Regular Meeting of February 25, 2021

City of Chandler — Regular Meeting (2021-03-22)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 144748 characters
CITY OF CHANDLER COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 
Regular Meeting 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 
OF CHANDLER, ARIZONA, held in the City of Chandler Council Chambers, 88 E. Chicago St., Chandler, 
Arizona, on Thursday, February 25, 2021. 
 
THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER BY MAYOR KEVIN HARTKE AT 6:00 P.M. 
 
The following members answered roll call:  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Kevin Hartke  
 
Mayor 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mark Stewart  
 
Vice Mayor 
René Lopez 
 
 
Councilmember 
OD Harris 
 
 
Councilmember 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Christine Ellis  
 
Councilmember 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Terry Roe 
 
 
Councilmember 
Matt Orlando  
 
Councilmember    
 
Also in attendance: 
 
 
 
Marsha Reed           
 
City Manager 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Joshua Wright  
 
Assistant City Manager 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debra Stapleton 
 
Assistant City Manager 
Kelly Schwab  
 
City Attorney 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dana DeLong  
 
City Clerk 
 
INVOCATION:  The invocation was given by Pastor Mark Rossington, Epiphany Lutheran Church. 
 
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Councilmember Ellis led the Pledge of Allegiance. 
 
BRIEFING: 
 
1. 
Citizen Bond Exploratory Committee Executive Summary by Chairman Boyd Dunn 
 
BOYD DUNN, Citizen Bond Exploratory Committee Chairman, presented the following Power Point 
presentation.  
 
• 
Citizen Bond Exploratory Committee Update 
• 
Citizen Bond Exploratory Committee 
o Boyd Dunn, Chair, Finance Subcommittee 
o Trinity Donovan, Public Safety Subcommittee 
o Mark Gildersleeve, IT Subcommittee 
o Ron Hardin, Public Works Subcommittee 
o Ted Huntington, Parks Subcommittee

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 2 of 47 
 
o Nina Mullins, Facilities Subcommittee 
o David Sperling, Airport Subcommittee  
• 
Citizen Bond Exploratory Committee Timeline 
o August 20, 2020 Citizen Bond Exploratory Committee Kick-Off Meeting 
▪ 
All 49 Committee members came together to hear from Mayor Kevin Hartke and Committee 
Chair, Boyd Dunn, on the purpose of the Committee 
o September 1, 2020 First Steering Committee Meeting 
o September 8, 2020 All Subcommittees began meeting this week 
o October 2020 Subcommittee members received tours of City facilities and learn about needed 
projects 
o November 5, 2020 Citizen bond Exploratory Committee Chair, Boyd Dunn, provided an update to 
the City Council on the Subcommittees progress 
o November 2020 Subcommittees began prioritizing projects needed in a potential bond election 
o December 15, 2020 Subcommittees finalized project priorities and submitted a final ranking sheet to 
Finance Subcommittee 
o December 2020 Finance Subcommittee evaluated financial options based on subcommittee 
recommendations 
o January 15, 2021 Steering Committee unanimously approved projects to be considered for a bond 
election 
o January 28, 2021 Citizen Bond Exploratory Committee Chair Boyd Dunn provided update to City 
Council on the Subcommittee’s progress 
o January 29, 2021 Steering Committee voted to approve the ballot question language 
o February 12, 2021 Steering Committee voted to approve Citizen bond Exploratory Committee 
Executive Report 
o February 25, 2021 Citizen Bond Exploratory Committee Executive Summary presented to the City 
Council by Chair, Boyd Dunn 
o March 1, 2021 Citizen bond Exploratory Committee Close out meeting  
• 
Public Communication  
o CAPA launched public information campaign in November 
o New section on City’s website created to be hub for all information chandleraz.gov/bondelection 
o Social Media posts and articles released in November 
o Additional information will be released following approval of Executive Summary 
• 
City of Chandler Bond History 
o 2000 Election 
o 2004 Election  
o 2007 Election 
• 
City of Chandler Bond History 
o Valley Bond Elections Since 2000 
• 
Committee Recommendation 
o Parks $72,985,000 
o Police $55,190,000 
o Fire $25,160,000 
o Facilities $33,570,000 
o Streets $85,780,000 
• 
Committee Recommendation 
o Received and evaluated 80 possible bond projects totaling $851,973,600 
o Subcommittees prioritized projects using “A” or “B” list as short and long term needs

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 3 of 47 
 
o Subcommittee members had opportunities to add projects they felt were important to the 
community 
o Recommendation includes 52 projects totally $403,747,000 
o New Authorization needed is $272,685,000 
o Recommendation does not increase primary or secondary property tax rates 
• 
Parks Subcommittee 
o Maintain existing City parks 
o Complete construction on regional parks 
o Higher priority for AJ Chandler park renovation 
o Completion of Mesquite Groves Regional Park 
o Folley Park Renovation  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked if the authorization from previous bond elections expire with this new 
authorization. 
 
DAWN LANG, Management Services Director, said it does not expire. 
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked if the prior authorization is included in this equation.  
 
MS. LANG said yes, the delta is what is being requested for this election.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked if there were a list of items that did not make the final list.  
 
MR. DUNN said he would provide more information regarding the information that did not make the list.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked if there sustainability and environmental concerns for some of the parks.  
 
MR. DUNN said the Subcommittee felt it was important that the parks needed to be sustainable.  
 
MS. LANG said environmental concerns are always reviewed for any project. Ms. Lang said the project lists also 
identify if the funding would come from the bond or are recommended to be paid from another funding 
source or bond election at a later time.  
 
MAYOR HARTKE asked if all projects are listed in the Executive Summary.  
 
MARSHA REED, City Manager, said yes.  
 
MR. DUNN continued the Power Point presentation.  
 
• 
Parks Subcommittee 
o Library Projects 
▪ 
The Subcommittee is recommending no additional authorization in this category 
• 
Public Safety – Fire Subcommittee 
o Subcommittee toured Fire Stations 282 and 281, Public Safety Training Center, and several response 
vehicles 
o Rebuild Fire Station 282 on existing footprint 
o Rebuild Fire Station 284 vs. renovation due to ongoing maintenance costs 
• 
Public Safety – Police Subcommittee

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 4 of 47 
 
o Subcommittee toured Public Safety Training Center, Police Main Station, and several response 
vehicles 
o New Forensic Services facility to allow for new specialties to be developed 
o Expansion of Communication and Investigations Bureau into existing Forensic Section Space 
• 
Facilities Subcommittee 
o Subcommittee worked off a recent facility assessment of 47 City facilities 
o Discussion centered around facilities with the greatest needs 
o Top 7 facilities needing improvements were included as the highest recommendation 
o Extend useful life of City facilities  
o Balanced approach: bond funded vs. cash funded  
 
VICE MAYOR STEWART said there was discussion about potentially downsizing some facilities as positions work 
remotely. Vice Mayor Stewart asked if that was factored into this.  
 
MS. REED said the space utilization study is currently undergoing the RFP process and would come to Council 
for the consultant to begin looking at that. Ms. Reed said the facilities that were focused on were facilities that 
would need to stay such as the Center for the Arts. Ms. Reed said there is some flexibility depending on how 
the space utilization study comes out.  
 
MR. DUNN continued the Power Point presentation.  
• 
Public Works Subcommittee 
o Subcommittee used projects in current CIP as part of recommendation 
o Then focused on Transit, Active Transit, and Streets projects from recent Transportation Master Plan 
that are not included to the CIP 
o Finance Subcommittee evaluated financial options based on the Operations and Maintenance of the 
new projects  
o Balanced approach: bond funded vs. cash funded  
• 
Public Works Subcommittee Continued 
o Expansion of arterial streets 
o Reconstruction to increase capacity of intersection and improve safety 
o Complete collector streets where there is no developer participation anticipated 
• 
Public Works Subcommittee 
o Reduce flood risk in downtown  
o Other miscellaneous improvements 
o Stormwater Projects 
▪ 
The Subcommittee is recommending no additional authorization in this category  
• 
Public Works Subcommittee 
o Capital needs are funded by issuing bonds 
o Debt is spread to the rate payers over time which allow current and future users to pay for the 
systems 
o Revenue Obligation and Excise Tax Revenue Obligation (ETRO) bonds are an alternate financing tool 
that do not require voter approval 
o Chandler has used ETROs over the last few years to fund utility projects 
o Recommendation is to use Revenue bonds or ETROs for utility projects  
• 
Information Technology Subcommittee 
o Subcommittee focused on a single project 
o Recently completed Fiver Assessment was the main discussion topic

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 5 of 47 
 
o Finance Subcommittee evaluated financial options before recommending to shift entire fiber project 
to cash funding  
o Cash was freed up from moving the Fire Station 282 rebuild from cash funded to bond funded 
• 
Airport Subcommittee 
o Subcommittee unanimously stated that the Cooper Road collector improvement was the highest 
priority  
o Cooper Road project to be included with Public Works bond package with Airport Subcommittees 
full support 
o Timing to recommend a bond project to extend Runway 4R-22L was premature 
o Subcommittee recommends additional analysis, economic impact studies to be completed prior to 
bond question for runway extension 
• 
Financial Considerations 
o City of Chandler maintains AAA bond rating 
o Correlates to lower taxes and utility rates for residents 
o Future capital/infrastructure needs exceed remaining bond authorization 
o Committee followed Council guidelines 
▪ 
Minimize increase in property taxes 
▪ 
Maintain existing infrastructure 
▪ 
Finish planned construction of streets and parks 
▪ 
Limit new projects adding ongoing O&M 
▪ 
Address public needs 
• 
Financial Considerations 
o Secondary Tax rate levy pays the principle and interest on GO bonds 
o To achieve a no tax rate increase it requires a balance between assessed values and tax rates 
o City has been very careful to not construct new facilities or projects without dedicated ongoing 
revenues to maintain them 
o Chart shows impact of bong projects to the ongoing O&M 
o Middle dark blue line is recommendation from Steering Committee 
o Option will not increase property tax rates based on current projections 
• 
Financial Considerations 
o Ongoing revenues must be available for capital O&M increases 
o Level of ongoing O&M available was determined by including other anticipated operational needs 
o Chart reflects why certain projects were removed from final recommendation due to the increase of 
property tax rates they would cause 
• 
Recommended Ballot Questions 
o Question 1  
o Purpose: Municipal Facilities Bonds 
o Amount: $33,570,000 
o Shall the Mayor and Council of the City of Chandler, Arizona, be authorized to issue and sell the 
following bonds of the City: 
o Purposes: To construct, improve, renovate, replace and remodel municipal buildings and critical 
infrastructure related thereto; to furnish and equip such facilities and improve the grounds thereof. 
o Payment of Bonds: Each series of these bonds will be issued at the option of the Mayor and Council 
as general obligation bonds of the City pursuant to Title 35, Chapter 3, Article 3, Arizona Revised 
Statutes, payable from the levy of an ad valorem tax against the taxable property located within the 
City and the issuance of these bonds will result in a property tax increase sufficient to pay the 
annual debt service of the bonds, unless the Mayor and Council provide for payment from other 
sources.

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 6 of 47 
 
• 
Recommended Ballot Questions 
o Question 2  
o Purpose: Park And Recreation Improvements/Community Services Bonds 
o Amount: $72,985,000 
o Shall the Mayor and Council of the City of Chandler, Arizona, be authorized to issue and sell the 
following bonds of the City: 
o Purposes: To construct, improve and acquire community, neighborhood, regional and aquatic parks, 
including recreational facilities, buildings and improvements; to acquire land for parks, recreational 
facilities, buildings and open spaces; to make improvements, additions and replacements to existing 
parks and recreational facilities and buildings; to landscape, furnish and equip existing and new 
parks and recreational facilities and buildings. 
o Payment of Bonds: Each series of these bonds will be issued at the option of the Mayor and Council 
as general obligation bonds of the City pursuant to Title 35, Chapter 3, Article 3, Arizona Revised 
Statutes, payable from the levy of an ad valorem tax against the taxable property located within the 
City, and the issuance of these bonds will result in a property tax increase sufficient to pay the 
annual debt service of the bonds, unless the Mayor and Council provide for payment from other 
sources. 
• 
Recommended Ballot Questions 
o Question 3  
o Purpose: Public Safety/Fire Bonds 
o Amount: $25,160,000 
o Shall the Mayor and Council of the City of Chandler, Arizona, be authorized to issue and sell the 
following bonds of the City: 
o Purposes: To construct, improve, renovate and remodel fire stations and other fire safety related 
facilities; to furnish, equip and improve fire stations, fire safety related facilities and radio 
infrastructure; and to acquire vehicles and land for fire and public safety purposes. 
o Payment of Bonds: Each series of these bonds will be issued at the option of the Mayor and Council 
as general obligation bonds of the City pursuant to Title 35, Chapter 3, Article 3, Arizona Revised 
Statutes, payable from the levy of an ad valorem tax against the taxable property located within the 
City, and the issuance of these bonds will result in a property tax increase sufficient to pay the 
annual debt service of the bonds, unless the Mayor and Council provide for payment from other 
sources. 
• 
Recommended Ballot Questions 
o Question 4 
o  Purpose: Public Safety/Police Bonds 
o Amount: $55,190,000 
o Shall the Mayor and Council of the City of Chandler, Arizona, be authorized to issue and sell the 
following bonds of the City: 
o Purposes: To construct, improve, renovate and remodel police stations and other police related 
facilities; to furnish, equip and improve police stations, police related facilities and radio 
infrastructure; and to acquire vehicles and land for police and public safety purposes. 
o Payment of Bonds: Each series of these bonds will be issued at the option of the Mayor and Council 
as general obligation bonds of the City pursuant to Title 35, Chapter 3, Article 3, Arizona Revised 
Statutes, payable from the levy of an ad valorem tax against the taxable property located within the 
City, and the issuance of these bonds will result in a property tax increase sufficient to pay the 
annual debt service of the bonds, unless the Mayor and Council provide for payment from other 
sources. 
• 
Recommended Ballot Questions

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 7 of 47 
 
o Question 5 
o Purpose: Public Works And Street And Transit Improvements Bonds 
o Amount: $85,780,000 
o Shall the Mayor and Council of the City of Chandler, Arizona, be authorized to issue and sell the 
following bonds of the City: 
o Purposes: To design, acquire, improve, construct, reconstruct and rehabilitate the streets, avenues, 
alleys and highways of or within the City; to design, acquire, install, construct and reconstruct street 
lighting, traffic signal control systems, underground utility lines, landscape improvements and 
transit bicycle program improvements, including shared use paths and trails; to acquire land and 
interests in [and for transportation purposes. 
o Payment of Bonds: Each series of these bonds will be issued at the option of the Mayor and Council 
as general obligation bonds of the City pursuant to Title 35, Chapter 3, Article 3, Arizona Revised 
Statutes, payable from the levy of an ad valorem tax against the taxable property located within the 
City, and the issuance of these bonds will result in a property tax increase sufficient to pay the 
annual debt service of the bonds, unless the Mayor and Council provide for payment from other 
sources. 
• 
Next Steps 
o February 25, 2021 Bond Steering Committee recommendations report finalized. Briefing to City 
Council by Steering Committee Chair at Work Session 
o February 25 - April 30, 2021 City Council discussion of recommendations 
o May 27, 2021 By resolution the City Council Calls for an Election and approves ballot language 
o June 18, 2021 Ballot language submitted to Maricopa County 
o August 4, 2021 Arguments Pro/Con filed with City Clerk 
o September 20, 2021 Sample Ballot/Informational Pamphlet mailed to voters before election 
o October 4, 2021 Last day for voters to register for election 
o October 6, 2021 First day to mail out ballot 
o November 2, 2021 Election Day 
o November 22, 2021 Deadline for City Council to canvas the election 
 
MAYOR HARTKE thanked everyone who served on the Bond Committee. Mayor Hartke said in the future 
Council would be able to have another bond election if needs or finances change. Mayor Hartke said this would 
not raise the tax rate and most would be paid from the secondary tax rate. Mayor Hartke said the fiscal policies 
have served the City well.  
 
