Staff Report

City of Mesa — City Council (2026-05-04)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 18021 characters
City Council Staff Report 
Date 
April 20, 2026 
Case No.  
ZON25-00288 
Project Name 
Haven at Destination 
Request 
 
Rezone 28+ acres from General Industrial (GI) to Small-Lot 
Single Residence 2.5 with a Planned Area Development Overly 
(RSL-2.5-PAD) to allow for a 155-lot single residence 
development 
 
Approval of residential product 
Project Location 
Northwest corner of South Meridian Road and Arizona Route 24 
Parcel No(s) 
304-34-057F 
 
Project Area 
28± acres 
Council District 
District 6 
Existing Zoning 
General Industrial (GI) 
General Plan 
Designation 
Urban Center  
Applicant 
Sean Lake, Pew and Lake, PLC 
Owner 
The Cubes at Meridian 24, LLC 
Staff Planner 
Mallory Ress, Senior Planner 
Proposition 
207 
Waiver Signed 
Yes

[2] 
Recommendation 
Staff find that the Proposed Project is consistent with the Mesa 2050 General Plan and the 
purpose for a Planned Area Development Overlay outlined in Section 11-22-1 of the MZO. 
 
Staff recommends approval with conditions.  
 
Planning & Zoning Board Recommendation:  
On March 25, 2026, the Planning and Zoning Board voted (6-0) to recommend that City Council 
approve the proposed project.  
Project Overview 
Request: 
The applicant is requesting approval for a rezoning of 28± acres from GI to RSL-2.5 with a PAD 
overlay and residential product for a 155-lot detached single residence development (Proposed 
Project).  
Concurrent Applications: 
 
Major General Plan Amendment: The Planning and Zoning Board held the first public 
hearing for the proposed Minor General Plan Amendment on September 23, 2025 for the 
Major General Plan Amendment.  The second public hearing was held on March 25, 2026, 
at Mesa City Hall. The GPA would change the General Plan Placetype from Urban Center 
to Mixed Residential. (Case No. GPA25-00283). 
 
Preliminary Plat: A separate Preliminary Plat application, to be approved by the Planning 
Director, is required for the Proposed Project (Case No. SUB26-00137).  
Site Context 
General Plan:  
 
The Placetype is Urban Center with an Evolve Growth Strategy. 
 
The requested Single-Family Residential land use is not a principal or secondary land use 
in the Urban Center Placetype.  The RSL-2.5-PAD is not consistent with the Urban Center 
Placetype.  
 
A Major General Plan Amendment is requested concurrently with this request to change 
the Placetype designation from Urban Center to Mixed Residential with an Evolve Growth 
Strategy.   
o The purpose of the Mixed Residential Placetype is to create a diverse mixture of 
housing, such as single-family detached and attached homes, duplexes, triplexes, 
quadplexes, townhomes. 
o Mixed Residential areas accommodate low- to medium-density multiple 
residences, not to exceed 30 dwelling units per acre.

[3] 
 
The Proposed Project is consistent with the Mixed Residential Placetype and furthers the 
implementation of, and is not contrary to, the Vision, Guiding Principles, Strategies of the 
2050 Mesa General Plan. 
 
Supporting General Plan Strategies: 
o N1. Promote complete communities in both existing and new neighborhoods. 
o H1. Create more opportunities for housing options. 
o H2. Sustain an adequate supply of attainable housing units to meet the needs of 
residents vulnerable to rising housing costs. 
o LU1. Promote a balance of land uses to enhance the quality of life for current and 
future generations. 
o LU2. Create opportunities for placemaking in neighborhoods that reinforce their 
unique character and sense of place. 
Sub-Area Plan: 
 
The Proposed Project is located within the Mixed Community District of the Mesa Gateway 
Strategic Development Plan.  
 
This area is envisioned to solidify the goal to balance land use and provide sustainability 
through the creation of a live/work/play community. While other districts allow for 
residential uses, this district is the primary area for residential development as residential 
use is critical to attaining the balance that is sought within the Mesa Gateway area amidst 
the employment, education, commercial and industrial uses found primarily within the 
other districts.  
 
The Proposed Project is consistent with the Mesa Gateway Strategic Development Plan 
and will strengthen the area by adding to its residential density, creating a sense of place; 
in these ways this furthers the vision, goals and strategies identified in the Mesa Gateway 
Strategic Development Plan 
Zoning:  
 
The project site is currently zoned General Industrial (GI). 
 
