Staff Report

City of Mesa — City Council (2026-05-04)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 31029 characters
1 
City Council Staff Report 
Date 
April 6, 2026 
Case No.  
ZON25-00917 
Project Name 
Longbow Mixed Use  
Request (Proposed 
Project) 
 Rezone 3.4± acres from Light Industrial with a Planned Area 
Development Overlay (LI-PAD) to Light Industrial with a Planned 
Area Development and Bonus Intensity Zone (LI-PAD-BIZ) to allow 
modifications to the Light Industrial (LI) development standards 
 A Council Use Permit (CUP) to allow a Hotel use in the Airport 
Overflight Area-2 (AOA-2)  
 Site Plan Review for an approximately 56,360 square foot Hotel and 
a future commercial development 
Project Location 
Approximately 1,665 feet west of the southwest corner of North Recker 
Road and East Longbow Parkway 
Parcel No(s) 
141-41-036 
 
Project Area 
3.4± acres 
Council District 
District 5 
Existing Zoning 
Light 
Industrial 
with 
a 
Planned Area Development 
Overlay (LI-PAD) 
General Plan 
Designation 
Regional Center Placetype 
with 
an 
Evolve 
Growth 
Strategy 
Applicant 
Chris Webb, Rose Law Group 
Owner 
Dover Associates, LLC 
Staff Planner 
Mallory Ress, Senior Planner 
Proposition 207 
Waiver Signed 
Yes

2 
Recommendation 
Staff Recommendation: 
Staff finds that the Proposed Project is consistent with the Mesa 2050 General Plan, the purpose 
for a Planned Area Development Overlay outlined in Section 11-22-1 of the MZO, and the review 
criteria for Site Plan Review outlined in Section 11-69-5 of the MZO.   
Staff recommends approval with conditions. 
Planning & Zoning Board Recommendation: 
On March 11, 2026, the Planning and Zoning Board voted (6-0) to recommend that City Council 
approve the proposed project. 
Project Overview 
Request: 
The applicant is requesting approval for a rezoning of 3.4+ acres from Light Industrial with a 
Planned Area Development Overlay (LI-PAD) to Light Industrial with a Planned Area Development 
and Bonus Intensity Zone (LI-PAD-BIZ) to allow modifications to the Light Industrial (LI) 
development standards, a Council Use Permit (CUP) to allow a hotel use in the Airport Overflight 
Area-2 (AOA-2) and Site Plan Review approval for an approximately 56,360 square foot, four-
story, 124-room hotel and future commercial development (Proposed Project).  
Concurrent Applications: 
 
Design Review: Design Review Board meeting was held on March 10, 2026, for review 
and approval of the proposed elevations and landscape plan (DRB25-00916). 
 
Minor Plat: A Minor Plat application, Case No. SUB26-00057, is under review by the 
Planning Director to split the Hotel property from the future commercial property. The 
anticipated lot lines are shown as proposed on the provided Site Plan 
 
Administrative Use Permit: An Administrative Use Permit application, Case No. 
ADM25-00935, is under review by the Planning Director to allow shared parking on the 
site.  
Site Context 
General Plan:  
 
The Placetype for the subject site is Regional Center with an Evolve Growth Strategy 
 
Under the Mesa 2050 General Plan Regional Centers are the major retail, cultural, 
recreational, and entertainment destinations in Mesa. They feature major retailers, 
national chains, specialty shops, and a wide range of services and amenities that draw 
customers from across the city. The focus of the Regional Center Placetype is commercial 
activity, and as such, its principal uses are retail, personal services, eating and drinking 
establishments, entertainment and recreation (which includes hotels), convenience 
services and business offices. 
 
The Evolve Growth Strategy indicates that Regional Centers should be mixed-use activity 
centers that include varied commercial uses such as retail or dining, a variety of housing 
choices, and recreational opportunities.

3 
 
The Proposed Project is consistent with the Regional Center Placetype and furthers the 
implementation of, and is not contrary to, the Vision, Guiding Principles, Strategies, and 
applicable elements of the Mesa 2050 General Plan. 
 
