Extracted text (via pymupdf)
45210 characters
December 6, 2023
Z2022185
Page 1 of 2
Report to the Board of Supervisors
Prepared by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
Board Hearing Date:
December 6, 2023
Case #/Title:
Z2022185 - PH68137A - TowerCom Hunt
Supervisor District:
4
Applicant/Owner:
Declan Murphy, Coal Creek Consulting LLC / Barbara Jane Hunt
Request:
Special Use Permit (SUP) to allow an 80’ ‘monotree’ Wireless
Communications Facility in the Rural-43 zoning district
Site Location:
Generally located at the NWC of Roeser Rd. & 239th Ave. in the
Buckeye area
Site Size:
Approximately 600 sq. ft.
County Island Status:
Yes (City of Buckeye)
Additional
Comments:
The applicant has directly worked with neighbors on site location
and tower stealth design. There are no outstanding concerns from
reviewing agencies.
Commission
Recommendation:
On 11/2/23, the Commission voted 5-0 to adopt a motion
recommending the Board of Supervisors approve Z2022185
subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘g’:
a.
Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the site plan entitled
“PH68137A Towercom Roeser“, consisting of 7 full-size sheets, dated September 27,
2023, except as modified by the following conditions. Staff may determine slight
refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan. Minor and
major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of
the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.
b.
Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the narrative report
entitled “Towercom TMobile”, consisting of 4 pages, dated, August 7, 2023, except as
modified by the following conditions.
c.
This special use permit is valid for a period of 25 years and shall expire on December 6,
2048 or upon termination of the use for a period of 90 or more days, whichever occurs
first. All site improvements associated with the special use permit shall be removed within
90 days of such expiration or termination of use.
December 6, 2023
Z2022185
Page 2 of 2
d.
The wireless communication tower shall retain the stealth properties as originally
designed. Any damaged or missing fronds or branches shall be replaced within 60 days
of such damage occurring.
e.
The following engineering condition shall apply:
1.
All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section
1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards;
Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual;
and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of
application for construction.
f.
Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for initiating a
revocation of this special use permit as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning
Ordinance.
g.
The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant,
with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to
enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application,
subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, and at the
time of expiration of the special use permit, the property shall revert to the zoning that
existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either
revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, or the expiration of the special
use permit, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide,
sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property
from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation or expiration of
the special use permit. The special use permit enhances the value of the property above
its value as of the date the special use permit is granted and reverting to the prior zoning
results in the same value of the property as if the special use permit had never been
granted.
Presented by:
Andrew Lorentzen, Planner
Reviewed by:
Darren Gérard, AICP, Planning Manager
Attachment:
11/2/23 P&Z Packet (24 pages)
Note:
11/2/23 Draft P&Z Minutes are not available as of the writing of this report, but can be
provided upon request later when available.
Z2022185
Page 1 of 6
Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission
Prepared by the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department
Case:
Z2022185 - PH68137A - TowerCom Hunt
Hearing Date:
November 2, 2023
Supervisor District:
4
Applicant:
Declan Murphy, Coal Creek Consulting LLC
Owner:
Barbara Jane Hunt
Request:
Special Use Permit (SUP) to allow an 80’ ‘monotree’ Wireless
Communications Facility in the Rural-43 zoning district
Site Location:
Generally located at the NWC of Roeser Rd. & 239th Ave. in the Buckeye
area
Site Size:
Approximately 600 sq. ft.
Density:
N/A
County Island:
Yes (City of Buckeye)
County Plan:
State Route 85 Area Plan - Large Lot Residential (1-2 d.u./ac)
Municipal Plan:
Buckeye – Neighborhoods (1+ d.u./ac)
Municipal Comments:
City of Buckeye – comment letter
Support/Opposition:
Two known opposition
Recommendation:
Approve with conditions
Z2022185
Page 2 of 6
Project Summary:
1.
The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit (SUP) for an 80’ Wireless Communications
Facility (WCF) and associated transmission equipment to be located on a Rural-43 zoned parcel
in the Buckeye area. The request is located on parcel 504-41-006T and is situated at the northwest
corner of Roeser & 239th Ave. The subject site is located on a small county island that is
comprised of approximately 10 acres over five residential lots, with the subject parcel accounting
for approximately 4.9 acres of the county island.
2.
The request is for an 80’ communications pole and facility designed to be obscured with a faux-
tree ‘monotree’ covering chosen through direct talks with neighbors and the parcel owner. The
SUP is specifically requested due to the location of the WCF on the parcel which does not meet
by-right location setback standards of 160’ as the proposed location is 110’-9” from the northern
and 20’-5” from the western parcel boundary.
3.
The applicant proposes the following development standards table:
2023 Aerial Photos
Regulation
WCF Rural Zoning Standard
Proposed SUP Standards
Required 2:1 Setback
(80’ Tower)
160-feet
20.5-feet (West)
110-feet (North)
Maximum diameter of antenna
arrays
8-feet
12-feet
Z2022185
Page 3 of 6
Existing Zoning
Z2022185
Page 4 of 6
Proposed Site Plan and elevation detail
Existing On-Site and Adjacent Zoning / Land Use:
4.
On-site:
Rural-43 / Single-family residential
North:
Rural-43 / Single-family residential
South:
Planned Residential / Single-family residential (City of Buckeye)
East:
Planned Residential / Single-family residential (City of Buckeye)
West:
Planned Residential / Vacant (City of Buckeye)
Utilities and Services:
5.