MS. LANG said they have taken into account all of the expenditures and what funds would be available for 
capital improvements.  
 
MR. DUNN said on March 1 there would be a reception with the Bond Committee and Subcommittee 
members. Mr. Dunn said they have about 80 projects and they were able to find ways to keep the projects 
within the authorization and keep the tax rate the same.  
 
VICE MAYOR STEWART thanked everyone who served. Vice Mayor Stewart asked if there would be more 
language added to the ballot or if that was final.  
 
MR. DUNN said this was suggested language that would be approved by the Council. Mr. Dunn said the bond 
counsel would discuss why this language is best for the legal requirements and still allow Council flexibility.

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 8 of 47 
 
VICE MAYOR STEWART asked if taxpayers would be able to see how much they would save by not passing this. 
Holding rates the same is great from a percentage perspective, but the housing prices are increasing.  
 
MS. REED said the Mayor would like to have a future work session with Council along with the bond counsel.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ROE thanked everyone who served on the Committee. Councilmember Roe said he has 
heard frustrations about items moving forward in the community and this is the process for getting those items 
done. Councilmember Roe said future Councils will continue to move forward. 
 
MR. DUNN said the City has great staff to provide information and work with the Committee.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO thanked everyone who served on the Committee and for the work they have 
done. Councilmember Orlando said local government is the last trusted entity in his mind. For this process the 
residents, staff, and Council were involved. This sends a positive message to the community that we have done 
our research and have the amenities and infrastructure the community wants to see.  
 
MR. DUNN said at a local level people have trust in the government and work to improve their City.  
 
CONSENT AGENDA – DISCUSSION 
None. 
CONSENT AGENDA – MOTION AND VOTE 
 
COUNCILMEMBER LOPEZ MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA OF THE FEBRUARY 25, 2021, CITY 
COUNCIL MEETING; SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ELLIS.  
 
MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY (7-0). 
 
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS  
 
1. 
February 2021 Council Minutes  
Move to approve the Council meeting minutes of the Study Session and Special Meeting of February 8, 
2021, and the Work Session and Regular Meeting of February 11, 2021. 
 
2. 
Professional Services Agreement with Gavan & Barker, Inc., for the Snedigar Sportsplex West Restroom 
Replacement project Design Services.  
Move City Council award Professional Services Agreement No. PR2102.201 to Gavan & Barker, Inc., for 
the Snedigar Sportsplex West Restroom Replacement project Design Services, in an amount not to 
exceed $36,690.07. 
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
Snedigar Sportsplex is a 91-acre recreation facility located at 4500 S. Basha Road, in the square mile 
bordered by Alma School Road, Arizona Avenue, Ocotillo Road and Chandler Heights Road. The original 
sports complex was constructed on 30 acres in 1991 and has since been expanded with new amenities 
added to keep pace with the needs for recreational sport fields and facilities. Key park amenities include 
baseball, soccer and softball fields, bike park, dog park, open turf area, playgrounds, shade ramadas, 
restroom buildings and shade structures. A single pair of restrooms in the ballfield area of the 
Sportsplex is not adequate for youth league teams, however, and there is a need for additional 
restrooms to meet user demand.

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 9 of 47 
 
 
The existing two restrooms, located in a single building measuring approximately 22 feet by 27 feet in 
the ballfield complex, will be removed and new restrooms constructed at the same location, along with 
associated utility connections and sidewalk reconstruction to ensure accessibility in the general vicinity 
of the new restroom building. The new restrooms include 8 individual unisex stalls and 2 individual 
unisex accessible stalls. Each stall will have a toilet, sink, and hand dryer. The building will also include a 
maintenance area and exterior drinking fountains.  This project also includes new lighted ramadas at the 
existing storage/overlook building as well as soil stabilizing of areas adjacent to the main walkway 
through the ballfields. 
 
The project scope of work consists of architectural design services, civil engineering, electrical 
engineering, data collection, site plans, demolition plans, and ramada plan, as well as restroom plans, 
technical specifications, estimates, construction documents, permitting, development of construction 
documents and bidding assistance. The contract completion time is 225 calendar days following Notice 
to Proceed. 
 
3. 
Final Adoption of Ordinance No. 4962, ANX20-0002, Annexation and Initial City Zoning - South of the 
Southwest Corner of Gilbert and Ocotillo Roads  
Move City Council adopt Ordinance No. 4962 approving ANX20-0002, Annexation and Initial City 
Zoning - South of the Southwest Corner of Gilbert and Ocotillo roads, as recommended by Planning 
staff. 
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
Located south of the southwest corner of Gilbert and Ocotillo roads. Zoned Rural-43 (RU-43) within 
Maricopa County. Approximately 1.71 acres. Council Public Hearing held on October 15, 2020. A Final 
Adoption of the Ordinance for rezoning is on this City Council Agenda. Ordinance introduced and 
tentatively adopted on February 11, 2021. 
 
Surrounding Land Use Data: 
North 
Unincorporated 
Maricopa 
County 
(Arizona Olympian Gymnastics) 
South 
Commercial (Dollar Self storage) 
East 
Gilbert Road, then new CUSD high school 
(under construction) 
West 
Canal, then City of Chandler water 
reclamation facilities 
 
General Plan and Area Plan Designations: 
 
Existing 
Proposed 
General Plan 
Neighborhoods 
 
 
No change 
Southeast Chandler Area Plan 
Envisioned Community/Regional Open 
Space and Recreational Opportunities 
Traditional Suburban 
Character 
 
 
Utility Service 
Existing municipal water service, wastewater service, and reclaimed water are available in Gilbert Road. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4. 
Final Adoption of Ordinance No. 4960, PLH20-0034 Chandler La Paglia High School Seminary and 
Professional Offices

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 10 of 47 
 
Move City Council adopt Ordinance No. 4960 approving PLH20-0034, La Paglia High School Seminary 
and Professional Offices, Rezoning from Agricultural District (AG-1) to Planned Area Development (PAD) 
for professional offices and institutional/educational uses located south of the southwest corner of 
Gilbert and Ocotillo roads, subject to the conditions as recommended by Planning and Zoning 
Commission. 
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
Site is approximately 1.7 net acres. Annexation public hearing held on October 15, 2020. Final adoption 
of the Annexation ordinance is concurrently scheduled for this Council Agenda. Site is currently vacant. 
Ordinance introduced and tentatively adopted on February 11, 2021. 
 
North 
Commercial (Unincorporated - Arizona 
Olympian Gymnastics) 
 
South 
Commercial (Dollar Self Storage) 
East 
Gilbert Rd. then new Chandler Unified 
School District high school 
 
West 
RWCD Canal 
 
General Plan and Area Plan Designations: 
 
Existing 
Proposed 
General Plan 
Neighborhoods 
 
 
No change 
Southeast Chandler Area Plan 
Envisioned Community/Regional Open 
Space and Recreational Opportunities 
Traditional Suburban 
Character 
 
 
Proposed Development 
Seminary 
 
 
Building Area  
3,681 sq. ft. (+ 1,329 sq. ft. future expansion) Total of 5,010 sq. ft. 
Building Height (max.) 
22 ft. 
Parking Required 
 
25 spaces total (includes future expansion) 
Parking Provided 
 
27 spaces total 
 
 
Future commercial 
offices/medical offices 
 
Building Area  
6,336 sq. ft. 
Building Height (max.) 
30 ft. 
Parking Required 
 
43 additional spaces (1 space per 150 sq. ft.) 
Parking Provided 
 
70 total shared spaces 
 
Review and Recommendation 
Planning staff finds the proposal is consistent with the General Plan designation of Neighborhoods and 
the amendment to the Southeast Chandler Area Plan (SECAP).  The Envisioned Community/Regional 
Open Space and Recreational Opportunities land use designation was identified at a time when the City 
owned property along the RWCD canal; however, the City property was sold and a regional open space 
and recreational area is no longer planned.  A Traditional Suburban Character land use allows single 
story buildings along arterial streets, including for commercial and institutional/educational 
developments.

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 11 of 47 
 
The request for rezoning to PAD provides for a limited list of permitted land uses which include the 
seminary (institutional/educational), general office, professional office, which generate low-traffic 
including but not limited to insurance, counseling, assisted living, real estate and title companies. 
Prohibited uses include medical and dental offices, retail of any kind, call centers, cleaners, barbers, 
personal services, animal boarding and similar businesses. The site layout and building architecture is in 
conformance with the SECAP design guidelines for commercial/non-residential land uses. Architectural 
design of the future professional office building requires a new PDP application to evaluate building 
architecture. Signage for the future phase may require a PDP if the development prefers to modify the 
requirements of the Sign Code for PAD zoned properties. The seminary proposes one wall-mounted 
sign. Staff finds the proposal to be consistent with the goals of the General Plan and the SECAP, as 
amended, and recommends approval subject to conditions. 
 
Traffic Analysis 
Gilbert Road is currently undergoing improvements from Ocotillo to Chandler Heights roads. 
Improvements consist of re-striping, narrowing medians to allow for three lanes in the northbound and 
southbound direction, and modifications to the medians for turning movements.  Traffic signals are 
proposed at two locations including the intersections of Gilbert and Brooks Farm road and the 
alignment of the existing driveway of the Olympian Gymnastics with the new entrance to the new high 
school. Pedestrian crossings will be designated at both traffic signals. The applicant states that the 
students will be transported by shuttle between the new high school and the new seminary.  
 
Public / Neighborhood Notification 
This request was noticed in accordance with the requirements of the Chandler Zoning Code. A 
Neighborhood Meeting sign was posted on the property. A virtual neighborhood meeting was held on 
December 3, 2020. Three residents attended virtually to obtain project information. No questions were 
asked. No opposition to request was stated. An attendee commented the project is a nice fit. As of 
writing this memo, Planning staff is not aware of opposition to the request. 
 
Planning and Zoning Commission Vote Report 
Planning and Zoning Commission meeting January 20, 2021. 
Motion to Approve. 
In Favor:  7     Opposed: 0 
 
Commission discussed the proposed permitted land uses and recommended that medical and dental 
office uses be prohibited uses due to traffic and circulation patterns both on site and off site. 
Stipulations No. 2 and No. 3 are revised to address Commission's direction. 
 
Recommended Conditions of Approval 
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends the City Council approve rezoning from Agricultural 
District (AG-1) to PAD for professional offices and institutional/educational uses, subject to the 
following conditions: 
1. Development shall be in substantial conformance with the Development Booklet, entitled "Chandler 
La Paglia High School Seminary and Professional Offices" and kept on file in the City of Chandler 
Planning Division, in File No. PLH20-0034, modified by such conditions included at the time the 
Booklet was approved by the Chandler City Council and/or as thereafter amended, modified or 
supplemented by the Chandler City Council. 
2. The following uses shall be permitted: 
3. Institutional uses including church, seminary, nursing home, and educational entity.

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 12 of 47 
 
4. Commercial Office uses including general office, professional office, insurance, counseling, real 
estate and title companies.  
5. Other similar institutional and/or office uses not listed here may be permitted upon determination 
by the Planning Administrator that it will not generate a greater or more intense traffic impact on 
the area. 
6. The following uses shall be prohibited: medical and dental offices, retail, call centers, dry cleaners, 
personal services (e.g., barber, nail and beauty salons, tattoo, day spa), animal daycare and 
boarding, bakery, bars, drive-through and restaurants. 
7. Completion of the construction of all required off-site street improvements including but not 
limited to paving, landscaping, curb, gutter and sidewalks, median improvements and street lighting 
to achieve conformance with City codes, standard details, and design manuals. 
8. Right-of-way dedications to achieve full half-widths, including turn lanes and deceleration lanes, per 
the standards of the Chandler Transportation Plan. 
9. Prior to the time of making any lot reservations or subsequent sales agreements, the 
subdivider/homebuilder/lot developer shall provide a written disclosure statement, for the signature 
of each buyer, acknowledging that the subdivision is located adjacent to or nearby a City of 
Chandler water facility/recharge ponds that may cause adverse noise, odors, and other externalities. 
The "Public Subdivision Report", "Purchase Contracts", CC&R's, and the individual lot property 
deeds shall include a disclosure statement outlining that the site is adjacent to or nearby a 
wastewater treatment facility, and the disclosure shall state that such uses are legal and should be 
expected to continue indefinitely. The disclosure shall be presented to prospective homebuyers on a 
separate, single form for them to read and sign prior to or simultaneously with executing a purchase 
agreement.  This responsibility for notice rests with the homebuilder/lot developer and shall not be 
construed as an absolute guarantee by the City of Chandler for receiving such notice. 
 
5. 
Introduction of Ordinance No. 4961, PLH20-0023, PLT20-0037 Pecos and McQueen Retail (Staff 
Requests Continuance to the March 25, 2021, City Council Meeting)  
Move City Council continue PLH20-0023 Pecos and McQueen Retail, located at the southwest corner of 
Pecos and McQueen roads, to the March 25, 2021, City Council meeting, as recommended by Planning 
and Zoning Commission. 
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
At the January 20, 2021, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, Commission continued the case to 
their Februrary 17, 2021, meeting for the purpose of holding a Design Review Committee meeting to 
address concerns regarding the proposed drive-through pads and site plan layout. On February 3, 2021, 
the Design Review Committee was held and provided design direction to the applicant.  
 
6. 
Resolution No. 5439, authorizing a Development Agreement with Valley Christian Schools for the 
Installation of Roadway and Traffic Improvements 
Resolution No. 5440, authorizing a Deactivation Agreement with Salt River Valley Water User's 
Association for Removal of an Irrigation Structure  
Development Agreement 
Move City Council approve Resolution No. 5439, authorizing a Development Agreement between the 
City of Chandler and Valley Christian Schools, an Arizona Non-profit Corporation, for the installation of 
roadway and traffic improvements at the intersection of North 56th Street and West Galveston Street, 
and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute other documents as needed to give effect to 
the agreement. 
Deactivation Agreement

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 13 of 47 
 
Move City Council approve Resolution No. 5440, authorizing a Deactivation Agreement between the 
City of Chandler and Salt River Valley Water User's Association, an Arizona Corporation, for the removal 
of an irrigation delivery structure to accommodate roadway and traffic improvements at the intersection 
of North 56th Street and West Galveston Street, and authorizing the City Manager or designee to 
execute other documents as needed to give effect to the agreement. 
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
Valley Christian Schools (VCS) owns multiple parcels of land in the area of North 56th Street and West 
Galveston Street, depicted in the attached vicinity map.  The existing campus is located at the northeast 
corner of this intersection.   An expansion of the property was authorized in 2010 when the City Council 
rezoned a portion of the campus from Planned Area Development (PAD) to PAD amended.   The 
rezoning ordinance contained provisions for phasing the campus expansion.  Phase one included 
construction of a temporary softball field south of Galveston Street and a new, two-story classroom 
building with occupancy limited to the first floor.  Phase one has been completed.    
 
