Extracted text (via pymupdf)
45692 characters
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
COUNCIL MINUTES
December 4, 2025
The City Council of the City of Mesa met in the Study Session room at City Hall, 20 East Main Street, on
December 4, 2025, at 7:30 a.m.
COUNCIL PRESENT
COUNCIL ABSENT
OFFICERS PRESENT
Scott Somers
Jennifer Duff
Alicia Goforth
Francisco Heredia
Dorean Taylor
Mark Freeman
Rich Adams
Marc Heirshberg
Holly Moseley
Jim Smith
Vice Mayor Somers conducted a roll call.
Vice Mayor Somers excused Mayor Freeman and Councilmember Adams from the entire
meeting.
1.
Review and discuss items on the agenda for the December 8, 2025, Regular Council meeting.
All of the items on the agenda were reviewed among Council and staff and the following was
noted:
Conflict of interest: None
Items removed from the consent agenda: None
Assistant City Manager Marc Heirshberg advised that Item 4-g and 4-h, (Dragon’s Lounge), on
the Regular Council agenda were originally recommended for denial, but the issues have been
resolved, and the agenda will be updated to reflect a recommendation for approval.
Responding to multiple questions from Councilmember Taylor regarding Item 4-a, (Royal Palms
Golf Course), on the Regular Council agenda, Business Services Director Ed Quedens explained
that the Police Department and Crime Prevention Unit evaluate calls in relation to an applicant's
location and there were no concerns regarding the calls related to the application. He added that
he will report back to Council with the required school distance information later today.
In response to multiple questions posed by Councilmember Taylor regarding Item 4-d, (Safeway
#1948), on the Regular Council agenda, Business Services Director Ed Quedens confirmed that
a store can hold multiple liquor licenses, which provides them additional privileges for sampling.
He noted that sampling must be a separate application with separate approval from the
Department of Liquor and the Liquor Board.
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Page 2
Responding to multiple questions from Councilmember Taylor regarding Item 5-b, (Three-Year
Term Contract with Two-Year Renewal Options for CCTV Camera Replacement for the
Transportation Department (Citywide)), on the Regular Council agenda, Transportation
Director Erik Guderian explained that the contract is for the purchase of additional cameras to be
installed in new locations or replacement of old cameras. He advised that the contract does not
include maintenance, which is provided by staff. He stated the cost of the cameras range from
$3,000 to $6,000, and the City has 175 cameras that are replaced approximately every 10 to 12
years. He stated the cameras installed at intersections will help the Transportation staff monitor
traffic from Mesa’s Transportation Management Center. He discussed the costs of the cameras
and the replacement cycle, noting that the vendor who was awarded the contract for the purchase
of the cameras went to the lowest responsible bidder.
In response to multiple questions posed by Councilmember Taylor regarding Item 5-c, (Three-
Year Term Contract with Seven-Year Renewal Options for Sewer, Manhole, Siphon
Cleaning, Video and Repair Services for the Water Resources Department (Citywide)), on
the Regular Council agenda, Water Resources Director Christopher Hassert provided an
overview of the contract and the scope of work. He commented that the vendors selected are the
lowest responsible bidders, and he clarified that the $2 million represents contract authority to
engage the contractors only for the sewer system. He answered that the Greenfield Road work in
District 2 is part of the Central Mesa Reuse Pipeline and was a capital project. He discussed that
manhole reconstructions or repairs are handled by several contractors, depending on the defects
or repairs needed, adding that the City manages over 30,000 manholes and has a program that
repairs approximately 500 annually.
Responding to multiple questions from Councilmember Taylor regarding Item 5-d, (Dollar Limit
Increase to the Term Contract for Bronze Water Service Valves, Fittings, and Hydrants for
the Materials and Supply Warehouse (for the Water Resources Department) (Citywide)), on
the Regular Council agenda, Mr. Hassert clarified that the request for $350,000 is not new funding,
rather an increase in warehouse spending authority with vendors to keep essential equipment in
stock. He emphasized the goal is to avoid shortages during both planned operations and urgent
repairs by maintaining adequate inventory.
Mr. Quedens clarified that the extension of the dollar limit increase of $350,000 is only necessary
for approximately a month to prevent the City from running out of stock before the new contract
begins in February.
Responding to multiple questions posed by Councilmember Taylor regarding Item 6-a, (ZON25-
00598 "AWS PHX 065" 71.3± acres located approximately 1,300 feet west of the northwest
corner of East Pecos Road and South Signal Butte Road. Council Use Permit to allow for
a Major Utility. Amazon Data Services, owner; Kimley Horn, applicant. (District 6)), on the
Regular Council agenda, Principal Planner Evan Balmer commented that all zoning and public
hearing applications involve citizen participation, with notifications sent to property owners within
1,000 feet. He added that applicants track and address any feedback received, and the amount
of feedback varies by location. He indicated that the current site is a large industrial area and no
feedback has been received.
