CC_ATTACH_HUD PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT_032626.DOCX

Page 1 of 14
PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
CITY OF TEMPE
AND THE
ARIZONA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 36 C.F.R. PART 800
REGARDING
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT-FUNDED 
PROGRAM ACTIVITIES 
WHEREAS, the City of Tempe (City) receives Federal funding administered by the U.S. 
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) (e.g., Community Development Block 
Grant (CDBG), CHOICE Neighborhood, HOME funds, Economic Development Initiative 
Community Project Funding (EDI CPF), and Public Housing Authority Operating and Capital 
Funds, etc.) that are used for various programs and program activities (“Programs” or “Program 
Activities”); and 
WHEREAS, the HUD-funded Programs and Program Activities qualify as a federal undertaking 
subject to the provisions of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), 54 
U.S.C. § 306108, and this Programmatic Agreement (Agreement or PA) provides a program 
alternative for HUD to fulfill its Section 106 responsibilities through the City’s consultation with the 
State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), and serves as the vehicle for resolving adverse 
effects to historic properties that may result from the implementation of these Federal Programs; 
and
WHEREAS, the Area of Potential Effects (APE) encompasses all municipal and private land 
within the City and for which the City is the Responsible Entity (RE); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to 24 C.F.R. Part 58, the City is the RE for compliance with Section 106 on 
behalf of HUD and is entering into this agreement as a signatory on behalf of HUD; and  
WHEREAS, the Arizona State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) is authorized to enter this 
Agreement in order to fulfill its role of advising and assisting Federal agencies in carrying out 
Section 106 responsibilities under Sections 101 and 106 of the NHPA and 36 C.F.R. § 
800.2(c)(1)(i) and § 800.6(b), and the SHPO is a Signatory to this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City invited the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) to participate 
in this Agreement on November 26, 2025, and as the ACHP declined to participate (Letter, Chris 
Daniel to Zachary J. Lechner, January 5, 2026), the Agreement is moving forward without ACHP 
participation pursuant to 36 C.F.R. § 800.6(a)(1)(iv); and 
WHEREAS, the City’s staff and contractors include individuals who meet the Secretary of the 
Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for Historic Architecture, Architectural History, 
History, and/or Archeology, or are individuals with relevant cultural resources management 
experience reviewing work conducted under the supervision of permitted staff; and

Page 2 of 14
WHEREAS, pursuant to 36 C.F.R. § 800.2(c)(2)(ii), the City has conducted outreach, has actively 
requested the comments and participation of, and has invited to participate as a concurring party to 
this Agreement, Indian tribes that attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties that 
may be affected by undertakings funded under the terms of this agreement including: Pueblo of Zuni, 
Tonto Apache Tribe, Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community, Gila River Indian Community, 
Yavapai-Apache Nation, Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe, White Mountain Apache Tribe, Pascua Yaqui 
Tribe, Hopi Tribe, Fort Mojave Indian Tribe, Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation, and Mescalero Apache 
Tribe; and
WHEREAS, the City will consult with Indian Tribes that attach cultural or religious significance to 
historic properties in the APE for each undertaking involving ground disturbance and/or construction; 
and  
WHEREAS, the City will, for each undertaking, coordinate its National Environmental Policy Act 
(NEPA) public participation requirements to assist the City in satisfying the public involvement 
requirements under Section 106 of the NHPA pursuant to 36 C.F.R. § 800.2(d)(3); and 
WHEREAS, the Arizona State Museum (ASM) has been invited to participate pursuant to 36 C.F.R. § 
800.6(c)(3), as it has mandated authority and responsibilities under the Arizona Antiquities Act (AAA), 
A.R.S. § 41-841 et seq., that apply to that portion of the undertaking on state lands in Arizona (state, 
county, municipality, or other subdivision of the state), and mandated authority and responsibilities 
under A.R.S. § 41-865 that apply to that portion of the undertaking on private lands, and has been 
invited to participate as a concurring party to this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City shall review and consult with SHPO, Tribes, and other interested parties, as 
appropriate on all undertakings that are not identified under this PA in accordance with 36 C.F.R. 
§ 800.3 through § 800.7; and 
NOW THEREFORE, the City and SHPO agree that the City’s Federally funded HUD programs 
shall be administered in accordance with the Stipulations provided below to satisfy the City’s 
Section 106 responsibilities for all individual undertakings. 
STIPULATIONS
The City of Tempe shall ensure the following stipulations are carried out:
I.
Definitions
The definitions of terms in this agreement follow those provided in 36 C.F.R. § 800.16.  
II.
Professional Standards
A. The City shall perform the rehabilitation actions at all buildings 50 years or older (except 
those that have previously been determined by SHPO to be ineligible for the National 
Register of Historic Places [NRHP]) in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior’s 
Standards for Rehabilitation; and the proposed work shall be reviewed by the City of 
Tempe Historic Preservation Office (CHPO). Where this work meets the conditions 
outlined in Stipulation III, SHPO consultation will not be required. 
B. The City shall ensure that any archaeological investigations that may be necessary shall 
be conducted by, or under the supervision of, a professional archaeologist meeting the

