Supporting Document (2cd99849...)

Item 8
CITY COUNCIL
REPORT
•f
Meeting Date:
General Plan Element: 
General Plan Goal:
June 9, 2026 
Land Use
Create a sense of community through land uses
ACTION
One Scottsdale 
20-ZN-2002#5 and 1-DA-2024
Request to consider the following:
1. Adopt Ordinance No. 4703 approving a zoning district map amendment to the existing 
Planning Community District (P-C) with comparable Planned Regional Center (PRC) zoning for 
the purpose of amending Use Regulations, including amendments to the One Scottsdale 
Amended Development Standards (Density), and Development Plan and Land Use Budget for 
a mixed-use development, including residential, commercial, and hotel, on a +/- 27-acre 
portion of a +/-130-acre site located at 19601 N. Scottsdale Road, 19190 N. 72nd Way, 19194 
N. 73rd Way.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 13620 to declare “One Scottsdale April 2026 Development Plan” as a 
public record, and
3. Adopt Resolution No. 13621 authorizing Development Agreement No. 2026-041 -COS.
Purpose of Request
The applicant’s request is to amend the One Scottsdale Development Plan, Development 
Standards and Land Use Budget as they pertain to a +/- 27-acre portion of Planning Unit II. The 
amendment proposed to reduce the total non-residential square footage from 2,866,145 million 
square feet to 1,494,000 million square feet and to allow an increase of 350 dwelling units, 
resulting in a total of 2,350 units across Planning Units II and III.
Additionally, the request includes an update to the approved Planned Regional Center (PRC) 
land Use Regulation list to reflect the City’s current PRC zoning use regulations as it pertains to 
the +/- 27-acre portion of Planning Unit II.
Key Items for Consideration
• 
Conformance with Scottsdale General Plan 2035, as amended
• 
Conformance with the Greater Airpark Character Area Plan, as amended
• 
Amended Development Standards-Density
• 
Update to the approved Land Use list to align with the City’s current zoning code
Action Taken_________________________________________________________

City Council Report | One Scottsdale
• 
Amendment to the One Scottsdale Master Development Plan Land Use Budget
• 
Amendment to the Mixed-Use Core boundaries within the One Scottsdale Master plan
• 
Reduction in the total non-residential square footage from 2,866,145 million square feet to 
1,494,000 million square feet.
• 
Increase of 350 dwelling units limited to the +/- 27-acre portion of Planning Unit II
• 
Planned Community District Findings
• 
Public comment received both support and opposition
• 
Planning Commission heard this case on May 13, 2026 and recommended approval with a 
unanimous (7-0) vote.
OWNER
One Scottsdale Core, LLC 
480-367-7300
APPLICANT CONTACT
Kurt Jones
Tiffany & Bosco, P.A. 
602-452-2729
LOCATION
olo
QC
SITE
o
■D••
^TieggcX
u
boulevard
to
19601 N. Scottsdale Road, 19190 N. 72"'* Way, 19194 N. 73''* Way
BACKGROUND
City of Scottsdale General Plan 2035
The City of Scottsdale General Plan 2035 Future Land Use Map designates the property as 
Mixed-Use Neighborhoods within the Regional Use Overlay category. Mixed-Use Neighborhoods 
focus on human-scale development and are located in areas with strong access to multiple 
modes of transportation and major regional services. These areas accommodate higher-density 
housing combined with complementary office or retail uses. Mixed-Use Neighborhoods are 
most suitable near and within Growth and Activity Areas and may be non-residential in the 
Greater Airpark Character Area. The Regional Use Overlay provides flexibility for land uses when 
it can be shown that new land uses are viable in serving a regional market. Regional uses 
include, but are not limited to, corporate office, region-serving retail, major medical, educational 
campus, community service facilities, tourism, and destination attractions.
The subject site is located within a General Plan 2035 designated Growth Area (Airpark Growth 
Area) - specific locations within the community that are most appropriate for development 
focus, and will best accommodate future growth, new development, and redevelopment.
Page 2 of 13

City Council Report | One Scottsdale
Greater Airpark Character Area Plan
The Greater Airpark Character Area Plan (GACAP) designates the property as Airpark Mixed Use- 
Residential (AMU-R) within both the Type C and Regional Core Development Types. AMU-R areas 
are appropriate for the greatest variety of land uses in the Greater Airpark and may include a 
combination of personal and business services, employment, office, institutional, cultural 
amenities, retail, hotel, and higher density residential. Developments in AMU-R areas should be 
pedestrian-oriented, have access to multiple modes of transportation, and should be located 
outside of the Airport’s 55 DNL contour. Residential and other sensitive uses should be a minor 
component of development and include adequate sound attenuation.
Within the GACAP, Development Types help define the size and scale of development. The 
northern portion of the subject site is designated as Type C, a Development Type which 
represents medium- to higher-scale development, supporting pedestrian activity in the Greater 
Airpark. Type C is encouraged in areas with access to multiple modes of transportation, served 
by regional transportation networks (i.e. freeways or transit corridors), and where the scale will 
complement the area’s character. The southern portion of the subject site is designated as 
Regional Core, a Development Type which denotes areas appropriate for the greatest 
development intensity to support major regional land uses, served by high-capacity transit or a 
freeway.
Zoning
In 2002, zoning case 20-ZN-2002 approved three Planning Units within the One Scottsdale 
Master Plan with a Land Use Budget Table for the entire 160-acre project: including maximum 
residential densities, maximum square feet of commercial, retail, and office; and maximum 
number of hotel keys within each Planning Unit. Planning Unit I is separated by the freeway 
alignment and is currently under construction (Optima McDowell Mountain Village). Planning 
Unit II and III are zoned Planned Regional Center, Planned Community Development (PRC PCD) 
to accommodate a mixed-use pedestrian-oriented development.
In 2016, zoning case 20-ZN-2002#3, amended the original development plan and land use 
budget for a density increase from 1,100 units to 2,000 units with the condition that 20% of the 
requested density shall be for-sale units; and an additional 1,066,145 square feet of non- 
residential area. To date. Planning Unit II and Planning Unit III have been partially developed 
and/or are under construction. Development within Planning Unit II includes: Illume (former 
Henkel/Dial building), and Multi-family (Streetlights, Atavia & Belgravia). Development within 
Planning Unit III includes Multi-family Residential (TDI & The Jefferson), Hilton Place Hotel, 
Commercial/Retail Pads, Medical Office Pads, and a Fueling Station with convenient store 
(QuickTrip).
Context
The boundary of this zoning request is generally located on the east side of N. Scottsdale Road, 
between Loop 101 and E. E. Legacy Boulevard. Please refer to context graphics attached.
Adjacent Uses and Zoning
• North: Mixed-Use Development (One Scottsdale Planning Unit III), zoned Planned Regional 
Center, Planning Community District (PRC PCD)
Page 3 of 13

City Council Report | One Scottsdale
• 
South: Mixed-Use Development (One Scottsdale Planning Unit II), zoned Planned Regional
Center, Planning Community District (PRC PCD)
• 
East: Mixed-Use Development (One Scottsdale Planning Unit II), zoned Planned Regional
Center, Planning Community District (PRC PCD)
• 
West: Undeveloped property within the City of Phoenix
Other Related Policies, References:
Scottsdale General Plan 2001, as amended
2010 Greater Airpark Character Area Plan, as amended
Zoning Ordinance
20-ZN-2002: Master Plan for One Scottsdale
20-ZN-2002#3: Amendment to Planning Unit II and III within the One Scottsdale Master plan to 
allow building height up to 90 feet, a reduction in density and an increase in non-residential area
APPLICANT’S PROPOSAL
Development Information
The proposed amendment reconfigures the approved mixed-use development within a +1-27- 
acre portion of Planning Unit II by reducing nonresidential square footage and increasing 
residential density. The request allows for an additional 350 dwelling units within this area, 
contributing to a total of 2,350 units across Planning Units II and III.
Concurrently, the commercial development allocation within the +/-27-acre area is limited to a 
maximum of 886,000 square feet, contributing to a reduction of an overall non-residential 
entitlement from 2,866,145 million square feet to 1,494,000 million square feet across Planning 
Units II and III, reflecting a recalibrated balance with the One Scottsdale master plan, as detailed 
in the land use table below.
CATEGORY
ZONING
PERMITTED USES WITHIN 
PLANNING UNITS
II
III
TOTAL
ALLOWED
Residential
PRC PCD
3tOOO-2.350
units
Conimcrcial/Retail/Officc PRC PCD
■2,866,145 
1.494.000 sf
Hotel
PRC PCD
400 rooms
Page 4 of 13

City Council Report | One Scottsdale
Development Agreement
The proposed First Amended and Restated Development Agreement for One Scottsdale is 
intended to update and recalibrate the overall development framework for Planning Units II and 
III. The agreement specifies the development standards and obligations that apply to the 
property as whole. Further, the agreement also includes a Development Attributes Table for 
Planning Units II and III, including the distribution of residential units, hotel, and non-residential 
square footage allocations. In addition to the development attributes, terms related to requiring 
for-sale residential units, off-site improvements, water improvement coordination, and traffic 
circulation are included.
Scottsdale Road Sewer Line
In-lieu of constructing the off-site sewer project, the developer agrees to make an in-lieu 
payment of Four Million One Hundred Thousand dollars ($4,100,00.00) to upsize to a new 18- 
inch sewer line.
Water Improvement Coordination
The developer is required to submit a hydraulic water analysis. If the analysis finds that water 
demand for each permit issued within One Scottsdale exceeds 1,600 gpm and flows are 
inadequate to meet City requirements, the City will not issue any building permits until the City 
has completed the Booster Pump Station 55A. To allow the developer to plan accordingly, the 
City agrees to complete construction of Booster Pump Station 55A no later than December 31, 
2029.
Traffic Signals
Per the terms of the development agreement, the developer has agreed to construct a traffic 
signal at North 73rd Way and East Legacy Boulevard no later than January 1,2027 and a traffic 
signal at North 73rd Street and East Legacy Boulevard no later than January 31,2028.
ZONING DISTRICT MAP AMENDMENT IMPACT ANALYSIS 
Land Use
The proposed Development Plan maintains the site’s mixed-use framework while recalibrating 
the overall land use distribution. Although the commercial square footage is reduced, the 
project continues to provide a blend of residential and non-residential uses consistent with the 
master planned mixed-use development. The remaining commercial entitlements are sufficient 
to support surrounding neighborhoods with services such as retail, restaurant, hotel and office. 
The amended mixed-use development plan remains consistent with the City’s General Plan and 
the Scottsdale Greater Airpark Character Area Plan, which designates One Scottsdale as 
Regional Core-Greatest Intensity. The Regional Core Development type is described as having 
the greatest development intensity adjacent to high-capacity transit lanes/areas that promote 
high scale development that encourages variable massing.
Page 5 of 13

City Council Report | One Scottsdale
Amended Development Plan, Mixed-Use Core
The amended Development Plan proposes a relocation of the designated Mixed-Use Core 
Boundaries within the overall One Scottsdale Master Plan. Under the previously approved plan, 
the Mixed-Use Core was generally depicted as extending from Scottsdale Road to the west, east 
to 73'"’ Way and bounded by Henkle Way to the south. The proposed amendment redefines the 
Mixed-Use Core to this +/- 27-acre portion that is bounded by Scottsdale Road to the west, 73'“^ 
Steet to the east. Legacy Boulevard to the north, and Henkel Way to the south. The adjustment 
consolidates the core into a more centralized area, reinforcing a pedestrian-oriented activity 
center. The modification is intended to enhance site circulation and align the development 
pattern with the updated density and intensity.
Airport Vicinity
The site is located approximately 2.25 miles northwest of the Scottsdale Airport runway and 
within the AC-1 Airport Influence Zone, which allows for hotel, commercial and residential uses 
provided a fair disclosure statement and Avigation Easement is recorded as a condition of 
development or building permit approval.
PCD Findings/Criteria
Pursuant to Section 5.2104 of the Zoning Ordinance, before approval of an application for a
PCD, the Planning Commission and City Council must find:
A. That the development proposed is in substantial harmony with the General Plan and can be
coordinated with existing and planned development of surrounding areas.
• 
The General Plan 2035 designates Scottsdale Road as a Scenic Corridor, roadways that 
provide significant landscaped buffer is needed between streets and adjacent land uses, 
where an enhanced streetscape appearance is desired, and where views to mountains 
and natural or man-made features will be maximized. Consistent with that designation. 
Scenic Corridor Easements have been dedicated in segments as development occurs. To 
that end, this proposal maintains the previously approved Scenic Corridor Easement 
along the site's full Scottsdale Road frontage, consistent with Case 20-ZN-2002.
• 
The General Plan 2035 Growth Areas Element (Goal GA 3) and the GACAP Land Use 
Chapter (Policy LU 5.2) encourages open space area as public amenities that benefit the 
community. Commensurate with this vision, the applicant proposes a future event plaza, 
within the “mixed-use core” portion of the development plan.
• 
The site is within the General Plan 2035 Greater Airpark Growth Area, where development 
intensity and future growth is anticipated to be coordinated with infrastructure 
investment. The Greater Airpark Character Area Plan (GACAP) further supports this 
framework through its Development Types, with the northern portion of the site 
designated Type C (medium- to higher-scale development) and the southern portion 
designated Regional Core (appropriate for the greatest development intensity). While the 
request would increase residential density, the proposal maintains other established 
development standards and the transition framework from prior approvals. Consistent 
with the Growth Area emphasis on coordinated infrastructure, the applicant is expected 
to complete off-site improvements, including construction of signalized intersections 
and off-site sewer upsizing.
Page 6 of 13

City Council Report | One Scottsdale
B. That the streets and thoroughfares proposed are suitable and adequate to serve the 
proposed uses and the anticipated traffic which will be generated thereby.
• The 2002 and 2016 entitlements provided significant regional and local transportation 
infrastructure improvements. The required roadway widening (Scottsdale Road), new 
roadways (Legacy Boulevard from Scottsdale Road to Hayden Road and the freeway 
frontage road from the Hayden Road interchange to the Scottsdale Road interchange), 
traffic signals, and internal roadways have all been developed to handle the proposed 
traffic for the request. The 2002 entitlements also require assistance in funding the study 
on how Miller Road is built and developed across the freeway corridor. In addition, the 
proposed employment and residential use for the request provides for more internal 
capture thereby reducing overall daily trips. The forethought and implementation of the 
required transportation infrastructure provides for streets and thoroughfares that are 
suitable to handle the anticipated traffic by the request. One Scottsdale has widened 
Scottsdale Road along the entire Property’s frontage for 3-lanes of travel in each 
direction. The traffic generated by the request is substantially less than that associated 
with the existing allowed development.
C. The Planning Commission and City Council shall further find that the facts submitted with 
the application and presented at the hearing establish beyond reasonable doubt that:
1. In the case of proposed residential development, such development will constitute a 
residential environment of sustained desirability and stability; that it will be in harmony 
with the character of the surrounding area; and that the sites proposed for public 
facilities, such as schools, playgrounds and parks, are adequate to serve the anticipated 
population. The Planning Commission and City Council shall be presented with written 
acknowledgment of this from the appropriate school district, the Scottsdale Parks and 
Recreation Commission and any other responsible agency.
• 
The request seeks to add 350 residences to project south of Legacy Boulevard. The 
additional residential units create a core of housing to support the proposed 
employment core and retail south of Legacy Boulevard and provide for condominium 
use for the north Scottsdale area. The existing and proposed infrastructure will be 
able to handle the additional residential units. The request includes sidewalks, 
plazas, gathering places, and social interaction. One Scottsdale will have a looped 
trail system along its perimeter with access to other surrounding areas. Nearby parks, 
schools and other facilities are available to the north and east. Internal pocket parks 
and amenities will be provided. We have received acknowledgement by the 
superintendent of the Paradise Valley Unified School District that the request will not 
impact the existing and future school enrollment.
2. In the case of proposed industrial or research uses, that such development will be 
appropriate in area, location and overall planning to the purpose intended; and that the 
design and development standards are such as to create an industrial environment of 
sustained desirability and stability.
• 
The request may attract a research type user or an office user with a research 
component. Illume is one such use that provides an office headquarters with an 
associated research facility in one building. Any research uses will be designed in the
Page 7 of 13

City Council Report | One Scottsdale
core area south of Legacy Boulevard and will be designed to operate in harmony with 
the other planned mixture of uses within One Scottsdale.
3. In the case of proposed commercial, educational, cultural, recreational and other 
nonresidential uses, that such development will be appropriate in area, location and 
overall planning to the purpose intended; and that such development will be in harmony 
with the character of the surrounding areas.
• The intent of the request is to create an urban, pedestrian friendly core of residential, 
employment, hospitality and support commercial retail and restaurant uses south of 
Legacy Drive. With the planned intense and dense land uses on adjacent Arizona 
State Land Department (ASLD) properties in Phoenix and Scottsdale, the reused non­
residential square footage will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding 
areas.
Transportation/TIMA
A Traffic Impact and Mitigation Analysis ("TIMA") was submitted for the project and 
Transportation staff accepted the TIMA dated February 2026 has been accepted. The proposed 
development will result in an estimated 29,321 trips generated per day, 2,283 trips (1,520 in/763 
out) generated in the AM peak hour, and 2,609 trips (967 in/1,642 out) generated in the PM peak 
hour. This represents a decrease of 665 daily trips over the previously approved development. 
The surrounding street network as stipulated addresses traffic impacts.
Water/Sewer
The applicant provided preliminary Basis of Design reports for water and sewer, which have 
been accepted with notes and stipulations by the Water Resources Division. The City of 
Scottsdale is an Arizona Department of Water Resources designated provider with a 100 years 
Assured Water Supply and will supply water in accordance with City codes, ordinances, and the 
City’s Drought Management Plan. All water and sewer infrastructure upgrades necessary to 
serve this project will be completed by the applicant per zoning stipulations and amended 
development agreement.
Fire/Police
The Public Safety Department has reviewed the application and finds that there is adequate 
ability to provide fire and police services for the proposed use. The nearest fire station is within 
2.5 miles of the site and located at 20355 N. Pima Road. The subject site is served by Police 
District Foothills, Beat 19. As with any project that contributes to growth, the fire department 
and police department continually anticipate and evaluate resource needs for the city’s budget 
process.
Economic Development
The One Scottsdale mixed-use development would create jobs through residential, hotel, retail, 
and especially office operations. The project has the potential to support the first two goals of 
the Economic Development Five-Year Strategic Plan: (1) Grow Scottsdale’s existing industries to 
foster economic vitality. (2) Attract investment to diversify Scottsdale’s economy.
Page 8 of 13

City Council Report | One Scottsdale
Open Space, Trails and Scenic Corridor
A one hundred (100) foot wide average and sixty (60) foot wide minimum scenic corridor is 
provided along the Scottsdale Road frontage, as required by the previous zoning approvals. In 
addition, a minimum of twenty (20) percent of the net PRC site shall be open space. A 
north/south thirty (30) foot wide open space/public access easement exists along the eastern 
edge of Planning Unit II that contains a 6-foot-wide concrete path. Two, thirty (30) foot wide 
east/west open space, public access easements are also provided and located within 350 feet 
of the eastern property line of Planning Unit II. Additionally, the developer has constructed an 8- 
foot-wide concrete path and trail along the Scottsdale Road frontage.
Housing Cost
Approval of the zoning district map amendment and development plan proposed by the 
applicant enables the construction of more housing and will introduce the opportunity for a 
mixed-use development into an existing retail/office center. In conjunction with state law, staff 
has considered the scope of the zoning district map amendment and development plan, as well 
as aspects which would affect the cost of construction. Staff has not identified any factors that 
would substantially impact the cost to construct housing.
Community Involvement
The City of Scottsdale promotes public participation in the development of the built 
environment. The applicant has also complied with the city’s suggested best practices for public 
outreach. Surrounding property owners, HOA’s and other interested parties were noticed via 
first class mail regarding the project. The distribution of this notification adhered to the City’s 
1,250-foot notification radius. According to the Citizen Review and Neighborhood Involvement 
Report, the applicant team has been communicating with neighboring property owners, 
businesses, and community members by telephone, and one-on-on meetings since May 2023, 
which includes an open house with the development team for residents of Grayhawk on 
November 15, 2023 hosted by the Grayhawk Community Association. An additional open house 
meeting was held on November 29, 2023 located at the Boys and Girls Club of Greater 
Scottsdale. The site and time were posted with the Early Notification Sign prior to the Open 
House. For additional information, please refer to the attached Citizen Review and 
Neighborhood Report.
Significant Updates to Development Proposal Since Initial Submittal
Since the initial submittal, the applicant has made several substantive modifications in 
response to staff review and community inputs. The proposed residential component has been 
reduced from 500 units to 350 units. In addition, the applicant has committed to the installation 
of traffic signals at the intersections of Legacy Boulevard and 73'^'' Way, and Legacy Boulevard 
and Street. Additionally, the proposal eliminates the Planned Regional Center (PRC) land 
Use List that was approved in zoning case no. 20-ZN-2002 and instead applies the City’s current 
PRC land use regulations.
Page 9 of 13

City Council Report | One Scottsdale
Community Impact
The proposed amendment to One Scottsdale reduces the approved commercial square footage 
by 1,372,145 square feet and increases the residential component by 350 residential units. The 
reduction in commercial intensity is expected to lessen potential external impacts to 
surrounding neighborhoods, including traffic volumes and peak-hour congestion. The 
amendment does not expand the project boundary beyond what was previously approved and 
remains consistent with the mixed-use character of the site.
Policy Implications
The reduction in commercial intensity is anticipated to decrease overall traffic generation 
compared to the previously approved land use allocations. Although the residential component 
increases, residential units generally generate less intensive peak demand than commercial 
uses. The revised land use budget represents a shift between land use categories rather than an 
expansion of the project boundaries, and the city infrastructure associated with the reallocation 
of land uses will continue to be evaluated for compliance with applicable infrastructure and 
service requirements through subsequent review processes.
PLANNING COMMISSION
At the March 25, 2026 Planning Commission Hearing, the applicant requested that the case be 
continued to the May 13, 2026 Planning Commission Hearing. The motion for continuance 
passed unanimously by a vote of 7-0.
At the May 13, 2026 Planning Commission Hearing, made a recommendation to City Council for 
approval per the attached stipulations. The motion passed unanimously by a vote of 7-0.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommended Approach:
1. Adopt Ordinance No. 4703 approving a zoning district map amendment to the existing 
Planning Community District (P-C) with comparable Planned Regional Center (PRC) zoning for 
the purpose of amending Use Regulations, including amendments to the One Scottsdale 
Amended Development Standards (Density), and Development Plan and Land Use Budget for 
a mixed-use development, including residential, commercial, and hotel, on a +/- 27-acre 
portion of a +/-130-acre site located at 19601 N. Scottsdale Road, 19190 N. 72nd Way, 19194 
N.73rd Way.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 13620 to declare “One Scottsdale April 2026 Development Plan” as a 
public record, and
3. Adopt Resolution No. 13621 authorizing Development Agreement No. 2026-041-COS.
Page 10 of 13

City Council Report | One Scottsdale
RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENTS
Planning and Development Services
Current Planning Services 
Long Range Planning 
Traffic Engineering 
Water Resources 
Fire and Life Safety 
Plan Review
Aviation
Aviation
Economic Development and Tourism
Economic Development
STAFF CONTACT
Meredith Tessier 
Senior Planner 
480-312-4211
E-mail: mtessier@ScottsdaleAZ.gov
Page 11 of 13

City Council Report | One Scottsdale
APPROVED BY
Meredith Tessier, Senior Planner 
Report Author
05/19/2026
Date
Tim Curtis, AlCP, Current Planning Director 
Planning Commission Liaison
Phone: 480-312-4210 Email: tcurtis@scottsdaleaz.gov
Erin Perreault, AlCP, Sr. Director/Zoning Administrator 
Planning & Development Services
Phone: 480-312-7093 
Email: eperreault@scottsdaleaz.gov
5/4/2026
Date
05/21/2026
Date
Page 12 of 13

City Council Report | One Scottsdale
ATTACHMENTS
1.
1A.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10. 
11. 
12.
13.
14.
15.
Context Aerial 
Aerial Close-Up 
Ordinance No. 4703 
Exhibit 1: Zoning Map 
Exhibit 2: Stipulations 
Resolution No. 13620
Exhibit 1: One Scottsdale April 2026 Development Plan
• 
Updated One Scottsdale Schedule A1 -Land use and Circulation Plan
• 
Updated One Scottsdale Schedule F-Circulation Plan
• 
Updated One Scottdale Schedule l-PRC Amended Development Standards, Use 
Regulations
Resolution No. 13621
Exhibit 1; Contract No. 2026-041-COS
Applicant’s Narrative
Conceptual Site Plan
Case No. 20-ZN-2002#3 One Scottsdale Land use and Circulation Plan (For Reference)
Existing General Plan
Greater Airpark Character Area Plan
Traffic Impact Summary
Community Involvement Report
Correspondence
City Notification Map
March 25, 2026 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 
May 13,2026 Planning Commission Draft Meeting Minutes
Page 13 of 13

'<7..f^ptpl^l
;«t v
\
^8
aftgpgtajQfc^r-^^.;' .- .-CVT-- .-. -..-•>..
.->?'“'^'>-
•t-f • .-i •.»:
Bfvd
Cavasson
«.
■-■•
_ f>»* j- .. -
■-:
i-
*
ST^:
Ethan Allen 
..»»»«^ ‘
•-•..
r.
:c
:«l^^v'-:^i
tO’pfima^McD^ell^Mqyntqin ^
TT-
</
!•'
V
n e ' ;, :r" .
f.'?! '-' j-rt ifi
1.
^QnS^minlmnfe
Vv-
^A
U..'
&
mj
A
■«■
lii'VA.
■/'
Q.S.
^:sai
40-45
Google Earth Pro Imagery
JT
Context Aerial
|20-ZN-2002#5
ATTACHMENT 1 
I 
—

JZWHk
9
\\>
E."Legacy Blvd
I ^
;i
L
c
,r
' 'll .-;
V
m
%
Pi
.t
\ >
.vaa^^
Uk-V
f t
4
4
-■>.
W'»
‘V
A.
Site
ssu
M
i
r*;
4jfc
1^
*•
n
t
zX
rsK'-',
»_: 
■■■■* 
ZL%.‘'.:-i>;'-'^.'*\'* ■ vs-'.fiA
V
if
iW
il:
m
*\
\xx*
i^. Vi
c?r?
'/■
ir^ iS:
/i''
»i. n
I'^v ~
ight
# //
«'
Ik
•ij
kA X
/»
A
'f-
4
' AV
.v>* w 
r'-r
•;■■ .
■
imF 'Jim
Q.S.
40-45 -------- 1—U22*if
I Google Earth Pro Imagery f,'
Close-up Aerial
ATTACHMENT 1A
20^-2002#^

ORDINANCE NO. 4703
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, 
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 455, THE 
ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, BY AND FOR THE 
PURPOSE OF CHANGING THE ZONING ON THE “DISTRICT MAP” TO 
ZONING APPROVED IN CASE NO. 20-ZN-2002#5 TO AMEND THE EXISTING 
PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT (P-C) WITH COMPARABLE PLANNED 
REGIONAL CENTER (PRC) ZONING FOR THE PURPOSE OF AMENDING 
USE REGULATIONS, INCLUDING AMENDMENTS TO THE ONE 
SCOTTSDALE AMENDED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (DENSITY), AND 
DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND LAND USE BUDGET FOR A MIXED-USE 
DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, AND HOTEL,
ON A +/- 27-ACRE PORTION OF A +/- 130-ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 19601 
N. SCOTTSDALE ROAD, 19190 N. 72ND WAY, AND 19194 N. 73RD WAY.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a hearing on May 13th, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the probable impact of Zoning Ordinance No. 
4703 on the cost to construct housing for sale or rent; and
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission has made findings in conformance with the 
requirements of the PCD district and the City Council also finds;
A. That the development proposed is in substantial harmony with the General Plan, and 
can be coordinated with existing and planned development of surrounding areas.
B. That the streets and thoroughfares proposed are suitable and adequate to serve the 
proposed uses and the anticipated traffic which will be generated thereby.
C. The Planning Commission and City Council shall find that the facts submitted with the 
application and presented at the hearing establish beyond reasonable doubt that:
1. In the case of proposed residential development, that such development will constitute 
a residential environment of sustained desirability and stability; that it will be in harmony with the 
character of the surrounding area; and that the sites proposed for public facilities, such as schools, 
playgrounds and parks, are adequate to serve the anticipated population.
2. In the case of proposed industrial or research uses, that such development will be 
appropriate in area, location and overall planning to the purpose intended; and that the design 
and development standards are such as to create an industrial environment of sustained 
desirability and stability.
3. In the case of proposed commercial, educational, cultural, recreational and other 
nonresidential uses, that such development will be appropriate in area, location and 
overall planning to the purpose intended; and that such development will be in harmony with the 
character of the surrounding areas.
19196656
Ordinance No. 4703 
Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT 2

WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposed development is in substantial 
harmony with the General Plan of the City of Scottsdale and will be coordinated with existing and 
planned development; and
WHEREAS, it is now necessary that the comprehensive zoning map of the City of 
Scottsdale (“District Map”) be amended to conform with the decision of the Scottsdale City Council 
in Case No. 20-ZN-2002#5.
follows:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Scottsdale, as
Section 1. That the “District Map” adopted as a part of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of 
Scottsdale, showing the zoning district boundaries, is amended by amending the existing 
Planning Community District (P-C) with comparable Planned Regional Center (PRC) zoning for 
the purpose of amending Use Regulations, including amendments to the One Scottsdale 
Amended Development Standards (Density), and Development Plan and Land Use Budget for a 
mixed-use development, including residential, commercial, and hotel, on a +/- 27-acre portion of 
a +/- 130-acre site located at located at 19601 N. Scottsdale Road, 19190 N. 72nd Way, 19194 
N. 73rd Way and marked as “Site” (the Property) on the map attached as Exhibit 1, incorporated 
herein by reference, and by adopting that certain document entitled “One Scottsdale April 2026 
Development Plan", declared as public record by Resolution No. 13620 which is incorporated into 
this ordinance by reference as if fully set forth herein.
Section 2. That the above rezoning approval is conditioned upon compliance with all 
stipulations attached hereto as Exhibit 2 and incorporated herein by reference.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Scottsdale, Maricopa County, 
Arizona this______ day of______________, 2026.
ATTEST:
CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, an Arizona 
municipal corporation
By:.
By:.
Ben Lane 
City Clerk
Lisa Borowsky 
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CJIY ATTORNEY
Lil0/t. Santaella, City Attorney 
By: Joe Padilla, Deputy City Attorney
Ordinance No. 4703 
Page 2 of 2
19196656

Q.S.
40-45
Zoning Graphic
£.'»7hompson^Pea/r^g>.
'■•fKWy
Rl^TiRGD
■O
0,o
oe
0)
D Site
T3
ou
P.GD
2
EHHenkel
Way
ZooP lOl
P j4estlin9
way
NORTH
(§8
i
0l
<bs.
*
N
RT5 RGD
RGD
RGPJRGD
•e,LegOCi‘i°f''
RGD
Existing Zoning
Ordinance No. 4703 
Exhibit 1 
Page 1 of 1
20-ZN-2002#5

Case 20-ZN-2002#5
Stipulations for the Zoning Application: 
One Scottsdale 
Case 20-ZN-2002#5
These stipulations are in order to protect the public health, safety, welfare, and the City of
Scottsdale.
GOVERNANCE:
1. 
GOVERNANCE. Stipulations from cases 20-ZN-2002 and 20-ZN-2002#3, not modified 
herein, shall remain in effect.
SITE DESIGN
2. CONFORMANCE TO DEVELOPMENT PLAN. Development shall conform with the following 
Development Plan, entitled "One Scottsdale April 2026 Development Plan," which is on file with the 
City Clerk and made a public record by Resolution No. 13620, and incorporated into these 
stipulations and ordinance by reference as if fully set forth herein. Any proposed significant change 
to the Development Plan, as determined by the Zoning Administrator, shall be subject to additional 
action and public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council. Where there is a 
conflict between the Development Plan and these stipulations, these stipulations shall prevail.
3. CONFORMANCE TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. Development shall conform with the associated 
Development Agreement, Contract No. 2026-041-COS (Resolution No. 13621). Any change to the 
Development Agreement shall be subject to City Council approval.
4. 
MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS - DENSITY. Maximum dwelling unit increase within the +/-27-acre area 
located in Planning Unit II, as identified in the approved development plan, shall not exceed 350 
units. These units are in addition to the previously approved 2,000 dwelling units within Planning 
Units II and III, for a total maximum of 2,350 dwelling units.
5. MAXIMUM COMMERCIAL FLOOR AREA - INTENSITY. Maximum commercial floor area permitted 
within the +/-27-acre area located in Planning Unit II, as identified in the approved development 
plan, shall not exceed 886,000 square feet. This floor area is a reduction to the previously approved 
2,866,145 square feet within Planning Units II and III, for a total maximum of 1,494,000 square feet. 
This stipulation shall apply only to the identified +/-27-acre area within Planning Unit II and shall not 
modify the commercial entitlements of other areas within Planning Unit II or III.
6. 
PROTECTION OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Any development on the property is subject to the 
requirements of Scottsdale Revised Code, Chapter 46, Article VI, Protection of Archaeological 
Resources, Section 46-134 - Discoveries of archaeological resources during construction.
DEDICATIONS
7. 
LOCAL RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE STREETS. All local residential private streets shall be contained within a 
subdivision tract of land and dedications to the property owners association consisting of property 
owners within the subdivision of the development project.
Ordinance No. 4703 
Exhibit 2 
Page 1 of 7

