Supporting Document (9477bf55...)
City of Scottsdale — Regular Meeting and Work Study Session (2026-07-01)
Extracted text (via pymupdf)
136723 characters
CITY COUNCII
REPORT
Item 10
•¥
*
&
Meeting Date:
General Plan Element:
General Plan Goal:
ACTION
July 1,2026
Land Use
Create a sense of community through land uses
Rivian Service and Delivery Center
ZN-0001-2026
Request to consider the following:
1. Adopt Ordinance No. 4716 a zoning district map amendment from Industrial Park, Planned
Community District (1-1 PCD) to General Commercial, Planned Community District (C-4 PCD)
and a request to amend development standards including Floor Area Ratio, Open Space,
Building Height, and Setbacks, on a +/-5.4 acre portion of a+/- 57.5 acre site located at 17771
N. Pima Road and APNs 215-04-471 and 215-04-470.
Goal/Purpose of Request
The applicant’s request isto amend the previously approved development plan (case 10-Z-1988)
including amended development standards to allow for different land uses, including a new
tenant user to utilize an existing building for a new vehicle service and delivery facility.
Key Items for Consideration
•
Associated previous zoning case 10-ZN-1988
•
Conformance with Scottsdale General Plan 2035, as amended
•
Conformancewith the Greater Airpark Character Area Plan, as amended
•
Consistency with the previously approved MEDCP(case 1-MP-2008)
•
Amended Development Standards
•
Planned Community District Findings
•
To date, one public comment has been received
•
Planning Commission heard this case 6/10/2026 and recommended approval with a vote of
6-0
OWNER_____________________ ______________________________________
101 Bell PI North LLC
Mack Real Estate Group
APPLICANT CONTACT_______________________________________________
George Pasquel III
Action Taken.
Planning Gomitiission Report | ZN-0001-2026: Rivian Rezone
Withey Morris Baugh, PLC
602-230-0600
LOCATION
AT
S
\
sin-iE
■» W-i.
/
17771 N Pima Rd., APNs 215-04-471 and 215-04-470
BACKGROUND ______________________________
General Plan
City of Scottsdale General Plan 2035 designates the property as Employment: Light
Industrial/Office. The Employment: Light Industrial/Office land use category provides a variety of
employitient opportunities, business enterprises, aviation uses, light manufacturing,
warehousing, and other light industrial and heavy commercial type activities.
The subject site is located within the General Plan designated Greater Airpark Growth Area - an
identified location within the community that is most a ppropriate for development focus, a nd will
best accommodate future growth, new development, revitalization, and redevelopment.
Scottsdale's Growth Areas focus on higher intensity development, a planned concentration of
land uses, and enhanced transportation and infrastructure in designated areas.
Character Area Plan
The Greater Airpark Character Area Plan (GACAP) designates the property as Employment (EMP)
land use within the Type C Development Type. This land use category includes an array of office,
commercial, warehousing, and light industrial land uses that provide opportunities for business
enterprises, as well as regional and local jobs. Within the Greater Airpark, Development Types
help define the size and scale of development. Type C development represents medium to higher
scale development, which supports pedestrian activity in the Greater Airpark.
Zoning
The site is currently zoned Industrial Park, Planned Community District (1-1 PCD). The 1-1 zoning
district allows for light manufacturing, light industrial, and other supportive uses but prohibits
vehicle sales, rental, or repair uses within this zoning district.
The proposed General Commercial (C-4) zoning district allows for high intensity uses similar to
those of the 1-1 zoning district and allows for vehicle sales, rental, or repair. As a part of this
fezoning , the applicant is requesting that the C-4 property development standards be amended
to the current 1-1 Zoning Ordinance development standards.
Context
The subject property is located within the Mack 101 development along the east side of the loop
101 Freeway, and west of the DC Ranch neighborhood park, with E. Bell Road to the south, and N.
Pima Road to the north. The Rivian tenant suite is proposed to be located within a portion of one
of the two existing buildings on stie and comprises +/- 65,000 square feet of the overall total +/-
185,000 building square footage. The applicant is also requesting additional parking adjacent to
this site to assist Rivian operations. Please refer to context graphics attached.
Adjacent Uses and Zoning
Page 2 of 9
Planning Commission Report | ZN-0001-2026: Rivian Rezone
•
North: Vacant Light industrial pad within Mack 101 development, zoned Industrial Park
Planned Community District (1-1 PCD).
•
South: Vacant Light industrial pad within Mack 101 development, zoned Industrial Park
Planned Community District (1-1 PCD).
•
East: Existing internalized community storage facility within DC Ranch Corporate Center,
zoned Industrial Park, Planned Community District (1-1 PCD).
•
West: Loop 101 Freeway, further west isthe Perimeter Center development, zoned Industrial
Park Planned Community District (1-1 PCD).
Other Related Policies, References:
Scottsdale General Plan 2035, as amended
The Greater Airpark Character Area Plan
Zoning Ordinance
11 -ZN-1986: Rezoned the subject site from R1 -35 to 1-1 PCD
Case 49-DR-2022#2: design review approval Mack 101 industrial development buildings C & D
Case 1 -MP-2008: established design standards for Mack development
APPLICANT’S PROPOSAL
Development Information
The applicant is requesting to amend the previously approved development plan to allow C-4
land uses and amend the C-4 property development standards to align with the current 1-1
property development standards. The rezone request primarily serves to allow for a vehicle
service, delivery and repair facility to be located within a constructed building at the Mack
Innovation Park.
•
Existing Use:
Light Industrial and Office development
•
Proposed Use:
Vehicle leasing, rental or sales with indoor or outdoor vehicle
display, storage, and vehicle repair
•
Buildings/Description:
Existing 1-story light industrial building
+/-57.49 Acres
+/-5.4 Acres
•
Parcel Size:
•
Rezone Area Size:
Page 3 of 9
Planning Commission Report | ZN-0001-2026: Rivian Rezone
IMPACT ANALYSIS
Land Use
Below is a summary table that compares the existing 1-1 development standards and the
proposed amended C-4 development standards.
Development
Standard
Current C-4 Standards
Current 1-1
Standards
Proposed Amended C-4
standards
(Request)
Floor Area
Ratio
Maximum: 0.80 multiplied by
the net lot area
Maximum: 0.80
multiplied by the net
lot area
Maximum: 0.80
multiplied by the net
lot area
Open Space
Minimum: 0.05 multiplied by
the net lot area.
For building heights over
twelve (12) feet: the minimum
required open space plus
0.004 multiplied bythenetlot
area, for each foot of building
height over twelve (12) feet.
Minimum: 0.10
multiplied by the net
lot area.
For building heights
over twelve (12) feet:
the minimum
required open space
plus 0.003
multiplied by the net
lot area, for each
foot of building
height over twelve
(12) feet.
Minimum: 0.10
multiplied by the net
lot area.
For building heights
over twelve (12) feet:
the minimum required
open space plus 0.003
multiplied by the net
lot area, for each foot
of building height over
twelve (12) feet.
Building
Height
Maximum: thirty-six (36) feet
Maximum: Fifty-two
(52) feet
Maximum: Fifty-two
(52) feet
Yards: Front
Front minimum: Twenty (20)
feet.
Front minimum:
Twenty (20) feet.
Front minimum:
Twenty (20) feet.
Airport Vicinity
As part of the development process within proximity to the airport, the applicant is required to submitfor
an FAA Determination (Form 7460-1) on any proposed structures to make sure the buildings will not be a
hazardfor aircraft. Before final plan approval, the owner shall submitthe FAA response to FAA Form 7460-
1. Airport staff reviewed the application and indicated support of the proposal subject to the review and
approval of the FAA.
Page 4 of 9
Planning Commission Report | ZN-0001-2026: Rivian Rezone
PCD Findings/Criteria
A. That the development proposed isin substantial harmony with the General Plan oftheCityof
Scottsdale and can be coordinated with existing and planned development of surrounding
areas.
•
The proposed development plan amendment is in substantial harmony with the
General Plan ‘Employment: Light tndustrial/Office land use designation. The proposal
intends to utilize existing buildings fora new user.
B. That the streets and thoroughfares proposed are suitable and adequate to serve the
proposed uses and the anticipated traffic which will be generated thereby.
•
The existing established street system is not impacted with this request. Internal
streets have been constructed to provide access to N. Pima Road to the north, newly
constructed N. 91^ Street to the east, E. Bell Road to the south, and the Loop 101
frontage to the west.
C. The Planning Commission and City Council shall further find that the facts submitted with
the application and presented at the hearing will establish beyond reasonable doubt that:
1. In the case of proposed development, that such development will constitute a residential
environment of sustained desirability and stability; that it will be in harmony with the
character ofthe surrounding area; andthatthesites proposed for public facilities, such
as schools, playgrounds and parks, are adequate to serve the anticipated population. The
Planning Commission and City Council shall be presented written acknowledgment of
this from the appropriate school district, the Scottsdale Parks and Recreation
Commission and any other responsible agency.
The proposed development plan does not include residential uses.
2.
3.
In the case of proposed industrial or research uses, that such development will be
appropriate in area, location and overall planning to the purpose intended; and thatthe
design and development standards are such as to create an industrial environment of
sustained desirability and stability.
• Although the request is to implement new land uses within an existing industrial park,
those additional uses do not fundamentally cause concern forthe surroundings as the
additional uses ^vehicle sales, rental, or repair) are similar uses to those ofthe 1-1
zoning district and commonly found in the Greater Airpark Character Area. This
request does seek amended development standards, but no major modifications to
the existing building would need to be made.
In the case of proposed commercial, educational, cultural, recreational and other
nonresidential uses, that such development will be appropriate in area, location and
overall planning to the purpose intended; and that such development will be in harmony
with the character of the surrounding areas.
Page 5 of 9
Planning Commission Report | ZN-0001-2026: Rivian Rezone
• The proposed development plan amendment will be in full conformance with the
amended C-4 property development standards. The scale and intensity of the
development proposed is congruent with surrounding sites. The proposed
development plan will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding area,
which shares the same property development standards.
Transportation
The proposed rezoning associated with the Rivian development is anticipated to generate an
additional 1,714 daily trips, 99 AM peak hour trips and 116 PM peak hour trips compared to
previous land use assumptions. The results of the queueing analysis indicate that queues at the
dedicated left-turn and right-turn lanes are anticipated to remain similarto queues under previous
land use assumptions. Therefore, the left-turn and right-turn lane lengths previously
recommended atthe study intersections in the approved TIMAs forthe overall Mack development
are recommended to be maintained.
Water/Sewer
The applicant provided Basis of Design reports for water and sewer have been accepted by the
Water Resources Division. The City of Scottsdale is an Arizona Department of Water Resources
designated provider with a 100 years Assured Water Supply and will supply water in accordance
with City codes, ordinances, and the City’s Drought Management Plan. All infrastructure
upgrades necessary to serve this project will be completed by the applicant.
Fire/Police
The nearest fire station is within 1 mile of the site and is located at 18455 N Hayden Rd. The subject
site is sen/ed by Police District Foothills, Beat 18. As with any project that contributes to growth,
the fire department and police department continually anticipate and evaluate resource needs
forthe city’s budget process.
Open Space
The development conforms with the overall open space requirement with a minimum requirement
of 216,670 square feet and a provided amount of 265,306 square feet. This request will have no
effect on the established desert arroyos or landscaping .
Housing Cost
The approval of the zoning district map amendment proposed by the applicant provides an
opportunityforadditionalcommercialusesfortheexistingproperty. In conjunction with state law,
staff has considered the scope of the zoning district map amendment, as well as aspects which
would affect the cost of construction of housingforsaleor rent. Staff has notidentified anyfactors
that would substantially impact the cost to construct housing for sale or rent.
Community Involvement
The City of Scottsdale promotes public participation in the development of the built environment.
The applicant complied with the city’s suggested best practices for public outreach. Atthe time
of writingthis report, staff only received one public comment requesting additional information
from the applicant about potential noise, pollution, and water usage.
Page 6 of 9
Planning Commission Report | ZN-0001-2026: Rivian Rezone
Significant Updates to Development Proposal Since Initial Submittal
•
Added on-site amenities for customers and employees
•
Added masonry screen walls and mature landscaping along N. Pima Road frontage
Community Impact
The proposed development will not create any significant adverse effects on the surrounding
development or the community at large.
Other Boards and Commissions
Planning Commission:
Planning Commission heard this case on June 10,2026 arid recommended approval with a 6-0
vote.
Recommended Approach:
Staff recommended that the Planning Commission find that the Planned Community District
criteria have been met, and determine that the proposed zoning district map amendment,
development plan, and amended development standards are consistent and conform with the
adopted General Plan, and makea recommendation to City Councilfor approval, per the attached
stipulations.
(RECOMMENDATION
Recommended Approach:
Adopt Ordinance No. 4716 a zoning district map amendment from Industrial Park, Planned
CommunityDistrict (1-1 PCD)to General Commercial, Planned Community District (C-4 PCD) and
a request to amend development standards including Floor Area Ratio, Open Space, Building
Height, and Setbacks, on a +/- 5.4 acre portion of a +/- 57.5 acre site located at 17771 N. Pima
Road and APNs 215-04-471 and 215-04-470.
RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACTS
Planning and Development
Services
Current Planning Services
Chris Zimmer
Senior Planner
480-312-2347
Email: czimmer@scottsdaleaz.gov
PublicWorks
Traffic Engineering
John Hoang
Senior Manager - Traffic Engineering
480-312-7645
Email: jhoang@scottsdaleaz.gov
Community & Economic
Development
Stormwater Management
Ghassan Aouad
Stormwater Engineer Senior
480-312-7055
Email: gaouad@scottsdaleaz.gov
Engineering Services
Water Resources
Rezaur Rahman
Water Resources Engineer Principal
480-312-5636
Email: rrahman@scottsdaleaz.gov
Page 7 of 9
Planning Commission Report | ZN-0001-2026: Rivian Rezone
Urmas Grossthal
Water Resources Engineer Principal
480-312-2831
Email: ugrossthal@scottsdaleaz.gov
Community & Economic
Development
Plan Review
Eliana Hayes
Development Engineering Manager
480-312-2757
Email: ehayes@scottsdaleaz.gov
Public Safety-Fire
Fire & Life Safety Services
Linda Wilson
Senior Plans Examiner
480-312-2372
Email: lwilson@scottsdaleaz.gov
Page 8 of 9
Planning Commission Report | ZN-0001-202e: Rivian Rezone
APPROVED BY
6/15/2026
Chris Zimmer, Senior Planner
Date
6/14/2026
Tim Curtis, AlCP, Current Planning Director
Planning Commission Liaison
Phone: 480-312-4210 Email: tcurtis@scottsdaleaz.gov
Date
'TJ!.
06/11/2026
Erin Perreault, AlCP, Executive Director
Planning and Development Services
Phone: 480-312-7093 Email: eperreault@scottsdaleaz.gov
Date
ATTACHMENTS
1. Context Aerial
2. Aerial Close-Up
3. Ordinance No. 4716
Exhibit 1: Zoning Map
Exhibit 2: Stipulations
Exhibit A to Exhibit 2: Rivian Development plan
4. Existing General Plan Land Use Map
5. Greater Airpark Character Area Land Use Plan
6. ExistingZoningMap
7. Zoning Land Use Comparison Summary
8. Traffic Impact Summary
9. Community Involvement
10. Correspondence
11 .City Notification Map
12. Planning Commission Draft Meeting Minutes June 10, 2026
Page 9 of 9
Ml
v/',,^2S223i£2^
''#avs
mmm
■ i__jt^.—"ac^g*.
1
tnifnni
UlnUJM
,.i-
^!P'
fclH^^pa
W, :
J_
^SteS^*^hvieiiwtili^D,^ll^L^ \
^—f-ttVesfworMDrS— %
'
- : p ;* ^;: >;>#1
:' '.life; J
Context Aerial
|ZN-0001-2026|
ATTACHMENT #1
yi.
y
5^
4
A
.>
Stale'ii
Law Firm
A-
■Si?
-jf
Jr
2
DC;fi
rt'O’'
y
m
» •.
.r'.
‘■ie.
%
Jy
v:
101
^ *“.Sitel
’♦
Se
'a
j.f'
,5
i/R-
s
’yi
5'
?
1»
rev
irU
is*
1
1
*
»
■• ir^iM
wr.
»**
T>.
•SI..
'jf
■?r^ .*=«‘
fa
Q.s. _______
37-49
''^^^^iGoogleEarthProlmage^
^ i
E.'.BellRd *^i..-r%wieir>g^-
Close-up Aerial
ATTACHMENT #2
i
i-
:,'j
5
J-v
•'
m
l&i:
ir-A
•'»-
^ vii
•1
i.
■>■
‘sA
Vi
'r
.i
V' ^:^> •
V .
?t:>
■r:
k-: -••: •».
•i.
1*
t
C* ».:-«
lij
:<
rsm^/„>r^
|ZN-0001-20^
ORDINANCE NO. 4716
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCOTTSDALE.
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA. AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 455. THE
ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SCOTTSDALE. BY AND FOR THE
PURPOSE OF CHANGING THE ZONING ON THE “DISTRICT MAP" TO
ZONING APPROVED IN CASE NO. ZN-0001-2026 FROM INDUSTRIAL
PARK PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT (I-1 PCD) TO GENERAL
COMMERCIAL PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT (C-4 PCD), AND A
REQUEST TO AMEND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS INCLUDING FLOOR
AREA RATIO, OPEN SPACE, BUILDING HEIGHT. AND SETBACKS. ON A
+/-5.4 ACRE PORTION OF A +/-57.5 ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 17771 N.
PIMA ROAD AND APNs 215-04-471 AND 215-04-470.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a hearing on June 10, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the probable impact of Zoning Ordinance
No. 4716 on the cost to construct housing for sale or rent; and
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission has made findings in conformance with the
requirements of the PCD district and the City Councii also finds:
A. That the deveiopment proposed is in substantial harmony with the General Plan, and
can be coordinated with existing and planned development of surrounding areas.
B. That the streets and thoroughfares proposed are suitable and adequate to serve the
proposed uses and the anticipated traffic which will be generated thereby.
C. The Planning Commission and City Council shall find that the facts submitted with
the application and presented at the hearing establish beyond reasonable doubt that:
1. In the case of proposed industrial or research uses, that such development will be
appropriate in area, location and overall planning to the purpose intended; and that the design
and development standards are such as to create an industrial environment of sustained
desirability and stability.
2. In the case of proposed commercial, educational, cultural, recreational and other
nonresidential uses, that such development will be appropriate in area, location and
overall planning to the purpose intended; and that such development will be in harmony with the
character of the surrounding areas.
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposed development is in substantial
harmony with the General Plan of the City of Scottsdale and will be coordinated with existing
and planned development; and
WHEREAS, it is now necessary that the comprehensive zoning map of the City of
Scottsdale (“District Map”) be amended to conform with the decision of the Scottsdale City
Council in Case No. ZN-0001-2026.
follows:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Scottsdale, as
19262341
Ordinance No. 4716
Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT #3
Section 1. That the “District Map” adopted as a part of the Zoning Ordinance of the City
of Scottsdale, showing the zoning district boundaries, is amended by rezoning a +/- 5.4 acre site
located at the 17771 N. Pima Road and APNs 215-04-471 and 215-04-470 and marked as “Site”
(the Property) on the map attached as Exhibit 1, incorporated herein by reference, from
Industrial Park, Planned Community District (1-1 PCD) to General Commercial, Planned
Community District (C-4 PCD).