Water:
N/A
Wastewater:
N/A
School Districts:
Buckeye Elementary / Buckeye Union High School
Fire:
Buckeye Valley Rural Fire District
Police:
Maricopa County Sherriff
Right-of-Way:
6.
There are no MCDOT designated roadways in the vicinity, Roeser Rd. is maintained by the City of
Buckeye and 239th Ave. is comprised of private easement segments.
Adopted Plan:
7.
City of Buckeye General Plan: The City of Buckeye’s General Plan, updated in 2022, designates
this site as ‘Neighborhoods’ which allows land densities over 1 du/ac.
Z2022185
Page 5 of 6
Public Participation Summary:
8.
The applicant posted the site and sent notification to all owners within 300’ of the proposed
parcel. The applicant has been in direct contact with the immediate neighbor to the north, The
Vargas Family, who are currently in the process of completing their new home on the adjacent
parcel. Discussions with the Vargas Family resulted in the applicant moving the WCF pole location
100’ to the south away from their parcel as well as being involved in choosing the screening faux
tree design.
9.
Staff and the applicant have also been in contact with another neighboring landowner and their
real estate market representative who are opposed to this proposed WCF. Their concerns are the
unsightly nature of the tower, property value influence and direct health impacts a tower may
bring.
10.
The case was routed to all registered area of interest members within the parcel vicinity. The City
of Buckeye responded with a comment letter stating they wish to see the tower developed with
City of Buckeye WCF regulations due to neighboring jurisdiction and existing and planned single
family home subdivisions to the East, South & West of the project. City of Buckeye regulations
would limit the tower to 50’ and require setbacks of 50’ from each lot line. The City additionally
commented they would prefer to utilize a palm style tree for screening for the tower.
Staff Analysis:
11.
Staff supports this request to add an additional communications tower in this area. The new
tower will provide accessibility, additional technology connections, and help fill in gaps for
emergency services network. Staff recognizes the efforts the applicant made to change the
location, screening and faux tree design in directly communicating and working with neighbors.
12.
Staff recognizes the City of Buckeye’s design concerns to limit the tower to 50’ per the City design
guidelines, however, due to the 2014 Infrastructure Order adopted to the FCC Spectrum Act of
2012, tower operators have the right and ability to expand approved facilities up to 20’ or 10% of
tower height (whichever’s grater). With the ability to expand and the applicants’ efforts in working
with the neighbor on site and design, staff supports the 30’ expanded height to 80’ which also
corresponds to County standards for approved tower height.
Recommendation:
13.
Staff recommends the Commission adopt a motion recommending that the Board of Supervisors
approve Z2022185 subject to the following conditions ‘a’ – ‘g’:
a.
Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the site plan entitled
“PH68137A Towercom Roeser“, consisting of 7 full-size sheets, dated September 27,
2023, except as modified by the following conditions. Staff may determine slight
refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan. Minor and
major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of
the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance.
Z2022185
Page 6 of 6
b.
Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the narrative report
entitled “Towercom TMobile”, consisting of 4 pages, dated, August 7, 2023, except as
modified by the following conditions.
c.
This special use permit is valid for a period of 25 years and shall expire on December 6,
2048 or upon termination of the use for a period of 90 or more days, whichever occurs
first. All site improvements associated with the special use permit shall be removed within
90 days of such expiration or termination of use.
d.
The wireless communication tower shall retain the stealth properties as originally
designed. Any damaged or missing fronds or branches shall be replaced within 60 days
of such damage occurring.
e.
The following engineering condition shall apply:
1.
All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section
1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards;
Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual;
and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of
application for construction.
f.
Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for initiating a
revocation of this special use permit as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning
Ordinance.
g.
The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the
applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the
property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of
application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any
condition, and at the time of expiration of the special use permit, the property shall revert
to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and
agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, or the
expiration of the special use permit, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date
of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no
diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due
to such revocation or expiration of the special use permit. The special use permit
enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the special use permit
is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if
the special use permit had never been granted.
Presented by:
Andrew Lorentzen, Planner
Reviewed by:
Darren Gerard, AICP, Planning Manager
Attachments:
Case Map (1 page)
Site Plan (7 pages)
Narrative Report (4 pages)
Engineering comments (1 page)
Opposition Letters (3 pages)
City of Buckeye Comments (2 pages)
PH68137A
TOWERCOM ROESER
CASE #: Z2022185
RFDS VER: 1 DATED 3/28/2023 AT 1:41:19 PM
TITLE SHEET, VICINITY
MAP & GENERAL
INFORMATION
T-1
SITE #:
SITE NAME:
STATE:
COUNTY:
DESIGN TYPE:
PROJECT SUMMARY
PROJECT TEAM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
CODE COMPLIANCE:
ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
SHEET INDEX
MARICOPA COUNTY
NEW SITE BUILD
VICINITY MAP
DRIVING DIRECTIONS
PH68137A
ROESER
ARIZONA
SITE LOCATION
APN: 504-41-006T
ZONING: RU-43
35' R/W
N0° 14' 55"E 2663.98'
S89° 28' 47"E
2644.29'
S0° 14' 11"W
635.00'
S89° 28' 47"E
330.55'
WEST ROESER ROAD
APN: 504-41-722
ZONING: PR
APN: 504-43-449
ZONING: PR
APN: 504-41-006W
ZONING: RU-43
(E) 8' UTILITY EASEMENT
(E) 3' IRRIGATION EASEMENT
(E) 15' EASEMENT FOR
ROADWAY PURPOSES
9
5
6
CENTER, SECTION 28,
TOWNSHIP 1N, RANGE 3W
P.O.C. LEASE AREA
& EASEMENTS
9
(E) BUILDING (TYP.)