Supporting General Plan Strategies: 
o LU1. Promote a balance of land uses to enhance the quality of life for current and 
future generations 
o ED4. Protect and promote Mesa’s airports as global connections for tourism and 
business development. 
Sub-Area Plan: 
 
The Proposed Project is located within the Business Park land use area of the Falcon 
Field Sub-Area Plan, which encourages business support amenities, such as hotels and 
retail establishments, to serve the area as it continues to develop. 
 
The Proposed Project is consistent with the Business Park land use area of the Falcon 
Field Sub-Area Plan and furthers the implementation of and is not contrary to its Vision 
and Land Use Strategies. 
Zoning:  
 
The project site is zoned Light Industrial with a Planned Area Development Overlay (LI-
PAD). 
 
General Retail and Eating and Drinking Establishments are permitted within the LI-PAD 
Zoning District. 
 
A Council Use Permit (CUP) is required to allow the Hotel use in the Airflight Overlay 
Area-2 (AOA-2). 
Surrounding Zoning & Use Activity: 
The proposed Hotel and future commercial uses are compatible with surrounding land uses, 
which include Hotels, Golf Course, Commercial Entertainment, Eating and Drinking 
Establishments, and vacant land. 
Northwest 
(Across Longbow Pkwy.) 
LC-PAD-CUP 
Vacant 
North 
(Across Longbow Pkwy.) 
LC-PAD-CUP 
Vacant  
Northeast 
(Across Longbow Pkwy.) 
LC-PAD-CUP 
Commercial Center and 
Vacant  
West 
LI-PAD-BIZ-CUP 
Hotel 
Project Site 
LI-PAD 
Vacant 
East 
LI-PAD 
Vacant 
Southwest 
LI-PAD 
Golf Course 
South 
LI-PAD 
Golf Course 
Southeast 
LI-PAD 
Golf Course 
Site History: 
 
September 24, 1979: City Council annexed 118.9± acres, including the project site, into 
the City of Mesa, establishing Agriculture (AG) zoning for the project site (Ordinance No. 
1272).

4 
 
March 21, 1983: City Council approved a rezone of the property from Agriculture (AG) to 
Light Industrial (LI) to allow for future industrial development (Case No. Z83-013; Ord. 
No. 1688). 
 
March 3, 2002: City Council approved a rezone of the property from LI to LI-PAD with a 
conceptual Bonus Intensity Zone (BIZ) overlay to allow for a Development Master Plan 
for the development of a business park with industrial, office, commercial, and golf course 
uses (Case No. Z02-001; Ord. No. 3972). 
 
November 18, 2008: City Council approved a modification to the existing Development 
Master Plan to allow for future commercial and employment uses (Case No. Z08-063; 
Ord. No. 4897). 
Project/Request Details 
Site Plan: 
 
Building Design:  
o The approximately 56,360 square foot Hotel will be a four-story building situated 
at the southern portion of the site.  
o Along the north side of the building is the main entrance and a 918 square foot 
entry plaza with a pedestrian path to the public sidewalk along Longbow Parkway.  
o The future commercial is situated north of the Hotel across required parking.  
o The site plan shows this area as pad-ready, with site plan review required for the 
development of the pad site.  
 
Pedestrian Connectivity:  
o Three pedestrian corridors connect the site. 
o The main connection point is at the center of the north property line and connects 
to the existing sidewalk along the southern side of Longbow Parkway via an 11-
foot by 14-foot pedestrian entry plaza, then a 5-foot-wide sidewalk traverses the 
subject site reaching the future commercial development and continuing through 
to the Hotel main entry.  
o Where the pedestrian walkway crosses drive aisles, a 5-foot-wide herringbone 
stamped concrete is proposed to differentiate the pedestrian crossing.  
o A second pedestrian walkway is provided from the Hotel entry and runs along the 
western portion of the site to reach the car park in the northwest portion of the 
site.  
o This 5-foot-wide connection provides the herringbone stamped concrete where it 
crosses drive aisles and elsewhere it is centered within 17-foot-wide landscaped 
medians, until reaching the walkway adjacent to the north of the Hotel.  
o The third pedestrian corridor is provided at the eastern portion of the site and 
provides a direct connection to the Longbow fitness trail that will run along the 
southern portion of the site and connects to the adjacent properties to the east 
and west.