VCS is now ready to proceed with phase two, which necessitates several off-site improvements.  These 
improvements include a deceleration lane on northbound 56th Street and the installation of a traffic 
signal at the intersection of North 56th Street and West Galveston Street.  The deceleration lane 
construction requires that an existing Salt River Valley Water User's Association (SRP) irrigation structure 
on the shoulder of North 56th Street be deactivated, removed, and replaced with a concrete manhole 
structure.   VCS is required to pay for and complete all off-site construction costs, including deactivation 
of the SRP structure, prior to proceeding with the next phase of the campus expansion.  SRP is requiring 
the City of Chandler be obligated to re-activate the irrigation structure in the unlikely event that it is 
needed in the future to service its shareholders in this area.  The City would be reimbursed by VCS for 
the costs associated with re-activating the structure, should it ever be required.  A separate irrigation 
structure deactivation agreement with SRP has been prepared for Council consideration, which is 
included in this agenda item.  
 
The Development Agreement between the City of Chandler and VCS contains the following key 
provisions: 
VCS will construct all required off-site improvements, including the deceleration lane on North 56th 
Street, the traffic signal, and the deactivation and removal of the SRP irrigation structure. VCS will be 
eligible for partial reimbursement for the traffic signal costs upon future development of the northwest 
and southwest corners of the intersection of North 56th Street and West Galveston Street. VCS will 
construct a parking lot at the southeast corner of North 56th Street and West Galveston Street. The City 
of Chandler will, subject to Council approval of the separate deactivation agreement, guarantee to 
restore and reactivate the SRP structure and obtain reimbursement from VCS should irrigation ever be 
required in this area in the future. 
 
Upon completion of the above: 
VCS may complete and occupy the second story of their new classroom building. The temporary 
modular classrooms will be removed within 45 days of occupancy of the second story. VCS will submit a 
comprehensive master plan that covers full build-out of the campus. VCS will submit a comprehensive 
traffic study for the full build-out campus master plan. The Planning division will process the VCS 
application for rezoning a portion of the campus. 
 
The Deactivation Agreement between the City of Chandler and SRP contains the following key 
provisions:

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 14 of 47 
 
SRP will abandon its use of the irrigation facility. The City of Chandler, through a separate agreement, 
will cause removal of the facility at VCS's sole expense. If at any time in the future, SRP determines 
irrigation is again needed at this location, the City will provide easements and pay all costs for design 
and construction of a replacement facility. SRP will design, construct, own and operate the replacement 
facility and hold the City harmless for any loss or damage. SRP agrees to comply with all City code 
requirements for all work in the City right of way. 
 
Financial Implications: 
Neither the agreement between the City of Chandler and VCS nor the agreement between the City of 
Chandler and SRP require any immediate capital expenditures by Chandler.  However, by entering into 
the agreement with SRP, Chandler is guaranteeing to pay for re-activation of the irrigation structure on 
North 56th Street, should that ever become necessary in the future.  Per the Development Agreement 
with VCS, however, the City of Chandler would be fully reimbursed by VCS for those expenses. 
 
7. 
Final Plat, PLT20-0024, Ferguson Enterprises MDC  
Move City Council approve Final Plat, PLT20-0024, Ferguson Enterprises MDC, located on the south side 
of Queen Creek Road, east of Hamilton Street, as recommended by Development Services Staff. 
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
Site is a single lot, 50.674 acres in size. Zoned Planned Area Development (PAD), Planned Industrial (I-1). 
The Council approved the zoning for industrial uses on November 7, 2019. The property owner is 
seeking Final Plat approval in order to construct an industrial building. The final plat establishes the 
tract boundaries, and creates the easements and rights of way to be conveyed or dedicated as part of 
developing the site in substantial conformance with Council approved zoning. 
 
8. 
Final Plat, PLT20-0025, Casadia  
Move City Council approve Final Plat, PLT20-0025, Casadia, located on the east side of McQueen Road, 
south of Chandler Heights Road, as recommended by Development Services Staff. 
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
Site is 5.0386 acres in size. Zoned Planned Area Development District (PAD) for residential 
subdivision.13 proposed lots and 3 tracts. The Council approved the rezoning of the property to 
Planned Area Development (PAD) for a single-family residential subdivision on April 20, 2020. The 
current property owner is seeking to subdivide the parcel into 13 residential building lots to be sold and 
owned individually. The final plat creates the lots, tracts, easements and rights of way to be conveyed or 
dedicated as part of developing the site in substantial conformance with the Council-approved 
rezoning. 
 
9. 
Purchase of HVAC Equipment, Installation and Services from TDIndustries, Inc., Johnson Controls, Inc., 
Daikin Applied Americas, Inc., and Trane U.S. Inc.  
Move City Council approve the utilization of Omnia Partners Contracts, No. R200403 with TDIndustries, 
Inc., Contract No.R200402 with Johnson Controls, Inc., Contract No.R200401 with Daikin Applied 
Americas, Inc., and Contract No. 15-JLP-023 with Trane U.S. Inc., for the purchase of HVAC equipment, 
installation and services, in an amount not to exceed $815,000.  
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
The Building and Facilities Division frequently uses outside vendors for repair and maintenance of Heat, 
Ventilation and Cooling (HVAC) equipment. This agreement will provide the City with multiple

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 15 of 47 
 
contractors for scheduled, preventive and emergency HVAC repairs throughout the City.  Building and 
Facilities will use this agreement for emergency repairs, and or replacement of packaged units, chillers, 
boilers and other related HVAC equipment located throughout the City.  This will reduce the premature 
failure of the equipment during peak demand and provide optimum energy efficiency. In addition, 
Public Works & Utilities Department will utilize this agreement for emergency repairs, and or 
replacement of packaged units, chillers, boilers and other related HVAC equipment at various locations 
throughout the Department. 
 
10. 
Agreement No. BF9-910-4013, Amendment No. 1, with Rycon Industries, Inc., dba Skyline Window 
Cleaning for Window Washing Services  
Move City Council approve Agreement No. BF9-910-4013, Amendment No. 1, with Rycon Industries, 
Inc., dba Skyline Window Cleaning, for window washing services, in an amount not to exceed $60,000, 
for a one-year term, February 1, 2021, through January 31, 2022. 
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
Building and Facilities is responsible for the window cleaning and power washing of entry points at City 
buildings.  The City Hall tower windows require specialized equipment and personnel certifications. The 
windows are typically cleaned every three months but can be more frequent depending on the facility, 
use, and environmental conditions. 
 
11. 
Enterprise License Agreement with Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI)  
Move City Council approve Agreement No. 4289 with Environmental Systems Research, Inc. (ESRI) for 
an enterprise license for Geographic Information System (GIS) software in the amount of $480,000 for a 
three-year period beginning March 12, 2021, through March 11, 2024, payable on an annual basis. 
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
The City's Geographic Information System (GIS) is based on ESRI GIS products. The City's GIS allows 
staff, citizens and business partners the ability to view City data in a spatial manner related to its 
physical location within the City. Since 2009, the City has had an Enterprise License Agreement with ESRI 
which allows City departments to deploy GIS software products as needed to support City services. The 
GIS advisory Committee considers each request for additional software installations to determine 
validity and monitors software installed to not adversely affect future costs of the licensing agreement. 
Recently, ESRI changed their pricing model and moved the City of Chandler to a Small Enterprise 
Government Agreement. This change simply moves the City into a different customer category. The City 
will continue to receive the same support and benefits experienced under the prior licensing 
arrangement. 
 
12. 
Agreement with Accelerated Technology Laboratories, Inc., for a Hosted Laboratory Information 
Management System  
Move City Council award Agreement No. IT9-208-4063, to Accelerated Technology Laboratories, Inc., 
for a hosted laboratory information management system, in the amount of $73,799. 
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
The Water Quality Division operates laboratories at three locations. The laboratories perform water 
quality regulatory compliance testing required by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and 
Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ), and process control testing to support water and 
wastewater treatment facilities. With over 6,500 samples received annually, each sample is tested for

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 16 of 47 
 
multiple constituents. Every sample also carries with it numerous Quality Assurance/ Quality Control 
(QA/QC) prerequisite criteria that must be met by the laboratories. 
 
Currently, sample tracking, management of the workflow, QA/QC tasks, testing results, data review, and 
record-keeping are done manually. Once testing is complete, in-house laboratory results are manually 
entered into spreadsheets and the water quality database. This manner of managing the laboratory 
workload is inefficient as well as subject to potential transcription errors, lost information, or 
inaccuracies that could compromise compliance. Implementing a Laboratory Information Management 
System (LIMS) will provide an automated interface with laboratory instruments to streamline entering of 
test results and QA/QC tracking, as well as a searchable sample management system to efficiently track 
the status of laboratory samples, testing, reporting, and sample storage. LIMS will also provide 
operational efficiencies for the Water Quality Division and maintain compliance with State and Federal 
water and wastewater regulations. 
 
13. 
Purchase of VMware Licenses and Annual Support from Dell  
Move City Council approve the purchase of VMware licenses and annual support utilizing the State of 
Arizona Contract No. ADSPO16-098163 with Dell in the amount of $134,366. 
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
The City of Chandler IT Department leverages VMware technologies to create efficiencies in 
infrastructure resources for applications and critical City services. Staff is recommending this purchase 
of additional VMware software to support the Dell/EMC VXrail solution. That solution will be providing 
server and storage resources for Citywide applications such as Lucity, ESRI GIS, MyTimekeeper, Accela, 
etc. This purchase will be co-termed to the existing VMware maintenance and renewed annually. 
 
14. 
License Series 12, Restaurant Liquor License application for Sonas Tavern #1, dba Rosati's Pizza  
Move for recommendation to the State Department of Liquor Licenses and Control for approval of the 
State Liquor Job No. 132127, a Series 12, Restaurant Liquor License, for Amy S. Nations, Agent, Sonas 
Tavern #1 Inc., dba Rosati's Pizza, located at 1050 E. Ray Road, Suite 2, and approval of the City of 
Chandler, Series 12, Restaurant Liquor License No. 300287 L12. 
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
This application for a liquor license was posted for hearing on February 25, 2021. The Police Department 
reports no objections to the issuance of this license, and no written protests pursuant to A.R.S. 4-201(B) 
have been received. With a Series 12, Restaurant Liquor License, the business may sell all liquors for on-
premise consumption only, with a minimum of 40% of the gross receipts from the sale of food. 
 
15. 
License Series 12, Restaurant Liquor License application, for GTC Chandler LLC, dba Good Time Charli's  
Move for recommendation to the State Department of Liquor Licenses and Control for approval of the 
State Liquor Job No. 132752, a Series 12, Restaurant Liquor License, for Raymond F. Sanchez, Agent, 
GTC Chandler LLC, dba Good Time Charli's, located at 6045 W. Chandler Boulevard, Suite 7, and 
approval of the City of Chandler, Series 12, Restaurant Liquor License No. 300408 L12. 
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
This application for a liquor license was posted for hearing on February 25, 2021. The Police Department 
reports no objections to the issuance of this license, and no written protests pursuant to A.R.S. 4-201(B) 
have been received. With a Series 12, Restaurant Liquor License, the business may sell all liquors for on-
premise consumption only, with a minimum of 40% of the gross receipts from the sale of food.

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 17 of 47 
 
 
16. 
New Liquor License Series 6, Bar Liquor License application for Yaashi Sibs Inc., dba 810 Billiards & 
Bowling  
Move for recommendation to the State Department of Liquor Licenses and Control for approval of the 
State Liquor Job No. 132056, a Series 6, Bar Liquor License for Poonam Manek, Agent, Yaashi Sibs Inc., 
dba 810 Billiards & Bowling, located at 3455 W. Frye Road, Suite 2, and approval of the City of Chandler, 
Series 6, Bar Liquor License No. 300410 L6. 
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
This application for the transfer of a liquor license was posted for hearing on February 25, 2021. The 
Police Department reports no objections to the issuance of this license, and no written protests 
pursuant to A.R.S. 4-201(B) have been received.  With a Series 6, Bar Liquor License, the business may 
sell all alcoholic beverages for on- or off-premise consumption. 
 
17. 
New Liquor License Series 12, Restaurant Liquor License application for Paletas Betty LLC, dba Paletas 
Betty  
Move for recommendation to the State Department of Liquor Licenses and Control for approval of the 
State Liquor Job No. 132855, a Series 12, Restaurant Liquor License, for Alvin Doi-Chih Hong, Agent, 
Paletas Betty LLC, dba Paletas Betty, located at 96 W. Boston Street, and approval of the City of 
Chandler, Series 12, Restaurant Liquor License No. 130621 L12. 
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
This application for a liquor license was posted for hearing on February 25, 2021. The Police Department 
reports no objections to the issuance of this license, and no written protests pursuant to A.R.S. 4-201(B) 
have been received. With a Series 12, Restaurant Liquor License, the business may sell all liquors for on-
premise consumption only, with a minimum of 40% of the gross receipts from the sale of food. 
 
18. 
New License Series 4, In State Wholesalers Liquor License application, for Nuwave Beverage LLC, dba 
Nuwave Beverage  
Move for recommendation to the State Department of Liquor Licenses and Control for approval of the 
State Liquor Job No. 129847, a Series 4, In State Wholesalers Liquor License, for Surekha Soorma, Agent, 
Nuwave Beverage LLC, dba Nuwave Beverage, located at 3225 N. Arizona Avenue, Suite 10, and 
approval of the City of Chandler, Series 4, In State Wholesalers Liquor License No. 300441 L04. 
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
This application for a liquor license was posted for hearing on February 25, 2021. The Police Department 
reports no objections to the issuance of this license, and no written protests pursuant to A.R.S. 4-201(B) 
have been received. With a Series 4, In State Wholesalers Liquor License, the business may sell at 
wholesale to licensed retailers only. 
 
19. 
Resolution No. 5441 authorizing Amendment No. 3 to the Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with 
Maricopa County for the Purpose of Providing Temporary Housing for At Risk Individuals and Families 
due to the COVID-19 Pandemic Utilizing Hotel Rooms  
Move City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 5441 approving and authorizing Amendment No. 3 to 
an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between Maricopa County Administered by its Human Services 
Department and City of Chandler for the purpose of providing temporary housing for at-risk individuals 
and families due to the COVID-19 pandemic utilizing hotel rooms in an amount of $79,580 for a new 
total expenditure of $238,740; extending the term of the agreement through March 31, 2021; and

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 18 of 47 
 
authorizing the City Manager or designee to sign the agreement and all related documents on behalf of 
the City of Chandler. 
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
On March 11, 2020, the Governor of the State of Arizona, Douglas A. Ducey, declared a State of 
Emergency in Arizona due to the novel Coronavirus and determined that the COVID-19 outbreak 
presents conditions that are, or are likely to be, beyond the control of services, personnel, equipment, 
and facilities of any single county, city, or town, and which requires the combined efforts of the State of 
Arizona and its political subdivisions. 
  
On March 19, 2020, Chandler Mayor Kevin Hartke issued a proclamation declaring the existence of an 
emergency as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak, placing the City of Chandler, County of Maricopa, and 
State of Arizona, in a condition of extreme peril to life and property. Pursuant to the emergency powers 
vested in the Mayor under Arizona Revised Statutes §26-311 and Chandler City Code §6-3.2, Mayor 
Hartke determined that extraordinary measures must be taken to alleviate the suffering of people and 
to protect or rehabilitate property. 
  