In response to questions from Councilmember Duff, Mr. Balmer explained that it is not uncommon
for a project to include both a Salt River Project (SRP) substation and a separate, privately owned
substation. He explained that power is delivered by SRP at high voltage and must be stepped
down to a usable level. He noted SRP substations are exempt from zoning and not subject to City
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Page 3
review, a privately owned substation is considered a major utility facility and requires a Council
Use Permit (CUP) in the light industrial (LI) zoning district, and although the facilities appear
similar on site and may look like two substations, only the private substation is subject to the CUP
request before Council.
Planning Director Mary Kopaskie-Brown explained that the Mesa Zoning Ordinance requires
screening and has regulations regarding appearance during the site plan process; however,
today's Council discussion focuses solely on the use itself.
In response to multiple questions posed by Councilmember Taylor regarding Item 8-b, (ZON23-
00365 “Fujifilm PAD Expansion” 61.6± acres located approximately 1,000 feet north of the
northwest corner of East Pecos Road and South Mountain Road. Rezone from Heavy
Industrial with a Planned Area Development overlay (HI-PAD) and Agricultural (AG) to
Heavy Industrial with a new Planned Area Development overlay and Site Plan Modification
to allow for the expansion of an existing industrial facility. Fujifilm Electronic Materials
USA Inc., owner; Benjamin Graff, Quarles & Brady, LLP, applicant. (District 6)), on the
Regular Council agenda, Mr. Balmer answered that the Fujifilm expansion followed the previous
citizen participation process described, but received little resident feedback due to its location
outside the mailing radius. He stated that the need for expansion is a result of growth and the
company has acquired a former Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) parcel zoned
agricultural, which is being rezoned to heavy industrial to include in their existing planned area
development (PAD) overlay. He added that design review is underway for the new infrastructure
with safety considerations and building design, noting that the rezoning aligns with the existing
development.
Vice Mayor Somers commented that the Fujifilm project has been in development for over a year,
with company representatives collaborating with the City on design elements and visual impacts
from State Route 24. He emphasized the project will create 80 well-paying jobs, potentially reduce
truck traffic, and the site is appropriately zoned.
Responding to a question from Councilmember Taylor regarding Item 8-c, (ZON24-00998 "623
S Mesa Dr" 0.6± acres located approximately 1,420 feet south of the southeast corner of
East Broadway Road and South Mesa Drive. Rezone from Multiple Residence-2 (RM-2) to
Multiple Residence-4 with a Bonus Intensity Zone overlay (RM-4-BIZ) and Site Plan Review
for a 15-unit multiple residence development. 623 South Mesa LLC, owner; Tim Boyle,
Atmosphere Architects, applicant. (District 4)), on the Regular Council agenda, Mr. Balmer
replied that the development is for 15-unit multiple residence apartments.
In response to multiple questions from Councilmember Taylor regarding Item 5-a, (One-Year
Term Contract for Forensic DNA Supplies for the Mesa Public Safety Support Department
(Sole Source) (Citywide)), on the Regular Council agenda, Public Safety Director Kimberly Meza
stated that Mesa’s forensics laboratory has served as a regional lab for Mesa, Tempe, Gilbert,
and Queen Creek since 2012. She explained how the agencies are invoiced and the operations
process. She indicated that regional collaboration has improved stability, efficiency, and
turnaround times, benefiting all participating cities and impacting crime.
Responding to multiple questions from Councilmember Duff regarding Item 9-b, (Proposed
amendments to Chapters 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 31, 86, and 87 of Title 11 of the Mesa City Code
pertaining to Battery Energy Storage Systems. The amendments include, but are not
limited to: adding definitions for Battery Energy Storage System, Battery Energy Storage
System Facility, Augmentation, and Nameplate Capacity; modifying land use tables to add
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Page 4
Battery Energy Storage System and Battery Energy Storage System Facility; establishing
development and other standards specific to Battery Energy Storage System Facilities.
(Citywide)), on the Regular Council agenda, Ms. Kopaskie-Brown explained that staff originally
recommended a 400-foot separation for Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS), mirroring
standards used for data centers; however, after receiving feedback from residents and
stakeholders, staff ultimately presented two options to Council for consideration, separation
recommendations for 400 feet and 1,000 feet. She emphasized that there is no industry standard
for separation distances for BESS, with recommendations ranging from 100 feet up to a mile; staff
aimed to strike a balance in their recommendation, noting that best practices vary widely and
there is no definitive benchmark.
Councilmember Duff expressed her opinion that a 400-foot separation requirement is sufficient
and that having a 1,000-foot separation requirement will make Mesa less competitive, affecting
energy costs and economic development. She commented that she will not support a 1,000-foot
separation requirement and discussed the challenges for BESS systems and energy developers.
In response to a question from Vice Mayor Somers, City Attorney Jim Smith clarified that if the
proposed amendments are not approved on Monday, under the zoning interpretation, BESS
would not be a permitted use and alternative options for Council consideration will be presented
to Council early next year. He affirmed that if the 1,000-foot separation requirement is approved,
Council can reduce or increase the requirement at a later date.