Section 2. That the above rezoning approval is conditioned upon compliance with all
stipulations attached hereto as Exhibit 2 incorporated herein by reference.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Scottsdale, Maricopa County,
Arizona this______ day of______________, 2026.
ATTEST;
CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, an Arizona
municipal corporation
By:.
Ben Lane
City Clerk
By:.
Lisa Borowsky
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO
.7
By:
LuisE>6antaella, City Attorney
By; Joe Padilla, Deputy City Attorney
Ordinance No. 4716
Page 2 of 2
1
j: h-
eo
0)
»»• ^'hj;
-O
3(0
(0
o
G-2 PCD,
o
O'
c.
0€ PCD,
\
s Si
2i
■(eslYhd)
✓
\
«s>.
'
^ \
(M
NORTH
<S3 I
Rr7iPCD,
0)
3MD
P.CD,
(U*
fwl
«<»
<x
Br
BenS
00 P.GD.
R-:5.P.GD.
oo
PCD
t
I
t
E. Hartford Drive
Q.S.
37-49
t
t
I
Zoning Graphic
,ao»|PrftnW,
ggBB I
ir^
R1-7iPCD
ESL^HD)
to
£
<s
Z
PRQP.CD
CIS'PJ^Dj PCD >CD ll-lllP.CPl ■gI3>.CD:
R-AESL^
Zoning
Ordinance No. 4716
Exhibit 1
Page 1 of 1
ZN-0001-2026
Stipulations for the Zoning Application:
Rivian Rezone
Application Number: ZN-0001-2026
These stipulations are in order to protect the public health, safety, welfare, and the City of Scottsdale.
SITE DESIGN
1. CONFORMANCE TO DEVELOPMENT PLAN. Development shall conform with the “Rivian
Development Plan” attached as Exhibit A to Exhibit 2 incorporated into these stipulations and
ordinance by reference as if fully set forth herein. Any proposed significant change to the
Development Plan, as determined by the Zoning Administrator, shall be subject to additional action
and public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council. Where there is a conflict
between the Development Plan and these stipulations, these stipulations shall prevail.
2. CONFORMANCE TO AMENDED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. Development shall conform
with the amended development standards, as shown in the development plan. Any change to the
development standards shall be subject to additional public hearings before the Planning Commission
and City Council.
INFRASTRUCTURE
3. WASTEWATER LINE. The Developer shall design and construct an eight (8) inch, dry, sewer main
from N Pima Road, at the existing, dry, sewer crossing, within existing water and sewer facilities
easement and right-of-way to the existing eighteen (18) inch sewer main crossing of the ADOT 101,
connecting into same; an approximately twelve hundred (1200) lineal foot Dry Sewer Extension. The
design of the Dry Sewer Extension shall occur such that within six (6) months of zoning adoption, the
Developer shall complete the design of the Dry Sewer Extension and submit to the City for approval.
The completion of the Dry Sewer Extension shall occur such that within twenty-four (24) months of
zoning adoption, the Developer shall have constructed and caused the city to accept the Dry Sewer
Extension.
4. WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENTS. The property owner shall provide all water and
■ wastewater infrastructure improvements, including any new service lines, connection, fire-hydrants,
and man-holes, necessary to serve the development.
5. WATER DEMAND. Water usage within the zoning boundary, as verified through water billing,
shall not exceed an average daily demand of one hundred ninety-eight (198) gallons per minute, a
max daily demand of three hundred ninety-five gallons per minute (395 gpm), or a peak daily demand
of eight hundred sixty-three gallons per minute (863 gpm), any underage's remain the property of the
city.
Ordinance No. 4716
Exhibit 2
Page 1 of2
EXTERIOR LIGHTING:
6.
7.
All exterior luminaires shall have integral lighting shield and be directed downward, including
landscape lighting.
All exterior luminaires mounted eight (8) feet or higher above finished grade, shall be directed
downward and have an integral lighting shield.
8. Any exterior luminaire with a total initial lumen output of greater than 1600 lumens shall have an
integral lighting shield.
9. Any exterior luminaire with a total initial lumen output of greater than 30S0 lumens shall be directed
downward and comply with the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IBS)
requirements for full cutoff.
10. The initial vertical luminance at 6-foot above grade, along the north, south, east, west, property line
shall not exceed 0.3 foot-candles. All exterior luminaires shall be included in this calculation.
11. All exterior luminaires shall meet all lES requirements for full cutoff and shall be aimed downward
and away from property line except for sign and landscape lighting.
12. Incorporate the following parking lot and site lighting into the project’s design:
a. The maintained average horizontal luminance level, at grade on the site, shall not exceed 2.0 foot-
candles. All exterior luminaires shall be included in this calculation.
b. The maintained maximum horizontal luminance level, at grade on the site, shall not exceed 8.0
foot-candles. All exterior luminaires shall be included in this calculation.
c. The initial vertical luminance at 6-foot above grade, along the entire property line shall not
exceed 0.8 foot-candles. All exterior luminaires shall be included in this calculation.
d. AH exterior lighting shall have a color temperature of 3,000 Kelvin or less.
e. The total lumen per luminaire shall not exceed 24,000 lumens.
REPORTS AND STUDIES
13. DRAINAGE REPORT. The development shall conform with submitted drainage report submitted
with this review, in accordance with the Design Standards and Policies Manual to the
satisfaction of stormwater staff.
Ordinance No. 4716
Exhibit 2
Page 2 of2
\
Rivian Development plan
Ordinance No. 4716
Exhibit A to Exhibit 2
Page 1 of 4
I
iiSi
/
III
f :
V
\
\
53 V
— [i 1!
ZONWCrW ^ \lW
ZOMNO OS
I
oi
-'j
\
►
o
CO
B
9-
<j
a
9
/■,
I
£
iiV
»7
SF
\
V>
t
\
\
H
I
m
m
±u;
im
\
\
}
LUIJ m
V
\
\
\
\
r:
(
0
I;
1J
\
\
FUirURE
ta t
f
PHASE'
\
\
\
t
\
I
\
\
mfflosF
S!S
\
N
jso-n
\
\
£
\
1
I
I
\
\
:rv-ijC5
\
V\
©
\
184^ SF
i«—iFioii«iawt.i
\
TO
\\
mm
>
m
w
/
\
A
\
ZONMG:M
7
/
m
:
Ftf
33
///
/ //
> /
/
'/
®
i
i2o,4irsr
s.
M
1^
ZOMNO: (•1
"1
V
s
k
tniAMAC
igfi
I
>jaTi
1
Tid “d rd “d
-ss-
TWMt|
^AMONd.
wiT
ifiv ii-y n^mmM
mn-e M»e
.-r: i.'.r 4’, mh^e:
dgSB
TOTM.
TOTAL
FS£::r •
«i
SITE PLAN KEYNOTES
I. UBTKFIKHrDMMT
I
toiaewmwc
1 «v.TiuiHcoi».w»o«ioe»Tie»>
4. aniwcnmuM
L tMDMMtfDCUMMOMei
ATfMUWM
A WCWCM PMCQiMMTZiM
EASEMENT LEGEND
(M«Mn04Da«*W
0ra>MfEA9e«HT
@DA««eW«»T
(2)«T«B«*MT
, nvTTPCMN
L ritmcMevciMM
U. UTtmtMMMTW.eMeNM
tv VMUrrtMMMVfLM
«. MttUMmTUM
a. rtowMwuav.MTTBVuuMlT
H fHTMrUMOMtTMkLTVP.
m. CtMWetSBfWrtfMMCMCWF.
0 moRMB) nj«£ uTurr e
0 BOSTMOKWaieMCMENr
®
®
0 Bomo W COUNTY MOMWY
t>«tgMtMTTOMAe«ICI0»*0
0 l«OU«S V iAWCMTs: 0
ENLARGED SITE PLAN - NORTH
itWF.eeiMKfM
BCMXr-tTO
atM«ni.Ci4>fM WM*l_D3»2t
K >1 A
I / INNOVATION
MACK PARK
e. t>t *» IW»B«Cioaoxt ti»twM
M «MMTVMei.MIBMt.eeiMCD
1 rtA
MACK
REAL
ESTATE
GROUP
NEC Loop 101 & Bell Road
SCOTTSDALE, AZ
Ordinance No. 4716
Exhibit A to Exhibit 2
Page 2 of 4
RZ21-Cm
I--
Butler Design Group. ir»c
DfcMtuos & ptoPfW
;
I .
: i .
\ .. .■ •
Legislative Draft of C-4 Development Standards
CHANGES MADE ARE SHOWN IN STRIKE-THROUGH AND BOLD AND UPPERCASE
Sec. 5.1600. - General Commercial (C-4).
Sec. 5.1601. - Purpose.
The C-4 District is intended to provide space for the heaviest type of commercial activities
found in the city, including iight manufacturing, warehousing, whoiesaling and vehicle leasing,
rental, sales and repair. This district provides opportunities for light industrial uses in order to
sustain and enhance the community's economic viability and employment opportunities. The
development standards are intended to provide development flexibility consistent with the
community's sensitive design principles, and appropriate transition in areas adjacent to
residential districts.
Sec. 5.1602. - Reserved.
Sec. 5.1603. - Use regulations.
A.
Permitted uses. Buildings, structures, or premises shali be used and buildings and structures
shali hereafter be erected, altered, or enlarged only for the following uses:
1. Any use shown as permitted in Tabie 11.201.A., subject to the limitations as listed.
B.
Uses permitted by conditional use permit.
1. Any use shown as permitted by conditional use permit in Table 11.201 .A., subject to the
limitations as iisted, and any additionai conditional use permit criteria.
Sec. 5.1604. - Property deveiopment standards.
The foliowing property development standards shall apply to all land and buildings in the C-
4 District.
A.
Floor area ratio.
1.
Maximum: 0.80 muitiplied by net lot area.
B.
Required open space.
1.
MINIMUM: 0.10 MULTIPLIED BY THE NET LOT AREA. Total open space.
a—Minimum: 0.05 multiplied by the net lot area.
2. b;—For building heights over twelve (12) feet: the minimum open space requirement
plus 0.0043 multiplied by the net lot area for each additional foot of building height
over twelve (12) feet.
2^—Total open space is distributed as follows:
€h—Frontage open spaee-minimum: 0.50 multiplied by the required total open
spacer
br—The remainder of the total open space, less the frontage open space, shall be
common open space.
3.
Parking areas and parking lot landscaping are not inciuded in the required open
space.
Ordinance No. 4716
Exhibit A to Exhibit 2
Page 3 of 4
4. NAOS may be included in the required open space.
C.
Building height.
1. Maximum: Thirty-six (36) FIFTY-TWO (62) feet, except as otherwise provided in
Article VII.
D.
Yards.
1. Front MINlMUM:Yard-TWENTY (20) FEET.
%—No front yard is required except as required in Article VII and this subsection
br- -if a bloek-is partly in a residential-distriGt shown on Table <1.100.-A., or the
residential portion of a Planned Community P-C or any portion of a Planned
Residential-Development PRD with-an underlying zoning district comparable to
the front yard-regulations of
B
2.
Refer-4o-B:2.a: above, Frontage open space-minimum.
Side and rear minimum: THIRTY (30)F-ifly (50) feet from a single-family residential
district SHOWN ON TABLE 4.100.A, OR THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF A P-
C, OR ANY PORTION OF A PRD WITH AN UNDERLYING ZONING DISTRICT
COMPARABLE TO THE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS SHOWN ON TABLE
4.100.A.and-twenty-five (25) feet--from a - multiple-family residential district.
E.
3. All outdoor activities, including storage, minimum: Fifty (50) feet from a residential
district as shown on Table 4.100.A., or the residential portion of a Planned
Community P-C or any portion of a Planned Residential Development PRD with an
underlying zoning district comparable to the residential districts shown on Table
4.100. A.
Screening.
1.
All activities, mechanical equipment, outdoor storage, and refuse areas shall be
within an enclosed building, or screened by a solid wall at least six (6) feet in height
or as otherwise approved by the Development Review Board.
2.
No outdoor storage shall be visible from off-site.
3.
Other requirements and exceptions are as specified in Article VII and Article X.
Sec. 5.1605. - General provisions.
Unless otherwise provided in this district, the provisions of Article VII shall apply.
Sec. 5.1606. - Signs.
The provisions of Article VIII shall apply.
Sec. 5.1607. - Off-street parking.
The provisions of Article IX shall apply.
Sec. 5.1608. - Landscaping.
Unless otherwise provided, the provisions of Article X. apply.
Ordinance No. 4716
Exhibit A to Exhibit 2
Page 4 of 4
imm
Emp/oymSif: Light
Industrial/Office
\
£, Princess
E. Bell Road
Q.S.
37-49
Deve/opedl
Open5pac3
Cultural/lnstifutional
or Public Use
I
-K
M
z
"i:il
i^ 3t-
if'
Employment: Light
Industrial/Office I
Urbam -
Neighborhoods
Employment: Light
Industrial/OfficeCommercial
Existing General Plan 2035 Future Land Use Map
+/- 5.4-acres of Employment: Light Industrial / Office
|ZN-0001-202^
ATTACHMENT #4
Legend
Land Use Plan:
Aapark Mixed Use-
Residential (AMU-R)
Airpartc Mixed Use (AMU)
Regional Tourism |RT)
Employment (EMP)
Aviation (AV)
open Space (OS]
iiiZLJ AVotAMU
Greater Airpork Boundory
: >>>>>>> Signature Corridor
Powerfne Corridor
Central Arizono Proiect
Rointree, between Hoyden
and Scottsdale Roods, is
subject to change os a port
of engineering associated
with street improvements
/
EMP
i
So
I \'
RT
- *
Site
' mu vi>'>>>H>a«>>>>>>>>»^
A .
0
0
i
m
AMU
RT
U
EMP
?»>
»»»
■<
Jf
A-*'
»»»>■»'
cO
^,6
>AMU
'IJK'U-) 1>K
AV
J-
1“
; Emp
V
o.
IMUNUKUIK[iKT.I
OctetHrM.MtO
Octotwrlt.SOIt MP-mi
Octab«2S,20)1
AprilS.}«U I0^2tll
OK«nb« 12014 S^»I4
Noir«rte 14.7016 J-GP-7016
Oclotw 1.7019 7-O> 7019
Am Kl 2020 7-<V^»t9
N
1
1 Mile
Greater Airpark
Land Use Plan
ZN-0001-2026
ATTACHMENT #5
/
t4. ^Sfh
■c ^
00 ^
S S!
z ^
■Z.
V
<9
O
G?2 PGD
(0
, p,ince
j>p
00 PGD
<8
e»
.n Dr/V^
%
,I0?PGD
\
(M
\
I
\
\
I
n
■EsJmDy
(SS I
Rl-7iRGD
o
SHE)
1331
P.GD
a>
v»
V
<0
z*
LRo/o
Br
BenB
OQ P.GD
R:5,PGD,
PGD
(U
45
to
O*
E. Hartford Drive
Q.S.
37-49
Zoning Graphic
t
I
I
P'/GJ2 rsB
E.,Bell,RdadI fela'PGD
Rl-TiPGD.
ESL'(HD)
z
PRG P.GD
lEonr
iM»j
R-AESL^
Existing Zoning
ZN-0001-2026
ATTACHMENT #6
SUMMARY OF C-4 AND 1-1 LAND USES
UNO USES
zoNiNCriaifmicTs-
PenTittted(P)ar
CohdltiWUse^
•'■^rC-4:
Aeronautical use, except off-airport heliport or helipad
P
Amusement and theme parks
CU
Appliance sales
P
Arts and craft production
P
Auction sales
CU
Big box
P/CU
Building material and garden sales
P
Carwash
CU
Courier and messenger
P
Data processing, hosting and related service
P
Day care center with drop off or outdoor play area farther than 100 feet from a residential district
P
P
Day care center with drop off or outdoor play area within 100 feet of a residential district
CU
Educational service, elementary and secondary school
P
CU
Educational service, other than elementary and secondary school
P
P
Electronic shopping and mail-order sen/ice
P
Equipment storage
P
Equipment sales, rental, and storage
P
Farm supply sales
P
Financial institution
P/CU
Funeral home and funeral services
Furniture and home furnishing sales
P
P
Gas station
CU
General and specialty trade contractors
P
Health and fitness studio
P
industrial launderer
P
Internalized community storage
P
P
Light manufacturing
P
P
Medical and diagnostics laboratory
P
Medical marijuana caregiver cultivation
CU
Medical marijuana use
CU
Multifamily Conversion
P
Multimedia production with communication tower equal to or less than 100 feet in height
P
P
Multimedia production with communication tower over 100 feet in height
CU
CU
Multimedia production without communication tower
P
P
Municipal use
p
P
Off*alrport heliport or helipad
CU
Office
P
Outdoor sales display area
CU
Personal care service
P
Place of worship
P
Recyclable material collection center
P
Repair and maintenance
P
Restaurant, excluding drive-through restaurant and excluding drive-ln restaurant
P
Restaurant, including drive-through restaurant but excluding drive-ln restaurant
Restaurant, including drive-through restaurant and including drtve-in restaurant
CU
Restoration service
P
Scenic and sightseeing transportation
P
Scientific research and development
P
P
Seasonal art festival
CU
Swimming pool sales, including display pools only and including construction equipment storage yard
P
Swimming pool sales. Including display pools only, but excluding construction equipment storage yard
P
Taxi and limousine service
P
Towing service
CU
Travel accommodation
Utility service yard
P
CU
Vehicle emissions testing facility
P
P
Vehicle leasing, rental or sales with indoor or outdoor vehicle display and storage
P
Vehicle leasing, rental or sales with indoor vehicle display and storage located in an enclosed building
P
Vehicle repair
P
Vehicle storage adjacent to residential districts
P
CU
Vehicle storage not adjacent to residential districts
P
P
Veterinary and pet care service
P
Wholesale, warehouse and distribution
P
P
Wireless communications facility. Type 1,2, and 3
P
P
Wireless communications facility, Type 4
CU
CU
ATTACHMENT#?
Kimley»>Horn
January 9, 2026
APPROVED
Brad Kanwischer, VP, Development Equity Investment
Mack Real Estate Group
2415 E Camelback Rd, Suite 920
Phoenix, AZ 85016
RE: Rivian Traffic Impact Statement - Scottsdale, Arizona
Dear Mr. Kanwischer:
This statement documents the trip generation of the proposed automobile sales and service
center, identified as Rivian, that is proposed to be located within the Mack Innovation Park on the
southeast corner of the intersection of State Route 101 (SRI 01) & Pima Road in Scottsdale,
Arizona. A portion of the warehousing land use that was previously planned within the Mack
Innovation Park development, the first two buildings are nearing completion of construction, is
proposed to be rezoned from 1-1 (PCD) to C-2 prior to development of the Rivian site.
Approximately 65,566 square feet (SF) of warehousing land use and a portion of the parking is
proposed to be rezoned for use by the Rivian site. A copy of the project site plan is provided in
Attachment 1.
Kimley-Horn previously analyzed the trip generation of the overall site in two traffic impact and
mitigation analyses (TIMAs), SEC SR101 and Pima Road Traffic impact and Mitigation Anaiysis,
and NEC SR101 and Beii Road Traffic impact and Mitigation Analysis, in September 2023. Both
TIMAs have since been approved by the City of Scottsdale and the Arizona Department of
Transportation (ADOT). Relevant excerpts from the approved TIMAs are included in
Attachment 2.
SITE ACCESS
No new site access points are proposed with the Rivian site. Access to the site will be provided
by the site driveways described in the approved TIMAs, which have been constructed at the time
of this statement as part of the Mack Innovation Park’s offsite improvements. All offsite roadway
and intersection improvements have also been constructed at the time of this statement.