The Proposed Project includes a request to rezone from GI to Small-Lot Single Residence 
2.5 with a Planned Area Development Overlay (RSL-2.5-PAD).  
 
Single Residence is a permitted use within the RSL-2.5 zoning district.  
 
The Proposed Project is within the Airfield Overflight Area 3 (AOA3) Overlay and single 
residential is a permitted use within the AOA3.

[4] 
Surrounding Zoning & Use Activity: 
The proposed Single Residence subdivision is compatible with surrounding land uses, which 
includes single residence developments, vacant land, and commercial uses.  
Northwest 
 
RS-6-PAD 
Single Residential 
North 
 
RS-6-PAD 
Single Residential  
Northeast 
(Across Meridian Road) 
San Tan Valley 
Single Residential 
West 
 
RS-6-PAD 
Single Residential 
Project Site 
 
GI 
Vacant 
East 
(Across Meridian Road) 
San Tan Valley 
Single Residential 
Southwest 
(Across SR-24 Freeway) 
GI 
Vacant 
South 
(Across SR-24 Freeway) 
GI 
Vacant 
Southeast 
(Across Meridian Road) 
Queen Creek 
Vacant 
Site History: 
 
May 17, 1990: City Council annexed 625.7± acres, including the project site, into the City 
of Mesa (Case No. A90-001; Ordinance No. 2514) and establish comparable City of Mesa 
zoning of Agricultural (AG) (Case No. Z90-025; Ordinance No.2529). 
 
September 10, 2001: City Council rezoned 98.7± acres, including the project site, from 
AG to M-2 (equivalent to current General Industrial [GI]) to allow for the development of 
an industrial park (Case No. Z01-045; Ordinance No. 3931).  
Site Plan: 
 
Access:  
o The proposed development will be accessed from Meridian Road, on the north 
side of the site.  
o Secondary emergency access from Meridian Road is located in the approximate 
center of the site.  
o A network of pedestrian paths and sidewalks connect the lots to the community 
open spaces, amenities and Meridian Road.  
 
Parking:  
o Per Table 11-32-3.A of the Mesa Zoning Ordinance (MZO), 310 covered parking 
spaces are required.  
o The Proposed Project has 310 private garage spaces (two per lot).

[5] 
o The driveway provided at each lot is large enough to fit two vehicles, providing 
residents with additional off-street parking options. 
 
Landscaping: The development features a variety of trees, shrubs and accent plants to 
provide shade and color along the streets and pathways and in the amenity spaces. 
 
Open Space: The amenity areas includes playground equipment, a pickle ball court, 
outdoor seating, game areas and shaded structures.  
Planned Area Development Overlay: 
Per Section 11-22 of the MZO, the purpose of a PAD overlay is to permit flexibility in the application 
of zoning standards and requirements where it can be demonstrated that the proposed 
development provides equivalent or superior standards in a creative way to meet the intent of the 
underlaying zoning district and general plan. 
Development Standards 
MZO Required 
PAD Proposed 
Minimum Yards  – 
MZO Table 11-5-3.A.2 
- Front – Garage 
- Rear 
 
 
20 feet 
15 feet 
 
 
18 feet 
8 feet 
Encroachments -  
MZO Section 11-5-3(B)(2)(a)(iii)(5) 
- Rear Patio 
 
 
Attached open porches, 
open 
patios, 
open 
carports 
or 
open 
balconies may encroach 
into a required rear yard, 
but shall be no closer 
than 15 feet to a rear 
property line, except in 
the 
RS-6 
and 
RS-7 
Districts, 
where 
these 
structures may encroach 
to within ten (10) feet of 
the rear property line. 
Such 
open 
structures 
may 
include 
window 
screens, knee walls, and 
other partial enclosures 
as specified in the Mesa 
Building Code for patio 
covers. 
 
 
Attached open porches, 
open 
patios, 
open 
carports 
or 
open 
balconies may encroach 
into a required rear yard, 
but shall be no closer than 
5 feet to a rear property 
line. Such open structures 
may 
include 
window 
screens, knee walls, and 
other partial enclosures 
as specified in the Mesa 
Building Code for patio 
covers.

