Presentation

City of Mesa — City Council (2026-02-09)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 2232 characters
City Council
ZON25-00210
February 9, 2026
Mary Kopaskie-Brown, Planning Director
Evan Balmer, Assistant Planning Director
1

Request
• Rezone from PEP-PAD to 
RM-2-PAD
• Site Plan Review
• To allow for an attached 
Single-Residence 
development
2

Location
• North of US60 Freeway
• East of Crismon Road
• South of Hampton
Avenue
3

General Plan
Current – Urban Center
• Compact mixed-use areas
• Contains retail, entertainment
and recreation facilities and
eating and drinking
establishments
• Single Residential is not a
principal or supporting land use
4

General Plan
Proposed – Urban Residential
• Diverse mixture of uses
• Can contain various low-, 
medium-, and high-density 
housing types
• Single Residential is a principal 
land use
5

Zoning
• Existing: Planned
Employment Park with a
Planned Area Development
(PEP-PAD)
• Proposed: Multiple Residence
2 with a Planned Area
Development (RM-2-PAD)
6

Site Photos
Looking south towards the site from Hampton Avenue 
7

PAD Overlay
The request includes a PAD overlay to allow modifications to the following standards:
•
Lot Area
•
Lot Width and Depth
•
Density
•
Building Coverage
•
Setbacks
In support of the requested PAD, the following has been provided:
• Units engaging Hampton Avenue & adjacent commercial
• A 1,250 sf commercial space
• High-quality elevations
• Enhanced perimeter landscaping
• Exceeding common and private open space & common amenities
9

Site Plan
• 102 attached single-residence lots
• Accessed from shared drive from 
Hampton Avenue & Crismon Road
• Clubhouse and 1,250 sf 
commercial space adjacent to 
shared drive
10

Landscape Plan
11

Elevations
12

Elevations
13

Citizen Participation
• Notified property owners within 
1,000’, HOAs and registered 
neighborhoods
• Applicant held 1 neighborhood 
meeting
• No comments received by Staff or 
Applicant
14

Findings
Complies with the 2050 Mesa General Plan
Complies with the criteria for PAD overlay outlined in MZO Chapter 22
Complies with the criteria for Site Plan Review outlined in MZO Chapter 69
Complies with the criteria for a SUP outlined in MZO Chapters 31 & 70
Staff recommends Approval with Conditions
Planning and Zoning Board recommends Approval with Conditions (6-0)
15

16