05.SU250027 PZ Staff Report

SU250027
Page 1 of 12
Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission
Prepared by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
Case:
SU250027 – Anthemnet/Verizon Wireless “PHO Westpark West” 
Hearing Date:
October 9, 2025
Supervisor District:
5
Applicant:
Todd Daoust
Owner:
Mount Zion Holy Spiritual Church of God 
  
Request:
Special Use Permit (SUP) for a wireless communication facility (WCF) in 
the Rural-43 zoning district
 
Site Location:
Generally located at the NEC of Pima St. and Palo Verde Rd. in the 
Hopeville/Buckeye area
 
Site Size:
2,500 sq. ft. lease area of a 1.6-acre parcel 
Density:
N/A
County Island: 
Yes (City of Buckeye) 
County Plan:
State Route 85 
Municipal Plan:
City of Buckeye – Activity Center 
Municipal Comments:
City of Buckeye has no objection, but prefers design other than a monopine
Support/Opposition:
None known
Recommendation:
Approve with conditions

SU250027
Page 2 of 12
Project Summary:
1.
The request is for an SUP for a 75’ (h) WCF monopine.  The tower is 70’ but the concealment 
elements (“pine bbranches” are 75’.  Ground equipment is within a walled compound.  The SUP is 
within a 50’ x 40’ or 2,000 sq. ft. lease area on a 1.6 acre parcel zoned Rural-43. The monopine 
design is to be disguised as a pine tree. The parcel is located at the NEC of Palo Verde Rd. and 
Pima St. in the southeast Buckeye/Hopeville area. The lease area is located near the northeastern 
corner of the parcel and is accessed by a 20’ wide access easement that extends northward from 
an existing driveway entrance off Pima St. along and parallel to the the Palo Verde Rd. frontage 
then turning eastward running parallel to and along the northern boundary of the parcel. A 20’ by 
20’ utility easement is recorded at the east side of the lease area extending to the east/rear 
property line and connecting  to a 10’ utility easement recorded at the east edge of the property. 
The 20’ access easement will be paved with asphalt millings and will serve as technician parking.
2.
The subject site is currently developed with a house of worship. The parcel was created as part 
of Tract “F” of the recorded plat for Hopeville. The historic final plat, S1984-034, was recorded on 
12-5-1984. Historic aerial photography captures the original church building as early as 1986. 
County records show a permit for an addition on the side of the church building per B200006627.
3.
The tower will include a total of nine (9) panel antennas, nine (9) remote radio units, one (1) OVP 
surge protector, 50kw diesel generator, two (2) equipment cabinets, two (2) hybrid cables and 
conduit runs. The WCF compound is to be enclosed within an 8’ tall CMU wall. The monopine will 
be neutral in color with a non-reflective sheen as required per MCZO article 1202.3.1.1.d. The WCF 
will be utilized for a Verizon antenna array with the ability to colocate two additional antenna 
arrays.  All antenna arrays will be within the stealth design’s concealment elements.
4.
The diameter of the tower proposed at 44 inches (3’ 8”), exceeds the maximum diameter of 30 
inches (2.5 ft) per MCZO Article 1202.3.1.1.c. 
The tower will also be located less than the required 2:1 setback distance per  MCZO Article 
1202.3.1.1.g from the north, east and south, which would otherwise  measure 140’ from all 
property lines. MCZO Article 1202.3.1.1.h limits the diameter of antenna arrays to a maximum 8’, 
or approximately half of the proposed antenna array of 16’-8”. These deviations trigger 
requirement for the SUP, see chart on next page.

SU250027
Page 3 of 12
REGULATION
BASE ZONING 
DISTRICT 
REGULATIONS for 
WCF
PROPOSED ZONING REGULATIONS 
(Rural-43 SUP)
Maximum WCF height  
80’ 
70’ (up to 75’ for ‘tree limbs’)
Setback from property 
lines
Two feet for every one 
foot in height (140’)
Northern Setback to antenna: 66’
Eastern Setback to antenna: 37’-8”
Southern Setback to antenna: 118’-10”
Maximum Diameter of 
Antenna Array
8’
16’-8”
Tower Diameter
2’-6”
3’-8”
Sight Visibility Triangles
25’ x 25’
Waived
5.
The narrative report states there are no other WCFs within a 1-mile radius of the site and the 
rapidly developing area is underserved by wireless communications infrastructure. The closest 
tower is east-southeast located 2.5 miles away. 2 miles north is a recently approved tower under 
construction not yet in service. A propagation map shown below justifies the request showing a 
significant gap in coverage that this proposal will fill.
Existing Radio Frequency Coverage

SU250027
Page 4 of 12
Anticipated Radio Frequency Coverage
2025 aerial image of site and surrounding environs.

SU250027
Page 5 of 12
Aerial image surrounding environs.

SU250027
Page 6 of 12
Zoning District map showing Rural-43 zone and Buckeye incorporated limits.

SU250027
Page 7 of 12
Proposed site plan
Enlarged image of site plan with lease area.

SU250027
Page 8 of 12
Tower elevation details 70’ height (75’ to branches) with east elevation

SU250027
Page 9 of 12
 Tower elevation details 70’ height (75’ to branches) with north elevation
Existing On-Site and Adjacent Zoning / Land Use:
6.
On-site:
Rural-43 / house of worship
North:
Rural-43 / vacant 
South:
R1-10 / single family residences
East:
Rural-43 / vacant
West:
Palo Verde Rd. then City of Buckeye / Buckeye Municipal Airport
Utilities and Services:
7.
Water:
N/A (City of Buckeye, fka Hopeville Water Company) 
Wastewater:
N/A (Septic systems)
School Districts:
Palo Verde Elementary School District / Buckeye Union High School District

SU250027
Page 10 of 12
Fire:
Arizona Fire and Medical Authority 
Police: 
MCSO 
Right-of-Way:
8.
The following table includes existing and proposed half-width right-of-way and the future 
classification based upon the Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) Major 
Streets and Routes Plan.  
Street Name
Half-width Existing R/W
Half-width Proposed R/W
Future Classification
Pima St.
50’
50’
Local
Adopted Plan:
9.
State Route 85 Area Plan (adopted May 2007): The County’s Area Plan designates the site as 
Large Lot Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) appropriate for farms and single-family 
residential development where urban services may be partially available.
 
10.
City of Buckeye General Plan - Airport Activity Center (adopted August 28, 2018): The subject 
site is designated as an Airport Employment Activity Center. The general plan describes this 
designation as an area expected to serve as a regional employment and retail hub, anchored by 
the Buckeye Airport.
Public Participation Summary:
11.
The applicant met all statutory minimum requirements for public outreach with notification 
mailers were sent to all property owners within 300’ of the site and all identified parties registered 
as an area of interest.  The site was posted with two public hearing notification signs.  City of 
Buckeye responded to staff’s request for comment requesting a different stealth design than the 
proposed pine tree design but did not oppose the case as long as the equipment compound was 
screened from view.
Outstanding Concerns from Reviewing Agencies:
12.
N/A
Staff Analysis:
13.
Staff notes the proposed WCF meets ordinance requirements for height but exceeds the 
maximum 8’ diameter for the antenna array at 16’-2”, is deficient of the required 2:1 setback per 
the underlying zoning district and exceeds the 30” diameter limit for the tower by approximately 
14 inches. This has triggered the SUP requirement. However, the WCF is a stealth designed as a 
pine tree with all antennas hidden by the design.  The height is necessary to provide required 
cellular coverage for three cellular carriers to the growing community, traffic along I-10 and the 
Buckeye Municipal Airport.  The increase in the antenna array size and reduction in setbacks are 
consistent with other WCF SUPs approved by the Board in this region (Z2024046 approved 
8/21/24). 
14.
Staff supports the SUP. The application was routed to the City of Buckeye, no objection was 
received from the City, registeredArea of Interest groups nor county review agenices. There is no 
known public opposition.

SU250027
Page 11 of 12
Recommendation:
15.
Staff recommends the Commission adopt a motion recommending that the Board of Supervisors 
approve SU250027 subject to the following conditions ‘a’ – ‘l’:
a.
Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled 
“Westpark West“, consisting of 8 full-size sheets, dated 6/27/25 and stamped received 
7/25/25 except as modified by the following conditions. Staff may determine slight 
refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan.  Minor and 
major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of 
the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.
b.
Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report 
entitled “Narrative Report for Special Use Permit Application – Anthemnet/Verizon 
Wireless ‘PHO Westpark West’”, consisting of 12 pages, stamped received 7/25/25 except 
as modified by the following conditions.
c.
The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 
1.
Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. 
All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 
1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; 
Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; 
and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of 
application for construction. 
2.
The proposed construction appears to meet the requirements of the Maricopa 
County Zoning Ordinance Section 1205.7.7 and as such a site plan containing the 
information on the attached checklist (Form 718) is required.
3.
Based upon the conceptual nature of the information submitted, changes to the 
site layout may be necessitated by the final design of the infrastructure. 
4.
The CMU enclosure will require drainage openings (turned block, every other block, 
no decorative block permitted) along the bottom. 
5.
Palo Verde Road is within the jurisdiction of the City of Buckeye. The applicant will 
be responsible for coordinating with the City to review any traffic impact, right-of-
way dedication, permitting or roadway improvement requirements associated with 
this project.
d.
The maximum height of the Wireless Communication Facility shall be limited to 70’ (up to 
75’ for stealth branches) unless an Eligible Facilities Request under Section 6409 of the 
Spectrum Act.
e.
The maximum allowed antenna array diameter is 16’-8” unless an Eligible Facilities 
Request under Section 6409 of the Spectrum Act.
f.
The maximum allowed tower diameter is 3’-8” unless an Eligible Facilities Request under 
Section 6409 of the Spectrum Act.
g.
The following setbacks shall apply: 
1.
Northern Setback to antenna array: 66’ 
2.
Eastern Setback to antenna: 37’-8”