5 
 
Access:  
o Access to the site is provided through shared driveways at the easternmost and 
westernmost sides of the site along Longbow Parkway.  
o A main drive aisle runs parallel to Longbow parkway and provides internal 
connections to the properties adjacent to the east and west.  
 
Parking:  
o Per Table 11-32-3.A of the Mesa Zoning Ordinance (MZO), 183 parking spaces 
are required.  
o An Administrative Use Permit (AUP), under case number ADM25-00935, is 
currently under review by the Planning Director for a shared parking agreement 
to reduce the total number of provided parking spaces to 131 stalls.  
o Under this request, the applicant has provided a Shared Parking Study that 
demonstrates a surplus of parking will be available on the site during peak parking 
periods for the Hotel and future users.  
o A condition of approval has been included requiring approval of the AUP prior to 
the submittal of any building permit. 
 
Landscaping:  
o The Proposed Project provides landscaping that is consistent with the approved 
Longbow Business Park and Golf Club plant list and meets or exceeds all required 
plant counts prescribed under Mesa Zoning Ordinance (MZO) Chapter 33, 
Landscaping.  
o As proposed, the applicant is providing eight (8) new trees including Rio Salado 
Mesquite and Ironwood along Longbow Parkway with seven (7) existing trees and 
74 shrubs, accents, and grasses, including, Regal Mist Grass, Purple Lantana, 
Baja Ruellia, Medicinal Aloe, and Texas Sage.  
o Throughout the site, trees will provide shade at the pedestrian connections where 
they cross parking islands and along the pedestrian walkway that connects to the 
Longbow fitness trail.  
o Significant tree plantings are provided in the retention area at the southeast 
portion of the site, adjacent to the Hotel amenity area and Longbow fitness trail.  
o The future retail pad provides a required 2-inch deep decomposed granite dust 
cover with extruded concrete curbing and a 5-foot-wide landscape area along the 
undeveloped edge of the pad. All requirements of Chapter 33 of the MZO are met. 
 
Open Space: The Proposed Project provides 52.9% Open Space (calculated to only 
include landscaped areas) with 50% required. Additionally, the hotel user will provide an 
amenity area including pool with a lounge area, synthetic lawn with cornhole, and firepit 
for use by hotel patrons. 
Bonus Intensity Zone Overlay: 
Per Section 11-21 of the MZO, the purpose of a BIZ overlay is to provide for variation from the 
application of residential densities and other development standards to allow greater intensity of 
development and encourage unique, innovative developments of superior quality. The BIZ overlay 
must demonstrate that the resulting development will further the goals and objectives of the

6 
General Plan, Specific Plans, and Council policies and will provide significant social or economic 
benefits to the City.  
Development Standards 
MZO 
Required 
BIZ Proposed 
Longbow DMP 
Maximum height 
Maximum Building Height   
MZO Section 11-7-3 
40 feet 
53 feet 
90 feet 
Per MZO Section 11-21-3(B), the City Council may approve modifications to the underlying district 
standards proportionate to the number of items and degree of compliance for projects that comply 
with a combination of the criteria for the BIZ. This includes a combination of either: 
 
Criteria (1) Providing distinctive, superior quality designs. (See Section 11-31-32, 
Superior Design) and Criteria (2) Addressing environmental performance standards; or 
 