In April 2020, the Maricopa County Human Services Department approached the cities of Mesa, Tempe 
and Chandler with a proposal to work cooperatively to assist persons experiencing homelessness by 
providing temporary housing to prevent exposure to the COVID-19 virus. Maricopa County agreed to 
enter into a lease agreement with a hotel and provide 24/7 on site security, while the partnering cities 
would provide the clientele and wrap-around services to support them during their stay and assist them 
in their transition to permanent housing. On July 13, 2020, the City of Chandler entered into this 
agreement for the period of April 26, 2020 through July 26, 2020. The service was successful, providing 
safe accommodations for Chandler residents experiencing homelessness to shelter in place. Regrettably, 
the hotel property changed ownership in July 2020 and the new owner chose not to renew the lease 
agreement with Maricopa County.  
  
On August 13, Amendment No. 1 was approved to extend the agreement to September 30, 2020, and 
add funding in an amount not to exceed $79,580 for 10 hotel rooms and security services. The City of 
Chandler secured hotel space and security services and continued to place and provide wrap-around 
support to program participants with the ultimate goal of transitioning them to permanency. On 
October 15, Amendment Number 2 was approved adding $79,580 for a new not-to-exceed amount of 
$159,160 and extending the term of the agreement through December 31, 2020. Amendment Number 
3 continues the support of 10 hotel rooms and security services through the addition of $79,580 for a 
new not-to-exceed amount of $238,740 and extends the term of the agreement through March 31, 
2021. 
 
The City of Chandler also utilizes Community Development Block Grant-Coronavirus (CDBG-CV) and AZ 
CARES funds to support this program. Through January 31, 2021, 104 Chandler residents have been 
served through the program. Of these, 43 have successfully transitioned to permanent housing and 14 
have entered emergency shelter or inpatient care where they will receive ongoing services to improve 
their housing stability and end their homelessness. As of January 31, 2021, 39 residents are actively 
participating in the program. 
 
Financial Implications:

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 19 of 47 
 
The City of Chandler provides client services through City staff and an existing contract with Community 
Bridges, Inc. which is funded from the Grant Fund, Community Development Cost Center, Food Meals 
and Lodging Account, and Maricopa County Cares Act Program (217.4700.5514.0.3NR001) for $79,580. 
 
20. 
Resolution No. 5442 Authorizing the Reallocation of AZCares Grant Funds for Future Distribution; and 
Reallocation to Chandler AZCEND, the Salvation Army Chandler Corps, Save the Family, and the 
Neighborhood Resources Department for Services to Assist Chandler Households Negatively Impacted 
by the Coronavirus Pandemic  
Move City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 5442 Authorizing the Reallocation of $3,000,000 of 
AZCares Grant Funds for future distribution; and authorizing reallocation to AZCares grant funds in the 
amount of $1,115,000 to Chandler AZCEND, the Salvation Army Chandler Corps, Save the Family, and 
the Neighborhood Resources Department for services to assist Chandler households negatively 
impacted by the Coronavirus Pandemic. 
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
On December 10, 2020, City Council approved Resolution No. 5430 authorizing the allocation of 
$4,115,000 of AZCARES funds to assist Chandler Households in need as a result of COVID-19. 
Specifically, the resolution authorized the allocation of $3,815,000 to AZCEND for rent and utility 
assistance, $200,000 to the Salvation Army Chandler Corps for rent and utility assistance, and $100,000 
to the Neighborhood Resources Department for hotel stays for persons experiencing homelessness. At 
this time, existing funds for these services were on target for full expenditure by December 31, 2020, 
and community need for these services remained high. 
 
In late December, Maricopa County notified AZCEND, the Community Action Program (CAP) serving 
Chandler residents, that it would make additional funds available to continue assistance through 
January and February, or until funds ran out. In early January, the City received notice from the US 
Department of the Treasury that it was eligible to apply for the new Emergency Rental Assistance 
Program (ERAP) and that funds would be available soon thereafter. The Neighborhood Resources 
Department applied for the funds on behalf of the City and received an award of $7,946,091.60. 
  
The new ERAP funds have very specific eligibility requirements. The program may assist renters with 
incomes up to 80% area median income (AMI) who meet specific criteria including receipt of 
unemployment benefits or can document a loss of income resulting from COVID-19, and can 
demonstrate a risk of homelessness or housing instability. Households at or below 50% AMI must be 
prioritized. Neither mortgage assistance nor move-in assistance is eligible through ERAP. Some 
Chandler households will have an urgent need, but be unable to meet the required criteria or provide 
the required documentation. In addition, there is an increasing need for move-in assistance to rehouse 
households that have become homeless as a result of the pandemic. To successfully combat housing 
instability and homelessness, it is critical to have alternative sources of funding available to assist 
Chandler households in need. 
 
As a result of this new resource, staff recommends the reallocation of $3,000,000 of AZCares grant 
funds be returned to the AZCares Grant Fund, Financial Reserve for future distribution. In addition, staff 
recommends reallocating the remaining $1,115,000 of the $4,115,000 AZCares funds allocated on 
December 10, 2020, to AZCEND, the Salvation Army Chandler Corp, Save the Family, and the 
Neighborhood Resources Department to serve Chandler households in need as follows:

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 20 of 47 
 
Staff recommends allocating $200,000 of AZCares grant funds to AZCEND for rent, utility, mortgage 
and move-in assistance. These funds will complement the ERAP funds recommended for allocation to 
AZCEND in Resolution No. 5443. In addition, staff recommends allocating $450,000 of AZCares grant 
funds to the Salvation Army Chandler Corps for rent, utility, mortgage and move-in assistance, as well 
as a second year of weather-related respite services previously supported for one year through AZCares 
grant funds. These funds will allow the Salvation Army to continue to the level of service they are 
currently providing through their first allocation of AZCares grant funds. 
 
Staff also recommends allocating $340,000 AZCares funds to Save the Family to support Rapid 
Rehousing for Chandler families with children for a second year. This program quickly re-houses 
Chandler families that become homeless as a result of COVID-19 and supports them as they regain 
stability and move back to independence. This program was previously funded for one year with 
AZCares funds. This service continues to be in high demand as the pandemic continues and emergency 
shelter continues to operate at a decreased capacity across the Valley. Finally, staff recommends 
allocating $125,000 AZCares grant funds to the Neighborhood Resources Department for hotel stays 
and client services for people experiencing homelessness. 
 
Financial Implications: 
AZCares of $3,000,000 would be transferred back to the Grant Fund, Non-Departmental Cost Center, 
AZCares Financial Reserve Account (217.1290.5926.0.3AZ000), from the Grant Fund, Community 
Development 
Cost 
Center, 
Professional Services Account, Community Support Program 
(217.4700.5219.0.3AZ001), for future distribution by Council. 
 
21. 
Resolution No. 5443 Authorizing an Agreement with the US Department of the Treasury for the 
Emergency Rental Assistance Program; Agreement with AZCEND to Administer and Distribute Funds to 
Assist Chandler Households in Need Due to COVID-19; Authorizing the Neighborhood Resources 
Department to Administer the Emergency Rental Assistance Program and Continue the Chandler Cares 
Team for a Second Year  
Move City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 5443 approving and authorizing an agreement 
between the US Department of the Treasury and the City of Chandler in the Amount of $7,946,091.60 
for the Emergency Rental Assistance Program and approve a General Fund, Contingency Transfer to the 
Grant Fund, Neighborhood Resources Department, Community Development Cost Center; thereby 
authorizing an agreement with AZCEND to administer and distribute funds in the amount of 
$7,671,091.60 to assist Chandler households in need due to COVID-19; and authorizing the 
Neighborhood Resources Department to utilize $275,000 to administer the Emergency Rental 
Assistance Program and Continue the Chandler Cares Team for a Second Year; and authorizing the City 
Manager or designee to sign agreements and all related documents on behalf of the City of Chandler. 
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
On March 11, 2020, the Governor of the State of Arizona, Douglas A. Ducey, declared that a State of 
Emergency exists in Arizona due to the COVID-19 outbreak and determined that the COVID-19 
outbreak presents conditions that are, or are likely to be, beyond the control of services, personnel, 
equipment, and facilities of any single county, city, or town, and which requires the combined efforts of 
the State of Arizona and its political subdivisions. On March 19, 2020, the Mayor of the City of Chandler 
Kevin Hartke, by proclamation declared a State of Local Emergency for the City to protect the health, 
safety, and welfare of the City and its residents and further declared that COVID-19 outbreak 
constitutes a condition of extreme peril to life and property within the City. Many Chandler households

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 21 of 47 
 
continue to demonstrate an urgent need for rental and utility assistance due to the financial impacts of 
COVID-19, including loss of employment.   
 
The United States Department of the Treasury, (Treasury) included appropriations for an Emergency 
Rental Assistance Program, (ERAP) created under Section 501 of Division N of the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2021, Pub. L. No. 116-260 (Dec. 27, 2020) (Section 501), for eligible local 
governmental entities. The Neighborhood Resources Department applied on behalf of the City to 
obtain Section 501 federal funds in connection with the City's responsibility for the public health, safety, 
and welfare of its citizenry and its determination that a compelling public purpose exists for the 
expenditure of federal funds for rental and utility assistance to ensure a safer and more stable 
environment during the COVID-19 emergency. 
  
As a result, the Treasury has released payment of $7,946,091.60 in ERAP funds to the City. The non-
profit organization AZCEND, serves as the City's Community Action Program (CAP) and works in 
partnership with the City to administer federal and local funds allocated for this purpose. AZCEND is 
uniquely qualified to administer and distribute these funds in compliance with Federal regulations, 
reporting requirements and expenditure deadlines. The City and AZCEND desire to enter into a contract 
in the amount of $7,671,091.60 so that AZCEND may assist the City in administering and distributing 
ERAP funds. The City will utilize $275,000 of the ten percent administrative allowance to administer the 
grant and fund the Chandler CARES Team, which assists Chandler residents and landlords in navigating 
the application process for a second year. 
 
Financial Implications: 
An allocation of $7,671,092 would be transferred from the General Fund, Non-Departmental Cost 
Center, Contingency Account (101.1290.5911), to the Grant Fund, Community Development Cost 
Center, Professional Services Account, Emergency Rental Assistance Program (217.4700.5219.0.3NR002). 
The Neighborhood Resources Department will distribute $7,671,091.60 to Chandler AZCEND to 
administer and distribute the funds, $275,000 will be used by the City to administer and fund the 
Chandler Cares Team.  There are no match requirements for ERAP funds.  
  
22. 
Agreement No. PW8-926-3939, Amendment No. 2, with United Fibers, LLC, for Processing and 
Marketing of Recyclable Materials  
Move City Council approve Agreement No. PW8-926-3939, Amendment No. 2, with United Fibers, LLC, 
for the processing and marketing of recyclable materials, in an amount not to exceed $1,200,000, for a 
one-year term, March 1, 2021, through February 28, 2022. 
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
On March 1, 2019, the City entered into an agreement with United Fibers, LLC, to process collected 
recyclable material. More than 20,935 tons of recycled material was collected from Chandler residents' 
homes in 2020 and delivered to United Fibers, LLC, for processing. The terms of the original agreement 
included a processing fee of $67.00 per ton, with the City receiving a 55% revenue share based on the 
weighted average of the actual sales of marketable recyclables per ton, and a $2.00 per ton education 
fee paid to the City. The term of this agreement was March 1, 2019, through February 28, 2020, with the 
option of up to four one-year extensions. 
 
In February 2020, City Council approved Amendment No. 1 to the agreement with United Fibers, LLC, 
that increased the processing fee to $80.00 per ton, and implemented a new waste disposal fee in the 
amount of $40.00 per ton for the disposal of contamination, residue, and trash, and eliminated the

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 22 of 47 
 
education fee. For this extension term, United Fibers, LLC, has requested to increase the processing fee 
to $85.00 per ton or an estimated annual increase of $160,000. All other terms of the previous 
agreement remain the same. These terms are consistent with what the vendor has agreed to with its 
other municipal customers. Staff continues to explore all options to reduce the cost required to process 
recycling materials generated within the City, as well as develop educational programs and 
communications regarding accepted recyclable materials and reduce contamination rates. 
 
23. 
Project Agreement No. SW2101.401, with Nesbitt Contracting Co., Inc., for the Solid Waste Landfill West 
Side Stormwater Channel Improvements  
Move City Council award Project Agreement No. SW2101.401, to Nesbitt Contracting Co., Inc., pursuant 
to Job Order Contract No. JOC1907.401, for the Solid Waste Landfill West Side Stormwater Channel 
Improvements, in an amount not to exceed $248,712.72. 
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
The Paseo Vista Recreation Area, located at 3850 S. McQueen Road, is a 64-acre former landfill site. In 
2005, the landfill was closed, and the site was redeveloped into a recreation area in 2009. One of the 
maintenance requirements for the closed landfill is to convey stormwater from the site to designated 
retention basins. One of the stormwater conveyance channels that stretches along the west side of the 
site has several sections that need repair due to settlement and erosion-caused damage. The general 
structural integrity of the channel is intact, but sections have either risen or dropped in elevation. These 
vertical changes have interrupted the designed passive functionality of the channel conveying 
stormwater that falls on the closed landfill to designated retention basins.  
 
City staff has selected the channel sections that have the most severe vertical elevation changes for 
removal and replacement. With these vertical issues, debris and sediment collect in the channel, and 
City staff is tasked with clearing the channel to restore the functionality. The channel is situated along 
the west side of the Paseo Vista Recreation Area, adjacent to the Paseo Trail and Salt River Project 
Consolidated Canal. The work will be coordinated with the Park Operations Division for any impacts to 
park amenities or the Paseo Trail. The project scope of work consists of removal and replacement of 
approximately 800 linear feet of the concrete channel, including subgrade preparation, compaction, 
shotcrete installation, and restoration of landscape areas disturbed by the work. The contract 
completion time is 90 calendar days following Notice to Proceed. 
 
24. 
Construction Manager at Risk Contract No. WA2008.251, with Achen-Gardner Construction, LLC, for the 
Loop 101 and 202 Freeway Waterline and Sewer Rehabilitation Pre-Construction Services  
Move City Council award Construction Manager at Risk Contract No. WA2008.251 to Achen-Gardner 
Construction, LLC, for the Loop 101 and 202 Freeway Waterline and Sewer Rehabilitation Pre-
Construction Services, in an amount not to exceed $249,854.82. 
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
In February 2018, the City experienced a large water main break northeast of the intersection of Price 
Road and the Loop 202 Santan Freeway. Staff responded quickly by shutting down the 36-inch 
diameter water transmission main. In the following months, the City hired a consultant and contractor 
to evaluate the cause and condition of damaged pipeline and perform necessary repairs. The condition 
assessment of the pipeline revealed that it was in poor condition and recommended that rehabilitation 
or replacement of the pipe be considered.

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 23 of 47 
 
The project scope of work consists of constructability studies and review, value engineering, project 
planning and scheduling, assistance in the coordination of contract documents, utility location, and 
preparation of Guaranteed Maximum Price packages. The contract completion time is 360 calendar 
days following Notice to Proceed. Construction-related contracts will be awarded separately. The City 
and the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) share a substantial interest in maintaining 
proper operation and long-term viability of these pipeline segments that cross beneath the Loop 101 
and Loop 202 freeway interchange. The City will continue to engage ADOT to partner in future efforts 
to assess and repair these pipelines. 
 