Case 20-ZN-2002#5
8. SUBDIVISION TRACTS, PRIVATE STREETS, MAINTENANCE, AND LIABILITY. A property owners 
association consisting of property owners within the subdivision of the development project shall 
own and be responsible for all maintenance and liabilities of all subdivision tracts, private streets 
and related infrastructure.
9. AVIGATION EASEMENT. With the Development Review application, the property owner shall 
dedicate an Avigation Easement to the City of Scottsdale, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, 
or designee.
10. SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS. The developer shall dedicate to the City, in conformance with the 
Scottsdale Revised Code and the Design Standards and Policies Manual, all sewer easements 
necessary to serve such development site.
11. WATERLINE EASEMENTS. The developer shall dedicate to the City, in conformance with the Scottsdale 
Revised Code and the Design Standards and Policies Manual, all water easements necessary to serve 
such development site.
INFRASTRUCTURE
12. STANDARDS OF IMPROVEMENTS. All Improvements (curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, driveways, 
pavement, concrete, water, wastewater, etc.) shall be constructed in accordance with the applicable 
City of Scottsdale Supplements to the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) Uniform 
Standard Specifications and Details for Public Works Construction, Maricopa Association of 
Governments (MAG) Uniform Standard Specifications and Details for Public Works Construction, the 
Design Standards and Policies Manual (DSPM), and all other applicable city codes and policies.
13. CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENTS. The property owner shall submit for approval the construction 
documents to construct the following improvements and commence construction upon receiving 
approval of the documents from the city:
A. TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION.
i. N 73'“’ WAY and E LEGACY BOULEVARD. Prior to issuance of any permit for a development 
project on the southwest corner of N 73^“ Way and E Legacy Blvd the master developer shall, 
no later than January r*- 2027, submit for approval the construction documents to construct a 
signalized intersection at N 73rd Way and E Legacy Blvd.
ii. N 73RD STREET and E LEGACY BOULEVARD. Prior to either the issuance of any permit for a 
development project on, or the recordation of a land division plat for, the southwest corner of 
N 73rd Street and E Legacy Blvd, the master developer shall, no later than January 31st 2028, 
submit for approval the construction documents to construct a signalized intersection at N 
73rd Street and E Legacy Blvd.
14. WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENTS.
i. 
Prior to the approval of any development project site plan, the owner or developer shall submit 
and receive approval of final basis of water and wastewater design reports.
ii. 
With the submittal of a development project, the owner or developer shall submit and obtain 
approval of all on-sIte water and wastewater infrastructure improvements, including any new 
public water system, public sewer system, service lines, connection, fire-hydrants, and man­
holes, necessary to serve the development and in accordance with city approved final basis of 
design water and wastewater reports.
Ordinance No. 4703 
Exhibit 2 
Page 2 of 7

Case 20-ZN-2002#5
iii. Due to density changes and shifts and additional fire flow requirement, any on-site water and 
sewer capacity issues and the associated infrastructure improvements (i.e., upsizing) wiil be the 
sole responsibility of the master developer (One Scottsdale) and the Owner.
15. WATER IMPROVEMENT COORDINATION. No building permit shall be granted for any portion of One 
Scottsdale prior to the city's completion (defined as construction completion and accepted by the 
city and Maricopa County Environmental Services Department per Scottsdale Revised Code Section 
48-103) of the following improvements once the summation of all average daily water demand for 
each permit issued within One Scottsdale reaches 1,600 gpm, or with its approval would exceed 
1,600 gpm, as tracked by owner or developer and determined accurate within city approved final 
basis of design reports:
i. The city Booster Pump Station 55A (water campus) capacity upgrades.
In accordance with the timing of parcel development, the owner or developer shall submit on-site 
and/or off-site water infrastructure improvements (except the city's Booster Pump Station 55A 
improvements) necessary to serve the development. However, if the updated Water Master Plan 
with revised hydraulic analysis conducted with concurrent fire hydrant flow test confirms no 
restrictions on water flow and pressure, this Stipulation will not be applicable and will not be 
enforced.
16. NEW WATER FACILITIES. Before the issuance of letters of acceptance by the Inspection Services 
Division for a development site, the developer shall construct all water lines and related facilities 
necessary to serve such development site.
17. WASTEWATER LINE. N SCOTTSDALE ROAD. To accommodate the increased flow of wastewater to 
the Scottsdale Road trunk line, the frontage 15-inch sewer line along Scottsdale Road at Loop-101 
requires upsizing it to 18-inch sewer line minimum.
I. The owner or developer shall submit and receive approval of a final basis of design 
report for sewer line improvements, eighteen (18) inch minimum, within Scottsdale 
Road between Scottsdale manholes # 9 to #7 (south of E Henkel Way to north of E 
Mayo Boulevard, approximately twelve hundred (1,200) lineal feet).
li. The property owner or developer shall submit and obtain approval of construction 
documents to construct the N Scottsdale Road sewer improvements in conformance 
with the city approved final basis of design report, eighteen (18) inch minimum, 
between Scottsdale manholes # 9 to # 7 (south of E Henkel Way to north of E Mayo 
Boulevard, approximately twelve hundred (1,200) lineal feet).
iii. Owner or developer shall be responsible for permitting any portions of the N 
Scottsdale Road sewer improvements contained within Arizona Department of 
Transportation right-of-way with the Arizona Department of Transportation prior to 
city's permit approval of same.
iv. However, if the city allows One Scottdale to utilize the in-lieu payment option, this 
Stipulation will not be applicable and will not be enforced.
18. BACKFLOW PREVENTION SYSTEMS. The property owner or developer shall provide and locate 
backflow prevention systems outside city right-of-way and immediately downstream and adjacent 
to its serving water meter.
Ordinance No. 4703 
Exhibit 2 
Page 3 of 7

Case 20-ZN-2002#5
19. STREET CUT SURCHARGE FEE. In lieu of any assessable street cut surcharge fees associated with N. 
Scottsdale Road sewer improvements, the owner or developer shall replace pavement surface in 
kind by milling and overlaying the lane or lanes impacted by infrastructure construction, full width/s, 
for the length of infrastructure construction plus twenty (20) feet at its commencement and another 
twenty (20) feet at its conclusion, minimum.
20. The requirements found in Section 17, Wastewater Line N. Scottsdale Road, and Section 19, Street 
Cut Surcharge Fee, shall not apply to this zoning action if the City agrees in the First Amended and 
Restated Development Agreement for One Scottsdale, Contract No. 2026-141-COS, to accept a 
payment in lieu of One Scottsdale constructing an eighteen inch sewer line in North Scottsdale Road.
21. NEW WASTEWATER FACILITIES. Before the issuance of letters of acceptance by the Inspection 
Services Division for a development site within the +/-27-acre area located in Planning Unit II, the 
developer shall provide sanitary sewer lines and wastewater-related facilities to serve such 
development site.
22. FIRE HYDRANT. The property owner shall provide fire hydrant(s) and related water infrastructure 
adjacent to lot, in the locations determined by the Fire Department Chief, or designee.
REPORTS AND STUDIES
23. FAA DETERMiNATION. With the Development Review Appiication, the property owner shall submit 
a copy of the FAA Determination letter on the FAA FORM 7460-1 for any proposed structures and/or 
appurtenances that penetrate the 100:1 slope. The elevation of the highest point of those 
structures, including the appurtenances, must be detailed in the FAA form 7460-1 submittal.
24. HEIGHT ANALYSIS. The owner of new development (and natural growth and construction equipment 
associated with new development), to be located within the twenty-thousand-foot radius of the 
Scottsdale Airport, that penetrates the 100:1 slope from the nearest point of the runway shall 
submit to the FAA the appropriate forms for FAA review. See FAA Form 7460-1. Before finai plan 
approval, the owner shall submit the FAA response to FAA Form 7460-1.
25. AIRCRAFT NOISE AND OVERFLIGHT DISCLOSURE. With the Development Review Application 
submittal, the property owner shall provide a copy of the noise disclosure notice that will be 
provided to occupants, potential homeowners, employees and/or students that will be located at 
the development project in a form acceptable to the Scottsdale Aviation Director.
26. FAiR DiSCLOSURE. Pursuant to the FAA Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study, each owner of property 
located in the areas labeled AC-1, AC-2 and AC-3 shown on Figure 1, Airport Influence Area, shall 
make fair disclosure to each purchaser. If a development is subject to Covenants, Conditions and 
Restrictions (CC&Rs), the owner shall include the disclosure in the CC&Rs.
27. BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT (WATER). With each Development Review application for development 
within the +/-27-acre area located in Planning Unit II, the developer shall submit a Water Basis of 
Design Report. The report shall conform to the Master Water Plan associated with this zoning 
action, as applicable, and the latest version of City of Scottsdale Design Standards and Policies 
Manual (DSPM) Chapter 6. The report shall identify the timing of and parties responsible for 
construction of all water facilities based on information available at the time of the basis of design 
report.
Ordinance No. 4703 
Exhibit 2 
Page 4 of 7

Case 20-ZN-2002#5
28. APPROVED BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT. Before improvement plan submittal, the developer shall have 
obtained approval of the Water Basis of Design Report from the City Water Resources Department.
29. BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT (WASTEWATER). With each Development Review application for 
development within +/-27-acre area located in Planning Units II, the developer shall submit a 
Wastewater Basis of Design Report. The report shall conform to the Master Wastewater Plan 
associated with this zoning action, as applicable, and the latest version of City of Scottsdale Design 
Standards and Policies Manual available from the City Water Resources Department. The report 
shall identify the timing of and parties responsible for construction of all wastewater facilities based 
on information available at the time of the Basis of Design report.
30. APPROVED BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT. Before improvement plan submittal, the developer shall have 
obtained approval of the Wastewater Basis of Design Report from the City Water Resources 
Department.
31. CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE REPORT. With each Development Review application, the developer shall 
submit a conceptual drainage report and plan subject to City staff approval. The conceptual report and 
plan shall conform to the approved Master Drainage Plan for Planning Units II, as applicable, and the 
City’s Design Standards and Policies Manual - Drainage Report Preparation. Analysis and mitigation 
shall be provided for any increase in runoff or identified impacts. All proposed engineering solutions 
shall comply with city minimum requirements and are submit to approval by city. In addition, the 
conceptual drainage report and plan shall:
a. 
Pre-vs. Post development peak discharge analysis using the 100 year,
2 hours and 6 hour storm events.
b. 
Finished floor elevation based on current Scottsdale Revised Code 
flood zone information.
MASTER PLANS
32. MASTER INFRASTRUCTURE PLANS. Master Plans are approved. Any major variation within the +/- 
27-acre area located in Planning Unit II, as identified in the approved development plan from the 
approved Master Plans will require an update to the Master Plans as determined by the Water 
Resources Senior Director or their designee. The property owner shall have each Master 
Infrastructure Plan specified below prepared by a registered engineer licensed to practice in 
Arizona, and in accordance with the Design Standards and Policies Manual. Each Master 
Infrastructure Plan shall be accepted by city staff with any Development Review submittal. Each 
Master Infrastructure Plan shall include a complete description of project phasing, identifying the 
timing and parties responsible for infrastructure construction based upon available information at 
the time of basis of design report.
33. Master Drainage Systems Plan: Development shall comply with the approved Master Drainage Plan 
and current city of Scottsdale Design Standards and Policies Manual (DSPM). The following items 
represent key drainage requirements that shall be addressed with individual development 
submittals:
a. Project-Specific Drainage Report. Development of parcels within One Scottsdale 
shall submit a drainage memo/technical memorandum to analyze the proposed 
site improvements and demonstrate conformance with the approved Master 
Drainage Plan Report.
Ordinance No. 4703 
Exhibit 2 
Page 5 of 7

Case 20-ZN-2002#5
b. Waiver Validation and Required Mitigation. The drainage report shall confirm that 
the new development does not cause the required storage volume (100 year, 2 
hours) to exceed the previously waived capacity.
c. 
Downstream Capacity and Impacts. The developer shall confirm that post­
development peak discharge (100 year, 6 hours) does not exceed the 600 cfs 
capacity of the regional channel and does not create adverse impacts to adjacent 
properties.
d. ADOT Coordination. If post-development flows exceed the conditions evaluated 
under the 2012 waiver, the developer shall coordinate with ADOT and provide 
written concurrence to the City prior to approval of improvement plans.
e. 
Safe Conveyance. The developer shall ensure that historical flow patterns are 
maintained and that runoff is safely conveyed to the regional drainage facility 
terminating at the north side of the Central Arizona Project canal.
Note: If conditions in items b and c above are met, requirements in items d and e 
do not apply.
34. MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN. Master Plans are approved. Any major variation from the approved 
Master Plans within the +/-27-acre area located in Planning Unit II, as identified in the approved 
development plan will require an update to the Master Plan as determined by Stormwater 
Management staff. A Master Drainage Plan shall be prepared in accordance with the City's design 
procedures and criteria by a registered engineer who is licensed in the State of Arizona. The Master 
Drainage Plan Report conforming to the Items below has previously been approved by the City of 
Scottsdale. Any major updates required to the approved Master Drainage Plan Report shall include:
a. 
Maps showing watersheds draining onto and through the Planning Unit, with 
estimates of peak flows for 10, 50, and 100-year flood events at concentration 
points entering the Planning Unit
b. 
Estimated peak flows and volumes of on-site runoff at concentration points 
exiting the Planning Unit for both developed and undeveloped conditions for 
the 10, 50, and 100-year flood events
c. 
Maps showing current FEMA special flood hazard areas and flood insurance 
zones, including depths and velocities
d. 
Location and estimated size of ail proposed drainage facilities, including 
culverts, detention basins, channels, etc.
e. 
A map that delineates the drainage area that will be served by each detention 
basin
f. 
Estimated peak flow from all drainage basins upstream of the proposed 
development, which may flow through the onsite system, shall be assessed 
for impacts to the entire system.
Note: If development conforms to the approved Master Drainage Plan within 
the +/-27-acre area located in Planning Unit II, as identified in the approved 
development plan with no major variations, items a-f above do not apply.
35. MASTER DRAINAGE REPORT APPROVAL. All development shall conform the approved Master 
Drainage Plan and current City of Scottsdale design standards.
Ordinance No. 4703 
Exhibit 2 
Page 6 of 7

Case 20-ZN-2002#5
36. MASTER WATER PLAN. Master Plans were approved in 2016 for Planning Units II and III. The 
proposed development for the +/-27-acre area located in Planning Unit II will require an update to 
the Master Plan as determined by the Water Resources Senior Director or their designee. A Master 
Water Plan shall be prepared in accordance with the City's design procedures and criteria by a 
registered engineer who is licensed in the State of Arizona. The report and plan shall conform to the 
latest version of City of Scottsdale Design Standards and Policies Manual (DSPM) Chapter 6 for 
parcels within the +/-27-acre area located in Planning Unit II. The Master Water Plan will include a 
discussion of the timing of and parties responsible for construction of all water facilities based on 
available information at the time of the basis of design report. All subsequent development plans 
shall conform to the approved master plans. Any proposed deviation from an approved master plan 
shall require review and approval by as determined by the Water Resources Senior Director or their 
designee.
37. MASTER WATER PLAN. Master Plans were approved in 2016 and are no longer applicable for parcels 
within the +/-27-acre area located in Planning Unit II. The proposed development will require an 
update to the Master Plans. Within three (3) months of zoning approval, the owner or developer 
shall submit to the city for its review and approval the Master Water Plan updated with concurrent 
fire hydrant flow test based hydraulic modeling and in conformance with city written standards.
38. MASTER WATER PLAN APPROVAL. Master Plans were approved in 2016 and are no longer applicable 
for parcels within the +/-27-acre area located in Planning Unit II. The proposed development will 
require an update to the Master Plans. Before the application of any basis of design reports to the 
Plan Review and Permit Services Division for parcels within the +/-27-acre area located in Planning 
Unit II, the Master Developer shall have obtained approval from the City Water Resources 
Department of the Master Water Plan.
39. MASTER WASTEWATER PLAN. Master Plans were approved in 2016 and are no longer applicable for 
parcels within the +/-27-acre area located in Planning Unit II. The proposed development will 
require an update to the Master Plans as determined by the Water Resources Senior Director or 
their designee. The Master Developer is required to resubmit Master Wastewater Plan Report 
updated with on-site and off-site (within Planning Units II and III) sewer capacity analyses within 
three (3) months of the approved Rezoning. Any variation impacting sewer capacity from the 
approved Master Plans will require an update to the Master Plans. The Master Wastewater Plan 
shall conform to the latest version of City of Scottsdale Design Standards and Policies Manual 
(DSPM), Chapter 7 for parcels within the +/-27-acre area located in Planning Unit II. The Master 
Wastewater Plan will include a discussion of the timing of and parties responsible for construction of 
all wastewater facilities based on available information at the time of the basis of design report. All 
subsequent development plans shall conform to the approved master plans.
40. STORMWATER STORAGE REQUIREMENTS. A Stormwater Storage Waiver has been approved by the 
City of Scottsdale dated 1/13/2012 and rezoning updated drainage memorandum sealed by 
consultant on April 10, 2026 that covers approximately 27 acres. The development shall conform to 
any/all subsequent modifications that were made to the original master drainage study and plans 
for One Scottsdale.
Ordinance No. 4703 
Exhibit 2 
Page 7 of 7

RESOLUTION NO. 13620
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, 
MARICOPA COUNTY. ARIZONA, DECLARING AS A PUBLIC RECORD THAT 
CERTAIN DOCUMENT FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF 
SCOTTSDALE AND ENTITLED "ONE SCOTTSDALE APRIL 2026 
DEVELOPMENT PLAN”.
WHEREAS, State Law permits cities to declare documents a public record for the purpose 
of incorporation into city ordinances; and
WHEREAS, the City of Scottsdale wishes to incorporate by reference amendments to the 
Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance No. 455, by first declaring said amendments to be a public record.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Scottsdale, Maricopa 
County, Arizona, as follows:
Section 1. That certain document entitled “One Scottsdale April 2026 Development Plan”, 
attached as Exhibit 1, a paper and an electronic copy of which are on file in the office of the City 
Clerk, is hereby declared to be a public record. Said copies are ordered to remain on file with the 
City Clerk for public use and inspection.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Scottsdale, Maricopa County, 
Arizona this____ day of_____________ , 2026.
ATTEST:
CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, an 
Arizona municipal corporation
By:.
Ben Lane, City Clerk
By:.
Lisa Borowsky, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: 
OFFICE^F THE>CITY ATTORNEY
Luis Er^antaella, City Attorney
By: Joe Padiila, Deputy City Attorney
19196657
Resolution No. 13620 
Page 1 of 1
ATTACHMENT 3

One Scottsdale April 2026 Development Plan
Resolution No. 13620 
Exhibit 1 
Page 1 of 12

DMB*
Building Llgacies Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Development Plan 
Project Narrative 
Final - April 2026
REQUEST
One Scottsdale Investors, LLC and RKCCLL Investments LLC, BDCCLL Investments LLC, CCFCLL Investments 
LLC and SMCCLL Investments (collectively, the "Owners") are owners of portions of the One Scottsdale 
mixed-use development project ("One Scottsdale") located at the northeast corner of Scottsdale Road 
and the Loop 101 freeway. The Owners have authorized Berry Riddell, Tiffany Bosco and DMB Associates, 
Inc. ("Applicant") to process a request to amend the existing Planned Community District with comparable 
Planned Regional Center ("PCD-PRC") zoning district for twenty-seven (27) acres of the overall PCD. The 
request is to update Schedule "C" which is the approved Land Use Budget ("LUB") to add 350 additional 
for-sale only residential units and to decrease non-residential square footage bv 1,372,145 square feet on 
the Owners portion of One Scottsdale south of Legacy Boulevard ("Request"). The goal is to 'right size' 
the approved residential and commercial entitlements to create the critical mass necessary to support 
the future mixed-use plans for the overall project. The proposed entitlements are in conformance with 
the current City of Scottsdale ("City") General Plan and Greater Airpark Character Area Plan ("GACAP"). 
The following narrative expands on the Request and its necessity to allow for the continued development 
of this mixed-use development core at one of the City's major intersections at Scottsdale Road and the 
Loop 101 freeway.
ONE SCOTTSDALE
Backeround/Historv
In 2002, the City approved DMB's request for a deveiopment proposal that would create a retail based, 
mixed-use core at the intersection of the Loop 101 freeway and the City's signature roadway, Scottsdale 
Road. The approval created flexible zoning entitlements that allowed approximately 1.8 million square 
feet of commercial, office and retail uses, 400 hotel rooms and up to 1,100 residential units ("2002 
Entitlements"). The 2002 Entitlements include requirements for master plans for water, wastewater, 
drainage, transportation and environmental design, all of which have been prepared and approved by the 
City.
One of the key components that allowed for the 2002 Entitlements was the comprehensive traffic analysis 
and recommendations that evolved from the zoning process. As a result, significant transportation 
infrastructure was required for the One Scottsdale project. Most of the required regional transportation 
improvements in excess of $13 million were constructed prior to any significant development occurring 
within One Scottsdale and which have been in place for many years In advance of actual development.
Resolution No. 13620 
Exhibit 1 
Page 2 of 12

DMB^
Building Lkcaciks Sinci; 1984
One Scottsdale 
Development Plan 
Page 2
These improvements including the widening of Scottsdale Road on the east side, new traffic signals at 
Scottsdale Road and Henkel's main entrance, and at the intersection of Legacy Boulevard and Scottsdale 
Road, construction of Legacy Boulevard, coordination of Legacy Boulevard to Hayden Road through 
Arizona State Land parcels and the Loop 101 Freeway frontage road from Hayden Road to Scottsdale Road. 
In addition, the 2002 Entitlements allowed the City and DMB to successfully attract a significant corporate 
user to the site, Henkel (previously Dial Corporation and now the Illume building). Given positive market 
response at that time, pre-development began on the site including significant grading, drainage and 
utilities to serve the Henkel building as well as major earthwork for proposed underground parking 
garages.
In 2016, the City approved an amendment to the development plan for additional non-residential and 
residential entitlement as well as the ability to go up to 90' in height in certain areas of PU II. As part of 
this approval, additional stipulations were approved including the need to potentially widen the west lane 
of Scottsdale Road to achieve a full 6-lane condition. Scottsdale Road has been recently widened in front 
of One Scottsdale achieving increased capacity along the Property's frontage. The Owners have invested 
over $32 million in infrastructure improvements to the site and surrounding area over the past 20+ years.
The One Scottsdale PCD has evolved since its original approval 24 years ago (20-ZN-2002). Subsequent 
amendments to the original zoning case {20-ZN-2002 #3 & 20-ZN-2002 #4) and this proposed amendment 
(20-ZN-2002 #5) depict the respective entitlements for different portions of the master plan. The below 
map identifies the applicable zoning case and entitlements for each portion of One Scottsdale.
Resolution No. 13620 
Exhibit 1 
Page 3 of 12

DMB“
(33 ; „ ,( 36 ): ;,
■ ■';'|,V 
r''4
Sr., .
•;
>
X-* ■
VHi
ft
iftwi roit*(tui 
MKlOfWfNY)
K:t‘
.fM 
1^-'
WllIONA
,. f! . JUTflANO 
‘oefAltMENt
) - . 
* ' K^tur*
vr •, 
>' 
-■ • '■ ".t*’
yyW- 
: Hj
/ f >''-4 4 \ H
■ ' 
■■'U*'4’1^''-
^ 
42 >•
■y." 
,.,6W,U -4^'v>
!A j' 
•v.'i'- 
/ l'
.i.
•> Vtf . iT'i. ■* 'i
Buii.dinc Lkcacjks Sinck 1984
IMCM^rSON riAX PAkKWAV..
2(WZN-2002 #3
20-Z9I-2002
20-ZN-2Q02 #5
»ivt>
20-ZN-2002 #3
...
>
IH i
k-,
20-ZN-2002
v"^
‘f’ n
• »V’‘
. ,rVy.
)■■ ,£nAct'^^f
A?# 
r'"^
ri
.>...:J|
^.; ,i
'■y f 
rSS‘
20.ZN-2002 #4
MAYO IIVD
One Scottsdale 
Development Plan 
Pages
One Scottsdale
Zoning Case Map
Resolution No. 13620 
Exhibit 1 
Page 4 of 12

DMB’
Building Llcaciks Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Development Plan 
Page 4
DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT
The existing PCD-PRC zoning was originally granted in 2002 and amended in 2016 by the City for properties 
north of the Loop 101 freeway. The existing entitlements created a specific set of development standards, 
land use mix and off-site requirements, which are utilized to guide development on the site.
The current request is to update the Project's existing zoning district (PCD-PRC) to siRnificantIv reduce the 
intensity of use allowed on the property and infrastructure impacts. The request continues to comply with 
the City's latest General Plan updates and Character Area planning efforts, including the GACAP. Due to 
its location at the freeway, the Character Area Plan designates One Scottsdale as a higher scale 
development and regional core, which allows for the greatest intensity and density.
Our request is to update the existing approved entitlements to better implement the City's current 
General Plan and Character Area planning efforts. In doing so, we intend to request an overall reduction 
in intensity resulting in a more sustainable, compatible and appropriate development for this area. The 
requested additional residential and reduction in commercial/office square footage within the core of 
Planning Unit II is also supported by the City's Character Area planning efforts and will result in less impact 
on City infrastructure. This includes a 31% reduction in water use, 20% reduction in wastewater use, and 
a 92% reduction in weekday vehicle trips and 93% reduction in am and pm peak traffic times to and from 
the Property. The proposed development plan amendment impacts are displayed on the below graphic.
Resolution No. 13620 
Exhibit 1 
Page 5 of 12

DMB"
Building Lecncies Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Development Plan 
Page 5
.C35:> 
C36:)
• a(5CODMl net to
Itortoi HIAITIt
fiiMrsoN rm piky
c.
ii
0
K
i:
ttlttc s >
190'MAX
WMAX
/
DE*v\?OPM^HTl
n
"C
iK
^ Q
38
' .^,^5 — >
39>r40
ifn(t iivD
D
x'-O.
"1z
S
\ X -
41
1
IWMAX
V
RESTAURANT/BI
42
iinAio
60* MAX r,
CONDo3iflil
HonO:
ofnci
\
|,(fUIlJ«E DEVtlOPMENTI \
■l
. In
44
Phase
IB
\\\
'V,«>
loop
£^3
PROI’OSRD aivii:ndmknt ^ 
TO TUK EXISTING ^ 
ENTJTLEMEN'l’S
• Remove 1,372,145 of norv<residential SF 
from PUIIond PU II)
• Add a mox of 350 for-sale residences
N
(i)
Proposed Amendment to Development Plan Map 
SUMMARY
Along with the updated Schedules that a part of this Development Plan Amendment, the Request is to 
update One Scottsdale's existing PRC zoning district to substantially reduce the intensity of One Scottsdale 
by approximately 1.3M square feet of non-residential intensity and increase the amount of housing by 
350 for-sale residences. These for-sale residences can only be developed in PU II. The intent of the 
Request is to remove overall Intensity while at the same time reducing impacts to the City's infrastructure 
including traffic, water use and sewer use. The changes continue to be consistent with and implement 
the City's current General Plan and Character Area Plan goals, policies and vision.
Resolution No. 13620 
Exhibit 1 
Page 6 of 12

; ;
( ^Ci
S O N_J't A K y A It OL* Y
i ;
I
;;
•
! :
nV • 
*
I ■'
Ji
;
i ■ /'-/tAi'.
*
i'
i ARIZONA 
STATE LAND 
DEPARTMENT
(rUTUtC rOTENTIAl 
DEVEIOPM6NT)
'v^
i
<• ■
' (
/
i
- A
• —f-p- .
Zi??lC5
0>
f
09
f / •
iMcsseae u 09
00
:i£^iD£i'tni\L
<.
..- i
I .<•
«o
N
V.
<e)
'I •»
O 9009
U ;■
*o
8
a
aO
• » kMliaaf r
.p
* b;/J: !
r'".’
•99
o<
o
t.
, *..'7
. .. ^
#9
• a
• r.:
• a
>8
o
o I
- J "
0
^r.
L o yjjjsjis
;f3WJ
H
o
VMC
©
VI AT
GRAYHAWK
VILLAGE AT 
GRAYHAWK
i.
■■“ZL.:
fs K
© ft 
^ 
*
I tr-.trv 
^
■ ISO ■
A i
L'AX
!
BIDWILL
(fUTUm rpTENTIM .;.; 
.' , Ivt-^sL
.OEyELQtMENTI
- NT wun M IS »T UIIID [0 ESTUMT. BIUl. giKE lEK. 
Esiuii>i.iMiai'EsiMiwis(SfBani>«»uM«stii*aT
WOMTOONON***
•y—a*
4
’ I
\\
li
:il , ! v^'
~"55W&
-'TLX
41
T': 5r-' .
i ■' \
itsuivsi'sniM.
il. ,^-^{
42
• •■A:
E.
. ■• 
. 'v
uisiLiijti
V
\ "
as3JD£jl/JAi
M
V ^
'! 44 );' ' '
tTl
e
Ph,ne
/
JiS/AlL/
o
>■
Sr
s
9 P
■a
t o Op
%
o
' 0 ;
ARIZONA 
STATE LAND 
DEPARTMENT
(FUrUEE POIENIIAL 
DEVEIOPMEHT)
n aSMMEYEClAiyRETAlEASFFICr, 
■ Elom.
□
RRSfDFNTTAl.
\ AMGNDMUNT BOUNDARY
*UXED USE CORE
atOTE;
l|lQctdWiwfM(«E. md»4r. 
•IW) »a4 folCAlruN Eliymwm 
awl KXMiuiH »K dMCXflMl W 
■MV.
(tnu^ mi mt ENbjnl ki 
diwy. railNlrfliatiNliyKl 
b 4n«ml bjr (kYdopocM
l]JilI
Resolution No. 13620?=i^S;;X"-S-
One Scottsdale Exhibiti
Land Use and Circulation Page7ofi2 cn-wm ^
SCHEDULEA1 
E|-':.'r,r.: i."'

I \
.n.,
\u bl
111
n signalized
l_l INTERSECTION 
(CcAcral Desigti Concept)
M
non-sionauzed
FULL klOVEkIF.NTS 
(GenertI Detign Concept)
4 I
> ■ i
*’^'*4 LEFT IN, RIGHT 
-W/RIGHT-OUT 
(OcDcnl Dniffii Concept)
I
I
I
I
RICHT-IN/ 
RIGHT-OUT 
(Gcacnl Oespi Cooccpi)
THOMPSON PEAK P
J
♦
III
O
h
'p
a
•f-
u.
Ui
<
O•f.
o
o
oA
c»
A
I
I
Pop JOj
“X
Ar«
le the Amendment fhxirtdmy
bivc been updated to tcflcci cxistini 
approved nod bull eonditioai
MAJOR STRECT
FUTURI; STREET
CONCETTUAL INTERNAL 
CIRCULATION (W>tiuB h> l>« <fe.
DICYCLE LANE <PROPOSGO) 
PEDESTRIAN TRAIL
rm CONCEPTUAL PARKING 
LlJ LOCATION 
^ POThN UAL BUS /
□
transit STOP
I SIGNAUZHO 
I INTERSECnOK
,*•* NON-SIGNALFZFD. 
*4*' FULL MOVEMENTS 
t‘\ LtPT IN.RIGirr 
V-' -IN/RIGHT-OUT 
RIOHT-IN/ 
RIGHT-OUT
DISTRICT
UOUNOARY
V AMENDMENT 
N BOUNDARY
One Scottsdale
Circulation
ResoluUon No. 13620 
■-'£?rjr,"rrz“V“
SCHEDULE F
Exhibit 1 
Page 8 of 12
T.
t"*! ........