(E) OVERHEAD (TYP.)
(E) BUILDING (TYP.)
SOUTH APACHE ROAD
W 1/4 COR., SEC. 28,
T. 1N, R. 3W
WEST BROADWAY ROAD
N 1/4 COR., SEC. 28,
T. 1N, R. 3W
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
BRASS CAP FLUSH (BCFL)
PROPERTY LINE
CENTERLINE
EASEMENT LINE
POSITION OF GEODETIC COORDINATES
DECIDUOUS TREE
PALM TREE
LEGEND
CALCULATED POSITION
PROJECT AREA
THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF
MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THE SOUTH 670 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF
THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 3 WEST OF
THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION AS CONVEYED TO THE TOWN OF BUCKEYE IN GENERAL
WARRANTY DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 23, 2011 IN RECORDING NO. 20110161027,
OFFICIAL RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE CENTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 28, A 1/2" REBAR WITH
CAP "LS 21081" ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL ACCORDING
TO DOCUMENT 2004-1192712, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY,
ARIZONA, WHENCE THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 28, A BRASS CAP
IN HANDHOLE, BEARS NORTH 89 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST, A
DISTANCE OF 2644.29 FEET AS SHOWN ON THE "MINOR LAND DIVISION", ACCORDING
TO BOOK 788 OF MAPS, PAGE 28, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY,
ARIZONA, SAID CENTER CORNER BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH
LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 28, SAID LINE ALSO BEING
THE MONUMENT LINE FOR ROESER ROAD, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID
PARCEL, A DISTANCE OF 330.54 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 25
SECONDS WEST, DEPARTING FROM SAID SOUTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 35.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 07 SECONDS EAST, ALONG A LINE BEING
35.00 FEET PERPENDICULAR AND PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 28, TO THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 28, A DISTANCE OF 330.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00
DEGREES 05 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 28, A DISTANCE OF 35.00 FEET RETURNING
TO THE CENTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 28 AND THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
LESSOR'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION (APN: 504-41-006T)
1.
ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE REPRESENTED IN NORTH
AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD88) ESTABLISHED FROM
GPS DERIVED ELLIPSOID HEIGHTS, APPLYING GEOID 12B SEPARATIONS
CONSTRAINING TO NGS CORS STATIONS PROVIDED IN THE "ONLINE
POSITIONING USER SERVICE" (OPUS) SOLUTION FOR THIS SPECIFIC
SITE.
2.
BEARINGS SHOWED HEREON ARE BASED UPON U.S. STATE PLANE
NAD83 COORDINATE SYSTEM ARIZONA STATE PLANE COORDINATE
ZONE CENTRAL, DETERMINED BY GPS OBSERVATIONS.
3.
FIELD WORK FOR THIS PROJECT WAS PERFORMED ON 04/15/22.
PROJECT META DATA
1.
ALL TITLE INFORMATION IS BASED UPON A COMMITMENT FOR TITLE
INSURANCE PREPARED BY COMMITTEMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE,
ORDER NO.: 10007311-010-BT-SW EFFECTIVE DATE: 03/22/2022.
2.
SURVEYOR HAS NOT PERFORMED A SEARCH OF PUBLIC RECORDS TO
DETERMINE ANY DEFECT IN TITLE.
3.
THE BOUNDARY SHOWN HEREON IS PLOTTED FROM RECORD
INFORMATION AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF
THE PROPERTY.
4.
SURVEYOR DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ALL UTILITIES ARE SHOWN OR
THEIR LOCATIONS. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND
DEVELOPER TO CONTACT BLUE STAKE AND ANY OTHER INVOLVED
AGENCIES TO LOCATE ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
REMOVAL, RELOCATION AND/ OR REPLACEMENT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY
OF THE CONTRACTOR.
R
O
Y
E
V
R
D
a
t
e
S
i
g
n
e
d
.
O
N
E
T
A
C
I
F
I
T
R
E
C
U
S
D
N
A
L
D
E
R
E
T
S
I
G
E
R
44007
RYAN L.
FIDLER
.
A
.
.
U
,
A
N
S
Z
I
A
R
O
SURVEYOR NOTES
0
05/04/22
TITLE REVIEW
SHEET NO.
REVISION:
REVISIONS
PROJECT No.
SITE NAME:
SITE ADDRESS:
SHEET TITLE:
FIELD BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
NO.
DATE
DESCRIPTION
REUSE OF DOCUMENT
THE IDEAS & DESIGN INCORPORATED HEREON, AS AN
INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, IS THE
PROPERTY OF RLF CONSULTING, LLC & IS NOT TO BE
USED FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT WRITTEN
AUTHORIZATION OF RLF CONSULTING, LLC.
TG
GAC
RLF
15006206
PH68137A
23910 W ROESER RD
BUCKEYE 85326
BOUNDARY DETAIL
LS-1
5.
EASEMENT(S) FOR THE PURPOSE(S) SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS
INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT:
PURPOSE: IRRIGATION PURPOSES
RECORDING DATE: DECEMBER 31, 1981
RECORDING NO: DOCKET 15737, PAGE 237
6.
EASEMENT(S) FOR THE PURPOSE(S) SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS
INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT:
PURPOSE: ROADWAY
RECORDING DATE: JUNE 09, 1983
RECORDING NO: 83-221013
9.
