Z2022180 BOS REPORT.PDF

Maricopa County — Formal (2023-01-25)

View PDF Item 15 Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 25252 characters
January 25, 2023 
Z2022180 
Page 1 of 3 
Report to the Board of Supervisors 
Prepared by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department 
 
 
 
Board Hearing Date: 
January 25, 2023 
 
Case #/Title:   
 
 
Z2022180 – Beers Property Voluntary Rezone CHCT 
 
Supervisor District: 
1 
 
Applicant/Owner:  
Gregory & Cynthia Beers 
 
Request: 
Voluntary Rezone from R-4 to Rural-43 RUPD 
 
Site Location: 
APN 304-87-009A @ 17340 E Starflower Ct. - generally located 
at the NWC of Starflower Ct. and 174th St. in the Queen Creek 
/ Chandler Heights area. 
 
Site Size: 
83,155 sq. ft. (1.95 acres) 
 
County Island Status: 
Yes (Town of Queen Creek, Town of Gilbert, Gila River Native 
American Community) 
Additional 
Comments: 
There are no outstanding concerns from reviewing agencies. 
There is no known opposition to the request. The proposed 
Rural-43 RUPD is an “opt in” consistent with the greater rural 
rezoning effort previously approved by the BOS under case 
Z2005006 on May 3, 2006.  
 
 
The Commission recommendation was for approval subject 
to conditions ‘a’ – ‘k’ as recommended in staff’s report to the 
Commission. These were the conditions carried forward 
verbatim from Z2005006.  However, all of the “opt in” rezones 
consistent with Z2005006 have simply been approved subject 
to condition ‘a’: 
 
 
a. 
Subject to all conditions of case Z2005006, including the following Rural-43 RUPD 
development standards: 
 
1. 
Average lot area per dwelling unit: 43,560 sq. ft.  
2. 
Minimum lot area: 35,000 sq. ft.  
3. 
Minimum lot width: 120’ 
4. 
Maximum lot coverage: 20% 
5. 
Minimum Distance between buildings: 15’ 
6. 
Minimum Front setback: 20’ 
7. 
Minimum Rear setback: 25 
8. 
Minimum Side setback: 5’

January 25, 2023 
Z2022180 
Page 2 of 3 
9. 
Minimum Street-side setback: 10’ 
10. 
Maximum building height: 30’  
11. 
Accessory Dwelling Units: One (1) secondary dwelling unit allowed with 
MCESD approval of liquid waste disposal system. 
 
Staff would recommend for consistency that motion for Approval of Z2022180 be subject only to 
condition ‘a’ as shown above. 
 
 
Commission  
 
Recommendation: 
On 12/8/22, the Commission voted 9-0 to initiate the request 
and to recommend approval of Z2022180 subject to 
condition ‘a’ – ‘k’:  
 
 
a. 
Case Z2005006 shall rezone parcels from R1-35 and R-4 to Rural-43 RUPD as 
indicated on the zoning exhibit entitled “Proposed Zoning Boundary Map (Project 
Name: Chandler Heights RUPD, Case Number: Z2005006)” and dated (as of) April 
24, 2006, except as modified by the following stipulations. 
 
b. 
Only parcels for which written property owner authorization has been received 
from the property owner of record shall be considered to be rezoned from R1-35 
and R-4 to Rural-43 RUPD as per case Z2005006. 
 
c. 
In the event that property owners, within the perimeter boundary shown on the 
zoning exhibit referenced in stipulation ‘a’ (Hunt Hwy. on the south; 172nd St., San 
Tan Blvd., and Recker Rd. on the west, Riggs Rd. on the north, and Sossaman Rd. 
on the east) wish to rezone their individual parcels from R1-35 and R-4 to Rural-43 
RUPD with the same RUPD standards to apply, the Commission shall initiate a 
rezone on their behalf. 
 
