20260518_WSS_TCC_TEMPE COMMUNITY COUNCIL AGENCY REVIEW 2026-27 HUMAN SERVICES FUNDING COMMUNITY RECOMMENDATIONS_FINAL.PDF
Extracted text (via pymupdf)
6754 characters
Agency Review FY 2026/27 COMMUNITY RECOMMENDATIONS Human Services Funding Agency Review OVERVIEW Community Volunteer Reviewers Changes in Process Funding & Requests 2 • Tempe Community Council – 54 years “Connecting those in need with those that care” • Council-initiated, community-driven human service funding process since 1985 • Agencies providing high quality services • Citizens recommend funding, engage in human service solutions and give back through interest, time, life experience, and donations Agency Review – Community Impact 3 Tempe City Council Strategic Priority Performance Measure 3.10 Human Service Grants Achieve a success rate of 100% for performance goals of funded agencies 2025 Community Needs Assessment 4 Tempe City Council Strategic Priority Performance Measure 3.10 Human Service Grants Achieve a success rate of 100% for performance goals of funded agencies Assessment Findings Aligned to the Social Determinants of Health Prioritization Summit with Intersectional Inquiry 5 Tempe City Council Strategic Priority Performance Measure 3.10 Human Service Grants Achieve a success rate of 100% for performance goals of funded agencies Human Services Needs Assessment Determine community human services needs and assets Prioritization Summit Convene local interest holders to determine solutions Agency Review Process Integrate recommendations for planning solutions to meet community need Fund Allocation Fund community- based organizations to implement programs & community solutions Funding Priorities Defined IN EACH DOMAIN 6 Healthy and affordable food starts with the understanding that "we are what we eat" and the availability of healthy, affordable food is vital for community health. Providing access to affordable, healthy food has a positive impact on nutrition, disease prevention, mental health, and early childhood brain development. The percentage (___%) of program participants who have improved consistent access to affordable, nutritious, and culturally appropriate food to meet their dietary needs and preferences for an active, healthy life. 1. (Top priority) Food pantries, distribution sites, food vouchers, and food boxes 2. Community fridge, community closet, diaper bank, or hygiene hub 3. Programs that link clients to produce boxes or pantries 4. Culturally tailored food access programs or mobile pantries 5. Other: Healthy & Affordable Food Overarching Performance Measure Prioritization Example Implemented in the 26-27 Human Services Funding Application Key Outcomes Are Suggested 7 Healthy & Affordable Food Output Measures (Quantity of Services Provided) Number of meals served per day/week/month Number of households or individuals served Pounds of food distributed Number of food boxes prepared and distributed Number of new clients enrolled in the program Outcome Measures (Impact on Clients & Community) Percentage of clients who report improved food security Reduction in client reliance on emergency food assistance over time Percentage of clients who access additional support services (e.g., job training, housing assistance) Client satisfaction survey results Improvement in dietary quality (e.g., increased fruit/vegetable consumption) Efficiency Measures (Resource Utilization) Cost per meal served Cost per pound of food distributed Percentage of food sourced through donations vs. purchases Volunteer hours contributed vs. paid staff time Time from food donation to distribution Quality Measures (Service Effectiveness & Client Experience) Percentage of meals meeting nutritional guidelines Food freshness and quality ratings from clients Wait time for food assistance Number of service complaints and resolution time Client feedback on dignity and respect during service interactions Sample Key Outcomes Funding Process Review 8 Application Review Interview Consensus (plus Preliminary Consensus) TCC Board Vote Council Presentation Distribution Quarterly Reports Budget 9 Available Funds General Funds Together Tempe – Water Bill Donations Together Tempe – Tempe Community Council Together Tempe – Healthy Giving Campaign $1,136,000 $1,100,000 $30,000 $3,500 $2,500 “Participating in Agency Review made me a more informed and aware member of my community” - Volunteer 10 Consensus Meeting Application Summary 11 Requested Amount Total Requested Amount $2,898,093 Total Available $1,136,000 Difference -$1,762,093 Applications 71 Applications 63 Agencies ______ 2 Collaborations 3 New Programs Application Scores 12 Scores Range from 49.33% to 93.67% Funding Formula NEW AND YEARLY AGENCIES 13 Not recommended for funding Top Score (all applications above 90) Received full request 35 Programs 27 Agencies Recommended for Funding Scores Below 75 Received partial funding based on final score Scores Above 75 72%-83% of Requested Amount Percentage Threshold Attendees of the final consensus meeting generated the following reduction formula to allocate $1,136,000 to determine the final recommendation Funding Breakdown BY SOCIAL DETERMINANT 14 4 Programs $124,411 4 Programs $124,463 3 Programs $85,894 4 Programs $67,664 7 Programs $170,319 8 Programs $406,004 3 Programs $55,807 2 Programs $101,438 35 of 71 Programs Funded Agency Review Community Consensus Funding Model Success 2026-27 Older Adults Individuals with Disabilities Children and Youth 15 62 Engaged Volunteers Rewarded High Performers in Each Social Determinant 50% of programs were Funded (Total Requests = 1/3 of available funds) Honored Program Request at a Higher Percentage than Prior Years Implemented Community Needs Assessment Findings Aligned Priorities to Social Determinants of Health Implemented 3-year Funding Cycle Agency Review Volunteers Judy Aldrich Jim Bander Oleg Barun Deb Beeman Colleen Bivona Nancy Blevins Briana Bobertz Charles Boles Kevin Brown Jacob Buttry Floyce Chavez Cate Cotier Jacqueline Destremps Sherrell Dotson Jan Doughty Sonal Dwivedi Donald Elliott Shelly Eqesque Laura Fox Kyesha Gatison Luke Guillow Jessica Horn Jacob Hughes Lauren Herrera Eve Jakob Magdalena Johnson Mary Jung Kiyomi Kurooka Gretchen Long Viwemi Makwakwa Linda Martin Terrisa Mays Shelia Miller Megan Monaghan-Hughes Eliana Morrison Kim Naig Ernest Palomino Molly Pino Isabella Popiel Jo Portillo Sharon Price Danielle Rae Ulm Dorothy Rasmussen Linda Redman Glen Reeves Katie Ritchie Joe Russo Kira Russo Kathleen Rutowski Leslie Schwalbe Anjin Singh Janet Spirer Madeleine Stilwell Genevieve Vega Joyce Vesper Shiri Volsan Rosemary Walsh Shauna Warner LaDonna Weaver Brian West Jennifer Williams 16 Questions?