25. 
Construction Manager at Risk Contract No. WW1901.401, with McCarthy Building Companies, Inc., for 
the Water Reclamation Facility Improvements GMP-1  
Move City Council award Construction Manager at Risk Contract No. WW1901.401 to McCarthy 
Building Companies, Inc., for the Water Reclamation Facility Improvements GMP-1, in an amount not to 
exceed $5,842,737. 
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
The City provides wastewater services to over 260,000 residents. This number is projected to increase to 
300,000 by the year 2040. Wastewater is delivered to reclamation facilities where it is treated to produce 
A+ quality effluent for delivery to the City's reclaimed water system. The Ocotillo Water Reclamation 
Facility, located at 3333 S. Old Price Road, was originally built in 1985. The Airport Water Reclamation 
Facility, located at 905 E. Queen Creek Road, was originally built in 1998. Both facilities are in need of 
rehabilitation due to aging infrastructure. Major components of the project will include the replacement 
of sand media filters with updated cloth media technologies, rehabilitation of secondary clarifiers, 
replacement of large diameter blower piping, and related instrumentation and electrical upgrades. 
 
The project scope of work for this first Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) construction contract consists 
of procurement of disc filters and stainless steel gates, demolition, and concrete work. This is the first of 
several GMP construction contracts that will be brought forward for City Council consideration on this 
project. The contract completion time is 250 calendar days following Notice to Proceed. A related 
Professional Services Agreement with Wilson Engineers, LLC., for the Water Reclamation Facility 
Improvements, is also scheduled for this City Council meeting. 
 
26. 
Professional Services Agreement No. WW1901.451, with Wilson Engineers, LLC, for the Water 
Reclamation Facility Improvements Construction Management Services  
Move City Council award Professional Services Agreement No. WW1901.451 to Wilson Engineers, LLC, 
for the Water Reclamation Facility Improvements Construction Management Services, in an amount not 
to exceed $126,410. 
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
The City provides wastewater services to over 260,000 residents. This number is projected to increase to 
300,000 by the year 2040. Wastewater is delivered to reclamation facilities where it is treated to produce 
A+ quality effluent for delivery to the City's reclaimed water system. The Ocotillo Water Reclamation 
Facility, located at 3333 S. Old Price Road, was originally built in 1985. The Airport Water Reclamation 
Facility, located at 905 E. Queen Creek Road, was originally built in 1998. Both facilities are in need of 
rehabilitation due to aging infrastructure. This is the first of subsequent Guaranteed Maximum Price 
(GMP) scopes of work for the overall project. Major components of the first GMP scope of work include 
the replacement of sand media filters with updated cloth media technologies, rehabilitation of

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 24 of 47 
 
secondary clarifiers, replacement of large diameter blower piping, and related instrumentation and 
electrical upgrades. 
 
The project scope of work consists of pre-construction assistance, contractor oversight, construction 
administration, construction inspection, schedule review, review of progress payments, and response to 
shop drawings and submittals. The contract completion time is 300 calendar days following Notice to 
Proceed. A related Construction Manager at Risk Contract with McCarthy Building Companies, Inc., for 
the Water Reclamation Facility Improvements, is also scheduled for this City Council meeting. 
 
27. 
Resolution No. 5438, Authorizing an Agreement Among the City of Chandler, Pima Utility Company, 
and Sun Lakes Marketing Limited Partnership, LLP, for Potable Water Interconnect and Abandonment of 
Inactive Wells  
Move City Council approve Resolution No. 5438, authorizing an agreement among the City of Chandler; 
Pima Utility Company, an Arizona Corporation; and Sun Lakes Marketing Limited Partnership, LLP, an 
Arizona limited partnership and a corporate affiliate of Pima Utility Company; for the delivery of potable 
water through interconnections between their potable water distribution systems and for the 
abandonment of inactive wells located near Alma School and Willis roads, Alma School and Pecos 
roads, and Alma School and Queen Creek roads and authorizing the Public Works and Utilities Director 
to execute the Agreement. 
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
Pima Utility Company manages a water distribution system for the Sun Lakes community, which is 
located southwest of Chandler and shares a common border with the City. The Pima Utility Company 
has requested the City provide an interconnection between the two respective water systems. With a 
population of just under 15,000 residents, Sun Lakes has a small water system and is dependent on only 
a few wells and storage reservoirs to meet its customers' needs. These factors have prompted Sun Lakes 
to seek interconnect facilities with its closest neighbors as a means of providing water to its customers 
during any potential future outages and planned maintenance activities. 
 
This proposed interconnect agreement will allow Chandler to supply potable water to Sun Lakes in the 
event its system experiences an emergency condition and is unable to meet its normal customer 
demands. In return, Sun Lakes agrees to ensure four of its inactive irrigation wells, which are situated off 
of Alma School Road, are abandoned per Arizona Department of Water Resources guidelines. This 
abandonment is beneficial to Chandler as these wells are within proximity of the City's existing potable 
water wells and there is potential for these wells to provide a pathway for contaminants to reach the 
aquifer. Additionally, Chandler will be reimbursed for the water provided at Chandler's then-current 
out-of-city industrial rate and also benefit by receiving Long Term Storage Credits (LTSCs) for all water 
delivered through the interconnect facilities. 
 
28. 
Purchase of Network Equipment and Services from Sentinel Technologies, Inc.  
Move City Council approve the purchase of network equipment and services from Sentinel 
Technologies, Inc., utilizing 1GPA Contract No. 21-02PV-08, in an amount not to exceed $126,940. 
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
The Tumbleweed Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) site consists of ten aquifer recharge and recovery 
wells used to store reclaimed water during times of excess and to supplement the reclaimed water 
system during times of peak demand. Upgrades are underway to change over from radio 
communication to fiber optic communications to enhance operations and security as well as to improve

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 25 of 47 
 
control remotely from the Airport Water Reclamation Facility (AWRF). To facilitate this communication 
conversion, new programmable logic controllers are being upgraded to the latest versions as current 
units are obsolete and unsupported by the manufacturer. This upgrade is in accordance with the 
Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Standards and Governance study as well as the City 
of Chandler Fiber Optic Master plan. This proposal is for installation of the required network switches 
and integration support to allow for communication between the programmable logic controllers and 
the SCADA system. The ultimate goal of the project is to provide improved reliability and security of 
communications and control between the Tumbleweed ASR well field and the AWRF. 
 
29. 
Agreement No. BF8-936-3802, Amendment No. 2, with Western States Fire Protection Co., for Fire 
Protection Services 
Move City Council approve Agreement No. BF8-936-3802, Amendment No. 2, with Western States Fire 
Protection Co., for fire protection services, increasing the spending limit by $720,000, for a revised 
amount not to exceed $920,000.  
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
The Pecos Surface Water Treatment Plant (PSWTP), located at 1475 E. Pecos Road, was built in 1987 and 
placed into service in 1989. The administration building houses a number of Public Works & Utilities 
Department staff and is the central hub of all water treatment and production throughout the City. 
Recently, a routine inspection of the fire monitoring systems at the PSWTP uncovered equipment 
failures which are preventing the various building fire alarm panels from communicating with each 
other. The lack of communication is a safety concern as in the event of a fire, the panels will not be able 
to relay trouble alarms to the Administration building to alert staff. 
 
Accordingly, PSWTP staff has worked with Western States Fire Protection representatives to develop a 
scope and cost associated with replacing the obsolete panels. Due to the age of the equipment, the 
systems cannot be repaired and must be replaced. This amendment will provide for the purchase and 
installation of replacement fire monitoring equipment and the repair of the alarm communications 
network. The Buildings & Facilities Division is also requesting additional funds to replace fire alarm 
systems that were identified as Priority 1, Year 1, in the facility condition assessment performed by 
consultant Faithful and Gould. Several of the fire alarm systems are currently experiencing operational 
issues and should be replaced now and not be delayed in anticipation of bond allocations. 
 
30. 
Sole Source Purchase of Hach Equipment, Service, and Parts  
Move City Council approve the sole source purchase of Hach equipment, service, and parts, from Hach 
Company, in the amount of $265,000. 
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
The Public Works & Utilties Department currently has a large amount of Hach Company water quality 
monitoring instruments installed throughout various water and wastewater treatment facilities. These 
instruments are critical to the operation of the facilities they serve and provide much needed data to 
the operations staff to ensure regulatory compliance and public health goals are maintained at all times. 
Hach Company is a sole source supplier of the equipment, parts, supplies, and technical support 
needed to maintain their proprietary equipment. Hach Company parts and supplies are required to 
maintain the accuracy and reliability of the equipment and to ensure the warranty remains intact. This 
purchase will provide staff with the ability to maintain existing Hach Company water quality 
instrumentation hardware. Additionally, staff will also be able to replace aging water quality instruments 
when their useful life has been exceeded.

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 26 of 47 
 
 
ACTION AGENDA ITEM 31 DISCUSSION: 
 
MAYOR HARTKE called for a staff presentation on Action Agenda Item No. 31.  
 
31. 
Introduction of Ordinance No. 4958, Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Plat, PLH19 -
0063/PLT19-0055 Elux at McQueen  
Rezoning 
 
LAUREN SHUMANN, Senior Planner, presented the following Power Point presentation. 
• 
PLH19-0063/PLT19-0055 Elux at McQueen 
• 
Request 
o Rezone from Agricultural (AG-1) district to Planned Area Development (PAD) for multi-family 
residential 
o Preliminary Development Plan approval for site layout and building architecture 
o Preliminary Plat approval 
• 
Proposed Development 
o 162 units within 12.87 net acres 
o 12.59 units per acre 
o A mix of one and two-story attached and detached units 
o 300 parking spaces required; 327 provided 
• 
Proposed Development 
o Private, gated yards 
o Highly amenitized development 
o Two entrances; McQueen Road and Senate Street   
• 
Proposed Architecture 
o Photo Renderings 
• 
General Plan 2016 
o Future Land Use Plan Map 
• 
Chandler Airpark Area Plan (CAAP)1998 
• 
Airport Commission Conflict Evaluation  
o Airport Commission November 18, 2020 
o Finding of conflict with current and future operations of the airport 
o Approval 5-0; 2 Absent  
• 
Neighborhood Outreach 
o Virtual Neighborhood Meeting via Zoom; September 30, 2020 
o Five households attended with general questions 
o Staff’s received one phone call from Horizon resident; concerns about traffic 
o As of today, staff is aware of no opposition 
• 
Planning and Zoning Commission 
o Meeting held; January 6, 2021 
o Recommendation of Approval  
o In Favor 6-0; 1 Absent 
• 
Staff Recommendation 
o General Plan conformance 
o Chandler Airpark Area Plan conformance 
o Compatible land use 
o Staff recommends approval

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 27 of 47 
 
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked for clarification on the location of the two story homes. 
 
MS. SCHUMANN displayed the layout and identified the two story home locations. 
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked what the setbacks were between the house and the property line.  
 
MS. SCHUMANN said the setback is 36 feet. There is about 10 feet of landscaping and a 24 foot drive aisle. The 
units that face the south are carriage units so there are garages on the first level and each of those would only 
have two units on top with consideration to how many windows face the south.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANO asked about the X’s on the map and if that was parking. 
 
MS. SCHUMANN said yes, it is covered parking.  
 
VICE MAYOR STEWART said there were concerns regarding traffic and asked if this could empty on Germann 
Road.  
 
MS. SCHUMANN said the original site plan had the main entry on Senate Place. When the subdivision to the 
south developed, Senate Place was developed to allow the property to have full access. In order for viability 
and visibility the developer requested a stoplight be installed. On the west side of McQueen road there is 
undeveloped area that would tie into Armstrong Way. 
 
VICE MAYOR STEWART said the light is great for the neighbors there, but not necessarily for those to the 
south. Vice Mayor Stewart asked if the Airport Area Plan update would happen.  
 
MS. SCHUMANN said staff is in the process of working on that and have met with the consultant. Ms. 
Schumann said they are in the process of preparing the alternative land use document.  
 
VICE MAYOR STEWART asked for more information by basic guidelines and what staff’s benchmarks are. 
 
MS. SCHUMANN said with regards to design there are a set of standards such as varying planes and materials 
as they do not want a box. Ms. Schumann said the renderings shown are the third submittal as staff was 
working with the applicant on the architecture. Ms. Schumann said this is more of a single family type home, 
but is a rental property.  
 
VICE MAYOR STEWART asked where the children in the community play.  
 
MS. SCHUMANN said she would defer to the applicant as to why the amenities did not include a playground. 
Each unit has a private gated back yard and there are landscaped areas for people to gather.  
 
VICE MAYOR STEWART asked if there were outlets for electric vehicles.  
 
MS. SCHUMANN said she would defer to the applicant.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER HARRIS asked how big the backyards are.

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 28 of 47 
 
MAYOR HARTKE said the applicant would provide more information. Mayor Hartke asked the Economic 
Development Director to speak about what other uses may be best for the land.  
 
MICAH MIRANDA, Economic Development Director, said the economy is doing well and there is a lot of 
interest from manufacturers. Mr. Miranda said he could envision a low density office product or flex industrial 
which has been successful along the freeway corridors and near the Airport.  
 
MAYOR HARTKE asked what traffic would look like for those products types in comparison to the plan 
presented.  
 
MR. MIRANDA said depending on the type of use the traffic engineers have different models. The office and 
industrial are usually on the lighter side, but without having the exact square footage it would be hard to 
estimate.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked if anyone has asked to put something there that is not residential.  
 
MR. MIRANDA said there has been interest on the Armstrong alignment from Hamilton all the way over 
because of its viability and freeway exposure. Mr. Miranda said staff refers them to the property representative 
to answer questions.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked if the value of the property was conducive to building that.   
 
MR. MIRANDA said he did not have the economics of the proposal for here, but given market for other types 
of projects there would be interest in doing something like that on the flex industrial side.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER HARRIS asked what the General Plan designates the land as.  
 
MS. SCHUMANN said the General Plan calls for neighborhoods, which is a very broad category that allows for a 
variety of densities. Ms. Schumann said there could be other uses considered such as commercial, institutional, 
public facilities, and commercial offices.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER HARRIS said there are residential sites around the land.  
 
MS. SCHUMANN said yes. The property also falls within the Chandler Airpark Area plan which is more specific 
and all of the surrounding land uses are residential and higher density residential.  
 
VICE MAYOR STEWART asked for the best practice for highway corridors and if there is a standard in the metro 
Phoenix area.  
 
MR. MIRANDA said the general preference is to put employment against freeway corridors in economic 
development.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER HARRIS said there should have been more community involvement in the project since only 
five residents gave their input. Councilmember Harris said the community seemed comfortable with the project 
being residential over commercial.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ROE said Ride Now moved near the freeway when they had a good location on Arizona 
Avenue. The business now is hard to get into and asked if that was the best choice for them.

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 29 of 47 
 
 
MR. MIRANDA said in the instance of Ride Now, they moved to a site near other automobile retailers which 
creates a cluster effect and is attractive in their instance.  
 
MAYOR HARTKE asked the applicant to present.  
 
BRENNAN RAY, 1850 N. Central Ave., on behalf of Snowden McQueen LLC, introduced the Snowden team and 
the property ownership group. Mr. Ray and presented the following Power Point presentation.  
 