Schedule I - P.R.C. Amended Development Standards
Change made by City Council shown In bold font and strikethroughs (Sec. S.2604.E.2) 
dated 11/19/2002.
20-ZN-2002 #5 proposed standards shown in italics, bold font and double strikethrough.
gBc. S,3$00 ------(ftBiCi/ Plonnoa R»gi»nal Gontor,
<BBi ftaCOI I Purposot
f-he purpose-eUtho plannod roglonal cewtef-ritetwBt-te to proWcto for a broad vadtfty-ef-goftQKti-meitehafuUser
and eerviee»-ift4uil tl»i»th aaii variety within a p/afiMd aemmereiai fragienalj eantof) wh/eh mayine/uela eff/o
and f9c/dent/a/ asoa carofM//y intar ra/atad by daaign ta aeeuro that tha ueaa eamptamant aaah athar and tho
whala ntixad uaa aamplaM,
Saot £>360 3. Approvale Raquirad,
Ar - ~An^appliaatian-f»f raaaning'ta-RRiGi ettaU ba aaeentpaniad by
raflaete all arttarla af tha P,R,G, diatrlat,
> Brta plan whieh'
U,------Any appileatlan far RB.Ci aanlng, ar roaaning to RB.C. ahall ba aaaampaniad by a traffla
impact study inaiuding, but nat naaaaeariiy iimitod tOi anaiyaia af triji gonaratlan, trip
diatributien^^npraa^-and -atpiaaei parking daaign, internal aireuiatiani capacity anaiyoiai
affect an raadway ayetam, and prapaaad aalatiansi
—Na etruatura ar building ehall be ballt ar ramadeied apen land In tha Pi Wit
until Davalapmant Review Beard appraval haa been ebtainad ae aatlinad in <
eootion I.OOa-thafoaf. fOrd. Na. 3a2§, § 1, b-4-Uf)
dietriet
rtiala Ij
Sac, s.aeoi, uc
agulada
A, Permittad-
BuildingSi strut
pramicaa ahall ba used and buUding-and-
atfuaturae ehall haraafter ba orocted, aitafad-i
4i—Rtttall ealoa,
• onlargodfurtba fellewing i
furniehlnga, waman'a wear and aaaaacaries, childran'a and infant'a waarr
family alathing, ahaaa, auatam ra//er/ng> furapparal, alathing rentatei and
fabrica,
b, Autamativa parte atara,
c, BIgbak, meaning any mingle retail apace (limited ta permitted ratal! uaaa In tfiia
BiBiCi diatrlat) with a building faatprint af ogual ta ar graatar than eavanty~
five theuaand /7g)0fl0j aguara faaU
d, —Boake, nawcpapar, magaaina ar ctatianary etorae,
Oi Camofa ar phatagraphia supply etans,
f, Gigar, •tabaaaer-aigafatta atacaa,
Resolution No. 13620 
Exhibit 1 
Page 9 of 12

gi Orug and proi»riata>y*t»i!o«t
—HorietCk
k Sating and Mnkittg pfaBcc withgut Hvo »ntortainm»nt or gatran tianoing,
fi— Poori etane awrf graoorioe euoh a» groporS) iloUeatosGone) moats-anst fishi •
fntUs and v»g»t»bf9Si earttly, nut, e^nfoetMHary, dairy productc, and
bakorioBt
k, fiumitun, h»m» furniahinge and aguigmant atatw auah as fumitura, inairia
window covaringa) ehina) gtaeewaro, matatwa/VrkaueahalsI apfi/ianeasi rai/iaa
and toiows/cne) nwgia eupplioc and aguigmaat, and iionio and gartablo
buainaea aerngutara,
<■ Ccncrai mofoiiandfeo ctoroc Inalusling- dopartmontj >>ariat>v antiquost Batoicgao
awdat) and wareiieHaa aiwdei 
Wi Gift, novaity, inijoerti arti^awaiiy ar aauvanir ataraa,
a>—Hobby ar toy etorae,
a,—Wemc imjafevomont etoras inefuding but not iimftod to gaintrglasa, waUpagar
and aa/pat 
g,—ti^aer efaroai
g—Aiaw-nwtor vafa'B/eataroc witi* fUaptay andctefagwancioaod within a buUaHng
andne aewiaa araai 
ft PeteiiB^Ci
ti Sporting goads end biayaiBai
t— Swhnmfnggaet and-joaiie auggllae andaeeeceedeoi
ai Samfaaoi
Oi Broadcagiing giwdia witiiewf fowoftoi
b$- gweinecc con>ioee ineiading fciaeprinfing and /efteteee/eyingi joiiinft'ng) maiiing
ea/v/aoe, offfaa e^aijament fonteie andjoiiafefinieiiing oeivieeoi 
Oi Pereenai wireiece eerviee faeUittae/ minor, cafcjeef to tha raguifomants of eaetiono
9.100 and 7,300,
d, Bdacadonai ceniieee ineiading art and maeie aehaola, daneing aahoele,
antensiona of eeiiogoc or aniacwcifiec and day eere oenfori 
a,—PinancO) ineafanee and foai eaiate aeniieoe ineiad/ng danWng and danii-aoiated
aowicos, aawinga and iean aaeoeiatione, aooaritiea, brokare and doaiofO) 
ineafanee agenie and bfokara, andreai eefate a j>onre and droifore and aaeeoiafed
een‘ieee and iiead<yaa»tefei
f, 
Govarnmantal aarvieae,
g, Weejeftai for animaie ineiading fcearding and/adflrfng/ofoaided tiiar thofo are no
a/een kannalo and joraaided that all aefiaftiae era eandaated in eeandpreef
fcaiidingoi
fa iUedicai eerviaoe ineiading offioee for /eftyeioiana) dondetei ootaogathoi
oitiregraeioraj egdeiana, agfenrefriate andgreag iteartfo aewieea with
onoiUarytoboratoflaa eaoiading ony aorvioea regairing eaernigiit gatient
afayoi
k
Poreonai eervieee ine/ading iaandering and dry eioaning cort'ieeet -ghotograg/iie 
aervioeC) beaaiy aiiegai dardor ahegai and ai»ee regair end aiiiningi Resolution No 13620 
J, Priwato businassi grofeaaienai and ciWe eiatoe and aaaoeiatienai 
Exhibit 1
Page 10 of 12

k, Prafoeeionaf eorvioae ineludina lagal eorvieoe,- Mginaaring,—intorior
—afitl—anMt9Btyral earvleaej and »M9Untlng,—auiUting—anti
baakkaaftlng-aotviaaarantl eaneulting aamiaaai
k- . noayatabfa matarial aaUaatioth
nil Ropair aarvleaa Inaludlng agpllanea rapald, watah, alaak andJawa/ry ragalr,
and ughalatary ahagt 
n, Raatauranti
at—Jaxidarmiat,
gtu. Travaf aganay, 
gt Vit/aa taga rantah
ft—Mvata and ahartar aahael having na raam rogularly uaoal far hayaing ar
aiaagfng avamlght, Sybjaet to Davalagmant fiaviow BaarsI aggraval and
aampifanaa with atandaada Jnalyd/ng, byf nat Umitad ta, tha fal/aw/ng ac wall aa
thaaa atharwiaa ragyifad4n tho dietriati
(1) Uaaatiam AU-propaaodprivata and ahat4ai‘aahaala ahaU ba faaatad a
minimym af fiva hyndrod (600) faat fram any adyit yeoi
(3) Lat araai Tha m/nimym /at ana aha// ba agyal to that ragyfrad far tha
aUatflatr^aapt that na lat ahall ba taaa than fafty-thraa thayaanal
(43i000) agyara faat (nat)i
{3} Thara ahall bane oytaida apaakaaayatam af baUa, If tha aahaaf byUding fa
witMn ana hyndrad (100) faat af a aingla-fatnUy daaaUing ar myttifamtly
fhaaUing yniP
(4) Opan apaaai Paryndariyingaaning diatriat apan apaea
ragy/ram antar~A44 MAOS ragy/ramanta of tha al/aMetmyatba mat anal
may ba app/laal tawarda tha avara// apan apaaa ragy/ramanta aykjaat
ta aamplianaa wftb MAOS standardat
(5) Parkingi Parking ahall abearva tha frant yardaatbaaka af tlta diatriat far all
frantagaat Ona third {Vk) ai tharagyirad parking may bo ebarod parking with
athar aatabliahmanta proaont an altai Parking ahall ba laaatad and-aaraanad
par tha ragy/ramanta aftha diatriati
ft) Qytdaar raaraatianaraai All aytdaar playgraynda and raaraadan araaa
ahall ba analaaad by a wall or fanaa ayffiaiont in haight ta-prataat tha
eofaty and walfara if tha etydonte and ahall ba laaatad within tha aida ar
raaryarsit Any playgraynd ar antdaar raaraatlan araa ahall ba laaatad a
minimym af fifty (BO) faat framamy raaidantlal diatriat and aaraanad by a
minimym alx-faat high walk
(7} Orap aff araai A drap affaraa aaaammadating a minimym affiva (S) vahialaa
ahall ba laaatad alartg a aidwyalk’ar landing araa aannaatad ta tha main antranaa
ta tha aahaaifThia-araa~ahall nat inalyda-ln*afnal'aita4raffia aialaai parking
epaaaai fira-lanaa, atai
(8) Anypyblia traila arpadaatrian eonnaatiana ahall ba Inaarporatad Inta tha
aita plan and^appravad by tha Davalapmant Ravlaw Beard.
(9) Giroyiatlon-plam TTwappliaant ahall eybmit a alrayiatian plan ta inayra
minimal aanflieta batwaan tha atadant drap aff araO} potontial van and bya
drap-aff araa, parking,-aaeaae drivowoyst padaatrian and biayala patha
onoita,
Resolution No. 13620 
Exhibit 1 
Page 11 of 12

-C*l^ttlfs^tr•»ntartainm»nt and f90f«afe'aw>
<■ Ghurohosi eynagBguos, and t9m/»l«Si 
*■ Guttural aat/vMoe fno/udfng fibrarios an^l mucoume,
«•—Gam» SMtQf ansi arcarioi
rt Paa/ar b///iarela parlor,
a,—PubUe acaambly faaililiae fnalutUng Inataar metian pioturo
thaatara anti tagitimota thoataiVt
A—Paanaatianaf faBiUtiac inolueling iaa akatingi ratiar ekatinjfi bawiingi gyi
baabb and fitnaac cantora,
maa/umai
4i Paa/f/anba/i
a, Patole, matala, and innai
b>—Myltifamf/y raafelantial.
U,—Ueaa aubjaet ta a aanMiana4 uaa/»armiti
h AutamabUa rantah 
3i AutamaMla-rafutifatulaafvlaa,
AutamabUa waeb aatvieaa axaluding aatf-af»afataA
4r~ Automativa tiraa, battariaa anelaeaaaaariaat
S,--Bfaadaaatlngatudiaa wfth tawarai
tw— Buainaea aahaal, 
h Gaaalina eataa antlaorviaa atatianat
8i- tnflmaraiiuarium,
Sh Liva antartainmant {aaa aaatian1t403 far arftaiia),
1Qi Naw and uaatimatar vabiata aalaa Inatutling-autslaaf ataragai
11, Outalaar faeraatianat faoilitlaa-wbiab ara araatar than twa f3} aaraa in eiao euah aa
mlnlatura galf, tannia eantar, watar parka ar/t/aii atrueturaa,
13, Paraanal wiralaaa aam/aa faai/itiaai majar, aubjaat ta tba ra^ulnmanta afaaatiana
4r4W,
3,100 ant/ 7,300,
13, Planataria.
14, Want nuraary,
16, Taan Oanea eantar,
16. Saasonal art faatival,
(Ofd^Na^l-lTSI, 8-at-CO, Ofrf. Na, 3317, § h 11 6 OOf OrO, f4a, 3430, § 1, 1-31 03i OrO,
Na. 3630, § 1,8 3 04i Ofrf. Ha, 3368, § 
6-06f-Grd. Na. 3043, § 3, 10.7-07} OrA Na,
3034, Shll 4 07,■ Oral, Na, 3103, § i,1-6-08i Orft, Ua, 3336, § 1, 6 4 OOj Oral, Na, 3304, 6
40.4)4)
Resolution No. 13620 
Exhibit 1 
Page 12 of 12

RESOLUTION NO. 13621
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA. 
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE DEVELOPMENT 
AGREEMENT NO. 2026-041-COS FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY 
LOCATED at 19601 N. SCOTTSDALE ROAD, 19190 N. 72ND WAY, AND 
19194 N. 73RDWAY.
WHEREAS, A.R.S. § 9-500.05 authorizes the City to enter into development agreements 
with persons having an interest in real property located in the City; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City and owner to enter into Development 
Agreement No. 2026-041-COS for a development located at the northeast corner of N. Scottsdale 
Road and the Loop 101 Freeway; and
WHEREAS, this Development Agreement No. 2026-041-COS is consistent with the 
portions of the City’s general plan applicable to the property on the date this Agreement is 
executed.
follows:
NOW, THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Scottsdale, as
Section 1. That Mayor Lisa Borowsky is authorized and directed to execute 
Development Agreement No. 2026-041-COS after it has been executed by all other parties.
Section 2. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to record Development Agreement 
No. 2026-041-COS with the Maricopa County Recorder within ten (10) days of its execution by 
all parties.
Section 3 . The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager or his designee to 
execute any other documents and take such other actions as are necessary to carry out the intent 
of this Resolution and Contract No. 2026-041-COS.
2026.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of Scottsdale this
_day of
CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, an Arizona 
ATTEST:
By:__________________________
Ben Lane, City Clerk
municipal corporation 
By:______________
Lisa Borowsky, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CJT¥t<^TTORNEY
By: 
,_________
Luidi^Santa^, City^Attorney
By: Joe Padilla, Deputy City Attorney
19196658
Resolution No. 13621 
Page 1 of 1
ATTACHMENT 4

When recorded, mail to:
ONE STOP SHOP
CITY OF SCOTTSDALE
7447 East Indian School Road, Suite 100
Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Contract No. 2026-141-COS 
Resolution No. 13621
FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
FOR ONE SCOTTSDALE
This First Amended and Restated Development Agreement for One Scottsdale (“Restated
Agreement”) is entered into as of the _____ day of_____ , 2026, among RKCCLL
INVESTMENTS 
LLC, an 
Arizona limited liability company (“RKCCLL”), 
BDCCLL
INVESTMENTS 
LLC, an 
Arizona limited liability company (“BDCCLL”), 
CCFCLL
INVESTMENTS 
LLC, an 
Arizona limited liability company (“CCFCLL”), 
SMCCLL
INVESTMENTS 
LLC , an Arizona limited liability company (“SMCCLL”), (collectively
Corrigan”), One Scottsdale Investors LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and One 
Scottsdale Core, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company (collectively, “DMB”), and the City 
of Scottsdale, a municipal corporation (the “City”). Collectively, Corrigan, DMB and the City are 
referred to herein as the “Parties.”
^^1
RECITALS
This Restated Agreement is predicated upon the following:
A. 
Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) § 9-500.05 authorizes the City to enter into a 
development agreement with a landowner or any other person having an interest in real property 
located in the City. Additionally, A.R.S. § 9-500.11 authorizes the City to appropriate and spend 
public monies for an in conjunction with economic development activities.
B. 
Corrigan and DMB are owners of portions of the real property located within the 
incorporated boundaries of the City commonly known as One Scottsdale and more particularly 
described and depicted on the attached Exhibit A (hereinafter referred to as the “Property” or “One 
Scottsdale”).
C. 
The Property is the subject of Development Agreement Number 2002-142-COS 
dated November 19,2002, recorded in the Records of the Maricopa County Recorder as Document 
Number 2002-1240138 (the “Original Agreement”), and as amended by the First Amendment to 
Development Agreement Number 2002-142-COS-A2 dated June 21, 2016, recorded in the 
Records of the Maricopa County Recorder as Document Number 20160447478 (the “First 
Amendment”).
D. 
By execution of that certain confirmation of Extension of Term in Development 
Agreement No. 2002-142-COS dated February 21, 2008, recorded in the Records of the Maricopa
19205562
Page 1 of21
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

County Recorder as Document Number 2008-0207479, the Parties confirmed that the performance 
based criteria contained in that Agreement had been met and the term of said Agreement was 
thereby extended to November 1,2027.
E. 
The City executed that certain Written Notice of Trigger Event dated May 13,2004, 
recorded in the Records of the Maricopa County Recorder as Document Number 2004-0541668, 
which confirmed that the improvement plans for development of an automobile dealership on that 
portion of One Scottsdale known as “Planning Unit I” had been timely submitted and therefore 
Planning Unit was designated as C-4. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 17.2.1.1 of the Original 
Agreement, the Original Agreement no longer applies to Planning Unit I. Additionally, The City 
executed that certain Partial Termination and Release of Development Agreement dated May 12, 
2003, recorded in the Records of the Maricopa County Recorder as Document Number 2003- 
0602832, which confirmed the termination of the Original Agreement in regards to property 
referred to in the Original Agreement as Planning Unit I (the “Partial Termination”). In a 
development agreement approved by the City on November 21, 2022, recorded in the Records of 
the Maricopa County Recorder as Document Number 2022084100 (the “Optima McDowell 
Agreement”), the parties to that Optima McDowell Agreement acknowledged in Section 9.1, the 
termination of the prior development agreement as they related to property identified as Planning 
Unit I. Accordingly, pursuant to the Partial Termination and further clarification in the Optima 
McDowell Agreement, this Restated Agreement no longer applies to Planning Unit I. The Parties 
intend to provide clarity as to the impact of the Partial Termination and the Optima McDowell 
Agreement by deleting all provisions of the Original Agreement that would be applicable to that 
particular property referred to as Plarming Unit I. Although terminated. Planning Unit I, also 
known as Optima McDowell Mountain Village, utilizes Planning Unit II and III to meet the 
minimum required acreage of 160-acres for a Planned Community (PC) District.
F. 
This Restated Agreement applies to the Property described and depicted on the 
attached Exhibit A.
G. 
Since the approval of the Original Agreement and the First Amendment, substantial
development, including development of required infrastructure as enumerated in the Original 
Agreement has occurred including the dedication of rights-of-way and construction of E. Legacy 
Boulevard (formerly known as “Center Drive”), Scottsdale Road, Access Roads and 
undergrounding of Utility lines. Therefore, certain sections of the Original Agreement and First 
Amendment have been satisfied and are removed from this Restated Agreement accordingly.
H. 
Section 8.2 of the Original Agreement and the First Amendment incorporates by 
reference the Development Plan for the Property, which was approved as part of Case No. 20-ZN- 
2002, Case No. 20-ZN-2002#3, and as amended by Case No. 20-ZN-2002#5 (collectively, the
Rezoning”). Because the Development Plan is approved as part of the Rezoning, references to 
the provisions of the Development Plan are unnecessary. Therefore, certain modifications to 
remove these references from this Restated Agreement are necess^uy.
I. 
Pursuant to Section 17.4 of the Original Agreement together with that certain 
Confirmation in Extension of Term in Development Agreement No. 2002-142-COS dated 
February 21, 2008, recorded in the Records of the Mairicopa County Recorder as Document
19205562
Page 2 of21
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

Number 2008-0207479, the Parties confirmed that the performance based criteria contained in the 
Original Agreement had been met and the term of the Original Agreement was thereby extended 
to November 19, 2027. Significant property remains to be developed and to ensure that it can 
develop consistently with approved requirements, the term of this Restated Agreement is being 
extended pursuant Section 16.2 herein.
J. 
The City believes that the development contemplated in the City’s General Plan 
(the “General Plan”) is essential to the appropriate development and growth of the area.
K. 
The Parties hereto desire to enter into this Restated Agreement to facilitate 
development consistent with the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Scottsdale 
(the “Zoning Ordinance”).
L. 
This Restated Agreement is intended to provide: (i) a framework for the 
implementation of the Development Plan, (ii) a process by which the Rezoning may be performed, 
and (iii) guiding principles for performance of the stipulations for Case No. 20-ZN-2002#5 and 
the development of the Property.
M. 
The Parties agree that the development of the Property pursuant to this Restated 
Agreement will result in plarming and economic benefits to the City and its residents and help 
maintain the Property and a quality development.
N. 
The Parties acknowledge that the ultimate development of the Property is a project 
of such magnitude and importance that assurances are required from the City that Corrigan, DMB 
or their successors have the right to complete the development of the Property pursuant to this 
Restated Agreement. DMB and Corrigan have expended substantial efforts and costs in the 
development of the Property, and DMB and Corrigan require assurances that the City will continue 
to allow for development pursuant to this Restated Agreement and the Rezoning. The City requires 
assurances that the development of the Property will be in accordance with the Rezoning and the 
terms and conditions of this Restated Agreement and any amendment hereto.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:
1. 
Effect of Amendment. As to the Property, this Restated Agreement shall be deemed to 
amend and restate, supersede and replace the Original Agreement and the First Amendment in its 
entirety.
2. 
Exhibits. The following documents are referred to in this Restated Agreement and are 
attached to and made a part of this Restated Agreement by this reference.
19205562
Page 3 of21
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

Exhibit Designation
A
B
C
Description
One Scottsdale Legal Description & Depiction 
Development Attributes Table
Legal Description & Depiction for +/- 27-acres associated 
with Case No. 20-ZN-2002#5
3. 
General Plan Conformance. The Parties expressly acknowledge and agree that the 
development contemplated pursuant to this Restated Agreement is consistent with the portions of 
the General Plan applicable to the Property on the date hereof and that there are no features of the 
development, including, without limitation, the intensity of development and range of land uses 
proposed herein, that cannot be accommodated within the scope of the General Plan.
4. 
Assignment. The rights and obligations of Corrigan or DMB respectively under this 
Restated Agreement may be transferred or assigned in whole or in part, by written instrument, to 
any subsequent ovmer of all or any portion of the Property without further consent from the City. 
Notice of any transfer or assignment in accordance with this Section shall be provided to the City 
within ten (10) days of such transfer or assignment. As provided in A.R.S. § 9-500.05(D), the 
burdens of this Restated Agreement bind, and the benefits of this Restated Agreement inure to, the 
Parties hereto and their successors in interest and assigns, except as provided below:
4.1 
The rights and obligations of Corrigan and DMB hereunder may only be 
assigned to a person or entity that has acquired the Property or a portion thereof and only by a 
written instrument, recorded in the official records of Maricopa County, Arizona, expressly 
assigning such rights and obligations.
4.2 
All third-party owners, and all future owners of any interest in a portion of 
the Property shall be deemed a successor-in-interest to Corrigan or DMB only as respects the 
zoning classification and approvals resulting from the Rezoning and as to the obligations to the 
City, including compliance with the terms of the Rezoning and this Restated Agreement, relating 
to the portion of the Property to which such owner holds title, and such owner shall not be deemed 
a third-party beneficiary respecting this Restated Agreement or the zoning classification and 
approval relating to any other portion of the Property owned by Corrigan or DMB, respectively 
which zoning classification and approvals may be amended by an action of the City and Corrigan 
and/or DMB as applicable to the portion of the Property for which such zoning change is sought 
in accordance with and subject to the limitations of Section 11 of this Restated Agreement.
4.3 
The development standards and obligations set forth in this Restated 
Agreement shall apply to the Property as a whole, as defined by its perimeter, rather than applying 
the standards to the individual lots, tracts, and parcels within the boundaries of the perimeter. No 
parcel within the Property may be developed in a manner that would cause the remaining Property 
to fall out of compliance with the approved development standards and applicable 
codes/regulations. No parcel within the Property may be developed in a manner that would cause 
the remaining Property to fall out of compliance with the approved development standards and 
applicable codes/regulations. The City shall have no obligation to approve an application for 
future land division of the Property if the same will result in the creation of nonconforming parcels.
19205562
Page 4 of21
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

however, the City shall treat any such application in the same manner as all other similarly situated 
applications.
4.4 Indemnification. Corrigan and DMB shall indemnify and hold the City, its 
employees, agents and officials (the City and any such person being herein called an “Indemnified 
Party”), harmless from any and all claims, actions, liabilities or costs, including reasonable 
attorneys' fees (herein referred to as “Claim(s)”), that any such Indemnified Party may become 
subject, at law or in equity or otherwise as a result of all third-party owners and all future ovmers 
of any part of the Property, or their successors and assigns, bringing a Claim, insofar as such 
Claims arise out of or are based upon any provisions of this Restated Agreement, except for those 
Claims which have been adjudicated to be caused by the negligence or misconduct of an 
Indemnified Party. An Indemnified Party shall, promptly after the receipt of written notice or 
actual knowledge of a Claim against such Indemnified P^trty in respect of which indemnification 
may be sought against Corrigan and DMB, notify Corrigan and DMB (as provided in Section 
17.1.1 of this Restated Agreement) in writing of such Claim, provided that the failure of the 
Indemnified Party to give written notice of such Claim shall not relieve Corrigan and DMB from 
its obligations under this Section except to the extent that such failure prejudices the defense of 
such action or proceeding by Corrigan and DMB. The Indemnified Party, at its expense, may 
employ separate counsel and participate in the defense. In case any such Claim is brought against 
an Indemnified Party, and such Indemnified Party notifies Corrigan and DMB of the 
commencement thereof, Corrigan and DMB shall promptly assume the defense thereof, with 
counsel satisfactory to such Indemnified Party, Corrigan and DMB. If Corrigan and DMB 
promptly assume the defense of any such Claim and pays all costs incurred in connection 
therewith, Corrigan and DMB will not be liable to such Indemnified Party under this Section for 
any legal or other expenses incurred by such Indemnified Party separately in connection with the 
defense thereof. If Corrigan and DMB do not promptly assume the defense of any such Claim 
after written notice from an Indemnified Party, until Corrigan and DMB do assume the defense of 
such action, the Indemnified Party shall have the right in good faith to direct the defense of such 
action on behalf of such Indemnified Party and, upon prior written notice to Corrigan and DMB, 
settle the Claim without the consent or approval of Corrigan and DMB. Corrigan and DMB, their 
successors and assigns, hereby waive and fully release any and all financial loss, injury, claims 
and causes of actions that they may have now or in the future against the City resulting from the 
development, sale or division of any of the Property into nonconforming parcels, or later deemed 
to be nonconforming parcels. The provisions of this Section shall run with the land and shall be 
binding upon Corrigan and DMB, their successors and assigns, and shall survive termination of 
this Restated Agreement.
5. Effective Date. The effective date of this Restated Agreement is the effective date of Case 
No. 20-ZN-2002#5.
5.1 Referendum Termination. If the Rezoning or this Restated Agreement are 
subject to a referendum that is certified to appear on a City election ballot, DMB and Corrigan 
may elect to terminate this Restated Agreement by written notice to the City. Moreover, if the 
Rezoning or this Restated Agreement are invalidated by a referendum, then this Restated 
Agreement shall be void ab initio.
19205562
Page 5 of 21
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

6. 
Relationship of the Parties. It is understood that the contractual relationship between the 
Parties is undertaken pursuant to the authorization contained in A.R.S. § 9-500.05 and nothing 
contained in this Restated Agreement shall create any partnership, joint venture or agency 
relationship between the City and Corrigan or DMB. Except as provide in Section 4 hereof, no 
term or provision of this Restated Agreement is intended to, or shall, be for the benefit of any 
person, firm, organization or corporation not a party hereto, and no such other person, firm, 
organization or corporation shall have any right or cause of action hereunder, whether as a third- 
party beneficiary or otherwise.
7. 
Rezoning of the Property.
7.1 Property zoned Planned Community (P-O District. The specific zoning 
district for the Property is Planned Community (P-C) District. The Rezoning is described in 
proceedings designated as Case No. 20-ZN-2002, as amended by Case 20-ZN-2002#3 and as 
amended by Case 20-ZN-2002#5 including all approved stipulations, requirements, and exhibits 
contained therein.
7.2. Development Plan. The City approved Rezoning included the approval of 
a Development Plan for the Property, as required by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of 
Scottsdale. The documents comprising the Development Plan for the Rezoning are on file in the 
City’s Planning and Development Services Department, and as may be amended from time to time.
7.2.1. Planning Units. The Development Plan applies to two (2) planning 
units, namely Planning Unit II and Planning Unit III, as described and depicted in Exhibit A of 
this Restated Agreement and the Rezoning and/or Development Plan and on file in the City’s 
Planning and Development Services Department.
7.2.2. Comparable Zoning Districts. The approved Development Plan as 
shown in the Rezoning establishes the comparable zoning district for the Property as Planned 
Regional Center (PRC) District.
7.2.3. Stipulations and Amended Development Standards. The approved 
Development Plan includes Stipulations set forth in the Development Plan and Case No. 20-ZN- 
2002, and the Amended Development Standards, set forth in the Development Plan and Case No. 
20-ZN-2002#3, as amended by Case No. 20-ZN-2002#5. The Parties understand and agree that 
this Restated Agreement cannot alter or amend the Rezoning. To the extent the Amended 
Development Standards limit or expand development otherwise permitted by the regulations for a 
particular zoning district classification as set forth in the Zoning Ordinance of the City of 
Scottsdale (the “Zoning Ordinance”), the Amended Development Standards shall govern.
7.3 Development Attributes (Planning Units II and III). Any development 
application submitted to the City with regard to the Property shall include an approved distribution 
request indicating the number of dwelling units, hotel rooms and/or gross floor area (collectively 
referred to as the “Development Attributes”) subject to the development application. The land use 
types, maximum land use density and intensity set forth in any development application shall be 
consistent with the budget set forth in the “Development Attributes Table”, attached hereto as 
Exhibit B. Each development application shall include a revised Development Attributes Table
19205562
Page 6 of21
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

indicating the number of dwelling units, hotel room and/or gross floor area subject to the 
development application, as well as the total number of dwelling units, hotel room and/or gross 
floor area remaining for the Property. The updated Development Attributes Table shall be kept 
in the City’s files for Case No. 20-ZN-2002#5.
7.4. City Services and Public Events. The Parties agree that the City Services 
and Public Events stipulations described in Section 2.8(A), Paragraphs 7 and 8, respectively, in 
Case No. 20-ZN-2002 will only apply to the real property identified as the approximate 27-acres 
associated with Case No. 20-ZN-2002#5, as described and depicted in Exhibit C. attached hereto.
7.5 Development Rights. In consideration of the substantial expenditures by 
DMB for the design and engineering of the Development Plan, the processing of the Rezoning, 
the dedication of rights-of-way along Scottsdale Road, Thompson Peak Parkway, and Legacy 
Boulevard , as well as contributions toward the construction and/or the construction of such roads, 
the City agrees that, for the term of this Restated Agreement, DMB, Corrigan and successor owners 
of the Property shall have a right to undertake and complete the development and use of the 
Property in accordance with this Restated Agreement and the Rezoning without being subject to 
subsequent amendments to the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Scottsdale. The City shall comply 
with A.R.S. § 9-463.06, as amended, for the adoption of any moratorium on construction or land 
development for the Property. For purposes of this Restated Agreement, the Development Plan 
eind comparable zoning district for the Property are deemed vested for the term of this Restated 
Agreement. Upon expiration of the term of this Restated Agreement, nothing herein affects the 
vesting of the Development Plan and comparable zoning district of the Property as a matter of 
common law.
7.6. Self-Help Remedy. In the event the City is unable to acquire the necessary 
right-of-way and/or complete off-site roadway improvements as required by this Restated 
Agreement or the Rezoning, DMB and Corrigan may make such improvements and receive 
corresponding credit for the cost of such off-site improvements against any in-lieu payments 
required in the Rezoning.
8. 
Well Site. A City of Scottsdale well and pump site is located on Scottsdale Road and 
is adjacent to the Property on three (3) sides (“Well Site 33”). DMB agrees to retain a consultant 
to conduct an assessment of the structural stability of Well Site 33 and implement any necessary 
corrective actions to ensure the long-term stability of Well Site 33. Upon completion of any 
necessary corrective actions, or if none are required. City agrees to permit DMB and Corrigan to 
architecturally enheince Well Site 33 to conform to the character of the new development, subject 
to the approval of the City.
9. 
Sewer Line In-Lieu Payment. The City has determined that the existing 15” sewer line in 
Scottsdale Road from MH#9 to MH#7 (approximately 1,200 linear feet) must be upsized with an 
18” sewer line minimum to accommodate the One Scottsdale development (“Off-Site Sewer 
Project”). Pursuant to Scottsdale City Code, developers are permitted to meet the responsibility 
for public infrastructure by making an in-lieu payment to the City. In-lieu of constructing the Off- 
Site Sewer Project, DMB and Corrigan agree to make an in-lieu payment of Four Million One 
Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($4,100,00.00) on or before twelve (12) months following
19205562
Page 7 of 21
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

the City Council’s approval of this Restated Agreement, provided that as of such date the Restated 
Agreement is not subject to any referendum certified to appear on a City election ballot. Payment 
of the in-lieu payment in full shall constitute full satisfaction of DMB and Corrigan’s obligation 
to construct the Off-Site Sewer Project. DMB and Corrigan shall have no further obligation with 
respect to the design and construction of the Off-Site Sewer Project. The In-Lieu Payment received 
by the City under this Amendment shall be placed in a separate fund and accounted for separately 
and shall only be used by the City for the purpose of completing the Off-Site Sewer Project.
9.1 Off-Site Sewer Project Construction. The City shall endeavor to finalize plans 
for the Off-Site Sewer Project within eighteen months of the effective date of this Amendment. 
The City shall complete construction of the Off-Site Sewer Project no later than December 31, 
2029. The City shall periodically evaluate the remaining capacity in the Scottsdale sewer line and 
shall provide DMB and Corrigan with sewer flow monitoring updates for the three sewer manholes 
the City is monitoring on a quarterly basis. The City shall immediately notify DMB and Corrigan 
if the approval of any further connections will cause an exceedance in the sewer line capacity. 
However, if One Scottsdale, Corrigan and DMB, or the developer of any parcel, and the City do 
not agree to design parameters for the on-site sewer lines per the DS&PM standards, the City may 
approve connections with the alternative design parameters and Corrigan and DMB shall assume 
all responsibility, liability, and costs associated with any sanitary sewer overflow, mainline 
surcharge, or property deimage resulting from excess sewer flow and/or pool backwash discharges 
from One Scottsdale. Should a sewer overflow occur due to the sewer discharge from One 
Scottsdale, Corrigan and DMB shall fully reimburse the City for all costs associated with 
containment, cleanup, remediation, and third-party damages. Furthermore, Corrigan and DMB 
shall indemnify, defend and hold the City, its employees, agents and officials, harmless from and 
against any and all claims, actions, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorneys' fees, arising 
out of or related to such overflows. If the City fails to complete the Off-Site Sewer Project by 
December 31,2029, the City shall allow development to proceed in accordance with the approved 
Water and Sewer Master Plans for the Property and shall implement interim measures at the City's 
sole cost to ensure uninterrupted service and capacity. The City shall not be responsible for or 
obligated to approve any connection before December 31,2029, that would result in exceeding the 
sewer line capacity per city design standards.
10. 
Water Improvement Coordination. DMB and Corrig2in shall submit an updated Water 
Master Plan with a revised hydraulic analysis conducted with concurrent fire hydrant flow test. If 
the analysis finds that summation of all average daily water demand for each permit issued within 
One Scottsdale exceeds 1,600 gpm and flows are inadequate to meet City requirements, the City 
will not issue any building permits until the City has completed the Booster Pump Station 55A. To 
allow DMB and Corrigan to plan accordingly, the City agrees to complete construction of Booster 
Pump Station 55A no later than December 31, 2029. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the City 
fails to complete Booster Pump Station 55A by December 31, 2029, after that date the City shall 
not withhold or delay issuance of building permits for the Property and shall allow development 
to proceed in accordance with the approved Water Master Plan, and shall implement interim 
measures at the City’s sole cost to ensure adequate water service and capacity.
11. 
Rezoning and Development Agreement Amendments. Pursuant to the terms of this 
Restated Agreement, the City shall not initiate any changes or modifications to the Rezoning,
19205562
Page 8 of21
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

except at the request of the owner of the portion of the Property for which such zoning change is 
sought. Any such request for change will be processed in the manner then set forth in the City’s 
Zoning Ordinance for zoning map amendment. If such a change is inconsistent with the provisions 
of this Restated Agreement, such change shall not be processed until an application is filed by 
Corrigan or DMB to amend this Restated Agreement and such change shall not become effective 
until the effective date of such amendment to this Restated Agreement to incorporate the change. 
Nothing set forth in this Section shall be deemed to require City approval of changes to the 
Rezoning after the effective date of this Restated Agreement.
12. Circulation.
12.1. Traffic Studies. The Rezoning includes a traffic impact study, the One Scottsdale 
Traffic Impact and Mitigation Analysis dated May 27, 2016 prepared by Lokahi, formerly known 
as J2 Engineering and Environmental Design (the “2016 Traffic Analysis”) Analysis, that includes 
an analysis of trip generation, trip distribution, ingress and egress, on-site and off-site capacity 
analysis, effect on relevant roadway systems and proposed improvements which satisfies the City’s 
requirement for a traffic impact and mitigation analysis for development of the Property. As long 
as development of the Property is in general conformance with the Development Plan set forth in 
the Rezoning, no further traffic impact and mitigation analysis is required for development of the 
Property or any portion thereof
12.2. 
In-Lieu Payments and Assurances of Construction. Wherever this Restated 
Agreement or the Rezoning requires construction of a roadway, an in-lieu payment for such 
construction may be an acceptable substitute as determined appropriate through an approved traffic 
study. The amount of the in-lieu payment shall be determined as follows: Corrigan or DMB shall 
either accept the City’s existing bid or submit an engineer’s estimate for plan preparation, design, 
and construction costs for the roadway, including all required pavement with curb and gutter, 
median improvements, utility relocations/modifications, traffic control, pedestrian improvements, 
survey, mobilization, general conditions and any required drainage structures. Approval of such 
estimate is subject to the review and discretion of the City Manager or designee. The in-lieu 
payment shall be based on the accepted bid or approved estimate plus twenty-five percent (25%) 
contingency cost and other incidental items as determined by the City Manager or designee.
12.3. 
Miller Road Extension and Underpass. The Parties hereto understand that the 
extension of Miller Road near the Property and the construction of an underpass beneath the 101 
Freeway along the Miller Road alignment may become necessary to resolve local and regional 
planning issues, and provide an alternative route to the Property. Corrigan and DMB, therefore, 
have paid the sum of $468,672.65 to the City toward the cost in creating a study to determine the 
feasibility, concept, design, cost, method of assessing costs, together with Corrigan and DMB’s 
proportional share of the cost of construction Miller Road from Union Hills to Thompson Peak 
Parkway, including an underpass beneath the 101 Freeway and the City hereby acknowledges 
receipt of the this payment in full.
12.4 Internal Shuttle Svstem/TMO. The Parties agree that Corrigan and DMB will 
construct a traffic signal at North 73rd Way/East Legacy Boulevard no later than January 1, 2027 
and a traffic signal at North 73rd Street/East Legacy Boulevard no later than January 31,2028, per
19205562
Page 9 of21
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