TRIP GENERATION
The trip generation of the currently proposed Rivian site was compared to that of the previously
proposed warehousing land use. Trip generation projections for the currently proposed site were
estimated using the weekday trip generation rates published by the Institute of Transportation
Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 12"’ Edition. Trip generation projections for the
previously proposed warehousing land use were estimated using the weekday trip generation
rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11'"
Edition to maintain consistency with the methodology of the previously approved TIMAs. Table 1
summarizes the trip generation comparison. Trip generation calculations are provided in
Attachment 3.
kimley-horn.com
ATTACHMENT #8
1661 East Camelback Road, Suite 400, Phoenix, AZ 85016
602 944 5500
KimIey»>Horn
Page 2
Table 1: Trip Generation Comparison
Land Use
Land
Use
Code
Size/
Quantity
Units
Daily
Total Weekday Trips
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In
Out Total
In
Out Total
Current Land Use Assumptions (ITE 12*^ Edition)
Automobile
Sales (New)
840
65,566
SF
1,826
80
30
110
51
77
128
Previous Land Use Assumptions (iTE Edition)
Warehousing
150
65,566
SF
112
8
3
11
3
9
12
Difference 1,714
72
27
99
48
68
116
Compared to previous land use assumptions, the proposed land use is expected to generate
1,714 additional daily trips, with 99 additional trips during the AM peak hour and 116 additional
trips during the PM peak hour. The additional peak hour trips generated by the proposed site
exceed the threshold of 100 peak hour trips that would generally require additional traffic analysis.
Therefore, additional analysis was performed to determine if the previous turn lane storage length
recommendations would accommodate the additional traffic.
REVISED 2028 TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUME PROJECTIONS
Revised 2028 total traffic volumes for the overall Mack Innovation Park under current land use
assumptions were estimated using the 2028 total traffic volumes previously developed in the
approved TIMAs and the traffic assignment of the additional trips generated by the proposed land
use change. The additional trips, shown as the difference between the previous and current land
uses’ trip generation in Table 1, were distributed and assigned to the surrounding roadway
network based on the methodology described in the approved TIMAs. The additional site traffic
assignment was added to the 2028 total traffic under previous land use assumptions to obtain
revised 2028 total traffic volume projections. The study area intersections from the approved
TIMAs were maintained. Relevant excerpts from the approved TIMAs are included in
Attachment 2.
Figure 1 shows the additional site traffic assignment associated with proposed change in land
use. Figure 2 shows the revised 2028 total traffic volumes.
kimley-horn.com I 1661 East Camelback Road, Suite 400, Phoenix, AZ 85016
1602 944 5500
J
I
I
-itr
r
t
T
§
III
a
/
..T
s
Trails de View
1(1
ii
oS>
1(1)
-»
C##
•s
M
8>
a
i»w
Pnposed
D
r
a.
O'
=•
-ll
•it?
\-
'4
tr
-=■«—T 'n'-
;Tfn ^1j
1(1)
mm M
S g-^Kil
53
1^ i
4a
I
«(t)
i
«(i»
Ip)
Bell Rd
-I
4a
i §
4«
Frank Uoyd Wright Blvd
J \
T
4«
4a
m
I
AM(PM) PEAK HOUR
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Kimley>^Horn
Figure 1
Additional Site Traffic Assignrrent
January 2026
SECSR101 and Pima Rd | Traffic Impact Statement
fin
I7D(47I]
if
Ji
r
Tr
“=:u
90am
mum
IfTWTH)
M(7t)
mA
§
iM(?q
I
II
Trailskie View
4n»»
1t4(417)
S
'S
CO
ts
a
Dnakoncnt
tr
5
O'
'V
8>
•^JITOW)
»a»
•\rriiy
:
>1
ll
'.T,
M
im
ji\.
.E
:~.-
11
P!
./ll.
i2<:^
BeiIRd
I
«-i«
«»
1(7t(l»1l
Frank Uoyd Wright Btvd
♦-taTtiaq
nMii)
;il,
I
itr
«o«ai
sy
•mtrm
w/vv^
PEAR hour
TRWWV0UJM6S
Kimiey>^Horn
Figure 2
2028 Total Traffic and Recommended Geometry
January 2026
SEC SRI 01 and Pima Rd | TrafRc impact Statement
Kimley»>Horn
Page 5
TURN LANE STORAGE LENGTH ANALYSIS
After reviewing the results of the additional site traffic assignment shown in Figure 1, any
intersections with a negligible increase in turning movement volumes were excluded from the
storage length calculations since the added volumes would not be expected to significantly
change the results. The following intersections were considered in the storage analysis (further
referred to as the “study intersections”):
SRI 01 SB Frontage Road & Pima Road/Princess Drive
SRI 01 NB Frontage Road & Pima Road/Princess Drive
SRI 01 NB Frontage Road & Bell Road
•
SRI 01 SB Frontage Road & Bell Road
•
SRI 01 NB Frontage Road & Frank Lloyd Wright Boulevard
SRI 01 SB Frontage Road & Frank Lloyd Wright Boulevard
Driveway D1 & Pima Road
• SRI 01 SB Frontage Road & Driveway D2
Queueing was analyzed at the dedicated left-turn and right-turn lanes at the study intersections
to confirm that the storage length recommendations from the approved TIMAs can accommodate
the revised 2028 total traffic volumes. The left-turn and right-turn storage calculations at the traffic
interchanges utilized the ADOT turn lane storage length methodology described in ADOT Traffic
Guidelines and Processes, Section 430 (TGP 430). ADOT calculates storage length by summing
queue length multiplied by a factor of 1.5 to 2 times plus braking distance. Additionally, 95*'^
percentile queues were analyzed using Synchro 12 analysis software. The Synchro queueing
methodology was analyzed at the traffic interchanges, and the Highway Capacity Manual, 7*^
Edition (HCM 7) methodology was analyzed at all other intersections.
Table 2 provides the storage length calculations for the dedicated left-turn lanes at the study area
intersections. The calculations associated with these conclusions are included in Attachment 4.
kimley-horn.com
1661 East Camelback Road, Suite 400, Phoenix, AZ 85016
602 944 5500
Kimley»>Horn
Page 6
Table 2. Left-Turn Storage
Intersection
and Approach
Previously
Recommended
Storage Length
Desired
Calculated Base (Minimum)
Queue Length Braking
Distance
95"' Percentile
Storage Length
Recommended
Storage
SRIOI SB Frontage Road & Pima Road/Princess Drive
Southbound
Approach
355 feet (LT)
355 feet (Th/LT)
490 feet (LT)
490 feet (Th/LT)
200 feet
(85 feet)
821 feet (LT)
821 feet (Th/LT)
355 feet (LT)
355 feet (Th/LT)
Westbound
Approach
1,215 feet
(Triple)
450 feet (Triple)
200 feet
(85 feet)
472 feet (Triple)
1,215 feet
(Triple)
SRlOl NB Frontage Road & Pima Road/Princess Drive
Northbound
Approach
275 feet (LT)
275 feet (Th/LT)
270 feet (LT)
270 feet (Th/LT)
200 feet
(85 feet)
426 feet (LT)
426 feet (Th/LT)
275 feet (LT)
275 feet (Th/LT)
Eastbound
Approach
400 feet
240 feet
200 feet
(85 feet)
330 feet
400 feet
SRIOI SB Frontage Road & Beil Road
Southbound
Approach
385 feet (LT)
385 feet (Th/LT)
530 feet (LT)
530 feet (Th/LT)
200 feet
(85 feet)
931 feet (LT)
931 feet (Th/LT)
385 feet (LT)
385 feet (Th/LT)
Westbound
Approach
625 feet (Dual)
445 feet
(Dual)
200 feet
(85 feet)
1028 feet
(Dual)
625 feet (Dual) (1)
SRIOI NB Frontage Road & Bell Road
Northbound
Approach
310 feet(LT)
310 feet (Th/LT)
270 feet (LT)
270 feet (Th/LT)
200 feet
(85 feet)
702 feet (LT)
702 feet (Th/LT)
310 feet (LT)
310 feet (Th/LT)
Eastbound
Approach
450 feet
85 feet
200 feet
(85 feet)
115 feet
450 feet
SRIOI SB Frontage Road & Frank Lloyd Wright Boulevard
Southbound
Approach
250 feet (Dual) (5)
435 feet (Dual)
200 feet
(85 feet)
583 feet (Dual)
250 feet (Dual) (')(=)
Westbound
Approach
580 feet (Dual)
190 feet (Dual)
200 feet
(85 feet)
254 feet (Dual)
580 feet (Dual)
SRIOI NB Frontage Road & Frank Lloyd Wright Boulevard
Northbound
Approach
285 feet (Dual) <®)
395 feet (Dual)
200 feet
(85 feet)
449 feet (Dual)
285 feet (Dual) <’)<=)
Eastbound
Approach
450 feet (Dual) (5)
350 feet (Dual)
200 feet
(85 feet)
400 feet (Dual)
450 feet (Dual)
TWLT = Two-way left-turn lane.
LT and Th/LT = Exclusive left-turn lane and through/left-turn lane.
Dual = Two left-turn lanes.
Triple = three left-turn lanes.
(’) Recommendation is consistent with previously recommended storage length.
(2) Additional storage available beyond striped turn lane.
(s)Value represents proposed improvements per Pima Freeway DCR. Interchange Is currently under construction.
The results of the analysis show that left-turn queue lengths are generally expected to remain
similar to previous projections with the revised site land use. Therefore, the left-turn lane storage
lengths previously recommended at the study intersections in the approved TIMAs are
recommended to be maintained.
kimley-horn.com
1661 East Camelback Road, Suite 400, Phoenix, AZ 85016
602 944 5500
Kimley»>Horn
Page 7
Table 3 provides the storage length calculations for the dedicated right-turn lanes at the study
area Intersections. The calculations associated with these conclusions are included in
Attachment 4.
Table 3. Right-Turn Storage
Intersection
and Approach
Previously
Recommended
Storage Length
Calculated
Queue Length
Desired
(Minimum)
Braking
Distance
95*'' Percentile
Storage Length
Recommended
Storage
SRIOI SB Frontage Road & Pima Road/Princess Drive
Southbound
Approach
355 feet (RT)
355 feet(Th/RT)
140 feet (RT)
140 feet (Th/RT)
200 feet
(85 feet)
63 feet (RT)
63 feet (Th/RT)
355 feet (RT)
355 feet(Th/RT)
Eastbound
Approach
245 feet (Dual)
150 feet (Dual)
200 feet
(85 feet)
162 feet (Dual)
245 feet (Dual)
5R101 NB Frontage Road & Pima Road/Princess Drive
Northbound
Approach
275 feet
(Dual, Drop,
Channelized,
Free-Flow)
.(6)
200 feet
(85 feet)
.0)
275 feet
(Dual, Drop,
Channelized,
Free-Flow)
Westbound
Approach
285 feet
350 feet
200 feet
(85 feet)
236 feet
285 feet
SRlOl SB Frontage Road & Bell Road
Southbound
Approach
385 feet (RT)
385 feet (Th/RT)
120 feet (RT)
120 feet (Th/RT)
200 feet
(85 feet)
Ofeet(RT)
0 feet (Th/RT)
385 feet (RT)
385 feet (Th/RT)
Eastbound
Approach
315 feet
175 feet
200 feet
(85 feet)
83 feet
315 feet
SRIOI NB Frontage Road & Bell Road
Northbound
Approach
310 feet (RT)
310 feet(Th/RT)
265 feet (RT)
265 feet (Th/RT)
200 feet
(85 feet)
102 feet (RT)
102 feet(Th/RT)
310 feet (RT) <*>
310 feet(Th/RT)
Westbound
Approach
350 feet
335 feet
200 feet
(85 feet)
464 feet
350 feet
SRIOI SB Frontage Road & Frank Lloyd Wright Boulevard
Southbound
Approach
225 feet
270 feet
200 feet
(85 feet)
704 feet
225 feet
Eastbound
Approach
175 feet
(Channelized)'^'
435 feet
200 feet
(85 feet)
(Channelized)
175 feet
(Channelized)
RT and Th/RT = Exclusive right-turn lane and through/right-turn lane.
Dual = Two right-turn lanes.
Drop = Through lane that transitions to right-turn oniy lane.
Channelized = Channei-separated right-turn iane.
Free Fiow = Operates without traffic conflicts.
<’) Recommendation is consistent with previousiy recommended storage length.
Additional storage available beyond striped turn iane.
(siVaiue represents proposed improvements per Pima Freeway DCR. interchange is currentiy under construction.
(6)Caiculated value not available for this movement.
<*) Storage iength does not account for free-flowing right-turn.
P) Free-flowing right-turn. Significant queueing not anticipated.
kimley-horn.com I 1661 East Camelback Road, Suite 400, Phoenix, AZ 85016 I 602 944 5500
Kimley»>Horn
Page 8
(Table 3 continued)
Intersection
and Approach
Previously
Recommended
Storage Length
Calculated
Queue Length
Desired
(Minimum)
Braking
Distance
95**' Percentile
Storage Length
Recommended
Storage
SR 101 NB Frontage Road & Frank Lloyd Wright Boulevard
Northbound
Approach
285 feet
120 feet
200 feet
(85 feet)
51 feet
285 feet
Westbound
Approach
225 feet (Dual)
(Channelized)*®’
275 feet (Dual)
200 feet
(85 feet)
(Channelized)
225 feet (Dual)
(Channelized)
Driveway D1 & Pima Road
Eastbound
Approach
150 feet(Drop)
.(6)
.(9)
150 feet(Drop)
SRIOI NB Frontage Road & Driveway D2
Northbound
Approach
300 feet
130 feet <®>
200 feet
(85 feet)
.(9)
300 feet
RT and Th/RT = Exclusive right-turn lane and through/right-turn lane.
Dual = Two right-turn lanes.
Drop = Through lane that transitions to right-turn only lane.
Channelized = Channel-separated right-turn lane.
Free Flow = Operates without traffic conflicts.
hi Recommendation is consistent with previously recommended storage length.
F) Additional storage available beyond striped turn lane.
® Value represents proposed improvements per Pima Freeway DCR. Interchange is currently under construction.
<^> Calculated value not available for this movement.
(8) Storage length does not account for free-flowing right-turn.
(81 Free-flowing right-turn. Significant queueing not anticipated.
The results of the analysis show that right-turn queue lengths are generally expected to remain
similar to previous projections with the revised site land use. Therefore, the right-turn lane storage
lengths previously recommended at the study intersections in the approved TIMAs are
recommended to be maintained.
CONCLUSION
The proposed rezoning associated with the proposed Rivian development is anticipated to
generate an additional 1,714 daily trips, 99 AM peak hour trips and 116 PM peak hour trips
compared to previous land use assumptions. The results of the queueing analysis indicate that
queues at the dedicated left-turn and right-turn lanes are anticipated to remain similar to queues
under previous land use assumptions. Therefore, the left-turn and right-turn lane lengths
previously recommended at the study intersections in the approved TIMAs for the overall
development are recommended to be maintained.
kimley-horn.com
1661 East Camelback Road, Suite 400, Phoenix, AZ 85016
602 944 5500
Kimley»>Horn
Page 9
If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me at (602) 944-5500.
Sincerely,
6
<<;
4’ o
77122
■s
□>
ALEXANDER
Si:
O(t o WEBER
Alexander Weber, P.E.
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES. INC.
Attachments:
•
Attachment 1: Site Plan
•
Attachment 2: Relevant TIMA Excerpts
•
Attachment 3: Trip Generation Calculations
Attachment 4: Storage Length Calculations
kimley-horn.com
1661 East Camelback Road, Suite 400, Phoenix, AZ 85016
602 944 5500
1FfiPKD
PROJECT AOOWU
I77T1 K P«ilA BOAO scorraodii «
OOSTnCZOMMO
MJMCMEA
TENANT MEA
PARKWO LOT 1 SITE AREA
OfnCE PMKMO STA1X6 (T,712 S.F. /»)
: » SPACES
STAU9 (STEW 8.P. J S»)
: 73 SPACES
.'ESK
EMSTM WORK PER PE RMTT «113Md
WAREHOUSE PARKNO STAU31
EWmo PARKMO AUOCATED TO TENANT
NFAtPARKWOlOTl
t» SPACES
:R) SPACES
EWSTWO EV STMX8 PNOVOe>
icw Ev sTAos mmucD
REOUMEO ADA PAMwa
ntOTIXD AOA PARKMO
EJUSTM3 MCTCU PARNNG
:SSPACSS
@@@@@(10)
1
@C^Cp(»)@@®®@
*
rT
s \
in
' \
AOMDONM. TENANT
PARmO (70 SPACES)
\
\
r IMSOMCr SCREEN WAAl.
I
VAHOUS EASEMENTS
\\
\\
t
\
J
9^
\ '/
i--------- WATER MAM ESWT.
w-tr^ WFS DCDCATEO »«RON
■\ i ■
WPS ESSfT.
r>
j BLDG C «WORTH ELEVATION
• , SCMS:
C-v
NEW TENANT PARNNG
^
(laospACEi
K
TTP AtlA »-0S .i^-y OmWifK-i
SPACE AM) RA*» r~T1
EV CHARBCR. TYP WWE-MDOOR-.____________ j
AOOfTIONAi. ADA STAU»—
n
: \z.i
V
:_:iL;_iL :iii!
j ^
PAWPASHWAT.TYP. U
STAUW rOKTTP.7
t
ICWEVPMKHO-'
y-y
w-c wo*
R '
CWST SEWER Eswr
PRCPO8E0 P-<r SOeWAiK —
. % ^
\
V-.' JS
\ .:P-'
' V'
\
\ \
\
i -
■ \-
NEW TENANT SPACE
65,566 S.F.
E30ETMGr-(r
ancMAuc
p.
\ \:
1
I
Vaccess
STAwriP.
\
EXISTING BUILDING PER PERMIT #1120-24
7
c.
'o-i
I-
I
V CONCRETE DOW
APRON. TVP.
! b
L,
-i
-„l
□
I__
:=
□
1
I-,,
V,
MACK
REAL
ESTATE
GROUP
K A /\
I / INNOVATION
MAUK PARK
NEC Loop 101 &Bell Road
SCOTTSDALE, AZ
1
07-02-25
22(as-ST17_NWC
SCALE. 1* > 46'
Butler Design Group. Inc
Sfcnilecis 4 puinners
Traffic Impact and Mitigation Analysis
SEC SR101 and Pima Road
Scottsdale, Arizona
Prepared for:
Mack Real Estate Development
Kimley»>Horn
VNORTHJ
Trailside View
■X %
•£5-
*,
I
4
'<>
oi>
V'
03
V-
fagl
(>S^
9
.. -£- :
03
V'
III ^ Lu . lii.
;
ri— - ir O rrni ':1''V-^
i!
i
O'
■ ip ■ ---^
..«0«
—:
i\
:i"iiV':^' ;':ni '■
‘ ;r
si..
yira'
I
E
- .#: T'l
U; Jijif Sl*
'K;.
*
101
■??' ■ ;'i i ■ /-si?-' ;■
\
jySSs. \S, • >
► ,
V
_-==
i.
\
I
Bell Rd
55
x:o
03
Frank Lloyd Wright Blvd
DRIVEWAYS
SITE (PARCEL 1)
PARCEL 5
PARCEL 6
Kiniley»>Horn
Figure 2
Site Plan
September 2023
SEC SR101 and Pima Rd | Traffic Impact and Mitigation Analysis
Traffic Impact and Mitigation Analysis
NEC SR101 and Bell Road
Scottsdale, Arizona
Prepared for:
Mack Real Estate Development
Kimley»>Horn
V NORTHJ
Trailside View
6
»■
<?
x>
%
S
\\
O'
/O
CO
m
CO
O'
0>
n
m
I
m
IT
n
m
ft
-S.