d. 
Development and use within the Rural-43 RUPD zoning district shall comply with 
the site plan and narrative report entitled “Site Plan (Project Name: Chandler 
Heights RUPD Case #Z2005006)” consisting of 16 pages including exhibits and 
sections under different title pages dated January 1, 2006, except that revised 
exhibits are dated (as of) April 24, 2006, except as modified by the following 
stipulations. 
 
e. 
The use regulations, height regulations, parking regulations and sign regulations of 
the Rural-43 RUPD zoning district are the same as the Rural-43 zoning district. 
 
f. 
The yard regulations of the Rural-43 RUPD zoning district are the same as the R-4 
zoning district. 
 
g. 
The intensity of use regulations of the Rural-43 RUPD zoning district are the same as 
the R1-35 zoning district except that: 
 
The average lot area per dwelling unit shall be 43,560 sq. ft. 
The minimum lot width shall be 120’. 
 
h. 
Any parcel rezoned under case Z2005006 that is substandard or otherwise 
nonconforming in regard to the Rural-43 RUPD zoning district must document Legal

January 25, 2023 
Z2022180 
Page 3 of 3 
Non-Conforming (LNC) status with the Planning & Development Department. It is 
the responsibility of the property owner to document LNC status. 
 
i. 
There shall be no relief granted to the development standards of the Rural-43 RUPD 
development standards except with Variance approval by the Board of 
Adjustment. 
 
j. 
Secondary dwelling units (guest homes, casitas, etc.) shall be allowed in the Rural-
43 RUPD zoning district with demonstration of adequate liquid waste disposal at 
the discretion of the Environmental Services Department 
 
k. 
Any subdivision plat within the Rural-43 zoning district shall include the following 
RUPD Chart: 
 
Avg. Lot Area/D.U.:  43,560 sq. ft. 
Min. Lot Area:  35,000 sq. ft. 
Min. Lot Width:  120’ 
Min. Distance Between Buildings:  15’ 
Min. Front Setback:  20’ 
Min. Rear Setback:  25’ 
Min. Side Setback:  5’ 
Min. Street-Side Setback:  10’ 
Max. Building Height:  30’ (2 stories) 
Off Street Parking:  2/d.u. 
Signs:  Same as Rural-43 
Uses:  Same as Rural-43 
Accessory Dwelling Units:  One (1) secondary dwelling unit allowed with MCESD 
approval of liquid waste disposal system 
 
 
 
Presented by: 
 
Daniel Johnson, Planner 
Reviewed by: 
 
Darren Gérard, AICP, Planning Manager   
 
Attachment: 
 
12/8/22 P&Z Packet (11 pages)  
 
 
Note: 
12/8/22 Draft P&Z Minutes are not available as of the writing of this report, but can 
be provided upon request later when available.

Z2022180 
Page 1 of 9 
Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission 
Prepared by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department 
 
 
 
Case: 
Z2022180 – Beers Property Voluntary Rezone CHCT 
 
Hearing Date: 
December 8, 2022 
 
Supervisor District: 
1 
 
 
 
  
 
Applicants &Owners: 
Gregory & Cynthia Beers  
   
Request: 
Request for Commission initiation of rezone from R-4 to Rural-43 RUPD 
 
  
 
Site Location: 
APN 304-87-009A @ 17340 E Starflower Ct. - generally located at the 
NWC of Starflower Ct. and 174th St. in the Chandler Heights area. 
 
  
Site Size: 
83,155 sq. ft. (Approx. 1.95 acres) 
 
Density: 
N/A 
 
County Island:  
Yes (Town of Queen Creek, Town of Gilbert, Gila River Native 
American Community) 
 
 
County Plan: 
Rural Development Area (0-1 d.u./ac) 
 
Municipal Plan: 
Town of Gilbert – San Tan Character Area (0-1 du/ac) 
 
Municipal Comments: 
None 
 
Support/Opposition: 
None received to date 
 
Recommendation: 
Initiate and Approve with condition

Z2022180 
Page 2 of 9 
Project Summary: 
 