Paragraph 12 of the Stipulations for Case No. 20-ZN-2002#5 (collectively the “New Traffic 
Signals”). Upon completion, the New Traffic Signals will be determined by the City’s Zoning 
administrator to satisfy the improved project circulation intent of the Internal Shuttle SystemATMO 
Stipulation described in Section 2.8(B), Paragraph 10-11 for Case No. 20-ZN-2002.
13. 
Guiding Principles. The Parties agree and understand that the legislative action required 
for approval of the Rezoning cannot be altered by this Restated Agreement and, therefore, 
wherever there is a perceived conflict between the Rezoning and this Restated Agreement, the 
Rezoning controls. The Parties further understand and agree that when attempting to resolve any 
such conflict it is the Parties’ intent that the Rezoning establishes the requirements for 
development, and this Restated Agreement establishes timing and financial considerations 
involved in complying with such requirements, and further protects Corrigan’s and DMB’s rights 
to develop pursuant to the Development Plan for the duration of this Restated Agreement. The 
Parties recognize that planning and development activities for the Property will require a 
significant amount of cooperation and coordination between the Parties to this Restated 
Agreement. Many of the requirements and procedures provided for in this Restated Agreement 
(and in the Amended Development Standards) contemplate that use of the Property in the future 
may be subject to procedures, requirements, regulations and ordinances not presently in effect as 
well as actions and decisions by the Parities which cannot be provided for with particularity at the 
time this Restated Agreement is being executed. Consequently, the Parties agree that they will act 
in good faith and with reasonableness in implementing, operating under, and exercising the rights, 
powers, privileges, and benefits conferred or reserved by this Restated Agreement or by law.
14. 
Zoning Ordinance Provisions Applicable to the Development of the Property.
Development of the Property shall be governed by the Zoning Ordinance in effect at the time of 
approval of the Original Agreement, as modified and supplemented by the Rezoning.
15. 
Amendment or Cancellation of the Restated Agreement. This Restated Agreement may be 
amended or canceled, in whole or in part and with respect to all or any portion of the Property, 
only with the mutual written consent of the Parties. Within ten (10) days after any such amendment 
or cancellation of this Restated Agreement, the amendment or cancellation shall be recorded by 
the City in the Official Records of Maricopa County, Arizona.
16. 
Duration. The Parties understand and agree that the new development anticipated by this 
Restated Agreement has been planned according to current forecasting and trends, and the 
development is anticipated to commence in the next three (3) to five (5) years. The Parties further 
understand and agree that a project of this magnitude may take longer than five (5) years to 
complete, and that assurances are necessary both that the City will comply with the terms of this 
Restated Agreement and that DMB, Corrigan, and any subsequent property owners will develop 
the Property as expeditiously as possible. The Parties, therefore, agree that performance under this 
Restated Agreement is a beneficial prerequisite to the continuance of this Restated Agreement.
16.1. Breach. Failure by any Party to perform or act in accordance with this Restated 
Agreement shall constitute a breach. Prior to exercising any remedy for a breach, the non­
breaching Party shall provide written notice to the breaching Party specifying the nature of the 
breach. The breaching Party shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of such notice to cure the
19205562
Page 10 of 21
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

breach (“Cure Period”); provided, however, that if the breach cannot reasonably be cured within 
such thirty (30) day period, the breaching Party shall have such additional time as is necessary to 
cure the breach so long as it commences the cure within the Cure Period and diligently prosecutes 
the same to completion. Breach of this Restated Agreement that remains uncured after the Cure 
Period, including the violation of any conditions or stipulations of the Rezoning, is grounds by the 
non-breaching Party for termination of this Restated Agreement or other remedies available at both 
law and in equity, including specific performance.
16.2. Automatic Termination and Extension. If not sooner terminated in accordance 
with the provisions hereof, this Restated Agreement shall automatically terminate and be of no 
further force or effect November 19,2037. If the Parties mutually determine that a longer period 
for the performance of the provisions of this Restated Agreement is necessary for any reason, the 
term of this Restated Agreement may be extended by a written amendment to this Restated 
Agreement approved by the City Council.
17. General Provisions.
17.1. Notices
17.1.1. Manner of Serving. All notices, filings, consents, approvals and other 
communications provided for herein or given in connection herewith (“Notices”) shall be validly 
given, filed, made, delivered or served if in writing and delivered personally or sent by registered 
or certified United Postal Service Mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid to:
If to the City:
The City of Scottsdale 
3939 Drinkwater Boulevard 
Scottsdale, Arizona 85251 
Attn: City Manager
With a copy to:
The City of Scottsdale 
3939 Drinkwater Boulevard 
Scottsdale, Arizona 85251 
Attn: City Attorney
If to Corrigan:
Fennemore Craig
3003 N. Central Avenue, suite 2600 
Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2913 
Attn: Steve Good , Esq.
If to Master Developer:
One Scottsdale Core, LLC 
c/o DMB Associates, Inc.
6263 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 330 
Scottsdale, Arizona 85250 
Attn: Michael Burke
One Scottsdale Investors, LLC
19205562
Page 11 of 21
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

With a copy to:
do DMB Associates, Inc.
6263 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 330 
Scottsdale, Arizona 85250 
Attn: Michael Burke
Tiffany & Bosco, P.A.
1850 N Central Avenue, 24'*’ Floor 
Phoenix, Arizona 85004 
Attn: William Lally, Esq.
Or to such other addresses as either party may from time to time designate in writing and deliver 
in a like manner. Any such change of address Notice shall be given at least ten (10) days before 
the date on which the change is to become effective.
17.1.2. Mailing Effective. Notices, given by mail, shall be deemed delivered 
seventy-two (72) hours following deposit in the U.S. Postal Service, in the manner set forth above.
17.2. 
Waiver. No delay in exercising any right or remedy shall constitute a waiver 
thereof and no waiver by the Parties of the breach of any provision of this Restated Agreement 
shall be construed as a waiver of any preceding or succeeding breach of the same or any other 
provision of this Restated Agreement. Nothing herein or in the Rezoning shall constitute or be 
deemed to be a waiver by Corrigan or DMB of their respective rights to request future rezonings 
or changes in development standards for all or any portion(s) of the Property pursuant to City 
procedures and requirements existing at the time of the request. Nothing herein contained shall be 
deemed to be a waiver by the City of the right to act, by approval or denial, on such rezoning or 
change, to the extent such action would not otherwise be in breach of this Restated Agreement.
17.3. Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. If legal action by any party is brought because of a 
breach of this Restated Agreement or to enforce a provision of this Restated Agreement, the 
prevailing party is entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees and court costs.
17.4. 
Counterparts. This Restated Agreement may be executed in two (2) or more 
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute 
one and the same instrument. The signature pages from one or more counterparts may be removed 
from such counterparts and such signature pages all attached to a single instrument so that the 
signatures of all Parties may be physically attached to a single document.
17.5. 
Headings. The description headings of the sections of this Restated Agreement are 
inserted for convenience only and shall not control or affect the meaning or construction of any of 
the provisions of this Restated Agreement.
17.6. 
Entire Agreement. This Restated Agreement constitutes the entire agreement 
between the Parties and shall not be changed or added to except in the manner provided in Section 
14. All prior and contemporaneous agreements, representations and understanding of the Parties, 
oral or written, other than specifically incorporated herein by reference, are superseded by this 
Restated Agreement.
19205562
Page 12 of 21
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

17.7. 
Severability. If any provision of this Restated Agreement is declared void or 
unenforceable, such provision shall be severed from this Restated Agreement, which shall 
otherwise remain in frill force and effect, provided that the overall intent of the Parties is not 
materially vitiated by such severability.
17.8. 
Governing Law. This Restated Agreement is entered into in Arizona and shall be 
construed and interpreted under the laws of the State of Arizona. The Parties agree that venue for 
action commenced in connection with this Restated Agreement shall be proper only in a court of 
competent jurisdiction location in Maricopa County, Arizona, and the Parties hereby waive any 
right to object to such venue.
17.9. 
Recordation. No later than ten (10) days after this Restated Agreement has been 
executed by the Parties, it shall be recorded in its entirety, by the City, in the Official Records of 
Maricopa County, Arizona.
17.10. Default. Remedies. If any Party to this Restated Agreement breaches any 
provision of this Restated Agreement, the non-defaulting Party shall be entitled to all remedies 
available at both law and in equity, including specific performance.
17.11. Authority. The Parties to this Restated Agreement represent to the other that they 
have full power and authority to enter into this Restated Agreement. Corrigan and DMB represent 
and warrant that they are duly formed and validly existing under the laws of the State of Arizona, 
and that they are duly qualified to do business in the State of Arizona and are in good standing 
under applicable state laws. The Parties represent to each other that the individuals executing this 
Restated Agreement on behalf of their respective Parties are authorized to bind the party on whose 
behalf each individual is signing.
17.12. Estoppel. Each of the Parties hereto covenant and agree with the other to 
provide within thirty (30) days of written request from the other an estoppel certificate signed by 
a duly authorized representative of such party indicating that the other Party(ies) are not then in 
default under any of the obligations pursuant to this Restated Agreement.
17.13. Cancellation of Contract. This Restated Agreement is subject to the 
cancellation provisions of A.R.S. § 38-511.
17.14. Exhibits and Recitals. Any exhibit attached hereto shall be deemed to have been 
incorporated herein by this reference with the same force and effect as if fully set forth in the body 
hereof The Recitals set forth at the beginning of this Restated Agreement are hereby 
acknowledged and incorporated herein and the Parties hereby confirm the accuracy thereof
18. Condominium Plat/For-Sale Residential Units. The additional three hundred fifty (350) 
residential dwelling units associated with Case No. 20-ZN-2002 #5 shall be for-sale units. 
Condominium plats for all 350 units must be recorded before construction. For the purposes of 
this Section 18, “for-sale” units shall mean platted residential dwelling units that are located within 
a recorded condominium plat, and that are offered for sale pursuant to a valid public report.
19205562
Page 13 of 21
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Restated Agreement as of the 
Effective Date.
[END OF TEXT- SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW]
19205562
Page 14 of 21
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

>
This instrument is hereby executed on behalf of City of Scottsdale, as of the Effective Date.
ATTEST: 
CITY OF SCOTTSDALE
an Arizona municipal corporation
Ben Lane, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM: 
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
(Pi
Lisa Borowsky, Mayor
LuiTE. Santaella, City Attorney 
By: Joe Padilla, Deputy City Attorney
STATE OF ARIZONA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF MARICOPA )
This instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of
.,20_
by Lisa Borowsky, the Mayor of the City of Scottsdale, Arizona, an Arizona municipal 
corporation, on behalf of said corporation.
Notary Public Signature 
My commission expires:
(AFFIX SEAL HERE)
[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
19205562
Page 15 of 21
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

This instrument is hereby executed on behalf of ONE SCOTTSDALE CORE, LLC, as of the 
Effective Date.
ONE SCOTTSDALE CORE, LLC, 
an Arizona limited liability company
By:
One Scottsdale Holdings, LLC, 
an Arizona limited liability company, 
its Manager
By: 
DMB Associates, Inc.,
an Arizona corporation, 
its Manager
By:
Name:
Its:
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
)
) ss. 
)
by.
This instrument was acknowledged before me this____ day of _
______________________, the________________________
,20
of
DMB ASSOCIATES, INC., an Arizona corporation, as Manager of ONE SCOTTSDALE 
HOLDINGS, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, as Manager of ONE SCOTTSDALE 
CORE, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, for and on behalf thereof.
Notary Public Signature 
My commission expires:
(AFFIX SEAL HERE)
[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
19205562
Page 16 of 21
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

This instrument is hereby executed on behalf of ONE SCOTTSDALE INVESTORS, LLC, as of 
the Effective Date.
ONE SCOTTSDALE INVESTORS, LLC, 
a Delaware limited liability company
By: ONE SCOTTSDALE CORE, LLC, an Arizona 
limited liability company, its Member
By: ONE SCOTTSDALE HOLDINGS LLC, an 
Arizona limited liability company, its Manager
By: DMB ASSOCIATES, INC., an Arizona 
corporation, its Manager
By:_________________________________
Its:_________________________________
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
)
) ss. 
)
by.
This instrument was acknowledged before me this____ day of
______________________, the________________________
,20
of
DMB ASSOCIATES, INC., an Arizona corporation, as Manager of ONE SCOTTSDALE 
HOLDINGS, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, as Manager of ONE SCOTTSDALE 
CORE, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, as Member of ONE SCOTTSDALE 
INVESTORS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, for and on behalf thereof.
Notary Public Signature 
My commission expires:
(AFFIX SEAL HERE)
[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
19205562
Page 17 of 21
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

This instrument is hereby executed on behalf of RKCCLL INVESTMENTS, LLC, as of the 
Effective Date.
RKCCLL INVESTMENTS, LLC, an Arizona 
limited liability company
By:.
Its;
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
)
) ss. 
)
,20
This instrument was acknowledged before me this____ day of___________
by_________________________, the__________________________________________ ^of
RKCCLL INVESTMENTS, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, for and on behalf thereof.
Notary Public Signature 
My commission expires:
(AFFIX SEAL HERE)
[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
19205562
Page 18 of 21
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

This instrument is hereby executed on behalf of BDCCLL INVESTMENTS, LLC, as of the 
Effective Date.
BDCCLL INVESTMENTS, LLC, an Arizona 
limited liability company
By:.
Its:
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
)
) ss. 
)
,20
This instrument was acknowledged before me this____ day of___________
by_________________________, the__________________________________________ of
BDCCLL INVESTMENTS, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, for and on behalf thereof
Notary Public Signature 
My commission expires:
(AFFIX SEAL HERE)
[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
19205562
Page 19 of 21
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

This instrument is hereby executed on behalf of CCFCLL INVESTMENTS, LLC, as of the 
Effective Date.
CCFCLL INVESTMENTS, LLC, an Arizona 
limited liability compeiny
By:.
Its:
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
)
) ss. 
)
,20
This instrument was acknowledged before me this____ day of___________
by_________________________, the__________________________________________ of
CCFCLL INVESTMENTS, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, for and on behalf thereof.
Notary Public Signature 
My commission expires:
(AFFIX SEAL HERE)
[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
19205562
Page 20 of 21
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

This instrument is hereby executed on behalf of SMCCLL INVESTMENTS, LLC, as of the 
Effective Date.
SMCCLL INVESTMENTS, LLC, an Arizona 
limited liability company
By:.
Its:
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
)
) ss. 
)
,20
This instrument was acknowledged before me this____ day of___________
by_________________________, the__________________________________________ ^of
SMCCLL INVESTMENTS, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, for and on behalf thereof.
Notary Public Signature 
My commission expires:
(AFFIX SEAL HERE)
[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
19205562
Page 21 of21
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

Wood, Patel & Associates, Inc.
602.335.8500
www.woodpatel.com
Revised May 20,2026 
WP# 215234.04 
Page I of 5
EXHIBIT “A”
LEGAL DESCRIPTION 
One Scottsdale 
Planning Area II
Lots 1,3,4 and 5 and Tract B, One Scottsdale Planning Unit II, recorded in Book 1688, page 27, 
Maricopa County Records (MCR), Maricopa County, Arizona.
TOGETHER WITH
Lot 6, One Scottsdale - Tales, recorded in Book 1791, page 45, Maricopa County Records (MCR), 
Maricopa County, Arizona.
TOGETHER WITH
Lots 8 and 9 and Tract C, One Scottsdale - Atavia, recorded in Book 1841, page 21, Maricopa 
County Records (MCR), Maricopa County, Arizona.
TOGETHER WITH
Portico Condominiums, recorded in Book 1716, page 103, Maricopa County Records (MCR), 
Maricopa County, Arizona.
TOGETHER WITH
Atavia Condominiums, recorded in Book 1854, page 11, Maricopa County Records (MCR), 
Maricopa County, Arizona.
19205562
Page 1 of 5
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

Exhibit “A”
Legal Description 
One Scottsdale 
Planning Area li
TOGETHER WITH
Revised May 20, 2026 
WP# 215234.04 
Page 2 of 5
Lot I, Minor Land Division of SCP 7201. recorded in Book 1907, page 29. Maricopa County 
Records (MCR), Maricopa County, Arizona.
This legal description is based on the Final Plat of One Scottsdale - Planning Area II, recorded 
in Book 1688, page 27, MCR, the Final Plat of One Scottsdale - Talos, recorded in Book 1791, 
page 45, MCR, the Final Plat of One Scottsdale - Atavia, recorded in Book 1841, page 21, MCR, 
the Final Plat of Portico Condominiums, recorded in Book 1716, page 3, MCR. the Final Plat of 
Atavia Condominiums, recorded in Book 1854, page 11, MCR, Minor Land Division of SCP 7201, 
recorded in Book 1907, page 29, MCR, and other client provided information and is located within 
an area surveyed by Wood, Patel & Associates, Inc. during the month of March, 2023. Any 
monumentation noted in this legal description is within acceptable tolerance (as defined in Arizona 
Boundary Survey Minimum Standards dated 02/14/2002) of said positions based on said survey.
if
<(/
•A
Ci
23945
m
BRIAN J
■<
CP
oi
O
DIEHL
<2
ned
NA, 0
EXPIRES e9.30-26
19205562
Page 2 of 5
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

EXHIBIT "A"
LOTS
ONESCOnSOALE- 
PLANNING UNIT II 
BOOK 1688, PAGE 27, MCR
LRGACY BLVD
•5 tr
Q o
in
'T
U1
“> < <3
O
t;.-
£ q:
oK
IIIi
^ O
LQ
O "
rg
^ 5
. OT i o 
>- t ^ ^
to
UJ
<
III
<N
O OQ
Q
O z
CT)
</)
<
CL
Q </)
o
UJ
a
o
z
5 s
O
QC ^
os
2^
O
CD
W
a
w
V/ ^ 
^8
<
nJ
> lU
m
o
<
8 o
*2 q:
]
<
Q
o
z n: zy
o
z
c/3
O S
DS
<*>
oo
< ^
r<\
Q o 
n y
>
z
o
a
O
CD
O
u
o?:
c/3.
<3
TRACTS
TRACTC
o8
LOTS
ONE SCOTTSDALE-ATAVIA 
BOOK 1841, PAGE 21. MCR
4
^>0
iOi
LOT 3
ONE SCOTTSDALE- 
PLANNING UNIT II 
BOOK 1688, PAGE 27, MCR
LOT 4
ONE SCOTTSDALE- 
PLANNING UNIT 11 
BOOK 1688, PAGE 27. MCR
WOOD
I’ATET.
np LATV/) . , 
BRIANJ, Zc
^ic-.V
9
c
EXPMES iMOiK
N
ONESCOnSDALE 
PLANNING AREA II 
Revised 05/20;2026 
WP# 215234,04 
PAGE 3 OF 5 
NOT TO SCALE
Z:\2021 \215234\Survey\Lega|\5234-L15R01 .dwg
19205562
Page 3 of 5
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

Wood, Patel & Associates. Inc.
480.834.3300
www.woodp3tel.com
Revised May 20. 2026 
WP# 215234.04 
Page 4 of 5
EXHIBIT “A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION 
One Scottsdale 
Planning Area III
Lots 1. 2, 4. 5, 6. 7 and 8. One Scottsdale Lot 3, recorded in Book 1599, page 25, Maricopa 
County Records (MCR), Maricopa County, Arizona.
TOGETHER WITH
Lots 1 and 2. Replat Parcel 1 of One Scottsdale, recorded in Book 1115, page 41, Maricopa 
County Records (MCR). Maricopa County, Arizona.
TOGETHER WITH
Lots 1A and IB, Replat of Parcel 3 of One Scottsdale Lot 3, recorded in Book 1876, page 2, 
Maricopa County Records (MCR), Maricopa County. Arizona.
This legal description is based on the Final Plat of One Scottsdale Lot 3. recorded in Book 1599, 
page 25, MCR, the Replat Parcel 1 of One Scottsdale, recorded in Book 1115, page 41, MCR. 
the Replat of Parcel 3 of One Scottsdale Lot 3. recorded in Book 1876, page 2. MCR and other 
client provided information and is located within an area surveyed by Wood. Patel & Associates, 
Inc. during the month of March, 2023. Any monumentation noted in this legal description is within 
acceptable tolerance (as defined in Arizona Boundary Survey Minimum Standards dated 
02/14/2002) of said positions based on said survey.
9-
<0
■Ti
-P
23W5
BRIAN J
-<
OJ
DIEHL
O
-i)
fo S, ned
4
►
VA
26
19205562
Page 4 of 5
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

EXHIBIT "A"
tor\
in < •
5“
U 
00
THOMPSON PEAK PKWY tract a
/
LOTB
ONE SCOTTSDALE LOT 3 
BOOK 1599. PAGE 25. MCR
LOT? •
ONE SCOnSDALE LOT 3 
BOOK 1599. PAGE 25. MCR
LOT 6
0NESC0TTSDA.EL0T3 
BOOK 1599. PAGE 25. MCR '
LOT 5
ONE SCOTTSDALE LOT 3 . 
BOOK 1599. PAGE 25. MCR
LOT 4 ■
ONESCOnSDALE LOT 3 
BOOK 1599, PAGE 25. MCR
L0T1A
REPLAT OF PARCEL 3 OF . 
ONE SCOTTSDALE LOT 3 
BOOK 1876, PAGE 2. MCR
I
LOTI
ONESCOnSDALELOTS 
BOOK 1599. PAGE 25. MCR
03
I
2:
CsJ
lU
r P
UJ (O «
00
TRACTE 
LOTI
REPLAT PARCEL 1 OF ONE 
SCOTTSDALE 
BOOK 1115, PAGE 41, MCR
o
I-
L0T2
ONE SCOTTSDALE LOT 3 
BOOK 1599. PAGE 25, MCR
LJ g lU
CM O «
Q
oi - ^ b? -•
W -
&Sg
UJ
UJ
oi
f—'
C/5
m
or
O
i
m
LEGACY BLVD
TRACT C
WOOD
PATEI.
23945 
•
Oi BRIANJ. -c
EXPt^E§0M0.;6
N
A
ONE SCOTTSDALE 
PLANNING AREA III 
Revised 5/20/2026 
WP# 215234.04 
PAGE 5 OF 5 
NOT TO SCALE
Z:l2021\215234\Survey\Legal\5234-L16R01.dwg
19205562
Page 5 of 5
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

Exhibit B
One Scottsdale Attributes Table
LAND USE BUDGET
Maximum Hotel: 400 rooms 
Maximum Residential: 2,350 dwelling units 
Maximum Commercial/Office/Retail: 1,494,000 square feet
PU-II & III ATTRIBUTES SUMMARY
HOTEL
(ROOMS)
RESn)ENTL4L
(DU)
COMMERCL4L/
OFFICE/RETAIL
(SF)
OPEN
SPACE
(AC)
Planning Unit II
270
1.640
1.258.000 
14.2 
3.8
Planning Unit III
130
710
236.000 
14.8 
3.5
TOTAL
400
2,350
1,494,000
29.0
7.3
Rev. 21MAY26
Page 1 of 6
19205562
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

Exhibit B
One Scottsdale Attributes Table
PU-II ATTRIBUTES
ID
PARCEL DESCRIPTION
APN
HOTEL
(ROOMS)
RESm-
ENTL4L
(DU)
2.1
2.2
One Scottsdale Multifamily Owner 
LLC I Streetliglits
215-05-310
NA
314
2.3
MAA Scottsdale Exchange LLC | 
Grand Peaks
215-05-312
NA
280
Dowe Scottsdale LLC | 
Tribute Hotel
215-05-313
157
NA
2.4 One Scottsdale Investors LLC
2.5
2.6
One Scottsdale Planning Unit 11 
Association Inc
215-05-314
215-05-316
NA
NA
NA
NA
One Scottsdale Planning Unit II 
Association Inc
215-05-317
NA
NA
2.7 BG One Scottsdale LLC | Portico
2.8 Avondale 1492 Holdings LLC I Talos 215-05-438
215-05-430
NA
2.9 One Scottsdale Investors LLC
2.9 One Scottsdale Investors LLC
215-05-443
NA
112
352
215-05-443
164
no
2.10 One Scottsdale Investors LLC
215-05-444
113
220
2.11 One Scottsdale Investors LLC | Tract C 215-05-445
2.12
BG Atavia LLC I Atavia
2.13 SCP 7201 LLC I flume
215-05-738
NA
NA
NA
88
PL-4NNINGITSTTII TOTAL
215-05-739
NA
NA
270
1,640
COMMERICAL/
OFFICE/RETAIL
(SF)
NA
NA
NA
15.000
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
871.000
NA
NA
372.000
1,258,000
OPEN SPACE
(AQ
0.9
0.6
0.3
0.2
2.3
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.3
0.3
2.9
1.1
1.0
0.6
14.2
Scenic
Corridor
portion
NA
NA
NA
0.2
2.3
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.3
NA
NA
NA
3.8
Re\>. 21MAY26
Page 2 of 6
19205562
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

Exhibit B
One Scottsdale Attributes Table
PU-III ATTRIBUTES
ID
PARC EL DESCRIPTION
APN
HOTEL
(ROOMS)
RESm-
ENTL4L
(DU)
COMMERIC.4L/
OrnCE/RETAIL
(SF)
OPEN SPACE
(AC)
Scenic
Corridor
portion
3.1 
One North Sconsdale Corp
215-05-008
NA
388
NA
2.7
NA
3.2 USCMF Avion on Legacy LLC
215-05-009
NA
322
NA
3.3
NA
3.3 One Scottsdale OtMiers Association Inc 215-05-011
NA
NA
NA
0.4
NA
3.4 One Scottsdale Owners Association Inc 215-05-012
NA
NA
NA
0.5
NA
3.5 One Scottsdale Owners Association Inc 215-05-013
NA
NA
NA
0.7
NA
3.6 One Scottsdale Owners Association Inc 215-05-014
NA
NA
NA
2.1
NA
3.7 One Scottsdale Owners Association Inc
3.8
HR RC One Scottsdale A' LLC | One 
Scottsdale Medical
215-05-015
215-05-302
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
105.000
0.0
1.4
NA
0.9
3.9 Scottsdale Suites 20001 LLC I Hilton
215-05-303
130
NA
NA
0.3
NA
3.10 Quiktrip Corporation
215-05-304C
NA
NA
10.000
0.7
0.7
3.11 RKCCLL In^'estments LLC ETAL
215-05-304d
NA
NA
60.000
0.7
NA
3.12 One Scottsdale Surgeiy- Center LLC
215-05-305
NA
NA
18.000
0.3
0.3
3.13 VXSN Holdings LLC
215-05-306
NA
NA
10.700
0.7
0.6
3.14 WTNLEE Scottsdale LLC
3.15 WTNLEE Scottsdale LLC
215-05-307
215-05-308
NA
NA
NA
NA
8.150
8.150
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
3.16 Torch Club LLC
215-05-309
NA
NA
16.000
0.3
0.3
PLANTSING I NTT IH TOTAL
130
710
236,000
14.8
3.5
Rev. 21MAY26
Page 3 of 6
19205562
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

Exhibit B
One Scottsdale Attributes Table
Notes:
1. These maximums for Hotel. CommercialTletaiTOffice. and Residential are intended to allow flexibility across all parcels and only 
provides a cap for the project. Uses and the location of uses are subject to change based on available land use budget.
2. The minimums for open space are intended to allow for flexibility across all parcels and only provides a minimum for the project 
and each planning unit. The location and quantity of open space is subject to change based on the available open space budget. 
Per 20-ZN-2002#3 approval a minimtan of 11.85 acres (20® o of the net site area of PU-II) is required as open space in PU-II and a 
minimiun of 7.68 acres (15®o of the net site area of PU-III) is required as open space in PU-III. At least 25®b of tlie minimiun 
required open space shall be Scenic Corridor open space.
3. A maximmn of 750 residential units shall be allowed in Planning Unit III. Per 20-ZN-2002#3 approval. 180 residential units must 
be “for sale” units. Per 20-ZN-2002#5 approval, all 350 imits must be “for sale” units. Collectively, a minimiun of 530 imits must 
be “for sale” units.
4. Up to 130 “additional” hotel rooms may be provided when the available Commercial/Retail/Oflfice land use budget is reduced by 
1,000 square feet for each “additional” hotel room over the maximum hotel rooms of the land use budget.
5. NA = Not Allocated
Rev. 21MAY26
Page 4 of 6
19205562
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

Exhibit B
One Scottsdale Attributes Table
o
CO
o
to
J
LEGACY BOULEVARD
V y
2.11
2.1
2.10
2.12
2.7
2.6
2.4
2.9
2.2
2.13
2.3
mn
PU-II
IWI
ONE SCOTTSDALE
Rev. 21MAY26
N.T.S. NORTH
Page 5 of 6
19205562
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

Exhibit B
One Scottsdale Attributes Table
....- 1 . ..
THOMPSON PEAK PARKWAY 
^3.3
O
on
»—
O
0.i
on
PU-III
3.8
3.7
3.16
3.15
3.14
^3.4
3.9
3.13
/^3.6
3
3.12
3.11
3.2
3.10
LEGACY BOULEVARD 
------ \ y
ONE SCOTTSDALE
Rev. 21MAY26
N.T.S. NORTH
Paae 6 of 6
19205562
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

Wood, Patel & Associates, Inc.
480.834.3300
www.woodpatel.com
May 21, 2026 
WP# 215234.04 
Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT “C”
LEGAL DESCRIPTION 
One Scottsdale 
Planning Unit II
Lot 5, One Scottsdale - Planning Unit II, recorded in Book 1688, page 27, Maricopa County 
Records (MCR), Maricopa County, Arizona.
TOGETHER WITH
Lots 8 and 9, One Scottsdale - Atavia, recorded in Book 1841, page 21, Maricopa County 
Records (MCR), Maricopa County, Arizona.
This legal description is based on the Final Plat of One Scottsdale - Planning Unit II, recorded in 
Book 1688, page 27. MCR and the Final Plat for One Scottsdale - Atavia. recorded in Book 1841, 
page 21, MCR.
LA/v^
ip
p-
•A
<y
CJ
09
23945 
BRIAN J 
DIEHL
m
lU
o
<2?/.
&ned
A
EXP
9-30-26
19205562
Page 1 of2
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

Exhibit C 
Legal Description
Taa^
•P.
'fc
A«.
?
c
23945
CO
m
BRIAN J 
DIEHL
C3
-<o
ui
,ct-
■R>
5i-
'ned
■i.
lA
EX
S 09-30-26
LOTS
ONESCOnSDALE- 
PLANNING UNIT II 
BOOK 1688, PAGE 27, MCR
/\
NORTH
NOT TO SCALE 
REVISED 21MAY26
LEGACY BLVD
H
Is
Ww
<
§
? 
C/3
Q.
o
Q CO
o
5 5
CDr-
<
LU
J
Zo
<
Q
§
c/3
CD
ou
C/D
LOTS
ONE SCOTTSDALE-ATAVIA 
BOOK 1841, PAGE 21, MCR
^Tb loi
Page 2 of2
19205562
Page 2 of 2
Agreement No. 2026-141-COS

DMB"
Buiiding Li-GACits Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Project Narrative 
Final - December 19,2025
REQUEST
One Scottsdale Investors, LLC and RKCCLL Investments LLC, BDCCLL Investments LLC, CCFCLL Investments 
LLC and SMCCLL Investments (collectively, the "Owners") are owners of portions of the One Scottsdale 
mixed-use development project ("One Scottsdale") located at the northeast corner of Scottsdale Road 
and the Loop 101 freeway. The Owners have authorized Berry Riddell, Tiffany Bosco and DMB Associates, 
Inc. ("Applicant") to process a request to amend approximately 27 acres of the existing Planned 
Community District with comparable Planned Regional Center ("PCD-PRC") zoning district. The request is 
to update Schedule "C" which is the approved Land Use Budget ("LUB") to add 350 additional for-saleonlv 
residential units and to decrease non-residential square footage by 1,372,145 square feet on the Owners 
portion of One Scottsdale south of Legacy Boulevard ("Request"). The goal is to 'right size' the approved 
residential and commercial entitlements to create the critical mass necessary to support the future mixed- 
use plans for the overall project. The proposed entitlements are in conformance with the current City of 
Scottsdale ("City") General Plan and Greater Airpark Character Area Plan ("GACAP"). The following 
narrative expands on the Request and its necessity to allow for the continued development of this mixed- 
use development core at one of the City's major intersections at Scottsdale Road and the Loop 101 
freeway.
ONE SCOTTSDALE
Backeround/Historv
In 2002, the City approved DMB's request for a development proposal that would create a retail based, 
mixed-use core at the intersection of the Loop 101 freeway and the City's signature roadway, Scottsdale 
Road. The approval created flexible zoning entitlements that allowed approximately 1.8 million square 
feet of commercial, office and retail uses, 400 hotel rooms and up to 1,100 residential units ("2002 
Entitlements"). The 2002 Entitlements include requirements for master plans for water, wastewater, 
drainage, transportation and environmental design, all of which have been prepared and approved by the 
City.
One of the key components that allowed for the 2002 Entitlements was the comprehensive traffic analysis 
and recommendations that evolved from the zoning process. As a result, significant transportation 
infrastructure was required for the One Scottsdale project. Most of the required regional transportation 
improvements in excess of $13 million were constructed prior to any significant development occurring 
within One Scottsdale and which have been in place for many years in advance of actual development.
ATTACHMENT 5

DMB“
Building Lkgacies Since 19S4
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page 2
These improvements including the widening of Scottsdale Road on the east side, new traffic signals at 
Scottsdale Road and Henkel's main entrance, and at the intersection of Legacy Boulevard and Scottsdale 
Road, construction of Legacy Boulevard, coordination of Legacy Boulevard to Hayden Road through 
Arizona State Land parcels and the Loop 101 Freeway frontage road from Hayden Road to Scottsdale Road 
In addition, the 2002 Entitlements allowed the City and DMB to successfully attract a significant corporate 
user to the site, Henkel (previously Dial Corporation and now the Illume building).
In 2016, the City approved an amendment to the zoning to allow for additional residential and non- 
residential entitlement. An additional 1,066,145 square feet of non-residential and 900 residential units 
(for PU II) was approved as well as the ability to go up to 90' in height in certain areas of PU II. As part of 
this approval, additional stipulations were approved including the need to potentially widen the west lane 
of Scottsdale Road to achieve a full 6-lane condition. Scottsdale Road has been recently widened in front 
of One Scottsdale achieving increased capacity along the Property's frontage.
The Illume campus in the southern portion of the property and the One North Scottsdale and Avion at 
Legacy residential developments in the northeastern portion of the property were the first properties to 
develop at One Scottsdale. Since 2021, additional properties have developed including the Home-to- 
Suites Hotel, construction of the Streetlights residential project, the Portico Condominiums and the retail 
shops and the Ryan medical office building. Additional properties have been sold with buildings in various 
stages of the permitting and approval process.
Planning Unit III
One Scottsdale, north of the Loop 101 freeway, is divided into two (2) separate planning units. Planning 
Unit II and Planning Unit III. Planning Unit III within One Scottsdale is bounded by Thompson Peak Parkway 
on the north, Scottsdale Road on the west. Legacy Boulevard on the south and the western boundary of 
the Grayhawk community on the east. The One North Scottsdale/Avion residential projects have utilized 
approximately 710 of the 750 residential dwelling units allocated within Planning Unit III.
The Home-to-Suites hotel was constructed and opened in 2023 in the middle portion of PU III and is a 4- 
story, 130-room extended stay hotel. The Ryan Company recently opened a medical focused, two-story, 
101,000 square foot office building. The office building is home to the City of Hope Cancer Center and 
Exalt Health. Also, a 10,700 square foot retail building with multiple retail uses and restaurants has also 
been completed. Additional projects that have received approval by the Development Review Board 
("DRB") and within PU III include the QuickTripgasfacility (under construction), and a 17,000 square foot, 
2-story medical office building. Approximately, 12 acres of property exist to be developed in PU III.
Planning Unit II
Planning Unit II is bounded by Legacy Boulevard on the north, Scottsdale Road on the west, Arizona State 
Land Department ("ASLD") property ("Crossroads East") to the east and the Loop 101 to the south.
Since 2016, several parcels have been sold and are currently under construction. The Beverly residential 
project (constructed by Streetlights and formerly referred to as "Streetlights") consists of 314-residences

DMB*
Building Lccaciks Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Pages
located at the northeast portion of PU II just south of Legacy Boulevard and east of 73'^"’ Way. Immediately 
south of the Beverly, Belgravia has completed the Portico condominium project that includes 112for-sale 
residences consisting of 1, 2, and 3 bedroom condominiums. Immediately south of Portico, is the Grand 
Peaks residential project, which has received approvals from the DRB. This project consists of 280 
residences. Another parcel within PU II includes the Talos project with a maximum of 352 residences. 
Belgravia again invested in One Scottsdale and is currently constructing a second for-sale community of 
88 condominiums that are designed with individual exterior entrances facing the internal private streets 
within One Scottsdale and the (4) interior buildings have entrances facing an interior common open space. 
The property has private streets on all sides of the development with access to public sidewalks for 360- 
degree pedestrian activity around the project. Approximately, 38 acres of land is remaining to be 
developed in PU II.
......................................... ■" -
!i^
•.•'.SUaSTAtioN^MlTI
1
N
a.-i
^'5
101
a
31
“'i
Surrounding Uses
To the north of Planning Unit III is the Discount Tire headquarters and HonorHealth Thompson Peak 
hospital. To the west, across Scottsdale Road is the City of Phoenix that is planned for dense and intense 
mixture of land uses with significant building heights (190 feet). To the south of Planning Unit II is the 
Loop 101 Freeway with the recently approved Optima project south of the freeway. To the east (of 
Planning Unit II) is the Crossroads East ASLD future mixed-use development with the ability to develop 
60-foot high buildings adjacent to Planning Unit II. The Cavasson mixed-use project has been developed 
further east at the northwest corner of Hayden and the Loop 101. The closest off-site residential uses are 
the Villages at Grayhawk condominium development and Vi independent and assisted living facility that 
are located immediately adjacent to the Jefferson residences within Planning Unit III.