[6] 
Development Standards 
MZO Required 
PAD Proposed 
RSL Open Space Requirements -
MZO Section 11-5-3(A)(5)(a)(ii) 
- Min. depth 
 
 
To 
count 
toward 
the 
required open space, the 
open space must have a 
minimum depth of at least 
six (6) feet as an upper 
story balcony, eight (8) 
feet as a porch or patio 
and ten (10) feet as a 
courtyard or lawn area 
 
 
To 
count 
toward 
the 
required open space, the 
open space must have a 
minimum depth of at least 
six (6) feet as an upper 
story balcony, and eight 
(8) feet as a porch, patio, 
courtyard or lawn area 
Garage Frontage and Location – 
MZO Section 11-5-3(B)(4)(a) 
 
 
Where garage doors face 
the front property line of 
the lot, the aggregate 
width of garage doors 
shall 
not 
exceed 
50 
percent (50%) of the 
aggregate width of the 
front building elevation 
 
Where garage doors face 
the front property line of 
the 
lot, the 
aggregate 
width of garage doors 
shall 
not 
exceed 
56 
percent 
(56%) 
of 
the 
aggregate width of the 
front building elevation 
Materials –  
MZO Section 11-5-3(B)(7) 
 
 
Buildings must contain at 
least two (2) kinds of 
primary exterior materials 
distinctively different in 
texture 
or 
masonry 
pattern, such as brick, 
stone, integrally tinted 
and 
textured masonry 
block, precast concrete, 
wood, 
natural 
and 
synthetic stone, stucco 
and synthetic stucco. 
 
Spanish elevations may 
contain 
only 
one 
(1) 
primary exterior material 
The Proposed Project offers creative, high-quality development for both residents and the 
surrounding area, providing: 
 
The quantity and quality of common open space exceed the requirements of the MZO: 
o Required: 18,600 square feet (120 square feet per lot) of common open space.  
o Proposed: 9.36 acres of programmed amenity and retention areas, including a 
2.19-acre amenity area. 
 
Front courtyards are provided for Spanish elevations, and additional columns and post 
details are provided for the Craftsman and Farmhouse elevations.

[7] 
 
Lighting, pavers, and exterior door details are provided to enhance the product design.  
Product Review: 
Product was reviewed as part of this request for the proposed residential subdivision in the RSL-
2.5 District.  
 
Four two-story product types are proposed for the 39-foot-wide lots, each with three 
different elevations.  
o The two-story product includes front porches, a covered rear patio, three or four 
bedrooms, and a two-car garage. 
o The two-story product will have the ability to be placed at the front setback or three 
feet behind it, allowing for variation in home placement along the street. 
 
Two single-story product types are proposed for the 50-foot-wide lots, each with six 
different elevations.  
o The single-story product includes covered front entries, a covered rear patio, three 
bedrooms and a two-car garage.  
o The single-story product will need to be placed at the front setback line; however, 
the single-story lots are not adjacent to each other so their uniformity in placement 
will not be noticeable. 
Impact Analyses 
School Impact: 
The Proposed Project is located within the Queen Creek Unified School District (QCUSD) and 
feeds a new elementary school and Eastmark High School (grades 7-12).  
Staff is awaiting a response from the QCUSD regarding the estimated demand for the school 
district.  
Citizen Participation 
The applicant conducted a citizen participation process, notifying surrounding property owners 
within 1,000 feet, and surrounding HOAs and registered neighbors, and invited them to a 
neighborhood meeting.  
Neighborhood Meeting: 
An in-person neighborhood meeting was held on July 29, 2025, with five (5) neighbors in 
attendance. Attendees raised questions and concerns related, and the applicant provided 
responses, related to: 
 
HOA and amenities:   
o The neighborhood will not be gated, and the amenity area will not be regulated by 
security. 
o There is no designated dog park; open space areas are available for pet owners 
to exercise their pets.

[8] 
o The HOA management company has not yet been determined. 
 
State Route 24:  
o The site plan will not change due to the expansion of State Route 24. 
o The project site property owner is responsible for half street improvements along 
the roads directly adjacent to the site. 
o Designated construction access from State Route 24 will be considered.   
 
Subdivision construction and ownership: 
o There is a purchase agreement in place, but the sale of the site will not be 
completed until entitlements are approved. 
o Acknowledged concern over construction materials that may cause flat tires. 
A second virtual neighborhood meeting was held on March 3, 2026, with five (5) neighbors in 
attendance. Attendees raised questions and concerns related to the following: 
 
Lot size and setbacks 
 
Parking 
 
Type of housing and amenities 
 
Home prices and anticipated construction start time 
The applicant provided the following responses: 
 
The typical lot size is 3,000sq.ft. and there are no zero lot line setbacks. 
 
