FY24 BUDGET PRESENTATION CONSTABLES JAN23 2023 (002).PPTX

Maricopa County — Informal (2023-01-23)

View PDF Item 3 Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 4113 characters
Maricopa County Constables
FY 24 Budget Presentation
January 23, 2023
10 AM
Nathan Wallace
Presiding Constable

ABOVE BASELINE REQUEST: $15,261
•
Restore Funding for Deputy Constable Warrants
•
Inactivate Administrative Clerk Warrants
•
Permanently Fund Warrants Program

Deputy Constable Warrants: Restore Position
Administrative Clerk Warrants: Inactivate Position
 
 
Request: Fund PCN 67708 Deputy Constable Warrants at 
$25.50/hr.
Inactivate PCN 67711 Administrative Clerk Warrants 
at $19.40/hr.
Purpose: To increase collections of justice court warrant fees 
through reestablishing second warrants deputy for the 
northwestern part of county; to consolidate warrants clerks’ 
duties into one position after trial period has shown as a 
feasible and efficient plan.

Above Baseline 
Request: $15,261
Above Baseline Request FY24
 
 
Position
Annual Salary
Variable Benefits 
Fixed Benefits
Total
PCN 67708
 $           53.244.00  $              10,553.00 
 $         13,632.00 
 $  77,429.00 
PCN 67711
 $           (40,507.00) $              (8,029.00)
 $        (13,632.00)
 $(62,168.00)
 
 
 
TOTAL $  15,261.00

CONSTABLE WARRANT DIVISION – MAKE 
PERMANENT PROGRAM
Request:
Make Constable Warrant Division a permanent 
program within the Constables Department. 
Make all positions in division regular employees, no 
longer contract employees. 
No additional funding is requested.
Purpose: To institutionalize a program that has demonstrated 
consistent successful collection of fines/fees for over ten years. To 
change employee status from contract to regular employee to 
eliminate end of fiscal year push to use vacation before it is lost.

BRIEF HISTORY 
§ 2009 – Maricopa County Justice Courts had over $92 million in outstanding fines owed by 
defendants who had been sentenced in civil, criminal, and criminal traffic cases. At the time, two 
systems were in place to collect unpaid fines; the first referred the fines to a collection agency and 
the other seized tax refunds from defendants. Both of these systems did little to dent the large 
amount of outstanding fines, so the justice courts would issue a Failure to Pay (FTP) warrant to 
defendants who failed to pay their fines. The fear of being arrested or jailed was sometimes enough 
to prompt defendants to pay their fines. However, because there was no law enforcement agency to 
serve these warrants, these fines would often continue to be unpaid.
HISTORY OF THE CONSTABLE WARRANT DIVISION

Page 2 of 3:
§ 2010 – Constables initiated a pilot program to determine if they could collect a significant amount 
of revenue for the justice courts by serving Failure to Pay warrants. After six months, the pilot 
program proved successful bringing in $69,770.56 from just three initial courts. 
§ 2010 –$200,000 awarded to form the Constable Warrant Division (CWD). This funded the hiring 
of two warrant deputies and two warrant clerks, the purchase of a vehicle for the deputies, and the 
setup of two work areas in existing office space within the Northwest Regional and San Tan 
Regional Justice Courts. 
HISTORY OF THE CONSTABLE WARRANT DIVISION

Page 3 of 3: Cost of the program remains the same with slight fluctuations in salaries and fuel over time.
HISTORY OF THE CONSTABLE WARRANT DIVISION
Program Expenses
Salaries and Benefits
$211,000
Vehicle/Supplies
$5,000
Training
$1,400
Total
$217,400

REVIEW Calendar 2022
• Total Cases Served/Attempted: 
30,195 –  an increase overall of 7500 (25%) served/attempts.
• Total Orders of Protection Served: 1,062
• Warrant Program:
Revenue Collection Total (2011 to Dec 2022):  $4,011,417
10 courts participating

FY 24 Revenue Projection
Revenue Projection $2,201,116
• Revenue from fees collected in the first half of FY23 have increased 
significantly as anticipated as continuation of trend from last year. 
• This shows an increase of 82% which has shown substantial revenue increases 
since this time last year. 
• Therefore, our revenue projection is accordingly increased with expectation 
for revenue to, at minimum, remain around the same as it is currently.

Thank You!
Questions?