SU250027
Page 12 of 12
3.
Southern Setback to antenna: 118’-10”
h.
A Minor Amendment shall be required to co-locate future carriers on the Wireless 
Communication Facility unless an Eligible Facilities Request under Section 6409 of the 
Spectrum Act. 
i.
The wireless communication tower shall retain the stealth properties as originally 
designed. Any damaged or missing fronds or branches shall be replaced within 90 days 
of such damage occurring. 
j.
This special use permit is valid for a period of 30 years and shall expire on November 5, 
2055, or upon termination of the use for a period of 90 or more days, whichever occurs 
first. All site improvements associated with the special use permit shall be removed within 
90 days of such expiration or termination of use.
k.
Noncompliance with any of the conditions assigned to the approval of this Special Use 
Permit by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors may be grounds for revocation in 
accordance with the requirements and procedures as set forth in the Maricopa County 
Zoning Ordinance. 
l.
The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, 
with the consent of the landowner.  The granting of this approval allows the property to 
enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, 
subject to conditions.  In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, and at the 
time of expiration of the Special Use Permit, the property shall revert to the zoning that 
existed on the date of application.  It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either 
revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, or the expiration of the Special 
Use Permit, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, 
divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the 
property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation or 
expiration of the Special Use Permit.  The Special Use Permit enhances the value of the 
property above its value as of the date the Special Use Permit is granted and reverting to 
the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Special Use Permit had 
never been granted.
Presented by:
Daniel Johnson, Planner
Reviewed by:
Rachel Applegate, Planning Supervisor
Attachments:
Case Map (1 page)
Site Plan (reduced 8.5”x11”, 8 pages)
Narrative Report (14 pages)
Engineering comments (3 pages)
Traffic Waiver (1 page)
City of Buckeye comment (1 page)

/
Maricopa County Planning & Development - Phoenix, AZ
5
Gross Acres: 0 approx.
Generated September 24, 2025 3:06 PM
SU250027
Application Name:
Legal Description
Anthemnet/Verizon Wireless "PHO Westpark West"
Applicant
Case Address
1N 4W 16
TODD DAOUST
29006 W PIMA ST
Applicant Phone/Email
Parcel Primary:504-29-086
(602) 549-9054
tdaoust@commscapesllc.com
BUCKEYE, AZ 85326
Map scale 1:2,400
Supervisor District No.
Installation of a proposed 75' stealth "monopine" Wireless Communications Facility in a 50' X 50' CMU-
walled compound in the R43 zoning district.

TITLE SHEET
T-1
YDC-11349
WESTPARK WEST
29006 W, PIMA STREET
BUCKEYE, AZ 85326
PRELIMINARY UNLESS SIGNED
19382
 
  
  
  
D
a
t
e
 
S
i
g
n
e
d
 
R
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
e
d
 
P
r
o
f
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l
 
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
RONALD C.
YOUNG
C
E
R
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
E
 
N
O
.
A
R
I
Z
O
N
A
 
U
.
S
.
A
.
 
EXP. 12/31/25
:
:
:
:
:
ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE
PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT
EDITIONS OF THE CODES AS ADAPTED BY
THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES.
BUILDING CODE
MECHANICAL CODE
PLUMBING CODE
ELECTRIC CODE
FIRE CODE
SPECIAL INSPECTIONS REQUIRED:
YES
BOLTS IN CONCRETE
:
2018
2018
2017
2018
2018
IBC
IMC
NEC
IPC
IFC
PROPOSED 70'-0" MONOPINE
AND COMMUNICATION FACILITY
WESTPARK WEST
VERIZON LOCATION CODE:  5000918646
VERIZON PROJECT NAME:  PHO_WESTPARK WEST
29006 W. PIMA STREET
BUCKEYE, AZ 85326
MARICOPA COUNTY
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT SUMMARY
TOWER OWNER
APPLICANT
GENERAL NOTES
INDEX OF DRAWINGS
SHT.
NO.
T-1
TITLE SHEET
REV.
NO.
B
C-1
OVERALL SITE PLAN
B
C-3
ENLARGED SITE PLAN
B
C-4
EAST ELEVATION
B
C-5
NORTH ELEVATION
B
LS-1
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
1
1.
THIS WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY
WILL MEET THE HEALTH AND SAFETY STANDARDS
FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EMISSIONS AS
ESTABLISHED BY THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION (FCC) OR ANY SUCCESSOR THEROF,
AND ANY OTHER FEDERAL OR STATE AGENCY.
2.
THIS WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY
WILL MEET THE REGULATIONS OF THE FCC
REGARDING PHYSICAL AND ELECTROMAGNETIC
INTERFERENCE
3.
LIGHTING OR SIGNS WILL BE PROVIDED ONLY AS
REQUIRED BY FEDERAL OR STATE AGENCIES.
4.
DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION OF THIS
PROJECT WILL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE
CODES AND ORDINANCES.
5.
EXISTING PARKING IS NOT AFFECTED BY THIS
PROJECT.
6.
THIS PROJECT DOES NOT INCLUDE WATER OR
SEWER.
CODE COMPLIANCE
811 INFORMATION
SITE NAME:
WESTPARK WEST
SITE ADDRESS: (STREET)`
1421 S. PALO VERDE RD
(CITY / ST / ZIP)
BUCKEYE, AZ 85326
APN / PARCEL ID:
504-29-086
COUNTY:
MARICOPA
JURISDICTION:
MARICOPA COUNTY
PROPERTY ACREAGE:
70,741 S.F. (1.62 ACRES)
LEASE AREA:
2500 S.F.
ANTHEMNET
270 S.F. 
VERIZON
ANTHEMNET, INC.
5151 HEADQUARTERS DRIVE, SUITE 170
PLANO, TX 75024
CONTACT: BILL PARRISH
PHONE: (469) 447-9540
EMAIL: BILL@ANTHEMNET.COM
PROPERTY OWNER
MOUNT ZION HOLY SPIRITUAL CHURCH OF GOD
22251 W. YAVAPAI STREET
BUCKEYE, AZ 85236
CONTACT: ABRAHAM HARRIS III
PHONE: (480) 709-9152
VICINITY MAP
CARRIER CONTACT
DESIGN FIRM
VERIZON WIRELESS
2600 W. GERONIMO PL
CHANDLER, AZ 85224
CONTACT: BRYAN RUDD
PHONE: (602) 320-7985
YOUNG DESIGN CORP.
10245 E. VIA LINDA, SUITE 211
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258
CONTACT: MATTHEW YOUNG
PHONE: (480) 451-9609
FAX: (480) 451-9608
UTILITY CONTACTS
SITE ACQUISITION
POWER COMPANY PHONE:
(602) 371-7171
FIBER COMPANY PHONE:
(800) 229-6751
COMMSCAPES, LLC
109 E. TUCKEY LANE
PHOENIX, AZ 85012
CONTACT: TODD DAOUST
PHONE: (602) 549-9054
LOCATION MAP
THIS PROJECT IS AN UNMANNED WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
FACILITY. IT WILL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING:
ANTHEMNET:
(1) NEW 70' MONOPINE
(1) NEW 50'X50' LEASE AREA W/ CMU SCREEN WALL
(3) WALL-MOUNTED METERS & DISCONNECTS
(1) TAPP BOX
COLLOCATION FOR THREE (3) WIRELESS PROVIDERS
ALL-WEATHER / DUST MITIGATING ACCESS ROAD WITH PARKING AREA
VERIZON:
(9) NEW PANEL ANTENNAS
(9) NEW REMOTE RADIO UNITS
(1) NEW OVP SURGE PROTECTOR AT ANTENNA LEVEL
(1) NEW 50KW DIESEL GENERATOR
(2) NEW EQUIPMENT CABINETS
(2) NEW HYBRID CABLES
NEW UTILITY CONDUIT RUNS
ANTHEMNET SCOPE OF WORK
NEW SITE TO BE DEVELOPED BY ANTHEMNET. ALL ITEMS TO BE
PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY ANTHEMNET UNLESS SPECIFICALLY
NOTED OTHERWISE, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO: TOWER, FENCE,
UTILITIES, FOUNDATIONS, TOWER SECTOR MOUNTS, ROAD, ALL
UNDERGROUND POWER AND FIBER CONDUITS WITH PULL STRINGS,
GROUNDING RINGS AND FIBER HAND HOLES.
CARRIER SCOPE OF WORK
CARRIER TO INSTALL EQUIPMENT CABINETS, GENERATOR, UTILITY
RACK AT EQUIPMENT CABINETS, RADIOS, ANTENNAS, CABLES, FIBER
AND ELECTRICAL FEEDS FROM METER TO EQUIPMENT.
UTILITY SCOPE OF WORK
[UTILITY COMPANY] TO INSTALL TRANSFORMER POLE AND RUN POWER
VIA TRENCH FROM TRANSFORMER TO METER BANK.
FIBER MEET-ME LOCATION COORDINATES:
LATITUDE:
33° 25' 54.975" N (NAD83)
LONGITUDE:
112° 40' 37.831" W (NAD83)
ELEVATION:
1045.0' A.M.S.L. (NAVD88)
NEW SITE LOCATION
LATITUDE:
33° 25' 54.341" N (NAD83)
LONGITUDE:
112° 40' 34.259" W (NAD83)
ELEVATION:
1047.0' A.M.S.L. (NAVD88)
APPROVALS
PROPERTY OWNER: 
CONSTRUCTION:
SITE ACQUISITION:
ZONING:
CONTRACTOR:
DRIVING DIRECTIONS
TRAVELING FROM SKY HARBOR INT'L AIRPORT: GET ON I-10 W FROM
SKY HARBOR BLVD W AND EXIT 148. FOLLOW I-10 W TO S. PALO VERDE
RD / N. SUN VALLEY PKWY IN BUCKEYE. TAKE EXIT 109 FROM I-10 W.
PHOENIX SKY
HARBOR
INTERNATIONAL
AIRPORT
10
10
TOLLESON
BUCKEYE
SWEETWATER
ESTATES
GLENDALE
202
101
W. BUCKEYE ROAD
S. PALO VERDE ROAD
85
S. PALO VERDE
ROAD
VERIZON PROJECT #:  17003299
C-2
UTILITY SITE PLAN
B
10
S. JOHNSON
ROAD
W. PIMA ST
W. COCOPAH
STREET
W. YUMA
RD
SUN VALLEY
PARKWAY
LS-2
SURVEY INFORMATION
1
SHEET NAME
SU250027 RCVD 7/25/25