DMB’
Building Li-CACifis Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page 4
REQUEST
Amendment to Zoning
The request is to update Schedule "C" which is the approved LUB to add 350 additional for-sale only 
residential units and to decrease non-residential square footage by 1,372,145 square feet on the Owners 
portion of One Scottsdale south of Legacy Boulevard. The existing PCD-PRC zoning was originally granted 
in 2002 and amended in 2016 by the City. The existing entitlements created a specific set of development 
standards, land use mix and off-site requirements, which are utilized to guide development on the site.
The Request for the approx. 27 acres of the Project significantly reduces the intensity of use allowed on 
the property and infrastructure impacts. The request continues to comply with the City's latest General 
Plan updates and Character Area planning efforts, including the GACAP. Due to its location at the freeway, 
the Character Area Plan designates One Scottsdale as a higher scale development and regional core, which 
allows for the greatest intensity and density.
Our request is to update the existing approved entitlements to better implement the City's current 
General Plan and Character Area planning efforts. In doing so, we intend to request an overall reduction 
in intensity resulting in a more sustainable, compatible and appropriate development for this area. The 
requested additional residential and reduction in commercial/office square footage within the core of 
Planning Unit II is also supported by the City's Character Area planning efforts and will result in less impact 
on City infrastructure. This includes a 31% reduction in water use, 20% reduction in wastewater use, and 
a 92% reduction in weekday vehicle trips and 93% reduction in am and pm peak traffic times to and from 
the Property

DMB”
Buildjng LecACifiS Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page 5
DISCOUNT I . 9 t
O N O B H t A I I H
Sci.e h..« 
lrpo|/,m1,v,Rr^xvi
-:jr'35>-.f363
iHivrsoN ri«i riti
✓
t.
5 •' 
'
S'
■
tflMCa 
.....
9
WMAX
IWMAX
‘
m i
/
:3
MORTENSOM CO
[FUTURF DEVELOPMENT)
%
i!-
-'‘a
r\
1:
/ -<
/ o
y
P
38
-I p
rantff^
COMCrw
• Z
N
111II
:ia
IS
IWMAX
( 42')
■ISTAU&ANT/ 
■ ■ETAlCJH 
H^ONOOS 
B|M0TH.VM 
■fOPEKEH
J
6CrMAX
2r.
T
fik
n
PhaSJJoRTENSON c5-
1;(ruTJRE DEVElOPwENT)
44
NJ
Phase
IB K
S5?5p>i:=r
'I
:? _
^Oop
■ .i J
pnop()si:o AMI'm)mi:nt ^ 
roriiK kxisiim; ^
KMin.KAIKMS
- Remove 1,372,145 of non-residentiol SF 
from PUIIond PU III
• Add a mox of 350 for-sole residents
\
(t)
City of Scottsdale General Plan Analysis
Since the 2002 Entitlements for One Scottsdale and in compliance with the state statutes, the City has 
continuously reviewed and updated their General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The General Plan 2035 
states:
The General Plan Is designed to be a broad, flexible document. Over time the General Plan 
is a living document that is legally amendable and manifested by many specific decisions 
and events that cause it to respond to the changing conditions, needs, and desires of the 
community.

DMB*
Building Lecaciks Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page 6
One Scottsdale and the requested changes comply with the City's existing 2035 General Plan. The 
Property is designated as Mixed-Use Neighborhoods with a Regional Use District overlay on the City's 
Conceptual Land Use Map. The request is to update the Project's zoning district (PCD-PRC) to comply with 
the City's latest General Plan updates and Character Area planning efforts. The Project lies within the 
City's GACAP. The Project's existing and proposed entitlements conform to the Airpark Mixed-Use 
Residential (AMU-R) land use designation. See GACAP Land Use Pian below. The Character Area Plan 
designates One Scottsdale as a higher scale development and regional core, which allows for greater 
intensity and density. This request meets market demand and implements the General Plan & GACAP.
Legend
Land Use Plan;
HHIII Aitpork Maed Use- 
Residontiol (AMU-RI
Airoork Moecl Us« lAMUj
IK
One
Scottsdale
■L
I
i
■"j
>>>
A Ju-R
Aj
4
^7!
^ EMP
r
2
s'-
RT
0
!sm
e^tLfc>>>Sp>»>>>>> >>>>>>>>
0 5
I
O
\
/ I A.
RT
a
j 
.
AaAj
EMP o
i'
L*-
I.*-
.I*-*- -i
IV
RogionQl Toufism |RI) 
Employment (EMP)
Aviolion |AV)
■■I Open Space (OSJ 
AVOfAMU
Gfeote* Aiipofk Boundofy 
>>>>>>> Signoture ComdG<
Powertoe Comdof 
— ■' Central Arizona Protect
Ralntreo. Potwoen Hoyden 
ond Scottsdcilo Roods, is 
sutijoci to clsongo os o pail 
ol ongIrseeilriQ citvocioted 
wilh slieel Impfovoments
GACAP Conceptual Development Types Map

DMB“
Building Lecacii:S Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page?
Legend
Conceptual Developnvent Types:
Type A- Medium Scole
Type 8- lofoe Mass
Type C- Highef Scole
'=5
Regional Cote- 
Grealest Inlenslly
.A
1
I
G*eotef Aifpotk Boondory 
I ■ " I Sensitive Edge
Powerline Conidot 
Centrol Arizona Prolect 
Open Space
7''^
0
•>V 
—rp
0
iH- -“t
»
;; wcstWorlo 
TyPRB...
J
mmW
%
'i
%
't
r • <1
'i
A
Greater Airpark Character Area Plan Analysis
From the General Purpose provision of the City's General Plan, it states that there are three (3) levels of 
planning in the City: citywide, character area, and neighborhood. Character area planning description 
includes the following:
Level 2 - Character Area Planning: Develops Character Plans on a priority basis over a period of time and 
speaks specifically to the goals and special attributes of an identifiable and functional area; i.e., its land 
uses, infrastructure, broadly defined urban architectural design philosophy, and transitions. Character 
Plans will ensure that quality of development and consistency of character drive Scottsdale's General Plan 
at the Character Plan level, all within the context of community-wide goals.
The City Council, in 2007, embarked on creating a character area plan to address the changing conditions 
in the real estate market for one of the City's largest and most important employment cores. The goals 
of the GACAP included:

DMB'
Building Legacies Since 1984
Enhance mobility and wayfinding;
Sustain existing neighborhoods;
Encourage a variety of land uses and activities;
Support and expand business diversity;
Encourage recreation and open space;
Promote sustainability and "green" design;
Enhance identity and architecture; and
Maintain and enhance the area's regional economic role.
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Pages
The Request for One Scottsdale will implement the GACAP's purpose statement. As part of the 2002 
Entitlements, significant transportation infrastructure was constructed and completed to address regional 
linkages and capacity for development at One Scottsdale and the surrounding ASLD properties within 
Scottsdale. In doing so, these roadway improvements enhanced mobility in this area of the Greater 
Airpark, sustained existing neighborhoods by reducing regional traffic on neighborhood streets, and 
enhanced the area's regional economic role.
The GACAP was approved with specific focused chapters intended to provide detail to guide decisions 
which fulfill the plans goals. The plan is divided into various topics including land use, neighborhoods and 
housing, aviation, community mobility, economic vitality, environmental planning, character and design, 
and public services and facilities. The GACAP is an update to the Greater Airpark area and General Plan 
that provides greater direction and development expectations for properties within this area of the City. 
The Request is an update to the 2002 Entitlements to further the recommendations set forth in the GACAP 
update.
GACAP Land Use
The Land Use chapter of the GACAP conceptualizes the Greater Airpark as a multi-faceted hub of 
commerce, employment, aviation, tourism, and recreation, as well as a center for growth in Scottsdale.
The Land Use chapter further states that characteristics of successful employment centers often include 
clusters of mutually supportive businesses, areas to relax and recreate, nearby access to a well-educated 
workforce, and transportation systems. The vision for the Greater Airpark includes a mix of uses and 
development types, standards to accommodate new types of development, and land uses flexible enough 
to accommodate new technologies, innovative business enterprises, and market pressures without 
interfering with Airport operations.
In order to achieve the above GACAP direction, the GACAP Land Use Plan designates where certain land 
uses should be located within the Greater Airpark area. One Scottsdale is designated as an Airpark Mixed 
Use-Residential (AMU-R) land use designation. The AMU-R designations are appropriate for the greatest 
variety of uses that may include a combination of personal and business services, employment, office, 
institutional, cultural amenities, retail, hotel, and higher density residential. Developments in AMU-R 
areas should be pedestrian-oriented, have access to multiple modes of transportation, and should be 
located outside of the Airport's 55 DNL contour.

DMB'
Bl'ilding Lecaciks Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page 9
One Scottsdale's existing zoning is PCD-PRC, which allows for a mixed-use development plan and complies 
with the General Plan's Regional Use Overlay. One Scottsdale's existing zoning also complies with the 
GACAP's new AMU-R land use designation. Furthermore, the Request, to amend the land use budget 
within the existing zoning district is consistent with the GACAP Land Use Plan and the vision articulated 
by the City. One Scottsdale exemplifies the characteristics of the AMU-R. The 2002 and 2016 Entitlements 
proposed a mixed-use destination of retail, employment, hotel, and residential uses. The Request is to 
further enhance this goal and provide a dynamic campus with support retail, restaurants, and corporate 
and employee housing options, all in accordance with City goals and policies.
Scottsdale Road and Legacy Boulevard are designated as 'signature corridors' on the GACAP Land Use 
Plan. One Scottsdale has an existing requirement to dedicate a significant scenic corridor along its 
Scottsdale Road frontage. The scenic setback from the roadway provides a natural, vegetated buffer to 
what is proposed to be a built environment consistent with the purpose, goals and vision of the GACAP. 
Scottsdale Road and Legacy Boulevard were widened and built by DMB for the purpose of providing the 
City with significant transportation infrastructure.
The Land Use chapter further lays out the character of development in each of the areas within the 
Greater Airpark. The GACAP Character Area Plan identifies three (3) conceptual development types on a 
map. Refer above to the GACAP Conceptual Development Types Map. The three development types are 
medium scale, larger mass and higher scales. Within the higher scale development areas, there are two 
(2) main 'Regional Core - Greatest Intensity' areas. One is along Scottsdale Road from Frank Lloyd Wright 
Boulevard south to Butherus Road. The other is One Scottsdale (south of Legacy Boulevard) from 
Scottsdale Road on the west into the ASLD lands to the east on the north side of the Loop 101 Freeway.
As recognized by the City's goals and policies, the goal of the Request is to create a core south of Legacy 
Boulevard. The GACAP designates the land south of Legacy Boulevard as a Higher Scale, Regional Core- 
Greatest Intensity designation. The GACAP states that development within the Higher Scale designated 
areas should be encouraged in areas with access to multiple modes of transportation, served by regional 
transportation networks (i.e. freeways), and where the scale will complement the area's character. Type 
C development is appropriate in areas next to both Types A and B development. Type C is not 
recommended immediately adjacent to the Scottsdale Airport. The Regional Core designation (Land Use, 
Conceptual Development Types Map, land use description page 16) means areas appropriate for the 
greatest development intensity in the Greater Airpark to support major regional land uses. Regional Core 
is only appropriate in Type C areas that are or will be served by high-capacity transit or a freeway. Regional 
Core areas should not be located adjacent to single-family residential areas or within Type A or B 
development areas.
Furthermore, One Scottsdale's existing and proposed entitlements meet all of the criteria and descriptions 
of the both the GACAP's Land Use Plan and the Conceptual Development Types Map. The northern 
portions of One Scottsdale are entitled for lower building intensity and heights to buffer and transition to 
nearby adjacent development within Grayhawk. An additional 'not to exceed' height is also incorporated 
into the One Scottsdale entitlement that matches the existing height of 1710 feet of the Discount Tire

DMB'
Building Legacies Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page 10
headquarters roof line at the northeast corner of Scottsdale Road and Thompson Peak Parkway. These 
restrictions are in accordance with the GACAP Conceptual Development Types Map, which allows for a 
mixture of higher scale development adjacent to Legacy Boulevard (north of Legacy Boulevard) while 
providing for Medium Scale and Sensitive Edge conditions adjacent to the Grayhawk community.
In addition, the Higher Scales designation on the Conceptual Development Types Map is also labeled with 
a 'Type C designation. Refer to Development Types Map above. Type C development represents more 
intensity with taller buildings with varying mass and a pedestrian orientation. The proposed development 
plan will implement the strategies outlined in the GACAP with the intention of building a pedestrian 
oriented project that creates open space plazas within a higher scale development. One Scottsdale is 
seeking to further implement the GACAP by modifying existing entitlements to better implement the 
purpose, goals, and vision of the Greater Airpark area.
m
IIIIII Hr *
GENERAL PLAN
The General Plan (Scottsdale General Plan 2035) was adopted by City Council on June 8, 2021 and ratified 
by the Scottsdale voters in November 2021. Building upon decades of planning and thousands of hours 
of community involvement. General Plan 2035 guides the physical development of Scottsdale and acts as 
a blueprint to enhance our community aspirations—Exceptional Experience, Outstanding Livability, 
Community Prosperity, and Distinctive Character. The General Plan is a broad, flexible document that 
changes as community needs, conditions, and direction change.
Scottsdale's General Plan promotes the community's vision by establishing goals and policies for each of 
its 24 elements. The following is an analysis of the requested update to the One Scottsdale development

DMB“
Building Legacies Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page 11
plan and its conformance with the General Plan 2035. The following are excerpts from the applicable 24 
elements of the City's General Plan.
CHARACTER & DESIGN ELEMENT
Introductory Excerpt: Scottsdale residents and visitors place extraordinary value on the diverse character 
and unique design qualities of our Sonoran Desert community. Each neighborhood setting holds an 
important image that, when grouped together, completes the Scottsdale mosaic. Whether in urban, 
suburban, rural, or native desert settings, the community provides a broad palette of experiences, visual 
expressions, and quality design. Scottsdale's rich design heritage is a product of proactive, creative, and 
inspired solutions to community design opportunities and issues. Examples include strong signage and 
landscaping standards, the Development Review Board, the Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance 
(ESLO), the Indian Bend Wash Greenbelt, Scenic Corridors, and Scottsdale Sensitive Design Principles. 
Good design sensitively responds to and strikes a balance among the character of the surrounding natural 
and built settings and the community's historical, cultural, and environmental resources. The beauty of 
our natural features, including the Sonoran Desert, mountains, and desert washes, provides a unique 
backdrop to the community. Our well-designed neighborhoods, businesses, recreational and cultural 
facilities, and public spaces combine to further make Scottsdale a desirable and memorable community. 
The goals and policies of the Character & Design Element focus on the important aspects, connections, 
transitions, and blending of characters that ensure our community evolves as an integrated mosaic.
Response: One Scottsdale is located at Scottsdale's signature roadway and the Loop 101 Freeway. The 
Greater Airpark Character Area Plan ("GACAP") and General Plan designate the Property as urban. Since, 
2002, One Scottsdale has been approved as an urban, mixed-use project. The Request enhances One 
Scottsdale status as a mixed-use project that will continue to create a broad palette of experiences, visual 
expressions, and quality design. The Project is at the gateway of the City's scenic corridor along the east 
side of Scottsdale Road. The proposal maintains a balance between the natural and built environments 
on the City's signature roadway.
Character Types Excerpt: Character Types describe the general pattern, form, and intensity of 
development. Character Types are distinct from zoning districts and land use categories. The Zoning 
Ordinance will govern specific development standards, such as building height, by zoning district. Per 
State Statute, Scottsdale must designate and maintain a broad variety of land uses and include density 
standards pertaining to land use categories that have such. Please reference the Land Use Element for 
that information.
■ Urban Character Types consist of higher-density residential, non-residential, and mixed-use 
neighborhoods, including apartments, high-density townhouses, business and employment centers, and 
resorts. Development in Urban Character Types should have pedestrian orientation, shade, activity 
nodes, and useable open spaces that encourage interaction among people. Building form and heights 
typically transition to adjacent Rural and Suburban Character Types. Taller buildings may be appropriate 
in Growth Areas, depending on context (see Growth Areas Element). Examples include Old Town 
Scottsdale, a mixed-use center of distinct urban districts; mixed-use portions of the Greater Airpark,

DMB“
Bl'Ildinc Lbgacies Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page 12
particularly along Scottsdale Road; areas within the Scottsdale Road and Shea Boulevard Couplet; and the 
HonorHealth hospital/medical campus near Shea Boulevard and 90th Street.
Response: One Scottsdale's existing approved entitlements are designed to create an urbanesque, mixed- 
use core within Planning Unit II. With the Property's designation as an urban character type, the proposal 
seeks to 'right-size' the mix of residential units within the Project. Creating the appropriate 'critical mass' 
of residential and non-residential uses will, by adding for sale residences, enable One Scottsdale to fulfill 
the character type designed for this area of the City. The development will create a building form that 
creates a mixed-use neighborhood, including multi-family, townhouses, condominiums, business and 
employment uses, and hospitality. One Scottsdale will have pedestrian orientation, shade, activity nodes, 
and useable open spaces that encourage interaction among people as envisioned in this Character Type.
tr-1 -*-i- K
: '-Mil. :
; I*:!:
< -
/■
■Jt
One Scottsdale
I
zmf ‘.j n
Jin
.zz» :
M
^z -z 
: (
-■H... . - «
L,
>
P
l-t-U z
ib
I i ^5 I
V i
ss.-n«n:»:
r*
zZC
z< n
src- i,.«r
<
'
•r
rr:
C .Mms:
M ! Mi
jroor o-aocrw 
Sew' S5wr Cc»e
IB 
Areo
pgia s^reoe C^NS-oc^ar 
m 
V'. yst
Seser zra 
Os^'c's

DMB'
Building Lbcacies Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page 13
■ -H-----------
One Scottsdale
-
:
-.j :•
««-v< _r r • 
: /
I
(
&
:9
=-r*j t:
:
I. ;
(
N
s
3
5
t
5
<
5treeTsccpes
3*
w^Cor
•scope
>
<
r» . i.i*r« t;
>
<
Ulli
roe rr ore
No
>
<
II
s o
S*cCe
viicr. 1..#:
>
*1-
.c c» r:
t
rs
: 
; J
< k
I i ll
i
V'
S*re*5ccpe 
s»"*scoe«
sooe t/dDcvk» Sorcror “reter/s
Employment Core Excerpt: Employment Cores are primary employment centers for the city. These areas 
are predominately concentrated in the Greater Airpark Character Area, a mixed-use employment core 
with primary freeway access, as well as around other major employment campuses, such as the Mayo 
Clinic and General Dynamics. Employment Cores support a wide range of activities, such as aviation, iight- 
industrial, and regional- and community-level employment uses. These areas consist of multi-functional 
buildings with an emphasis on technology and corporate character. Taller building heights are found 
within the core, and low-scale building heights are typically found within the transition areas adjacent to 
Rural and Suburban Character Types. The Greater Airpark Character Area Plan denotes appropriate 
locations for height and intensity in the Airpark area. (See also: Growth Areas Element).

DMB^
Building Legacies Since 19S4
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page 14
Response: The Employment Core within the GACAP is described as a mixed-use employment core with 
primary freeway access. The Property's location within the GACAP supports the nearby employment cores 
of the airpark, Cure Corridor, and nearby Cavasson project. One Scottsdale will continue to provide the 
mixture of uses that supports the employment core with residential, service, restaurant, and retail uses.
Goal CD 1 Determine the appropriateness of all development in terms of community goals, surrounding 
area character, and context.
CD 1.2 Consider the effects of building height, overall development density, and building orientation on 
adjacent neighborhood character, privacy, and viewsheds
Response: One Scottsdale is strategically positioned at a major arterial and freeway, an area long 
designated for more intense development. Adjacent lands to the west in the City of Phoenix and east are 
planned for more intense uses and the areas to the north is built with low scale office and medical use. 
Sensitivity to uses to the east in Grayhawk resulted in compatible residential uses in Grayhawk. The 
Request does not seek to increase building height and concentrates the increase infor-sale housing away 
from adjacent neighborhoods while reducing non-residential building massing and intensity.
CD 1.3 Ensure that all development is a part of and contributes to established Character Types.
Response: The Property is within the urban character type and when completed. One Scottsdale will be a 
part of and contribute to the established Character Type In a manner that complements and Is consistent 
with other uses north of the Loop 101.
CD 3.1 Strengthen Scottsdale's economic and environmental attributes, distinctive character, and 
attractiveness through collaborative site planning and design.
Response: One Scottsdale has developed over time with a distinctive character transitioning from a more 
suburban character on the north to a more urban character on the south as you get closer to the Loop 101. 
The adjustment in residential units and non-residential square footage for the Project provides for an 
environmental attribute with lower for-sale water usage than the existing approved land use entitlements. 
With a major corporate headquarters building to the south, an acute care facility to strengthen 
Scottsdale's Cure Corridor on the north, and quality mixed-uses in between, the Project will strengthen 
Scottsdale's economic stature. One Scottsdale's approved architectural styles and support of diversity of 
architecture will also create an even more attractive mixed-use development.
Goal CD 4 Enhance the design of streets and public spaces to improve Scottsdale's visual quality, 
experience, Sonoran Desert context, and social life.
Response: One Scottsdale's private streets are designed to celebrate the pedestrian with an urban, 
pedestrian feel. With the scenic corridor and paths and trails throughout the Project, One Scottsdale 
provides public and open spaces to improve Scottsdale's visual quality. These features, including the 
significant Scenic Corridor along Scottsdale Road provide a gateway to north Scottsdale, announcing the 
importance of the desert openness of this area. Additionally, within the site, comfortable walkways and

DMB“
Building Legacies Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page 15
paths offer opportunities for people to traverse the area and provide for social gathering spots. 
Additionally, the scale of the project and structures provides for a sense of intimacy and creating an 
environment that feels safe and inviting.
CD 4.3 Establish new, and maintain existing, guidelines and policies for the design and maintenance of 
Visually Significant Roadways and major city streets, including Scenic Corridors, Buffered Roadways, 
Desert Scenic Roadways (in ESLO districts), and streets with themed streetscape designs.
Response: One Scottsdale is the first development north of the Loop 101 Freeway on Scottsdale's signature 
road. Since 2002, the Project has provide a substantial scenic corridor along the east side of Scottsdale 
Road. The significant Scenic Corridor along Scottsdale Road provides a gateway to north Scottsdale, 
announcing the importance of the desert habitat of this area.
LAND USE ELEMENT
Goal LU 1 Enhance Scottsdale's economic viability by encouraging land uses that reinforce the City's 
reputation as the premier international tourist destination in the Southwest and sustain the City's role as 
a regional cultural center and economic hub. Land uses should be compatible with Scottsdale's character 
and physical appearance.
Response: One Scottsdale is located at northeast corner of Scottsdale Road and the Loop 101. The 
Property's approved entitlements include a substantial scenic corridor, building height transitions from 
Scottsdale Road to the nearby Grayhawk development, master planned access points, trails and paths 
around the Project and a unique mixed-use land plan. The Request enhances these Project attributes.
LU 1.1 Encourage land uses that preserve a high quality of life and further define Scottsdale's sense of 
place within the region.
Response: One Scottsdale has been planned for a mixture of land uses at the City's signature road and the 
City's only freeway. 'Right sizing' the for-sale residential component and non-residential component of 
the Project will further refine Scottsdale's sense of place within the region while providing additional 
housing intended to serve existing and future employment in the area. The addition of condominium use 
will provide additional opportunities for residents seeking an ownership lifestyle in north Scottsdale but at 
a smaller scale than the abundant and high scale traditional single family residential, allowing for residents 
to stay in the area.
LU 1.2 Celebrate Scottsdale's desert city image by preserving natural open space and natural ecosystems.
Response: The Project's scenic corridor and provision of internal and perimeter open spaces accentuates 
Scottsdale's desert city image. The significant Scenic Corridor along Scottsdale Road provides a gateway 
to north Scottsdale, announcing the importance of the desert habitat of this area.
LU 1.4 Collaborate with adjacent jurisdictions to understand the dynamics of, and coordinate on, 
emerging and redeveloping areas adjacent to the City boundary.

DMB^
Building Legacies Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page 16
Response: The community goals for One Scottsdale and the surrounding area have been revised with the 
City's update to the General Plan and the adoption of the GACAP. This area, from Scottsdale Road east 
along both sides of the Loop 101 Freeway corridor to Bell Road allows for 'Higher Scale' development. The 
area inclusive of a majority of One Scottsdale south of Legacy Boulevard east to Miller Road within the 
Crossroads East land area on both sides of the Loop 101 Freeway is designated as a Regional Core 
designation. This designation denotes areas appropriate for the greatest development intensity in the 
Greater Airpark to support major regional land uses. Regional Core is only appropriate in Type C areas 
that are or will be served by high-capacity transit or a freeway. The request does not include any additional 
building height for the Project. The request for additional for-sale housing and reduction in commercial 
square footage continues to meet the goals set forth in the GACAP Regional Core designation. The 
amendment request respects the natural environment, site conditions and unique character of the area. 
Furthermore, the amendment is consistent with the land plan for the Crossroads East development to the 
east. Finally, the amendment respects the heights, residential density, and intensity adjacent to the multi­
family areas east of One Scottsdale within Grayhawk.
LU 2.1 Ensure neighborhood "edges" transition to one another through compatible land uses and 
development patterns.
Response: The proposal does not impact any of the edges of One Scottsdale. A majority of the eastern 
boundary of One Scottsdale is either developed, under development, or approved for development. The 
proposed additional for-sale housing and reduction in non-residential square footage only impacts internal 
areas of the Project.
LU 3.1 Allow for the diversity and innovative development patterns of residential uses and supporting 
services to provide for the needs of the community.
Response: One Scottsdale's existing approved entitlements provides for a diversity of land uses within a 
master planned community. The request seeks additional for-sale residential uses at a location in 
Scottsdale along a major thoroughfare (Scottsdale Road) and the City's Loop 101 freeway. One Scottsdale 
will continue to provide for a mixture of land uses that will allow for residents to live, work, and play in the 
area. The provision of additional condominium use in this area will provide opportunity for such use within 
the north Scottsdale area, which has relatively very little of this housing option for those residents who 
would like to downsize and simplify.
LU 3.2 Integrate housing, employment, and supporting infrastructure, primarily in mixed-use 
neighborhoods and Growth and Activity Areas, to support a jobs/housing balance.
Response: One Scottsdale meets this policy by integrating housing, employment, and supporting 
infrastructure within the limits of the development. One Scottsdale is located just to the south of Grayhawk 
and west of the Cavasson master planned developments. Together, they create a connected network of 
land uses that support each other and connects needed infrastructure. The mixture of uses will support 
the City's jobs/housing balance.
LU 4.1 Integrate land uses and transportation systems to allow for a variety of mobility choices.

DMB'
Building Legacies Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page 17
Response: One Scottsdale built its significant transportation infrastructure upfront in the early 2000's. As 
a result, the surrounding Grayhawk and north Scottsdale traffic has been able to utilize wider lanes on 
Scottsdale Road and a Legacy Boulevard connection from Scottsdale Road east to Hayden Road for 
approximately twenty (20) years. Growth in the area has utilized One Scottsdale's investment in the 
benefits of the improved roadway system in and around the Project. One Scottsdale's compact design will 
include sidewalks internal to the Project with a pedestrian system throughout, around, and within the 
Project. Bus stops and electric vehicle charging stations are now developed or proposed as part of the 
evolving Project and future mobility enhancements will be included in the Project.
LU 4.2 Provide opportunities for pedestrian-oriented development, reduced parking demand, and 
context appropriate mobility choices.
Response: One Scottsdale's master pedestrian circulation plan, sidewalks, paths, and trails provide for 
various internal and external pedestrian access opportunities. The continued and refined mix of land use 
will also result in reduced parking demand and greater use of multi-modal travel options.
LU 4.3 Locate regional land uses and intensities in Growth and Activity Areas to provide the greatest 
access to various modes of transportation.
Response: One Scottsdale's prime location at Scottsdale Road and the Loop 101 Freeway allows for the 
greatest access to various modes of transportation and in keeping with city plans, concentrates intensity 
at the major transportation corridors. The request ultimately reduces the overall vehicular traffic Impacts 
to the area by eliminating a significant amount of development intensity.
LU 5.1 Encourage a variety of compatible mixed-use land uses within or next to Growth and Activity Areas, 
along major streets, and within particular Character Areas to reduce automobile use and improve air 
quality.
LU 5.2 Concentrate greater development intensities in Growth and Activity Areas, thereby reducing 
development pressures in low-density areas and conserving energy.
Response: One Scottsdale includes corporate office, medical office, hospitality, retail, restaurants, and 
residential within a soon to be built mixed-use core. The Request concentrates within Planning Unit II, 
south of Legacy Boulevard. The additional for-sale residential units will provide for employer and employee 
housing for the surrounding Growth and Activity Centers, much of which will be developed in the future on 
ASLD lands. The pedestrian trails, paths, and numerous internal sidewalks within the Project will reduce 
automobile use and improve air quality.
Goal LU 6 Attract and retain diverse employment, business, and retail land uses to improve the economic 
well-being of Scottsdale's residents.
LU 6.1 Promote opportunities for the expansion and revitalization of employment and commercial uses 
within the city.