O'
fl
6^
..^00
ll"
o<\<'
i
lL
Til
rI
rn
i
}
iex'f
kr
Q iTgfw^»>0 GtWfc' m.
■t
'f
E
5
X-
LJ
n;
111
11/
101
X'SN
6
'X
i. i
VS
I
Bel Rd
Frank Lloyd Wright Blvd
LEGEND
driveways
SITE
Kimley»>Horn
Figure 2
Site Plan
September 2023
NEC SRI 01 and Bell Rd | Traffic Impact Analysis
5.0 PROJECTED TRAFFIC
5.1 SITE TRAFFIC FORECASTS
5.1.1 TRIP GENERATION
The Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation, H**' Edition was used to obtain daily and
peak hour trip generation rates and inbound-outbound percentages, which were then used to estimate the
number of daily and peak hour trips that can be attributed to the proposed development. The site trip
generation was further divided into car and truck trips based on the truck trip percentages for
Warehousing land uses presented in Appendix I of the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3^ Edition. The
trip generation characteristics of the site are summarized in Table 6. Trip generation calculations can be
found in the Appendix.
Table 6. Project Trip Generation
Land Use
ITE
Daily
AM Peak
PM Peak
code
Total
out Total In Out Total
Parcel 2A
Warehousing
150
404,075
SF
692
53
16
69
20
53
73
Parcel 2B*
Warehousing
I 150 I 105,915
SF
182
14
4
18
5
14
19
Total Trips 874
67
20
87
25
67
92
Car Trips 700
53
16
69
20
53
73
Truck Trips
174
14
4
18
5
14
19
*Future phase development. Site traffic assignment volumes to be realized in the ultimate buildout of Parcel 2.
The proposed development is expected to generate 874 daily trips, with 87 trips occurring in the AM peak
hour and 92 trips occurring in the PM peak hour.
5.1.2 TRIP DISTRIBUTION
Daily passenger car trips were distributed over the cardinal directions based on the Maricopa Association
of Governments' (MAG) estimate of total households within an 11.5-mile radius of the site. This radius is
based on the average employment-based trip length as reported in the 2017 National Household Travel
Survey.
Percent to and from:
2020
2040
North
11 %
13 %
East
9 %
8 %
South
32 %
29 %
West
49 %
50 %
The results of this distribution were used as a basis for determining the ultimate passenger car trip
distribution for the site. In addition to the MAG land use database for current and future land use
projections, the ultimate surrounding roadway system was also taken into consideration when trip
distribution was determined; therefore, the distribution shown above was further refined by considering
NEC SR101 and Bell Road | Traffic Impact and Mitigation Analysis
September 2023
the future roadway network near the site. Figure 4 illustrates the passenger car trip distribution for the
study area.
Truck traffic utilized a different trip distribution that was oriented predominantly to the freeway to account
for differences in truck travel patterns. Figure 4 illustrates the truck trip distribution for the study area.
5.1.4 SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT
Trips generated by the proposed development were assigned to the roadway network based on the trip
distribution and the likely travel patterns to and from the site. Figure 5 shows the results of the site traffic
assignment. Additional figures showing the routes into and out of the site from SRI 01 and the site traffic
assignment broken out into car and truck traffic are included in the Appendix.
5.2 FUTURE TRAFFIC FORECASTING
The background traffic volumes for the buildout year 2025 were calculated based on 2022 traffic counts
and the annual traffic growth rate. Based on historical trends in the COS average daily traffic volume data
from 2014, 2016, and 2018 and development potential in the area, an annual growth rate of 1.0 percent
per year was applied to the existing turning movements to obtain background traffic volumes for the year
2025. The resulting 2025 background traffic volumes are shown in Figure 6. The relevant COS average
daily segment traffic volume maps are included in the Appendix.
In addition to applying the annual traffic growth rate to the existing 2022 traffic counts, traffic from the
adjacent developments discussed in Section 3.2 of this report was included in the background traffic
volumes for the horizon year 2028. To account for the impacts of the adjacent developments on the
surrounding roadway network, trip generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE)
Trip Generation, 11*'' Edition were used to estimate the development’s peak hour trip generation, shown
below in Table 7.
Table 7. Adjacent Development Trip Generation
Land Use
ITE
Code
Quantity Units
Daily
Total
AM Peak
Out Total
Parcel 1
PM Peak
Out Total
Warehousing
ISO 572,170
SF
980
75
22
97
29
74
103
Parcel 3
General Office Building 710
300,000
SF
3,252
401
55
456
73
359
432
Parcel 4
General Office Building 710
49,200
SF
534
66
9
75
12
59
71
Parcel 5
General Office Building 710
54,000
SF
586
72
10
82
13
65
78
High-Turnover (Sit-
Down) Restaurant
932
6,000
SF
644
31
26
57
33
21
54
Parcel 6
General Office Building | 710 | 40,000 | SF
434
54
7
61
10
48
58
Total Trips
6,430
699
129
828
195
626
796
NEC SR101 and Bell Road | Traffic Impact and Mitigation Analysis
September 2023
A
r
rm
SI
i
Ji
0(«
I
es
*?«««
itM
If
0W-*
4«K1M
timiTW
«—«ni)
•POi)
'flff
r
r
^T
MOM
WiJ—»
leem
J*74(1»
III
9
P
?
Traiiside View
<f>
:
. V
ill
^*(171)
s®
^T^
«P)
a
II
©
4(M»
t
I
1
r
rr
a.
O'
4
C
I
4,
;
Si
M
Jl
5
\r
:
WTOM
s
m-l,
E
s
"rtr A .,s
■^TT
j J I ■ '+
III
/liu
*w,a
ra
4—tnwa \
■m
ur
Mr
III
4n<K}—"
»t*(1HD—*
114^1)-^ if
T. 1
iA
lilM
aM<Mdi
lam
Bell Rd
2o
,A/®^
s’"'V J /- >
I
§
J
II
41(11)-^
r
r
^11
8/
Frank Lloyd Wright Blvd
; A
■Tiuai
Jl'.
*
=f Mtiir,
•sir
*ti{i«i)
wttm-*
TWLT - IWCmAY LBT-T\JRN LANE
LEGEND
-XXDOQ
PEAK HOUR
TfWTtCVOLUMES
LASCUSC
■ ANTOPATH) BACKGROUtsD
LANEUS£NPROVEMENTS
___ FUTURELAftLat
EXmMQ INTERSECTION
CONTROL
ANnOPATHI BACKGROUND
NTERSECnON CONTROL
■uPfloveers
PROPOSED NTERSeCnON
CONTROL
Kimley>^Horn
Figure 9
2028 Total Traffic and Recommended Geometry
September 2023
NEC SR101 and Bell Rd | Traffic Impact Anatysis
Intersection
NB
SB
52
43
7
55
EB
43
WB
19
15
Intersection
LOS
31
5R101 SB Frontage Road & Frank Lloyd Wright Boulevard
AM Peak
C
28
C
28
D
46
D
43
A
1
D
54
C
29
C
32
PM Peak
D
38
D
50
D
37
D
51
A
2
D
54
C
22
D
36
SRIOI NB Frontage Road & Frank Lloyd Wright Boulevard
AM Peak
C
29
C
27
A
5
D
55
C
23
D
47
A
1
C
27
PM Peak
D
45
C
34
B
12
D
54
B
19
D
35
A
1
C
27
As shown in Table 16, the alternative scenario review indicated that the LOS of each movement at the
TIs can be improved to LOS E or better with the implementation of the previously mentioned
improvements.
There are constraints that would need review if geometric improvements were to be considered at these
Tl locations. These constraints include but are not limited to right-of-way acquisition, underpass bridge
modifications, and utility and traffic signal equipment relocations.
6.2 LEFT-TURN LANES
The City of Scottsdale requires left-turn lanes at all street intersections on major collector and arterial
roadways. Turn lane lengths are to be determined based on the anticipated turning volume and the traffic
control type. The City of Scottsdale requires left-turn lanes to be constructed with a standard storage
length of 150 feet and minimum storage length of 100 feet. Left-turn lanes should be constructed with a
reverse curve length per COS Standard Detail 2225.
The signalized and unsignalized intersections and site driveways in the study area were analyzed to
determine the left-turn storage needed to accommodate the expected traffic volumes in the horizon year
2028. The left-turn storage calculations at the traffic interchanges utilized ADOT turn lane criteria. Per
ADOT TCP 430, ADOT calculates storage length by summing queue length multiplied by a factor of 1.5
to 2 times plus braking distance. The left-turn storage calculations at the remaining intersections utilized
AASHTO turn lane criteria. Additionally, Synchro 95*^ percentile queues were analyzed at the traffic
interchanges, and HCM 95‘'' percentile queues were analyzed at all other intersections. Table 17 provides
the recommended left-turn storage at the study area intersections. The recommended storage lengths are
based on total traffic volumes shown in Figure 9. The calculations associated with these conclusions and
the relevant COS and ADOT standards are included in the Appendix.
NEC SRIOI and Bell Road | Traffic Impact and Mitigation Analysis
September 2023
40
Table 17. Left-Turn Storage
Intersection
and
Approach
Existing Storage
Length
Calculated
Queue Length
Desired
(Minimum)
Braking
Distance
95'*' Percentile
Storage Length
5R101 SB Frontage Road & Pima Road/Princess Drive
Recommended
Storage
Southbound
Approach
355 feet (LT)
355 feet (Th/LT)
470 feet (LT)
470 feet (Th/LT)
200 feet
(85 feet)
781 feet (LT)
781 feet (Th/LT)
355 feet (LT) <2)
355 feet (Th/LT)
Westbound
Approach
765 feet (Dual)
450 feet (Triple)
200 feet
(85 feet)
462 feet (Triple)
1,215 feet d)(5)
(Triple)
5R101NB Frontage Road & Pima Road/Princess Drive
Northbound
Approach
275 feet (LT)
275 feet (Th/LT)
265 feet (LT)
265 feet (Th/LT)
200 feet
(85 feet)
397 feet (LT)
397 feet (Th/LT)
275 feet (LT) <2)
275 feet (Th/LT)
Eastbound
Approach
400 feet
240 feet
200 feet
(85 feet)
326 feet
400 feet dlH)
Pima RoadSt Traiiside View
Southbound
Approach
140 feet
150 feet
N/A
25 feet
115 feet (’X-ixe)
Westbound
Approach
195 feet
225 feet
N/A
175 feet
190 feet (9(4)(6)
91" Street« Traiiside View
Northbound
Approach
150 feet
100 feet
N/A
25 feet
150 feet d)
91" Street & Driveway D3
Northbound
Approach
100 feet
N/A
25 feet
150 feet
Southbound
Approach
N/A
TWLT
91" Street & Driveway D4
Northbound
Approach
100 feet
N/A
25 feet
150 feet
SRIOI SB Frontage Road & Beii Road
Southbound
Approach
385 feet (LT)
385 feet (Th/LT)
530 feet (LT)
530 feet (Th/LT)
200 feet
(85 feet)
916 feet (LT)
916 feet (Th/LT)
385 feet (LT) (2)
385 feet (Th/LT)
Westbound
Approach
625 feet
(Dual)
440 feet
(Dual)
200 feet
(85 feet)
992 feet
(Dual)
625 feet (Dual) d)
SRlOl NB Frontage Road & Beii Road
Northbound
Approach
310 feet (LT)
310 feet (Th/LT)
270 feet (LT)
270 feet (Th/LT)
200 feet
(85 feet)
683 feet (LT)
683 feet (Th/LT)
310 feet (LT) d)
310 feet (ThAT)
Eastbound
Approach
450 feet
85 feet
200 feet
(85 feet)
113 feet
450 feet d)(4)
90* Street & Beii Road
Eastbound
Approach
100 feet
N/A
25 feet
250 feet
Westbound
Approach
55 feet
100 feet
N/A
25 feet
55feetd)H)
4
NEC SR101 and Bell Road | Traffic Impact and Mitigation Analysis
September 2023
Intersection
and
Approach
Existing Storage
Length
Calculated
Queue Length
Desired
(Minimum)
Braking
Distance
95'^ Percentile
Storage Length
91" Street & Bell Road
Recommended
Storage
Northbound
Approach
120 feet (Dual)
275 feet
N/A
300 feet
120 feet (“)
Southbound
Approach
100 feet
N/A
25 feet
150 feet
Eastbound
Approach
550 feet
N/A
525 feet
400 feet
Westbound
Approach
245 feet
125 feet
N/A
50 feet
245 feet d)W
SRIOI SB Frontage Road & Frank Lloyd Wright Boulevard
Southbound
Approach
250 feet (Dual)
(5)
435 feet (Dual)
200 feet
(85 feet)
534 feet (Dual)
250 feet (Dual)
(2)(S)
Westbound
Approach
580 feet (Dual)
(5)
190 feet (Dual)
200 feet
(85 feet)
224 feet (Dual)
580 feet (Dual)
(1)(4)(5)
SRlOl NB Frontage Road & Frank Lloyd Wright Boulevard
Northbound
Approach
285 feet (Dual)
(5)
395 feet (Dual)
200 feet
(85 feet)
442 feet (Dual)
285 feet (Dual)
(4)(5)
Eastbound
Approach
450 feet (Dual)
(5)
350 feet (Dual)
200 feet
(85 feet)
371 feet (Dual)
450 feet (Dual)
(2)(5)
TWLT = Twt>-way left-turn lane.
LT and Th/LT = Exclusive left-turn lane and through/left-tum lane.
Dual = Two left-turn lanes.
Triple = three left-turn lanes.
(') Calculated or 95% Percentile Storage Length value less than or equal to existing.
(2) Additional storage available beyond striped turn lane.
P) Turn lane Is geometrically constrained. Maximize turn storage.
P) Site does not contribute or minimally contributes traffic to movement.
PIValue represents proposed improvements per Pima Freeway DCR.
PlValue represents proposed Improvements per Pima Rd and Trailside View Intersection Improvement Plans.
The left-turn lanes should provide the storage recommended in Table 17 and an appropriate reverse
curve length per COS Standard Detail 2225.
The northbound approaches to Driveway D3 and Driveway D4 are recommended to be constructed with
150 feet of northbound left-turn lane storage.
The proposed eastbound left-turn lane at the intersection of 91®* Street & Bell Road is geometrically
constrained by the existing westbound left-turn lane at the intersection of 90**' Street & Bell Road. The
eastbound left turn lane storage is recommended to be maximized. Approximately 400 feet of eastbound
left-turn storage is anticipated to be provided.
The westbound dual left-turn lanes at the intersection of SR101 NB Frontage Road & Bell Road are
geometrically constrained by the existing median width east of the Tl. Since these turn lanes are unlikely
to be extended in the future, the proposed eastbound left-turn lane storage at the intersection of OO*”
Street & Bell Road is recommended to be maximized to provide approximately 250 feet of storage.
The existing outer northbound left-turn lane at the intersection of 91®* Street & Bell Road is recommended
to be restriped as a dedicated through lane to accommodate northbound through traffic on 91®* Street. It is
NEC SR101 and Beli Road | Traffic Impact and Mitigation Analysis
September 2023
42
anticipated that the existing two-way left-turn iane on 91®* Street south of Bell Road will accommodate
expected left-turn queues.
6.3 RIGHT-TURN LANES
Right-turn lanes are often recommended on roadways where right-turning vehicles create delays or safety
concerns for other traffic movements. The need for a right-turn lane depends on the speed of traffic on
the road, the volume of traffic turning right, and the through traffic volume in the same lane as the right-
turning traffic.
6.3.1 INTERSECTIONS
The City of Scottsdale recommends a right-turn lane at all street intersections on major arteriai roadways
and on other roadways based on anticipated turning volumes and traffic control.
Based on a review of roadway classifications and the 2028 total traffic volumes, a right-turn lane is
recommended at the southbound approach to the intersection of 91®* Street & Bell Road. The City of
Scottsdale requires right-turn lanes to be constructed with a standard storage length of 150 feet and
minimum storage length of 100 feet. Right-turn lanes should be constructed with a reverse curve length
per COS Standard Detail 2225.
The signalized and unsignalized intersections and site driveways in the study area were analyzed to
determine the right-turn storage needed to accommodate the expected traffic volumes in the horizon year
2028. The right-turn storage calculations at the traffic interchanges utilized ADOT turn lane criteria. Per
ADOT TCP 430, ADOT calculates storage length by summing queue length multiplied by a factor of 1.5
to 2 times plus braking distance. The right-turn storage calculations at the remaining intersections utilized
AASHTO turn lane criteria. Additionally, Synchro 95*** percentile queues were analyzed at the traffic
interchanges, and HCM 95*** percentile queues were analyzed at all other intersections. Table 18 provides
the recommended right-turn storage at the study area intersections. The recommended storage lengths
are based on total traffic volumes shown in Figure 9. The calculations associated with these conclusions
and the reievant COS and ADOT standards are included in the Appendix.
NEC SR101 and Beli Road | Traffic Impact and Mitigation Analysis
September 2023
Table 18. Right-Turn Storage
Intersection
and
Approach
Existing Storage
Length
Calculated
Queue Length
Desired
(Minimum)
Braking
Distance
95“'' Percentile
Storage Length
Recommended Storage
5R101 SB Frontage Road & Pima Road/Princess Drive
Southbound
Approach
355 feet (RT)
355 feet (Th/RT)
140 feet (RT)
140 feet (Th/RT)
200 feet
(85 feet)
62 feet (RT)
62 feet (Th/RT)
355 feet (RT)<i>l‘'>
355 feet (Th/RT)
Eastbound
Approach
245 feet (Dual)
150 feet (Dual)
200 feet
(85 feet)
159 feet (Dual)
245 feet (Dual)
5R101NB Frontage Road & Pima Road/Princess Drive
Northbound
Approach
275 feet
(Trap, Free Flow)
.(6)
200 feet
(85 feet)
275 feet (Dual, Trap)
(Channelized, Free Flow)
Westbound
Approach
285 feet
350 feet
200 feet
(85 feet)
233 feet
285 feet'iX'"
Pima Road & Trailside View
Northbound
Approach
100 feet
300 feet
N/A
225 feet
300 feet
Westbound
Approach
200 feet
175 feet
N/A
200 feet
200 feet ^
91^ Street & Traiiside View
Eastbound
Approach
125 feet
150 feet
N/A
25 feet
125 feet W
SRIOI SB Frontage Road & Beii Road
Southbound
Approach
385 feet (RT)
385 feet (Th/RT)
120 feet (RT)
120 feet (Th/RT)
200 feet
(85 feet)
0 feet (RT)
Ofeet (Th/RT)
385 feet (RT) •i"'"
385 feet (Th/RT)
Eastbound
Approach
315 feet
175 feet
200 feet
(85 feet)
82 feet
315 feet
SRlOl NB Frontage Road & Beii Road
Northbound
Approach
310 feet (RT)
310 feet (Th/RT)
260 feet (RT)
260 feet (Th/RT)
200 feet
(85 feet)
97 feet (RT)
97 feet (Th/RT)
310 feet (RT)
310 feet (Th/RT)
Westbound
Approach
175 feet
335 feet
200 feet
(85 feet)
441 feet
350 feet
90* Street & Beii Road
Eastbound
Approach
150 feet
100 feet
N/A
150 feet
91^ streets, Beil Road
Northbound
Approach
120 feet
150 feet
N/A
75 feet
120 feet
Southbound
Approach
250 feet
N/A
175 feet
250 feet (Trap)
Eastbound
Approach
205 feet
200 feet
N/A
75 feet
205 feet'i’l'"
SRIOI SB Frontage Road S, Frank Lloyd Wright Boulevard
Southbound
Approach
225 feet'=>
270 feet
200 feet
(85 feet)
672 feet
225 feet
Eastbound
Approach
175 feet
(Channelized)
435 feet
200 feet
(85 feet)
(Channelized)
175 feet
(Channelized)*^’*^’
NEC SR101 and Bell Road | Traffic Impact and Mitigation Analysis
September 2023
44
Intersection
and
Approach
Existing Storage
Length
Calculated
Queue Length
Desired
(Minimum)
Braking
Distance
95"’ Percentile
Storage Length
Recommended Storage
5R101NB Frontage Road & Frank Lloyd Wright Boulevard
Northbound
Approach
285 feet <=>
120 feet
200 feet
(85 feet)
50 feet
285 feet
Westbound
Approach
225 feet (Dual)
(Channelized)
270 feet (Dual)
200 feet
(85 feet)
(Channelized)
225 feet (Dual)
(Channelized)
RT and Th/RT = Exclusive righl-tum lane and thraugh/righl-turn lane.