Criteria (1) Providing distinctive, superior quality designs. (See Section 11-31-32, 
Superior Design) and Criteria (3) Providing documented evidence that the building(s) will 
meet or exceed nationally recognized environmental performance standards. For 
purposes of this criterion, buildings that are designed to earn Green Globes, LEED™ 
Silver, or to be in compliance with the International Green Construction Code and/or 
equivalent third-party criteria, are considered to be energy efficient and no higher 
standard shall be required. 
Projects with fewer modifications will comply with a lower percentage of the criteria requirements 
in their request for the BIZ overlay. Projects with a higher number, and greater deviation from, the 
adopted standards are required to comply with a higher percentage of criteria in their request for 
the BIZ overlay. 
The Proposed Project includes one modification to development standards and is required to 
comply with a lower percentage of criteria as staff evaluates the project and makes a 
recommendation. 
Additionally, in 2008 the City Council approved modifications to the Longbow Development Master 
Plan (DMP) which included conceptual maximum building heights with the future approval of a 
BIZ overlay and Site Plan Review if the building height exceeds the allowed height of the 
underlying zoning district. Under the DMP the Proposed Project is within the conceptual 90-foot 
maximum building height area, and the applicant is proposing a top height of 53 feet for the hotel 
building only.  
The future commercial building will be required to be less than or equal to the maximum allowed 
height of 40-feet for the Light Industrial (LI) zoning district or an amendment to the BIZ overlay 
will be required. The proposed height for the hotel provides greater use of the site while 
maintaining a moderate height that is compatible with the surrounding development. The table 
above shows the MZO required standards, the proposed BIZ modifications and the DMP allowed 
height per Ord. No. 4897 (Case No. Z08-063). 
The following summarizes an evaluation of each criteria for the BIZ overlay request. 
1. Provide distinctive, superior quality designs. (See Section 11-31-32, Superior Design) 
Per MZO Section 11-31-32, for a project to reflect Superior Design it will 
incorporate all of the following elements:

7 
A. Holistic Approach to Project Design. Varied, high-quality, regionally-
appropriate building materials, used in distinctive building forms, building 
massing and detailing that result in a note-worthy example of holistic site 
design, architecture, landscaping and signage; and 
The Proposed Project includes the required proportions of building 
materials, used in distinctive building forms and detailing including a mix 
of materials and forms, shaded walkways and detailing.  
B. Responsive Approach to Site and Sub-Area Context. Architectural and  
landscape architecture details and features that reflect the character defined 
in Sub-Area Plans or the General Plan's Placetype urban design 
characteristics, that are harmonious with adjacent development patterns, 
integrate with the physical conditions of the immediate site, and create a unique 
sense of place; and  
The Proposed Project architectural form and landscaping is consistent 
with the Longbow Park area and design guidelines.  
C. Sustainable Design. Site design, architecture and landscaping features 
that address the local climate to reduce summer sun penetration and provide 
summer sunshade protection for pedestrians, promote energy and water 
conservation, promote the preservation or creation of open space, provide for 
and encourage the use of multiple modes of transportation, utilize existing 
infrastructure, and create the opportunity for social interaction; and 
The Proposed Project provides large trees that shade pedestrian areas 
and walkways. Paved areas are broken up with landscaping and shaded 
foundation areas and connections to the shared trail along the golf 
course. 
D. Exceeds Standards. Provision of details and features that exceed the 
criteria and standards specified in Sections 11-5-3, 11-5-5, 11-6-43, 11-6-4 (as 
applicable), 11-7-3, 11-8-5, 11-8-6 and Chapters 30 through 34, where 
applicable; and 
The Proposed Project exceeds standard requirements through enhanced  
architectural, landscape, and site design. Foundation base calculations  
exceed base requirements through use of averaging and provide shaded 
walkways on the north side of the building. Material quality and façade 
articulation including varied parapet heights, stone, stucco and cement 
board, glazing, and shaded entries further elevate the project above 
baseline commercial standards. 
E. Great Public Spaces. Details and features that create attractive, 
comfortable environments for pedestrians; ensure safe, useful and well-
integrated open or public spaces; and include high quality amenities. 
The Proposed Project includes well-designed open spaces that enhance  
the pedestrian and customer experience. Extended canopies provide 
year-round shade and weather protection. A network of pedestrian 
pathways connect the hotel to the future commercial pad, Longbow 
Parkway, and to the trail along the golf course.