PROPOSED TOWER
CENTER OF GEODETIC COORDINATES
LAT.= 33° 25' 54.341" NORTH
33.431761 NORTH
LON.= 112° 40' 34.259" WEST
112.676183 WEST
ELEV. @ GROUND =1047.0'
EC
ET
EM
WM
EM
EC
W LINE, SECTION 16,
TOWNSHIP 1N, RANGE 4W
    1044.8 EP
    1043.9 EP
    1041.6 EP
    1044.7 EP
    1043.8 EP
    1044.1 TBC
    1045.2 TBC
    1047.9 TBC
    1045.1 TBC
    1044.2 NG
    1043.6 NG
    1042.4 NG
    1046.1 NG
    1045.2 NG
    1046.2 NG
    1047.7 NG
    1045.7 NG
    1047.2 NG
    1055.5 BLDG
    1057.4 BLDG
    1047.3 CS
    1046.7 CS
    1044.7 CS
    1044.5 CS
    1064.6 PEAK
    1062.2 PEAK
    1046.8 SW
    1047.1 SW
    1046.9 SW
    1054.7 BLDG
    1064.6 PEAK
    1054.3 BLDG
    1055.3 BLDG
    1055.3 BLDG
    1055.1 BLDG
    1053.3 BLDG
APN: 504-29-086
TRACT "F"
SOUTH PALO VERDE ROAD
APN: 504-29-085
APN: 504-29-087
(E) LESSORS PARCEL LINE
(E) BUILDING
(E) R/W LINE
(E) SEPTIC ACCESS
(E) SHED
(E) BACK OF SIDEWALK
       (E) 8' P.U.E.
10
14
       (E) RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT
       FOR COMMUNICATION UTILITIES
       (E) 10' UTILITIES EASEMENT
10
       (E) 40' B.S.L.
10
       (E) 40' ACCESS EASEMENT
10
(E) BUILDING OVERHANG
(E) BACK OF CURB
(E) FACE OF CURB
(E) BACK OF CURB
(E) FACE OF CURB
(E) EDGE OF PAVEMENT
FOUND BCFL
FOUND BCFL
(E) EDGE OF
PAVEMENT
(E) BUILDING
FOOTPRINT
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
       (E) ELECTRIC SWITCH
CABINET EASEMENT
10
25' R/W
25' R/W
    1046.4 SW
55' R/W
CALCULATED
POSITION
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1047
1046
1045
WEST PIMA STREET
SOUTH 290TH DRIVE
(E) PROPERTY LINE
P.O.C. LEASE AREA'S
& EASEMENTS
P.O.B. 20' UTILITY
EASEMENT
(P) 20' UTILITY
EASEMENT
P.O.B. 50' x 50'
LEASE AREA
P.O.B. 18' x 15'
LEASE AREA
P.O.B. 20' ACCESS &
UTILITY EASEMENT
(P) 20' ACCESS &
UTILITY EASEMENT
P.O.B. 6' UTILITY
EASEMENT
PROPOSED FIBER VAULT
CENTER OF GEODETIC COORDINATES
LAT.= 33° 25' 54.975" NORTH
33.431937 NORTH
LON.= 112° 40' 37.831" WEST
112.677175 WEST
ELEV. @ GROUND =1045.0'
(P) 6' UTILITY
EASEMENT
L=39.22', R=25.00'
D=89°53'09"
S89° 48' 13"E
205.00'
L=226.89', R=1000.00'
D=12°59'59"
S0° 04' 56"W
330.00'
N0° 04' 56"E
185.05'
S89° 48' 13"E
350.00'
S0° 04' 56"W
189.29'
L=201.34', R=974.98'
D=11°49'54"
N89° 48' 13"W
125.10'
S0° 04' 56"W  56.71'
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
L10
L11
20.00'
40.00'
L12
L13
L14
L15
L16
LEGEND
SECTION LINE
ELECTRIC CABINET
SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT
ELECTRIC METER
SIGN
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
BRASS CAP FLUSH (BCFL)
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE (OTHER)
CENTERLINE
EASEMENT LINE
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE
OHE
OHE
POSITION OF GEODETIC COORDINATES
DECIDUOUS TREE
PALM TREE
EM
EC
ET
STREET LIGHT W/ MAST ARM
POWER POLE
P.U.E. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
B.S.L. BUILDING SETBACK LINE
WATER METER
WM
CALCULATED POSITION
FOUND BCFL
WEST COCOPAH STRE
PROJECT AREA
ALL OF TRACT F, HOPEVILLE, ACCORDING TO BOOK 275 OF MAPS, PAGE 49,
RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
EXCEPT ALL OIL, GAS, OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES, HELIUM OR
OTHER SUBSTANCES OF A GASEOUS NATURE, COAL, METALS, MINERALS,
FOSSILS, FERTILIZER OF EVERY NAME AND DESCRIPTION AND EXCEPT ALL
URANIUM, THORIUM OR ANY OTHER MATERIAL WHICH IS OR MAY BE
DETERMINED TO BE PECULIARLY ESSENTIAL TO THE PRODUCTION OF
FISSIONABLE MATERIALS
WHETHER OR NOT OF COMMERCIAL VALUE, AS SET FORTH IN SECTION
37-231, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES.
LESSOR'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION (APN: 504-29-086)
1.
ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE REPRESENTED IN NORTH
AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD88) ESTABLISHED FROM
GPS DERIVED ELLIPSOID HEIGHTS, APPLYING GEOID 12B SEPARATIONS
CONSTRAINING TO NGS CORS STATIONS PROVIDED IN THE "ONLINE
POSITIONING USER SERVICE" (OPUS) SOLUTION FOR THIS SPECIFIC
SITE.
2.
BEARINGS SHOWED HEREON ARE BASED UPON U.S. STATE PLANE
NAD83 COORDINATE SYSTEM ARIZONA STATE PLANE COORDINATE
ZONE CENTRAL, DETERMINED BY GPS OBSERVATIONS.
3.
FIELD WORK FOR THIS PROJECT WAS PERFORMED ON 01/15/25.
PROJECT META DATA
1.
ALL TITLE INFORMATION IS BASED UPON A COMMITMENT FOR TITLE
INSURANCE PREPARED BY WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE
COMPANY, ORDER NO.: ANT-202122-C EFFECTIVE DATE: 11/21/2024.
2.
SURVEYOR HAS NOT PERFORMED A SEARCH OF PUBLIC RECORDS TO
DETERMINE ANY DEFECT IN TITLE.
3.
THE BOUNDARY SHOWN HEREON IS PLOTTED FROM RECORD
INFORMATION AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF
THE PROPERTY.
4.
SURVEYOR DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ALL UTILITIES ARE SHOWN OR
THEIR LOCATIONS. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND
DEVELOPER TO CONTACT BLUE STAKE AND ANY OTHER INVOLVED
AGENCIES TO LOCATE ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
REMOVAL, RELOCATION AND/ OR REPLACEMENT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY
OF THE CONTRACTOR.
R
O
Y
E
V
R
D
a
t
e
S
i
g
n
e
d
.
O
N
E
T
A
C
I
F
I
T
R
E
C
U
S
D
N
A
L
D
E
R
E
T
S
I
G
E
R
44007
RYAN L.
FIDLER
.
A
.
.
U
,
A
N
S
Z
I
A
R
O
SURVEYOR NOTES
0
01/27/25
TITLE REVIEW
SHEET NO.
REVISION:
REVISIONS
PROJECT No.
SITE NAME:
SITE ADDRESS:
SHEET TITLE:
FIELD BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
NO.
DATE
DESCRIPTION
REUSE OF DOCUMENT
THE IDEAS & DESIGN INCORPORATED HEREON, AS  AN
INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, IS THE
PROPERTY OF RLF CONSULTING, LLC & IS NOT TO BE
USED FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT WRITTEN
AUTHORIZATION OF RLF CONSULTING, LLC.
CEF
GAC
RLF
2500003
PHO WESTPARK WEST
29006 W. PIMA ST.
BUCKEYE, AZ 85326
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
LS-1
10.   ANY AND ALL MATTERS DISCLOSED ON THE MAP ENTITLED "FINAL PLAT:
HOPEVILLE” DATED DECEMBER 3, 1984 AND RECORDED DECEMBER 5, 1984
IN (BOOK) 275 (PAGE) 49, IN MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.
14. RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT BETWEEN MOUNT ZION HOLY SPIRITUAL
CHURCH OF GOD, AN ARIZONA CORPORATION; AND THE MOUNTAIN
STATES TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY, DATED DECEMBER 2, 1988
AND RECORDED DECEMBER 21, 1988 IN (INSTRUMENT) 88 618119, IN
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.
ITEMS 1-9, AND 11-13 OF THE CLIENT PROVIDED TITLE REPORT DO NOT
CONTAIN GRAPHICALLY PLOTTABLE EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, RESTRICTIONS
OR OTHER ENCUMBRANCES. THE SURVEYOR CANNOT GUARANTEE THAT
NON-PLOTTABLE ENCUMBRANCES DO NOT EXIST THAT MAY AFFECT THE
SUBJECT LEASED PREMISES.
SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS
jsultzbach@com-serv.com
jsultzbach@com-serv.com
NORTH
THE PROPOSED LEASE PREMISES SHOWN HEREON APPEAR TO BE WITHIN FLOOD
ZONE "X" AS DELINEATED ON THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
FIRM MAP NO. 04013C2095L DATED 10/16/2013.
FLOOD ZONE "X" IS DEFINED AS: AN AREA INUNDATED BY 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE
FLOODING.
FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION
10245
architecture       / 
E. Via Linda,
 Scottsdale, AZ 85258
    project management
fax: 480 451 9608
ph: 480 451 9609
 corp@ydcoffice.com
e mail:
PALO VERDE RD
PIMA ST
290TH AVE
290TH DR
COCOPATH ST
1
02/12/25
FINAL
2600 W. GERONIMO PL.
CHANDLER, AZ 85224
LINE TABLE
LINE
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
L10
L11
L12
L13
L14
L15
L16
LENGTH
20.04
40.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
10.00
2.00
18.00
15.00
18.00
15.00
31.82
285.27
195.00
12.23
24.63
BEARING
N90° 00' 00"W
S0° 00' 01"W
N90° 00' 00"W
N0° 00' 01"W
N89° 59' 54"E
S0° 00' 07"E
N90° 00' 00"W
S0° 00' 00"E
N90° 00' 00"W
N0° 00' 00"E
N90° 00' 00"E
N0° 00' 01"W
N89° 48' 13"W
S0° 00' 00"E
N54° 52' 34"W
N90° 00' 00"W

