the
ordinance?
Examples: Short-term rentals, food trucks, tiny homes, mobile vending, urban agriculture
Skip to Question 3
18
September 22, 2025
58.
Single staircase for building under six stories. Tiny homes/starter homes
would help young families.
59.
Short-Term Rentals continue to destroy neighborhoods
60.
Allow far more tiny homes to give an option for single people.
61.
All of the above should be made clear to developers and new homeowners
and not impinge upon established residential areas.
62.
No short term rentals, or must be registered as a short-term rental.
63.
None that I can think of.
64.
To many horses on to small of land
65.
Outside shed ordinances, oversized structures ( garages ).
66.
Short-term rentals: address noise, outdoor fireplace and fire pit use, and
overflowing outdoor garbage bins.
67.
Include a one time grand to help pay for a ADU to be built on private property
or easy to qualify loans to build ADA,s from the State or City.
68.
Tiny homes and non-resident owned short-term rentals!!
69.
No on-street RV parking for more than 24 hours continuous and 48 hours
total in a 168 hour week.
70.
Mixed use with clustering and/ or vertical versus horizontal living,
entertainment, office, commercial districts.
71.
back yard pool child protection devices( fence, window lock, door self
closing...) should not be required when a lot backs up to a LAKE
72.
Short term rentals must be controlled. The right to rent a property is not
greater than the rights of the neighborhood.
73.
any structure that is used as a home
74.
All the items you listed.
75.
Again nothing over 2 stories. We love our sky
76.
Tiny homes
77.
Urban agriculture
78.
"Short term rentals should definitely be addressed, as unregulated rentals
can ruin a neighborhood.
79.
Requiring more open space is also a positive."
80.
ONLY STAND ALONE HOUSES!!!
81.
We live on a county island with the City of Mesa surrounding us. It would
make more sense to rezone to include our county island as City of Mesa. It
Go Back to Question 1
2. Are there new or emerging uses that should be included in the
ordinance?
Examples: Short-term rentals, food trucks, tiny homes, mobile vending, urban agriculture
Skip to Question 3
19
September 22, 2025
takes a longer time for the Maricopa sheriff to respond than it would the
Mesa police department to respond.
82.
Short term rentals should be banned in single family zoned areas!!!!!
83.
I do not support casitas on existing residential lots. This will especially hurt
neighborhoods with large lots. We need to keep as many large lots in the city
as we can. There are food trucks and business vehicles and even 18-
wheelers parked on the streets without any enforcement.
84.
Short-term rentals should be monitored more closely and inspected. Urban
agriculture should be allowed, even for houses/properties that adjoin each
other. People should be able to avoid having to live in food deserts, being
able to grow their own food, as possible, while not encroaching on their
neighbors.
85.
No idea
86.
Tiny homes in rural settings, roads that aren't really roads nor easements,
consider the size of vehicles and number per residence [increased over the
last 15 years].
87.
Short-term rentals, food trucks, urban agriculture
88.
You need to integrate urban living (condos/apartments/townhomes) within
easy walking distance to stores, dining, groceries, etc so people don’t have to
drive everywhere. Prasada is a great shopping center but what a missed
opportunity to put living on top of retail!! Traffic and parking is horrible,
89.
Allow lots with X % available space to build a casita for rental purposes. For
example if the house occupies too large a % of the lot there won't be room to
build a casita. If there is both adequate lot space and the owner's desire to
build a casita he/she should be allowed to do so (provided the casita meets
all building codes).
90.
Tiny homes
91.
Short term rentals is an issue in condos and communities, they should be
taxed higher. Parking in the street overnight should be kept to a minimum.
People have 3 car garages and keep them as storage unit and park across
the street which causes havoc coming
92.
Encourage home ownership at all levels. Smaller homes and community
farm space for resident use.
93.
Reduction of food trucks or provision of designated spaces within
commercial zones for food trucks
Go Back to Question 1
2. Are there new or emerging uses that should be included in the
ordinance?
Examples: Short-term rentals, food trucks, tiny homes, mobile vending, urban agriculture
Skip to Question 3
20
September 22, 2025
94.
tiny homes with adequate open space like maybe including urban agriculture
95.
No. You have it covered.
96.
Short term rentals and food trucks are a blight.
97.
I support tiny homes built around urban agriculture. There needs to be more
mobile vending and more food trucks to encourage small businesses as
currently Tempe as too many small businesses going under as nationwide
chains move in.
98.
short-term rentals
99.
Food trucks and urban agriculture.
100.
Mind that RURAL Arizona should be allowed to have horses, pens, fencing,
shade structures... Western Maricopa Cty has a huge number of equestrian
use increase currently. (yes, it is not that clear! I had reviewers ask for a finish
floor elevation on a shade cover!!!). Fencing should not count as structures in
rural areas.
101.
urban agriculture
102.
I would support urban agriculture. Also, tiny home developments could be
considered to help the homeless, but only if they can be provided with
security for both the tiny-home residents and the surrounding communities.
Given the severely reduced national funding, rather than finding ways to
attract more residents, we should prioritize finding ways to feed and provide
health care for existing low income residents, starting with school lunches.
103.
Tiny Homes, duplexes that use a main house/small attached dwelling
concept, any mixed housing that would allow single family, duplex, quad in
the same subdivision. Anything that creates more housing opportunities and
choices.
104.
Tiny homes
105.
Address housing affordability, don't crowd homes just to have more
106.
Urban agriculture.
107.
Tiny homes, food trucks, short-term rentals, urban agriculture
108.
short term rentals
109.
"Tiny homes
110.
Urban agriculture"
111.
Yes to all of the above things listed.
112.
urban agriculture, more green spaces
113.
Short term rentals should be illegal in the county.
Go Back to Question 1
2. Are there new or emerging uses that should be included in the
ordinance?
Examples: Short-term rentals, food trucks, tiny homes, mobile vending, urban agriculture
Skip to Question 3
21
September 22, 2025
114.
short-term rentals, street parking, commercial companies operating out of
residence
115.
Again, Sun City doesn’t have many of those issues. But I don’t believe we are
all served equally here. It may not be possible to change, however, I do not
feel equally represented in my neighborhood.
116.
There are pros and cons on short term rentals. As a consumer of weekend
short term rentals for scrapbooking or quilting, I don't think these uses
impact a neighborhood. On the other hand, if the short term rental is for a
party, wedding, sports events, this may impact the neighborhood with noise
and disorderly conduct.
117.
"No short-term rentals. The renter ends up renting to under 55 people but
they never get caught as to the short term stay and SCHOA being
understaffed due to resources.
118.
No oversized vehicles allowed to park over 72 hours"
119.
Adu short term rentals
120.
All considerations should be evaluated, provided there are no unfunded
mandates. Make sure you have the necessary funds and infrastructure to
enforce the policies. Once someone is allowed to make changes, even in an
emergency, it’s difficult to ensure compliance with the temporary measures.
If it's necessary for the initial design to be aesthetically pleasing, you face
fewer risks. There is a lot to plan and coordinate, with many moving parts.
121.
short-term rental limitations to ensure communities aren't financially
impacted by these temporary environments.
122.
landscaping standards
123.
Stop dropping tall buildings into the neighbor hoods of Phoenix and
destroying our way of life and property values.
124.
LESS short term rentals
125.
Setbacks need to stay in place to allow for proper drainage and the overall
aesthetics of the neighborhood. Noone wants to have a property and then
have their neighbor build something up against their property line. There
needs to be space between so people can enjoy their homes and look out
their windows without looking directly at their neighbors' wall, or other less
desirable things. Just like personal space. It allows room to breathe.
126.
Keep lower standards in the county and simpler processes. Lower standards
for agricultural properties and farms that should be incentivized and
Go Back to Question 1
2. Are there new or emerging uses that should be included in the
ordinance?
Examples: Short-term rentals, food trucks, tiny homes, mobile vending, urban agriculture
Skip to Question 3
22
September 22, 2025
protected. Not so much concrete and asphalt and expensive engineering.
Don't replace residential with industrial. Don’t overregulate the environment.
127.
Tighter rules and enforcement for short term rentals.
128.
"More zoning requirements are needed for short-term rentals, especially
residential housing that is being used for air-BNB rentals.
129.
There should be separate zoning requirements for lots being used for tiny
hones (specially lot coverage allowances), thereby creating more homes for
the homeless, and for those unable to afford a full-size home. "
130.
n/a
131.
Not any that I can think of
132.
I absolutely believe that STRs have damaged neighborhoods and added to
the housing shortage. Investors are buying up homes which should be used
for residents, reducing the number of homes that are available for individual
homeowners/families to purchase. I do not support permitting the building
of ADUs on property that will be used as STRs. Families should be able to
build "mother-in-law additions" for relatives/local residents long term use, but
ADUs should not be allowed as vacation rentals
133.
Tiny homes, in law suites
134.
Adus
135.
Short term rentals - rules and regulations should be set out
136.
Tiny homes, bigger lots, more parks/greenbelts around neighborhoods
137.
Equine training areas jumps ditches BMX tracks
138.
Short-term rentals
139.
Sensible water usage. Require builders to landscape with drought tolerant
landscaping.
140.
Tighter restrictions on short term rentals. Fewer challenges to zoning
regulations
141.
short term rentals, urban agriculture
142.
Tiny homes, water/landscaping, urban agriculture
143.
Short-term rentals should not be allowed in established neighborhoods,
established before 1975.
144.
short term tiny house or rv usage
145.
I think existing empty structures should be available for housing the
homeless by turning them into small affordable apartments. Zoning issues
Go Back to Question 1
2. Are there new or emerging uses that should be included in the
ordinance?
Examples: Short-term rentals, food trucks, tiny homes, mobile vending, urban agriculture
Skip to Question 3
23
September 22, 2025
may be making this more difficult. I've seen where abandoned malls have
been converted to affordable communities. I love that idea.
146.
Urban agriculture, things like keeping chickens and/or honey bee hives,
casita use (short term rental=boo whereas multigenerational living = yay!)
147.
Any sort of housing for those that are currently unhoused, from tiny homes
to apartment style and housing specifically for families. And affordable
housing.
148.
Fewer parking space requirements; more small homes
149.
Short term rentals have destroyed neighborhoods and put home values out
of reach for the average family. Families cannot compete with investors.
Ordinances need to treat these rentals as commercial properties and
subjected to the same restrictions as hotels. I believe tiny homes can serve a
purpose and nice neighborhoods can be developed giving people pride of
ownership. In high density areas parks and urban gardens should be within
10-15 min walk for residents.
150.
"Develop open space areas in southeast and southwest regions of county.
151.
Tiny homes with community green recreation spaces. "
152.
Eliminate short-term rentals, allow tiny homes with restrictions, location of
tiny homes should not conflict or be in proximity to single-family homes,
urban agriculture should be isolated from housing areas
153.
No
154.
Minimum lot size for casitas
155.
STR for sure
156.
Short term rentals should be limited.
157.
NO
158.
Definitely more on ability to have backyard rentals (tiny homes) would help.
All new construction should be required to have a certain percentage as
greenscape with lots of trees. Once people have squeezed their savings to
get into a home they can’t afford to get plantings.
159.
Since the county spends lots of money on zoning planners, ask them. If they
can't or won't provide answers, then evaluate whether the lots of money you
spend on your planners is spent wisely, then act on your evaluation.
160.
I like your examples to include: Short-term rentals, food trucks, tiny homes,
mobile vending, urban agriculture
Go Back to Question 1
2. Are there new or emerging uses that should be included in the
ordinance?
Examples: Short-term rentals, food trucks, tiny homes, mobile vending, urban agriculture
Skip to Question 3
24
September 22, 2025
161.
Yes. Subdividing too much - high density where there is no infrastructure to
support it.
162.
Short-term rentals, tiny homes, Accessory dwelling units for rent or for office.
Trailers (mobile homes, annex) like the kind you see on construction sites or
at schools, that can be added as an additional dwelling unit.
163.
This is a wide-ranging question that requires discussion that is difficult within
the confines of a questionnaire. (You could mitigate this problem with links
to information on pros and cons of things most likely to be considered.
164.
We should be working with the utilities, the tech sector and governing boards
to plan in advance what is on the horizon that should be accounted for in the
future.
165.
We do not need more food trucks. We need less. The West Valley is being
flooded with tiny rental homes, including section 8 and section 24 which
takes the area out of balance. This is already causing a large increase in
crime. You really had a great master plan, but because of all the rezoning
there is no longer balance. Your roads are inadequate to meet the needs of
traffic and are constantly in need of repair and there is roadwork being done
everywhere, causing major traffic, delays and jams.
166.
above
167.
More urban agriculture.
168.
See above.
169.
Make it more friendly for people living in areas such as less apartments that
are overpopulated
170.
Small shops and micro businesses
171.
Tiny homes and urban agriculture spaces would help with the affordable
housing crisis and give some healthy mitigation in the many food deserts
that exist in the greater Phoenix area.
172.
Short term rentals should be regulated, food trucks/ mobile vendors should
require regular consistent regulation for food handling and should have
designated locations of operations especially in rural areas where these are
not available to residents within a 5 mile radius. Tiny homes should be
allowed on any residential property. More support should be available for
urban agriculture regarding environmental protection and what plants/
vegetation can thrive in our climate and soil conditions. Along with what
would additives are environmentally friendly for soil conditions.
Go Back to Question 1
2. Are there new or emerging uses that should be included in the
ordinance?
Examples: Short-term rentals, food trucks, tiny homes, mobile vending, urban agriculture
Skip to Question 3
25
September 22, 2025
173.
The term for ADUs and Casitas is being used as a legal loop hole for building
two homes on one property under RU-48 which most likely was not the
original intent. These buildings should not be allowed to have an attached
garage and be limited to 1000 to 1200 square feet. I have people building
1800 to 2200 square foot casitas on one acre lots in Pasqualetti Ranch
subdivision which was originally intended for a single residence. I am the
Architect Committee Chairman and we are getting a lot of opposition from
people buying into the community.
174.
The single family home is the American dream, but it comes at a cost that is
not recognized; urban sprawl, traffic, pollution, etc. These intangible costs
should be considered and made part of any development proposal.
175.
All family oriented, youth activities, senior living, disabled individuals
community based ventures considered for zoning. In contrast, recently
released felons, sex offenders, the violent mentally ill, and homeless drug
addicts managed away from schools, playgrounds, family restaurants,
neighborhoods, etc. for safety reasons.
176.
All of the above
177.
I have no opinion about this.
178.
Short term rentals regulated and requiring permits/registration (both county
and state) for rural communities, horse and cattle care standards for rural
(i.e. limit number or horses per acre, limit number of cattle per acre, removal
or manure to monthly, safety/welfare of animals regulated - starving and
sickly animal removal and inclusion of permitting for safety esp. for
businesses, permit inclusions for manure in runoff areas), regulations on well
usage in rural
179.
How ironic that Arizona has become Condo Association unfriendly!
Associations NEED to limit short term rentals, condo owners should NOT be
allowed to be corporate investment schemes are a means for opportunist
owners who have no intention of living in a community to violate the rights of
those who do!
180.
Short-term rentals and tiny homes.
181.
Urban agriculture, accounting for ability to harvest rainwater, encourage
reuse of greywater and make it easier for mobile businesses and communal
business office resources.
Go Back to Question 1
2. Are there new or emerging uses that should be included in the
ordinance?
Examples: Short-term rentals, food trucks, tiny homes, mobile vending, urban agriculture
Skip to Question 3
26
September 22, 2025
182.
Every home should be built with solar roofs or, at least, solar panels. Housing
would be more affordable if people were not worried about the cost of
electricity and would be healthier for individuals to feel they are able to use
air conditioning during excessive heat AND poor air quality days.
183.
ADUs
184.
yes, what are the requirements for tiny homes or yurts. What are the bare
minimum amenities, especially in the summer months. Can space be rented
in residential areas for food truck weekly events? Can I have chickens and
what are the requirements that meet ASPCA standards during summer
months? Can I rent space to neighbors who want to plant gardens in my
empty lot? Can I rent space to RVs to park in my residential property? Can I
rent space to neighbors to park their vehicles because there are too many
people living on one street with no multilevel parking? Can I have a farmers
market in my front yard, like a yard sale? Can I turn my empty lot into a dog
park space to rent hourly for neighbors?
185.
ADUs and more mixed use, better public transportation.
186.
"The number of Maricopa County farm decline was more severe than
Arizona’s overall. This analysis threatens our ability serve our local
population with food, through a reduction in workforce, participation
reduction in food assistance programs, and weakening in infrastructure
investment. Here are the figures:
187.
Maricopa County farms had a 38.4% drop from 2012–2022, compared to the
state’s 16.5%.
188.
From 2017–2022, Maricopa farms decreased 18.5%, again steeper than the
state’s 12.4%.
189.
In 2012, Maricopa accounted for 12.4% of the state total (2,479 out of
20,005). By 2022, it dropped to 9.1% (1,527 out of 16,710), showing its
relative contribution to the state’s total is shrinking.
190.
Farms can be part of a the climate adaptation strategies through their ability
to evapotranspirate, absorb less heat than urban built environment, and
maintain soil moisture. "
191.
Both VRBO/BNB and longer-term rentals need to account for the safety,
integrity, and peace of the community
192.
"Short term rentals should be included in zoning. There should be stricter
regulations on homes being rented in an area or community- if a community
Go Back to Question 1
2. Are there new or emerging uses that should be included in the
ordinance?
Examples: Short-term rentals, food trucks, tiny homes, mobile vending, urban agriculture
Skip to Question 3
27
September 22, 2025
is being built, there should be guidelines on how many rental houses can be
in a community at one time, extra rules for their owners to make sure they
adhere to laws and community CC&Rs.
193.
Zoning laws should also include street renovation within a 2-mile radius to
ensure that all the added people in a new community can fit on the streets
around it. "
194.
HAVE Vacation Rentals Registrations- current & Visible, I just learned they
can rent rooms out as well, then you have 2 individuals in 1untit not a family
or group. Current out of state license plates in VRBO RENTALS, A physical list
of ALL units that are VRBO rentals in a complex--- fines for garbage and
debris, not picked up
195.
"Short-term rentals with restrictions
196.
Dedicated areas for food trucks, mobile vending, farmers market, etc.,
197.
Mandate covered parking for commercial or retail establishments;
alternatively, increased landscape on the parking lots. "
198.
Short term rentals in age-restricted communities. Keeping track of age-
qualified renters every week on one of 17,500 homes and 381 condos is
impossible.
199.
Short term rentals should be included and should have a minimum 30 day
rental period. People want to live in communities, not in a neighborhood with
people constantly coming and going.
200.
All of the examples. Encourage density. I hear endless complaints about LA
Sprawl, but Phoenix is basically there now. We need density more than ever,
along with public transit and a reduced focus on automobiles.
201.
regulations on food trucks
202.
"Utility Scale Solar
203.
BESS
204.
Build to Rent"
205.
"commercial buildings: increase street (Behind side walks) and adjacent
housing set backs to 300 yards minimum
206.
short term rentals should be confined to commercial areas, not sub
divisions
207.
food trucks should only be allowed on commercial lots
208.
urban agriculture should only be allowed on designated properties (i.E. horse
properties, not sub divisions"
Go Back to Question 1
2. Are there new or emerging uses that should be included in the
ordinance?
Examples: Short-term rentals, food trucks, tiny homes, mobile vending, urban agriculture
Skip to Question 3
28
September 22, 2025
209.
All of the above
210.
short term rentals
211.
Urban agriculture!
212.
Urban agriculture, tiny homes, landscaping that supports shade and cooling,
building materials that are cooling such as porous concrete. Allow quarter
minus gravel in HOA communities (quarter minus retains much less heat
than the larger gravel required by McCormick Ranch HOA). Allow and
promote grass, do not promote astroturf which is hot and can smother and
kill trees.
213.
Short term rentals
214.
If you start adding the examples you've suggested Maricopa County will start
looking like California and we don't want that. Leave it alone.
215.
Encourage tiny home in back yard and authorize street parking.
216.
Wireless Communications. With the increase in usage and a growing
population Maricopa should allow for a more user friendly ordinance on
Wireless facilities including setback reductions for stealth design facilities.
217.
Walkable city, 15 minute city, zone so that within a 15 minute walk everything
anyone could need is there
218.
For the residential communities that are impacted by recent changes in
zoning within their community that there are addressed protections for noise,
pollution, construction activity, dumping, safety, etc, to counterbalance the
diminished previously enjoyed community integrity. Renters (as a whole) do
not have the same commitment to the community as primary owner
residents. No more single-family residential use changes are needed
anywhere in the county. Take a beat. Over the last decade, all residential
homeowners have seen an erosion in their community in favor of "outside"
interests and have brought a significant increase in "business" activity in
areas they had planned to avoid. Unused Commercial (vacant, undeveloped
for decades) should be the first location where new "needed" residential
rezoning needs to occur, rather than targeting established residential
communities that change their community integrity.
219.
Urban agriculture should be available for folks to use to reduce their tax
burden IF they are truly producing. Higher walls, better capacity to have
privacy from noisy neighbors and their cameras. Higher walls and ways to
obstruct t views could act to reduce complaints about neighbors and what
Go Back to Question 1
2. Are there new or emerging uses that should be included in the
ordinance?
Examples: Short-term rentals, food trucks, tiny homes, mobile vending, urban agriculture
Skip to Question 3
29
September 22, 2025
they do in their backyards - backyards should be our piece of heaven on earth
to do with what we want - have a farm, collect cars, build a resort - whatever,
and the city out to stay out of it. Do not allow lot splits of the larger lots in the
older parts of Phoenix.
220.
No; there should be more restrictions and proper enforcement. This isn’t
California.
221.
No - keep the classics. State already has "STR" .
222.
Allow and encourage accessory dwelling units (ADUs), tiny homes, modular
homes, live-work units, and urban agriculture
223.
Yes. The ordinance should proactively address new and emerging uses that
contribute to more resilient, healthy, and livable communities. Examples
include: Urban agriculture and community gardens — Allowing these as a
permitted use in more zoning districts, including mixed-use and higher-
density residential areas, with streamlined approvals. This could include
rooftop gardens, vertical farming, and small-scale neighborhood
greenhouses. Shade equity measures — Encouraging or requiring shade
structures, tree planting, and other heat mitigation features in public and
private developments, especially in underserved areas that currently lack
shade coverage. Tiny homes and small-footprint housing — Enabling these
both as primary residences and as accessory units, with clear standards that
balance safety and flexibility, to support housing affordability and variety.
Mobile vending and food trucks — Allowing flexible siting in more districts,
especially near transit, parks, and event spaces, while maintaining
reasonable safety and traffic flow standards. Shared mobility hubs —
Designating areas for bike-share, scooter-share, and micro-mobility
charging/parking, integrated with transit stops and pedestrian networks. Co-
working and live/work spaces — Supporting flexible spaces that allow both
residential and commercial activity in the same building, to reduce commute
distances and encourage local economic activity. By integrating these uses
into the MCZO in a clear and forward-looking way, Maricopa County can
support emerging community needs while fostering walkable, climate-
resilient, and socially connected neighborhoods.
224.
Tiny homes, county wide ADU approvals, urban farming, and density bonuses
for maxing out floor area ratios.
225.
Allow more missing middle style housing
Go Back to Question 1
2. Are there new or emerging uses that should be included in the
ordinance?
Examples: Short-term rentals, food trucks, tiny homes, mobile vending, urban agriculture
Skip to Question 3
30
September 22, 2025
226.
Yes, increase use of transit-oriented districts to allow sidewalk widening and
pedestrianization where appropriate. Allow multi-family and mixed-use
development on commercial land.
227.
We do not need these to identify "emerging uses". The goal should not be to
identify and name each and every use of property. The goal should be to
deregulate building unless it poses a direct hazard to safety, or leads to over-
consumption of energy.
228.
Mixed use zoning
229.
Allowing food trucks or tiny homes would be a good idea, so long as the
zoning code will be more permissive to allowing those uses than it is
currently.
230.
Support and promote ADUs, tiny homes, modular housing, live-work spaces,
and urban farming.
231.
1. Short-term rentals is an issue that needs more review and limitations
placed on them. Sun City, an age restricted retirement community protected
by the Senior Citizen Overlay wasn’t designed for this and it can be
challenging to verify the age of renters as they are coming and going. There
is concern among our residents at the number of rentals that are popping up
in Sun City. 2. Tiny Homes and/or Casita’s being allowed on single dwelling
properties would be a concern even though our CC&Rs don’t allow it.
However, again, since the County doesn’t work with HOAs as stated in
comment #1, the concern would be that a permit would be issue, resident
begins construction to then find out that this would be permitted.
232.
Open space retainment.
233.
Mixed-use developments, walkabity, sustainability, bike-friendly, transit-
oriented, food trucks, tiny homes, mobile vending, urban agriculture,
pedestrians zones, protected bike lanes.
234.
Allow for dense, walkable neighborhoods with a mix of uses so that our
neighborhoods are more vibrant and less cookie cutter & stale.
235.
Yes, the ordinance should include emerging uses like shade equity measures
and tiny homes or small-footprint housing. As extreme heat becomes a
growing concern, requiring or incentivizing shade structures, tree cover, and
heat-resilient design—especially in underserved areas—can greatly improve
public health and livability. At the same time, allowing tiny homes and
compact housing types provides flexible, affordable options that meet
Go Back to Question 1
2. Are there new or emerging uses that should be included in the
ordinance?
Examples: Short-term rentals, food trucks, tiny homes, mobile vending, urban agriculture
Skip to Question 3
31
September 22, 2025
changing household needs and support more inclusive, space-efficient
development.
236.
No short term rentals, freedom to do business,
237.
Urban agriculture/ farming and food trucks (mobile) are important
238.
Yes. Urban agriculture, rural residential
239.
Restricted short term rentals. Urban agriculture.
240.
NO. All of the examples should be prohibited.
241.
All the examples (Short-term rentals, food trucks, tiny homes, mobile
vending, urban agriculture) are good. Mostly, you need to allow much more
flexibility for where homes can go, and make it so that not 95% of your
homes are single family detached homes.
242.
no mixed use zoning
243.
If not, consider Compliance ARS Title 36-2062 Licensure, Standards, Civil
Penalties, Inspections (SLGH)
244.
Field not completed
245.
No- WE DONT WANT TO BE LIKE LA OR SAN FRANCISCO ARIZONA IS
FAMILY ORIENTED!
246.
Air BnBs absolutely need to have some kind if zoning policy or differntiation
to avoid the mass worker displacement we have in Sedona and seen in other
areas such as Colorado. It's very pie in the sky, but a sub-delineation for third
spaces would be nice, i.e. places people can go where they don't have to
spend money or ingest calories. These could overlap with green zones or be
an oddly shaped parcel. Please note that I am not talking about a park per se.
Think some of the plazas in European cities, places that may be bordered by
retail or recreation but also just have benches or a fountain (yes, I know we
have a drought but we can water data centers than we can water human
pursuits as well) or other art and benches where you can just sit and people
watch or whatever. Again, you don't have to spend money or consume
calories or alcohol but can still be out in an evening. This is what many
European cities do with bizarrely shaped, undevelopable plots in the middle
of urban landscapes. But they have a sub-zoning deliniation for them. Here,
even if it's too hat to enjoy recreationally, a parcel like that coukd be
engineered and landscaped in such a way as to help mitigate the heat island
effect.
Go Back to Question 1
2. Are there new or emerging uses that should be included in the
ordinance?
Examples: Short-term rentals, food trucks, tiny homes, mobile vending, urban agriculture
Skip to Question 3
32
September 22, 2025
247.
More available use options with LESS burdensome regulation. Especially on
large lots.
248.
All
249.
Short term rentals may need some limitation.
250.
No short-term rentals in single family home neighborhoods
251.
I only know about R-44, it's mostly good zoning except it only allows for 1
house per acre (it really should be released a bit to allow for 2) and there's a
silly limit on the number of vehicles allowed to be parked here. Relax those
things.
252.
tiny homes
253.
Tiny homes, non profit use
254.
Allow and encourage accessory dwelling units (ADUs), tiny homes, modular
homes, live-work units, and urban agriculture
Go Back to Question 1
3. What is your opinion on reducing and standardizing setbacks
for residential development
o Strongly support, - more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing options
o Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate infrastructure or
spacing is available
o Neutral – no strong opinion
o Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
o Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary should be preserved.
Skip to Question 4
33
September 22, 2025
1.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
2.
Neutral – no strong opinion
3.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
4.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
5.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
6.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
7.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
8.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
9.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
10.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
11.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
12.
I would need more info on this. I don't want them too close but not if it
prevents building
13.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
14.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
15.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
16.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
17.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
18.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
19.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
20.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
21.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
22.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
Question 3
Go Back to Question 2
3. What is your opinion on reducing and standardizing setbacks
for residential development
o Strongly support, - more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing options
o Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate infrastructure or
spacing is available
o Neutral – no strong opinion
o Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
o Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary should be preserved.
Skip to Question 4
34
September 22, 2025
23.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
24.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
25.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
26.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
27.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
28.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
29.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
30.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
31.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
32.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
33.
Neutral – no strong opinion
34.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
35.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
36.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
37.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
38.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
39.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
40.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
41.
Neutral – no strong opinion
42.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
43.
Neutral – no strong opinion
Go Back to Question 2
3. What is your opinion on reducing and standardizing setbacks
for residential development
o Strongly support, - more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing options
o Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate infrastructure or
spacing is available
o Neutral – no strong opinion
o Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
o Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary should be preserved.
Skip to Question 4
35
September 22, 2025
44.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
45.
Neutral – no strong opinion
46.
Continue with setbacks to stop developers from cramming in more people
47.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
48.
Neutral – no strong opinion
49.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
50.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
51.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
52.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
53.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
54.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
55.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
56.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
57.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
58.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
59.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
60.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
61.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
62.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
63.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
64.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
65.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
66.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
67.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
Go Back to Question 2
3. What is your opinion on reducing and standardizing setbacks
for residential development
o Strongly support, - more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing options
o Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate infrastructure or
spacing is available
o Neutral – no strong opinion
o Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
o Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary should be preserved.
Skip to Question 4
36
September 22, 2025
68.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
69.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
70.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
71.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
72.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
73.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
74.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
75.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
76.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
77.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
78.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
79.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
80.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
81.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
82.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
83.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
84.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
85.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
86.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
87.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
Go Back to Question 2
3. What is your opinion on reducing and standardizing setbacks
for residential development
o Strongly support, - more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing options
o Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate infrastructure or
spacing is available
o Neutral – no strong opinion
o Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
o Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary should be preserved.
Skip to Question 4
37
September 22, 2025
88.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
89.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
90.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
91.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
92.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
93.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
94.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
95.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
96.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
97.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
98.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
99.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
100.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
101.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
102.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
103.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
104.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
105.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
106.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
107.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
108.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
109.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
Go Back to Question 2
3. What is your opinion on reducing and standardizing setbacks
for residential development
o Strongly support, - more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing options
o Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate infrastructure or
spacing is available
o Neutral – no strong opinion
o Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
o Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary should be preserved.
Skip to Question 4
38
September 22, 2025
110.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
111.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
112.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
113.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
114.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
115.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
116.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
117.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
118.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
119.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
120.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
121.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
122.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
123.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
124.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
125.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
126.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
127.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
128.
Neutral – no strong opinion
129.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
130.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
131.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
132.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
133.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
Go Back to Question 2
3. What is your opinion on reducing and standardizing setbacks
for residential development
o Strongly support, - more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing options
o Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate infrastructure or
spacing is available
o Neutral – no strong opinion
o Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
o Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary should be preserved.
Skip to Question 4
39
September 22, 2025
134.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
135.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
136.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
137.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
138.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
139.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
140.
Neutral – no strong opinion
141.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
142.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
143.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
144.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
145.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
146.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
147.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
148.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
149.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
150.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
151.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
152.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
153.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
154.
do not reduce setbacks, increase them fewer apts and condos and fewer
homes per lot
Go Back to Question 2
3. What is your opinion on reducing and standardizing setbacks
for residential development
o Strongly support, - more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing options
o Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate infrastructure or
spacing is available
o Neutral – no strong opinion
o Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
o Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary should be preserved.
Skip to Question 4
40
September 22, 2025
155.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
156.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
157.
I strongly OPPOSE smaller setbacks/lot sizes for new homes; lot size
should be in sync with home size to ensure privacy, fire safety, visual
aesthetics and neighborhood character. The current trend of building homes
right next to each other is an absolute eyesore and honestly, it looks
ridiculous.
158.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
159.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
160.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
161.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
162.
driveways are too short, larger SUV's/trucks these days don't fit and hang
over sidewalks and people get citations for blocking sidewalks because
their vehicles are too long
163.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
164.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
165.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
166.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
167.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
168.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
169.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
170.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
171.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
172.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
Go Back to Question 2
3. What is your opinion on reducing and standardizing setbacks
for residential development
o Strongly support, - more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing options
o Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate infrastructure or
spacing is available
o Neutral – no strong opinion
o Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
o Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary should be preserved.
Skip to Question 4
41
September 22, 2025
173.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
174.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
175.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
176.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
177.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
178.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
179.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
180.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
181.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
182.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
183.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
184.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
185.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
186.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
187.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
188.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
189.
setbacks should be increased to reduce density
190.
No
191.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
192.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
193.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
194.
Neutral – no strong opinion
Go Back to Question 2
3. What is your opinion on reducing and standardizing setbacks
for residential development
o Strongly support, - more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing options
o Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate infrastructure or
spacing is available
o Neutral – no strong opinion
o Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
o Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary should be preserved.
Skip to Question 4
42
September 22, 2025
195.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
196.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
197.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
198.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
199.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
200.
Neutral – no strong opinion
201.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
202.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
203.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
204.
above response
205.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
206.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
207.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
208.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
209.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
210.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
211.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
212.
Strongly oppose current setbacks of 3 foot. This is a potential issue for
firefighters and impacts privacy. Also impacts the appearance of our
community making it look like California. Recently the have been a lot of
issues where fires jump from on residential building to another because they
are too close.
213.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
Go Back to Question 2
3. What is your opinion on reducing and standardizing setbacks
for residential development
o Strongly support, - more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing options
o Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate infrastructure or
spacing is available
o Neutral – no strong opinion
o Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
o Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary should be preserved.
Skip to Question 4
43
September 22, 2025
214.
None of the above addresses a uniform standard for the zones. Real priority
on fire, drainage, and other safety issues with peer-reviewed case studies on
the effects of past setbacks.
215.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
216.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
217.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
218.
Neutral – no strong opinion
219.
Establish a minimum setback, then leave it to architects and owners!
220.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
221.
Neutral – no strong opinion
222.
Both, keep privacy and fire safety but reduce "xeroscaping" that is just
gravel-scaping and lawns.
223.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
224.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
225.
allow where spacing is available, depends are crime levels, extra space is a
deterrent for crime. Please, not like NY.
226.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
227.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
228.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
229.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
230.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
231.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
232.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
233.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
234.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
235.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
Go Back to Question 2
3. What is your opinion on reducing and standardizing setbacks
for residential development
o Strongly support, - more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing options
o Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate infrastructure or
spacing is available
o Neutral – no strong opinion
o Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
o Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary should be preserved.
Skip to Question 4
44
September 22, 2025
236.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
237.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
238.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
239.
set backs should be increased
240.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
241.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
242.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
243.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
244.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
245.
Neutral – no strong opinion
246.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
247.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
248.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
249.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
250.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
251.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
252.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
253.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
254.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
255.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
256.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
257.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
Go Back to Question 2
3. What is your opinion on reducing and standardizing setbacks
for residential development
o Strongly support, - more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing options
o Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate infrastructure or
spacing is available
o Neutral – no strong opinion
o Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
o Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary should be preserved.
Skip to Question 4
45
September 22, 2025
258.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
259.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
260.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
261.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
262.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
263.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
264.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
265.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
266.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
267.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
268.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
269.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
270.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
271.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
272.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
273.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
Go Back to Question 2
3. What is your opinion on reducing and standardizing setbacks
for residential development
o Strongly support, - more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing options
o Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate infrastructure or
spacing is available
o Neutral – no strong opinion
o Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
o Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary should be preserved.
Skip to Question 4
46
September 22, 2025
274.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
275.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
276.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
277.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
option
278.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
279.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
280.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
281.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
282.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
283.
Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
284.
Field not completed
285.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
286.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
287.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
288.
Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate
infrastructure or spacing is available
289.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
290.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
291.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
292.
Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary and should be preserved
293.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
294.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
Go Back to Question 2
3. What is your opinion on reducing and standardizing setbacks
for residential development
o Strongly support, - more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing options
o Support with limits – allow reduced setbacks where appropriate infrastructure or
spacing is available
o Neutral – no strong opinion
o Oppose – smaller setbacks may lead to privacy or drainage issues
o Strongly oppose – current setbacks are necessary should be preserved.
Skip to Question 4
47
September 22, 2025
295.
Strongly support – more flexibility in setbacks supports more housing
options
Go Back to Question 2
4. Should Maricopa County allow taller building heights in more
zoning districts?
Example: Multi-story residential, vertical mixed-use, and industrial buildings. Where and
under what conditions should this be allowed?
Skip to Question 5
48
September 22, 2025
1.
Maybe in industrial but no where else
2.
Yes
3.
No, we are congested enough already.
4.
This should be considered in proximity to urban areas that have development
standards along for taller building and more creative development standards.
5.
No- we have a special landscape here- protect our beauty! Consider water &
electric needs too.
6.
preference to lower building heights except in areas that are planned for high
density.
7.
Yes, but only if there is no impact to others currently there and no impact to
communications in the area. Site studies may be needed.
8.
Nothing near residential areas, in commercial zoning areas only
9.
No
10.
No - especially in existing areas and where this contradicts CC&Rs
11.
We need more buildings that are GREEN - forget about how tall and focus on
building with new technologies that withstand heat and climate change.
12.
Yes. Raise buildings heights for all zoning districts but in particular Industrial
spec buildings will all need at least 55-60'
13.
Not in Rural area
14.
No
15.
It should be allowed in your downtown districts. No more than three story in
residentially zoned areas.
16.
no
17.
The Lord should keep the character of the Neighborhood large multi story
buildings and residential don’t fit in all neighborhoods must think of the traffic
and how much population they’ll be bringing in especially in multistory
residential. Where are you? You’re gonna have families with 3,4,5kids where
are they gonna go
18.
No! Tempe is ruined because of all the tall buildings they were allowed to
build. They should have allowed shorter buildings. So upset because of all
the tall buildings now.
19.
Depends. No definition on taller. But usage and application are crucial.
20.
On larger lots sure, but not on smaller lots.
21.
Multi-story residential, vertical mixed use everywhere. Industrial building with
industrial waste concerns should be in industrial zoning.
Question 4
Go Back to Question 3
4. Should Maricopa County allow taller building heights in more
zoning districts?
Example: Multi-story residential, vertical mixed-use, and industrial buildings. Where and
under what conditions should this be allowed?
Skip to Question 5
49
September 22, 2025
22.
Height is the question; 2-3 stories max; could lead to higher buildings having
unrestricted view into adjacent housing & yards
23.
No
24.
I would say yes for mixed use/residential. Housing is an issue this might
help…
25.
Keep that to business areas and out of residential. residents often choose
where they live based on the character of the area and changing established
and often cherished areas changes the character too much.
26.
Yes, along arterial and collector roads (5 stories) and tapering down from
there.
27.
No they are high enough. Too many apartments.
28.
Taller building heights should be looked at carefully, given the amount of air
traffic already over most of the valley.
29.
Yes unless they obstruct mountain views
30.
Not if it interferes with residential solar panels on existing rooms.
31.
Building heights and setbacks are not what is causing housing to be
unattainable. The ridiculous prices of homes is what is making housing
unattainable. Developers are running amok, unchecked putting in subdivisions
with "private" streets that are too narrow to allow street parking and
insufficient space for people to park their vehicles. Housing prices are so high
that multiple generations are living in a single home and they have a lot of
vehicles with no where to park them! How about some regulations on street
widths!!
32.
No
33.
Yes, to a point
34.
The mixed residential Is not a good thing.
35.
Not in established neighborhoods
36.
No, over crowding, reduced views.
37.
No
38.
We arent allowed to add a second story. It would really help if we could add a
second level residential on our home
39.
PLEASE, NO MORE TALL MULTI-RESIDENTIAL HOUSING UNITS!!!!! THE
VALLEY IS LOSING IT'S VISUAL OF MANY MOUNTAIN RANGES--AND THERE
ARE SIMPLY TOO MANY MULTI-RESIDENTIAL HOUSING UNITS GOING UP.
OUR VALLEY IS TURNING INTO CALIFORNIA WHEN IT COMES TO
Go Back to Question 3
4. Should Maricopa County allow taller building heights in more
zoning districts?
Example: Multi-story residential, vertical mixed-use, and industrial buildings. Where and
under what conditions should this be allowed?
Skip to Question 5
50
September 22, 2025
POPULATION, INFRASTRUCTURE/ROADS NOT SUPPORTING ALL OF THIS
GROWTH, AND WATER SHORTAGE.
40.
No. We live here for the views. There's plenty of open land to build
horizontally!
41.
No answer
42.
No taller bldgs. Need to keep skyline with mountains
43.
No
44.
NO!
45.
Yes
46.
No Comment
47.
No mixed use. No apartments that are 3 stories among single story homes.
Put apartments with other apartments. Homeowners don't want apartments
in their neighborhood.
48.
NO
49.
NO
50.
Yes
51.
No
52.
Only in urban areas. Suburban areas should have shorter building heights.
Rural should be under 3 stories.
53.
I would prefer not to have multi-story buildings (apartment houses) more than
three stories in height. It's an esthetic I prefer, to not feel so closed in and
squished together.
54.
NO
55.
Maybe if all located away from residential
56.
No taller or vertical structures
57.
I think the taller buildings should only be put off of our major interstates.
Possibly north Grand Ave. north of Surprise area could possibly work.
58.
No, added pollution. Reduces water and electricity availability, reduces quality
of life, reduces ability to see beyond immediate area.
59.
Yes to a certain degree. Should allow for variety based on exact street
location, lot size, and certain factors such as busier residential vs pure
residential.
60.
No
61.
Do not allow taller buildings. These cost more in power to cool and cause
greater density
Go Back to Question 3
4. Should Maricopa County allow taller building heights in more
zoning districts?
Example: Multi-story residential, vertical mixed-use, and industrial buildings. Where and
under what conditions should this be allowed?
Skip to Question 5
51
September 22, 2025
62.
No
63.
no
64.
No, stop at 5-6 stories
65.
To accommodate growth we either have to go OUT or go UP. We did not learn
from Los Angeles and we have gone OUT. Multi-story residential should be
allowed on primary streets and in retail districts and near Light Rail stops.
66.
No, downtown is fine outskirts should stay as is
67.
yes. allow MF projects for affordable housing options whether BTR (build to
rent) or RTO (rent to own)
68.