Dual = Two right-turn lanes.
Trap = Through lane that transitions to right-turn only lane.
Channelized = Channei-separated right-turn lane.
Free Flow = Operates without traffic conflicts.
I') Caiculated or 95% Percentiie Storage Length vaiue less than or equal to existing.
P) Additional storage available beyond striped turn iane.
P) Turn lane Is geometrically constrained.
(<) Site does not contribute or minimally contributes traffic to movement.
(5) Value represents proposed improvements per Pima Freeway DCR.
(°)Calcuiated value not available for this movement.
<°> Storage length does not account for free-flowing right-turn.
(S) Free-flowing right-turn. Significant queueing not anticipated.
The right-turn lanes should provide the storage recommended in Table 18 and an appropriate reverse
curve iength per COS Standard Detail 2225.
Per coordination with ADOT and the City of Scottsdale, dual channelized free-flow right-turn lanes are
anticipated to be instalied on the northbound approach to the intersection of the SRI 01 NB Frontage
Road & Pima Road/Princess Drive with construction of Parcel 1 north of the site to improve traffic
operations at the Tl. Both turn lanes are anticipated to be trap lanes. The turn lanes are recommended to
be striped with 275 feet of storage.
An additional eastbound receiving lane is anticipated to be constructed at the intersection of SRI 01 NB
Frontage Road & Pima Road/Princess Drive to accommodate the additional free-flowing northbound
right-turn lane. The additional lane is anticipated to transition to a right-turn trap lane at Driveway D1.
The westbound right-turn lane at the intersection of SRI 01 NB Frontage Road & Bell Road is
recommended to be extended to provide 350 feet of westbound right turn storage and an appropriate
taper length per ADOT TCP 430.
The northbound right-turn lane at the intersection of Pima Road and Trailside View is recommended to be
extended to provide 300 feet of northbound right-turn storage and an appropriate reverse curve length per
COS Standard Detail 2225.
The outer southbound through lane at the intersection of 91®' Street and Bell Road is recommended to
transition to a right-turn trap lane with 250 feet of storage.
6.3.2 DRIVEWAY
The City of Scottsdale recommends a right-turn lane at site driveways on major arterial roadways and
when the criteria specified in the COS Design Standards & Policies Manual (DSPM) are met. These
NEC SR101 and Bell Road | Traffic Impact and Mitigation Analysis
September 2023
criteria consider the daily traffic volumes on the street, the 85'^ percentile traffic speed on the street, and
the turning volume into the driveway.
Based on a review of the 2028 total traffic volumes and roadway conditions, a righMurn lane is warranted
at the eastbound approach of Driveway D1 on Pima Road. An additional eastbound through lane is also
anticipated to be installed along Pinna Road from SR101 NB Frontage Road and will transition to a right-
turn lane at Driveway D1. Therefore, a right-turn trap lane is recommended to be striped at this location
with 150 feet of storage.
A northbound right-turn trap lane is recommended to be striped at the intersection of 91st Street &
Driveway D3 to transition the 91®' Street cross-section to a single northbound through lane north of
Driveway D3. The trap lane is recommended to be striped with 150 feet of storage.
ADOT recommends a right-turn lane when the criteria in ADOT TGP 245 are met. These criteria consider
the peak hour volume on the adjacent street, the posted speed on the roadway, and the right-turn
volume.
Based on a review of the 2028 total traffic volumes and roadway conditions, a right-turn lane is warranted
at the northbound approach to Driveway D2 on SRI 01 NB Frontage Road. Therefore, a righWurn lane is
recommended to be constructed at this location with 300 feet of storage and an appropriate taper length
per ADOT TGP 430.
The relevant COS and ADOT right-turn lane standards are included in the Appendix.
6:4^ DRIVEWAY Cf^tERIA "
;
The City of Scottsdale requires driveways to be spaced from each other and street intersections as
defined in the COS DSPM Section 5-3.2000. Standard driveway spacing is 500 feet along a major arterial
roadway, 330 feet along a minor arterial roadway, and 250 feet along a major collector roadway,
measured between centerlines of driveways or roadways. Site driveways are also recommended to align
with driveways on the opposite side of the street;
Based on the site plan and coordination with the City of Scottsdale, the proposed driveway locations are
anticipated to satisfy these driveway spacing requirements.
6.5 CROSS-SEGtlONS
The 91®' Street alignment is identified as a major collector roadway by the 2016 COS Transportation
Master Plan. 91®' Street appears to be constructed to a three-lane urban minor collector cross-section
north of the site and a five-lane urban rriajor collector cross-section south of the site. Based on the
recommended storage lengths along 91®' Street, it is recommended that 91®' Street be constructed to a
suburban major collector cross-section from Driveway D3 to Bell Road to match the street section on the
south side of Bell Road. The cross-section should maintain a raised median and two travel lanes in each
direction. The outer northbound through lane is recommended to transition to a right-turn trap lane at
Driveway D3 to transition from a major collector to a minor collector cross-section north of the driveway.
NEC SR101 and Bell Road | Traffic lmpactand Mitigation Analysis
September 2023
ITE Trip Generation Summary
WeoMay Trip Generator)
Trips Based on Average Rates/Equations
Kimley»>Horn
Project Name
Project Number
Current Land Use
rTE Version
Trip Genoration Characteriatica
ITE 12th Ed
Land Us« * Coda
(840) Automobile Sales (Now)
Suboafesgory
All Sites
No. Units
65.566
bid^ndsirf
KSF
MIy
SEC SRIO-I & Pima Road
291335001
Avarag* Rata/Equation
AM
Total Trips
T = 27.84{X)
mm = 0.81 LnfX)-»-1.31
PM
Lnm = 0.84 Ln(X)-*-1.34
Daly
1.826
AM
In
60
Out
30
Total
110
In
51
Out
77
Total
128
Previous Land Use
rrEVsnkm
Trip Gonaration Characteriatica
Land UaaeCoda
Subcataoory
No.Unlta
Vai
DMIy
Avaraga Rata/Equatlon
AM
Total Trips
PM
Daly
AM
In
Out
TetM
In
Out
Total
ITE 11th Ed
(150) Warehousing
All Sites
65.566
KSF
T s 1.71(X)
T = 0.17(X}
T = 0.18(X)
112
3
11
3
9
12
Difference (Current Land Use - Previous Land Use)
I 1,714 I 72 I 27 I 99 I 46 I 68 I 116 I
ADOT Left-Turn Storage Analysis
IntorsMtien
PMk
volunw
(vph)
SignallXMl?
(Ptaca in "X")
fftigAiIind
Yet
SR1Q1 SB Frontage Rd & Pima Rd/Prtncess Df
SB
WB
719
1351
X
Cycis Lingth • of Turn
No (soeoiMli) UiMS
Oip(fMt)
Braking Oistanci
Dislrabl* Mlnimufii
fT6P430)
Stti HV
Existing
VolufiM
(vph)
Qtioui Lmth W)
Estknatod
Existing HV
Volume (vph)
Average CalouMedHV
HV% Vekime (veh)
HV Storage
M)ustiiient(ft)
Adjusted
Base
Queue (ft)
1.Sx
Queue
2x
Queue
ADOT Required Turn Lane (ft)
M3NAUZEO
Con
Minimum Consei
(Mln.*1.5) (Das. + rS] (Dei.4^2)
X
120
120
1.5
3
90
90
200
200
85
85
400
380
9
1
569
1253
57
125
9%
9%
2
2
70
70
470
70S
450
675
940
900
SOQ
925
1150
775
875
1100
SR101 NB Frontage Rd & Pima Rd/Prlncess Dr
NB
EB
243
X
X
120
1
90
90
200
85
85
205
1
0
229
37
23
9%
1
1
35
35
240
360
480
450
575
700
SR101 SB Frontage Rd & Bel Rd
SB
WB
823
861
X
X
120
120
1.5
2
90
90
200
65
85
460
370
6
11
583
578
58
58
8%
8%
2
70
70
530
440
795
660
1060
680
900
750
1000
875
1275
1100
SR101 NB Frontage Rd & Bel Rd
NB
EB
47
X
X
120
1,5
1
90
90
200
85
235
40
0
0
44
39
9%
1
1
35
as
405
130
540
170
500
225
625
350
750
375
5R101 SB Fitmtage Rd & Frartk Uo>d Wright B>»d
SB
WB
867
X
X
120
120
2
90
90
200
65
85
365
155
0
0
807
342
81
9%
2
1
70
35
435
190
655
285
670
360
750
375
675
500
1075
600
SR101 NB Frontage Rd & Frank Lloyd Wright Blvd
NB
EB
772
663
Estimated Existing HV%
HV Storags Adjustment (ft|
101^
X
X
120
120
2
90
90
200
200
85
65
325
260
0
0
727
615
73
62
9%
9%
2
2
70
70
395
350
595
525
790
700
700
625
800
725
1000
900
Tniek Length (ft) 60
Car Length (ft) 25
K:V>HX_CMIi2»1335001 Mack RE Plma.101\T>dneiAi
ge_291335001_ADOTj«
ADOT RIght-Tum Storage Analysis
pMk
vohan*
l*ph>
RTOR
RMueaen?
SlgnaUzMl?
Wght-Tum (p|,ic» «n 'X*)
No
trot
:ycteLan9lh •BfTurn
(MCOrM*) LaiM*
OWtfMt)
OMiraMo iWilmuni
Bho
(TOP430J
8MKV
VotutM(vph)
Existing
Vobrns
(vph)
ExMingHV
VolumsCvph)
KV%
CsIcuMkIKV
VofanM(vsh)
HVStmgs
m
Adjustsd
Bms
OMusm
ADOT RooutrsdTwn tons cni
UNI
{MbL*1.S) tDts.*1J) (D«.*2)
Cor
SR101 SB Fronlaes Rd E Pima RdlPflncess Dr
120
1,5
105
0
2*7
25
9%
14C
N/A
N/A
WA^
SR101 NB Froniags Rd & Pima Rd/Prncae
SR101 NB Trontags Rd ft Onvwsy 02
SR101 SB Fiontua Rd & B
213
17C
255
N/A^
»10l NB Frontags Rd S
N/A*75
120
200
85
317
N/A
SR101 SB Pwttao* Rd A Frwik LkMj wnght BM
0
SR101 NB f rontaoe Rd A FranK Lloyfl Wnghl Blva
NB
76
120
as
85
0
1*2
35
2*0
N/A
27S
N/A
500
750
ExMtm KV%
Truck Length (ft)
60
Car Unglh <fl)
25
K.mX_CMUS133MI01 HmM RE Ams.lO-
3M0D1 jOOTjO
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS (ADOT TOP 430)
QUEUE LENGTH
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Queue Length = N x Q / L x Average Vehicle Length
’POISSON METHOD’
Queue Length =
—— , Average Vehicle Length
L
Where:
N = veh/interval = V x C / 3600
V=peak hourly volume (vph)
Where :
C = cycle length (sec)
Q = queue factor = 1.5 to 2
L = number of left turn lanes
25 ft/veh = Average Length of Passenger Cars
60 fl/veh = Average Length of Trucks
UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Queue Length = V x 2 min/interval / 60 min/hr x Average Vehicle Length
N = vehicles/interval;
V*C
3600
V = peak turning volume (vehicles per hour)
C = cycle length (seconds)
L = number of left turn lanes
z = 1.282 for 90% confidence level
z = 1.645 for 95% confidence level (Typically used)
25 ftA/eh = Average Length of Passenger Cars
60 ft/veh = Average Length of Trucks
Where:
V = peak turning volume (vehicles per hour)
25 ftA/eh = Average Length of Passenger Cars
60 ft/veh = Average Length of Trucks
BRAKING DISTANCE
Table 430^. Braking DIsUnce
POSTED
or
DESIGN SPEED
(moh)
30
IS
40
4S
50
$5
60
65
70
75
braking
SPEED
DE3 RABLE
20
34
38
43
47
52
56
60
64
70
DISTANCE
(foot)
BO
115
ISO
200
245
300
380
415
490
S8S
ENTERING
SPEED
(mph)
MINIMUM
20
35
30
35
40
45
50
65
60
65
20
25
26
34
38
43
47
S3
56
61
BRANNO BRAKING
SPEED DISTANCE
(mrfi)(foot)
20
40
60
85
120
145
200
265
315
400
GAP LENGTH
Table 430-1. Left Turn Lane Gap Lengths
POSTED or
DESIGN SPEED
(mph)
<40
GAP
(feet)
40-50
>50
60
90
140
Mack Innovation Park - Riyian Rezoning
CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT REPORT
ZN-0001 -2026 - Updated March, 2026
I. Introduction
This Citizen Involvement Report is being provided in association with a rezoning
application for the Mack Innovation Park located immediately east of fhe Loop
101 freeway between Bell Road and Pima Road. See aerial at TAB A. The
application proposes to rezone a small, roughly 5-acre portion of fhe site from 1-1,
PCD to C-4, PCD while also modifying fhe PCD overlay fhaf exists upon the full +/-
100-acre site. The purpose of fhe application is to enable Rivian Automotive to
occupy an existing building within the Park.
The Property has a General Plan designation of "Employment Light Industrial /
Office" and is also locafed within a "Regional Use Overlay" ond within the Greater
Airpark Character Area Plan. No change to the existing General Plan, Overlay or
Character Area Plan designations are required or proposed for this application.
II. Overall Outreach Summary
This site has q long record of putreach dating back to the Development Review
applications that were submitted in 2022 and eventually approved in 2024 under
Case No. 49-DR-2022#2. Numerous open house meetings, small group meetings
and notifications occurred during that process and the overall goal of the Park
was discussed and conveyed in those meetings. That goal - to create something
different from tradifional industrial parks and to avoid an abundance of intense
industrial operations and semi-truck traffic - is furfhered by this application.
Rivian's facilities are clean, technologically advanced, and aligned with
Scottsdale’s focus on innovafion and economic growth. They also have a
substantial customer base in Scottsdale that will be better served with the build
out of this new facility.
As with the prior application, before fhe formal open house was conducfed or fhe
rezonihg applicafion is even filed, pur pffice cpnducfed spme preliminary
putreach tc gauge receptance tc the fcrthccming request - including with
members ef the DC Ranch ccmmunity. Members of the development team also
have ongoing call with Director of Public Affairs for DC Ranch Community Council.
ATTACHMENT #9
III. Formal Outreach Milestones
September 4, 2025:
• First-class letters were mailed out to property owners within the vicinity of
the Property including property owners within 1,250 feet of the overall site
(not just the smaller area subject to the C-4 zoning request) and registered
HOA's and interested parties os provided by the City. The letter included
exhibits, described the application and invited the recipient to attend on
open house meeting. The recipient was also encouraged to contact the
applicant or City with any questions or comments and appropriate contact
information was provided. See notification letter, exhibits and mailing list
attached at TAB B.
September 5, 2025:
In addition to the letters, five (5) Project Under Consideration signs were
posted along the perimeter of the site. The sign provided application
information as well as contact information as required by the City. See
affidavit of posting attached at TAB C. Open house information was also
provided to City Staff for disbursement as needed.
September 17, 2025:
An open house meeting was conducted in proximity to the site at the
Scottsdale Marriot at McDowell Mountain. A presentation was made with
exhibits and a Q&A session occurred. An estimated 25 people attended
the meeting, though not all elected to sign in. See sign in sheet attached
at TAB D.
January 20, 2026:
• Formal application submitted to the City. (Application No. ZN-0001-2026)
February, 2026:
• City sent out Notice of Zoning District Map Amendment Request postcard
regarding submitted application and appropriate contact information.
Ongoing:
• Regular status update calls have been ongoing with the Director of Public
Affairs for DC Ranch Community Council.
2
CITIZEN REVIEW REPORT
Rivian Rezoning - Mack Innovation Park
IV. Summary of Comments, Concerns, Issues
The overall response to the proposed use has been extremely positive. Attendees
at the open house were happy to see a higher-end user and a less industrial type
of use. The fact that the building was already constructed and a known entity
also provided relief to some attendees.
There were questions about battery storage and safety. It was noted that Rivian
utilizes a just-in-time delivery protocol for batteries. The vehicle batteries are not
stored on-site and the old batteries leave the facility on the same palette the new
one arrives on. It was also noted that no disassembly or repair of batteries occurs
at this location.
Questions regarding the sale of vehicles at this location were asked. It was noted
that the car buying process has drastically changed in recent years and a lot of
car buying occurs online nowadays. Such online purchases might be delivered to
this facility for customer pick-up. While some custorners might purchase an onsite
vehicle, that is not the typical experience. Most purchasing customers will view
display models, ask questions and potentially pick out options with a Rivian
associate at this location. They may even purchase the car at the facility, but
typically the car would be delivered at d later date.
Questions regarding the PCD modification were also asked. It was also noted that,
through the PCD amendment, the C-4 area will be required to conform to the
existing 1-1 development standards like the vast majority of the rest of the Park. It
was also noted that C-4 has a lower building height than 1-1, but that the building
Rivian will be occupying was already constructed at the higher, 1-1 district height.
The majority of questions dealt with what else may or may not be planned on the
remainder of the Park. Residents are concerned about traffic and in particular
the existing conditions along the Loop TOl ingress and egress roadways. The
Applicant noted that they had worked extensively with ADOT and the City to try
and make a better condition. This included the installation of an additional lane
on the 101-frontage road, the addition of a second. Tree-flow right turn lane onto
northbound Pima, and a new dedicated turn lane into the project along Pima. It
was also conveyed that the new, 91st Street extension running north of Bell Road
will be 4-lanes to start but then taper to only 2 lanes north of this site and that the
northern 2-lane segment is not a truck route
The Applicant will continue to be available to answer questions from any
interested parties regarding this exciting project and will continue to keep the City
informed.
3
CITIZEN REVIEW REPORT
Rivian Rezoning - Mack Innovation Park
Tab A
!
Bpi
m
t
■%
w
'/■
i
i
/.
I
k'M
s
'■?
%
fi
i’-
tJ
;S
*
a
L<
4
r.
m
•jr-
I
m
-1
...i
«
M-y
m
• •::
<■1^
>
I'
'3
t
•’!,
rii
i’
?