R
O
Y
E
V
R
D
a
t
e
S
i
g
n
e
d
.
O
N
E
T
A
C
I
F
I
T
R
E
C
U
S
D
N
A
L
D
E
R
E
T
S
I
G
E
R
44007
RYAN L.
FIDLER
.
A
.
.
U
,
A
N
S
Z
I
A
R
O
0
01/27/25
TITLE REVIEW
SHEET NO.
REVISION:
REVISIONS
PROJECT No.
SITE NAME:
SITE ADDRESS:
SHEET TITLE:
FIELD BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
NO.
DATE
DESCRIPTION
REUSE OF DOCUMENT
THE IDEAS & DESIGN INCORPORATED HEREON, AS  AN
INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, IS THE
PROPERTY OF RLF CONSULTING, LLC & IS NOT TO BE
USED FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT WRITTEN
AUTHORIZATION OF RLF CONSULTING, LLC.
CEF
GAC
RLF
2500003
PHO WESTPARK WEST
29006 W. PIMA ST.
BUCKEYE, AZ 85326
SURVEY INFORMATION
LS-2
jsultzbach@com-serv.com
jsultzbach@com-serv.com
10245
architecture       / 
E. Via Linda,
 Scottsdale, AZ 85258
    project management
fax: 480 451 9608
ph: 480 451 9609
 corp@ydcoffice.com
e mail:
1
02/12/25
FINAL
2600 W. GERONIMO PL.
CHANDLER, AZ 85224
A TRACT OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF TRACT F, HOPEVILLE, ACCORDING TO
BOOK 275 OF MAPS, PAGE 49, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
BEING A 20.00 FOOT STRIP OF LAND LYING 10.00 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT F; THENCE
SOUTH 00°04'56" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT F, A DISTANCE
OF 56.71 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 20.04 FEET TO THE POINT OF
TERMINUS.
ALL SIDELINES OF DESCRIBED EASEMENT ARE TO BE SHORTENED OR
LENGTHENED TO FORM ONE CONTIGUOUS PARCEL.
LESSEE'S 20' UTILITY EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A TRACT OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF TRACT F, HOPEVILLE, ACCORDING TO
BOOK 275 OF MAPS, PAGE 49, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT F; THENCE
SOUTH 00°04'56" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT F, A DISTANCE
OF 56.71 FEET; THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 20.04 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 00°00'01" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°00'01" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°59'54" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°00'07" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 2500 SQUARE FEET OR 0.057 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
LESSEE'S 50' x 50' LEASE AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A TRACT OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF TRACT F, HOPEVILLE, ACCORDING TO
BOOK 275 OF MAPS, PAGE 49, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT F; THENCE
SOUTH 00°04'56" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT F, A DISTANCE
OF 56.71 FEET; THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 20.04 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°00'01" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 00°00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 18.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 18.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 270 SQUARE FEET OR 0.006 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
LESSEE'S 18' x 15' LEASE AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A TRACT OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF TRACT F, HOPEVILLE, ACCORDING TO
BOOK 275 OF MAPS, PAGE 49, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
BEING A 20.00 FOOT STRIP OF LAND LYING 10.00 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT F; THENCE
SOUTH 00°04'56" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT F, A DISTANCE
OF 56.71 FEET; THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 20.04 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°00'01" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°00'01" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°59'54" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTH 00°00'01" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 31.82 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°48'13" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 285.27 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 195.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF
TERMINUS.
ALL SIDELINES OF DESCRIBED EASEMENT ARE TO BE SHORTENED OR
LENGTHENED TO FORM ONE CONTIGUOUS PARCEL.
LESSEE'S 20' ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A TRACT OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF TRACT F, HOPEVILLE, ACCORDING TO
BOOK 275 OF MAPS, PAGE 49, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
BEING A 6.00 FOOT STRIP OF LAND LYING 3.00 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT F; THENCE
SOUTH 00°04'56" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT F, A DISTANCE
OF 56.71 FEET; THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 20.04 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°00'01" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°00'01" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°59'54" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°00'01" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 31.82 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°48'13" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 285.27 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 54°52'34" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 12.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 24.63 FEET THE POINT OF
TERMINUS.
ALL SIDELINES OF DESCRIBED EASEMENT ARE TO BE SHORTENED OR
LENGTHENED TO FORM ONE CONTIGUOUS PARCEL.
LESSEE'S 6' UTILITY EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LINE TABLE
LINE
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
LENGTH
20.04
40.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
10.00
2.00
18.00
BEARING
N90° 00' 00"W
S0° 00' 01"W
N90° 00' 00"W
N0° 00' 01"W
N89° 59' 54"E
S0° 00' 07"E
N90° 00' 00"W
S0° 00' 00"E
LINE TABLE
LINE
L9
L10
L11
L12
L13
L14
L15
L16
LENGTH
15.00
18.00
15.00
31.82
285.27
195.00
12.23
24.63
BEARING
N90° 00' 00"W
N0° 00' 00"E
N90° 00' 00"E
N0° 00' 01"W
N89° 48' 13"W
S0° 00' 00"E
N54° 52' 34"W
N90° 00' 00"W

WM
EM
EC
APN: 504-29-086
ZONING: RU-43
SOUTH PALO VERDE ROAD
APN: 504-29-085
ZONING: RU-43
APN: 504-29-087
ZONING: RU-43
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
S89° 48' 13"E
205.00'
L=226.89', R=1000.00'
D=12°59'59"
S0° 04' 56"W
330.00'
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1047
1046
1045
WEST PIMA STREET
SOUTH 290TH DRIVE
N0° 04' 56"E
185.05'
S89° 48' 13"E
350.00'
S0° 04' 56"W
189.29'
L=201.34', R=974.98
'
D=11°49'54"
N89° 48' 13"W
125.10'
EC
ET
EM
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING
OVERHANG
EXISTING SEPTIC
TANK ACCESS
EXISTING
BUILDING
EXISTING SHED, TO
REMAIN IN PLACE
EXISTING 10' WIDE
UTILITY EASEMENT
EXISTING 40' WIDE
ACCESS EASEMENT
EXISTING 75KVA
TRANSFORMER #TX-01
EXISTING ELECTRIC
SWITCH CABINET
EASEMENT
EXISTING 8'
WIDE P.U.E.
25'-0"
R.O.W.
25'-0"
R.O.W.
FOUND
BCFL
R.O.W.
LINE
FOUND
B.C.F.L.
EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT
FOR COMMUNICATIONS UTILITIES
EXISTING 40'
BUILDING
SETBACK LINE
40'-0" B.S.L.
55'-0" R.O.W.
L=39.22', R=25.00'
D=89°53'09"
CALCULATED
POSITION
W LINE, SECTION 16
TOWNSHIP 1N, RANGE 4W
EDGE OF EXISTING
PAVEMENT
PROPOSED VERIZON
24"X36" TRAFFIC-RATED
MEET POINT FIBER VAULT
PROPOSED (1) 2" Ø U.G.
FIBER CONDUIT, ±361'-3"
PROPOSED 6' WIDE
ANTHEMNET UTILITY
EASEMENT
PROPOSED ANTHEMNET
SITE FIBER VAULT
(2) PROPOSED ANTHEMNET 8'
WIDE T.S. ACCESS GATES W/
PAINTED SOLID METAL BACKING
PROPOSED ANTHEMNET
WALL-MOUNTED 200AMP
METER, DISCONNECT,
AND TAPP BOX, TO BE
UTILIZED BY VERIZON
PROPOSED WALL-MOUNTED
ANTHEMNET 200AMP METERS &
DISCONNECTS, TO BE UTILIZED
BY FUTURE CARRIERS
PROPOSED 20' WIDE
UTILITY EASEMENT
PROPOSED VERIZON OUTDOOR
EQUIPMENT CABINETS ON A
PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB
PROPOSED VERIZON
PANEL AND ATS MOUNTED
TO A PROPOSED H-FRAME
PROPOSED VERIZON 50KW
DIESEL-DRIVEN BACKUP
GENERATOR MOUNTED TO A
PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB
PROPOSED VERIZON
ANTENNA ARRAY ON
NSTD446 COMPLIANT
MOUNTS, SEE THIS SHEET
FOR CONFIGURATION
PROPOSED 20' WIDE
ANTHEMNET ACCESS /
UTILITY EASEMENT
PROPOSED 20' WIDE
ANTHEMNET ACCESS /
UTILITY EASEMENT
ZONING: R1-10
ZONING: R1-10
ET
NEW 50KVA APS
TRANSFORMER #W10260,
SOURCE OF POWER
OVERALL SITE PLAN
C-1
YDC-11349
WESTPARK WEST
29006 W, PIMA STREET
BUCKEYE, AZ 85326
PRELIMINARY UNLESS SIGNED
19382
 
  
  
  
D
a
t
e
 
S
i
g
n
e
d
 
R
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
e
d
 
P
r
o
f
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l
 
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
RONALD C.
YOUNG
C
E
R
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
E
 
N
O
.
A
R
I
Z
O
N
A
 
U
.
S
.
A
.
 
EXP. 12/31/25
OVERALL SITE PLAN
N O R T H
C-1
1
SEE UTILITY PLAN ON
C-2 SHEET FOR POWER
ROUTE DETAILS
SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"
SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"
10'
20'
0
40'
OF TOWER FROM PROPERTY LINE
NORTH
EAST
WEST
SOUTH
PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR
PROPOSED SETBACKS TO CENTER
± 71'-10"   
± 125'-9" 
± 305'-0"
± 45'-0"  
* SETBACKS ARE DERIVED FROM A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY

ET
EM
UGE
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
20'-0" PROPOSED
UTIL. EASEMENT
20'-0" PROPOSED
ACCESS / UTIL. EASEMENT
PROPOSED ANTHEMNET 8'
HIGH CMU SCREEN WALLED
EQUIPMENT COMPOUND,
COLOR AND TEXTURE OF
WALL TO BE COORDINATED
WITH LANDLORD
PROPOSED ANTHEMNET
50'X50' LEASE AREA
PROPOSED VERIZON
ANTENNA ARRAY ON
NSTD446 COMPLIANT
MOUNTS MOUNTED TO NEW
ANTHEMNET MONOPINE
PROPOSED VERIZON 50KW
DIESEL-DRIVEN BACKUP
GENERATOR ON PROPOSED
CONCRETE SLAB
PROPOSED VERIZON
PANEL AND ATS
MOUNTED TO A
PROPOSED H-FRAME
PROPOSED VERIZON
OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT
CABINETS ON PROPOSED
CONCRETE SLAB
NEW APS 50KVA
TRANSFORMER #W10260
MOUNTED ON A NEW
CONCRETE SLAB, WITH (2) NEW
CONCRETE FILLED BOLLARDS
PROPOSED ANTHEMNET
WALL-MOUNTED 200AMP METER,
DISCONNECT, AND TAPP BOX,
TO BE UTILIZED BY VERIZON
PROPOSED ANTHEMNET (2)
WALL-MOUNTED 200AMP METERS
& DISCONNECTS, TO BE UTILIZED
BY FUTURE CARRIERS
PROPOSED ANTHEMNET
24"X36" TRAFFIC RATED
SITE FIBER VAULT FOR
USED BY VERIZON
PROPOSED ANTHEMNET
24"X36" TRAFFIC RATED
SITE FIBER VAULT FOR
USE BY OTHER CARRIERS
(2) PROPOSED
ANTHEMNET T.S. ACCESS
GATES W/ PAINTED SOLID
METAL BACKING
PROPOSED 20' WIDE
ANTHEMNET ACCESS /
UTILITY EASEMENT
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING BUILDING
EXISTING SHED, TO
REMAIN IN PLACE
EXISTING
WALL-MOUNTED METER,
TO REMAIN IN PLACE
EXISTING 75KVA APS
TRANSFORMER #TX-01
(SOURCE OF POWER)
40'-0" EXISTING ACCESS EASEMENT
10'-0" UTIL
EASEMENT
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING 8' WIDE
UTILITIES EASEMENT
EXISTING 40' WIDE
ACCESS EASEMENT
APN: 504-29-087
ZONING: RU-43
APN: 504-29-086
ZONING: RU-43
PROPOSED VERIZON U.G.
COAX ROUTE BETWEEN
PROPOSED VERIZON
OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT
CABINETS AND PROPOSED
MONOPINE, ±20'-5"
APN: 504-29-085
ZONING: RU-43
PROPOSED (1) 2" Ø U.G.
FIBER CONDUIT, ±361'-3"
PROPOSED (1) UA1/0T-2" Ø
U.G. CONDUITS PER APS
SPECIFICATIONS, ±12'-0",
SEE APS PD #WA869082
FOR MORE DETAILS
(3) NEW UA1/0AV-3 3" U.G.
CONDUITS ROUTED FROM
NEW TRANSFORMER TO (3)
METERS, ±108' PER APS
#WA869082 PD
ET
UTILITY SITE PLAN
C-2
YDC-11349
WESTPARK WEST
29006 W, PIMA STREET
BUCKEYE, AZ 85326
PRELIMINARY UNLESS SIGNED
19382
 