Yes. Multi-story buildings and mixed use will help increase units available to
keep housing affordable. Ideally near good public transit to help reduce the
need for car dependency.
69.
NO! taller buildings block the view and reduce privacy in neighborhoods. More
people in less space leads to increased stress among neighbors
70.
No, taller buildings degrade neighborhoods, since privacy is compromised.
Tall buildings allow the occupants to visually intrude on others’ property
71.
Absolutely!
72.
Multi-story buildings that are in residential planning should remain as it has
been. Presently there are appropriate community-oriented guidelines for
spacing which helps with community privacy. Established neighborhood
guidelines should remain. Multistory (more than 2 stories) buildings could be
in new developments where residents would be aware of potential drawbacks
when they rent or purchase a home. Also, a tall pitch of a roof should be
considered for specific construction that will not obstruct existing resident's
views.
73.
No! Lower heights and bigger set backs makes our valley special. That's what
makes our roads seem big and expansive. These new high buildings with
minimal setbacks KILL THE VIEWS and makes residents closterphobic. We
like expanse NOT HIGH DENSITY.
74.
Only allow taller buildings in areas that already allow them
75.
When the height of the new building does not obstruct the view of the
mountains for the buildings already there.
76.
Yes
77.
No
78.
I feel that would depend on what building uses are already on land in the area.
Go Back to Question 3
4. Should Maricopa County allow taller building heights in more
zoning districts?
Example: Multi-story residential, vertical mixed-use, and industrial buildings. Where and
under what conditions should this be allowed?
Skip to Question 5
52
September 22, 2025
79.
No. Keep building heights low. Population density needs to be kept low. Water
conservation should be the number one concern.
80.
Allow multi story’s on the back of the house
81.
Yes, to increase opportunities for first time buyers.
82.
No. Keep tall buildings out of zones other than in a downtown area.
83.
Definitely support vertical versus horizontal density. This does not have to be
high rise in proportion, 3-4 story, townhouse, flat over flat , etc. allowed where
housing options are limited especially to support worker’s housing as a
component.
84.
No
85.
yes, we must build up, not out
86.
Sure taller is ok, but keep the parking and density in alignment.
87.
limit the height for all structure business and residential
88.
Yes. Multi-use buildings (retail or offices on first floor with two or three floors
above with maximum of floors
89.
NO
90.
It seems there’s to many already
91.
"Absolutely NOT
92.
Do not ever allow taller buildings "
93.
In clearly defined locations, taller buildings could be a positive addition to
housing options.
94.
NO!!!
95.
Multi story buildings in a residential area cuts down on air flow making the
temperatures feel hotter and also multi story buildings cuts down on
individual property owners privacy. Multi story buildings should be restricted
to industrial parks or commercial zoned areas.
96.
Taller buildings should be permitted only by a vote of the neighborhood -
defined by owners within, say, 1/4 mile.
97.
No and stop building apartments especially in South Tempe and Chandler
98.
No. My big concern is WATER. We have less and less. And yet there are
proposals for bigger buildings that will gulp water through increased
population?
99.
No
100. No, taller buildings block views and makes one feel closed in. In the Phoenix
area and close by areas that are already high-rise buildings multi-story
Go Back to Question 3
4. Should Maricopa County allow taller building heights in more
zoning districts?
Example: Multi-story residential, vertical mixed-use, and industrial buildings. Where and
under what conditions should this be allowed?
Skip to Question 5
53
September 22, 2025
residential housing can be built there. However, outer areas that do not have
this, prevent the encroachment of these types of buildings into these
communities.
101. No
102. Yes
103. Vertical mixed-use should be considered for every vertical space being
constructed. It could alleviate some of the shortage of units. Taller buildings
have to considered based on the community where it will be placed.
104. No, not taller building heights.
105. 1000% YES!!! Vertical mixed use is necessary compared to suburban sprawl.
The development along the 303 is so boring with cookie cutter single family
homes and chain store shops
106. Yes in any district not already zoned single family residential. Don't let the
screams of the NIMBY's deter you -- everyone needs shelter (except the
mentally ill who refuse it). Can't force it on someone who doesn't cooperate
to receive it.
107. Yes. Where there is sufficient infrastructure to support higher density (transit
hubs, public transport availability)
108. No. Keep taller buildings in commercial zoned areas exclusively
109. I don’t personally want to see tall buildings. It describes a beautiful desert
Mountain View, which is why I moved here. Scottsdale especially in North
Scottsdale is getting so built up off of Scottsdale Road. The beautiful desert
is being destroyed.
110. Need more information on impact of taller buildings in the mentioned zoning
districts. Roads in and out of these districts should support increase in
population density.
111. No
112. Maintain current height restrictions
113. Depends on flying objects. If there are airplanes around, stay down.
114. Definitely not.
115. No
116. Only in areas where taller buildings already exist, not in residential areas.
Along the Rio Salado corridor there is still space for tall buildings.
117. Higher buildings should be restricted to more city-center locations, keeping
the majority of suburban areas single story
Go Back to Question 3
4. Should Maricopa County allow taller building heights in more
zoning districts?
Example: Multi-story residential, vertical mixed-use, and industrial buildings. Where and
under what conditions should this be allowed?
Skip to Question 5
54
September 22, 2025
118. Limits on apartment/townhome building height. Especially near single family
homes.
119. Yes these should be allowed everywhere except existing single family
neighborhoods, especially historical ones.
120. Make it easier in hillside. It is always a mess to explain/figure out how tall a
building can be.
121. No.
122. If we need more tall buildings, they should be in their own district or few
districts. They should not infringe on the character of residential
neighborhoods.
123. not in favor of this change
124. Yes, always should be allowed in the central downtown areas of each
municipality and other urban centers such as Kierland, Scottsdale Quarters,
major corridors such as Shea, Indian School, etc.
125. No
126. "Care should be taken with heights of building in more suburban and rural
areas to preserve our desert ""look"".
127. Heights in building within large city limits could have more flexibility."
128. no!
129. None. Arizona should be a state we preserve the open desert areas. I believe
instead of having large buildings and congested cities, we attract more
agricultural and desert terrain studies, students, forest services and the like.
I’ve lived here my entire life, 68 years, and it’s disappointing to see this
beautiful habitat being destroyed.
130. No
131. they should not allow taller building heights, especially industrial buildings.
132. Yes, with changing industries emerging and old ones going away the
ordinance should adapt to the needs of new development and industries.
133. I am in favor of taller buildings for low income housing only
134. Only in incorporated, business or industrial areas.
135. yes, build up to allow things to be more walk-able/contained in areas - more
accessible.
136. Eh, not sure. Don’t wanna be LA.
137. multi story use is acceptable in industrial or business area. Caution is needed
in residential areas consisting of one or two level homes
Go Back to Question 3
4. Should Maricopa County allow taller building heights in more
zoning districts?
Example: Multi-story residential, vertical mixed-use, and industrial buildings. Where and
under what conditions should this be allowed?
Skip to Question 5
55
September 22, 2025
138. "NOT IN SUN CITY!! Non of the above should be allowed in Sun City, not how
Del Web set this up and we all moved here because of the rules and
regulations to homes. It’s real frustrating to see how some of the people have
been allowed to add a second story or huge rv garage. SCHOA DIDN'T
APPROVE THESE SO HOW DID THEY COME INTO EXISTENCE? I asked
SCHOA that question and they said “the county”. WOW!
139. Also, no home businesses are allowed here - as it should be and stay that
way"
140. Maintaining curb appeal is very important, as you can see from most of my
answers, especially as apartment buildings are becoming taller. We really
need to discourage the construction of more apartments, as they no longer
offer affordable housing like they used to.
141. no, not in residential areas. Some of us have beautiful views that are getting
polluted with hideous corporation buildings and warehouses.
142. Multi-story residential, vertical mixed-use, and industrial buildings should not
be allowed in rural zoning districts.
143. Depends on where it is. Leave the neighbor hoods alone.
144. NO
145. NO, NO, NO!!!!! Lately, we have seen horrible decisions come to fruition. In the
west valley, we have seen HUGE commercial buildings, with 60 ++ feet in
height, being constructed directly next to NEIGHBORHOODS!! Not just any
neighborhood, but homes with acreage and livestock. It does not mix and is a
huge eyesore to the residents that have lived there for decades. What a
nuisance and a reduction in their home values. These people have lost not
only their views of what was a beautiful open landscape, but their home
equity has severely been affected negatively. Shame on those who approved
these buildings. Zoning laws should never be changed in a way that would be
detrimental to the existing community. Any potential changes should be made
to reduce the impact or improve the overall aesthetics of the area. Taller
buildings need to stay in line with what other taller commercial space that
exists, or closer to busier roads or freeways. Not out in quiet neighborhoods.
146. "Less industrial.
147. Dont put 3 plus stories next to single family residential.
148. Dont overdo mixed use. You end up with cheap apartments and vacant or
cheap commercial."
Go Back to Question 3
4. Should Maricopa County allow taller building heights in more
zoning districts?
Example: Multi-story residential, vertical mixed-use, and industrial buildings. Where and
under what conditions should this be allowed?
Skip to Question 5
56
September 22, 2025
149. No.
150. "Multi-story residential should be limited to 2 stories. If you increase the lot
coverage allowance to 50-60%, residents can have the large house they want
without over-shadowing their neighbors with 3-4 story houses. Maintaining
privacy.
151. Vertical mixed use should be contained to 2-3 stories & only in zones for
businesses.
152. Industrial buildings should also be contained to 3-4 stories in zones for
warehouses/industrial use. "
153. Yes
154. I think this should be allowed (within limits) but not in mobile home parks with
small lots
155. prefer no or minimal additional height
156. no tall buildings in residential areas, they block our Valley views from our
houses. I like to look out back and see the mountains and the
sunset/sunrises, I do NOT want to look out and see a tall commercial building
157. No. There is to much that taller building effects, taller building equal higher
occupancy and it disrupts the areas and natural views of the area that we are
all fond of.
158. None, building heights should be restricted in each distinctive zone
159. Absolutely not. Too many taller buildings already.
160. no, they are already building too much. We need more outdoor spaces to
enjoy
161. Yes
162. Only in central corridor.
163. Urban areas only
164. 7-8 story limit so as to preserve views of mountains
165. No.
166. Maybe. It depends on adjacent structures
167. Yes, This county is so spread out that it it impacts the environment negatively.
The mass transport system is inadequate for the population needs. Housing
needs to be closer to the places that people work. Cars are a big factor in our
frequent high pollution alerts. Other environmentally friendly solutions need to
be developed.
168. No
Go Back to Question 3
4. Should Maricopa County allow taller building heights in more
zoning districts?
Example: Multi-story residential, vertical mixed-use, and industrial buildings. Where and
under what conditions should this be allowed?
Skip to Question 5
57
September 22, 2025
169. NO. Please preserve the lower building heights.
170. Any. No height restriction outside of perhaps safety around airports and
funding for EMS response.
171. Allow multi-residential units in single family home areas (ie, more
townhomes/condos in neighborhoods)
172. Okay for downtown areas, business areas in Scottsdale okay. Not okay in
established neighborhoods built prior to 1975.
173. Residential views add to the property value. If allowing taller building heights
will restrict views of mountains especially, I'm opposed. Where the view has
no value, then allowing taller building heights should be considered.
174. Absolutely not
175. No comments
176. Yes when needed to provide more housing, especially near public
transportation
177. Not when it deviates from existing height restrictions. Variants should not be
allowed where homes already have been constructed.
178. "No. Not in established residential neighborhoods.
179. Important to maintain the beauty, view and character of our cities/towns. "
180. Multifamily height approval should be approved by the surrounding single-
family residential lots. Ideally, Multifamily sites should be isolated away from
single family use areas
181. No
182. Taller buildings should only be allowed in dense urban areas.
183. Urban areas only.
184. Taller buildings should be limited
185. NO
186. No.
187. There are too many tall buildings (mostly apartments) that are an eyesore,
and block the view of others. Keep tall building corridors so that this impact to
previous developments are at same level.
188. Absolutely not.
189. No strong opinion.
190. This is asking for a thesis to be provided by lay persons.
191. We should standardize the height limit but we need to understand with the
population increase up is better than out for areas that are condensed.
Go Back to Question 3
4. Should Maricopa County allow taller building heights in more
zoning districts?
Example: Multi-story residential, vertical mixed-use, and industrial buildings. Where and
under what conditions should this be allowed?
Skip to Question 5
58
September 22, 2025
192. I believe that there should be a two story limit to homes and a three-story limit
to apartment buildings.
193. Which districts ? Please specify.
194. No, keep them low.
195. No - see response #1
196. No
197. Yes, support density of vertical mixed-use and multi-story residential
198. Oppose strongly
199. Yes. It's the only way to limit urban sprawl.
200. Peer-reviewed case studies on the effects of taller buildings in these zones.
What was allowed? What happened where? And why did that produce such
outcomes?
201. Absolutely not! We bought our first property here 15 years ago and are
appalled by the number of high density building we see everywhere. The
impact on our limited water supply, traffic, and noise is very troublesome. The
impact on the Mountain View’s and green space) (which made us want to live
here) is so depressing.
202. Yes, a thousand times yes. Wherever it doesn't interfere with an airport, this
should be allowed and encouraged.
203. NO to any changes
204. "No. Putting taller residential houses adjacent to single-story residential
homes will diminish the value of homes built in the ""suburbs"" by people who
likely assumed that their neighborhood would include homes similar to theirs.
205. Changing zoning rules would decrease the value of homes and those that
moved to Surprise to live in a neighborhood that will remain as it was when
they made their investment in our city."
206. NO! Restrict high rise building to designated districts, and don't allow them to
intrude into communities that have ZERO high rise buildings!
207. Nothing that crowds out sunlight for existing homes. And, no building in
residential areas over three stories.
208. Entitlement 623 has not perce a direct
209. I think taller buildings are more efficient as opposed to spreading out, desert-
ifying more land and increasing already long commutes in heavy traffic.
210. "limit residential housing developments/ single family homes, to 2 stories.
211. City dwellings may be high rises."
Go Back to Question 3
4. Should Maricopa County allow taller building heights in more
zoning districts?
Example: Multi-story residential, vertical mixed-use, and industrial buildings. Where and
under what conditions should this be allowed?
Skip to Question 5
59
September 22, 2025
212. Yes, the current requirements make a two story home feel very small.
213. Max 3 stories in residential when it does not stick out like a sore thumb.
Changes need to happen gradually, and multi-story buildings should have
architectural appeal, else we'll end up like the 60s and 70s with the "projects"
feel. Let's not repeat the past in Maricopa. You should read up on urban
planning mistakes in history.
214. Vertical mixed use building please.
215. No.
216. "Taller buildings should only be allowed where they do not crowd existing
architecture. Allowing construction of, for instance, condo blocks in single-
family residential areas creates a visual and practical mismatch of use cases
and also diminishes utility of the area due to increased traffic and reduced
parking.
217. Taller commercial buildings should be in a discrete zoning area. "
218. yes...residential should allow up to 35'...30' is so limiting when doing larger
homes with 2 stories...especially if wanting a steeper style architecture.
219. Taller building heights should be allowed only in downtown urban areas to
preserve community aesthetics, especially near mountains and landmarks
220. Taller buildings that block scenic views should not be allowed, and not in
residential housing areas either
221. Yes, in a saturated neighborhood where single family residential is not
possible, multi-story residential must be allowed. Same for commercial or
industrial buildings.
222. In Sun City, most residents prefer to not reside next door to a two-story
building staring down at their lot. SCHOA would prefer that buildings
constructed on the lots will have roof lines that match or are less than the
main resident's roof line.
223. Unfortunately, urban sprawl is a serious concern in one of the largest metro
areas in the country. I strongly recommend more multi-story residential
development, especially in inner-city zones including the various suburban
cities.
224. Yes, but taller buildings need to be evaluated on a case by case basis. If next
to a neighborhood of single family homes, building heights should be
restricted.
Go Back to Question 3
4. Should Maricopa County allow taller building heights in more
zoning districts?
Example: Multi-story residential, vertical mixed-use, and industrial buildings. Where and
under what conditions should this be allowed?
Skip to Question 5
60
September 22, 2025
225. Yes. The sprawl is ridiculous and detrimental to the environment, we should
be building up, not out.
226. I don't want taller buildings
227. "no taller buildings...why have surrounding mountains when they cannot be
seen
228. enough of the developers wielding their tax potential to get taller buildings"
229. This would depend on the district and should be critically studied and include
community impute and support.
230. No
231. should NOT be allowed in residential areas that already DO NOT have multi-
story.
232. Absolutely not. Population density might bring more revenue for the County
and RE investors but will hurt the look and feel of the open space. We used to
be able to see the skyline and enjoy nice mountain views and now that is
disappearing all over the valley.
233. yes
234. No
235. YES, vertical mixed-use, grocery stores at the bottom, housing on top
236. NO
237. As this participant generally understands it, the majority of what is under your
purview vs under "city" regulation which then this question would not apply,
therefore - the county property should align with the neighboring municipality
to the tune of say a 5 mi radius and if the average in that area is higher - as an
average then accommodate in the same manner. Phoenix has done a horrible
job of managing area aesthetics. Additionally, Phoenix allows enough of a
dramatic difference between what they allow and what is even on the right
side (as an example), of another municipality and we can see areas of no
cohesive of density, aesthetics, types, rules - even with political signs.....litter
aligned along one long stretch because that is City of Phoenix and the other is
any other community. So, this is to say the county should be in a position to
not allow the same "nearly anything goes" approach to building heights.
BTW, the questions that are multiple choice under the "oppose" option - let's
be clear it isn't just drainage that is of a concern related to increased coverage
- what about fire? What about demands for parking? What about the quiet
Go Back to Question 3
4. Should Maricopa County allow taller building heights in more
zoning districts?
Example: Multi-story residential, vertical mixed-use, and industrial buildings. Where and
under what conditions should this be allowed?
Skip to Question 5
61
September 22, 2025
enjoyment by increasing the density? What about view considerations? Just a
thought - drainage is important but that is not the only concern.
238. No! Do not allow the beauty of our desert to be obscured. Do not allow the
high density to continue. More density with no new infrastructure is
unsustainable and creates an angry, hostile environment for the residents. I
do think some mixed use in the downtown areas would be nice.
239. No. Absolutely not. We don’t need more people moving here.
240. No
241. Yes. Taller buildings should be allowed across Maricopa County, specifically
near employment centers, transit corridors, education facilities, and services.
This flexibility will enable multifamily homes and other essential housing
types that meet the needs of our growing population and help people live
closer to where they work. Allowing increased building heights in appropriate
areas is a key strategy to accommodate this growth sustainably and ensure
that the Phoenix Valley can continue to thrive as an affordable and accessible
region for workers, families, and older adults alike.
242. Yes, infill is essential to address the housing crisis and talled buildings are the
solution.
243. Yes. It should be more legal across the board to build taller building in all
situations.
244. Yes, the County should allow taller buildings in significantly more zoning
districts. Limiting height too strictly forces horizontal sprawl, increases
infrastructure costs, and worsens traffic and emissions. Strategic height
allowances are essential to meet housing demand, improve affordability, and
create the walkable, transit-oriented neighborhoods our region needs. Taller
buildings should be permitted by right in: All areas served by high-capacity
transit (light rail, future BRT, major bus routes). Existing and planned mixed-
use and commercial corridors, so residents can live near jobs, services, and
entertainment without long commutes. Neighborhood centers and hubs
where increased density supports local businesses and public services.
Height increases should not be contingent on excessive discretionary review
when the infrastructure can support it. Instead, design standards can ensure
new buildings contribute positively to the street, with: Ground floors that
engage pedestrians. Integrated shade and green infrastructure to reduce
heat-island effects. Affordable housing set-asides to ensure inclusive growth.
Go Back to Question 3
4. Should Maricopa County allow taller building heights in more
zoning districts?
Example: Multi-story residential, vertical mixed-use, and industrial buildings. Where and
under what conditions should this be allowed?
Skip to Question 5
62
September 22, 2025
By embracing taller, denser development in the right places, Maricopa County
can reduce sprawl, lower infrastructure costs per resident, expand housing
options, and build communities that are more sustainable, connected, and
resilient in the face of extreme heat and growth pressures.
245. Absolutely yes. Maricopa County should abolish all height restrictions in all
zoning districts.
246. Yes. In all areas allow the next increment in density, so that acre lots are
allowed to be divided into half acre lots, single family homes are allowed to
become duplexes or add adus, and duplexes are allowed to add a story and
have four units, etc. Multistory residential should be allowed within a short
distance of all public transit stops and freeways.
247. Yes, allowable building height should automatically increase based on some
standard, such as census tract population.
248. Yes. At least 6 stories should be allowed by right on all residential land.
Maricopa county should follow the states of Texas and Tennessee as well as
New York City, Seattle, Honolulu, Austin, and other cities in allowing single-
stair residential buildings up to 6-stories as long as they include sprinklers,
fire-rated walls, and pressurized stairs. These buildings are proven to have
identical fire safety outcomes to dual-stair buildings and they allow more
units to be build on smaller lots. For a neighborhood to be walkable, it
requires 20 dwelling units per acre. Maricopa County should stop forcing all
neighborhoods to be car-dependent.
249. Yes
250. Yes, especially for residential/commercial/mixed-used buildings.
251. Yes - all of the above
252. Yes
253. Permit taller buildings countywide, especially near jobs, transit, schools, and
services. This approach supports more multifamily and diverse housing
options, helping residents live closer to work. Targeted height increases in key
areas will accommodate growth sustainably, keeping the Phoenix Valley
affordable and accessible for workers, families, and older adults.
254. As an age restricted retirement community protected by the Senior Citizen
Overlay, a concern that has emerged is that as the legislature is
contemplating creating additional housing by renovating retail spaces and
allowing religious organizations to build affordable housing on property
Go Back to Question 3
4. Should Maricopa County allow taller building heights in more
zoning districts?
Example: Multi-story residential, vertical mixed-use, and industrial buildings. Where and
under what conditions should this be allowed?
Skip to Question 5
63
September 22, 2025
owned by them, that if built in within our community borders, those properties
would not be under the Senior Citizen Overlay restrictions. If this were to
happen, it would be detrimental to our community. There should be protection
included in future zoning decisions to safeguard all of the Senior Citizen
Overlay communities in Maricopa County.
255. No more taller buildings. Those should be zoned in very specific places where
tall buildings exist as to not disturb community aesthetic or block community
views.
256. YES! Home owners and developers should always be able to build as they
please. It is their community to live in. Anywhere and under any condition, it
puts less stress on undeveloped natural areas.
257. Yes
258. Yes, Maricopa County should allow taller building heights in more zoning
districts. Allowing greater height supports environmental sustainability by
reducing sprawl, cutting down on car dependency, and making better use of
existing infrastructure. It also makes it easier to mix residential and
commercial uses, creating vibrant, walkable neighborhoods where people can
live closer to jobs, shops, and services. This approach not only lowers
emissions but also supports local businesses and expands housing options
in high-demand areas.
259. Yes, allow taller and more dense development along transit corridors
260. Absolutely
261. Yes without a question, the fact that we didn’t ask this question 25 years ago
blows my mind because we are literally the antithesis of urban planning and
design which is a symbol of inertia and shameful.
262. It shouldn't be restricting them, except in cases where there is a flight zone.
Resident shouldn't be able to restrict other people's property. My neighbor
owns their lot, not their view from the lot.
263. No, any building that blocks views of mountains is unacceptable. Tall
buildings also use more water, power, gas so not good
264. Absolutely not! Even in industrial areas, maximum limit should be less than
60, and NO variance granted. 90 feet should NEVER be allowed under any
zoning district!
265. Only in cases where views from nearby homes or businesses will not be
affected.
Go Back to Question 3
4. Should Maricopa County allow taller building heights in more
zoning districts?
Example: Multi-story residential, vertical mixed-use, and industrial buildings. Where and
under what conditions should this be allowed?
Skip to Question 5
64
September 22, 2025
266. Absolutely not.
267. taller apartment buildings should NOT be allowed in residential/suburban
areas. Downtown areas of cities may be the only place with taller and/or
industrial buildings. including taller apartments. Taller apartments and
industrial restrict air flow and view in residential areas and are a hazard
268. Yes, there is no reason for buildings to be frozen at 30-40 feet height if the
business or the use can support more.
269. allow tall building where there are already other tall buildings. Focus on
preserving the view of our wonderful mountains.
270. Field not completed
271. yes, mixed use
272. NO
273. Absolutely, and especially vertical mixed use.
274. Field not completed
275. Keep buildings as low as possible. Don’t destroy the Mountain Views!
276. No
277. No, why would it be a good idea to allow taller building heights in more zoning
districts? How does it benefit quality of life.
278. No, I think that they should go through rezoning for things like that
279. multi-story residential. In communities planned to include multi-story,
separated from single-family neighborhoods
280. Yes
281. Yes. Taller buildings should be allowed across Maricopa County, specifically
near employment centers, transit corridors, education facilities, and services.
This flexibility will enable multifamily homes and other essential housing
types that meet the needs of our growing population and help people live
closer to where they work. Allowing increased building heights in appropriate
areas is a key strategy to accommodate this growth sustainably and ensure
that the Phoenix Valley can continue to thrive as an affordable and accessible
region for workers, families, and older adults alike.
282.
Go Back to Question 3
5. What is your opinion on increasing lot coverage allowances for
residential properties?
Lot coverage refers to the percentage of a lot that may be covered by buildings or
structures. Increasing lot coverage can allow for larger homes, accessory structures, or
more flexible site design. Currently, some zoning districts have very low lot coverage limits
(e.g., 25-30%), which may restrict certain housing types or layouts.
Skip to Question 6
65
September 22, 2025
1.
Support with limits – allow increased lo coverage only where adequate
infrasF2:F251tructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
2.
Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
3.
Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
4.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
5.
Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
6.
Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
7.
Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
8.
Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
9.
Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
10.
Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
11.
Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
12.
Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
13.
Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
14.
Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
15.
Case by case
16.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
17.
Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
18.
Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
Question 5
Go Back to Question 4
5. What is your opinion on increasing lot coverage allowances for
residential properties?
Lot coverage refers to the percentage of a lot that may be covered by buildings or
structures. Increasing lot coverage can allow for larger homes, accessory structures, or
more flexible site design. Currently, some zoning districts have very low lot coverage limits
(e.g., 25-30%), which may restrict certain housing types or layouts.
Skip to Question 6
66
September 22, 2025
19.
Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
20.
Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
21.
Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
22.
Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
23.
Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
24.
Neutral – no strong opinion
25.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
26.
Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
27.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
28.
Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
29.
Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
30.
Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
31.
Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
32.
Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
33.
Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
34.
Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
35.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
36.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
37.
Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
Go Back to Question 4
5. What is your opinion on increasing lot coverage allowances for
residential properties?
Lot coverage refers to the percentage of a lot that may be covered by buildings or
structures. Increasing lot coverage can allow for larger homes, accessory structures, or
more flexible site design. Currently, some zoning districts have very low lot coverage limits
(e.g., 25-30%), which may restrict certain housing types or layouts.
Skip to Question 6
67
September 22, 2025
38.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
39.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
40.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
41.
Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
42.
Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
43.
Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
44.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
45.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
46.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
47.
Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
48.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
49.
Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
50.
Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
51.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
52.
Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
53.
Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
54.
Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
55.
Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
Go Back to Question 4
5. What is your opinion on increasing lot coverage allowances for
residential properties?
Lot coverage refers to the percentage of a lot that may be covered by buildings or
structures. Increasing lot coverage can allow for larger homes, accessory structures, or
more flexible site design. Currently, some zoning districts have very low lot coverage limits
(e.g., 25-30%), which may restrict certain housing types or layouts.
Skip to Question 6
68
September 22, 2025
56.
Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
57.
Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
58.
Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
59.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
60.
Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
61.
Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
62.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
63.
Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
64.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
65.
Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
66.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
67.
Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
68.
Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
69.
Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
70.
Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
71.
Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
72.
Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
73.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
Go Back to Question 4
5. What is your opinion on increasing lot coverage allowances for
residential properties?
Lot coverage refers to the percentage of a lot that may be covered by buildings or
structures. Increasing lot coverage can allow for larger homes, accessory structures, or
more flexible site design. Currently, some zoning districts have very low lot coverage limits
(e.g., 25-30%), which may restrict certain housing types or layouts.
Skip to Question 6
69
September 22, 2025
74.
Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
75.
Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
76.
Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
77.
Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
78.
Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
79.
Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
80.
Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
81.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
82.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
83.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
84.
Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
85.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
86.
Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
87.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
88.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
89.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
90.
Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
91.
Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
92.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
Go Back to Question 4
5. What is your opinion on increasing lot coverage allowances for
residential properties?
Lot coverage refers to the percentage of a lot that may be covered by buildings or
structures. Increasing lot coverage can allow for larger homes, accessory structures, or
more flexible site design. Currently, some zoning districts have very low lot coverage limits
(e.g., 25-30%), which may restrict certain housing types or layouts.
Skip to Question 6
70
September 22, 2025
93.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
94.
Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
95.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
96.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
97.
Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
98.
Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
99.
Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
100. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
101. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
102. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
103. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
104. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
105. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
106. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
107. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
108. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
109. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
110. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
111. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
112. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
Go Back to Question 4
5. What is your opinion on increasing lot coverage allowances for
residential properties?
Lot coverage refers to the percentage of a lot that may be covered by buildings or
structures. Increasing lot coverage can allow for larger homes, accessory structures, or
more flexible site design. Currently, some zoning districts have very low lot coverage limits
(e.g., 25-30%), which may restrict certain housing types or layouts.
Skip to Question 6
71
September 22, 2025
113. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
114. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
115. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
116. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
117. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
118. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
119. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
120. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
121. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
122. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
123. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
124. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
125. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
126. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
127. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
128. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
129. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
130. Neutral – no strong opinion
131. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
132. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
Go Back to Question 4
5. What is your opinion on increasing lot coverage allowances for
residential properties?
Lot coverage refers to the percentage of a lot that may be covered by buildings or
structures. Increasing lot coverage can allow for larger homes, accessory structures, or
more flexible site design. Currently, some zoning districts have very low lot coverage limits
(e.g., 25-30%), which may restrict certain housing types or layouts.
Skip to Question 6
72
September 22, 2025
133. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
134. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
135. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
136. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
137. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
138. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
139. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
140. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
141. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
142. Neutral – no strong opinion
143. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
144. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
145. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
146. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
147. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
148. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
149. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
150. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
Go Back to Question 4
5. What is your opinion on increasing lot coverage allowances for
residential properties?
Lot coverage refers to the percentage of a lot that may be covered by buildings or
structures. Increasing lot coverage can allow for larger homes, accessory structures, or
more flexible site design. Currently, some zoning districts have very low lot coverage limits
(e.g., 25-30%), which may restrict certain housing types or layouts.
Skip to Question 6
73
September 22, 2025
151. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
152. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
153. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
154. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
155. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
156. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
157. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
158. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
159. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
160. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
161. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
162. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
163. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
164. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
165. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
166. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
167. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
168. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
169. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
170. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
Go Back to Question 4
5. What is your opinion on increasing lot coverage allowances for
residential properties?
Lot coverage refers to the percentage of a lot that may be covered by buildings or
structures. Increasing lot coverage can allow for larger homes, accessory structures, or
more flexible site design. Currently, some zoning districts have very low lot coverage limits
(e.g., 25-30%), which may restrict certain housing types or layouts.
Skip to Question 6
74
September 22, 2025
171. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
172. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
173. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
174. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
175. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
176. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
177. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
178. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
179. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
180. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
181. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
182. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
183. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
184. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
185. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
186. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
187. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
Go Back to Question 4
5. What is your opinion on increasing lot coverage allowances for
residential properties?
Lot coverage refers to the percentage of a lot that may be covered by buildings or
structures. Increasing lot coverage can allow for larger homes, accessory structures, or
more flexible site design. Currently, some zoning districts have very low lot coverage limits
(e.g., 25-30%), which may restrict certain housing types or layouts.
Skip to Question 6
75
September 22, 2025
188. Oppose if the location, height, and other eyesores impact neighbors. Not
more than 50% of lot for structures.
189. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
190. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
191. Lot coverage should be reduced to control density
192. No
193. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
194. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
195. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
196. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
197. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
198. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
199. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
200. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
201. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
202. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
203. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
204. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
205. Provide information about your plans.
206. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
207. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
208. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
209. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
Go Back to Question 4
5. What is your opinion on increasing lot coverage allowances for
residential properties?
Lot coverage refers to the percentage of a lot that may be covered by buildings or
structures. Increasing lot coverage can allow for larger homes, accessory structures, or
more flexible site design. Currently, some zoning districts have very low lot coverage limits
(e.g., 25-30%), which may restrict certain housing types or layouts.
Skip to Question 6
76
September 22, 2025
210. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
211. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
212. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
213. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
214. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
215. None of the above. What has worked and what hasn't worked with past zoning
enforcement parameters? Enhancing the positive effects and modifying or
eliminating the negative effects is ideal.
216. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
217. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
218. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
219. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
220. Overdevelopment and property coverage is a threat to long term water
resources!
221. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
222. Neutral – no strong opinion
223. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
224. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
225. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
226. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
227. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
Go Back to Question 4
5. What is your opinion on increasing lot coverage allowances for
residential properties?
Lot coverage refers to the percentage of a lot that may be covered by buildings or
structures. Increasing lot coverage can allow for larger homes, accessory structures, or
more flexible site design. Currently, some zoning districts have very low lot coverage limits
(e.g., 25-30%), which may restrict certain housing types or layouts.
Skip to Question 6
77
September 22, 2025
228. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
229. Lot coverage (and, to an extent, setback regulations) hamper the development
of existing land and reduce the ability of homeowners to make full use of their
property as they see fit.
230. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
231. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
232. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
233. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
234. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
235. I support limited increase in allowance, but the primary limit is that we do
NOT need larger houses. An increase for multi-unit, multi story apartments is
acceptable.
236. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
237. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
238. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
239. For large lot development (RU43) increased lot coverage could result in
increased drainage issues
240. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
241. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
242. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
243. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
244. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
Go Back to Question 4
5. What is your opinion on increasing lot coverage allowances for
residential properties?
Lot coverage refers to the percentage of a lot that may be covered by buildings or
structures. Increasing lot coverage can allow for larger homes, accessory structures, or
more flexible site design. Currently, some zoning districts have very low lot coverage limits
(e.g., 25-30%), which may restrict certain housing types or layouts.
Skip to Question 6
78
September 22, 2025
245. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
246. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
247. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
248. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
249. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
250. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
251. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
252. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
253. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
254. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
255. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
256. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
257. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
258. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
259. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
260. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
261. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
262. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
263. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
Go Back to Question 4
5. What is your opinion on increasing lot coverage allowances for
residential properties?
Lot coverage refers to the percentage of a lot that may be covered by buildings or
structures. Increasing lot coverage can allow for larger homes, accessory structures, or
more flexible site design. Currently, some zoning districts have very low lot coverage limits
(e.g., 25-30%), which may restrict certain housing types or layouts.
Skip to Question 6
79
September 22, 2025
264. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
265. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
266. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
267. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
268. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
269. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
270. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
271. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
272. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
273. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
274. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
275. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
276. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
277. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
278. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
279. Neutral – no strong opinion
280. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
281. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
Go Back to Question 4
5. What is your opinion on increasing lot coverage allowances for
residential properties?
Lot coverage refers to the percentage of a lot that may be covered by buildings or
structures. Increasing lot coverage can allow for larger homes, accessory structures, or
more flexible site design. Currently, some zoning districts have very low lot coverage limits
(e.g., 25-30%), which may restrict certain housing types or layouts.
Skip to Question 6
80
September 22, 2025
282. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
283. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
284. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
285. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
286. Field not completed
287. Neutral – no strong opinion
288. Oppose – concerned about overdevelopment, reduced open space or
drainage
289. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
290. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
291. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
292. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
293. Strongly oppose – lot coverage limits are important for community character
294. Support with limits – allow increased lot coverage only where adequate
infrastructure (e.g., water, sewer, drainage) is available
295. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
296. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
297. Strongly support – more flexibility will help accommodate modern housing
needs
298.
Go Back to Question 4
6. If Maricopa County reduced minimum parking requirements,
what strategies would you support?
o Shared parking between multiple uses
o Flexible parking based on location
o Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing
o On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement
o Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
o Replacing parking with open space or landscaping
o I do not support reducing parking requirements
Skip to Question 7
81
September 22, 2025
1.
Shared parking between multiple uses; Parking maximums to prevent
overbuilding; Replacing parking with open space or landscaping;
2.
Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; Walkable places like
Europe ;
3.
Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
4.
Shared parking between multiple uses; Parking maximums to prevent
overbuilding; Flexible parking based on location; Allow for parking studies to
be performed by reputable third party firms. ;
5.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
6.
Shared parking between multiple uses;
7.
reduce requirements with limit on number of vehicles allowed per lot size to
reduce 5-8 vehicles all residing in same single family home;
8.
Reduce the traffic calming features that is keeping the parking lots having
easy access. from ;
9.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
10.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
11.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
12.
i don't know what this is;
13.
Shared parking between multiple uses; On-street parking to satisfy part of
requirement; Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; Flexible
parking based on location;
14.
N/A;
15.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
16.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
17.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
18.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
19.
Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;I do not support reducing parking
requirements;
Question 6
Go Back to Question 5
6. If Maricopa County reduced minimum parking requirements,
what strategies would you support?
o Shared parking between multiple uses
o Flexible parking based on location
o Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing
o On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement
o Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
o Replacing parking with open space or landscaping
o I do not support reducing parking requirements
Skip to Question 7
82
September 22, 2025
20.
Flexible parking based on location; Shared parking between multiple uses;
On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement; Parking maximums to
prevent overbuilding; I do not support reducing parking requirements;
21.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
22.
Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; Flexible parking based
on location;Shared parking between multiple uses; Replacing parking with
open space or landscaping;
23.
Shared parking between multiple uses; Flexible parking based on location;
On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement;
24.
Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing;
25.
Flexible parking based on location;
26.
Flexible parking based on location; Reduced requirements for
affordable/senior housing;
27.
I do not support reducing parking requirements; only if the area is sufficiently
supported with public transport ;
28.
Shared parking between multiple uses; Flexible parking based on location;
Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; On-street parking to
satisfy part of requirement; Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
29.
Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
30.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
31.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
32.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
33.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
34.
On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement;
35.
Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding; The formula to calculate
minimum number of parking spots for rental properties should be updated it
embrace the reality that these days it's necessary for multiple unrelated
adults to share housing. Therefore new builders should be required to have
one parking space per bedroom on their properties plus X percent of extra
spots for visitors ;
Go Back to Question 5
6. If Maricopa County reduced minimum parking requirements,
what strategies would you support?
o Shared parking between multiple uses
o Flexible parking based on location
o Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing
o On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement
o Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
o Replacing parking with open space or landscaping
o I do not support reducing parking requirements
Skip to Question 7
83
September 22, 2025
36.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
37.
Flexible parking based on location;
38.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
39.
Flexible parking based on location;
40.
Shared parking between multiple uses; Flexible parking based on location;
41.
Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
42.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
43.
Flexible parking based on location; Shared parking between multiple uses;
Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding; I do not support reducing parking
requirements;
44.
Flexible parking based on location; Shared parking between multiple uses;
Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; On-street parking to
satisfy part of requirement; Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
Replacing parking with open space or landscaping;
45.
Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; Shared parking
between multiple uses; Flexible parking based on location;
46.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
47.
Flexible parking based on location;
48.
Replacing parking with open space or landscaping;
49.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
50.
Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing;
51.
Replacing parking with open space or landscaping; I do not support reducing
parking requirements;
52.
Shared parking between multiple uses; Flexible parking based on location;
Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; On-street parking to
satisfy part of requirement; Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
53.
Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
54.
Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; Parking maximums to
prevent overbuilding;
55.
Replacing parking with open space or landscaping;
Go Back to Question 5
6. If Maricopa County reduced minimum parking requirements,
what strategies would you support?
o Shared parking between multiple uses
o Flexible parking based on location
o Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing
o On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement
o Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
o Replacing parking with open space or landscaping
o I do not support reducing parking requirements
Skip to Question 7
84
September 22, 2025
56.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
57.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
58.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
59.
Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
60.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
61.
Flexible parking based on location; Shared parking between multiple uses;
Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
62.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
63.
Shared parking between multiple uses; Flexible parking based on location;
Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; On-street parking to
satisfy part of requirement; Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
Replacing parking with open space or landscaping;
64.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
65.
Flexible parking based on location; Reduced requirements for
affordable/senior housing; Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
Replacing parking with open space or landscaping;
66.
Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding; On-street parking to satisfy part
of requirement; Replacing parking with open space or landscaping;
67.
I do not support reducing parking requirements; On-street parking to satisfy
part of requirement; Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
68.
Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
69.
Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding; I do not support reducing parking
requirements; Replacing parking with open space or landscaping;
70.
Shared parking between multiple uses; Flexible parking based on location;
Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; Replacing parking with
open space or landscaping;
71.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
72.
Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing;
Go Back to Question 5
6. If Maricopa County reduced minimum parking requirements,
what strategies would you support?
o Shared parking between multiple uses
o Flexible parking based on location
o Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing
o On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement
o Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
o Replacing parking with open space or landscaping
o I do not support reducing parking requirements
Skip to Question 7
85
September 22, 2025
73.
Shared parking between multiple uses; Flexible parking based on location;
Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding; Replacing parking with open
space or landscaping;
74.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
75.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
76.
Shared parking between multiple uses; On-street parking to satisfy part of
requirement; Flexible parking based on location; Reduced requirements for
affordable/senior housing;
77.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
78.
Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding; Replacing parking with open
space or landscaping; I do not support reducing parking requirements;don't
reduce parking at senior housing, they drive;
79.
Shared parking between multiple uses; Flexible parking based on location;
On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement; Parking maximums to
prevent overbuilding; I do not support reducing parking requirements;Shared
makes sense - when businesses are closed their parking should be used by
anybody needing a space. Parkers could click QR code on signing to pay
nominal fee to help with upkeep & cleaning. City could help monitor/issue
tickets to parkers who fail to pay.;
80.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
81.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
82.
Flexible parking based on location;
83.
Replacing parking with open space or landscaping;
84.
Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
85.
Shared parking between multiple uses; Flexible parking based on location;
Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; Parking maximums to
prevent overbuilding; Replacing parking with open space or landscaping; I do
not support reducing parking requirements;
86.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
87.
Flexible parking based on location; Shared parking between multiple uses;
Go Back to Question 5
6. If Maricopa County reduced minimum parking requirements,
what strategies would you support?
o Shared parking between multiple uses
o Flexible parking based on location
o Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing
o On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement
o Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
o Replacing parking with open space or landscaping
o I do not support reducing parking requirements
Skip to Question 7
86
September 22, 2025
88.
Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; On-street parking to
satisfy part of requirement; Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
Shared parking between multiple uses;
89.
Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding; Flexible parking based on
location;
90.
