CI WITH AZTEC ENGINEERING.PDF

Maricopa County — Formal (2023-01-25)

View PDF Item 98 Meeting page

Extracted text (via ocr_local) 21194 characters
DocuSign Envelope ID: C9AF4853-3003-43FC-A7C1-C69C25BFADCO

Office of Procurement Services

GOODS AND SERVICES
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE FORM
This form is to be used when a department believes an acquisition is considered Competition Impracticable and the acquisition
dollar amount is above $10,000. The Chief Procurement Officer can approve purchases up to $100,000. Board of Supervisors
approval is required if the acquisition is over $100,000. This form must be submitted for approval to: Office of Procurement
Services | 301 W Jefferson Street Suite 700 | Phoenix, AZ 85003. Fax number: 602.506.6766. The signed form must be retained
in the purchasing file. Unless approved by the Board of Supervisors in a formal agenda item or the Chief Procurement Officer in
a formal Contract a Cl form is valid from July 1 thru June 30th of each Fiscal Year.

DEPARTMENT NAME ‘ DEPARTMENT RX#
Transportation

PROPOSED CONTRACT VENDOR ueED wenrieo bate:4 1/22/2022
Company: Aztec Engineering ESTED DELNERY
Address: 4561 E. McDowell Rd. bate: 01/27/2023
City, State: Phoenix, AZ QUOTED PRICE: 31.939
Zip/Postal Code: |85008 ,
Phone: (602) 454-0402 Accounting String:
Fax: (602) 454-0403
Contact Name: |Mark Gilliland

DESCRIPTION OF GOODS OR SERVICES REQUIRED: _
The estimated cost of this Procurement is: < $100k y |> $100k

Is this a Technology Procurement? [res No

COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE CATEGORY (check applicable box, attach documentation or provide explanation below.)
Maricopa County Procurement Code MC1-351 states: “Competition|mpracticable” means an acquisition where, competition is
impractical because of standardization, warranty, or other factors as approved by the Board of Supervisors.

NOTE: The following are unlikely to be sufficient Competition Impracticable justifications:

' Personal or department preference for a product or vendor

' Department perception that the vendor is the best qualified (this should be determined through a competitive process)
' Lack of department planning resulting in limited time to conduct a competitive procurement

' Specialincentive or deal offered (can be assessed in open and competitive solicitation)

' Department convenience

[_Jsoftware license renewals, additions, or upgrades available
from only one source

L_ JBrand compatibility available from only one source (no other
distributors)

[_ ]srant specified (supporting documents attached)
L_ [matting lists, subscriptions or media advertising
[_ Marranty voided if service provided by other contract vendor [_Jother proprietary situation

[Vother (Provide written explanation below)

DocuSign Envelope ID: C9AF4853-3003-43FC-A7C1-C69C25BFADCO

THIS ISA COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT BECAUSE (attach additional page if needed):

Aztec Engineering has the project history and detailed design knowledge of the TT0248 Deer

Valley Road, El Mirage to 109th Avenue project, for providing the Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) work related to the completed
construction project. The continuation of their services adds efficiency and consistency to the project. The project schedule would be
impacted severely If a different consultant were to be procured. A LOMR submittal to FEMA is required after construction completion.
This change order will include an extension for time to prepare and submit the report, and accounts for FEMA review time, and time to
address comments and re-submittal if necessary. The assignment completion date will be Nov. 30, 2024.

Furthermore, through its comprehensive research and past experience, and given the current deadlines Imposed by FEMA, MCDOT
has been able to reasonably determine that no other firm can conceivably perform this additional work in the time frames necessary
other than the engineer of record in order to allow MCDOT to complete this additional work.

Anew firm would have to expend extensive effort to review hydraulic calculations and related assumptions, and to review previous
reports, hydraulic models, and would not have the knowledge regarding past guidance from the County's Flood Control District and
FEMA. Therefore, it is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public interest to have another firm perform this work.