Discussion ensued relating to the impact of 400-feet and 1,000-feet separation requirements for
BESS, zoning districts affected by the separation requirement, safety concerns, and legal
conforming and non-conforming uses.
Responding to a question from Councilmember Taylor, Assistant Planning Director Rachel
Phillips explained the difference between a legal conforming use and non-conforming use.
Police Deputy Director Patrick Phelps introduced Police Technical Division Manager Wayne
Kwong and displayed a PowerPoint presentation regarding Item 7-a, (Approving and
authorizing the City Manager to enter into an Agreement with The Arizona Department of
Administration for the implementation, maintenance, and support of a real-time decision
and operations management system. (Citywide)) and Item 7-b (Purchase of an Integrated
Data Platform Solution for the Mesa Police Department (Sole Source) (Citywide)), on the
Regular Council meeting agenda. (See Attachment 1)
Mr. Phelps described the capabilities of the Peregrine software and its benefits to the Police
Department. He shared various types of data that can be utilized with the new software product.
(See Pages 2 and 3 of Attachment 1)
Mr. Phelps provided an overview of the proposed one-year pilot program to implement a data-
sharing platform. He explained that the City selected Peregrine because of its integration with
other Valley and regional agencies, and its cost effectiveness, noting that many agencies are
moving toward this platform. He highlighted the enhanced regional data-sharing capabilities
Peregrine would provide. (See Pages 4 and 5 of Attachment 1)
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Page 5
In response to a question from Vice Mayor Somers, Mr. Phelps replied that the state is providing
$215,800 for the system purchase price, fully funding the first year.
Mr. Phelps explained possibilities of moving forward into a second year with the software if the
product proves successful and worth the funding, and whether additional state funding becomes
available. He added that there is potential for the product to be used beyond the Police
Department for other types of data correlation searches, but the intent is to first prove the value
of the platform within the Police Department using the existing state funding. (See Page 6 of
Attachment 1)
Discussion ensued regarding the Peregrine software capability, ownership, various applications,
and search processes.
In response to multiple questions from Councilmember Taylor, Mr. Kwong described how the
Peregrine software would upload data to the cloud. He commented that Peregrine, or Versaterm,
would manage any software updates or changes.
Responding to multiple questions posed by Vice Mayor Somers, Mr. Phelps stated that he does
not anticipate massive database changes to occur, mostly functionality changes that do not affect
the data. He noted that the software will not access the Fire Department’s database, it is strictly
for the PD’s records management and computer aided design (CAD) data.
In response to a question from Councilmember Heredia, Mr. Phelps replied that the intention is
to prove the success of the new technology in the first year. He stated that by connecting more
internal data sources to the new technology, staff anticipate streamlining the public records
requests, making the process more efficient for the criminal justice information division.
Responding to a question posed by Councilmember Taylor, Mr. Phelps answered that the
proposed maintenance costs would be $215,000 annually, with the existing data sources.
In response to multiple questions from Councilmember Taylor, Mr. Kwong commented that the
subscription cost is full service and he does not anticipate that the City will maintain the technology
in-house. He added that the dashboard is customizable with the existing data and if more data is
needed, staff can make a request to Peregrine.
Vice Mayor Somers thanked staff for the presentation.
2-a.
Hear a presentation, discuss, and provide direction on the MesaCONNECTED Transit-Oriented
Development Plan.
Assistant Planning Director Rachel Phillips displayed a PowerPoint Presentation. (See
Attachment 2)
Ms. Phillips outlined the presentation topics for the project, which was a result of a grant received
from the Federal Transit Administration to conduct land use planning around transit. She identified
what is involved in the Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Plan, described the type of
community that is being developed, and highlighted what is not included in the plan. (See Pages
2 through 5 of Attachment 2)
Ms. Phillips presented a map of the MesaCONNECTED corridor, a five-mile route illustrating the
boundaries that connect with light rail and major activity centers within West Mesa. She explained
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Page 6
that the corridor was chosen for several favorable components and high transit ridership within
the city that create a diverse mixed-use environment. (See Pages 6 and 7 of Attachment 2)
Ms. Phillips reviewed the phases of the project schedule and outreach methods, noting that public
engagement occurs throughout all phases. She provided the results of the feedback received
from residents and the development community. (See Pages 8 through 11 of Attachment 2)
Ms. Phillips shared the vision statement for the TOD Plan and provided an overview of the five
chapters of the Plan Organization. (See Pages 12 and 13 of Attachment 2)
Ms. Phillips discussed the different components of the transit node planning with a map of the
corridor and 11 proposed transit nodes in regional destinations. She explained the various stops
along the corridor that are different in character and the strategy to tailor each area. She described
the three node classifications (neighborhood, urban and regional) and how each was determined
to attract a vibrant environment and prepare for future growth. She highlighted the tools and
metrics used in the evaluation to tailor strategies and incentives for each area, noting each will be
revisited over time to adapt to changes and encourage TOD. She described the use of transit
node profiles, detailing mixed land uses and other characteristics as part of the planning process.