Flexible parking based on location; On-street parking to satisfy part of
requirement; Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; More
available public transportation access;
91.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
92.
Shared parking between multiple uses; Replacing parking with open space or
landscaping;
93.
Flexible parking based on location; On-street parking to satisfy part of
requirement; Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding; Replacing parking
with open space or landscaping;
94.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
95.
Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
96.
Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
97.
Replacing parking with open space or landscaping;
98.
Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding; I do not support reducing parking
requirements.
99.
I do not support reducing parking requirements;
100. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
101. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
102. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding; Shared parking between multiple
uses; Flexible parking based on location; Replacing parking with open space
or landscaping;
103. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
104. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
105. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
106. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
Go Back to Question 5
6. If Maricopa County reduced minimum parking requirements,
what strategies would you support?
o Shared parking between multiple uses
o Flexible parking based on location
o Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing
o On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement
o Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
o Replacing parking with open space or landscaping
o I do not support reducing parking requirements
Skip to Question 7
87
September 22, 2025
107. Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; On-street parking to
satisfy part of requirement; Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
108. Flexible parking based on location;
109. Flexible parking based on location; On-street parking to satisfy part of
requirement;
110. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
111. Shared parking between multiple uses; Flexible parking based on location;
On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement; Parking maximums to
prevent overbuilding;
112. Shared parking between multiple uses; Flexible parking based on location;
On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement; Replacing parking with open
space or landscaping;
113. Reduce min parking requirements within 1/4 mile of public transit systems;
114. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
115. Flexible parking based on location; Reduced requirements for
affordable/senior housing;
116. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding; Flexible parking based on
location;
117. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
118. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
119. Flexible parking based on location; I do not support reducing parking
requirements;
120. I do not support reducing parking requirements; Need at least 10%
Handicapped;
121. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
122. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
123. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
124. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding; Replacing parking with open
space or landscaping;
125. Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing;
Go Back to Question 5
6. If Maricopa County reduced minimum parking requirements,
what strategies would you support?
o Shared parking between multiple uses
o Flexible parking based on location
o Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing
o On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement
o Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
o Replacing parking with open space or landscaping
o I do not support reducing parking requirements
Skip to Question 7
88
September 22, 2025
126. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding; Reduced requirements for
affordable/senior housing; Flexible parking based on location;
127. Shared parking between multiple uses; On-street parking to satisfy part of
requirement; Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding; Flexible parking
based on location; Replacing parking with open space or landscaping;
128. Flexible parking based on location;
129. On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement; I do not support reducing
parking requirements;
130. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
131. Flexible parking based on location;
132. Shared parking between multiple uses; Flexible parking based on location;
On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement; Parking maximums to
prevent overbuilding;
133. Shared parking between multiple uses; Flexible parking based on location;
Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; On-street parking to
satisfy part of requirement;
134. Flexible parking based on location;
135. Shared parking between multiple uses; Flexible parking based on location;
136. Shared parking between multiple uses; Flexible parking based on location;
Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; On-street parking to
satisfy part of requirement; Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
Replacing parking with open space or landscaping;
137. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
138. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
139. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
140. Parking requirements should be reviewed in respect to change in shopping
and business operations. However you must be careful not to make major
changes base on a few small trend. . ;
141. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
Go Back to Question 5
6. If Maricopa County reduced minimum parking requirements,
what strategies would you support?
o Shared parking between multiple uses
o Flexible parking based on location
o Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing
o On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement
o Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
o Replacing parking with open space or landscaping
o I do not support reducing parking requirements
Skip to Question 7
89
September 22, 2025
142. Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; Flexible parking based
on location; I do not support reducing parking requirements;
143. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding; Replacing parking with open
space or landscaping; I do not support reducing parking requirements;
Shared parking between multiple uses;
144. Flexible parking based on location; On-street parking to satisfy part of
requirement; Replacing parking with open space or landscaping;
145. Flexible parking based on location;
146. Shared parking between multiple uses; On-street parking to satisfy part of
requirement; Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; Flexible
parking based on location; Replacing parking with open space or
landscaping;
147. On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement; Reduced requirements for
affordable/senior housing; Flexible parking based on location; Shared
parking between multiple uses;
148. On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement;
149. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
150. Replacing parking with open space or landscaping; Parking maximums to
prevent overbuilding;
151. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
152. Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; Parking maximums to
prevent overbuilding; Replacing parking with open space or landscaping;
153. Flexible parking based on location; On-street parking to satisfy part of
requirement; Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding; Replacing parking
with open space or landscaping;
154. I do not support reducing parking requirements; We need parking so people
cam get to work in our spread out county. ;
155. Shared parking between multiple uses; Flexible parking based on location;
Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; Replacing parking with
open space or landscaping; Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
Go Back to Question 5
6. If Maricopa County reduced minimum parking requirements,
what strategies would you support?
o Shared parking between multiple uses
o Flexible parking based on location
o Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing
o On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement
o Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
o Replacing parking with open space or landscaping
o I do not support reducing parking requirements
Skip to Question 7
90
September 22, 2025
156. Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; Parking maximums to
prevent overbuilding; Replacing parking with open space or landscaping;
Flexible parking based on location;
157. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
158. In our over 55 community, we allow 1 car per driveway and no overnight
street parking. It works in our small lot size environment;
159. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
160. no matter where you live or where you go, seems there is never enough
parking spaces;
161. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding; Shared parking between multiple
uses; Flexible parking based on location;
162. I do not support reducing parking requirements; Parking maximums to
prevent overbuilding;
163. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
164. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding; Replacing parking with open
space or landscaping; On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement;
Flexible parking based on location;
165. Flexible parking based on location;
166. Shared parking between multiple uses; Flexible parking based on location;
Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; On-street parking to
satisfy part of requirement;
167. Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; Flexible parking based
on location; Shared parking between multiple uses; Parking maximums to
prevent overbuilding;
168. Shared parking between multiple uses; Parking maximums to prevent
overbuilding;
169. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
170. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
171. Shared parking between multiple uses; Flexible parking based on location;
Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
Go Back to Question 5
6. If Maricopa County reduced minimum parking requirements,
what strategies would you support?
o Shared parking between multiple uses
o Flexible parking based on location
o Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing
o On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement
o Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
o Replacing parking with open space or landscaping
o I do not support reducing parking requirements
Skip to Question 7
91
September 22, 2025
172. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding; Replacing parking with open
space or landscaping;
173. I do not support reducing parking requirements; Replacing parking with open
space or landscaping;
174. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
175. Shared parking between multiple uses; Flexible parking based on location;
Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; Replacing parking with
open space or landscaping;
176. Flexible parking based on location;
177. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
178. Shared parking between multiple uses; Parking maximums to prevent
overbuilding; Replacing parking with open space or landscaping;
179. Replacing parking with open space or landscaping;
180. Shared parking between multiple uses; Flexible parking based on location;
On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement; Parking maximums to
prevent overbuilding; Replacing parking with open space or landscaping;
Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing;
181. Shared parking between multiple uses; Flexible parking based on location;
On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement;
182. Shared parking between multiple uses; Flexible parking based on location;
Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; Replacing parking with
open space or landscaping; Demand based parking fees; efforts to stop
people from storing (parking) their personal property (motor vehicle) on
public property (the street) unless rules are changed to allow other personal
property on the street;
183. Shared parking between multiple uses; Reduced requirements for
affordable/senior housing; Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
184. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
185. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding; I do not support reducing parking
requirements;
Go Back to Question 5
6. If Maricopa County reduced minimum parking requirements,
what strategies would you support?
o Shared parking between multiple uses
o Flexible parking based on location
o Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing
o On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement
o Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
o Replacing parking with open space or landscaping
o I do not support reducing parking requirements
Skip to Question 7
92
September 22, 2025
186. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
187. No;
188. On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement; Parking maximums to
prevent overbuilding; I do not support reducing parking requirements;
189. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
190. Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; On-street parking to
satisfy part of requirement; Shared parking between multiple uses;
191. Replacing parking with open space or landscaping;
192. Shared parking between multiple uses;
193. Shared parking between multiple uses; Reduced requirements for
affordable/senior housing; On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement;
Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
194. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
195. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding; Replacing parking with open
space or landscaping; I do not support reducing parking requirements;
196. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
197. Shared parking between multiple uses; Replacing parking with open space or
landscaping; On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement; I do not
support reducing parking requirements;
198. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
199. Shared parking between multiple uses; Parking maximums to prevent
overbuilding;
200. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
201. What is your plan at the city?;
202. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding; Reduced requirements for
affordable/senior housing; Shared parking between multiple uses;
203. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
204. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
205. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding; Shared parking between multiple
uses;
Go Back to Question 5
6. If Maricopa County reduced minimum parking requirements,
what strategies would you support?
o Shared parking between multiple uses
o Flexible parking based on location
o Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing
o On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement
o Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
o Replacing parking with open space or landscaping
o I do not support reducing parking requirements
Skip to Question 7
93
September 22, 2025
206. Shared parking between multiple uses; Flexible parking based on location;
Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; Replacing parking with
open space or landscaping;
207. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding; Reduce the number of handicap
accessible spots per total number of spots in a commercial development t I
go to many stores such as Costco and Home Depot and Walmart plus many
others and there are so many handicap spots it appears they are never going
to be filled. Also, have police or parking infraction people better monitor
whom is in that spot actually I end up buying more online because parking
many times is so difficult for a non-handicap person.;
208. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
209. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
210. Understanding the details of living in the space. What would a typical day
look like for a resident? Walk through the steps of accessing transportation
as a resident, neighbor, or visitor. Is it convenient? Do any unforeseen
inconveniences, costs, or hardships emerge? ;
211. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding; Flexible parking based on
location; Shared parking between multiple uses;
212. Shared parking between multiple uses; Flexible parking based on location;
Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; On-street parking to
satisfy part of requirement;
213. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
214. Replacing parking with open space or landscaping;
215. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
216. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
217. Replacing parking with open space or landscaping;
218. On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement; Reduced requirements for
affordable/senior housing; Shared parking between multiple uses; Parking
maximums to prevent overbuilding;
Go Back to Question 5
6. If Maricopa County reduced minimum parking requirements,
what strategies would you support?
o Shared parking between multiple uses
o Flexible parking based on location
o Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing
o On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement
o Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
o Replacing parking with open space or landscaping
o I do not support reducing parking requirements
Skip to Question 7
94
September 22, 2025
219. Shared parking between multiple uses; Flexible parking based on location;
Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; On-street parking to
satisfy part of requirement;
220. Shared parking between multiple uses; Flexible parking based on location;
Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; Parking maximums to
prevent overbuilding; Replacing parking with open space or landscaping;
221. Replacing parking with open space or landscaping; Flexible parking based on
location; Shared parking between multiple uses;
222. Replacing parking with open space or landscaping;
223. On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement; Parking maximums to
prevent overbuilding;
224. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
225. Flexible parking based on location; Reduced requirements for
affordable/senior housing; Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
226. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
227. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
228. Replacing parking with open space or landscaping; Parking maximums to
prevent overbuilding; I support an increase in public transit to reduce the
need for more parking.;
229. Shared parking between multiple uses; Flexible parking based on location;
Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding;
230. Shared parking between multiple uses; Flexible parking based on location;
On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement; Solar over lots;
231. Flexible parking based on location;
232. Flexible parking based on location; Flexible based use;
233. I do not support reducing parking requirements; add: 9' minimum parking
spaces and more spaces;
234. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding; Shared parking between multiple
uses; Flexible parking based on location; Reduced requirements for
Go Back to Question 5
6. If Maricopa County reduced minimum parking requirements,
what strategies would you support?
o Shared parking between multiple uses
o Flexible parking based on location
o Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing
o On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement
o Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
o Replacing parking with open space or landscaping
o I do not support reducing parking requirements
Skip to Question 7
95
September 22, 2025
affordable/senior housing; On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement;
Replacing parking with open space or landscaping;
235. Flexible parking based on location; Replacing parking with open space or
landscaping;
236. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
237. I do not support reducing parking requirements; Shared parking between
multiple uses;
238. Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing; Flexible parking based
on location; On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement;
239. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
240. Flexible parking based on location; Reduced requirements for
affordable/senior housing; On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement;
241. I do not support reducing parking requirements;
242. Flexible parking based on location;
243. Field not completed
244. Shared parking between multiple uses
245. I do not support reducing parking requirements
246. I do not support reducing parking requirements
247. I do not support reducing parking requirements
248. I do not support reducing parking requirements
249. I do not support reducing parking requirements
250. Replacing parking with open space or landscaping
251. Shared parking between multiple uses
252. Flexible parking based on location
253. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
254. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
255. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
256. On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement
257. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
258. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
Go Back to Question 5
6. If Maricopa County reduced minimum parking requirements,
what strategies would you support?
o Shared parking between multiple uses
o Flexible parking based on location
o Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing
o On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement
o Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
o Replacing parking with open space or landscaping
o I do not support reducing parking requirements
Skip to Question 7
96
September 22, 2025
259. Flexible parking based on location
260. Shared parking between multiple uses
261. I do not support reducing parking requirements
262. On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement
263. I do not support reducing parking requirements
264. Replacing parking with open space or landscaping
265. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
266. On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement
267. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
268. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
269. On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement
270. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
271. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
272. I do not support reducing parking requirements
273. Replacing parking with open space or landscaping
274. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
275. I do not support reducing parking requirements
276. I do not support reducing parking requirements
277. On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement
278. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
279. Field not completed
280. Flexible parking based on location
281. Replacing parking with open space or landscaping
282. Shared parking between multiple uses
283. Field not completed
284. I do not support reducing parking requirements
285. I do not support reducing parking requirements
286. I do not support reducing parking requirements
287. Flexible parking based on location
288. Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
Go Back to Question 5
6. If Maricopa County reduced minimum parking requirements,
what strategies would you support?
o Shared parking between multiple uses
o Flexible parking based on location
o Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing
o On-street parking to satisfy part of requirement
o Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
o Replacing parking with open space or landscaping
o I do not support reducing parking requirements
Skip to Question 7
97
September 22, 2025
289.
Flexible parking based on location
290.
Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding
Go Back to Question 5
7. Additional comments or concerns about parking requirements:
Skip to Question 8
98
September 22, 2025
1.
Parking requirements should be set based on the use of the property. The
example given about the data center is a good example of common sense
parking requirements.
2.
Keep adequate space between parking rows- I’ve noticed some parking lots
are “ shorter” and difficult to park both into & exiting the parking space.
Damage to our cars is also a concern as well as just getting out of your car!
We have MANY large trucks, various sized cars & SUVs, one size does NOT
fit all.
3.
enforce the written code which many officers and other agencies have no
clue
4.
Our traffic is already overloaded & more traffic to come. Allowing more
density without proper parking requirements is a recipe for disaster, property
damage, & fights for parking.
5.
None
6.
None
7.
Parking requirements put in for a reason I don’t think they should be
changing just because somebody wants to shove it more buildings and
there’s room for
8.
Never enough parking for events and daily use.
9.
Do not reduce parking requirements
10.
absolutely no street parking
11.
Residential parking structures
12.
Other jurisdictions have completely eliminated parking requirements and it
has greatly benefitted small business and added housing options
13.
Where is there a parking problem? You have your garage and drive way?
14.
Parking, traffic and street congestion is already a concern.
15.
Street parking devalues neighborhoods and leads to car theft and breakins.
16.
It keeps our streets cleared and clean.
17.
Parking space is a huge issue with these subdivisions. They make the streets
too narrow so it people have to park on the street, there isnt room for two
way traffic or emergency vehicles. Do not allow these developers to reduce
parking space.
18.
On street parking should not be included in parking spot counts
19.
No large trucks in residential areas. No trailers
20.
Allow more parking for Senior citizen communities. Possibly fewer for other
areas
Question 7
Go Back to Question 6
7. Additional comments or concerns about parking requirements:
Skip to Question 8
99
September 22, 2025
21.
Housing is so expensive. Allowing a tiny house or small addition would
make it more affordable to care for our extended family
22.
I support off street parking where available.
23.
Wider parking spots
24.
No parking garages
25.
Enforce Street Side Parking Restrictions of RV, Boats and Utility Vehicles.
Current enforcement allows Corner Houses to Park, Store RV, Boats on
Street Side to the Side of their Houses. Street Side Parking should be a
violation Street Side in both Front and Side Yards.
26.
I do not support reducing parking requirements. When apartments are built
they never allow enough spaces as it is. It causes parking on the street and
causes accidents and congestion.
27.
NO
28.
I LIVE IN A MIXED NEIGHBORHOOD WITH RENTAL HOMES TO THE SOUTH
AND APARTMENTS TO THE EAST. THERE ARE SO MANY CARS PARKED IN
THE STREET AND IN PEOPLE'S FRONT YARDS. I SUPPOSE THIS IS
BECAUSE RENTAL PRICES ARE SO HIGH THERE ARE MANY MANY PEOPLE
LIVING IN ONE RENTAL. SO THE COUNTY SHOULD WORK ON MODERATING
THE PRICE OF RENTALS.
29.
Limit to prevent overbuilding
30.
There is nothing more frustrating than inaccessible parking. This is
especially true in senior housing, but I believe adequate parking is essential
for people to feel welcome in their community. It is almost a human need in
an area without public transportation.
31.
IN APARTMENTS OR CONDOS A REQUIREMENT OF AT LEAST TWO SPACES
PER UNIT.
32.
Vehicles must park in driveways not on streets in residential areas at all
times
33.
We want adequate available parking in the design of the space. I am not
open to parking on the streets for residential. I think over 55 communities
need to enforce there parking rules.
34.
We already have problems locating parking in heavily populated areas. If we
cut back further I’m also concerned about increased crime, congestion of
buildings, increased pollution, less water availability.
35.
I do not understand the parking requirements terminology as you use it.
Go Back to Question 6
7. Additional comments or concerns about parking requirements:
Skip to Question 8
100
September 22, 2025
36.
Maricopa county is already overbuilt and over populated. Stop handing out
building permits to developers who only want to make money and don’t care
about who it affects. Plus we live in the desert and have water issues.
37.
My impression is that parking requirements for most cities' retail
establishments and apartments is excessive.
38.
See above hoas should have been grandfathered to original rules and require
super majority to change to remove
39.
Hard to manage people that park cars in the street and then block part of
someone's driveway. Calling the sheriff or police or HOA for this violation is
hardly the right thing to do with all the other pressing, illegal issues in our
area.
40.
Please require pathways in parking lots and a certain percentage be covered
by trees or structures. So much heat is collected during the summer days.
Many parking lots are massive and unfilled. It's a waste and again collects
heat.
41.
If there isn't enough parking on a property ie: driveways ,which already seems
very minimal on new builds, then the streets are filled with cars and safety for
citizens is reduced. Difficult for emergency vehicles to access streets.
42.
Reducing parking provisions adversely penalizes other property owners and
create dangerously crowded streets. Again, the poor are most affected
43.
Many residential streets are too narrow for a car to be parked on each side
without limiting a car to safely travel up the middle of the street.
44.
Don't mess with historical Old Town area to add parking. Better to make
exiting lots into multi-level structures to increase # of parking spots
exponentially without making more ugly parking lots.
45.
"There is not enough parking for the buildings already and the street parking
in some areas is very limited.
46.
Maricopa County needs to keep to a minimum the number of buildings and
paved sidewalks, parking lots and roads in order to prevent adding to the
number of heat islands.
47.
Future generations will rely less on private transportation and more on ride
share options.
48.
With many cars per household lots should have long driveways to keep the
streets clear foe traffic
49.
It seems parking is often underrated as an impact to a neighborhood. Often
“work force housing” gets shorted on parking considering many employees
Go Back to Question 6
7. Additional comments or concerns about parking requirements:
Skip to Question 8
101
September 22, 2025
have take home vehicles that take additional spaces every night and over
weekends.
50.
Stop trying to destroy Maricopa County. All you people want is money!!! You
do not care about people or the environment!!!
51.
I don’t think any residence should be allowed to have cars parked on their
lawns. Cars should only be allowed on driveways or for short times along the
edge of the street in front of a residence.
52.
Cars are not going away - street parking is dangerous and difficult. Every
dwelling unit should be required to have 2 parking spaces, minimum.
53.
Reducing parking moves Phoenix toward public transportation, and away
from car ownership. Phoenix is too spread out to have public transportation
for all. The Light Rail has ruined Central Avenue and causes vehicle traffic to
not be able to turn left and they end up putting more miles on the vehicle.
This seems intentional to discourage vehicle traffic.
54.
On-street parking is a problem in many places, causing two lanes to become
one while trying to weave through the parked cars and avoiding oncoming
traffic. There needs to be a lot of parking available for buildings, not a
reducing of the number required.
55.
Big cars need to fit in the driveway
56.
Limited on street parking is best
57.
Don't let the screaming and wailing of the NIMBY's discourage your mission.
They're like irrational crybaby children incapable of logical thought.
58.
For tall rise buildings require minimum underground parking with electric
charge option be provided. Reduce area of surface parking lots.
59.
Parking requirements prevent overcrowding
60.
Consider the structure use when planning parking. If a majority of structures
do business at meal times, there may be a need for more parking than if the
structure types were operating hours.
61.
Make parking big enough for full sized vehicles, not Smart Cars.
62.
Make parking spaces wide enough to prevent damage to doors and fenders
of our ever-costlier vehicles.
63.
Generations Z and Alpha are less interested in driving. It is time to stop
building massive parking lots that never fill that contribute to the urban heat
island effect.
64.
Greater consi9deration of underground parking structures is needed, rather
than above ground structures
Go Back to Question 6
7. Additional comments or concerns about parking requirements:
Skip to Question 8
102
September 22, 2025
65.
There are so many massive parking lots in Maricopa County that are only
ever half to a quarter full. I think we can safely reduce parking lot size. This
would allow for more green space to help with the urban heat island, beautify
the Valley and increase well-being of residents.
66.
Don't ask for details on rural properties. They all have ample parking!
67.
Maybe we should be exploring more mass transit and requiring parking
garages with monitored camera coverage for apartment buildings and large
commercial developments.
68.
Metered parking in areas where there are shortages. If we create more
walkable communities with neighborhood restaurants and grocery stores
this problem becomes less of a burden on municipalities.
69.
"Consider multi level parking lots. More parking space, less land use.
70.
Consider more handicap parking requirements for businesses and venues."
71.
Give us free parking!
72.
Increase parking for the disabled
73.
No
74.
An overall review is need in all areas, commercial residential and industrial.
allowing smaller and smaller lot sizes many projects do not have enough
room on lot or street frontage to for parking. Commercial needs are changing
with the move away from mall type shopping. Parking need a comprehensive
overhaul.
75.
As I am handicapped I would prefer preference to disabled parking in more
areas and enforced.
76.
Too high a percentage of handicapped parking spots. Usually the VAST
majority ate not in use.
77.
Its important to keep in mind that now with ride-sharing services - less
parking may be needed? Also, might be good to plan for rideshare sections.
78.
Eh, I’m not sure. Downtown Phx is much different than outlying areas.
79.
"I’m not sure how to answer that except in Sun City parking on the streets
needs to be:
80.
72 hour limit for RVs and large vehicles
81.
No long term parking or unattended vehicles - no matter where it’s parked. As
is, some condo associations allow long term parking or RVs. These streets
belong to all of us, no individual associations. "
82.
Your context suggests you're talking about public parking. I do not think we
try to restrict private parking unless it's front yard parking, as that diminishes
neighborhood aesthetics and lowers property values.
Go Back to Question 6
7. Additional comments or concerns about parking requirements:
Skip to Question 8
103
September 22, 2025
83.
There is not enough around high density projects forcing parking on streets
in local neighborhoods.
84.
too many unused parking lots. Huge parking lots are completely unnecessary
especially in shopping centers where few stores get foot traffic. Nicely
landscaped areas preferable
85.
It seems there are too many commercial(shopping/restaurants) buildings
being built that are too close together and sharing a parking lot that is not big
enough to accommodate. These need to be spread out and have some open
space landscape in between to help with aesthetics and congestion during
the busy times. Parking spaces need to be larger to accommodate trucks,
mini-vans, vans and sport utility vehicles with wider lanes to allow bigger
vehicles to turn without running over the curbs!
86.
We need more parking not less. Planners try to pretend we are Copenhagen,
but we are structurally soread out forever and need cars. People in
apartments deserve enough spaces to host friends. Only in designated areas
should parking be shared. People need to get to work. The trades are spread
oitbsob we need more parking or people will struggle to work.
87.
n/a
88.
Reducing the restrictions only leads to worse looking neighborhoods.
89.
Build carports or garages that are large enough to accommodate large
vehicles. People can't park in their garages. Most "two-car" garages don't fit
two vehicles. It is a huge issue in my neighborhood. Then, there are no places
for visitors to park due to residents having to park on the streets.
90.
We were attracted to far north Phoenix and Scottsdale largely because of the
commercial setbacks, which allow the desert, not buildings, to be featured.
91.
There are many lots that are empty at various times. These need to be used
more efficiently. Parking garages should have rooftop solar panels to provide
additional energy and relief from the sun.
92.
Need adequate parking. Need to enforce restrictions
93.
Please do not allow high density builds with limited parking. It does not work.
Make sure new builds have a garage sizes that will enable most SUVs to fit.
94.
I do not like street parking and do not think that a property owner or renter
should have to park on the street if they have one or two vehicles. Street
parking should require extra roadway width and clear lane striping so that
cars do not have to face head on traffic to get through. Heavy street parking
also reduces visibility ahead for drivers on narrow roads.
Go Back to Question 6
7. Additional comments or concerns about parking requirements:
Skip to Question 8
104
September 22, 2025
95.
"Watch every @climatetown video on YouTube but he has a great one on
parking:
96.
https://youtu.be/OUNXFHpUhu8?si=mS3Xij-kEW2TDCcl"
97.
Trees in parking lots
98.
"Individuals in Maricopa county need cars!
99.
We do not have planned and Developed “Smart Cities”. We are not NYC or
San Francisco.
100. People moved to AZ for the neighborhood living and wide open spaces for
recreation.
101. Our summer weather is not conducive to b walking, strolling babies, or Sr
citizens getting round the valley. "
102. Many families have 2 or more cars therefore parking requirements need to
increase
103. We don’t have enough parking anyway. Need more.
104. Reduced parking requirements allowed with approved variance
105. Make exception if Valet is implemented
106. Stop overbuilding the valley. Give incentives to get people to buy older
homes in run down neighborhoods and fix them up instead of buying new
107. When developers are allowed to reduce parking and green space it negatively
affects other existing developments. It's not a good thing. Makes for angry
people impacted by this encroachment.
108. If parking requirements are reduced, skateboard lockers, bicycle lockers, ride
share/paratransit loading/unloading zones, and transit shelters need to be
increased.
109. We also need to encourage mass transit so people have options to cars.
Increase bus/tram/light rail options, taxi, car service to cut down on
individual car use.
110. Your program does not specify EXACTLY what you want to do where and
when. The vote needs to be in the hands of the voters.
111. People need to use their own assigned parking and quit parking on the street
112. Cities needs market rate parking. Parking minimums and overbuilding leads
to pedestrians crossing huge lots to reach storefronts, retail, etc. and the lots
are mostly empty and unused.
113. open up building codes to allow for say rooftop parking on top of the stores I
know it sounds like a crazily idea but itt would be one way of saving a lot of
land space. An example of this is the North Scottsdale BMW, a Penske
Go Back to Question 6
7. Additional comments or concerns about parking requirements:
Skip to Question 8
105
September 22, 2025
dealership that has rooftop parking for their inventory of used and new cars
on the roof.
114. Homes presently being built do not provide adequate parking for larger
vehicles such as pickup trucks. Maybe increase the offset of the front yard
to 50 foot and requirement for garage sizes need to be added. Streets are
being use for permanent parking on both sides and people are competing for
parking
115. A lot of times, the macro-big picture is only considered, and not the micro-
details of items such as the traffic flow of surroundings, ease of use, and
accessing the amenities. Doing a preliminary walk through of the basic
functions: waking up/going to bed, preparing meals, going to and from
work/errands/school, school bus stops/public transportation stops, getting
deliveries/mail, parking for the residents/guests, pedestrian walking access
for pets/children/bikes. These factors create a sustainable zone and
enhance productivity and efficiency for the community to thrive.
116. Logic should prevail based on situation. Analyze needs so spaces meet
needs, but aren’t excessive infringements on green space. Find a balance to
create required spaces, while leaving room for landscaping and green space.
Zoning should not allow buildings where parking lots exceed coverage limits.
Maybe the create spaces with low rise garages.
117. I support lowering parking requirements and bringing in more mass transit
options.
118. The valley, its roads and infrastructure is being overwhelmed by egregiously
excessive development! Stop, make developers tear down and rebuild/rehab
existing strictures! There are empty buildings all over the valley!
119. Many of my neighbors have four large vehicles. Plus, newer neighbors tend
to be generational families. I'm not even counting their work vehicles and
equipment (trailers). Then, we have all of the neighbors who host out-of-
state visitors with vehicles and RVs.
120. I think different uses have different parking needs, it makes more sense to
allow for using the assets that are already available perhaps with %
allocation limits. For example, restaurants and apartments could share street
and parking lots if usage would be during different times of the day.
Alternately or additionally, there could be a percent allocation so that if
another business would be added, it could be determined that the existing
parking is or isn't sufficient.
Go Back to Question 6
7. Additional comments or concerns about parking requirements:
Skip to Question 8
106
September 22, 2025
121. All parking lots should have solar panels. More trees on city side walk areas
and where street parking is permitted to increase shade and decrease heat
retention in city streets
122. Given the high prices of housing, multiple families need to live together,
creating parking issues. When you add apartments to the equation, there is
no parking space available. This needs to be considered when allowing
multilevel buildings.
123. Incentives for public transportation as first option
124. Revitalize parking structures to support landscaping (trees, shrubs, earth) to
reduce urban heat and support soil moisture catchment.
125. Since Arizona only has plates required on the back or rear of the vehicle NO
REAR END OR BACKED IN PARKING ANYWHERE OR CHANGE THE LAW GET
MORE REVENUE AND REQUIRE FRONT AND REAR TAGS
126. Mandate covered parking (preferably solar carports or solar canopies) for
any new commercial or retail establishments.
127. Street parking in a retirement community increases accidents.
128. Parking is a waste of space, and minimums lead to sprawl. Eradicate the
minimums and encourage mixed use.
129. I would like flexible parking however enforcing that might be costly.
130. developers have ruined Maricopa county
131. Important to consider street parking causing congestion and making roads
very narrow.
132. I’d like to see parking areas use pourus materials such as pourus concrete
because of their cooling properties, sound mitigation and aesthetics (one
example is the parking lot at Scottsdale Fire in Old Town.)
133. A server farm doesn't need 200 parking spots. However, I believe the intent
is to cram more people into smaller spaces but most still have vehicles and
this is the problem. It's ok to stop or slow the growth. Next you'll complain
we are running out of water.
134. Need additional places
135. Parking lots should be covered with solar panels. Parking should be placed
behind homes instead of in front drive ways allowing for walkable
neighborhoods
136. Parking reduction is not easily answered either pro or against.... no one can
restrict vehicle ownership (driving license is the only thing that is regulated),
therefore, assuming what the need is today (per the conversation about
rideshare, or public transit) is not anything you can control. A person who
Go Back to Question 6
7. Additional comments or concerns about parking requirements:
Skip to Question 8
107
September 22, 2025
does not have a vehicle today and moves into a community, because at the
same time they aren't signing anything that says they cannot have a vehicle
while they live there, replacement renters/owners also cannot regulate
against ownership.... Until the public at large has given up their rights to have
personal transportation, parking should not be diminished. Builders want
reductions for their bottom line vs what is best for the community for
decades to come.
137. We MUST combat the heat-island and developers are the reason for it. More
green spaces, particularly where the flood irrigation is available to use for
landscape. Stop with the high density. We are out west where there is plenty
of space - space things out! Quit Creating Tomorrow's Ghettos Today with
the cramped lots where 5 other homes can see in your backyard, where you
can hear and smell what your neighbors are doing - allow for space. You
cater to developers and leave the citizenry to be miserable with the effects of
it.
138. There are too many people here already. Enforcement needs to be
consistent.
139. 2 spaces per dwelling.
140. I would have selected more of the strategies above, but the form wouldn’t
allow. Excessive parking requirements drive up housing costs and limit land
that could be used for homes. Parking reforms should reflect modern
transportation trends and the need for housing options for all residents,
including those who do not drive or rely on personal vehicles.
141. Our current parking requirements are too high and result in car-oriented
construction, which is not a solution for urban areas.
142. The county should radically reduce parking requirements. It's impossible for
the county to overdo it.
143. Parking requirements should be rethought to prioritize walkability,
affordability, and climate resilience. Overbuilt parking drives up development
costs, consumes valuable land, contributes to the urban heat island effect,
and locks in car dependency. I strongly support implementing parking
maximums to prevent excessive supply, especially in areas with good transit
access or high walkability. Other strategies worth integrating include flexible
parking standards based on location (with reduced or no minimums near
transit), shared parking between complementary uses, and reduced
requirements for affordable and senior housing to lower project costs and
improve feasibility. Allowing on-street parking to count toward requirements
Go Back to Question 6
7. Additional comments or concerns about parking requirements:
Skip to Question 8
108
September 22, 2025
and encouraging the conversion of excess parking to green space or public
amenities would further improve livability. Overall, parking policy should
match actual demand and community goals, not outdated assumptions
about every household needing multiple cars. By setting reasonable limits,
encouraging alternatives to driving, and reclaiming excess asphalt for
housing, shade, and public space, Maricopa County can create more vibrant,
equitable, and sustainable neighborhoods.
144. Maricopa County must abolish all parking minimums. This is the top priority
to creating dense walkable neighborhoods that reduce the dependency on
single occupancy vehicles.
145. Eliminate all parking minimums and allow developers and owners to
determine their own parking needs. Maricopa County should be the leader in
this area. Parking minimums are junk science!
146. Eliminate them
147. Forcing people to install parking indirectly forces non car users to subsidize
car users. This is a terrible policy and causes more harm than the harm it is
trying to prevent.
148. Parking minimums are wasteful and land should be better utilized
149. Parking minimums are difficult to calibrate and eliminating them will still lead
to ample parking spots due to market demand. For that same reason,
parking maximums are probably not a good idea even though I personally
don’t find large parking lots to be desirable.
150. Parking fees should be used to fund shared public goods (e.g. parks,
development of more pedestrian and bike-friendly infrastructure, etc.) in the
area. Employers who provide free parking to employees should be required to
pay employees who don't use the parking the equivalent amount, to
incentivize use of non-car modes of transportation.
151. High parking requirements increase housing costs and reduce space for
homes. Parking policies should align with current transportation trends and
provide housing options for all, including residents who don’t drive or own a
personal vehicle.
152. The parking minimums should be ABOLISHED! We need more community.
Our priority should be walkable, bikeable, and transit oriented developments.
Parking creates heat, wastes money, and has only one use. It is useless for
people who do not drive.
153. Please eliminate parking minimums
Go Back to Question 6
7. Additional comments or concerns about parking requirements:
Skip to Question 8
109
September 22, 2025
154. Parking requirements should be reevaluated to prioritize more sustainable
and community-friendly land use. Reducing the amount of required parking
can free up space for bike lanes, secure bike parking, and green
infrastructure like trees, landscaping, and shaded public areas. This shift
supports healthier, more active transportation options while also helping to
reduce the urban heat island effect and improve overall neighborhood
livability.
155. Minimum parking requirements should be completely abolished, it would
allow you to do all or most of the above options
156. Parking requirements should be slashed and giant streets should be
repurposed for more street parking
157. ELIMÍNATE PARKING REQUIREMENTS. This is a bipartisan issue it’s an
absolute overstep from the city to tell me how many parking spots I need to
build, that’s a free market decision and it continually taxes non car drivers on
driving which is taxing the poor for the rich. GET RID OF THEM LOWERING
ISNT ENOUGH.
158. 10% of Phoenix is a parking lot. We should be building things we need closer
together to reduce the need to drive in the first place. It puts less strain on
our liable to maintain infrastructure too.
159. Need consideration for limited street parking for RV’s or visitors.
160. Field not completed
161. reducing parking requirements make the roadways unsafe and is bad for
community character
162. You should make Question #6 multiple choice. I would support all of the
strategies for parking reductions.
163. All vehicles need to have a maximum time that they are allowed to remain
continuously in the same place. Something like a 72 hour max.
164. Parking on neighborhood streets should be Limited
165. Enough of prioritizing vehicles over people.
166. Reducing parking requirements, increases street parking, making turning and
traveling more challenging/dangerous
167. There should be no parking restraints when we own the land and are able to
park without blocking emergency access or access to other's properties. It's
silly that there are "no more than X vehicles allowed to park" when we have
an acre.
168. Field not completed
169. Land owners should decide what and where they park
Go Back to Question 6
7. Additional comments or concerns about parking requirements:
Skip to Question 8
110
September 22, 2025
170. Shared parking between multiple uses, Flexible parking based on location,
Reduced requirements for affordable/senior housing, On-street parking to
satisfy part of requirement, Parking maximums to prevent overbuilding,
Replacing parking with open space or landscaping, Excessive parking
requirements drive up housing costs and limit land that could be used for
homes. Parking reforms should reflect modern transportation trends and the
need for housing options for all residents, including those who do not drive
or rely on personal vehicles.
Go Back to Question 6
8. What types of housing should Maricopa County prioritize?
Examples: Small-lot homes, duplexes, townhomes, ADUs, manufactured or modular
housing, live-work units.
Skip to Question 9
111
September 22, 2025
1.
ADUs, large lot executive home lots,
2.
Affordable mixed used walkable housing
3.
First-time buyer home buildings. That is, a first-time home buyer usually
cannot afford the large houses that often are what’s built.
4.
All examples noted are important. In addition, senior housing continues to be
a growing near-term housing need and should be addressed - both larger
housing care complexes and in smaller group home settings.
5.
Home ownership to me - apartments that have no parks/ open spaces or
parking spaces for every unit is discriminatory! What about visitors- where
can they park?!
6.
townhomes
7.
I am not informed so would rather not comment
8.
ADU's and affordable single residences with small yards so some has a
place for a dog. Many area's in the east valley have nice rental places like this
but none where someone can purchase the dwelling.
9.
It depends where in the county you’re looking at. It’s not a one size fits all.
Live/work units in more commercial areas & affordable housing where that is
needed. Don’t throw monkey wrench’s in established neighborhoods &
destroy the integrity. You just ruin it for all the people who have lived by the
rules!
10.
Single family homes with attached garage.
11.
Single family homes with attached garage
12.
as many of these - and more - that allows sustainable, affordable housing for
everyone
13.
Live work
14.
ADU's and Live work units
15.
Single family homes with yard space and modular housing
16.
With water being a concern, we Shouldn't be encouraging expansion
17.
Customs
18.
All of the above over single family.
19.
all of the above; good urban planner can use hybrid model to fit the needs in
specific areas
20.
Townhomes
21.
Single family, first time homeowner, affordable housing for both young and
elderly. Limit all investment housing.
Question 8
Go Back to Question 7
8. What types of housing should Maricopa County prioritize?
Examples: Small-lot homes, duplexes, townhomes, ADUs, manufactured or modular
housing, live-work units.
Skip to Question 9
112
September 22, 2025
22.
multi-family housing, affordable housing, small lot development and
townhomes
23.
I don’t agree with any of the above, leave it alone.
24.
Duplexes, townhouses, modular housing.
25.
Live work units
26.
All the above
27.
Less expensive homes that people can actually afford.
28.
Individual homes, condos, and apartments only
29.
Small lot homes and duplexes to be owned by PEOPLE not corporations.
30.
Town homes
31.
Small lot homes followed by townhomes
32.
Live-work units.
33.
ADUs, room additions, allow multiple houses, offer real help with the
paperwork and process. It is already stressful to be caring for aging family
without trying to figure out rules and paperwork. Have a person that kindly
explains and show how to access the process correctly
34.
LIVE-WORK UNITS, MANUFACTURED/MODULAR HOMES AND SMALL-LOT
HOMES WOULD BE AT THE BOTTOM OUR LIST.
35.
Small lot homes, and more housing for low income residents.
36.
No answer
37.
Townhomes
38.
Repurposed empty buildings, small lot , townhouses, live work
39.
"Stop with the apartments and so
40.
Many developments. Gilbert is ruined "
41.
Small lot home
42.
Represent Tax Paying Citizens instead of Homeless of Business in
Residential Properties.
43.
I would like to see single family homes on medium lot size, not more
apartments
44.
Small lot homes
45.
DUPLEX TOWNHOMES. WE ALREADY HAVE SMALL LOT HOMES.
ACTUALLY I BELIEVE WE SHOULD HAVE A MORITORIUM ON BUILDING ANY
MORE APARTMENTS OR HOMES OF ANY TYPE IN MARICOPA CTY.
46.
Live-work units
47.
It’s not the type of housing. It’s where there is sufficient infrastructure to
support it. The roads are in sufficient in many areas for the density allowed.
Go Back to Question 7
8. What types of housing should Maricopa County prioritize?
Examples: Small-lot homes, duplexes, townhomes, ADUs, manufactured or modular
housing, live-work units.
Skip to Question 9
113
September 22, 2025
48.
"A reasonable mix of all types.
49.
SINGLE HOMES NO MANUFACTURED HOMEST
50.
Small lot homes that are affordable instead of rentals or apartments or mfd
and modular housing
51.
Large lots to reduce high density population
52.
single homes
53.
"We could use more townhomes and condo complexes, not rentals. I am not
a fan of all the small home rental communities. I think that is getting over
done.
54.
I do think we should consider building modular and manufactured housing
communities. We need to have more affordable ways to purchase a home."
55.
Townhomes, single family, small -lot. Not manufactured or modular.
56.
Smaller lot homes, ADUs, more duplexes and townhomes.
57.
ADU’s
58.
Duplex and or townhome complexes that adhere to to desert scape and
utilize solar capability.
59.
Townhomes, small lot home, and duplexes where appropriate and in their
own communities.
60.
standard housing as is currently the practice.
61.
Single family homes only. Way too many condos
62.
Duplexes and town homes should be at the top of the list. (I have lived in a
Scottsdale townhouse for 50 years.)
63.
Small lot homes
64.
ADU's on all of Maricopa County, provided house has the space, including
Sun City, Sun City West
65.
All the examples given; small-lot homes, duplexes, townhomes, adus, etc.
More choices and price ranges support the growing population. We have so
many suburbs and a lack of the other options mentioned.
66.
I want to say small lot individual homes so people have some personal
space. It can be difficult to share yards and outside areas with neighbors that
have different ideas about what behaviors they find acceptable.
67.