SEARCH
Asearch was conducted consisting of: (check all that apply) RESULTS
[_] Market research [public notice given, list [ho alternatives were identified
Other vendors contacted other yjne alternatives were deemed acceptable
O O Mecause (explain below):

Describe the search from above in detail:

The alternative is to use another design consultant and this is not acceptable because of the
unfamiliarity other consultants have with this project, and additional delay to the schedule.
Aztec Engineering has the history, detailed knowledge, and is the engineer of record for the
plans and specifications of the project and the Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR).

PRICE
MC1-352-B states: The Using Agency requesting a Competition Impracticable Procurement shall provide written evidence
to support a Competition Impracticable determination containing an explanation of why the proposed procurement
process is advantageous to the County; and the scope, duration, and estimated total dollar value of the procurement.

Price has been fairly and reasonably established by: im Comparison to public sector contract pricing

fz[Comparison to previous comparable purchases O Discount off published catalog pricing
from a different vendor Ol Market survey

Ol Independent estimate O Other, explain:
: , :

Describe methodology and results (attach any written supporting data, e.g., survey or market analysis):

The proposed fee for this work is consistent with other approved contract rates for this type of
work.

DocuSign Envelope ID: C9AF4853-3003-43FC-A7C1-C69C25BFADCO

CERTIFICATIONS

| certify:

1) | recognize that the Maricopa County Procurement Code requires the use of competitive solicitations unless
exempted by law. | have reviewed the information and materials relevant to this procurement of goods and services,
and am requesting approval of an exception to the competitive process for the reasons described;

2) the price to be paid to the proposed vendor is fair, reasonable, and provides the best value to Maricopa County; and
3) this request for an exception to the competitive solicitation process is not the result of inadequate advance planning
or for purposes of securing the services of a preferred vendor.

Department Head or Department Head Delegate Signature (Required)

jocuSigned by:
jennifer Toth juunifer Pot 11/30/2022
Printed Name Signature °eeenceeetse-- Date

Office of Procurement Services os
The CPO can approve procurements up to $100,000. If this request is over $100,000 it must be submitted f (S
11/3

an agenda item to the Board of Supervisors for consideration. (0/2022

[> approved/Recommended for Approval
(P| Kei twe Ok ax Ve G, Decent, S202

Printed Name id Signature Date

Office of Enterprise Technology (If this procurement is classified as a technology procurement it must be
forwarded to OET for coordination and/or approval. If this procurement request is not approved by OET, the form will
be returned to the requestor.)

Approved, Recommended purchase is in line with Maricopa County's strategic technology plan or currently installed
Lequipment or service, and is considered to be a competition impracticable procurement.

CO Not Approved. Reasoning:

Printed Name Signature Date

DocuSign Envelope ID: CC65A5BB-BCD6-4B8A-9E99-C9E6AB748B3C.

Scope of Services — Project
Specific

Scoping and Final Design

Deer Valley Road: El Mirage Road to 109" Avenue
Work Assignment No. 3

Consultant: AZTEC
Project No: TT0248
Contract No.: 2015-032

Maricopa County
Department of Transportation
2901 W. Durango Street
Phoenix, AZ 85009

September 2022

DocuSign Envelope ID: CC65A5BB-BCD6-4B8A-9E99-C9E6AB748B3C.
Scope of Services

Project Specific
Table of Contents
SCOPE OF SERVICES — PROJECT SPECIBIC....cccsssssessesseceseesssssesseeseeeenssssseseeseneseee eapensasnensncanae 3
Project Overview ...cscccceseseesssssssesesecessreeescsesnsessscscscsessesescssssscscssssscssssssssessesesssessscsesseeseseseseesseseessees 3
PrOjeCt LOCAION A. eececececesesescesssesesesesscsessscsesescscscsesesssesescscseseseseseseseseseeeesssssssesesesesesesesenenecseseseseaeseees 3
Project. Background evswsccvoceversucesrvcossuncrsessivsncvsrscawcasasivedsnsusvssscsvenvvonssseevivcecsusceasuecsnenticnresvevibestcanaaeees 3
PHOJECl PUL POS Crxscecevoeseneroresavscccersasesamversumeassussanseagueaeenseenaasar sere taTereS CRON Aer areas T IRATE 3
LenB th. OF S€iViCeS wcsencncsopeee rience nee mater 3
100.3.3 Mattix:of Responsibilities ps ccscssccesssseeneveamrenroa mance mnensamnmsenmutarenuatenren 3
100.3.4 Matrix of Deliverables
100.3.5 Communication Plan...
100.4 Design Criteria..
400.1 Stakeholder Meetings..
1200.1 Project Submittals oo... ccseesescscseesesescscesessssssesessssscseesesessseeseasscsssesenesssseeeens 6
List of Tables