• 
Elux at McQueen  
o SEC of McQueen Road and Loop 202 
• 
Why this residential development on this Site? 
o 100% consistent with the General Plan, Airpark Area Plan, Santan Freeway Corridor Area Plan 
o 100% consistent with and compatible to existing S-F and M-F developments 
o 100% consistent with good planning principles  
o No neighborhood opposition 
o Planning Staff recommendation for approval 
o Unanimous Planning Commission recommendation for approval (on Consent) 
• 
Why this residential development on this Site? 
o Approval does not impact the City Council’s priority of maintaining employment uses on 
Employment-designated land under the General Plan.  
• 
Project Site and Surrounding Areas  
• 
City’s General Plan 2016 
o Future Land Use Plan Map 
• 
Airpark Area Plan 1998 
• 
Santan Freeway Corridor Area Plan October 23 1999 
• 
Site Layout 
• 
Building A 
• 
Building B 
• 
Building C 
• 
Employment Challenges 
o Site Limitations 
• 
Photos looking SE, NW, W, NE, Eastbound, Westbound  
• 
Employment Challenges 
o Site Limitations 
o Traffic sensitivity on McQueen Road 
• 
Traffic Generation  
o Elux at McQueen  
▪ 
ITE Code 220 
▪ 
Qty 162 
▪ 
Unit Dwelling Units 
▪ 
Weekday Total 1,184 
o General Office building 
▪ 
ITE Code 710 
▪ 
Qty 252 
▪ 
Unit 1000 SF GFA 
▪ 
Weekday Total 2,454 
• 
Traffic Queueing

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 30 of 47 
 
o General Office Building 
▪ 
SB Left 95th Percentile Queue 
▪ 
Year 2022 AM Peak Hour 175 
▪ 
SB Left Turn Storage Provided 70 
▪ 
Queue Exceeds Provided Storage Requires Modification to Median 
o Elux at McQueen  
▪ 
SB Left 95th Percentile Queue 
▪ 
Year 2022 AM Peak Hour 25 
▪ 
SB Left Turn Storage Provided 70 
▪ 
Sufficient Queue Provided 
• 
Average Daily Traffic Increase 
o Elux at McQueen vs. General Office Development 
o McQueen Road 10% Increase 
o Germann Road 55% Increase 
o Senate Street 39% Increase  
• 
Employment Challenges 
o Site Limitations 
o Traffic sensitivity on McQueen Road 
o Neighbors (None in opposition to the residential case) 
• 
Horizon (South of Site) 
o 10 ft. rear setback 
• 
Employment Challenges 
o Site Limitations 
o Traffic sensitivity on McQueen Road 
o Neighbors (None in opposition to the residential case) 
o Existing entitled Employment land along the 202 
• 
Office Developments on the Loop 202 
o 462,000 sf; 4 story; 4 years on market, initially was to break ground in 2016 
o 65,000 sf; 3 story; under construction 
o 350,000 sf; 4 story and 6 story 
o 220,000 sf; 2 buildings 
o 6 ac. Marketed as office for approx. 2 years 
o 1,097,000 sf office within 2 mi.  
• 
San Tan Frwy 202 
o Chandler Airport Center Master Plan General Uses  
• 
Chandler Airport Center still has over 90 acres of available land to develop within the master plan  
• 
Southeast of airport has over 200 acres of available land. Frontage on Gilbert Road and west of the Hub 
(Insight) are better candidates for additional corporate office users/projects.  
• 
Employment Challenges 
o Site Limitations 
o Traffic sensitivity on McQueen Road 
o Neighbors (None in opposition to the residential case) 
o Existing entitled Employment land along the 202 
o Planning Principles 
• 
Planning Principles 
o Transition in density/intensity 
o Group “like” developments together 
o Ensure compatibly and uses create synergy

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 31 of 47 
 
• 
Planning Staff briefing on Multi-Family (10/15/2020) 
o Suburban Density (12 – 18 du/ac) 
o Along Arterial Roads and Freeways 
o Adjacent to Employment 
o As well as areas where Urban Density is allowed 
• 
Planning Staff briefing on Multi-Family (10/15/2020) 
o Take Aways  
▪ 
Continue to follow the General Plan 
• 
Continue to recommend densities in appropriate locations 
• 
Density can be a factor in affordability 
▪ 
Preserve employment areas (multi-family is complementary to employment, not a 
replacement for it) 
• 
Why this residential development on this Site? 
o High-quality development that was thoroughly vetted by Planning Staff and the Planning 
Commission 
o 100% consistent with the General Plan, Airpark Area Plan, Santan Freeway Corridor Area Plan 
o No Neighbor opposition 
o Planning Staff and Unanimous Planning Commission recommendations for approval 
o Preserves Council priority of maintaining employment uses on Employment-designated land under 
the General Plan 
• 
Request City Council’s approval in accordance with Planning Staff’s and Planning Commission’s unanimous 
recommendation for approval 
 
COUNCILMEMBER ELLIS asked why this was not a higher density project.  
 
MR. RAY said with the single family style two story units, the highest density he has seen is around 12. This type 
of development does not achieve a high density. There has been a heightened sensitivity to apartment 
complexes being built in south Chandler and there is a traffic concern as well. Mr. Ray said they were sensitive 
to the existing comments Council had received relative to that when designing the site. 
 
COUNCILMEMBER ELLIS said this was great for Chandler. 
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO thanked Mr. Ray for also protecting the employment corridors. Councilmember 
Orlando asked if the existing residents have two stories.  
 
MR. RAY said yes, they are all existing two stories that line the rear of the property.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked how tall the two story buildings are.  
 
MR. RAY said 26.7 feet. Mr. Ray said they have oriented the two stories so they are to the development.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO said if they were to put in a multi-flex building would they request a midrise 
overlay or up to 40 feet.  
 
MR. RAY said yes, the last flex industrial project he worked on in Chandler went to 50 feet. Many of the flex 
industrial buildings require greater interior clear space.

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 32 of 47 
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO said that type of building would be double in size and the industrial flex would 
be right next to the homes.  
 
MR. RAY said there are a variety of ways to design it.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO said a flex industrial space did not seem to fit the space. Councilmember 
Orlando asked if the traffic study for the right hand turns included large trucks for a flex industrial space 
scenario.  
 
MR. RAY said no, the study presumed normal vehicles.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked if staff reviewed the traffic study for the office space.  
 
MR. RAY said staff reviews the impact this development would have on adjacent streets. Mr. Ray said there was 
a long discussion about traffic flows and staff asked for a traffic signal to be put in.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER HARRIS asked about the estimated rent and how much someone would have to make to 
live in this development. Councilmember Harris said parks are important and there is not a park in the 
development and asked for clarification. 
 
MR. RAY said he has worked on this type of housing product throughout the Valley and the single family style 
rental homes are a life style choice. Mr. Ray said this type of housing product is popular with single women 
who make about 50% of this type of community because of the privacy and security. Mr. Ray said this appeals 
to those wanting to downsize or young professionals where the maintenance is all inclusive. Mr. Ray said for 
this housing product there are two children for every 10 residences so there are not a lot of tot lots. Mr. Ray 
said there is a club house, pools, and open spaces, pickleball courts, and ramadas. Mr. Ray said Tumbleweed 
Park is nearby as well. Mr. Ray said lots are 8 feet deep and are landscaped. Mr. Ray said the rent range is from 
$1,300 to $2,500 and someone would need to make $32,000 to $100,000.  
 
VICE MAYOR STEWART said this is an important piece of property and had some concerns regarding the 
amenities. Vice Mayor Stewart said he did not see the need for a full traffic light and would like the applicant to 
work more with staff.  
 
MOTION 
COUNCILMEMBER STEWART MOVED TO TABLE ACTION AGENDA ITEM NO. 31 OF THE FEBRUARY 25, 2021, 
CITY COUNCIL MEETING, TO MARCH 25, 2021; SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ELLIS.  
 
MAYOR HARTKE said he would vote no on an extension to the next Council meeting. 
 
COUNCILMEMER LOPEZ said he would vote no on an extension and felt the development met the 
expectations.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO said he heard there were concerns for a tot park, electrical vehicles, and color 
diversity on the color palette of the design and asked if that was part of the reason for the extension. 
Councilmember Orlando asked if that was Vice Mayor Stewart’s intention then they could work on stipulations 
to be added.  
 
VICE MAYOR STEWART said he would like to work on the stipulations.

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 33 of 47 
 
 
KELLY SCHWAB said Vice Mayor Stewart and Councilmember Ellis would need to rescind their motion.  
 
MOTION WITHDRAWN 
MOTION TO TABLE ACTION AGENDA ITEM NO. 31 WAS WITHDRAWN by Vice Mayor Stewart and 
Councilmember Ellis.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked if the applicant would be comfortable with the addition of stipulations.  
 
MAYOR HARTKE asked Vice Mayor Stewart how many electric vehicle stations were being requested.  
 
VICE MAYOR STEWART said he wanted to move the parking away from the existing houses and asked for a 
minimum of two electric vehicle charging stations.  
 
MR. RAY said they would be agreeable to the tot lot. Mr. Ray said they would be agreeable to providing a 
minimum of two electric vehicle charging stations. Mr. Ray said there is no parking immediately adjacent to the 
neighbors, but the drive aisle is 25 feet. There is a 10 foot landscape setback with a row of trees, the 25 foot 
drive aisle, and then the parking spaces. There is no parking adjacent to the parking development. Mr. Ray said 
there are some carriage units along the south with garages and 25 covered parking spaces.  
 
VICE MAYOR STEWART said there was concern from a noise perspective.  
 
MR. RAY said that issue was discussed at the neighborhood meeting and there were concerns about privacy. 
The residents along the north property line felt comfortable with this layout.  
 
VICE MAYOR STEWART asked if all of those homes were occupied.  
 
DEREK HORN, Development Services Director, did not know if they were all occupied.  
 
MR. RAY said he believed they were all occupied. 
 
COUNCILMEMBER HARRIS said he liked the project and believed the project should move forward and asked if 
the additional details could be worked out after the meeting. 
 
MS. SCHWAB said the stipulations need to be added to the ordinance.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER HARRIS supported the project with the stipulations. 
 
COUNCILMEMBER LOPEZ said he supported the project with the tot lot and the electric vehicle charging 
stations.  
 
MAYOR HARTKE asked for clarification on the light on Armstrong and McQueen.  
 
DANA ALVIDREZ, City Transportation Engineer, said the recommendation did come from staff as they are 
looking for connections across the street on the west side of McQueen in order to get circulation to the area. 
Ms. Alvidrez said Armstrong and Hamilton are the two collectors they are trying to build up.  
 
MAYOR HARTKE asked if the first developer to build is the one to put in the light.

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 34 of 47 
 
 
MS. ALVIDREZ said every corner pays 25% is typically how it is done. In this case the development would pay 
50%. Ms. Alvidrez said because of the location to the freeway, it is important safe movements can be made out 
of the development.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ROE said this piece of land is complex and if Senate was the main entrance it would be 
more appealing. Councilmember Roe said no one anticipated all of the high density housing, but that is mostly 
what is being requested to develop. Councilmember Roe said the Armstrong intersection is still a concern and 
it was disappointing.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ELLIS was in agreement with the stipulations. 
 
The following speaker cards were received regarding Action Agenda Item No. 31. The speakers did not speak.  
 
Scott Curtis, 4744 N. 56th St., was in support.  
Brian Hanger, 2071 E. Kaibab Pl., was in support.  
Nancy Berge, 123 N. Centennial Way, was in support.  
Andy Baron, 310 E. Rio Salado Pkwy, was in support.  
 
 
ACTION AGENDA ITEM 31 – MOTION AND VOTE: 
 
COUNCILEMEMBER ORLANDO MOVED TO APPROVE ACTION AGENDA ITEM NO. 31 OF THE FEBRUARY 25, 
2021, CITY COUNCIL MEETING, WITH THE ADDITIONAL STIPULATIONS THAT THE APPLICANT WORK WITH 
STAFF TO ADD A MINIMUM OF TWO ELECTRICAL VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS, PROVIDE A TOT PARK, AND 
PAINT COLOR SCHEME DIVERSITY; SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER HARRIS.  
 
MOTION CARRIED BY MAJORITY (6-1). COUNCILMEMBER ROE DISSENTING.  
 
 
ACTION AGENDA ITEM 32 DISCUSSION : 
 
MAYOR HARTKE called for a staff presentation on Action Agenda Item No. 32.  
 
32. 
Resolution No. 5431 Amending the Citywide Fee Schedule  
 
MATT DUNBAR, Budget Manager, presented the following Power Point presentation.  
• 
Overview – Annual Review 
o Departments review fees annually as part of budget process 
o To be effective March 1, 2021 for mid-year changes (Fire and Airport) or effective July 1, 2021 for 
the remainder 
• 
Overview – Fee Characteristics 
o Fees assessed for use of facilities or services benefiting specific groups 
o Fees reflect recovery of cost to provide service, unless market demands lower rate 
o Authority to charge must exist in City Code (amounts/specifics set by resolution)  
• 
Overview – Schedule  
o Process follows City Code 2-17; The Establishment and Modification of Fees and Rates

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 35 of 47 
 
o Nov/Dec 2020 Departments proposed fee updates and discussed with City Manager during budget 
process  
o Dec 2020 proposed fees were analyzed and summarized (verified City Code authority existed to 
charge fees) 
o Dec. 23, 2020 Posted proposed new/modified fee summary online for at least 60 days 
o Feb. 3, 2021 Feb 10, 2021 Posted and published Notice of Intent to Amend the Citywide Fee 
Schedule, 15 days prior to Council action, as well as social media postings 
• 
Departments Proposing Fee Updates 
o City Manager- Airport Division 
o Fire 
o Development Services – Planning Division 
o Cultural Development – Museum Division 
o Community Services – Recreation and Aquatics Division 
o Neighborhood Resources –Code Enforcement Division 
 
RYAN REEVES, Airport Business Coordinator, continued the presentation.  
• 
City Manager Airport Division 
• 
Airport Operation Fees 
o Changes the fuel fee calculation 
o Adjust charges for exclusive use of staff time on activity not associated with normal airport 
operations 
o Adjusts a Hangar Lock/Access Card/Device Replacement Fee 
o Adds retention of the Hangar Deposit and staff hourly rates to any hangar not maintained 
appropriately 
o Adds Aviation Use lease language  
o P. 7 of Summary/p. 14, 15 of Citywide Fee Schedule 
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked how this compared to the other providers at the Airport of their fuel.  
 
MR. REEVES said staff has been in communication with Chandler Air Service as they also provide self-service 
and full service fuel. Mr. Reeves said they are aware of the change and have not had any concerns.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked if the City also receives a percentage of their fees.  
 
MR. REEVES said yes, there is still a fuel flowage fee per gallon.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO said the pricing would be comparative to the City and the City would also receive 
a slight fee.  
 
MAYOR HARTKE clarified that all of these changes bring the City closer to the market rates and standards. 
 
SCOTT CHAPMAN, Assistant Fire Chief, continued the presentation.  
• 
Paramedic Student Registration 
o Allows for a $6,000 fee to be charged for students participating in our paramedic training classes 
from other agencies  
o (p.1 of Summary/ p. 33 of Citywide Fee Schedule) 
 
COUNCILMEMBER LOPEZ asked how often outside partners send staff to train.

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 36 of 47 
 
 
ASSISTANT CHIEF CHAPMAN said it is frequent that regional partners will ask if there are available seats.  
 
DEREK HORN, Development Services Director, continued the presentation.  
• 
Proposed Development Services Fees 
o Adjust Rezoning Fee to $100 for Historic Preservation district Applications 
o Establish $50 fee per application for incorporation into an existing Historic Preservation District  
o (p.1 of Summary / p. 26 of Citywide Fee Schedule) 
 
KIM MOYERS, Cultural Development Director, continued the preservation. 
• 
Proposed Museum Fees 
o Remove facility rental fees, merchandise mark-up fee, and Chandler non-profit group fee (allows 
fees to be collected by newly formed Museum Foundation) 
o (p. 2 of Summary/ p. 24-25 of Citywide Fee Schedule) 
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked how much activity they have had in renting the Museum. 
 