>4i.W
1
«
♦if
1
fr '>-4^
f
r<
;l*l ■ ^...i V - ■.•. .Mimm
>
Ml
x
1 ^
z.
m
- '!>
.. :l'
HS
!■: 5
p
s
nu
«
V;
«1 •
0
m
I
N
0*^
4
•>
;•
V.
i
• !
V %
m
m
;,i
6
V
F
\
S
iiiaedaf
iM.ooa
\
;''i
Y.
a
<: V 1*1" I'
fTl
*
.T
--*■
I
a
I
rj
%
«•
1'.
G
h
V
•ft,™
iGscisar
1
»
:v
\
t
■.>i
$
.V;
*
1
'i
J»t
V
t^.
to
fi
I
tc
-r>?t
»
^■B
t
^5^
■3
lip
%•
a
AM.
iiS
>•>
ia
- -.-.m
BELL ROAtr
COLOR MASTER SITE PLAN
B
MACK
REAL
ESTATE
GROUP
N yl A /—^ I / INNOVATION
MAOK PARK
NEC Loop 101 &Bell Road
r^istf
MM. IOJO 2029
oozi.2on
22024^T19_MSP Cotarad
1
Scottsdale, AZ
DR24-2
Butler Design Group, Inc
architects & ptannefs
TabB
MREG 101 BELL LLC
2415 East Camelback Road, Suite 920
Phoenix, AZ 85016
480.712-9427
September 4, 2025
Re:
Open House Invitation - Rezoning for Rivian Automotive and a Planned Shared
Development (PSD) Overlay to share development standards and modifications to existing
Planned Community District (PCD) - Mack Innovation Park - Southeast Corner of the Loop
101 Fwy & Pima Road (APN # 215-07-470, -471, and -022P) - Project No. 546-PA-2025
Dear Neighbor or Interested Citizen:
We are excited to invite you to an upcoming open house regarding an application
within the Mack Innovation Park. As you likely know, the Park is adjacent to the Loop 101
Freeway between Pima and Bell Roads. The majority of the Property (+/-95-acres) is zoned
Industrial Park, Planned Community District (1-1, PCD), a small portion of which also has an
Environmentally Sensitive Lands overlay (1-1, PCD, ESL). The entire Property has a General
Plan designation of “Employment: Light Industrial / Office.”
We are thrilled to announce that Rivian Automotive has elected to locate a new Service
& Delivery facility within the Mack Innovation Park! Rivian is a pioneering, American electric
vehicle manufacturer and technology company. With this investment, they will occupy 65,000
square feet of Building C, which is already under construction on the campus. See enclosed
exhibit for reference. While this is a significant investment that will produce substantial sales
tax for the City, Rivian has elected to locate here without receiving sales tax incentives or any
kickbacks from the City.
At Mack Innovation Park, our vision has always been to create something different
from traditional industrial parks found elsewhere in the Valley - avoiding the abundance of
intense industrial operations, nuisances, and heavy semi-truck traffic. Rivian exemplifies this
vision. Their facilities are clean, technologically advanced, and aligned with Scottsdale’s
focus on innovation and economic growth. They also have a substantial customer base in
Scottsdale.
It is important to note, no significant changes are occurring to the previously approved
buildings or site approvals that have been extensively discussed and reviewed for this
campus. Rivian is simply moving into one of the already approved buildings (Building C),
which is nearing completion of construction. To allow for Rivian’s use, a portion of that
building and site (approximately 5.5-acres) will be rezoned from Industrial Park (1-1) to
General Commercial (C-4). While technically a rezoning, this application is actually a down
zoning from the current Industrial (1-1) designation, which allows for more intensive industrial
and manufacturing uses.
Concurrently with this C-4 application, we will also be processing an amendment to
the existing PCD overlay and will add a PSD overlay over the full 95-acre campus. These
applications are more technical in nature. The PCD amendment will enable the existing
building height in the new, C-4 zoned area. (The C-4 district limits building height to 36 feet.
Notice of Open House - Rivian Automotive
MREG 101 BELL LLC
2415 East Camelback Road, Suite 920
Phoenix, AZ 85016
480.712-9427
but again, Building C has aiready been approved and constructed at the permissibie 1-1
buiiding heights (up to 52 feet max.). The PSD overlay allows individual parcels within a
campus setting to share deveiopment standards, thus enabiing the campus to function more
as one cohesive development, instead of a collection of individual parcels.
Again, no significant changes are occurring to the existing building or site approvals.
Rivian is moving into a building which is already approved and nearing completion of
construction. No modifications are proposed to the previously approved building heights,
sizes, or other major site elements. This is simply a downzoning from Industrial to
Commercial zoning to allow for this exciting new use, while also processing the PCD
amendment and overlay to enable shared development standards.
To review this exciting project and meet the development team, we have scheduled
an open house for September 17, 2025, from 6pm - 7pm at the Scottsdale Marriott at
McDoweii Mountains, 16770 N. Perimeter Drive in Scottsdaie, 85260. We hope you can
attend, but if this date and time are not convenient, we would, as always, be happy to speak
with you by phone or in person at your convenience. Please contact George Pasquel III at
Withey Morris Baugh, PLC, at 602.230.0600 or George@wmbattorneys.com. You can also
reach the City’s Project Coordinator, Meredith Tessier at 480.312.4211 or at
MTessier@Scottsdaleaz.gov. Information can also be found on the City’s website at:
https://www.scottsdaieaz.gov/pianning-development/proJects-in-process.
Again, feel free to contact George Pasquel III at 602.230.0600 or
George@wmbattomeys.com. We look forward to seeing you and thank you for your courtesy
and consideration.
Sincerely,
MREG 101 BELL, LLC
By
Craig S. Henig
Authorized Signatory
Notice of Open House - Rivian Automotive
i
I
I
t
'■■
r‘
i
S
1
;i-r
s
k-3
a.
<v
.-Im
I
•A?
rfis
'^j
i
4
5«
>•
i
-1
'•>.»■ t
i:a
Y.
If
•f'
!«>
♦
*■*1
k *
v» #
S*
A
;.i‘
,5 A
■f
<P I-
T
tv.
■u^P
M
.V-:
«
t?
i.-»
8^1''
iv^
TvfV-^'v
lipii'm?
v«
Krr
m
I
■sy
/'a
A-
F-f-
i^
A
m
*<<.j
m
B
-!<
2»^
-1
K
-AV
1—.
I IB
li't /<• £‘ jii^ r- k- i« z-r^ t-1-
r-:
►<■ »r r
c
so,
1M,M0tF
« ■aa-';.
\
S!
I
1*1
I
'«
.'v
V
lOl
•v^
m
W-.
.•
»
m
s
*■
0
H
rv.n*
?•
1
120.41$ tf
s
/
V*
•S 'V
ft’
;• ^ii
k'K 'K'K K'KlS^'m K-^ X l
m:
y
r
m a K i
M
-i
-<-
V
>
•-t
i: *52
!.
»
.V
\
1
I
*
i-
A-
gf
fe
I
k
S
t0..
m
!!
i?-
••
\
m
\
%
5-
»'i
V
■«i
«J|^
IH
V
A
t
% v.»
:r
••
'Q
« %
0
*
ftm
IP
•3='
I
.«
I
Ik
£
mm
s.
m
Pis
Wmrnmr^"
COLOR MASTER SITE PLAN
^
MACK
INNOVATION
PARK
•CM.£: r- IW
Itov. 0906.2$
o$i9.«n$
22Q244Tt$_USPCakx«d
MACK
REAL
ESTATE
'GROUP
NEC Loop 101 &Bell Road
Scottsdale, AZ
DR24-2
1
S'o
Butler Design Group, Inc
architects & planners
TOO JECT DATA:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
17771 N P(MA ROAD SCOnSOALE.AZ
EXI8TN0Z0MNG
BLOGCAREA
T&4ANTAREA
PARKING LOT 1 SITE AREA
“■i
?>
(2)m^NORTH ELEVATION
::
■
70 SPACES
BUILDINGS
m
'ir—
I ,e> I, .:| ii ,v
«I“|PJLI!.|
..91»}»»r il IPBaFpi., %
t ft-■
i
L; ■ ^
I
%'
169.590 SI.
(DR APPROVED)
m
i
m
M
t:
m
x-
m
'•
^4.
Jil
LOTI
I
t r-.T
. „
130 SPACES
riaiiitii:-" ,,,
f
■111
c
TENANT SPACE
6S.S66SF
■•«•. %h\
m
184,960 SF
+9,000 SF (Optional Mezz.)
(UNDER CONSTRUCTION)
„ -r-----—
r
mi
•.
%
flJS
I /
f-
s; y
■r»>Vi
m
000
MACK
REAL
ESTATE
GROUP
K A /\ ^^ I / INNOVATION
MAUK PARK
NEC Loop 101 &Bell Road
SCOTTSDALE, AZ
0
\
ornjs
ZaOM^TIT.NWC
"I
•CALE.i*-«-
Butler Design Group. Inc
arcnitccts & planners
AVERY
5160
101 BELL PI NORTH LLC
2415 E CAMELBACK RD STE 920
PHOENIX, AZ 85016
hcisy l"eei Address LiiDCis
Bond cSlong line to expose Pop-up Edge
101 BELL SOUTH LLC
2415 E CAMELBACK RD STE 920
PHOENIX, AZ 85016
Uoo Avery Tcirplntc SIGO i
16622 N91ST STREET LLC
27668 N 85TH LN
PEORIA, AZ 85383
16624 NORTH 90TH STREET LLC
16624 N 90TH ST STE 200
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
16631ST105 LLC
10632 N SCOTTSDALE RD UNIT 453
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85254
16674 N 91ST STREET STE 106 LLC
16674 N91ST ST STE 106
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
16801 NORTH 94TH STREET 2012 LLC
10258 E GOLD DUSTAVE
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258
17465 N 93RD ST LLC
9304 E VERDE GROVE VIEW STE 100
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
190 WEST ST JAMES LLC
21710 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STE 200
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
8765 EAST BELL ROAD LLC
5600 N 4TH ST
PHOENIX, AZ 85012
8913 BELL LLC
4771 N 20TH STSTE B22
PHOENIX, AZ 85016
90TH & BELL LLC
16801 N 90TH ST 102
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
9112 VERDE LLC
9112 E VERDE GROVE VW
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
9208 VGV LLC
15029 N 74TH 5T
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
9220 VGV LLC
15029 N 74TH ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
9221 DESERT VIEW LLC
9621 E BUTEO DR
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
9304 E VERDE GROVE VIEW LLC
9304 E VERDE GROVE VIEW STE 100
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
9393 VENTURESLLC
9393 E BELL RD
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
ADELSON SPORTS LLC
6501 E GREENWAY PKWY 103-504
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85254
AG LEAF LLC
20865 N90TH PL STE 200
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
AG-CW EAST BELL ROAD OWNER LLC
30021 TOMAS STE 130
RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA, CA 92688
ANDERSON ROBERT J
11906 LEMON CREST DR
LAKESIDE, CA 92040
ANSARI MOEEZ H/BEATRICE L TR
8105 IRVINE CENTER DR 1100
IRVINE, CA 92618
APPLE TEN SPE SCOTTSDALE INC
814 E MAIN ST
RICHMOND, VA 23219
ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
PO BOX 53999 MS 9565
PHOENIX, AZ 85072
ARIZONA STATE LAND DEPARTMENT
1616 W ADAMS ST
PHOENIX, AZ 85007
ARIZONA STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
205 S 17TH AVE MD 612E
PHOENIX, AZ 85007
ARL8LLC
11445 E VIA LINDA STE 2-612
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85259
AWW PRINCESS MOB OWNER LLC
802 N 3RD AVE
PHOENIX, AZ 85003
AZUL BELL 101 LLC
8889 E BELL RD 201
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
EtiqueUes cl'tidieibu Easy Peel
Allez a avery.ca/gabnritsI
AVERY
5160
B & F & Y PROPERTIES LLC
8765 E BELL RD 113
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
Easy reel Address Laoeis
Bend iiloiKi line to expose I’op-ep BdC)C
B J & P INVESTMENTS LLC
31912 N 141ST ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85262
Use Avefy Tomplatt 51G0 •
BA NAMAK AZ LLC
13876 N 83RD PL
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
BAHIA CAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLC
8900 E BAHIA DR 200
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
BAHIA CONDO LLC
8475 E HARTFORD DR STE 100
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
BAHIA DRIVE LLC
625 W DEER VALLEY DR UNIT 103 PMB 618
PHOENIX, AZ 85027
BAHIA HOLDINGS LLC
8340 E RAINTREE DR
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
BAILEY FAMILY TRUST
9215 E DESERT ARROYOS
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
BARAKAT HOLDINGS LLC
4602EBERNEILDR
PHOENIX, AZ 85028
BARNETCHE-LUGO FAMILY TRUST
9214 E DESERT PARK DR
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
BASHAH PROPERTIES LLC
PO BOX 54837
PHOENIX, AZ 85078
BATES AARON
9221 E DESERT ARROYOS ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
BAYAN HOLDINGS LLC
8961 E BELL RD STE 202
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
BAYNE SQUAD FAMILY TRUST
15012 206TH AVE SE
RENTON, WA 98059
BEARDSLEY ROBERT D/MARTINEZ MAX J
103 CALLE PAULA
SANTA FE, NM 87505
BERNOFF SUCCESS INSTITUTE LLC
9801 E CARON ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258
BGH INVESTMENTS LLC
8913 E BELL RD BLDG E STE lOlB
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
BGH INVESTMENTS LLC
4821 N SCOTTSDALE RD
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85251
BICKHAM JOHN MICHAEL
16801 N 94TH ST UNIT 1008
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
BIG SCOTTSDALE LLC
14160 SVY 72NO AVE STE 110
TIGARD, OR 97224
BLUE RIDGE HOLDING LLC
8757 E BELL RD
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
BOTKIN JULIE M
10883 VIA LOMBARD UNIT 2105
SAN DIEGO, CA 92129
BOVAPA PARTNERS LLC
8970 E BAHIA DR STE 100
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
BRANDEL RYAN
17708 N 92ND ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
BRONNENKANTADAM
23650 N 84TH PL
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
BROWNELL PROPERTIES 2018 LLC
10270 E GOLD DUST AVE
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258
BROWNLEE CLAY R/DOROTHY J
16801 N 94TH ST UNIT 2002
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
BROWNLEE WILLIAM
ALEXANDER/MADISON
17829 N 92ND ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
BTS HOLDINGS 103 LLC
797 E CEDAR DR
CHANDLER, AZ 85249
BUCCI PATRICK/AIMEE
9232 E VIA DE VAQUERO DR
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
i
rtiquettos d'adresse Easy Pec
;ry.ca/gabaritsI
AVERY
5160
BUELL CECILY A/L SCOTT
8355 DK RANCH RD
FLAG5TAFF, AZ 86005
bend alony line to expose Pop-up PJye
BUNNELL JOHN
16801 N94TH ST APT 2008
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
Use Awry Tempiat
C N S PROPERTIES LLC
16631 N 9TH ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
C5 VENTURES LLC
6929 N HAYDEN RD C4-163
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85250
CAMDEN USA INC
PO BOX 27329
HOUSTON, TX 77227
CARDELLA FAMILY LIVING TRUST
6343 CARLSBAD DR
TINLEY PARK, IL 60477
CARSON GROUP LLC
8269 E DEL CADENA DR
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258
CD 90TH ST LLC
7898 E ACOMA DR
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
CHEYENNE INVESTMENT GROUP LLC
16650 N91ST ST STE 107
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
CHINNAPPAN AND RAMASAMY REVOCABLE
TRUST
1585 ANDERSON RD APT 322
MCLEAN, VA 85288
CHRISTAKOS PROPERTIES LLC
8573 E PRINCESS DR STE 201
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
CHRISTENSEN SHARON E
16801 N 94TH STE 2013
SCOTTSDALE. AZ 85250
CILIENTO ANGELO
3917 E HALF HITCH PL
.PHOENIX, AZ 85050
CLANTON REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC
16674 N 91ST ST STE 106
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
COMPULSIVE LLC
14516 FLATTOP RANCH RD
AUSTIN, TX 78732
COMSTOCK FAMILY LLC
NO ADDRESS PROVIDED
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
CORPORATE CENTER AT DC RANCH
ASSOCIATION
2394 E CAMELBACK RD 600
PHOENIX, AZ 85016
COYOTES ICE 3 LLC
7114 E STETSON DR STE 400
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85251
COYOTES ICE LLC
9375 E BELL RD
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
CRANE NORMAN B/VERNABELLE TR
23005 N74TH ST UNIT 3007
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
CROW JOHN/MARY MONICA
17828 N 92ND ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
CROW MADELEINE GRACE/EBERT
MATTHEW
16801 N 94TH ST UNIT 1062
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
DAGNEY ENTERPRISES LLC
7820 E EVANS RD STE 700
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
DANA FREEWAY BUILDING LLC
3716 E PALM ST
MESA, AZ 85215
DC COMMERCIAL LLC
PO BOX 8540
STOCKTON, CA 95208
DC RANCH ASSOCIATION INC
20551 N PIMA RD
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85331
DC RANCH ASSOCIATION INC
20551 N PIMA RD 5TE 180
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
DC RANCH CROSSING ASSOCIATES LLC
1860 ALA MOANA BLVD
HONOLULU, HI 96815
DELLY MAHA
16801 N 94TH ST 1014
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
DESCALSO DANIEL/JULIA GAMLEN
9214 E VIA DE VAQUERO DR
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
Etiquettes d'cidicsse Easy Pe
Allez a avery.ca/gabarits
___ LiiLiETizie GdU.int Averv SKi'lI
AVERY
5160
DESERT FAIRWAYS 204-205, LLC
8765 E BELL RD
SCOTT5DALE, AZ 85260
basy Peel Adciress LaDeis
Bend nioncj hne to expose Pop-up Edge
DINKELMEYER ANDREW JOHN/LISA MARIE
17781 N 92ND ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
Use Avery Template 5150
DITTRICK PHILLIP
16674 N91ST ST 104
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
DUNBAR PROPERTIES LLC
9170 E BAHIA DR STE 102
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
DYER HOLDINGS LLC
9236 E DESERT VILLAGE DR
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
EDELBACH KENNETH/CHRISTINA R
2887 SLATE CT NW
ROCHESTER, MN 55901
ENDURANCE PROPERTIES LLC
9376 E BAHIA DR STE 103D
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85259
ESSARY MATTHEW K/ALISON C
18198 N 92ND ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
EWR SCOTTSDALE TERRA VERDE LLC
51 BROADWAY STE 600
FARGO, ND 58102
EWR SCOTTSDALE TOWERS LLC
51 BROADWAY N 600
FARGO, ND 58102
FARR GARY l/PATMORE-FARR CONNIE L
16801 N94TH ST 2064
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
FETZER SCOTTSDALE PARTNERS LLC
1019 W WISE RD STE 201
SCHAUMBERG, IL 60193
FISCHER 12 LLC
11153 E KAREN DR
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
FISCHER FAMILY TRUST
16801 N 94TH ST 2011
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
FRANCIS JASON/MORGAN
17776 N 92ND PL
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
FRESHWATER LLC
16655 N90TH ST STE 100
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
65BC LLC
7337 E DOUBLETREE RANCH RD STE C28a
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258
GARON LIVING TRUST
17756 N92ND ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
GATES BOX LLC
4840 E JASMINE UNIT 105
MESA, AZ 85205
GIVENS JOHN K/JOREEN J
16801 N 94TH ST 1004
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
GOLD5MITH MERYL
9225 E CANYON VIEW RD
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
GOODMAN GARRISON M/LEIGH ANNE
18310 N92ND ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
GRADY JOHN T/JANELLJ
9239 E CANYON VIEW RD
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
GRADY JOHN T/JANELLJ
17733 N 92ND ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
GRANT RUSSELL REVOCABLE TRUST
9209 E DESERT ARROYOS
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
GREENWAY SADDLERY INC
2902 E GREENWAY RD
PHOENIX, AZ 85032
GRSJ TRUST
8053 E THORNTREE DR
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85266
GRUETZMACHER PATRICK JAMES
9245 E CANYON VW
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
GUERRA PROPERTIES LLC
8765 E BELL RD STE 105
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
H & L SPEEDWAY PROPERTIES LLC
30 E CALLE CLARAVISTA
TUCSON, AZ 85716
Etiquettes d'ndresse E.isy Peel
B
Allcz n evety.ca/gabari
AVERY
5160
H F OFFICE LLC
10673 E FI RETHROW DR
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
bcisy
AOcrreiS^aD^is^
Bend oIohq line lo expose Pop-up Etlg
HAEBIG FAMILY TRUST
18182 N 92ND ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
Uso Av*-:-ry