1. 
On May 3, 2006, the Board of Supervisors (BOS) approved case Z2005006 that voluntarily 
rezoned properties from R-5, R-4 & R1-35 to Rural-43 RUPD for approximately 1,280 acres 
north of Hunt Hwy. between 172nd St. and Sossaman Rd. in the Chandler Heights area. 
This rezone was initiated by the Commission on behalf of a grass roots group known as 
the Chandler Heights Community Organization (now dissolved) and participating 
property owners. At the time 671 out of 982 potential parcels were voluntarily rezoned 
representing 68% of the community. The community desired uses per the Rural-43 zoning 
district, such as the keeping of farm animals, but to maintain more liberal development 
standards akin to the current and predominant R-4 zoning. 
 
The BOS approved Z2005006 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘k’, as follows: 
 
a. 
Case Z2005006 shall rezone parcels from R1-35 and R-4 to Rural-43 RUPD as 
indicated on the zoning exhibit entitled “Proposed Zoning Boundary Map (Project 
Name: Chandler Heights RUPD, Case Number: Z2005006)” and dated (as of) April 
24, 2006, except as modified by the following stipulations. 
 
b. 
Only parcels for which written property owner authorization has been received 
from the property owner of record shall be considered to be rezoned from R1-35 
and R-4 to Rural-43 RUPD as per case Z2005006. 
 
c. 
In the event that property owners, within the perimeter boundary shown on the 
zoning exhibit referenced in stipulation ‘a’ (Hunt Hwy. on the south; 172nd St., San 
Tan Blvd., and Recker Rd. on the west, Riggs Rd. on the north, and Sossaman Rd. 
on the east) wish to rezone their individual parcels from R1-35 and R-4 to Rural-43 
RUPD with the same RUPD standards to apply, the Commission shall initiate a 
rezone on their behalf. 
 
d. 
Development and use within the Rural-43 RUPD zoning district shall comply with 
the site plan and narrative report entitled “Site Plan (Project Name: Chandler 
Heights RUPD Case #Z2005006)” consisting of 16 pages including exhibits and 
sections under different title pages dated January 1, 2006, except that revised 
exhibits are dated (as of) April 24, 2006, except as modified by the following 
stipulations. 
 
e. 
The use regulations, height regulations, parking regulations and sign regulations of 
the Rural-43 RUPD zoning district are the same as the Rural-43 zoning district. 
 
f. 
The yard regulations of the Rural-43 RUPD zoning district are the same as the R-4 
zoning district. 
 
g. 
The intensity of use regulations of the Rural-43 RUPD zoning district are the same as 
the R1-35 zoning district except that: 
 
• 
The average lot area per dwelling unit shall be 43,560 sq. ft. 
• 
The minimum lot width shall be 120’.

Z2022180 
Page 3 of 9 
h. 
Any parcel rezoned under case Z2005006 that is substandard or otherwise 
nonconforming in regard to the Rural-43 RUPD zoning district must document Legal 
Non-Conforming (LNC) status with the Planning & Development Department. It is 
the responsibility of the property owner to document LNC status. 
 
i. 
There shall be no relief granted to the development standards of the Rural-43 RUPD 
development standards except with Variance approval by the Board of 
Adjustment. 
 
j. 
Secondary dwelling units (guest homes, casitas, etc.) shall be allowed in the Rural-
43 RUPD zoning district with demonstration of adequate liquid waste disposal at 
the discretion of the Environmental Services Department 
 
k. 
Any subdivision plat within the Rural-43 zoning district shall include the following 
RUPD Chart:. 
 