MATTERS CONTAINED IN THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT
ENTITLED: AGREEMENT
RECORDING DATE: JULY 16, 2003
RECORDING NO: 2003-0933632
REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE TO SAID DOCUMENT FOR FULL
PARTICULARS.
ITEMS 1-4, 7, 8, 10, AND 11 OF THE CLIENT PROVIDED TITLE REPORT DO NOT
CONTAIN GRAPHICALLY PLOTTABLE EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, RESTRICTIONS
OR OTHER ENCUMBRANCES. THE SURVEYOR CANNOT GUARANTEE THAT
NON-PLOTTABLE ENCUMBRANCES DO NOT EXIST THAT MAY AFFECT THE
SUBJECT LEASED PREMISES.
SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS
jsultzbach@com-serv.com
jsultzbach@com-serv.com
NORTH
THE PROPOSED LEASE PREMISES SHOWN HEREON APPEAR TO BE WITHIN FLOOD
ZONE "X" AS DELINEATED ON THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
FIRM MAP NO. 04013C2115L DATED 10/16/2013.
FLOOD ZONE "X" IS DEFINED AS: AN AREA INUNDATED BY 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE
FLOODING.
FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION
SURVEY DETAIL
SHEET LS-2
ROESER RD
ATLANTA AVE
CHIPMAN RD
WIER AVE
GROVE ST
GROVE ST
238TH LN
237TH DR
MOBILE LN
ROMLEY AVE
237TH DR
ROMLEY AVE
R
1
09/07/23
FINAL
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
APN: 504-41-006T
ZONING: RU-43
APN: 504-41-006W
ZONING: RU-43
APN: 504-41-722
ZONING: PR
APN: 504-43-449
ZONING: PR
951.2 NG
950.6 NG
951.0 NG
950.4 NG
950.7 NG
949.9 NG
949.8 NG
950.4 NG
950.3 NG
951.3 NG
949.6 EDR
950.4 EDR
950.5 EDR
949.5 EDR
955.7 WIF
954.8 FNC
955.2 BWF
955.3 BWF
954.7 FNC
X
X
(E) 3' IRRIGATION EASEMENT
(E) 15' EASEMENT FOR
ROADWAY PURPOSES
5
6
(E) EDGE OF DIRT ROAD
(E) GATE (TYP.)
(E) LESSOR'S PARCEL LINE
(E) LESSOR'S PARCEL LINE
950
949
950
950
949.6 NG
949.0 NG
949.6 NG
(E) IRON
FENCE
PROPOSED TOWER
CENTER OF GEODETIC COORDINATES
LAT.= 33° 24' 02.908" NORTH
33.400808 NORTH
LON.= 112° 33' 57.820" WEST
112.566061 WEST
ELEV. @ GROUND =950'
N0° 15' 04"E 601.81'
N89° 28' 47"W 255.36'
S0° 31' 13"W 81.79'
N0° 33' 06"E 44.50'
S89° 28' 47"E 255.36'
S89° 28' 47"E 330.69'
S0° 14' 55"W 601.86'
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
L10
(P) ACCESS &
UTILITY EASEMENT
(P) ACCESS &
UTILITY EASEMENT
P.O.B. LEASE AREA
P.O.B. 5' UTILITY
EASEMENT 2
L15
L16
L17
L18
L19
L20
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
(P) 5' UTILITY
EASEMENT 2
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
BRASS CAP FLUSH (BCFL)
PROPERTY LINE
CENTERLINE
EASEMENT LINE
POSITION OF GEODETIC COORDINATES
DECIDUOUS TREE
PALM TREE
LEGEND
CALCULATED POSITION
(E) 8' UTILITY EASEMENT
9
(E) BUILDING (TYP.)
N0° 14' 55"E
35.00'
PROPOSED FIBER VAULT
CENTER OF GEODETIC COORDINATES
LAT.= 33° 23' 57.738" NORTH
33.399372 NORTH
LON.= 112° 33' 54.451" WEST
112.565125 WEST
ELEV. @ GROUND =945'
P.O.B. ACCESS &
UTILITY EASEMENT
P.O.B. UTILITY
EASEMENT 1
(P) UTILITY
EASEMENT 1
L1
N0° 15' 04"E 601.81'
S0° 14' 55"W 601.86'
L11
L12
L13
L14
WEST ROESER ROAD
35' R/W
(P) ACCESS &
UTILITY EASEMENT
CENTER, SECTION 28,
TOWNSHIP 1N, RANGE 3W
P.O.C. LEASE AREA
& EASEMENTS
R
O
Y
E
V
R
D
a
t
e
S
i
g
n
e
d
.
O
N
E
T
A
C
I
F
I
T
R
E
C
U
S
D
N
A
L
D
E
R
E
T
S
I
G
E
R
44007
RYAN L.
FIDLER
.
A
.
.
U
,
A
N
S
Z
I
A
R
O
0
05/04/22
TITLE REVIEW
SHEET NO.
REVISION:
REVISIONS
PROJECT No.
SITE NAME:
SITE ADDRESS:
SHEET TITLE:
FIELD BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
NO.
DATE
DESCRIPTION
REUSE OF DOCUMENT
THE IDEAS & DESIGN INCORPORATED HEREON, AS AN
INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, IS THE
PROPERTY OF RLF CONSULTING, LLC & IS NOT TO BE
USED FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT WRITTEN
AUTHORIZATION OF RLF CONSULTING, LLC.