DMB*
Building Legacies Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page 18
LU 6.2 Support well-planned, clustered employment centers of related or similar uses such as Healthcare 
and Research and Development land uses.
LU 6.3 Encourage commercial land uses of similar scale and character in proximity to or within medium- 
to high-density residential areas to promote walkable connections.
Response: One Scottsdale will be 'book-ended by two (2) major office buildings on the north and south 
sides of the Property. With one building at 475,000 square feet and the other at 115,700 square feet, the 
initial stages of the Project is prioritizing employment uses within the Greater Airpark area. Additional 
hospitality and retail uses are being developed within Planning Unit Hi. Additional land availability within 
Planning Unit III (north of Legacy Blvd.) will provide for additional office, retail and service uses. The 
majority of the eastern side of the Property is composed of quality residential uses. The Request, although 
to decrease the non-residential square footage, still provides for over 975,000 square feet of potential 
'class A’ office or retail, hospitality, restaurant, service uses to the overall mixed-use community. The 
mixed-use, walkable design is unchanged by the Request. An allowance for 1.5+ million square feet of 
non-residential square footage entitlements on approx. 100 acres including significant residential mixed- 
use is ample square footage to implement quality employment as envisioned by the General Plan and 
Greater Airpark Character Area Plan. With the proposed additional for-sale housing, a significant core of 
medium- to high-density residential development within the Project will provide substantial walkable 
connections to the surrounding commercial and employment core.
ARTS, CULTURE & CREATIVE COMMUNITY ELEMENT
Goal ACC 3 Promote creative place-making to revitalize neighborhoods, enhance sense of place, celebrate 
cultural heritage, and strengthen community character.
ACC 3.1 Integrate art into public programs, natural features, civic buildings, infrastructure, and other 
community assets to strengthen sense of place.
ACC 3.4 Integrate public art at various scales into the built environment citywide.
Response: One Scottsdale has an approved Master Environmental Design Concept Plan ("MEDCP") that 
will continue to guide place-making opportunities within the Project. For example, a recent Development 
Review Board approval of a residential project within Planning Unit II has four (4) locations for the 
placement of public art.
SUSTAINABILITY & ENVIRONMENT
OS 1.3 Continuous Open Spaces. Develop a system of continuous open spaces that connect citywide and 
regionally. Such open spaces include washes (inclusive of Vista Corridors), streetscapes, wildlife corridors, 
trails, and canals.
OS 1.4 Developed Open Space. Offer public and private parks and open spaces to accommodate both 
active and passive recreation.

DMB^
Building Lecacirs Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page 19
Response: One Scottsdale is implementing a scenic corridor along the Scottsdale Road frontage. Within 
that scenic corridor and other open space areas, the Project will provide trails, passive recreation, and 
seating areas for residents, employees, and visitors.
OS 4.1 Develop a public trail and path system that links to other City and regional systems.
Response: One Scottsdale has developed a path and trail system through the scenic corridor and along 
the east side open space area to allow for public access around the entire Property. Numerous internal 
sidewalks and paths provide for direct access throughout the Project. The paths, trails, and sidewalks all 
connect to the north and east for the use of neighborhoods

DMB“
Building Lecacics Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page 20
■ * 
j RETAIL'
90' MAX 4 I
TjCI AYHAW
\
•j£t fe*rft
»JN
H'
HOME 2 
SUITES 
HOTEL
Y1
//
mm
190'MAX
RESTAURANT/ 
if RETAIL
OFFICE
AVION
n
OH LEGACY
QUICK \
imiOCNTlALI
I
wm
TRIP 'office
o
a
i2
UGiCr BIVD
u
tn
» •
z
»•
-1
} AFS I 
* SJESTA'ION
■ ‘
TALOS
(ICtOINTIAI)
X
F\ 
• *1
.~.v
41
■2
1
\i
RESTAURAHT/
s
If
!\\
RETAIL/
CONDO/
HOTEL/
OFFICE
THE
BEVER.y
42 >
A
.(j
CBftlOeNTiAU
V*.
, 
60'MAX
'4.'
ATAVIA
(COfOOHfMUNSt
J*
*
■ V -y.^' 
<■
' \
PORTICO
(COHOOMtMUMI)
MORTENSON CO
■ U ■ \ I
: M ■) V 
• «
A
f .
[FUIURF DtV-aOl'MEKT)
« 
If..
HINKEl WV
,v -
L- , 
. i
Phase
IB
>
\ 
, R SAURANT/
\ N V 
RETAIL
RESIDENTIAL/
CONDOS
y
IB Public EveoiPbza
GRAND
PEAKS
CPCMOfNTtMJ
m
ILUMC
<orrtca>
^ 8’ wide pot
A-
• ! ' * :
■»
■. 
' ■ If’' *''■ 
' •
s' • • 'J- t;
't /. . * V •
' 
• . Jt / 
..
’ • 
-h-y
TRIBUTE
HOTEL
.-r.
• «
V jjPf 6' wide path
loop
i
loj
'^r 5 wide path
»♦ i

DMB“
Building Lecacies Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page 21
OS 4.3 As development and redevelopment occurs along transportation corridors, ensure the 
preservation of mountain viewsheds, the Sonoran Desert, natural features, and landmarks that enhance 
the unique image and aesthetics of major streets through open space buffering. The following Visually 
Significant Roadway designations should be applied:
■ Scenic Corridors should be designated along major streets where a significant landscaped buffer is 
needed between streets and adjacent land uses, where an enhanced streetscape appearance is desired, 
and where views to mountains and natural or man-made features will be maximized. Scenic Corridors 
may provide enhanced opportunities for open space, scenic viewing, trails, and pathways in the 
community.
Response: One Scottsdale provides for a significant scenic corridor along the City's signature roadway. 
The provision of a scenic corridor directly north of the City's lone freeway creates a constant scenic corridor 
along the east side of the road consistent with this policy. In addition, building heights/elevations are 
stepped back from the scenic corridor along Scottsdale Road.
OS 4.4 Encourage the use of drainage areas, Vista Corridors, and transmission line corridors as open 
space opportunities.
Response: To better utilize drainage areas on the site, he Property owner undergrounded some of the 
drainage to create a more walkable open space and pedestrian corridor along the entire east side of the 
Project. Some drainage is contained in the northern portion of the path.
OS 5.2 Locate publicly accessible and useable open spaces within Growth and Activity Areas and 
established neighborhoods.
Response: All paths, trails, and sidewalks along the internal streets are accessible to the public.

DMB“
Building Lecacibs Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page 22
■'X: 
' V '■ •; 
■
01 K-sm: i>KDi:siHiA.\ co.n.nkci i\ha
■ IIONa'stATI lAHO
'■ V •
It
I
S'
• y
GRAYHAWK
I
••
KAI'UIR KtTRf A1
■/IV.
CRAVHAWK V *1
«.\)V(N )H^ At ‘ . 
•
. jiui'Ank 
•
.» •
* .
9 ?
CRAVHAWK v<. 
.
riA/A •
o*
^4
■■ 
' / ■ O'
rt.
-t
i
-<
• CRAVHAWK
■ . nil PARK
o
n‘
o
CtATHAWK
MAT J U '
:4ir
W
“ -o A
o •
Xo
♦ ■• V: * 
/•'
'/ QJ --fiJ
VI Al •
CHAVMAWK /
••: 
V / •
fjj / ■ 
.0
DM VINl'l
CRAVHAWK
CRAVHAWK
I....-
r*
<
*
•i'*!
r
Att
s?,;—il-s:
■QBTCNIOH
lll.ll ?« VI I I'
■,r
4-
.V'
:
, 
On-Stred Crcwlolion
S >•*{ ON-Smd CircwlahOA
V- /
*1
I •
ii
OS 8.5 Create usable open spaces from existing rights-of-way, sidewalk widening, street realignment, 
development of trails, and other creative solutions.
Response: One Scottsdale is designed with internal private streets and enhanced sidewalks with public 
access.
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
EP 3.1 Reduce automobile emissions through traffic management; transportation improvements; 
promotion of a wide variety of mobility options; travel demand reduction strategies; expansion of regional 
connectivity; and use of electric and alternative fuel vehicles.
Response: The Request seeks to add housing and reduce non-residential intensity, and thereby decrease 
traffic to and from the site. With the transportation infrastructure in place, this 'down-zoning', as it relates 
to traffic, will reduce automobile emissions through strong pedestrian and bike connectivity within and to 
and from adjacent development. Electric vehicle charging stations will continue to be provided.
EP 5.5 Expand Green Building construction standards to include all new and remodeled residential and 
commercial buildings
Response: New construction at One Scottsdale will comply with the City's green building construction 
standards.
Goal EP 7 Identify and reduce heat islands.

DMB'
Bujldinc LKGACIfiS SlNCE 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page 23
Response: One Scottsdale is designed with private tree-lined streets and driveways and surrounded by 
scenic corridors and landscaped walking paths. The reduction in large, paved parking lots within Planning 
Unit II as part of this Request will help reduce the urban heat island effect.
CONSERVATION ELEMENT
Goal Consv 4 Conserve water and encourage the reuse of wastewater.
Response: The adjustment of the land use budget, reduction of significant non-residential square footage 
and the addition offor-sale housing, will result in an approximately thirty-one percent (31%) reduction in 
water use compared to the existing and approved land use entitlements, as calculated using the criteria 
noted in the City Council approved development agreement. More specifically, the reduction of 
approximately 1.2 million square feet of office use, and 190,000 square feet of retail space results in a 
reduction of approximately 2,100 gallons per minute at the peak hour. The addition of 350 for-sale 
residences and 15,500 square feet of restaurant results in approximately 240 peak hour gallons per minute 
of additional water demand. The resulting net demand is a reduction of approximately 1,860 gallons per 
day at the peak hour.
Using the design criteria in the City Council approved development agreement, the changes to land use 
result In a slight decrease in the total wastewater demand. Coordination with the City of Scottsdale Water 
Resources department is ongoing to determine the final design criteria. Using the design criteria noted in 
the 2018 Design Standards and Policy manual, the proposed land uses were calculated to reduce the 
overall water demand by 31% and reduce the overall wastewater demand by 20%.
W VI
I)I.\1AM)(:<I\1I’\HIS()N
W \SI I .W AI l it ni.\l \M)( OMI’MiHON
APPROVfD 
PROPOSED
ZONING 
CHANGE
APPROVED 
PROPOSED
ZONING 
CHANGE
■fe.
i K-31%
-20%)

DMB“
Building Lecacirs Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page 24
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
Goal Cl 1 Seek early and ongoing community involvement through broad public input in project and 
policy-making discussions.
Cl 1.1 Maximize opportunities for early notification of proposed projects using a variety of methods.
Response: Our outreach started with our most direct residential neighbors/community, Grayhawk. We 
contacted their homeowners association ("HOA") board of directors and had an initial meeting to kick-off 
our community involvement. The HOA board of directors recommended an initial Grayhawk resident open 
house and informational meeting prior to the required City open house. We conducted an open house in 
the Grayhawk board offices as our initial outreach meeting. There were approximately twenty-five (25) 
attendees to discuss our proposal. As was done when One Scottsdale was initially entitled in 2002, the 
Grayhawk community was our initial outreach. Community outreach has continued since that initial 
meeting. Since this application has taken some time to proceed through the City's review process, we 
intend to hold another open house for the Grayhawk community, which is the most impacted community 
to our request.
Cl 4.3 Seek to involve community groups, HOAs, and other organizations in the sharing of both City and 
project information.
Response: We engaged with the Grayhawk community and their HOA on our land use proposal before our 
required City open house. We will continue to communicate with Grayhawk and other community groups 
through the entire process.
HOUSING ELEMENT
Goal HI Support diverse, safe, resource-efficient, and high-quality housing options.
Policy H1.4 Support the creation of mixed-use projects, primarily in Growth and Activity Areas, to increase 
housing supply within walking distance of employment, transportation options, and services.
Response: One Scottsdale is located within a designated Growth and Activity Area. The mixed-use core of 
the Project is generally south of Legacy Boulevard. It Is within this area of the Project (Planning Unit II) 
that additional for-sale housing is proposed which will be within walking distance of employment, 
transportation options, and services.
H 1.5 Encourage a variety of housing densities in context-appropriate locations throughout Scottsdale to 
accommodate projected population growth.
Response: One Scottsdale has many different residential projects built, under construction and planned. 
All have unique and differing qualities and characteristics and densities that are in context appropriate 
locations and which provide opportunities for those wishing to downsize and those who work in the area.

DMB’
Building Lkcaciks Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page 25
Goal H2 Provide a variety of housing options that meet the socioeconomic needs of people who live and 
work in Scottsdale.
H 2.7 Encourage the development of workforce housing with the new development and/or expansion of 
hotels, resorts, and other generators of service-level employment.
Response: The addition of additional housing options at varying densities and residence size will help 
accommodate the need for more attainable housing for teachers, first responders, health care workers, 
and others critical to our economy. Additionally, the provision of condominiums also provide another 
opportunity for north Scottsdale residents to perhaps downsize or just relocate to a "lock and leave" home.
Goal H 3 Provide housing options that allow for all generations of Scottsdale residents to continue to live 
here, regardless of life stage or ability.
Response: Senior living options are being actively pursued. The amenities, walkable environment, services, 
and nearby medical facilities support the goal of allowing all generations to live within the community.
CIRCULATION ELEMENT
C 1.2 Coordinate transportation and land use planning to enhance an integrated, sustainable 
transportation system that promotes livable neighborhoods, economic vitality, safety, efficiency, mode 
choice, and adequate parking.
Response: One Scottsdale is ideally situated aiong major transportation corridors (Scottsdale Road and 
Loop 101 Freeway) and is planned for a live/work/play environment. This combination promotes livable 
neighborhoods, economic vitality, safety, efficiency, and mode choice that enhances parking availability.
C 1.10 Control access to and from arterial streets and regional transportation corridors to protect their 
abilities to move multimodal traffic efficiently.
Response: One Scottsdale's occess points were established with the Project's approval in 2002. A central 
street. Legacy Boulevard, was constructed in the early 2000's to provide an east/west connection from 
Scottsdale Road to Flayden Road. Internal streets within the Project aiiow for north/south traffic, excellent 
bicycle and pedestrian movement within the community is established as well. Finally, the Project has 
direct access to the freeway frontage road.
C 2.1 Encourage a mix of land uses that will reduce the distance and frequency of automobile trips and 
support mobility choices.
Response: One Scottsdale has always been planned for, and built with, a mix of land uses. The request for 
a reduction in non-residential square footage and additionai residential provides for an approximate 
ninety-two percent (92%) reduction in weekday trips and ninety-three percent (93%) reduction in peak 
hour trips.

DMB’
Building Legacies Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page 26
THAI I ICIMI-AC I I \\i:i;kl)AV K)lAl/H{l|-S TRAFI-’K: IMPACT 1 ANK'.PM PKAK 1 lOFH TRIPS
APPROVED
ZONING
PROPOSED
CHANGE
APPROVED
ZONING
PROPOSED
CHANGE
-92%
-93%
I
rr.'
ir^
C 3.2 Create a diversity of mobility choices in Growth and Activity Areas, which have the greatest intensity 
of development.
Response: One Scottsdale utilizes numerous pedestrian and bicycle mobility options to and from and 
within the Project.
C 4.1 Provide and maintain expansion and modification options for existing and future transportation 
networks to efficiently serve future mobility needs.
Response: Although One Scottsdale has constructed all of the required public infrastructure required by 
their 2002 entitlements, the developer was asked to provide interim street improvements on the west side 
of Scottsdale Road with the 2016 case so that by the city there were three (3) lanes of traffic across the 
Property frontage in both directions. Prior to these improvements by One Scottsdale, Scottsdale Road 
transitioned from three (3) lanes at the freeway to two (2) lanes in each direction. One Scottsdale has also 
recently updated it's Scottsdale Road frontage by creating a 6-lane configuration from the freeway north 
to Thompson Peak Parkway.
C 4.5 Advance partnerships and privatization to provide additional choices for addressing gaps in the 
mobility system.

DMB*
Building Llcacies Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page 27
Response: In 2002, One Scottsdale agreed to financially participate in the construction of Miiler Road to 
the east. Miiler Road is approximately one-quarter (Va) mile east of One Scottsdale. That financial 
contribution has been made to the City.
C 6.1 Coordinate regional transportation planning and implementation strategies in partnership with 
neighboring jurisdictions and regional. State, and Federal governmental agencies.
Response: One Scottsdale coordinated with the Arizona Department of Transportation in constructing the 
north side freeway frontage road from Hayden Road on the east to Scottsdaie Road. This connection 
demonstrated the developer's continuing commitment to coordinating and partnering with other 
jurisdictions for the betterment of the regional transportation system.
GROWTH AREAS
GA 1.4 Accommodate the highest intensity of development in designated Growth Areas. In some cases. 
Character Area Plans may be more specific on appropriate locations for higher intensity development 
within both Growth and Activity Areas.
Response: One Scottsdale is located in the Greater Airpark Growth Area. With higher intensity and density 
adjacent to One Scottsdale to the east (multi-family dwellings in Grayhawk and Crossroads East state land 
entitlements), and to the west in the City of Phoenix, the requested changes to the land use budget is an 
appropriate location for additional density and restructuring of non-residential square footage.

DMB“
Building Legacies Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page 28
LONE MOJNTAIN *0.
DIXirA DR.
DrNAMnCBLVO.
jomaxro
HARPY VAUBY RO.
PWKACLE PEAK RO.
OS* VAUtY RO.
LOOP >0>
UNION KLLS DR.
BaLRO./FRAN^UOrDWRIGrTBlVO. ^ 
CREBKIMAY PKM'Y.
ThUNDERSIRD RO.
CACtUS RD.
SHCA BLVD
DOUBUETRee RANCH RO.
WcCORWCK PXWY.
ROLAN BEND RO.
U4COU< DR.
McOONAlODR.
CMAPARRAi RDVCAMELBACR RO. 
CAMEllACK RD.
NOLAN SCHOOL. RD.
THOMAS RD.
McDOVYELi. RD. 
vOOPSOa 
VcA£LLPS RO.
lilOVBOtM
)
1
Old Town
-i
I
SI
-U
<
I
( ---------
d
a;
1-
IB
Si
r^
i
L
iir- -
<
fi
s
I
£
8
8
S
£
(---
Growth Areas Map
{—
r
tf
(—
<
L.
(—
/
c
McDowell Rood / Scoltsdole Rood Growth Areo
Old Town Growth Area
Downtown Core
Greater Airpark Growth Area
Acllvlty Area
Scottsdale McDoweH Sonoran Preserve
<See Ope<i SpocB
GA 1.5 Identify Growth and Activity Area "edges," and incorporate context-appropriate transitions 
between these "edges" and adjacent neighborhoods to minimize the impacts of higher-intensity 
development.
GA 5.1 Support land use compatibility with nearby neighborhoods through context appropriate 
development within Growth and Activity Areas.
Response: One Scottsdale's original 2002 entitlements, provide for height, density, and intensity 
transitions from the Grayhawk community north and east of the Project. The proposal maintains these 
already approved transitions. In addition, the majority of the eastern edge of Planning Unit II is allowed 
for building heights of up to ninety (90) feet. Current Development Review Board approvals and 
construction are only utilizing a maximum of sixty (60) feet in height for an even better transition to the 
Grayhawk community.

DMB
Building Legacies Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page 29
GA 3.1 Provide useable public open space as an integral part of Growth and Activity Areas to encourage 
public gathering, enhance aesthetics, preserve viewsheds, and serve as buffers between differing land 
uses and intensities.
Response: One Scottsdale is committed to a scenic corridor along its Scottsdale Road frontage. There are 
trails and paths that encircle the 134+-acre Project. Future public open space will be provided within 
Planning Unit li at full build-out.
• 
VISION
T ' 
- J.- Vmi
m
n
i
-4
1
«.!
I - l k
lii ^ Miia 
mm M
' ■> "t
m
I
i* r
M'.,
COST OF DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT
COD 1.2 Public infrastructure provided by development should be reasonable, fair, and mutually beneficial 
to the City.
COD 2.1 Plan and promote the orderly building of infrastructure, such as water, sewer, drainage, streets, 
and transit shelters.
Response: One Scottsdale was originally approved in 2002. A few years later, Scottsdale Road and Legacy 
Boulevard were constructed at One Scottsdale's expense. These roadways and improvements have been 
in place for approximately twenty (20) years. Regional drainage was also constructed for the area by One 
Scottsdale in the early 2000's.

DMB'
Building Legacies Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page 30
COD 2.4 Promote private-sector participation in the development of needed public facilities and 
amenities through required fees, dedication of land, and construction of facilities.
Response: One Scottsdale has demonstrated its commitment to to provide facilities as required by law 
and has contributed to the development of significant infrastructure in the area to support the 
development.
PUBLIC SERVICES & FACILITIES ELEMENT
PSF 2.3 Encourage the undergrounding of all new and existing electrical distribution lines carrying 
voltages of 69kV and lower.
Response: One Scottsdale had 69 KV power lines in front of the Project along the east side of Scottsdale 
Road. One of the initial public improvements was to underground that power line at a substantial cost to 
One Scottsdale. With the scenic corridor taking shape along portions of the Project's frontage, the under 
grounding of the power lines has benefitted the aesthetics to the users of this roadway.
ECONOMIC VITALITY ELEMENT
EV 1.2 Support retention and expansion of established businesses, and provide resources for businesses 
to adapt to changing market conditions.
Response: The additional for-sale housing and their household spending will assist local businesses.
EV 3.8 Promote orderly, planned growth to reduce service costs, maximize use of existing and proposed 
public facilities, and enhance available revenues.
Response: One Scottsdale can now be considered "infill" development with all of the recognized benefits 
of such development patterns on infrastructure.
PCD Findings
One Scottsdale is within a PCD zoning district with comparable PRC zoning. With the 2002 Entitlements, 
we provided justification and findings that allowed the PCD to be applied to the property. With the 
Request to update the development standards for One Scottsdale, we offer the following findings required 
by the Zoning Ordinance:
Before approval or modified approval of an application for a proposed P-C District, the Planning 
Commission and the City Council must find:
A. That the development proposed is in substantial harmony with the General Plan, and can be 
coordinated with existing and planned development of surrounding areas.
Response: As described fully above In the GACAP analysis and zoning update, the Request intends to fulfill 
the goals, policies and vision of the General Plan, the associated character area plan and utilize 
development standards present PCD-PRC zoning district. To the west, Phoenix has designated the area as

DMB‘
Building Legacirs Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page 31
a 'core' within their general plan. This means that proposals for underlying zoning districts in the future 
for this land may request building heights up to 190 feet and still be in conformance with their general 
plan. The ASLD property to the east (Crossroads East within the City) is zoned for 60 feet in height and 
mixed-use land uses. The Cavasson project has building heights above 100 feet and significant office 
square footage. The Request seeks to 'right-size' the non-residential square footage and residential units 
south of Legacy Drive away from the Grayhawk community and consistent with future development within 
the ASLD properties. The request is in substantial harmony the General Plan and existing and future 
development in the surrounding areas.
B. 
That the streets and thoroughfares proposed are suitable and adequate to serve the proposed 
uses and the anticipated traffic which will be generated thereby.
Response: The 2002 and 2016 Entitlements provided for significant regional and local transportation 
infrastructure improvements. The required roadway widening (Scottsdale Road), new roadways (Legacy 
Boulevard from Scottsdale Road to Hayden Road and the freeway frontage road from the Hayden Road 
interchange to the Scottsdale Road interchange), traffic signals, and internal roadways have all been 
developed to handle the proposed traffic for the Request. The 2002 Entitlements also require assistance 
in funding the study on how Miller Road is built and developed across the freeway corridor. In addition, 
the proposed employment andfor-sale residential use for the Request provides for more internal capture 
thereby reducing overall daily trips. The forethought and implementation of the required transportation 
infrastructure provides for streets and thoroughfares that are suitable to handle the anticipated traffic by 
the Request. One Scottsdale has widened Scottsdale Road along the entire Property's frontage for 3-lanes 
of travel in each direction. The traffic generated by the Request is substantially less than that associated 
with the existing allowed development.
C. 
The Planning Commission and City Council shall further find that the facts submitted with the 
application and presented at the hearing establish beyond reasonable doubt that:
1. In the case of proposed residential development, that such development will constitute a 
residential environment of sustained desirability and stability; that it will be in harmony with the character 
of the surrounding area; and that the sites proposed for public facilities, such as schools, playgrounds and 
parks, are adequate to serve the anticipated population. The Planning Commission and City Council shall 
be presented written acknowledgment of this from the appropriate school district, the Scottsdale Parks 
and Recreation Commission and any other responsible agency.
The Request seeks to add 350for-sale residences to Project south of Legacy Boulevard. The additional for- 
sale residential units create a core of housing to support the proposed employment core and retail south 
of Legacy Boulevard and provide for condominium use for the north Scottsdale area. The scale and density 
of the Request are in harmony with residentiai communities in Grayhawk. The existing and proposed 
infrastructure wiil be able to handle the additional residential units. The Request includes sidewalks, 
plazas, gathering places, and social interaction. One Scottsdale will have a looped trail system along its 
perimeter with access to other surrounding areas. Nearby parks, schools and other facilities are available 
to the north and east. Internal pocket parks and amenities will also be provided. We have received

DMB“
Building Legacies Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page 32
acknowledgement by the Superintendent of the Paradise Valley Unified School District that the Request 
will not impact the existing and future school enrollment.
2. 
In the case of proposed industrial or research uses, that such development will be appropriate in 
area, location and overall planning to the purpose intended; and that the design and development 
standards are such as to create an industrial environment of sustained desirability and stability.
The Request may attract a research type user or an office user with a research component. Hume is one 
such use that provides for an office headquarters with an associated research facility in one building. Any 
research uses will be designed in the core area south of Legacy Boulevard and be designed to operate in 
harmony with the other planned mixture of uses within One Scottsdale
3. 
In the case of proposed commercial, educational, cultural, recreational and other nonresidential 
uses, that such development will be appropriate in area, location and overall planning to the purpose 
intended; and that such development will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding areas.
As stated throughout this Project narrative, the intent of the Request is to create an urban, pedestrian 
friendly core of residential, employment, hospitality and support commercial retail and restaurant uses 
south of Legacy Drive. With the development of Scottsdale 101, Promenade, Scottsdale Quarter, Kierland, 
City North, the Mortensen project in Phoenix and other commercial centers in this area of the City, One 
Scottsdale can no longer be planned as a major retail destination. With the pianned intense and dense 
land uses on adjacent ASLD properties in Phoenix and Scottsdale, the reused non-residential square 
footage will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding areas.
Neighborhood Outreach
As with our 2002 and 2016 Entitlements, we continue to strive to ensure all affected stakeholders are 
made aware of our proposed Request. Prior to our official submittal, we reached out to the Grayhawk 
Community Association ("Grayhawk Board") to preview our request to amend our development plan. 
From that meeting, we coordinated with the Grayhawk Board, a Grayhawk only neighborhood outreach 
meeting at the Grayhawk Board offices. The Grayhawk Board sent notices to approximately 3,800 
residences within Grayhawk. This community meeting was conducted on November 15*^ 2023, in the 
evening. There were approximately 25 attendees at this open house. On November 29'^ 2023, we also 
conducted the City required neighborhood open house at the Grayhawk Boys & Girls Club. Again, there 
were approximately 25-30 attendees at this open house. Post submittal, our outreach will include updates 
to the Grayhawk Board, adjacent property owners including Discount Tire, Stockdale - the owner of the 
Illume building. Honor Health, the Vi, ASLD, Paradise Valley Unified School District, Coalition of Greater 
Scottsdale ("COG's") and many others. Please refer to the Citizen Involvement Plan and Report submitted 
with this application.

DMW
Building Legacies Since 1984
One Scottsdale 
Amendment to Zoning 
Page 33
Summary
The Request is to update One Scottsdale's existing PRC zoning district to substantially reduce the intensity 
of One Scottsdale by approximately 1.3M square feet of non-residential intensity and increase the amount 
of housing by 350 for-sale residences for approx. 27 acres of the overall PCD. The intent of the Request 
is to remove overall intensity while at the same time reducing impacts to the City's infrastructure including 
traffic, water use and sewer use. The changes continue to be consistent with and implement the City's 
current General Plan and Character Area Plan goals, policies and vision.

DMB'
Building Legacies Since 1984
One Scottsdale Development Plan 
Amendment Proposed Public Benefit 
Narrative 
April 2026
The Proposed Development Plan Amendment ("Request") is to amend the One Scottsdale development 
plan to 'right-size' the number of residential units and non-residential square footage for the One 
Scottsdale project ("Project"). The Project was initially approved in 2002 and was envisioned as mixed- 
use retail, office, hotel and residential core at the intersection of the freeway and the City of Scottsdale 
("City") signature roadway. The following document provides a description of the extensive public 
benefits the Project has provided to this area of the City over the two (2) decades since the original 
entitlements were approved.
One Scottsdale initially built or paid for the major transportation network adjacent to and within the 
Project. These major and costly improvements, as well as the others listed below, demonstrate the 
developer's commitment to improving the City's infrastructure and roadway network and other significant 
public benefits. These public benefits are as follows:
• 
Dedication of right-of-way for Scottsdale Road, Thompson Peak Parkway, Legacy Boulevard, and 
the Loop 101 Frontage Road which have been completed since 2009.
Reimbursed the City for the costs to improve Scottsdale Road from the Loop 101 north to 
Thompson Peak Parkway. These half street improvements on the east side of Scottsdale Road 
from the Loop 101 to Thompson Peak Parkway fulfill the ultimate street configuration for this 
major arterial. These improvements have been constructed since 2008.
• 
Legacy Boulevard - Constructed full street improvements for a half mile east/west minor arterial 
street from Scottsdale Road east to Hayden Road. These improvements have been constructed 
since 2008.
• 
Mayo Boulevard - Reimbursed half street improved along Project's frontage even though no 
development has occurred on what was Planning Unit I from the original 2002 entitlements. These 
improvements have been constructed since 2008.
• 
Pima Freeway (Loop 101) frontage road - In lieu payment occurred in 2007 which accelerated the 
frontage roads construction from Hayden Road to Scottsdale Road along the north side of the 
freeway. These improvements have been completed since 2008.
The above roadway improvements equate to approximately $6.8 million of public improvements 
including the necessary public utility easements.
Recently, One Scottsdale completed the construction of the 6*'' lane on the west half of Scottsdale 
Road, allowing for increased capacity and building to its ultimate condition. This lane has been 
open for use for several months. Completed in 2025 at a cost of $1.9 million.

DMB*
Building Legacies Since 1984
• 
A significant area along Scottsdale Road is required to dedicate a scenic corridor with a minimum 
width of 60' with an average width of 100' for the entire iength of the property. This equates to 
approximately seven (7) acres of land along Scottsdale Road. The scenic corridor dedications have 
occurred along Scottsdale Road where development has or is occurring. Within the scenic 
corridor, there are public paved and unpaved trails and paths. These paths connect the entire 
perimeter of the Project providing a walking/biking loop fully accessible and open to the public.
The scenic corridor is completed within PU III and partially completed in PU II.
Along the east side of the Project open space and public paths along with some drainage 
improvements totaling over 3 acres have been provided. One Scottsdale also provided drainage 
improvements for off-site regional flows and created a public access amenity along the entire east 
side of the Project. This east side open space area provides an important part of the pedestrian 
trail system for the site and the general area. The majority of these improvements are complete as 
of 12/31/2025.
• 
Regional Drainage Improvements south of the freeway. One Scottsdale designed, permitted and 
funded $500,000 towards the construction of the drainage improvements south of the 101 as part 
of the regional drainage solution for this part of Scottsdale. These improvements have been 
completed since 2010.
Miller Road Street/Underpass- One Scottsdale has contributed $468,000 to the City to assist with 
Miller Road construction to accelerate another north/south street to the street grid in this area 
which wiil ultimately connect Miller Road from Thompson Peak Parkway on the north to Mayo 
Boulevard on the south with an underpass under the Loop 101 freeway. Paid in full in 2024.
Funded the undergrounding of 69kv power lines - Under-grounded 69kv power lines along the 
east side of Scottsdale Road and into and out of the APS substation east of the project along the 
north side of Legacy Blvd. allowing for scenic corridor and unfettered views to the east. These 
improvements have been completed since 2009. Total cost - $1.2 million.
Transit Facilities along Scottsdale Road (constructed bus stop facilities just north of Legacy Blvd.) 
Completed.
Traffic Signal construction - Legacy Blvd. & Scottsdale Rd. and at Henkel Way and Scottsdale Rd. 
Completed.
• 
Landscape Buffer along the south side of Thompson Peak Parkway for additionai building and 
natural setback along the roadway. Completed.
City Services Space - the provision of a future 2,400 square foot office space for an emergency 
services center and a citizen services center is required within the core area of Planning Unit II.
Public Events Space - A designated open area will be provided for the City to be utilized for public 
events. This space shall be made available to the City for up to five (5) special events each year.
The location, size and design of this space shall be determined through a collaborative process 
including the developer and the City.
Twenty (20) Percent Open Space - Planning Unit II will provide a greater amount of open space 
than the minimum PCD-PRC standard of fifteen (15) percent.
Requested Development Plan Amendment - Provides for changes that will would result in the 
reduction of impact to City services including a 31% reduction in water use, 20% reduction in wastewater 
use, and a 92% reduction in weekday vehicle trips and 93% reduction in am and pm peaktraffic times to and from 
the Property in the area of Scottsdale Road and the Loop 101.

DMB*
Building Legacies Since 1984
One Scottsdale has developed in a methodically responsible way providing public benefits beyond the 
boundary of the Project and prior to the need or demand based on the existing uses to date. One 
Scottsdale's first development, the Dial/Henkel office building was developed in 2008-2009 and the first 
residential project occurred in 2012 over four (4) years after a majority of these public improvements had 
been constructed. Now ten (10) plus years later, other commercial and residential projects are developing 
within the Project. The requested Development Plan Amendment will allow One Scottsdale to continue 
develop in a responsible manner while continuing to provide the existing and required public benefits.