  
  
  
D
a
t
e
 
S
i
g
n
e
d
 
R
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
e
d
 
P
r
o
f
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l
 
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
RONALD C.
YOUNG
C
E
R
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
E
 
N
O
.
A
R
I
Z
O
N
A
 
U
.
S
.
A
.
 
EXP. 12/31/25
UTILITY SITE PLAN
N O R T H
C-2
1
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
4'
8'
0
16'
SEE ENLARGED PLANS ON
C-3 SHEET FOR DETAILS

UGE
UGE
UGE
CLEAR
PER
NEC
ER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
U.G. FIBER
50'-0" PROPOSED ANTHEMNET PREMISES
31'-8" PROPOSED ANTHEMNET CMU SCREEN WALL
12'-0"
5'-5"
20'-0" PROPOSED ANTHEMNET
ACCESS / UTILITY EASEMENT
(2) PROPOSED ANTHEMNET 6'
WIDE T.S. ACCESS GATES W/
PAINTED SOLID METAL BACKING
PROPOSED 50'X50'
ANTHEMNET LEASE AREA
PROPOSED ANTHEMNET
24"X36" TRAFFIC RATED
SITE FIBER VAULT FOR USE
BY OTHER CARRIERS
PROPOSED ANTHEMNET
24"X36" TRAFFIC RATED
SITE FIBER VAULT FOR
USE BY VERIZON
PROPOSED ANTHEMNET
WALL-MOUNTED 200AMP METER,
DISCONNECT, AND TAPP BOX, TO
BE UTILIZED BY VERIZON
PROPOSED ANTHEMNET
WALL-MOUNTED 200AMP
METERS & DISCONNECTS,
TO BE UTILIZED BY
FUTURE CARRIERS
20'-0" PROPOSED ANTHEMNET
UTILITY EASEMENT
PROPOSED VERIZON
OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT
CABINETS ON PROPOSED
CONCRETE SLAB
PROPOSED VERIZON U.G. 2.5"Ø POWER
CONDUIT BETWEEN I.L.C. & CABINETS, ±11'-8"
PROPOSED VERIZON
PANEL AND ATS MOUNTED
TO A PROPOSED H-FRAME
PROPOSED  2.5"Ø
VERIZON U.G.
POWER CONDUIT
BETWEEN I.L.C. &
GENERATOR, ±7'-6"
1'-4"
2'-0"
4'-0"
SLAB
7'-0"
4'-0"
SLAB
1'-0"
18'-0" PROPOSED VERIZON
LEASE AREA
6'-0"
4'-0"
PROPOSED VERIZON 50KW
DIESEL-DRIVEN BACKUP GENERATOR
ON PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB
PROPOSED (1) 2"Ø U.G.
FIBER CONDUIT, ±361'-5"
PROPOSED 20' WIDE
ANTHEMNET ACCESS /
UTILITY EASEMENT
15'-0" PROPOSED VERIZON LEASE AREA
2'-0"
12'-0" SLAB
1'-0"
1'-1"
25'-0"
50'-0" PROPOSED ANTHEMNET PREMISES
49'-1" PROPOSED ANTHEMNET CMU SCREEN WALL
6"
6"
PROPOSED ANTHEMNET 8'
HIGH CMU SCREEN WALLED
EQUIPMENT COMPOUND,
COLOR AND TEXTURE OF
WALL TO BE COORDINATED
WITH LANDLORD
1047'
APN: 504-29-086
ZONING: RU-43
PROPOSED VERIZON U.G.
COAX ROUTE BETWEEN
PROPOSED VERIZON OUTDOOR
EQUIPMENT CABINETS AND
PROPOSED MONOPINE, ±20'-5"
25'-0"
ET
PROPERTY LINE
(3) NEW UA1/0AV-3 3" U.G.
CONDUITS ROUTED FROM NEW
TRANSFORMER TO (3) METERS,
±108' PER APS #WA869082 PD
NEW APS 50KVA TRANSFORMER
#W10260 MOUNTED ON A NEW
CONCRETE SLAB, WITH (2) NEW
CONCRETE FILLED BOLLARDS
ENLARGED SITE PLAN
C-3
YDC-11349
WESTPARK WEST
29006 W, PIMA STREET
BUCKEYE, AZ 85326
PRELIMINARY UNLESS SIGNED
19382
 
  
  
  
D
a
t
e
 
S
i
g
n
e
d
 
R
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
e
d
 
P
r
o
f
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l
 
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
RONALD C.
YOUNG
C
E
R
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
E
 
N
O
.
A
R
I
Z
O
N
A
 
U
.
S
.
A
.
 
EXP. 12/31/25
ENLARGED SITE PLAN
N O R T H
C-3
1
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2'
4'
0
8'
ANTENNA CONFIGURATION @ 71'-0" 
2
NOT USED
3
4
PROPOSED VERIZON
ANTENNAS, (3)
SECTORS W/ (3)
ANTENNAS PER SECTOR
(3) PROPOSED VERIZON
MOUNTS TO COMPLY WITH
NSTD446 STANDARDS
(6) PROPOSED B13 & B66
DUAL BAND RRHS, (3) B48
C-BAND RRH'S, (3 TOTAL)
PER SECTOR, (9) TOTAL
MOUNTED BEHIND
PROPOSED ANTENNAS
(2) PROPOSED VERIZON
LINES OF 6x12 HYBRID
CABLE, ROUTED INSIDE
PROPOSED ANTHEMNET
MONOPINE
COAXIAL CABLE TABLE
SECTORAZIMUTH CTRLINE
NO.
SIZE
TYPE
ALPHA
BETA
GAMMA
0°
120°
240°
71'-0"
71'-0"
71'-0"
NOTE:
ALL AZIMUTHS ARE SHOWN RELATIVE TO TRUE NORTH,
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE
*IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY
AZIMUTHS DEPICTED HEREIN WITH RF DEPARTMENT PRIOR
TO INSTALLING ANTENNAS.
1-5/8"
2
6X12 HYBRID
CABLE
-
-
-
-
-
-
COAX CABLE INFORMATION
120°
0°
240°
(1) PROPOSED VERIZON
12-PORT NEMA J-BOX
(OVP-12), MOUNTED TO
MOUNTING FRAME NEAR
CABLE ENTRY PORT,
FIELD VERIFY EXACT
LOCATION
PROPOSED ANTHEMNET 75'
MONOPINE W/ VERIZON
ANTENNA ARRAY, NEEDLES
AND BRANCHES NOT
SHOWN FOR CLARITY
-
-
-
-
-
-

PROPOSED VERIZON ANTENNA
ARRAY MOUNTED TO NSTD445/446
APPROVED MOUNTING FRAMES ON
NEW ANTHEMNET MONOPINE,
COLOR TO BE COORDINATED WITH
LANDLORD AND MANUFACTURER
TO CONCEAL ANTENNAS
ANTENNAS AND DISHES
SHALL HAVE PINE NEEDLE
"SOCKS" TO MATCH NEEDLE
DENSITY AND COLOR OF
PROPOSED MONOPINE
FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNA
ARRAY LOCATION
65'-0" TO RAD CENTER OF PROPOSED VERIZON ANTENNA ARRAY
70'-0" TO TOP OF PROPOSED VERIZON ANTENNA ARRAY / TOP OF PROPOSED ANTHEMNET MONOPINE STRUCTURE
75'-0" TO TOP OF DW TOWER BRANCHES / NEEDLES (OVERALL HEIGHT)
8'-0"
PROPOSED
ANTHEMNET MONOPINE
W/ PROPOSED VERIZON
ANTENNA ARRAY
PROPOSED VERIZON 50KW
DIESEL-DRIVEN BACKUP
GENERATOR ON PROPOSED
CONCRETE SLAB
PROPOSED VERIZON PANEL AND ATS
MOUNTED TO A PROPOSED H-FRAME
PROPOSED VERIZON OUTDOOR
EQUIPMENT CABINETS ON
PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB
EXISTING BUILDING BEYOND, TO
REMAIN IN PLACE
PROPOSED ANTHEMNET
WALL-MOUNTED 200AMP
METERS & DISCONNECTS,
TO BE UTILIZED BY
FUTURE CARRIERS
PROPOSED ANTHEMNET
WALL-MOUNTED 200AMP
METER, DISCONNECT,
AND TAPP BOX, TO BE
UTILIZED BY VERIZON
PROPOSED ANTHEMNET 8'
HIGH CMU SCREEN WALLED
EQUIPMENT COMPOUND,
COLOR AND TEXTURE OF
WALL TO BE COORDINATED
WITH LANDLORD
EXISTING SHED, TO
REMAIN IN PLACE
EXISTING METER
BANK, BY OTHERS,
TO REMAIN IN PLACE
8'-0" CMU WALL
7'-7" GENERATOR
7'-2" CABINET
FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNA
ARRAY LOCATION
EAST ELEVATION
C-4
YDC-11349
WESTPARK WEST
29006 W, PIMA STREET
BUCKEYE, AZ 85326
PRELIMINARY UNLESS SIGNED
19382
 
  
  
  
D
a
t
e
 
S
i
g
n
e
d
 
R
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
e
d
 
P
r
o
f
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l
 
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
RONALD C.
YOUNG
C
E
R
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
E
 
N
O
.
A
R
I
Z
O
N
A
 
U
.
S
.
A
.
 
