Presentation

City of Mesa — City Council (2026-05-04)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 4261 characters
City Council
ZON25-00234
April 20, 2026
Mary Kopaskie-Brown, Planning Director
Evan Balmer, Assistant Planning Director
1

Request
• Rezone from AG to RSL-
2.5-PAD
• Product Review
• To allow for a 230-lot 
single-family residential 
subdivision
2

Location
• North of Warner Road and west of 
the 202 Freeway
• Southeast corner of Hawes Road and 
Mesquite Street
3

General Plan
• Variety of low intensity business 
operations that are compatible with 
residential uses
• Uses include offices, medical facilities, 
research and development centers
• Residential zoning districts: 
 RM-2, RM-3, RM-4, RM-5
Current – Local Employment Center
4

General Plan
• Principal Land Uses: Business 
Offices, Medical Facilities, Light 
Industrial, & Retail
• Zoning districts: OC, NC, LC, GC, 
PEP, LI, EO, & PS
Current – Local Employment Center
5

General Plan
• Principal land uses include single 
and multi-family residential, retail, 
personal services, eating and 
drinking establishments, and 
business offices
• Zoning districts: RS-9, -7, & -6, RSL-
4.5, -4.0, -3.0, & -2.5, RM-2, -3, -4, 
& -5, OC, NC, LC, GC, MX, PC, ID-1, 
ID-2, LR, and PS
Proposed – Urban Residential
6

Zoning
Existing: 
• Maricopa County, Light Industrial 
(IND-2)
Proposed: 
• Small Lot Single Residence 2.5 with a 
Planned Area Development Overlay 
(RSL-2.5-PAD)
7

Site Photos
Looking southwest towards the project site from Mesquite Street
8

Site Photos
Looking southeast towards the project site from Mesquite Street
9

Preliminary Plat
• 230 lots
• Typical lot – 3,120 sq. ft.
• Lot width minimum – 39 ft.
• Oversized lot width – 50 ft.
• Lot depth minimum – 80 ft. 
• Oversized lot width – 80 ft.
• Enhanced architecture at corner 
lots (     ) 
10

Landscaping & Amenities
• Native and low-water-use trees and shrubs 
including shade trees for sustainability
• 20- to 49-foot-wide landscaped buffer 
along east property line
• The large amenity area stretches between 
the main entries and includes a swimming 
pool, open-air clubhouse, ramadas, 
seating, pickleball, play structures and 
fitness stations, picnic tables and game 
areas
11

Development Standard
MZO Required
PAD Proposed 
Garage Standard – 
Aggregate Width of Garage 
Doors
50%
56%
Minimum Yards (ft.) –
Front – Garage 
Rear
20 feet
15 feet
18 feet
8 feet 
Encroachments - 
Attached open porches, open patios, open 
carports or open balconies may encroach into 
a required rear yard, but shall be no closer 
than 15 feet to a rear property line
Attached open porches, open 
patios, open carports or open 
balconies may encroach into a 
required rear yard, but shall be no 
closer than 5 feet to a rear 
property line
Planned Area Development
12

Development Standard
MZO Required
PAD Proposed 
RSL Open Space 
Requirements – 
Minimum Depth
6 feet as an upper story balcony
8 feet as a porch or patio
10 feet as a courtyard or lawn area
6 feet as an upper story 
balcony
8 feet as a porch, patio, 
courtyard or lawn area
Materials –
Primary Materials
Minimum of 2 kinds of primary 
exterior materials required that are 
distinctive in texture or masonry
Spanish elevations may contain 
only one primary exterior 
material
Planned Area Development
13

Planned Area Development
• Front porches exceed minimum requirements; courtyard wall provided 
with Spanish elevations
• 4.38 acres of amenity and retention areas (0.63 acres of common open 
space required)
• Amenity areas include swimming pool, clubhouse, ramadas, pickleball, 
play structures and fitness stations, picnic tables and game areas
• Building design and site design
• Driveway parking and on-street parking is available
14

Renderings
15

Renderings
16

Renderings
17

Citizen Participation
• Notified property owners within 1000 
feet, HOAs and registered 
neighborhoods and invited them to a 
virtual neighborhood meeting
• Virtual neighborhood meetings 
• July 28, 2025 – No residents 
attended the meeting
• March 3, 2026 – No residents 
attended the meeting
• No comments received by staff
18

Findings
Complies with the 2050 Mesa General Plan 
Criteria in Chapters 22 & 69 for PAD & Site Plan Review
Staff recommends Approval with Conditions
Planning and Zoning Board recommends Approval with Conditions (6-0)
19

Elevations
21

Elevations
22