8 
Based on the above discussion, staff finds that the Proposed Project 
complies with Criteria 1 required for approval of a BIZ overlay. 
2. Address environmental performance standards outlined below: 
a.  Site selection criteria. Sites shall meet one or more of the following criteria. 
i. 
Redevelop and rehabilitate economically distressed properties 
(particularly greyfield sites), damaged sites or environmentally 
contaminated ‘brownfield’ sites. 
While the site is not considered a greyfield or brownfield site, 
as a vacant site, it is not operating at its highest and best 
economic use. The development of this site will be a positive 
economic benefit both within the immediate area as well as 
the larger City of Mesa. 
The Proposed Project does not meet this Criteria. 
ii. 
Utilize areas with existing utility and transportation infrastructure 
and existing community services. This criterion is preferred for 
higher density and higher intensity development, when feasible.  
The site has access to City of Mesa utilities and direct access 
to Longbow Parkway. Longbow Parkway includes detached 
sidewalks that connect the proposed development to 
adjacent commercial developments. 
The Proposed Project meets this Criteria. 
iii. 
Utilize locations within ½ mile of a planned light rail line or ¼ mile 
from an existing or planned bus stop. This criterion is preferred for 
higher density and higher intensity development, when feasible. 
The Proposed Project is not within ½ mile of a planned light 
rail line or ¼ mile from an existing or planned bus stop. 
The Proposed Project does not meet this Criteria. 
b. Site design criteria. Designing the site to facilitate alternative modes of 
transportation and to reduce onsite environmental impacts. 
i. 
Provide safe and secure storage for bicycles. For residential 
projects, safe and secure bicycle storage areas shall be provided 
on-site for a minimum 15% of the residents. 
The proposed development includes bicycle racks for use by 
customers and employees that are directly accessible from 
Longbow Parkway.  
The Proposed Project meets this Criteria. 
ii. 
Include priority location parking for low-emission vehicles in parking 
areas. 
The Proposed Project does not include priority parking for low 
emission vehicles. 
The Proposed Project does not meet this Criteria.

9 
iii. 
Provide priority location parking spaces for carpool or vanpool 
vehicles. 
The proposed development does not identify priority parking 
locations for carpool or vanpool vehicles on the site plan.  
The Proposed Project does not meet this Criteria. 
iv. 
Provide the number of parking spaces designed to serve a 
development site consistent with the number of spaces required to 
meet the minimum parking ratio. Parking spaces over the minimum 
number is discouraged. 
Per Table 11-32-3A of the MZO, 183 parking spaces are required 
for the proposed development. The site plan submitted shows 
131 parking spaces being provided on site. An AUP is currently 
under review to allow for shared parking between the proposed 
Hotel and future Retail.  
The Proposed Project meets this Criteria. 
v. 
For greenfield sites, protect or restore natural areas on site with 
native vegetation to encourage biodiversity and for enjoyment by 
people. For previously developed sites, restore areas with native or 
adapted vegetation to encourage biodiversity and for enjoyment by 
people. The size of the space should be appropriate for the size of 
the site and the activity level or use of the site. 
Although the site is undeveloped, native vegetation was 
removed many years ago. The landscape plan for the Proposed 
Project includes drought tolerant and regionally appropriate 
plant species. 
The Proposed Project meets this Criteria. 
vi. 
Design the project to be energy efficient including, but not limited to, 
designed to reduce summer heat gain, reduce winter heat loss, 
utilize day lighting strategies and provide the opportunity for 
occupants to take advantage of renewable energy. The design also 
mitigates the effects of solar exposure for users and pedestrians. For 
purposes of this criterion, buildings that have efficient HVAC 
systems, incorporate passive solar heating, cooling and day lighting 
strategies within an efficient building envelope, as recommended by 
the Department of Energy's Energy Efficiency and Renewable 
Energy (EERE) section, including buildings designed to earn the 
EPA ENERGY STAR or designed to meet LEED™ Silver or 
equivalent third-party criteria are considered to be energy efficient 
and no higher standard shall be used 
The architectural design proposed includes shaded walkways 
and pedestrian entries, which help to mitigate the effects of 
solar exposure for employees and visitors to the site.  
The Proposed Project meets this Criteria. 
c. 
Provide documented evidence that the building(s) will meet or exceed 
nationally recognized environmental performance standards. For purposes