TG
GAC
RLF
15006206
PH68137A
23910 W ROESER RD
BUCKEYE 85326
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
LS-2
jsultzbach@com-serv.com
jsultzbach@com-serv.com
NORTH
R
1
09/07/23
FINAL
A TRACT OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THE PARCEL LAND DESCRIBED IN
WARRANTY DEED WITH RECORDING NO. 20041192712, DATED: 10/12/2004, LOCATED
IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 3 WEST, AND
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 28 WHICH THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER
BEARS NORTH 00°14'55" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2663.98 FEET; NORTH 00°14'55" EAST,
A DISTANCE OF 35.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTH 89°28'47" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 12.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°15'04" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 601.81 FEET;
TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE (LEFT) HAVING A RADIUS OF 4.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
89°43'52", AN ARC LENGTH OF 6.26 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°28'47" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 255.36 FEET;
TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE (LEFT) HAVING A RADIUS OF 9.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
90°00'00", AN ARC LENGTH OF 14.14 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°31'13" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 81.79 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°28'47" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 12.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°31'13" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°28'47" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°31'13" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 12.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89°28'47" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 24.00 FEET;
TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE (LEFT) HAVING A RADIUS OF 6.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
90°00'00", AN ARC LENGTH OF 9.42 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°33'06" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 44.50 FEET;
TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE (RIGHT) HAVING A RADIUS
OF 20.98 FEET, FROM WHICH THE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 87°35'02" EAST;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
88°07'41", AN ARC LENGTH OF 32.27 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89°28'47" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 255.36 FEET;
TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE (RIGHT) HAVING A RADIUS
OF 15.95 FEET, FROM WHICH THE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 00°26'57" WEST;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
89°58'28", AN ARC LENGTH OF 25.05 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°14'55" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 601.86 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 12097 SQUARE FEET OR 0.278 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
LESSEE'S ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT DESCRIPTION
A TRACT OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THE PARCEL LAND DESCRIBED IN
WARRANTY DEED WITH RECORDING NO. 20041192712, DATED: 10/12/2004, LOCATED
IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 3 WEST, AND
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 28 WHICH THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER
BEARS NORTH 00°14'55" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2663.98 FEET; NORTH 00°14'55" EAST,
A DISTANCE OF 35.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°28'47" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 12.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°15'04" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 601.81 FEET;
TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE (LEFT) HAVING A RADIUS OF 4.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
89°43'52", AN ARC LENGTH OF 6.26 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°28'47" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 255.36 FEET;
TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE (LEFT) HAVING A RADIUS OF 9.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
90°00'00", AN ARC LENGTH OF 14.14 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°31'13" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 81.79 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°28'47" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 12.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTH 89°28'47" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°31'13" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89°28'47" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°31'13" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 600 SQUARE FEET OR 0.014 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
LESSEE'S LEASE AREA DESCRIPTION
A TRACT OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THE PARCEL LAND DESCRIBED IN
WARRANTY DEED WITH RECORDING NO. 20041192712, DATED: 10/12/2004, LOCATED
IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 3 WEST, AND
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 28 WHICH THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER
BEARS NORTH 00°14'55" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2663.98 FEET; NORTH 00°14'55" EAST,
A DISTANCE OF 35.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°28'47" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 12.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°15'04" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 601.81 FEET;
TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE (LEFT) HAVING A RADIUS OF 4.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
89°43'52", AN ARC LENGTH OF 6.26 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°28'47" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 255.36 FEET;
TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE (LEFT) HAVING A RADIUS OF 9.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
90°00'00", AN ARC LENGTH OF 14.14 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°31'13" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 81.79 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°28'47" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 12.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°31'13" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°28'47" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°31'13" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 12.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89°28'47" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 24.00 FEET;
TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE (LEFT) HAVING A RADIUS OF 6.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
90°00'00", AN ARC LENGTH OF 9.42 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°33'06" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 44.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTH 00°03'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 33.62 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89°59'51" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 285.66 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°19'06" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 18.72 FEET;
TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 16.62 FEET,
FROM WHICH THE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 34°33'54" WEST;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
19°03'47", AN ARC LENGTH OF 5.53 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°19'06" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 11.39 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 275.63 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 15.91 FEET;
TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.96 FEET,
FROM WHICH THE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 49°38'54" EAST;
THENCE SOUTH, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 37°57'17", AN
ARC LENGTH OF 13.89 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 1592 SQUARE FEET OR 0.037 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
LESSEE'S UTILITY EASEMENT 2 DESCRIPTION
A TRACT OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THE PARCEL LAND DESCRIBED IN
WARRANTY DEED WITH RECORDING NO. 20041192712, DATED: 10/12/2004, LOCATED
IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 3 WEST, AND
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 28 WHICH THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER
BEARS NORTH 00°14'55" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2663.98 FEET; NORTH 00°14'55" EAST,
A DISTANCE OF 35.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°28'47" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 12.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTH 89°28'47" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 16.75 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°15'04" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89°28'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 16.75 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°15'04" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 84 SQUARE FEET OR 0.002 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
LESSEE'S UTILITY EASEMENT 1 DESCRIPTION
LINE TABLE
LINE
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
L10
LENGTH
12.00
12.00
20.00
30.00
12.00
24.00
30.00
20.00
30.00
20.00
BEARING
N89° 28' 47"W
N89° 28' 47"W
N0° 31' 13"E
N89° 28' 47"W
N0° 31' 13"E
S89° 28' 47"E
N89° 28' 47"W
N0° 31' 13"E
S89° 28' 47"E
S0° 31' 13"W
LINE TABLE
LINE
L11
L12
L13
L14
L15
L16
L17
L18
L19
L20
LENGTH
16.75
5.00
16.75
5.00
33.62
285.66
18.72
11.39
275.63
15.91
BEARING
N89° 28' 47"W
N0° 15' 04"E
S89° 28' 49"E
S0° 15' 04"W
N0° 03' 00"W
S89° 59' 51"E
S0° 19' 06"W
N0° 19' 06"E
N90° 00' 00"W
S0° 00' 00"E
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
LENGTH
6.26
14.14
9.42
32.27
25.05
5.53
13.89
RADIUS
4.00
9.00
6.00
20.98
15.95
16.62
20.96
DELTA
89°43'52"
90°00'00"
90°00'00"
88°07'41"
89°58'28"
19°03'47"
37°57'17"
CHORD BRG.