CONCEPTUAL SITE PLANm
K^O
.THOMPSON PEAK PKIVY
. .A
j= ^
•4
VI
r--%
%
'g^k
SCOTTSDALE
(Msmmuu
%
KXOCt.^^HOMia'%4
'Lf sums-« 
iVajOO" HOTIL^f
I : «
KSTAURANT/ ^ 
V «
wu-T Dl
L.
■'
?-5?i
y
190'MAX
>
y
m
j
i
i',
t. £
> VI LI AGE 5 
‘
r,
-ife
i
AVION ON
i legacyI
, (■UtMNTMlT
^r>
, n
•A,
j 
^ 
leg
A.
rSi^H
fiv
Y i
r.
Pl " 
•'
>•
39£r40
ft
in
o-
li-
&
■V
i
-3
m
>
Z \
HE
^ X
n;
II
4
*1
[T
41
J
I
USE
42
GO
E*
60' MAX ^
K \ N >-• . I*
> .\t
r
WMAX
/
HOTtU
V
U
(FUIUC
nAZA)
V
E'l
MORTENSON COX
M
l*.H!»tfl-Wl — —
ENT| V
(FUTURE DEVELOPMENT!
\
Phase
IB
RiSTAU RANT/
RnAlt.
■;£gaSip^^fasw--■■■ ft. 
~ .
A iJiUJ 
Dl.CI AIliKK 1,':. li()2-.
r H 
ATTAHHMFNT R
*rr
rn
«•
*5
9>r
k
»
.
I
6 li
ATTACHMENT 6

Resolution No. 10409 
Exhibit A
Page 85 ol 87
USrSAS SHOVE'S
I
>1mm
1^0
I
v'lfI
>*
>
t>
sc
cot KM
4
f
1}
- f}
r
“ri'
t3r
a
r
;y
•'i
ay
{
X
Wi
>
5 ;•
•t
i^r
'*
%i'
iI
V
<.7
V
r.
tn*
r
*-*> K'te
Vl
■:
P “':^svKtr“
? ; ■ ■/
1
I I WSIWNHAL 
H AUToDFAtFRSHir MIXtOHM
(K'lOtRM ACTJVIIY AREA
f*■! MlXtDUSF PUHSTKIAN 
I.J ITWI nisiKKn
AMI NDMl vr BOtWnARY
FOR REFERENCE
STACKED 40S 
Land Use and Circulation
SCHKDULC Al
e Ite Am
ri IVMnt«>
t«vc bem u(:^bic<•t k< rvfWvt rtiMmf 
■pprovn] and Nail condimn*
Mill
HwK.iib■!■>■» lu.^*} 
•k> wa^dk-ntiw
nat«rM*BaMr<
MX p«w «it(ni »> vfvMl
m. rm *
E -. :
ATTACHMENT 7

' "'Sip 
O
Developed
h%i:a
□
wrnim
■'-^1 m
Urban
Neighborhoods
-'A
lO
0
L
£ou
V
Roolevard
E. Legacy
Site
3i
Mixed-Use
Neighborhoods
o
Q>
Js
S
-c
^:*-
fs
r
-»t
■
Jc
Pro/
m
mi%
Q.S.
40-45
Existing General Plan 2035 Future Land Use Map 
+/-1.4 million square feet of Mixed-Use Neighborhoods
20-ZN-2002#5
ATTACHMENT 8

Greater Airpark
I I Gfeolef Airpork Chorocter 
* AroaPJan
Powerfne Cofridor 
Cenlrol Arizona Proiecl
Site
Watei^
CAMPUi\^
%
amI
«o
0
OOtP
COUISI
crirct
f-
0
m
u
WestWomld
l liuiitl'fcUS l.iK -
AlRf
KH
— I
..-■ i iS*':*-"
••
, C;?.
IMIJNDI KtMKI.> RO
IN!
1Mile
Greater Airport 
Character Area
|20-ZN-2002#5
ATTACHMENT 9

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SUMMARY 
One Scottsdale
NEC SR lOlL and Scottsdale Road 
20-ZN-2002#5
Summary Prepared by John Hoang, COS Traffic Engineering 
Summary Prepared on 02/23/2026
Traffic Impact Study Prepared by Kristen Stevens, Lokahi, Dated: 02/10/2026 
Traffic Impact Study Status: Accepted
Existing Conditions 
Site Location
The site (PU II and PU III) is located on the east side of Scottsdale Road between SR lOlL and Thompson Peak 
Parkway.
Existing Development
The existing PU II consists of a 325,156 square office and vacant land. The existing PU III consist of a 130 room 
hotel and vacant land.
Study Area Intersections
• 
Scottsdale Road and Thompson Peak Parkway
• 
Scottsdale Road and Legacy Boulevard
• 
Scottsdale Road and Henkel Way
• 
SR lOlLWB Ramps
• 
SR lOlLEB Ramps
• 
Thompson Peak Parkway and 73rd Street
• 
Legacy Boulevard and 73rd Street
• 
Henkel Way and Loop 101WB Frontage Road
Proposed Development:
Description
The proposed development plan in comparison with previously proposed and approved.
The overall land uses proposed for the One Scottsdale development under the 2025 Proposal, 
as compared to the 2023 Proposal and 2016 Approved Zoning, are summarized below:
One Scottsdale
• 
Retail
• 
Office
• 
Restaurant
• 
Hotel
• 
Residential
202s Proposal
80,300 SF 
1,298,000 SF 
115,500 SF 
400 rooms 
2,350 DU
202^ Proposal
80.500 SF 
1,298,000 SF
115.500 SF 
400 rooms
2.500 DU
2016 Approved Zoning
269,900 SF 
2.496,245 SF 
100,000 SF 
400 rooms 
2,000 DU
Site Access and Study Intersections
• The existing site access intersections to remain are as follows;
o Scottsdale Road and Driveway A (approx. 490' south of Thompson Peak Parkway) 
o Scottsdale Road and Driveway B (approx. 965' south of Thompson Peak Parkway) 
o Scottsdale Road and Driveway C (approx. 1,280' south of Thompson Peak Parkway) 
o Scottsdale Road and Henkel Way (approx. 700' north of the SR lOlL WB Ramps) 
o Thompson Peak Parkway and 73rd Street (approx. 670' east of Scottsdale Road) 
o Legacy Boulevard and 73rd Street (approx. 565' east of Scottsdale Road) 
o Legacy Boulevard and Driveway D (approx. 1,240' east of Scottsdale Road).
The proposed site access intersections are as follows:
ATTACHMENT 10

o Scottsdale Road and Driveway F (approx. 360' south of Legacy Boulevard) 
o Scottsdale Road and Driveway G (approx. 645' south of Legacy Boulevard) 
o Scottsdale Road and Driveway H (approx. 1,015' south of Legacy Boulevard) 
o Legacy Boulevard and Driveway E (approx. 300' east of Scottsdale Road) 
o Legacy Boulevard and Driveway I (approx. 900' east of Scottsdale Road)
Trip Generation
• The trip generation as shown in the study for the proposed One Scottsdale development is shown in the tables 
below:
Table 3 -Trip Generation (150 Residential Units)
Land Use
Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise)
ITE ^ 
.. Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Qtv Unit
Code ^ ^ 
Total Total In Out Total In Out
221
150 Dwelling
Units
665
55
13
42
57
36
21
Table 4 -Trip Generation (2025 Proposal)
Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 
Total Total In Out Total In Out
2025 Proposal
29,321
2,283
1,520
763
2,609
967
1,642
• 
City of Scottsdale transportation staff agrees with the methodology and reductions using the Institute of Transportation 
Engineers (ITE) publication entitled Trip Generation 11'*' Edition, National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) 
Report 684: Enhancing Internal Trip Capture Estimation for Mixed-Use Developments, and Trip Generation Manual: Pass-By 
Data and Rate Tables/2021 Pass-By Tables.
• 
The projected trip generation trip difference between the previously proposed and current proposed One Scottsdale 
development is approximately 1226 fewer weekday trips, 1,628 fewer AM peak hour trips, and 1,300 fewer PM peak hour 
trips.
Table 5 -Trip Generation (2025 Proposal vs. 2016 Approved Zoning)
2016 Approved Zoning (Approved TI&MA)
Weekday AM Peak Hour 
PM Peak Hour
Total Total In Out Total In Out
30,547 
3,9” 2,754 1,157 3,909 1.288 2,621
2025 Proposal
Difference 
% Difference
29,321m
2,283
1,520
763
2,609
967
1,642
-1,628 
1,234 
-394 
-1,300
-42s 
-45% 
-34* 
-33%
The 2025 Proposal for One Scottsdale is expected to generate 1,226 fewer weekday trips than 
the 2016 Approved Zoning, inciuding 1,628 fewer AM peak hour trips and 1,300 fewer PM peak 
hour trips.
2025 Proposal vs. 2023 Proposal
The comparison of trip generation between the 2025 Proposal and the 2023 Proposal, 
reflecting the reduction of 150 multifamily dwelling units is shown in Table 6.
Table 6 -Trip Generation (2025 Proposal vs. 2023 Proposal)
2023 Proposal (Approved TIBiMA)
Weekday AM Peak Hour 
PM Peak Hour
Total Total In Out Total In Out
29,986 
2,338 1,533 
805 
2,666 1,003 '>663
2025 Proposal
29,321 
2,283 1,520 
763 
2,609 
967 
1,642
Difference 
% Difference
4%

Traffic Analysis:
Intersection Level of Service and Recommended Improvements
• 
The intersection levels of service were reported for horizon year 2029 with traffic generated by the buildout of 
the proposed development.
• 
Study intersections with acceptable levels of service in all movements include the following:
Scottsdale Road and Driveway A 
Scottsdale Road and Driveway C 
Thompson Peak Parkway and 73rd Street
o Legacy Boulevard and Driveway D 
o Henkel Way and Loop 101 WB Frontage Road 
Scottsdale Road and Driveway F
■ Recommended Improvements:
Construct a one-way stop-controlled driveway, which allows for RIRO movements 
Install westbound right turn lane 
Scottsdale Road and Driveway G
Recommended Improvements:
Construct a one-way stop-controlled driveway, which allows for right-in/right-out/left-in 
movements
o
o
o
o
o
■
o
o
Install westbound right turn lane 
Legacy Boulevard and Driveway E
■ 
Recommended Improvements:
• 
Construct a two-way stop-controlled driveway, which allows for RIRO movements
• 
Install westbound right turn lane 
Legacy Boulevard and Driveway I
■ 
Recommended Improvements:
• 
Construct a one-way stop-controlled driveway, which allows for RIRO movements
• 
• Install westbound right turn lane
• Study intersections with delay in one or more movements include the following: 
o Scottsdale Road and Thompson Peak Parkway
■ 
LOS F in the NB thru movement during the PM peak hour 
o Scottsdale Road and Driveway B
■ 
LOS E or worse in the SB left turn movement during the AM and PM peak hours 
o Scottsdale Road and Legacy Boulevard
■ 
LOS E in the SB left turn movement during the PM peak hour
■ 
LOS E in the WB left turn movement during the PM peak hour 
Scottsdale Road and Henkel Way
■ 
LOS E in the WB left turn movement during the AM peak hour
■ 
Recommended Improvements:
• 
Improve southbound signal head to include permitted - protected left turn phasing 
Loop 101 WB Ramps
■ 
LOS E in the NB thru movement during the PM peak hour
■ 
LOS E in the SB right turn movement during the PM peak hour
■ 
LOS F in the SB thru movement during the AM and PM peak hours 
Loop 101 EB Ramps
■ 
LOS F in the NB thru movement during the AM and PM peak hours
■ 
LOS E in the EB thru/right movement during the AM peak hour 
Legacy Boulevard and 73rd Street
■ 
LOS D or worse in the NB/SB left turn movements during the AM and PM peak hours
■ 
Recommended Improvements:
• 
Modify striping to include a through lane on the north and south approaches
• 
Although a traffic signal is warranted, the signal control is not incorporated in the build 
capacity analysis as adequate storage is provided for the queued vehicles in the AM and
o
o
o
o

o
PM peak hours. It is recommended that additional traffic signal warrant analyses be 
conducted in the future as surrounding development progresses and forecasted traffic 
volumes are realized to determine the appropriate timing for signal control.
Scottsdale Road and Driveway H
■ LOS F in the SB left turn movement during the AM and PM peak hours
Summary:
A Traffic Impact and Mitigation Analysis ("TIMA") was submitted for the project. The TIMA dated February 2026 has been 
accepted. The proposed development will result in an estimated 29,321 trips generated per day, 2,283 trips (1,520 in/763 
out) generated in the AM peak hour, and 2,609 trips (967 in/1,642 out) generated in the PM peak hour. This represents a 
decrease of 665 daily trips over the previously approved development.
With the addition of the proposed site generated traffic by horizon year 2029, operations at the intersections within the 
vicinity of the site will continue to operate at acceptable levels (LOS Cor better), with the exception of certain movements 
at the following intersections:
Scottsdale Road and Thompson Peak Parkway 
Scottsdale Road and Driveway B 
Scottsdale Road and Legacy Boulevard 
Scottsdale Road and Henkel Way 
Loop 101WB Ramps 
Loop 101 EB Ramps 
Legacy Boulevard and 73'^'' Street 
Scottsdale Road and Driveway H
The developer is responsible for constructing two new traffic signals as indicated in the stipulations and some traffic signal 
modifications at Scottsdale and Henkel at build out as indicated in the approved TIMA February 2026.

/
I ,
eCHNICAL SOLUTIONS
CITIZEN REVIEW & NEIGHBORHOOD INVOLVEMENT REPORT 
DMB- One Scottsdale
February 20, 2026
Overview
This Citizen Review Report is being performed in association with a request 
to modify the Land Use Budget of the existing PCD-PRC zoning on the 
property located at the northeast corner of the Loop 101 freeway and 
Scottsdale Road. The proposed request would decrease the allowable 
non-residential square footage by approximately 1,372,145+/- square feet 
in exchange for an additional 350 residential units. Additionally, some 
outdated stipulations will be modified as part of this request. This proposal 
is in conformance with the City of Scottsdale's General Plan and Greater 
Airpark Character Area Plan. This Citizen Review Report will be updated 
throughout the process.
The entire project team is sensitive to the importance of neighborhood 
involvement and creating a positive relationship with property owners, 
residents, business owners, homeowners associations, and other interested 
parties. Communication with these parties will be ongoing throughout the 
process. Work on compiling a list of impacted and interested stakeholders 
and neighborhood outreach began prior to the application filing and will 
also continue throughout the process. Communication with impacted 
and interested parties has taken place with verbal, written, and electronic 
contact.
Community Involvement
The outreach team has been communicating with neighboring property 
owners, businesses, and community members by telephone, and one-on- 
one meetings since May 2023, which included an open house with the 
development team for residents of Grayhawk on November 15, 2023 
hosted by the Grayhawk Community Association. 17 interested Grayhawk 
residents attended this open house.
Surrounding property owners, HOAs and other interested parties were 
noticed via first class mail regarding the project. The distribution of this 
notification adhered to the City's new 1,250' radius mailing requirements
ATTACHMENT 11
5111 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 260 • Scottsdale, AZ 85250 • (602) 957-3434 • FAX (6CQ) 955-4505 • Email: info@techmcalsoMonsaz.com

as specified in the Citizen Review Checklist. This notification contained 
information about the project, as well as contact information for the 
development team. This contact person will continue to provide, as 
needed, additional information and the opportunity to give feedback.
The notification also contained information regarding a neighborhood 
Open House that was held on November 29, 2023 for those who wished to 
learn more about the project. The site and time were posted with the 
Early Notification Sign prior to the Open House.
18 interested people attended the Open House. Attendees were 
generally supportive of the project. Questions and comments arose 
regarding potential retail tenants (specifically restaurants), the type of 
housing product, and traffic. These questions were ail answered by the 
development team to the best of their ability.
The development team has continued to be accessible by phone and 
email subsequent to the Open House to ensure that surrounding property 
owners and neighbors have ongoing opportunities to comment and ask 
questions. Specifically, the development team has kept the Grayhawk 
Community Association updated and has had multiple meetings with the 
Association’s Development Committee. In addition, neighboring 
commercial property owners have been contacted to make sure that 
any questions they might have about the proposal have been answered.
A vital part of the outreach process is to allow people to express their 
concerns and understand issues and attempt to address them in a 
professional and timely manner. Again, the entire team realizes 
the importance of the neighborhood involvement process and is 
committed to communication and outreach for the project.
Attachments:
Notification Letter 
Notification List 
Affidavit of Posting 
Sign-in Sheets 
Comment Cards
5111 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 260 • Scottsdale, AZ 85250 • (602) 957-3434 • FAX: (602) 955-4505 • Email: iiifo(gtechnicalsolutionsaz.com

DMB*
Building Legacies Since 1984
November 17, 2023
RE: Open House for Proposed Development Plan Amendments to Existing 
Zoning at One Scottsdale
Dear neighbor:
We are pleased to inform you about an upcoming request from DMB Associates, Inc. 
(DMB) regarding their One Scottsdale development located at the northeast comer of the Loop 
101 Freeway and Scottsdale Road (see attached map of site location). We are holding an open 
house to share with property owners and other stakeholders in the area our request to amend the 
existing zoning. We are holding a come-and-go open house on Wednesday, November 29, 2023, 
from 5:30 pm - 6:30 pm at the Boys & Girls Club located at 20199 N. 78th Place (map of open 
house location also attached) within the Grayhawk community.
We are proposing to modify the Land Use Budget of the existing PCD-PRC (Planned 
Community District with comparable Plaimed Regional Center) zoning on the property. We are 
requesting to decrease the non-residential square footage allowed and increase the number of 
residential units allowed on the property. The current PCD-PRC zoning allows for a pedestrian 
friendly, mixed-use project of residential, office, commercial and restaurant uses. The requested 
amendment intends to decrease the non-residential square footage by over 1,000,000 square feet 
in exchange for an additional 500 residential units. The existing PCD-PRC zoning is not changing 
as part of this request. The requested amendments will apply mainly to the undeveloped portion 
of the property south of Legacy Boulevard. Finally, we seek to modify outdated stipulations 
applicable to the property.
To find out more about our request, please plan on attending our come-and-go open house 
and speak to our development team. If you cannot make the open house, please feel free to contact 
our outreach team. Technical Solutions, at (602) 957-3434 or info(a),technicalsolutionsaz.com. The 
City of Scottsdale Project Coordinator for the project is Meredith Tessier, who can be reached at 
480-312-4211 or MTessier@ScottsdaleAZ.gov.
Sincerely, 
Michael F. Burke
TTlucJuLti '^uaJu.
DMB Associates, Inc.

y.it-z s i
-'aHWMCsn^'-
:LE
<>
-A
MCDOWCLL SOMOftAM f^HCSBRVE
:v ' '’■
oe rancn
^.'Vi':
■^H
-:•- v;
*»»»
m/^j
:-
rs3
|%5«i^r-
t.1^
T^aiiiMMbw..4i PU31 
^
2i
iv<is2Si
v:
Vi- * ■■ ■ 
V"-—- -v*^'!’*
^IRCEtLlGHT^
» - -
•X*
j .•
SCOTTSDALE ROAD
- c
:£.>'-5
01
.■»t
i
r
i'
>
I
V
fm^£':h7"^'^
mM m
*-«- -
-r.;
PMH
One Scottsdale Located in foreground 
Outlined in white with PU-II and PU-III
(PU stands for Planning Unit. One Scottsdale is divided into 2 planning units)
\U\IMHI H i:., I'U:';

m
#
s»
I
r
it
.m
W
Vi
M
fliSlS
^fi
iT'
:/i^
•m
i«
i
V
IT
A:
■»
v:
I
r
»
:ir
»
•c
Si
%v
It
i/*
iSM,
!r.
t:
¥ m
;e
Boys & Girls Club in Grayhawk
Look for open House signs to enter on north side of Building 
20199 N 78th PI, Scottsdale, AZ 85255

s
I
*
I
Affidavit of Posting
Required: Signed, Notarized originals.
Recommended: E-mail copy to your project coordinator.
□ Project Under Consideration Sign (White)
□ Public Hearing Notice Sign (Red)
Case Number: 
Project Name: 
Location:
Site Posting Date: 
Applicant Name:
Sign Company Name: 
Phone Number:
721-PA-2023
NEC Loop 101 & Scottsdale Rd
11/16/23
Tiffany & Bosco
Dynamite Signs
480-585-3031
I confirm that the site has been posted as indicated by the Project Manager for the case as listed above.
9
Applicant Si^3ur^
11/16/23
Date
Return completed original notarized affidavit AND pictures to the Current Planning Office no later than 
14 days after your application submittal.
Acknowledged before me on
T
f
JESSE SIMPSON 
Notary Public - Arizona 
:gl Maricopa County 
Commission » 650315 
My Comm. Expires May 31, 2027
Public
My commission expires: s/sr/z
(
f
City of Scottsdale — Current Planning Division
7447 E Indian School Road, Suite 105, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 ♦ Phone: 480-312-7000 ♦ Fax: 480-312-7088
CP_A/lWwiLfloa»iB
Page 1 of 1
Revision Die: 20-0ct-04

fei
r V
t
A
tea
>:.•
»•
:g.^
1
i:,^1
'k
Early Notification of 
Project Under Consideration
Neighborhood Open House Meeting:
Date: 
Wednesdayt November 29th, 2023
Tim©: 
5:30 P.M.-7:00 PM
Location: Boys & GIris Club of Greater Scottsdale 
20199 N, 78th Place
Location: NEC of the Loop 101 Freeway and Scottsdale Road 
ProiGCt OvGrviGW^
• Request; Modifleatbn of tti Land Use Budget of the eidsting PCD-PRC {Planned 
• Community District with compMble Planned Regional Center) zoning on the property-
• Discrlptior of Project and Proposed Use: The riquested amendnnent Intends to 
decrease the non-resldential square footage by over 1,000,000 square feet and 
add 500 residential units for the area nialmy in the undeveloped portion of Ihe 
property south of Legacy Boulevard, as well as proposing modifications to 
outdated stipulations applicable to the property.
• Sle Acroaga: 134 Gross Acres 
• Site Zoning: Current Zoning Is PCD-PRC
Applicant Contact: 
City Contact:
Kurt Jones 
Meredith Tessier
602.452.2729 
480.312.421i
kajones@tblaw.com 
Mtessier@scottsdaleaz.gov
Pre.Application#: 721-PA.2023 
Posting Data; 11I16HIH3 
.
^ 
for romavlng ordofielnfl elffn p-tiw to date af last hsarina •Appltcanl ResDOiiallill tor Sian Ramweil
t:: iI
L-,
bi:ii:L3c]a
I
at 4:C 
geak

t
tr
£1-
■4
■If
£■.
3-
■4-'
n
•'ll:*
Early Notification of 
Protect Under Consideration
!l mmk
Neighborhood Open House Meeting;
Dale: 
Wednesday, November 29Ui, 2023
Time; 
5.30 RM.-7;00P.M-
Locatiofi: Soys & Giris Club of Greater Scottsdate 
20199 N. 78th Place
Location; NEC ofttio Loop 101 Freeway and Scottsdale Road
Project Overview;
• Requast: MadilcalionoftheLandIteBudgataftIleadtIingPCD'PRC (Plarned
Conirnut% Dtetrid with cornparabte Rannsd Re^kval Cenlnr) zcuiing on the properly.,
• Description of Project and Proposed Use: The re<)uested amendmeirt intends to 
decrease the non^resldentlal square footam by over 1,000,000 square feel and 
add 500 residenllal units for the area mainly In the undeveloped urtion of the 
property south cf Legacy Boulevare, as well as proposing modlrcatbns to 
outdalsd stfpuiations applcable to Ihe properly.
• Site Acreage: 1340ross Acres 
•Site Zoning: Curent Zoning is PCO<^RC
Applicant Contact;
Kurt Jones 
602-452-2729 
kajone3@tb law.com
Pre-Appllcatlon#: 721‘PA-2023
City Contact:
Meredith Tessier 
480-312-4211
Mtes5ler@5cottsdalea2.gov 
Posting Date: 11/16/2023
41
f
f
n
■
&
4 ^
^ 4
mm
-Panally rw removing cr iftdscltig siin prior to iM* of l»it Im-lng -AppScaiTt Refponsltte tor ^ Rirooinl'
I
IVU(»
1-.W
N
iC3C
3SitX3M3PM'
cottscJaie^^d-.

%
»Uf^'
-'Xl^^x-
- p -
,;■
V
r:
. /'j^::;-.’®^'...... 
;
■
:^‘'-
?i:SC
- ^>;;-
-4. - V . - ■ >4 ■ ■^•^:y.:
Early Notification of 
Project Under Consideration
Neighborhood Open House Meeting:
Date: 
Wednesday, November 29tli, 2023
Time: 
5:30 P.M.-7; 00 P.M.
Location: Boys & Girls Club of Greater Scottsdale 
20199 N. 78th Place
~
; ^
'■rr-.JL-.
,9 .- -
*
-I
'V *»*
"■ ^4
.IT*
I
IK4a(K
Location: NEC of the Loop 101 Freeway and Scottsdale Road 
Project Overview:
' • Request: ModfRcation of the Land Use Budoetof the existing PC04>RC [Pfatmed 
Community District with comparable Planrwd j^lonal Center) zoning on the property.
• Descriplon of Project and Proposec Use: The requested amendment intends to 
decrease the norKesidentbl square footage by over 1,000,000 square feet and 
add 500 residential units for the area mainly In the undeveloped i>ortion of the 
property south of Legacy Boulevard as wall es pri^osng modifications to 
outdated stJpulatdns applbabie to the property.
• ate Acreage: t34 Gross Acw 
• ate Zoning. CinentZoniag Is PCO-PRC
City Contact:
Meredith Tessier 
480-312-4211
Mtessier@scottsdaleaz.gov
Posting Date: 11/15/2023
Applicant Contact:
Kurt Jones
602-452-2729
kaJones@tbiaw.com
Pre-Application#: 721-PA-2023
^ ^MiaHy .lwiwnovlnfl of discing sign prkir id dais of last ^««lng -AppUcant RMpotttlb* fof Stfln Riflwva) ,
^ 
f ■
3
■s.
1X4
im
1
|h»*
=X
Ifc-
irk
U::iL
V ^
-t-
t.
H
■m-^X
r:
r.:A.
v:
4.V 
^
202
M S sMtsaai.e Rd^ 
feAZ:65f55

One Scottsdale
Neighborhood Meeting Sign-In Sheet 
Wednesday, November 15, 2023
First Name
Last Name
Street Address
City, State & Zip Phone
Email
76Vb £ 
oK
rci^r\ » , r jr ly(j j ~z . \A~/fr\JL/U
^30*/^ ^ ■ Ia>'i'L/|s^9^-0 l/ja-c^ 5cof^
M/):P
£ f

One Scottsdale
Neighborhood Meeting Sign-In Sheet 
Wednesday, November 15, 2023
First Name
Last Name
Street Address
City, State & Zip
Phone
Email
SaCJy
^/Q ( 
/^y/orp 
SOA if&S7^S>
'y'/4^o~ca/f
’T*\ \AA.
1^1 F>,n^^spiv Ln. 
fcca--m-tc3fcgatgssropkcg-^
3<dT63tH
A
jXn 'KOA-201-2/^^
/
/

One Scottsdale
Neighborhood Meeting Sign-In Sheet 
Wednesday, November 15, 2023
First Name
Last Name
street Address
City, State & Zip Phone
Email
iZ , 
iiU A-Z
m
o
A
a
/«
'(
f
a. 2- r- ^ . -7 y>
f7 f/ (g
•*t
-7s'^~7 £• J 
^aii^y^^SdST
A-yT 
5V<^

One Scottsdale
Neighborhood Meeting Sign-In Sheet 
Wednesday, November 29, 2023
First Name
Last Name
Street Address
City, State & Zip
Phone
Email
U\ih(tikSVd5 ....
3ory>
{ t
4Sb3Ly£n07L. 
.
o
tJ
K
\AnT%> vj
vl
'7Mm}55h
iT\ oup'^ft
r>'
•, • ; - .
'.• V
'■.V.
• •• l‘--

One Scottsdale
Neighborhood Meeting Sign-In Sheet 
Wednesday, November 29, 2023
First Name
Last Name
Street Address
/
City, State & Zip
Phone
Email
-miEiMtr
A/4£>z^
Jfr\
r
p
PiaM
'I
/C)l 3,^ AJ 7L^^^ $f -ii: siO?Pl
‘f 4iA-7s:3'm
t\
//
/J 'P/J^ tTr- ^
Q^C^L
h
c?n5 "FiU—
k
f ^
a
Z' I
^ usaVi
7A
q^n3o £- ir
SapTfzd^^e^ 
i:> -f 
qgos^ o 
YE"
••- .
•- • -5^'

One Scottsdale
Neighborhood Meeting Sign-In Sheet 
Wednesday, November 29, 2023
First Name
Last Name
Street Address
'3^
kJ'Ic
5^^
City, State & Zip Phone
Email
UjAflO
^szs'r 
^ 
-
(9700 U 
fifriois <^Cr^UKCi hrm^ 
^grvfaXj
KV
1 '''VryvV?f<=^Q^^

One Scottsdale
Neighborhood Meeting Sign-In Sheet 
Wednesday, November 29, 2023
First Name
Last Name
\/\W^ 'k\s "iYtN
Street Address
City, State & Zip Phone
Email
a
72M.
Hvj ( g P
FUOAlA
i
s: \ - 
i:':.:
■■<;■
■V .vv-V. ■
iV.'-
;-■■■■• '■. .V 
•: 1 .• 
■*.
•K-ii., 'iV'j 
-H
.-t •• i-'.
-..../Mr-'-'-tst-

PRINT NAME
One Scottsdale
__  
Community Input Card
ADDRESS 
^-'6'tfi^nj^^.jrrC^ CITYt^riitrfe*^^*^ ZIP fSS^SS"
PHONE 
-'ZH. 5 - <44^^ EMAIL '^er.e 
Cb'C.
PLEASE TELL US YOUR THOUGHTS & SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED PROJECT;
Technical Solutions • 5111 N. Scottsdale Rd., Suite 260 Scottsdaie, AZ 85250 • Phone: (602) 957-3434 • Fax: (602) 9554505
•1.