MS. MOYERS said because of COVID-19 they have not had many rentals, but they will continue to have the 
Museum available keep the rates at market rate. 
 
MAYOR HARTKE asked if there is still City oversite with the fees being collected by the Museum Foundation. 
 
MS. MOYERS said yes, there is oversite on the Foundation and would directly go back into the Museum.  
 
VICE MAYOR STEWART thanked the Museum Foundation for all they do.  
 
ANDY BASS, Community Services Director, continued the presentation.  
• 
Proposed Recreation/Aquatics Fees 
o Mini Field Preparation Fee 
o Changes to lifeguard fees for swim team and general private party use 
o Pool Pass fee changes 
o (p. 3-5 of Summary/ p. 16-18 of Citywide Fee Schedule 
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO confirmed it was $1.75 for children to swim. 
 
MR. BASS said yes.  
 
LEAH POWELL, Neighborhood Resources Director, continued the presentation.  
• 
Proposed Code Enforcement Fees 
o Change abatement administrative fee 
o  Add demolition abatement administrative fee 
o (p. 6 of Summary/ p. 30 of Citywide Fee Schedule) 
• 
Fee Deletions 
o Non-compliance re-inspection fee 
o Subsequent non-compliance re-inspection fees 
o (p. 5 of Summary / p. 30 of Citywide Fee Schedule)

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 37 of 47 
 
MAYOR HARTKE asked if the demolition was done for houses in a certain area that Council had discussed in 
the past.  
 
MS. POWELL said there was discussion around using CDBG funds to do that and it became complicated 
because the home owner had to pay a percentage. This was during a time where there were more foreclosures. 
Ms. Powell said they did clean up several structures and have not had the need to use that type of program 
since then for homes that pose safety issues.  
 
MAYOR HARTKE said a speaker card was received and invited the resident to speak.  
 
JOHN HOINEKI, 23405 S. 1132 Pl., President of the Arizona Aquatic Club, said they have a partnership with the 
City Fire Department and the organization runs competitive youth swimming. Mr. Hoineki said he was in 
support of the life guard fee structure, but requested that it be delayed 6 months due to COVID-19. He said the 
organization runs on a tight budget and is currently running on a smaller capacity and have taken 
extraordinary measures to keep members safe. Mr. Hoineki said the delay would allow more time for 
memberships to recover as some families are still waiting until the situation improves.  
 
MS. REED said the fee would begin at the start of the next fiscal year.  
 
MR. HOINEKI said he is requesting the fee to begin January 2022 for the life guard fee.  
 
MAYOR HARTKE asked when the life guard fee was raised.  
 
MR. BASS said he estimated around 2008 or 2009, but did not have the exact date.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked if the pool would lose a lot of money if they were to keep the fee the same 
until January 2022.  
 
MR. BASS said the fee has been used for many years and they would continue to use the current fee through 
the season.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO asked if they could add a stipulation in the motion since the fee would still occur 
in the same fiscal year.  
 
MS. SCHWAB said yes.  
 
MAYOR HARTKE asked if there was a way to use CARES dollars to make the organization whole. There are 
many organizations who have to pay the life guard fee.  
 
MR. BASS said there is a fee to swim teams and fee for rentals. Mr. Bass said the rentals could be moved up 
and the swim teams could stay at the current rate.  
 
VICE MAYOR STEWART asked if there was a way to use CARES dollars.  
 
MS. REED said staff did not have concerns moving the fee to January 2022.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER HARRIS suggested all of the increased fees be moved to January 2022.

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 38 of 47 
 
MAYOR HARTKE said he was in support of pushing this specific fee back, but not all of the fees.  
 
ACTION AGENDA ITEM 32 – MOTION AND VOTE: 
COUNCILEMEMBER LOPEZ MOVED TO APPROVE ACTION AGENDA ITEM NO. 32 OF THE FEBRUARY 25, 2021, 
CITY COUNCIL MEETING, WITH THE ADDITIONAL STIPULATION THAT THE LIFE GUARD FEE FOR SWIM TEAMS 
DOES NOT INCREASE UNTIL JANUARY 2022; SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER HARRIS.  
 
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY (7-0).  
 
ACTION AGENDA: 
 
31. 
Introduction of Ordinance No. 4958, Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Plat, PLH19-
0063/PLT19-0055 Elux at McQueen  
Rezoning 
Move City Council introduce and tentatively adopt Ordinance No. 4958 approving PLH19-0063 Elux at 
McQueen, Rezoning from AG-1 to PAD for multi-family residential located at the southeast corner of 
McQueen Road and the Loop 202 Santan Freeway, subject to the conditions as recommended by the 
Planning and Zoning Commission. 
Preliminary Development Plan  
Move City Council approve Preliminary Development Plan PLH19-0063 Elux at McQueen for site layout 
and building architecture located at the southeast corner of McQueen Road and the Loop 202 Santan 
Freeway, subject to the conditions as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. 
Preliminary Plat 
Move City Council approve Preliminary Plat PLT19-0055 Elux at McQueen located at the southeast 
corner of McQueen Road and the Loop 202 Santan Freeway, subject to the condition recommended by 
the Planning and Zoning Commission. 
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
This item was continued from the January 28, 2021, City Council meeting to allow the applicant more 
time to evaluate the proposal. Approximately 12.87 net acres. Subject site zoned AG-1 and 
undeveloped. General Plan designates the site as Neighborhoods and within a Growth Area. Chandler 
Airpark Area Plan (CAAP) designates the site as High Density Residential (HDR) 12.1-18 units per acre 
(du/ac). Project consist of 162 units totaling 12.59 du/ac. 
 
Surrounding Land Use Data: 
North 
Loop 202 Santan Freeway, then 
single-family residential 
 
South 
Single-family residential (6.7 du/ac) 
East 
Multi-family (17.94 du/ac) 
 
West 
McQueen Road, then vacant agricultural 
General Plan and Area Plan Designations: 
 
Existing 
Proposed 
General Plan 
Neighborhoods & Growth Area 
 
No change 
Chandler Airpark Area Plan 
 
High Density Residential (HDR) 12.1-18 du/ac 
No change 
 
Proposed Development 
Proposed Land Use 
Multi-family dwelling units 
162 Units 
12.59 dwelling units per acre (du/ac)

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 39 of 47 
 
 
 
Building 
Design 
Height 
17' 6"  single-story buildings 
27' 6"  two-story buildings; max 30 feet 
As measured to top of highest point of roof 
Roof Design and Material 
 
Gable roofs and flat parapets 
Concrete roof tiles 
Façade Materials 
 
Modern architectural style 
Stucco 
Tile cladding 
Building Accents 
 
Four different sizes of tempered glazed 
windows 
Metal trim/fascia   
Tile cladding 
Canopy at front-door and rear patios 
Building Access 
 
Direct ground-floor walk-up 
access to each unit 
Site Design & Open 
Space  
Detached and attached single-family-like rental units 
108  1-story units 
 54 2-story units 
Private gated yards for each unit, 192-248 sq. ft. typ. 
Pool, ramadas, pickle ball court, indoor community gym, dog park, and 1-story 
club house 
2.88 acres of shared open space 
Full signalized access along McQueen Road with secondary access from Senate 
Street to the east; the development will be gated 
Parking 
 
300 parking spaces required 
327 parking spaces provided including private garages, covered and uncovered 
spaces, and guest parking 
 
Review and Recommendation 
Planning staff finds the proposal is consistent with the General Plan and more specifically consistent 
with the 1998 Chandler Airpark Area Plan (CAAP) designation of High-Density Residential. Densities up 
to 18 dwelling units per acre can be considered for properties adjacent to arterial streets, freeways, 
and/or employment corridors. The subject site abuts the Loop 202 Santan freeway and existing multi-
family to the east. The proposed single unit detached and attached units offer a transition between low-
medium density single-family residential to the south and the freeway to the north while aligning with 
the vision of the CAAP. Although the proposal is for multi-family residential, its design and function are 
similar to single-family residential. Staff finds the proposal to be consistent with the goals of the 
General Plan and the CAAP and recommends approval subject to conditions. 
 
Economic Analysis  
An economic and fiscal impact analysis was conducted based on project details provided by the 
applicant and staff assumptions. The analysis determined the project will generate a positive net fiscal 
impact for the City. Net income to the City resulting from the project is estimated at approximately 
$843,336 over 10 years. This total includes revenues from property taxes, building permit and plan 
review fees, transaction privilege tax on construction, real property rental tax, state shared revenues, 
and local spending by residents.

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 40 of 47 
 
Traffic Analysis 
The applicant for the proposed development has worked with City staff regarding access to the site via 
McQueen Road. As surrounding properties developed to the east and south, traffic circulation was 
considered. Senate Street, a public street, was constructed during the development of the Horizon 
subdivision to the south, allowing full access to the southeast corner of the subject site. The applicant 
provided a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) to the City's Transportation Engineer detailing traffic patterns of  
the proposed residential. The counts returning to the site via the recommended route (Senate Street) 
raised concerns about residents making unprotected u-turns at Germann Road or the entry to the 
Horizon subdivision to access what was previously planned to be a right-in/right-out only access on 
McQueen Road.  The solution for this development and the larger area, including future office uses 
west of McQueen Road, is signalizing Armstrong Way at McQueen Road.  As such, a traffic signal 
allowing full movement on McQueen Road is proposed and supported by staff in order to reduce traffic 
on Senate Street and to facilitate traffic circulation for future industrial properties on the west side of 
McQueen Road.  The TIA has been reviewed and accepted by the City's Transportation Engineer. 
  
The proposal exceeds the parking requirements of the City Zoning Code by providing twenty-seven 
additional spaces. Further, the site layout does not include any tandem parking spaces. Tandem parking 
spaces may cause a heavier demand to be placed on guest parking spaces by the residents. Avoiding 
the use of tandem parking spaces further ensures that the number of provided spaces will adequately 
accommodate the proposed units. 
 
Public / Neighborhood Notification 
This request was noticed in accordance with the requirements of the Chandler Land Use and Zoning 
Code. To comply with CDC social distancing guidelines, the applicant hosted a digital neighborhood 
meeting via Zoom on September 30, 2020. Five (5) households attended the virtual meeting and had 
general questions about the proposal and buffer between the multi-family and the existing subdivision 
to the south. No opposition was expressed. Planning staff has received one phone call from a Horizon 
resident, whose home fronts Senate Street, with traffic concerns from the proposed development. Staff 
stated Senate Street was built for access to the subject site and a majority of proposed traffic from the 
new development will use the McQueen Road entry.  As of writing this memo, Planning staff has not 
received any opposition regarding the request. 
 
Airport Commission Conflict Evaluation 
Airport Commission meeting November 18, 2020. 
Motion to find conflict with existing or planned airport operations. 
In Favor: 5 Opposed: 0 Absent: 2 (Siegel, Kruse)   
 
The Airport Commission reviewed the request in accordance with the Airport Conflicts Evaluation 
Process. The Airport Planning Administrator has issued a conflicts evaluation report indicating that the 
Airport Commission determined that the proposed development does constitute a conflict with existing 
or planned airport operations. A copy of the Airport Planning Administrator's report detailing the 
Airport Commission's findings is attached to this memo. The Airport Commission's recommended 
mitigation measures to address the operational conflict are included as stipulations of the rezoning. 
  
Planning and Zoning Commission Vote Report 
Planning and Zoning Commission meeting January 6, 2020. 
Motion to Approve. 
In Favor: 6 Opposed: 0 Absent: 1 (Heumann)

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 41 of 47 
 
 
Recommended Conditions of Approval 
Rezoning 
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends the City Council approve rezoning from AG-1 to PAD 
multi-family residential, subject to the following conditions: 
 
1. Development shall be in substantial conformance with the Development Booklet, entitled "Elux at 
McQueen" and kept on file in the City of Chandler Planning Division, in File No. PLH19-0063, 
modified by such conditions included at the time the Booklet was approved by the Chandler City 
Council and/or as thereafter amended, modified or supplemented by the Chandler City Council. 
2.  The multi-family apartment manager shall display, in a conspicuous place within the rental office, a 
map illustrating the location of the development Elux at McQueen in the context of the Chandler 
Airpark Area Plan. The map shall identify the Airport Impact Overlay District, the noise contours and 
over flight patterns as depicted in Exhibit 6A in the FAR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study 
document as adopted by Chandler City Council (Resolution No. 2590, 11-5-98), and the noise 
contours as identified in the Chandler Airpark Area Plan. Such map or aerial photo shall be a 
minimum size of 24" x 36". Compliance with this condition shall be demonstrated by the property 
owner or multifamily apartment manager submitting to the Zoning Administrator of a signed 
affidavit and photograph that acknowledges such map is on display prior to beginning any rental 
activity. 
3. Prior to execution of any lease, prospective apartment tenants shall be given written disclosure in 
their lease and in a separately signed disclosure statement acknowledging that this apartment 
community is located proximate to the Chandler Municipal Airport that includes a heliport, aircraft 
engine testing facility, and an aircraft storage facility, that an avigational easement exists on the 
property, the property lies within the Chandler Municipal Airport Impact Overlay District, and that 
the property is subject to aircraft noise and over flight activity. The requirement for such disclosure 
shall be confirmed in an avigation notice covenant that runs with the land and is recorded with the 
Maricopa County Recorder prior to issuance of the first building permit for this development. 
4. The developer shall provide the city with an avigational easement over the subject property in 
accordance with Section 3004 of the City of Chandler Zoning Code. 
5. Prior to building permit issuance for any structures the developer shall provide a DETERMINATION 
OF NO HAZARD TO AVIATION approval as issued by the FAA after filing an FAA Form 7460, Notice 
of Proposed Construction or Alteration. 
6. The Final Plat shall contain the following statement on the cover sheet in a prominent location and 
in large text: "This property is located within the Chandler Municipal Airport Impact Overlay District 
and is subject to aircraft noise and frequent over flight activity, and is encumbered by an avigational 
easement to the City of Chandler." 
7. All leases at Elux at McQueen shall provide that all questions, concerns, or complaints any tenant 
may have about the Chandler Municipal Airport or the operation of aircraft landing at, taking off 
from, or operating at or on Chandler Municipal Airport shall be directed solely to the manager of 
Elux at McQueen development and not to the Chandler Municipal Airport, the City of Chandler, the 
FAA, any aircraft owner, or any pilot. All leases shall also provide that it shall be within the sole and 
absolute discretion of the manager of Elux at McQueen (and not the tenant) to determine (after the 
manager's due consideration of all airport related acknowledgments and disclosures that are 
required by the Zoning Stipulations and consideration of all information known to Elux at 
McQueen's Manager) whether or not, when, and how to communicate any tenants question, 
concern, or complain to the manager of the Chandler Municipal Airport.