Development Standard 
Existing R-4 
Proposed Rural-43 RUPD (Z2005006) 
Avg. Lot Area/D.U. 
2,000 sq. ft. 
43,560 sq. ft. 
Min Lot Area 
6,000 sq. ft. 
35,000 sq. ft. 
Min. Lot Width 
60’ 
120’ 
Max. Lot Coverage 
60% 
20% 
Min. Distance Between Buildings 
10’ 
15’ 
Min. Front Setback 
20’ 
20’ 
Min. Rear Setback 
25’ 
25’ 
Min. Side Setback 
5’ 
5’ 
Min. Street-Side Setback 
10’ 
10’ 
Max. Building Height 
40’ (3 stories) 
30’ (2 stories) 
Off-Street Parking  
2 / d.u. 
2 / d.u. 
Signs 
Same as Rural-43 
Same as Rural-43 
Uses 
Same as R1-35 
Same as Rural-43 
Accessory Dwelling Units 
Same as R1-35 
One (1) secondary dwelling unit 
allowed with MCESD approval of 
liquid waste disposal system 
 
The applicant is requesting commission initiative and voluntary rezone from R4 to RU-43 
RUPD in order to accommodate temporary housing during construction of a primary 
residence through a Temporary Use Permit. Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance allows 
temporary housing only in rural zones. The applicant was not aware of the requirement 
and the unpermitted use of the RV as temporary housing was subject of violation 
V202101838, now under administrative remedy status to be resolved at the conclusion of 
this rezone request. After the zone change is granted, the applicant intends to apply to 
live on the property in an RV temporarily during construction of the primary residence, 
allowed per MCZO 1302.4 in Rural zones. 
 
Existing On-Site and Adjacent Zoning / Land Use: 
 
2. 
On-site: 
 
R-4 RUPD / vacant  
North: 
Town of Gilbert SF-35 RUPD / single-family residence  
South: 
R-4 RUPD / vacant 
East: 
S 174th St the RU-43 RUPD / single-family residence 
West: 
R-4 / single family residence

Z2022180 
Page 4 of 9 
Utilities and Services: 
 
3. 
Water: 
Chandler Heights Irrigation District 
Wastewater: 
Septic 
School District: 
Chandler Unified School District 
Fire: 
Gilbert County Island Fire District 
Police:  
MCESD  
 
Site and Surrounding Zoning

Z2022180 
Page 5 of 9 
2022 Aerial Photo of Site and Surrounding Parcels 
 
 
 
 
Adopted Plans: 
 
4. 
Maricopa County “Vision 2030” Comprehensive Plan:  The Comprehensive Plan 
designates the Chandler Heights area as being within the Rural Development Area (0-1 
d.u./ac), after decommissioning of the Queen Creek Area Plan. 
 
5. 
Town of Gilbert General Plan: The Gilbert General Plan was approved by voters on 
November 6, 2001, and was amended by the Town Council on January 20, 2004. The 
Gilbert General Plan covers that portion of Chandler Heights bounded by 172nd St. on 
the west, Riggs Rd. on the north, Recker Rd. on the east, and Hunt Hwy. on the south. It 
designates this area for low density Residential uses of 0-1 d.u./ac. The proposed Rural-43 
RUPD zoning would be more in line with this land use designation than is the current R-4 
zoning. 
 
6. 
Town of Queen Creek General Plan: The Town Council adopted the Queen Creek General 
Plan on May 15, 2002. It designates this entire area for Very Low Density Residential uses 
of 0-1 d.u./ac. The proposed Rural-43 RUPD zoning is in concert with the Queen Creek 
General Plan.

Z2022180 
Page 6 of 9 
Public Participation Summary: 
 
7. 
Staff posted the site November 15, 2022 and sent notice of hearing to all owner’s within 
300’ of the subject site on November 22nd. No opposition has been received by staff. 
 
Outstanding Concerns from Reviewing Agencies: 
 
8. 
N/A 
 
Staff Analysis: 
 
9. 
This case, Z2022180, is a voluntary rezone from R-4 to Rural-43 RUPD as permitted by 
rezoning case Z2005006. Chandler Heights is characterized by a low density mix of 
housing scattered amongst tracts of irrigated farmland, including some orchards and 
range.  Chandler Heights is an agrarian community with a long history of farming and 
ranching. Large tracts remain undeveloped and void of buildings. The reason for the 
Z2005006 rezoning was to replace the urban density residential rezoning that covers a 
large swath of the community with a rural zoning category more appropriate for the 
community.  The Rural-43 RUPD zoning permits the keeping of farm animals but recognizes 
the more flexible development standards as a legacy of the historic urban zoning in this 
semi-rural community. 
 