Smaller homes on small, but not tiny, lots. Until the late 1960s, 1,600 sq fr
dwellings were considered perfectly adequate and grand. Families would
have 3 or more children. Today, we seem to think 2,500 sq ft is inadequate,
and in today’s homes, three or more kids is the exception
68.
Whatever you can get a builder to actually build!
Go Back to Question 7
8. What types of housing should Maricopa County prioritize?
Examples: Small-lot homes, duplexes, townhomes, ADUs, manufactured or modular
housing, live-work units.
Skip to Question 9
114
September 22, 2025
69.
Are we running out of room for home construction? This has been a rural-
farming community which is why people have lived and worked here. Too
much construction and business focus will turn our communities into Los
Angeles. You will destroy the joy of living here and put money in the pockets
of developers.
70.
Smaller homes, patio homes, for existing 2-12 unit properties make zoning
more flexible to add density without knocking down existing buildings or
allowing more stories. Many small buildings have extra space (side
yards/courtyards) that could accommodate more units.
71.
condos,
72.
Not sure.
73.
Modular
74.
"Low income housing, honest low income, not these inflated rents.
75.
Low income housing doesn't have to be lavish but respectable."
76.
Duplexes and modular homes
77.
homes, no more townhomes,
78.
New housing permits should prioritize affordability, and all the examples
above can be considered.
79.
All of the examples
80.
"All
81.
Of the above are reasonable solutions to affordable housing challenges."
82.
Single family homes.
83.
live work units and ADUs
84.
Reduce the ratio of rental units to ownership property. My kids are having a
difficult time competing for a home when most properties are “flipped”.
85.
all types should be allowed based on the wants of the owner
86.
Residential with retail or offices on first floor.
87.
Single family homes
88.
All of above multiple homes per lot
89.
It depends on the area. Duplexes are usually a good option
90.
Affordable housing strategies can and should include multi family, and
manufactured homes as well.
91.
Stand alone houses!!!
92.
Small to medium sized individual homes
93.
Maricopa County is too large an area to give one answer. Higher density
belongs closer to shopping - not farther out!
Go Back to Question 7
8. What types of housing should Maricopa County prioritize?
Examples: Small-lot homes, duplexes, townhomes, ADUs, manufactured or modular
housing, live-work units.
Skip to Question 9
115
September 22, 2025
94.
Maricopa County is hard to answer and depends on the area - that’s a large
question to answer it by the county. Each city / area is unique so it’s not a
one county answer. Definitely not duplexes and more apartments in the
overcrowded apartment areas yet these continue to be built and it’s sad.
95.
Whatever types of housing stress the grid less and use less water.
96.
We need to fill in the city instead of scraping the desert, which needs
protection. Small lots take green areas away which cause the city to be
warmer. More streets, more concrete, fewer trees will hurt the environment.
Manufactured and modular housing are more affordable but will cause lower
income neighborhoods.
97.
Single family homes. Manufactured homes should not be built - much of
Maricopa County removed them from many areas already. We do not need
to cycle through this again. With duplexes, it would be good to allow them to
raise a limited number of hens like stand-alone homes can.
98.
Live work unit
99.
senior housing, veterans' housing, unhoused individuals' housing,
cooperative use where common kitchen and meeting space, but otherwise
individual houses
100. Townhomes. Manufactured housing is more affordable than stick built and
should be encouraged more.
101. All of the above. Who needs 2000+ square foot homes? The valley is so ugly
with suburban sprawl, which is a shame because it’s surrounded by beautiful
mountains
102. All of the above, emphasizing live-work units. Would support entrepreneurial
endeavors & aspirations.
103. ADUs, small lot homes.
104. Senior housing, gated cohousing and master planning
105. Single family homes of all sized.
106. Single family homes
107. small lot homes
108. What ever sells. Affordable housing is a misnomer. Also, affordable housing
turns into slums. Its not the housing that needs changing, its the people.
109. Single family homes on a minimum of 1/4 acre.
110. Single family homes
111. I want to see more small-lot homes, duplexes, and townhomes like those that
exist along the Hardy Road/Southern Avenue intersection in Tempe. Those
Go Back to Question 7
8. What types of housing should Maricopa County prioritize?
Examples: Small-lot homes, duplexes, townhomes, ADUs, manufactured or modular
housing, live-work units.
Skip to Question 9
116
September 22, 2025
can be affordable while avoiding the look that we are "warehousing" lower-
income people or building "projects" or "wards" like those seen in older large
cities.
112. single family homes
113. Anything affordable. Prices here are insane. Stop allowing corporations to
buy up all the homes.
114. That depends ENTIRELY on the location! And therefore is a stupid question.
There is no use prioritizing a type in such a huge County with everything from
very poor areas (Aguila) to super urban (greater Phoenix). I appreciate that
you allow tiny houses.
115. lower priced homes on decent sized lots
116. I strongly oppose developments of small-lot homes. There is a place for well
designed townhome communities with common open spaces, and I see no
problem with ADUs or home expansions as long as total lot coverage is no
more than around 40% and setbacks are observed.
117. Affordable, smaller, more density utilizing all of the above housing types.
118. Townhomes
119. Family homes, affordable housing
120. Small homes and duplexes certainly, have greenbelts or small parks.
Restrictions on investors purchasing homes for rentals. So many
neighborhoods with no sense of community now.
121. ADUs, manufactured or modular housing
122. duplexes
123. duplexes, ADU's, live-work units
124. All types should be encouraged as our society evolves. All people should
have ability to choose what type of housing the wish to live in.
125. modular housing, live-work units
126. No change. We don’t want to become Los Angeles or other counties.
127. ADU, live-work, townhomes
128. Maricopa county housing has become unaffordable for so many recently.
Rents are higher than mortgage payments, in so many cases. But mortgages
have become harder to qualify for, and property prices ballooned.
129. I love the idea of live-work units, especially near light rail or bus routes. One
ADU per residential home lot is sufficient.
130. Sin City - as is
131. ADUs
Go Back to Question 7
8. What types of housing should Maricopa County prioritize?
Examples: Small-lot homes, duplexes, townhomes, ADUs, manufactured or modular
housing, live-work units.
Skip to Question 9
117
September 22, 2025
132. Small-lot home things that maximize but still offer ownership.
133. Small-lot homes, duplexes, townhomes, ADUs increase the population
density in any area. A study should be conducted for each area to determine
whether the local community and infrastructure are supportive of this
initiative.
134. Smart and well thought out housing that fits Phoenix residents and not just
lining the pockets of the developers and the local politicians.
135. single family very large lots limited to replacing only 2 homes on the lot
136. It would be nice to have options such as townhomes that are single story and
two-story options. Have stricter design guidelines with more open space and
pathways to encourage better quality of life.
137. Ownership. Single family. Lower the price to own a home by increasing
supply and utilities and resources. Capture rainwater. Build more energy
producing facilities. Increase supply not overregulation.
138. Standard (NOT small!) lot homes; ADU's
139. Tiny homes, small-lot homes, live-work units, but NOT duplexes &
townhomes.
140. I do not support affordable housing.
141. Small-lot homes, duplexes, townhomes, manufactured or modular housing,
seem reasonable if they are not overused. No one wants to turn our
neighborhoods into beehives, or Soviet-era block housing
142. affordable housing, those small houses along the west side of L101 in
Glendale look cute, I'd buy one! But unfortunately you can't buy one for
yourself because they're owned by corporations and you can only rent them.
Corporations shouldn't be allowed to buy up all the housing, makes people
not be able to ever buy their own home, only rent from a corporation
143. ADU's, live work to reduce commute, manufactured homes not in mobile
home parks Matian
144. Affordable Single family development promotes pride of home ownership,
property values and community
145. Single family homes
146. Bigger lot homes, Next Generation homes, people should be allowed to park
their campers/RVs/boats on their lots in the backyard.
147. Small Lot homes
148. Duplexes and ADU
149. Ownership, not rental, Duplexes, patio homes and and 2 story townhomes.
Go Back to Question 7
8. What types of housing should Maricopa County prioritize?
Examples: Small-lot homes, duplexes, townhomes, ADUs, manufactured or modular
housing, live-work units.
Skip to Question 9
118
September 22, 2025
150. Live-work units
151. Affordable homes for middle to lower income families.
152. No mobile homes. Maintain character of neighborhood but can alliw mire
controlled building
153. Homes that are in neighborhoods with enough space to create space for
common use (park area, gazebos, play area, pickleball). Create communities
not dense high rises.
154. large lot family homes.
155. Small affordable single family homes
156. duplexes (or quadplexes - 4 unit per building), ADUs, modular housing
157. We need more affordable housing so small-lot homes, some townhomes.
158. modular
159. Well built affordable housing for families. Three to four bedrooms with
private fenced yard space. This housing needs to be well energy efficient
and free of toxic materials. Hemp is a perfect building material. It insulates
well and is slow to burn in fires. It also IMPROVES air quality. Why isn't this
researched for use in Maricopa county? I like duplexes and townhouses for
families that need more affordable housing.
160. Small homes not apartments duplexes
161. Multi-family units, neighborhoods of tiny homes for homeless, modular
housing, walkability is key!
162. Affordable housing and transitional housing for those without homes that
makes sense in the area where it’s being built; blends well with existing
structures and allows green space.
163. smaller homes; smaller lots; auxiliary dwellings;
164. small lot homes with neighborhood green space.
165. Small starter homes to get more people out of apartments and begin making
equity
166. No
167. Mid-size lot homes of no less than 10,000 square feet
168. Live work
169. Residential housing. No multi family buildings
170. Stop building, where is the water coming from? Stop allowing grass to be
planted in the desert.
171. Live-work units, manufactured (not in parks), duplexes and townhomes
172. Low cost housing.
Go Back to Question 7
8. What types of housing should Maricopa County prioritize?
Examples: Small-lot homes, duplexes, townhomes, ADUs, manufactured or modular
housing, live-work units.
Skip to Question 9
119
September 22, 2025
173. Small-lot homes, duplexes, ADUs, live-work units.
174. Honor the rural character and deny mass subdivision of acreage. We were
meant to be agricultural, don't take that away from us.
175. Regardless of the housing type, people need an additional way besides a car
to get somewhere. Sidewalks, ramps, multi-use paths, bike lanes,
skateboard and bike lockers, loading and unloading zones for ride share/
paratransit/ shuttles, and transit shelters.
176. All of these have their merits. However, not all are appropriate for all zones.
(This would seem to be self evident.)
177. We need to prioritize first time homes, condos/townhouses and multi-
generational housing.
178. There needs to be a balance between single-family homes and commercial
businesses. Please stop rezoning for section 8 and section 24 housing. That
is causing and will cause even more problems with crime and traffic. We are
being overrun by industrial complexes and commercial businesses within
residential areas. It has been my experience that this is not a good mix.
179. Lower cost community housing, NOT $2,000.00 plus rental units.
180. Smaller single-family houses, perhaps without all the bells and whistles, and
perhaps on smaller lots within the specific development. In-city multihousing
as in-fill where a new neighborhood could be established, not in already
established neighborhoods that could lose their character.
181. Less small lot homes, and less apartments on every corner
182. Townhomes and small-lot "starter homes" allowing for homeownership for a
larger percentage of working class with shorter commutes.
183. All of the above. We must integrate more housing into more areas of
Phoenix. Adaptive reuse of existing buildings is one possibility. We cannot
afford to keep taking more open spaces or agriculturally necessary land and
buildings residential dwellings. We need open spaces to preserve the
environment and conserve our water use which is wasteful and dangerous
for the future availability.
184. Have some developments even in wealthy area allow for small sq footage
homes on smaller footprint lots, but without the feeling of being crammed in.
Say 1500 to 2300 sq foot homes sit on lots that are say maybe 100’ wide by
maybe 100 foot deep allowing for a nice setback still room for a small pool
and say maybe 10 foot on each side to the property line. I am just guessing
Go Back to Question 7
8. What types of housing should Maricopa County prioritize?
Examples: Small-lot homes, duplexes, townhomes, ADUs, manufactured or modular
housing, live-work units.
Skip to Question 9
120
September 22, 2025
at the dimension. But I believe younger people would like high quality smaller
homes on much smaller lots than current size lots of 1/2 acre or more see
185. ADUs
186. Previously discussed
187. Live work units
188. What do population statistics and studies say? Is there a need for a certain
type of structure in areas near elementary school that differs from an area of
industrial structures? Each zone is unique with different needs.
189. Look for balance and don’t overbuild. Be creative to deal with vacant retail
and businesses.
190. Small lots, duplex/triplex, townhomes, ADU. Anything that ups the housing
supply.
191. manufactured and modular housing
192. Single-family homes with buffers around each.
193. Small-lot homes and duplexes.
194. Generational homes, live-work units and tiny homes.
195. Affleck and daise
196. I think Maricopa County should prioritize housing that doesn't increase the
demand on water resources. All housing or at least all new housing should
be required to have rainwater recapture, greywater reuse or some other water
conservation methods to reduce or eliminate demand.
197. Manufactured housing could help, especially first time buyers, afford a new
home,.
198. ADUs
199. small-lot homes
200. Workforce housing to reduce housing issues for working families.
201. Protect open green areas with zoning to support open green space or
farming. The significant increase in built structures has created an urban
heat island, which drastically increases the area of dangerous heat.
202. ADUs
203. Owner occupied and restrict investors
204. "Small lot homes, definitely more Duplexes, & Town homes.
205. Modular or Manufactured homes in designated areas and must own the
land"
206. "Small-lot homes/duplexes/ADUs where there is land availability is
constrained.
Go Back to Question 7
8. What types of housing should Maricopa County prioritize?
Examples: Small-lot homes, duplexes, townhomes, ADUs, manufactured or modular
housing, live-work units.
Skip to Question 9
121
September 22, 2025
207. Prefab homes to address homelessness (for example. Boxabl)"
208. Lot sizes are already very small, especially in new developments. We do not
support further reductions in lot size. Consider multi-family housing in areas
that are zoned for this. Minimize multi-family housing in neighborhoods that
are primarily single family homes.
209. Townhomes and mixed use. Shopping on the first and second floors, living
above.
210. small-lot homes
211. less multiple high rise apartments
212. Housing that fits the needs of everyone
213. townhomes
214. Environmentally conscious housing.
215. Single family homes
216. Single family housing only.
217. Affordability for all
218. Anything that promotes home ownership. Rentals create lifelong poverty.
219. Small lot homes, duplexes and Townhomes.
220. Mixed use housing
221. While providing housing is important, it is also important to protect those
neighborhoods that are established and to protect the homeowners who
made an investment based on current zoning restrictions.
222. Ownership. Rental products are essential, but not the focus of society, to the
detriment of the ownership community, which is still your largest audience.
223. Homes for less fortunate people.
224. They should prioritize not building any more homes. There are too many
people here already. Add more parks and trees. More homes=more
hardscaping/roads/parking lots=higher temperatures.
225. Single family homes in their own districts. Two family homes in their own
districts. 3 to 8 units "missing middle" in their own districts. Horse stables
should be encouraged, farmlettes.
226. Maricopa County should prioritize a diversity of housing options. Small-lot
homes, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, townhomes, ADUs, manufactured or
modular homes, and multifamily apartments are all essential to meeting the
needs of workers, families, older adults, and others across all income levels.
227. Small-lot homes, duplexes, townhomes, apartments, single staircase
housing.
Go Back to Question 7
8. What types of housing should Maricopa County prioritize?
Examples: Small-lot homes, duplexes, townhomes, ADUs, manufactured or modular
housing, live-work units.
Skip to Question 9
122
September 22, 2025
228. Dense housing, apartments, and townhomes.
229. Maricopa County should prioritize housing types that meaningfully increase
density, support walkability, and make the best use of existing infrastructure.
The focus should be on: Duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes: Allowable by
right in more zoning districts to expand the “missing middle” housing that’s
critical for affordability. Townhomes, small apartment buildings, and mid-rise
apartments (up to ~10 stories): Particularly in and around commercial
corridors, job centers, and transit-served areas, where added density
supports local businesses, transit viability, and a vibrant street life. Live-work
units: Integrating housing and small business uses to reduce vehicle trips
and activate neighborhoods. Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs): As a
supplemental option for gentle infill, especially in existing single-family
neighborhoods. Manufactured and modular housing: Deployed in a way that
adds density in urban and suburban settings while keeping costs lower.
These housing types should be permitted by right in more districts, with
fewer discretionary approvals, especially near transit, schools, and job hubs.
A mix of missing-middle and mid-rise buildings, paired with walkable street
design and public amenities, will create inclusive, climate-resilient
communities and make it possible for more people to live closer to daily
needs without long commutes.
230. Maricopa County must prioritize approving dense medium and high rise for
sale condominiums near all high frequency transit.
231. Multi family and mixed use developments, car free developments such as
Cul-de-sac
232. Duplexes, triplexes, quad-plexes, and small multi-family (discourage huge
developments that create lots of dead sidewalk space)
233. Stop trying to regulate housing by type. Just allow anyone who owns
property and has money to build whatever housing they want as long as it is
SAFE and ENERGY EFFICIENT.
234. Townhomes, apartments, mixed use
235. All of the above! Allowing for more dense multi family is also good, but with
the county islands being uncommon in dense urban environments, also
allowing small lots and middle housing could help people utilize large acre
lots and meet demand for homeownership.
236. Missing middle housing in general, high-density apartment buildings, mixed
use apartment buildings
Go Back to Question 7
8. What types of housing should Maricopa County prioritize?
Examples: Small-lot homes, duplexes, townhomes, ADUs, manufactured or modular
housing, live-work units.
Skip to Question 9
123
September 22, 2025
237. Maricopa County should focus on offering diverse housing choices. Small-lot
houses, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, townhomes, ADUs, manufactured or
modular homes, and multifamily apartments are all vital to serving workers,
families, older adults, and residents of all income levels.
238. Maintaining rural communities and open space and reducing the amount of
rezoning from agriculture to housing that can take place.
239. Mixed-use, walkable developments should be the priority.
240. All types should be allowed to meet diversity of market demand.
241. Maricopa County should prioritize housing types that support environmental
sustainability and reduce sprawl. This includes compact, energy-efficient
options like duplexes, fourplexes, townhomes, and mid-rise apartments in
walkable, transit-accessible areas. The County should also support ADUs,
tiny homes, and modular housing, which use less land and resources while
offering more affordable choices. Prioritizing infill development over new
sprawl helps protect open space, lower emissions, and make better use of
existing infrastructure.
242. Townhomes, apartments, duplexes, etc.. Prioritize dense housing that
decreases housing costs and facilitates walkable neighborhoods and higher
public transit usage. Do not prioritize single family residential
243. Affordable dense townhomes
244. Townhomes and ADUs. Live-work shouldn’t be considered because people
need to do more than just living and working, staying in one place is bad for
people’s mental health.
245. FOR SALE multifamily.
246. Single family homes are needed. No more townhomes or apartments
247. Rural residential
248. No opinion
249. None of the examples. My guess is no one working on the revisions want
these options built in their neighborhood.
250. Single family homes, townhomes. Single family homes should not be on top
of each other. City of Glendale built homes on 51st Ave and Peoria that are
right on top of each other. This is a fire a hazard and ruins the community.
Too many houses. reducing lot size is a BIG mistake for us
251. ADUs are really popular for so many families
252. Traditional single family homes, duplexes and townhomes.
Go Back to Question 7
8. What types of housing should Maricopa County prioritize?
Examples: Small-lot homes, duplexes, townhomes, ADUs, manufactured or modular
housing, live-work units.
Skip to Question 9
124
September 22, 2025
253. Does Maricopa County Zoning prioritize SLGH's and if so, monitor resident
activity? If not, should that be a priority in residential neighborhoods
254. Field not completed
255. Single family homes There are already too many GIGANTIC APARTMENT
COMPLEXES THAT TAKE UP AN ENTIRE CITY BLOCK IN GLENDALE & WEST
PHX AREAS J
256. Apartments, including duplexes and quadplexes. The age of the homeowner
and "neighborhood character" is over; no one under 40 is ever going to be
able to afford to buy a house and most digital nomads don't want one
anyway. Allow peope to make apartments their long-tern home like they do in
parts of Canada and most countries, including in Africa and Europe, that
*don't* have housing issues. They allow apartment renters to bring in their
own appliances; multi-year leases are common, you can paint the walls and
don't have to worry about moving every two years because of cruel, random
rent hikes. An apartment can be and often is a hone, too. Also, encourage
less ridiculous apartments that don't foster utility gouging. I would rather pay
less rent than an additional $60/mo. for a pool I never use. Apartments don't
have to be either "luxury" or ghetto; they can be decent and offee dignity to us
making less than $50k a year. Discourage this absurd luxury living only trend.
257. Field not completed
258. All
259. Field not completed
260. SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. WOW, this is not even listed.
261. Maricopa County should not prioritize any homes and just let the owners of
the land do what we want within reason.
262. increasing lot coverage allowances for residential properties
263. Whatever property owners want
264. Maricopa County should prioritize a diversity of housing options. Small-lot
homes, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, townhomes, ADUs, manufactured or
modular homes, and multifamily apartments are all essential to meeting the
needs of workers, families, older adults, and others across all income levels.
265.
Go Back to Question 7
9. What zoning strategies could increase housing availability and
attainability?
Examples: Allow multiple homes per lot, permit fee-title splits, streamline review, provide
incentives, reducing lot sizes
Skip to Question 10
125
September 22, 2025
1.
Allow multi use development
2.
Reducing lot sizes sounds good, but not so small that a person “can pass the
butter to neighbor through the window”.
3.
Multiple homes per lot does not help - had not made a positive difference in
CA. Streamline review and reducing lot sizes should be carefully considered.
4.
We have pollution issues here- why are you forcing more people per square
foot?! Overcrowding our roads causes more accidents & frustrating drivers. I
don’t want to live in a congested city! It invites more crime too.
5.
DO NOT ALLOW MULTIPLE HOMES ON A LOT OF SINGLE FAMILY HOMES
NEIGHBORHOODS! This plan is going to destroy beautiful existing
communities. Choose areas to allow this & zone according. The governors
plan is destructive to Arizona & does not do anything but turn our state into
the mess southern California has become & supports greed only as people
try to cram as many buildings & people into whatever they can & charge rent
just creating a problem for everyone.
6.
Keep out illegal immigrants. Young buyers need roomates to split expenses
as I did when owning my first home in the 1980s when interest rates were
10% to 14%. In order to buy a home, they need to earn more than minimum
wage. Rent for a few years first, before you can afford to buy. That's what I
did.
7.
Strongly NOT in favor of adding more structures to existing lots. Need to
preserve Community character and zoning. In rural areas providing
incentives and streamlining review to add more single family houses.
8.
i'm open to any of these - the idea is progress
9.
Incentive
10.
incentives and multiple homes per lot if they meet the set back requirements.
11.
"Why does the county want to over populate, build but not over build. People
like having room
12.
Don’t need to build 3 story apartments with not enough parking. Increase
traffic and need for more infrastructure and schools"
13.
No more building. Will not have enough water availability to cover this in the
future.
14.
Stop adding housing
15.
Allow multi generational housing.
16.
All of the above.
Question 9
Go Back to Question 8
9. What zoning strategies could increase housing availability and
attainability?
Examples: Allow multiple homes per lot, permit fee-title splits, streamline review, provide
incentives, reducing lot sizes
Skip to Question 10
126
September 22, 2025
17.
streamline review; govt inertia kills good ideas
18.
Streamline review by having zoning guidance,
19.
"provide incentives, reducing lot sizes
20.
reduce % of short term rentals which take up valuable housing for residents.
21.
Eliminating density caps and having other bulk requirements (height limits,
set backs, lot coverage, open space requirements) dictate how large a
building can be
22.
you have done all of the above and should stop it.
23.
Streamline review
24.
More inventory
25.
Streamline review,
26.
I dont think zoning is the issue, prices are.
27.
Lot size only
28.
Use any power in your means to punish corporate home ownership. I know I
sound like a broken record but seriously, it's a problem.
29.
Reduce lot size
30.
Can our water supply support more homes? Maybe we should have a
moratorium on new homes in areas that have water issues.
31.
Allow multiple homes per lot only in small communities (areas where they
are contained, but not throughout the zones
32.
Streamline review. Insist small towns like Litchfield park allow additional
housing in backyards
33.
Reduce lot sizes and/or setbacks.
34.
No answer
35.
Permit fee-title splits, streamline review, automation, provide incentives
36.
Stop! No more increased housing
37.
Streamline review
38.
NO Change that would not be in the interest of Tax Paying Citizens.
39.
"I do not agree with this. We are too tight as it is. No Apartments or town
homes
40.
"
41.
Reducing lot sizes
42.
NOT IN FAVOR OF ANY OF THE ABOVE.
43.
Allow multiple homes
44.
Provide incentives
Go Back to Question 8
9. What zoning strategies could increase housing availability and
attainability?
Examples: Allow multiple homes per lot, permit fee-title splits, streamline review, provide
incentives, reducing lot sizes
Skip to Question 10
127
September 22, 2025
45.
Too complex to answer here. Are you incentivizing investors? Builders?
Renters? Or homeowners?
46.
Single home on single lot. Multiple homes create multiple problems.
47.
As above
48.
Be open to a developer who would be willing to build affordable townhomes,
condos within the existing community. We need several master planned type
of townhome or condo developments, where folks can purchase and choose
to live in a townhome or condo with some amenities available. You can have
sections of 4 to 6 homes per section in a community.
49.
Streamline zoning, some smaller lot size but keep larger also available.
50.
Incentives for creative housing solutions, more ability to easily ask for
variances so some restrictions in place but easier to get approval for more
special circumstances.
51.
Streamline reviews
52.
Usage and of water dictate housing
53.
I'm not sure it is a zoning issue.
54.
increasing housing availability will only cause long term problems. you need
to study the problems uncontrolled population growth has caused in other
states like California, Colorado and others.
55.
None of these
56.
All of the above.
57.
Streamline review
58.
provide incentives
59.
Streamline reviews and cutting red tape on projects that can be pre-approved
would help.
60.
I don't know.Maybe streamline the reviews. Why keep building when we are
short on water?
61.
Allow entire neighborhoods to make density decisions and not be imposed
62.
At this point all of the above.
63.
Do not change the number of housing units on existing property.
64.
We're over buildings. The new rentals will push pricing down on older rentals.
Focus needs to be on homeless prevention. Its cheaper and more beneficial
to assist people in staying in their residences than having them get evicted
and become homeless, loose their jobs and need even more assistance.
65.
streamline reviews
Go Back to Question 8
9. What zoning strategies could increase housing availability and
attainability?
Examples: Allow multiple homes per lot, permit fee-title splits, streamline review, provide
incentives, reducing lot sizes
Skip to Question 10
128
September 22, 2025
66.
Build more low income housing in the way of small homes.
67.
Make sure the county looks at water availability in the future and over
populated for the area size.
68.
Maricopa County should be looking at ways to contain density, not add to it.
Overbuilding is already causing residential to wells dry up. High density is
creating more heat islands.
69.
Allow Multiple housing per lot
70.
Smaller lots, smaller houses, and increased height limits in new areas to
accommodate high density housing.
71.
Incentives and multi-unit housing.
72.
Impact fees, long ramp from concept to vertical and focus on SFD versus
mixed use creates additional non-value add expense.
73.
None of the above.
74.
allow one home plus guest house per lot with no lot size restrictions
75.
No recommendations
76.
Stop the government from claiming so much land. Should be available for
building homes
77.
Multiple homes per lot
78.
Duplexes
79.
Incentivized growth seems like an effective strategy to create more
affordable housing.
80.
Maricopa County does not need more people.
81.
Smaller lot size but multiple homes on one lot would decrease property
values
82.
Affordability is a good idea for designated affordable neighborhoods only!
83.
We need to limit and/or stop bullies we can find more water sources.
84.
No to all of these ideas.
85.
In Fountain Hills and Scottsdale height restrictions should be maintained as
well as lot sizes. In the larger cities, that are more urban already and already
have multi-story buildings, that is where high-rise buildings may be built.
Keeping the integrity of communities is important.
86.
Reduce lot size and streamline
87.
One additional and smaller home per lot (mother-in-law style housing on the
main house lot). Provide incentives.
88.
All of the above
Go Back to Question 8
9. What zoning strategies could increase housing availability and
attainability?
Examples: Allow multiple homes per lot, permit fee-title splits, streamline review, provide
incentives, reducing lot sizes
Skip to Question 10
129
September 22, 2025
89.
Accelerate reviews!
90.
Anything that reduces red tape or creates a smooth, streamlined process.
91.
Multiple homes per lot, permit fee-title splits. Allow both short and long term
rental of ADUs, tiny homes.
92.
?
93.
streamline review, reducing lot size
94.
None. Homes are never affordable. They are investments.
95.
We don't need any more housing or people. Highrise dwellings are polluting
our skylines.
96.
Reducing lot sizes! Narrow residential streets as older neighborhoods have
wide streets that drivers speed down, which makes speed humps necessary.
I believe Tempe is already streamlining review to the point that established
residents have too little say in zoning.
97.
more emphasis on housing basics, like kitchens, living rooms and bedrooms
... less optional multi-use spaces
98.
Stop allowing corporations to buy up all the homes. Less short term rentals.
99.
Allow multiple homes per lot. At least in some zones with larger parcels.
100.
streamline fees, permits, and review.
101.
The main reason for low affordability is inflation. None of the above will
correct that, but it will correct itself with time. In the meantime, please don’t
turn Gilbert into an apartment community or one that looks like an apartment
community with crowded housing and commercial development that
threatens our water supply.
102.
Reducing minimum lot size requirements, incentives for higher density and
more affordable square footage.
103.
Why accommodate everyone to the detriment of solid families/ownership?
104.
Allow multiple homes per lot, streamline review
105.
Provide incentives
106.
There should be all types of choices available. Streamlining the review
process should be a priority but not at the expense of existing homeowners.
107.
multiple homes per lot
108.
No good options come to mind. No need to change the nature of the county.
Growth is not a bad thing as is.
109.
reduced rent
110.
provide incentives
Go Back to Question 8
9. What zoning strategies could increase housing availability and
attainability?
Examples: Allow multiple homes per lot, permit fee-title splits, streamline review, provide
incentives, reducing lot sizes
Skip to Question 10
130
September 22, 2025
111.
Don’t know about strategies, but I know the ruling party would be against it. I
know that (when) my situation changes there is real potential for me to
become homeless. I am 62 and disabled. How can I possibly improve my
situation? Answer: I can’t.
112.
If there are more people in Maricopa County, where will the water come
from?
113.
Our community is good as is.
114.
Grants for ADU’s
115.
Multiple homes allowed and maximizing lot space
116.
No changes
117.
I believe zoning as currently written is fine and should be left alone. The city
changes it at will anyway.
118.
Do NOT reduce lot sizes. Instead offer variety of lot sizes. Neighborhoods are
being built with NO room to park!! Driveways are becoming shorter that the
owners can't even park in their own driveway. If they are allowed to park on
the street, you can't even get a car between houses because there is not
enough room!! It is ridiculous!
119.
Single family. Lower the price to own a home by increasing supply and
utilities and resources. Capture rainwater. Build more energy producing
facilities. Increase supply not overregulation.
120.
Build more entry level homes for first-time buyers on standard (NOT small)
size lot.
121.
Increase lot sizes so multiple homes per lot would be an option for families.
122.
increasing lot sizes
123.
remove (or at least update/change) some of the setback restrictions to make
better use of the small lot sizes in mobile home parks
124.
Zone neighborhoods to prohibit STRs -- stop investors from buying up
available housing. Zone ADUs to prohibit STR usage. Keep housing available
to residents, not vacationers. Visitors should use hotels.
125.
build more of those little homes and allow people to buy them, not let them
be owned by corporations who only rent them out.
126.
Streamline review when water requirements are met
127.
Designated areas for multigenerational housing
Go Back to Question 8
9. What zoning strategies could increase housing availability and
attainability?
Examples: Allow multiple homes per lot, permit fee-title splits, streamline review, provide
incentives, reducing lot sizes
Skip to Question 10
131
September 22, 2025
128.
I'm not for increasing availability. If you build it, they will come. This county
doesn't need continued relentless growth that strains infrastructure and
utilities (especially water).
129.
Provide incentives, walking paths, dog parks in the community. Make nice
outdoor areas. Allow space for families to live together-next generation or
detached. Give more privacy or Landscape that will grow along the fences.
130.
Title splits
131.
"Reduce lot size and provide incentives. Increase casitas throughout
Phoenix.
132.
Consideration for drainage and fire hazards."
133.
Do not impact rural areas that have open space, NAOS, and livestock/equine
uses.
134.
Limit the greed of the developers and investors.
135.
Allow condos/townhomes/duplex or quadplex in a previously 'single family
home' lot
136.
We really need small starter homes on small lots, can also provide
incentives.
137.
On large lots, permit a casita type home to be built for adults caring for their
elders.
138.
LIMIT RENT COST. Limit corporations buying houses. Landlord should not be
a job.
139.
I don’t know much about this topic
140.
"Development in outlying county property;
141.
Small home communities, small lots, recreation green spaces,
142.
"
143.
See #8
144.
No
145.
Zoning for specific uses
146.
Streamline review
147.
Would not have multiple homes per lot
148.
Do not do any of the above.
149.
Streamline reviews, reduce the government effects and delays on
contractors
150.
Keep things as-is.
Go Back to Question 8
9. What zoning strategies could increase housing availability and
attainability?
Examples: Allow multiple homes per lot, permit fee-title splits, streamline review, provide
incentives, reducing lot sizes
Skip to Question 10
132
September 22, 2025
151.
Cramming more people into the same space is not the answer. The allure of
the West was wide-open spaces. Don't turn Arizona into Los Angeles by
thinking we need more density and taller apartment buildings. The
apartments they build are unaffordable for most anyway and negatively
impact surrounding neighborhoods. Most don't want that.
152.
None. We don't have the water to support it.
153.
Build modestly where people want to live. Multiple homes per lot or reducing
lot sizes need to consider adequate infrastructure including fire safety.
154.
See Q8
155.
Streamline review, permits and consistent rules for building per city across
the county.
156.
Revert to your original zoning plans. Improve your existing roadways before
you overbuild.
157.
Make a plan and submit it to the voters.
158.
Provide incentives to developers to build in older, deteriorated neighborhoods
that could be rejuvenated while providing viable housing for people who
would use existing mass transit.
159.
Quit over building apartments.
160.
These examples all sound promising.
161.
See my answer I number 8
162.
Allow multiple homes per lot
163.
Opposed having Multiple homes on one lot
164.
Streamline review
165.
Fully understanding the zone is the first strategy. What does the zone
consists of? Schools, parks, retail businesses, industrial businesses, a
landfill? Then looking at what zoning practices have been successful and
unsuccessful in the past. Adjusting policy to the needs of the communities,
not the projected bottom-line of an ambitious developer. Attainability will be
difficult in areas that didn't take into account the needs and wants of the
customer.
166.
Not qualified to answer, but it’s important to have some reasonable rentals
and some properties well priced for first-time buyers.
167.
Multiple homes per lot/duplexes, reducing public comments or input
168.
streamline review
Go Back to Question 8
9. What zoning strategies could increase housing availability and
attainability?
Examples: Allow multiple homes per lot, permit fee-title splits, streamline review, provide
incentives, reducing lot sizes
Skip to Question 10
133
September 22, 2025
169.
Streamline the review process AND allow residents to attend zoning
meetings via telecom.
170.
Slow the development or a water crisis looms! Rehab and rebuild older
structures and building abandoned of hundreds of lots!
171.
In new development sites, allow many of the above.
172.
Maybe multiple small homes with permit fee-title splits could be useful. I
hate to say this but our area doesn't have the resources to accommodate
outward growth and more water / electricity demand.
173.
Multiple homes per lot would help but only if they are limited to single story
homes due to the enhanced overcrowded feeling in homes that are muliple
story but very close together.
174.
Allow multiple homes per lot, streamline review, provide incentives
175.
Please do not reduce lot sizes. There are so many opportunities to increase
housing - empty lots, run-down, unoccupied homes. Build, but also fix what's
available.
176.
More mixed use.
177.
Allow split lots, permit short-term stays in temporary structures (e.g. camper
trailers)
178.
Is it possible to zone housing to restrict investors because they buy up the
inventory and raise rates on families.
179.
Providing incentives
180.
Reduce lot sizes; more duplexes.
181.
Streamline review, consider providing incentives.
182.
Mixed use development. More townhomes and condos. Reduce lot sizes. A
Sprawl Tax.
183.
reduce lot sizes
184.
less homes per lot
185.
With the water crisis we face I find it very confusing that there is so much
building at all. maybe we should consider a no growth policy until we figure
out the water problem.
186.
provide incentives
187.
Stop trying to increase housing availability. Instead focus on fair wages that
allow single family homes. It's ok to slow the growth.
188.
reducing lot and home size
189.
Reduce lot sizes where applicable and streamline the review process.
Go Back to Question 8
9. What zoning strategies could increase housing availability and
attainability?
Examples: Allow multiple homes per lot, permit fee-title splits, streamline review, provide
incentives, reducing lot sizes
Skip to Question 10
134
September 22, 2025
190.
Multiple homes per lot, mixed use housing,
191.
Do not force HOAs to permit multi housing and ADUs
192.
Zoning is not responsible for this....this is a false flag conversation that is
tired. The plan accounts for residential zoning, which is only one piece. There
are so many other zoning zones that are not residential. There are plenty of
commercial locations that are vacant and underutilized. If there were more
conversions over to residential to solve the "use" and create an active "use"
vs a "vacant" eyesore.....then that would be good zoning attention and
solution when the need to "increase" is needed.
193.
Tiny home neighborhoods?
194.
Zoning needs to be properly enforced first. If people can’t find housing here
they should move on elsewhere.
195.
Has the county ever used its county owned land to build housing? Seems like
a good idea.
196.
Maricopa County should expand by-right zoning for multifamily and missing
middle housing in more districts. Additional strategies include streamlining
approval processes, reducing minimum lot sizes, permitting fee-title splits,
and offering incentives for projects that deliver homes within reach for
residents at all income levels. To meet the housing needs of this growing and
diverse population, the County should pursue a comprehensive zoning
reform that: Increases the share of land zoned for multifamily by right; Allows
missing middle housing types in more districts; Reduces minimum lot sizes
and procedural hurdles; Modernizes zoning rules to reflect today’s housing
demands. These changes would help address the structural single-family
bias in the zoning code, diversify housing options, and promote housing
attainability for residents across income levels.
197.
Reducing step back and parking requirement would be very helpful, as well
as requiring housing developments to be mixed income.
198.
Allow developers to build more densely everywhere and reduce review times.
199.
To meaningfully increase housing availability and attainability, Maricopa
County should: Allow multiple homes per lot by right. Including duplexes,
triplexes, fourplexes, and small apartment buildings, without excessive
discretionary review. Reduce minimum lot sizes. To enable more efficient
land use, lower per-unit land costs, and support walkable block patterns.
Permit fee-title splits and lot splits. So homeowners and small-scale
Go Back to Question 8
9. What zoning strategies could increase housing availability and
attainability?
Examples: Allow multiple homes per lot, permit fee-title splits, streamline review, provide
incentives, reducing lot sizes
Skip to Question 10
135
September 22, 2025
developers can create additional housing without large-scale master-planned
projects. Streamline and expedite review processes. Especially for projects
that include affordable units, are near transit, or meet design standards that
support walkability and climate resilience. Provide meaningful incentives.
Such as density bonuses, reduced impact fees, or parking requirement
reductions for projects that include affordable or workforce housing. Allow
mixed-use and live-work developments by right. So housing can be
integrated into commercial corridors and neighborhood centers. Enable mid-
rise and taller housing near transit. Similar to successful mixed-use
neighborhoods in other cities, which combine density with high quality of life.
By removing unnecessary barriers, making approvals predictable, and
allowing a wider variety of housing types in more places, the County can
expand supply, improve affordability, and create more vibrant, sustainable
communities.
200.
Prioritize by-right ministerial approval of every project that maximizes the
floor area ratio for density near high frequency transit.
201.
Provide a well specified plan, and when a proposal comes in and is
determined to meet the plan requirements, the proposal is approved with no
further comments
202.
All of the above.
203.
Remove all zoning regulations except those that directly pertain to safety and
energy efficiency
204.
Reducing lot sizes, upzoning, ADU,
205.
All of the above! These are all good ideas. I think providing incentives,
depending on what it means, is the “least good” of these options as allowing
housing with minimal restrictions is more successful than policies like
density bonuses.
206.
Multiple homes per lot, reduced lot size, allow for construction of medium
and high-density housing in areas that are currently only zoned for single
family homes, eliminate minimum parking requirement (which will make
construction cheaper and therefore housing cheaper to renters/buyers)
207.
Maricopa County should broaden by-right zoning for multifamily and missing
middle housing across more districts. Key steps include streamlining
approvals, lowering minimum lot sizes, allowing fee-title splits, and offering
incentives for projects that provide homes affordable to residents at all
Go Back to Question 8
9. What zoning strategies could increase housing availability and
attainability?
Examples: Allow multiple homes per lot, permit fee-title splits, streamline review, provide
incentives, reducing lot sizes
Skip to Question 10
136
September 22, 2025
income levels. A comprehensive zoning reform should: -Increase land zoned
for multifamily by right -Permit missing middle housing types in more
districts -Reduce minimum lot sizes and cut procedural barriers -Update
zoning rules to match current housing needs These changes would reduce
the zoning code’s single-family bias, expand housing variety, and improve
attainability for residents across the income spectrum.
208.
We would oppose allowing multiple homes per lot. However, this is included
in our CC&Rs, but again, please see my comment in #1. Also, allowing
multiple homes per lot would increase parking issues.
209.
Allow multiple homes per lot, abolishing parking mandates, streamlining
review, reducing lot size.
210.
Get government out of the way, allow for dense, walkable, mixed use
communities.
211.
allowing multiple homes per lot, provide incentives and reduce lot sizes
212.
Allowing multiple homes on lots currently zoned for single family, allowing
apartments to be built taller, public and affordable housing projects,
minimize red tape for development that significantly increases housing
stock, up zone current areas where it makes sense.
213.
Field not completed
214.
Literally just letting people build density and minimizing the process for
retirees, Kevin Hartke, and Tempe to stop low income housing
215.
Give 0% interests loans to homeowners (not corporations) based off the
value of their property to increase their lot size for more dense housing and
the money can only be used for increasing their density. As the county, you
will benefit from increase property tax revenue from taxable SF and a safe
investment as you would own the property if there was to be a default. The
homeowner has an easier line of credit and can increase the density and
value of their property if they would like.
216.
No need for increased housing. There’s thousands of available units right
now and every week
217.
Changing some industrial to housing and open space.
218.
No change
219.
It's not the role of government to determine housing prices, subsidize
purchases, rezone residential land, etc.
220.
Streamline review and provide incentives
Go Back to Question 8
9. What zoning strategies could increase housing availability and
attainability?