HALMI & ROENIGK PROPERTIES LLC
7402 E VISTA DR
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85250
HEGEMON LLC
7402 E VISTA DR
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85250
HHS REAL ESTATE LLC
8985 E BELL RD
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
HICKEY DAVID/KELLYS
18426 N 65TH PL
PHOENIX, AZ 85054
hilltroym/tiffanyd
17800 N92ND PL
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
HM FAMILY TRUST
18291 N PIMA RD STE 110 PMB 159
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
HRUSHKA ADAM J/BARBARA ANN
16801 N 94TH ST 2006
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
HUDWIL HOLDINGS LLC
1753 E. BROADWAY RD. STE 101-275
TEMPE, AZ 85282
HUFFMAN TODD D/LYNNE A
25401 ADDINGTON CT
PERRYSBURG, OH 43551
IGNARSKIJOLENE L
9249 E DESERT ARROYOS
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
10 DATA CENTERS LLC
1101 ENTERPRISE DR
ROYERSFORD, PA 19468
IRRELEVANT INVESTMENTS LLC
10101 N92ND ST STE 101
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258
IT CANYON LLC
6940 E DOUBLETREE RANCH RD
PARADISE VALLEY, AZ 85253
J&C ARIZONA PROPERTIES LLC
10673 E FIRETHORN DR
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
JASON DEAN LLC
17491 N 93RD ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
JCG 16621 PROPERTY LLC
10115 E BELL RD STE 107-621
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
JCG 16631 PROPERTY LLC
10115 E BELL RD STE 107-621
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
JCG 16631-106 PROPERTY LLC
10115 E BELL RD STE 107-621
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
JCG 16650 PROPERTY LLC/R & J PROPERTY
HOLDINGS LLC
10115 E BELL RD STE 107-621
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
JCG 9170 PROPERTY LLC
10115 E BELL RD STE 107-621
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
JD STROM LLC
1709 181ST PL SW
LYNNWOOD, WA 98037
JLNILLC
11445 E VIA LINDA STE 2-521
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85259
JOCK AND SONCHEN PATTON TRUST
17805 N 92ND ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
JOHN F HORNACEK TRUST/SUSAN C
HORNACEKTRUST
713 S STONE AVE
LA GRANGE, IL 60525
JOHN VAN ROOY AND ALLISON VAN ROOY
REV LIV TR
2918 SWEETWATER AVE
LAKE HAVASU CITY, AZ 86406
JR CLARK LLC
8765 E BELL RD STE 201
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
JUGGERNAUT HOLDINGS LLC
16460 N91ST ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
KAKWANI FAMILY TRUST
9185 E CANYON VIEW
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
EtiqueUei d'acliesso E;isy Peel
IQ
Allez a avery.ca/gabnrits
i ihl''-.!-/ If' C-dh.iri; Avlt :)l'o0I
AVERY
5160
KALYANAM GOWRI
9255 E DESERT ARROYOS
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
hasyt"eel Ariciross laocis
Bend dlonci line la expose Pop-up Eclye
KNASE RICHARD J
16801 N 94TH ST 1013
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
KOO ELIZABETH LOKI
13675 NOEL RD 305
DALLAS, TX 75240
KRISHNANS FAMILY TRUST
17709 N 92N0 ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
LAMBERT STEVEN M/RABE JENNIFER L
674NUVOLAVISTAa
RICHLAND, VYA 99352
LANNING PROPERTY 18140 LLC
12462 N 81STST
SCOTTADALE,AZ 85260
LEAP DAY LLC
3317 E BELL RD STE 243
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85032
LEBLANC INVESTMENT PROPERTIES LLC
8686 E STAGHORN LN
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85266
LECKIE ALEX/JEANNE
9207 E TRAILSIDE VW
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
LEVY KYLE/MCMILLAN LAUREL
18338 N 92ND ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ852SS
LITERATI LLC
8424 E CALLE BUENA VIS
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
LITERATI LLC
8424 E CALLE BUENA VIS
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
LIU chenaiaoyan/alexjohn
9239 E VIA DE VAQUERO DR
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
LOEPPKY MARK/JILLIAN
45 CATHEDRAL BLUFFS RD
CORMAN PARK, SK S7P lAl, CANADA
LONLEY CACTUS LLC
8937 E BELL RD STE 101
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
LUZI SCOTT/ALECIA
9510 HARDING BLVD
WAUWATOSA, Wl 53226
LYNCH JORDAN/KAI LEY
18196 N 92ND ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
M G REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS COMPANY LLC
6540 E CHOLLA DR
PARADISE VALLEY, AZ 85253
MACKAY NEIL V
16674 N 91ST ST UNIT lOlD
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
MACLEAN LIVING TRUST
9233 E VIA DE VAQUERO DR
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
MALO PROPERTIES LLC/NATIONAL LASER
INSTITUTE LLC
16601 N 90TH ST 100/101
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
MARK A CHRISTENSEN & SHEILA W
CHRISTENSEN TR
9221 E VIA DE VAQUERO DR
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
MARLA A WALBERG LIVING TRUST
10092 E FLATHORN DR
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
MCCAGUE THOMAS/LESLEY
9227 E VIA DE VAQUERO DR
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
MCDONALD JULIE R FRANK
4859 E MOCKINGBIRD LN
PARADISE VALLEV, AZ 85253
MCGARITY FAMILY REVOCABLE LIVING
TRUST
9202 E VIA DE VAQUERO DR
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
MCGOWAN TERENCE B
16801 N94TH ST APT 2009
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
MCGOWAN TERENCE B/KLASKO PATRICIA B
16801 N 94TH ST UNIT 1010
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
MCLURG DAVE/VERA
9220 E DESERT PARK DR
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
MD OFFICES LLC
5425 E BELL RD STE 121
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85254
Etiqi'ettes d’cidmsfe Easy ^eel
Allez a avery.ca/gabarits
Avriv b 1".'I
J
AVERy
5160
MEJIA SERGIO
17732 N92ND ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
basy reel /xciaiess Laoeis
iend along line* to oxpoic Pop-up Edge
MENG PROPERTIES LLC
6557 E VISTA DEL ORO DR
PRESCOTT, AZ 86303
METIS GROUP THE LLC
8312 E CALLE DE ALEGRIA
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
MG REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS COMPANY LLC
20865 N 90TH PL UNIT 210
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
MICHAEL AND JULIE SPEETZEN FAMILY
TRUST
374FERNDALE RDW
WAYZATA, MN 55391
MILICEVICFRANO P/ANTE
18254 N92ND ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
MILLSTEIN DIANNE F
16801 N 94TH ST UNIT 1012
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
MINOU FAIZ LIVING TRUST
16801 N 94TH ST APT 2004
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
MNMW LLC
11811 N TATUM BLVD P129
PHOENIX, AZ 85028
MOPAR RANCH LLC
28440 N 75TH ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85266
MOREIRA LIVING TRUST
9267 E DESERT ARROYOS
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
MORINATEUTA
8 CIRCLE DR UNITE
TIBURON,CA 94920
MREG 101 BELL LLC CP # 53-121889
60 COLUMBUS OR FL 20
NEW YORK, NY 10023
MREG 101 BELL NORTH LLC
60 COLUMBUS CIRFL20
NEW YORK, NY 10023
MSE INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENTS LLC
16410 N91ST ST STE 112
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
MULLINIKS BILL M
PO BOX 1460
CAREFREE, AZ 85377
NANCO PROPERTIES LLC
PO BOX 45347
PHOENIX, AZ 85064
NAVICAN HOLDINGS LLC
9170 E BAHIA DR 101
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
NESTOR FAMILY LIVING TRUST
21036 N 102ND ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
NGO KELVIN/VU KATHY N
18212 N 92ND ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
NHP LLC
8900 E BAHIA STE 101
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
NORTH HILL DEVELOPMENT LLC
501 NW GRAND BLVD
OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73118
NORTH SCOTTSDALE AESTHETICS LLC
8900 E BAHIA DR STE 110
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
NORTH SCOTTSDALE SPORTS COMPLEX
HOLDINGS LLC
1204 SUNCAST LN STE 2
EL DORADO HILLS, CA 95762
NUSS JENNIFER/MICHAEL
9225 E TRAILSIDE VW
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
OBRIEN REALTY LLC
9380 E BAHIA DR 202
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
OMALLEY JAY/STACEY
9213 E TRAILSIDE VW
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
ORRISON RICHARD/SHERRY
9208 E VIA DE VAQUERO DR
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
PARADISE FAB 4 LLC
8761 E BELL RD
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
PARAGON HOLDINGS LLC
9096 E BAHIA DR UNIT 109
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
HtiquettOb d'ddresse Lnsy '^eel
I
Allez a avery.ca/gabaritsI
AVERY
L—^
5160
PARANTHAMAN AND GOVINDAN TRUST
17757 N92ND ST
SCOTTSDALE, A2 85255
PB SQUARE DLLC
8596 E VOLTAIRE AVE
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
Ecisy Peel Address Labels
Bend iiloncj line to expose Pop-up hdge
PATRICIA B KLASKO LIVING TRUST
16801 N 94TH ST APT 1017
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
PEGASUS DEER VALLEY OWNER LLC
8888 E RAINTREE DR 155
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
r# A|
■ Kfl ■ SJ111 ■] R11
Use Avery
5160 I
PATRICIA G LOGAN REVOCABLE TRUST
5621 SADDLE RIDGE DR
MEDFORD, OR 97504
PENNYPACKER ABBAJAY FAMILY TRUST
16495 N 113TH WAY
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
PERIMETER GATEWAY PORTFOUO LLC
802 N 3RD AVE
PHOENIX, AZ 85003
PETER CATALANO AND JENNIFER CATALANO
TRUST
9273 E DESERT ARROYOS
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
PITEA FAMILY TRUST
9820 E THOMPSON PEAK PKWY UNIT 718
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
PLG HOLDINGS II LLC
8765 E BELL RD 110
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
POLLY HOLDINGS LLC/JDR HOLDINGS LLC
17392 DAIMIERSTUNIT 100
IRVINE, CA 92614
POTATO GARDEN LLC
PO BOX 1078
HIGLEY, AZ 85236
PRECISE INSTRUMENTATION TRAINING &
CONSULTANTS LLC
14648 S 46TH ST
PHOENIX, AZ 85044
R & K REAL ESTATE LLC
8761 E BELL RD STE 105
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
R&N DURR TRUST
11845 E BECKER LN
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85259
RAINTREE INVESTMENTS FAMILY LIMITED
PARTNERSH
25457 N 114TH ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
RBB HOLDINGS 2 LLC
7114 E STETSON DR STE 400
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85251
REJUVENT PROPERTIES LLC
9155 E BELL RD STE 101
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
RENUE BAHIA LLC
8900 E BAHIA DR STE 105
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
REVOCABLE TRUST WILLIAM J LYSTER AND
JERE L LYSTER
929 HALECREST DR
ESCONDIDO, CA 92025
REYNOLDS KIMBERLY M
9233 E CANYON VIEW RD
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
RICHARD ZACHARY/NICOLE
9220 E VIA DE VAQUERO DR
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
ROBERT AND JULIANNE HITTENBERGER
LIVING TRUST \
18240 N 92ND ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
ROBERTSON CONNOR
9233 E DESERT ARROYOS
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
ROBISON PROPERTIES LLC
9376 E BAHIA DR UNIT D-107
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
RUSCH ROBERT J JR/ANGELA F
9208 E DESERT PARK DR
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
RW TRUST/ETAL
8729 LAKE EDGE DR
LAUREL, MD 20723
S 8i L KING LLC
9025 E KAREN DR
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
SALIDA 1011 LLC
6412 E LARKSPUR DR
5COTTSDALE,AZ 85254
SALKIN NEIL/LINDA/HALLDOR50N
RYAN/JENNIFER
7215 E SILVERSTONE DR APT 2100
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
Fliqucttes d'adt-;sso Easy Peel
B
Allez a avery.ca/gabciritII
AVERY
5160
SANCHEZ ADALBERTO BARNETCHE/ETAL
9214 DESERT PARK DR
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
SCOTTSDALE CITY OF
7227 E INDIAN SCHOOL RD STE 205
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85251
tasyreei Aacircss uiut^ib
Benoolong line to oxpobc.* Pop-up ElIqo
SAVONE ANGELO/ANNA TR
26094 N 88TH WAY
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
SCOTTSDALE MEDICAL CAMPUS JPBRE LLC
9343 E BAHIA DR
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
Use Avetv Tf'-mLitn SIGO !
SCOTTSDALE AREA ASSOC OF REALTORS
8600 E ANDERSON DR STE 200
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
SCOTTSDALE REAL CO LLC
1220 20THSTSE310
SALEM, OR 97302
SH 781-796 LLC
6890 S 2300 E PO BOX 71870
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84171
SHEFA BEIT YOSEF PROPERTIES LLC
7398 E CORTEZ RD
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
SHELDON ROBERT C/JACQUELINE E
12917 SE 309TH PL
AUBURN, WA 98092
SILVERLEAF AUTO GARAGES LLC
16410 N91ST ST STE 112
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
SIMON JONGERT TRUST
18324 N 92ND ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
SKIN & GRIN LLC
3811 E BELL RD STE 207
PHOENIX, AZ 85032
SNIDER ROBERT E/CHRISTINE Y
9572 FENDALL HALL CIR
MONTGOMERY, AL 36117
SONG BERNICE STURTEVANT TR
8577 VILLAGE LN
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770
SOP MCDOWELL MTN BUSINESS PARK II LLC
2390 E CAMELBACK RD 320
PHOENIX, AZ 85016
SPEUR PARTNERS LLC
8486 N 84TH PL
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258
STALEY LINDA L
9201 E DESERT ARROYOS
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
STORAGE INVEST LINE LP
2042 BUSINESS CENTER DR STE 100
IRVINE, CA 92612
STRONG TOWER LLC
10610 E CHOLLA ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 852S9
STUART BEVERLY
16801 N 94TH ST APT 1009
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
SUGOVIC MILOS/BROOKE
16801 N 94TH ST APT 1016
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
SULLIVAN CRAIG E/LORI M
17780 N92ND ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
SUNRENU PROPERTIES LLC
16674 N91ST ST STE 105
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
5YLVIE ANIEL LIVING TRUST
16801 N 94TH ST UNIT 1002
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
SZABO PROPERTIES LLC
2907 UUREL LAKE DR
KINGWOOD, TX 77339
TA DESERT PARKS VISTA LLC
610 NEWPORT CENTER DR STE 1550
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660
TATONKA PROPERTIES TWO LLC
345 SPRINGSIDE DR STE 101
AKRON, OH 44333
TIERRA MARKETING SERVICES LLC
9170 E BAHIA DR STE 103A
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
TLG INVESTMENTS LLC
9096 E BAHIA DR 102
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
TNT PROJECT LLC
7730 E REDFIELD RD BLD
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
B
Klicuettes d'acliesse Easy Pee
Allez a svery.c^/gabnrits
iJtiii
Ic Or,bi.ru Av-jiy b i60I
AVERY
5160
TONIC LLC
20909 N90TH PLSTE 202
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
easy Peel address LdOeis
Bend alon^ lir.c to expose Pop-up Edge
TOWNSEND FAMILY TRUST
18226 N 92ND ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
bse Avery Tenip'':itL'' SIGO
TRAILSIDEVIEW LLC
7010 E ACOMA DR 103
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85254
TRW 11971 TRUST
16801 N94TH ST APT 1005
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
TULLY REAGAN/MALATEK KEVIN ALAN
18154 N 92ND ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
USA BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
23636 N 7TH ST
PHOENIX, AZ 85024
VALK PROPERTIES THREE LLC
1450 T L TOWNSEND DR STE 100
ROCKWALL, TX 75032
VEACH BRENT
17704 N 92ND PL
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
VICTORIA ANNE ELIZABETH OBENSHAIN
DARBY REVOCABLE TRUST
17728 N 92ND PL
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
VIKING CAKE HOLDINGS II LLC
11375 E PARADISE LN
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
VOICE BUCCI HOLDINGS CORPORATION
1669 W 3RD AVE STE 202
VANCOUVER, BC V6J IKl, CANADA
VOICE INSTITUTE LLC
16674 N91ST ST STE 102
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
WAGGONER JERRY/KRISTI
16801 N 94TH ST UNIT 1003
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
WALLEY DONNA K
PO BOX 22070
FLAGSTAFF, AZ 86002
WDG ENTERPRISES LLC
11068 E JASMINE DR
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
WEISS KAREN
9229 E CANYON VIEW RD
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
WEST END HOTEL LLC
4211 REDWOOD AVE UNIT 401
LOS ANGELES, CA 90066
WOLD WILLIAM/JILL
16801 N 94TH ST UNIT 2019
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
WOLLMANN ANDREW F
16621 N 91ST ST STE 106
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
WREN VALERIE Q
18268 N 92ND ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
WRIGHT JOSEPH PATRICK
16801 N94TH ST APT 2001
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260
ZAMBRANO ALYSSA/DANIEL
3816 DAWSON ST
AURORA, CO 80014
ZLOTO DANIELLE/WILNER MICHAEL
9226 E VIA DE VAQUERO DR
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
ZUCCA LLC
11852 E HUNT HWY
CHANDLER, AZ 85249
I
PiqL.ettes d';)dte,sse Easy Peel
Allezci avery.ca/gnbarits J
10 Grbar t Avgjv 5'60 i
AVERY
5160
Commissioner George Ertel
City of Scottsdale Planning Commission
11725 N. 129th Way
Scottsdale, AZ 85259
Easy rt!fl Address IaDtfiS
Bond n!ong line lo expose Pop-up E Jgc
Carla
3420 N. 78th 5treet
Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Use Awry
Chris Schaffner
7346 E. Sunnyside Dr.
Scottsdale, AZ 85260
Community Development Director
Town of Paradise Valley
6401 E Lincoln Drive
Paradise Valley, AZ 85253
Constance Laub
10105 E. Via Linda Suite 345
Scottsdale, AZ 85258
David G. Gulino
5235 N. Woodmere Fairway
Scottsdale, AZ 85250
Edwin Bull
Burch & Cracchiolo PA
1850 N. Central Ave., Ste. 1700
Phoenix, AZ 85004
John Berry/Michele Hammond
Berry Riddell, LLC
6750 E Camelback Rd, Ste 100
Scottsdale, AZ 85251
John Washington
3518 N. Chambers Court
Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Kathy Littlefield
aty of Scottsdale City Council
3939 N. Drinkwater Bivd.
Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Maricopa County Superintendent of
Schools
4041N. Central Avenue Suite 1200
Phoenix, AZ 85012
Planning & Development Department
Maricopa County Planning & Development
301W Jefferson St., Suite 170
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Planning St Development Director
City of Phoenix
200 West Washington Street, 2nd Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Planning St Engineering Section Manager
Arizona State Land Department
1110 W. Washington St.
Phoenix, AZ 85007
Planning and Zoning
Town of Carefree
8 Sundial Circle P.O. Box 740
Carefree, AZ 85377
Planning Department
Town of Cave Creek
37622 N Cave Creek Road
Cave Creek, AZ 85331
Planning Department
SRP-MIC
10005 E Osborn Road
Scottsdale, AZ 85256
ADOT Central District - Red Letter
Arizona Department of Transportation
2140 W. Hilton Avenue, Mail Drop PMOO
Phoenix, AZ 85009
Planning St Zoning Division
Town of Fountain Hills
16705 E. Avenue of the Fountains
Fountain Hills, AZ 85268
Superintendent
Scottsdale Unified School District
8500 E. Jackrabbit Rd
Scottsdale, AZ 85250
SRP Land Department atten: Sherry
Wagner/Right-of-Way Technician, SR.