Page 3 of 14
Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for Archeology, and under 
the authority of an AAA permit, when required. 
C. The City shall ensure that any proposed rehabilitation work at eligible or listed NRHP 
buildings is reviewed by qualified City or contracted staff meeting the Secretary of the 
Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for Architectural History or Historic 
Architecture.
D. Infill projects proposed in eligible or listed NRHP districts shall be reviewed by qualified 
City staff to assure treatment consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards.
III. Conditioned Rehabilitation Actions for Buildings
The following actions do not require consultation with SHPO provided the conditions listed 
below are met. Mobile homes and buildings less than 50 years old and/or previously 
determined by the SHPO to be ineligible for listing on the NRHP are also exempt from 
consultation. The City shall document all activities conducted under this Stipulation, and list 
them in the quarterly report, as described in Stipulation VI. 
A. Rehabilitation Actions
Pursuant to 36 C.F.R. § 800.3(a)(1), the City has determined these types of activities have 
low potential to cause adverse effects to historic properties, assuming such historic 
properties are present:
1.
Systems Rehabilitation
(a) Replacement of interior plumbing;
(b) Replacement of electrical systems;
(c) Replacement of HVAC systems, including interior ductwork in any location or 
exterior equipment in their original location; and
(d) Installation of smoke detectors.
2.
Interior Rehabilitation*
(a) Replacement of interior floor coverings;
(b) Installation of insulation above ceilings and in attic spaces;
(c) Replacement of weather-stripping;
(d) Repainting interior;
(e) Replacement of kitchen cabinets, countertops, and appliances;
(f) Bathroom improvements;
(g) Interior door replacement;
(h) Door hardware replacement; and
(i) Repair of interior wall and ceiling surfaces.
*Not including significant interior alterations or renovations that could compromise the 
integrity of a historic property or a building where the interiors are historically, 
architecturally, or culturally significant, as determined by the CHPO.
3.
Exterior Rehabilitation
(a) Door repair, and/or reglazing (in-kind);
(b) Abatement of hazardous materials;
(c) Door hardware replacement (in-kind);

Page 4 of 14
(d) Repainting of previously painted exterior surfaces provided that destructive 
surface preparation treatments, including but not limited to water blasting, 
sandblasting, and chemical cleaning are not used (no painting of surfaces not 
previously painted);
(e) Repair or partial replacement of porches, exterior siding, balustrades, stairs, 
fascia, or other trim (in-kind);
(f) Non-original fence replacement;
(g) Foundation repair that maintains any decorative materials;
(h) Termite treatment;
(i) Installation of temporary ramps;
(j) Work related to extant plantings;
(k) Installation of gutters and downspouts, painted to match fascia;
(l) Driveway repair; and
(m)Repair of any holes in the exterior where equipment penetrated the building.
4.
Infill Construction
Infill projects or additions require consultation with SHPO prior to the commencement 
of work if:

The proposed infill involves demolition of an eligible or listed property; or

The proposed infill is located in a NRHP-listed or eligible historic district.
B. Conditions of Implementation
The conditions of implementation shall be limited to the following:
1.
Replacement of historic windows and doors shall as closely as practicable, under the 
City’s sole discretion, match the existing in design, operation, glazing, sash pattern, 
material, and size. 
2.
Re-roofing material shall as closely as practicable, under the City’s sole discretion, 
match the existing material in design, appearance, and scale. 
3.
Repair or partial replacement of porches, exterior siding, balustrades, stairs, fascia, 
or other trim shall as closely as practicable, under the City’s sole discretion, match 
extant, removed, and/or adjacent materials (as applicable) in location, dimension, 
texture, and design. 
IV. Program Activities Requiring SHPO Consultation
SHPO will review all requests for initial consultation within 30 calendar days of confirmed delivery.  
A. SHPO review pursuant to 36 C.F.R. § 800.3 through § 800.7 is required for projects whose 
rehabilitation activities are not listed in Stipulation III with buildings that are 50 years or 
older (excepting those that have previously been determined by SHPO to be ineligible for 
the NRHP).
B. SHPO review is required for all projects proposing full or partial building demolition, new 
additions, and/or alterations of character-defining features for buildings 50 years or older 
(excepting those that have previously been determined by SHPO to be ineligible for the 
NRHP.)

Page 5 of 14
C. If repair or replacement activities require new construction excavation, archaeological 
review may be necessary; see Stipulation V of this Agreement.
V. Archaeological Review of HUD Programs Involving Ground Disturbance
The actions listed in Stipulation III.A. should involve minimal ground disturbance and as such 
may not require archaeological review. This stipulation describes the possible situations 
where archaeological review would be warranted, as well as procedures for that review. 
A. If a proposed rehabilitation project will involve ground disturbance over more than 10 cubic 
feet of soil or a lateral displacement of soil more than 2 feet in any direction, the proposed 
project must be reviewed for archaeological sensitivity by the City’s qualified staff or 
consultant. 
B. When such ground disturbance is anticipated, the City’s qualified staff or a qualified 
consultant will conduct a review of ASM’s Archaeological Records Office (ARO) and/or 
AZSITE to determine whether existing cultural resource sites are present in the proposed 
project area, and whether the project area has been previously inventoried to current 
standards for cultural resources. After the review, the City’s qualified staff will make a 
determination as to the need for archaeological survey, testing, data recovery, or 
monitoring. If further archaeological work is not needed, information about the project will 
be submitted to SHPO in a quarterly batch report, as described in Stipulation VI.C.
C. The City acknowledges that the Tribes possess special expertise in assessing the 
eligibility of properties with tribal religious and cultural significance, and the City may utilize 
this expertise in determining if any such properties are eligible for listing in the NRHP. The 
City will also notify the Tribes of any projects with the potential to adversely affect cultural 
resources with tribal religious and cultural significance. After reviewing any project, the 
Tribes can request to further consult on these projects by notifying the City in writing.
D. If the City’s qualified staff or consultant determines that an archaeological survey is 
needed for the proposed ground disturbance, the City will ensure completion of fieldwork. 
The City will then consult with SHPO and the Tribe(s) if cultural resource sites (as defined 
by ASM) are identified. The City will consult on determinations of eligibility, any 
recommendations for treatment (e.g., archaeological testing, data recovery or monitoring), 
and a finding of effect (i.e., No Adverse Effect or Adverse Effect). The survey and survey 
reporting shall follow state and Federal standards for archaeological investigations as well 
as SHPO’s most current Survey Report Standards. If the survey does not identify any 
cultural resource sites (i.e., a negative survey), the results will be reported on a Summary 
Report Survey Form (SRSF) and submitted to SHPO in a quarterly batch report, as 
described in Stipulation VI.C.  If the survey is located on municipal land, the report will be 
concurrently submitted to ASM to satisfy permitting requirements under the Arizona 
Antiquities Act.
E. If the City’s qualified staff determines that the proposed action will result in a No Historic 
Properties Affected finding, either due to a negative survey or avoidance of impacts to an 
identified historic property, then the City will submit the archaeologist’s report on a SRSF 
to the SHPO for review and comment. This consultation shall be submitted in the quarterly 
report (see Stipulation VI.C). The City shall initiate concurrent review by ASM for any