Table 1 — Matrix of Responsibilities ..
Table 2 — Matrix of Deliverables
Table 3 — Contact Table....
Table 4 — Design Criteria ..
Table 5 — Project Submittals Table

ae
5
5
6
6

Project No.: TT0248 Contract No.: 2015-032
Revised: September 2023 Page 2 of 6

DocuSign Envelope ID: CC65A5BB-BCD6-4B8A-9E99-C9E6AB748B3C

Scope of Services
Project Specific

SCOPE OF SERVICES — PROJECT SPECIFIC

Project Overview
Project Location

The Deer Valley Road: El Mirage Road to 109" Avenue (DVR) project is located in the northwest Valley
and is approximately 2.5 miles in length. Specifically, the project lies within Sections 18 and 19,
Township 4 North, Range | East and Sections 13 and 14, Township 4 North, Range 1 West of the Gila
and Salt River Baseline & Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona.

Project Background

The DVR area is mainly comprised of undeveloped open desert surrounding the Agua Fria River (AFR).
There are residential developments in the western portion of the area. Several active sand and gravel
mining operations are located in the AFR.

Project Purpose

The DVR project has been constructed and provides an additional crossing of the AFR between Bell Road
and Happy Valley Parkway. Bell Road was the only bridged east-west crossing of the river between Olive
Avenue and Happy Valley Parkway, a span of 10 miles. This Scope of Services and Cost Proposal for
the requested Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) services for the DVR crossing of the AFR and are being
submitted as a Change Order to Work Assignment No. 3.

Length of Services

The length of these additional post design services is estimated to be one year from Notice to Proceed
(NTP) which would be October 2023.

100.3.3 Matrix of Responsibilities
Table 1 — Matrix of Responsibilities
scope Item Consultant MCDOT Other (Identify)
Section

100 Project Management X
200 Data Acquisition N/A
300 Land Survey xX
400 Project Coordination N/A
500 Utilities and Railroad N/A
600 Environmental N/A
700 Alternatives Analysis, SDR, and N/A

Plans

Technical Memoranda and
800 Reports (DVR Crossing of AFR X

LOMR)
900 Right-of-Way N/A
1000 Planning N/A
1100 Plans, Specifications, and Estimate N/A
1200 Value Engineering N/A
1300 Bidding Phase N/A
1400 Post Design N/A
Project No.: TT0248 Contract No.: 2015-032

Revised: September 2023 Page 3 of 6

DocuSign Envelope ID: CC65A5BB-BCD6-4B8A-9E99-C9EGAB748B3C
Scope of Services
Project Specific

| 1500 | References | | N/A

AZTEC completed the final design of DVR project for MCDOT including developing the Conditional
Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) for the DVR crossing of the AFR. The DVR construction has recently
been completed and MCDOT has requested AZTEC to develop the LOMR for this crossing. AZTEC’s
remaining budget for post design services will be credited towards this effort.

100 Project Management

A maximum of three AZTEC staff members will attend six Progress Meetings by videoconference
including preparing and distributing meeting agendas and notes. Project Administration will be
performed including monthly invoicing and progress reports.

300 Land Survey

MCDOT will perform the Land Survey effort including providing topographic files of the as-built
conditions as needed to develop the LOMR. MCDOT will provide as-built construction documents and/or
a signed and sealed survey report to include in the LOMR documentation. AZTEC includes no survey or
record drawing development effort in this scope of services.