Examples: Allow multiple homes per lot, permit fee-title splits, streamline review, provide
incentives, reducing lot sizes
Skip to Question 10
137
September 22, 2025
221.
get rid of lot size minimums
222.
I don't see a problem with current housing. Supply and demand will be fine.
223.
Does ARS Title 36 (36-2062) 5 (good neighbor policy to address
neighborhood complaints/concerns) allow County Zoning to routinely
inspect/monitor a SLGH to insure license compliance?
224.
Field not completed
225.
Don’t mess with our neighborhoods & Parks !
226.
See above.
227.
Field not completed
228.
All
229.
I do not support any of the proposals mentioned below.
230.
NO, DO NOT ALLOW MULTIPLE HOMES PER LOT. NO REDUCING LOT SIZES.
HUGE MULTI-HOUSING COMPLEXES ARE ALREADY BEING BUILT ALL OVER
THE COUNTY. THIS IS NOT NEEDED.
231.
Allowing owners of land to do what they wish within reason. We have 1 acre
in R-44 zoning, our home only takes 1/4 of that, but we can't do anything else
with the land due to the zoning. . Land is really nice (I hate houses that you
can touch the neighbor in) but 1 house per acre seems too strict, especially
with how expensive land is currently. Allowing 2 houses per acre would still
keep the nice rural feel but allow for more flexibility and housing.
232.
increasing lot coverage allowances for residential properties
233.
Less fees on everything
234.
Maricopa County should expand by-right zoning for multifamily and missing
middle housing in more districts. Additional strategies include streamlining
approval processes, reducing minimum lot sizes, permitting fee-title splits,
and offering incentives for projects that deliver homes within reach for
residents at all income levels. To meet the housing needs of this growing and
diverse population, the County should pursue a comprehensive zoning
reform that: Increases the share of land zoned for multifamily by right,
Allows missing middle housing types in more districts, Reduces minimum
lot sizes and procedural hurdles, Modernizes zoning rules to reflect today’s
housing demands, These changes would help address the structural single-
family bias in the zoning code, diversify housing options, and promote
housing attainability for residents across income levels.
235.
Go Back to Question 8
10. In your opinion, how can zoning regulations improve quality
of life in rural and unincorporated areas?
Examples: Protect open space, ensure infrastructure access, preserve community
character, reduce nuisance impacts
138
September 22, 2025
1.
Protect rural lifestyle, preserve natural areas and provide open space and
recreation, eliminate noxious uses like battery storage facilities and mining
uses in county Islands.
2.
Increase transit access and bike racks.
3.
Protect open spaces.
4.
Encourage and protect rural and small/mini farm properties, where
appropriate.
5.
I agree with your stated examples! Protect rural areas as “ rural” to allow
freedom to choose this lifestyle. Protect our farmland & support farmers. I
love driving in farm areas- it’s calming, stress relievers & beautiful.
6.
allow for wind and solar as an allowed use in unincorporated areas.
7.
not anywhere because of lack of enforcing when violated
8.
Starting occurring back of grass area's and start using desert scape in the
communities. Many of these grass area's retention area's are not capable of
being used by communities so why are they grass. Some of the larger spray
heads can use up to 35 gallons of water per minute. Also give incentives for
manufactures that add small solar units to homes that will cover 25-30 % of
daily power use. Find a way to use reclaimed water without mandating the
community have their own lake or fountain area. Why not have a shared
water front for this that multiple communities and Government facilities can
draw from.
9.
"All of the above items are important to maintain the rural feel & quality of
life we love & enjoy in Arizona & many have worked hard to maintain.
10.
Please don’t destroy it for the sake of a few thoughtless greedy people who
don’t care about what has been established over many years."
11.
Preserve community character.
12.
Provide zoning regulations to ensure quality housing while preserving
community character.
13.
Over rule Surprise mayor city council desire to annex and tax rural area.
14.
"Control traffic and insure community life
15.
Less travel less pollution "
16.
Protect open space, ensure infrastructure access, preserve community
character, reduce nuisance impacts
17.
Keep the character of the Neighborhood and don’t overpopulate will ruin the
quality of life of people who have been here
Go Back to Question 9
10. In your opinion, how can zoning regulations improve quality
of life in rural and unincorporated areas?
Examples: Protect open space, ensure infrastructure access, preserve community
character, reduce nuisance impacts
139
September 22, 2025
18.
Leave zoning alone. It is fine
19.
Large minimum lot sizes
20.
Require incorporation into the city.
21.
leave rural & unincorporated areas alone; stay in your lane in the city
22.
By having zoning guidance, building will balance open space and
community character…avoiding random housing that doesn’t fit with the
neighboring homes for example.
23.
Hopefully help with the water crisis we are already in.
24.
Maintaining long-term economic viability (increased density=increased tax
base for the same infrastructure)
25.
I don’t live in an unincorporated area or rural area so I wouldn’t know.
26.
Protect open space, preserve community character, nuisance impacts.
27.
Preserve character
28.
Keep our open spaces, less drivers and larger trucks.
29.
Making the house have to have more space between them may help with
nuisances. The houses are jammed so close together that people cant fart
without their neighbor hearing it.
30.
Preserves community character
31.
See #9 response
32.
Reduce red tape
33.
Preserve community
34.
We need green spaces to keep temperatures down. They are being removed
in Sun City due to water costs....but they were green spaces since
concept.....and we wonder why it's getting hotter!
35.
Only if they preserve community character.
36.
"All the above
37.
"
38.
Protect open spaces,
39.
Yes
40.
Stop building developments, apartments and small houses right next to
each other. Maricopa is being ruined
41.
Protect open space, reduce nuisance impacts
42.
INFORCE THE PRESENT ZONING CODES. Zoning enforcement Employees
ignore violations unless there is a complaint.
Go Back to Question 9
10. In your opinion, how can zoning regulations improve quality
of life in rural and unincorporated areas?
Examples: Protect open space, ensure infrastructure access, preserve community
character, reduce nuisance impacts
140
September 22, 2025
43.
Definitely protect open space, preserve community character, Low density
homes.
44.
Ensure adequate supporting infrastructure for proposed homes
45.
WE HAVE ZONING LAWS IN MESA BUT NO ENFORCEMENT. A
HOMEOWNER CAN FILE A COMPLAINT AND THE ZONING OFFICE REACTS
TO THAT ONE COMPLAINT EVEN THOUGH DRIVING DOWN THE SAME
STREET THERE ARE 100 VIOLATIONS. ALSO, REPEAT OFFENDERS SHOULD
BE PENALIZED WITH MUCH HIGHER FINES.
46.
Prevents overbuilding
47.
The whole hauled water situation should never have happened. The private
roads are confusing and open to wild interpretation and neighborhood
feuds. The roads should have been dedicated to the county. Although I’m
sure the county didn’t want to maintain them. You don’t have enough
sheriffs to cover the unincorporated areas. So everyone out here tends to
take the law into their own hands. Not good. You don’t enforce the zoning
that you do have. That’s a whole other conversation.
48.
Protect open space
49.
Especially in areas that are beginning to be developed, it is essential to
protect green space, to provide well-planned roads and business/industrial
areas. It is also vital to protect space for schools and libraries to be built
should the demographics of an area demand them. Zoning could also
provide for community centers and sports complexes for children's, teens,
and community sports teams A well-rounded community assures that an
area maintain those characteristics that make a community attractive to
potential buyers/renters.
50.
REQUIRE OPEN SPACE AND MAKE THE LOTS AT LEAST 1/2 ACRE.
51.
Protects individual space from encroachment
52.
Protect & preserve open space & views & over populated areas
53.
protect open space. quit packing people in together, like in downtown
Mesa. The quality of life there is horrible.
54.
I think having modern commercial centers near residential is imperative.
Folks want to be able to go to a nice grocery market, drug store, gas station
and some dining options and not having to drive long distance. A village
within the village works nicely for people. I also think we should consider
tearing down and rebuilding better commercial centers in some areas in the
Go Back to Question 9
10. In your opinion, how can zoning regulations improve quality
of life in rural and unincorporated areas?
Examples: Protect open space, ensure infrastructure access, preserve community
character, reduce nuisance impacts
141
September 22, 2025
west valley. South Peoria off Grand Ave. has become a real eyesore, and
needs urban renewal. We need to clean up much of Grand Ave. We need to
build some very affordable housing for lower income folks that live off of
Grand Ave. in these sections of town. I wish old town Glendale would
revitalize there old town area and get some new ideas of modern
commercial back in there. We just need to keep renewing some of these old
neglected areas, but we also need to think of building high quality
communities with very nice amenities if we want to have some serious
future new residents to live in the west valley. If we don't put in some very
nice things, people will continue to give all there money to Scottsdale.
Northwest valley needs to develop a very high quality way of life. We already
have the physical beauty going for us in the west valley. Thank you. Eileen
McCarty Grant 623 734 3644.
55.
"Preserve community structure and environment.
56.
Don’t turn us further into another LA. "
57.
More shade and more open spaces, preserve more historic buildings shares,
limit too bright LED lightings.
58.
Protect open space and preserve community character
59.
Protect open space, access to solar capability, prevent outside purchase of
farm land
60.
Protect open spaces, preserve community character and reduce nuisance
impacts.
61.
avoid high density housing
62.
All of these
63.
Make every attempt to preserve the character of the area while also
championing development that will encourage younger residents to stay and
not relocate to nearby urban areas. Reasonable population growth should
be encouraged.
64.
Protect open space
65.
If a home could add an in-law suite (whether ADU, tiny home, or home
addition), this could help keep families together, reduce living cost, plus not
have to pay for independent or assisted living facilities. An ADU could help
boomerang kids, college kids who can stay at home but with own space,
etc.
Go Back to Question 9
10. In your opinion, how can zoning regulations improve quality
of life in rural and unincorporated areas?
Examples: Protect open space, ensure infrastructure access, preserve community
character, reduce nuisance impacts
142
September 22, 2025
66.
I don't live in a rural area, although, I do visit frequently. Some zoning
regulations can help protect natural environments. While keeping in mind
that limiting housing costs everyone more and limits the county's ability to
grow.
67.
All of the above.
68.
Protecting open and rural space are crucial All development in rural areas
should be limited. Perhaps, the county could consider the purchase of
development rights, as a way to prohibit development and compensate rural
owners.
69.
Find creative ways to create more density without just cookie cutter homes.
70.
Protect our lifestyle do not permit over building, keep our community
character intact!
71.
"Protect open space, parks, BLM and State owned land. Assist with water
conservation.
72.
Preserve community character.
73.
Insure infrastructure for those areas. Also protect open space.
74.
Protect open spaced
75.
Think economics, resources, preservation.
76.
Reduce density, protect open space, preserve water, use strategies to
prevent heat islands.
77.
More housing on smaller lots
78.
protect open sauce, preserve community, add more tree coverage with
native big trees that will help with shade
79.
Infrastructure access, preservation of community character.
80.
Keep people from doing whatever they want with their property, and all of
the Examples.
81.
Infrastructure access and flex zoning to allow for recapture of the
infrastructure as well as off set of open space burden.
82.
Larger lots.
83.
improve quality of life by providing city water and garbage pick up These
residents pay city tax’s should be given same services without paying extra
or finding outside company at greater expense
84.
All the above.
85.
Yes
Go Back to Question 9
10. In your opinion, how can zoning regulations improve quality
of life in rural and unincorporated areas?
Examples: Protect open space, ensure infrastructure access, preserve community
character, reduce nuisance impacts
143
September 22, 2025
86.
Protect open space. Every certified developer should have open space in
plans. Never allow industrial near rural family homes especially if zoning is
RU-43!
87.
Preserving community character while both protecting and creating
additional open spaces around and inside the communities helps maintain a
natural feel.
88.
Increase lot size!!! STOP building apartments and condos!!! Only stand alone
houses!!!
89.
Over population in my estimation is not advantageous based on the recent
reports about our drinking water crisis.
90.
Regulations must be designed for specific neighborhoods rather than trying
to come up with a one-size fits all set of rules! Some neighborhoods need
more housing near transportation but trying to increase density in rural
areas is unfair to homeowners who want to preserve what they paid for!
91.
Protect water sources We need to use less, not more.
92.
Yes to all of these ideas.
93.
Protect open spaces, community character - including the dark sky
community and sightlines of the environment around them. Keep Fountain
Hills the community that it is, not overrun with high-rise buildings and high-
density housing.
94.
Reduce nuisance and noise
95.
In rural and unincorporated areas, there is a need for "mini commercial
zones." I live 18 miles from a supermarket -- ideally there would be a smaller
market within 10 miles of my home.
96.
Preserve open space, ensure infrastructure access, reduce nuisance
impacts
97.
All the above
98.
Agree with all the above examples listed for this question.
99.
Protect open space by not having a smaller lot lines, requiring more
minimum acreage to build
100.
Protect open spaces and prepare for appropriate development to meet
growing needs. Balance growth while maintaining the cultural reasons why
people/business want to be there. Sometimes, no is the answer.
101.
I believe zoning regulations can help preserve the community
characteristics that we hope to maintain. I'm concerned that without
Go Back to Question 9
10. In your opinion, how can zoning regulations improve quality
of life in rural and unincorporated areas?
Examples: Protect open space, ensure infrastructure access, preserve community
character, reduce nuisance impacts
144
September 22, 2025
sufficient zoning regulations developers will only do what makes the most
money for them without concern for protecting open spaces or other issues
such as traffic flow.
102.
Protect open spaces
103.
preserve community character and reduce nuisanceimpacts
104.
If its not an acre, its not a parcel. Keep it open. There are no jobs for people
in the outlying areas. If there are no jobs within five miles, there should not
be 9 to acre or apartments.
105.
"Protect open space, ensure infrastructure access, preserve community
character, reduce nuisance impacts. Amen.
106.
Limiting development. Adding parks and environmentally/unique protected
areas
107.
I want to preserve my neighborhood's character: quiet, family-oriented, low-
crime, very few nuisance properties. Allow older neighborhoods to keep
their character. Also recognize that continued rapid growth will be difficult to
sustain in the long run due to water availability and fights with other states
and Mexico for water rights.
108.
Protect more open spaces and preserve community culture
109.
Please protect what open space we have left!! The heat is becoming
unbearable, nighttime temps stay high and the heat bubble pushes storms
around the valley leaving us dry and hot. Not only that but we're just this ugly
sprawling mass of concrete. There is no character in newly developed areas,
it's all poorly produced ugly (but still expensive) homes and strip malls.
110.
Zoning regulations have over time become more and more complicated
which is useless for rural/unincorporated areas. They are NOT big cities with
lots of close populations. SIMPLIFY for unincorporated areas.
Simplify/streamline review processes.
111.
protect open spaces. stop putting more housing developments to gobble
up all agricultural areas.
112.
All of the above. I wasn’t aware that Gilbert could regulate unincorporated
areas. When the current owners are ready to sell, the town might consider
buying and incorporating them. Many will come with their own water.
113.
This is Additional Comments to my previous response. Gilbert seems to
have little area to expand, but there are Native American reservations that
we might be able to work with for the benefit of all. Although we have cause
Go Back to Question 9
10. In your opinion, how can zoning regulations improve quality
of life in rural and unincorporated areas?
Examples: Protect open space, ensure infrastructure access, preserve community
character, reduce nuisance impacts
145
September 22, 2025
to object to many things about the Chinese government, there is much to
respect about their success in turning deserts into fertile land that collects
its own water and supports farms and communities. Reservations have a lot
of uninhabited desert that, with the support of our town (and possibly the
state) could be jointly developed for mutual benefit.
114.
Protecting open space by controlling sprawl, allowing higher density for
preserved open space.
115.
Ensure infrastructure access
116.
all of the above
117.
Don't sell and build homes on our preserves!
118.
Protect open space and desert species. That’s why we long-timers and our
offspring stay here.
119.
Protect open space, preserve community character
120.
Protect open space, preserve community character.
121.
All of your suggestions above, the difficulty is trying to satisfy all people in
our ever changing world and environment.
122.
As is is good. No need for Maricopa County to buy more open space and
take off the tax rolls. Enough is probably enough.
123.
protect open space, reduce noise using open spaces, community gardens
124.
protect open space, preserve community character, reduce nuisance
impacts, help communities welcome growth if there are things in place to
preserve current gems/charm of rural areas
125.
Good god, is that even a question? How about equal representation, as a
starting point.
126.
Zoning in rural areas may prevent unsightly lots. Another solution may be to
require fences that hide unsightly areas like junk cars, old machinery, and
work supplies
127.
I can’t answer for other than Sun City but if the county would only work with
our home owners association, life would be much more pleasant - which is
why we chose to move from Washington to your state. We love Sun City but
in the last few years we’ve seen these monstrosity of buildings go up (RV
garages and add on 2 story) and all we can say “why and how”? Thank you
for listening to this one older ladies’ voice.
128.
Open spaces are great, but affordable housing is much better.
Go Back to Question 9
10. In your opinion, how can zoning regulations improve quality
of life in rural and unincorporated areas?
Examples: Protect open space, ensure infrastructure access, preserve community
character, reduce nuisance impacts
146
September 22, 2025
129.
protect open space, ensure buildings don't have negative affects on other
properties or cause damage due to rain surge/run-off flooding where none
existed before.
130.
rational development
131.
Protect community character, way of life (noise, garbage, pests, traffic etc...)
and home values.
132.
Protect open space preserve community character reduce nuisance
impacts. Many lovely neighborhoods with character are gone which reduces
property values
133.
Please, please, please, protect open space and quality of life. Please do not
allow every inch of land to be built on. There has to be a limit to what is
allowed to be built on for each square mile. Please implement larger
setbacks from major roadways to where housing and commercial can be
built. (Example: at least 100 feet away from curb to wall, at least 200 feet
from curb to a structure) This makes driving down the road look and feel
better and not feel like you are a mouse running through a maze or tunnel. It
also is safer. You must protect and preserve the existing communities and
their lifestyle. People move out of the city to get AWAY from the congestion.
They do not mind driving to get what they need! They do NOT want the
congestion, so do not create it by over building. They all own trucks, so keep
that in mind when building roads and parking lots! Keep the rural areas rural.
Please!!
134.
Biased question. Too many regulations only hurts and creates inflation.
They make it cost prohibitive for small owners. You have to hire an attorney
or expensive engineer to build a shed or do basic things. Home builders
can't afford to build a standard neighborhood bc of engineering costs and
arbitrary design standards. We have inflation. Solve it by making it easier to
build. Deregulate the million page building code and design and engineering
standards. I know design professionals amd regulations like Chandler,
Mesa, Phoenix, Scottsdale drive them insane and increases stress and
anxiety. Don’t go with the bandwagon of insanity.
135.
Protect open space, preserve community character by enforcing larger lot
size for new construction. Protecting citizens with stronger nuisance/noise
standards. Thank you for asking these questions :)
136.
n/a
Go Back to Question 9
10. In your opinion, how can zoning regulations improve quality
of life in rural and unincorporated areas?
Examples: Protect open space, ensure infrastructure access, preserve community
character, reduce nuisance impacts
147
September 22, 2025
137.
I have no opinion on this. But thanks for sending me the survey so I could
voice my opinion on the possible Maricopa County zoning ordinance
updates
138.
I'm not familiar with the needs of these areas
139.
all of the above you used as examples
140.
Maintain rural character especially since that is why a lot of people move
out of the city, to get away from the city.
141.
Retain unique characteristics surrounded with buffer zones for future
development
142.
Protect open space needs to be a priority to protect the desert. Additionally,
there is not enough water available to continue to grow at past rates. At
some point you have to limit building.
143.
Protect open space, ensure infrastructure access, preserve community
character, reduce nuisance impacts
144.
Do not tell the land owner where buildings must go
145.
Open spaces can insure future water supply. Overbuilding in rural areas may
decrease water supply.
146.
Ket them stay as us. Do not urbanize or create heat islands, encourage
pkantibgvif trees and native landscaping
147.
All I f the above. Also, allow mixed use zoning
148.
Protec open space. Create ways to enjoy the open space.
149.
allow more ADUs so families can share space and/or have a rental income
150.
preserve community character and reduce nuisance impacts.
151.
Protect open space, preserve community character
152.
I have no idea.
153.
Do not build there
154.
No opinion
155.
Your examples are good suggestions.
156.
I like all of the above examples. We need to protect open spaces that
preserve community as well as AZ ‘S character.
157.
"Important to preserve neighborhoods.
158.
People move to county for open space recreation - protect open spaces.
159.
County not conducive to mass-transit!
160.
Due to weather car transportation is necessary!
161.
See #1 thru #9
Go Back to Question 9
10. In your opinion, how can zoning regulations improve quality
of life in rural and unincorporated areas?
Examples: Protect open space, ensure infrastructure access, preserve community
character, reduce nuisance impacts
148
September 22, 2025
162.
"We need
163.
The open space"
164.
Zoning regulations should require larger lot sizes in rural and
unincorporated areas.
165.
Protect open space
166.
Limit population growth
167.
Protect open space if you do build, buildings must fit into the char of the
small town.
168.
Protect open space…work with existing. Community Character is affected
when you dump train depots next door. Quit with the changing regs just to
appease the large companies. Yes, it brings in jobs but at some point we
need to say Enough. Don’t ruin our desert/agricultural areas.
169.
enforce what you enact.
170.
Protect open space, ensure infrastructure access, preserve community
character, reduce nuisance impacts
171.
Keep rural character and allow agriculture to flourish. Protect our rural
communities.
172.
I don't want to live in a rural area. I want to live in a suburban or urban area.
I suspect that people who choose to live in rural areas want the freedom to
do what they want on their property with the convenience of services found
in urban areas.
173.
The examples you give seem a good starting point.
174.
I think the same approach can be taken in rural areas or unincorporated
areas. Consistent codes, rules, approached for future needs in utilities, tech
and infrastructure would help them as well.
175.
We need open spaces, which is rapidly disappearing. Your roads are highly
inadequate for all the building you are doing with rezoning. If we do not
preserve community character, the quality of life will diminish greatly, and it
is already started.
176.
Again, I am not an expert on rural or unincorporated areas, but the voting
populace should have the final vote after proposals submitted by city
"experts" who have NO financial interest in the outcome.
177.
Protect open space.
Go Back to Question 9
10. In your opinion, how can zoning regulations improve quality
of life in rural and unincorporated areas?
Examples: Protect open space, ensure infrastructure access, preserve community
character, reduce nuisance impacts
149
September 22, 2025
178.
The zoning philosophy in rural areas should be the same as in urban areas:
Preserve the existing character of the community as additional development
occurs.
179.
Preserve community character
180.
Yes. All examples sound positive. Especially protecting open spaces and
ensuring infrastructure access to residents.
181.
I know this does not answer this question, but thanks for the survey! Ken
Michalzuk
182.
Pave streets and add lighting in rural residential neighborhoods
183.
I agree with all the examples
184.
Yes. Protecting open space is important.
185.
Learning from past mistakes across all zones with unbiased internal and
external audits of regulations, enforcement agencies, and administrative
personnel will improve the quality of life everywhere. Without accountability
and oversight of leadership, the zoning system will continue to fail until a
full collapse, leaving everyone to suffer from the consequences.
186.
All the above
187.
I have no interest in rural/unincorporated areas.
188.
Preserve community character, regulate runoff, limit horse/cattle numbers
per acre, limit businesses boarding equine/cattle and regulate with permits,
limit rural small business that are not permitted!
189.
Preserve communities' character.
190.
Slow development!
191.
Access to local water and safe roads should be a priority.
192.
I think zoning can protect rural and unincorporated areas by preserving
them, not all members of society want to live in an urban environment or to
be invaded by solar farms. It takes a mental and emotional toll on members
of urban society when there isn't a break from the city.
193.
Increase internet speeds so that people can work from home. There are still
pockets in the central city that are not allowed or do not have access to
high-speed internet.
194.
Preserve open space and reclaim vacant or unused lots for open space
development. Our neighborhoods would benefit from a reduction in the heat
island effect.
Go Back to Question 9
10. In your opinion, how can zoning regulations improve quality
of life in rural and unincorporated areas?
Examples: Protect open space, ensure infrastructure access, preserve community
character, reduce nuisance impacts
150
September 22, 2025
195.
ALL OF THIS. Protect historical open space (ranches, fields, canal areas, and
more), ensure infrastructure because far too many homes are being built in
areas served by old ranch roads in south Phoenix that cannot handle the
traffic, preserve community character so it's not just housing and strip
malls.
196.
All of the Above.
197.
"Protect open space;
198.
Allow more landscaping
199.
Increase parks and recreational areas.
200.
Plant more trees please (try to build a NYC Central Park, even if it cannot be
of the same size)."
201.
Protect open space and limit development.
202.
It doesn't, it just lets nimbys keep out people they don't want around and
causes rising costs for everyone.
203.
protect open space
204.
need more restrictions
205.
It protects all of the above
206.
protect open space, ensure adequate structures
207.
Protect open spaces, stop over development!
208.
Back up the CC&Rs of the rural neighborhoods. You currently ignore them
and cause all kinds of problems turning what was once beautiful
neighborhoods into junk filled industrial looking messes. It's difficult to even
get the County to enforce the ordinances already on the books and now you
want to change them further.
209.
Ensure infrastructure access.
210.
All of the above
211.
Infrastructure access is an issue in Maricopa County.
212.
Protect Open Space
213.
No opinion
214.
I am sure those within these areas are the best sources of information.
215.
All of these -> Protect open space, ensure infrastructure access, preserve
community character, reduce nuisance impacts + large lots, space between
homes, privacy from eyes, ears, smells - just allow ppl to have their little
space free from annoyances. Allow us to own 500 feet of airspace above
our lots so we can stop drones etc from invading our privacy.
Go Back to Question 9
10. In your opinion, how can zoning regulations improve quality
of life in rural and unincorporated areas?
Examples: Protect open space, ensure infrastructure access, preserve community
character, reduce nuisance impacts
151
September 22, 2025
216.
How about actually enforcing ordinances in rural areas instead of letting
LLCs and businesses operate out of RU zoned lots under the table/without
SUPs or zoning changes? Keep Arizona wild, and stop letting businesses
encroach upon the rural residential areas.
217.
Retain private property rights.The property is the most expensive
investment a family/individual makes - changing the zoning is akin to
changing the basis for why/how the property was purchased. Please review
appraisals to learn the basis of valuation before changing zoning codes and
maps, thank you.
218.
Zoning can improve quality of life in rural areas by balancing protection of
open space with the need for flexible housing options that allow residents to
stay in their communities.
219.
Zoning regulations are almost universally bad. We'd be better off if they
didn't exist at all than continues under the current regime.
220.
Zoning regulations in rural and unincorporated areas can improve quality of
life by preventing sprawl creep and ensuring growth happens in a
sustainable way. This can be done by: Protecting open space and natural
features to maintain desert ecosystems, wildlife corridors, and scenic views
while directing growth to appropriate locations. Ensuring that new
development has adequate water, wastewater, transportation, and
broadband infrastructure before it is approved. Encouraging clustered or
village-style development that concentrates housing and services in
walkable nodes, which preserves surrounding open land and reduces the
need for long car trips. Supporting small-scale agriculture and local food
production, including urban agriculture, farm stands, and farmers markets,
to strengthen local economies and food resilience. Requiring shade and
heat mitigation standards so that public spaces, trails, and village centers
include tree canopy, shade structures, and cool materials. Reducing
nuisance impacts by carefully siting and designing industrial or high-traffic
uses to minimize noise, dust, and light pollution. By focusing on compact,
connected community hubs and protecting rural landscapes, the County can
prevent low-density sprawl from eroding both rural character and the
livability of urban areas.
221.
Remove all parking minimums which cost rural and unincorporated areas
too much money to build and maintain.
Go Back to Question 9
10. In your opinion, how can zoning regulations improve quality
of life in rural and unincorporated areas?
Examples: Protect open space, ensure infrastructure access, preserve community
character, reduce nuisance impacts
152
September 22, 2025
222.
Most zoning regulations destroy rural areas by encouraging sprawl and
covering wild open spaces with single family homes. To protect our open
spaces and community resources, housing must be built more densely.
223.
Yes, encouraging the development of small dense 'main Street' style
development (such as downtown Prescott) in rural town centers to increase
economic activity and sense of community and place.
224.
Spending less money on housing and transportation can drastically improve
quality of life. Allowing all building that meets safety and energy efficient
standards will lower housing costs and transportation costs, improving
quality of life. Maricopa County has done a TERRIBLE JOB thus far in
assuring high quality of life.
225.
Zoning regulations can set expectations about development in a community,
but they can also restrict property rights, and good codes recognize this and
seek a balance
226.
Zoning can strengthen rural quality of life by protecting open space while
enabling flexible housing options that help residents remain in their
communities. Offering a variety of home types, such as ADUs and smaller
lot developments, supports intergenerational living, aging in place, and
ensures rural residents have housing that meets their needs.
227.
County vs. CCR’s - As mentioned earlier, Maricopa County should do a better
job at educating the public about the difference between County Ordinances
and Deed Restrictions. Those applying for permits need to be directed to
their HOA for sign off on a project before applying for a county permit. This
helps to protect the property owner, reduce nuisance impacts, and preserve
community character. Group Homes – Though this is a federal issue,
Maricopa County should consider increase the 1,200-foot county ordinance
limit between these types of homes. Due to the uniqueness of Sun City, lots
sizes and cost of homes, unfortunately, there are Group Homes popping up
throughout the community. This does affect the character of the community
and affects property values. Door to Door Soliciting – Retirement
communities are prime targets for scams and many of these scams happen
at their front door. There is huge support from the Sun City community to
impose an ordinance to stop and/or limit door to door soliciting. There are
cities/counties across the United States that have implemented ordinances
on this issue. In fact, Phoenix has one -
Go Back to Question 9
10. In your opinion, how can zoning regulations improve quality
of life in rural and unincorporated areas?
Examples: Protect open space, ensure infrastructure access, preserve community
character, reduce nuisance impacts
153
September 22, 2025
https://phoenix.municipal.codes/CC/23-143. This is a MUCH-NEEDED
ordinance. Also, couldn’t make a comment on #5 but we would prefer to
keep the 30% lot allowance.
228.
If we develop in already developed areas, we can have less of an impact on
farmland/ undeveloped natural reserves. It will ensure everyone has easy
access to nature, and creating cleaner air.
229.
Prevent polluting industry from being next door to other uses. That is the
only useful role for zoning, everything else is government overreach.
230.
Requiring shade and heat mitigation through tree planting, cool materials,
and shaded public spaces to make outdoor areas more livable in high-heat
conditions
231.
Field not completed
232.
Field no completed
233.
Protect open space
234.
If we are able to up zone more in the city instead of focusing on parking, we
would be able to preserve rural life. A lot of rural communities are brought
up because the land is cheap and developers go in to build cheap HOA
communities. The less we are able to build in the city, the more we have to
eat into our rural communities.
235.
DO NOT allow industrial near Rural residential! Protect open space, reduce
noise and nuisance impacts, preserve community character. I.e. DO NOT
allow BNSF to build at their proposed LPP near Wittmann. This would
greatly impact quality of life in rural and unincorporated areas! Keep rural
residential zoning.
236.
Ensure infrastructure access. Reduce nuisance impacts.
237.
Every zoning regulation does the opposite of how it is described so the
quality of life in unincorporated areas should be left as is
238.
protect open space and our deserts. There is too much concrete, concrete
walls, and artificial turf ruining our way of life. Rural areas should be
protected. Leave room for our Ranchers and families who enjoy Horses,
cows, 4H. Streamline review for multiple acre properties.
239.
reduce nuisance impacts and protect open space.
240.
Bottom line: If a SLGH is allowed/zoned in a residential neighborhood the
home owner and short term residents should abide by the rules set forth in
ARS Title 36. Can/will Maricopa County Zoning assume this responsibility?
Go Back to Question 9
10. In your opinion, how can zoning regulations improve quality
of life in rural and unincorporated areas?
Examples: Protect open space, ensure infrastructure access, preserve community
character, reduce nuisance impacts
154
September 22, 2025
241.
Field not completed
242.
STOP ALLOWING HALFWAY HOUSES IN FAMILY NEIGHBORHOODS-ZONING
SHOULD PROHIBIT CRIMINALS, ESPECIALLY PEDOPHILES FROM LIVING IN
FAMILY NEIGHBORHOODS WITH CHILDREN.
243.
Multiuse and verticle multiuse is a really underestimated and potentially
impactful solution for rural areas. For example, teachers could enjoy a
decent apaprtment above the grocery store or even health clinic, making it
easoer for rural communities to recruit teachers. In rural communities,
proximity isn't convenience, it's actually a necessity more often than not. So
while I'm not saying make a rural area dense, exactly, it may be worth it to
examine how to better leverage already existing infrastructure.
244.
Less is more in rural areas. For example zoning regulations for fencing in
the rural area is stupid. Stop allowing "subdivisions" and small lot
communities in rural and agricultural areas. Use infill incentives to keep
those developments closer to the cities where services are. Putting
subdivisions in the middle of the desert with no actual services increases
urban sprawl and destruction of the rural way of life.
245.
Keep the one acre rural areas. Don’t let other things, like data centers and
railroads bully there way in! Be strong!
246.
Infrastructure access needs to be defined. I support other items.
247.
DO NOT ALLOW BUILDING OF LARGE CORPORATED ENTITIES IN RURAL
AND UNICORPORATED AREAS
248.
Prevent fraudulent/nuisance complaints from repeat offenders. Our
neighbors and us have been getting multiple complaints only to have the
county come out and say "oh, you are fully compliant." It causes stress and
extra money for us. We believe that the complainant is trying to force us to
move. Yet we were told we can't do anything about people complaining over
and over again with almost the same verbiage.
249.
ensure residential lot coverage increased, improve neighborhood safety and
access, protect against zoning violators, control and plan to ensure mixed
use does not impact community character
250.
Leave people alone
251.
Zoning can improve quality of life in rural areas by balancing protection of
open space with the need for flexible housing options that allow residents to
stay in their communities. Allowing a range of home types, including ADUs
Go Back to Question 9
10. In your opinion, how can zoning regulations improve quality
of life in rural and unincorporated areas?
Examples: Protect open space, ensure infrastructure access, preserve community
character, reduce nuisance impacts
155
September 22, 2025
and smaller lot developments, will support intergenerational living, aging in
place, and ensure that rural residents also have access to homes that meet
their needs.
Go Back to Question 9
Comment ID
Date posted
User name
Feedback Type
Subject Area
Comment
Page of PDF
33
09/17/2025 - 10:54am
Tim Dickman
Comment
General
We live in a beautiful and diverse state. I really believe that zoning is best done by local cities and towns and not by the county or state. Even within
Maricopa county, forcing zoning on local cities and towns is just wrong. Look where it got us with short term rentals and the state preemptions!
1
60
09/21/2025 - 12:28pm
sarah
Comment
General
You should make the page #'s exactly what they are in the document, instead of what page it is in the "chapter or section. This would make it easier for
public to search and print from the document. Also, it should be searchable by keywords....
2
117
10/06/2025 - 2:25pm
Patricia DiRoss
Comment
Development Regulations -
WCF
Wireless Communication Facilities (WCF)
Chapter 129 – Development Regulations (PDF Pages 309-316)
Relevant Section:
· Section 902.2.5 (PDF page 10) . “Facilities for public safety agencies are exempt from the requirements of this Section.”
· Proposed feedback:
Revise to: “Facilities for federal and public safety agencies are exempt from the requirements of this Section.”
· Notes: Federal (SRP entity) versus state and local law governance. Local ordinances do not override federal jurisdiction.
4
118
10/06/2025 - 2:28pm
Patricia DiRoss
Comment
Development Regulations -
WCF
Relevant Section:
· 902.3.1 Location Sub-Item 1. Bullet item C (PDF page 310-311)
· Concern: “Towers and support structures shall have a maximum diameter of 30” inches (2.5 feet).
· Proposed feedback:
Revise to: “Towers and support structures shall have a maximum base diameter of 60 inches (5 feet) and a maximum top diameter of 42 inches (3.5 feet).”
· Notes: It is common for wireless facility poles to be tapered—wider at the base and narrower at the top. The current document references a 30-inch
diameter and the accompanying diagram shows this measurement at the top of the pole. However, it does not specify the diameter at the base, which
may be intentional. In practice, most tapered poles deployed for wireless infrastructure vary in range from 36 to 60 inches diameter at the base. As such,
the proposed diameter does not reflect the typical dimensions of commonly deployed poles and may need clarification or adjustment to accommodate
standard industry designs.
4
120
10/06/2025 - 3:13pm
Patricia DiRoss
Comment
Development Regulations -
WCF
Relevant Section:
· 902.3.1 Item 3 (PDF page 315-316), bullets a-d.
Diameter restrictions are not applicable to utility power infrastructure (e.g. transmission, distribution poles, etc.)
4
31
09/17/2025 - 10:44am
Nicholas Voss
Comment
General
Excellent!
7
72
09/24/2025 - 12:29pm
Jane Peiffer
Comment
Introductory - Purpose
I believe preventing overcrowding of land and undue congestion of population is an important factor in land use ordinances. Taking this out helps large
developers to put more in smaller spaces. It does nothing to actually protect the people who actual live here and live in rural areas specifically for
protection from overcrowding.
7
97
09/30/2025 - 11:02am
Elisa Navarette
Comment
Introductory - Purpose
I object to deleting this line, I think this should still be an objective. The zoning commission may be reconsidering the size and conditions of what can be
built on a piece of land but this should still be a consideration. Overcrowding contributes to traffic concerns, crime and other disturbances of the peace.
7
73
09/24/2025 - 12:41pm
Jane Peiffer
Question
Definitions
Why is Appeal being taken out? Will there no longer be a method for review of a lower decision without going to court? If there is a zoning ordinance
violation and the property owner thinks the decision is wrong will they have no recourse other than through the Courts?
11
167
10/17/2025 - 12:21pm
Autumn Johnson
Question
Definitions
Is the ordinance intended to cover residential and commercial/industrial batteries used primarily for on site purposes?
12
32
09/17/2025 - 10:50am
Nicholas Voss
Comment
Definitions
Security person does not need to register and obtain a DPS license (Guard Card).
15
63
09/23/2025 - 12:28pm
Jane Peiffer
Typo
Definitions
incorrect word; should read "public" not pubic
15
64
09/23/2025 - 12:34pm
Jane Peiffer
Comment
Definitions
I would like to see the word "landscaping" removed from this definition. General landscaping of a private property is no the same as the other activities in
the list.
18
119
10/06/2025 - 2:31pm
Wendy
Comment
Definitions
I think this is mispelled....Do you mean offal?
23
71
09/24/2025 - 12:23pm
Jane Peiffer
Typo
Definitions
Should there be a comma between the words rental and repair?
25
65
09/23/2025 - 12:52pm
Jane Peiffer
Question
Definitions
So if a parcel doesn't have "principal frontage upon a street" then what is it? Lots of parcels are accessed by easements or private drives.
29
98
09/30/2025 - 11:49am
Elisa Navarette
Typo
Definitions
Looks like there may be a comma missing after arranged.
29
MARICOPA COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE - DRAFT #1 PUBLIC REVIEW COMMENTS (KONVEIO)
66
09/23/2025 - 12:59pm
Jane Peiffer
Question
Definitions
Can this be made a list or with bullet points instead of one gigantic sentence? Such as saying measurements are made as follows:
For lots having front and rear lot lines that are parallel ....
For lots having front and rear lot lines that are NOT parallel ...
For triangle shaped lots ....
30
110
10/03/2025 - 10:13am
Jeff
Typo
Definitions
I do not believe this to be gramaticly correct.
32
67
09/23/2025 - 4:19pm
Jane Peiffer
Comment
Definitions
This title change doesn't make sense. Marijuana Use is an activity generally of the end user not the business selling it.
Marijuana Establishments and Dispensaries would be a better title since that is what is described.
Or Marijuana Business, but not Marijuana "use".
33
35
09/17/2025 - 11:32am
Michael Smith
Comment
Definitions
I appreciate the LEGAL nonconforming use as my property and residence was constructed in the 70s and it should not be incumbent on residents to make
their places current to regulations thereafter. Appreciate the grandfathering. At one point I intended to upgrade my property but when I went to county for
permits they expected me to pay thousands of dollars in fees from what the previous owner or owners had incurred. I simply could not afford to do that
and decided to leave everything as is and withdrew my permits.
34
68
09/23/2025 - 4:31pm
Jane Peiffer
Question
Definitions
Doesn't this undermine the new Accessory Dwelling Units regulations? If the main home is a triple wide manufactured home wouldn't a mobile home or a
single or double wide manufactured home count as an ADU?
It seems like this will create confusion unless there are size limits or better explanation of when this would be applicable as different than a primary
home/ADU
34
69
09/23/2025 - 4:36pm
Jane Peiffer
Comment
Definitions
Agree! This is absolutely needed and the specific label of "Legal" nonconforming use is a better phrase.
34
70
09/23/2025 - 4:47pm
Jane Peiffer
Comment
Definitions
After reading this out loud, it doesn't actually make sense.
Maybe insert the word "otherwise" after the red "that" before does not conform...
So it would read "The lawful use of any building, lot, parcel or tract of land existing at the time this Ordinance, or amendments thereto, become effective
that otherwise does not conform with the use regulation of the zoning district in which it is located"
34
169
10/17/2025 - 1:37pm
Susan Brenton
Question
Definitions
Why not use the same definition for Mobile Home/Manufactured Home Park as the state uses in the Mobile Home Parks Landlord Tenant Act: a mobile
home park is any parcel of land that contains FOUR or more mobile home spaces.
34
75
09/24/2025 - 12:55pm
Jane Peiffer
Typo
Definitions
Should there be a semicolon after music but before zoo?
35
76
09/24/2025 - 1:02pm
Jane Peiffer
Comment
Definitions
County parks often have rental pavillions, sports fields and other areas. Wouldn't that be considered commercial as they are transactional arrangements?
I think you should strike the words "non-commercial" and "not-for-profit." If someone wants to use their land as a private park type space they should be
allowed to do so.
36
77
09/24/2025 - 1:26pm
Jane Peiffer
Comment
Definitions
"for individuals with limited mobility" is poor restriction definition. Anyone could say they have limited mobility. Perhaps it should read more along the
lines of: "for vehicles that possess a state issued ADA/Handicap license plate or window placard and possessing an occupant with limited mobility."
36
78
09/24/2025 - 1:42pm
Jane Peiffer
Comment
Definitions
Not all access easements are roads. Utility access easements are not roads, they are specific limited access to the easement holder. If two neighbors
have an access easement for the furthest third neighbor that is not a "road" but more of a private driveway limited to the three properties and not to the
public in general such that a road provides. Not all private roads or easements have "right-of-way" lines either.