On-street parking is permitted 
 
The homes are single-family detached, and the HOA amenities are only available to 
residents of this subdivision 
 
At this time there is not an exact price for the homes and the hope is that construction will 
commence soon after entitlement are obtained. 
Required Notification: 
 
Property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject site. Based on the records of the City of 
Mesa Community Services Department, there are no active HOAs within ½ mile or 
registered neighborhoods within one mile of the subject site. 
 
Staff has not received any questions or comments on the Proposed Project. 
Conditions of Approval 
Staff recommends approval of the requested Rezoning and proposed product, subject to the 
following conditions: 
1. Compliance with the final site plan, landscape plan, product details and plot plans as 
submitted. 
2. Compliance with all requirements of Case Numbers GPA25-00283 and SUB26-00137.

[9] 
3. Installation of all off-site improvements and street frontage landscaping during the first 
phase of construction. 
4. Dedicate the right-of-way and easements required under the Mesa City Code at the time 
of application for a building permit, at the time of recordation of the subdivision plat, or at 
the time of the City's request for dedication, whichever comes first. 
5. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, obtain approval of a Preliminary Plat and 
obtain approval of and record a Final Plat. 
6. Compliance with all City development codes and regulations, except the modification to 
the development standards as approved with this PAD Overlay as shown in the following 
table: 
Development Standards 
PAD Approved 
Minimum Yards  – 
MZO Table 11-5-3.A.2 
- Front – Garage 
- Rear 
 
 
18 feet 
8 feet 
 
Encroachments -  
MZO Section 11-5-3(B)(2)(a)(iii)(5) 
- Rear Patio 
Attached open porches, open patios, open 
carports or open balconies may encroach 
into a required rear yard, but shall be no 
closer than 5 feet to a rear property line. 
Such open structures may include window 
screens, knee walls, and other partial 
enclosures as specified in the Mesa 
Building Code for patio covers. 
RSL Open Space Requirements -
MZO Section 11-5-3(A)(5)(a)(ii) 
- Min. depth 
 
 
To count toward the required open space, 
the open space must have a minimum depth 
of at least six (6) feet as an upper story 
balcony, and eight (8) feet as a porch, patio, 
courtyard or lawn area 
Garage Frontage and Location – 
MZO Section 11-5-3(B)(4)(a) 
 
 
 
Where garage doors face the front property 
line of the lot, the aggregate width of garage 
doors shall not exceed 56 percent (56%) of 
the aggregate width of the front building 
elevation 
Materials –  
MZO Section 11-5-3(B)(7) 
 
Spanish elevations may contain only one (1) 
primary exterior material

[10] 
 
7. Compliance with all requirements of Chapter 19 of the Zoning Ordinance including:  
a. Owner must execute the City’s standard Avigation Easement and Release for 
Mesa Gateway Airport prior to or concurrently with the recordation of the Final 
Plat or the issuance of a building permit, whichever occurs first.  
b. Due to the proximity to Mesa Gateway Airport, any proposed permanent or 
temporary structure, as required by the FAA, is subject to an FAA filing for review 
in conformance with CFR Title 14 Part 77 (Form 7460) to determine any effect to 
navigable airspace and air navigation facilities. A completed form with a 
response by the FAA must accompany any building permit application for 
structure(s) on the property.  
c. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, provide documentation by a 
registered professional engineer or registered professional architect 
demonstrating compliance with the noise level reductions required in Section 11-
19-5 of the Mesa Zoning Ordinance. 
d. Provide written notice to future property owners that the project is within three 
miles of Mesa Gateway Airport. 
e. All Final Plats must include a disclosure notice in accordance with Section 11-19-
5(C) of the Zoning Ordinance which must state in part: “This property, due to its 
proximity to Mesa Gateway Airport, will experience aircraft overflights, which are 
expected to generate noise levels that may be of concern to some individuals.” 
Exhibits 
Exhibit 1 - Presentation  
Exhibit 2 - Ordinance  
Exhibit 3 - Ordinance Map  
Exhibit 4 - Vicinity Map  
Exhibit 5 - Site Plan  
Exhibit 6 - Minutes  
Exhibit 7 - Submittal Documents