BA250033 Handout Memo

Maricopa County — Board of Adjustment (2025-07-17)

View PDF Item 7 Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 4945 characters
DATE:
July 17, 2025
TO:
Board of Adjustment   
From:
Nick Schlimm, Planner
SUBJECT:
BA250033 – Wiley Property   
Agenda Item: #7
Since the publication of the staff report for the referenced case, staff received one notice of 
opposition from the owner of the property adjacent to the west of the subject property. It is this 
neighboring property (as well as Stacey Road) from which the applicant is requesting the reduced 
setback for the basketball / pickleball court.
The author of the letter states that the court’s proximity to her property is creating an ongoing 
safety hazard as basketballs and pickleballs are frequently crossing into her property. These 
incidents have already resulted in property damage, including to her dining room and bedroom 
windows, her pool filtration system, and her landscaping and outdoor furniture.
Furthermore, the use of the court is causing disturbances both in terms of noise and light 
pollution, and the author notes that pickleball courts typically generate noise in the 60-70 decibel 
range.
Finally, the author alleges that the applicant (who had previously submitted the permit for the 
swimming pool on the subject property) was aware of the permitting regulations governing sports 
courts and nonetheless opted to build the court without benefit of zoning clearance and an issued 
permit.
For these reasons, the author of the letter has requested that the Board of Adjustment deny this 
variance request.
Attachments:
Letter of Opposition (2 pages)

Written Comment – Variance Case BA250033 
Submitted by: Anterre Beebe (Adjacent Property Owner) 
Dear Board Members, 
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this variance request. 
I live immediately west of the property seeking a variance for a sport court, court lights, and basketball 
hoop that were built without permits--just 58 inches from our shared fence line, well short of the 
required 20-foot setback. (See Photo 1) 
This extreme proximity has created an ongoing safety hazard for my family. Basketballs and high-
speed pickleballs frequently fly over the fence into our yard. It’s not a matter of if someone gets hurt, 
it’s when. I can easily picture my teenage daughter sunbathing by the pool when a basketball launches 
over and hits her. Or our dog getting sick after chewing on a stray pickleball. These are real concerns, 
not hypotheticals. (See Photo 2) 
The court has also caused property damage. We’ve had basketballs hit our dining room and bedroom 
windows, and pickleballs get pulled into our pool filtration system. Balls have smashed into 
landscaping and outdoor furniture by the pool. While the damage has been relatively minor so far, it’s 
only a matter of time until it’s not. The issue isn’t the player skill level, it’s how close the court is to our 
home. (See Photos 3 and 4) 
There’s also the issue of noise and disturbance. Basketballs hitting the backboard or bouncing off 
concrete are loud, but pickleball is something else entirely. Its sharp, repetitive pops are jarring and 
carry through my entire home. As pickleball grows in popularity, so do noise complaints--because 
people quickly realize how disruptive it is. A quick Google search shows that typical pickleball courts 
generate noise in the 60–70 decibel range, which exceeds many residential noise standards. It’s just 
not compatible with the quiet nature of a residential backyard. Additionally, the light spillover from the 
court lights is extreme and literally illuminates our dining room, living room, primary bedroom and 
daughter’s bedroom. 
Finally, I want to point out that the contractor who built the court knew the permitting regulations. He 
applied for a pool permit at the same time, yet skipped permits for the court and lighting presumably 
because he knew they wouldn’t be approved. Whether it was deliberate or careless, it shouldn’t be 
rewarded. Granting a variance after the fact sends a troubling message: that the zoning code can be 
ignored if you push the issue far enough. It invites others to build whatever they want, wherever they 
want, and hope no one challenges it. 
I respectfully urge the Board to deny this variance. My family shouldn’t have to sacrifice our safety, 
peace, and property value so someone else can have a full-size, recreational, park-like setup in a 
space that simply can’t accommodate it and doesn’t meet the size requirements for such use. 
Thank you for your time and consideration. 
Sincerely, 
Anterre Beebe

Supporting Photos 
Photo #1 
Photo #2 
58-inch setback shown from our side of the 
fence using a measuring tape. 
View of basketball hoop and court directly 
adjacent to our poolside lounge area. 
Photo #3 
Photo #4 
Court and proximity as viewed from our 
backyard, showing full hoop height and visual 
intrusion. 
Photo posted to public Instagram showing 
court and basketball hoop’s distance from 
fence line, taken from inside the neighboring 
property.