40
79
09/24/2025 - 2:01pm
Jane Peiffer
Comment
Definitions
This is a ridiculous restriction and is overly intrusive. Let the HOAs or the CCRs enact restrictions on "community / subdivisions" but leave the rest of us
alone. I should be able to have a garage sale or home party as often as I see fit, so long as traffic doesn't impact my neighbors and sale items are not
creating a littering or trash problem.
A good compromise might be to say 1 weekend per month, not to exceed 24 individual days in one year.
40
10
09/15/2025 - 3:49pm
Jean
Comment
Definitions
this addition to "but not including" is not clear as the same institutions are listed in the first sentence defining "School"
41
80
09/24/2025 - 2:33pm
Jane Peiffer
Question
Definitions
Couldn't this definition be eliminated since there are already definitions for Private School and Public School? Or could they be combined as a School
general definition and then sub listing between public and private? Seems overly redundant.
Additionally, why would a business colleges and trade or vocational schools be excluded? These would often offer multiple "branches" of learning and
course selections. Why are preschools, nursery schools and nurseries listed as both schools and then later excluded under the "not including" list?
41
81
09/24/2025 - 2:37pm
Jane Peiffer
Comment
Definitions
"Future right-of-way line" as a restriction is unduly burdensome on the property owner. The county should either acquire the right-of way and maintain it,
or it should not count against the property owner. The County should not be able to say "well, we might want a road there in the future so you can't use xxx
feet of the property you pay taxes on."
41
82
09/24/2025 - 2:38pm
Jane Peiffer
Comment
Definitions
object to "future right-of-way line" here as well.
41
147
10/13/2025 - 12:09pm
James Carpentier
Comment
The methodology to measure sign should be included in the sign regulation section of the code.
42
148
10/13/2025 - 12:11pm
James Carpentier
Comment
The section that includes the level 1 to 4 levels of operation should be include in the sign code section that regulates EMDs.
42
83
09/24/2025 - 2:45pm
Jane Peiffer
Typo
Definitions
Missing a comma. "A sign, except billboard signs, portraying..."
43
168
10/17/2025 - 12:26pm
Autumn Johnson
Question
Definitions
Should these definitions be modified to apply only to utility scale projects?
45
11
09/15/2025 - 3:54pm
Jean
Typo
Definitions
correction eliminating "of" and replacing with "or" appears to be the wrong instance as the next use of "of" should be changed to "or":
Uses of properties that maintain "or" enhance .....
46
99
09/30/2025 - 12:15pm
Elisa Navarette
Typo
Definitions
This should maybe have an "or" between maintain & enhance instead.
46
34
09/17/2025 - 11:22am
Michael Smith
Comment
Definitions
What is purpose of yard sales not to exceed 6 a year? There is a widow about a mile from us who has a garage sale every weekend. I would hope the
county is not going to bear harm upon her when her sole income is social security. If it taxes county is after, maybe clarify this.
47
84
09/24/2025 - 2:56pm
Jane Peiffer
Comment
Definitions
I completely agree. This restriction is an excessive intrusion by the county.
47
30
09/17/2025 - 10:42am
Michael Smith
Typo
Definitions
Utility Treatment page 48 ... treatment is not spelled correctly
48
100
09/30/2025 - 12:21pm
Elisa Navarette
Comment
Definitions
It seems that this could be limiting alternative energy generation technologies that we don't currently use in large quantities but that may be used in the
future. Could this be reworded as such: "Facilities designed to generate and distribute energy (e.g. electrical, nuclear, solar, etc. )..."
48
85
09/24/2025 - 3:06pm
Jane Peiffer
Comment
Definitions
The original edit "...or their duly authorize representative." is better than the newer/longer update. Or you could change representative (singular) to the
plural form if the Director is likely to designate/authorize multiple people for various functions (i.e., one per district or for different types of
permits/violations, etc.)
51
86
09/24/2025 - 3:16pm
Jane Peiffer
Comment
Administration
The chart above says Extensions to Temporary Use Permits are under the Decision Authority of the Board of Adjustment. But this paragraph says its the
Planning and Zoning Commission.
52
87
09/24/2025 - 3:26pm
Jane Peiffer
Comment
Administration
Isn't there a further appeal if Planning and Zoning Commission denies an application? I realize there is only so many spaces on the chart/columns but
there has to be a way to add the actual appeal step. Could the parenthetical of "(Upon Administrative Denial)" be added to the Decision Authority under
the "(Upon Opposition Received)"
52
88
09/24/2025 - 3:31pm
Jane Peiffer
Comment
Administration
All sections under this Planning and Zoning Commission relate to Temporary Use Permits and contain no other functions assigned to the Planning and
Zoning Commission. The Chart on page 52 clearly indicates that they have many functions. Shouldn't those functions also appear here? Or is there a
later section where the other functions are discussed and where these can be listed as part of the "complete" list of functions and authority.
52
74
09/24/2025 - 12:51pm
Jane Peiffer
Question
Administration
The chart on the previous page (52) says that requests for extensions for Temporary Use Permits are heard by the Board of Adjustment. This section
indicates that they will by heard by Planning and Zoning Commission. Should these match or is there two separate hearings/a possibility for an appeal
from Board of Adjustment to the Planning and Zoning Commission?
53
17
09/16/2025 - 12:18pm
Brittany C
Comment
Administration - Zone Change Consider increasing to 30 days, 15 is insufficient for today's fast paced lives
57
18
09/16/2025 - 12:19pm
Brittany C
Comment
Administration - Zone Change Consider increasing to 1,000 ft. That's not a far distance when considering the impact of rezoning
57
19
09/16/2025 - 12:19pm
Brittany C
Comment
Administration - Zone Change Consider increasing to 1,000 ft. That's not a far distance when considering the impact of rezoning
57
89
09/24/2025 - 4:23pm
Jane Peiffer
Comment
Administration
Love this addition of "clearly visible for the nearest public right-of-way...in order to ensure visibility." So many times the area of proposed change in the
unincorporated area is away from a roadway as an addition to a different development area. Requiring signage near an actual road is a great step in the
right direction!
57
90
09/24/2025 - 4:28pm
Jane Peiffer
Comment
Administration
Agree! Or some proportional increase in distance based on the size of the area of the application. 300' for 5 acres, 1000' for 5-20 acres, 2000' for 20-50
acres, etc. The larger the area of the proposed change the larger the potential future effect on the area so the larger the notification area should be also.
57
91
09/24/2025 - 4:33pm
Jane Peiffer
Comment
Administration
If the notification area is increased then this sentence could read "within the notification area or a reasonable proximity to the subject property..." If
someone is outside the 300' (or whatever distance line) by 20' or even 100' they should still be heard and considered the same as someone withing the
distance line.
57
20
09/16/2025 - 12:20pm
Brittany C
Comment
Administration - Zone Change 15 days is insufficient considering busy schedules and lifestyles. 30 days allows public to take part in the process. Consider increasing
58
21
09/16/2025 - 12:20pm
Brittany C
Comment
Administration - Zone Change Consider increasing to 30 days
58
22
09/16/2025 - 12:21pm
Brittany C
Comment
Administration - Zone Change 300 ft is not far enough considering the impact of rezoning. Consider 1000 ft
58
23
09/16/2025 - 12:21pm
Brittany C
Comment
Administration - Zone Change Consider increasing to 1000 ft
58
24
09/16/2025 - 12:21pm
Brittany C
Comment
Administration - Zone Change Consider increasing to 1,000 ft
58
92
09/24/2025 - 5:17pm
Jane Peiffer
Comment
Administration
The effects of changes in zoning are much further reaching the the closest 300'. This should be expanded.
58
101
09/30/2025 - 12:32pm
Elisa Navarette
Comment
Administration
I don't think newspapers reach the general public anymore, even with online digital versions as these often require subscriptions. While I don't think we
should place undue burden on applicants to reach those in the area of concern, I do think there should be a more reliable way, possibly direct mailing or
social media.
58
93
09/24/2025 - 5:22pm
Jane Peiffer
Comment
Administration
Amendments initiated by the Commission should also be held to the same public notice procedures, not just public hearing requirements. I would add
the words "notice and" between public -- hearing.
59
111
10/03/2025 - 10:26am
Jeff
Comment
Administration
What are you saying here? By deleting any rule to notify neighbors of a zoning change for any category?
59
154
10/16/2025 - 3:57pm
Jane Peiffer
Typo
Typo - remove the "e" from "maye"
59
121
10/06/2025 - 4:13pm
Wendy
Comment
Administration
Should reduction in permitted uses be in here?
60
123
10/06/2025 - 4:59pm
Jane Peiffer
Question
Administration
What about private individuals who are interested in changes and developments in their communities but are not part of an "interest group"? Can those
folks sign up the same way to get notified?
61
155
10/16/2025 - 4:20pm
Jane Peiffer
Typo
Administration
typo "maye" should be may
62
156
10/16/2025 - 4:27pm
Jane Peiffer
Question
Administration
Why would major plan amendments to a Unit Plan of Development be held to a lower review standard than a major plan amendment to a Special Use
Permit? Would the impacts of a major plan amendment on a Unit Plan of Development have more and longer lasting impacts on an area than that of a
Special Use Permit area? All "major plan amendments" should be treated the same.
63
157
10/16/2025 - 4:32pm
Jane Peiffer
Question
Administration
If a major plan amendment can be approved administratively by the planning and development department, why does a minor amendment only get a
"Staff will recommend approval, approval subject to conditions, or denial." Can minor plan amendments actually be administratively approved by staff?
What happens after staff recommendations? What is the process after that? The Major plan amendment section above lists the process but this one only
lists a recommendation stage.
63
158
10/17/2025 - 11:04am
Andrew Yancey
Comment
Administration - POD Process
We suggest eliminating or extending the POD expiration provisions. At a minimum, the POD should be valid for at least 3 years and not have any limit on
the number of extensions that can be approved by staff. In addition, the POD applicant should be able to request a longer expiration as part of the POD
application. An example of this approach can be found in Buckeye's proposed zoning ordinance update (set for City Council hearing on 10/21):
"Approval of a Site Plan shall be effective for three years, unless otherwise stated in such approval. The validity period may be administratively extended
an additional 12 months from the date of expiration if, in the opinion of the Zoning Administrator, unforeseen circumstances led to the delay in
construction of the project. Though there is no limit on the number of extensions that may be granted, approval of any extension is discretionary and may
be based on factors
including, but not limited to, the Site Plan is no longer in conformance with updated or revised City codes and/or other requirements."
68
164
10/17/2025 - 12:04pm
Autumn Johnson
Comment
Administration - POD Process
Article 305.4.2 – Plan of Development (Site Plan) Expiration
The current two-year expiration period, with only a single one-year extension, is insufficient for solar projects, which often experience extended
development timelines due to utility coordination and other regulatory processes. The expiration period should be lengthened—or eliminated entirely—for
solar projects, and applicants should be permitted to obtain an unlimited number of extensions as needed.
68
25
09/16/2025 - 4:53pm
Matt Evans
Comment
Zoning Districts - R2
R-2, under Definitions, it appears that min lot is 6k sf but min lot area says 1,000 sf.
92
26
09/16/2025 - 5:05pm
Matt Evans
Comment
Zoning Districts - Development
Standards
For R-5 max height, 48 feet would be more appropriate and this tends to align with City of Phoenix. This density allowance requires 4 stories of height to
achieve the density. 3-story multifamily typically maxes out at 30 units per acre once setbacks, open space, parking, and landscaping are site planned.
Each floor is typically 10 ft and plus an allowance for attic trusses on the top floor for a flat roof with parapet; or a pitched roof.
93
27
09/16/2025 - 5:09pm
Matt Evans
Comment
Zoning Districts - Development
Standards
R-4 at this density is around 21.8 units per acre. This category would benefit from an allowance of 30 units per acre (min lot area would equal 1,450 sf per
unit). The height allowance works for 3-story multifamily.
93
96
09/29/2025 - 10:26am
Andrew Yancey
Comment
Zoning Districts - Purpose
Industrial
New IND-2 landscaping/buffering requirement should not apply to utility-scale solar and BESS projects. These projects are low-water use by nature, and
irrigation requirements should not apply. They are also typically in more remote areas where such screening does not serve a practical purpose. In
addition, standard industrial screening in these areas can appear unnatural and out of character - natural desert is generally much more consistent with
the area's character.
104
102
09/30/2025 - 3:08pm
Elisa Navarette
Comment
Industrial - Development
Standards
I think requiring landscaping that in effect requires water usage needs to be reconsidered. While I agree with rain gardens and other methods of helping to
slow rainwater runoff to prevent erosion and to recharge aquifers, I don't think we should require water usage for the sake of landscaping when we are still
trying to figure out how to supply water for the residents and agriculture. This should only be required to the extent that it will cause the property to match
the surroundings. In other words, if there is residential on one side, then facing that side there should be landscaping so as to not devalue or take away
aesthetically from that neighborhood.
104
103
09/30/2025 - 3:11pm
Elisa Navarette
Comment
Industrial - Development
Standards
Should this not also reference "OUTDOOR LIGHT CONTROL PROVISIONS ARTICLE 1112.1.PURPOSE: These provisions are intended to control the use of
outdoor artificial illuminating devices emitting rays into the night sky which have a detrimental effect on astronomical observations. It is the intention of
this Ordinance to encourage good lighting practices such that lighting systems are designed to conserve energy and money, while increasing nighttime
safety, utility, security and productivity."
104
104
09/30/2025 - 3:12pm
Elisa Navarette
Comment
Industrial - Development
Standards
Shouldn't this also reference "OUTDOOR LIGHT CONTROL PROVISIONS ARTICLE 1112.1.PURPOSE: These provisions are intended to control the use of
outdoor artificial illuminating devices emitting rays into the night sky which have a detrimental effect on astronomical observations. It is the intention of
this Ordinance to encourage good lighting practices such that lighting systems are designed to conserve energy and money, while increasing nighttime
safety, utility, security and productivity."
104
162
10/17/2025 - 11:20am
Chinedu Oputa
Comment
Industrial - Development
Standards
I recommend that the IND-2 landscaping/buffering requirement should not apply to utility-scale solar and BESS projects
104
165
10/17/2025 - 12:10pm
Autumn Johnson
Comment
Industrial - Development
Standards
Article 506 – Landscaping and Buffering
The landscaping and buffering requirements for industrial districts are not appropriate for solar projects and impose unnecessary costs given the large
land area such projects typically cover. Solar projects should be exempt from these industrial landscaping and buffering standards.
If a full exemption is not adopted, there should at least be a mechanism allowing staff to administratively approve alternative approaches for remote
projects, similar to the process proposed by the City of Buckeye. Additionally, any irrigation requirements would undermine one of the key environmental
benefits of solar facilities—their inherently low water use.
104
113
10/03/2025 - 10:58am
Jeff
Comment
Zoning Districts
You are efectively deleting all zoning calasifications
108
114
10/03/2025 - 10:59am
Jeff
Comment
Zoning Districts
All these difinitions are being deleted and changed to a confusing chart.
118
12
09/16/2025 - 11:58am
Carolina
Question
Zoning District Use Table
What is the definition of "exotic" or "wild"? Are alpacas exotic? Are Zebus exotic? Is an untrained BLM mustang straight from holding "wild"? All of those
are currently happening in rural zones.
131
94
09/29/2025 - 10:19am
Andrew Yancey
Comment
Zoning District Use Table
Please clarify that 500' is measured to the existing residential structure.
152
105
09/30/2025 - 3:30pm
Elisa Navarette
Comment
Zoning District Use Table
Please make sure there is consideration for any occupied or non-occupied property zoned as residential.
152
124
10/10/2025 - 11:30am
Ty Utton
Comment
Zoning District Use Table
The proposed 500-foot separation between BESS installations and residential areas is excessive and not justified by fire codes or prevailing industry
standards. A more reasonable, performance-based setback framework with flexibility for mitigation would better balance safety and development needs.
152
151
10/14/2025 - 3:35pm
Cepand Alizadeh
Comment
Zoning District Use Table
While we appreciate the county’s proactive approach to revising and updating its zoning ordinance, the setback requirements in the draft amendments
raise significant concerns within the industry and merit reconsideration. The proposed 100-foot setback from property lines and 500-foot setback from
existing residences are excessive and unsupported by BESS-specific impact data. Such restrictions could limit available land, particularly in urban and
infill areas, forcing developers to abandon otherwise viable sites and slowing deployment of critical clean energy infrastructure. More onerous setbacks
can also drive up land acquisition and engineering costs. This could make projects financially unfeasible, especially for smaller-scale or community-based
initiatives.
Community safety would be protected and practical deployment supported through a more balanced approach, such as a 150-foot setback combined
with appropriate screening, fire safety and sound attenuation measures.
152
166
10/17/2025 - 12:15pm
Autumn Johnson
Comment
Zoning District Use Table
Article 601 – Setbacks
It is recommended that the ordinance reference the most recent versions of UL 9540 and the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 855 to ensure
consistency with current national safety standards. The American Planning Association (APA) has found that the national average for BESS-specific
setbacks ranges from 50 to 150 feet from property lines. While NFPA 855 recommends 100 feet, we recommend that Maricopa County adopt a maximum
setback of no more than 150 feet measured from the structures themselves rather than from the property line, consistent with the Phoenix Regional
Standard Operating Procedures for Battery Energy Storage Systems.
Setbacks should be measured from the BESS equipment, not the property boundary. This approach would align Maricopa County’s ordinance with
national standards, strengthen regulatory defensibility, and ensure that safety requirements are proportionate to actual risk rather than imposing arbitrary
distances that could either under- or over-regulate BESS facilities.
Modern BESS projects are subject to updated safety standards and design improvements that address issues identified in earlier systems. The American
Clean Power Association (ACP) provides a helpful FAQ regarding battery safety and air emissions, noting that the average emissions rates of equivalent
masses of plastics exceed those of batteries. Following the Moss Landing incident, sampling conducted by the Environmental Health Division and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) found “no threat to human health or the surrounding environment.”
All forms of electricity generation and energy storage carry some degree of risk; however, battery incidents account for only about 2 percent of
installations nationwide. Setbacks for BESS should therefore not be more restrictive than those applied to comparable energy infrastructure, such as
substations.
152
106
09/30/2025 - 3:34pm
Elisa Navarette
Comment
Zoning District Use Table
I think this should also include a stipulation such as this one: "*Include the distancing of 100' from property lines and 500' from existing residential uses."
164
61
09/22/2025 - 9:26pm
Mark Beck
Comment
Accessory Use Standards
Does this include Tesla Powerwall or other residential storage system?
It seems that this should be written to exclude individual or residential battery storage systems.
175
149
10/13/2025 - 5:18pm
Patricia DiRoss
Comment
Accessory Use Standards
A 100-ft set back from the property line is significant. Looking at existing projects in Maricopa County a typical setback is between 30-60 ft. If possible, it
would be beneficial to have a 50-ft setback requirement from property line.
175
152
10/14/2025 - 3:36pm
Cepand Alizadeh
Comment
Accessory Use Standards
As stated earlier in my prior comment on the proposed draft document, we appreciate the county’s proactive approach to revising and updating its zoning
ordinance. That said, the setback requirements in the draft amendments raise significant concerns within the industry and merit reconsideration. The
proposed 100-foot setback from property lines and 500-foot setback from existing residences are excessive and unsupported by BESS-specific impact
data. Such restrictions could limit available land, particularly in urban and infill areas, forcing developers to abandon otherwise viable sites and slowing
deployment of critical clean energy infrastructure. More onerous setbacks can also drive up land acquisition and engineering costs. This could make
projects financially unfeasible, especially for smaller-scale or community-based initiatives.
Community safety would be protected and practical deployment supported through a more balanced approach, such as a 150-foot setback combined
with appropriate screening, fire safety and sound attenuation measures.
175
159
10/17/2025 - 11:17am
Chinedu Oputa
Comment
Accessory Use Standards
I appreciate the City’s commitment to ensuring public safety in the siting of Battery Energy Storage Systems. However, I encourage the City to reconsider
the proposed fixed setback distances of 100 feet from property lines and 500 feet from residential uses, as these standards are overly rigid and do not
account for evolving technology, proven mitigation measures, or the performance-based framework established under NFPA 855 and UL 9540A testing
protocols.
National and state agencies are moving away from one-size-fits-all setbacks toward flexible, risk-based approaches that evaluate each project’s design,
chemistry, enclosure type, and fire-protection features. A fixed 500-foot setback can make otherwise safe, well-designed projects infeasible especially in
industrial or utility corridors without necessarily improving safety outcomes.
I recommend that the City adopt language that:
Allows performance-based or site-specific alternatives when supported by UL 9540A test data, thermal/radiant heat-flux modeling, or other engineering
analyses demonstrating equivalent safety.
Recognizes the role of fire-rated barriers, active suppression systems, and access design in achieving safe separation distances.
Encourages early consultation with the Fire Department or AHJ to evaluate alternative compliance pathways under NFPA 855 Section 4.3 (“Equivalency”).
Adopting a performance-based setback framework would maintain public safety while enabling more efficient land use, better integration with existing
infrastructure, and broader deployment of clean-energy storage projects that benefit the community.
175
172
10/17/2025 - 6:11pm
Jason Burwen
Comment
Accessory Use Standards
The proposed setback requirements are in conflict with the rigorous, risk-informed methods established in the National Fire Protection Association 855
Standard for the Installation of Stationary Energy Storage Systems. Conflicting local requirements could cause unintended confusion and may not achieve
the intended result of enhanced safety for Maricopa County residents. We recommend the ordinance remain consistent with the NFPA 855 standard and
its methods for ensuring public safety, including in equipment setback and spacing.
In addition, any new ordinance should clearly grandfather projects with existing permit actions, ensuring they remain subject to the prior setback
standards. This is important to preserve fairness and regulatory certainty for projects already well advanced in local permitting and to ensure Maricopa
County continues to be viewed as a reliable and predictable jurisdiction for investment in critical energy infrastructure.
175
160
10/17/2025 - 11:18am
Chinedu Oputa
Comment
Accessory Use Standards
The draft does not include provisions to allow BESS as an accessory use when located on the same parcel and under the same ownership as a permitted
principal use (e.g., solar or industrial generation sites).
I would recommend the inclusion of this provision.
176
107
09/30/2025 - 3:44pm
Elisa Navarette
Comment
PAD
Would like to see an additional requirement that they explain how they are demonstrating "sustainable development."
185
122
10/06/2025 - 4:22pm
Wendy
Comment
UPD
Why are we requiring any specific findings here? Aren't you subjecting yourself to a potential issue if the findings are not clear enough.
189
116
10/03/2025 - 11:17am
Jeff
Comment
Wickenburg Highway Scenic
Corridor
This is a mistake. This will not go over well with the community. You are deleting the senic coridor from rockaway hills south.
199
108
09/30/2025 - 3:51pm
Elisa Navarette
Comment
Wickenburg Highway Scenic
Corridor
Would like to see a provision for lighting to protect the wildlife in this area. "Mitigating these effects requires using shielded fixtures, warm light, and
dimming lights to necessary levels, as well as limiting light trespass and skyglow, according to the National Park Service."
202
112
10/03/2025 - 10:51am
Jeff
Comment
Wickenburg Highway Scenic
Corridor
Why get rid of this survey?
207
36
09/18/2025 - 12:22pm
Patricia DiRoss
Comment
Overlay Zoning Districts
SRP is an overhead distribution company. I would like to propose amended language such as: “While undergrounding is the standard, exceptions may
apply, particularly for SRP-led and funded projects.”
208
28
09/16/2025 - 5:31pm
Matt Evans
Comment
General Regulations - Parking
Requirements
Suggest basing this on unit type/number of bedrooms. City of Phoenix standards work well in the general market. Perhaps 1.25 per studio or 1 bedroom,
1.75 per 2 bedroom, 2 per 3 bedroom unit.
This allows for adequate resident and guest parking based on a particular project's unique unit mix.
Mandating reserved guest parking creates logistical and practical issues for a rental community. Policing who is and who is not a guest is extremely
difficult to manage. It is better to leave the parking space allocations to the property management and owner.
256
13
09/16/2025 - 12:01pm
Carolina
Question
General Regulations -
Transportation and Future
ROW
Is this information accessible to Civil Engineers? How can we determine setbacks along section lines, half section lines, quarter section lines...
265
109
10/02/2025 - 11:23am
Elisa Navarette
Comment
Transportation, Access and
ROW
This seems like a large jump in allowable expansion that could impact housing, it seems like there should be a threshold over which any impacted
neighborhoods should have an opportunity to weigh in.
265
115
10/03/2025 - 11:04am
Jeff
Comment
Transportation, Access and
ROW
This should not be deleted, exhisting wording is more clear.
265
62
09/22/2025 - 10:19pm
Mark Beck
Comment
General Regulations - Height
Regulations
This section regarding SVT is overly restrictive to development in Desert Hills. There are literally hundreds of non-conforming instances including public
roadways where this condition is not met. Additionally, based on living with conditions where the 25x25 SVT from right of way or easement is not met, I do
not expect that traffic collisions or an impact to traffic safety can be attributed to not having this requirement.
Perhaps reducing to edge of pavement in rural areas would keep this from being overly burdensome and precluding reasonable development of rural,
single family homes.
271
14
09/16/2025 - 12:02pm
Carolina
Question
General Regulations - Fences,
Walls, and Retaining Walls
Electric fencing is quite common to contain livestock in rural zoning. Is there an exception for that?
273
145
10/13/2025 - 11:57am
James Carpentier
Comment
Development Regulations
Electronic message displays should also be listed since they do not require shielding.
282
146
10/13/2025 - 12:02pm
James Carpentier
Comment
Development Regulations
Exemptions from section 12.7.2 should be allowed for businesses that are open past 11:00 pm.
283
15
09/16/2025 - 12:04pm
Carolina
Comment
Development Regulations -
Hillside
Lots in rural zoning are usually larger and often require up to 1:40 scale to depict the whole property. Although not expressed previously in the zoning
ordinance, this has been accepted practice
308
16
09/16/2025 - 12:08pm
Carolina
Comment
Development Regulations -
Hillside
The 25' interval requirement seems excessive. Although not expressed previously in the zoning ordinance, showing less than 25' intervals (usually two
cross sections per building only) has been accepted practice.
308
29
09/16/2025 - 5:56pm
Matt Evans
Comment
Development Regulations -
Mobile Home Park
Suggest not defining the average width with a minimum since this restricts product type that may have dimensions different from the standard double-
wide.
The minimum 3,000 sf per unit seems reasonable.
316
95
09/29/2025 - 10:21am
Andrew Yancey
Comment
Development Regulations -
Renewable Energy
Please clarify that lot coverage exemption applies to BESS in addition to solar panels.
337
161
10/17/2025 - 11:19am
Andrew Yancey
Comment
Development Regulations -
Renewable Energy
We propose adding a new Section 906.3.4 with the following text to address specific perimeter treatment issues for solar and BESS projects: "Alternatives
to wall, buffer, and landscaping requirements for industrial districts may be approved by the Planning and Development Department as part of a POD
application for a utility-scale solar generation, BESS, or other renewable energy system project based on the use’s low visibility from public view, remote
location, or where wall, buffer, or landscaping alternatives would be consistent with the character of the surrounding area."
Renewable energy projects are often located in remote areas where screening requirements do not provide any tangible benefit. Due to the size of many
energy projects, these requirements can be quite costly and can often be counterproductive by introducing more manmade apparatuses in areas
characterized by native desert landscape and vegetation. Further, one of the benefits of solar and BESS projects is that they do not require water use;
therefore, adding in an irrigated landscaping requirement cuts against this low-water benefit.
337
163
10/17/2025 - 11:21am
Andrew Yancey
Comment
Development Regulations -
Renewable Energy
This approach would also be similar to the County's proposal to allow staff to administratively reduce certain parking requirements where an applicant
can demonstrate such modification is warranted.
337
170
10/17/2025 - 4:27pm
Sarah Sawyer
Comment
Signs
Suggesting a revision to this provision to increase clarity on what can be sought with an SUP:
1301.1.21. Billboard(s) subject to the following*
1. The billboard(s) is a lawfully existing structure made legal-nonconforming as of December 15, 2021 with regard to the requirements of Chapter 14 of
this Ordinance.
a. The billboard is located in a C-2, C-3, IND-2 or IND-3 zoning district.
b. The billboard may be modified or converted to digital display with a Special Use Permit. A Special Use Permit may be obtained to vary the following
development standards for digital billboards:
i. The distance of radial separation between billboards located 3 miles or greater from the boundary of any incorporated city or town, pursuant to
Section1403.3.1.A.1.a.
ii. The distance of radial separation between billboards located fewer than 3 miles from the boundary of any incorporated city or town, pursuant to
Section 1403.3.1.A.1.b.
iii. The distance from a residential zoning district boundary or a parcel boundary of a residential use in a rural zoning district, pursuant to Section
1403.3.1.B.1.
iv. The distance of a digital or illuminated billboard from a residential zoning district boundary or a parcel boundary of a residential use in a rural zoning
district, pursuant to Section 1403.3.1.B.2.
v. The distance from a park, school, or roadside rest area, pursuant to Section 1403.3.1.B.3.
vi. The distance of a digital billboard from an existing billboard, pursuant to Section 1403.3.1.J.1.ii.
vii. The distance of a digital billboard from the boundary of an incorporated city or town, pursuant to section 1403.3.1.J.1.i.
viii. The distance of a digital billboard from an existing freeway’s main travel lanes, pursuant to section 1403.3.1.J.1.ii.
c. If illuminated the billboard shall be digital or lighting shall be mounted at the top of the sign face so that it is directed downward and shielded so that it
is only illuminating the sign face in conformance with Article 1112.3.2.
d. The Special Use Permit may be approved without an expiration date or validity period.
349
125
10/13/2025 - 9:52am
James Carpentier
Comment
Signs
Exemptions of this nature may be considered content regulation in conflict with Reed vs. Town of Gilbert. If you contact me, I will send some
complimentary resources.
366
126
10/13/2025 - 9:55am
James Carpentier
Comment
Signs
The methodology to measure the .3 foot-candle brightness should be included. Contact me for the resource that outlines this methodology.
367
127
10/13/2025 - 9:59am
James Carpentier
Comment
Signs
Section 5. is not reasonable since every sign will increase the ambient light intensity. We suggest that a reasonable enforceable illumination standard be
established for static signs.
367
128
10/13/2025 - 10:10am
James Carpentier
Comment
Signs
The removal of the sign 30 days after continual use is not reasonable. Additional time needs to be allowed.
368
129
10/13/2025 - 10:14am
James Carpentier
Comment
Signs
We recommend avoiding content regulation of this nature to avoid potential conflict with Reed vs. Town of Gilbert.
369
130
10/13/2025 - 10:19am
James Carpentier
Comment
Signs
Directory signs should be regulated in a content neutral manner without reference to content such as a minor sign with time, place and manner
regulations.
369
131
10/13/2025 - 10:31am
James Carpentier
Comment
Signs
We recommend that RE signs be regulated in a content neutral manner. Rather than pertaining to during the sale or listing. Another option is to describe
the sign type such as post sign with a sample image along with time, place and manner requirements.
373
132
10/13/2025 - 10:34am
James Carpentier
Comment
Signs
This also contains content regulation and should refer to during construction rather than identifying. As an option describe the sign type and include
reasonable time, place and manner restrictions.
374
133
10/13/2025 - 10:38am
James Carpentier
Comment
Signs
We recommend that sign regulations be by district rather than use and not include the term identifying since this may be considered content regulation.
378
134
10/13/2025 - 10:44am
James Carpentier
Comment
Signs
The wall sign area needs to consider and allow for additional sign area for double frontage parcels and corner parcels.
381
135
10/13/2025 - 10:47am
James Carpentier
Comment
Signs
A permitter wall sign should not be included in the allowances for wall signs. These are two separate sign types.
381
136
10/13/2025 - 10:50am
James Carpentier
Comment
Signs
We recommend that the sign regulations be by district rather than use to avoid content regulation.
382
137
10/13/2025 - 10:51am
James Carpentier
Comment
Signs
We recommend that w2.wa. be eliminated since this is content regulation.
382
138
10/13/2025 - 10:53am
James Carpentier
Comment
Signs
We recommend that 2.2.1. be eliminated since this is content regulation.
382
139
10/13/2025 - 10:54am
James Carpentier
Comment
Signs
We recommend that the allowable sign area for canopies not be included in the allowable sign area for wall signs.
382
140
10/13/2025 - 10:59am
James Carpentier
Question
Signs
This sign type is not intended to be legible from the street. What is the purpose to have this sign type screened from the ROW?
383
141
10/13/2025 - 11:04am
James Carpentier
Comment
Signs
We recommend that this section refer to drive through facilities rather than restaurants to avoid content regulation.
383
142
10/13/2025 - 11:22am
James Carpentier
Question
Signs
Section 3. is not clear what shall not exceed 50% of the gross sign area?
384
150
10/14/2025 - 6:54am
Deacon Wardlow
Comment
Signs
I recommend caution when releasing code with specifications which could create a "sole source' directive effectively giving a single manufacturer a
monopoly in the area. The specific build stated in Chapter 11, section J, part 2 refers to a patented configuration which is solely owned by Watchfire Signs
(https://www.watchfire.com/digital-billboard-light-mitigation).
As this part of the code is written it could be in violation of the Sherman Act and Clayton Act. Brightness and display management is well addressed
elsewhere in section J and the easiest way to avoid future conflict/issues would be to remove this section as the rest of the code regarding Digital
Billboards is well considered.
389
171
10/17/2025 - 4:29pm
Sarah Sawyer
Comment
Signs
We suggest the following revision to this provision, to correct the grammar of the provision:
Section 1403.3.1.J: General provisions applicable to digital billboards:
1. Digital billboards shall be permitted if:
i. Located fewer than 3 miles from the boundary of an incorporated city or town; or
ii. If within 300 feet of and oriented towards an existing freeway’s main travel lanes as classified by Maricopa County as of December 15, 2021.
389
143
10/13/2025 - 11:41am
James Carpentier
Comment
Signs
This section needs to accommodate double frontage or corner lots with similar standards.
391
144
10/13/2025 - 11:43am
James Carpentier
Comment
Signs
The allowable area for this sign type should be encouraged by not including the sign type with the allowable sign area for walls.
392
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the
county.
From:
Adam Cannon (PND)
To:
Rhonda Buss
Cc:
Karen Dada
Subject:
RE: Maricopa County Zoning Code Draft Update
Date:
Thursday, October 16, 2025 3:40:00 PM
Attachments:
image001.png
Thank you Rhonda!
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner
Planning & Development
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003
O: 602-372-0292
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov
[ Maricopa.Gov ]
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and
development for the next decade and beyond. Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be
heard!
Additionally, the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance is being updated. Visit MCZO Update to learn more and comment on
changes to the ordinance.
From: Rhonda Buss <rbuss@azland.gov>
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2025 1:52 PM
To: Adam Cannon (PND) <Adam.Cannon@maricopa.gov>
Cc: Karen Dada <kdada@azland.gov>
Subject: Maricopa County Zoning Code Draft Update
Dear Adam, Thank you for the County’s red-lined draft Zoning Code update and for taking the time to discuss our questions. ASLD offers initial comments (attached) on the draft. All page numbers referenced are from the PDF of the document. ASLD
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Dear Adam,
Thank you for the County’s red-lined draft Zoning Code update and for taking the time
to discuss our questions. ASLD offers initial comments (attached) on the draft. All
page numbers referenced are from the PDF of the document. ASLD continues to
review the draft and may provide additional comments later.
We are happy to discuss any of our comments. Please feel free to contact us if the
County has any comments or questions.
We appreciate our continued partnership in the planning of STL.
Thank you,
Rhonda Buss, AICP
Planner III
1110 W. Washington St
Phoenix, AZ 85007
602-542-3126
land.az.gov | Facebook | Twitter/X
Zoning Code Update Review
Comment Form
Name: Rhonda Buss
Email: rbuss@azland.gov
Title and Organization: Planner III, ASLD
#
Document Location
Concerns/Comments
Comment
Number
Provide specific information
where your comment applies,
e.g., section, page #, and
goal/policy number
ASLD concern/comment.
1
All page numbers referenced below
are from the PDF of the document.
ASLD offers the comments below.
1. The graphics are extremely helpful, making the document more user friendly!
2. PDF page numbers are referenced.
3. Consider including density transfers by right in the zoning code to implement the
County’s Comp. Plan goals.
4. Please provide a red-lined version of the 2nd draft.
2
Definitions, Industrial Center, Page
28
Consider broadening the definition to include multiple industrial zoning districts. There may be
related less intensive support businesses that could create a buffer between a primary use and
adjacent development.
3
Definitions, Principal Building, Page
37
Small typo in “Building.”
4
Definitions, Utility Treatment, Page
48
Small typo in “Treatment”
Zoning Code Update Review
Comment Form
#
Document Location
Concerns/Comments
5
Article 504 Commercial Zoning Dist.
Standards, Page 100
Step-backs could potentially be utilized for a more gradual transition and less visual massing
from the street level. Consider a higher lot coverage percentage in the C-O District to achieve
this.
6
Article 504 Commercial Zoning Dist.
Standards, Page 100
Contemplate a higher lot coverage percentage in the C-S District to help meet sustainability
goals.
What does the implementation of pad sites look like given the 50-foot setback in C-S?
7
Industrial Zoning Dist. Standards,
Height, Page 104
Advanced manufacturing requires greater height maximums. Consider a higher maximum or
establishing a process for administrative approval for greater heights.
8
Chapter 6 Use Table, Commercial
Educational, Pg. 130
Perhaps educational training could a be permitted use in C-1.
9
Chapter 6 Use Table, Commercial
Food and Beverage, Pg. 132
Consider including Food and Beverage, Ice Cream Shops, as a permitted right in the C-S, C-1, C2,
C3 zoning districts.
10
Chapter 6 Use Table, General Retail,
Pg. 135
It seems like indoor general retail use could be allowed in the both C-S and C-1 districts.
11
Chapter 6 Use Table, Light Retail, Pg.
138
Light retail services as a permitted use in C-S & C-1 is supported.
12
Chapter 6 Use Table, Art Galleries,
Banks & Financial Institutions, Book
and Stationary Shops, Pg. 138
Art Galleries, Banks & Financial Institutions, Book and Stationary Shops could be supported in C-
S.
13
Chapter 6 Use Table, Office, Page
141
Office use by right is supported in C-O.
Zoning Code Update Review
Comment Form
#
Document Location
Concerns/Comments
14
Chapter 6 Use Table, Professional
Office, Page 142
Professional Office use by right is supported in C-O, C-S, C-1, C-2, C-3.
15
Chapter 6 Use Table, Plant nurseries
and greenhouses (wholesale only) &
Plant Nurseries, Page 144
Wholesale plant and nurseries/Retail Plant Nurseries are commercial uses than residential.
Should these uses be an unpermitted use in R1-35, R1-18, R1-10, R1-8, R-2, R-3, R-4, R-5?
16
Chapter 6 Use Table, BESS & Data
Centers, Page 152
BESS and Data Center uses are generally passive uses once constructed. Consider including
BESS and Data Center uses in C-2 and IND-1 subject to a POD.
17
Chapter 7 Overlay Zoning Districts,
Highway 74 Scenic Highway; Pages
206 &208
Page 206 & 208: A 75-foot average and 50-foot minimum setback is quite large. Please retain the
density bonus to accommodate the setbacks, height limits, and other restrictions.
18
Chapter 8 General Regulations,
Parking Requirements Table– Article
802.1, Page 256
Consider adding a caveat that allows for parking to be determined by a parking study. New
technologies/innovations (car sharing, scooters, bikeshare, deliveries, etc.) may reduce the need
for vehicles/parking.
19
Chapter 8 General Regulations,
Article 901.1, Page 306
…contained within the building envelop and leach fields should be contained on-site.
20
Chapter 9 Dev. Standards, Section
906.2.2, Page 337
…accessory use within the IND 2 and IND-3 zoning district…
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the
county.
From:
Eric Kriwer
To:
Rachel Applegate (PND)
Cc:
Robert Olmstead
Subject:
RE: [EXTERNAL:] MCZO Update - BESS Facilities - Emergency Fire Evaluation
Date:
Wednesday, October 22, 2025 3:13:59 PM
Attachments:
image002.png
image003.png
Good afternoon Rachel,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback on the draft update. My apologies for the delayed
response. I currently serve as the Assistant Chief of Logistics, and while I am no longer the Fire
Marshal, Deputy Chief Olmstead now serves as our code official and reports directly to me. He can
provide additional technical feedback as needed. I am still engaged in discussions on renewable
energy and codes when I am available.
Professionally, I am in full support of the proposed separation requirements outlined in the draft—
specifically the 100-foot setback from all lot lines and the 500-foot minimum separation from
residential structures. I would recommend clarifying that the 500-foot distance be measured from
the residential lot line rather than the structure itself.
These standards represent a prudent and safety-focused approach that balances community
protection with responsible energy development. The proposed setbacks provide critical buffer
zones that mitigate risks from potential thermal events, toxic off-gassing, and other hazards
associated with large-scale BESS installations.
Thank you again for including us in this important discussion. Please don’t hesitate to reach out if
further clarification or collaboration is needed.
Best regards,
Eric
Eric Kriwer
Assistant Chief
Arizona Fire & Medical Authority
18818 N. Spanish Garden Dr.
Sun City West, AZ 85375
Phone: 623-544-5400
www.afma.az.gov
From: Rachel Applegate (PND) <Rachel.Applegate@Maricopa.Gov>
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2025 6:51 AM
To: Eric Kriwer <EKriwer@AFMA.Az.gov>
Cc: Rachel Applegate (PND) <Rachel.Applegate@Maricopa.Gov>
Subject: [EXTERNAL:] MCZO Update - BESS Facilities - Emergency Fire Evaluation
WARNING: This email originated from outside of AFMA. DO NOT respond, click links or open attachments unless
you can verify this outside sender and trust that the content is safe.
Good morning Eric,
We currently are working on the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance update and are
requesting your evaluation and analysis on Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) facilities.
As part of the update to the Ordinance we have included BESS as new emerging technology
with a recommendation to establish safety regulations for BESS facilities to include a 100’
from all lot lines and 500’ minimum separation from battery enclosures from residential
structures.
As part of this process for public input we have received several comments from energy
generation industry representatives regarding the inclusion of setback and separation distance
from residential uses.
Historically, Planning and Development has been including the 100’ setback from lot lines and
500’ distance from existing residential uses with proposed BESS facilities as part of the zone
change with overlay as conditions of approval. Planning & Development as part of entitlement
review started evaluating the battery structures with a minimum setback of 100’ from lot lines
to isolate the structure for emergency firefighting staging and refuge area. The 500’ separation
is for life safety issues with potential toxic fumes and noxious/poisonous fumes in the event of
a fire can dissipate in the air prior to reaching residential sites. Planning & Development will
refer to the regulatory fire agency for review/comment with these applications.