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 42 of 47 
 
8. All apartment buildings shall be designed and built to achieve an interior noise level not to exceed 
45 decibels (Ldn) from aircraft noise.  A professional acoustical consultant, architect or engineer 
shall certify that the project's construction plans are in conformance with this condition. 
9. In the event the multi-family residential is platted to allow unit ownership, prior to the time of 
making 
any 
lot 
reservations 
or 
subsequent 
sales 
agreements, 
the 
subdivider/homebuilder/developer shall provide a written disclosure statement, for the signature of 
each buyer, acknowledging that this subdivision lies within the Chandler Municipal Airport Impact 
Overlay District, as specified in the Chandler Zoning Code.  The disclosure statement shall 
acknowledge the proximity of this subdivision to the Chandler Airport and that an avigational 
easement exists and/or is required on the property, and further, shall acknowledge that the property 
is subject to aircraft noise and overflight activity and other externalities.  This document signed by 
the homebuyer shall be recorded with Maricopa County Recorder's Office upon sale of the property. 
The "Public Subdivision Report", "Purchase Contracts", CC&R's, and the individual lot/unit property 
deeds shall include a disclosure statement outlining that the site is adjacent to or nearby an existing 
municipal airport, and the disclosure shall state that such uses are legal and should be expected to 
continue indefinitely. This responsibility for notice rests with the subdivider/homebuilder/developer 
and shall not be construed as an absolute guarantee by the City of Chandler for receiving such 
notice. 
10. Multi-family dwelling units shall be permitted up to a maximum density of 12.6 dwelling units per 
acre. 
11. The developer shall be responsible for the design and installation of a traffic signal at the 
intersection of McQueen Road and Armstrong Way during the initial phase of construction. 
12. Completion of the construction of all required off-site street improvements including but not 
limited to paving, landscaping, curb, gutter and sidewalks, median improvements and street lighting 
to achieve conformance with City codes, standard details, and design manuals. 
13. The developer shall be required to install landscaping in the arterial street median(s) adjoini ng this 
project. In the event that the landscaping already exists within such median(s) the developer shall be 
required to upgrade such landscaping to meet current City Standards.  
14. Right-of-way dedications to achieve full half-widths, including turn lanes and deceleration lanes, per 
the standards of the Chandler Transportation Plan. 
15. Minimum setbacks shall be as provided below and further detailed in the development booklet: 
Property Line Location    Minimum Building Setback 
McQueen Road    50' 
North Property Line     10' 
East Property Line    10' 
South Property Line    35' 
 
Preliminary Development Plan 
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends City Council approve the Preliminary Development Plan, 
subject to the following conditions: 
1. Development shall be in substantial conformance with the Development Booklet, entitled, "Elux at 
McQueen" and kept on file in the City of Chandler Planning Division, in File No. PLH19-0063, 
modified by such conditions included at the time the Booklet was approved by the Chandler City 
Council and/or as thereafter amended, modified or supplemented by Chandler City Council.  
2. Landscaping plans (including for open spaces, retention, rights-of-way, and street medians) shall be 
approved by the Planning Administrator.  
3. All mechanical equipment, including HVAC, utility meters, etc. shall be screened from view by 
material(s) that are architecturally integrated and consistent with the proposed buildings.

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 43 of 47 
 
4. Signage shall substantially be as shown within the submitted Development Booklet and shall follow 
all applicable criteria of the City of Chandler Sign Code.  
5. Preliminary Development Plan approval does not constitute Final Development Plan approval; 
compliance with the details required by all applicable codes and conditions of the City of Chandler 
and this Preliminary Development Plan shall apply. 
6. The site shall be maintained in a clean and orderly manner.  
7. The landscaping in all open-spaces shall be maintained by the property owner or property owners' 
association, and shall be maintained at a level consistent with or better than at the time of planting.   
8. The landscaping in all rights-of-way shall be maintained by the adjacent property owner or property 
owners' association. 
9. Roadway-style signs shall be installed at multiple locations as depicted in the development booklet 
that identify the presence of low flying aircraft. 
 
Preliminary Plat 
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat, subject to 
the following condition: 
1. Approval by the City Engineer and Planning Administrator with regard to the details of all submittals 
required by code or condition. 
 
32. 
Resolution No. 5431 Amending the Citywide Fee Schedule  
Move to pass and adopt Resolution No. 5431 amending the Citywide Fee Schedule relating to the 
Airport, Community Services, Development Services, Cultural Development, Fire, and Neighborhood 
Resources Departments or Divisions, with the Airport and Fire fee changes becoming effective March 1, 
2021, and the remaining fees effective July 1, 2021. 
 
BACKGROUND FROM COUNCIL MEMO: 
Each year, departments review their fees to determine if any updates are necessary that require 
modifying, eliminating, or adding a new fee.  Updates may be necessary to reflect an increased cost of a 
service provided, or a need to establish fees for new or enhanced services or facilities.  All fees charged 
to citizens or businesses (except those exempted by City Code section 2-17) are reflected in the 
Citywide Fee Schedule and follow the requirements detailed in the City Code to establish or modify 
fees. While most fee changes are consolidated and submitted to Council as part of the annual budget 
process, there are occasions where fees need to be modified mid-year. During Fiscal Year (FY) 2020-21, 
fee changes were identified and reviewed as part of a mid-year analysis that will serve to update fees 
both for the existing fiscal year as well as changes needed for FY 2021-22. 
 
Based on the requirements of Chandler City Code 2-17, all recommended new or modified fees have 
been summarized in The Summary of Proposed New or Modified Fees (Attachment 2).  This was posted 
on the City's website on December 23, 2020, for 60 days (Attachment 3). Additionally, a Notice of 
Intention to Amend the Citywide Fee Schedule (Attachment 4) was published in the Arizona Republic on 
February 3, 2021 and February 10, 2021, as well as through social media on the same days, to inform 
the public of the proposed fee changes to be discussed at the February 25, 2021, City Council meeting 
as an action item, to allow for public comment. 
 
The following proposed fee changes are brought forward by the City Manager Department, Airport 
Division, and reflect the fees related to the operations of the Airport, and the desire to regulate business 
activity:

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 44 of 47 
 
Change the fuel calculation: the retail price of aviation fuel shall be determined by a "cost-plus" formula 
based upon the wholesale price of the fuel inventory plus an amount not less than eighty ($0.80) cents 
per gallon, inclusive of applicable federal, state, and local fees and taxes. Add charges for exclusive use 
of staff time on activity not associated with normal airport operations and maintenance of the facility: 
(a) Regular Staff Charges During Posted Business Hours (actual time rounded up to nearest .25 hour, 
$45.00/hour) (b) Overtime/Call Out Staff Charges Outside of Posted Business Hours (2-hour minimum 
charge) (actual time rounded up to nearest .25 hour, $68.00/hour). Adds a Hangar Lock/Access 
Card/Device Replacement Fee (per each replacement) of $35.00 or actual cost of replacement, 
whichever is higher. Adds retention of the Hangar Deposit ($150) and staff hourly rates to any hangar 
not maintained per Section 16 of the Chandler Municipal Airport Aircraft Hangar Storage Agreement. 
Adds Aviation Use (Non-prime) Negotiable (negotiable base of $9.50/sq. ft/year minimum, plus 
consideration of appraisal and comps); Aviation Use (Prime) Negotiable (negotiable base of $22/sq. 
ft/year minimum, plus consideration of appraisal and comps). One-year terms. 
 
The following fee change is recommended for the Fire Department, to offset the costs associated with 
offering the Paramedic Program to outside agencies: 
Add $6,000 per student per class fee - Offered to other agencies/municipalities. 
 
The following fee changes are recommended for the Development Services Department, Planning 
Division to carve out Historic Preservation and reduce the cost associated with the normal zoning 
process: 
Adjust rezoning fee to $100 for Historic Preservation Neighborhood Application. Add $50 fee - per 
Resident/Home addition of Historic Preservation Overlay Application. 
 
The following fee changes are recommended for the Cultural Development Department, Museum 
Division to allow for newly formed Museum foundation to set and manage these fees: 
Delete museum facility room rental fees, merchandise mark-up fee, and Chandler non-profit group fee. 
 
The following fee changes are recommended for the Community Services Department, Recreation and 
Aquatic Division: 
Add Mini Field Preparations fees: $21/prep – resident $29/prep - non-resident $32/prep – commercial 
Change Swim Team Lifeguard fee from $15 to $20 per hour per guard. Change general private party 
Lifeguard fee from $15 to $20 per hour per guard. Change $10 Pool Pass - Youth (20 punches) to Pool 
Pass - Youth (15 punches), 25% discount of the normal entry fee (currently equates to $11.25). Change 
$30 Pool Pass - Adult (20 punches) to Pool Pass - Adult (15 punches), 25% discount of the normal entry 
fee rounded to nearest 1/4 dollar (currently equates to $25.50). Change $15 Pool Pass - Youth (30 
punches) to 50% discount of the normal entry fee rounded to nearest 1/4 dollar (would not change the 
current fee, only fee reference). Change $45 Pool Pass - Adult (30 punches) to 50% discount of the 
normal entry fee rounded to nearest 1/4 dollar (currently equates to $33.75). 
 
The following fee changes are recommended for the Neighborhood Resources Department, Code 
Enforcement Division, due to new code language providing for a more efficient method of recouping 
costs: 
Delete $50 First non-compliance re- inspection fee. Delete $75 Subsequent re-inspection with 
continued non-compliance fee(s). Change Abatement Administrative Fee from $150 to 25% of 
contractor cost. Add Demolition Abatement Administrative Fee of 25% of demolition contractor cost.

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 45 of 47 
 
In addition, technical corrections, which have no fee impacts, are being made to the Citywide Fee 
Schedule to clarify the fee description. 
  
Financial Implications: 
The amendments to the Citywide Fee Schedule are estimated to generate approximately $48,400 within 
the General Fund and $42,000 for the Airport Operating Fund. 
 
UNSCHEDULED PUBLIC APPEARANCES  
 
MAYOR HARTKE said that a number of speaker cards were received regarding an officer involved shooting that 
occurred January 2, 2021. This case is currently an active investigation internally and with the Maricopa County 
Attorney’s Office. The Police Department released the body camera footage of the incident on January 15, 
2021. This incident will be reviewed by the Citizen’s Panel for Review of Force after the investigation is 
complete.  
 
PHIL MARTINEZ, 4444 N. 7th, Tempe, activist against police violence and came in support of the Cano family 
and Change Our America Foundation. The Cano family suffered a tragedy on January 2, 2021, where 17 year 
old Anthony Cano was shot twice in the back by an officer. Mr. Martinez said there is legal recourse that the 
family must take and naming the officer is important. Mr. Martinez asked that the body camera footage, the 
officer’s name, and any interviews with the officer be released so the family could proactively seek legal 
resources. Since the Police Chief has not released the information it shows that he is in line with other Police 
Departments across the nation where they stall specifically to hinder the victim’s right to seek restitution. Mr. 
Martinez asked the Mayor to instruct staff to release the information.  
 
MARCUS CANO, Mesa, Arizona, said his cousin was chased by a police officer for a reason that was not given 
until hours after the fact, which was not having lights on his bike. Mr. Cano said the officers at the hospital 
indicated they shot the wrong person as there was an incident early in the day and the suspect resembled 
Anthony. Mr. Cano said his cousin did not stop for the officer and ran away and dropped his weapon. Mr. Cano 
said he was a kid and did not know what to do.  Police are given a large amount of power and are granted with 
the extreme opportunity to kill or save a life. Mr. Cano asked Council to make the right choice and asked the 
Department train officers on handling civilians with weapons, release the officer’s name, the full unedited body 
camera footage, and the officers on the scene that night. Mr. Cano said the officer needs to be held 
accountable.  
 
RENA ALLEN, 1717 Angle Pkwy, McKinney, Texas, said what happened should have never happened. Ms. Allen 
said everyone has a family and would do anything to protect their family. Ms. Allen asked what if your worry as 
a kid was protecting yourself and how to defend yourself. Ms. Allen said Anthony’s full name was presented to 
the world for people to make judgements and asked why the cop had not been named. Ms. Allen said the 
officer was able to delete anything that was able to make him look like a bad person. Ms. Allen said the Police 
Department did not have a problem releasing a minor’s name, but had a problem releasing an officer’s name 
who shot a kid in the back twice. Ms. Allen said after watching the video footage there was no threat to the 
officer, it was just a little kid trying to run home to his mother. Ms. Allen said they could not fully grieve until 
they get answers. Ms. Allen said they are being treated like they do not matter and that Anthony did not 
matter. Ms. Allen said she would not allow him to be another statistic because of the neighborhood he was in 
and they could continue to fight for answers.  
 
SYLVIA MORALES, 1654 W. 6th Dr., Mesa, Arizona, said she was Anthony’s grandmother and they were here for 
their peace of mind. Ms. Morales said Anthony was a great kid and he was at the wrong place at the wrong

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 46 of 47 
 
time. Ms. Morales said they want closure, the name of the officer, and the body cameras of all officers there. 
Ms. Morales said Anthony’s grandfather was a 26 year veteran of Scottsdale Police Department, two uncles that 
were policemen and an uncle was a judge. Ms. Morales worked for the DOC and another relative works there 
as well. Ms. Morales said this is an injustice and they need closure and would get that the lawful and honest 
way. Ms. Morales said they were counting on the Council to get the name of the officer and all of the footage.  
 
Roxanne Sandoval, 1702 E. Chandler Blvd., Chandler Blvd., was here to support the Cano family and her son was 
Anthony’s best friend. Ms. Sandoval requested the City be transparent as the family is not able to grieve their 
child since they are still looking for answers. Ms. Sandoval said Anthony was shot in the back twice. Ms. 
Sandoval said they try to hold the kids accountable and teach them how to act and react but the community is 
not holding the Chandler Police Department accountable to be transparent. Ms. Sandoval said there is no 
going back and if someone did something wrong all they can do is hold that person accountable and grieve. 
Ms. Sandoval said accidents happen, but it happened and they need to be held accountable. 
 
Renee Cano and Anissa Medina submitted a speaker card but did not speak.  
 
CURRENT EVENTS  
  
1. Mayor's Announcements 
a. Retirement Recognition of City Manager, Marsha Reed 
 
MAYOR HARTKE presented City Manager Marsha Reed a key to the City and thanked Ms. Reed for her service.  
2. 
Council's Announcements 
COUNCILMEMBER ORLANDO thanked Ms. Reed for her years of service and congratulated her on retirement.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ELLIS thanked Ms. Reed for everything she has done for the City and her leadership.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER ROE said being a City Manager is one of the most impossible jobs and it takes a unique 
individual to do that. Councilmember Roe said Ms. Reed has done a great job and congratulated her on her 
retirement.  
 
VICE MAYOR STEWART said Ms. Reed has done a great job creating an internal culture that cares so much 
about the City.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER LOPEZ thanked Ms. Reed for her work at the City and she has done a great job at a very 
difficult job. Councilmember Lopez said Ms. Reed has really implemented the Council’s vision and has gotten 
the City through difficult times such as COVID-19.  
 
COUNCILMEMBER HARRIS said he appreciated Ms. Reed as she has helped him grow as a Councilmember and 
thanked her for her service.  
3. 
City Manager's Announcements 
MS. REED presented a video and thanked Council, staff, and her family for their support.

CHANDLER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 
Thursday, February 25, 2021 
 
 
Page 47 of 47 
 
 
ADJOURNMENT:  The meeting was adjourned at 9:32 p.m. 
 
ATTEST:  __________________________ 
 
______________________________ 
                  
City Clerk                                                   Mayor 
 
 
Approval Date of Minutes:  March 22, 2021 
 
 
CERTIFICATION 
 
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the Regular Meeting 
of the City Council of Chandler, Arizona, held on the 25th day of February, 2021.  I further certify that the 
meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. 
 
 
DATED this _______ day of March, 2021. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
___________________________ 
                                                        
 
 
 
City Clerk