10. 
The proposed rezoning is in concert with land use development patterns of the Chandler 
Heights region. The proposed rezoning is in concert with applicable land use plans. 
Condition ‘c’ of Z2005006 approved by the BOS on 5/3/06 indicated that future parcels may 
voluntarily seek to rezone the Chandler Heights Rural-43 RUPD zoning per Z2005006. Staff 
believes it is appropriate to ameliorate the checkerboard pattern of R-4 zoning in this area. 
 
11. 
Zoning case Z2005006 resulted in a checkerboard patterns between the Rural-43 RUPD 
and R-4 zoning, which can be problematic.  Per condition ‘c’ of Z2005006: “In the event 
that property owners within the perimeter boundary shown on the zoning exhibit 
referenced in stipulation ‘a’ (Hunt Hwy. on the south; 172nd St., San Tan Blvd., and Recker 
Rd. on the west, Riggs Rd. on the north, and Sossaman Rd. on the east) wish to rezone 
their individual parcels from R1-35 and R-4 to Rural-43 RUPD with the same RUPD standards 
to apply, the Commission shall initiate a rezone on their behalf.” 
 
12. 
Although the staff recommendation is for approval consistent with the stipulations related 
to the Z2005006, staff must point out a concern with the subject request.  The applicant 
has come in requesting the rezoning of a single parcel surrounded by parcels zoned R-4.  
Importantly, all lots along this segment of Starflower Ct. have been developed or are 
being developed for single-family residences on acre sized lots.  The character of 
development for the immediate neighborhood of Starflower Ct. is single-family residential 
as opposed to the residential agrarian nature of the requested Rural-43 RUPD zoning, 
similar to the properties east of 174th St. zoned RU-43. Opponents of similar voluntary 
rezones in the past have indicated potential adverse impacts to the immediate 
surrounding residences due to the allowed rural uses provided by the Rural-43 RUPD 
zoning.  Despite this, staff believes that the ongoing effort to reduce the density and 
intensity of this region is important both from a land use pattern perspective, as well as a 
water sustainability perspective.

Z2022180 
Page 7 of 9 
13. 
The following aerial photograph show the developing streetscape.  There are about 4 
lots fronting this segment of Starflower Ct. and all are developed with single-family homes 
or have single-family homes under construction.  Despite being unregulated land 
divisions, the development has the appearance of a residential subdivision with similar lot 
layouts and architectural styles for all of the homes. Staff believes this rezone will continue 
this pattern.  
 
Aerial Photographs looking north along the 17000 block of E. Starflower Ct. 
Photograph date 1/1/2019 
 
 
Recommendation: 
 
14. 
Staff recommends the Commission motion to initiate and approve case Z2022180 subject 
to conditions ‘a’ through ‘k’: 
 
 
a. Case Z2005006 shall rezone parcels from R1-35 and R-4 to Rural-43 RUPD as 
indicated on the zoning exhibit entitled “Proposed Zoning Boundary Map (Project 
Name: Chandler Heights RUPD, Case Number: Z2005006)” and dated (as of) April 
24, 2006, except as modified by the following stipulations. 
 
b. 
Only parcels for which written property owner authorization has been received 
from the property owner of record shall be considered to be rezoned from R1-35 
and R-4 to Rural-43 RUPD as per case Z2005006. 
 
c. 
In the event that property owners, within the perimeter boundary shown on the 
zoning exhibit referenced in stipulation ‘a’ (Hunt Hwy. on the south; 172nd St., San 
Tan Blvd., and Recker Rd. on the west, Riggs Rd. on the north, and Sossaman Rd. 
on the east) wish to rezone their individual parcels from R1-35 and R-4 to Rural-43