We like to receive your thoughts or comments on the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance
Update – Draft version 1 with your expertise and safety standards regarding the proposed 100’
and 500’ minimum separation.
You are welcome to comment on the MCZO Update – Draft Version 1 – BESS is listed in the
Definition section (Chapter 2, page 3) and located within Chapter 6 – use Table (Chapter 6,
page 27). We are also working with the consultant to update the language for version 2 of the
Ordinance to include the following language:
603.10. - Battery Energy Storage Systems - Include the distancing of 100' from all lot
lines and 500' minimum separation for battery enclosures from residential structures.
We currently have the public comment period open until 10/17 on our website to comment on
version 1, but you are welcome to provide input/comment or share with other fire district
representatives. We are planning on taking version 2 of the Ordinance to the November 6th
Planning & Zoning Commission.
If you could provide us your feedback and input, that will assist in evaluating the setback and
separation for emergency response as part of the draft language to present to the Planning &
Zoning Commission and Board of Supervisors.
Thank you in advance for your assistance. Please feel free to contact me if you have any
questions.
Rachel Applegate
Planning Supervisor
Planning & Development
301 W. Jefferson St. Suite 170 Phoenix, AZ 85003
O: 602-372-0318
[ Maricopa.Gov ]
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and
development for the next decade and beyond. Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be
heard!
Additionally, the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance is being updated. Visit MCZO Update to learn more and comment on
changes to the ordinance.
This message is intended only for the named recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), you are
notified that the dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you receive
this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the sender either at the above e-mail
address or telephone the Arizona Fire & Medical Authority (AFMA) at (623) 544-5400. Thank You.
To ensure compliance with Arizona's open meeting laws, members of the North County, South County
and/or Arizona Fire & Medical Authority's Board of Directors who have received this message may reply
directly to the sender but must not correspond with or send a copy of their reply regarding this message to
any other members of their respective Board(s). Recipients of this message who are not Board members
must not forward this message to any of the North County, South County or AFMA Board Members.
www.ariseia.org
7144 E. Stetson Dr., Suite 300
Scottsdale, AZ 85251
1
October 17, 2025
Maricopa County
Planning and Development Department
301 W. Jefferson Street, Suite 170
Phoenix, AZ 85003
RE: MZCO Update Draft #1 comments as to renewable energy and battery storage
Dear Supervisors, Commissioners, and Staff,
The Arizona Solar Energy Industries Association (AriSEIA) is the State’s solar, storage, and
electrification trade association. We are active on energy policy issues at every level of
government in Arizona. We have previously engaged on the City of Eloy, Mohave County, City
of Mesa, City of Buckeye, Town of Chino Valley, Navajo County, Apache County, Town of
Gila Bend, City of Surprise, and Yavapai County solar/storage ordinances. While we made
comments into the online draft document, please find our consolidated comments on the draft
below:
Article 305.4.2 – Plan of Development (Site Plan) Expiration
The current two-year expiration period, with only a single one-year extension, is insufficient for
solar projects, which often experience extended development timelines due to utility
coordination and other regulatory processes. The expiration period should be lengthened—or
eliminated entirely—for solar projects, and applicants should be permitted to obtain an unlimited
number of extensions as needed.
Article 506 – Landscaping and Buffering
The landscaping and buffering requirements for industrial districts are not appropriate for solar
projects and impose unnecessary costs given the large land area such projects typically cover.
Solar projects should be exempt from these industrial landscaping and buffering standards.
If a full exemption is not adopted, there should at least be a mechanism allowing staff to
administratively approve alternative approaches for remote projects, similar to the process
proposed by the City of Buckeye. Additionally, any irrigation requirements would undermine
one of the key environmental benefits of solar facilities—their inherently low water use.
Article 601 – Setbacks
Tying the ordinance to the most recent versions of UL 9540 and National Fire Protection Agency
(NFPA) 855 is recommended. The American Planning Association found the national setback
average for BESS-specific setbacks was 50-150 feet from property lines.1 While the NFPA
recommends 100’, we recommend no more than 150’ from the structures (not the property line)
based on the Phoenix Regional Standard Operating Procedures Battery Energy Storage Systems
1 American Planning Association, Zoning Practice, P.10 (Mar. 2024), available here https://planning-org-uploaded-
media.s3.amazonaws.com/publication/download_pdf/Zoning-Practice-2024-03.pdf
2
policy.2 Also, the setbacks should be measured from the BESS equipment, not the BESS
property line. This would align Maricopa County’s ordinance with national standards, improve
regulatory defensibility, and ensure that safety requirements scale appropriately with actual risk
rather than imposing arbitrary limits that could either under- or over-regulate BESS facilities.
Additionally, modern BESS projects are subject to new and updated safety standards and codes
that have addressed and corrected issues found in earlier system design. The American Clean
Power Association (ACP) provides a helpful FAQ that covers questions about battery safety and
air emissions.3 ACP also has a Claims v. Facts one-pager on battery safety, included again as
Attachment A. “It should also be noted that the average emissions rates of equivalent masses of
plastics exceed those of batteries.”4 Additionally, sampling was done by the Environmental
Health Division and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) after the Moss Landing
incident and “no threat to human health or the surrounding environment” was found.5 All
electricity generation and energy storage creates some amount of risk. However, battery
incidents represent only 2% of battery installations.6 Setbacks for batteries should not be more
onerous than setbacks for other energy infrastructure, such as substations. ACP’s model BESS
ordinance is included as Attachment B.
Applicability
Your current battery energy storage system (BESS) definition does not exempt distributed
projects. If the ordinance is intended to only apply to utility scale projects, we suggest you make
that explicit. A sample definition is below:
Battery Energy Storage System (BESS):
A facility that stores electrical energy in battery cells or modules for later use in providing
electricity to the grid or enhancing the reliability and efficiency of the electric system. A BESS
includes all associated structures, equipment, and controls necessary for safe and effective
operation.
For purposes of this ordinance, a BESS shall be considered utility-scale when designed for
wholesale energy market participation or grid services and when not primarily intended to serve
on-site end-use load. Residential, commercial, and industrial systems installed behind the
customer meter or serving on-site consumption shall be considered distributed generation and
are exempt from this definition.
2 City of Phoenix, Battery Energy Storage Systems, April 2023, available here
https://www.phoenix.gov/firesite/Documents/205.20A%20Battery%20Energy%20Storage%20Systems.pdf.
3 American Clean Power Association, Energy Storage: Safety FAQ, available here https://cleanpower.org/wp-
content/uploads/gateway/2023/07/ACP-ES-Product-4-BESS-Safety-FAQs-230724.pdf.
4 Consolidated Edison and NYSERDA, Considerations for ESS Fire Safety, Feb. 9, 2017, at iii, available here
https://www.nyserda.ny.gov/-/media/Project/Nyserda/files/Publications/Research/Energy-Storage/20170118-ConEd-
NYSERDA-Battery-Testing-Report.pdf.
5 County of Monterey, Air Quality Testing Information and Process During Moss Landing Fire Incident, Sept. 30,
2022, available here https://www.countyofmonterey.gov/Home/Components/News/News/9345/1336.
6 California Public Utility Commission, Energy Storage Procurement Study: Safety Best Practices, 2023, available
here https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/-/media/cpuc-website/divisions/energy-division/documents/energy-storage/2023-05-
31_lumen_energy-storage-procurement-study-report-attf.pdf.
3
Similarly, you have three different definitions of solar. These should also be revised and the
ordinance should make it clear that the ordinance is intended to only apply to utility scale
projects. A sample definition is below:
Solar Energy Facility (Utility-Scale):
A facility that converts sunlight into electrical energy using photovoltaic or concentrated solar
technologies and delivers that energy to the electric transmission or distribution grid for
wholesale market participation or sale to a utility. A solar energy facility includes all associated
equipment, such as panels, inverters, racking systems, transformers, access roads, and
maintenance buildings.
This definition applies only to utility-scale solar installations. It excludes solar energy systems
installed for on-site use or self-consumption, such as residential, commercial, or industrial
distributed generation located behind the meter or designed to offset the energy use of the
property on which it is installed.
Waiver Provision
The ordinance should include a waiver provision in the event a project proposal conflicts with
some component of the ordinance, but is otherwise an ideal site. The City of Eloy Solar and
BESS Ordinance includes such a provision.7 We recommend adding language such as that
included in 21-3-1.39(B) of Eloy’s ordinance. A waiver provision gives the city the flexibility
when special circumstances and safety demand.
Other
As discussed above, the NFPA 855 provides recognized industry best practices for BESS.
Incorporating NFPA 855 by reference into this ordinance will provide Maricopa County with clear,
nationally recognized metrics on maximum system capacity, hazard mitigation, emergency
response, and decommissioning.
Thank you for your time and consideration and we look forward to continuing to engage with the
County on this ordinance as the stakeholder process progresses.
Respectfully,
Autumn Johnson
Executive Director
AriSEIA
(520) 240-4757
autumn@ariseia.org
7 Eloy Ordinance, 21-3-1.39, available here https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/eloyaz/latest/eloy_az/0-0-0-9381.
ATTACHMENT A
Claims vs. Facts: Energy Storage Leading on Safety December 2023
cleanpower.org
Energy Storage Leading on Safety
Utility-scale battery energy storage is safe and highly regulated,
growing safer as technology advances and as regulations adopt the
most up-to-date safety standards.
CLAIM: The incidence of battery fires is increasing.
FACTS: Energy storage battery fires are decreasing as a
percentage of deployments.
• Between 2017 and 2022, U.S. energy storage deployments
increased by more than 18 times, from 645 MWh to 12,191 MWh1,
while worldwide safety events over the same period increased
by a much smaller number, from two to 122.
• During this time, codes and standards regulating energy storage
systems have rapidly evolved to better address safety concerns.
CLAIM: Today’s larger battery systems use tens of
thousands of cells, so fires are inevitable.
FACTS: Cell failure rates are extremely low, and
safety features in today’s designs further reduce the
probability of fires.
• One estimate from 2012 quotes a failure rate ranging from 1 in
10 million to 1 in 40 million cells3, and there are undoubtedly
improvements from these levels.
• Lithium-ion batteries experience extremely low failure rates, as
shown by electric vehicle data.
• Tesla alone sold nearly 900,000 vehicles in the first half of
20234. These sales of new vehicles represent around three-
quarters of a billion cells, but safety events involving all EVs
on the road globally, from all manufacturers, amounted to
just a few dozen fires.
• Today’s energy storage systems (ESSs) predominantly use
safer lithium-iron phosphate (LFP) chemistry, compared with
the nickel-manganese-cobalt (NMC) technology found in EVs.
• LFP cell failure results in less energy release and a lower
probability of fire.
• ESS designs incorporate features to avoid propagation of cell
failure within the battery, contributing to improved safety.
Claims vs. Facts
Background
Energy storage systems (ESS) are critical to a clean and efficient electric grid, storing clean energy and enabling its use when it
is needed. Installation is accelerating rapidly—as of Q3 2023, there was seven times more utility-scale energy storage capacity
operating than at the end of 2020. This growth is driving job creation, investment in American manufacturing, and is improving
grid resilience and energy security.
However, because energy storage technologies are generally newer than most other types of grid infrastructure like substations
and transformers, there are questions and claims related to the safety of a common battery energy storage technology, lithium-
ion (Li-ion) batteries. All of these questions and claims can be addressed with facts. The industry continues to address these
concerns to ensure community confidence in this increasingly essential electric grid infrastructure.
1 US Energy Storage Monitor, Q1 2023 full report and 2022 Year in Review, Wood Mackenzie Power & Renewables/American Clean Power Association,
https://www.woodmac.com/industry/power-and-renewables/us-energy-storage-monitor/
2 Electric Power Research Institute, BESS Failure Event Database, https://storagewiki.epri.com/index.php/BESS_Failure_Event_Database
3 D. Doughty, Vehicle Battery Safety Roadmap Guidance, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, October 2012, https://doi.org/10.2172/1055366.
4 EV sales: Hyundai overtakes GM, but Tesla’s U.S. dominance continues
Photo credit: Fluence
Photo credit: Fluence
Claims vs. Facts: Energy Storage Leading on Safety December 2023
cleanpower.org
CLAIM: E-bike and e-scooter fires have resulted in
deaths—so large batteries for energy storage may be even
more deadly.
FACTS: No deaths have resulted from energy storage
facilities in the United States. Battery energy storage
facilities are very different from consumer electronics, with
secure, highly regulated electric infrastructure that use
robust codes and standards to guide and maintain safety.
• E-mobility devices have been lightly regulated in the past,
and some products have used poor-quality battery cells and
ineffective safety systems.
• They are also charged inside homes, sometimes along egress
routes, creating a high level of risk.
• Like EV batteries, ESS battery systems are highly regulated
and subject to stringent certification and testing requirements.
• The difference in regulation is evident in vehicle statistics.
Worldwide, for the first half of 2023, EV FireSafe cites 500+
light electric vehicle (E-bike and E-scooter) battery fires, but
only 44 passenger EV fires5.
• Additionally, utility-scale energy storage systems are located
within secure facilities with site plans explicitly designed
around maximizing safety of those operating the facilities
and their neighbors.
• The ESS industry meets with and shares best practices with
first responders and communities.
• Lessons learned from earlier ESS incidents have been
reflected in the evolution of codes and standards. Often,
companies go beyond mandatory testing to test more
extreme failure scenarios.
• Altogether, like other electric grid infrastructure, energy storage
systems are highly regulated and there are established safety
designs, features, and practices proven to eliminate risks to
operators, firefighters, and the broader community.
• The industry is committed to meeting these standards, such
as NFPA 855, which are regularly updated to reflect the latest
evidence-based best practices.
CLAIM: Battery fires emit toxic fumes and pose a risk to
the community
FACTS: Past incidents demonstrate that fires
are contained within the facility, and air quality in
neighboring areas remains at safe levels.
• Laboratory testing of emissions from Li-ion cells in thermal
runaway shows that emissions are similar to those found in
plastics fires6.
• During an ESS battery fire, only trace amounts of chemicals are
detected in sampling around the event, and overall air quality
remains at safe levels.
• During a fire at a Tesla Megapack at Moss Landing in California,
air-quality testing showed no hazards to human health7.
CLAIM: Fire suppression systems should be mandatory
for all lithium-ion battery systems.
FACTS: Regulations that aren’t vetted by organizations
like the National Fire Protection Association or are
inconsistent with the International Fire Code may make
projects less safe.
• Established national and international codes and standards
already require BESS to incorporate the appropriate safety
features to contain any potential fires or thermal events.
• Successful suppression of a fire does not guarantee that the
underlying thermal runaway event has been terminated, so
containing a fire is the best way to protect first responders and
communities.
• The energy storage industry is working to avoid events such as
the explosion at an installation in McMicken, Arizona, in which
four firefighters were injured8. Prior to this event, the industry
was focused on extinguishing fires as quickly possible, but
McMicken showed that explosion can be a greater hazard and
fire containment is a better strategy.
• The accepted best practice for the rare ESS fires that do occur
is to contain them, managing the burn of the limited affected
unit in a controlled manner while protecting nearby structures
and equipment. This strategy eliminates any explosion hazard,
avoids issues with stranded energy and reignition, and
minimizes contaminated runoff of firefighting water.
• Codes and standards are changing to reflect this practice,
placing an emphasis on explosion prevention. One proposal
for the 2026 edition of NFPA 855, Standard for the Installation
of Stationary Energy Storage Systems, would forbid installation
of traditional clean-agent or aerosol fire suppression systems
unless testing demonstrates that use of such systems does not
create an explosion risk.
5 EV FireSafe, All Electrified Transport LIB Fire Incidents, Global, 1st January to 30th June 2023, https://www.evfiresafe.com/ev-battery-fire-overview.
6 DNV-GL, Considerations for ESS Fire Safety, Report for Consolidated Edison and NYSERDA, 2017
7 Air quality testing showed no hazards to human health amid battery fire in Moss Landing
8 Arizona ESS Explosion Investigation and Line of Duty Injury Reports Now Available
Photo credit: AES
ATTACHMENT B
Utility-Scale
Battery Energy
Storage Systems
MODEL ORDINANCE
MODEL ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE FRAMEWORK
American Clean Power Association
The American Clean Power Association (ACP) is the leading voice of today’s multi-tech clean
energy industry, representing over 800 energy storage, wind, utility-scale solar, clean hydrogen
and transmission companies. ACP is committed to meeting America’s national security,
economic and climate goals with fast-growing, low-cost, and reliable domestic power.
About this Document
This document is intended to provide guidance to local governments considering developing an
ordinance or rules related to the development of utility-scale battery energy storage systems. The
recommendations and considerations included in this framework draw from a variety of sources
including: national fire safety standards, guidance established by national energy laboratories,
and existing state laws and local regulations.
The American Clean Power Association supports the adoption of NFPA 855, the national fire
protection safety standard for grid-connected energy storage. This safety standard, developed by
firefighters, fire protection professionals, and safety experts, provides comprehensive
requirements and guidance on the design, installation, and operation of energy storage facilities
for all site and community contexts.
Instructions for Use
This document is designed to inform the development of individual ordinances or state
regulations to guide the development of utility-scale energy storage facilities. It may not be
appropriate for the Model Ordinance to be adopted precisely as it is written. It is intended to be
advisory, and users should not rely upon it as legal advice. Local government officials are urged
to seek legal advice from their attorneys before enacting a battery energy storage system
ordinance. Local governments must consider how the language in this Model Ordinance may or
should be modified to suit local conditions, comprehensive plans, existing land use and zoning
provisions.
Table of Contents
Model Ordinance
I.
Definitions & Applicability
II.
Land Use & Siting Standards
III.
Permitting & Environmental
Compliance
IV.
Safety & Certifications
V.
Decommissioning
Appendices
VI.
Resources
a. NFPA 855 Overview
b. Template Emergency Response Plan
c. First Responders Guide to BESS
VII.
Glossary of Terms
Section I: Definitions & Applicability
A. Definitions
"Energy Storage" means any technology that is capable of absorbing electricity, storing
the electricity for a period of time, and redelivering the electricity.
"Battery Energy Storage System" (BESS) means electrochemical devices that charge, or
collect, energy from the grid or a generation facility, store that energy, and then discharge
that energy at a later time to provide electricity or other grid services.
“National Fire Protection Association” (NFPA) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to
eliminating death, injury, property, and economic loss due to fire, electrical, and related
hazards. Established in 1896, the NFPA develops and publishes over 300 consensus
codes and standards intended to minimize the risk and effects of fire by establishing
criteria for building, processing, design, service, and installation in the United States and
internationally. The NFPA’s mission extends beyond code development; it also focuses on
research, training, education, and advocacy to promote safety and preparedness.
“National Electric Code” (NEC) also known as NFPA 70, is a set of standards for the safe
installation of electrical wiring and equipment in the United States. Its primary purpose is
to ensure the safety of electrical installations by setting forth requirements to protect
people and property from electrical hazards. The NEC covers the installation of electrical
conductors, equipment, and raceways; signaling and communications conductors and
equipment; and fiber optics. It is updated every three years to incorporate new
technologies and improve safety measures
“NFPA 855” the Standard for the Installation of Stationary Energy Storage Systems,
provides comprehensive guidelines for the safe installation of stationary energy storage
systems (ESS), including those using lithium batteries. This standard addresses various
aspects of installation to mitigate fire and explosion risks associated with energy storage
technologies. It covers topics such as system design, construction, operation, and
maintenance to ensure safety and reliability.
“UL 9540” is a standard for Energy Storage Systems (ESS) and Equipment. It is designed
to ensure the safety of these systems and covers their construction, performance, and
testing requirements. UL 9540 certification is essential for verifying that energy storage
systems, such as batteries and related equipment, meet rigorous safety standards to
prevent hazards related to electrical, mechanical, and environmental conditions.
B. Applicability
The requirements of this ordinance shall apply to all battery energy storage systems with
a rated nameplate capacity of equal to or greater than 1,000 kilowatts (1 megawatt).
The requirements of this ordinance shall apply to all battery energy storage systems
permitted and installed in [County/Village/Town/City] after the effective date of this
ordinance.
This ordinance does not extend to the general maintenance and repair of battery energy
storage systems permitted, installed, or modified prior to the effective date of this
ordinance.
C. Application Approval
Applications for permits shall be approved in accordance with Section [XXX] of
[County/Village/Town/City] ordinances.
D. Timeline for Review and Approval
The [County/Village/Town/City] shall complete an initial review of the application to
determine compliance with the requirements established within this ordinance and shall
provide written approval or issue a notice of deficiency within 30 days of receipt of the
application.
The notice of deficiency must include a list of each requirement included in this ordinance
with which the applicant has not sufficiently demonstrated compliance and issue a
recommendation for achieving sufficient compliance.
If no written approval or notice of deficiency is provided within 30 days of receipt of the
application, the application shall be considered approved.
Section II: Land Use & Siting Standards
A. Land Use Zones
Battery energy storage systems that comply with the requirements established in this
ordinance shall be permitted in all land use zones.1
Agricultural: Permitted-by-Right
1 Land Use Zoning defini'ons differ between local jurisdic'ons, so it is important for each community to assess the
right process for permi;ng energy storage across zones. Because ba?ery energy storage technologies are uniquely
flexible and modular, they can be safely sited within any land use context. In some contexts, ba?ery energy storage
systems, which serve as cri'cal grid infrastructure and present minimal impacts to adjacent land, can be sited by
right – this includes land use zones being u'lized primarily for agricultural, industrial, and commercial func'ons.
Energy infrastructure, like substa'ons, are seamlessly integrated into these zones.
Other zones may present contextual considera'ons that local jurisdic'ons may wish to consider, thus ba?ery
energy storage facili'es may be subject to discre'onary permi;ng in public, mixed use, and residen'al zones.
However, similar to transformers and distribu'on transmission lines, energy storage facili'es can provide cri'cal
services while safely opera'ng in these land use zones. Ba?ery energy storage systems may also provide important
services, such as lowering electricity costs, to residences as part of community energy infrastructure, or provide
reliability-focused services to other cri'cal infrastructure such as hospitals,
Industrial: Permitted-by-Right
Commercial: Permitted-by-Right
Public & Institutional: Discretionary Permit
Mixed Use: Discretionary Permit
Residential: Discretionary Permit
B. Setbacks
Battery energy storage systems shall comply with NFPA 855 requirements related to
setbacks and buffers.2
An applicant may request a waiver of these requirements under circumstances that an
engineered solution may satisfy setback requirements outlined in NFPA 855.
C. Lighting Requirements
Battery energy storage systems shall comply with NFPA 855 requirements related to
lighting. 3
Lighting requirements applicable to other infrastructure within the
[County/Village/Town/City], or requirements specified in state statute or code for
electrical infrastructure are appropriate to apply to BESS so long as they do not conflict
with NFPA 855.
D. Security and Screening
Battery energy storage systems shall have a perimeter fence of at least 7 feet in height,
consistent with requirements established in NFPA 70.4
Battery energy storage systems shall also comply with specifications established in NFPA
855 relating to barriers and buffering.5
2 NFPA 855 includes specifica'ons for setbacks and buffering between the energy storage system and property
lines, buildings, and other poten'al exposures. These distances are determined based on type and size of the
energy storage system, its energy capacity, and the surrounding environment.
3 NFPA 855 and NFPA 70 iden'fies ligh'ng requirements for energy storage systems. These requirements are
designed to ensure adequate visibility for safe opera'on, maintenance, and emergency response. Ligh'ng
provisions typically cover areas such as access points, equipment loca'ons, and signage. The specific ligh'ng
requirements may vary depending on factors such as the size and configura'on of the energy storage system, as
well as the surrounding environment.
4 NFPA 70 requires all large electrical installa'ons, including u'lity-scale energy storage systems, to have a
perimeter fence of at least 7 feet to prevent unauthorized access to the facility.
5 NFPA 855 and NFPA 70 includes requirements for security and barriers to enhance the safety and protec'on of
energy storage systems. These requirements are aimed at preven'ng unauthorized access, as well as containing
and securing the site. Security barriers may involve measures such as fencing, gates, locks, access controls, and
E. Auditory Requirements
The average noise generated from the battery energy storage systems, components, and
associated ancillary equipment, measured at the nearest building, lot line that can be
built upon, or public way, shall not exceed any auditory limits established for each land
use zone.6
Section III: Permitting & Environmental Compliance
A. Site Plan Applications
A site plan application shall include the following information:
1. Property lines and physical features, including roads, for the project site.
2. Proposed changes to the landscape of the site, grading, vegetation clearing and
planting, exterior lighting, and screening vegetation or structures.
3. Zoning district designation for the parcel(s) of land comprising the project site.
B. Special / Conditional Use Permits
Applications for special use or conditional use permits shall be considered and approved
in accordance with Section [XXX] of [County/Village/Town/City] ordinances.
C. Environmental Compliance
An applicant shall comply with, and receive the necessary permits for, relevant state
environmental and wildlife laws prior to commencing construction and operation of the
battery energy storage system.7
D. Review of Augmentation Plans
Battery energy storage system applicants may include a plan for periodic augmentation
to maintain the capacity of the system or nominally increase the capacity of the system
for approval as part of the site plan application.
surveillance systems. Some barriers may be designed to compartmentalize and contain the energy storage system
and in the rare case an incident occurs on site. The specific requirements for security and fire barriers outlined in
NFPA 855 may vary depending on factors such as the size, type, and loca'on of the energy storage system.
6 BESS have demonstrated minimal or limited auditory impact on adjacent proper'es. At close distances, sound
caused by BESS can range from 60 to 80 decibels, equivalent to the sound of a conversa'on (60db) and the sound
of being inside a car (80db). Beyond property lines, and with the setbacks and screening specifica'ons in NFPA 855,
neighboring proper'es should experience minimal impact. For more informa'on, consult the Pacific Northwest
Na'onal Laboratory publica'on on Energy Storage in Local Zoning Ordinances.
7 During normal opera'ons, ba?ery energy storage systems do not create any emissions or discharge any
pollutants. During rare instances of an incident or opera'onal errors, NFPA 855 details requirements related to the
containment of any poten'al hazards, including spill control measures. Historical inves'ga'ons into the effects of
fire-related incidents have determined there were no harmful levels of toxins detected at the site, adjacent
proper'es, and there was no risk to the broader community.
The owner of an operating battery energy storage system shall provide notice to the
[County/Village/Town/City] at least 90 days prior to the commencement of augmentation
activities at the site of the battery energy storage system.
The owner shall also provide an updated site plan that identifies any changes resulting
from augmentation of the battery energy storage system. Augmentation modifications
that require the issuance of a building permit may be considered under the special /
conditional use permitting process in accordance with Section [XXX] of
[County/Village/Town/City] ordinances.
Section IV: Commissioning, Safety Standards & Certifications
A. Commissioning Plan
Prior to issuance of a building permit, battery energy storage system Applicants shall
submit a commissioning plan that contains:
4. A electrical diagram detailing the battery energy storage system layout,
associated components, and electrical interconnection methods, with all National
Electrical Code compliant disconnects and over current devices.
5. A preliminary equipment specification sheet that documents the proposed battery
energy storage system components, inverters and associated electrical
equipment that are to be installed. A final equipment specification sheet shall be
submitted prior to the issuance of the building permit.
6. Name, address, and contact information of proposed or potential system installer
and the owner and/or operator of the battery energy storage system. Such
information of the final system installer shall be submitted prior to the issuance of
building permit.
7. A commissioning report meeting the requirements of NFPA 855 section 6.1.5 shall
be submitted prior to final inspection.
B. Safety Requirements
Battery energy storage systems shall comply with the latest published version of the
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 855, Standard for Installation of Stationary
Energy Storage Systems, at the date of the submission of the application.8
Prior to issuance of a building permit, battery energy storage system Applicants are
required to:
8 NFPA 855: is the standard developed by the Na'onal Fire Protec'on Associa'on (NFPA) that addresses the design,
installa'on, and opera'on of energy storage systems (ESS). The purpose of NFPA 855 is to ensure the safety of ESS
installa'ons and provides prescrip've requirements including, but not limited to: site plans, equipment designs
and specifica'ons, fire protec'on, emergency response, training, maintenance, tes'ng and cer'fica'ons. Local
jurisdic'ons can comprehensively address safety by simply requiring applicants to comply with the latest version of
NFPA 855. The Interna8onal Fire Code (IFC) is harmonized with NFPA 855.
i.
Submit an emergency response plan as an appendix to the project application.
ii.
Submit a plan as an appendix to the project application for offering site-specific
training to the fire service and emergency personnel of jurisdiction prior to
commencing operation.
iii.
Conduct hazard mitigation analyses if specified by NFPA 855.
C. Equipment Certification
All batteries integrated within the battery energy storage system shall be listed under UL
1973. The battery energy storage system shall be listed in accordance with UL 9540,
either from the manufacturer or by field evaluation.9
Section V: Decommissioning
A. Decommissioning Plan
A decommissioning plan that is consistent with agreements reached between the
applicant and other landowners of participating properties and that ensures the return of
all participating properties to a useful condition, including removal of above-surface
facilities and infrastructure that have no ongoing purpose, shall be provided by the
applicant.
The decommissioning plan shall include, but is not limited to, financial assurance in the
form of a bond, a parent company guarantee, or an irrevocable letter of credit, but
excluding cash, to be determined by applicant. The amount of the financial assurance
shall not be less than the estimated cost of decommissioning the energy facility, after
deducting salvage or recycling value, as calculated by a third party with expertise in
decommissioning, hired by the applicant.
However, the financial assurance may be posted in increments as follows:
i.
At least 25% by the start of full commercial operation.
ii.
At least 50% by the start of the fifth year of commercial operation.
iii.
100% by the start of the tenth year of commercial operation. (s) Other information
reasonably required by the commission.
9 UL 9540 Cer8fica8on: When a ba?ery energy storage system is listed under UL 9540, it means that it has been
tested and cer'fied by a Na'onally Recognized Tes'ng Laboratory (NRTL) to meet the safety requirements outlined
in UL 9540, which specifically covers energy storage systems and equipment. This cer'fica'on indicates that the
ba?ery has undergone rigorous tes'ng to ensure it meets safety requirements related to fire, electrical, and other
poten'al hazards associated with energy storage systems. UL 9540 lis'ng provides assurance to consumers,
regulators, and insurers that the ba?ery meets recognized safety standards for use in energy storage applica'ons.
Section VI: Resources
As state and local jurisdictions consider the recommended framework for siting and permitting
battery energy storage facilities outlined in this model ordinance, ACP seeks to provide
communities with resources and technical guidance. ACP encourages the review of the following
materials:
NFPA 855: Guiding Energy Storage System Safety: NFPA 855 (2023), the Standard for the
Installation of Stationary Energy Storage Systems, provides mandatory requirements for, and
explanations of, the safety strategies and features of energy storage systems (ESS). Applying to
all energy storage technologies, the standard includes chapters for specific technology classes.
The depth of this standard makes it a valuable resource for all Authorities Having Jurisdiction
(AHJs). The focus of this fact sheet is on how the standard applies to electrochemical (battery)
energy storage systems in Chapter 9 and specifically on lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries.
U.S. Codes & Standards for Battery Energy Storage Systems: This document provides an
overview of current codes and standards (C+S) applicable to U.S. installations of utility-scale
battery energy storage systems. This overview highlights the most impactful documents and is
not intended to be exhaustive. Many of these C+S mandate compliance with other standards not
listed here, so the reader is cautioned not to use this document as a guideline for product
compliance. This guide provides a graphic to show the hierarchy and groupings of these C+S,
followed by short descriptions of each. This document also summarizes some of the changes in
the 2023 edition of one of the most important standards, NFPA 855, and provides a more
detailed bibliography of the featured documents.
First Responders Guide to Lithium-Ion Battery Energy Storage System Incidents: This
document provides guidance to first responders for incidents involving energy storage systems
(ESS). The guidance is specific to ESS with lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries, but some elements may
apply to other technologies also. This guide provides recommendations for pre-incident planning
and incident response. Additional tutorial content is provided for each of the hazard categories.
The Bibliography provides references to applicable codes and standards, and other documents
of interest.
Energy Storage Emergency Response Plan Template: This document is the result of a
collaborative effort to develop a standardized template to guide the development of project-
specific emergency response plans, informed by the latest evidence-based strategies and
recommendations established by the National Fire Protection Association. This document is
intended to be adapted by users as needed to be appropriate to the conditions, environment,
staffing, structure, technologies, and blueprint of a given site.
Energy Storage & Safety: Safety is fundamental to all parts of our electric system, including
energy storage, and the safe operation of our energy infrastructure is critical to provide the
electricity that keeps our lights on, our refrigerators running, our homes air conditioned and
heated, and our businesses operating. This fact sheet provides a brief overview of how energy
storage is safe by design, with built in features and strategies used to promote and maintain safe
operation.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Energy Storage Systems: ACP has compiled a
comprehensive list of Battery Energy Storage Safety FAQs for your convenience. Read ACP’s
FAQ document to learn more in detail.
The Role of Energy Storage on the Electric Grid: Energy storage technologies are uniquely
positioned to reduce energy system costs and, over the long-term, lower rates for consumers by:
optimizing the grid; bolstering reliability; and enabling a clean grid. Energy storage is, at its core,
a resilience enabling and reliability enhancing technology. Across the country, states are
choosing energy storage as the best and most cost-effective way to improve grid resilience and
reliability.
Claims vs. Facts: Energy Storage Safety: Because energy storage facilities are generally newer
than most other types of critical grid infrastructure like substations and transformers,
communities may have questions about the safety and reliability of the technology. Amidst these
questions, some inaccurate claims have been made about energy storage – this resource
addresses some of the most common inaccurate claims about energy storage safety.
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the
county.
From:
Courtney Coolidge
To:
Rachel Applegate (PND)
Subject:
Public Comments MCZO Update Draft #1
Date:
Friday, October 17, 2025 12:20:26 PM
Good afternoon Rachel,
I wanted to follow up to expand on a comment we had posted to the MCZO Update Draft #1. Below
please find additional information on our request to remove the 500’ setback for the Commission’s
consideration.
Thank you!
----
Dear Maricopa County Planning & Zoning Commission,
On behalf of the Arizona Chamber of Commerce & Industry, I write to respectfully request that the
Planning & Zoning Commission reconsider the proposed 500-foot setback requirement for Battery
Energy Storage Systems (BESS) as currently included in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance
Update Draft #1. The proposed 500-foot setback is overly conservative and does not reflect a
contemporary understanding of BESS safety or industry standards and is not tied to any recognized
safety or operational standard practices. We urge the Commission to instead adopt a setback that is
technically grounded and consistent with nationally accepted safety standards, specifically the
National Fire Protection Association.
In addition to the lack of technical justification for the standard, imposing an overly large setback will
have adverse impacts on project deployment, undermine energy goals and increase costs for
ratepayers. This will significantly restrict viable sites for BESS installations—especially in more
densely developed or contested areas. It will reduce the amount of energy storage that developers
can build, thereby limiting flexibility in grid operations, curtailing renewable integration, and
increasing costs for consumers.
The Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry supports responsible deployment of energy
storage as a component of our state’s energy resilience and grid modernization. We believe that the
currently proposed 500-foot setback will impose significant barriers without commensurate safety
benefits.
We appreciate the Commissions time and consideration.
Thank you,
--
Courtney Coolidge
Executive Vice President
Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry
M 760-473-0759
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the
county.
From:
Cepand Alizadeh
To:
Rachel Applegate (PND)
Subject:
Letter from Arizona Technology Council re: Maricopa County BESS Ordinance
Date:
Tuesday, October 14, 2025 3:48:06 PM
Attachments:
image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image008.png
image009.png
Maricopa County BESS Letter_(RA).docx
Dear Ms. Applegate,
Hope you are well. Attached to this email, please find a letter from Steven G. Zylstra,
President & CEO of the Arizona Technology Council and SciTech Institute, regarding
the proposed update to the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance that would impact
where battery energy storage system (BESS) facilities can be built within county
limits.
BESS facilities are rigorously engineered for safety, reliability and long-term
performance. They also support Arizona’s broader economic goals, creating high-quality
jobs in construction, manufacturing and engineering while strengthening our state’s
clean energy leadership and competitiveness.
The Council appreciates Maricopa County’s proactive approach. While we support
updates to the zoning ordinance to ensure that the land use and development code
evolves over time, some elements of the draft amendments, specifically the
proposed setbacks, raise concerns within the industry and merit reconsideration.
You will read about these concerns in the attached letter.
Please share this document with the appropriate staff. I have also directly commented
on the draft document available online with our association’s thoughts and
considerations.
As always, if I can answer any questions for you, do not hesitate to reach out.
Respectfully,
Cepand Alizadeh
cepand alizadeh, esq.
government relations specialist
arizona technology council
2800 n. central ave • suite 1530 • phoenix, az 85004
c. 703.655.4258
Mission: To empower innovators who drive impact that positively transforms the world.
Vision: Advance Arizona as a preferred technology ecosystem for purpose-driven innovators
globally.
Purpose: Catalyzing technology Innovators to accelerate Arizona’s global impact.
Rachel Applegate
Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
301 W. Jefferson St., Suite 170
Phoenix, AZ 85003
October 20, 2025
Re: Draft Maricopa County Ordinance Regarding Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS)
Dear Ms. Applegate,
As president and CEO of the state’s premier trade association representing more than 750 science and technology companies, I
respectfully request that Maricopa County’s Planning and Development Department consider the following information before finalizing
zoning ordinance amendments that would define and restrict the siting of battery energy storage systems (BESS) within county limits.
At the Arizona Technology Council, we advocate an energy strategy that leverages Arizona’s diverse mix of clean and renewable resources.
As demand for renewable energy continues to rise, so does the need for utility-scale BESS projects to meet peak demand, enhance grid
stability and ensure reliable service. These systems store excess solar energy and deliver it when generation declines (most notably around
sunset), helping to reduce reliance on traditional generation and strengthen overall grid resilience.
Modern battery storage systems are safe, reliable and rigorously engineered. They incorporate advanced technologies and strict safety
protocols that ensure dependable performance and compliance with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and International Fire
Code standards. Beyond their technical merits, BESS facilities create high-quality jobs in construction, manufacturing and engineering
while bolstering Arizona’s clean energy leadership and economic competitiveness.
While we appreciate the county’s proactive approach to revising and updating its zoning ordinance, the setback requirements in the draft
amendments raise significant concerns within the industry and merit reconsideration. The proposed 100-foot setback from property lines
and 500-foot setback from existing residences are excessive and unsupported by BESS-specific impact data. Such restrictions could limit
available land, particularly in urban and infill areas, forcing developers to abandon otherwise viable sites and slowing deployment of critical
clean energy infrastructure. More onerous setbacks can also drive up land acquisition and engineering costs. This could make projects
financially unfeasible, especially for smaller-scale or community-based initiatives.
Community safety would be protected and practical deployment supported through a more balanced approach, such as a 150-foot setback
combined with appropriate screening, fire safety and sound attenuation measures.
A modern, flexible energy infrastructure is vital to sustaining Maricopa County’s fast-growing innovation economy. The county’s zoning
policies should reflect a commitment to future-ready infrastructure that advances both business growth and environmental responsibility.
Thank you for your leadership and commitment to fostering a forward-looking business environment. Please don’t hesitate to contact me if
the Council can provide additional data, technical expertise or stakeholder engagement to support a balanced outcome.
Respectfully,
ARIZONA TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL & SCITECH INSTITUTE
Steven G. Zylstra
President & CEO
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages
from new senders. Always validate the sender first.
From:
Brian Scholl
To:
Darren Gerard (PND); Tom Ellsworth (PND); Rachel Applegate (PND)
Subject:
Maricopa County BESS Setback Letter
Date:
Friday, October 17, 2025 3:51:01 PM
Attachments:
Outlook-l5x5umdy.png
Outlook-oddlqqwl.png
Maricopa County Setback Letter - ESRG.pdf
Good Afternoon
Please see the attached letter in support of continuing to enforce the 2018 International
Fire Code's setback of 100 feet for Battery Energy Storage Systems to property lines, as
opposed to increasing this requirement to 500 feet to residential property lines. Please
feel free to reach out with any questions. Thank you and have a great weekend.
Brian Scholl
Director of Emergency Response
brian.scholl@energyresponsegroup.com
480-420-9687
Follow us on LinkedIn
Energy Safety Response Group LLC
Brian Scholl
Director of Emergency Response
+1 480-420-9687
brian.scholl@energyresponsegroup.com
October 17, 2025
To:
Tom Ellsworth, Planning Director
Darren Gerard, Deputy Director Planning & Development
Rachel Applegate, Planning and Zoning
Maricopa County Planning & Development
301 W. Jefferson Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Re: Battery Energy Storage Systems Setbacks
My name is Brian Scholl, and I am the Director of Emergency Response for Energy Safety Response
Group (ESRG). We are focused on safety, permitting, and emergency response in the field of alternative
energy technologies, with a focus on energy storage systems, and have performed nearly three hundred
medium and large-scale fire tests on a range of energy storage technologies, primarily lithium-ion
batteries, across all common chemistries. In addition, after 23 years, I recently retired from the Phoenix
Fire Department as a Deputy Fire Marshal, so I understand the codes and standards here in the valley.
This memo provides insight into the requirements for setback distances for Battery Energy Storage
Systems.
Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) Codes and Standards
The following codes and standards apply to this document:
2018 International Fire Code §1207 Electrical Energy Storage Systems (as adopted by
the state of Arizona)
NFPA 855 Standard for the Installation of Stationary Energy Storage Systems (2023 Ed.)
Additional supporting codes, standards, or other documents that may inform this report include:
UL 9540 Standard for Energy Storage Systems and Equipment, 2020 Edition
UL 9540A Test Method for Evaluating Thermal Runaway Fire Propagation in Battery
Energy Storage Systems, 2019 Edition
Setback Requirements
Currently, Maricopa County has adopted and is using the 2018 International Fire Code (IFC) as the fire
code for the county. The separation distance required in section 1206.2.8.7.1 for outdoor installation is
Page 2
five (5) feet from the BESS to exposures to include but not limited to property lines, public ways, and
buildings. The 2018 IFC does not directly reference the National Fire Protection Association’s (NFPA)
855, which is the National Standard on Battery Energy Storage Systems, but that standard also only
requires a 5-foot separation to exposures.