10 
of this criterion, buildings that are designed to earn LEED™ Silver, Green 
Globes, and/or equivalent third-party criteria, and no higher standard shall 
be required. Avoid sites considered inappropriate, such as prime farmland, 
land identified as habitat for endangered species, and wetlands or riparian 
areas associated with wildlife. 
The building proposed for the site is not designed to LEED standards. 
The Proposed Project does not this Criteria. 
d. 
Utilize areas with existing utility and transportation infrastructure and 
existing community services. This criterion is preferred for higher density 
and higher intensity development, when feasible. 
The site is in close proximity to existing utility infrastructure and is 
located to support the surrounding area of commercial spaces and 
residential neighborhoods. 
The Proposed Project meets this Criteria. 
e. 
Redevelop and rehabilitate economically distressed properties (particularly 
Greyfield sites), damaged sites or environmentally contaminated 
'brownfield' sites. 
While the site is not considered a greyfield or brownfield site, as a 
vacant site, it is not operating at its highest and best economic use. 
The development of this site will be a positive economic benefit both 
within the immediate area as well as the larger City of Mesa. 
The Proposed Project meets this Criteria. 
f. 
Utilize locations within ½ mile of a planned light rail line or ¼ mile from an 
existing or planned bus stop. This criterion is preferred for higher density 
and higher intensity development, when feasible. 
The Proposed Project is not within ½ mile of a planned light rail line 
or ¼ mile from an existing or planned bus stop. 
The Proposed Project does not meet this Criteria. 
3. Provide documented evidence that the building(s) will meet or exceed nationally  
recognized environmental performance standards. For purposes of this criterion, 
buildings that are designed to earn Green Globes, LEED™ Silver, or to be in compliance 
with the International Green Construction Code and/or equivalent third-party criteria, are 
considered to be energy efficient and no higher standard shall be required. 
The building proposed for the site is not designed to LEED standards. 
The Proposed Project does not this Criteria. 
Based on the above analysis, staff finds that the Proposed Project is consistent with the purpose 
of a BIZ overlay as outlined in MZO Section 11-21. The BIZ overlay provides for variation from 
the application of residential densities and other development standards to allow greater intensity 
of development and encourage unique, innovative developments of superior quality.

11 
Council Use Permit: 
Per Section 11-19 of the MZO the property is located within the Airfield (AF) Overlay District due 
to its proximity to Falcon Field Airport, specifically within Airport Overflight Area Two (AOA 2). Per 
MZO Section 11-7-2, a Council Use Permit (CUP) is required for the development of a hotel within 
the AOA 2 district. Section 11-70-6 of the MZO outlines review criteria for approval of the CUP. 
The subject request conforms to the criteria of MZO 11-70-6 as outlined below.  
Approval Criteria - Section 11-70-6(D): 
1. Approval of the proposed project will advance the goals and objectives of and is 
consistent with the policies of the General Plan and any other applicable City plan 
and/or policies:  
As described above, the Proposed Project complies with the Mesa 2050 General Plan 
and Falcon Field Sub Area Plan providing business supporting amenities and commercial 
activity. 
2. The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed project 
are consistent with the purposes of the district where it is located and conform 
with the General Plan and with any other applicable City plan or policies:  
The Proposed Project aligns with the zoning district’s intent, providing permitted uses and 
is consistent with the General Plan, which contemplates commercial activity such as the 
proposed hotel and commercial uses like restaurants and retail. The site design provides 
vehicular connectivity to the surrounding properties and provides pedestrian connections 
throughout the site and to adjacent properties.  
3. The proposed project will not be injurious or detrimental to the adjacent or 
surrounding properties in the area of the proposed project or improvements in the 
neighborhood or to the general welfare of the City:  
The Proposed Project will not be injurious or detrimental to surrounding properties or the 
welfare of the City. The proposed uses are consistent with the existing uses in the 
immediate vicinity and will provide business supportive uses encouraged under the 
Falcon Field Sub Area Plan.  
4. Adequate public services, public facilities and public infrastructure are available 
to serve the proposed project:  
The site has immediate access to Longbow Parkway which has sufficient vehicle capacity 
for the proposed uses. Additionally, there is existing public water and sewer infrastructure 
in the vicinity which the Proposed Project will be required to connect to.  
Citizen Participation 
The applicant conducted a Citizen Participation process, notifying surrounding property owners, 
HOAs, and registered neighbors.  
Neighborhood Meeting: 
A neighborhood meeting was held on February 5, 2026, one member of the public was in 
attendance and expressed support for the project. A comment card was provided by the attendee 
and is attached as part of Exhibit 8.