800 Technical Memoranda and Reports

AZTEC will develop the LOMR for the DVR crossing of AFR. The LOMR will be based upon as-built
survey performed after construction is complete. AZTEC will revise the HEC-RAS model and the
floodplain mapping accordingly. AZTEC will provide technical information as requested by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to facilitate their review of the LOMR and coordinate with
Flood Control District of Maricopa County (FCDMC). AZTEC will prepare the supporting
documentation, technical data notebook and FEMA forms. This will also include the preparation of cover
sheet and appropriate exhibits for the LOMR. AZTEC will address review comments from the agencies
and incorporate these into the LOMR. AZTEC will submit the LOMR to FEMA and will take the lead in
coordination with FEMA. The County will be consulted on all comments and responses to FEMA.

This scope of work assumes the latest revision to the Agua Fria River hydraulic model is based on the
effective 7/17/2015 LOMR for the Agua Fria Truck Reliever Road (AFTRR). The previous CLOMR
hydraulic model for the DVR project is also based on the 2015 AFTRR LOMR model. This scope of work
does not include scope to update the DVR LOMR hydraulic model to a hydraulic model currently in
review / approval with FCDMC and FEMA.

AZTEC will pay for the printing and compilation of the LOMR. It is assumed that no more than two
rounds of LOMR reviews by MCDOT, City of Peoria, and FCDMC will be required. It is assumed that
no more than one round of LOMR review by FEMA is required. City of Peoria and FCDMC will each
sign the MT-2 forms as the local community authority. Each round of reviews will include two hard copies
of the LOMR being delivered to MCDOT for MT-2 form signatures. MCDOT will then deliver one hard
copy of the LOMR with a signed MT-2 form to FCDMC for their review and signature of the MT-2 form.
The final signed MT-2 form by MCDOT and FCDMC will be returned to AZTEC for resubmittal to
FEMA.

AZTEC will revise the property owner notification letter and will perform the distribution and follow up
efforts with the property owners as needed.

100.3.4 Matrix of Deliverables
MicroStation will be used to develop CADD deliverables and will use MCDOT’s CADD Standards.

Project No.: TT0248 Contract No.: 2015-032
Revised: September 2023 Page 4 of 6

DocuSign Envelope ID: CC65A5BB-BCD6-4B8A-9E99-C9EGAB748B3C
Scope of Services
Project Specific

\
Table 2 — Matrix of Deliverables
Item Deliverable 1st 2nd 3rd
DVR Crossing of AFR LOMR D F AS

D = Draft, F = Final & S = Sealed

100.3.5 Communication Plan
Table 3 — Contact Table
Name Role Agenc Phone Mailing Address Email Address
ooo Number €
Ben Project 2901 W. Durango Street | Ben.markert@maric
CcDO -506-
Markert Manager MDOT |) 6027208-8654 Phoenix, AZ 85009 Opa.gov
Jimmy Bridge 2901 W. Durango Street | Jimmy.camp@maric
CDOT -506-:
Camp Engineer M 602:5064880 Phoenix, AZ 85009 Opa.gov
Bassem . 2901 W. Durango Street | Bassem.naba@mari
2-506-
Naba Drainage MCDOT | 602-506-1713 Phoenix, AZ 85009 copa.gov
Jessy Utility 2901 W. Durango Street | Jessy.emert@maric
McDO -506-
Emert Coordinator 1 |) 02:506-408! Phoenix, AZ 85009 opa.gov
Greg 2901 W. Durango Street | Greg.hunter@maric
Hunter Survey MCDOT’ |, 602:506-4679 Phoenix, AZ 85009 opa.gov
. Environmental 2901 W. Durango Street | Joe.pinto@maricop
Joe Pinto Manager MCDOT | 602-506-8068 Phoenix, AZ 85009 a.gov
Right-of-Way 2901 W. Durango Street | Pat.mertz@maricop
Pat Mertz Manager MCDOT | 602-506-4639 Phoenix, AZ 85009 aigOV
Bryan Communicatio 2901 W. Durango Street | Bryan.pahia@maric
Pahia ns MCDOT’ | 602/506-0543 Phoenix, AZ 85009 opa.gov
. . 2901 W. Durango Street | John.shi@maricopa.
John Shi Materials MCDOT | 602-506-8658 Phoenix, AZ 85009 gov
Brian 5 2901 W. Durango Street | Brian.neves@maric
2-506-
Neves Tratie MEDOT || G02 2061626 Phoenix, AZ 85009 opa.gov
David 9875 North 85" Avenue, | charles.andrews@p
Fritz Roadway MCDOT’ | 602-506-2826 Peoria, AZ 85345 eoriaaz.gov
Charles a . 2901 W. Durango Street | David.fritz@marico
Andrews Liaison Peoria | 623-773-7358 Phoenix, AZ 85009 pa.gov
Mark Project 501 North 44" Street,
Gilliland M ne ay AZTEC | 480-688-1398 Suite 300 meilliland@aztec.us
a Phoenix, AZ 85008
Eric Prdiect 501 North 44" Street,
F 4s AZTEC | 602-363-2099 Suite 300 ewatkins@aztec.us
Watkins Engineer .
Phoenix, AZ