EXP. 12/31/25
PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION
C-4
1
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2'
4'
0
8'

PROPOSED VERIZON ANTENNA
ARRAY MOUNTED TO NSTD445/446
APPROVED MOUNTING FRAMES ON
NEW ANTHEMNET MONOPINE,
COLOR TO BE COORDINATED WITH
LANDLORD AND MANUFACTURER
TO CONCEAL ANTENNAS
ANTENNAS AND DISHES
SHALL HAVE PINE NEEDLE
"SOCKS" TO MATCH NEEDLE
DENSITY AND COLOR OF
PROPOSED MONOPINE
FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNA
ARRAY LOCATION
65'-0" TO RAD CENTER OF PROPOSED VERIZON ANTENNA ARRAY
70'-0" TO TOP OF PROPOSED VERIZON ANTENNA ARRAY / TOP OF PROPOSED ANTHEMNET MONOPINE STRUCTURE
75'-0" TO TOP OF DW TOWER BRANCHES / NEEDLES (OVERALL HEIGHT)
8'-0"
PROPOSED
ANTHEMNET MONOPINE
W/ PROPOSED VERIZON
ANTENNA ARRAY
(3) PROPOSED ANTHEMNET
WALL-MOUNTED 200AMP
METERS, DISCONNECTS,
AND (1) TAPP BOX, (1) TO
BE UTILIZED BY VERIZON
EXISTING SHED, TO
REMAIN IN PLACE
EXISTING
BUILDING, TO
REMAIN IN PLACE
FUTURE CARRIER ANTENNA
ARRAY LOCATION
PROPOSED VERIZON PANEL
AND ATS MOUNTED TO A
PROPOSED H-FRAME
PROPOSED VERIZON 50KW
DIESEL-DRIVEN BACKUP
GENERATOR ON PROPOSED
CONCRETE SLAB
(2) ANTHEMNET 6' WIDE T.S.
ACCESS GATES, W/ PAINTED
SOLID METAL BACKING TO
MATCH WALL COLOR
PROPOSED VERIZON
EQUIPMENT CABINETS
ON PROPOSED
CONCRETE SLAB
PROPOSED ANTHEMNET 8' HIGH
CMU SCREEN WALLED
EQUIPMENT COMPOUND, COLOR
AND TEXTURE OF WALL TO BE
COORDINATED WITH LANDLORD
8'-0" CMU WALL
7'-7" GENERATOR
7'-2" CABINET
NORTH ELEVATION
C-5
YDC-11349
WESTPARK WEST
29006 W, PIMA STREET
BUCKEYE, AZ 85326
PRELIMINARY UNLESS SIGNED
19382
 
  
  
  
D
a
t
e
 
S
i
g
n
e
d
 
R
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
e
d
 
P
r
o
f
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l
 
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
RONALD C.
YOUNG
C
E
R
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
E
 
N
O
.
A
R
I
Z
O
N
A
 
U
.
S
.
A
.
 
EXP. 12/31/25
PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION
C-5
1
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2'
4'
0
8'

Narrative Report  
For 
Special Use Permit Application 
 
 
Anthemnet/Verizon Wireless 
“PHO Westpark West” 
 
 
Proposed 70’ monopine in 50’ X 50’ compound 
 
29006 W Pima St Buckeye AZ 85326 
 
SEC of Palo Verde Road and I-10 in the Buckeye area 
 
 
 
PA-250069 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SU250027
SU250027 RCVD 7/25/25

PROJECT STATEMENT 
 FOR  
NEW WIRELESS COMMUNICATION 70’ MONOPINE 
 
Submitted to Maricopa County 
Planning & Development 
 
July 2025 
 
1.  
GENERAL INFORMATION 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Applicant: 
Anthemnet 
 
Todd Daoust 
 
109 East Tuckey Lane 
 
Phoenix, AZ  85012 
 
 
Site Address: 
29006 W Pima Street 
 
Buckeye, AZ  85326 
 
 
 
Assessor’s Parcel No.:    
504-29-086 
 
Zoning: 
RU-43 
 
Parcel Size: 
1.62 Acres, +/- 
 
SUP/Lease Area Size:   
2500 square feet 
 
Anthemnet/Verizon Site: PHO Westpark West 
 
Property Owner: 
Mt Zion Holy Spiritual Church of God 
 
Request: 
Approval of a new 70’ Monopine within a 50’ X 50’ compound    
 
  
 
  
2.  
INTRODUCTION                   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Wireless technology has become an integral part of our daily lives.  This technology relies on 
infrastructure (Cell Sites) to create the coverage and capacity to meet bandwidth demand.  In 2020, 
wireless traffic topped 42 trillion MBs- a 208% increase since 2016.  Current estimates indicate there are 
as many as 329 million mobile users (88 percent of regional population), up from 313 million (86 percent 
of regional population) in 2018 (Source:  Cisco Networking).  
High speed mobile broadband is available to nearly all consumers in the U.S., and those broadband 
speeds keep increasing.  Faster speeds mean better connections and more advanced applications.  
Wireless is increasingly the preferred way to access the internet.  Wireless data use will continue to 
grow.  By 2025, people will interact with connected devices every 18 seconds.  5G networks will be 100 
times faster, connect 100 times more devices and be five times more responsive.

Connecting everyone and everything will unlock innovation across every part of our lives-powering 
breakthroughs in healthcare, energy, and manufacturing. 
Wireless industry innovation will enable truly smart cities and is critical to the emerging Internet of 
Things, connecting watches, clothing, drones, homes, offices, cars and more- creating new industries 
and jobs, improving safety, reducing waste, and enhancing our environment. 
3.  
PURPOSE OF REQUEST                              
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
This application requests Maricopa County approve a Special Use Permit for a new Wireless 
Communications Facility (“WCF”).  The WCF would feature a 70’ Monopine and therefore meet the 
maximum height requirements as outlined in Chapter 12 of the MCZO.  However, the proposed facility 
would not meet a 2:1 setback in all directions.  Additionally, the Monopine would feature a maximum 
diameter exceeding 30 inches at the base and would include an antenna array diameter exceeding eight 
feet.  For these reasons, a SUP is necessary to approve the facility. 
 
4.  
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Applicant is proposing to build a 50’ X 50’X 8’ CMU wall around the 70’ Monopine and the proposed 
Verizon Wireless equipment cabinets to screen from public view. The CMU wall will be painted to match 
the existing buildings to integrate the proposed wireless communications facility into the prevailing on-
site architecture.  The proposed Monopine will accommodate two additional wireless carriers on the 
structure to deliver high-capacity wireless services and create a centralized location for future wireless 
providers to deploy quickly, effectively, and efficiently in the future.   
 
The proposed site is located within a larger 1.62 Acre parcel zoned RU-43 currently utilized as a church. 
 
5.  
SUP COMPARISON CHART 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Development Standards 
Base Standards 
(WCF in Rueal-43) 
Proposed Standards 
(WCF in Rural-43 SUP) 
Max. Height 
80’ 
70’ (up to 75’ for faux tree branches) 
Max. Antenna Array 
Diameter 
8’ 
16’-8” 
Max. Tower Diameter 
2’-6” 
3’-8” 
Min. WCF Setback from 
Rural/Residential Zoning 
140’ (for 70’ tower) 
180’ (for max. 80’ tower) 
North:  66’ (RU-43/Vacant) 
South:  118’-10” (R1-10/M.H.R.) 
West:  299’-11” (CG (Buckeye)/Buckeye 
Airport) 
East:  37’-8” (RU-43/Vacant) 
Roadway/Parking 
Surfacing 
Pavement 
(Asphalt Millings 
Acceptable) 
Pavement 
(Asphalt Millings 
Acceptable) 
Sight Visibility Triangles 
25’ X 25’ 
Waived

The site varies from the standards set forth in MCZO for WCFs.  Below is a justification for the 
deviation(s) from those standards: 
 
• 
Max Antenna Array (10’ vs 8’)- The size and number of antennas impact the width (diameter of 
the antenna array).  The anchor tenant, Verizon Wireless, will be transmitting and receiving a 
number of frequency bands from this site, including CMRS (Cellular), LTE, AWS, PCS, L-Sub 6, and 
CBRS to support 4G and 5G technologies.  These antennas require horizontal separation from 
one another to address interference with one another.  In addition, a wider antenna array 
(mount) provides for a wider aperture for branches to extend through the array to increase 
screening. 
 
• 
Setbacks 2:1 vs > 2:1)- The site observes a 2:1 setback from the west, but not the north, south, 
and east.  This is primarily due to the placement of the building on the parcel  
 
• 
Max. Tower Diameter (30” vs. 36”)- The site is designed to accommodate 3 wireless carriers.  
We are proposing all carrier cabling to be routed through the tower caisson (foundation) into 
the pole.  The increased diameter, while only a negligible 6” increase, more easily 
accommodates the internal cabling structurally and spatially. 
6. 
RELATIONSHIP TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES                          
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Proposed Site is zoned RU-43, where non-stealth freestanding Wireless Communication Facilities are 
allowed both with and without a Special Use Permit.    
 
In this particular case, a Special Use Permit is required as: 
 
1.)  The site does not meet a 2:1 setback from all property lines, and 
2.) The proposed antenna array (10’) exceeds the maximum diameter (8’ circumference line) 
3.) The pole base exceeds the maximum base pole diameter of 2’-6” 
 
The 1.62 +/- Acre parent parcel is used as a worship facility.  Generally speaking, the parent parcel and 
proposed site are situated in an area bordered by Yuma /Buckeye Road to the north, Palo Verde Road to 
the west, Pima Street to the south.   The closest arterial to the east is S.R. 85, approximately 3 miles 
east.  Interstate 10 is approximately ½ mile to the north. 
   
The general area is characterized by vacant land to the north and east, single family residential land to 
the south, and the Buckeye airport to the west. The area is experiencing moderate to high growth as 
urbanization expands westward along interstate 10. 
 
Given the rapid development, the area is underserved by wireless communications infrastructure, 
with the closest tower being located 2.5 miles away (east-southeast), occupied by Verizon Wireless.   
 
It is also worth noting the County recently approved a Verizon Wireless site 2 miles north in August 2024 
(2024046).  As of the date of this Narrative, the site is under construction and not yet in service.