Z2022180 
Page 8 of 9 
RUPD with the same RUPD standards to apply, the Commission shall initiate a 
rezone on their behalf. 
 
d. 
Development and use within the Rural-43 RUPD zoning district shall comply with 
the site plan and narrative report entitled “Site Plan (Project Name: Chandler 
Heights RUPD Case #Z2005006)” consisting of 16 pages including exhibits and 
sections under different title pages dated January 1, 2006, except that revised 
exhibits are dated (as of) April 24, 2006, except as modified by the following 
stipulations. 
 
e. 
The use regulations, height regulations, parking regulations and sign regulations of 
the Rural-43 RUPD zoning district are the same as the Rural-43 zoning district. 
 
f. 
The yard regulations of the Rural-43 RUPD zoning district are the same as the R-4 
zoning district. 
 
g. 
The intensity of use regulations of the Rural-43 RUPD zoning district are the same as 
the R1-35 zoning district except that: 
 
• 
The average lot area per dwelling unit shall be 43,560 sq. ft. 
• 
The minimum lot width shall be 120’. 
 
h. 
Any parcel rezoned under case Z2005006 that is substandard or otherwise 
nonconforming in regard to the Rural-43 RUPD zoning district must document Legal 
Non-Conforming (LNC) status with the Planning & Development Department. It is 
the responsibility of the property owner to document LNC status. 
 
i. 
There shall be no relief granted to the development standards of the Rural-43 RUPD 
development standards except with Variance approval by the Board of 
Adjustment. 
 
j. 
Secondary dwelling units (guest homes, casitas, etc.) shall be allowed in the Rural-
43 RUPD zoning district with demonstration of adequate liquid waste disposal at 
the discretion of the Environmental Services Department 
 
k. 
Any subdivision plat within the Rural-43 zoning district shall include the following 
RUPD Chart: 
 
Development Standard 
Existing R-4 
Proposed Rural-43 RUPD (Z2005006) 
Avg. Lot Area/D.U. 
2,000 sq. ft. 
43,560 sq. ft. 
Min Lot Area 
6,000 sq. ft. 
35,000 sq. ft. 
Min. Lot Width 
60’ 
120’ 
Max. Lot Coverage 
60% 
20% 
Min. Distance Between Buildings 
10’ 
15’ 
Min. Front Setback 
20’ 
20’ 
Min. Rear Setback 
25’ 
25’ 
Min. Side Setback 
5’ 
5’ 
Min. Street-Side Setback 
10’ 
10’ 
Max. Building Height 
40’ (3 stories) 
30’ (2 stories) 
Off-Street Parking  
2 / d.u. 
2 / d.u. 
Signs 
Same as Rural-43 
Same as Rural-43

Z2022180 
Page 9 of 9 
Uses 
Same as R1-35 
Same as Rural-43 
Accessory Dwelling Units 
Same as R1-35 
One (1) secondary dwelling unit 
allowed with MCESD approval of 
liquid waste disposal system 
 
 
 
Presented by: 
Daniel Johnson, Planner  
Reviewed by: 
Darren V. Gerard, AICP, Planning Division Manager  
 
Attachment: 
Case Map (1 page) 
 
Application (1 page)

MARICOPA COUNTY
/
Maricopa County Planning & Development - Phoenix, AZ
1
Gross Acres: 2 approx.
Generated November 9, 2022 15:48 PM
Z2022180
Application Name:
Legal Description
Beers Property Voluntary Rezone CHCT
Applicant
Case Address
,
Gregory Beers
Applicant Phone/Email
Parcel Primary:
602.625.3617
ourlifeforce@cox.net
Map scale 1:796
Supervisor District No.
304-87-009A
ZONE CHANGE FROM R-4 TO RURAL-43 RUPD - CHANDLER HEIGHTS REZONE
5.3585 in