Page 6 of 14
surveys that require a AAA permit, per Stipulation V.H. Prior to implementation of the 
proposed activity, affiliated tribes shall be consulted on all ground-disturbing undertakings, 
as described in Stipulation V.A.
F. If the City’s qualified staff determines that a No Adverse Effect finding is appropriate 
contingent upon avoidance of the site or monitoring of the proposed ground disturbance, 
the City shall consult with the SHPO and Tribes to seek agreement that monitoring or 
avoidance will be adequate to ensure the no adverse effect finding. If it is determined that 
monitoring is appropriate, the City shall subsequently consult with SHPO and Tribes on a 
Monitoring and Discovery Plan detailing the steps that will be taken during monitoring.
G. If it is determined that the proposed project will result in a finding of Adverse Effect the 
City will continue consultation with SHPO, Tribes, and other consulting parties on 
appropriate treatment measures, and develop and implement a project-specific 
memorandum of agreement (MOA) and project-specific addendum to the City of Tempe’s 
General Historic Properties Treatment Plan. The City and SHPO may enter into 
project/site specific MOAs under the authority of this PA.
H. The City shall concurrently consult with the Arizona State Museum on all projects involving 
an Arizona Antiquities Act permit.
I.
Once SHPO has approved the mitigation results report, the project’s ground-disturbing 
activities can proceed.
VI.
Reporting Requirements
The CHPO will submit quarterly reports to the SHPO and other consulting parties. The report 
will include the following:
A. For projects that did not require SHPO review:
The report will provide the following information: the names and locations of each 
undertaking considered; a brief scope of activities conducted for the undertaking; NRHP 
eligibility determinations of properties within the APE; the project effect finding; and any 
efforts to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects of specific undertakings on historic 
properties. The SHPO agrees to review the submitted quarterly report information within 
30 calendar days. Changes to the frequency of batch consultation submissions may be 
made without amendment, provided that all parties are in agreement with the change.
B. Rehabilitation Work for Buildings Reports
The City will submit to SHPO all information from undertakings conducted in accordance 
with Stipulation III from the date of the last report to 30 calendar days before the date of 
current report. The report shall include a table of addresses of rehabilitated properties, 
their construction date, NRHP eligibility status, and activities conducted. 
C. Archaeological Reports 
1.
The City will submit all documents resulting from Stipulation V.B-D from the date of 
the last report to 30 calendar days before the date of current report. The City will 
provide a cover letter that includes a summary of acreage inventoried and reports

Page 7 of 14
reviewed, as well as all SRSFs. The summary will also include activities, general 
location, and acreage covered under Stipulation V.D. SHPO may request copies of all 
reports and documents used by the City to make decisions pursuant to Stipulations 
V.D and V.E. Changes to the frequency of batch consultation submissions may be made 
without amendment providing all parties agree.
2.
After an archaeological investigation (e.g., survey to identify historic properties, 
archaeological monitoring, phased archaeological data recovery) has been conducted, 
the City shall ensure that a draft report detailing the results of the investigation, and 
any recommendations as per Stipulations V.E and V.F, is prepared. The City will e-
mail the report to the SHPO and Tribes; the SHPO will expedite their review and 
comment on the submittal within 10 business days.
3.
The SHPO will either concur with the recommendations in the report or provide the 
City with their comments. The SHPO’s consultation shall be conveyed by e-mail.
4.
If the archaeological investigation involves permitting from the ASM, the City shall 
concurrently consult with the ASM and SHPO.
VII. Annual Report
The City shall submit an annual report to SHPO by January 31 of each year that this 
Agreement is in effect that addresses the City’s historic preservation actions performed for 
the Programs during the previous calendar year. The report will summarize projects reviewed 
in the previous year that have gone through formal consultation with SHPO, and those 
projects that did not require SHPO review. The report will provide the following information: 
the names and locations of each Undertaking considered; a brief scope of activities 
conducted for the Undertaking; NRHP eligibility determinations of properties within the APE; 
the project effect finding; and any efforts to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects of 
specific undertakings on historic properties. Within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of the 
annual report, the SHPO agrees to review the submitted annual report information to provide 
input and to determine if any amendments to the PA are necessary. If requested, an annual 
meeting will be held to discuss the report.
VIII.
Post-Review Discoveries 
A. Should a discovery of archaeological or historic materials that are 50 years or older not 
covered under A.R.S. § 41-844 or A.R.S. § 41-865 occur, the City will require that these 
materials be treated in accordance with all applicable laws. The proponent will cease all 
ground disturbing activities within 50 feet (15 m) of any discovery and will notify the City 
of the discovery within 24 hours. The City will notify the SHPO of the discovery.
B. Notification/reporting and treatment of unanticipated discoveries on City lands, or where 
the City is the RE, will comply with A.R.S. § 41-844 and § 41-865, as applicable. Any such 
discoveries will be reported to the Director of the ASM. 
C. The City will consult with consulting parties on the NRHP eligibility of the newly discovered 
cultural resource. If eligible, the City will ensure that treatment measures are completed 
as necessary under the guidance of a professionally qualified archaeologist. Reporting 
and review processes will follow Stipulations VI and VII.