This site will improve the coverage and capacity for this growing part of the valley.  For more 
information, please refer to the Special Use Permit Supplemental Questionnaire for Wireless 
Communications Facilities included in the Appendix to this Narrative. 
 
The site observes in excess of the required 2:1 setback from west property line.  The setbacks from the 
north and east property lines are just under 1:1. The setback to the south is just under 2:1.  The closes 
single family residence is approximately 175’ to the south (includes Pina Street ROW).  
 
The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows: 
 
 
Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Direction 
Existing Zoning 
Existing Use 
Site 
RU-43 
Church 
North 
RU-43 
Airport 
East 
RU-43 
Vacant 
South 
R1-10 
Single Family Residential 
West 
(Buckeye) General 
Commerce 
Buckeye Airport

Zoning Map 
 
 
 
The proposed site observes the following setbacks (as calculated from the face of the antenna array to 
Property lines: 
 
 
 
 
 
Direction 
Distance  
Adjacent Use 
North 
66’ 
Vacant (single family 
residential planned) 
East 
37’-8” 
Vacant (single family 
residential planned) 
South 
118’-10” 
Single Family residential 
West 
299’-11” 
Buckeye Regional Airport

7.  
LOCATION AND ACCESSIBILITY  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The proposed site is located in the west valley, South of Interstate 10 and east of Palo Verde Road. 
Access to the proposed site is via the existing curb cut off of West Pima Street (at the southwest corner 
of the Property).  A private all-weather access driveway will extend from the aforementioned access 
point to the site.   
 
8.   
CIRCULATION SYSTEM  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The proposed site will not impact the existing circulation system of the parent parcel.  In fact, the 
proposed site is intentionally proposed in an area that will not impact internal traffic flows for church 
parking.  The proposed site includes the 20’ wide all-weather (Asphalt milling) access driveway and 
utility easement along the west and north boundaries. This driveway will provide access to the proposed 
site off of West Pima Street (paved). 
Once constructed, the access to the site is anticipated to occur approximately once per month for 
maintenance. 
 
9.   
DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE (Phasing) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The initial construction is anticipated to take approximately 8 weeks, including all civil (tower, fiber, 
power, compound, and access road) and the installation of Verizon Wireless equipment at the site. 
 
Thereafter, construction (installation/collocation), or modification of equipment at the site will only 
occur once a new Building Permit (including necessary zoning approvals) is obtained from Maricopa 
County.  The installation of additional carrier equipment (collocation) is anticipated to take 
approximately 4 weeks per wireless tenant. 
 
10.   
COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The proposed site is located in unincorporated Maricopa County.  As such, community facilities and 
services are limited.  Most developed parcels are served by the Hopeville Water Company, and private  
septic tank, and trash service.  Police Service is provided by MCSO, and fire service is provided by the 
Buckeye Valley Rural Fire District.  The site is located within the Palo Verde Elementary School District 
and the Buckeye Union High School District. 
This site is anticipated to serve the wireless voice, data, and internet needs of Verizon wireless 
customers in the community once developed.  Thereafter, the site will be marketed to additional 
wireless carriers to offer competing services for the community.

Anthemnet/Verizon Wireless “PHO Westpark West” SU-25-0027 
Radio Frequency (Coverage) Propagation Plots 
 
Coverage PRE (existing) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Substantial gap in coverage

Anthemnet/Verizon Wireless “PHO Westpark West” SU-25-0027 
Radio Frequency (Coverage) Propagation Plots 
 
Coverage POST

11. 
CARRIER COVERAGE                     
               
 
 
 
 
 
 
The need for wireless service is determined by market demand, density of surrounding sites, coverage 
requirements for a specific geographic area, and the obligation to provide continuous coverage from one 
site to another in a particular geographic region to avoid call failures, dropped calls and slow data speeds. 
Approval of this application will allow Verizon Wireless and potentially other wireless carriers to meet the 
service demands of this area from this particular location. 
 
It is important to note there are no existing sites within 1 mile of the proposed location.  The closest 
tower(s) are lattice towers located 2.5 miles east-southeast of the proposed site.  It is important to note 
Verizon Wireless is currently located on that site.  As previously mentioned, the County recently also 
approved a Verizon Wireless site 2 miles north in August 2024 (2024046).  This site is under construction 
and not yet in service. 
 
The Proposed Site’s location and placement within the property, together with the property’s zoning, 
surrounding land use, and common land ownership to the south and west make this location superior to 
the other site locations in the area.  In addition, the design will accommodate additional wireless carriers, 
eliminating the need for additional sites in the immediate area.  Lastly, capitalizing on increased coverage 
afforded by this superior site will enable less intense WCF uses (i.e. small cells) to be deployed in more 
sensitive areas with less intrusive impact in the future. 
 
Wireless coverage provided by communication sites, such as the one at this location, will function as an 
important link to complete and fortify the overall communications network locally and nationally. The 
Project will be an essential part of Verizon’s, and possibly other wireless carriers’, regional wireless 
network. This site will fill a significant gap in coverage and expand coverage in the area. 
 
11. 
SITE JUSTIFICATION 
 
______________________________________________ 
 
Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 
 
A. Least Intrusive Means to Fill a Significant Gap in Coverage. 
 
Section 332(c)(7)(B)(i)(II) of the Federal Telecom Act of 1996 bars local governmental decisions from 
precluding the provision of wireless services: 
 
The regulation of the placement, construction, and modification of 
personal wireless service facilities by any State or Local government or 
instrumentality thereof— 
*** 
(II) shall not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of 
personal wireless services. 
 
The areas in which wireless communication facilities can be relocated is geographically limited because 
each site is a “link” in a chain or honeycomb of sites and cannot move very far in any direction once the 
network has been established.  Moving too far one way or another would cause interference or create a 
gap in coverage.  Further, the Proposed Site’s height, placement, color and screening mechanism renders 
this site the lease intrusive means of addressing this gap.

The direct and indirect financial benefits of reliable wireless service to the growing area surrounding the 
proposed site in Maricopa County and Buckeye are supported by the overwhelming use by the public 
and private sector. In a recent report, the “National 911 Program,” which is an office housed within the 
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, found that “76 percent of consumers are using cellular 
phones to make 911 calls.”  Today, just over half – 50.8% - of American households only have a mobile 
voice connection and 90% of US households use wireless service. For Millennials (those born between 
1982 and 2004), that increases to over two-thirds who live in mobile-only households.  Wireless may 
also be the only connection available to access 911 and reverse 911. A 2015 survey found that cellular 
service is of major importance to homebuyers. It was more important than schools when looking for a 
home (cellular service ranked 76% versus 60% for schools). Cellular coverage trailed only crime rates 
(96%), local taxes (90%), and amenities (84%). Among Millennials, 83% said cell service was the most 
important fact in purchasing a home. (RootMetrics & Money, June 2, 2015). In 2016, wireless data traffic 
reached yet another record high.    In all, traffic totaled 13.72 trillion megabytes – the equivalent of 1.58 
million years of streaming HD video – an increase of 4.07 trillion megabytes over 2015. Over the past 
two years, data use has increased 238 percent. (2017 CTIA Wireless Snapshot, May 2017). 
 
 With this increase in demand from users in vehicles, at home, and those who work from home, there is a 
need for facilities to meet the customer needs. 
 
12.  
ANALYSIS OF FEDERAL LAW 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In addition to local and state law, this application is governed by the Federal Communications Act, 47 
U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B).  In the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (“Telecom 
Act”) Congress added Section 332(c)(7)(B), which provides rights to wireless service providers and 
establishes limitations upon state and local zoning authorities with respect to applications for permits to 
construct wireless service facilities. The express purpose of the Act is “to promote competition and reduce 
regulation in order to secure lower prices and higher quality services for American telecommunications 
consumers.”  Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56, 56 (1996); see also City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams, 
544 U.S. 113, 115 (2005).  It also is intended to “encourage the rapid deployment of new 
telecommunications technologies.”  Id.; see also H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 104-458, at 113 (1996) (purpose of 
the 1996 Act is “to provide for a pro-competitive, deregulatory national policy framework designed to 
accelerate rapidly private sector deployment of advanced telecommunications and information 
technologies and services . . . by opening all telecommunications markets to competition”). 
 
Recognizing that wireless service can bring enormous benefits to communities and can boost jobs and 
economic productivity, this important law and subsequent regulations applicable to wireless facilities 
were enacted to remove impediments to and promote the rapid deployment of wireless technology on a 
national basis.  
 
The applicable limitations and directives include the following: 
 
(a) 
State and local governments may not unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally 
equivalent services (§332(c)(7)(B)(i)(I)).

(b) 
State and local governments may not regulate the placement, construction or modification of 
wireless service facilities in a manner that prohibits, or has the effect of prohibiting, the provision of 
personal wireless services (better known as the “effective prohibition clause”) (§332(c)(7)(B)(i)(II)).  
 
(c) 
State and local governments must act on requests for authorization to construct or modify 
wireless service facilities within a reasonable period of time (§332(c)(7)(B)(ii)). 
 
(d) 
Any decision by a state or local government to deny a request for construction or modification of 
personal wireless service facilities must be in writing and supported by substantial evidence contained in 
a written record (§332(c)(7)(B)(iii)).  
 
(e) 
Finally, no state or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, 
construction or modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the perceived 
environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with federal 
communications commission’s regulations concerning such emissions (§332(c)(7)(B)(iv)).  
 
Rapid deployment of wireless facilities is an important national issue, especially given the trend of 
Americans eliminating traditional landline service in favor of wireless communications.  The Center for 
Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) tracks “wireless substitution” rates as part of its National Health 
Interview Survey and publishes the findings every six months in its Wireless Substitution reports. The most 
recent report, issued in December of 20197, estimates that more than one-half (57%) of American homes 
have only wireless phones.    
 
Reliable and robust wireless communication is essential, especially considering over half of Americans and 
Coloradans do not have a landline and rely on wireless service to conduct personal and business 
communications, to access the internet or to reach emergency responders. Ensuring access in the event 
of an emergency is critical, be it communications between emergency service personnel or for people 
calling for help.    
 
 
13.  
CONCLUSION                                    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Proposed Site will support Verizon Wireless and other potential wireless carriers and therefore help 
reduce the number of towers needed to serve the community within this service area. The proposed 70’ 
Monopine will take advantage of the site’s superior geographic location and land use attributes to 
improve coverage in the area in the least intrusive means possible.  In addition, the location of the 
proposed site will allow multiple carriers to locate within the heart of the growing far West Valley and 
deploy services quickly, effectively, and efficiently.