• 
.., 
Planning & Development Department 
ALL FEES ARE DUE AT TIME OF APPLICATION AND ARE NON-REFUNDABLE . 
ZONE CHANGE WITH OVERLAY APPLICATION 
Project Name 
Gregory and Cynthia Beers new cons truction (APN: 304-87-009A) 
Description of Request: 
request rezoning from R-4 to Rural-43 RUPD 
Existing Use of Property: 
_u_n_im..:.p_ro_ve_ d_la_n_d . ...:.(o_ra_n..::;g _e _or_ch_ a_rd..:..) ______________________ _ 
Existing Zoning District: 
Chandler Heights Citrus Irriga tion District 
-----''-----_..:;_ ________________________ _
Requested Zone Change with Overlay: 
Related Case Numbers: (List V# if site is subject to code violation): 
Address (if known): 
_ 1 _134_0_E_S_ta_rft_ow_e_r _CT ___________________________ _ 
General Location (include nearest city/town): 
North of Hunt Highway, West of 17f4th ST. Queen Creek, AZ. 85142 
Size in Acres: 
_1 _.9 _6 _____________ 
Square Feet: 
_s_9o_o_o ____________ _ 
Legal Description 
Section: 
35 
Township: 
2 south 
6 East 
------
------
Assessor's Parcel Number(s): 
_3_0 _4-_B7_ -o_o _9A ___________________________ _ 
Subdivision Name (if applicable): 
Range: 
Name: 
Address: 
City: 
Phone#: 
Name: 
Address: 
City: 
Phone#: 
NIA 
N/A 
_____________________ _ Contact: 
_N_tA __________ _ 
N/A 
_______________ State: _N_tA _________ _ 
Zip: 
N/A 
Fax#: 
Gregory and Cynthia Beers 
17340 E Starftower CT 
Queen Creek 
( 602) 62 5 -3617
Fax#: 
Email: NIA 
Contact: 
_6_ 02_.3_ 2_1._02_1_s _______ _ 
State: _AZ. ______ --=-=-=---=-- Zip: 
_s_51_4.,.2 ___ _
Email: ourlifeforce@cox.net
I (property owner) Gregory and Cynthia Beers 
authorize ( owner's agent) _,_N.,_,/..,_A_,_ _______ ----i 
to file this application on all matters relating to this request with Maricopa County. By signing this form as the 
property owner I hereby agree to abide by any and all conditions that may be assigned by the Maricopa County 
Board of Supervisors, Maricopa County Planning and Zoning Commission, or Maricopa County Planning and 
Development Department staff as applicable, as part of any approval of this request, including conditions, 
development agreements, and/or any other requirement that may encumber or otherwise affect the use of my 
ro ert . 
The property owner acknowledges that the approval being sought by this application may cause a reduction in 
the existing rights to use, divide, sell or possess the private property that is the subject of this application. The 
property owner further acknowledges that it is the property owner who has requested the action sought by the 
filing of this application. Therefore, with full knowledge of all rights granted to the property owner pursuant to 
A.R.S.§ 12-1132 through 1138, the property owner does hereby waive any and all claims for diminution in value of 
the property with regard to an action ta n by M ·cop 
ounty 
result of the filing of thi application. 
Property Owner Signature: 
·
ate:
., / 1 - 'Y
cer I t a 
e s  a ements 1n 
1s opp 1cot1on and support material ore true. Any approvals or permits granted by Maricopa 
County in reliance upon the truthfulnes 
· 
. 
Owner or Authorized Agent Signature: 
/.l.!lCK,,.	
'..ld'Ll
:d,)<.I 
CASE INACTIVITY 
Cases which are not active within six (6) months will be considered inactive and closed by staff. A letter 
addressing the inactivity will be sent to the owner's authorized agent or property owner with notification of the 
case to be closed within thirty (30) days. To pursue entitlement after the closing of the case, a new application 
and associated fees will need to be filed. 
Zone Change with Overlay 
11/19/2021 
Rural 43 RUPD
V202101838