In addition to working for ESRG, I am also on the International Code Council’s (ICC) Fire Code Action
Committee (FCAC) as well as a Technical Committee member on NFPA 855. The FCAC is a group of
ICC members that writes and reviews new code language for the upcoming IFC; we are currently working
on the 2027 version of the IFC. As a Technical Committee member for NFPA 855, I also write and review
code language for the national standard on battery energy storage systems. Both these codes are
considered “consensus” codes or standards because they are made up of fire service professionals,
industry, manufacturers, installers, end users, and special experts. This ensures that the code language
is not more favorable to one group or another. The most current editions of both these codes still only
require a 5-foot separation between the batteries and exposures like property lines. We did add the term
“Remote Location”. To meet the Remote Location definition, your batteries must be 100 feet from any
exposures like property lines. The Remote Location is the most stringent separation in either code to
date. Given the evolving nature of BESS technology and the varying site conditions across different
projects, setbacks and separation from residential structures should be determined based on
demonstrated fire data rather than an arbitrary 500’ distance requirement. Project-specific fire mitigation
measures, including firefighter staging areas and adherence to best practices, should be the guiding
factors in determining appropriate site design. Given the size of most sites, imposing a 500-foot preferred
separation from residential properties would effectively eliminate the feasibility of most projects and
hinder the region’s energy reliability.
Conclusion
The most restrictive setback in any of the current and past fire codes and NFPA 855 has been 100 feet.
According to both the IFC and NFPA 855, if you provide this 100-foot setback, you actually get relief from
other sections within the code. As part of our training for our first responders, we train the first arriving
fire crews to set up at a distance of 100 feet from the enclosure where the incident is occurring. We
determined that the 100-foot separation is adequate based on our own data that we collected from the
large-scale fire testing that we have performed, along with data from other testing labs and from actual
data from a recent incident involving BESS. ESRG has the data from over 300 medium and large-scale
battery fire tests that validate the 100-foot separation is adequate to keep our firefighters and community
safe. I hope Maricopa County will stay consistent with all the consensus codes and standards and only
require a maximum 100-foot setback.
Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional information. I look forward to working
with you on this matter.
Thank you,
Brian Scholl
Director of Emergency Response
C: +1 480-420-9687
E: brian.scholl@energyresponsegroup.com
https://www.energyresponsegroup.com/
American Clean Power Association | 1299 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 1300, Washington, DC 20004
202.383.2500 | cleanpower.org
1
Maricopa County Government
Planning & Development Department
301 W. Jefferson, Suite 170
Phoenix, AZ 85003
October 17, 2025
To whom it may concern:
On behalf of the American Clean Power Association (ACP) and its members, please
find below feedback regarding the proposed updates to the Maricopa County Zoning
Ordinance impacting the development and setbacks for battery energy storage systems
(BESS). ACP appreciates the opportunity to participate in the stakeholder feedback and
review process undertaken by the county in updating its ordinance.
Maricopa County maintains a reputation as a national leader for BESS
development, with approximately 2,400 MW of energy storage capacity currently online
across the county and approximately 2,700 MW of energy storage capacity in
development. As energy consumers grapple with high and rising energy costs,1 Arizonans
throughout the county and across the state are already realizing the benefits of a more
reliable and resilient grid bolstered by energy storage resources, including enhanced grid
reliability to mitigate extreme weather conditions and helping to moderate electricity
prices by storing and dispatching low-cost energy generation during peak, high-cost
periods of energy demand.2 Accordingly, ACP respectfully requests that the proposed 500-
foot setback from existing residential uses and 100-foot setback from property lines for
Battery Energy Storage Systems be reassessed and revised to reflect setback
recommendations and other safety standards outlined in NFPA 855, Standard for the
1 Beck, M., & Ben Brown. (2025, October 15). “Nearly impossible to keep up”: Groups Rally Against Proposed APS
Rate Hike. ABC15 Arizona in Phoenix (KNXV). https://www.abc15.com/news/state/nearly-impossible-to-keep-up-
groups-rally-against-proposed-aps-rate-hike
2 For an in-depth analysis of energy storage’s impacts on market conditions, see The American Clean Power
Association. (2024). Analysis: Significant Energy Storage Capacity Additions Keep Costs Low and Power Reliable in
Texas. American Clean Power. https://cleanpower.org/wp-content/uploads/gateway/2024/12/ACP_Storage-in-
ERCOT_2024_Analysis.pdf
American Clean Power Association | 1299 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 1300, Washington, DC 20004
202.383.2500 | cleanpower.org
2
Installation of Stationary Energy Storage Systems.3 By aligning ordinance regulations with
national standards, developed and regularly updated by fire safety officials and technical
experts to reflect a robust and growing body of scholarship and experience informing best
practices for the safe construction, commissioning and operation of BESS facilities,
Maricopa County can ensure the community and its residents continue to enjoy the
benefits made possible by energy storage development.
First published in 2020, NFPA 855 standards reflect a comprehensive, data- and
experience-informed set of requirements and best practices governing the safe
development of energy storage systems. The standards, most recently updated in
September 2025 ahead of its 2026 publication date, establish technology-specific
requirements for commercially-available energy storage systems, including
electrochemical energy storage systems, the technology category under which BESS
facilities are regulated. Reflected in the standards are different criteria that must be met,
and best practices that should be observed, depending on the location of BESS facilities
and the integration of protective measures to minimize and mitigate any potential impacts
stemming from a thermal incident affecting BESS technology. States, including Indiana,4
Michigan,5 New York,6 and Texas,7 have incorporated NFPA 855 by reference into
regulations governing BESS construction and operation.
By contrast, establishing arbitrary setback distances as measured from residences
and property lines can artificially constrain project development without properly
addressing safety considerations for energy storage systems and potential incident
response scenarios. BESS facilities have a relatively small land-use impact, with
contemporary facilities using outdoor, containerized systems or dedicated-use buildings
requiring between 0.03 to 0.1 acres per megawatt of nameplate capacity.8 This small
3 National Fire Protection Agency. (2025). NFPA 855 Standard Development. nfpa.org.
https://www.nfpa.org/codes-and-standards/nfpa-855-standard-development/855
4 Ind. Code § 22-14-8 (2023).
5 Mich. Comp. Laws § 460.1226 (2023)
6 N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 12, § 1207.1.3 (2025).
7 Tex. Util. Code § 187.003 (2025).
8 Krol, M., and Mills, S. (2024). Planning & Zoning for Battery Energy Storage Systems: A Guide for Michigan Local
Governments. University of Michigan Center for Empowering Communities.
https://graham.umich.edu/project/bess-guide
American Clean Power Association | 1299 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 1300, Washington, DC 20004
202.383.2500 | cleanpower.org
3
footprint allows for energy storage systems, particularly those developed at utility scale or
as a grid-connected resource, to be developed in close proximity to existing transmission
infrastructure with limited impact on surrounding developments. By artificially restricting
building areas on otherwise permissibly zoned parcels, arbitrary setbacks can expand total
land use requirements for facility development,9 potentially rendering key parcels adjacent
to existing substations and transmission lines as unusable and therefore requiring
additional transmission infrastructure build-out. This ultimately results in an unintended,
inverse consequence to land use impacts intended to be addressed by development
regulation through parcel setbacks.
Thank you for your consideration of these comments. ACP looks forward to
continuing to engage with the Planning & Development Department throughout the
revision process of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance to ensure that county residents
continue to realize the benefits of energy storage development in the community.
Sincerely,
Bennett Fuson
Director of Energy Storage
American Clean Power
9 For reference, see slide 56, Battery Energy Storage Systems Fire Safety Symposium (24 July 2025). California Office
of the State Fire Marshal. https://34c031f8-c9fd-4018-8c5a-4159cdff6b0d-cdn-endpoint.azureedge.net/-
/media/osfm-website/what-we-do/code-development-and-analysis/battery-storage-systems/2025-calfire---sft-ca-
battery-energy-storage-systems-fire-safety-symposium-
full.pdf?rev=5c46c55078d34915b7f5319cc24e2132&hash=1CEB185AD02BE8EBFB637921854CF1C9
To: Maricopa County Planning & Development
From: NextEra Energy Resources
Date: 10/17/2025
RE: Comments on draft zoning code governance for Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS)
NextEra Energy Resources, LLC (“NextEra Resources”) appreciates the opportunity to provide
comments on the policy recommendations for Battery Energy Storage Systems Projects as
Maricopa County in the Chapter 6 Zoning District Use update. Protecting personnel and the
community is of paramount importance to us. We respectfully request that our following
comments and suggestions be reviewed and carefully considered in shaping the final policy
recommendations to be presented to the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors for their
decision-making.
It is our aim to contribute constructively to the development and implementation of effective and
practical permitting policies for BESS facilities and welcome any questions, requests for
additional information, or outreach from Maricopa County during this process.
603.10. Battery Energy Storage Systems –
• Policy Recommendation:
NextEra Energy Resources recommends that Maricopa County revises the proposed
standard and adopts a 100-foot setback from property lines for Battery Energy Storage
System (BESS) projects, in accordance with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
855 and International Fire Code (IFC) guidance.
• Comment:
The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 855 and the International Fire Code
(IFC) governs the design of BESS projects ensuring safety standards of adjacent uses.
By incorporating a 100-foot setback a BESS project is designated as a ‘Remote Location’
utilizing a data-based approach to public safety paired with energy infrastructure. The
current draft, specifically the 500-foot setback from existing residential uses arbitrarily
exceeds national fire safety guidelines and is not supported by data nor studies
surrounding BESS safety.
Battery Energy Storage technology has continued to advance incorporating design
features to address previous fire and explosion risk noted for legacy system thermal
runaway events. Testing standards, established by the Underwriters’ Laboratories (UL)
and codified in UL9540 and UL9540A, require manufacturers of utility scale Battery
Energy Storage Systems to design systems to mitigate the likelihood of thermal runaway
within BESS container racks and remove the possibility of propagation between BESS
containers.
Adoption of more stringent design requirements than what is established by national
standards eliminates siting and site-specific design flexibility and overly restricts the
development of critical infrastructure necessary to maintain a reliable, affordable, and
available grid.
NextEra Energy Resources respectfully request Maricopa County adopt a standard 100-
foot setback for BESS projects in the Chapter 6 Zoning District Use Table consistent with
national standards and allow for site-specific, discretionary, setbacks where required.
Sincerely,
Kyle Whittier
Director Development
AICP
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages
from new senders. Always validate the sender first.
From:
John Karakoulakis
To:
Tom Ellsworth (PND); Darren Gerard (PND); Rachel Applegate (PND)
Cc:
Ronald Quarles (PND)
Subject:
Comments on BESS Ordinance - Maricopa County, AZ
Date:
Friday, October 17, 2025 5:41:46 PM
Attachments:
Maricopa.BESS.code.TWW.Comments 10-17-25.pdf
Hello Mr. Ellsworth, Mr. Gerard, and Ms. Applegate:
Please see the attached comments regarding the draft BESS ordinance for Maricopa
County from The Western Way.
Also, attached to our comments you will find a recent report that our organization
published, "Safety Improvements in Long-Duration Battery Storage: A Summary for
Decisionmakers,” which details the current standards, codes, and regulations which
govern the safe design and deployment of modern BESS systems.
Please let me know if you have any questions of if we can provide any additional
information.
Thanks,
John Karakoulakis
Executive Director, The Western Way
To: Maricopa County Planning & Development
From: The Western Way
Date: 10/17/2025
RE: Comments on Draft Zoning Code Governance for Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS)
The Western Way (TWW) appreciates the opportunity to offer thoughtful input regarding the
policy recommendations for Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) as part of Maricopa
County’s Chapter 6 Zoning District Use update. Safeguarding both personnel and the broader
community remains a core concern for our organization. We hope that these recommendations
will be helpful as Maricopa County prepares its final proposal for the Board of Supervisors.
Our intent is to assist in effective and pragmatic permitting processes for BESS facilities, and we
welcome further engagement from Maricopa County, including requests for clarification or
additional information, throughout the course of this discussion. TWW recently published a
report for policy makers, “Safety Improvements in Long-Duration Battery Storage: A Summary
for Decisionmakers”. (See Attached). The report details the various safety codes, standards, and
regulations that govern the design and deployment of modern BESS facilities.
Regarding setback requirements for Battery Energy Storage Systems, TWW recommends the
adoption of a 100-foot setback from property lines for BESS projects. This recommendation is
consistent with the standards set forth by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 855
and the International Fire Code (IFC).
As our report notes, NFPA 855 and the IFC serve as foundational guidelines for the safe design
and placement of BESS projects near adjacent land uses. A 100-foot setback classifies such
developments as ‘Remote Locations’ and is firmly rooted in a data-driven approach to public
safety within energy infrastructure. The currently proposed 500-foot setback from residential
properties notably exceeds national fire safety recommendations and does not appear to be
substantiated by relevant research or empirical data concerning BESS safety.
Advancements in BESS technology have introduced sophisticated design features that address
prior concerns related to fire and explosion risks, including those linked to thermal runaway in
legacy systems. Utility-scale BESS manufacturers are now subject to stringent testing standards,
delineated by Underwriters Laboratories under UL9540 and UL9540A, which require systems to
mitigate the likelihood of thermal runaway within container racks and prevent propagation
between individual containers.
Imposing requirements that surpass established national standards may unnecessarily constrain
the flexibility of siting and site-specific design, thereby impeding the deployment of vital
infrastructure essential for a dependable, affordable, and resilient electric grid, at a time when
Arizona needs all of the energy resources that it can deploy.
In light of the above, TWW respectfully urges Maricopa County to adopt the nationally
consistent 100-foot setback for BESS projects within the Chapter 6 Zoning District Use Table
and to retain the capacity for site-specific, discretionary setbacks when circumstances warrant.
Sincerely,
Executive Director, The Western Way
SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS IN LONG-
DURATION BATTERY STORAGE:
A SUMMARY FOR
DECISIONMAKERS
SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS IN LONG-DURATION BATTERY STORAGE: A SUMMARY FOR DECISIONMAKERS 2
America’s power grid consists of more than 7,000 power plants and millions of miles of high- and
low-voltage power lines – and operating the grid is an extremely complex challenge.
Historically, the amount of electricity being supplied from thousands of power plants must – at
all times – equal the amount of electricity that’s being demanded by hundreds of millions of
consumers. During severe weather events and other disruptions, the challenge of perfectly
balancing supply and demand is even more difficult, and it can often produce large increases in
the retail prices of electricity.
However, in recent years, market forces and scientific innovations have produced technologies
that can store large amounts of electricity for hours or days after it is generated until it is needed.
These energy-storage technologies provide an important operational buffer for the grid, making it
more reliable and reducing the likelihood of costly price spikes in electricity bills. Energy Storage
also provides crucial support for intermittent renewable resources such as solar and wind energy
by storing excess power generated during peak conditions and supplying it when the renewable
energy is not available (sun not shining or wind not blowing). One of the most common types of
energy storage is battery energy storage systems (BESS).
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS IN LONG-DURATION BATTERY STORAGE: A SUMMARY FOR DECISIONMAKERS 3
Batteries are the fastest growing category of energy storage technologies in the United States
today. In most cases, these batteries are larger, more advanced and rigorously tested versions of
the same technologies used in everyday household items, including laptops and cell phones.
Just like all energy technologies and facilities – including pipelines and gas stations – battery
storage facilities have a limited fire and explosion risk. But in recent years, a wave of safety
improvements have been adopted as battery manufacturers, power companies, regulators and
public safety officials have gained more experience with large-scale battery technologies.
Those safety improvements include fire retardant materials, enhanced cooling systems, thermal
barriers, better storage container design, improved sensors and early detection systems that can
respond more quickly if an abnormality is observed, and updated fire protection systems. Taken
together, these improvements successfully cut the failure rate (per installed MWh) of large-scale
batteries by 97% between 2018 and 2023, according to the Electric Power Research Institute
(EPRI).
This paper summarizes the changes in safety regulations and industry practices behind this success
story.
SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS IN LONG-DURATION BATTERY STORAGE: A SUMMARY FOR DECISIONMAKERS 4
KEY REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS AND STANDARDS FOR
BATTERY STORAGE:
For any energy system – including oil and gas wells, pipelines, refineries and
retail gas stations – there is a risk of fire and explosion that must be managed
and, as appropriate, regulated by outside entities. And as with other major
energy technologies, the safety of battery energy storage systems is governed
by an overlapping series of codes, standards, and regulations. Key frameworks
include:
• NFPA 855: Standard for the Installation of Stationary Energy Storage
Systems: This foundational standard provides comprehensive guidelines
for the safe installation of all types of energy storage systems, including
batteries. Recent editions have incorporated more specific requirements for
energy storage systems, particularly addressing thermal runaway mitigation,
smoke and fire detection, and explosion control.
• UL 9540: Standard for Safety of Energy Storage Systems and Equipment:
This standard focuses on the integrated system, evaluating the safety
of electrical, mechanical, and thermal aspects. It plays a critical role in
ensuring that listed and labeled equipment meets rigorous safety standards.
NFPA 855 requires all BESS to be listed to UL 9540.
• UL 9540A: Test Method for Evaluating Thermal Runaway Fire Propagation
in Battery Energy Storage Systems: This crucial test method assesses the
potential for thermal runaway to propagate within a battery system. It
provides critical data for designing effective thermal runaway propagation
prevention and containment strategies.
• International Fire Code (IFC): The IFC provides a model code adopted
by many jurisdictions, addressing fire safety requirements for various
occupancies, including those housing energy storage systems. The latest
editions of the IFC specifically refer to NFPA 855 for most of the battery
requirements.
• National Electrical Code (NEC): The NEC covers electrical installation fire
safety aspects of energy storage systems, including wiring, grounding, and
overcurrent protection.
• OSHA Regulations: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) sets workplace safety standards, including those relevant to the
installation, operation, and maintenance of LDES systems.
SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS IN LONG-DURATION BATTERY STORAGE: A SUMMARY FOR DECISIONMAKERS 5
KEY REGULATORY AND OPERATIONAL CHANGES TO IMPROVE
BATTERY STORAGE SAFETY:
New fire code regulations and evolving firefighting strategies are significantly
improving the safety of battery energy storage systems. Key changes have
reduced the risk of fire spread and explosion.
1. Spacing Requirements
NFPA 855 and the IFC contain requirements for the minimum spacing between
indoor and outdoor energy storage containers. The prescribed spacing may
only be reduced with UL 9540A testing results demonstrating safety and the
approval of the authority having jurisdiction (AHJ). Indoor installations of 50
kilowatt-hour (kWh) battery systems now require 3-foot spacing between
units, unless test results from UL 9540A or other large-scale fire test along
with a report produced by a fire protection engineer can convince the AHJ
to waive or reduce the spacing. Outdoor containerized systems have spacing
requirements dependent on the manufacturers design specifications and its
testing certification and final approval of local AHJ. These changes have largely
confined fires to a single container, preventing widespread damage.
2. Increased Testing and Improved Designs
The requirement for UL 9540 listing and successful completion of UL
9540A testing are important safety standards for energy storage systems.
Improvements in design include:
• More effective cooling systems that maintain optimal battery temperatures
and prevent overheating.
• Extensive sensor networks monitor cell and module temperatures,
providing early warning signs of thermal anomalies.
• Algorithms and analytics are employed to detect subtle temperature
changes indicative of incipient thermal runaway, enabling proactive
intervention.
SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS IN LONG-DURATION BATTERY STORAGE: A SUMMARY FOR DECISIONMAKERS 6
3. Pressure Management
In cases of thermal runaway and fire, the risk of explosion can be greatly
minimized by reducing the buildup of pressure inside a battery storage unit.
Recent fire-code updates include “deflagration management” strategies,
including exhaust ventilation systems and pressure-sensitive panels that
open automatically when a potentially explosive combination of heat and
gases are detected.
4. Improved Thermal Runaway Prevention and Protection
• Fire retardant materials that insulate modules from one another and limit
the propagation of a thermal runaway event within the battery container.
• Fire safety systems (FSS) for lithium-ion BESS are equipped with 24 hours of
standby backup power and 2 hours of alarm backup power.
• All BESS are equipped with deflagration protection and/or prevention
systems, in accordance with NFPA 68 and/or NFPA 69, respectively.
• NPFA 68 provides deflagration panels that will open to provide pressure
relief and prevent the risk of danger from an explosion.
• NFPA 69 provides a combustible gas reduction system that will detect a
thermal runaway event and exhaust the gases to prevent the accumulation
of an explosive atmosphere.
“The global installed capacity of utility-scale battery energy storage
systems (BESS) has dramatically increased over the last five years.
While recent fires afflicting some of these BESS have garnered
significant media attention, the overall rate of incidents has sharply
decreased, as lessons learned from early failure incidents have
been incorporated into new designs and best practices.”
– Electric Power Research Institute, 2024
SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS IN LONG-DURATION BATTERY STORAGE: A SUMMARY FOR DECISIONMAKERS 7
OUTLOOK FOR NEW BATTERY TECHNOLOGIES AND TRADEOFFS
Currently, around 95% of battery storage projects make use of lithium-ion (LI) technology, which
leverages the same chemical process as the batteries used in consumer electronics and electric
vehicles. However, additional technologies are being explored, which offer different tradeoffs
between their ability to store and discharge electricity and safety considerations.
• Lithium-titanate oxide (LTO) batteries are considered a very safe chemistry, although
compared to other Li-ion chemistries, LTO is more costly and takes up more space.
• Lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries offer better safety than nickel-cobalt-aluminum (NCA),
lithium-manganese oxide (LMO), lithium-cobalt oxide (LCO), and nickel-manganese-cobalt
(NMC) batteries, being about four times safer and less likely to be triggered or propagate,
producing about half the amount of heat and flammable gasses as other chemistries in a
failure. However, they are still more susceptible to fire than lead-acid, nickel-cadmium, and
sodium-nickel chloride batteries.
• Solid-state Li-ion batteries, which replace most flammable electrolytes with a polymer or
solid, are at least five years from full commercialization. While they offer increased energy
density, solid-state batteries using lithium metal (like those that have been announced for
vehicles for increased range) instead of lithium-ion may actually increase fire risk.
SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS IN LONG-DURATION BATTERY STORAGE: A SUMMARY FOR DECISIONMAKERS 8
As with all major energy technologies and systems – including oil and gas
production sites, pipelines, refineries and gas stations – the operation of large-
scale battery storage facilities does not happen in isolation. Instead, these
facilities operate under an overlapping set of regulations and industry practices
designed to manage and reduce safety risks, including the risk of fires and
explosions.
Major progress has been made in recent years to enhance safety
regulations, practices, and technologies related to large-scale
battery storage systems. According to EPRI, these changes in
regulation and best practices have already reduced the failure
rate of battery storage systems by 97%.
Continued improvements are expected to reduce this failure rate even further.
Against this small and manageable risk, the benefits of battery storage facilities
include a more stable power grid and a lower risk of costly price spikes during
severe weather and other disruptive events. When viewed in this light, the
continued expansion of energy storage systems under close regulatory scrutiny
can be viewed as a net positive for the stability and affordability of the U.S.
power grid and the consumers it serves.
CONCLUSION
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
From:
Andrew Yancey
To:
Darren Gerard (PND)
Cc:
Adam Cannon (PND); Ronald Quarles (PND); Rachel Applegate (PND)
Subject:
MCZO Update - Buckeye Examples
Date:
Friday, October 17, 2025 11:23:03 AM
Attachments:
image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
image005.png
Darren – Thank you for talking with me earlier this week about the MCZO update, in particular some of my
comments re solar provisions. As a follow up to our discussion, I have dropped a few comments in the
global share document for the MCZO. But I also wanted to provide you the back up we discussed with
examples from Buckeye’s Code update (scheduled for City Council approval on Tuesday). The link to
Buckeye’s full proposed update is here: Buckeye Development Code Update. I’ve provided a few snippets
below.
We appreciate the County’s efforts to streamline the MCZO and consistent work with us and our solar
developer clients on renewable energy projects. I’d be happy to discuss any of these matters with you
further. Thank you.
Buckeye Provision re Perimeter Treatment for Solar Projects. Per below, Buckeye’s Code update grants
the Zoning Administrator the ability to approve alternative wall and landscaping proposals for remote or low
visibility projects. This allows the exercise of professional judgment to determine when underlying screening
and perimeter requirements may not be appropriate for large, remote utility-scale solar projects.
Section 3.3.2.C (re Solar Generation Station use specifically). A similar standard is provided for BESS in
Section 3.2.2.A.2.c.
Buckeye’s Site Plan Expiration Provisions
Section 8.9.E – site plan review section (general application). Generally, Buckeye will allow (a) allow site
plans to be valid for 3 years, (b) allow applicants to request additional time as part of their site plan
application (“unless otherwise stated in such approval”), and (c) unlimited one year extensions approved by
staff.
Section 3.2.2.C.6 clarifies there is no limit to extension for solar site plans. There are a number of factors
that can cause solar projects to work with utilities for years on interconnection studies and participating in
competitive RFPs that can create a time lag prior to construction.
BESS Separation. Finally, I wanted to share Buckeye’s proposed 150’ setback for BESS from existing or
planned residential.
Section 3.2.2.A.2.b
Andrew D. Yancey, Esq.
Partner
Bergin, Frakes, Smalley & Oberholtzer, PLLC
4343 East Camelback Road, Suite 210
Phoenix, Arizona 85018
Direct: 602.899.0217
Cell: 619.540.3375
Fax: 602.888.7856
From:
Adam Cannon (PND)
To:
enjmoore@gmail.com
Cc:
Rachel Applegate (PND); Ronald Quarles (PND)
Subject:
FW: MCZO Update New Chapter 9 (was chapter 12) Group Homes
Date:
Monday, October 20, 2025 3:19:27 PM
Attachments:
Community Residence Packet vs 12-2-24.pdf
image001.png
Good afternoon Judy,
Thank you for your comments. Per Arizona case law (see Montana Ranch vs. Beaith),
HOAs cannot prevent group homes (community residences) from being established.
The Fair Housing Act has been interpreted to prevent jurisdictions from prohibiting
community residences. Additionally, except for a few considerations (such as
distancing), jurisdictions cannot treat group homes differently than traditional family
homes. Recovery communities are not permitted in rural or single-family zones at all. In
other zones, a recovery community may be permitted with a special use permit or by
right depending on the zone.
You are correct about ownership of the property. It cannot be transferred as a licensed
and permitted business to a new owner; however, it is legal to sell the property and
advertise it as a potential assisted living home so long as appropriate permitting from
both the County and ADHS is obtained. I have spoken directly with the real estate agent
responsible for the listing and they will be altering the listing to remove inaccurate
terminology. They will also be checking any other listings that may be out there. Also,
they have been informed that unless and until there is a County approved community
residence application and ADHS licensure, a new owner would not be able to operate a
community residence. They were not aware that it could not be transferred and that
there was a County permit required.
Thank you again. Please let us know if you have additional questions.
Best regards,
Adam Cannon, AICP
Senior Planner
Planning & Development
301 W Jefferson St. Phoenix, AZ 85003
O: 602-372-0292
E: adam.cannon@maricopa.gov
[ Maricopa.Gov ]
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
Maricopa County is developing the Framework 2040 Comprehensive Plan – a document which guides growth and
development for the next decade and beyond. Visit Framework 2040 to learn how to participate, attend meetings and be
heard!
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Please use caution when you receive messages
from new senders. Always validate the sender first.
Additionally, the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance is being updated. Visit MCZO Update to learn more and comment on
changes to the ordinance.
From: Ed and Judy Moore <enjmoore@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2025 11:42 AM
To: Rachel Applegate (PND) <Rachel.Applegate@Maricopa.Gov>
Subject: MCZO Update New Chapter 9 (was chapter 12) Group Homes
I respectfully request that this new chapter clarify the relationship between the +55 age overlay, the SCHOA restriction for operating a business out of a home in Sun City, and the draft Chapter 9 on Group Homes. My specific concern after reading
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
I respectfully request that this new chapter clarify the relationship between the +55 age
overlay, the SCHOA restriction for operating a business out of a home in Sun City, and
the draft Chapter 9 on Group Homes. My specific concern after reading draft Chapter 9,
is a lack of clarity of the Maricopa permitting process or granting of a license, and
whether it can override the HOA requirements attached to the residential deed. The
property currently for sale at 10441 W Twin Oaks Drive, advertises that the property is a
licensed and permitted business opportunity to operate a 10 bed assisted living home
within the Sun City community. Although Chapter 907.3.6 clearly states that any license
or permit issued by the Department for a community residence or recovery community is
issued to the owner of record in possession of the property, it also states that the license
or permit issued by the Department is not transferable and does not run with the land. It
does not appear that this business opportunity for sale can transfer the current permits
and licenses.
Can this property be legally transferred as a licenced and permitted business to a new
owner? Or does it create a violation that then revokes the permit and license and
another group home can then be created less than 1200 feet away (as described further
in Chapter 9)? Could this create a "wildcat" type of development within our residential
community as these business opportunities proliferate under licenses and permits
granted as "community residences and recovery communities"?
Please consider further clarification to tighten up Chapter 9.
Thank you.
Judy Moore
425-750-7719
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the
county.
From:
Rebecca Sobie
To:
Darren Gerard (PND); Rachel Applegate (PND)
Cc:
carpinem@mcao.mcaricopa.gov
Subject:
RE: Disability Rights Arizona- Comments and Proposed Red-lines re MCZO Update
Date:
Wednesday, August 13, 2025 10:55:44 AM
Attachments:
image001.png
image002.png
DRAZ Comments and Proposed Red-Lines to MCZO Definition of Disability- FINAL (Submitted 08.12.25).docx
Good morning,
Following up on the below email, I realized that the PDF version that I submitted
yesterday did not reflect DRAZ’s proposed red-lines. I have attached a Word version,
which includes the proposed red-lining to the definition of “disability” in the MCZO.
Can you please email back to confirm receipt.
Thank you very much,
Rebecca Sobie
Rebecca Sobie (she/her/hers)
Senior Staff Attorney
Disability Rights Arizona
5025 E. Washington St., Ste. 202
Phoenix, AZ 85034
Phone: (602) 274-6287, ext. 212
Fax: (602) 274-6779
E-mail: rsobie@disabilityrightsaz.org
Website: www.disabilityrightsaz.org
Follow us:
DRAZ supports an inclusive culture that encourages, respects and celebrates
diversity.
This communication is confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity named above. If you have received this communication in error, please
immediately destroy it and notify the sender by reply e-mail or by telephone at 1-800-
922-1447.
From: Rebecca Sobie
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2025 5:52 PM
To: Darren.Gerard@Maricopa.Gov; rachel.applegate@maricopa.gov
Cc: carpinem@mcao.mcaricopa.gov
Subject: Disability Rights Arizona- Comments and Proposed Red-lines re MCZO Update
Good afternoon,
On behalf of Disability Rights Arizona (DRAZ), for Maricopa County’s consideration
during the open comment period for the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance Update,
please find attached DRAZ’s Comments and Proposed Amendments to the Definition
of “Disability” in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.
Kindly email back to confirm receipt, and please feel free to contact me with any
follow-up questions regarding the attached.
Thank you for your consideration.
Respectfully,
Rebecca Sobie
Rebecca Sobie (she/her/hers)
Senior Staff Attorney
Disability Rights Arizona
5025 E. Washington St., Ste. 202
Phoenix, AZ 85034
Phone: (602) 274-6287, ext. 212
Fax: (602) 274-6779
E-mail: rsobie@disabilityrightsaz.org
Website: www.disabilityrightsaz.org
Follow us:
DRAZ supports an inclusive culture that encourages, respects and celebrates
diversity.
This communication is confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity named above. If you have received this communication in error, please
immediately destroy it and notify the sender by reply e-mail or by telephone at 1-800-
922-1447.
5025 East Washington Street, Suite 202
4539 E. Ft Lowell Road
Phoenix, Arizona 85034-7437
Tucson, Arizona 85712-1108
(602) 274-6287 (Voice) – (602) 274-6779 (Fax)
(520) 327-9547 (Voice) – (520) 884-0992 (Fax)
www.disabilityrightsaz.org
Follow us on:
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Comments and Proposed Amendments to the Definition of “Disability”
in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance
Submitted: August 12, 2025
Disability Rights Arizona, the designated Protection and Advocacy system for
people with disabilities in Arizona, respectfully submits the following comments
and proposed red-lines to the definition of “disability” under Chapter 2 (Section
201, Page 8) of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance, to be in line with the
“disability” definitions set forth in the Fair Housing Act and the Americans with
Disabilities Act, and their corresponding regulations.
The term “disability” means, with respect to an individual – (a) A physical or
mental impairment that substantially limits one or more activities of such
individual; (b) a record of such an impairment; or being regarded as having
such an impairment as per the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.
Code § 12102, and the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S. Code § 3602(h). People
with disabilities do not include individuals who are currently illegally using
alcohol, illegal drugs controlled substances, or usingcurrently certain
illegally using drugscontrolled substances to which they are addicted or
individuals who constitute a direct threat to the health and safety of others.
These changes are necessary to harmonize with federal law. The Fair Housing
Amendments Act (FHA) defines disability1 as: “(1) a physical or mental
impairment which substantially limits one or more of [a] person’s major life
activities, (2) a record of having such an impairment, or (3) being regarding as
having such an impairment.” 42 U.S.C. § 3602(h). The Americans with Disabilities
Act (ADA) defines “disability” as “(i) a physical or mental impairment that
substantially limits one or more major life activities of [an] individual; (ii) a record
of such an impairment; or (iii) being regarded as having such an impairment.” 28
C.F.R. § 35.108(a)(1).
1 The FHA uses the term “handicap” instead of “disability” throughout, but they are defined
the same.
August 12, 2025
Proposed Amendments to MCZO Definition of “Disability”
Page 2 of 3
Alcoholism, usage of legal drugs, and whether an individual poses a direct threat
to the health and safety of others are not exclusions to the definitions of disability
under these laws. The FHA definition of disability only excludes “current, illegal
use of or addiction to a controlled substance”, and does not exclude alcoholism
or addiction to legal drugs. 42 U.S.C. § 3602(h); see also 24 C.F.R. §
100.201(a)(2) (disability definition of FHA includes alcoholism and drug addiction,
“other than addiction caused by current, illegal use of a controlled substance”).
Additionally, the ADA definition of “physical or mental impairment” includes drug
addiction and alcoholism. See 28 C.F.R. § 35.108(b)(2).
The reference to “direct threat” in the definition of disability in the Zoning
Ordinance should also be removed. If a housing provider is proposing to exclude
someone from housing on the basis that their tenancy poses a direct threat to the
health and safety of others, the housing provider has an obligation to conduct an
individualized direct threat analysis that evaluates the risk and considers if a
reasonable accommodation could mitigate the threat otherwise posed by the
individual.
Per 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(9), “direct threat” does not apply to the definition of
disability, but rather is a carve out or exception to the protection for people with
disabilities, and requires an individualized analysis of alleged “direct threat,” with
particularized proof of dangerous behavior based on objective evidence, and
deference to accommodation. See Kuhn by & through Kuhn v. McNary Ests.
Homeowners Ass'n, Inc., 228 F. Supp. 3d 1142, 1151 (D. Or. 2017) (prior to
exclusion from housing, direct threat determination “must rely on an individualized
assessment that is based on reliable objective evidence” and must consider risk
factors, the probability of injury, and whether any reasonable accommodations
will eliminate the direct threat. See also Hernandez v. Golf Course Ests. Home
Owners Ass'n, 454 F. Supp. 3d 1029, 1038, n.4 (D. Or. 2020).
DRAZ thanks Maricopa County in advance for considering these comments.
Please feel free to contact DRAZ Senior Staff Attorney Rebecca Sobie at
rsobie@disabilityrightsaz.org for any follow-up questions regarding these
comments.
August 12, 2025
Proposed Amendments to MCZO Definition of “Disability”
Page 3 of 3
Sincerely,
Rebecca Sobie
Senior Staff Attorney
Disability Rights Arizona
1
Ronald Quarles (PND)
From:
Darren Gerard (PND)
Sent:
Wednesday, June 18, 2025 12:04 PM
To:
Ronald Quarles (PND); Adam Cannon (PND)
Cc:
Rachel Applegate (PND); Tom Ellsworth (PND); Mike James;
eric.rosenlof@matrixdesigngroup.com
Subject:
Fwd: Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance Update
FYI
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jack Gilmore <jgilmore@getgilmore.com>
Date: June 18, 2025 at 11:51:10 AM MST
To: "Rachel Applegate (PND)" <Rachel.Applegate@maricopa.gov>, "Darren Gerard (PND)"
<Darren.Gerard@maricopa.gov>
Subject: Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance Update
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.
Rachel / Darren:
I attended the Stakeholder meeting on June 5th that Tom Ellsworth presented. I did mention a couple of
items, but with more time to consider and some recent experiences, I have prepared a more
comprehensive list:
1. Landscape Ordinance is necessary. Too often, developers will minimize and/or delay an
installation because there is no requirement….
2. Building Heights for warehouse/distribution… Minimum should be 48’, with additional setbacks
at 3:1 or 5:1 ratio up to 56’.
3. I would recommend that there be an allowance for the Planning Director to authorize deviations
for building heights, parking ratios, etc, up to 10%...
4. Parking ratios need to be re-evaluated to reflect many of the municipalities.
5. Consider adopting a similar City of Phoenix Commerce Park District utilizing the General
Commerce Park Option. The primary benefit allows support commercial uses; restaurants, retail
with sales areas less than 5,000sf, etc… It also requires additional perimeter landscape
setbacks…
6. Based on some recent experiences, the Military Compatibility Permit needs some attention. For
vacant areas zoned RU-43 that are impacted by noise contours that were also created prior to
Luke’s designation, there is a question regarding restrictions of lots created by a plat versus lots
that were created by land divisions…
7. The MCP requires a POD, no question. What is not clear are the subsequent POD’s that
represent later phases… The MCP Packet does not clearly indicate that subsequent POD’s must
be processed all the way to the BOS. The UC has already approved the land use. As long as the
2
subsequent POD is in general conformance, why the extra process to P&Z and BOS? The basic
POD allows an administrative review. If the POD for a MCP requires BOS approval, the packet
should make that much clearer.
8. Based on our experience with Roosevelt St west of 339th Ave, there needs to be better
cooperation/communication between Planning and MCDOT.
9. As I experienced very recently, phasing off-sites related to an interim use in a very rural area
should be more easily considered than just citing an ordinance. We scheduled a pre-app
meeting and my client specifically requested that the off-sites be deferred until there were
utilities (W&S) that could support actual site development (buildings and employees). Although
there was not a blanket acknowledgement, the decision would be based on the traffic
study… The TIS generated minimal traffic as expected and we indicated in that report that the
off-sites would be installed at a later date when utilities were available to support actual
industrial projects. Our initial use was for construction storage yards, no structures… Prior to
receiving the second MCP review comments, we were informed that the TIS was
approved… However, the second review quoted an ordinance requiring the off-sites… As you
can imagine, my clients were quite disappointed. This may be a one off and worth a discussion,
but we are now scaling back the initial phases to see if MCDOT will allow the off-sites to be
deferred.
I want these items to be constructive. If I can assist in discussions to explain these issues, please call.
Best
Jack
Jack Gilmore
5080 N 40th Street, Suite 205
Phoenix, AZ 85018
c. 602 999 8860
jgilmore@getgilmore.com
http://www.getgilmore.com/
Thank you for considering the environment before printing this e-mail
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the
county.
From:
William E. Lally
To:
Tom Ellsworth (PND); Darren Gerard (PND)
Cc:
Rachel Applegate (PND); Kurt A. Jones
Subject:
Comments to MC Text Amendment
Date:
Wednesday, October 15, 2025 1:59:23 PM
Attachments:
Outlook-tblogo.png
West Valley 500K SF Parking Study - September 2025.pdf
City of Phoenix Parking Ordinance.png
Tom and Darren,
I’ve been speaking with our client, Indicap, who has developed several industrial buildings in
the County and is currently working to secure users for the remaining ones. They have
encountered challenges meeting the existing parking requirements for industrial
developments.
We understand that you’ve already proposed updates to the industrial parking standards as
part of the pending text amendment. However, our client respectfully requests that you
consider a further modification to those proposed standards.
As shown in the attached excerpt from the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Phoenix’s parking
requirements for industrial buildings are considerably less restrictive than both the current
County standards and the proposed MCTA revisions. Additionally, the attached parking survey
of Indicap’s site and nearby industrial properties demonstrates that Indicap’s building (Line 2)
is subject to parking ratios that are, in many cases, nearly double those applied to comparable
buildings in the area.
We urge your consideration of adopting parking requirements more closely aligned with those
of the City of Phoenix.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide input on the Maricopa County Text Amendment.
William E. Lally | Shareholder | 602.452.2716 [o] 480.620.9272 [m]
wel@tblaw.com | Bio | vCard | Website | Practice Areas
he future then please respond to the sender to this effect.
Developer / Equity /
Owner
Project Name
Location
RBA (SF)
Building
Configure
Building Depth
Clear Height
Power
Auto Parking
Ratio
Year Built
Brochure
Base Building
Improvements
1
CRG
The Cubes at Glendale
Building E
7421 N Reems Rd
Glendale
570,080
Crossdock
620'
40'
(2) 3,000A
277/480v
356
0.6 / 1000
Aug-22
Link to Brochure
LED lighting
*Building is leased; additional
improvements were made after lease
was signed
2
Indicap & Invesco
Virgin Industrial Park
Building A
15784 W Hatcher Rd
Glendale
566,121
Cross Dock
560'
36'
(2) 3,000A
277/480v
748
1.3 / 1000
Aug-24
Link to Brochure
4,069 SF spec office
LED lighting
Some dock equipment
Warehouse HVAC
3
CapRock
West 202 Logistics
Building B
700 N 55th Ave
Phoenix
532,713
Crossdock
540'
40'
3,600A
277/480v
269
0.5 / 1000
Aug-23
Link to Brochure
2,500 SF spec office
LED lighting
Pit levelers on every other door
Warehouse HVAC
*Building is leased
4
Outrigger Industrial
& DWS
Luke Logistics Center
Building D
17000 W Glendale Ave
Glendale
522,480
Crossdock
510'
40'
(2) 3,000A
277/480v
267
0.5 / 1000
Aug-23
Link to Brochure
2,500 SF spec office
LED lighting
(24) dock levelers
Warehouse HVAC
*Building is partially leased
5
Johnson
Development
Litchfield Palms Logistics Park
Building C
200 S Litchfield Rd
Goodyear
521,302
Crossdock
546'
40'
3,000A
277/480v
405
0.8 / 1000
Nov-23
Link to Brochure
3,688 SF spec office
LED lighting
(24) dock levelers
(12) HVLS fans
Warehouse HVAC
*Building is leased
6
SIHI
Camelback 303
Phase I
4895 N Pebble Creek Pkwy
Goodyear
514,063
Crossdock
540'
40'
3,000A
277/480v
413
0.8 / 1000
Q3 2024
Link to Brochure
3,900 SF spec office
(47) pit levelers
LED lighting
HVAC units
*Building is leased
7
Dermody Properties
LogistiCenter at Copperwing
Building B4
Northern Pkwy & Dysart Rd
El Mirage
520,787
Crossdock
620'
40'
3,000A
277/480v
279
0.5 / 1000
Planned
Link to Brochure
TBD
West Valley | Big Box Building Specs
500,000 - 575,000 SF
September 2025
Last updated 9/25/2025