Summary Sheet- RFCA SUMMARY
Extracted text (via pymupdf)
6036 characters
CITY OF TEMPE Meeting Date: 5/14/2026 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Agenda Item: 8A3 ACTION: Approve the utilization of one-year, State of Arizona cooperative contracts with Courtesy Auto of Mesa, Courtesy Chevrolet, Sanderson Ford, Larry Miller Toyota (Bell Road), Midway Chevrolet, O’Reilly Chevrolet, PFVT Motors DBA Peoria Ford, San Tan Auto Partners, LLC – Ford and Sands Chevrolet for the purchase of 55 vehicles. FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of these contracts will not exceed $3,600,000. Sufficient funds have been appropriated in the General Fund, Cost Centers, 1871 (Facilities Services), 1976 (IT Training and Print Shop), 1977 (IT: System Administration), 2210 (Office of the Chief), 2241 (Criminal Investigation), 2248 (Central City), 2271 (Field Operations Admin), 2727 (Code Compliance), 2923 (Care 7), 3251 (Park Asset Management Program), 3254 (Parks Maintenance Rio Salado), 3255 (North Parks), 3258 (South Parks), 3321 (Fleet Services), 3342 (Tech Services/Utilities) and 3345 (CIP Construction), Fire Medical Resue Fund, Cost Center 2363 (Apparatus Maintenance), Arts and Culture Fund, Cost Center 3762 (TCA Art Park), Highway User Revenue Fund, Cost Centers 3813 (Construction), 3823 (Operations-Transportation), and Water and Wastewater Fund, Cost Centers 3022 (Water Distribution System), 3044 (Environmental-Hazardous Material) for anticipated expenditures during the current fiscal year and the next fiscal year, contingent upon City Council approval of the City’s annual budget. RECOMMENDATION: Approve utilization of the contracts. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: (CTR059314 – CTR059325) The State of Arizona solicited bids and awarded contracts to Courtesy Auto of Mesa, Courtesy Chevrolet, Sanderson Ford, EMV Automotive, Larry Miller Toyota, Midway Chevrolet, O’Reilly Chevrolet, PFVT Motors, San Tan Auto Partners and Sands Chevrolet which contain cooperative language allowing the use by other governmental agencies for the purchase of sedans, light duty, medium duty and heavy-duty vehicles. The State of Arizona utilized a competitive bid process that established pricing based on purchase volumes anticipated for the State and other utilizing governmental agencies. City personnel participated in the State’s planning meeting and provided the City’s forecasted quantities by type of vehicle. The quantity of vehicles purchased under the State contract far exceeds the number of vehicles that would be purchased individually by any utilizing entity thereby leveraging cost savings for the City. Municipal Fleet Industry Best Practices In keeping with municipal fleet industry best practices, the City’s vehicle replacement strategy is centered on asset protection and lifecycle cost analysis for each category of vehicle and equipment. Lifecycle analysis considers capital costs, depreciation costs, operating and maintenance costs and residual value at auction. Tempe’s Public Works Department, Field Operations Division, Fleet Services Section, determines the lowest annualized cost of equipment by category to establish replacement guidelines utilizing industry best practice that provides the lowest overall cost of the City’s fleet. Replaced vehicles will be sold at auction to recover residual value. Analysis of Tempe Fleet 2 Industry best standard practice for the average age of a municipal fleet is five and one-half to six years. The average age of Tempe’s fleet is just over five and one-half years. As a vehicle ages, the maintenance requirements, including labor and replacement parts costs, increase and the residual value of the vehicle at auction decreases. Therefore, timely replacement of vehicles is the most cost-effective approach to controlling overall fleet costs. The maintenance hours required by Tempe’s older fleet vehicles exceed the number of hours Fleet Services staff has available to maintain these vehicles. To address this, Fleet Services is working with departments to “right size” the fleet, implement a timely vehicle replacement schedule and remove or repurpose vehicles that are underutilized. This review will ensure that the City achieves the most cost-effective approach to reducing overall vehicle costs. Alternative Fuel Vehicles When new or replacement vehicles are purchased, Fleet Services coordinates with departments to purchase alternative fuel vehicles whenever possible to include electric and hybrid electric vehicles based on the department’s needs. Budgeted Vehicles It is expected that these contracts will be utilized for the purchase of 55 replacement vehicles, which have been budgeted in Fiscal Year 2026-2027, as indicated in the following tables. The exact class of vehicles and their respective costs to be purchased may vary depending on final budgeting decisions for Fiscal Year 2026-2027. As part of the overall estimated cost, staff is including a contingency budget of a total of $133,000, which may be used to purchase new vehicles that have not been identified at present. The total cost, including sales tax will not exceed the requested amount of $3,600,000 Class of vehicle Quantity Cabs and chassis 12 SUVs 25 Trucks/Pickups 12 Vans 6 Total 55 Department/Division Quantity Estimated Cost Arts and Culture 1 $60,000 Community Development 4 $244,000 Community Health & Human Services 1 $65,000 Community Services 7 $410,000 Facilities 2 $135,000 Fire 1 $55,000 Information Technology 3 $195,000 Police 22 $1,505,000 Public Works - Engineering 3 $169,000 Public Works - Fleet 5 $240,000 Public Works - Water Utilities 4 $269,000 Transportation and Sustainability - Streets 1 $60,000 Transportation and Sustainability - Transportation 1 $60,000 Contingency - $133,000 Total 55 $3,600,000 3 ATTACHMENTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT(S): David Tavares, Deputy Public Works Director - Field Operations, (480) 350- 2819 Department Director: Laura Calder, Financial Services Director Legal review by: Dave Park, Senior Assistant City Attorney Prepared by: Alicia Ruiz, Procurement Officer