Page 8 of 14
D. If human remains or formal animal burials are discovered, construction personnel will stop 
all work within 100 feet of the encounter, take reasonable measures to secure the area 
and protect the exposed remains and contact the City, and ASM. The archaeological 
contractor shall follow all procedures set forth in the Burial Discovery Agreement.
IX. Confidentiality
To the maximum extent allowed by federal and state law, the City will maintain confidentiality 
of sensitive information regarding historic properties, including those to which a Tribe attaches 
religious or cultural significance, that could be damaged through looting or disturbance. 
However, any documents or records the City has in its possession are subject to the Freedom 
of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552 et seq.) and its exemptions, as applicable. The City 
shall evaluate whether a FOIA request for records or documents would involve a sensitive 
historic property, or a historic property to which a Tribe attaches religious or cultural 
significance, and if such documents that contain information that the City is authorized to 
withhold from disclosure by other statutes including Section 304 of the NHPA. If this is the 
case, then the City will consult with the Keeper and the ACHP regarding withholding sensitive 
information. If a Tribally sensitive property is involved, the City will also consult with the 
relevant Tribe(s) prior to making a determination in response to a FOIA request.
X. Dispute Resolution
A. Should any signatory to this Agreement object at any time to any actions proposed or the 
manner in which the terms of this Agreement are implemented, the City shall consult with 
such party to resolve the objection and shall notify the SHPO and consulting parties of the 
objection. If the City determines that such objection cannot be resolved, the City will submit 
the dispute to the ACHP for its comment.
B. The City shall forward all documentation relevant to the dispute, including the proposed 
resolution, to the ACHP. The ACHP shall provide the City with its opinion on the resolution 
of the objection within 30 calendar days of receiving adequate documentation. Prior to 
reaching a final decision on the dispute, the City shall prepare a written response that 
considers any timely opinions or comments regarding the dispute from the ACHP, 
signatories, and concurring parties, and provide them with a copy of this written response. 
The City may then proceed in accordance with its decision.
C. If the ACHP does not provide comments regarding the dispute within the 30-day time 
period, the City may make a final decision on the dispute and proceed accordingly. Prior 
to reaching a final decision, the City shall prepare a written response that considers any 
timely comments regarding the dispute from the parties to the Agreement and provide 
them and the ACHP with a copy of such written response.  
D. The responsibilities of the City to carry out all other actions subject to the terms of this 
Agreement that are not the subject of the dispute remain unchanged.
E. At any time during implementation of the measures stipulated in this Agreement, should 
an objection pertaining to this Agreement or the effect of an undertaking on historic 
properties be raised by a member of the public, the City shall notify the parties to this

Page 9 of 14
Agreement and take the objection into account, consulting with the objector and with 
relevant parties to this Agreement to resolve the objection. 
 