(See Pages 14 through 17 of Attachment 2)
Ms. Phillips outlined the next steps, indicating that City Council will consider the TOD Plan and a
draft text amendment for a TOD overlay with specific development standards on December 8,
2025. She also mentioned that broader application of these standards throughout the city may be
proposed in the future. (See Page 18 of Attachment 2)
Councilmember Duff expressed support for the TOD Plan, stating the area will be enhanced by
the connectivity in Mesa, as well as the transformation of the former Fiesta Mall site. She
emphasized smart, coordinated planning that supports economic growth, improves quality of life,
and strengthens downtown as an economic engine.
Councilmember Heredia commented that the corridor is one of the fastest-growing corridors, with
high renter populations and limited land remaining. He stressed the need for future-focused
planning and the importance of transportation options, and the role of TOD in supporting infill
development. He cited past successes, including revitalizing long-blighted properties, and
emphasized strategic planning to support students, businesses, and regional partnerships while
positioning West Mesa for long-term success.
Councilmember Goforth stated the corridor already exists and the plan provides an opportunity to
formalize and protect those characteristics. She emphasized that the plan reflects strong
community input and engagement and aligns with what residents and businesses want for their
neighborhood.
In response to multiple questions from Councilmember Taylor, Ms. Phillips replied the City has
an agreement with a deadline to close out the grant by the end of February and requires Council
to take action.
Ms. Kopaskie-Brown provided details on outreach methods and community input, acknowledging
challenges but emphasizing diversified engagement efforts. She reinforced that the plan does not
involve construction or transit decisions and is meant to capture and guide land use for growth
already occurring.
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Page 7
In response to a question from Councilmember Taylor, Ms. Phillips commented that the plan does
not have any binding effects for approval by Council or any financial obligations.
Responding to a question from Vice Mayor Somers, Ms. Kopaskie-Brown explained that the plan
serves as guidance for the City and there is no commitment in terms of building or a zoning text
amendment. She emphasized that any action would require Council approval.
In response to a question from Vice Mayor Somers, Ms. Phillips clarified that low impact
development refers to green infrastructure practices related to water and wastewater.
Responding to a question from Councilmember Taylor, Transit Services Director Jodi Sorell
clarified that referenced studies were completed in 2021 and funded by Proposition 400; no local
money was used to fund the studies. She added Proposition 400 expires in December of 2025
and has been replaced by voter-approved Proposition 479 in November.
In response to a question from Councilmember Taylor, Ms. Phillips commented that public
outreach began in 2023 and continues, with a draft plan available online. She noted only five
public comments have been received.
Vice Mayor Somers thanked staff for the presentation.
(Vice Mayor Somers declared a recess at 9:43 a.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:52 a.m.)
2-b.
Hear a presentation, and discuss electric bicycles (e-bikes) in the City of Mesa, including e-bikes
in Mesa Parks.
Parks Recreation and Community Facilities Director Andrea Moore introduced Management
Assistant II Haylie Smith, Police Lieutenant Ryan Stokes, Fire Captain Jim Barnhart, and
displayed a PowerPoint Presentation. (See Attachment 3)
Ms. Smith presented an overview of the topics of the presentation to help build community
awareness around e-bikes and their proper usage with the proposed code updates. (See Page 2
of Attachment 3)
In response to a question from Councilmember Goforth, Lieutenant Stokes presented a table
identifying the different classifications of e-bikes and defined each one. (See Pages 7 and 8 of
Attachment 3)
Responding to a question from Vice Mayor Somers, Lieutenant Stokes replied that the average
speed of a pedal bike only is estimated to range from 10-to-15 miles per hour (mph).
Ms. Smith reviewed the current laws and codes for e-bikes, which are currently not allowed in
Mesa parks. She provided a comparison chart illustrating the surrounding cities and their e-bike
regulations. She shared the proposed updates to the City codes, including a new speed limit for
e-bike usage on Shared-Use Paths (SUP) and sidewalks. (See Pages 3 through 6 Attachment 3)
Lieutenant Stokes clarified the definition of an e-bike is that the bike is required to have pedals
and must be under 750 watts of power. (See Pages 7 of Attachment 3)
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Page 8
In response to a question from Councilmember Goforth, Ms. Moore stated that SUPs have always
been part of the Parks’ code in terms of rules; however, the Transportation Department is
responsible for maintenance.