Project No.: TT0248
Revised: September 2023

Contract No.: 2015-032

Page 5 of 6

Scope of Services

DocuSign Envelope ID: CC65A5BB-BCD6-4B8A-9E99-C9E6AB748B3C

Project Specific
Tim 501 North 44" Street,
Mahon Drainage AZTEC | 602-510-2415 Suite 300 tmahon@aztec.us
Phoenix, AZ 85008
501 North 44" Street,
Andrew . .
Moreno Traffic AZTEC | 602-659-9309 Suite 300 amoreno@aztec.us
Phoenix, AZ 85008
John 501 North 44" Street,
Gleason Bridge AZTEC | 602-659-9358 Suite 300 jgleason@aztec.us
Phoenix, AZ 85008
Dan 501 North 44" Street, dwoelzlein@aztec.u
Woelzlei Landscape AZTEC | 602-659-9317 Suite 300 é ,
n Phoenix, AZ 85008
100.4 Design Criteria

400.1

Table 4 — Design Criteria

Criterion Reference Section
Current MCDOT Roadway,
Traffic, and Drainage As Applicable
Design Manuals
Current MAG Specifications
and Details with MCDOT As Applicable

Supplements

Stakeholder Meetings

No additional Stakeholder Meetings are anticipated.

1200.1 Project Submittals
Table 5 — Project Submittals Table
& n
Legend: Sea |= = s
H# - Number of Hard Copies Requested = g Fa a fey bg 5 3
oa i c me
E - Indicates Electronic Submittal is Requested | £ @ | 9 e 8 s/3 & 2) 5
SS/2F | oS |] ES §| 6
22/2/52 |e 3) &
eg ]oe @el/nakl
Bee | Ba. |Sre lease s| oe
= ce 5 < Doe Ss
a:4| 2085 ow 3
Sook oO 3 ry te, Ss =
Submittal Document 3° i] 5
2 Ee
iL
DVR Crossing of AFR LOMR 2 2 2 1 7

R:\Phoenix\Projects\AZE1574_ MCDOT_On-Call_Eng_Des\ProjAdmin\Work Assignment 3 Contract Modification 7\20220925mkg-
DeerValleyRoadScopeRev0.docx

Project No.: TT0248

Revised: September 2023

Contract No.: 2015-032

Page 6 of 6

DocuSign Envelope ID: CC65A5BB-BCD6-4B8A-9E99-CSE6AB748B3C

Deer Valley Road: El Mirage Road to 109th Avenue AZTEC
PROJECT NO. TT0248 Contract No. 2015-032