Mail Station PABIOW
P.O. Box 52025
Phoenix, AZ 85072-2025
Southwest Gas Corporation
2200 N. Central Avenue Ste 101
Phoenix, AZ 85004
Superintendent
Cave Creek Unified School District
P.O. Box 426
Cave Creek, AZ 85327
Withey Morris, PLC
2525 E. Arizona Biltmore Circle Suite A-212
Phoenix, AZ 85016
Paradise Valley Unified School District
15002 N. 32nd Street
Phoenix, AZ 85032
Maggie Keasler
7127 E. 6th Ave.
Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Susan Demmitt/NickSobraske
Gammage & Burnham
40 N. Central Ave., 20th Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85004
Paul Alessio
7527 E. Tailspin Lane
Scottsdale, AZ 85255
Rose Law Group
Attn: Jennifer Hall
7144 E Stetson Drive, Suite 300
Scottsdale, AZ 85251
City of Mesa
Attn: Tye Hodson
55 N Center Dr
Mesa, AZ 85201
Etiquettf^s d'cidreshO E;isy Poel
B
Allez ;i avery.ca/gabarits
___ I.':; i.'.ei le '.'i.- lxiril Avery I
AVERY
5160
Michael P. Leary
Commercial Development Consulting
10278 E. Hillery Dr.
Scottsdale, AZ 85255
basy reel Mciclrebb Louei^
Bond cHoiKj lino to export' Pop-up Edge
v^U lU uvt:.
,
UseAvery Templotci S iGO i
Tom Emele Property Manager
Salida Condo Assn
3260 E Indian School Rd
Phoenix, AZ 85018
Drew Ashmun Property Manager
The Villas at Desert Park Village / DC Ranch
1600 W Broadway Rd Unit 200
Tempe, AZ 85282
Chey Harmon President
The Villas at Desert Park Village / DC Ranch
1600 W Broadway Rd Unit 200
Tempe, AZ 85282
Theodore Meegan Vice-President
The Villas at Desert Park Village / DC Ranch
1600 W Broadway Rd Unit 200
Tempe, AZ 85282
Katherine Benveniste
The Villas at Desert Park Village / DC Ranch
1600 W Broadway Rd Unit 200
Tempe, AZ 85282
Etiquettes cl'aclI esse Easy
Allcv .i nvety.ca/gabnrits 1
J
I
TabC
:?
5.
c t?
0 10%
Affidavit of Posting
Required: Signed^ Notarized originais.
Recommended: E-mail copy to your project Coordinator.
19 Project Under Consideration Sigh (White)
□ Public Hearing Notice Sign (Red)
Case Number:
Project Name:
Location:
Site Posting Date:
Appiicant Name:
Sign Company Name:
Phone Number:
546-PA-2025
SEC Pima Rd & Loop 101 Fwy
09/05/25
Withey Morris Baugh
Dynamite Signs
480-585-3031
I confirm that the site has been posted as indicated by the Project Manager for the case as listed above.
^yysj
\pplica
ApplicaaftSignatur
09/05/25
Date
Return completed original notarized affidavit AND pictures to the Current Pianning Office no iater than
14 days after your appiication submittal.
Acknowledged before me on------Septemberii, 2025
MARnCTHCOHtUD
Houry Public-Aflioni
Maricop* County
CemmlutoA f 671441
My Coffiffl. tfpifti Ocl If. 1016
a
Jpiary0jblic
My commission expires;
“2^
City of Scottsdale--Current Planning Diyisipn
7447 E Indian School Road, Suite 105, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 ♦ Phone: 480-312-7000 ♦ Fax: 480.312-7088
CP_Amdavit_Posting
i
Page 1 of 1
Revision Date: 20-0ct-04
1®*^^ Early Notification of
S^iO’roiect Under Consideration^iMM
If,
—r -
■
vxerj^
roject Under Consideration
Neighborhood Open House Meeting
Date: Wednesday, September 17,2025
Time: 6:00 P.M - 7:00 P.M.
Location: Scottsdale Maniott at McDowell Mountains • 16770 North Perimeter Drive, Scottsdale
fr ^
sft
Site Address: Southeast Corner of Pima Rd and Loop 101 Fwy, Scottsdale AZ
Project Overview:
Request: Planned Shared Development (PSD) Overlay to share development standards
between parcels on existing campus (+/-95 acres) and Rezoning to add C-4 (General
Commercial) zoning district and modify development standards of existing Planned
Community District (PCD) on 5.4-acres of existing campus.
Description of Project and Proposed Use: Light Industrial Campus with New EVAutomotive
Service & Delivery on +/-5.4-acres
Site Acreage:-r-l-SS acres
Site Zoning: 1-1, PCD (Industrial Park, Planned Community District) and 1-1, PCD, ESL
1.
' ‘j
City Contact:
MTessier@scottsdaleaz|o^ ^
SP-fete31^E-''''*^«y“°"^sBaugh,PLC Name:MeredithTessier
Phoneft6D2-230.0600
Phone #: 480-312-4211
Email Address: george@wmbattomeys.com
Email Address:
-
Pre-Application #: 546-PA-2025
iiT—...
.Posting Date: 9/5/25
fof removing or defacing sign prior to date of last hearing. Applicant Responsible for Sign Remold
<•*0>ro,
M04
»4S(
Com
i'n-0:
'X.
m
m
ibei^
1-331^mmmm
i
i
4
\
<?
-
■Si
■ i4
al :
1
_. y Notification of"^
roject Under Consideration
s
■JP^
Jp,
'-*»
Neighborhood Open House Meeting
Date: Wednesday, September 17,2025
Time: 6:00 P.M-7:00 P.M.
I Location: Scottsdale Marriott at McDowell Mountains ■ 16770 North Perimeter Drive, Scottsdale
Site Address: Southeast Corner of Pima Rd and Loop 101 Fwy, Scottsdale AZ
Project Overview:
- -
Request: Planned Shared Development (PSD) Overlay to share development standards
between parcels on existing campus (+/-95 acres) and Rezoning to add C-4 (General
Commercial) zoning district and modify development standards of existing Planned
Community District (PCD) on 5.4-acres of existing campus.
f
Description of Project and Proposed Use: Light Industrial Campus with New EVAutomotive
^
Service & Delivery on +/-5.4-acres
Site Acreage: +/-95 acres
Site Zoning: 1-1, PCD (Industrial Park, Planned Community District) and 1-1, PCD, ESL
(Environmentally Sensitive Lands)
Applicant/Contsct;
t
Name; George Pasquel HI-Withey Morris Baugh, PLC Npe: Meredi]^ tor IIh
‘
Phone ft: 6M-0600
Phone#:480-312-4211
Email Address; george(gwmbattomeys.com
Email Address:
Pre-Application #:546-PA-2025
MTessier@scottsdalea2.gov
Posting Dste; 915/25
' Psnaity for rwnoving of cWacIng sign prior to (tats of last hsaring. Applicant Responsible for Sign Removal.
mm
'J.,.
"Sepprnl:
' -u |er5, 2025 at 12:03 PM
53:649918,-111.887694
’ ' , ■ E Traiiside View
Scoft^ile AZ 85255
amm
'F'
*
\
I
^^ r
w.--
’ wiiiiimeng
_ .
c’SSe
>i
2
■«i^u
■aficr
¥arly Notificati(
Project Under Consideration
Neighborhood Open House Meeting
Date: Wednesday, September 17,2025
Time; 6:00 P.M - 7:00 P.M.
Location: Scottsdale Marriott at McDowell Mountains ■ 16770 North Perimeter Drive, Scottsdale
Site Address: Southeast Comer of Pima Rd and Loop 101 Fwy, Scottsdale AZ
Project Overview:
'
Request: Planned Shared Development (PSD) Overlay to share development standards
between parcels on existing campus (+/-95 acres) and Rezoning to add C-4 (General
Commercial) zoning district and modify development standards of existing Planned
<5
Community District (PCD) on 5.4-acres of existing campus.
'
Description of Project and Proposed Use: Light Industrial Campus with New EVAutomotive
Service & Delivery on +/-S.4-acres
Site Acreage: +1-95 acres
Site Zoning: 1-1, PCD (Industrial Park, Planned Community District) and 1-1, PCD, ESL
(Environmentally Sensitive Lands)
Applicant/Contact:
City Contact:
Name: George Pasquel 111-Wrthey Morris Baugh, PLC Name: Meredith Tessier
Phone #: 602-230-0600
Phone #: 480-312-4211
Email Address: george(gwmbattomeys.com Email Address:
Pre-Application»: 546-PA-2025
MTessier§scottsdaleaz.go\
Posting Date: 9/S/2S
* Penalty for removing or defacing sign prior to date of last hearing. Applicant Responsible for Sign Removal. ,
s
-
■'■: Sfept
V '
Scottsdai
ifKi
.64^276,-1
'^'rv N Pim^Rb
Scottsdale AZ* 85255
F' Early Notification of
Hgyroject Under Consideration
. '•* fe:.
1-
l:
V.
^-^=5t3!ca-_;~
Neighborhood Open House Meeting
Date; Wednesday, September 17,2025
Time: 6:00 P.M-7:00 P.M.
Location: Scottsdale Marriott at McDowell Mountains -16770 North Perimeter Drive, Scottsdale
Site Address: Southeast Corner of Pima Rd and Loop 101 Fwy, Scottsdale AZ
Project Overview:
B Request: Planned Shared Development (PSD) Overlay to share development standards
between parcels on existing campus {*l-i5 acres) and RezonIng to add C4 (General
Commercial) zoning district and modify development standards of existing Planned
Community District (PCD) on 5.4-acres of existing campus.
4
r'n
Description of Project and Proposed Use: Light Industrial Campus with New EV Automotive j
Service & Delivery on+/-5.4-acres
*
Site Acreage: +/-95 acres
Site Zoning: 1-1, PCD (Industrial Park, Planned Community District) and H, PCD, ESL
(Environmentally Sensitive Lands)
lll-Withey Morris Baugh, PLC
T^ier
iirSirfifMi'ir^ISffPhnri" #; 602-230-0600
Phone #; 480-312-4211
Email Address: george@wmbattomeys.com
Email Address;
Pre-Application #: 546-PA-2025
MTessier@scottsdaleaz.gov
* p^ity (ofnimo^ng or defacing sign prior to date of last hearing. Applicant Responsible for Sign Removal.
A.
r
;
J«S0IV
A
Mm
5^
mi
Is
is:
'J
1*4-
mm
'XM
mu
c
*
Early Notification of
Project Under Consideratior
-*
llifyOVATIO ^
PARV
I'
SGQTTSDA
•n N \
•
Neighborhood Open House Meeting
Date: Wednesday, September 17,2025
Time: 6:00 P.M-7:00 P.M.
I Location: Scottsdale Marriott at McDoweli Mountains • 16770 North Perimeter Drive, Scottsdale
Site Address: Southeast Comer of Pima Rd and Loop 101 Fwy, Scottsdale AZ
Project Overview:
Request: Planned Shared Development (PSD) Overlay to share development standards
between parcels on existing campus (+/-95 acres) and Rezoning to add C-4 (Generai
Commercial) zoning district and modify deveiopment standards of existing Pianned
Community District (PCD) on 5.4-acres of existing campus.
Description of Project and Proposed Use: Light industriai Campus with New EV Automotive
Service & Delivery on +/-5.4-acres
Site Acreage:+/-95 acres
Site Zoning: H, PCD (Industrial Park, Planned Community District) and H, PCD, ESL
(Environmentally Sensitive Lands)
ADDlicant/Contact:
City Contact:
Ks&d,te,go,
Potting Ditt: VSIK
w .
A
nr d.r«:lnii lion ofiof to date ot latt htaring. Applicant Respontibit for Sign Removtt. _
SCQttSCl^l^lSS^S
rrabD
SIGN-IN
MREG101 BELL, LLC
Southeast corner of the Loop 101 Fwy & Pima Road, Scottsdale, AZ
Neighborhood Open House Meeting
September 17™, 2025 - 6:00 PM - Scottsdale Marriott at McDowell Mountains -16770 N. Perimeter Drive, Scottsdale, AZ 85260
NAME (Please Print)
ADDRESS
PHONE NO,
E-MAIL ADDRESS
ZOSS^ ijfU^E
■48o.€.OP.'T^l3 pErefe.KIET
davbl.<\ri^Al2CL
/. ^oP[
4.
}
9^Soe
^
^0 (1
5. i^nirajn g^ty.nXV-
£■
6. U>Uifg/7
^
*■.,11
I
'
ll_--
i<«0'aivl?7o
Kaj/y^laoxU^noiLeaiu
7. ^m\jiyiK^sn\ b
Lont)'^ea^ koUi ^/o-5^7-361 (, j>/o^^3a\\o(?nvr^.(avv\
ieC~
7
oay
I, «<4 'V
H■ C)uy\4r
’^258'£^.Ds&crt/t»r
Hso-58S-^'i
■XJD^
SIGN-IN
MREG101 BELL, LLC
Southeast corner of the Loop 101 Fwy & Pima Road, Scottsdale, AZ
Neighborhood Open House Meeting
September 17™, 2025 - 6:00 PM - Scottsdale Marriott at McDowell Mountains -16770 N. Perimeter Drive, Scottsdale, AZ 85260
NAME (Please Print)
ADDRESS
PHONE NO.
E-MAIL ADDRESS
lcnclQr\iple-(^/'(yn
A
«
72. dhtis ^A,oller\ ^315 £ Vi't.w 12A
701 -M
Cjk
o ll OiyVl© oL coi
ToLic A
i? 5
cdh
15./!/^lirec\iw\c{- liH^^
^^«
l^:=±r>B^»0
s^rWiAv QX-
77.
75.
19.
f
20.
_
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
M
ProlectInDut
What will be the impact? ZN-0001-2026
Tuesday, February 17, 2026 3:51:33 PM
External Email: Please use caution if opening links or attachments!
HeUo,
I live in the DC Ranch Estates. Over the course of the last 2 years we’ve seen significant rise in neighborhood
traffic, noise at all hours (due to improper original noise study not accounting for homes), and air pollution.
There is application for re-zoning. I request a new noise study and air pollution studies are conducted on business
days. The last noise study was incorrect and did not include the proximity of the homes and only listed the soccer
field. Im not sure, but also believe it was not conducted during business hours. Regardless, an updated study may
help guide additional zoning requests.
Additionally, how would the rezoning impact pollution and resource (particularly water) usage?
Thank you for looking into this matter.
Bobbi Hopkins
ATTACHMENT #10
City Notifications - Mailing List Selection Map
Rivian Service and Delivery Center
Iff'-
•rja
mmm
im
P -Vv.u
ils^i
%
m
.*mm
■Ki
liiDS
f‘ L
r.
.0
\v
i, \ 1
mm
;
»?5a
»<
i'l
tS:
t: •■ .
t. ■; •
asS*!*
li
■<
-'..i 5!!..i-v.*.'r\ y
Labels Pulled
June 1®‘, 2026
Additional Notifications:
Interested Parties List
Adjacent HOA’s
P&Z E-Newsletter
Facebook
Nextdoor.com
City Website-Projects in the hearing process
Map Legend:
Site Boundary
Properties within 1250-feet
Postcards: 146
ZN-0001-2026
ATTACHMENT #11
IT1
■f
f-
SCOTTSDALE PLANNING COMMISSION
KIVA-CITY HALL
3939 DRINKWATER BOULEVARD
SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 10, 2026
*DRAFT SUMMARIZED MEETING MINUTES *
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
Joe Young, Chair
William Scarbrough, Vice Chair
George Ertel, Commissioner
Michal Ann Joyner, Commissioner
Doug Drake, Commissioner
Barney Gonzales, Commissioner
David Reid, Commissioner
William Scarbrough, Vice Chair
STAFF:
Tim Curtis
Joe Padilla
Dustin Robertson
Casey Steinke
Chris Zimmer
Jack Kelly
Jason McWilliams
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Young called the regular session of the Scottsdale Planning Commission to order at 5:01 p.m.
ROLL CALL
A formal roll call was conducted confirming members present as stated above.
MINUTES REVIEW AND APPROVAL
1. Approval of the May 27, 2026 Regular Meeting Minutes.
Commissioner Reid made a motion to approve the May 27, 2026 Regular Meeting
Minutes. Second by Commissioner Joyner, the motion unanimously by a vote of six
(6) to zero (0).
* Note: These are summary action minutes only. A complete copy of the meeting audio is available on the
Planning Commission page on ScottsdaleAZ.gov. search “Planning Commission”
ATTACHMENT #12
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting Minutes
June 10, 2026
Page 2 of 2
Consent Agenda
2. ZN-0001-2026 (Rivian Service and Delivery Center)
Request by owner for approval of a zoning district map amendment from Industrial Park,
Planned Community District (1-1 PCD) to General Commercial, Planned Community
District (C-4 PCD) and a request to amend development standards including Floor Area
Ratio, Open Space, Building Height, and Setbacks, on a +/-5.4 acre portion of a +/-57.5
acre site located at 17771 N. Pima Road and 215-04-471 and 215-04-470. Staff contact
person is Chris Zimmer, 480-312-2347. Applicant contact person is George Pasquel
III, 602-230-0600.
3. ZN-0004-2026 (Scottsdale NEQ (North East Quadrant) Parking Structure)
Request by owner for a Zoning District Map Amendment from Parking District Downtown
Overlay (P-2 DO) to Downtown/Multiple Use, Type 3 with Planned Block Development
Overlay, Downtown Overlay (D/DMU-3 PBD DO) zoning with a development plan for a
municipal use for a parking structure, including amended development standards for
setbacks, stepbacks, and building location on a +/-1.05-acre site located at 7375 E.
Stetson Drive. Staff contact person is Casey Steinke, 480-312-2611. Applicant contact
person is Carlos De Alva, 520-519-9335.
Items No. 2 & 3; Commissioner Ertel made a motion for recommendation of
approval to City Council for cases ZN-0001-2026 and ZN-0004-2026 after finding that
the proposed PCD and PBD criteria have been met and that the proposed Zoning
District Map Amendments are consistent and conform with the adopted General
Plan, per the attached stipulations. Second by Commissioner Reid, the motion
unanimously by a vote of six (6) to zero (0).
ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to discuss, the regular session of the Planning Commission
adjourned at 5:07 p.m.
* Note: These are summary action minutes only. A complete copy of the meeting audio is available on the
Planning Commission page on ScottsdaleAZ.gov, search “Planning Commission”