N44° 36' 52"W
S45° 31' 13"W
N45° 31' 13"E
N46° 28' 48"E
S44° 33' 49"E
N64° 58' 00"W
S21° 22' 28"W
CHORD LENGTH
5.64
12.73
8.49
29.18
22.55
5.50
13.63
PH68137A
TOWERCOM ROESER
CASE #: Z2022185
RFDS VER: 1 DATED 3/28/2023 AT 1:41:19 PM
OVERALL SITE PLAN
Z-1
SITE PLAN
1
SCALE:
1" = 60'
N
W. ROESER RD.
S. 239TH AVE.
APN: 504-41-006T
ZONING: RU-43
APN: 504-41-722
ZONING: PR
APN: 504-41-006W
ZONING: RU-43
APN: 504-41-449
ZONING: RU-43
PH68137A
TOWERCOM ROESER
CASE #: Z2022185
RFDS VER: 1 DATED 3/28/2023 AT 1:41:19 PM
ENLARGED SITE PLAN
Z-2
ENLARGED SITE PLAN
1
SCALE:
1/2" = 1'-0"
N
PH68137A
TOWERCOM ROESER
CASE #: Z2022185
RFDS VER: 1 DATED 3/28/2023 AT 1:41:19 PM
ENLARGED
DIMENSION AND
ANTENNA PLAN
Z-3
SCALE:
3/4" = 1'-0"
N
ENLARGED T-MOBILE ANTENNA PLAN
2
ENLARGED T-MOBILE DIMENSION PLAN
1
120°
AZIMUTH
0°
AZIMUTH
240°
AZIMUTH
SCALE:
3/8" = 1'-0"
N
3
ENLARGED AT&T ANTENNA PLAN
SCALE:
N.T.S.
120°
AZIMUTH
0°
AZIMUTH
240°
AZIMUTH
PH68137A
TOWERCOM ROESER
CASE #: Z2022185
RFDS VER: 1 DATED 3/28/2023 AT 1:41:19 PM
ELEVATIONS
Z-4
EAST ELEVATION
1
SCALE:
3/16" = 1'-0"
NORTH ELEVATION
2
SCALE:
3/16" = 1'-0"
Site Name: PH68137A - TowerCom Hunt
Address: 23910 W Roeser Road, Buckeye AZ 85326
Parcel: 504-41-006T
Case #: Z2022185
Purpose of Request
T-Mobile is committed to improving coverage and expanding network capacity to meet
customer demand throughout Maricopa County. T-Mobile in cooperation with TowerCom is
proposing a new Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) to be located at 23910 W Roeser Road,
Buckeye.
The proposed WCF will provide residents, visitors and businesses with improved high quality
reliable wireless service for both personal & business, in addition to enhancing emergency
services in the area.
Details of Request
T-Mobile is proposing a new 80’ WCF disguised as a “Tree” with an associated equipment
compound enclosed by a masonry wall. The proposed site will be centrally located on the
subject property. The site will also accommodate AT&T as detailed on the attached site
plan/elevation, and possibly can accommodate additional carriers if necessary.
Proposed Site Location
The proposed 600 sq/ft equipment compound will be enclosed by an 8’ Masonry wall and will
have the following setbacks:
From North Property Line: 100’-2”
From South Property Line: 514’-11”
From East Property Line: 293’-1”
From West Property Line: 7’-7”
SUP Request
T-Mobile is requesting a Special Use Permit to allow an 80’ WCF structure height, and two
antenna arrays at different levels with a diameter of 12’, and the following pole setbacks:
Pole Setbacks
From North Property Line: 110’-9”
From South Property Line: 524’-4”
From East Property Line: 310’-4”’
From West Property Line: 20’-5”
Relationship to Surrounding Properties
The proposed WCF will not alter or impact the existing conditions on the subject property, or
surrounding properties, or impact traffic in the immediate area.
Property to North: County RU-43
Property to South: Buckeye PR
Property to East: Buckeye PR
Property to West: Buckeye PR
City of Buckeye Comments – I did respond to the City of Buckeye comments via email on
1/13/23, and received a response from City planner Ken Galica on 1/17/23.
The proposed site is designed to accommodate multiple carriers, in fact AT&T is ready and
waiting to co-locate on the subject site. Ken did mention that they City of Buckeye would
support a taller site if multiple carriers, so the 80’ is justifiable and typically allowed in RU-43
elsewhere in the County.