Lieutenant Stokes commented that the top speed listed for each class represents the maximum
allowable speed, noting where each is permitted in parks and how the updated code would
change those allowances. He clarified the distinction between an electric mini scooter, which
weighs up to 30 pounds, and an electric standup scooter that has a maximum weight of 75
pounds. (See Page 8 of Attachment 3)
Ms. Smith defined the difference between a motor vehicle versus a motorized electric vehicle and
highlighted the categories that would be allowed in parks with the proposed updates. She outlined
the guidelines and requirements for safe operations. (See Pages 9 and 10 of Attachment 3)
Ms. Smith discussed the damages across parks from various types of motor vehicles and
motorized electric vehicles, and emphasized that part of the public outreach campaign is to build
more community awareness around the different types of vandalism that the City is experiencing
to begin addressing that within the parks’ system. She presented images showing the damages
that have occurred and recognized the need to bring more community and public awareness to
reduce vandalism incidents. (See Pages 11 and 12 of Attachment 3)
In response to a question from Vice Mayor Somers, Ms. Smith stated that the majority of the
damage is caused by e-scooters.
Fire Captain Barnhart discussed the hazards of e-bike batteries and lithium-ion batteries, which
are mostly a result of improper usage, storage, or charging. He explained the challenges with
distinguishing the rapid fires that have a toxic nature and different chemical makeups. He played
a video illustrating how quickly a fire can develop and the dangers of not being able to escape.
He identified safety tips for public messaging on operating e-bikes safely. (See Pages 13 and 14
of Attachment 3)
Ms. Smith highlighted the community outreach campaigns and various supporting taglines for
public messaging. She highlighted the campaign pillars, which will target different audiences and
use various types of marketing to bring awareness of rules and regulations. (See Pages 16
through 19 of Attachment 3)
Lieutenant Stokes reviewed the enforcement strategy after messaging has been delivered, and
indicated the Police Department (PD) will monitor certain locations based on data. (See Page 20
of Attachment 3)
Discussion ensued relating to speed limits for e-bikes, pedal bikes, and modified motor vehicles
and management of enforcement.
(At 10:22 a.m. Vice Mayor Somers excused Councilmember Heredia from the remainder of the
meeting.)
Vice Mayor Somers requested more research be conducted on the five-mph speed limit for
bicycles.
Vice Mayor Somers thanked staff for the presentation
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Page 9
3.
Acknowledge receipt of minutes of various boards and committees.
3-a.
Museum & Cultural Advisory Board meeting held on September 25, 2025.
It was moved by Councilmember Duff, seconded by Councilmember Taylor, that receipt of the
above-listed minutes be acknowledged.
Upon tabulation of votes, it showed:
AYES – Somers–Duff–Goforth–Taylor
NAYS – None
ABSENT– Freeman–Adams–Heredia
Vice Mayor Somers declared the motion carried unanimously by those present.
4.
Current events summary including meetings and conferences attended.
Vice Mayor Somers and Councilmembers highlighted the events, meetings, and conferences
recently attended.
5.
Scheduling of meetings.
Assistant City Manager Marc Heirshberg stated that the schedule of meetings is as follows:
Monday, December 8, 2026, 3:30 p.m. – Special meeting
Monday, December 8, 2026, 5:15 p.m. – Study Session
Monday, December 8, 2026, 5:45 p.m. – Regular Council meeting
6.
Adjournment.
Without objection, the Study Session adjourned at 10:39 a.m.
____________________________________
SCOTT SOMERS, VICE MAYOR
ATTEST:
_______________________________
HOLLY MOSELEY, CITY CLERK
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Page 10
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the Study Session
of the City Council of Mesa, Arizona, held on the 4th day of December 2025. I further certify that the
meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present.
_______________________________
HOLLY MOSELEY, CITY CLERK
lr
(Attachments – 3)
Mesa Police Department
Peregrine Pilot
1
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 1
Page 1 of 6
•
Software which creates “Google” like searches against multiple
systems such as Records Management Systems (RMS) and Computer
Aided Dispatch (CAD) systems.
•
Allows officers, detectives and crime analysts to more easily search
existing records
•
Improves our ability to visualize and map our existing data
•
Automates current manual crime analysis reports and maps
•
Provides desktop and mobile access
•
Used by over 250 public safety agencies
What is Peregrine
2
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 1
Page 2 of 6
People, vehicles, phones, address, keywords
Search – Desktop, Mobile
Visualize and analyze information geospatially
Maps
Uncover connections quickly
Network & Link Analysis
Automated, customizable statistical reporting
Charts & Dashboards
Improved Search Capabilities
Mobile Application
Access information on the go
3
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 1
Page 3 of 6
• Senate Bill 1735 Provided funding to the City of Mesa and other
East Valley agencies for one year for Peregrine implementation
•
$215,800 allocated to the City of Mesa
• Agreement with Peregrine has no obligation to continue past the
pilot period
• Continuation past the pilot period depends on success of the
pilot and future funding availability
• Pilot funds RMS and CAD integration only
Pilot Program
4
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 1
Page 4 of 6
• East Valley agencies including Mesa, Tempe, Scottsdale,
Chandler, Queen Creek, Apache Junction and ASU are working to
enhance regional data sharing capabilities through Peregrine
• Improve investigative ability by searching against multiple
agencies from a single interface
• Replaces older information sharing tools
Regional Data Sharing
5
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 1
Page 5 of 6
• Additional data sources can be added to Peregrine
•
Simply public records request searches
•
Find correlations between disparate data sources such as crime and
staffing
•
Can be used for other types of City data to look for correlations and
efficiencies
Future Possibilities
6
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 1
Page 6 of 6
Mary Kopaskie-Brown, Planning Director
Rachel Phillips, Assistant Planning Director
Sean Pesek, Senior Planner
City Council
December 1, 2025
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 2
Page 1 of 18
2
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Background
• Community Engagement
• Plan Content
• Next Steps
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 2
Page 2 of 18
What is MesaCONNECTED?
