Summary Sheet- RFCA SUMMARY
Extracted text (via pymupdf)
3577 characters
CITY OF TEMPE Meeting Date: 04/30/2026 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Agenda Item: 7B6 ACTION: Approve one-year contract renewals with Law Office of Manuel S. Silvas, Phoenix Defense Law Group, Redpath Law, Rideout Law, The Schreck Law Firm, and Yako Law, who provide court- appointed attorney representation for defendants whose cases are filed with the City of Tempe Municipal Court. FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of the contracts will not exceed $455,000. Sufficient funds have been appropriated in the General Fund, Cost Center 1410 (Judicial Division – Administration), for anticipated expenditures during the current fiscal year and next fiscal year, contingent upon City Council approval of the City’s annual budget. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the contract renewals. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: (T24-118-02, 03, 04, 05, 07, 08 and T25-131-01) City Council approved the contract awards on June 6, 2024, for an initial one-year period, with four, one-year renewal options. This renewal request is the second of four renewal options. The contracts provide court-appointed attorney representation to indigent individuals entitled to counsel in any criminal proceeding that may result in punishment involving a loss of liberty, including hearings to determine release conditions at or following the initial appearance, as well as other criminal proceedings. The Court may also appoint an attorney for a defendant if required by the interests of justice. Additionally, court-appointed attorneys represent participants in Tempe Treatment Courts (Mental Health Court and Veterans Court). The City has utilized contracted court-appointed attorneys to provide these services for more than twenty years. The Court has established a fixed rate ($180) per assigned case and ($70) per hour for coverage during the in-custody docket. Tempe Municipal Court has similar costs for indigent representation among municipal courts of similar size and seeks reimbursement, when possible, by assessing fees to some defendants to offset a portion of the costs attributed to their defense. Contractor Performance The performance of the contractors was evaluated by City staff as shown in the following tables: Law Office of Manuel S. Silvas Phoenix Defense Law Group Redpath Law Evaluation Criteria Meets Contract Requirements Does Not Meet Contract Requirements Meets Contract Requirements Does Not Meet Contract Requirements Meets Contract Requirements Does Not Meet Contract Requirements Contract personnel are responsive, cooperative, and available X X X Quality of products or services delivered X X X Timeliness of performance X X X Follow-up skills in resolving complaints or problems X X X 2 Promptness and accuracy of pricing on submitted invoices X X X Rideout Law The Schreck Law Firm Yako Law Evaluation Criteria Meets Contract Requirements Does Not Meet Contract Requirements Meets Contract Requirements Does Not Meet Contract Requirements Meets Contract Requirements Does Not Meet Contract Requirements Contract personnel are responsive, cooperative, and available X X X Quality of products or services delivered X X X Timeliness of performance X X X Follow-up skills in resolving complaints or problems X X X Promptness and accuracy of pricing on submitted invoices X X X ATTACHMENTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT(S): Alexis Allen, Court Director, (480) 350-8252 Department Director: Laura Calder, Financial Services Director Legal review by: Dave Park, Senior Assistant City Attorney Prepared by: Cecille Lewis, Procurement Officer