Appendix A 
SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITITES

SPECIAL USE PERMIT SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE FOR 
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES 
 
 
The following is supplemental information required to be submitted and addressed in the narrative report for the Special 
Use Permit. 
 
1. 
What is the height of the proposed WCF? 70’ (75’ including branches) 
 
2. 
Provide a map showing all the existing WCFs within a 1,000 feet radius for sites within Rural, Single-Family 
Residential or Multiple-Family zoning districts (Regardless of provider).  There are no existing sites within a1000’ 
radius of the proposed site. 
3. 
Provide a list with locations and approximate height of all existing vertical structures (of a height approximately equal 
or greater than the requested tower) within the WCF’s search area. This includes church spires and steeples, light 
standards, water towers, transmission lines, buildings, or other similar structures.  There is no existing verticality 
within the prescribed Search Area. 
 
4. 
Provide a map showing the service areas which the proposed facility will serve. 
 
5. 
Explain any attempts or possibilities that have been investigated relating to co-location with another provider or 
existing facility.  Since there are no existing sites and/or verticality within the Search Area, collocation was not an 
option. 
6. 
Explain how this request can facilitate co-location with other users.  This site will be designed to accommodate at least 
two additional wireless carriers/tenants. 
 
7. 
Will the request involve removal of mature trees or cacti? If so, discuss plans for relocation of such vegetation.  No. 
 
8. 
Discuss the following compatibility issues:   Addressed in body of narrative. 
a. 
Setbacks from residential uses. 
b. 
Setbacks from all property lines. 
c. 
Setbacks from uses/structures on adjacent property. 
d. 
Setbacks from public and private streets or access easements. 
e. 
Future additional appurtenances or expansion plans. 
f. 
Color and type of tower, landscaping, and fence screening. 
g. 
Surrounding non-residential uses (if applicable). 
 
9. 
If a stealth design is not being proposed, please explain why.  N/A; Stealth design is being proposed. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Planning & Development Department 
301 W. Jefferson St., Suite 170 Phoenix, Arizona 85003 
P: 602.506.3301 
Special Use Permit Application Packet 
3/6/23

Zachary Kobza, P.E.
Planning & Development 
301 W. Jefferson St., Suite 170 
Phoenix, Arizona 85003 
Phone: (602) 723-5248 
Fax: (602) 506-8762 
www.maricopa.gov/planning 
Email address: 
Zachary.Kobza@maricopa.gov 
  
Planning & Development
 
Engineering Plan Review 
 
 
Date:    
August 14, 2025 
 
Memo To: Darren Gerard, AICP, Planning Manager, Department of Planning & 
Development 
 
Attn: 
Nick Schlimm, Planner, Planning & Development Services 
 
cc: 
Bob Fedorka, PE, Engineering Manager, Planning & Development 
 
From: 
Zachary Kobza, PE, Plans Examiner Engineer, Planning & 
Development 
 
Subject:   
SU250027 – Installation of a proposed 75’ stealth “monoline” Wireless 
Communications Facility in a 50’ X 50’ CMU-walled compound. 
APN(s): 
504-29-086 
Engineering Review has reviewed the first plan and report routed for review on 
07/25/2025, for the subject application and has no further objections: 
 
 
The following stipulations will apply: 
 
1. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design 
only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with 
Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and 
Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway 
Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices 
at the time of application for construction. 
 
2. The proposed construction appears to meet the requirements of the Maricopa 
County Zoning Ordinance Section 1205.7.7 and as such a site plan containing 
the information on the attached checklist (Form 718) is required. 
 
3. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes 
to the site layout may be necessitated by the final design of the infrastructure. 
 
4. The CMU enclosure will require drainage openings (turned block, every other 
block, no decorative block permitted) along the bottom. 
 
5. Palo Verde Road is within the jurisdiction of the City of Buckeye. The applicant 
will be responsible for coordinating with the City to review any traffic impact, 
right-of-way dedication, permitting or roadway improvement requirements 
associated with this project. 
 
 
Please contact me with any questions.

Page 2 of 3 
 
 
 
DRAINAGE PLAN REVIEW REFERENCES:   
 
The Drainage Regulations are listed in Section 1205 of the MCZO: 
https://www.maricopa.gov/documentcenter/view/272  
Maricopa County Drainage Policies and Standards Manual: 
https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/Home/View/2369  
For Additional Information See: 
https://www.maricopa.gov/1635/Drainage-Review 
 
FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT OF MARICOPA COUNTY REFERENCES:   
 
Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County: 
https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/630  
For Additional Information See: 
https://www.maricopa.gov/3847/Flood-Control-District  
 
PND TRANSPORTATION REFERENCES: 
 
Residential Driveway Guidelines 
https://www.maricopa.gov/documentcenter/view/362  
Roadway Design Manual 
http://www.mcdot.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/24883 
Maricopa County Resolution for ROW Permits 
https://www.maricopa.gov/documentcenter/view/364  
For Additional Information See: 
https://www.maricopa.gov/156/MCDOT  
 
PND STORMWATER QUALITY (SWPPP) REFERENCES: 
 
Storm Water Quality Management and Discharge Control Regulation 
https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/6577 
Air Pollution Control Regulations Rule 310 
https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/5354  
For Additional Information See: 
https://www.maricopa.gov/3980/Water-Sewage-Stormwater-Waste

Page 3 of 3 
 
 
 
Abbreviations Key: 
 
Drainage: 
 
DD =   
Department Directive (See: http://www.maricopa.gov/1911/Department-
Directives) 
MCZO = 
Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance 
DPSM =  Maricopa County Drainage Policies and Standards 
SSA =   
State Standard Attachment 
DDMV1=  Maricopa County Drainage Design Manual – Hydrology 
DDMV2 =  Maricopa County Drainage Design Manual – Hydraulics 
 
Flood Control: 
 
FRMC = 
Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County 
 
PND Transportation: 
 
RDM =  
MCDOT Roadway Design Manual 
RDG =  
MCDOT Residential Design Guidelines 
MSRP =  MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan 
 
PND Storm Water: 
SWMDCR= 
Maricopa County Storm Water Quality Management and Discharge 
Control Regulation 
DDMV3=  Maricopa County Drainage Design Manual – Erosion Control 
APCR= 
Maricopa County Air Pollution Control Regulations – Rule 310

TIS Waiver |Anthemnet/Verizon Wireless
Traffic Study Waiver Request
APN 504-29-086
Commscapes, LLC
SU250027 
Plans Sealed By
Not Applicable
Hasina Luna/602.506.7174
Int. Review No.
Date
Item No.
Page No.
Review Comment
Code
HL
1
9/10/2025
1
General
The proposed site is located in the west valley, South of Interstate 10 and east of Palo Verde Road. 
Access to the proposed site is via the existing curb cut off of West Pima Street (at the southwest 
corner of the Property). A private all-weather access driveway will extend from the 
aforementioned access point to the site.
HL
2
9/10/2025
2
General
The proposed site will not impact the existing circulation system of the parent parcel. In fact, the 
proposed site is intentionally proposed in an area that will not impact internal traffic flows for 
church parking. The proposed site includes the 20’ wide all-weather (Asphalt milling) access 
driveway and utility easement along the west and north boundaries. This driveway will provide 
access to the proposed site off of West Pima Street (paved).Once constructed, the access to the 
site is anticipated to occur approximately once per month for maintenance.
HL
3
9/10/2025
3
General
Based on the nature of the development and remote location of the Site, County estimates that 
the proposed development would generate fewer than 100 peak hours trips and will have 
negligible impact on to County roadways in the vicinity of the Site.
The Traffic Study Waiver Is Approved As Noted Above
Consultant Comment
Discipline
Consultant
Signature
Date
This application requests Maricopa County for a new Wireless Communications Facility (“WCF”). The WCF would feature a 70’ Monopine and therefore meet the maximum height 
requirements as outlined in Chapter 12 of the MCZO. However, the proposed facility would not meet a 2:1 setback in all directions. Additionally, the Monopine would feature a 
maximum diameter exceeding 30 inches at the base and would include an antenna array diameter exceeding eight feet.The Applicant is proposing to build a 50’ X 50’X 8’ CMU 
wall around the 70’ Monopine and the proposed 
Verizon Wireless equipment cabinets to screen from public view. 
Traffic Engineering Review Comment Sheet
Project Name
Location
MCDOT File No.
Reviewer/Phone No.
Consultant: Please use the code and respond to each comment in the Consultant Reply Column. This sheet is for our records, please answer every question and sign and date your acknowledgment or the plans will be sent back to 
complete the process. Send back the marked-up plans and a new set of plans along with this sheet. Thank you for your cooperation.  
    Consultant Code: A=Will Comply   B=Deleted   C=Consultant to Evaluate
General Project Summary:
Page 1 of 7

1
Daniel Johnson (PND)
From:
Joseph Mueller <jmueller@buckeyeaz.gov>
Sent:
Monday, September 8, 2025 5:16 PM
To:
Daniel Johnson (PND)
Subject:
Re: County Notice of Public Hearing SU250027
This Message Is From an External Sender  
This message came from outside your organization. Please use caution when corresponding outside the county.  
 
No, the use is fine, we are more concerned that the ground equipment be properly screened which it is. 
 
Joe 
 
 
From: Daniel Johnson (PND) <Daniel.Johnson@Maricopa.Gov> 
Sent: Monday, September 8, 2025 3:58 PM 
To: Joseph Mueller <jmueller@buckeyeaz.gov> 
Subject: RE: County Notice of Public Hearing SU250027  
 
[NOTICE:  This message originated outside of the City of Buckeye -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open 
attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.] 
Want a broadleaf instead? 
  
-Daniel Johnson 
602-506-4242 
  
From: Joseph Mueller <jmueller@buckeyeaz.gov> 
Sent: Monday, September 8, 2025 3:12 PM 
To: Daniel Johnson (PND) <Daniel.Johnson@Maricopa.Gov> 
Subject: Re: County Notice of Public Hearing SU250027 
  
Afternoon Daniel! Thank you for sending this over. City staff would prefer a different design rather than a monopine, but has no opposition to the proposal. Here's an interesting link about the history of Hopeville/Allenville: Looking back at 
Afternoon Daniel! 
  
Thank you for sending this over.  City staff would prefer a different design rather than a monopine, but 
has no opposition to the proposal.  
  
Here's an interesting link about the history of Hopeville/Allenville: Looking back at Allenville — Buckeye’s 
all-Black community | Estrella Mountain Community College 
  
Kind regards, 
  
 
You don't often get email from daniel.johnson@maricopa.gov. Learn why this is important