use, housing, transportation, and economic development with a focus on:
• Promoting a diverse mix of housing types;
• Supporting business growth and retention;
• Strengthening business centers such as Riverview, Fiesta District, and Downtown;
• Revitalizing properties in Redevelopment Areas;
• Encouraging infill, adaptive reuse, and redevelopment;
• Expanding mobility options;
• Reducing traffic congestion and pollution; and
• Enhancing public spaces and placemaking.
Connecting Our Neighborhoods for NExt-Generation Community, Transit,
& Economic Development
Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Plan for a 5-mile transit corridor that integrates land
3
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 2
Page 3 of 18
What is TOD?
BUILDING COMPLETE, WALKABLE COMMUNITIES AROUND PUBLIC TRANSIT
4
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 2
Page 4 of 18
What TOD is Not
NOT a transit plan → Land use strategy around transit
NOT specific to one transit mode → Works with all transit types
NOT always high-density → Context-sensitive density
NOT standardized → Tailored to each neighborhood
5
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 2
Page 5 of 18
MesaCONNECTED Corridor
• 5-mile transit route
• Extends ½ mile on either side of:
Rio Salado Parkway
Dobson Road
Southern Avenue
Country Club Drive
• Will connect to the Tempe
Streetcar and Light Rail
6
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 2
Page 6 of 18
Why this Corridor?
7
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 2
Page 7 of 18
Project Schedule
8
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 2
Page 8 of 18
Public Engagement
9
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 2
Page 9 of 18
What We Heard From
Residents
• Walkability matters - Strong desire to walk/bike to shops, restaurants,
and public spaces
• Safety first - Increased safety, shaded paths, and better bike routes
• Protect West Mesa's character - Residents value Mesa’s diversity and
community identity
• Context-sensitive development - Higher density in urban areas, lower
density next to established neighborhoods
• Everyday amenities nearby - Public spaces, restaurants, retail, and
grocery stores need to be within walking distance
10
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 2
Page 10 of 18
What We Heard From the
Development Community
• Align plans with market realities - Ensure TOD vision matches
demographics and economic feasibility
• Reduce barriers to development – TOD specific zoning + simplified
review and approval processes
• Provide development incentives – Financial or regulatory tools to
encourage investment
• Prioritize shade and walkability - Design standards that create
comfortable pedestrian environments
11
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 2
Page 11 of 18
MesaCONNECTED Vision
The MesaCONNECTED Corridor is a vibrant,
connected community that is safe and resilient,
easy to move through, seamlessly linked to
transit, and rich in economic opportunity
12
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 2
Page 12 of 18
Plan Organization
Outlines the purpose of the Plan, overview of planning process,
community engagement, and plan organization
Documents existing conditions i.e population, economy, mobility,
built form, and housing
Established the Plan’s vision, guiding principles, and corridor-
wide strategies
Introduces transit node classifications, TOD Continuum Tool,
and transit node profile for 11 proposed transit nodes
Action Plan to implement and advance the community’s
vision for the Corridor i.e. Overlay text amendments
13
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 2
Page 13 of 18
Transit Node Planning
14
• Transit Node Classifications – context specific
approach
• Transit Node Evaluation & Continuum Tool –
assess readiness for transit-oriented growth
• Transit Node Profiles for 11 potential Transit
Nodes
• Introduction - describing the area
• Transit Node Snapshot
• Illustrative Concept Plans
• Design Considerations
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 2
Page 14 of 18
Transit Node Classifications
15
NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSIT NODE
• Compact, community-oriented
hubs
• Retail, small office, and medium
density housing (e.g. duplexes,
townhomes, small apartments)
• Delivers everyday goods, services
and diverse housing options
URBAN TRANSIT NODE
• Medium density mixed-use hub
• Employment, retail, and medium
density housing (e.g. townhomes,
small apartments, and mid-rise
condos)
• Designed to provide a “walk-
everywhere” experience
REGIONAL TRANSIT NODE
• Primary economic, cultural, and
entertainment hub
• Large format office, employment
centers, destination retail and
entertainment and dense mix of
housing
• Vibrant, accessible attraction
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 2
Page 15 of 18
Transit Node Evaluation
16
TOD Continuum
• Tool that assesses how prepared transit node is to
support transit-oriented growth and attract
investment