PRINT NAME
One Scottsdale 
Community Input Card
ADDRESS
EMAIL
CITY
C^I7 2IP <^^<5 l-kS^
PLEASE TELL US YOUR THOUGHTS & SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED PROJECT:
//y ^Atfishrrs 
-/d fji
'^B\/£LofNENr 
________
Xl-he^r OF7hpiEr/2- 
Technical Solutions • 5111 N. Scottsdale Rd., Suite 260 Scottsdale, AZ 85250 • Phone: (602) 957-3434 • Fax: (602) 9554505
A

November 29. 2023
Notes for meetirm with DMB Associates. Inc, at Bovs & Girls Club
Wc understand that DMB acts in concert with the economics of its project. 
However, the current residents see that the enormity of the tremendous influx of 
housing that is about to inundate us will totally change the character of this 
Grayhawk neighborhood; bringing many more people, cars and visitors to an area 
that already does not meet the needs of its current population. For example, wc 
have only two grocery stores (Hayden and Mayo), to serv'e current and future 
residents; and while there are medical offices in the vicinity, an appointment to 
begin a relationship with my new GP was not available for 6 months. One can but 
w onder how all of this will affect our neighborhood schools. And, you can forget 
about a parking space when you go to use the facilities that are here to serve you.
Your letter did not mention how many residential units DMB included in their 
plans originally, without the amendment.
With ail the currently planned residential projects, from where does the additional 
water needed for 500 more residential units come? Those units would easily bring 
at least 1,500 more residents to your project and our neighborhood.
Are you doing away with the non-residential uses altogether or virtually altogether, 
to replace them with housing? Then, you are not really offering a truly mixed-use 
project anymore.
If you w ere allow ed to do what you are asking for, and add 500 more units, what 
would stop the many other projects and developers in our area from asking for the 
same kind of amendment to their plans?
With the coming of the many residential projects approved for this area and the 
scheduled transformation of the dead-end at 76"^ Street into an active Miller Road, 
this neighborhood is on the verge of losing its unique character and becoming just 
another chaotic area with too few services and too many people.
The bottom line is that this amendment should not be viewed in a vacuum as one 
residential project but instead, as one of many, along with all of the numerous 
consequences that flow therefrom.
Beverly Bond

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Tessier, Meredith
Wednesday, November 29, 2023 10:12 AM 
Falk, Scott
info@technicalsolutionsaz.com; sbsmith@technicalsolutionsaz.com
RE: Nov 17 letter regarding Open House for Proposed Development Plan Amendments
to Existing Zoning at One Scottsdale
Good Morning Scott-
Please see my response e-mail to you sent on 11/27/2023. At this time, the applicant can assist you with your questions 
regarding the type of residential units as a formal case application has not been submitted to the City. I have copied the 
applicant contact Susan Bitter-Smith to this e-mail to address your questions.
Thank you,
Meredith Tessier, Senior Planner 
Planning & Development Services
^•‘CITY OF
#SCOnSDAlE
From: Falk, Scott <SFalk@irwbaird.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2023 9:05 AM
To: info@technicalsolutionsaz.com; Tessier, Meredith <MTessier@ScottsdaleAz.Gov>
Subject: RE: Nov 17 letter regarding Open House for Proposed Development Plan Amendments to Existing Zoning at One 
Scottsdale
External Email: Please use caution if opening links or attachments!
Thoughts?
Scott
From: Falk, Scott <SFalk@rwbaird.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2023 1:46 PM
To: info@technicalsolutionsaz.com: MTessier@ScottsdaleAZ.eov
Subject: Nov 17 letter regarding Open House for Proposed Development Plan Amendments to Existing Zoning at One 
Scottsdale
wa
I am unable to make the Open House on 11/29, but am questioning what type of "residential units" you 
are calling out here?
• 
Single family homes (lot sizes)?
• 
Townhouse/Condos (density)?
• 
Apartments (density)?
• 
Some of all of the above?
Is there a plat or plan that shows what would be developed where?
ATTACHMENT 12

I am very concerned by w/hat I see as the continual quest to over develop properties in North Scottsdale.
I would appreciate a prompt response (prior to 11/29).
Thank you,
Scott Falk
Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated does not accept buy, sell or other transaction orders by e-mail, or any instructions 
by e-mail that require a signature. This e-mail message, and any attachment(s), is not an offer, or solicitation of an offer, 
to buy or sell any security or other product. Unless otherwise specifically indicated, information contained in this 
communication is not an official confirmation of any transaction or an official statement of Baird. The information 
provided is subject to change without notice. This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information or may 
otherwise be protected by law, rule or regulation. Any use, copying or distribution of the information contained in this e- 
mail by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact 
the sender, and delete the material from any computer on which it exists. Baird, in accordance with applicable law, 
reserves the right to monitor, review and retain all electronic communications, including e-mails, traveling through its 
networks and systems. E-mail transmissions cannot be guaranteed to be secure, timely or error-free. Baird therefore 
recommends that you do not send any sensitive information such as account or personal identification numbers by e- 
mail.
Please click here <https://www.bairdwealth.com/globalassets/pdfs/help/consolidated-report-disclosure.pdf> for 
important information about any client reports you receive.
2

From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Tessier, Meredith
Monday, Novennber 27, 2023 9;27 AM 
Derek Ostensen
RE: One Scottsdale - Land Use Modification
Derek-
Thank you for contacting the City of Scottsdale regarding the applicant rezone request reference #721-PA-2023. The 
applicant is currently in the public outreach process which is prior to their formal application submittal. As such, the 
applicant and/or developer (DMB) can better assist you with your questions below. Once the applicant has submitted 
their application to the City, their submittal can be viewed through the Case Information Sheet and/or Planning Records 
Department.
Thank you.
Meredith Tessier, Senior Planner 
Planning & Development Services
^'CITV Of
# SCOTTSDALE
From: Derek Ostensen <dostensen@olen.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 21,2023 3:03 PM
To: Tessier, Meredith <MTessier(5)ScottsdaleAz.Gov>
Subject: One Scottsdale - Land Use Modification
A External Email: Please use caution if opening links or attachments!
Hi Meredith,
Just left you a voicemail. I'd like to request the following regarding DMB's proposed land use change please:
• Map of the area where the 500 units would be added.
Information on the type of units intended - apartment, condo, townhome, single family?
Update on when the City expects the other intended retail, hotels and office to be built on the other vacant DMB land. 
Any details you have on what is planned for DMB's vacant land north of Legacy Blvd. and when that would be built.
• The Public Review schedule and venues for the City process.
Thank you,
Derek Ostensen 
Senior Vice President
Olen Properties 
Seven Corporate Plaza 
Newport Beach, CA 92660 
949-683-4683 (Direct) 
www.oIenproperties.com
1

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Palmer, Don L <Don.PalmerJr@gd-ms.com>
Monday, November 27, 2023 8:34 AM
Tessier, Meredith
doni 998otl@cox.net
One Scottsdale zoning amendment
A External Email: Please use caution if opening links or attachments!
Good morning Meredith,
I am reaching out to you with concern over the amended rezoning request at One Scottsdale. Amending zoning 
plans seems to be pretty easy to get the Developers what they want. What's the purpose of a zoning plan in the first 
place? I've lived in Grayhawk for 27 years, and seen the incredible drive to pack as many people as feasibly possible into 
this area. I just can't wait to see what Phoenix does on the other side of Scottsdale Road with single and multifamily 
housing (between Loop 101 and Pinnacle Peak Rd). I feel that this area is going to be gridlock when that large parcel gets 
developed, as it is already nerve wracking trying to use Scottsdale Road at 60 MPH+ and constant heavy traffic. I don't 
know what happened to "The West's Most Western Town", but I don't see it anymore!
I always thought I would spend my entire life here, but I have really questioned that lately. I don't enjoy living 
here the way I used to. Scottsdale is slowly changing and doesn't have that unique, western feel anymore. In my opinion 
it is being ruined and there is no going back!
Don Palmer, C.S.P.
1

Mayor and City Council Members 
City of Scottsdale 
3939 N. Drinlcw’ater Blvd, 
Scottsdale, Arizona 85251
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
1 am \vi iting today to show my support for the proposed modifications to the One 
Scollsdalc development located on the northeast corner of Scottsdale Road and Loop 
101.1 believe reducing the intensity of uses at this location and bringing in luxury for- 
salc housing is great for the area. These modifications will result in less traffic, less 
water use, and a more contextually appropriate project overall.
This is exactly the land of proposal that we should be supporting in LScottsdale. Please 
vote yes for One Scottsdale.
Sincerely,

Mayor and City Council Members 
City of Scottsdale 
3939 N. Drinkwater Blvd. 
Scottsdale, Arizona 85251
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
I am writing today to show my support for the proposed modifications to the One 
Scottsdale development located on the northeast comer of Scottsdale Road and Loop 
101.1 believe reducing the intensity of uses at this location and bringing in luxury for- 
sale housing is great for the area. These modifications will result in less traffic, less 
water use, and a more contextually appropriate project overall.
This is exactly the kind of proposal that we should be supporting in Scottsdale. Please 
vote yes for One Scottsdale.
Sincerely,
03/05/2026
David Rutledge 
9760 E. Monument Drive 
Scottsdale, AZ 85262

Mayor and City Council Members 
City of Scottsdale 
3939 N. Drinkwater Blvd. 
Scottsdale, Arizona 85251
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
I am writing today to show my support for the proposed modifications to the One 
Scottsdale development located on the northeast corner of Scottsdale Road and Loop 
101.1 believe reducing the intensity of uses at this location and bringing in luxury for- 
sale housing is great for the area. These modifications will result in less traffic, less 
water use, and a more contextually appropriate project overall.
This is exactly the kind of proposal that we should be supporting in Scottsdale. Please 
vote yes for One Scottsdale.
./
Sincerely,

Mayor and City Council Members 
City of Scottsdale 
3939 N. Drinkwater Blvd. 
Scottsdale, Arizona 85251
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
As a neighboring property owner, I would like to express my support for the proposed 
modifications to the One Scottsdale development located on the northeast corner of 
Scottsdale Road and Loop 101.1 believe reducing the intensity of uses at this location 
and bringing in luxury for-sale housing is great for the area. These modifications will 
result in less traffic, less water use, and a more contextually appropriate project overall.
This is exactly the kind of proposal that we should be supporting in Scottsdale. Please 
vote yes for One Scottsdale.
Sincerely,
Joe Courtney

Mayor and City Council Members 
City of Scottsdale 
3939 N. Drinkwater Blvd. 
Scottsdale, Arizona 85251
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
As a neighboring property owner, I would like to express my support for the proposed 
modifications to the One Scottsdale development located on the northeast corner of 
Scottsdale Road and Loop 101.1 believe reducing the intensity of uses at this location 
and bringing in luxury for-sale housing is great for the area. These modifications will 
result in less traffic, less water use, and a more contextually appropriate project overall.
This is exactly the kind of proposal that we should be supporting in Scottsdale. Please 
vote yes for One Scottsdale.
Sincerely,
Lee Courtney

March 4,2026
Mayor and City Council Members 
City of Scottsdale 
3939 N. Drinkwater Blvd. 
Scottsdale, Arizona 85251
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
As a neighboring property owner, I would like to express my support for the proposed 
modifications to the One Scottsdale development located on the northeast corner of 
Scottsdale Road and Loop 101.1 believe reducing the intensity of uses at this location 
and bringing in luxury for-sale housing is great for the area. These modifications will 
result in less traffic, less water use, and a more contextually appropriate project overall.
This is exactly the kind of proposal that we should be supporting in Scottsdale. Please 
vote yes for One Scottsdale.
Sincerely,
Brian Bertram 
7730 E Vaquero Dr 
Scottsdale, AZ 85258

Mayor and City Council Members 
City of Scottsdale 
3939 N. Drinkwater Blvd. 
Scottsdale, Arizona 85251
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
I am writing today to show my support for the proposed modifications to the One 
Scottsdale development located on the northeast corner of Scottsdale Road and Loop 
101.1 believe reducing the intensity of uses at this location and bringing in luxury for- 
sale housing is great for the area. These modifications will result in less traffic, less 
water use, and a more contextually appropriate project overall.
This is exactly the kind of proposal that we should be supporting in Scottsdale. Please 
vote yes for One Scottsdale.
Sincerely,

Mayor and City Council Members 
City of Scottsdale 
3939 N. Drinkwater Blvd. 
Scottsdale, Arizona 85251
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
As a neighboring propert>' owner, I would like to express my support for the proposed 
modifications to the One Scottsdale development located on the northeast corner of 
Scottsdale Road and Loop lOi. I believe reducing the intensit>^ of uses at this location 
and bringing in luxury for-sale housing is great for the area. These modifications will 
result in less traffic, less water use, and a more contextually appropriate project overall.
This is exactly the kind of proposal that we should be supporting in Scottsdale. Please 
vote yes for One Scottsdale.
Sincerely,

From: MICHAEL D'Andrea <mfdandrea(5)msn.com>
Sent: Monday, March 9, 2026 7:27 PM
To: Borowsky, Lisa <lborowskv(5)scottsdaleaz.eov>: City Council <citvcouncil(S)scottsdaleaz.gov>
Cc: City Manager Mailbox <citvmanager(S)scottsdaleaz.eov>: Curtis, Tim <tcurtis@scottsdaleaz.gov>
Subject: 20-ZN-2002#5 - ONE SCOTTSDALE
I External Email: Please use caution if opening links or attachments!
Mayor Borowsky & Members of the Scottsdale City Council:
My name is Mike D'Andrea, I am an architect, real estate developer, and builder in our community and 
have been for almost 30 years! I know some of you personally and have formerly served this Council and 
our great City as both your Planning Commission Chairman and Development Review Board Member for 
(12) years (2002-2014), thankyou foryour service.
I’m writing to you as a follow up to my March 18, 2024, e-mail correspondence in regard to this very 
property/project. For clarity, my original note as referenced (and its disdain) had everything to do with 
the aesthetics and quality of the projects that have been approved and built on this site vs. fundamental 
land use objections.
Given the current economic landscape, the timing since last modifications as well as the recently 
acquired adjacent property to the immediate west purchased by the AZ Cardinals, I think we (as a city) 
need to be nimble on this parcel. I am quite concerned with the traffic impacts in the area, as I drive past 
this site daily in route to my North Scottsdale home and expect the situation to continue to worsen if we 
do not properly address. This application (and proposed uses) seems to greatly reduce peak hour traffic, 
as well significantly reduce both water demand and usage. Further, the request of ‘for sale’ is an added 
benefit for the overall quality of this community.
Therefore. I am in support of this request with one distinct notation (below):
I'd like to challenge the DRB (or now City Staff), Planning Commission and this Council to ensure that the 
balance of the projects that get designed, developed and/or approved/built at this location are subject to 
the 'Uniquely Scottsdale' strict standards of high design quality and community aesthetics that we've 
always been so very good about upholding and demanding.
Sincerely,
Michael F. D’Andrea 
602-999-7759
1

From: WebServices <WebServices(5)scottsdaleaz.gov>
Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2026 11:38 AM
To: Planning Commission <Planningcommission(S)scottsdaleaz.gov> 
Subject: Planning Commission Public Comment 
Importance: High
Name: Georgia Meacham 
Address: 19700 N 76th St.
Email: gRorgiameacham@gmaiLcom
Phone: (208)317-8317
Comment:
I am looking to comment on the One Scottsdale amended plan (20-ZN-2002#5) I am a Scottsdale 
resident and live in the Grayhawk community that is near the proposed site change. This area is in 
need of commercial/retail development. So much residential development has happened in the 
last few years that without the needed amenities that were proposed when this plan was originally 
approved, we risk turning this area into a car reliant disaster. We need walkable communities and 
services. Adding an additional 350 residential units puts stress on our water supply. What about the 
100 year plan? Citizens rely on this metric. Amended plans erode trust in the process. Please say no 
to adding additional residential units. Thank you, Georgia Meacham 19700 N. 76th St. #2157 
Scottsdale, AZ
1

PRISMJET
Mayor and City Council Members 
City of Scottsdale 
3939 N. Drinkwater Blvd. 
Scottsdale, Arizona 85251
The Honorable Lisa Borowsky and Members of the Scottsdale City Council:
I founded and operate a business in North Scottsdale, and I am always happy to see proposals 
for new residential ownership that will continue to provide customer and employee potential 
for our business. For that reason, I support the modifications to the One Scottsdale 
development located on the northeast corner of Scottsdale Road and Loop 101. Housing, 
particularly this proposed luxury for-sale housing, is a great addition to the area and helps 
ensure that local businesses succeed.
Please support this proposal for One Scottsdale.
Sincerely,
Scott Casey
15003 N Airport Drive Scottsdale, AZ 85260 
480-426-8180
scott.casey@prismjet.net

Mayor and City Council Members 
City of Scottsdale 
3939 N. Drinkwater Blvd. 
Scottsdale, Arizona 85251
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
1 am writing today to show my support for the proposed modifications to the One 
Scottsdale development located on the northeast comer of Scottsdale Road and Loop 
101.1 believe reducing the intensity of uses at this location and bringing in luxury for- 
sale housing is great for the area. These modifications will result in less traffic, less 
water use, and a more contextually appropriate project overall.
This is exactly the kind of proposal that we should be supporting in Scottsdale. Please 
vote yes for One Scottsdale.
Sincerely,
L±
Qc{.

March 9, 2026
Mayor and City Council Members 
City of Scottsdale 
3939 N. Drinkwater Blvd. 
Scottsdale, Arizona 85251
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
As a former resident of Scottsdale and an active business professional in the community, it is 
exciting to see development that leads to economic growth and stability for all stakeholders. The 
experience, attention to detail, and commitment to responsible growth that One Scottsdale's 
leadership team bring to the city will surely be evident with this project. As such, I support the 
modifications to the One Scottsdale development located on the northeast corner of Scottsdale 
Road and Loop 101.
Please support this proposal for One Scottsdale!
Sincerely,
-----
Matt Beverage

Mayor and City Council Members 
City of Scottsdale 
3939 N. Drinkwater Blvd. 
Scottsdale, Arizona 85251
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
I own a business in North Scottsdale, and I am always happy to see proposals for new 
residential ownership that will continue to provide customer and employee potential for our 
business economy. For that reason, I support the modifications to the One Scottsdale^ 
development located on the northeast corner of Scottsdale Road and Loop 101. Housing, 
particularly this proposed luxury for-sale housing, is a great addition to the area and helps 
ensure that local businesses succeed.
Please support this proposal for One Scottsdafel
Sincerely,
/ //fic
yf-i/z/rrid/)

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
GLM <georgiameacham@gmail.com> 
Wednesday, May 13, 2026 4:19 PM 
Rahman, Rezaur 
Tessier, Meredith
Re: Planning Commission Public Comment
4 External Email: Please use caution if opening links or attachments!
Thank you. I live in the area and have concerns for the increase demand of water. The sheer number of 
units in a mile radius from the proposed development is unsustainable with our current water situation. 
When you receive the analysis would you kindly forward it to me.
I appreciate the work you do for our city.
Sending my best,
"Georgia Meacham
On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 2:15 PM Rahman, Rezaur <RRahman(ascottsdaleaz.gov> wrote: 
Hello Georgia,
Good afternoon! Thanks for your inquiry on water usage reduction. Water Resources has not received a formal 
comparative analysis supporting the referenced “40% reduction” in projected water demand and therefore, 
cannot independently validate that figure.
Once those materials are submitted, the project will continue through the standard Water Resources review 
process, including evaluation of infrastructure capacity, operational considerations, and applicable service 
requirements.
Please let us know if you have additional questions or inquiries.
Regards,
Rezaur.
1

Rezaur Rahman, Ph.D., P.E.
Principal Engineer, Water Resources 
9379 E .San Salvador Dr
Scottsriale. AZ 85258 
rrahmanOscottsrialeaz.gov
SCOTTSDALE
^WATER
"Water Sustainability through Stewardship, Innovation and People"
For sending attachments over SMB, please use the link below:
https://sRf:ijremail.scfittsria lea?. gov/filfidrnp/rrahmanOlscottsda leaz.gov
From: Tessier, Meredith <MTessier(®ScottsdaleAz.Gov>
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2026 2:23 PM
To: georgiameacham(S)gmail.com
Cc: Rahman, Rezaur <RRahman(a)Scottsdaleaz.gov>
Subject: RE: Planning Commission Public Comment
Georgia-
Thank you for your e-mail. In response to your questions regarding water usage and analysis, please contact 
Rezaur Rahman, Principal Water Resource Engineer, 480-312-5636 for additional information and assistance 
regarding your questions.
Thank you,
Meredith Tessier, Senior Planner 
Planning & Development Services 
480-312-4211
2

j^CITVOF
SCOTTSDALE
Resources and information provided by Planning & Development Services staff are provided as a courtesy. Staff 
members cannot provide legal advice regarding any property or project. Additionally, staff members cannot provide 
any guarantees that the resources and information provided are definitive, accurate, or comprehensive. Customers are 
responsible for conducting their own due diligence and are encouraged to consult with legal counsel if they need 
assistance or advice concerning their property or project.
From: WebServices <WebServices(ascottsdaleaz.gov>
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2026 8:23 AM
To: Planning Commission <Planningcommission@scottsdaleaz.eov> 
Subject: Planning Commission Public Comment 
Importance: High
Name: Georgia Meacham 
Address: 19700 N 76th St.
Email: georgiameacham@gmail.com
Phone:(208)317-8317
Comment:
I have reviewed the original proposal and also the Scottdale Airport Park Guidelines. Susan Bitter 
Smith contacted me and sent a connectivity rendering. It does not meet the original intent of 
overlay. Connectivity like Grayhawk or DC Ranch seem more inline. Walking along Hayden or 
Scottsdale road does not connect neighborhoods. Susan told me that the water usage had been 
reduced by 40 %. I would like to see how that is calculated. I contacted ADWR and they told me 
that they don't regulate every development request. My main concern is the water. Was it certified 
under the original application? Where is the analysis that was used? Thank you in advance.
3

cu
f/Toi
Affidavit of Posting
Required: Signed, Notarized originals.
Recommended: E-mail copy to your project coordinator.
□ Project Under Consideration Sign (White)
IB Public Hearing Notice Sign (Red)
Case Number: 
Project Name: 
Location:
Site Posting Date: 
Applicant Name:
Sign Company Name: 
Phone Number:
20-ZN-2002#5
NEC Loop 101 & Scottsdale Rd
04/23/26
Tiffany & Bosco
Dynamite Signs
480-585-3031
I confirm that th^ sit§4ias been posted as indicated by the Project Manager for the case as listed above.
04/23/26
Applicant S/g\ature
Date
Return completed original notarized affidavit AND pictures to the Current Planning Office no later than 
14 days after your application submittal.
Acknowledged before me on April 23, 2026
MARTSCTM CONRAD 
Notify Public - Artioni 
Mjrtcopi County 
Commliilen 0 67J44I
My Comm. Dpirot Oct 23, 1021
f
NotarVPfe
My commission expires:
City of Scottsdale -- Current Planning Division
7447 E Indian School Road. Suite 105, Scottsdale. AZ 85251 ♦ Phone: 480-312-7000 ♦ Fax; 480-312-7088
CP_Aff}davit_Posting
Page 1 of 1
Revision Date: 20-0c/-04

m.r
.-1
City of Scottsdale PUBLIC NOTICE
ZONING/PUBL C HEARING
CITY HALL: 3939 North Drinkwater Boulevar
PLANNING COMMISSION: 5:00 PM., 5/13/26 CITY COUNCIL: 5:00 PM., TBD 
REQUEST: Request by owner for a zoning district map amendment to the existing Planning Community 
District jPC) with comparable Planned Regional Center (PRC) zoning for the purpose of amending Use 
. Regulations, including amendments to the One Scottsdale Amended Development Standards (Density) 
and Development Plan and Land Use Budget for a mixed-use development, including residential, 
commercial, and hotel, all on a +/■ 27 acre site located at 19601 N. Scottsdale Road, 19190 N. 72nd 
Way, and 19194 N, 73rd Way. The proposed changes include adding 350 residential units and reducing 
commercial area by 1,372,145 million square feet.
CASE NUMBER: 20-ZN-2002#5 
„
Tiff,my S Bosco. P.A. 
312.4211
City Contdct:
Mer«(;filh Tessier 
(4flO) 312-4211
mtessierfScottsdaleAigov PoslingOale: 3/6/26
Gf'ayhawk’Park O
HonorHeaith 
I ScDtIsda'e A 
Thompson Peak 
Medical Center
O
mm
I® d -Statii

City of Scottsdale PUBLIC NOTICE
scan.
snap,
I ^ 
ZONING/PUBLIC HEARING -Hh
■ 
CITY HALL: 3939 North Drinkwater Boulevar
I PLANNING COMMISSION: 5:00 PM., 5/13/26 CITY COUNCIL: 5:00 PM., TBD 
I REQUEST: Request by owner for a zoning district map amendment to the existing Planning Community 
I District (PC) with comparable Planned Regional Center (PRC) zoning for the purpose of amending Use 
I Regulations, including amendments to the One Scottsdale Amended Development Standards (Density,
H and Development Plan and Land Use Budget for a mixed-use development, including residentia, 
dl commercial, and hotel, all on a +/■ 27 acre site located at 19601 N, Scottsdale Road, 19190 N. 72nd 
' Way, and 19194 N. 73rd Way, The proposed changes include adding 350 residential units and reducing 
commercial area by 1,372,145 million square feet,
CASE NUMBER: 20-ZN-2002J5
Proiecl Localton. LIOIW6, N SCOHSOALE RD (NE Conerl 
Applicant Contact:
Tiffany & Bosco. P>.
(602)452-3729
Ca«P.cA.j:dOi«atC.r>c'5cylisda'e 480-3l2-’T6; ProiectinfonTwuon may Peresearchedav mips, eserv^c
rces sconsdaleai.9<iv,P)dgrescurces.Cases. Penalty for remov ng or de'Kine s-gn pnor to date of last hear.rg Applican responsWefo' sign re-noai '
'............... . '
O
■T‘
m
■r.M
m
V--V' -- - V . • 
-Ti-- '
iSSiSa^iSfe

City of Scottsdale PUBLIC NOTICE
ZONING/PUBL C HEARING
CITY HALL: 3939 North Drinkwater Boulevar 
I
PLANNING COMMISSION: 5:00 PM, 5/13/26 CITY COUNCIL: 5:00 PM, TBD 
I
REQUEST: Request by owner for a zoning district map amendment to the existing Planning Community I 
District (PC) with comparable Planned Regional Center (PRC) zoning for the purpose of amending Use H 
Regulations, including amendments to the One Scottsdale Amended Development Standards (Density), I 
and Development Plan and Land Use Budget for a mixed-use development, including residential, W 
commercial, and hotel, all on a +/• 27 acre site located at 19601 N. Scottsdale Road, 19190 N, 72nd 
Way, and 19194 N. 73rd Way. The proposed changes include adding 350 residential units and reducing " 
commercial area by 1,372,145 million square feet,
p CASE NUMBER: 20-ZN-2002#5 
K
City Contact: 
Mertdith Tessier 
(4801312-4211
iy- :■
HonocHeallh
Thompson Peak 
Medical Center
d
mm
W
ss 
at:!Jsi®a
fS^i
mi

City Notifications - Maiiing List Seiection Map
One Scottsdale
If-
mm
-
.v-
■W 
J'ilr;’ -'o-
m
•IT"
Wimxmamm-,
Labels Pulled 
March 6, 2026
Additional Notifications:
Interested Parties List 
Adjacent HOA’s 
P&Z E-Newsletter 
Facebook 
Nextdoor.com
City Website-Projects in the hearing process
Map Legend:
Site Boundary
Properties within 1,250-feet
Postcards: 540
20-ZN-2002#5
ATTACHMENT 13

Approved 4/8/2026 (JM|
k>r'
SllTlf ■
J-f
7Z0.
SCOTTSDALE PLANNING COMMISSION 
KIVA-CITY HALL
3939 DRINKWATER BOULEVARD 
SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 25, 2026
*SUMMARIZED MEETING MINUTES *
PRESENT:
Joe Young, Chair 
William Scarbrough, Vice Chair 
George Ertel, Commissioner 
Michal Ann Joyner, Commissioner 
Barney Gonzales, Commissioner 
Doug Drake, Commissioner 
David Reid, Commissioner
ABSENT: 
None
STAFF: 
Tim Curtis
Joe Padilla 
Becca Cox 
Meredith Tessier 
Andrew Dobson 
Keith Niederer 
Greg Bloemberg 
Jack Kelly 
Jason McWilliams
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Young called the regular session of the Scottsdale Planning Commission to order at 5:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
A formal roll call was conducted confirming members present as stated above.
MINUTES REVIEW AND APPROVAL
1. Approval of the January 14, 2026 Regular Meeting Minutes.
Commissioner Reid made a motion to approve the January 28, 2026 Regular Meeting 
Minutes. Second by Vice Chair Scarbrough, the motion passed unanimously by a vote of 
seven (7) to zero (0).
* Note; These are summary action minutes only. A complete copy of the meeting audio is available on the 
Planning Commission page on ScottsdaleAZ.gov, search “Planning Commission”
ATTACHMENT 14

Planning Connmission 
Regular Meeting Minutes 
March 25, 2026 
Page 2 of 3
Continuances
2. 20-ZN-2002#5 (One Scottsdale)
APPLICANT REQUEST TO CONTINUE TO MAY 13. 2026
Request by owner for a zoning district map amendment to the existing Planning 
Community District (P-C) with comparable Planned Regional Center (PRC) zoning for the 
purpose of amending Use Regulations, including amendments to the One Scottsdale 
Amended Development Standards (Density), and Development Plan and Land Use 
Budget for a mixed-use development, including residential, commercial, and hotel, all on a 
+/- 126-acre site located at 7355 N. Thompson Peak Parkway, 7340 E. Legacy Boulevard, 
7245 E. Thompson Peak Parkway, 20159 N. Scottsdale Road, 20103 N. Scottsdale Road, 
20001 N. Scottsdale Road, 19730 N. 73rd Street, 19641 N. Scottsdale Road, 19623 N. 
Scottsdale Road, 19605 N. Scottsdale Road, 19552 N. 73rd Street, 7395 E. Legacy 
Boulevard, 19355 N. 73rd Way, 7370 E. Henkel Way, 18920 N. 74th Street, 7221 E. 
Legacy Boulevard, 19360 N. 73rd Way, 19194 N. 73rd Way, 19001 N. Scottsdale Road, 
APN: 215-05-005B, 19601 N. Scottsdale Road, APN: 215-05-001A, and 19190 N. 72nd 
Way. The proposed changes include adding 350 for sale residential units and reducing 
commercial area by 1,372,145 million square feet. Staff contact person is Meredith 
Tessier, 480-312-4211. Applicant contact person is Kurt Jones, 602-452-2729.
Item No. 2; Commissioner Drake made a motion to continue case 20-ZN-2002#5 to 
the May 13th, 2026 agenda. Second by Commissioner Joyner, the motion passed 
unanimously by a vote of seven (7) to zero (0).
Consent Agenda
3. UP-0003-2026 (Crown Castle BO 826045 / T-Mobile Monarch Monopalm)
Request by owner for renewal of a conditional use permit for an existing type 4 alternative 
concealment wireless communication facility designed as a 55-foot-taii artificial palm tree located 
at 7220 E. McKellips Road (A.P.N. 131-16-143) with muitipie family residential district (R-5) zoning. 
Staff contact person is Keith Niederer, 480-312-2953. Applicant contact person is Todd 
Daoust, (602) 549-9054.
4. 22-UP-2003#5 (Crown Castle BU 823707 Conditional Use Permit Renewal)
Request by owner for approval of a Conditional Use Permit for an existing Type 4 
Alternative Concealment Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) concealed within a 30- 
foot-tall artificial cactus located on a +/-26-acre site located at 39730 N. Cave Creek Road 
with Open Space Environmentally Sensitive Lands District (O-S ESL) zoning. Staff 
contact person is Keith Niederer, 480-312-2953. Applicant contact person Is Todd 
Daoust, (602) 549-9054.
5. 4-UP-2016#3 (Vertical Bridge - US-AZ-7008 T-Mobile PH30920A Granite Reef Church)
Request by owner for renewal of a Conditional Use Permit for an existing Type 4, 
Alternative Concealment Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) concealed within a 45- 
foot tall church steeple, with associated ground mounted equipment located a 2.76+/- acre
* Note: These are summary action minutes only. A complete copy of the meeting audio is available on the 
Planning Commission page on ScottsdaleAZ.gov, search “Planning Commission”

Planning Commission 
Regular Meeting Minutes 
March 25, 2026 
Page 3 of 3
property at 4425 N. Granite Reef Road with Single-family Residential (R1-7) zoning. Staff 
contact person is Andrew Dobson, 480-312-2515. Applicant contact person is Isabel 
Chavez, 951-496-2452.
6. 7-UP-2016#2 (Oasis Cafe^
Request by owner for an amendment to an existing conditional use permit for a bar to 
allow for a +/- 1,863 square foot bar expansion on a 6,210 square foot site located at 4441 
N. Buckboard Trail with Central Business/Parking District Downtown Overlay and Parking 
District Vehicle Parking Downtown Overlay (C-2/P-3 DO & P-2 DO) zoning. Staff contact 
person is Greg Bloemberg, 480-312-4306. Applicant contact person is Lauren Proper 
Potter, 480-921-2800.
Item No. 3, 4 ,5 6; Vice Chair Scarbrough made a motion for recommendation for 
cases UP-0003-2026, 22-UP-2003#5, 4-UP-2016#3, and 7-UP-2016#2 after finding that 
the CUP criteria have been met and that the proposed Conditional Use Permits are 
consistent and conform with the adopted General Plan, per the attached 
stipulations. Second by Commissioner Ertel, the motion passed unanimously by a 
vote of seven (7) to zero (0).
ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to discuss, the regular session of the Planning Commission 
adjourned at 5:06 p.m.
* Note: These are summary action minutes only. A complete copy of the meeting audio is available on the 
Planning Commission page on ScottsdaleAZ.gov, search “Planning Commission”

s
■
-f
k
%
X
I
0
SCOTTSDALE PLANNING COMMISSION 
KIVA-CITY HALL
3939 DRINKWATER BOULEVARD 
SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA
WEDNESDAY, MAY 13, 2026
‘DRAFT SUMMARIZED MEETING MINUTES *
PRESENT:
Joe Young, Chair 
William Scarbrough, Vice Chair 
George Ertel, Commissioner 
Michal Ann Joyner, Commissioner 
Barney Gonzales, Commissioner 
Doug Drake, Commissioner 
David Reid, Commissioner
ABSENT:
STAFF:
None
Tim Curtis 
Joe Padilla 
Becca Cox 
Casey Steinke 
Meredith Tessier 
Jason Katz 
Jack Kelly 
Jason McWilliams
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Young called the regular session of the Scottsdale Planning Commission to order at 5:01 p.m.
ROLL CALL
A formal roll call was conducted confirming members present as stated above.
MINUTES REVIEW AND APPROVAL
1. Approval of the April 22, 2026 Regular Meeting Minutes.
Commissioner Joyner made a motion to approve the April 22, 2026 Regular Meeting Minutes. Second 
by Commissioner Ertel, the motion passed unanimously by a vote of seven (7) to zero (0).
* Note: These are summary action minutes only. A complete copy of the meeting audio is available on the 
Planning Commission page on ScottsdaleAZ.gov, search “Planning Commission”
ATTACHMENT 15

Planning Commission 
Regular Meeting Minutes 
May 13, 2026 
Page 2 of 3
Consent Abenda
2. 2-AB-2025 (Scarpulla & Ruggiero Abandonment)
A request by owners to abandon 8 feet of GLO roadway easement located along the 
western boundary and 33 feet of GLO roadway easement (and 25 feet of redundant road 
right-of-way) along the southern boundary of property located at 28811 N 79th St. (parcel 
216-69-143), in addition to abandoning 8 feet of GLO roadway easement located along the 
western boundary and 33 feet of GLO roadway easement along the northern boundary of 
property located at 28755 N 79th St. (parcel 216-69-145) with Single-family Residential, 
Environmentally Sensitive Lands, Foothills Overlay (R1-70/ESL/FO) zoning, totaling 
approximately 25,560 square-feet of right-of-way. Staff contact person is Casey Steinke, 
480-312-2611. Applicant contact person is Jason Laumeyer, 480-619-1010.
3. 3-UP-2025 (Terawatt)
Request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit for Vehicle Storage (EV charging) on a 
+/- 0.72-acre site with Highway Commercial Downtown Overlay (C-3 DO) zoning. Staff 
contact person is Casey Steinke, 480-312-2611. Applicant contact person is Michele 
Hammond, 480-385-2727.
Item No. 3; Moved to Regular Agenda. Commissioner Joyner made a motion for recommendation of 
approval to City Council for case 3-UP-2025 after finding that the CUP criteria have been met and that 
the proposed Conditional Use Permit is consistent and conforms with the adopted General Plan, per 
the attached stipulations. Second by Commissioner Ertel, the motion passed by a vote of six (6) to 
(1) with Commissioner Gonzales dissenting.
4. 9-UP-2025 (Super Star Car Wash CUP)
Request by applicant for a Conditional Use Permit for an automated car wash on a 1.52 
acre parcel located at 8980 E Shea Boulevard with existing Central Business (C-2) zoning. 
Staff contact person is Jason Katz, 480-312-2542. Applicant contact person is 
Madison Leake, (602) 234-8791.
Items No. 2 & 4; Vice Chair Scarbrough made a motion for recommendation of approval to City 
Council for cases 2-AB-2025 and 9-UP-2025 after finding that the CUP criteria have been met and that 
the proposed Conditional Use Permit and abandonment are consistent and conform with the adopted 
General Plan, per the attached stipulations. Second by Commissioner Joyner, the motion passed 
unanimously by a vote of seven (7) to zero (0).
Reguiar Abenda
5. 20-ZN-2002#5 (One Scottsdale)
Request by owner for a zoning district map amendment to the existing Planning 
Community District (P-C) with comparable Planned Regional Center (PRC) zoning for the 
purpose of amending Use Regulations, including amendments to the One Scottsdale 
Amended Development Standards (Density), and Development Plan and Land Use 
Budget for a mixed-use development, including residential, commercial, and hotel, all on a 
+/- 27-acre portion of +/-130-acre site located at 19601 N. Scottsdale Road, 19190 N.
72nd Way, and 19194 N. 73rd Way. The proposed changes include adding 350
* Note: These are summary action minutes only. A complete copy of the meeting audio is available on the 
Planning Commission page on ScottsdaleAZ.gov, search “Planning Commission”

Planning Commission 
Regular Meeting Minutes 
May 13, 2026 
Page 3 of 3
residential units and reducing commercial area by 1,372,145 million square feet. Staff 
contact person is Meredith Tessier, 480-312-4211. Applicant contact person is Kurt 
Jones, 602-452-2729.
Item No. 5; Commissioner Joyner made a motion for recommendation of approval to City Council for 
case 20-ZN-2002#5 after finding that the Planned Community Development criteria have been met 
and determine that the proposed zoning district map amendment and development plan are 
consistent and conform with the adopted General Plan. Second by Commissioner Ertel, the motion 
passed unanimously by a vote of seven (7) to zero (0).
ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to discuss, the regular session of the Planning Commission 
adjourned at 6:08 p.m.
* Note: These are summary action minutes only. A complete copy of the meeting audio is available on the 
Planning Commission page on ScottsdaleAZ.gov, search “Planning Commission"