12 
Required Notification: 
 
Property owners within 1,000 feet, HOAs within ½ mile, and registered neighborhoods 
within one mile of the subject site were notified of the public hearing.  
 
Staff has received no public comment regarding the Proposed Project. 
Conditions of Approval 
Staff recommends approval of the Rezone, Council Use Permit and Site Plan Review, subject to 
the following conditions: 
1. Compliance with final site plan submitted. 
2. Compliance with all requirements of Design Review case DRB25-00916. 
3. Compliance with all conditions of approval of Ordinance No. 4897, except as modified 
by this request. 
4. Prior to the submittal of any building permit, obtain approval of an AUP for the shared 
parking arrangement.  
5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, record a cross-access agreement with the 
adjacent property to the east. 
6. Compliance with all requirements of Chapter 19 of the Zoning Ordinance including:  
a. Owner must execute the City’s standard Avigation Easement and Release for 
Falcon Field Airport prior to or concurrently with the recordation of the Final Plat 
or the issuance of a building permit, whichever occurs first.  
b. Due to the proximity to Falcon Field Airport, any proposed permanent or 
temporary structure, as required by the FAA, is subject to an FAA filing for review 
in conformance with CFR Title 14 Part 77 (Form 7460) to determine any effect to 
navigable airspace and air navigation facilities. A completed form with a response 
by the FAA must accompany any building permit application for structure(s) on 
the property.  
c. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, provide documentation by a 
registered professional engineer or registered professional architect 
demonstrating compliance with the noise level reductions required in Section 11-
19-5 of the Mesa Zoning Ordinance. 
d. Provide written notice to future property owners that the project is within 3 miles 
of Falcon Field Airport 
e. All Final Plats must include a disclosure notice in accordance with Section 11-19-
5(C) of the Zoning Ordinance which must state in part: “This property, due to its 
proximity to Falcon Field Airport, will experience aircraft overflights, which are 
expected to generate noise levels that may be of concern to some individuals.”

13 
7. Compliance with all City development codes and regulations, except the modification 
to the development standards as approved in Ord. No. 3972 and Ord. No. 4897 and 
with this BIZ Overlay as shown in the following table: 
Development Standards 
BIZ Approved 
Maximum Building Height    
MZO Section 11-7-3 
53 feet 
8. Prior to the City Council hearing, provide updated site and landscape plans that show 
the location of a shade structure(s) covering the turf area shown on the east side of 
the pool on the final site plan. The shade structure(s) must cover a minimum of 75% 
of the proposed 1,800 square foot turf area in area, no less than 1,350 square feet, 
and provide seating options. The final design shall be approved administratively by the 
Planning Director prior to the submittal of any building permit. 
Exhibits 
Exhibit 1 - Presentation  
Exhibit 2 - Ordinance 
Exhibit 3 - Ordinance Map  
Exhibit 4 - Vicinity Map  
Exhibit 5 - Site Plan  
Exhibit 6 - Minutes  
Exhibit 7 - Submittal Documents