DERIVATION OF COST PROPOSAL SUMMARY

(Figures Rounded To The Nearest $1)
ESTIMATED DIRECT LABOR

PERSON BILLING
CLASSIFICATION HOURS RATE/HOUR TOTAL
Project Principal - $ 86.59 $ -
Project Manager 18 $ 62.49 $ 1,125
Senior Engineer 50 $ 65.02 $ 3,251
Project Engineer 12 $ 52.13 $ 626
Engineer/Designer 108 $ 38.52 $ 4,160
CADD/Technician 56 $ 30.59 $ 1,713
Project Administration - $ 19.43 $ -
244 Hours
Estimated Labor Cost $ 10,875
Overhead 172.68% $ 18,779
Subtotal $ 29,654
ESTIMATED DIRECT EXPENSES
(Listed By Item At Estimated Actual Cost - NO MARKUP)
Travel $ 7
Plotting $ =
Miscellaneous Expenses $ 9,320.00
Total Estimated Expenses $ 9,320
ESTIMATED OUTSIDE SERVICES AND CONSULTANTS
Firm Cost
$ =
Total Estimated Outside Services $ -
PROFIT (Direct Labor +Overhead) 10% 2,965.40
REMAINING PDS FEE CREDIT 10,000.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE $ 31,939
CONTRACT TIME 365 Calendar Days

hah Lee 9/25/2022
Date

June 2017 Page 1 of 3

£107 080d

soz eunr

[ovrz gs | 80h zb os | 8h I ]
o'ez a 8 ‘S19HO7] UOREOUNON Z-LIN SNOT z:008
o"osh oF ool OF (uoneUIpI00D WW PUB DINGO "YINOT av 30 Bulssosd UAC) sHodey pue epuesoWwaN jeo1UYDeL 1008
| ‘SpHoday pue epuBJOWAyy [eD1UyIa1 OOS!
loveL | a uonensiUIUpY 9l01d OL"OOL
love ZL 9 9 sBunaaW SsasBoid y99f01d 9°00
juawabeuey ya!olg OOL
Uo
= ueigiu daaui6ug | saaujGug | seGeuew | jedioug 3294S sus
ree eASIUIPY nsiiqavolqueouibua| pated | sowas | roofed | roofoa | simon | on | ?S aSvL

ZE0-SLOZ “ON JORIUOD

JaLlZv

ASVHd - SYNOH AAVLS GALVIILSA

8vZ0Ll “ON LOArOdd
O@NUSAY USO} OF PeOY abe | :peoy Agen 120q

‘OPGSyLEVITEO-G636-VEsy-9A08-ASSINN :A] adojonuy ubignoog

DocuSign Envelope ID: CC65A5BB-BCD6-4B8A-9E99-C9E6AB748B3C

ane 2017

Deer Valley Road: El Mirage Road to 109th Avenue

PROJECT NO. TT0248

ESTIMATE OF DIRECT EXPENSES

AZTEC
Contract No. 2015-032

Travel
A. Local Mileage at ——
$ 0.54 -__|miles
Subtotal Travel $ =
Plotting
B. Exhibits at $ od -__|exhibits
$ -
C. Plots at $ - -__|plots
$ ae
D. Plan Submittals
Half Size Bond Copies at $ - -___|Copies
Full Size Bond Copies at $ - -___|Copies
Subtotal Plotting $ 2
Miscellaneous Expenses
C. Other 8.5 x11 0 @ $0.03/copy (3000 copies) $ 90.00
Certified Letter (USPS 50@$4.00 each) $ 200.00
Postage Stamp (50@ $0.60 each) $ 30.00
11.0 x 17 0 @ $0.06/copy (7500 copies) $ 5
Full Size Mylars 0 @ $9.25 $ i
Full Size Vellums 0 @ $3.30 $ B
Messenger 6 @ $21.95 $ :
Hard Copy LOMR Reports (7 Reports) $ 4,000
FEMA Electronic LOMC Submittal $ 8,000.00
Subtotal Miscellaneous Expenses | EVI)
ESTIMATED OUTSIDE SERVICES & CONSULTANTS
$ -
$ .
TOTAL ESTIMATED OUTSIDE SERVICES Suan

TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENSES

$ 9,320

Page fof f