With regards to the type of site, we have been working with the adjacent neighbors and the
consensus is that the proposed Broadleaf is the preferred method of stealthing. The City of
Buckeye has preferred typical Monopole type sites in the past, but subject property ownership
and adjacent neighbors prefer the proposed Broadleaf Treet over any other option.
The most recent wireless technology requires more radio equipment to be mounted closer to
the antennas up on the actual pole/structure. So a Broadleaf Tree can better conceal this type
of equipment configuration as opposed to a MonoPalm. The Broadleaf Tree branches will not
only better conceal the antennas/radios, but will hold up better overtime from a UV
perspective, and therefore maintain the aesthetics of the site long term. A Broadleaf Tree with
the proper branch density/color can be far more aesthetically pleasing and durable over the
best quality MonoPalm.
The proposed site maybe visited once a month for routine maintenance, or the event of a
breakdown, so the proposed use will not impact traffic in the area and will comply with all local,
state and federal laws & regulations.
Please let me know if you need any additional information.
Sincerely,
Declan Murphy
Coal Creek Consulting for T-Mobile/TowerCom
8283 N Hayden Road, Suite 258, Scottsdale AZ 85258
Tel: (602) 326-0111
Email: dmurphy@coal-creek.com
Krystina Pacheco, P.E.
Planning & Development
301 W. Jefferson Ave., Suite 170
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
Phone: (602) 506-8790
Fax: (602) 506-8762
www.maricopa.gov/planning
Email address:
Krystina.pacheco@maricopa.gov
Maricopa County
Planning & Development Department
Engineering Plan Review
Date:
November 4, 2022
Memo To:
Darren Gerard, AICP, Planning Manager, Department of Planning &
Development
Attn:
Andrew Lorentzen, Planner, Planning & Development Services
From:
Krystina Pacheco, P.E., Plans Examiner Engineer, Planning & Development
Services
cc:
Michael Norris, P.E., Engineering Manager, Planning & Development
Subject:
Z2022185 – SUP for New Wireless Communication Facility
(E1 Memo)
Job Site Address:
23910 W Roeser Road, Buckeye
APN(s):
504-41-006T
PND engineering plan review (DPR, FCD and PND Transportation) has reviewed the 1st
submittal of the SUP application routed for review on Octobe 13, 2022. PND Engineering
has no comments or objections subject to the following conditions:
1. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205
of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards;
Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual;
and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of
application for construction.
Please contact me if you have any questions or require any additional information.
1
Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From:
Benjamin Harvey <benharvey17@hotmail.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 10:46 AM
To:
Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Subject:
Re: Z2022185 - Comments
I would like to express my opposition to the requested Special Use Permit for a new Wireless
Communication Facility at 23910 W Roeser Road, Buckeye AZ 85326.
This unsightly tower will be placed extremely close to our lot and also directly next door to a family
home being built. It is also extremely close to a housing development and schools. Not only is this
very unsightly, it will negatively affect the house prices of properties in the vicinity, but also exposure
to microwaves from cell phone towers can interfere with your body's own EMFs, causing a variety of
potential health problems, including, headaches, memory loss, cardiovascular stress, low sperm
count, birth defects and cancer.
Thank you,
Ben Harvey
From: Andrew Lorentzen (PND) <Andrew.Lorentzen@maricopa.gov>
Sent: Thursday, 27 April 2023 2:34 PM
To: benharvey17@hotmail.com <benharvey17@hotmail.com>
Subject: Z2022185 ‐ Comments
Hello Ben,
Thank you for speaking with me today regarding Z2022185. As discussed, please send me a brief written opposition to
the application so I can make the comments part of the record.
Thank you,
Andrew Lorentzen
Planner
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
301 W. Jefferson St. Suite 170
Phoenix, AZ 85003
O: 602-506-2364
MARICOPA.GOV
Andrew.lorentzen@maricopa.gov
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | LinkedIn
1
Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From:
Lynn Dodd <rxdodd@aol.com>
Sent:
Monday, June 19, 2023 4:51 PM
To:
Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Cc:
benharvey17@hotmail.com
Subject:
re: commercial special use permit ZONING CASE # Z2022185. 80 foot cell tower
Attachments:
Z2022185 - 10_17_2022 - CITY OF BUCKEYE RESPONSE.pdf; MOVE CELL TOWER HERE.pdf; MOVE
HERE.pdf; MAP OF AFFECTED PROPERTIES.pdf; AERIAL CELL TOWER LOCATION.pdf
JUNE 19,2023
RE: commercial special use permit ZONING CASE # Z2022185.
80 foot cell tower in Buckeye 4928 S. 239th Ave
Dear Andrew-
I represent the LOA Group & Ben Harvey owners of 504-41-006V, a residential
zoned 1 acre parcel of vacant land that is currently on the market for sale. This
parcel is approximately 170 feet north of the proposed 80 foot cell tower. The LOA
Group is opposed to the placement of the cell tower and are concerned that they
will not be able to sell their lot. Not only are the towers unsightly, they could pose a
health risk from RF radiation. These are valid concerns for a potential buyer
wanting to live in this location.
Barbara Jane Hunt of 23910 W. Roeser Road, owner of 504-41-006 , a 5 acre parcel,
sold the 4 adjacent north 1 acre parcels to various buyers in 2006 including the
parcel owned by the LOA Group. The only use for the four parcels are for single
family homes. These parcels are on a county island along with Hunt's parcel and
surrounded properties in the City of Buckeye.