• 3 Metrics - TOD Characteristics, Redevelopment
Potential, and Transit Readiness
• Can be updated anytime to provide a current
snapshot of the Corridor
• Informs various strategies and interventions
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 2
Page 16 of 18
Transit Node Profiles
Introduction
Describes the nodes place
within the corridor, existing
conditions, redevelopment
potential, and TOD
Continuum strategy
Illustrative
Concept Plans
Illustrates potential land
uses and
infill/redevelopment
scenarios
• Zoning
• Land Use
• Population
• Employment
Snapshot Info
•Placetypes • Continuum
Scores
• Planning
Areas
Design
17
Considerations
Transit node specific
recommendations
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 2
Page 17 of 18
Next Steps
•
City Council Action - December 8th
•
Implementation - Draft Text Amendments
18
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 2
Page 18 of 18
E-Bike Code
Updates &
Communication
Strategy
December 4, 2025
Andrea Moore, PRCF Director
Haylie Smith, PRCF Support Services Administrator – SA
Lieutenant Ryan Stokes, Mesa PD
Captain Jim Barnhart, MFMD
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 3
Page 1 of 21
Overview
Current Code & City Comparison
Proposed E-Bike Updates to City Code
Vandalism and Safety Concerns with E-Bikes
Public Outreach and Communication Strategy
Enforcement Strategy
2
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 3
Page 2 of 21
Current Code & Laws
E-Bikes are prohibited in City of Mesa parks, only
non-motorized bikes are allowed
Riders must be 16 years of age or older to ride an
e-bike in Mesa
Understand basic rules of the road and the
concept of right-of-way
15 MPH speed limit on shared-use paths
3
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 3
Page 3 of 21
City Comparison
4
Gilbert
Scottsdale
Tempe
Phoenix
Chandler
E-Bikes Allowed In
Parks?
Stipulations?
Class 1,
2, & 3
Class 1 & 2
Motor
Disengaged
N/A
N/A
Age Requirement?
**
**
Helmet
Requirement?
**Age requirement for Class 3 E-Bikes only
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 3
Page 4 of 21
Updates to City Code
Definitions added for E-Bikes and difference between motor vehicles and motorized
electric vehicles
Class 1 & 2 E-Bikes & E-Scooters are allowed in City of Mesa parks wherever bikes
are allowed
*Must be operated safely (5 MPH speed limit in parks added to traffic code)
*Helmet requirement added to traffic code for riders under 18
Multi-use path language in parks code Shared-use path
5
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 3
Page 5 of 21
Shared-Use Paths & Sidewalks
Class 1 & Class 2 E-Bikes and E-Scooters will be allowed on shared-use
paths (canal paths) AND on sidewalks in parks
Shared-use Path
Sidewalk in Park
Photo credit: freespiritwear.com
6
15 MPH Speed Limit
5 MPH Speed Limit
Current
*New*
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 3
Page 6 of 21
Overview
E-Bike
Definition
A vehicle having two or
three wheels, with fully
operable pedals, and
an electric motor not
exceeding seven
hundred fifty (750)
watts of power.
Usage is on the rise.
7
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 3
Page 7 of 21
E-Bike Classifications
Bicycle
Class 1 E-Bike
Class 2 E-Bike
Class 3 E-Bike
Electric Mini
Scooter
Electric Standup
Scooter
Pedal Assist
**
N/A
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
20 MPH
20 MPH
28 MPH
10 MPH
20 MPH
Currently Allowed
in Parks?
Allowed in Parks
w/ Code Updates?
**Class 2 pedaling
NOT REQUIRED for
motor assistance
8
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 3
Page 8 of 21
Clear Definitions: Motor Vehicle
vs. Motorized Electric Vehicle
Motor Vehicle
A self-propelled vehicle or, for the
purposes of the laws relating to the
imposition of a tax on motor vehicle fuel,
a vehicle that is operated on the highways
of this state and that is propelled by the
use of motor vehicle fuel. Motor vehicle
includes, but is not limited to, an all-
terrain vehicle, dune buggy, vehicle fuel
powered automobile or truck, gas
powered moped, motorcycle, motor driven
cycle, motor vehicle, or off-road
recreational motor vehicle.
Motorized Electric Vehicle
A vehicle including, but not limited to, auto
cycle, class 1 electric bicycle*, class 2
electric bicycle*, class 3 electric bicycle,
electric miniature scooter*, electric
mobility device*, electric standup
scooter*, electric powered automobile or
truck, golf cart, electric powered moped,
motorized wheelchair*, motorized
quadricycle, motorized skateboard,
neighborhood electric shuttle,
neighborhood electric vehicle, personal
mobile cargo carrying device, or utility cart.
*Allowed in parks
with code
updates where
bikes are allowed
9
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 3
Page 9 of 21
Watching the speed (5 MPH park speed limit)
Using primarily on sidewalks in parks (NOT
playgrounds, benches, tables, etc.)
Yielding right-of-way to pedestrians or people
using a mobility device
Helmet requirement under 18
*Riders must be 16 – it’s already the law*
What does
“Operated
Safely” Mean?