XI. Amendments
A. This Agreement may be amended when such an amendment is agreed to in writing by the 
signatories. Any signatory to this Agreement may propose an amendment in writing to the 
City.
B. The City shall consult with the signatories to this Agreement to consider the proposed 
amendment. If there is agreement among all signatories, the document shall be amended 
accordingly, and the amendment will be effective on the date a copy signed by all of the 
signatories is filed with the ACHP. The City shall provide all parties with a copy of the 
executed amendment.
C. Additions, deletions, and other revisions to the Programs subject to this Agreement can 
be accomplished through written agreement among the signatories. The City will initiate 
such written consultation with the signatories; the signatories have 30 calendar days in 
which to review and comment on the proposed changes to the components of the various 
Programs covered by this Agreement.
XII.Duration
A. This Agreement shall remain in effect for ten (10) years beginning on the date of execution 
unless amended or terminated.  
B. Prior to the expiration of this Agreement, SHPO and the City of Tempe may mutually agree 
to extend the Agreement for up to three (3) additional one (1) year terms. Each extension 
may be executed by letter agreement and will not require a formal amendment. The letter 
agreement for extension will be initiated by the City of Tempe. Once SHPO and the City 
of Tempe have agreed and signed the extension letter, it shall be considered executed. 
The City Manager will sign on behalf of the City. Copies of the signed extension letter will 
be provided to the ACHP and all consulting parties to this PA.
XIII.
Termination
A. If any signatory to this Agreement determines that its terms will not or cannot be carried 
out, that party shall immediately consult with the other signatories to attempt to develop 
an amendment per Stipulation XI. If, within thirty (30) calendar days (or another time period 
agreed to by all signatories), an amendment cannot be reached, any signatory may 
terminate the Agreement upon written notification to the other signatories. 
B. Once the Agreement is terminated, and prior to work continuing on the undertaking, the 
City must either (a) execute an Agreement pursuant to 36 C.F.R. § 800.6 or (b) request, 
consider, and respond to the comments of the ACHP under 36 C.F.R. § 800.7. The City 
shall notify the signatories as to the course of action it will pursue.

Page 10 of 14
C. In the event the City fails to carry out the terms of the Agreement, the City shall comply 
with 36 C.F.R. Part 800 for each and every housing unit rehabilitation as a separate and 
discrete undertaking.
XIV.
Counterpart Signatures
This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and 
all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
Execution of this Agreement by the City and the SHPO, and implementation of its terms, 
evidence that the City has considered the effects of the undertaking on historic properties 
and has afforded the ACHP an opportunity to comment.

Page 11 of 14
PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
CITY OF TEMPE
AND THE
ARIZONA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 36 C.F.R. PART 800
REGARDING
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT-FUNDED 
PROGRAM ACTIVITIES 
SIGNATORY
SIGNED AND ACCEPTED THIS ____________________ day of ______________, 2026.
CITY OF TEMPE
_____________________________
Rosa Inchausti, City Manager
City of Tempe

Page 12 of 14
PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
CITY OF TEMPE
AND THE
ARIZONA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 36 C.F.R. PART 800
REGARDING
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT-FUNDED 
PROGRAM ACTIVITIES 
SIGNATORY
ARIZONA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
_____________________________
Kathryn Leonard
Arizona State Historic Preservation Officer
CONCURRING PARTY
ARIZONA STATE MUSEUM
_____________________________
Patrick D. Lyons
Museum Director
AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY
_____________________________
Mr. Gabriel Lopez 
Chairman

Page 13 of 14
TOHONO-O’ODHAM NATION
_____________________________
Mr. Verlon M. Jose
Cha
PUEBLO OF ZUNI
_____________________________
Mr. Arden Kucate
Governor
TONTO APACHE TRIBE
_____________________________
Mr. Calvin Johnson
Chairman
SALT RIVER PIMA-MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY
_____________________________
Mr. Martin Harvier
President
GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY
_____________________________
Stephen Roe Lewis
Governor
YAVAPEI-APACHE NATION
_____________________________
Mr. Buddy Rocha, Jr.
Chairman
YAVAPAI-PRESCOTT INDIAN TRIBE
_____________________________
Mr. Robert Ogo
President
WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE TRIBE
_____________________________
Mr. Jerome Kasey III
Acting Chairman

Page 14 of 14
PASCUA YAQUI TRIBE
_____________________________
Julian Hernandez
Chairman
HOPI TRIBE
_____________________________
Mr. Lamar Keevama
Chairman
FORT MOJAVE INDIAN TRIBE
_____________________________
Linda Otero
Director, AhaMakav Cultural Society
FORT MCDOWELL YAVAPAI NATION
_____________________________
Mr. Timothy Williams
Chairman
MESCALERO APACHE TRIBE
_____________________________
Mr. Thora Walsh Padilla
President