The parcel on the north boundary of Hunts property where the cell tower is
proposed to go is owned by Mr. VARGAS is currently under construction for his
2
new home. that cell tower will be within 9 feet of the VARGAS home and 170 feet of
the LOA Group parcel. There is another new home being constructed on the 4th
parcel by Mr. Zepeda.
THE VARGAS HOME
THE ZEPEDA HOME
A solution for this issue would be to move the proposed cell tower 600 feet SOUTH to the
southwest corner of Barbara Jane Hunt's property where the tower would be facing Roeser
Road.
The City of Buckeye also recommended that the tower be 50 feet and not 80 feet and the
minimum set back from any property line be at least the height of the tower to be
constructed. Please ask the applicant to consider moving the tower 600 feet to the southwest
corner of the Hunt property.
Lynn Dodd, CRS,CLHMS, SRES,SRS,ABR,GREEN
rCRMS-Certified Risk Management Specialist
An Arizona Native Who KNOWS The Territory!
Carol Lynn Dodd, PLLC
Realty Executives Scottsdale
480-948-9450 office
602-561-7873 cell
602-494-9303 fax
RxDodd@aol.com
www.joanandlynn.com
10607 N Hayden Rd #100
Scottsdale, AZ 85260
1
Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
From:
Ken Galica <kgalica@buckeyeaz.gov>
Sent:
Monday, October 17, 2022 8:51 AM
To:
Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Cc:
Adam Copeland; Hobart Wingard; Andrea Marquez; Brian Craig
Subject:
RE: Z2022185 - PH68137A - TowerCom Hunt EDR
Attachments:
Z2022185 TAC MEMO.pdf; 1R - PLZS-22-00012 - MONTANA VISTA - FINAL PLAT.pdf
Follow Up Flag:
Follow up
Flag Status:
Flagged
Good morning, Andrew:
Given that the proposed cell tower is located in a small county island with Buckeye jurisdiction on all sides, we do kindly
request that the tower meet the City’s design requirements.
For context, a residential subdivision, Montana Vista II, is in the final stages of review just west of the site (Zoning and
Preliminary Plat approved, Final Plat in review – see attached), and we have an existing single‐family community to the
east, so it is even more important that we make sure the tower will be scaled properly at this location.
The design standards that the City would request be applied to this location are:
Limit height to 50 feet
Setback from west and north property lines should be at least the height of the proposed tower (a 50’ tower
would be setback at least 50’ from both of those property lines).
A stealth design should be provided – with palms provided on the property, a date palm design would be
appropriate here.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks!
Ken Galica
Principal Planner
Development Services Department
(623) 349‐6214
From: Andrew Lorentzen (PND) <Andrew.Lorentzen@maricopa.gov>
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2022 10:50 AM
To: Frank McWilliams (MCSO) <FrankMcWilliams@MCSO.maricopa.gov>; bfenske@azdot.gov; jgarcia@azdot.gov;
swilken@azmag.gov; Agarza@azmag.gov; Kurt Cotner <kcotner@azmag.gov>; pe@azland.gov;
Dkrantz@citytocitycre.com; dhenning@westvalleyview.com; admin@bvfd.az.gov; Jon.Lacy@bvfd.az.gov;
Mark.burdick@bvfd.az.gov; Ken Galica <kgalica@buckeyeaz.gov>; Declan Murphy <dmurphy@coal‐creek.com>;
PNDAddressing <PNDAddressing@maricopa.gov>; Souren Naradikian (ENV) <Souren.Naradikian@Maricopa.Gov>; Bob
Fedorka (PND) <Bob.Fedorka@Maricopa.Gov>
Subject: RE: Z2022185 ‐ PH68137A ‐ TowerCom Hunt EDR
2
[NOTICE: This message originated outside of the City of Buckeye ‐‐ DO NOT CLICK on links or
open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.]
CORRECTION – Application is for a New Wireless Carrier Facility.
Please contact if this creates any issues.
Andrew Lorentzen
Planner
Planning & Development
602‐506‐2364
Andrew.Lorentzen@Maricopa.gov
From: Andrew Lorentzen (PND)
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2022 10:07 AM
To: Frank McWilliams (MCSO) <FrankMcWilliams@MCSO.maricopa.gov>; bfenske@azdot.gov; jgarcia@azdot.gov;
swilken@azmag.gov; Agarza@azmag.gov; kcotner@azmag.gov; pe@azland.gov; Dkrantz@citytocitycre.com;
dhenning@westvalleyview.com; admin@bvfd.az.gov; Jon.Lacy@bvfd.az.gov; Mark.burdick@bvfd.az.gov;
kgalica@buckeyeaz.gov; dmurphy@coal‐creek.com; PNDAddressing <PNDAddressing@maricopa.gov>; Souren
Naradikian (ENV) <Souren.Naradikian@Maricopa.Gov>; Bob Fedorka (PND) <Bob.Fedorka@Maricopa.Gov>
Subject: Z2022185 ‐ PH68137A ‐ TowerCom Hunt EDR
Reviewing Agencies – A application has been filed with Maricopa County for a digital billboard conversion and height
adjustment. Please see attached TAC memo for additional information.
Please provide any comments by November 10th, 2022.
IF there are any additional questions please contact me.
Andrew Lorentzen
Planner
Maricopa County Planning & Development
301 W. Jefferson St, Suite 170 Phoenix, AZ 85003
Desk: 602‐506‐2364
Andrew.Lorentzen@Maricopa.gov
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual(s) addressed in the message. If
you are not the named addressee, you should not disseminate, distribute, or copy this e‐mail. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, distributing, or copying this e‐mail is strictly prohibited.