10
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 3
Page 10 of 21
Seeing Damage Across Parks from
Various Vehicle Types
Motor Vehicle
A self-propelled vehicle or, for the
purposes of the laws relating to the
imposition of a tax on motor vehicle fuel,
a vehicle that is operated on the highways
of this state and that is propelled by the
use of motor vehicle fuel. Motor vehicle
includes, but is not limited to, an all-
terrain vehicle*, dune buggy, vehicle fuel
powered automobile or truck, gas
powered moped*, motorcycle*, motor
driven cycle*, motor vehicle, or off-road
recreational motor vehicle*.
Motorized Electric Vehicle
A vehicle including, but not limited to, auto
cycle, class 1 electric bicycle, class 2
electric bicycle, class 3 electric bicycle*,
electric miniature scooter*, electric mobility
device, electric standup scooter*, electric
powered automobile or truck, golf cart*,
electric powered moped*, motorized
wheelchair, motorized quadricycle*,
motorized skateboard*, neighborhood
electric shuttle, neighborhood electric
vehicle, personal mobile cargo carrying
device, or utility cart.
*Damaging our
parks
11
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 3
Page 11 of 21
Eastmark
Desert Arroyo
Inspirian @ Eastmark
Stapley
Basin 306
Chaparral
Candlelight
12
Inspirian @ Eastmark
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 3
Page 12 of 21
E-Bike Battery Hazards
The Problem
Damaged or defective batteries can overheat,
catch fire, or explode
Lithium-ion battery fires give off toxic gases,
and they burn extremely hot
Signs of a Problem
Unusual odor
Change in color
Too much heat
Change in shape
Leaking
Smoking
Not keeping a charge
13
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 3
Page 13 of 21
E-Bike Battery Hazards
Safety Tips
Only purchase and use devices, batteries, and charging equipment that are listed by a nationally
recognized testing lab and labeled accordingly
Always follow the instructions from the manufacturer
Only use the battery and the charger that were designed for, and came with, the device
Do not keep charging the device or device battery after it is fully charged
Only charge one device or device battery at a time to prevent overloading the circuit
Keep batteries at room temperature when possible. Do not charge them at temperatures below 32°F (0°C)
or above 105°F (40°C)
14
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 3
Page 14 of 21
E-Bike Battery Hazards
Safety Tips
Do not store batteries in direct sunlight or inside hot vehicles and keep away from children and liquids
Store e-bikes, e-scooters, and batteries away from exit doors and anything that can get hot or catch fire
Only have device repairs performed by a qualified professional
Do not put lithium-ion batteries in the trash – recycling is always the best option – take the batteries to a
battery recycling location or contact your local waste department for disposal instructions
If You See a Fire
Leave the building immediately
Don’t try to fight the fire
Call 9-1-1
15
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 3
Page 15 of 21
Mesa, Mind Your
Motors So Good Times
Keep On Rolling
Campaign Goals
1.
Increase safety throughout our community
2.
Reduce property damage incidents
3.
Increase community awareness of laws
4.
Encourage peer accountability and reporting
5.
Position Mesa as a proactive City prioritizing
safety & accessibility
Slow Your Roll. Safety's the Goal.
Safe Rides. Good Vibes.
Share the Space. Enjoy the Place.
Slow Down, So Fun Goes Around.
16
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 3
Page 16 of 21
Mesa, Mind Your Motors So Good
Times Keep On Rolling
Primary Audiences
Parents of Children Ages 10-17
Adult Park Visitors
Property Owners/Nextdoor Users
Secondary Audiences
Teens & Young Adults Ages 13-24
E-Bike Retailers & Rental Companies
Campaign Pillars
Be Mindful Of…
The Law
Safety
Community
Property
17
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 3
Page 17 of 21
Newsletter Articles (partner with HOAs)
Flyers & Postcards
Social Media Posts
Website Updates
Billboards
Mesa, Mind
Your Motors So
Good Times
Keep On Rolling
Community
Awareness
18
Compliance
&
Enforcement
Course
Correction
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 3
Page 18 of 21
Newsletter Articles (partner with HOAs)
Flyers & Postcards
Social Media Posts
Website Updates
Billboards
Mesa, Mind
Your Motors So
Good Times
Keep On Rolling
“Be Mindful
Of…”
Riders must be 16 years or older
E-Bikes and E-Scooters are only allowed
on sidewalks in parks
Helmets are required for riders under 18
5 MPH speed limit in parks
19
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 3
Page 19 of 21
Enforcement Strategy
After a comprehensive educational campaign to the
public with various City of Mesa departments and the
school districts, enforcement deployments will begin
Enforcement efforts will be data-driven to specific
areas with reported criminal damage to COM parks,
high crash locations and reported violations of Mesa
City Code and ARS
Enforcement efforts will include the traffic division
and all five patrol divisions (patrol and specialty units)
20
Vista Monterey
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 3
Page 20 of 21
Thank you
Study Session
December 4, 2025
Attachment 3
Page 21 of 21